40 CFR Part 52 · Subpart O--Y
Part 52—Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans
Protection of Environment · Chapter I, Chapter I—Environmental Protection Agency · Subchapter C
40 CFR Part 52, Subpart O--Y - Words
- 950,625
- Sections
- 242
- Last amended
- September 28, 2026
- Administered by
- Environmental Protection Agency
40 CFR Part 52
Text as published by eCFR on .
Subpart O—Illinois
§ 52.719 [Reserved]
§ 52.720 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State implementation plan for the State of Illinois under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q and 40 CFR part 51 to meet national ambient air quality standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to December 31, 2016, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Entries in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with the EPA approval dates after December 31, 2016, have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the State implementation plan and for incorporation by reference into the plan as it is contained in this section, and will be considered by the Director of the Federal Register for approval in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 5 certifies that the materials provided by EPA at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the state implementation plan as of the dates referenced in paragraph (b)(1).
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air Programs Branch, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, or the National Archives and Records Administration. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(c) EPA approved regulations.
| Illinois citation | Title/subject | State effective date |
EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code | ||||
| Subtitle A: General Provisions | ||||
| Chapter I: Pollution Control Board | ||||
| Part 101: General Rules—Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 101.112 | Bias and Conflict of Interest | 7/5/2017 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49671 | Only paragraph (d). |
| Part 106: Procedural Regulations | ||||
| Subpart E: Alternative Opacity Procedures | ||||
| 106.501 | Scope and Applicability | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 106.502 | Joint or Single Petition | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 106.503 | Request to Agency to Join as Co-Petitioner | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 106.504 | Contents of Petition | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 106.505 | Response and Reply | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 106.506 | Notice and Conduct of Hearing | 6/5/1990 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 106.507 | Opinions and Orders | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| Subpart J: Culpability Determinations | ||||
| 106.930 | Applicability | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 106.931 | Petition for Review | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 106.932 | Response and Reply | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 106.933 | Notice and Hearing | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 106.934 | Opinion and Order | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| Subtitle B: Air Pollution | ||||
| Chapter I: Pollution Control Board | ||||
| Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions | ||||
| Part 201: Permits and General Provisions | ||||
| Subpart A: Definitions | ||||
| 201.102 | Definitions | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 101. |
| Subpart B: General Provisions | ||||
| 201.121 | Existence of Permit No Defense | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(h). |
| 201.122 | Proof of Emissions | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 108. |
| 201.123 | Burden of Persuasion Regarding Exceptions | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 111. |
| 201.124 | Annual Report | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 112. |
| 201.125 | Severability | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 113. |
| 201.126 | Repealer | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 114. |
| Subpart C: Prohibitions | ||||
| 201.141 | Prohibition of Air Pollution | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 102. |
| 201.142 | Construction Permit Required | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(a)(1). |
| 201.143 | Operating Permits for New Sources | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(b)(1). |
| 201.144 | Operating Permits for Existing Sources | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(b)(2). |
| 201.146 | Exemptions From State Permit Requirements | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | Except (mmm). |
| 201.147 | Former Permits | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(j). |
| 201.148 | Operation Without Compliance Program and Project Completion Schedule | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 104(a). |
| 201.149 | Operation During Malfunction, Breakdown or Startups | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 105(a). |
| 201.150 | Circumvention | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 109. |
| 201.151 | Design of Effluent Exhaust Systems | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 110. |
| Subpart D: Permit Applications and Review Process | ||||
| 201.152 | Contents of Application for Construction Permit | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| 201.156 | Conditions | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(a)(6). |
| 201.157 | Contents of Application for Operating Permit | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| 201.158 | Incomplete Applications | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| 201.159 | Signatures | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| 201.160 | Standards for Issuance | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| 201.161 | Conditions | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(b)(7). |
| 201.162 | Duration | 12/1/2010 | 4/7/2014, 79 FR 18997 | |
| 201.163 | Joint Construction and Operating Permits | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| 201.164 | Design Criteria | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| 201.165 | Hearings | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(e). |
| 201.166 | Revocation | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(f). |
| 201.167 | Revisions to Permits | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(g). |
| 201.168 | Appeals From Conditions | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 103(k). |
| Subpart F: CAAPP Permits | ||||
| 201.207 | Applicability | 6/23/1998 | 1/3/2000, 65 FR 14 | |
| Subpart H: Compliance Programs and Project Completion Schedules | ||||
| 201.241 | Contents of Compliance Program | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 104(b)(1). |
| 201.242 | Contents of Project Completion Schedule | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 104(b)(2, 3). |
| 201.243 | Standards for Approval | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 104(c). |
| 201.244 | Revisions | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 104(d). |
| 201.245 | Effects of Approval | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 104(e). |
| 201.246 | Records and Reports | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 104(f). |
| Subpart I: Malfunctions, Breakdowns or Startups | ||||
| 201.261 | Contents of Request for Permission To Operate During a Malfunction, Breakdown or Startup | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 105(b). |
| 201.262 | Standards for Granting Permission To Operate During a Malfunction, Breakdown or Startup | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 105(c). |
| 201.263 | Records and Reports | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 105(d). |
| 201.264 | Continued Operation or Startup Prior to Granting of Operating Permit | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 105(e). |
| 201.265 | Effect of Granting of Permission To Operate During a Malfunction, Breakdown or Startup | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 105(f). |
| Subpart J: Monitoring and Testing | ||||
| 201.281 | Permit Monitoring Equipment Requirements | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.282 | Testing | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 106(b). |
| 201.283 | Records and Reports | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 106(c). |
| Subpart K: Records and Reports | ||||
| 201.301 | Records | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 107(a). |
| 201.302 | Reports | 12/23/2013 | 3/13/2015, 80 FR 13248 | |
| Subpart L: Continuous Monitoring | ||||
| 201.401 | Continuous Monitoring Requirements | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.402 | Alternative Monitoring | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.403 | Exempt Sources | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.404 | Monitoring System Malfunction | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.405 | Excess Emission Reporting | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.406 | Data Reduction | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.407 | Retention of Information | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| 201.408 | Compliance Schedules | 2/3/1989 | 4/6/1993, 58 FR 17780 | |
| Subpart M: Permit By Rule (PBR)—General Provisions | ||||
| 201.500 | Purpose | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.505 | Applicability | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.510 | Notice of Intent to Be Covered By a PBR (Notification) | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.515 | Commencing Construction or Modification | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.520 | Modification or Change in Status of an Emission Unit Covered by a PBR | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.525 | Standard Conditions for PBR | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.530 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.535 | Authority to Operate | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.540 | Enforcement Authority | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| Subpart N: Permit By Rule (PBR)—Boilers Less Than Or Equal To 100 MMBtu/hr | ||||
| 201.600 | Applicability | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.605 | Boiler Notice of Intent to Be Covered by a PBR (Notification) 201.610 | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.615 | Opacity Requirements | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.620 | Requirements for Use of Diesel Fuel and Refinery Fuel Gas 201.625 | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.625 | Carbon Monoxide (CO) Requirements | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.630 | Nitrogen Oxide (NOX) Requirements | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| 201.635 | PBR Boiler Reporting Requirements | 3/24/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50854 | |
| Part 203: Major Stationary Sources Construction and Modification | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 203.101 | Definitions | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.103 | Actual Construction | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.104 | Actual Emissions | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.107 | Allowable Emissions | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.110 | Available Growth Margin | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.112 | Building, Structure and Facility | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.113 | Commence | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.116 | Construction | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.117 | Dispersion Enhancement Techniques | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.119 | Emission Baseline | 7/22/1983 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.121 | Emission Offset | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.122 | Emissions Unit | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.123 | Federally Enforceable | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.124 | Fugitive Emissions | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.125 | Installation | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.126 | Lowest Achievable Emission Rate | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.127 | Nonattainment Area | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.128 | Potential To Emit | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.131 | Reasonable Further Progress | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.134 | Secondary Emissions | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.136 | Stationary Source | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.150 | Public Participation | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| Subpart B: Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas | ||||
| 203.201 | Prohibition | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.202 | Coordination With Permit Requirement and Application Pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 201 | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.203 | Construction Permit Requirement and Application | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.205 | Effect of Permits | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.206 | Major Stationary Source | 3/10/1998 | 5/13/2003, 68 FR 25504 | |
| 203.207 | Major Modification of a Source | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 203.208 | Net Emission Determination | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.209 | Significant Emissions Determination | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.210 | Relaxation of a Source-Specific Limitation | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.211 | Permit Exemption Based on Fugitive Emissions | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| Subpart C: Requirements for Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas | ||||
| 203.301 | Lowest Achievable Emission Rate | 3/10/1998 | 5/13/2003, 68 FR 25504 | |
| 203.302 | Maintenance of Reasonable Further Progress and Emission Offsets | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.303 | Baseline and Emission Offsets Determination | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| 203.305 | Compliance by Existing Sources | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.306 | Analysis of Alternatives | 4/30/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| Subpart F: Operation of a Major Stationary Source or Major Modification | ||||
| 203.601 | Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Compliance Requirement | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| 203.602 | Emission Offset Maintenance Requirement | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| Subpart G: General Maintenance of Emission Offsets | ||||
| 203.701 | General Maintenance of Emission Offsets | 3/22/1988 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | |
| Subpart H: Offsets for Emission Increases From Rocket Engines and Motor Firing | ||||
| 203.801 | Offsetting by Alternative or Innovative Means | 5/14/1993 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49778 | |
| Part 204: Prevention of Significant Deterioration | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 204.100 | Incorporations by Reference | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.110 | Abbreviations and Acronyms | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.120 | Severability | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart B: Definitions | ||||
| 204.200 | Definitions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.210 | Actual Emissions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.220 | Adverse Impact on Visibility | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.230 | Allowable Emissions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.240 | Baseline Actual Emissions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.250 | Baseline Area | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.260 | Baseline Concentration | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.270 | Begin Actual Construction | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.280 | Best Available Control Technology (BACT) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.290 | Building, Structure, Facility, or Installation | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.300 | Clean Coal Technology | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.310 | Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.320 | Commence | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.330 | Complete | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.340 | Construction | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.350 | Dispersion Technique | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.360 | Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.370 | Emissions Unit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.380 | Excessive Concentration | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.390 | Federal Land Manager | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.400 | Federally Enforceable | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.410 | Fugitive Emissions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.420 | Good Engineering Practice | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.430 | Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.440 | High Terrain | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.450 | Indian Reservation | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.460 | Indian Governing Body | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.470 | Innovative Control Technology | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.480 | Low Terrain | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.490 | Major Modification | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.500 | Major Source Baseline Date | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.510 | Major Stationary Source | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.520 | Minor Source Baseline Date | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.530 | Nearby | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.540 | Necessary Preconstruction Approvals or Permits | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.550 | Net Emissions Increase | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.560 | Potential to Emit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.570 | Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.580 | Process Unit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.590 | Project | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.600 | Projected Actual Emissions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.610 | Regulated NSR Pollutant | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.620 | Replacement Unit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.630 | Repowering | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.640 | Reviewing Authority | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.650 | Secondary Emissions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.660 | Significant | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.670 | Significant Emissions Increase | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.680 | Stack in Existence | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.690 | Stationary Source | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.700 | Subject to Regulation | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.710 | Temporary Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart C: Major Stationary Sources in Attainment and Unclassifiable Areas | ||||
| 204.800 | Applicability | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.810 | Source Information | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.820 | Source Obligation | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.830 | Permit Expiration | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.840 | Effect of Permits | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.850 | Relaxation of a Source-Specific Limitation | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.860 | Exemptions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart D: Increment | ||||
| 204.900 | Ambient Air Increments | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.910 | Ambient Air Ceilings | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.920 | Restrictions on Area Classifications | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.930 | Redesignation | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart E: Stack Heights | ||||
| 204.1000 | Stack Heights | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart F: Requirements for Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications in Attainment and Unclassifiable Areas | ||||
| 204.1100 | Control Technology Review | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1110 | Source Impact Analysis | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1120 | Air Quality Models | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1130 | Air Quality Analysis | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1140 | Additional Impact Analyses | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart G: Additional Requirements for Class I Areas | ||||
| 204.1200 | Additional Requirements for Sources Impacting Federal Class I Areas | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart H: General Obligations of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
| 204.1300 | Notification of Application Completeness to Applicants | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1310 | Transmittal of Application to USEPA | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1320 | Public Participation | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1330 | Issuance Within One Year of Submittal of Complete Application | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1340 | Permit Rescission | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart I: Nonapplicability Recordkeeping and Reporting | ||||
| 204.1400 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Certain Projects at Major Stationary Sources | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart J: Innovative Control Technology | ||||
| 204.1500 | Innovative Control Technology | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart K: Plantwide Applicability Limitation | ||||
| 204.1600 | Applicability | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1610 | Definitions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1620 | Actuals PAL | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1630 | Allowable Emissions | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1640 | Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1650 | Continuous Emissions Rate Monitoring System (CERMS) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1660 | Continuous Parameter Monitoring System (CPMS) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1670 | Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1680 | Major Emissions Unit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1690 | Plantwide Applicability Limitation (PAL) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1700 | PAL Effective Date | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1710 | PAL Effective Period | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1720 | PAL Major Modification | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1730 | PAL Permit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1740 | PAL Pollutant | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1750 | Predictive Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1760 | Reasonably Achievable Control Technology (RACT) | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1770 | Significant Emissions Unit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1780 | Small Emissions Unit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1790 | Permit Application Requirements | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1800 | General Requirements for Establishing PAL | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1810 | Public Participation Requirements | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1820 | Setting the 10-Year Actuals PAL Level | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1830 | Contents of the PAL Permit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1840 | Effective Period and Reopening a PAL Permit | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1850 | Expiration of a PAL | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1860 | Renewal of a PAL | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1870 | Increasing the PAL During the PAL Effective Period | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1880 | Monitoring Requirements | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1890 | Recordkeeping Requirements | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1900 | Reporting and Notification Requirements | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 204.1910 | Transition Requirements | 9/4/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources | ||||
| Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 211.101 | Incorporations by Reference | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 211.102 | Abbreviations and Conversion Factors | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart B: Definitions | ||||
| 211.121 | Other Definitions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.125 | Ablative Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.130 | Accelacota | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.150 | Accumulator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.170 | Acid Gases | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.200 | Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Welding | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.210 | Actual Heat Input | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.230 | Adhesive | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.233 | Adhesion Primer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.234 | Adhesive Bonding Primer | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.235 | Adhesive Primer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.240 | Adhesion Promoter | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.245 | Adhesion Promoter for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.250 | Aeration | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.260 | Aerosol Adhesive and Adhesive Primer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.270 | Aerosol Can Filling Line | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.271 | Aerosol Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.272 | Aerospace Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.273 | Aerospace Coating Operation | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.275 | Aerospace Flexible Primer | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.277 | Aerospace Facility | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.278 | Aerospace Pretreatment Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.280 | Aerospace Primer | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.284 | Aerospace Specialty Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.289 | Aerospace Vehicle or Component | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.290 | Afterburner | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.300 | Aircraft Fluid Systems | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.303 | Aircraft Transparancies | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.310 | Air Contaminant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.330 | Air Dried Coatings | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.350 | Air Oxidation Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.370 | Air Pollutant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.390 | Air Pollution | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.410 | Air Pollution Control Equipment | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.430 | Air Suspension Coater/Dryer | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.450 | Airless Spray | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.470 | Air Assisted Airless Spray | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.474 | Alcohol | 5/9/1995 | 11/8/1995, 60 FR 56238 | |
| 211.481 | Ammunition Sealant | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.490 | Annual Grain Through Put | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.491 | Antichafe Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.492 | Antifoulant Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.493 | Antifouling Sealer/Tie Coat | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.495 | Anti-Glare/Safety Coating | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.500 | Antique Aerospace Vehicle or Component | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.510 | Application Area | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.520 | Aqueous Cleaning Solvent | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.530 | Architectural Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.540 | Architectural Structure | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.550 | As Applied | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.560 | As-Applied Fountain Solution | 5/9/1995 | 11/8/1995, 60 FR 56238 | |
| 211.570 | Asphalt | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.590 | Asphalt Prime Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.610 | Automobile | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.630 | Automobile or Light Duty Truck Assembly Source or Automobile or Light Duty Truck Manufacturing Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.650 | Automobile or Light Duty Truck Refinishing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.660 | Automotive/Transportation Plastic Parts | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.670 | Baked Coatings | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.685 | Basecoat/Clearcoat System | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.690 | Batch Loading | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.695 | Batch Operation | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 211.696 | Batch Process Train | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 211.710 | Bead Dipping | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.712 | Bearing Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.715 | Bedliner | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.730 | Binders | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.735 | Black Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.737 | Bonding Maskant | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.740 | Brakehorsepower (rated-bhp) | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 211.750 | British Thermal Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.770 | Brush or Wipe Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.790 | Bulk Gasoline Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.810 | Bulk Gasoline Terminal | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.820 | Business Machine Plastic Parts | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.825 | Camouflage Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.830 | Can | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.850 | Can Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.870 | Can Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.880 | Cap Sealant | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.890 | Capture | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.910 | Capture Device | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.930 | Capture Efficiency | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.950 | Capture System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.954 | Cavity Wax | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.955 | Cement | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.960 | Cement Kiln | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.965 | Ceramic Tile Installation Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.970 | Certified Investigation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.975 | Chemical Agent-Resistant Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.980 | Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 211.985 | Chemical Milling Maskant | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.990 | Choke Loading | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1000 | Class II Finish | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1010 | Clean Air Act | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1050 | Cleaning and Separating Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1070 | Cleaning Materials | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.1090 | Clear Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1095 | Clear Coating for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1110 | Clear Topcoat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1120 | Clinker | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.1128 | Closed Molding | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1130 | Closed Purge System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1150 | Closed Vent System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1170 | Coal Refuse | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1190 | Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1210 | Coating Applicator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1230 | Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1250 | Coating Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1270 | Coil Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1290 | Coil Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1310 | Cold Cleaning | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1326 | Commercial Exterior Aerodynamic Structure Primer | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1327 | Commercial Interior Adhesive | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1329 | Compatible Substrate Primer | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1330 | Complete Combustion | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1350 | Component | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1370 | Concrete Curing Compounds | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1390 | Concentrated Nitric Acid Manufacturing Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1410 | Condensate | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1430 | Condensible PM 10 | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1432 | Confined Space | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1455 | Contact Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1467 | Continuous Coater | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 211.1470 | Continuous Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1490 | Control Device | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1510 | Control Device Efficiency | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1520 | Conventional Air Spray | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 211.1530 | Conventional Soybean Crushing Source | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1550 | Conveyorized Degreasing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1555 | Corrosion Prevention System | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1560 | Cove Base | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1565 | Cove Base Installation Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1567 | Critical Use and Line Sealer Maskant | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1570 | Crude Oil | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1590 | Crude Oil Gathering | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1610 | Crushing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1620 | Cryogenic Flexible Primer | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1625 | Cryoprotective Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1630 | Custody Transfer | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1650 | Cutback Asphalt | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1655 | Cyanoacrylate Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1670 | Daily Weighted Average VOM Content | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1690 | Day | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1700 | Deadener | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1710 | Degreaser | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1730 | Delivery Vessel | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1735 | Department of Defense Classified Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1740 | Diesel Engine | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 211.1745 | Digital Printing | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1750 | Dip Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1770 | Distillate Fuel Oil | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1780 | Distillation Unit | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 211.1790 | Drum | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1810 | Dry Cleaning Operation or Dry Cleaning Facility | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1820 | Dry Lubricative Material for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1830 | Dump Pit Area | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1850 | Effective Grate Area | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1870 | Effluent Water Separator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1872 | Ejection Cartridge Sealant | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1875 | Elastomeric Materials | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.1876 | Electric Dissipating Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1877 | Electric-Insulating Varnish | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1878 | Electrical Apparatus Component | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1880 | Electrical Switchgear Compartment Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1882 | Electrodeposition Primer (EDP) | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1883 | Electromagnetic Interference/Radio Frequency Interference (EMI/RFI) Shielding Coatings | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1885 | Electronic Component | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.1890 | Electrostatic Bell or Disc Spray | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1895 | Electrostatic Discharge and Electromagnetic Interference Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1900 | Electrostatic Prep Coat | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.1910 | Electrostatic Spray | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1915 | Elevated-Temperature Skydrol-Resistant Commercial Primer | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.1920 | Emergency or Standby Unit | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 211.1930 | Emission Rate | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1950 | Emission Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1970 | Enamel | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.1990 | Enclose | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2010 | End Sealing Compound Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2030 | Enhanced Under-the-Cup Fill | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.2035 | Epoxy Polyamide Topcoat | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2040 | Etching Filler | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2050 | Ethanol Blend Gasoline | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2055 | Ethylene Propylenediene Monomer (DPDM) Roof Membrane | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2070 | Excess Air | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2090 | Excessive Release | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2130 | Existing Grain Handling Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2150 | Exterior Base Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2170 | Exterior End Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2180 | Exterior Primer for Large Commercial Aircraft | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2190 | External Floating Roof | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2200 | Extreme High-Gloss Coating | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2210 | Extreme Performance Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2230 | Fabric Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2250 | Fabric Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2270 | Federally Enforceable Limitations and Conditions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2285 | Feed Mill | 6/17/1997 | 2/17/2000, 65 FR 8064 | |
| 211.2300 | Fill | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 211.2310 | Final Repair Coat | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2320 | Finish Primer Surfacer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2330 | Firebox | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2340 | Fire-Resistant Interior Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2350 | Fixed Roof Tank | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2358 | Flat Wood Paneling | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2359 | Flat Wood Paneling Coating Line | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2360 | Flexible Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2365 | Flexible Operation Unit | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 211.2368 | Flexible Packaging | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2369 | Flexible Vinyl | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2370 | Flexographic Printing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2390 | Flexographic Printing Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2400 | Flight Test Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2410 | Floating Roof | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2412 | Flush Cleaning at Aerospace Facilities | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2415 | Fog Coat | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2430 | Fountain Solution | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2450 | Freeboard Height | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2470 | Fuel Combustion Emission Unit or Fuel Combustion Emission Source | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2480 | Fuel Tank Adhesive for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2485 | Fuel Tank Coating for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2490 | Fugitive Particulate Matter | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2510 | Full Operating Flowrate | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2525 | Gasket/Gasket Sealing Material | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2530 | Gas Service | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2550 | Gas/Gas Method | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2570 | Gasoline | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2590 | Gasoline Dispensing Operation or Gasoline Dispensing Facility | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2610 | Gel Coat | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.2612 | General Aviation | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2613 | General Aviation Rework Facility | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2615 | General Work Surface | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2622 | Glass Bonding Primer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2630 | Gloss Reducers | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.2650 | Grain | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2670 | Grain Drying Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2690 | Grain Handling and Conditioning Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2710 | Grain Handling Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2730 | Green Tire Spraying | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2750 | Green Tires | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2770 | Gross Heating Value | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2790 | Gross Vehicle Weight Rating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2795 | Hand-Wipe Cleaning Operation at Aerospace Facilities | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2800 | Hardwood Plywood | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2810 | Heated Airless Spray | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2825 | Heat-Resistant Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2830 | Heatset | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2840 | Heatset Web Letterpress Printing Line | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2850 | Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Line | 5/9/1995 | 11/8/1995, 60 FR 56238 | |
| 211.2870 | Heavy Liquid | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 211.2890 | Heavy Metals | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2910 | Heavy Off Highway Vehicle Products | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2930 | Heavy Off Highway Vehicle Products Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2950 | Heavy Off Highway Vehicle Products Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2955 | High Bake Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2956 | High Build Primer Surfacer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2958 | High Gloss Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2960 | High-Performance Architectural Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2965 | High Precision Optic | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.2970 | High Temperature Aluminum Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.2980 | High Temperature Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.2990 | High Volume Low Pressure (HVLP) Spray | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3010 | Hood | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3030 | Hot Well | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3050 | Housekeeping Practices | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3070 | Incinerator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3090 | Indirect Heat Transfer | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3095 | Indoor Floor Covering Installation Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3110 | Ink | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3120 | In-Line Repair | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3130 | In-Process Tank | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3150 | In-Situ Sampling Systems | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3160 | Insulation Covering | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3170 | Interior Body Spray Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3180 | Intermediate Release Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3190 | Internal Floating Roof | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3210 | Internal Transferring Area | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3215 | Janitorial Cleaning | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3230 | Lacquers | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3240 | Laminate | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3250 | Large Appliance | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3270 | Large Appliance Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3290 | Large Appliance Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3300 | Lean-Burn Engine | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 211.3305 | Letterpress Printing Line | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3310 | Light Liquid | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3330 | Light Duty Truck | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3350 | Light Oil | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3360 | Limited Access Space | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3370 | Liquid/Gas Method | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3390 | Liquid Mounted Seal | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3410 | Liquid Service | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3430 | Liquids Dripping | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3450 | Lithographic Printing Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3470 | Load Out Area | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3480 | Loading Event | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 211.3483 | Long Dry Kiln | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.3485 | Long Wet Kiln | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.3487 | Low-NOX Burner | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.3490 | Low Solvent Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3505 | Lubricating Wax/Compound | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3510 | Magnet Wire | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3530 | Magnet Wire Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3550 | Magnet Wire Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3555 | Maintenance Cleaning | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3570 | Major Dump Pit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3590 | Major Metropolitan Area (MMA) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3610 | Major Population Area (MPA) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3630 | Manufacturing Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3650 | Marine Terminal | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 211.3660 | Marine Vessel | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 211.3665 | Mask Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3670 | Material Recovery Section | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3690 | Maximum Theoretical Emissions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3695 | Maximum True Vapor Pressure | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 211.3705 | Medical Device | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3707 | Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3710 | Metal Furniture | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3730 | Metal Furniture Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3750 | Metal Furniture Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3755 | Metalized Epoxy Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3760 | Metallic Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3770 | Metallic Shoe Type Seal | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3775 | Metal to Urethane/Rubber Molding or Casting Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3780 | Mid-Kiln Firing | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.3785 | Military Specification Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3790 | Miscellaneous Fabricated Product Manufacturing Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3810 | Miscellaneous Formulation Manufacturing Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3820 | Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesive Application Operation | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3830 | Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3850 | Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3870 | Miscellaneous Metal Parts or Products Coating Line | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3890 | Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3910 | Mixing Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3915 | Mobile Equipment | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.3920 | Mold Release Coating for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.3925 | Mold Seal Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3930 | Monitor | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3950 | Monomer | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.3960 | Motor Vehicles | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.3961 | Motor Vehicle Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3965 | Motor Vehicle Refinishing | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.3966 | Motor Vehicle Weatherstrip Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3967 | Mouth Waterproofing Sealant | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3968 | Multi-Colored Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3969 | Multi-Component Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3970 | Multiple Package Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.3975 | Multipurpose Construction Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3985 | Natural Finish Hardwood Plywood Panel | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.3990 | New Grain Drying Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4010 | New Grain Handling Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4030 | No Detectable Volatile Organic Material Emissions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4050 | Non-Contact Process Water Cooling Tower | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.4052 | Non-Convertible Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4055 | Non-Flexible Coating | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.4065 | Non-Heatset | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4066 | Nonstructural Adhesive | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.4067 | NOX Trading Program | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.4070 | Offset | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4080 | One-Component Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4090 | One Hundred Percent Acid | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4110 | One Turn Storage Space | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4130 | Opacity | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4150 | Opaque Stains | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4170 | Open Top Vapor Degreasing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4190 | Open Ended Valve | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4210 | Operator of a Gasoline Dispensing Operation or Operator of a Gasoline Dispensing Facility | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4215 | Optical Antireflection Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.4220 | Optical Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4230 | Organic Compound | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4250 | Organic Material and Organic Materials | 10/19/1995 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11550 | |
| 211.4260 | Organic Solvent | 10/19/1995 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11550 | |
| 211.4270 | Organic Vapor | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4285 | Outdoor Floor Covering Installation Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4290 | Oven | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4310 | Overall Control | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4330 | Overvarnish | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4350 | Owner of a Gasoline Dispensing Operation or Owner of a Gasoline Dispensing Facility | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4370 | Owner or Operator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4390 | Packaging Rotogravure Printing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4410 | Packaging Rotogravure Printing Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4430 | Pail | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4450 | Paint Manufacturing Source or Paint Manufacturing Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4455 | Pan-Backing Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4460 | Panel | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4470 | Paper Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4490 | Paper Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4510 | Particulate Matter | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4530 | Parts per Million (Volume) or Ppm (VOL) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4535 | Part Marking Aerospace Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.4540 | Perimeter Bonded Sheet Flooring | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4550 | Person | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4590 | Petroleum | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4610 | Petroleum Liquid | 10/19/1995 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11550 | |
| 211.4630 | Petroleum Refinery | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4650 | Pharmaceutical | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4670 | Pharmaceutical Coating Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4690 | Photochemically Reactive Material | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4710 | Pigmented Coatings | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4730 | Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4735 | Plastic | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4740 | Plastic Part | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.4750 | Plasticizers | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4760 | Plastic Solvent Welding Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4765 | Plastic Solvent Welding Adhesive Primer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4768 | Pleasure Craft | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4769 | Pleasure Craft Surface Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4770 | PM 10 | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4790 | Pneumatic Rubber Tire Manufacture | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4810 | Polybasic Organic Acid Partial Oxidation Manufacturing Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4830 | Polyester Resin Material(s) | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.4850 | Polyester Resin Products Manufacturing Process | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.4870 | Polystyrene Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4890 | Polystyrene Resin | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4895 | Polyvinyl Chloride Plastic (PVC Plastic) | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4900 | Porous Material | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.4910 | Portable Grain Handling Equipment | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4930 | Portland Cement Manufacturing Process Emission Source | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4950 | Portland Cement Process or Portland Cement Manufacturing Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.4970 | Potential To Emit | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.4990 | Power Driven Fastener Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5010 | Precoat | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.5012 | Prefabricated Architectural Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5015 | Preheater Kiln | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.5020 | Preheater/Precalciner Kiln | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.5030 | Pressure Release | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5050 | Pressure Tank | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5060 | Pressure/Vacuum Relief Valve | 9/21/1994 | 1/27/1995, 60 FR 5318 | |
| 211.5061 | Pretreatment Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5062 | Pretreatment Wash Primer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5065 | Primary Product | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 211.5070 | Prime Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5072 | Primer for General Aviation Rework Facility | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5075 | Primer Sealant | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5080 | Primer Sealer | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.5090 | Primer Surfacer Coat | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5110 | Primer Surfacer Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5130 | Primers | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5140 | Printed Interior Panel | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5150 | Printing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5170 | Printing Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5185 | Process Emission Source | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5190 | Process Emission Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5210 | Process Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5230 | Process Unit Shutdown | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5245 | Process Vent | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 211.5250 | Process Weight Rate | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5270 | Production Equipment Exhaust System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5310 | Publication Rotogravure Printing Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5330 | Purged Process Fluid | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5335 | Radiation Effect Coating | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5336 | Radiation-Effect or Electric Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5338 | Radome | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5339 | Rain Erosion-Resistant Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5350 | Reactor | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5370 | Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5390 | Reclamation System | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.5400 | Red Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5410 | Refiner | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5430 | Refinery Fuel Gas | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5450 | Refinery Fuel Gas System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5470 | Refinery Unit or Refinery Process Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5480 | Reflective Argent Coating | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.5490 | Refrigerated Condenser | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5500 | Regulated Air Pollutant | 12/7/1993 | 4/5/1995, 60 FR 17229 | |
| 211.5510 | Reid Vapor Pressure | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 211.5520 | Reinforced Plastic Composite | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5530 | Repair | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.5535 | Repair Cleaning | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5550 | Repair Coat | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5570 | Repaired | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5585 | Research and Development Operation | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5590 | Residual Fuel Oil | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5600 | Resist Coat | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.5610 | Restricted Area | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5630 | Retail Outlet | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5640 | Rich-Burn Engine | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 211.5650 | Ringelmann Chart | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5670 | Roadway | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5675 | Rocket Motor Bonding Adhesive | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5680 | Rocket Motor Nozzle Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5690 | Roll Coater | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5710 | Roll Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5730 | Roll Printer | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5750 | Roll Printing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5770 | Rotogravure Printing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5790 | Rotogravure Printing Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5800 | Rubber | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5805 | Rubber-Based Adhesive | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5810 | Safety Relief Valve | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5830 | Sandblasting | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5850 | Sanding Sealers | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5855 | Scale Inhibitor | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5860 | Scientific Instrument | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5870 | Screening | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5875 | Screen Printing | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5883 | Screen Print Ink for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5885 | Screen Reclamation | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5887 | Sealant for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5890 | Sealer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5895 | Seal Coat Maskant | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5900 | Self-Priming Topcoat for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5905 | Self-Priming Topcoat for General Aviation Rework Facility | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5907 | Semi-Aqueous Cleaning Solvent | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.5910 | Semi Transparent Stains | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5930 | Sensor | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5950 | Set of Safety Relief Valves | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5970 | Sheet Basecoat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.5980 | Sheet-Fed | 5/9/1995 | 11/8/1995, 60 FR 56238 | |
| 211.5985 | Sheet Rubber Lining Installation | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5987 | Shock-Free Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.5990 | Shotblasting | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6010 | Side Seam Spray Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6012 | Silicone-Release Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6013 | Silicone Insulation Material | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6015 | Single-Ply Roof Membrane | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6017 | Single-Ply Roof Membrane Adhesive Primer | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6020 | Single-Ply Roof Membrane Installation and Repair Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6025 | Single Unit Operation | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 211.6030 | Smoke | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6050 | Smokeless Flare | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6055 | Smoothing and Caulking Compounds | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6060 | Soft Coat | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.6063 | Solar-Absorbent Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6064 | Solid Film Lubricant | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6065 | Solids Turnover Ratio (RT) | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6070 | Solvent | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6090 | Solvent Cleaning | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6110 | Solvent Recovery System | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.6130 | Source | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 211.6133 | Space Vehicle | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6137 | Specialized Function Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6140 | Specialty Coatings | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.6145 | Specialty Coatings for Motor Vehicles | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.6150 | Specialty High Gloss Catalyzed Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6170 | Specialty Leather | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.6190 | Specialty Soybean Crushing Source | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6210 | Splash Loading | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6230 | Stack | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6250 | Stain Coating | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.6270 | Standard Conditions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6290 | Standard Cubic Foot (Scf) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6310 | Start Up | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6330 | Stationary Emission Source | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6350 | Stationary Emission Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6370 | Stationary Source | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6390 | Stationary Storage Tank | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6400 | Stencil Coat | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6405 | Sterilization Indicating Ink | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6410 | Storage Tank or Storage Vessel | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6420 | Strippable Spray Booth Coating | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 211.6425 | Stripping | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6426 | Structural Autoclavable Adhesive for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6427 | Structural Glazing | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6428 | Structural Nonautoclavable Adhesive for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6430 | Styrene Devolatilizer Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6450 | Styrene Recovery Unit | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6460 | Subfloor | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6470 | Submerged Loading Pipe | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6490 | Substrate | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6510 | Sulfuric Acid Mist | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6530 | Surface Condenser | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6535 | Surface Preparation | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6540 | Surface Preparation Materials | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.6550 | Synthetic Organic Chemical or Polymer Manufacturing Plant | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6570 | Tablet Coating Operation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6575 | Temporary Protective Coating for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6580 | Texture Coat | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.6583 | Thermal Control Coating for Aerospace Applications | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6585 | Thin Metal Laminating Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6587 | Thin Particleboard | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6590 | Thirty Day Rolling Average | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6610 | Three Piece Can | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6620 | Three or Four Stage Coating System | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.6630 | Through-the-Valve Fill | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.6635 | Tileboard | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6640 | Tire Repair | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6650 | Tooling Resin | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.6670 | Topcoat | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6685 | Topcoat for General Aviation Rework Facility | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6690 | Topcoat Operation | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6695 | Topcoat System | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.6710 | Touch-Up | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.6720 | Touch-Up Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.6730 | Transfer Efficiency | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6740 | Translucent Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6750 | Tread End Cementing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6770 | True Vapor Pressure | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6780 | Trunk Interior Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6790 | Turnaround | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6810 | Two Piece Can | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6825 | Underbody Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6830 | Under-the-Cup Fill | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.6850 | Undertread Cementing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6860 | Uniform Finish Blender | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 211.6870 | Unregulated Safety Relief Valve | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6880 | Vacuum Metallizing | 5/9/1995 | 10/26/1995, 60 FR 54807 | |
| 211.6885 | Vacuum Metalizing Coating | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.6890 | Vacuum Producing System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6910 | Vacuum Service | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6930 | Valves Not Externally Regulated | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6950 | Vapor Balance System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.6970 | Vapor Collection System | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 211.6990 | Vapor Control System | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 211.7010 | Vapor Mounted Primary Seal | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7030 | Vapor Recovery System | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7050 | Vapor-Suppressed Polyester Resin | 1/18/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 211.7070 | Vinyl Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7090 | Vinyl Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7110 | Volatile Organic Liquid (VOL) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7130 | Volatile Organic Material Content (VOMC) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7150 | Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) | 10/20/2020 | 6/16/2021, 86 FR 31920 | |
| 211.7170 | Volatile Petroleum Liquid | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7190 | Wash Coat | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7200 | Washoff Operations | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 211.7210 | Wastewater (Oil/Water) Separator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7220 | Waterproof Resorcinol Glue | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.7230 | Weak Nitric Acid Manufacturing Process | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7240 | Weatherstrip Adhesive | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.7250 | Web | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7260 | Wet Fastener Installation Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.7270 | Wholesale Purchase Consumer | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7275 | Wing Coating | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 211.7290 | Wood Furniture | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 211.7310 | Wood Furniture Coating | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7330 | Wood Furniture Coating Line | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 211.7350 | Woodworking | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Part 212: Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions | ||||
| Subpart A: General | ||||
| 212.107 | Measurement Method for Visible Emissions | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| 212.108 | Measurement Methods for PM-10 Emissions and Condensible PM-10 Emissions | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| 212.109 | Measurement Methods for Opacity | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| 212.110 | Measurement Methods for Particulate Matter | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| 212.111 | Abbreviations and Units | 10/4/1991 | 10/21/1993, 58 FR 54291 | |
| 212.113 | Incorporations by Reference | 5/22/1996 | 7/14/1999, 64 FR 37847 | |
| Subpart B: Visible Emissions | ||||
| 212.121 | Opacity Standards | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.122 | Visible Emissions Limitations for Certain Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced on or After April 14, 1972 | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.123 | Visible Emissions Limitations for All Other Emission Units | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.124 | Exceptions | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.125 | Determination of Violations | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.126 | Adjusted Opacity Standards Procedures | 7/13/1988 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| Subpart D: Particulate Matter Emissions From Incinerators | ||||
| 212.181 | Limitations for Incinerators | 6/4/1980 | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57893 | |
| 212.182 | Aqueous Waste Incinerators | 6/4/1980 | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57893 | |
| 212.183 | Certain Wood Waste Incinerators | 6/4/1980 | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57893 | |
| 212.184 | Explosive Waste Incinerators | 6/4/1980 | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57893 | |
| 212.185 | Continuous Automatic Stoking Animal Pathological Waste Incinerators | 12/30/1986 | 9/15/1993, 58 FR 48312 | |
| Subpart E: Particulate Matter Emissions From Fuel Combustion Emission Units | ||||
| 212.201 | Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced Prior to April 14, 1972, Using Solid Fuel Exclusively Located in the Chicago Area | 7/9/1986 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.202 | Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced Prior to April 14, 1972, Using Solid Fuel Exclusively Located Outside the Chicago Area | 7/9/1986 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.203 | Controlled Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced Prior to April 14, 1972, Using Solid Fuel Exclusively | 7/9/1986 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.204 | Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced on or After April 14, 1972, Using Solid Fuel Exclusively | 7/9/1986 | 12/29/1992, 57 FR 61834 | |
| 212.205 | Coal-Fired Industrial Boilers for Which Construction or Modification Commenced Prior to April 14, 1972, Equipped With Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems | 10/19/1981 | 2/22/1984, 49 FR 6490 | |
| 212.206 | Emission Units Using Liquid Fuel Exclusively | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| 212.207 | Emission Units Using More Than One Type of Fuel | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| 212.208 | Aggregation of Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced Prior to April 14, 1972 | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| 212.210 | Emissions Limitations for Certain Fuel Combustion Emission Units Located in the Vicinity of Granite City | 5/22/1996 | 7/14/1999, 64 FR 37847 | |
| Subpart K: Fugitive Particulate Matter | ||||
| 212.301 | Fugitive Particulate Matter | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.302 | Geographical Areas of Application | 5/22/1996 | 7/14/1999, 64 FR 37847 | |
| 212.304 | Storage Piles | 10/26/1979 | 4/26/1982, 47 FR 17814 | |
| 212.305 | Conveyor Loading Operations | 10/26/1979 | 4/26/1982, 47 FR 17814 | |
| 212.306 | Traffic Areas | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.307 | Materials Collected by Pollution Control Equipment | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.308 | Spraying or Choke-Feeding Required | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.309 | Operating Program | 5/22/1996 | 7/14/1999, 64 FR 37847 | |
| 212.310 | Minimum Operating Program | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.312 | Amendment to Operating Program | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.313 | Emission Standard for Particulate Collection Equipment | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.314 | Exception for Excess Wind Speed | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.315 | Covering for Vehicles | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.316 | Emissions Limitations for Emission Units in Certain Areas | 5/22/1996 | 7/14/1999, 64 FR 37847 | |
| Subpart L: Particulate Matter Emissions From Process Emission Units | ||||
| 212.321 | Process Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced on or After April 14, 1972 | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.322 | Process Emission Units for Which Construction or Modification Commenced Prior to April 14, 1972 | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.323 | Stock Piles | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.324 | Process Emission Units in Certain Areas | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| Subpart N: Food Manufacturing | ||||
| 212.361 | Corn Wet Milling Processes | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.362 | Emission Units in Certain Areas | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| Subpart O: Petroleum Refining, Petrochemical and Chemical Manufacturing | ||||
| 212.381 | Catalyst Regenerators of Fluidized Catalytic Converters | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart Q: Stone, Clay, Glass and Concrete Manufacturing | ||||
| 212.421 | Portland Cement Processes for Which Construction or Modification Commenced on or After April 14, 1972 | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| 212.422 | Portland Cement Manufacturing Processes | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.423 | Emission Limits for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Plant Located in LaSalle County, South of the Illinois River | 10/4/1991 | 10/21/1993, 58 FR 54291 | |
| 212.424 | Fugitive Particulate Matter Control for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Plant and Associated Quarry Operations Located in LaSalle County, South of the Illinois River | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 212.425 | Emission Units in Certain Areas | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| Subpart R: Primary and Fabricated Metal Products and Machinery Manufacture | ||||
| 212.441 | Steel Manufacturing Processes | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.442 | Beehive Coke Ovens | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.443 | Coke Plants | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 212.444 | Sinter Processes | 9/28/1979 | 9/3/1981, 46 FR 44172 | |
| 212.445 | Blast Furnace Cast Houses | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 212.446 | Basic Oxygen Furnaces | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| 212.447 | Hot Metal Desulfurization Not Located in the BOF | 9/28/1979 | 9/3/1981, 46 FR 44172 | |
| 212.448 | Electric Arc Furnaces | 9/28/1979 | 9/3/1981, 46 FR 44172 | |
| 212.449 | Argon-Oxygen Decarburization Vessels | 9/28/1979 | 9/3/1981, 46 FR 44172 | |
| 212.450 | Liquid Steel Charging | 9/28/1979 | 9/3/1981, 46 FR 44172 | |
| 212.451 | Hot Scarfing Machines | 9/28/1979 | 9/3/1981, 46 FR 44172 | |
| 212.455 | Highlines on Steel Mills | 10/26/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.456 | Certain Small Foundries | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.457 | Certain Small Iron-Melting Air Furnaces | 9/28/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30057 | |
| 212.458 | Emission Units in Certain Areas | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| Subpart S: Agriculture | ||||
| 212.461 | Grain-Handling and Drying in General | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.462 | Grain-Handling Operations | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.463 | Grain Drying Operations | 9/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 212.464 | Sources in Certain Areas | 5/22/1996 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | |
| Subpart T: Construction and Wood Products | ||||
| 212.681 | Grinding, Woodworking, Sandblasting and Shotblasting | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| Subpart U: Additional Control Measures | ||||
| 212.700 | Applicability | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 212.701 | Contingency Measure Plans, Submittal and Compliance Date | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 212.702 | Determination of Contributing Sources | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 212.703 | Contingency Measure Plan Elements | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 212.704 | Implementation | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 212.705 | Alternative Implementation | 7/11/1994 | 7/13/1995, 60 FR 36060 | |
| 212.Appendix C: | Past Compliance Dates | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | Approved as Rules 202(e), 203(c), 203(d)(3)(A) & (B), 203(d)(5)(L) & (M), 203(d)(8)(J), 203(f)(3) Preamble, 203(f)(3)(F) Preamble, and 203(i). |
| Part 214: Sulfur Limitations | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 214.101 | Measurement Methods | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.102 | Abbreviations and Units | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.103 | Definitions | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.104 | Incorporations by Reference | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| Subpart B: New Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | ||||
| 214.121 | Large Sources | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.122 | Small Sources | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| Subpart C: Existing Solid Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | ||||
| 214.141 | Sources Located in Metropolitan Areas | 3/28/1983 | 9/3/1992, 57 FR 40333 | thru (a). |
| 214.141 | Sources Located in Metropolitan Areas | 5/20/1986 | 9/2/1992, 57 FR 40126 | (b), (c), and (d). |
| 214.142 | Small Sources Located Outside Metropolitan Areas | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | Approved as Rule 204(c)(1)(B). |
| 214.143 | Large Sources Located Outside Metropolitan Areas | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart D: Existing Liquid or Mixed Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | ||||
| 214.161 | Liquid Fuel Burned Exclusively | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.162 | Combination of Fuels | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| Subpart E: Aggregation of Sources Outside Metropolitan Areas | ||||
| 214.181 | Dispersion Enhancement Techniques | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 214.182 | Prohibition | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(e) (intro). |
| 214.183 | General Formula | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(e)(1). |
| 214.184 | Special Formula | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(e)(2). |
| 214.185 | Alternative Emission Rate | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(e)(3). |
| 214.186 | New Operating Permits | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(e)(4). |
| Subpart F: Alternative Standards for Sources Inside Metropolitan Areas | ||||
| 214.201 | Alternative Standards for Sources in Metropolitan Areas | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.202 | Dispersion Enhancement Techniques | 3/28/1983 | 9/3/1992, 57 FR 40333 | |
| Subpart K: Process Emission Sources | ||||
| 214.300 | Scope | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.301 | General Limitation | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(f)(1)(A). |
| 214.302 | Exception for Air Pollution Control Equipment | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | Approved as Rule 204(f)(1)(C). |
| 214.303 | Use of Sulfuric Acid | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(f)(2)(B). |
| 214.305 | Fuel Sulfur Content Limitations | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| Subpart O: Petroleum Refining, Petrochemical and Chemical Manufacturing | ||||
| 214.381 | Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Only (a) and (b). Approved as Rule 204(f)(1)(B) and (f)(2)(A). |
| 214.382 | Petroleum and Petrochemical Processes | 12/5/1988 | 1/28/1994, 59 FR 4001 | |
| 214.383 | Chemical Manufacturing | 2/3/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 204(f)(1)(E). |
| Subpart Q: Primary and Secondary Metal Manufacturing | ||||
| 214.421 | Combination of Fuels at Steel Mills in Metropolitan Areas | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| Subpart X: Utilities | ||||
| 214.560 | Scope | 5/20/1986 | 9/2/1992, 57 FR 40126 | |
| 214.561 | E. D. Edwards Electric Generating Station | 7/11/2003 | 11/10/2008, 73 FR 66555 | |
| Subpart AA: Requirements for Certain SO 2 Sources | ||||
| 214.600 | Definitions | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.601 | Applicability | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.602 | Compliance Deadline | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.603 | Emission Limitations | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.604 | Monitoring and Testing | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.605 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 12/7/2015 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| 214.Appendix C: | Compliance Dates | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | Approved as Rule 204(e)(1). |
| Part 215: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 215.101 | Clean-Up and Disposal Operations | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.102 | Testing Methods | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.104 | Definitions | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 215.105 | Incorporation by Reference | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 215.108 | Measurement of Vapor Pressures | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.109 | Monitoring for Negligibly-Reactive Compounds | 6/19/1998 | 1/15/1999, 64 FR 2581 | |
| Subpart B: Organic Emissions From Storage and Loading Operations | ||||
| 215.121 | Storage Containers | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.122 | Loading Operations | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.123 | Petroleum Liquid Storage Tanks | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.124 | External Floating Roofs | 1/21/1983 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.125 | Compliance Dates and Geographical Areas | 1/21/1983 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.126 | Compliance Plan | 1/21/1983 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart C: Organic Emissions From Miscellaneous Equipment | ||||
| 215.141 | Separation Operations | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.142 | Pumps and Compressors | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.143 | Vapor Blowdown | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.144 | Safety Relief Valves | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning | ||||
| 215.181 | Solvent Cleaning in General | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.182 | Cold Cleaning | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.183 | Open Top Vapor Degreasing | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.184 | Conveyorized Degreasing | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart F: Coating Operations | ||||
| 215.202 | Compliance Schedules | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.204 | Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Plants | 6/19/1998 | 1/15/1999, 64 FR 2581 | |
| 215.205 | Alternative Emission Limitations | 6/19/1998 | 1/15/1999, 64 FR 2581 | |
| 215.206 | Exemptions From Emission Limitations | 6/19/1998 | 1/15/1999, 64 FR 2581 | |
| 215.207 | Compliance by Aggregation of Emission Units | 6/19/1998 | 1/15/1999, 64 FR 2581 | |
| 215.208 | Testing Methods for Volatile Organic Material Content | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.209 | Exemption From General Rule on Use of Organic Material | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.211 | Compliance Dates and Geographical Areas | 6/19/1998 | 1/15/1999, 64 FR 2581 | |
| 215.212 | Compliance Plan | 6/19/1998 | 1/15/1999, 64 FR 2581 | |
| 215.213 | Special Requirements for Compliance Plan | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.215 | DMI Emissions Limitations | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart H: Special Limitations for Sources in Major Urbanized Areas Which Are Nonattainment for Ozone | ||||
| 215.240 | Applicability | 6/29/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.241 | External Floating Roofs | 6/29/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.249 | Compliance Dates | 6/29/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart K: Use of Organic Material | ||||
| 215.301 | Use of Organic Material | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.302 | Alternative Standard | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.303 | Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.304 | Operations With Compliance Program | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart P: Printing and Publishing | ||||
| 215.408 | Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing | 9/30/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart Q: Leaks From Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Equipment | ||||
| 215.420 | Applicability | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.421 | General Requirements | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.422 | Inspection Program Plan for Leaks | 8/28/1985 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.423 | Inspection Program for Leaks | 8/28/1985 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.424 | Repairing Leaks | 8/28/1985 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.425 | Recordkeeping for Leaks | 8/28/1985 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.426 | Reporting for Leaks | 8/28/1985 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.427 | Alternative Program for Leaks | 8/28/1985 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.428 | Compliance Dates | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.429 | Compliance Plan | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.430 | General Requirements | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.431 | Inspection Program Plan for Leaks | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.433 | Repairing Leaks | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.434 | Recordkeeping for Leaks | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.435 | Report for Leaks | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.437 | Open-Ended Valves | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.438 | Compliance Plan | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart R: Petroleum Refining and Related Industries; Asphalt Materials | ||||
| 215.441 | Petroleum Refinery Waste Gas Disposal | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.442 | Vacuum Producing Systems | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.443 | Wastewater (Oil/Water) Separator | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.444 | Process Unit Turnarounds | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.445 | Leaks: General Requirements | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.446 | Monitoring Program Plan for Leaks | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.447 | Monitoring Program for Leaks | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.448 | Recordkeeping for Leaks | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.449 | Reporting for Leaks | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.450 | Alternative Program for Leaks | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.451 | Sealing Device Requirements | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.453 | Compliance Dates and Geographical Areas | 1/21/1983 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart S: Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastic Products | ||||
| 215.461 | Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.462 | Green Tire Spraying Operations | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.463 | Alternative Emission Reduction Systems | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.464 | Emissions Testing | 1/21/1983 | 11/27/1987, 52 FR 45333 | |
| 215.465 | Compliance Dates and Geographical Areas | 1/21/1983 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.466 | Compliance Plan | 1/21/1983 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | ||||
| 215.480 | Applicability of Subpart T | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.481 | Control of Reactors, Distillation Units, Crystallizers, Centrifuges and Vacuum Dryers | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.482 | Control of Air Dryers, Production Equipment Exhaust Systems and Filters | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.483 | Material Storage and Transfer | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.484 | In-Process Tanks | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.485 | Leaks | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.486 | Other Emission Sources | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.487 | Testing | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.488 | Monitors for Air Pollution Control Equipment | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.489 | Recordkeeping (Renumbered) | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| 215.490 | Compliance Schedule (Renumbered) | 5/14/1991 | 8/18/1992, 57 FR 37100 | |
| Subpart V: Air Oxidation Processes | ||||
| 215.520 | Applicability | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.521 | Definitions | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.525 | Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.526 | Testing and Monitoring | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.527 | Compliance Date | 12/14/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart W: Agriculture | ||||
| 215.541 | Pesticide Exception | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart X: Construction | ||||
| 215.561 | Architectural Coatings | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.562 | Paving Operations | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.563 | Cutback Asphalt | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| Subpart Y: Gasoline Distribution | ||||
| 215.581 | Bulk Gasoline Plants | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 215.582 | Bulk Gasoline Terminals | 6/29/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.583 | Gasoline Dispensing Facilities—Storage Tank Filling Operations | 6/29/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.584 | Gasoline Delivery Vessels | 6/29/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart Z: Dry Cleaners | ||||
| 215.607 | Standards for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 4/3/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.608 | Operating Practices for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 4/3/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.609 | Program for Inspection and Repair of Leaks | 4/3/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.610 | Testing and Monitoring | 4/3/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.611 | Exemption for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 4/3/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.612 | Compliance Dates and Geographical Areas | 4/3/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.613 | Compliance Plan | 4/3/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| Subpart BB: Polystyrene Plants | ||||
| 215.875 | Applicability of Subpart BB | 9/30/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.877 | Emissions Limitation at Polystyrene Plants | 9/30/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.879 | Compliance Date | 9/30/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.881 | Compliance Plan | 9/30/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.883 | Special Requirements for Compliance Plan | 9/30/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.886 | Emissions Testing | 9/30/1987 | 6/29/1990, 55 FR 26814 | |
| 215.Appendix C: | Past Compliance Dates | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rules 104(a), 104(g), 104(h), 205(j), and 205(m). |
| Part 216: Carbon Monoxide Emissions | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 216.101 | Measurement Methods | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(f). |
| Subpart B: Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | ||||
| 216.121 | Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(a). |
| Subpart C: Incinerators | ||||
| 216.141 | Incinerators | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(b). |
| 216.142 | Exceptions | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(b)(1,2). |
| Subpart N: Petroleum Refining and Chemical Manufacture | ||||
| 216.361 | Petroleum and Petrochemical Processes | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(c). |
| 216.362 | Polybasic Organic Acid Partial Oxidation Manufacturing Processes | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(h). |
| Subpart O: Primary and Fabricated Metal Products | ||||
| 216.381 | Cupolas | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(e). |
| 216.382 | Exception, General Motor's Ferrous Foundry in Vermilion County | 11/13/1992 | 8/4/1994, 59 FR 39686 | |
| 216.Appendix C: | Compliance Dates | 7/28/1979 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 206(g). |
| Part 217: Nitrogen Oxides Emissions | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 217.101 | Measurement Methods | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 217.102 | Abbreviations and Units | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 217.104 | Incorporations by Reference | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| Subpart B: New Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | ||||
| 217.121 | New Emission Sources | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 207(a)(1)-(4), 207(a)(5)(A). |
| Subpart C: Existing Fuel Combustion Emission Sources | ||||
| 217.141 | Existing Emission Sources in Major Metropolitan Areas | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 207(b) and (c). |
| Subpart K: Process Emission Sources | ||||
| 217.301 | Industrial Processes | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 207(e). |
| Subpart O: Chemical Manufacture | ||||
| 217.381 | Nitric Acid Manufacturing Processes | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 207(d). |
| Subpart Q: Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and Turbines | ||||
| 217.386 | Applicability | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 217.388 | Control and Maintenance Requirements | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 217.390 | Emissions Averaging Plans | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 217.392 | Compliance | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 217.394 | Testing and Monitoring | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| 217.396 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| Subpart T: Cement Kilns | ||||
| 217.400 | Applicability | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.402 | Control Requirements | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.404 | Testing | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.406 | Monitoring | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.408 | Reporting | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.410 | Recordkeeping | 3/15/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| Subpart U: NO X Control and Trading Program for Specified NO X Generating Units | ||||
| 217.450 | Purpose | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.452 | Severability | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.454 | Applicability | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.456 | Compliance Requirements | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.458 | Permitting Requirements | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.460 | Subpart U NOX Trading Budget | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.462 | Methodology for Obtaining NOX Allocations | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.464 | Methodology for Determining NOX Allowances From the New Source Set-Aside | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.466 | NOX Allocations Procedure for Subpart U Budget Units | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.468 | New Source Set-Asides for “New” Budget Units | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.470 | Early Reduction Credits (ERCS) for Budget Units | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.472 | Low-Emitter Requirements | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.474 | Opt-In Units | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.476 | Opt-In Process | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.478 | Opt-In Budget Units: Withdrawal From NOX Trading Program | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.480 | Opt-In Units: Change in Regulatory Status | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| 217.482 | Allowance Allocations To Opt-In Budget Units | 4/17/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56449 | |
| Subpart V: Electric Power Generation | ||||
| 217.521 | Lake of Egypt Power Plant | 4/13/1978 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| 217.700 | Purpose | 4/17/2001 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| 217.702 | Severability | 4/17/2001 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| 217.704 | Applicability | 4/17/2001 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| 217.706 | Emission Limitations | 4/17/2001 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| 217.708 | NOX Averaging | 4/17/2001 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| 217.710 | Monitoring | 4/17/2001 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| 217.712 | Reporting and Recordkeeping | 4/17/2001 | 6/18/2001, 66 FR 32769 | |
| Subpart W: NO X Trading Program for Electrical Generating Units | ||||
| 217.750 | Purpose | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.751 | Sunset Provisions | 11/2/2009 | 3/1/2010, 75 FR 9103 | |
| 217.752 | Severability | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.754 | Applicability | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.756 | Compliance Requirements | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | Except (d)(3). |
| 217.758 | Permitting Requirements | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.760 | NOx Trading Budget | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.762 | Methodology for Calculating NOX Allocations for Budget Electrical Generating Units (EGUs) | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.764 | NOX Allocations for Budget EGUs | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.768 | New Source Set-Asides for “New” Budget EGUs | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.770 | Early Reduction Credits for Budget EGUs | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.774 | Opt-In Units | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.776 | Opt-In Process | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.778 | Budget Opt-In Units: Withdrawal From NOX Trading Program | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.780 | Opt-In Units: Change in Regulatory Status | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.782 | Allowance Allocations to Budget Opt-In Units | 12/26/2000 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | |
| 217.Appendix C: | Compliance Dates | 4/14/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | |
| 217.Appendix G: | Existing Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines Affected by the NOX Sip Call | 9/25/2007 | 6/26/2009, 74 FR 30466 | |
| Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 218.100 | Introduction | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.101 | Savings Clause | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 218.102 | Abbreviations and Conversion Factors | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.103 | Applicability | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.104 | Definitions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.105 | Test Methods and Procedures | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.106 | Compliance Dates | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.107 | Operation of Afterburners | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.108 | Exemptions, Variations, and Alternative Means of Control or Compliance Determinations | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.109 | Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Liquids | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.110 | Vapor Pressure of Organic Material or Solvent | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.111 | Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Material | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.112 | Incorporations by Reference | 12/23/2013 | 3/13/2015, 80 FR 13248 | |
| 218.114 | Compliance With Permit Conditions | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| Subpart B: Organic Emissions From Storage and Loading Operations | ||||
| 218.119 | Applicability for VOL | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 218.120 | Control Requirements for Storage Containers of VOL | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 218.121 | Storage Containers | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.122 | Loading Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.123 | Petroleum Liquid Storage Tanks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.124 | External Floating Roofs | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.125 | Compliance Dates | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 218.127 | Testing VOL Operations | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 218.128 | Monitoring VOL Operations | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 218.129 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for VOL Operations | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| Subpart C: Organic Emissions From Miscellaneous Equipment | ||||
| 218.141 | Separation Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.142 | Pumps and Compressors | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.143 | Vapor Blowdown | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.144 | Safety Relief Valves | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning | ||||
| 218.181 | Solvent Cleaning Degreasing Operations | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.182 | Cold Cleaning | 6/9/1997 | 11/26/1997, 62 FR 62951 | |
| 218.183 | Open Top Vapor Degreasing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.184 | Conveyorized Degreasing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.186 | Test Methods | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.187 | Other Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart F: Coating Operations | ||||
| 218.204 | Emission Limitations | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.205 | Daily-Weighted Average Limitations | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.206 | Solids Basis Calculation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.207 | Alternative Emission Limitations | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.208 | Exemptions From Emission Limitations | 10/25/2011 | 4/19/2013, 78 FR 23495 | |
| 218.209 | Exemption From General Rule on Use of Organic Material | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.210 | Compliance Schedule | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.211 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.212 | Cross-Line Averaging To Establish Compliance for Coating Lines | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.213 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-Line Averaging Participating Coating Lines | 5/9/1995 | 2/13/1996, 61 FR 5511 | |
| 218.214 | Changing Compliance Methods | 5/9/1995 | 2/13/1996, 61 FR 5511 | |
| 218.215 | Wood Furniture Coating Averaging Approach | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 218.216 | Wood Furniture Coating Add-On Control Use | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 218.217 | Wood Furniture Coating and Flat Wood Paneling Coating Work Practice Standards | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.218 | Work Practice Standards for Paper Coatings, Metal Furniture Coatings, and Large Appliance Coatings | 3/23/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.219 | Work Practice Standards for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings and Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart G: Use of Organic Material | ||||
| 218.301 | Use of Organic Material | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.302 | Alternative Standard | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.303 | Fuel Combustion Emission Units | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.304 | Operations With Compliance Program | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart H: Printing and Publishing | ||||
| 218.401 | Flexographic and Rotogravure Printing | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.402 | Applicability | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.403 | Compliance Schedule | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.404 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.405 | Lithographic Printing: Applicability | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.407 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements for Lithographic Printing Lines | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.409 | Testing for Lithographic Printing on and After March 15, 1996 | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.410 | Monitoring Requirements for Lithographic Printing | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.411 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Lithographic Printing | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.412 | Letterpress Printing Lines: Applicability | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.413 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements for Letterpress Printing Lines | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.415 | Testing for Letterpress Printing Lines | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.416 | Monitoring Requirements for Letterpress Printing Lines | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.417 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Letterpress Printing Lines | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant | ||||
| 218.421 | General Requirements | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.422 | Inspection Program Plan for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.423 | Inspection Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.424 | Repairing Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.425 | Recordkeeping for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.426 | Report for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.427 | Alternative Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.428 | Open-Ended Valves | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.429 | Standards for Control Devices | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.431 | Applicability | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 218.432 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 218.433 | Performance and Testing Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 218.434 | Monitoring Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 218.435 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 218.436 | Compliance Date | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| Subpart R: Petroleum Refining and Related Industries; Asphalt Materials | ||||
| 218.441 | Petroleum Refinery Waste Gas Disposal | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.442 | Vacuum Producing Systems | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.443 | Wastewater (Oil/Water) Separator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.444 | Process Unit Turnarounds | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.445 | Leaks: General Requirements | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.446 | Monitoring Program Plan for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.447 | Monitoring Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.448 | Recordkeeping for Leaks | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.449 | Reporting for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.450 | Alternative Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.451 | Sealing Device Requirements | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.452 | Compliance Schedule for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart S: Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastic Products | ||||
| 218.461 | Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.462 | Green Tire Spraying Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.463 | Alternative Emission Reduction Systems | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.464 | Emission Testing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | ||||
| 218.480 | Applicability | 8/26/2008 | 11/3/2010, 75 FR 67623 | |
| 218.481 | Control of Reactors, Distillation Units, Crystallizers, Centrifuges and Vacuum Dryers | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.482 | Control of Air Dryers, Production Equipment Exhaust Systems and Filters | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.483 | Material Storage and Transfer | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.484 | In-Process Tanks | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.485 | Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.486 | Other Emission Units | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.487 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.488 | Monitoring for Air Pollution Control Equipment | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.489 | Recordkeeping for Air Pollution Control Equipment | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart V: Batch Operations and Air Oxidation Processes | ||||
| 218.500 | Applicability for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 218.501 | Control Requirements for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 218.502 | Determination of Uncontrolled Total Annual Mass Emissions and Average Flow Rate Values for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 218.503 | Performance and Testing Requirements for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 218.504 | Monitoring Requirements for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 218.505 | Reporting and Recordkeeping for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 218.506 | Compliance Date | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 218.520 | Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 218.522 | Savings Clause | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 218.523 | Compliance | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 218.524 | Determination of Applicability | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 218.525 | Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 218.526 | Testing and Monitoring | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart W: Agriculture | ||||
| 218.541 | Pesticide Exception | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart X: Construction | ||||
| 218.561 | Architectural Coatings | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.562 | Paving Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.563 | Cutback Asphalt | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart Y: Gasoline Distribution | ||||
| 218.581 | Bulk Gasoline Plants | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.582 | Bulk Gasoline Terminals | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.583 | Gasoline Dispensing Operations—Storage Tank Filling Operations | 12/23/2013 | 3/13/2015, 80 FR 13248 | |
| 218.584 | Gasoline Delivery Vessels | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.586 | Gasoline Dispensing Operations—Motor Vehicle Fueling Operations | 12/23/2013 | 3/13/2015, 80 FR 13248 | |
| Subpart Z: Dry Cleaners | ||||
| 218.607 | Standards for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.608 | Operating Practices for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.609 | Program for Inspection and Repair of Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.610 | Testing and Monitoring | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.611 | Applicability for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| Subpart AA: Paint and Ink Manufacturing | ||||
| 218.620 | Applicability | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.621 | Exemption for Waterbase Material and Heatset Offset Ink | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.624 | Open Top Mills, Tanks, Vats or Vessels | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.625 | Grinding Mills | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.626 | Storage Tanks | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.628 | Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.630 | Clean Up | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.636 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.637 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart BB: Polystyrene Plants | ||||
| 218.640 | Applicability | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.642 | Emissions Limitation at Polystyrene Plants | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.644 | Emissions Testing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart CC: Polyester Resin Product Manufacturing Process | ||||
| 218.660 | Applicability | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.666 | Control Requirements | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.667 | Compliance Schedule | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.668 | Testing | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.670 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Exempt Emission Units | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.672 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Subject Emission Units | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| Subpart DD: Aerosol Can Fillings | ||||
| 218.680 | Applicability | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.686 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/12/1997, 62 FR 11327 | |
| 218.688 | Testing | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.690 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Exempt Emission Units | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.692 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Subject Emission Units | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| Subpart GG: Marine Terminals | ||||
| 218.760 | Applicability | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 218.762 | Control Requirements | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 218.764 | Compliance Certification | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 218.766 | Leaks | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 218.768 | Testing and Monitoring | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 218.770 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| Subpart HH: Motor Vehicle Refinishing | ||||
| 218.780 | Emission Limitations | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 218.782 | Alternative Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 218.784 | Equipment Specifications | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 218.786 | Surface Preparation Materials | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 218.787 | Work Practices | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 218.788 | Testing | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 218.789 | Monitoring and Recordkeeping for Control Devices | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 218.790 | General Recordkeeping and Reporting | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 218.791 | Compliance Date | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| Subpart II: Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials | ||||
| 218.890 | Applicability | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.891 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements | 7/27/11 | 3/23/12, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.892 | Testing Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.894 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart JJ: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives | ||||
| 218.900 | Applicability | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.901 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.902 | Testing Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.903 | Monitoring Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 218.904 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart PP: Miscellaneous Fabricated Product Manufacturing Processes | ||||
| 218.920 | Applicability | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.926 | Control Requirements | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.927 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.928 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.929 | Cementable and Dress or Performance Shoe Leather | 4/8/2003 | 5/24/2004, 69 FR 29446 | |
| Subpart QQ: Miscellaneous Formulation Manufacturing Processes | ||||
| 218.940 | Applicability | 7/16/1998 | 6/18/1999, 64 FR 32810 | |
| 218.946 | Control Requirements | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.947 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.948 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart RR: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing Processes | ||||
| 218.960 | Applicability | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.966 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/12/1997, 62 FR 11327 | |
| 218.967 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.968 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| Subpart TT: Other Emission Units | ||||
| 218.980 | Applicability | 5/9/1995 | 3/12/1997, 62 FR 11327 | |
| 218.986 | Control Requirements | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.987 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.988 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| Subpart UU: Recordkeeping and Reporting | ||||
| 218.990 | Exempt Emission Units | 9/27/1993 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.991 | Subject Emission Units | 1/24/1994 | 10/21/1996, 61 FR 54556 | |
| 218.Appendix A: | List of Chemicals Defining Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.Appendix B: | VOM Measurement Techniques for Capture Efficiency | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.Appendix C: | Reference Test Methods for Air Oxidation Processes | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.Appendix D: | Coefficients for the Total Resource Effectiveness Index (TRE) Equation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 218.Appendix E: | List of Affected Marine Terminals | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 218.Appendix G: | TRE Index Measurements for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 218.Appendix H: | Baseline VOM Content Limitations for Subpart F, Section 218.212 Cross-Line Averaging | 5/9/1995 | 2/13/1996, 61 FR 5511 | |
| Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 219.100 | Introduction | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.101 | Savings Clause | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 219.102 | Abbreviations and Conversion Factors | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.103 | Applicability | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.104 | Definitions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.105 | Test Methods and Procedures | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.106 | Compliance Dates | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.107 | Operation of Afterburners | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.108 | Exemptions, Variations, and Alternative Means of Control or Compliance Determinations | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.109 | Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Liquids | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.110 | Vapor Pressure of Organic Material or Solvent | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.111 | Vapor Pressure of Volatile Organic Material | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.112 | Incorporation by Reference | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| Subpart B: Organic Emissions From Storage and Loading Operations | ||||
| 219.119 | Applicability for VOL | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 219.120 | Control Requirements for Storage Containers of VOL | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 219.121 | Storage Containers of VPL | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.122 | Loading Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.123 | Petroleum Liquid Storage Tanks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.124 | External Floating Roofs | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.125 | Compliance Dates | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 219.127 | Testing VOL Operations | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| 219.128 | Monitoring VOL Operations | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 219.129 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for VOL Operations | 11/15/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41338 | |
| Subpart C: Organic Emissions From Miscellaneous Equipment | ||||
| 219.141 | Separation Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.142 | Pumps and Compressors | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.143 | Vapor Blowdown | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.144 | Safety Relief Valves | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning | ||||
| 219.181 | Solvent Cleaning Degreasing Operations | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.182 | Cold Cleaning | 6/9/1997 | 11/26/1997, 62 FR 62951 | |
| 219.183 | Open Top Vapor Degreasing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.184 | Conveyorized Degreasing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.186 | Test Methods | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.187 | Other Industrial Cleaning Operations | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| Subpart F: Coating Operations | ||||
| 219.204 | Emission Limitations | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.205 | Daily-Weighted Average Limitations | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.206 | Solids Basis Calculation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.207 | Alternative Emission Limitations | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.208 | Exemptions from Emission Limitations | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.209 | Exemption From General Rule on Use of Organic Material | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.210 | Compliance Schedule | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.211 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| 219.212 | Cross-Line Averaging To Establish Compliance for Coating Lines | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.213 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-Line Averaging Participating Coating Lines | 5/9/1995 | 2/13/1996, 61 FR 5511 | |
| 219.214 | Changing Compliance Methods | 5/9/1995 | 2/13/1996, 61 FR 5511 | |
| 219.215 | Wood Furniture Coating Averaging Approach | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 219.216 | Wood Furniture Coating Add-On Control Use | 2/2/1998 | 5/19/1998, 63 FR 27489 | |
| 219.217 | Wood Furniture Coating and Flat Wood Paneling Coating Work Practice Standards | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.218 | Work Practice Standards for Paper Coatings, Metal Furniture Coatings, and Large Appliance Coatings | 3/23/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.219 | Work Practice Standards for Aerospace Facilities | 3/4/2021 | 4/11/2023, 88 FR 21490 | |
| Subpart G: Use of Organic Material | ||||
| 219.301 | Use of Organic Material | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.302 | Alternative Standard | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.303 | Fuel Combustion Emission Units | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.304 | Operations With Compliance Program | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart H: Printing and Publishing | ||||
| 219.401 | Flexographic and Rotogravure Printing | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.402 | Applicability | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.403 | Compliance Schedule | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.404 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.405 | Lithographic Printing: Applicability | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.407 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements for Lithographic Printing Lines | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.409 | Testing for Lithographic Printing | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.410 | Monitoring Requirements for Lithographic Printing | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.411 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Lithographic Printing | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.412 | Letterpress Printing Lines: Applicability | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.413 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements for Letterpress Printing Lines | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.415 | Testing for Letterpress Printing Lines | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.416 | Monitoring Requirements for Letterpress Printing Lines | 6/25/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.417 | Recordkeeping and Reporting for Letterpress Printing Lines | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant | ||||
| 219.421 | General Requirements | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.422 | Inspection Program Plan for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.423 | Inspection Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.424 | Repairing Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.425 | Recordkeeping for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.426 | Report for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.427 | Alternative Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.428 | Open-Ended Valves | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.429 | Standards for Control Devices | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.431 | Applicability | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 219.432 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 219.433 | Performance and Testing Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 219.434 | Monitoring Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 219.435 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 219.436 | Compliance Date | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| Subpart R: Petroleum Refining and Related Industries; Asphalt Materials | ||||
| 219.441 | Petroleum Refinery Waste Gas Disposal | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.442 | Vacuum Producing Systems | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.443 | Wastewater (Oil/Water) Separator | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.444 | Process Unit Turnarounds | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.445 | Leaks: General Requirements | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.446 | Monitoring Program Plan for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.447 | Monitoring Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.448 | Recordkeeping for Leaks | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.449 | Reporting for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.450 | Alternative Program for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.451 | Sealing Device Requirements | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.452 | Compliance Schedule for Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart S: Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastic Products | ||||
| 219.461 | Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.462 | Green Tire Spraying Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.463 | Alternative Emission Reduction Systems | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.464 | Emission Testing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing | ||||
| 219.480 | Applicability | 5/9/1995 | 3/12/1997, 62 FR 11327 | |
| 219.481 | Control of Reactors, Distillation Units, Crystallizers, Centrifuges and Vacuum Dryers | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.482 | Control of Air Dryers, Production Equipment Exhaust Systems and Filters | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.483 | Material Storage and Transfer | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.484 | In-Process Tanks | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.485 | Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.486 | Other Emission Units | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.487 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.488 | Monitoring for Air Pollution Control Equipment | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.489 | Recordkeeping for Air Pollution Control Equipment | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart V: Batch Operations and Air Oxidation Processes | ||||
| 219.500 | Applicability for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 219.501 | Control Requirements for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 219.502 | Determination of Uncontrolled Total Annual Mass Emissions and Actual Weighted Average Flow Rate Values for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 219.503 | Performance and Testing Requirements for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 219.504 | Monitoring Requirements for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 219.505 | Reporting and Recordkeeping for Batch Operations | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 219.506 | Compliance Date | 5/22/1995 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14484 | |
| 219.520 | Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 219.522 | Savings Clause | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 219.523 | Compliance | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 219.524 | Determination of Applicability | 11/15/1994 | 9/27/1995, 60 FR 49770 | |
| 219.526 | Testing and Monitoring | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart W: Agriculture | ||||
| 219.541 | Pesticide Exception | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart X: Construction | ||||
| 219.561 | Architectural Coatings | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.562 | Paving Operations | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.563 | Cutback Asphalt | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart Y: Gasoline Distribution | ||||
| 219.581 | Bulk Gasoline Plants | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.582 | Bulk Gasoline Terminals | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.583 | Gasoline Dispensing Operations—Storage Tank Filling Operations | 12/23/2013 | 3/13/2015, 80 FR 13248 | |
| 219.584 | Gasoline Delivery Vessels | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart Z: Dry Cleaners | ||||
| 219.607 | Standards for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.608 | Operating Practices for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.609 | Program for Inspection and Repair of Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.610 | Testing and Monitoring | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.611 | Exemption for Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart AA: Paint and Ink Manufacturing | ||||
| 219.620 | Applicability | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.621 | Exemption for Waterbase Material and Heatset-Offset Ink | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.623 | Permit Conditions | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.624 | Open-Top Mills, Tanks, Vats or Vessels | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.625 | Grinding Mills | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.626 | Storage Tanks | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.628 | Leaks | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.630 | Clean Up | 8/16/1991 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.636 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.637 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart BB: Polystyrene Plants | ||||
| 219.640 | Applicability | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.642 | Emissions Limitation at Polystyrene Plants | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.644 | Emissions Testing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| Subpart GG: Marine Terminals | ||||
| 219.760 | Applicability | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 219.762 | Control Requirements | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 219.764 | Compliance Certification | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 219.766 | Leaks | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 219.768 | Testing and Monitoring | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 219.770 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 10/25/1994 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| Subpart HH: Motor Vehicle Refinishing | ||||
| 219.780 | Emission Limitations | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 219.782 | Alternative Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 219.784 | Equipment Specifications | 1/28/2013 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60070 | |
| 219.786 | Surface Preparation Materials | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 219.787 | Work Practices | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 219.788 | Testing | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 219.789 | Monitoring and Recordkeeping for Control Devices | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| 219.791 | Compliance Date | 5/9/1995 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38577 | |
| Subpart II: Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials | ||||
| 219.890 | Applicability | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.891 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.892 | Testing and Monitoring Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.894 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart JJ: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives | ||||
| 219.900 | Applicability | 9/14/2010 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.901 | Emission Limitations and Control Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.902 | Testing Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.903 | Monitoring Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| 219.904 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements | 7/27/2011 | 3/23/2012, 77 FR 16940 | |
| Subpart PP: Miscellaneous Fabricated Product Manufacturing Processes | ||||
| 219.920 | Applicability | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.923 | Permit Conditions | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.926 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.927 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.928 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| Subpart QQ: Miscellaneous Formulation Manufacturing Processes | ||||
| 219.940 | Applicability | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.943 | Permit Conditions | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.946 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.947 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.948 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| Subpart RR: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing Processes | ||||
| 219.960 | Applicability | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.963 | Permit Conditions | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.966 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.967 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.968 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| Subpart TT: Other Emission Units | ||||
| 219.980 | Applicability | 5/9/1995 | 3/12/1997, 62 FR 11327 | |
| 219.983 | Permit Conditions | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.986 | Control Requirements | 5/9/1995 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.987 | Compliance Schedule | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.988 | Testing | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| Subpart UU: Recordkeeping and Reporting | ||||
| 219.990 | Exempt Emission Units | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.991 | Subject Emission Units | 9/27/1993 | 5/7/1996, 61 FR 20455 | |
| 219.Appendix A: | List of Chemicals Defining Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.Appendix B: | VOM Measurement Techniques for Capture Efficiency (Repealed) | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.Appendix C: | Reference Methods and Procedures | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.Appendix D: | Coefficients for the Total Resource Effectiveness Index (TRE) Equation | 9/27/1993 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46562 | |
| 219.Appendix E: | List of Affected Marine Terminals | 2/15/1996 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16801 | |
| 219.Appendix G: | TRE Index Measurements for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units | 5/9/1995 | 3/23/1998, 63 FR 13784 | |
| 219.Appendix H: | Baseline VOM Content Limitations for Subpart F, Section 219.212 Cross-Line Averaging | 5/9/1995 | 2/13/1996, 61 FR 5511 | |
| Part 223: Standards and Limitations for Organic Material Emissions for Area Sources | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 223.100 | Severability | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.105 | Abbreviations and Acronyms | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.120 | Incorporations by Reference | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| Subpart B: Consumer and Commercial Products | ||||
| 223.200 | Purpose | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.201 | Applicability | 5/4/2012 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.203 | Definitions for Subpart B | 5/4/2012 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.205 | Standards | 5/4/2012 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.206 | Diluted Products | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.207 | Products Registered Under FIFRA | 5/4/2012 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.208 | Requirements for Aerosol Adhesives | 5/4/2012 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.209 | Requirements for Floor Wax Strippers | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.210 | Products Containing Ozone-Depleting Compounds | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.211 | Requirements for Adhesive Removers, Aerosol Adhesives, Contact Adhesives, Electrical Cleaners, Electronic Cleaners, Footwear or Leather Care Products, General Purpose Degreasers, and Graffiti Removers | 5/4/2012 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.220 | Requirements for Charcoal Lighter Material | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.230 | Exemptions | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.240 | Innovative Product Exemption | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.245 | Alternative Compliance Plans | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.250 | Product Dating | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.255 | Additional Product Dating Requirements | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.260 | Most Restrictive Limit | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.265 | Additional Labeling Requirements for Aerosol Adhesives, Adhesive Removers, Electronic Cleaners, Electrical Cleaners, Energized Electrical Cleaners, and Contact Adhesives | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.270 | Reporting Requirements | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.275 | Special Recordkeeping Requirements for Consumer Products That Contain Perchloroethylene or Methylene Chloride | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.280 | Calculating Illinois Sales | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/13, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.285 | Test Methods | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| Subpart C: Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings | ||||
| 223.300 | Purpose | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.305 | Applicability | 5/4/2012 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.307 | Definitions for Subpart C | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.310 | Standards | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.320 | Container Labeling Requirements | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.330 | Reporting Requirements | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.340 | Compliance Provisions and Test Methods | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.350 | Alternative Test Methods | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.360 | Methacrylate Traffic Coating Markings | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| 223.370 | Test Methods | 6/8/2009 | 5/6/2013, 78 FR 26258 | |
| Part 225: Control of Emissions From Large Combustion Sources | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 225.120 | Abbreviations and Acronyms | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.130 | Definitions | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.140 | Incorporations by Reference | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.150 | Commence Commercial Operation | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| Subpart B: Control of Mercury Emissions From Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units | ||||
| 225.233 | Multi-Pollutant Standard (MPS) | 8/23/2019 | 6/25/2021, 86 FR 33527 | Except (c), (d), and (i). |
| 225.291 | Combined Pollutant Standard: Purpose | 12/7/2015 | 2/28/2018, 83 FR 8612 | |
| 225.292 | Applicability of the Combined Pollutant Standard | 12/7/2015 | 2/28/2018, 83 FR 8612 | |
| 225.293 | Combined Pollutant Standard: Notice of Intent | 12/7/2015 | 2/28/2018, 83 FR 8612 | |
| 225.295 | Combined Pollutant Standard: Emission Standards for NOX and SO2 | 12/7/2015 | 2/28/2018, 83 FR 8612 | Except (a)(4). |
| 225.296 | Combined Pollutant Standard: Control Technology Requirements for NOX, SO2, and PM Emissions | 12/7/2015 | 2/28/2018, 83 FR 8612 | Except (d). |
| Subpart C: Clean Air Act Interstate Rule (CAIR) SO 2 Trading Program | ||||
| 225.300 | Purpose | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.305 | Applicability | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.310 | Compliance Requirements | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.315 | Appeal Procedures | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.320 | Permit Requirements | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.325 | Trading Program | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| Subpart D: CAIR NO X Annual Trading Program | ||||
| 225.400 | Purpose | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.405 | Applicability | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.410 | Compliance Requirements | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.415 | Appeal Procedures | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.420 | Permit Requirements | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.425 | Annual Trading Budget | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.430 | Timing for Annual Allocations | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.435 | Methodology for Calculating Annual Allocations | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.440 | Annual Allocations | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.445 | New Unit Set-Aside (NUSA) | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.450 | Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Gross Electrical Output and Useful Thermal Energy | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.455 | Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.460 | Energy Efficiency and Conservation, Renewable Energy, and Clean Technology Projects | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.465 | Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) Allowances | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.470 | Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) Applications | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.475 | Agency Action on Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) Applications | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.480 | Compliance Supplement Pool | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| Subpart E: CAIR NO X Ozone Season Trading Program | ||||
| 225.500 | Purpose | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.505 | Applicability | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.510 | Compliance Requirements | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.515 | Appeal Procedures | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.520 | Permit Requirements | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.525 | Ozone Season Trading Budget | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.530 | Timing for Ozone Season Allocations | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.535 | Methodology for Calculating Ozone Season Allocations | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.540 | Ozone Season Allocations | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.545 | New Unit Set-Aside (NUSA) | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.550 | Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Gross Electrical Output and Useful Thermal Energy | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.555 | Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.560 | Energy Efficiency and Conservation, Renewable Energy, and Clean Technology Projects | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.565 | Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) Allowances | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.570 | Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) Applications | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.575 | Agency Action on Clean Air Set-Aside (CASA) Applications | 8/31/2007 | 10/16/2007, 72 FR 58528 | |
| 225.Appendix A | Specified EGUs for Purposes of the CPS Coal-Fired Boilers as of July 1, 2016 | 12/7/2015 | 2/28/2018, 83 FR 8612 | |
| Part 226: Standards and Limitations for Certain Sources of Lead | ||||
| 226.100 | Severability | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.105 | Scope and Organization | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.110 | Abbreviations and Acronyms | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.115 | Definitions | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.120 | Incorporations by Reference | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.125 | Applicability | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.130 | Compliance Date | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.140 | Lead Emission Standards | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.150 | Operational Monitoring for Control Device | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.155 | Total Enclosure | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.160 | Operational Measurement for Total Enclosure | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.165 | Inspection | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.170 | Lead Fugitive Dust Operating Program | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.175 | Emissions Testing | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| 226.185 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 4/21/2014 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| Subchapter i: Open Burning | ||||
| Part 237: Open Burning | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 237.101 | Definitions | 9/7/1971 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 401. |
| 237.102 | Prohibitions | 9/7/1971 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 402. |
| 237.103 | Explosive Wastes | 9/7/1971 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 405. |
| 237.110 | Local Enforcement | 9/7/1971 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 406. |
| 237.120 | Exemptions | 9/7/1971 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 403. |
| Subpart B: Permits | ||||
| 237.201 | Permits | 9/7/1971 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10862 | Approved as Rule 404. |
| Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile Sources | ||||
| Part 240: Mobile Sources | ||||
| Subpart A: Definitions and General Provisions | ||||
| 240.101 | Preamble | 12/20/1994 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.102 | Definitions | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.103 | Prohibitions | 4/14/1972 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.104 | Inspection | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.105 | Penalties | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.106 | Determination of Violation | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.107 | Incorporations by Reference | 3/18/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart B: Emissions | ||||
| 240.121 | Smoke Emissions | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.122 | Diesel Engine Emissions Standards for Locomotives | 4/7/1992 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.123 | Liquid Petroleum Gas Fuel Systems | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart C: Smoke Opacity Standards and Test Procedures for Diesel-Powered Heavy Duty Vehicles | ||||
| 240.140 | Applicability | 2/26/2001 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.141 | Smoke Opacity Standards and Test Procedures for Diesel-Powered Heavy Duty Vehicles | 2/26/2001 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart D: Steady-State Idle Mode Test Emission Standards | ||||
| 240.151 | Applicability | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.152 | Steady-State Idle Mode Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards | 3/18/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.153 | Compliance Determination | 3/18/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart F: Evaporative Test Standards | ||||
| 240.171 | Applicability | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.172 | Evaporative System Integrity Test Standards | 7/13/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart G: On-Road Remote Sensing Test Emission Standards | ||||
| 240.181 | Applicability | 3/18/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.182 | On-Road Remote Sensing Emission Standards | 3/18/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.183 | Compliance Determination | 7/13/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart H: On-Board Diagnostic Test Standards | ||||
| 240.191 | Applicability | 3/18/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.192 | On-Board Diagnostic Test Standards | 12/18/2001 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.193 | Compliance Determination | 12/18/2001 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart I: Visual Inspection Test Standards | ||||
| 240.201 | Applicability | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.202 | Visual Inspection Test Standards | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.203 | Compliance Determination | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.Appendix A: | Rule Into Section Table | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 240.Appendix B: | Section Into Rule Table | 2/1/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Part 241: Clean Fuel Fleet Program | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 241.101 | Other Definitions | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.102 | Definitions | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.103 | Abbreviations | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.104 | Incorporations by Reference | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| Subpart B: General Requirements | ||||
| 241.110 | Applicability | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.111 | Exemptions | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.112 | Registration of Fleet Owners or Operators | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.113 | Control Requirements | 11/25/1997 | 2/17/1999, 64 FR 7788 | |
| 241.114 | Conversions | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.115 | Operating Requirements | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| Subpart C: Credits | ||||
| 241.130 | Clean Fuel Fleet Credit Program | 11/25/1997 | 2/17/1999, 64 FR 7788 | |
| 241.131 | Credit Provisions | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| Subpart D: Recordkeeping and Reporting | ||||
| 241.140 | Reporting Requirements | 11/25/1997 | 2/17/1999, 64 FR 7788 | |
| 241.141 | Recordkeeping Requirements | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.142 | Report of Credit Activities | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.Appendix A: | Emission Standards for Clean Fuel Vehicles | 9/11/1995 | 3/19/1996, 61 FR 11139 | |
| 241.Appendix B: | Credit Values | 11/25/1997 | 2/17/1999, 64 FR 7788 | |
| Subchapter l: Air Quality Standards and Episodes | ||||
| Part 243: Air Quality Standards | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 243.101 | Definitions | 12/17/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.102 | Scope | 12/17/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.103 | Applicability | 7/29/2013 | 5/20/2015, 80 FR 28835 | |
| 243.104 | Nondegradation | 10/25/2011 | 5/23/2013, 78 FR 30770 | |
| 243.105 | Air Quality Monitoring Data Influenced by Exceptional Events | 12/17/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.106 | Monitoring | 4/14/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | |
| 243.107 | Reference Conditions | 12/17/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.108 | Incorporations by Reference | 5/16/2024 | 10/3/2024, 89 FR 80402 | |
| Subpart B: Standards and Measurement Methods | ||||
| 243.120 | PM10 and PM2.5 | 8/18/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.122 | Sulfur Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide) | 3/4/2022 | 1/17/2024, 89 FR 2883 | |
| 243.123 | Carbon Monoxide | 8/18/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.124 | Nitrogen Oxides (Nitrogen Dioxide as Indicator) | 8/18/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.126 | Lead | 8/18/2020 | 10/4/2021, 86 FR 54626 | |
| 243.120 | PM10 and PM2.5 | 2/19/2019 | 11/5/2019, 84 FR 59527 | |
| 243.123 | Carbon Monoxide | 7/29/2013 | 5/20/2015, 80 FR 28835 | |
| 243.124 | Nitrogen Oxides (Nitrogen Dioxide as Indicator) | 1/23/2017 | 7/18/2017, 82 FR 32771 | |
| 243.125 | Ozone | 5/16/2024 | 10/3/2024, 89 FR 80402 | |
| 243.126 | Lead | 2/19/2019 | 11/5/2019, 84 FR 59527 | |
| Part 244: Episodes | ||||
| Subpart A: Definitions and General Provisions | ||||
| 244.101 | Definitions | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.102 | Responsibility of the Agency | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 402. |
| 244.103 | Determination of Required Actions | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 402. |
| 244.104 | Determination of Atmospheric Conditions | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 402. |
| 244.105 | Determination of Expected Contaminant Emissions | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 402. |
| 244.106 | Monitoring | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.107 | Determination of Areas Affected | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.108 | Failure To Comply With Episode Requirements | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 402. |
| 244.109 | Sealing of Offenders | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 402. |
| Subpart B: Local Agency Responsibilities | ||||
| 244.121 | Local Agency Responsibilities | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| Subpart C: Episode Action Plans | ||||
| 244.141 | Requirement for Plans | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 404. |
| 244.142 | Facilities for Which Action Plans Are Required | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 404. |
| 244.143 | Submission of Plans | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 404. |
| 244.144 | Contents of Plans | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 404. |
| 244.145 | Processing Procedures | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 404. |
| Subpart D: Episode Stages | ||||
| 244.161 | Advisory, Alert and Emergency Levels | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.162 | Criteria for Declaring an Advisory | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.163 | Criteria for Declaring a Yellow Alert | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.164 | Criteria for Declaring a Red Alert | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 405(e). |
| 244.165 | Criteria for Declaring an Emergency | 8/18/1972 | 2/21/1980, 45 FR 11472 | Approved as Rule 405(e). |
| 244.166 | Criteria for Terminating Advisory, Alert and Emergency | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.167 | Episode Stage Notification | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.168 | Contents of Episode Stage Notification | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.169 | Actions During Episode Stages | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| 244.Appendix D: | Required Emission Reduction Actions | 5/15/1992 | 1/12/1993, 58 FR 3844 | |
| Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency | ||||
| Part 252: Public Participation in the Air Pollution Control Permit Program | ||||
| Subpart A: Introduction | ||||
| 252.101 | Purpose | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.102 | Abbreviations and Acronyms | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.103 | Definitions | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.104 | Applicability | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.105 | Application for a PSD Permit | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.106 | Consolidation | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Subpart B: Procedures for Public Review | ||||
| 252.201 | Notice and Opportunity to Comment | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.202 | Draft Permit | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.203 | Project Summary, Statement of Basis, or Fact Sheet | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.204 | Availability of Documents | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.205 | Opportunity for Public Hearing | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.206 | Procedures for Public Hearings | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.207 | Obligation to Raise Issues and Provide Information During the Public Comment Period for PSD Permits | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.208 | Reopening of the Public Comment Period for PSD Permits | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.209 | Issuance of a Final PSD Permit Decision | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.210 | Response to Comments for a Final PSD Permit Decision | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| 252.211 | Administrative Record for a Final PSD Permit Decision | 6/10/2020 | 9/9/2021, 86 FR 50459 | |
| Part 254: Annual Emissions Report | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 254.101 | Purpose | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.102 | Applicability | 4/20/2012 | 7/3/2013, 67 FR 40013 | |
| 254.103 | Definitions | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.120 | Applicable Pollutants for Annual Emissions Reporting | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.132 | Failure To File a Complete Report | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.133 | Voluntary Submittal of Data | 5/14/1993 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.134 | Retention of Records | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.135 | Reporting of Errors | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.136 | Confidentiality and Trade Secret Protection | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.137 | Reporting Schedule | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.138 | Issuance of Source Inventory Report | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| Subpart B: Reporting Requirements for Large Sources | ||||
| 254.203 | Contents of Subpart B Annual Emissions Report | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.204 | Complete Reports | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| Subpart C: Reporting Requirements for Other Sources | ||||
| 254.303 | Contents of Subpart C Annual Emissions Report | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| 254.306 | Complete Reports | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| Subpart E: Seasonal Emissions Report Under ERMS | ||||
| 254.501 | Contents of a Seasonal Emissions Report | 7/17/2001 | 5/15/2002, 67 FR 34614 | |
| Part 255: General Conformity: Criteria and Procedures | ||||
| 255.100 | Purpose | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.110 | Federal Requirement | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.120 | Applicability | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.140 | Definitions | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.150 | Abbreviations | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.160 | Incorporations by Reference | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.170 | Activities Exempt From Conformity Analysis | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.180 | Conformity Analysis | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.190 | Reporting Requirements | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.200 | Public Participation | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.210 | Frequency of Conformity Determinations | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.220 | Criteria for Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.230 | Procedures for Conformity Determinations of General Federal Actions | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| 255.240 | Mitigation of Air Quality Impacts | 3/6/1997 | 12/23/1997, 62 FR 67000 | |
| Part 276: Procedures To Be Followed in the Performance of Inspections of Motor Vehicle Emissions | ||||
| Subpart A: General Provisions | ||||
| 276.101 | Purpose and Applicability | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.102 | Definitions | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.103 | Abbreviations | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.104 | Incorporations by Reference | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.105 | Sunset Provisions | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart B: Vehicle Emissions Inspection Procedures | ||||
| 276.201 | General Description of Vehicle Emissions Inspection Procedures | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.202 | Pollutants To Be Tested—Exhaust Test | 9/28/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.203 | Dilution—Steady-State Idle Exhaust Test and Transient Loaded Mode Exhaust Test | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.204 | Steady-State Idle Exhaust Emissions Test Procedures | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.205 | Evaporative System Integrity Test Procedures | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.206 | Engine and Fuel Type Modifications | 6/14/1996 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.208 | On-Road Remote Sensing Test Procedures | 9/28/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.209 | On-Board Diagnostic Test Procedures | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.210 | Visual Inspection Test Procedures | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | 276.210 |
| Subpart C: Sticker or Certificate Issuance, Display, and Possession | ||||
| 276.301 | General Requirements | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.302 | Determination of Affected Counties | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.303 | Emissions Inspection Sticker or Certificate Design and Content | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart D: Waiver and Economic Hardship Extension Requirements | ||||
| 276.401 | Waiver Requirements | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.403 | Denial or Issuance of Waiver | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.404 | Economic Hardship Extension Requirements | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.405 | Outside of Affected Counties Annual Exemption Requirements | 1/30/2012 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart E: Test Equipment Specifications | ||||
| 276.501 | General Requirements | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.502 | Steady-State Idle Exhaust Test Analysis Systems Functional Requirements | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.503 | Steady-State Idle Exhaust Test Analysis Systems Performance Criteria | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.504 | Evaporative System Integrity Test Functional Requirements and Performance Criteria | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.507 | On-Road Remote Sensing Test Systems Functional Requirements and Performance Criteria | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.508 | On-Board Diagnostic Test Systems Functional Requirements and Performance Criteria | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart F: Equipment Maintenance and Calibration | ||||
| 276.601 | Steady-State Idle Test Equipment Maintenance | 9/28/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.602 | Steady-State Idle Test Equipment Calibration | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.603 | Evaporative System Integrity Test Maintenance and Calibration | 9/28/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.604 | Record Keeping | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.606 | On-Road Remote Sensing Test Systems Maintenance and Calibration | 9/28/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.607 | On-Board Diagnostic Test Systems Maintenance and Calibration | 9/28/1998 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart G: Fleet Self-Testing Requirements | ||||
| 276.701 | General Requirements | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.702 | Fleet Inspection Permit | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.703 | Fleet Inspection Permittee Operating Requirements | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.704 | Private Official Inspection Station Auditing and Surveillance | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.705 | Fleet Vehicle Inspection Procedures (Renumbered) | 6/14/1996 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart H: Grievance Procedure | ||||
| 276.801 | General Requirements | 6/14/1996 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.802 | Procedure for Filing Grievance | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.803 | Agency Investigation | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.804 | Review of Agency's Determination | 6/14/1996 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart I: Notices | ||||
| 276.901 | General Requirements | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.902 | Vehicle Emissions Test Notice | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart J: Reciprocity With Other Jurisdictions | ||||
| 276.1001 | Requirements for Vehicles Registered in Affected Counties and Located in Other Jurisdictions Requiring Vehicle Emissions Inspection | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| 276.1002 | Requirements for Vehicles Registered in Other Jurisdictions Requiring Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Located in an Affected County | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Subpart K: Repair Facility Performance Reporting | ||||
| 276.1101 | Requirements for Collecting and Reporting Data Pertaining to the Repair of Vehicles That Failed or Were Rejected From an Emissions Inspection | 6/28/2011 | 8/13/2014, 79 FR 47377 | |
| Part 283: General Procedures for Emissions Tests Averaging | ||||
| Subpart A: Introduction | ||||
| 283.110 | Purpose | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| 283.120 | Applicability | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| 283.130 | Definitions | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| Subpart B: Procedures for Averaging of Test Results | ||||
| 283.210 | Criteria for Averaging Tests | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| 283.220 | Test Plan Requirements | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| 283.230 | Changes to the Test Plan | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| 283.240 | Averaging Procedure | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| 283.250 | Compliance Determination | 9/11/2000 | 5/9/2003, 68 FR 24885 | |
| State Statutes | ||||
| 20 ILCS 605/46.13a | Civil Administrative Code | 9/21/1992 | 8/30/1993, 58 FR 45448 | Subsection 46.13(a) [Approved Under Public Act 87-1177]. |
| 415 ILCS 5/9 | Illinois Environmental Protection Act | 6/21/1996 | 5/29/2002, 67 FR 37323 | Section 9(f) [Approved Under Public Act 89-491]. |
| 415 ILCS 5/9.1 | Illinois Environmental Protection Act | 9/17/1991 | 12/17/1992, 57 FR 59928 | (Ch. 111 1/2, par. 1009.1) par. 1009.1(a), (b), (c), (d) and (f). [Approved Under Public Act 87-555]. |
| 415 ILCS 5/9.9 | Illinois Environmental Protection Act | 7/1/2001 | 11/8/2001, 66 FR 56454 | Section 9.9(f) [Approved Under Public Act 92-0012]. |
| 415 ILCS 5/39.5 | Illinois Environmental Protection Act | 9/26/1992 | 8/30/1993, 58 FR 45448 | Subsection 20 [Approved Under Public Act 87-1213]. |
| 625 ILCS 5/13B | Illinois Vehicle Code | 1/18/1994 | 7/25/1996, 61 FR 38582 | 625 ILCS 5/13B [Approved Under Public Act 88-533]. |
(d) EPA approved state source-specific requirements.
| Name of source | Order/permit No. | State effective date |
EPA approval date |
Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alton Steel | 18020009 | 3/5/2018 | 2/21/2023, 88 FR 10464 | |
| Alumax Incorporated, Morris, IL | PCB AS 92-13 | 9/1/1994 | 2/1/1996, 61 FR 3575 | |
| Argonne National Laboratory | PCB AS 03-4 | 12/18/2003 | 7/28/2004, 69 FR 44967 | |
| Bema Film Systems, Incorporated, DuPage Co | PCB AS 00-11 | 1/18/2001 | 11/30/2001, 66 FR 59702 | |
| Calpine Corporation (Zion Energy Center) | PCB 16-112 | 12/19/2016 | 12/9/2019, 84 FR 67191 | As amended on 8/17/2017. |
| Central Can Company (CCC), Chicago, IL | PCB AS 94-18 | 8/6/1998, eff. 7/1/1991 | 3/18/1999, 64 FR 13346 | |
| Chase Products Company, Broadview (Cook Co.) | PCB AS 94-4 | 5/16/1996 | 6/9/1997, 62 FR 31341 | |
| City Water, Light & Power, City of Springfield | 9090046 | 6/23/2011 | 7/6/2012, 77 FR 39943 | Joint Construction and Operating Permit. |
| CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC. (formerly Cromwell-Phoenix, Inc) | PCB AS 03-05 | 11/20/2003 | 10/29/2008, 73 FR 64213 | |
| Exelon Generation, LLC | PCB 16-106 | 9/13/2016 | 12/9/2019, 84 FR 67191 | |
| Ford Motor Company | PCB, AS 02-03 | 11/21/2002 | 3/22/2004, 69 FR 13239 | |
| Ford Motor Company Chicago Assembly Plant | PCB, AS 05-5 | 9/1/2005 | 9/6/2006, 71 FR 52464 | |
| Greif Packaging, LLC, Naperville, DuPage Co | PCB AS 2011-01 | 4/5/2012 | 10/22/2012, 77 FR 64422 | |
| IL Power Company's Baldwin Power Station | PCB 79-7 | 9/8/1983 | 4/18/1990, 55 FR 14419 | Emission limits within Paragraph 1 of Final Order. |
| Kincaid Generation, LLC | 9050022 | 6/24/2011 | 7/6/2012, 77 FR 39943 | Joint Construction and Operating Permit. |
| Laclede Steel Sulfur dioxide plan | 93070030 | 11/18/1993 | 4/20/1994, 59 FR 18752 | FESOP for boilers and reheat furnaces. |
| Leisure Properties LLC/D/B/A Crownline Boats, West Frankfort, Illinois | PCB AS 04-01 | 7/22/2004 | 4/20/2012, 77 FR 23622 | Effective date identified in error as 7/22/2002 in the document heading. Due to ownership change, the Board transferred the adjusted standard to Leisure Properties LLC D/B/A Crownline Boats by Board order AS04-l, effective 10/7/2010. |
| Louis Berkman Company, d/b/a/ the Swenson Spreader Company's Lindenwood, Ogle Co | PCB, AS 97-5 | 5/7/1998 | 5/27/2004, 69 FR 30224 | |
| LTV Steel Company, Inc. | 98120091 | 5/14/1999 | 7/14/1999, 64 FR 37847 | Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit. |
| Midwest Generation, LLC | PCB 12-121 | 8/23/2012 | 7/20/2015, 80 FR 42726 | Certificate of Acceptance, dated 8/24/2012, filed with the Illinois Pollution Control Board Clerk's Office 8/27/2012. |
| Midwest Generation, LLC | PCB 13-24 | 4/4/2013 | 7/20/2015, 80 FR 42726 | Certificate of Acceptance, dated 5/16/13, filed with the Illinois Pollution Control Board Clerk's Office 5/17/2013. |
| National Steel Corporation, Granite City Division | 95010005 | 10/21/1997 | 3/11/1998, 63 FR 11842 | Joint Construction and Operating Permit. |
| Quantum Chemical Corporation, Morris, Aux Sable Township, Grundy Co | PCB AS 92-14 | 10/7/1993 | 4/3/1995, 60 FR 16803 | adjusted standard. |
| Reynolds Metals Company's McCook Sheet and Plate Plant in McCook, IL (in Cook Co.) | PCB AS 91-8 | 9/21/1995 | 1/21/1997, 62 FR 2916 | |
| Royal Fiberglass Products, d/b/a Viking Pools | PCB AS 09-14 | 9/5/2013 | 7/14/2014, 79 FR 40673 | |
| Solar Corporation, Libertyville, IL | PCB AS 94-2 | 7/20/1995 | 2/23/1998, 63 FR 8855 | |
| Stepan Company Millsdale Plant | 197800AAE | 10/30/2020 | 8/13/2021, 86 FR 44616 | |
| Sun Chemical Corporation, Northlake, IL | PCB AS 99-4 | 5/20/1999 | 9/13/1999, 64 FR 49400 | |
| Vonco Products, Incorporated, Lake Co | PCB AS 00-12 | 1/18/2001 | 11/30/2001, 66 FR 59704 |
(e) EPA approved nonregulatory and quasi-regulatory provisions.
| Name of SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area | State submittal date | EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air quality surveillance network | State-wide | 12/20/1979 | 3/4/1981, 46 FR 15137 | |
| Coal ban | Chicago Area | 10/22/1973 | 3/2/1976, 41 FR 8956 | |
| Compliance schedules | State-wide | 3/13/1973, 4/3/1973, 5/3/1973, 6/15/1973, and 8/7/1973 |
3/2/1976, 41 FR 8956 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2008) certification of emissions statement regulations | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 5/9/2017 | 7/11/2017, 82 FR 31913 | Certification that Illinois' previously approved regulations at 35 IAC part 254 meet the emission statement requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2008) Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements | Chicago area | 5/23/2018 | 2/6/2019, 84 FR 2063 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2015) certification of emissions statement regulations | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 5/16/2019 | 1/24/2020, 85 FR 4231 | Certification that Illinois' previously approved regulations at 35 IAC Part 254 meet the emissions statement requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2015) Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 10/9/2024 | 5/14/2026, 91 FR 27207 | |
| Regional haze plan | Statewide | 6/24/2011 | 7/6/2012, 77 FR 39943 | |
| Regional Haze Progress Report | Statewide | 2/1/2017 | 4/12/2018, 83 FR 15744 | |
| Small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program | State-wide | 11/12/1992 | 8/30/1993, 58 FR 45451 | |
| Total Suspended Particulate Control Strategy analysis | State-wide | 10/1/1981 | 9/30/1982, 47 FR 43054 | |
| Transportation control plan | Chicago Area | 4/17/1973 | 3/2/1976, 41 FR 8956 | |
| Transportation control plan | Chicago Area | 4/30/1980 | 1/27/1981, 46 FR 8472 | |
| Transportation control plan | Chicago Area | 8/20/1980 and 3/20/1981 | 11/16/1981, 46 FR 56196 | |
| Transportation control plan | Peoria Area | 10/15/1980 | 11/16/1981, 46 FR 56196 | |
| Transportation control plan | St. Louis Area | 4/1/1981 | 11/16/1981, 46 FR 56196 | |
| Transportation control plans | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 12/3/1982 | 10/4/1990, 55 FR 40658 | |
| Attainment and Maintenance Plans | ||||
| Carbon monoxide attainment demonstration | Chicago Area | 5/4/1983 | 10/4/1990, 55 FR 40658 | |
| Lead (1978) attainment and maintenance plan | Granite City area | 9/30/1983 | 7/24/1984, 49 FR 29790 | |
| Lead (2008)—Clean Data Determination | Chicago Area | N/A | 8/25/2015, 80 FR 51131 | |
| Lead (2008) Redesignation and maintenance plan | Chicago and Granite City areas | 9/22/2016 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| Ozone (1-hour) attainment demonstration | Chicago area | 12/26/2000 | 11/13/2001, 66 FR 56904 | |
| Ozone (1-hour) attainment demonstration | St. Louis area | 11/15/1999, 2/10/2000, 4/13/2001, and 4/30/2001 |
6/26/2001, 66 FR 33996 | EPA is disapproving the request for an exemption from the NOX NSR and certain NOX conformity requirements for Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties. |
| Ozone (1-hour) attainment plan revision | Chicago severe nonattainment area | 4/11/2003 | 9/15/2003, 68 FR 53887 | |
| Ozone (1-hour) redesignation and maintenance plan | Jersey County | 11/12/1993 | 3/14/1995, 60 FR 13634 | |
| Ozone (1-hour) redesignation and maintenance plan | St. Louis Area | 12/30/2002 | 5/12/2003, 68 FR 25542 | |
| Ozone (1-hour revoked) finding of attainment | Chicago area | 1/30/2007 | 12/30/2008, 73 FR 79652 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 1997) Determination of Attainment | Chicago area | N/A | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40262 | Correction to codification published on 3/12/2010 at 75 FR 12088. |
| Ozone (8-hour, 1997) Determination of Attainment | St. Louis area | N/A | 6/9/2011, 76 FR 33647 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 1997) maintenance plan revision | Chicago area | 3/28/2014 | 10/6/2014, 79 FR 60073 | Revised VOC and NOX Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEB) for the year 2025. |
| Ozone (8-hour, 1997) redesignation and maintenance plan | Chicago area | 7/23/2009, and 9/16/2011 | 8/13/2012, 77 FR 48062 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 1997) redesignation and maintenance plan | St. Louis area | 5/26/2010, and 9/16/2011 | 6/12/2012, 77 FR 34819 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 1997) second maintenance plan | St. Louis area | 8/24/2022 | 5/30/2023, 88 FR 34449 | Jersey County only. |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2008) Determination of Attainment | St. Louis area | N/A | 6/27/2016, 81 FR 41444 | determination that the area attained by the 7/20/2016 attainment date. |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2008) redesignation and maintenance plan | St. Louis area | 5/8/2017 | 3/1/2018, 83 FR 8756 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2008) redesignation and maintenance plan | Chicago Area | 1/25/2022 | 5/20/2022, 87 FR 30828 | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2015) Clean Data Determination | St. Louis area | N/A | 8/13/2026, 91 FR 52246 | EPA's final determination suspends requirements for Illinois EPA to submit an attainment demonstration and other associated nonattainment planning requirements for the St. Louis area for as long as the area continues to attain the 2015 ozone NAAQS. |
| PM10 maintenance plan | Granite City area | 3/19/1996, and 10/15/1996 | 3/11/1998, 47 FR 11842 | |
| PM10 maintenance plan | Lake Calumet (Southeast Chicago), Cook County | 8/2/2005, as supplemented on 9/8/2005 | 9/22/2005, 70 FR 55545 | |
| PM10 maintenance plan | LaSalle County | 6/2/1995, and 1/9/1996 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41342 | |
| PM10 maintenance plan | Lyons Township (McCook), Cook County | 8/2/2005 | 9/22/2005, 70 FR 55541 | |
| PM2.5 (1997)—Clean Data Determination | St. Louis area | N/A | 5/23/2011, 76 FR 29652 | |
| PM2.5 (1997)—Determination of Attainment | Chicago area | N/A | 11/27/2009, 74 FR 62243 | |
| PM2.5 (1997)—Determination of Attainment | St. Louis area | N/A | 6/27/2012, 77 FR 38184 | |
| PM2.5 (1997)—maintenance plan and motor vehicle emissions budgets | Chicago area | 10/15/2010, supplemented on 9/16/2011, and 5/6/2013 | 10/2/2013, 78 FR 60704 | |
| PM2.5 (1997)—maintenance plan and motor vehicle emissions budgets | St. Louis area | 12/6/2018 | 5/28/2019, 84 FR 24395 | |
| Sulfur dioxide (2010) nonattainment plans | Lemont and Pekin | 3/2/2016 | 2/1/2018, 83 FR 4591 | |
| Sulfur dioxide (2010) nonattainment plan | Alton Township | 12/31/2018 | 2/21/2023, 88 FR 10464 | |
| Sulfur dioxide (2010) maintenance plan | Alton Township | 10/2/2023 | 12/30/24, 89 FR 106357 | |
| Sulfur dioxide control strategy | Cincinnati, Pekin and Elm Grove Townships in Tazewell County and Logan and Limestone Townships in Peoria County | 3/24/1983 and 5/3/1983 | 8/8/1984, 49 FR 31685 | Correction to codification published on 2/9/1994 at 59 FR 5955. |
| Sulfur dioxide maintenance plan | Peoria and Hollis Townships in Peoria County and Groveland Township in Tazewell County | 11/10/1994 | 60 FR 17001, 4/4/1995 | |
| Sulfur dioxide (2010) maintenance plan | Lemont and Pekin | 5/24/2019 | 5/26/2020, 85 FR 31378 | |
| Emission Inventories | ||||
| Emission inventory—1990 (1-hour ozone) | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 11/12/1993 | 3/14/1995, 60 FR 13631 | |
| Emission inventories—2002 (NOX, primary PM2.5, SO2, ammonia, and VOC) | Chicago area | 10/15/2010, supplemented on 5/6/2013 | 10/2/2013, 78 FR 60704 | |
| Emissions inventory—2002 (1997 8-hour ozone) | St. Louis area | 5/26/2010, supplemented on 9/16/2011 | 6/12/2012, 77 FR 34819 | |
| Emissions inventory—2002 (1997 8-hour ozone) | Chicago area | 6/21/2006, supplemented on 9/16/2011 | 8/13/2012, 77 FR 48062 | |
| Emissions inventories—2008 (NOX, primary PM2.5, SO2, ammonia, and VOC) | St. Louis area | 12/6/2018 | 5/28/2019, 84 FR 24395 | |
| Emission inventory—2011 (2008 8-hour ozone) | St. Louis area | 9/3/2014 | 3/7/2016, 81 FR 11671 | |
| Emission inventory—2011 (2008 8-hour ozone) | Chicago area | 1/10/2019 | 8/19/2020, 85 FR 50955 | |
| Emission inventory—2012 (2008 Lead) | Chicago and Granite City areas | 9/22/2016 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13198 | |
| Emissions inventory—2017 (2015 8-hour ozone) | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 10/9/2024 | 5/14/2026, 91 FR 27207 | |
| Moderate Area & Above Ozone Requirements | ||||
| 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 11/15/1993 | 12/18/1997, 62 FR 66279 | |
| I/M certification (8-hour, 2008 ozone) | Chicago area | 1/10/2019 | 8/19/2020, 85 FR 50955 | |
| Negative declaration—Natural gas/gasoline processing plants | State-wide | 11/14/1985 | 11/24/1986, 51 FR 42221 | |
| Negative declaration—Aerospace manufacturing and rework industry | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 10/11/1996 | 2/11/1997, 62 FR 6127 | |
| Negative declaration—Industrial cleaning solvents category | St. Louis area | 10/2/1998 | 1/6/1999, 64 FR 756 | |
| Negative declaration—Industrial cleaning solvents category | Chicago area | 12/23/1999 | 2/7/2001, 66 FR 9206 | |
| Negative declaration—Industrial wastewater category | Chicago area | 12/23/1999 | 4/27/2001, 66 FR 21096 | |
| Negative declaration—Industrial wastewater category | St. Louis area | 10/2/1998 | 1/6/1999, 64 FR 756 | |
| Negative declaration—Shipbuilding and ship repair industry | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 10/11/1996 | 2/11/1997, 62 FR 6126 | |
| 2008 8-hour Ozone Negative Declarations | Chicago area | 1/10/2019 | 8/13/2021, 86 FR 44616 | Includes: Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities, High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins, Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants, Oil and Natural Gas Industry, Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Industry, and Vegetable Oil Processing. |
| 2008 8-hour Ozone Section 182(b)(2) VOC RACT Rules Certification | Chicago area | 1/10/2019 | 8/13/2021, 86 FR 44616 | |
| 2008 8-hour Ozone Non-CTG RACT Demonstration— | Chicago area | 1/10/2019 | 8/13/2021, 86 FR 44616 | Industrial Wastewater Category. |
| 2008 8-hour Ozone Serious Planning Elements | Chicago Area | 1/25/2022 | 5/20/2022, 87 FR 30828 | 2035 VOC and NO X motor vehicle emissions budgets, VOC RACT certification, Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program certification, clean-fuel vehicle programs certification, enhanced monitoring of ozone and ozone precursors certification. |
| 2015 8-hour Ozone Moderate Planning Elements | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 10/9/2024 | 5/14/2026, 91 FR 27207 | 2023 VOC and NOX Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets, Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program certification. |
| 2008 8-hour Ozone NO X RACT Waiver | Chicago Area | 1/25/2022 | 5/20/2022, 87 FR 30828 | |
| NOX RACT waiver (1997 8-hour ozone) | Chicago and St. Louis areas | 7/29/2010 | 2/22/2011, 76 FR 9655 | |
| NOX waiver—RACT, NSR, vehicle I/M, and general conformity | Chicago severe nonattainment area | 7/13/1994 | 1/26/1996, 61 FR 2428 | does not cover the exemption of NOX transportation conformity requirements. |
| NOX waiver—transportation conformity requirements | Chicago severe nonattainment area | 6/20/1995 | 2/12/1996, 61 FR 5291 | |
| Photochemical assessment ambient monitoring system (PAMS) | 11/4/1993 | 2/25/1994, 59 FR 9091 | ||
| Post-1996 Rate Of Progress Plan | Chicago area | 12/18/1997, 12/17/1999, 1/14/2000, 1/21/2000, and 2/17/2000 |
12/18/2000, 65 FR 78961 | Includes Contingency measure plan and Transportation Control Measures (TCMs). |
| Transportation control measures as part of the 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans | St. Louis area | 11/15/1993 | 12/18/1997, 62 FR 66279 | Work trip reductions; transit improvements; and traffic flow improvements. |
| Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) SIP and, transportation control measures (TCMs) as part of the 15 percent rate-of-progress plan | Chicago area | 7/14/1994 | 9/21/1995, 60 FR 48896 | |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements | ||||
| 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 12/12/2007 and 9/22/2020 | 4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved except (D)(i)(I) [Prongs 1 and 2]. A FIP is in place for these elements. |
| 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 12/12/2007 and 9/22/2020 | 4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved except (D)(i)(I) [Prongs 1 and 2]. A FIP is in place for these elements. |
| 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 8/9/2011, supplemented on 8/25/2011, 6/27/2012, 7/5/2017 and 9/22/2020 |
4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved except (D)(i)(I) [Prongs 1 and 2]. A FIP is in place for these elements. |
| 2008 Lead NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 12/31/2012, 7/5/2017 and 9/22/2020 |
4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved. |
| 2008 Ozone NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 12/31/2012, 7/5/2017 and 9/22/2020 |
4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved except (D)(i)(I) [Prongs 1 and 2]. A FIP is in place for these elements. |
| 2010 NO2 NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 12/31/2012, 7/5/2017 and 9/22/2020 |
4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved. |
| 2010 SO2 NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 12/31/2012, 7/5/2017 and 9/22/2020 |
4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved except (D)(i)(I) [Prongs 1 and 2], which have not yet been submitted. |
| 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 9/29/2017 and 9/22/2020 | 4/8/2022, 87 FR 20715 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved except (D)(i)(II) Prong 4. |
| 2015 Ozone NAAQS Infrastructure Requirements | Statewide | 5/16/2019 and 9/22/2020 | 2/13/2023, 88 FR 9336 | All CAA infrastructure elements under 110(a)(2) have been approved except (D)(i)(I) Prongs 1, 2, which are disapproved, and no action has been taken on (D)(i)(II) Prong 4. |
[82 FR 30638, June 30, 2017]
§ 52.721 Classification of regions.
The Illinois plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Ozone | |
| Burlington-Keokuk Interstate | I | I | III | III | III |
| East Central Illinois Intrastate | III | II | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Chicago Interstate (Indiana-Illinois) | I | I | I | I | I |
| Metropolitan Dubuque Interstate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Quad Cities Interstate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan St. Louis Interstate (Missouri-Illinois) | I | I | III | I | I |
| North Central Illinois Intrastate | II | IA | III | III | III |
| Paducah (Kentucky)-Cairo (Illinois) Interstate | I | II | III | III | III |
| Rockford (Illinois)-Janesville-Beloit (Wisconsin) Interstate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Southeast Illinois Intrastate | III | II | III | III | III |
| West Central Illinois Intrastate | I | IA | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10862, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974; 45 FR 11493, Feb. 21, 1980]
§ 52.722 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approved Illinois' plan for the attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds the plan satisfies all requirements of part D, title I of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977, except as noted below. In addition, continued satisfaction of the requirements of part D for the ozone portion of the SIP depends on the adoption and submittal of RACT requirements by July 1, 1980, for the sources covered by CTGs between January 1978 and January 1979 and adoption and submittal by each subsequent January of additional RACT requirements for sources covered by CTGs issued by the previous January.
(b) The Administrator finds that the transportation control plans for the East St. Louis and Chicago areas submitted on December 3, 1982, satisfy the related requirements of part D, title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977.
(c) The Administrator finds that the carbon monoxide control strategy submitted on May 4, 1983, satisfies all requirements of part D, title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977, except for section 172(b)(6).
[55 FR 40661, Oct. 4, 1990]
§ 52.723 [Reserved]
§ 52.724 Control strategy: Sulfur dioxide.
(a) Part D—Conditional Approval—The Illinois plan is approved provided that the following condition is satisfied:
(1) The plan includes a reanalysis of the Pekin, Illinois area, a submittal of the analysis results to USEPA, the proposal of any additional regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board necessary to insure attainment and maintenance of the sulfur dioxide standard, and the promulgation of any necessary regulations. The State must complete the reanalysis, submit the results to USEPA and submit any necessary, additional regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board by September 30, 1980. Any necessary regulation must be finally promulgated by the State and submitted to USEPA by September 30, 1981.
(2) Extension of Condition—USEPA approves the date of July 1, 1984 for submitting the draft sulfur dioxide rule revisions and supporting documentation as required in (a)(1) for Peoria, Hollis and Groveland Townships in Illinois. The State must complete final rule adoption as expeditiously as possible but no later than December 31, 1985.
(b) Part D—Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rules 204(c)(1)(B), Rule 204(c)(1)(C), Rule 204(e)(1) and Rule 204(e)(2) for those sources for which these rules represent a relaxation of the federally enforceable State Implementation Plan. Rule 204(c)(1)(B), Rule 204(c)(1)(C), Rule 204(e)(1) and Rule 204(e)(2) are approved as not representing relaxations of the State Implementation Plan for the following sources:
| County | Name | Emissions formerly allowable 1 | Emissions now allowable without new permit application 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boone | Chrysler | 1,760 (4.4) | 1,760 (4.4) |
| Champaign | Chanute Air Base | 1,317 (3.0) | 1,317 (3.0) |
| Crawford | CIPS | 8,242 (5.1) | 8,242 (5.1) |
| Douglas | USI Chemicals | 8,022 (5.3) | 8,022 (5.3) |
| Fulton | Freeman Coal | 22.2 (1.2) | 22.2 (1.2) |
| La Salle | Del Monte | 296 (3.9) | 296 (3.9) |
| Massac | EEI Joppa | 36,865 (3.6) | 36,865 (3.6) |
| Montgomery | CIPS | 55,555 (5.8) | 55,555 (5.8) |
| Morgan | ......do | 24,000 (6.0) | 20,800 (5.2) |
| Putnam | Illinois Power | 17,051 (5.8) | 17,051 (5.8) |
| Randolph | ......do 3 | 81,339 (4.6) | 81,339 (4.6) |
| Rock Island | International Harvester | 1,643 (4.35) | 1,643 (4.35) |
| Williamson | Marion Correctional | 396 (5.7) | 396 (5.7) |
| 1 6.0 lbs/MMBTU of existing coal fired capacity or total 204(e)(2) emissions less actual oil fired and NSPS emissions, whichever is lower. | |||
| 2 Maximum allowable emissions for existing coal fired capacity according to revised rules 204(c) and 204(e) consolidated, usually equally equalling total emissions as given by 204(e)(2) less actual oil fired NSPS emissions. (In the one case wherein the new allowable limit is less than that given by 204(e)(2) the allowable emissions were determined by 204(e)(1) with which the source is required to comply.) | |||
| 3 Source is in compliance per 204(e)(3). | |||
| CIPS = Central Illinois Public Service. | |||
| EEI = Electric Energy Incorporated. |
This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(1).
(c) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rule 204(e)(4) as not being adequate to protect the NAAQS. This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).
(d) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rule 204(f)(1)(D) as completely deregulating SO2 emissions from existing processes without providing an assessment of the ambient air quality impact or a showing that increasing the allowable emissions from these sources will not cause or contribute to violations of the NAAQS or PSD increments. This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).
(e) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves Rule 204(h) for those sources for which USEPA has disapproved rules 204(c) and 204(e). This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).
(f) Approval—USEPA approves rule 204(e)(3) for those sources able to show that the proposed emission rate will not cause or contribute to a violation of the NAAQS. The State must submit these emission limitations, along with the technical support to USEPA for approval.
(g) Part D—Approval—The State plan for Alton Township, Madison County, which consists of a federally Enforceable State Operating Permit controlling sulfur dioxide emissions from the boilers and reheat furnaces at Laclede Steel, which was submitted on November 18, 1993, is approved.
(h) Approval—On November 10, 1994, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a sulfur dioxide redesignation request and maintenance plan for Peoria and Hollis Townships in Peoria County and Groveland Township in Tazewell County to redesignate the townships to attainment for sulfur dioxide. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(d) of the Clean Air Act (Act) as amended in 1990.
[45 FR 62806, 62809, Sept. 22, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 5250, Feb. 7, 1985; 59 FR 18753, Apr. 20, 1994; 60 FR 17001, Apr. 4, 1995]
§ 52.725 Control strategy: Particulates.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) Part D—Disapproval. (1) U.S. EPA disapproves the provisions of Rule 203(f) which allow the use of an equivalent method without review and approval of that method. Any source subject to Rule 203(f) which chooses to use an equivalent method must have that equivalent method submitted to U.S. EPA and approved as a SIP revision.
(2) U.S. EPA disapproves the following portions of Rule 203(d)(5) which regulate the control of particulate matter from specific sources within the iron and steel industry: Rule 205(d)(5)(B)(ii), Rule 205(d)(5)(B)(iii), Rule 205(d)(5)(D), and Rule 205(d)(5)(K).
(3) USEPA disapproves a proposed SIP revision submitted by the State on May 12, 1982, in the form of a May 18, 1981 Consent Decree (Civil Action 81-3009) to which USEPA, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and National Steel Corporation are parties and a draft Alternative Control Strategy Permit. This submission was modified by the State, September 30, 1982, with the submission of a separate document embodying the elements of the Alternative Control Strategy. This separate document was intended to become an enforceable part of the SIP.
(c) Approval—On September 28, 1988, the State of Illinois submitted a committal SIP for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 micrometers (PM10) for the Illinois Group II areas of concern in DuPage, Will, Rock Island, Macon, Randolph, and St. Clair Counties. The committal SIP contains all the requirements identified in the July 1, 1987, promulgation of the SIP requirements for PM10 at 52 FR 24681.
(d) Approval—On June 2, 1995, and January 9, 1996, the State of Illinois submitted a maintenance plan for the particulate matter nonattainment portion of LaSalle County, and requested that it be redesignated to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter. The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(e) Approval—On March 19, 1996, and October 15, 1996, Illinois submitted requests to redesignate the Granite City Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment area to attainment status for the PM National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), as well as a maintenance plan for the Granite City area to ensure continued attainment of the NAAQS. The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(f) On November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, and June 14, 1996, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests to meet commitments related to the conditional approval of Illinois' May 15, 1992, SIP submittal for the Lake Calumet (SE Chicago), McCook, and Granite City, Illinois, Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment areas. The EPA is approving the SIP revision request as it applies to the McCook PM nonattainment area. For the McCook PM nonattainment area, all of the deficiencies of the May 15, 1992, submittal have been corrected.
(g) Approval—On May 5, 1992, November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, June 14, 1996, February 3, 1997, October 16, 1997, October 21, 1997, February 1, 1999, and May 19, 1999, Illinois submitted SIP revision requests to meet the Part D particulate matter (PM) nonattainment plan requirements for the Lake Calumet, Granite City and McCook moderate PM nonattainment areas. The submittals include federally enforceable construction permit, application number 93040047, issued on January 11, 1999, to Acme Steel Company. The part D plans for these areas are approved.
(h) Approval—On August 2, 2005, the State of Illinois submitted a request to redesignate the Lyons Township (McCook), Cook County particulate matter nonattainment area to attainment of the NAAQS for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM-10). In its submittal, the State also requested that EPA approve the maintenance plan for the area into the Illinois PM SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(i) Approval—On August 2, 2005, and as supplemented on September 8, 2005, the State of Illinois submitted a request to redesignate the Lake Calumet (Southeast Chicago), Cook County particulate matter nonattainment area to attainment of the NAAQS for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM-10). In its submittal, the State also requested that EPA approve the maintenance plan for the area into the Illinois PM SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(j) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of November 27, 2009, that the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress, contingency measures, and other plan elements related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(k) Determination of attainment. EPA has determined, as of May 23, 2011, that the St. Louis (MO-IL) metropolitan 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress, contingency measures, and other plan elements related to attainment of the standards for as long as the area continues to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. In addition, based upon review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007 to 2009, EPA has determined that the St. Louis (MO-IL) PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010.
(l) Approval—The 1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN nonattainment area (including Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties, Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County, and Oswego Township in Kendall County) has been approved as submitted on October 15, 2010, and supplemented on September 16, 2011, and May 6, 2013. The maintenance plan establishes 2008 and 2025 motor vehicle emissions budgets for this area of 127,951 tons per year for NOX and 5,100 tons per year for primary PM2.5 in 2008 and 44,224 tons per year for NOX and 2,377 tons per year for primary PM2.5 in 2025.
(m) Illinois' 2002 NOX, primary PM2.5, SO2, ammonia, and VOC emission inventories, as submitted on October 15, 2010, and supplemented on May 6, 2013, satisfy the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for the Chicago area.
[45 FR 11493, Feb. 21, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 44185, Sept. 3, 1981; 47 FR 26620, June 21, 1982; 48 FR 45246, Oct. 4, 1983; 49 FR 1905, Jan. 16, 1984; 55 FR 20266, May 16, 1990; 61 FR 41345, Aug. 8, 1996; 63 FR 11846, Mar. 11, 1998; 63 FR 47434, Sept. 8, 1998; 64 FR 37851, July 14, 1999; 70 FR 55545, 55549, Sept. 22, 2005; 74 FR 62249, Nov. 27, 2009; 76 FR 29656, May 23, 2011; 77 FR 38184, June 27, 2012; 78 FR 60706, Oct. 2, 2013]
§ 52.726 Control strategy: Ozone.
(a) Part D—Conditional Approval—The Illinois plan is approved provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) The State conducts a study to demonstrate that the 75 percent overall control efficiency requirement in Rule 205(n) represents RACT, submits the results of the study to USEPA, and submits any necessary regulations representing RACT to the Illinois Pollution Control Board. The State must comply with these conditions by February 28, 1981. Any necessary regulations must be finally promulgated by the State and submitted to USEPA by February 28, 1982.
(3) Extension of Condition—USEPA approves the date of July 31, 1984 for the State of Illinois to satisfy the condition of approval to the ozone State Implementation Plan listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(b) Disapproval—USEPA disapproves the compliance schedule in Rule 205(j) as it applies to loading rack controls for all emission sources subject to Rule 205(b)(1), as approved by USEPA on May 31, 1972 which were required to be in compliance by December 31, 1973. This disapproval does not in and of itself result in the growth restrictions of section 110(a)(2)(I).
(c) Negative Declarations—Stationary Source Categories. The State of Illinois has certified to the satisfaction of USEPA that no sources are located in the nonattainment areas of the State which are covered by the following Control Technique Guidelines:
(1) High density polyethylene and polypropylene manufacturers.
(2) Vegetable oil processing sources with volatile organic compound emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year.
(d) Part D Disapproval—The Administrator finds that Illinois' ozone plan for Cook, Lake, DuPage and Kane Counties, which was required to be submitted by July 1, 1982, does not satisfy all the requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act and, thus, is disapproved. No major new stationary source, of major modification of a stationary source, or volatile organic compounds may be constructed in Cook, Lake, DuPage or Kane Counties, unless the construction permit application is complete on or before November 16, 1988. This disapproval does not affect USEPA's approval (or conditional approval) of individual parts of Illinois' ozone plan, and they remain approved.
(e) Disapproval—The Administrator finds that the following State rules have not been demonstrated to be consistent with the reasonably available control technology requirements of section 172 of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977, and thus, are disapproved: subpart F, section 215.204(c); subpart F, section 215.206(b); subpart F, section 215.204(j)(4); subpart I; subpart AA; subpart PP; subpart QQ; subpart RR; subpart A, section 215.102; subpart T; subpart H, section 215.245; subpart F, section 215.207; and subpart A, section 215.107, all of title 35; Environmental Protection; subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board of the Illinois Administrative Code (June 1989).
(f) On September 30, 1992, the State submitted rules regulating volatile organic compound emissions from gasoline dispensing facilities' motor vehicle fuel operations (Stage II vapor recovery rules) in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Air must as part of the program conduct inspections of facilities subject to this rule to ensure compliance with the applicable rules. These inspections will be conducted on an annual basis or an alternative schedule as approved in the USEPA Fiscal Year Inspection Program Plan.
(g) Approval—The Administrator approves the incorporation of the photochemical assessment ambient monitoring system submitted by Illinois on November 4, 1993, into the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This submittal satisfies 40 CFR 58.20(f) which requires the State to provide for the establishment and maintenance of photochemical assessment monitoring stations (PAMS) by November 12, 1993.
(h) Approval—On November 12, 1993, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted an ozone redesignation request and maintenance plan for Jersey County ozone nonattainment area and requested that Jersey County be redesignated to attainment for ozone. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(d) of the Act. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Illinois ozone State Implementation Plan for Jersey County.
(i) The base year (1990) ozone emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for the following Illinois ozone nonattainment areas: the Chicago nonattainment area—Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, Will and McHenry Counties, Aux Sable and Gooselake Townships in Grundy County, and Oswego Township in Kendall County; the Metro-East St. Louis nonattainment area—Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties; and Jersey County.
(j) Approval—On July 14, 1994, Illinois submitted two of three elements required by section 182(d)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Amendments of 1990 to be incorporated as part of the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) State Implementation Plan intended to offset any growth in emissions from a growth in vehicle miles traveled. These elements are the offsetting of growth in emissions attributable to growth in VMT which was due November 15, 1992, and, transportation control measures (TCMs) required as part of Illinois' 15 percent reasonable further progress (RFP) plan which was due November 15, 1993. Illinois satisfied the first requirement by projecting emissions from mobile sources and demonstrating that no increase in emissions would take place. Illinois satisfied the second requirement by submitting the TCMs listed in Table 1 which are now approved into the Illinois SIP.
| Project type | Location description | Completion status | SIP credit VOC tpd |
|---|---|---|---|
| RS/SIG MOD | Madison Street (Western Ave. to Halsted Street) | Done | 0.015400 |
| SIG COORD | Willow Road (Landwer Road to Shermer) | Awarded | 0.052000 |
| SIG COORD | Rand Road (Baldwin Road to Kennicott) | Awarded | 0.052000 |
| SIG COORD | Northwest Hwy (Potter Road to Cumberland Avenue) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIGS/SIG COORD | 159th Street (US 45 to 76th Ave & at 91st Avenue) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Harlem Ave. (71st St. to 92nd) | Awarded | 0.052000 |
| SIG COORD | Harlem Ave. (99th Street to 135th St.) | Awarded | 0.052000 |
| RECONST/SIGS/LTS | Archer Ave. (88th Ave to 65th St.) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Ogden Ave. (N. Aurora Road to Naper Boulevard) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | North Ave. (Tyler to Kautz) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Higgens Road (Il 72 at Il 31) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Sheridan Road (Il 173 to Wadsworth) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Lagrange Road (Belmont to Lake St.) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Dundee Road (Sanders Road to Skokie Valley Road) | Awarded | 0.052000 |
| SIG COORD | Dundee Road (Buffalo Grove Road to Il 21) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| INT IMP/SIG COORD | Golf Road (E. River Road to Washington Ave.) | Awarded | 0.052000 |
| SIG COORD | Golf Road (Barrington to Roselle Road) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Higgins Road (Barrington to Roselle Road) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Joe Orr Road (Vincennes Ave. to Il 1) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| Project type | Location description | Completion status | SIP credit |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIG COORD/RS | Crawford Ave. (93rd Street to 127th Street) | Awarded | 0.052000 |
| SIG COORD | IL 53 (Briarcliff to South of I-55) | Done | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | Ogden Ave. (Oakwood Avenue to Fairview Avenue) | Awarded | 0.019000 |
| SIG COORD | US 14 (Rohlwing Road to Wilke Road) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | US 30 (At Cottage Grove, Ellis St) | Awarded | 0.030000 |
| SIG COORD | IL 53 (Modonough to Mills) | Done | 0.030000 |
| SIG CONN | Ogden Ave. (IL 43 to 31st Street) | Awarded | 0.013000 |
| SIG CONN | US 12 (Long Grove—Hicks Road) | Awarded | 0.055200 |
| SIG CONN | North Ave. (Oak Park to Ridgeland) | Awarded | 0.007000 |
| SIG CONN | Roosevelt Road (Westchester Bl—IL 43) | Awarded | 0.137000 |
| SIG CONN | Depster St (Keeler to Crawford Ave.) | Awarded | 0.010000 |
| SIG CONN | Arlington Hgts Rd. (Thomas to Central) | Awarded | 0.044000 |
| SIG CONN | Palatine Rd. (Shoenbeck to Wolf Roads) | Awarded | 0.042500 |
| SIG CONN | Western Ave. (US 30—Lakewood) | Awarded | 0.018900 |
| RS/INT IMP | North Ave. (I-290 to IL 43) | Awarded | 0.056100 |
| INT IMP | Plum Grove Rd. (At Higgins Road) | Awarded | 0.010700 |
| INT IMP | St Street (At Illinois) | Awarded | 0.002700 |
| RS/SIG MOD/INT IMP | Illinois/Grand (Kingsbury to Lake Shore Drive) | Done | 0.004200 |
| ADD TURN LANES | York Rd. (Industrial to Grand Ave.) | Done | 0.003800 |
| SERVICE IMP | SW Route Lane Service | Scheduled | 0.005516 |
| SIG INTCONN | Washington Street | Scheduled | 0.030370 |
| SIG INTCONN | IL 59 | Scheduled | 0.068650 |
| ENGR | Citywide—Naperville | 0.086230 | |
| SIG INTCONN | Washington Street | Scheduled | 0.008230 |
| SIG INTCONN | Lewis Ave. (Yorkhousse to ILL 173) | Scheduled | 0.034600 |
| SIG INTCONN | Schaumberg Rd. (Barrington to Martingale) | Scheduled | 0.078080 |
| Vanpool Program (94 vehicles) | Region-Wide Suburban | Done | 0.134000 |
| Transp. Center | North West Cook County | Done | 0.032835 |
| Transp. Center | Sears T.F. | Done | 0.005805 |
| Station | Clark/Lake | Done | 0.010000 |
| Station Recon | 18Th Douglas Line | Done | 0.001500 |
| Station Recon | Linden | Done | 0.001500 |
| Station Recon | Cottage Grove | Done | 0.001300 |
| Com. Pkg | Lisle | Done | 0.010177 |
| Com. Pkg | Jefferson Park | Done | 0.000110 |
| Com. Pkg | Edison Park | Done | 0.003614 |
| Com. Pkg | Palatine | Done | 0.004336 |
| Com. Pkg | Central Street | Done | 0.000519 |
| Com. Pkg | Palatine | Done | 0.004890 |
| Com. Pkg | Crystal Lake | Done | 0.034948 |
| Com. Pkg | 137Th/Riverdale | Done | 0.004565 |
| Com. Pkg | River Forest | Done | 0.000289 |
| Com. Pkg | 115Th/Kensington | Done | 0.002795 |
| Com. Pkg | 119Th St | Done | 0.004483 |
| Com. Pkg | Wilmette | Done | 0.001587 |
| Com. Pkg | 111Th St | Done | 0.000507 |
| Com. Pkg | Edison Park | Done | 0.002371 |
| Com. Pkg | Joliet | Done | 0.003967 |
| Com. Pkg | Hanover Park | Done | 0.021799 |
| Com. Pkg | Bartlett | Done | 0.008911 |
| Com. Pkg | Chicago Ridge | Done | 0.002159 |
| Com. Pkg | 103 Rd St | Done | 0.000675 |
| Com. Pkg | Elmhurst | Done | 0.003857 |
| Com. Pkg | Bartlett | Done | 0.009326 |
| Com. Pkg | Morton Grove | Done | 0.001444 |
| Com. Pkg | Palatine | Done | 0.003598 |
| Com. Pkg | Harvard | Done | 0.006299 |
| Com. Pkg | Willow Springs | Done | 0.001200 |
| Com. Pkg | Edgebrook | Done | 0.002240 |
| Com. Pkg | Bensenville | Done | 0.002010 |
| Com. Pkg | Hanover Park | Done | 0.015020 |
| Com. Pkg | Midlothian | Done | 0.002570 |
| Com. Pkg | Route 59 | Done | 0.025020 |
| Com. Pkg | Lake Forest (West) | Done | 0.013780 |
| Com. Pkg | Lombard | Done | |
| Com. Pkg | Elmhurst | Done | 0.001010 |
| Com. Pkg | Woodstock | Done | 0.019000 |
| Com. Pkg | University Park | Done | 0.019950 |
| Com. Pkg | Grayslake | Done | 0.006210 |
| Com. Pkg | Oak Forest | Done | 0.004260 |
| Com. Pkg | 91 St St. | Done | 0.003380 |
| Com. Pkg | Lockport | Done | 0.007360 |
| Com. Pkg | Ravenswood | Done | 0.000130 |
| Com. Pkg | Hickory Creek | Done | 0.060140 |
| Com. Pkg | Cary | Done | 0.005980 |
| Com. Pkg | Blue Island | Done | 0.019430 |
| Com. Pkg | Lemont | Done | 0.016200 |
| Com. Pkg | Itasca | Done | 0.003860 |
| Com. Pkg | Maywood | Done | 0.000600 |
| Com. Pkg | Ivanhoe | Done | 0.001960 |
| Com. Pkg | Ravinia | Done | 0.003210 |
| Com. Pkg | Fox River Grove | Done | 0.025170 |
| Com. Pkg | Medinah | Done | 0.012250 |
| Com. Pkg | Hanover Park | Done | 0.011840 |
| Com. Pkg | Worth | Done | 0.003530 |
| Com. Pkg | Roselle | Done | 0.007710 |
| Com. Pkg | Crystal Lake | Done | 0.015050 |
| Com. Pkg | Gresham | Done | 0.000300 |
| Com. Pkg | Barrington | Done | 0.002420 |
| Rideshare Prog. | Regionwide | Scheduled | 0.040000 |
| Rapid Transit Service | Midway Airport | Done | 0.220000 |
| Transp. Center | Deerfield Lake-Cook | Done | 0.004160 |
| Station Recon | Davis St. | Done | 0.004000 |
| Station Recon | Addison | Done | 0.004000 |
| Station Recon | King Drive | Done | 0.003000 |
| Station Recon | Washington/Wells | Done | 0.003000 |
| Com. Pkg | Cary | Done | 0.027910 |
| Com. Pkg | Morton Grove | Done | 0.002460 |
| Com. Pkg | 80th Ave. | Scheduled | 0.043200 |
| Com. Pkg | Round Lake | Done | 0.015150 |
| Com. Pkg | Grayslake | Done | 0.009170 |
| Com. Pkg | Ingleside | Scheduled | 0.005430 |
| Com. Pkg | Schamburg | Scheduled | 0.042090 |
| Com. Pkg | Oak Forest | Scheduled | 0.004680 |
| Com. Pkg | Lake Cook | Scheduled | 0.026390 |
| Com. Pkg | Grayslake | Scheduled | 0.035290 |
(k) Approval—EPA is approving the section 182(f) oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT), new source review (NSR), vehicle inspection/maintenance (I/M), and general conformity exemptions for the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County severe ozone nonattainment area as requested by the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin in a July 13, 1994 submittal. This approval does not cover the exemption of NOX transportation conformity requirements of section 176(c) for this area. Approval of these exemptions is contingent on the results of the final ozone attainment demonstration expected to be submitted in mid-1997. The approval will be modified if the final attainment demonstration demonstrates that NOX emission controls are needed in the nonattainment area to attain the ozone standard in the Lake Michigan Ozone Study modeling domain.
(l) Approval—The United States Environmental Protection Agency is approving under section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act the exemption of the Chicago severe, ozone nonattainment area from the build/no-build and less than-1990 interim transportation conformity oxides of nitrogen requirements as requested by the State of Illinois in a June 20, 1995 submittal. In light of the modeling completed thus far and considering the importance of the OTAG process and attainment plan modeling efforts, USEPA grants this NOX waiver on a contingent basis. As the OTAG modeling results and control recommendations are completed in 1996, this information will be incorporated into attainment plans being developed by the LADCO States. When these attainment plans are submitted to USEPA in mid-1997, these new modeling analyses will be reviewed to determine if the NOX waiver should be continued, altered, or removed. USEPA's rulemaking action to reconsider the initial NOX waiver may occur simultaneously with rulemaking action on the attainment plans. The USEPA also reserves the right to require NOX emission controls for transportation sources under section 110(a)(2)(D) of the Act if future ozone modeling demonstrates that such controls are needed to achieve the ozone standard in downwind areas. The Chicago severe ozone nonattainment area includes the Counties of Cook, DuPage, Grundy (Aux Sable and Gooselake Townships), Kane, Kendall (Oswego Township), Lake, McHenry, and Will.
(m) [Reserved]
(n) Negative declaration—Shipbuilding and ship repair industry. On October 11, 1996, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the shipbuilding and ship repair industry are located in the Chicago, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Will Counties and Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County and Oswego Township in Kendall County or the Metro-East, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties.
(o) Negative declaration—Aerospace manufacturing and rework industry. On October 11, 1996, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Industry are located in the Chicago, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, Will Counties and Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County and Oswego Township in Kendall County or the Metro-East, Illinois ozone nonattainment area which is comprised of Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties.
(p) Approval—On November 15, 1993, Illinois submitted 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans for the Chicago ozone nonattainment area as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. These plans satisfy sections 182(b)(1), 172(c)(9), and 182(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.
(q) Approval—On November 15, 1993, Illinois submitted 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans for the Metro-East St. Louis ozone nonattainment area as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. These plans satisfy sections 182(b)(1) and 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.
(r) Approval—On November 15, 1993, Illinois submitted the following transportation control measures as part of the 15 percent rate-of-progress and 3 percent contingency plans for the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area: Work trip reductions; transit improvements; and traffic flow improvements.
(s) On October 10, 1997, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan, in the form of a letter from Bharat Mathur, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. This October 10, 1997, letter requests a change in regulatory status for Riverside Laboratories, Inc.'s Kane County facility, to reflect that the Federal site-specific rule for Riverside (40 CFR 52.741(e)(10)) has been superseded by the State of Illinois regulations, including the emission limits in 35 Illinois Administrative Code 218.204(c) and the associated control requirements, test methods and recordkeeping requirements in Part 218 and the associated definitions in part 211. These State regulations shall become the federally approved regulations applicable to Riverside on August 31, 1998. The site-specific rule, applicable to Riverside, promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency on August 21, 1995 (40 CFR 52.741(e)(10)), remains in effect and is enforceable after August 31, 1998 for the period before August 31, 1998.
(t) The Illinois volatile organic compound (VOC) rules that apply to the Stepan Company Millsdale Plant for volatile organic liquid storage (35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 218, Subpart B), batch processing (35 Ill. Admin. Code Parts 218 and 219, Subpart V) and continuous reactor and distillation processes (35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 218, Subpart Q) were approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on August 8, 1996, April 2, 1996, and June 17, 1997, respectively. Because these rules have been approved into the State Implementation Plan and represent reasonably available control technology for VOC, USEPA revokes the June 29, 1990 Federal Implementation Plan as it applies to Stepan and replaces it with Illinois' volatile organic liquid storage, batch process, and continuous reactor and distillation process rules.
(u) Negative declaration—Industrial wastewater category. On October 2, 1998, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Industrial wastewater category are located in the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area (Metro-East). The Metro-East area is comprised of Madison, Monroe and St. Clair Counties which are located in southwest Illinois, adjacent to St. Louis, Missouri.
(v) Negative declaration—Industrial cleaning solvents category. On October 2, 1998, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Industrial cleaning solvents category are located in the Metro-East ozone nonattainment area (Metro-East). The Metro-East area is comprised of Madison, Monroe and St. Clair Counties which are located in southwest Illinois, adjacent to St. Louis, Missouri.
(w) Approval—On December 18, 1997, December 17, 1999, January 14, 2000, and January 21, 2000, Illinois submitted a post-1996 Rate Of Progress Plan for the Chicago ozone nonattainment area as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This plan reduces ozone precursor emissions by 9 percent from 1990 baseline emissions by November 15, 1999. This plan also supports a mobile source emissions budget of 279.3 tons/day of volatile organic compounds for transportation conformity purposes.
(x) Approval—On December 18, 1997, Illinois submitted a contingency measure plan as part of the Chicago Area post-1996 Rate of Progress Plan. This plan reduces volatile organic compound emissions in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area by 3 percent from 1990 baseline emissions by November 15, 1999.
(y) Approval—On December 18, 1997, Illinois submitted Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) as part of the post-1996 Rate Of Progress Plan for the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The TCMs being approved are listed in the following documents published by the Chicago Area Transportation Study: “Transportation Control Measures Contribution to the Post-1996 Rate-Of-Progress State Implementation Plan,” March 22, 1996; “Transportation Control Measures Contribution to the 9 percent Control Strategy State Implementation Plan,” June 11, 1998; and “1999 Transportation Control Measures Contribution to the 9 percent Rate of Progress Control Strategy State Implementation Plan,” December 9, 1999.
(z) Negative declaration—Industrial cleaning solvents category. On December 23, 1999, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the industrial cleaning solvents category are located in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The Chicago ozone nonattainment area includes Cook County, DuPage County, Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County, Kane County, Oswego Township in Kendall County, Lake County, McHenry County and Will County.
(aa) Negative declaration—Industrial wastewater category. On December 23, 1999, the State of Illinois certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the Industrial Wastewater Category are located in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area. The Chicago ozone nonattainment area includes Cook County, DuPage County, Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships in Grundy County, Kane County, Oswego Township in Kendall County, Lake County, McHenry County and Will County.
(bb) Approval—Revisions to the SIP submitted by Illinois on November 15, 1999; February 10, 2000; April 13, 2001; and April 30, 2001. The revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(c)(2)(A) of the Act for the Metro-East St. Louis area. The revision establishes an attainment date of November 15, 2004, for the St. Louis moderate ozone nonattainment area. This revision establishes MVEBs for 2004 of 26.62 TPD of VOC and 35.52 TPD of NOX to be used in transportation conformity in the Metro-East St. Louis area until revised budgets pursuant to MOBILE6 are submitted and found adequate. In the revision, Illinois commits to revise its VOC and NOX transportation conformity budgets within two years of the release of MOBILE6. No conformity determinations will be made during the second year following the release of MOBILE6 unless and until the MVEBs have been recalculated using MOBILE6 and found adequate by EPA. EPA is granting a waiver for the Metro East St. Louis area to the state of Illinois from the NOX RACT requirements of the Act and disapproving the request for a waiver from the NOX NSR and NOX general conformity requirements. EPA is finding that the Contingency Measures identified by Illinois are adequate to meet the requirements of the Act. EPA finds that the Illinois SIP meets the requirements pertaining to RACM under the Act for the Metro-East St. Louis area.
(cc) Approval—Illinois has adopted and USEPA has approved sufficient NOX emission regulations to assure that it will achieve the level of NOX emissions budgeted for the State by USEPA. USEPA has made two minor budget revisions requested by Illinois, adding a boiler owned by LTV Steel and deleting a boiler owned by the University of Illinois from the inventory of large NOX sources.
(dd) Chicago Ozone Attainment Demonstration Approval—On December 26, 2000, Illinois submitted a one-hour ozone attainment demonstration plan as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This plan includes: A modeled demonstration of attainment and associated attainment year conformity emission budgets; a plan to reduce ozone precursor emissions by 3 percent per year from 2000 to 2007 (a post-1999 rate-of-progress plan), and associated conformity emission budgets; a contingency measures plan for both the ozone attainment demonstration and the post-1999 rate-of-progress plan; a commitment to conduct a Mid-Course Review of the ozone attainment demonstration by the end of 2004; a demonstration that Illinois has implemented all reasonably available control measures; and a commitment to revise motor vehicle emission budgets within two years after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officially releases the MOBILE6 emission factor model.
(ee) Approval of the Maintenance Plan for the Illinois Portion of the St. Louis Area—On December 30, 2002 Illinois submitted Maintenance Plan for the Illinois portion of the St. Louis Nonattainment Area. The plan includes 2014 On-Road Motor Vehicle Emission Budget of 10.13 tons per ozone season weekday of VOCs and 18.72 tons per ozone season weekday NOX to be used in transportation conformity.
(ff) Approval—On April 11, 2003, Illinois submitted a revision to the ozone attainment plan for the Chicago severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area. This plan revised the 2005 and 2007 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEB) recalculated using the emissions factor model MOBILE6. The approved motor vehicle emissions budgets are 151.11 tons per day VOC for 2005 and 127.42 tons per day VOC and 280.4 tons per day NOX for 2007.
(gg) Approval—On January 30, 2007, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) requested that EPA find that the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana (IL-IN) nonattainment area, attained the revoked 1-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). After review of this submission, EPA approves this finding.
(hh) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving 35 Illinois Administrative Code part 217, subpart X, Voluntary NOX Emissions Reduction Program, as a revision to the Illinois SIP.
(ii) Approval. EPA is approving a July 29, 2010, request from the State of Illinois for a waiver from the Clean Air Act requirement for Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) in the Illinois portions of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana (Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties, and portions of Grundy (Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships) and Kendall (Oswego Township) Counties in Illinois) and St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois (Jersey, Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties in Illinois) 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas.
(jj) Determination of attainment. On June 5, 2009, the state of Indiana requested that EPA find that the Indiana portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana (IL-IN) ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). After review of Indiana's submission and 2006-2008 ozone air quality data for this ozone nonattainment area, EPA finds that the entire Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Therefore, EPA has determined, as of March 12, 2010, that Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties, and portions of Grundy County (Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships) and Kendall County (Oswego Township) in Illinois have attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
(kk) Determination of attainment. EPA has determined, as of June 9, 2011, that the St. Louis (MO-IL) metropolitan 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.918, suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress, contingency measures, and other plan elements related to attainment of the standards for as long as the area continues to meet the 1997 Ozone NAAQS. In addition, based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007 to 2009, the St. Louis (MO-IL) ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010.
(ll) Approval—On May 26, 2010, and September 16, 2011, Illinois submitted a request to redesignate the Illinois portion of the St. Louis, MO-IL area to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. The St. Louis area includes Jersey, Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties in Illinois and St. Louis City and Franklin, Jefferson, St. Charles and St. Louis Counties in Missouri. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a plan for maintaining the 1997 8-hour ozone standard through 2025 in the area as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Part of the section 175A maintenance plan includes a contingency plan. The ozone maintenance plan establishes 2008 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Illinois portion of the St. Louis area of 17.27 tpd for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 52.57 tpd for nitrogen oxides (NOX). In addition the maintenance plan establishes 2025 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Illinois portion of the St. Louis area of 5.68 tpd for VOC and 15.22 tpd for NOX.
(mm) Emissions inventories for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard—
(1) Approval—Illinois' 2002 emissions inventory satisfies the emissions inventory requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act for the Illinois portion of the St. Louis, MO-IL area under the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
(2) Approval—Illinois' 2002 volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides emission inventories satisfy the emissions inventory requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act for the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana area under the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
(nn) Approval—On July 23, 2009, and September 16, 2011, Illinois submitted a request to redesignate the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana area to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. The Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana area includes Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties and portions of Grundy (Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships) and Kendall (Oswego Township) Counties. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a plan for maintaining the 1997 8-hour ozone standard through 2025 in the area as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Part of the section 175A maintenance plan includes a contingency plan. The ozone maintenance plan establishes 2008 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana area of 117.23 tons per day (tpd) for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 373.52 tpd for nitrogen oxides (NOX). In addition, the maintenance plan establishes 2025 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana area of 48.13 tpd for VOC and 125.27 tpd for NOX.
(oo) Approval—On March 28, 2014, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan for the Illinois portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana area (the Greater Chicago Area). The submittal established new Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEB) for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) for the year 2025. The MVEBs for the Illinois portion of the Greater Chicago Area are: 60.13 tons/day of VOC emissions and 150.27 tons/day of NOX emissions for the year 2025.
(pp) On September 3, 2014, Illinois submitted 2011 volatile organic compounds and oxides of nitrogen emission inventories for the Illinois portions of the Chicago-Naperville, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin and St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standard as a revision of the Illinois state implementation plan. The emission inventories are approved as a revision of the state's implementation plan.
(qq) Determination of attainment. As required by section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act, EPA has determined that the St. Louis, MO-IL marginal 2008 ozone nonattainment area has attained the NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2016.
[45 FR 55197, Aug. 19, 1980]
§ 52.727 [Reserved]
§ 52.728 Control strategy: Nitrogen dioxide. [Reserved]
§ 52.729 [Reserved]
§ 52.730 Compliance schedules.
(a) The requirements of § 51.262(a) of this chapter are not met since compliance schedules with adequate increments of progress have not been submitted for every source for which they are required.
(b) Federal compliance schedules. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the owner or operator of any stationary source subject to the following emission limiting regulations in the Illinois implementation plan shall comply with the applicable compliance schedule in paragraph (b)(2) of this section: Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(d)(4), 203(d)(6)(B)(ii)(bb), 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), 203(g)(4), 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e).
(2) Compliance schedules. (i) The owner or operator of any stationary source subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule 203(d)(4) shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.
(a) September 30, 1973—Advertise for bids for purchase and construction or installation of equipment, or for materials requisite for process modification sufficient to control particulate emissions from the source.
(b) November 15, 1973—Award contracts for emission control systems or process modification, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification.
(c) May 31, 1974—Initiate onsite construction or installation of emission control system or process modification.
(d) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite construction or installation of emission system or process modification.
(e) May 31, 1975—Complete shakedown operation and performance test on source, submit performance test results to the Administrator; achieve full compliance with State agency regulation.
(ii) The owner or operator of any stationary source subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule 203(d)(6)(B)(ii)(bb) shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.
(a) September 30, 1973—Advertise for bids for purchase and construction or for modification of equipment sufficient to control particulate emissions from the source.
(b) November 15, 1973—Award contracts for emissions control systems or process modification, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification.
(c) March 31, 1974—Initiate onsite construction or installation of emission control system.
(d) October 31, 1974—Complete onsite construction or installation of emission control system.
(e) December 31, 1974—Achieve final compliance with Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(d)(6)(B)(ii)(bb).
(iii) (a) The owner or operator of any boiler or furnace of more than 250 million BTU per hour heat input subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulation Rule 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e) shall notify the Administrator, no later than October 1, 1973, of his intent to utilize either low-sulfur fuel or stack gas desulfurization to the requirements of said regulation.
(b) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(a) of this section who elects to utilize low sulfur fuel shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.
(1) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a projection of the amount of fuel, by types, that will be substantially adequate to enable compliance with Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e) on May 31, 1975, and for at least one year thereafter.
(2) December 31, 1973—Sign contracts with fuel suppliers for fuel requirements as projected above.
(3) January 31, 1974—Submit a statement as to whether boiler modifications will be required. If modifications will be required, submit plans for such modifications.
(4) March 15, 1974—Let contracts for necessary boiler modifications, if applicable.
(5) June 15, 1974—Initiate onsite modifications, if applicable.
(6) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite modifications, if applicable.
(7) May 31, 1975—Final compliance with the emission limitation of Rules 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e).
(c) Any owner or operator of a fuel combustion source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(a) of this section who elects to utilize stack gas desulfurization shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.
(1) November 1, 1973—Let necessary contracts for construction.
(2) March 31, 1974—Initiate onsite construction.
(3) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite construction.
(4) May 31, 1975—Complete shakedown operations and performance test on source, submit performance test results to the Administrator; achieve full compliance with Rule 204(c)(1)(A), 204(c)(2), 204(d), and 204(e).
(iv) (a) The owner or operator of any stationary source subject to Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4) shall notify the Administrator, no later than October 1, 1973, of his intent to utilize either low ash fuel or a stack gas cleaning system to meet the requirements of said regulation.
(b) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(a) of this section who elects to utilize low ash fuel shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.
(1) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a projection of the amount of fuel, by types, that will be substantially adequate to enable compliance with Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4) on May 31, 1975, and for at least one year thereafter.
(2) December 31, 1973—Sign contracts with fuel suppliers for fuel requirements as projected above.
(3) January 31, 1974—Submit a statement as to whether boiler modifications will be required. If modifications will be required, submit plans for such modifications.
(4) March 15, 1974—Let contracts for necessary boiler modifications, if applicable.
(5) June 15, 1974—Initiate onsite modifications, if applicable.
(6) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite modifications, if applicable.
(7) May 31, 1975—Final compliance with the emission limitation of Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4).
(c) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(a) of this section who elects to utilize a stack gas cleaning system shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the date specified.
(1) January 15, 1974—Let necessary contracts for construction.
(2) April 1, 1974—Initiate onsite construction.
(3) April 1, 1975—Complete onsite construction.
(4) May 31, 1975—Complete shakedown operations and performance tests on source, submit performance test results to the Administrator; achieve full compliance with Rule 203(g)(1)(B), 203(g)(2), 203(g)(3), and 203(g)(4).
(v) Ten days prior to the conduct of any performance test required by this paragraph, the owner or operator of the affected source shall give notice of such test to the Administrator to afford him the opportunity to have an observer present.
(vi) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule above shall certify to the Administrator, within five days after the deadline for each increment of progress in that schedule, whether or not the increment has been met.
(3)(i) None of the above paragraphs shall apply to a source which is presently in compliance with applicable regulations and which has certified such compliance to the Administrator by October 1, 1973. The Administrator may request whatever supporting information he considers necessary for proper certification.
(ii) Any compliance schedule adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(iii) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule in this paragraph may submit to the Administrator no later than October 1, 1973, a proposed alternative compliance schedule. No such compliance schedule may provide for final compliance after the final compliance date in the applicable compliance schedule of this paragraph. If promulgated by the Administrator, such schedule shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(4) Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude the Administrator from promulgating a separate schedule for any source to which the application of the compliance schedules in paragraph (b)(2) of this section fail to satisfy the requirements of §§ 51.261 and 51.262(a) of this chapter.
(c) [Reserved]
(d) The compliance schedules for the sources identified below are disapproved as not meeting the requirements of subpart N of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State, unless otherwise noted.
| Source | Location | Regulation involved | Date schedule adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| christian county | |||
| Allied Mills, Inc | Taylorville | 204(c) | Feb. 28, 1973. |
| cook county | |||
| Harco Aluminum Inc | Chicago | 204(c) | Dec. 9, 1973. |
| J. L. Clark Manufacturing Co | Downers Grove | 205(f) | May 4, 1973. |
| Johnson & Johnson | Bedford Park | 205(f) | Jun. 20, 1973. |
| Lloyd J. Harris Pie, Co. Inc | Chicago | 204(c) | Feb. 27, 1973. |
| Union Oil Co. of California (a) No. 10 boiler |
......do | 204(c) | Jun. 19, 1973, Dec. 13, 1973. |
| (b) 11BIA crude heater | |||
| W. H. Hutchingson & Son, Inc | ......do | 205(f) | Aug. 12, 1973. |
| Western Rust Proof Co | ......do | 204(c) | Oct. 10, 1973. |
| Wheeler Uniform Service Inc | ......do | 204(c) | May 22, 1973. |
| Wm. Yuenger Manufacturing Co | ......do | 204(c) | Aug. 16, 1973. |
| World's Finest Chocolate Inc | ......do | 204(c) | May 30, 1973. |
| jackson county | |||
| Tuck Industries, Inc | Carbondale | 204(c) | Jun. 20, 1973. |
| kane county | |||
| All Steel Equipment Corp | Montgomery | 204(f) | July 24, 1973. |
| Consolidated Food Inc | Aurora | 205(f) | May 9, 1973. |
| lake county | |||
| Morton Manufacturing Co | Libertyville | 205(f) | Aug. 27, 1973. |
| la salle county | |||
| Allied Mills Inc | Mendota | 204(c) | May 28, 1973. |
| madison county | |||
| Clark Oil & Refining Corp | Hartford | 204(f) | Feb. 22, 1973. |
| Granite City Steel Co | Granite City | 203(d)(6) | Apr. 25, 1972. |
| (a) Coke oven pushing operations | as amended. | ||
| (b) Charging operations | May 21, 1973. | ||
| Illinois Power Company (Wood River Boiler No. 5) | E. Alton | 204(c) | May 1, 1973. |
| Owens-Illinois Inc | Madison | 204(c) | May 2, 1973. |
| Owen-Illinois Inc. (No. 2 Powerhouse) | Alton | 204(c) | Mar. 30, 1973. |
| Shell Oil Co. (Cat. Cracker Units Nos. 1, 2) | Roxana | 203(b) | Nov. 27, 1972. |
| randolf county | |||
| Chester Dairy Co | Chester | 204(c) | Aug. 6, 1973. |
| st. clair county | |||
| Lock Stove Co | East St. Louis | 205(b) | June 11, 1973. |
| tazewell county | |||
| Quaker Oats Co | Pekin | 204(c) | May 24, 1973. |
| vermillion county | |||
| Lauhoff Grain Co | Danville | 204(c) | Mar. 31, 1973. |
[38 FR 16145, June 20, 1973, as amended at 38 FR 22742, Aug. 23, 1973; 38 FR 24342, Sept. 7, 1973; 39 FR 28155, Aug. 5, 1974; 51 FR 40675, 40676, 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 54 FR 25258, June 14, 1989]
§ 52.731 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Illinois and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Illinois' State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Illinois' SIP revision described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Illinois and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program in subpart BBBBB of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2015 and 2016.
(2) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Illinois and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 through 2020.
(3) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Illinois and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program in subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2021 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Illinois' State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(iii), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(3) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Illinois' SIP revision described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances under subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, after 2020 the provisions of § 97.826(c) of this chapter (concerning the transfer of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances between certain accounts under common control), the provisions of § 97.826(d) of this chapter (concerning the conversion of amounts of unused CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances allocated for control periods before 2021 to different amounts of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances), and the provisions of § 97.811(d) of this chapter (concerning the recall of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances equivalent in quantity and usability to all such allowances allocated to units in the State for control periods after 2020) shall continue to apply.
(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (b)(3) of this section is stayed with regard to emissions occurring in 2024 and thereafter, provided that while such stay remains in effect, the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall apply with regard to such emissions.
(c)(1) The owner and operator of each source located in the State of Illinois and for which requirements are set forth in § 52.40 and § 52.41, § 52.42, § 52.43, § 52.44, § 52.45, or § 52.46 must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2026 and each subsequent year.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (c)(1) of this section is stayed.
[77 FR 75384, Dec. 20, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 74586 and 74594, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 65924, Dec. 21, 2018; 86 FR 23174, Apr. 30, 2021; 88 FR 36890, June 5, 2023; 89 FR 87969, Nov. 6, 2024]
§ 52.732 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Illinois and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 1 Trading Program in subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Illinois' State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Illinois' SIP revision described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances under subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48364, Aug. 8, 2011. Redesignated at 77 FR 10334, Feb. 21, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 74586, Oct. 26, 2016]
§§ 52.733-52.735 [Reserved]
§ 52.736 Review of new sources and modifications.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) The rules submitted by the State on March 24, 1988, to satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act are approved. These rules are part 203: Major Stationary Sources Construction and Modification as effective March 22, 1991. The moratorium on construction and modification of new sources in nonattainment areas as provided in section 110(a)(2)(I) of the Clean Air Act is revoked.
[57 FR 59935, Dec. 17, 1992]
§ 52.737 Operating permits.
Emission limitation and other provisions contained in operating permits issued by the State in accordance with the provisions of the federally approved permit program shall be the applicable requirements of the federally approved Illinois SIP for the purpose of section 113 of the Clean Air Act and shall be enforceable by USEPA and by any person in the same manner as other requirements of the SIP. USEPA reserves the right to deem an operating permit not federally enforceable. Such a determination will be made according to appropriate procedures, and be based upon the permit, permit approval procedures or permit requirements which do not conform with the operating permit program requirements or the requirements of USEPA's underlying regulations.
[57 FR 59936, Dec. 17, 1992]
§ 52.738 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are met, except for sources seeking permits to locate in Indian reservations within the State of Illinois, and any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction.
(b) The provisions of § 52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable State plan for the State of Illinois for sources seeking permits to locate in Indian reservations or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction.
(c) All applications and other information required pursuant to § 52.21 from sources located in the State of Illinois shall be submitted to the state agency, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 1021 North Grand Avenue East, Springfield, Illinois 62794.
[45 FR 52741, Aug. 7, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 9584, Jan. 29, 1981; 68 FR 11323, Mar. 10, 2003; 68 FR 74489, Dec. 24, 2003; 75 FR 55275, Sept. 10, 2010; 86 FR 50470, Sept. 9, 2021]
§ 52.739 Permit fees.
(a) The requirements of section 110(a)(2)(K) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 are not met since the state has not submitted to EPA, as a part of its State Implementation Plan, provisions for a permit fee system.
[46 FR 23237, Apr. 24, 1981]
§ 52.740 Interstate pollution.
(a) The requirements of section 126(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 are not met since the state has not submitted to EPA, as a part of its State Implementation Plan, the procedures on which the state is relying to notify nearby states of any proposed major stationary source which may significantly contribute to levels of air pollution in excess of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards in that state.
[46 FR 23237, Apr. 24, 1981]
§ 52.741 Control strategy: Ozone control measures for Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties.
(a) General Provisions—(1) Abbreviations and conversion factors. (i) The following abbreviations are used in § 52.741:
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
bbl barrels (42 gallons)
°C degrees Celsius or centigrade
cm centimeters
cu in. cubic inches
°F degrees Fahrenheit
FIP Federal implementation plan
ft feet
ft 2 square feet
g grams
gpm gallons per minute
g/mole grams per mole
gal gallons
hr hours
in inches
K degrees Kelvin
kcal kilocalories
kg kilograms
kg/hr kilograms per hour
kPa kilopascals; one thousand newtons per square meter
l liters
l/sec liters per second
lbs pounds
lbs/hr pounds per hour
lbs/gal pounds per gallon
LEL lower explosive limit
m meters
m 2 square meters
m 3 cubmic meters
mg milligrams
Mg Megagrams, metric tons or tonnes
ml milliliters
min minutes
MJ megajoules
mm Hg millimeters of mercury
ppm parts per million
ppmv parts per million by volume
psi pounds per square inch
psia pounds per square inch absolute
psig pounds per square inch gauge
scf standard cubic feet
scm standard cubic meters
sec seconds
SIP State implementation plan
sq cm square centimeters
sq in square inches
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOC volatile organic compounds
VOL volatile organic liquids
VOM volatile organic materials
(ii) The following conversion factors are used in § 52.741.
| English | Metric |
|---|---|
| 1 gal | 3.785 l. |
| 1,000 gal | 3,785 l or 3.785 m3. |
| 1 psia | 6.897 kPa (51.71 mm Hg). |
| 2.205 lbs | 1 kg. |
| 1 bbl | 159.0 l. |
| 1 cu in | 16.39 ml. |
| 1 lb/gal | 119,800 mg/l. |
| 1 ton | 0.907 Mg. |
(2) Applicability. (i) Any source that received a stay, as indicated in § 218.103(a)(2), remains subject to the stay if still in effect, or (if the stay is no longer in effect) the federally-promulgated or federally-approved rule applicable to such source.
(ii)(A) Effective November 20, 1996 Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, and Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area replace the requirements of 40 CFR 52.741 Control strategy: Ozone control measures for Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will County as the federally enforceable control measures in these counties for the major non-Control Technique Guideline (CTG) sources in the Chicago area, previously subject to paragraph u, v, w, or x because of the applicability criteria in these paragraphs.
(B) In accordance with § 218.101(b), for the major non-CTG sources subject to paragraphs u, v, w, or x because of the applicability criteria of those paragraphs, the requirements of paragraphs u, v, w, and x, and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph y and any related parts of § 52.741 necessary to implement these paragraphs (including, but not limited to, those paragraphs containing test methods and definitions), shall remain in effect and are enforceable after November 20, 1996 for the period from July 30, 1990 until November 20, 1996.
(iii)(A) Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) (i) and (ii) of this section, effective October 11, 1994, Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, and Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area replace the requirements of this § 52.741 Control strategy: Ozone control measures for Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will County as the federally enforceable control measures in these counties.
(B) In accordance with § 218.101(b), the requirements of § 52.741 shall remain in effect and are enforceable after October 11, 1994, for the period from July 30, 1990, to October 11, 1994.
(3) Definitions. The following terms are defined for the purpose of § 52.741.
Accelacota means a pharmaceutical coating operation which consists of a horizontally rotating perforated drum in which tablets are placed, a coating is applied by spraying, and the coating is dried by the flow of air across the drum through the perforations.
Accumulator means the reservoir of a condensing unit receiving the condensate from a surface condenser.
Actual emissions means the actual quantity of VOM emissions from an emission source during a particular time period.
Adhesive means any substance or mixture of substances intended to serve as a joining compound.
Administrator means the Administrator of the USEPA or that person's designee.
Afterburner means a control device in which materials in gaseous effluent are combusted.
Air contaminant means any solid, liquid, or gaseous matter, any odor, or any form of energy, that is capable of being released into the atmosphere from an emission source.
Air dried coatings means any coatings that dry by use of air or forced air at temperatures up to 363.15 K (194 °F).
Air pollution means the presence in the atmosphere of one or more air contaminants in sufficient quantities and of such characteristics and duration as to be injurious to human, plant, or animal life, to health, or to property, or to unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of life or property.
Air pollution control equipment means any equipment or facility of a type intended to eliminate, prevent, reduce or control the emission of specified air contaminants to the atmosphere.
Air suspension coater/dryer means a pharmaceutical coating operation which consists of vertical chambers in which tablets or particles are placed, and a coating is applied and then dried while the tablets or particles are kept in a fluidized state by the passage of air upward through the chambers.
Air-assisted airless spray means a spray coating method which combines compressed air with hydraulic pressure to atomize the coating material into finer droplets than is achieved with pure airless spray. Lower hydraulic pressure is used than with airless spray.
Airless spray means a spray coating method in which the coating is atomized by forcing it through a small opening at high pressure. The coating liquid is not mixed with air before exiting from the nozzle.
Allowable emissions means the quantity of VOM emissions during a particular time period from a stationary source calculated using the maximum rated capacity of the source (unless restricted by federally enforceable limitations on operating rate, hours of operation, or both) and the most stringent of:
(A) The applicable standards in 40 CFR parts 60 and 61:
(B) The applicable implementation plan; or
(C) A federally enforceable permit.
Ambient air quality standards means those standards designed to protect the public health and welfare codified in 40 CFR part 50 and promulgated from time to time by the USEPA pursuant to authority contained in Section 108 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., as amended from time to time.
Applicator means a device used in a coating line to apply coating.
As applied means the exact formulation of a coating during application on or impregnation into a substrate.
Asphalt means the dark-brown to black cementitious material (solid, semisolid, or liquid in consistency) of which the main constituents are bitumens which occur naturally or as a residue of petroleum refining.
Automobile means a motor vehicle capable of carrying no more than 12 passengers.
Automobile or light-duty truck assembly plant means a facility where parts are assembled or finished for eventual inclusion into a finished automobile or light-duty truck ready for sale to vehicle dealers, but not including customizers, body shops, and other repainters.
Automobile or light-duty truck refinishing means the repainting of used automobiles and light-duty trucks.
Baked coatings means any coating which is cured or dried in an oven where the oven air temperature exceeds 90 °C (194 °F).
Binders means organic materials and resins which do not contain VOM's.
Bituminous coatings means black or brownish coating materials which are soluble in carbon disulfide, which consist mainly of hydrocarbons, and which are obtained from natural deposits or as residues from the distillation of crude oils or of low grades of coal.
Brush or wipe coating means a manual method of applying a coating using a brush, cloth, or similar object.
Bulk gasoline plant means a gasoline storage and distribution facility with an average throughput of 76,000 l (20,000 gal) or less on a 30-day rolling average that distributes gasoline to gasoline dispensing facilities.
Can means any metal container, with or without a top, cover, spout or handles, into which solid or liquid materials are packaged.
Can coating means any coating applied on a single walled container that is manufactured from metal sheets thinner than 29 gauge (0.0141 in.).
Can coating facility means a facility that includes one or more can coating line(s).
Can coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of cans or can components.
Capture means the containment or recovery of emissions from a process for direction into a duct which may be exhausted through a stack or sent to a control device. The overall abatement of emissions from a process with an add-on control device is a function both of the capture efficiency and of the control device.
Capture device means a hood, enclosed room floor sweep or other means of collecting solvent or other pollutants into a duct. The pollutant can then be directed to a pollution control device such as an afterburner or carbon adsorber. Sometimes the term is used loosely to include the control device.
Capture efficiency means the fraction of all VOM generated by a process that are directed to an abatement or recovery device.
Capture system means all equipment (including, but not limited to, hoods, ducts, fans, ovens, dryers, etc.) used to contain, collect and transport an air pollutant to a control device.
Clean Air Act means the Clean Air Act of 1963, as amended, including the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
Clear coating means coatings that lack color and opacity or are transparent using the undercoat as a reflectant base or undertone color.
Clear topcoat means the final coating which contains binders, but not opaque pigments, and is specifically formulated to form a transparent or translucent solid protective film.
Closed vent system means a system that is not open to the atmosphere and is composed of piping, connections, and, if necessary, flow inducing devices that transport gas or vapor from an emission source to a control device.
Coating means a material applied onto or impregnated into a substrate for protective, decorative, or functional purposes. Such materials include, but are not limited to, paints, varnishes, sealers, adhesives, thinners, diluents, and inks.
Coating applicator means equipment used to apply a coating.
Coating line means an operation consisting of a series of one or more coating applicators and any associated flash-off areas, drying areas, and ovens wherein a surface coating is applied, dried, or cured. (It is not necessary for an operation to have an oven, or flash-off area, or drying area to be included in this definition.)
Coating plant means any plant that contains one or more coating line(s).
Coil means any flat metal sheet or strip that is rolled or wound in concentric rings.
Coil coating means any coating applied on any flat metal sheet or strip that comes in rolls or coils.
Coil coating facility means a facility that includes one or more coil coating line(s).
Coil coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative or functional coating is applied onto the surface of flat metal sheets, strips, rolls, or coils for industrial or commercial use.
Cold cleaning means the process of cleaning and removing soils from surfaces by spraying, brushing, flushing, or immersion while maintaining the organic solvent below its boiling point. Wipe cleaning is not included in this definition.
Component means, with respect to synthetic organic chemical and polymer manufacturing equipment, and petroleum refining and related industries, any piece of equipment which has the potential to leak VOM including, but not limited to, pump seals, compressor seals, seal oil degassing vents, pipeline valves, pressure relief devices, process drains, and open ended pipes. This definition excludes valves which are not externally regulated, flanges, and equipment in heavy liquid service. For purposes of paragraph (i) of this section, this definition also excludes bleed ports of gear pumps in polymer service.
Concrete curing compounds means any coating applied to freshly poured concrete to retard the evaporation of water.
Condensate means volatile organic liquid separated from its associated gases, which condenses due to changes in the temperature or pressure and remains liquid at standard conditions.
Continuous process means, with respect to polystyrene resin, a method of manufacture in which the styrene raw material is delivered on a continuous basis to the reactor in which the styrene is polymerized to polystyrene.
Control device means equipment (such as an afterburner or adsorber) used to remove or prevent the emission of air pollutants from a contaminated exhaust stream.
Control device efficiency means the ratio of pollution prevented by a control device and the pollution introduced to the control device, expressed as a percentage.
Conveyorized degreasing means the continuous process of cleaning and removing soils from surfaces utilizing either cold or vaporized solvents.
Crude oil means a naturally occurring mixture which consists of hydrocarbons and sulfur, nitrogen, or oxygen derivatives of hydrocarbons and which is a liquid at standard conditions.
Crude oil gathering means the transportation of crude oil or condensate after custody transfer between a production facility and a reception point.
Custody transfer means the transfer of produced petroleum and/or condensate after processing and/or treating in the producing operations, from storage tanks or automatic transfer facilities to pipelines or any other forms of transportation.
Daily-weighted average VOM content means the average VOM content of two or more coatings as applied on a coating line during any day, taking into account the fraction of total coating volume that each coating represents, as calculated with the following equation:
Where:
VOMw = The average VOM content of two or more coatings as applied each day on a coating line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),
n = The number of different coatings as applied each day on a coating line,
Vi = The volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on a coating line in units of l (gal).
Ci = The VOM content of each coating as applied each day on a coating line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), and
VT = The total volume of all coatings (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on a coating line in units of l (gal).
Day means the consecutive 24 hours beginning at 12 a.m. (midnight) local time.
Degreaser means any equipment or system used in solvent cleaning.
Delivery vessel means any tank truck or trailer equipped with a storage tank that is used for the transport of gasoline to a stationary storage tank at a gasoline dispensing facility, bulk gasoline plant, or bulk gasoline terminal.
Dip coating means a method of applying coatings in which the part is submerged in a tank filled with the coating.
Drum means any cylindrical metal shipping container of 13- to 110-gallon capacity.
Electrostatic bell or disc spray means an electrostatic spray coating method in which a rapidly-spinning bell- or disc-shaped applicator is used to create a fine mist and apply the coating with high transfer efficiency.
Electrostatic spray means a spray coating method in which opposite electrical charges are applied to the substrate and the coating. The coating is attracted to the object due to the electrostatic potential between them.
Emission source and source mean any facility from which VOM is emitted or capable of being emitted into the atmosphere.
Enamel means a coating that cures by chemical cross-linking of its base resin. Enamels can be distinguished from lacquers because enamels are not readily resoluble in their original solvent.
Enclose means to cover any VOL surface that is exposed to the atmosphere.
End sealing compound coat means a compound applied to can ends which functions as a gasket when the end is assembled onto the can.
Excessive release means a discharge of more than 295 g (0.65 lbs) of mercaptans and/or hydrogen sulfide into the atmosphere in any 5-minute period.
Exterior base coat means a coating applied to the exterior of a can body, or flat sheet to provide protection to the metal or to provide background for any lithographic or printing operation.
Exterior end coat means a coating applied to the exterior end of a can to provide protection to the metal.
External-floating roof means a cover over an open top storage tank consisting of a double deck or pontoon single deck which rests upon and is supported by the volatile organic liquid being contained and is equipped with a closure seal or seals to close the space between the roof edge and tank shell.
Extreme environmental conditions means exposure to any or all of the following: ambient weather conditions; temperatures consistently above 95 °C (203 °F); detergents; abrasive and scouring agents; solvents; or corrosive atmospheres.
Extreme performance coating means any coating which during intended use is exposed to extreme environmental conditions.
Fabric coating means any coating applied on textile fabric. Fabric coating includes the application of coatings by impregnation.
Fabric coating facility means a facility that includes one or more fabric coating lines.
Fabric coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating or reinforcing material is applied on or impregnated into a textile fabric.
Federally enforceable means all limitations and conditions which are enforceable by the Administrator including those requirements developed pursuant to 40 CFR parts 60 and 61; requirements within any applicable implementation plan; and any permit requirements established pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 or under regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR part 51 subpart I and 40 CFR 51.166.
Final repair coat means the repainting of any topcoat which is damaged during vehicle assembly.
Firebox means the chamber or compartment of a boiler or furnace in which materials are burned, but not the combustion chamber or afterburner of an incinerator.
Fixed-roof tank means a cylindrical shell with a permanently affixed roof.
Flexographic printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of elastomeric materials.
Flexographic printing line means a printing line in which each roll printer uses a roll with raised areas for applying an image such as words, designs, or pictures to a substrate. The image carrier on the roll is made of rubber or other elastome
Floating roof means a roof on a stationary tank, reservoir, or other container which moves vertically upon change in volume of the stored material.
Fountain solution means the solution which is applied to the image plate to maintain hydrophilic properties of the non-image areas.
Fuel combustion emission source means any furnace, boiler, or similar equipment used for the primary purpose of producing heat or power by indirect heat transfer.
Fuel gas system means a system for collection of refinery fuel gas including, but not limited to, piping for collecting tail gas from various process units, mixing drums and controls, and distribution piping.
Gas/gas method means either of two methods for determining capture which rely only on gas phase measurements. The first method requires construction of a temporary total enclosure (TTE) to ensure that all would-be fugitive emissions are measured. The second method uses the building or room which houses the facility as an enclosure. The second method requires that all other VOM sources within the room be shut down while the test is performed, but all fans and blowers within the room must be operated according to normal procedures.
Gas service means that the component contains process fluid that is in the gaseous state at operating conditions.
Gasoline means any petroleum distillate or petroleum distillate/alcohol blend having a Reid vapor pressure of 27.6 kPa or greater which is used as a fuel for internal combustion engines.
Gasoline dispensing facility means any site where gasoline is transferred from a stationary storage tank to a motor vehicle gasoline tank used to provide fuel to the engine of that motor vehicle.
Gross vehicle weight means the manufacturer's gross weight rating for the individual vehicle.
Gross vehicle weight rating means the value specified by the manufacturer as the maximum design loaded weight of a single vehicle.
Heated airless spray means an airless spray coating method in which the coating is heated just prior to application.
Heatset means a class of web-offset lithography which requires a heated dryer to solidify the printing inks.
Heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line means a lithographic printing line in which a blanket cylinder is used to transfer ink from a plate cylinder to a substrate continuously fed from a roll or an extension process and an oven is used to solidify the printing inks.
Heavy liquid means liquid with a true vapor pressure of less than 0.3 kPa (0.04 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F) established in a standard reference text or as determined by ASTM method D2879-86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742); or which has 0.1 Reid Vapor Pressure as determined by ASTM method D323-82 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742); or which when distilled requires a temperature of 421.95 K (300 °F) or greater to recover 10 percent of the liquid as determined by ASTM method D86-82 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).
Heavy off-highway vehicle products means, for the purpose of paragraph (e) of this section, heavy construction, mining, farming, or material handling equipment; heavy industrial engines; diesel-electric locomotives and associated power generation equipment; and the components of such equipment or engines.
Heavy off-highway vehicle products coating facility means a facility that includes one or more heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line(s).
Heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of heavy off-highway vehicle products.
High temperature aluminum coating means a coating that is certified to withstand a temperature of 537.8 °C (1000 °F) for 24 hours.
Hood means a partial enclosure or canopy for capturing and exhausting, by means of a draft, the organic vapors or other fumes rising from a coating process or other source.
Hood capture efficiency means the emissions from a process which are captured by the hood and directed into a control device, expressed as a percentage of all emissions.
Hot well means the reservoir of a condensing unit receiving the condensate from a barometric condenser.
Hour means a block period of 60 minutes (e.g., 1 a.m. to 2 a.m.).
In vacuum service means, for the purpose of paragraph (i) of this section, equipment which is operating at an internal pressure that is at least 5 kPa (0.73 psia) below ambient pressure.
In-process tank means a container used for mixing, blending, heating, reacting, holding, crystallizing, evaporating or cleaning operations in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals.
Incinerator means a combustion apparatus in which refuse is burned.
Indirect heat transfer means transfer of heat in such a way that the source of heat does not come into direct contact with process materials.
Ink means a coating used in printing, impressing, or transferring an image onto a substrate.
Interior body spray coat means a coating applied by spray to the interior of a can body.
Internal-floating roof means a cover or roof in a fixed-roof tank which rests upon and is supported by the volatile organic liquid being contained and is equipped with a closure seal or seals to close the space between the roof edge and tank shell.
Lacquers means any clear wood finishes formulated with nitrocellulose or synthetic resins to dry by evaporation without chemical reaction, including clear lacquer sanding sealers.
Large appliance means any residential and commercial washers, dryers, ranges, refrigerators, freezers, water heaters, dish washers, trash compactors, air conditioners, and other similar products.
Large appliance coating means any coating applied to the component metal parts (including, but not limited to, doors, cases, lids, panels, and interior support parts) of residential and commercial washers, dryers, ranges, refrigerators, freezers, water heaters, dish washers, trash compactors, air conditioners, and other similar products.
Large appliance coating facility means a facility that includes one or more large appliance coating line(s).
Large appliance coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of large appliances.
Light liquid means VOM in the liquid state which is not defined as heavy liquid.
Light-duty truck means any motor vehicle rated at 3,850 kg gross vehicle weight or less, designed mainly to transport property.
Liquid/gas method means either of two methods for determining capture which require both gas phase and liquid phase measurements and analysis. The first method requires construction of a TTE. The second method uses the building or room which houses the facility as an enclosure. The second method requires that all other VOM sources within the room be shut down while the test is performed, but all fans and blowers within the room must be operated according to normal procedures.
Liquid service means that the equipment or component contains process fluid that is in a liquid state at operating conditions.
Lithographic printing line means a printing line, except that the substrate is not necessarily fed from an unwinding roll, in which each roll printer uses a roll where both the image and non-image areas are essentially in the same plane (planographic).
Magnet wire means aluminum or copper wire formed into an electromagnetic coil.
Magnet wire coating means any coating or electrically insulating varnish or enamel applied to magnet wire.
Magnet wire coating facility means a facility that includes one or more magnet wire coating line(s).
Magnet wire coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of a magnet wire.
Malfunction means any sudden and unavoidable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused entirely or in part by poor maintenance, careless operation, or any other preventable upset condition or preventable equipment breakdown shall not be considered malfunctions.
Manufacturing process means a method whereby a process emission source or series of process emission sources is used to convert raw materials, feed stocks, subassemblies, or other components into a product, either for sale or for use as a component in a subsequent manufacturing process.
Maximum theoretical emissions means the quantity of volatile organic material emissions that theoretically could be emitted by a stationary source before add-on controls based on the design capacity or maximum production capacity of the source and 8760 hours per year. The design capacity or maximum production capacity includes use of coating(s) or ink(s) with the highest volatile organic material content actually used in practice by the source.
Metal furniture means a furniture piece including, but not limited to, tables, chairs, waste baskets, beds, desks, lockers, benches, shelving, file cabinets, lamps, and room dividers.
Metal furniture coating means any non-adhesive coating applied to any furniture piece made of metal or any metal part which is or will be assembled with other metal, wood, fabric, plastic or glass parts to form a furniture piece including, but not limited to, tables, chairs, waste baskets, beds, desks, lockers, benches, shelving, file cabinets, lamps, and room dividers. This definition shall not apply to any coating line coating miscellaneous metal parts or products.
Metal furniture coating facility means a facility that includes one or more metal furniture coating line(s).
Metal furniture coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of metal furniture.
Metallic shoe-type seal means a primary or secondary seal constructed of metal sheets (shoes) which are joined together to form a ring, springs, or levers which attach the shoes to the floating roof and hold the shoes against the tank wall, and a coated fabric which is suspended from the shoes to the floating roof.
Miscellaneous fabricated product manufacturing process means:
(A) A manufacturing process involving one or more of the following applications, including any drying and curing of formulations, and capable of emitting VOM:
(1) Adhesives to fabricate or assemble components or products.
(2) Asphalt solutions to paper or fiberboard.
(3) Asphalt to paper or felt.
(4) Coatings or dye to leather.
(5) Coatings to plastic.
(6) Coatings to rubber or glass.
(7) Disinfectant material to manufactured items.
(8) Plastic foam scrap or “fluff” from the manufacture of foam containers and packaging material to form resin pallets.
(9) Resin solutions to fiber substances.
(10) Viscose solutions for food casings.
(B) The storage and handling of formulations associated with the process described above, and the use and handling of organic liquids and other substances for clean-up operations associated with the process described in this definition.
Miscellaneous formulation manufacturing process means:
(A) A manufacturing process which compounds one or more of the following and is capable of emitting VOM:
(1) Adhesives.
(2) Asphalt solutions.
(3) Caulks, sealants, or waterproofing agents.
(4) Coatings, other than paint and ink.
(5) Concrete curing compounds.
(6) Dyes.
(7) Friction materials and compounds.
(8) Resin solutions.
(9) Rubber solutions.
(10) Viscose solutions.
(B) The storage and handling of formulations associated with the process described above, and the use and handling of organic liquids and other substances for clean-up operations associated with the process described in this definition.
Miscellaneous metal parts or products means any metal part or metal product, even if attached to or combined with a nonmental part or product, except cans, coils, metal furniture, large appliances, magnet wire, automobiles, ships, and airplane bodies.
Miscellaneous metal parts and products coating means any coating applied to any metal part or metal product, even if attached to or combined with a nonmetal part or product, except cans, coils, metal furniture, large appliances, and magnet wire. Prime coat, prime surfacer coat, topcoat, and final repair coat for automobiles and light-duty trucks are not miscellaneous metal parts and products coatings. However, underbody anti-chip (e.g., underbody plastisol) automobile, and light-duty truck coatings are miscellaneous metal parts and products coatings. Also, automobile or light-duty truck refinishing coatings, coatings applied to the exterior of marine vessels, coatings applied to the exterior of airplanes, and the customized topcoating of automobiles and trucks if production is less than 35 vehicles per day are not miscellaneous metal parts and products coatings.
Miscellaneous metal parts or products coating facility means a facility that includes one or more miscellaneous metal parts or products coating lines.
Miscellaneous metal parts or products coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto the surface of miscellaneous metal parts or products.
Miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing process means:
(A) A manufacturing process which produces by chemical reaction, one or more of the following organic compounds or mixtures of organic compounds and which is capable of emitting VOM:
(1) Chemicals listed in appendix A of this section.
(2) Chlorinated and sulfonated compounds.
(3) Cosmetic, detergent, soap, or surfactant intermediaries or specialties and products.
(4) Disinfectants.
(5) Food additives.
(6) Oil and petroleum product additives.
(7) Plasticizers.
(8) Resins or polymers.
(9) Rubber additives.
(10) Sweeteners.
(11) Varnishes.
(B) The storage and handling of formulations associated with the process described above and the use and handling of organic liquids and other substances for clean-up operations associated with the process described in this definition.
Monitor means to measure and record.
Multiple package coating means a coating made from more than one different ingredient which must be mixed prior to using and has a limited pot life due to the chemical reaction which occurs upon mixing.
Offset means, with respect to printing and publishing operations, use of a blanket cylinder to transfer ink from the plate cylinder to the surface to be printed.
Opaque stains means all stains that are not semi-transparent stains.
Open top vapor depressing means the batch process of cleaning and removing soils from surfaces by condensing hot solvent vapor on the colder metal parts.
Open-ended valve means any valve, except pressure relief devices, having one side of the valve in contact with process fluid and one side open to the atmosphere, either directly or through open piping.
Organic compound means any compound of carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate.
Organic material means any chemical compound of carbon including diluents and thinners which are liquids at standard conditions and which are used as dissolvers, viscosity reducers, or cleaning agents, but excluding methane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbonic acid, metallic carbide, metallic carbonates, and ammonium carbonate.
Organic vapor means the gaseous phase of an organic material or a mixture of organic materials present in the atmosphere.
Oven means a chamber within which heat is used for one or more of the following purposes: Dry, bake, cure, or polymerize a coating or ink.
Overall control means the product of the capture efficiency and the control device efficiency.
Overvarnish means a transparent coating applied directly over ink or coating.
Owner or operator means any person who owns, operates, leases, controls, or supervises an emission source or air pollution control equipment.
Packaging rotogravure printing means rotogravure printing upon paper, paper board, metal foil, plastic film, and other substrates, which are, in subsequent operations, formed into packaging products or labels for articles to be sold.
Packaging rotogravure printing line means a rotogravure printing line in which surface coatings are applied to paper, paperboard, foil, film, or other substrates which are to be used to produce containers, packaging products, or labels for articles.
Pail means any cylindrical metal shipping container of 1- to 12-gallon capacity and constructed of 29-gauge and heavier metal.
Paint manufacturing plant means a plant that mixes, blends, or compounds enamels, lacquers, sealers, shellacs, stains, varnishes, or pigmented surface coatings.
Paper coating means any coating applied on paper, plastic film, or metallic foil to make certain products, including (but not limited to) adhesive tapes and labels, book covers, post cards, office copier paper, drafting paper, or pressure sensitive tapes. Paper coating includes the application of coatings by impregnation and/or saturation.
Paper coating facility means a facility that includes one or more paper coating lines.
Paper coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied on, saturated into, or impregnated into paper, plastic film, or metallic foil to make certain products, including (but not limited to) adhesive tapes and labels, book covers, post cards, office copier paper, drafting paper, and pressure sensitive tapes.
Parts per million (volume) means a volume/volume ratio which expresses the volumetric concentration of gaseous air contaminant in a million unit volume of gas.
Person means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, State, municipality, political subdivision of a State; any agency, department, or instrumentality of the United States; and any officer, agent, or employee thereof.
Petroleum means the crude oil removed from the earth and the oils derived from tar sands, shale, and coal.
Petroleum refinery means any facility engaged in producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, or other products through distillation of petroleum, or through redistillation, cracking, or reforming of unfinished petroleum derivatives.
Pharmaceutical means any compound or mixture, other than food, used in the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, treatment, or cure of disease in man and animal.
Pharmaceutical coating operation means a device in which a coating is applied to a pharmaceutical, including air drying or curing of the coating.
Pigmented coatings means opaque coatings containing binders and colored pigments which are formulated to conceal the wood surface either as an undercoat or topcoat.
Plant means all of the pollutant-emitting activities which belong to the same industrial grouping, are located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties, and are under the control of the same person (or persons under common control), except the activities of any marine vessel. Pollutant-emitting activities shall be considered as part of the same industrial grouping if they belong to the same “Major Group” (i.e., which have the same two-digit code) as described in the “Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987” (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).
Plasticizers means a substance added to a polymer composition to soften and add flexibility to the product.
Prime coat means the first of two or more coatings applied to a surface.
Prime surfacer coat means a coating used to touch up areas on the surface of automobile or light-duty truck bodies not adequately covered by the prime coat before application of the top coat. The prime surfacer coat is applied between the prime coat and topcoat. An anti-chip coating applied to main body parts (e.g., rocker panels, bottom of doors and fenders, and leading edge of roof) is a prime surfacer coat.
Primers means any coatings formulated and applied to substrates to provide a firm bond between the substrate and subsequent coats.
Printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate using ink.
Printing line means an operation consisting of a series of one or more roll printers and any associated roll coaters, drying areas, and ovens wherein one or more coatings are applied, dried, and/or cured.
Process means any stationary emission source other than a fuel combustion emission source or an incinerator.
Production equipment exhaust system means a system for collecting and directing into the atmosphere emissions of volatile organic material from reactors, centrifuges, and other process emission sources.
Publication rotogravure printing line means a rotogravure printing line in which coatings are applied to paper which is subsequently formed into books, magazines, catalogues, brochures, directories, newspaper supplements, or other types of printed material.
Reactor means a vat, vessel, or other device in which chemical reactions take place.
Refiner means any person who owns, leases operates, controls, or supervises a refinery.
Refinery unit, process unit or unit means a set of components which are a part of a basic process operation such as distillation, hydrotreating, cracking, or reforming of hydrocarbons.
Refrigerated condenser means a surface condenser in which the coolant supplied to the condenser has been cooled by a mechanical device, other than by a cooling tower or evaporative spray cooling, such as refrigeration unit or steam chiller unit.
Repair coatings means coatings used to correct imperfections or damage to furniture surface.
Repaired means, for the purpose of paragraph (i) of this section, that equipment component has been adjusted, or otherwise altered, to eliminate a leak.
Roll coater means an apparatus in which a uniform layer of coating is applied by means of one or more rolls across the entire width of a moving substrate.
Roll printer means an apparatus used in the application of words, designs, or pictures to a substrate, usually by means of one or more rolls each with only partial coverage.
Roll printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or metal rolls each with only partial coverage.
Roller coating means a method of applying a coating to a sheet or strip in which the coating is transferred by a roller or series of rollers.
Rotogravure printing means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is recessed relative to the non-image area.
Rotogravure printing line means a printing line in which each roll printer uses a roll with recessed areas for applying an image to a substrate.
Safety relief valve means a valve which is normally closed and which is designed to open in order to relieve excessive pressures within a vessel or pipe.
Sanding sealers means any coatings formulated for and applied to bare wood for sanding and to seal the wood for subsequent application of varnish. To be considered a sanding sealer a coating must be clearly labelled as such.
Sealer means a coating containing binders which seals wood prior to the application of the subsequent coatings.
Semi-transparent stains means stains containing dyes or semi-transparent pigments which are formulated to enhance wood grain and change the color of the surface but not to conceal the surface, including, but not limited to, sap stain, toner, non-grain raising stains, pad stain, or spatter stain.
Set of safety relief valves means one or more safety relief valves designed to open in order to relieve excessive pressures in the same vessel or pipe.
Sheet basecoat means a coating applied to metal when the metal is in sheet form to serve as either the exterior or interior of a can for either two-piece or three-piece cans.
Side-seam spray coat means a coating applied to the seam of a three-piece can.
Single coat means one coating application applied to a metal surface.
Solvent means a liquid substance that is used to dissolve or dilute another substance.
Solvent cleaning means the process of cleaning soils from surfaces by cold cleaning, open top vapor degreasing, or conveyorized degreasing.
Specified air contaminant means any air contaminant as to which this Section contains emission standards or other specific limitations.
Splash loading means a method of loading a tank, railroad tank car, tank truck, or trailer by use of other than a submerged loading pipe.
Standard conditions means a temperature of 70 °F and a pressure of 14.7 psia.
Standard cubic foot (scf) means the volume of one cubic foot of gas at standard conditions.
Standard Industrial Classification Manual means the Standard Industrial Classification Manual (1987), Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).
Start-up means the setting in operation of an emission source for any purpose.
Stationary emission source and Stationary source mean an emission source which is not self-propelled.
Storage tank or storage vessel means any stationary tank, reservoir or container used for the storage of VOL's.
Submerged loading pipe means any discharge pipe or nozzle which meets either of the following conditions:
(A) Where the tank is filled from the top, the end of the discharge pipe or nozzle must be totally submerged when the liquid level is 15 cm (6 in.) above the bottom of the tank.
(B) Where the tank is filled from the side, the discharge pipe or nozzle must be totally submerged when the liquid level is 46 cm (18 in.) above the bottom of the tank.
Substrate means the surface onto which a coating is applied or into which a coating is impregnated.
Surface condenser means a device which removes a substance from a gas stream by reducing the temperature of the stream, without direct contact between the coolant and the stream.
Tablet coating operation means a pharmaceutical coating operation in which tablets are coated.
Thirty-day rolling average means any value arithmetically averaged over any consecutive thirty-days.
Three-piece can means a can which is made from a rectangular sheet and two circular ends.
Topcoat means a coating applied in a multiple coat operation other than prime coat, final repair coat, or prime surfacer coat.
Topcoat operation means all topcoat spray booths, flash-off areas, and bake ovens at a facility which are used to apply, dry, or cure the final coatings (except final off-line repair) on components of automobile or light-duty truck bodies.
Transfer efficiency means the ratio of the amount of coating solids deposited onto a part or product to the total amount of coating solids used.
True vapor pressure means the equilibrium partial pressure exerted by a volatile organic liquid as determined in accordance with methods described in American Petroleum Institute Bulletin 2517, “Evaporation Loss From Floating Roof Tanks,” second edition, February 1980 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742).
Two-piece can means a can which is drawn from a shallow cup and requires only one end to be attached.
Undercoaters means any coatings formulated for and applied to substrates to provide a smooth surface for subsequent coats.
Unregulated safety relief valve means a safety relief valve which cannot be actuated by a means other than high pressure in the pipe or vessel which it protects.
Vacuum producing system means any reciprocating, rotary, or centrifugal blower or compressor or any jet ejector or device that creates suction from a pressure below atmospheric and discharges against a greater pressure.
Valves not externally regulated means valves that have no external controls, such as in-line check valves.
Vapor balance system means any combination of pipes or hoses which creates a closed system between the vapor spaces of an unloading tank and a receiving tank such that vapors displaced from the receiving tank are transferred to the tank being unloaded.
Vapor collection system means all piping, seals, hoses, connections, pressure-vacuum vents, and other possible sources between the gasoline delivery vessel and the vapor processing unit and/or the storage tanks and vapor holder.
Vapor control system means any system that limits or prevents release to the atmosphere of organic material in the vapors displaced from a tank during the transfer of gasoline.
Vapor recovery system means a vapor gathering system capable of collecting all VOM vapors and gases discharged from the storage tank and a vapor disposal system capable of processing such VOM vapors and gases so as to prevent their emission to the atmosphere.
Vehicle means a device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn upon a highway, excepting a device moved exclusively by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.
Vinyl coating means any topcoat or printing ink applied to vinyl coated fabric or vinyl sheets. Vinyl coating does not include plastisols.
Vinyl coating facility means a facility that includes one or more vinyl coating line(s).
Vinyl coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative or functional coating is applied onto vinyl coated fabric or vinyl sheets.
Volatile organic liquid means any substance which is liquid at storage conditions and which contains volatile organic compounds.
Volatile organic material (VOM) or volatile organic compounds (VOC) is as defined in § 51.100(s) of this chapter.
Wash coat means a coating containing binders which seals wood surfaces, prevents undesired staining, and controls penetration.
Web means a substrate which is printed in continuous roll-fed presses.
Wood furniture means room furnishings including cabinets (kitchen, bath, and vanity), tables, chairs, beds, sofas, shutters, art objects, wood paneling, wood flooring, and any other coated furnishings made of wood, wood composition, or fabricated wood materials.
Wood furniture coating facility means a facility that includes one or more wood furniture coating line(s).
Wood furniture coating line means a coating line in which any protective, decorative, or functional coating is applied onto wood furniture.
Woodworking means the shaping, sawing, grinding, smoothing, polishing, and making into products of any form or shape of wood.
(4) Testing methods and procedures—(i) Coatings, inks and fountain solutions. The following test methods and procedures shall be used to determine compliance of as applied coatings, inks, and fountain solutions with the limitations set forth in § 52.741.
(A) Sampling. Samples collected for analyses shall be one-liter taken into a one-liter container at a location and time such that the sample will be representative of the coating as applied (i.e., the sample shall include any dilution solvent or other VOM added during the manufacturing process). The container must be tightly sealed immediately after the sample is taken. Any solvent or other VOM added after the sample is taken must be measured and accounted for in the calculations in paragraph (a)(4)(i)(C) of this section. For multiple package coatings, separate samples of each component shall be obtained. A mixed sample shall not be obtained as it will cure in the container. Sampling procedures shall follow the guidelines presented in:
(1) ASTM D3925-81 (Reapproved 1985) Standard Practice for Sampling Liquid Paints and Related Pigment Coating. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(2) ASTM E300-86 Standard Practice for Sampling Industrial Chemicals. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(B) Analyses. The applicable analytical methods specified below shall be used to determine the composition of coatings, inks, or fountain solutions as applied.
(1) Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, shall be used to determine the VOM content and density of coatings. If it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Administrator that plant coating formulation data are equivalent to Method 24 results, formulation data may be used. In the event of any inconsistency between a Method 24 test and a facility's formulation data, the Method 24 test will govern.
(2) Method 24A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, shall be used to determine the VOM content and density of rotogravure printing inks and related coatings. If it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the plant coating formulation data are equivalent to Method 24A results, formulation data may be used. In the event of any inconsistency between a Method 24A test and a facility's formulation data, the Method 24A test will govern.
(3) The following ASTM methods are the analytical procedures for determining VOM:
(i) ASTM D1475-85: Standard Test Method for Density of Paint, Varnish, Lacquer and Related Products. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(ii) ASTM D2369-87: Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of Coatings. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(iii) ASTM D3792-86: Standard Test Method for Water Content of Water-reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(iv) ASTM D4017-81 (Reapproved 1987): Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Method. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(v) ASTM D4457-85: Standard Test Method for Determination of Dichloromethane and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in Paints and Coatings by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph. (The procedure delineated above can be used to develop protocols for any compounds specifically exempted from the definition of VOM.) This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(vi) ASTM D2697-86: Standard Test Method for Volume Non-Volatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings. This test method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(vii) ASTM D3980-87: Standard Practice for Interlaboratory Testing of Paint and Related Materials. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(viii) ASTM E180-85: Standard Practice for Determining the Precision of ASTM Methods for Analysis of and Testing of Industrial Chemicals. This practice is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(ix) ASTM D2372-85: Standard Method of Separation of Vehicle from Solvent-reducible Paints. This method is incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742.
(4) Use of an adaptation to any of the analytical methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(i)(B)(1), (2) and (3) may be approved by the Administrator on a case-by-case basis. An owner or operator must submit sufficient documentation for the Administrator to find that the analytical methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(i)(B)(1), (2) and (3) will yield inaccurate results and that the proposed adaptation is appropriate.
(C) Calculations. Calculations for determining the VOM content, water content and the content of any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM of coatings, inks and fountain solutions as applied shall follow the guidance provided in the following documents.
(1) “A Guide for Surface Coating Calculation” EPA-340/1-86-016 (which is available from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(2) “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Paint, Ink and Other Coatings” (revised June 1986) EPA-450/3-84-019 (which is available from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(3) “A Guide for Graphic Arts Calculations” August 1988 EPA-340/1-88-003 (which is available from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(ii) Automobile or light-duty truck test protocol. The protocol for testing, including determining the transfer efficiency, of coating applicators at topcoat coating operations at an automobile assembly facility shall follow the procedure in: “Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations” December 1988 EPA-450/3-88-018 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(iii) Capture system efficiency test protocols—(A) Applicability. The requirements of paragraphs (a)(4)(iii)(B) of this section shall apply to all VOM emitting processes employing capture equipment (e.g., hoods, ducts), except those cases noted below.
(1) If a source installs a permanent total enclosure (PTE) that meets USEPA specifications, and which directs all VOM to a control device, then the source is exempted from the requirements described in paragraph (B). The USEPA specifications to determine whether a structure is considered a PTE are given in Procedure T of appendix B of this section. In this instance, the capture efficiency is assumed to be 100 percent and the source is still required to measure control efficiency using appropriate test methods as specified in (a)(4)(iv) of this section.
(2) If a source uses a control device designed to collect and recover VOM (e.g., carbon adsorber), an explicit measurement of capture efficiency is not necessary provided that the conditions given below are met. The overall control of the system can be determined by directly comparing the input liquid VOM to the recovered liquid VOM. The general procedure for use in this situation is given in 40 CFR 60.433, with the following additional restrictions:
(i) The source must be able to equate solvent usage with solvent recovery on a 24-hour (daily) basis, rather than a 30-day weighted average, within 72 hours following the 24-hour period. In addition, one of the following two criteria must be met:
(ii) The solvent recovery system (i.e., capture and control system) must be dedicated to a single process line (e.g., one process line venting to a carbon adsorber system), or
(iii) If the solvent recovery system controls multiple process lines, then the source must be able to demonstrate that the overall control (i.e., the total recovered solvent VOM divided by the sum of liquid VOM input to all process lines venting to the control system) meets or exceeds the most stringent standard applicable for any process line venting to the control system.
(B) Specific requirements. The capture efficiency of a process line shall be measured using one of the four protocols given below. Any error margin associated with a test protocol may not be incorporated into the results of a capture efficiency test. If these techniques are not suitable for a particular process, then the source must present an alternative capture efficiency protocol and obtain approval for it by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revisions.
(1) Gas/gas method using temporary total enclosure (TTE). The USEPA specifications to determine whether a temporary enclosure is considered a TTE are given in Procedure T of appendix B of this section. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:
CE = Gw / (GW + Fw)
Where:
CE = capture efficiency, decimal fraction.
Gw = mass of VOM captured and delivered to control device using a TTE.
Fw = mass of fugitive VOM that escapes from a TTE.
Procedure G.2 contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Gw. Procedure F.1 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Fw.
(2) Liquid/gas method using TTE. The USEPA specifications to determine whether a temporary enclosure is considered a TTE are given in Procedure T of appendix B of this section. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:
CE = (L − F) / L
Where:
CE = capture efficiency, decimal fraction.
L = mass of liquid VOM input to process.
Fw = mass of fugitive VOM that escapes from a TTE.
Procedure L contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain L. Procedure F.1 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain Fw.
(3) Gas/gas method using the building or room (building or room enclosure) in which the affected source is located as the enclosure and in which “F” and “G” are measured while operating only the affected facility. All fans and blowers in the building or room must be operated as they would under normal production. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:
CE = G / (G + FB)
Where:
CE = capture efficiency, decimal fraction.
G = mass of VOM captured and delivered to control device.
FB = mass of fugitive VOM that escapes from building enclosure.
Procedure G.2 contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain G. Procedure F.2 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain FB.
(4) Liquid/gas method using the building or room (building or room enclosure) in which the affected source is located as the enclosure and in which “F” and “L” are measured while operating only the affected facility. All fans and blowers in the building or room must be operated as they would under normal production. The capture efficiency equation to be used for this protocol is:
CE = (L − FB) / L
Where:
CE = capture efficiency, decimal fraction.
L = mass of liquid VOM input to process.
FB = mass of fugitive VOM that escapes from building enclosure.
Procedure L contained in appendix B of this section is used to obtain L. Procedure F.2 in appendix B of this section is used to obtain FB.
(C) Recordkeeping and reporting. (1) All affected facilities must maintain a copy of the capture efficiency protocol submitted to USEPA on file. All results of the appropriate test methods and capture efficiency protocols must be reported to USEPA within sixty (60) days of the test date. A copy of the results must be kept on file with the source for a period of three (3) years.
(2) If any changes are made to capture or control equipment, then the source is required to notify USEPA of these changes and a new test may be required by USEPA.
(3) The source must notify the Administrator 30 days prior to performing any capture efficiency or control test. At that time, the source must notify the Administrator which capture efficiency protocol and control device test methods will be used.
(4) Sources utilizing a PTE must demonstrate that this enclosure meets the requirement given in Procedure T (in appendix B of this section) for a PTE during any testing of their control device.
(5) Sources utilizing a TTE must demonstrate that their TTE meets the requirements given in Procedure T (in appendix B of this section) for a TTE during testing of their control device. The source must also provide documentation that the quality assurance criteria for a TTE have been achieved.
(iv) Control device efficiency testing and monitoring. (A) The control device efficiency shall be determined by simultaneously measuring the inlet and outlet gas phase VOM concentrations and gas volumetric flow rates in accordance with the gas phase test methods specified in paragraph (a)(4)(vi) of this section.
(B) Any owner or operator that uses an afterburner or carbon adsorber to comply with any paragraph of § 52.741 shall use USEPA approved continuous monitoring equipment which is installed, calibrated, maintained, and operated according to vendor specifications at all times the afterburner or carbon adsorber is in use. The continuous monitoring equipment must monitor the following parameters:
(1) Combustion chamber temperature of each afterburner.
(2) Temperature rise across each catalytic afterburner bed or VOM concentration of exhaust.
(3) The VOM concentration of each carbon adsorption bed exhaust.
(v) Overall efficiency. (A) The overall efficiency of the emission control system shall be determined as the product of the capture system efficiency and the control device efficiency or by the liquid/liquid test protocol as specified in 40 CFR 60.433 (and revised by paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(A)(2) of this section for each solvent recovery system. In those cases in which the overall efficiency is being determined for an entire line, the capture efficiency used to calculate the product of the capture and control efficiency is the total capture efficiency over the entire line.
(B) For coating lines which are both chosen by the owner or operator to comply with paragraphs (e)(2)(ii), (e)(2)(iii), (e)(2)(iv), (e)(2)(v), or (e)(2)(vi) of this section by the alternative in paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section and meet the criteria allowing them to comply with paragraph (e)(2) of this section instead of paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the overall efficiency of the capture system and control device, as determined by the test methods and procedures specified in paragraphs (a)(4) (iii), (iv) and (v)(A) of this section, shall be no less than the equivalent overall efficiency which shall be calculated by the following equation:
E = ([VOMa − VOM1]/VOMa) × 100
Where:
E = Equivalent overall efficiency of the capture system and control device as a percentage,
VOMa = Actual VOM content of a coating, or the daily-weighted average VOM content of two or more coatings (if more than one coating is used), as applied to the subject coating line as determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section in units of kg VOM/l (lb VOM/gal) of coating solids as applied,
VOM1 = The VOM emission limit specified in paragraph (e)(2) (i) or (ii) of this section in units of kg VOM/l (lb VOM/gal) of coating solids as applied.
(vi) Volatile organic material gas phase source test methods. The methods in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, delineated below shall be used to determine control device efficiencies.
(A) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 18, 25 or 25A, as appropriate to the conditions at the site, shall be used to determine VOM concentration. Method selection shall be based on consideration of the diversity of organic species present and their total concentration and on consideration of the potential presence of interfering gases. Except as indicated in paragraphs (a)(4)(vi)(A)(1) and (2) of this section, the test shall consist of three separate runs, each lasting a minimum of 60 min, unless the Administrator determines that process variables dictate shorter sampling times.
(1) When the method is to be used to determine the efficiency of a carbon adsoption system with a common exhaust stack for all the individual adsorber vessels, the test shall consist of three separate runs, each coinciding with one or more complete sequences through the adsorption cycles of all the individual adsorber vessels.
(2) When the method is to be used to determine the efficiency of a carbon adsorption system with individual exhaust stacks for each adsorber vessel, each adsorber vessel shall be tested individually. The test for each adsorber vessel shall consist of three separate runs. Each run shall coincide with one or more complete adsorption cycles.
(B) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 1 or 1A shall be used for sample and velocity traverses.
(C) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 2, 2A, 2C or 2D shall be used for velocity and volumetric flow rates.
(D) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 3 shall be used for gas analysis.
(E) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 4 shall be used for stack gas moisture.
(F) 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Methods 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 3 and 4 shall be performed, as applicable, at least twice during each test run.
(G) Use of an adaptation to any of the test methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(vi) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) of this section may be approved by the Administrator on a case-by-case basis. An owner or operator must submit sufficient documentation for the Administrator to find that the test methods specified in paragraphs (a)(4)(vi) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) of this section will yield inaccurate results and that the proposed adaptation is appropriate.
(vii) Leak detection methods for volatile organic material. Owners or operators required by the various subparts of this regulation to carry out a leak detection monitoring program shall comply with the following requirements:
(A) Leak detection monitoring. (1) Monitoring shall comply with 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. Method 21.
(2) The detection instrument shall meet the performance criteria of Method 21.
(3) The instrument shall be calibrated before use on each day of its use by the methods specified in Method 21.
(4) Calibration gases shall be:
(i) Zero air (less than 10 ppm of hydrocarbon in air); and
(ii) A mixture of methane or n-hexane and air at a concentration of approximately, but no less than, 10,000 ppm methane or n-hexane.
(5) The instrument probe shall be traversed around all potential leak interfaces as close to the interface as possible as described in Method 21.
(B) When equipment is tested for compliance with no detectable emissions as required, the test shall comply with the following requirements:
(1) The requirements of paragraphs (a)(4) (vii)(A)(1) through (vii)(A)(5) of this section shall apply.
(2) The background level shall be determined as set forth in Method 21.
(C) Leak detection tests shall be performed consistent with:
(1) “APTI Course SI 417 controlling Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Leaking Process Equipment” EPA-450/2-82-015 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(2) “Portable Instrument User's Manual for Monitoring VOC Sources” EPA-340/1-86-015 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(3) “Protocols for Generating Unit-Specific Emission Estimates for Equipment Leaks of VOC and VHAP” EPA-450/3-88-010 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(4) “Petroleum Refinery Enforcement Manual” EPA-340/1-80-008 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(viii) Bulk gasoline delivery system test protocol. (A) The method for determining the emissions of gasoline from a vapor recovery system are delineated in 40 CFR part 60, subpart XX, § 60.503.
(B) Other tests shall be performed consistent with:
(1) “Inspection Manual for Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Gasoline Marketing Operations: Appendix D” EPA-340/1-80-012 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(2) “Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals: Appendix A” EPA-450/2-77-026 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161)
(5) Compliance dates. Compliance with the requirements of all rules is required by July 1, 1991, unless otherwise indicated by compliance dates contained in specific rules. This paragraph shall not operate to provide additional time for compliance under section 113(d) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(d), for sources subject to compliance upon promulgation.
(6) Afterburners. The operation of any natural gas fired afterburner and capture system used to comply with § 52.741 is not required during the period of November 1 of any year to April 1 of the following year provided that the operation of such devices is not required for purposes of occupational safety or health, or for the control of toxic substances, odor nuisances, or other regulated pollutants.
(7) Exemptions, variances, and alternative means of control or compliance determinations. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other paragraphs of this section, any exemptions, variances or alternatives to the control requirements, emission limitations, or test methods in the Illinois SIP or FIP can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(8) Vapor pressure of volatile organic liquids. (i) If the VOL consists of only a single compound, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879-86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or the vapor pressure may be obtained from a published source such as: Boublik, T., V. Fried and E. Hala, “The Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances,” Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York (1973); Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1984); CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company (1986-87); and Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, John A. Dean, editor, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1985).
(ii) If the VOL is a mixture, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879-86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or by the following equation:
Where:
Pvol = Total vapor pressure of the mixture,
n = Number of components in the mixture,
i = Subscript denoting an individual component,
Pi = Vapor pressure of a component determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section
Xi = Mole fraction of the component in the total mixture.
(9) Vapor pressure of organic material or solvent. (i) If the organic material or solvent consists of only a single compound, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879-86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or the vapor pressure may be obtained from a published source such as: Boublik, T., V. Fried and E. Hala, “The Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances,” Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York (1973); Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1984); CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company (1986-87); and Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, John A. Dean, editor, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1985).
(ii) If the organic material or solvent is in a mixture made up of both organic material compounds and compounds which are not organic material, the vapor pressure shall be determined by the following equation:
Where:
Pom = Total vapor pressure of the portion of the mixture which is composed of organic material,
n = Number of organic material components in the mixture,
i = Subscript denoting an individual component,
Pi = Vapor pressure of an organic material component determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section,
Xi = Mole fraction of the organic material component of the total mixture.
(iii) If the organic material or solvent is in a mixture made up of only organic material compounds, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879-86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or by the above equation.
(10) Vapor pressure of volatile organic material. (i) If the VOM consists of only a single compound, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879-86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or the vapor pressure may be obtained from a published source such as: Boublik, T., V. Fried and E. Hala, “The Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances,” Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York (1973); Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1984); CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company (1986-87); and Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, John A. Dean, editor, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1985).
(ii) If the VOM is in a mixture made up of both VOM compounds and compounds which are not VOM, the vapor pressure shall be determined by the following equation:
Where:
Pvom = Total vapor pressure of the portion of the mixture which is composed of VOM,
n = Number of VOM components in the mixture,
i = Subscript denoting an individual component,
Pi = Vapor pressure of a VOM component determined in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section,
Xi = Mole fraction of the VOM component of the total mixture.
(iii) If the VOM is in a mixture made up of only VOM compounds, the vapor pressure shall be determined by ASTM Method D2879-86 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or by the above equation.
(b)-(c) [Reserved]
(d) Solvent cleaning—(1) Solvent cleaning in general. The requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182-215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) shall apply to all cold cleaning, open top vapor degreasing, and conveyorized degreasing operations.
(2) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source which was previously exempt from the requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182-215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) because it satisfied the criteria in either (d)(a)(i) or (d)(2)(ii) of this section, shall comply with the requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182-215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) on and after July 1, 1991. A source which did not satisfy the criteria in either (d)(a)(i) or (d)(2)(ii) of this section, shall comply with the requirements of subpart E (sections 215.182-215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) upon promulgation.
(i) If emissions of VOM exceed neither 6.8 kg (15 lbs) in any one day, nor 1.4 kg (3 lbs) in any one hour, or
(ii) If the source is used exclusively for chemical or physical analysis or for determination of product quality and commercial acceptance, provided that the operation of the source is not an integral part of the production process, the emissions of VOM from the source do not exceed 363 kg (800 lbs) in any calendar month, and the exemption had been approved in writing by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
(3) Test methods. The following test methods shall be used to demonstrate compliance with subpart E (sections 215.182-215.184) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742):
(i) Vapor pressures shall be determined by using the procedure specified in paragraph (a)(9) of this section.
(ii) Exhaust ventilation rates shall be determined by using the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(vi)(C) of this section.
(iii) The performance of control devices shall be determined by using the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(vi) of this section.
(e) Coating operations—(1) Emission limitations for manufacturing plants. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, no owner or operator of a coating line shall apply at any time any coating in which the VOM content exceeds the following emission limitations for the specified coating. The following emission limitations are expressed in units of VOM per volume of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied at each coating applicator, except where noted. Compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM should be treated as water for the purpose of calculating the “less water” part of the coating composition. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(ii) of this section. As an alternative to compliance with this paragraph, the owner or operator of a coating line may meet the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section. The equation presented in paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section shall be used to calculate emission limitations for determining compliance by add-on controls, credits for transfer efficiency, emissions trades and cross-line averaging.
| kg/l | lb/gal | |
|---|---|---|
| (A) Automobile or Light-Duty Truck Coating | ||
| (1) Prime coat | 0.14 | (1.2) |
| (2) Prime surfacer coat | 0.34 | (2.8) |
| Note: The prime surfacer coat limitation is based upon a transfer efficiency of 30 percent. Transfer efficiency credits can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision. | ||
| (3) Topcoat | 1.81 | (15.1) |
| Note: The topcoat limitation is in units of kg (lbs) of VOM per l (gal) of coating solids deposited. Compliance with the limitation shall be based on the daily-weighted average VOM content from the entire topcoat operation (all topcoat spray booths, flash-off areas and bake ovens). Compliance shall be demonstrated in accordance with the topcoat protocol for automobiles and light-duty trucks referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section. Paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section does not apply to the topcoat limitation.) At least 180 days prior to the initial compliance date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the topcoat limitation shall submit to the Administrator a detailed proposal specifying the method of demonstrating compliance with the protocol. The proposal shall include, at a minimum, a comprehensive plan (including a rationale) for determining the transfer efficiency at each booth through the use of in-plant, or pilot testing; the selection of coatings to be tested (for the purpose of determining transfer efficiency) including the rationale for coating groupings; and the method for determining the analytic VOM content of as applied coatings and the formulation solvent content of as applied coatings. Upon approval of the protocol by the Administrator, the source may proceed with the compliance demonstration. | ||
| (4) Final repair coat | 0.58 | (4.8) |
| (B) Can Coating | ||
| (1) Sheet basecoat and overvarnish | 0.34 | (2.8) |
| (2) Exterior basecoat and overvarnish | 0.34 | (2.8) |
| (3) Interior body spray coat | 0.51 | (4.2) |
| (4) Exterior end coat | 0.51 | (4.2) |
| (5) Side seam spray coat | 0.66 | (5.5) |
| (6) End sealing compound coat | 0.44 | (3.7) |
| (C) Paper Coating | 0.35 | (2.9) |
| Note: The paper coating limitation shall not apply to any owner or operator of any paper coating line on which printing is performed if the paper coating line complies with the emissions limitations in paragraph (h)(1) of this section: Printing and Publishing. | ||
| (D) Coil Coating | 0.31 | (2.6) |
| (E) Fabric Coating | 0.35 | (2.9) |
| (F) Vinyl Coating | 0.45 | (3.8) |
| (G) Metal Furniture Coating | 0.36 | (3.0) |
| (H) Large Appliance Coating | 0.34 | (2.8) |
| Note: The limitation shall not apply to the use of quick-drying lacquers for repair of scratches and nicks that occur during assembly, provided that the volume of coating does not exceed 0.95 l (1 quart) in any one rolling eight-hour period. | ||
| (I) Magnet Wire Coating | 0.20 | (1.7) |
| (J) Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coating | ||
| (1) Clear coating | 0.52 | (4.3) |
| (2) Air-dried coating | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (3) Extreme performance coating | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (4) Steel pail and drum interior coating | 0.52 | (4.3) |
| (5) All other coatings | 0.36 | (3.0) |
| kg/l | lb/gal | |
|---|---|---|
| (K) Heavy Off-Highway Vehicle Products Coating | ||
| (1) Extreme performance prime coat | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (2) Extreme performance top-coat (air dried) | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (3) Final repair coat (air dried) | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (4) All other coatings are subject to the emission limitations for miscellaneous metal parts and products coatings in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section. | ||
| (L) Wood Furniture Coating | ||
| (1) Clear topcoat | 0.67 | (5.6) |
| (2) Opaque stain | 0.56 | (4.7) |
| (3) Pigmented coat | 0.60 | (5.0) |
| (4) Repair coat | 0.67 | (5.6) |
| (5) Sealer | 0.67 | (5.6) |
| (6) Semi-transparent stain | 0.79 | (6.6) |
| (7) Wash coat | 0.73 | (6.1) |
| Note: An owner or operator of a wood furniture coating operation subject to this paragraph shall apply all coatings, with the exception of no more than 37.8 l (10 gal) of coating per day used for touch-up and repair operations, using one or more of the following application systems: airless spray application system, air-assisted airless spray application system, electrostatic spray application system, electrostatic bell or disc spray application system, heated airless spray application system, roller coating, brush or wipe coating application system, or dip coating application system. | ||
| (M) Existing Diesel-Electric Locomotive Coating Lines in Cook County | ||
| (1) Extreme performance prime coat | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (2) Extreme performance top-coat (air dried) | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (3) Final repair coat (air dried) | 0.42 | (3.5) |
| (4) High-temperature aluminum coating | 0.72 | (6.0) |
| (5) All other coatings | 0.36 | (3.0) |
(ii) Daily-weighted average limitations. No owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate the subject coating line unless the owner or operator has demonstrated compliance with paragraph (e)(1) (ii)(A), (ii)(B), (ii)(C), (ii)(D), (ii)(E) or (ii)(F) of this section (depending upon the source category) through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(iii) of this section.
(A) No owner or operator of a coating line subject to only one of the limitations from among paragraph (e)(1) (i)(A)(1), (i)(A)(2), (i)(A)(4), (i)(C), (i)(D), (i)(E), (i)(F), (i)(G), (i)(H), or (i)(I) of this section shall apply coating on any such coating line, during any day, whose daily-weighted average VOM content exceeds the emission limitation to which the coatings are subject.
(B) No owner or operator of a miscellaneous metal parts and products coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section shall apply coatings to miscellaneous metal parts or products on the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) (1) or (2) of this section are met.
(1) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section, during the same day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or
(2) For each coating line which applies coatings from more than one of the four coating categories in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.
(C) No owner or operator of a can coating facility subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section shall operate the subject coating facility using a coating with a VOM content in excess of the limitations specified in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section unless all of the following requirements are met:
(1) An alternative daily emission limitation shall be determined according to paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of this section. Actual daily emissions shall never exceed the alternative daily emission limitation and shall be calculated by use of the following equation.
Where:
Ed = Actual VOM emissions for the day in units of kg/day (lbs/day),
i = Subscript denoting a specific coating applied,
n = Total number of coatings applied in the can coating operation,
Vi = Volume of each coating applied for the day in units of l/day (gal/day) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), and
Ci = The VOM content of each coating as applied in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM).
(2) The alternative daily emission limitation (Ad) shall be determined on a daily basis as follows:
Where:
Ad = The VOM emissions allowed for the day in units of kg/day (lbs/day),
i = Subscript denoting a specific coating applied,
n = Total number of surface coatings applied in the can coating operation,
Ci = The VOM content of each surface coating as applied in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),
Di = The density of VOM in each coating applied. For the purposes of calculating Ad, the density is 0.882 kg VOM/l VOM (7.36 lbs VOM/gal VOM),
Vi = Volume of each surface coating applied for the day in units of l (gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),
Li = The VOM emission limitation for each surface coating applied as specified in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM).
(D) No owner or operator of a heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section shall apply coatings to heavy off-highway vehicle products on the subject coating line unless the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(D) (1) or (2) of this section are met.
(1) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section, during the same day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or
(2) For each coating line which applies coatings subject to more than one numerical emission limitation in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.
(E) No owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section shall apply coatings to wood furniture on the subject coating line unless the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(E) (1) or (2) of this section, in addition to the requirements specified in the note to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section, are met.
(1) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section, during the same day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.67 kg/l [5.6 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or
(2) For each coating line which applies coatings subject to more than one numerical emission limitation in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.
(F) No owner or operator of an existing diesel-electric locomotive coating line in Cook County, subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section shall apply coatings to diesel-electric locomotives on the subject coating line unless the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(F) (1) or (2) of this section are met.
(1) For each coating line which applies multiple coatings, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section, during the same day (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed the coating VOM content limit corresponding to the category of coating used, or
(2) For each coating line which applies coatings subject to more than one numerical emission limitation in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section, during the same day, the owner or operator shall submit to and receive approval from the Administrator for a site-specific FIP revision. To receive approval, the requirements of USEPA's Emissions Trading Policy Statement (and related policy) must be satisfied.
(iii) Limitations in terms of kg (lbs) of VOM emissions per l (gal) of solids as applied at each coating applicator shall be determined by the following equation:
Where:
S = The limitation on VOM emissions in terms of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of solids,
C = The limitation on VOM emissions in terms of kg/l (lbs/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically excluded from the definition of VOM) specified in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section,
D = The density of VOM in the coating. For the purposes of calculating S, the density is 0.882 kg VOM/l VOM (7.36 lbs VOM/gal VOM).
(2) Alternative emission limitations. Any owner or operator of a coating line subject to paragraph (e)(1) of this section may comply with this paragraph, rather than with paragraph (e)(1) of this section, if a capture system and control device are operated at all times and the owner or operator demonstrates compliance with paragraphs (e)(2) (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) or (vii) of this section (depending upon the source category) through the applicable coating analysis and capture system and control device efficiency test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(iv) of this section; and the control device is equipped with the applicable monitoring equipment specified in paragraph (a)(4)(iv) of this section and the monitoring equipment is installed, calibrated, operated and maintained according to vendor specifications at all times the control device is in use. The use of a capture system and control device, which does not demonstrate compliance with paragraph (e)(2) (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi), or (vii), may only be used as an alternative to compliance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section if approved as a FIP revision.
(i) Alternative add-on control methodologies. (A) The coating line is equipped with a capture system and control device that provides 81 percent reduction in the overall emissions of VOM from the coating line and the control device has a 90 percent efficiency, or
(B) The system used to control VOM from the coating line is demonstrated to have an overall efficiency sufficient to limit VOM emissions to no more than what is allowed under paragraph (e)(1) of this section. Use of any control system other than an afterburner, carbon absorption, condensation, or absorption scrubber system can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision. Transfer efficiency credits can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision. Baseline transfer efficiencies and transfer efficiency test methods must be approved by the Administrator.
Such overall efficiency is to be determined as follows:
(1) Obtain the emission limitation from the appropriate paragraph in (e)(1) of this section,
(2) Calculate “S” according to the equation in paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section,
(3) Calculate the overall efficiency required according to paragraph (a)(4)(v) of this section. For the purposes of calculating this value, according to the equation in (a)(4)(v)(B) of this section VOM1 is equal to the value of “S” as determined above in (i)(B)(2).
(ii) No owner or operator of a coating line subject to only one of the emission limitations from among paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(1), (e)(1)(i)(A)(2), (e)(1)(i)(A)(4), (e)(1)(i)(C), (e)(1)(i)(D), (e)(1)(i)(E), (e)(1)(i)(F), (e)(1)(i)(G), (e)(1)(i)(H), or (e)(1)(i)(I) of this section and equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met. No owner or operator of a coating line subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section and equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the coating line unless the owner or operator demonstrates compliance with the topcoat limitation in accordance with the topcoat protocol for automobile or light-duty trucks referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section.
(iii) No owner or operator of a miscellaneous metal parts and products coating line which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(J) of this section (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met.
(iv) No owner or operator of a heavy off-highway vehicle products coating line which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(K) of this section (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gal]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met.
(v) No owner or operator of an existing diesel-electric locomotive coating line in Cook County which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(M) of this section (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.42 kg/l [3.5 lbs/gals]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met.
(vi) No owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line which applies one or more coatings during the same day, all of which are subject to the same numerical emission limitation within paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) (e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject to 0.67 kg/l [5.6 lbs/gal]), and which is equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating line unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i) (A) or (B) of this section are met. If compliance is achieved by meeting the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section, then the provisions in the note to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section must also be met.
(vii) No owner or operator of a can coating facility and equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject coating facility unless the requirements in paragraph (e)(2)(vii) (A) or (B) of this section are met.
(A) An alternative daily emission limitation shall be determined according to paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of this section. Actual daily emissions shall never exceed the alternative daily emission limitation and shall be calculated by use of the following equation:
Where:
Ed = Actual VOM emissions for the day in units of kg/day (lbs/day),
i = Subscript denoting the specific coating applied,
n = Total number of surface coatings as applied in the can coating operation,
Vi = Volume of each coating as applied for the day in units of 1/day (gal/day) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),
Ci = The VOM content of each coating as applied in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), and
Fi = Fraction, by weight, of VOM emissions from the surface coating, reduced or prevented from being emitted to the ambient air. This is the overall efficiency of the capture system and control device.
(B) The coating line is equipped with a capture system and control device that provide 75 percent reduction in the overall emissions of VOM from the coating line and the control device has a 90 percent efficiency.
(3) Exemptions from emission limitations—(i) Exemptions for all source categories except wood furniture coating. The limitations of paragraph (e) of this section shall not apply to coating lines within a facility, that otherwise would be subject to the same subparagraph of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section (because they belong to the same source category, e.g. can coating), provided that combined actual emissions of VOM from all lines at the facility subject to that subparagraph never exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture systems and control devices. (For example, can coating lines within a plant would not be subject to the limitations of subparagraph (e)(1)(i)(B) of this section if the combined actual emissions of VOM from the can coating lines never exceed 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture systems and control devices.) Volatile organic material emissions from heavy off-highway vehicle products coating lines must be combined with VOM emissions from miscellaneous metal parts and products coating lines to determine applicability. Any owner or operator of a coating facility shall comply with the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section if total VOM emissions from the subject coating lines are always less than or equal to 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) before the application of capture systems and control devices and, therefore, are not subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section. Once a category of coating lines at a facility is subject to the limitations in paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the coating lines are always subject to the limitations in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
(ii) Applicability for wood furniture coating. (A) The limitations of paragraph (e) of this section shall apply to a plant's wood furniture coating lines if the plant contains process emission sources, not regulated by paragraphs (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1), or subparts B, Q (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), R (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), S, V, X, Y (sections 215.582-215.584), or Z of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), which as a group both:
(1) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and
(2) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM per calendar year if no air pollution control equipment were used, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or SIP or FIP version.
(B) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(A) of this section, the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section shall continue to apply to any wood furniture coating line which was ever subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L) of this section.
(C) For the purposes of paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules), section, or paragraph if it is subject to the limitations of that subpart (of the Illinois rules), section, or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules), section, or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.
(D) Any owner or operator of a wood furniture coating line to which the limitations of paragraph (e) of this section are not applicable due to the criteria in paragraph (e)(3)(ii) of this section shall, upon request by the Administrator, submit records to the Administrator within 30 calendar days from the date of the request that document that the coating line is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e) of this section.
(4) Exemption from general rule on use of organic material. No owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section is required to meet the limitations of subpart K (section 215.301 or 215.302) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), after the date by which the coating line is required to meet paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
(5) Compliance schedule. Except as specified in paragraph (e)(7) of this section, every owner or operator of a coating line (of a type included within paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section) shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (e)(1),(e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section and paragraph (e)(6) of this section in accordance with the appropriate compliance schedule as specified in paragraph (e)(5)(i),(ii),(iii) or (iv) of this section.
(i) No owner or operator of a coating line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section. Wood furniture coating lines are not subject to paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section.
(ii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (e)(6)(ii) of this section.
(iii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) and (e)(6)(iii) of this section.
(iv) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(2) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(6)(iv) of this section.
(6) Recordkeeping and reporting. The VOM content of each coating and the efficiency of each capture system and control device shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (e)(6) of this section.
(i) Any owner or operator of a coating line which is exempted from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility referenced in paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section shall certify to the Administrator that the facility is exempt under the provisions of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section. Such certification shall include:
(1) A declaration that the facility is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section; and
(2) Calculations which demonstrate that the combined VOM emissions from all coating lines at the facility never exceed 6.8 kg (15 lbs) per day before the application of capture systems and control devices. The following equation shall be used to calculate total VOM emissions:
Where:
Te = Total VOM emissions from coating lines at a facility each day before the application of capture systems and control devices in units of kg/day (lbs/day),
m = Number of coating lines at the facility,
j = Subscript denoting an individual coating line,
n = Number of different coatings as applied each day on each coating line at the facility,
i = Subscript denoting an individual coating,
Ai = Weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line at the facility in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal), and
Bi = Volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line at the facility in units of l/day (gal/day). The instrument or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each coating as applied on each coating line each day shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility referenced in paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.
(2) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility exempted from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall notify the Administrator of any record showing that total VOM emissions from the coating facility exceed 6.8 kg (15 lbs) in any day before the application of capture systems and control devices shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days after the exceedance occurs.
(ii) Any owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new coating line, or upon changing the method of compliance from an existing subject coating line from paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section; the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall certify to the Administrator that the coating line will be in compliance with paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.
(2) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.
(3) For coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section, certification shall include:
(i) The name and identification number of each coating line which will comply by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section,
(ii) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line,
(iii) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating as applied on each coating line,
(iv) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating as applied each day on each coating line,
(v) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(B) of this section for coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section,
(vi) An example format in which the records required in paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(B) of this section for coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.
(2) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.
(3) For coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section, the owner or operator shall maintain all records necessary to calculate the daily-weighted average VOM content from the coating line in accordance with the proposal submitted, and approved by the Administrator, pursuant to paragraph (e)(1)(A)(3) of this section.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing violation of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation, except that any record showing a violation of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 15 days from the end of the month in which the violation occurred.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section from paragraph (e)(1)(i) to paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6) (iii)(A) or (iv)(A) of this section, respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section from paragraph (e)(1)(i) to paragraph (e)(1)(ii) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6) (iii) or (iv) of this section, respectively.
(3) For coating lines subject to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A)(3) of this section, the owner or operator shall notify the Administrator of any change to the topcoating operation at least 30 days before the change is effected. The Administrator shall determine whether or not recertification testing is required. If the Administrator determines that recertification testing is required, then the owner or operator shall submit a proposal to the Administrator to test within 30 days and retest within 30 days of the Administrator's approval of the proposal.
(iii) Any owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new coating line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing subject coating line from paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section; the owner or operator of the subject coating line shall certify to the Administrator that the coating line will be in compliance with paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating line which will comply by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section.
(2) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.
(3) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.
(4) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating as applied each day on each coating line.
(5) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (e)(6)(iii)(B) of this section.
(6) An example of the format in which the records required in paragraph (e)(6)(iii)(B) of this section will be kept.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.
(2) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.
(3) The daily-weighted average VOM content of all coatings as applied on each coating line as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing violation of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(1)(ii) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(A) or (iv)(A), respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(1)(ii) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(2) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii) or (iv), respectively.
(iv) Any operator or owner of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(2) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(2)(ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) or (vii) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new coating line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing coating line from paragraph (e)(1) (i) or (ii) to paragraph (e)(2) of this section; the owner or operator of the subject coating line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject coating line will be in compliance with paragraph (e)(2) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a coating line subject to the limitations of paragraph (e)(2) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (e)(2) (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi) or (vii) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The weight of VOM per volume of coating solids as applied each day on each coating line, if complying pursuant to paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section.
(2) Control device monitoring data.
(3) A log operating time for the capture system, control device, monitoring equipment and the associated coating line.
(4) A maintenance log for the capture system, control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing violation of paragraph (e)(2) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii)(A) or (iii)(A) of this section, respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (e) from paragraph (e)(2) to paragraph (e)(1)(i) or paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (e)(6)(ii) or (iii) of this section, respectively.
(7) Compliance schedule for diesel electric locomotive coatings. Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, the compliance date for the emission limitations and standards for “topcoat” and “final repair coat” operations only as applied to General Motors Corporation at their diesel electric locomotive coating lines in Cook County, Illinois, codified at 40 CFR 52.741(e)(1)(i)(M) (2) and (3) is specified in this paragraph (e)(7). Compliance with the requirements of paragraph (e)(1), (e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section and paragraph (e)(6) of this section must be in accordance with the appropriate compliance schedule as specified in paragraph (e)(7)(i),(ii),(iii), or (iv) of this section.
(i) No owner or operator of a coating line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (e)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (e)(6)(i) of this section.
(ii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (e)(1)(i) and (e)(6)(ii) of this section.
(iii) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) and (e)(6)(iii) of this section.
(iv) No owner or operator of a coating line complying by means of paragraph (e)(2) of this section shall operate said coating line on or after March 25, 1995, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (e)(2) and (e)(6)(iv) of this section.
(8) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the wood coating line, which coats wooden globe stand components, at Replogle Globes, Inc. (Replogle) Broadview facility in Cook County, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section.
(i) After October 6, 1991, no coatings shall at any time be applied which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating.
(A) 6.59 pounds (lbs) Volatile Organic Material (VOM) per gallon of stain (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat wooden globe stand components. Such stain consists of #9250 Walnut NGR Stain (RGI # W06000100), #9974 Cherry NGR Stain (RGI # W06003500) and #9943 Ash NGR Stain (RGI # W06003600). The Administrator must be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement stains.
(B) 5.53 lbs VOM per gallon of Sanding Sealer (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat wooden globe stand components. Such sealer consists of #15304 High Build Sanding Sealer (RGI # W06003700). The Administrator must be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement sanding sealer.
(C) 5.20 lbs VOM per gallon of lacquer (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat wooden globe stand components. Such lacquer consists of #15352 High Build Lacquer (RGI # W06003300). The Administrator shall be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement lacquer.
(ii) After October 6, 1991, the volume of coatings used shall not exceed the following:
(A) 5,000 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (e)(8)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as follows:
(1) Compute the volume of specified coating used each month by the 15th of the following month.
(2) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly coating use for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of coatings used).
(B) 4,000 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (e)(8)(i)(B) of this section. The yearly volume of the coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (e)(8)(ii)(A)(1) and (e)(8)(ii)(A)(2) of this section.
(C) 5,000 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (e)(8)(i)(C) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (e)(8)(ii)(A)(1) and (e)(8)(ii)(A)(2) of this section.
(iii) Beginning on October 6, 1991, the owner and operator of the Replogle Globes, Inc. plant in Broadview, Illinois shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at Replogle Globes, Inc. for three (3) years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(A) the name and identification number of each coating as applied on any wood coating line.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume (determined in accordance with the procedures in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section) and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any wood coating line.
(9) [Reserved]
(10) Until December 31, 1996, the control and recordkeeping requirements in this paragraph apply to the three solvent-based polyester paper coating lines (Lines C, D and E) at Riverside Laboratories' Kane County, Illinois facility, instead of the control requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (e)(6) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section. The requirements in paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), and (e)(6) of this section shall apply to Riverside on and after December 31, 1996.
(i) After December 21, 1995, no coatings shall at any time be applied on Lines C, D or E which exceed 3.5 pounds (lbs.) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), except as provided in paragraph (e)(10)(ii) of this section.
(ii) After December 21, 1995, the following specifically identified coatings may exceed 3.5 lbs. VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) only if they are applied on Line E and they do not exceed the limits indicated below (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM):
EXP-5027—4.34 lbs./gallon
PD 75 CLR—4.19 lbs./gallon
PD 75 BRN—4.18 lbs./gallon
SQZ-54—3.88 lbs./gallon
SPX-34GL—3.51 lbs./gallon
(iii) That portion of Riverside's polyester production which is manufactured with the use of any VOC, from Lines C, D, and E, may not exceed the following levels: 35 million square feet per year during and after 1992, 29 million square feet per year during and after 1994, and 25 million square feet during 1996. Compliance with this requirement shall be determined by adding the polyester production from any 12 consecutive months during and after the years indicated, through 1996. That is, the polyester production for any 12 consecutive months starting with January 1992 cannot exceed 35 million square feet; the polyester production from any 12 consecutive months starting with January 1994 cannot exceed 29 million square feet; and the polyester production for the twelve months from January through December 1996 cannot exceed 25 million square feet. Only those square feet of polyester whose production involves the use of VOC need to be restricted by the production levels in this paragraph (e)(10)(iii) of this section.
(iv) By December 21, 1995, Riverside shall certify to the Administrator that its polyester coating operations will be in compliance with paragraphs (e)(10)(i), (e)(10)(ii), and (e)(10)(iii) of this section. Such certification shall include the following:
(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on coating lines C, D and E.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on each coating line.
(v) The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any polyester coating not previously identified pursuant to paragraph (e)(10)(iv) of this section. This notification must include the information specified in paragraphs (e)(10)(iv)(A) and (e)(10)(iv)(B) of this section.
(vi) On and after December 21, 1995, Riverside shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating and maintain the information at the facility for a period of 3 years:
(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day.
(C) Any record showing a VOM content in excess of the emission limits in paragraph (e)(10)(i) or (e)(10)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following its collection.
(D) Any VOM besides acetone used in any coating must be identified.
(vii) Starting with the first full month after December 21, 1995, Riverside shall collect and record the figures on polyester production (in square feet), for each month and maintain the information at the facility for a period of at least 3 years.
(viii) Regardless of any other provision of paragraph (e)(10) of this section, after August 21, 1995 no coating which contains any VOM other than acetone shall at any time be applied on Line C, D, or E which exceeds 2.9 lbs. VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM).
(f)-(g) [Reserved]
(h) Printing and publishing—(1) Flexographic and rotogravure printing. (i) No owner or operator of a subject flexographic, packaging rotogravure or publication rotogravure printing line shall apply at any time any coating or ink unless the VOM content does not exceed the limitation specified in either paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) or (B) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating or ink analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(ii) of this section. As an alternative to compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section, a subject printing line may meet the requirements of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) or (iii) of this section.
(A) Forty percent VOM by volume of the coating and ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), or
(B) Twenty-five percent VOM by volume of the volatile content in the coating and ink.
(ii) No owner or operator of a subject flexographic, packaging rotogravure or publication rotogravure printing line shall apply coatings or inks on the subject printing line unless the weighted average, by volume, VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied each day on the subject printing line does not exceed the limitation specified in either paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) (as determined by paragraph (h)(1)(ii)(A) or (h)(1)(i)(B) (as determined by paragraph (h)(1)(ii)(B) of this section. Compliance with this paragraph must be demonstrated through the applicable coating or ink analysis test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this section and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(iii) of this section.
(A) The following equation shall be used to determine if the weighted average VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied each day on the subject printing line exceeds the limitation specified in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section.
Where:
VOM(i)(A) = The weighted average VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of all coatings and inks (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) used each day,
i = Subscript denoting a specific coating or ink as applied,
n = The number of different coatings and/or inks as applied each day on a printing line,
Ci = The VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of each coating or ink as applied (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM),
Li = The liquid volume of each coating or ink as applied in units of l (gal),
Vsi = The volume fraction of solids in each coating or ink as applied, and
VVOMi = The volume fraction of VOM in each coating or ink as applied.
(B) The following equation shall be used to determine if the weighted average VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied each day on the subject printing line exceeds the limitation specified in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(B) of this section.
Where:
VOM(i)(B) = The weighted average VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of the volatile content of all coatings and inks used each day,
i = Subscript denoting a specific coating or ink as applied,
n = The number of different coatings and/or inks as applied each day on each printing line,
Ci = The VOM content in units of percent VOM by volume of the volatile matter in each coating or ink as applied,
Li = The liquid volume of each coating or ink as applied in units of l (gal), and
VVMi = The volume fraction of volatile matter in each coating or ink as applied.
(iii) No owner or operator of a subject flexographic, packaging rotogravure or publication rotogravure printing line equipped with a capture system and control device shall operate the subject printing line unless the owner or operator meets the requirements in paragraph (h)(1)(iii) (A), (B) or (C) and paragraphs (h)(1)(iii) (D), (E) and (F) of this section.
(A) A carbon adsorption system is used which reduces the captured VOM emissions by at least 90 percent by weight, or
(B) An incineration system is used which reduces the captured VOM emissions by at least 90 percent by weight, or
(C) An alternative VOM emission reduction system is demonstrated to have at least a 90 percent control device efficiency and the alternative emission reduction system is approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revisions, and
(D) The printing line is equipped with a capture system and control device that provides an overall reduction in VOM emissions of at least:
(1) 75 percent where a publication rotogravure printing line is employed, or
(2) 65 percent where a packaging rotogravure printing line is employed, or
(3) 60 percent where a flexographic printing line is employed, and
(E) The control device is equipped with the applicable monitoring equipment specified in paragraph (a)(4)(iv)(B) of this section and the monitoring equipment is installed, calibrated, operated and maintained according to vendor specifications at all times the control device is in use, and
(F) The capture system and control device are operated at all times when the subject printing line is in operation. The owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance with this paragraph by using the applicable capture system and control device test methods and procedures specified in paragraphs (a)(4) (iii) through (vi) of this section and by complying with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(iv) of this section.
(2) Applicability. (i) The limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section apply to all flexographic and rotogravure printing lines at a subject facility. All facilities with flexographic and/or rotogravure printing lines are subject facilities unless:
(A) Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all flexographic and rotogravure printing line(s) at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices, or
(B) A federally enforceable construction permit or SIP or FIP revision for all flexographic and rotogravure printing line(s) at a facility requires the owner or operator to limit production or capacity of these printing line(s) to reduce total VOM emissions from all flexographic and rotogravure printing line(s) to 90.7 Mg (100 tons) or less per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices.
(ii) Upon achieving compliance with paragraph (h) of this section, the emission source is not required to meet subpart K (sections 215.301 or 215.302) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742). Emission sources exempt from paragraph (h) of this section are subject to subpart K (sections 215.301 or 215.302). Rotogravure or flexographic equipment used for both roll printing and paper coating are subject to paragraph (h) of this section.
(iii) Once subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section, a flexographic or rotogravure printing line is always subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section.
(iv) Any owner or operator of any flexographic or rotogravure printing line that is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section is subject to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section.
(3) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of a flexographic and/or rotogravure printing line shall comply with the applicable requirements of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and paragraph (h)(4) of this section in accordance with the applicable compliance schedule specified in paragraph (h)(3) (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this section.
(i) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section.
(ii) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this section.
(iii) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(1)(ii) and (h)(4)(iii) of this section.
(iv) No owner or operator of a flexographic or rotogravure printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(1)(iii) and (h)(4)(iv) of this section.
(4) Recordkeeping and reporting. The VOM content of each coating and ink and the efficiency of each capture system and control device shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (h)(4) of this section.
(i) Any owner or operator of a printing line which is exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility to which paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section is applicable shall certify to the Administrator that the facility is exempt under the provisions of paragraph (h)(2) of this section. Such certification shall include:
(1) A declaration that the facility is exempt from the limitations of the criteria in paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of paragraph (h)(2) of this section, and
(2) Calculations which demonstrate that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all flexographic and rotogravure printing lines at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices. Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM for a flexograhpic or rotogravure printing facility is the sum of maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from each flexographic and rotogravure printing line at the facility. The following equation shall be used to calculate total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM per calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices for each flexographic and rotogravure printing line at the facility:
Ep = A × B
Where:
Ep = Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from one flexographic or rotogravure printing line in units of kg/year (lbs/year),
A = Weight of VOM per volume of solids of the coating or ink with the highest VOM content as applied each year on the printing line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of coating or ink solids, and
B = Total volume of solids for all coatings and inks that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line in units of l/year (gal/year). The instrument and/or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each coating and ink as applied and the amount that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility referenced in paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each year for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.
(2) The VOM content and the volume of each coating and ink as applied each year on each printing line.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(2) of this section shall notify the Administrator of any record showing that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all printing lines exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) in any calendar year before the application of capture systems and control devices, shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days after the exceedance occurs.
(ii) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance from an existing subject printing line from paragraph (h)(1) (ii) or (iii) of this section to paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall certify to the Administrator that the printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.
(2) The VOM content of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.
(2) The VOM content of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) of this section from paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section to paragraph (h)(1) (ii) or (iii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (iii)(A) or (iv)(A) of this section respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(i) to paragraph (h)(1) (ii) or (iii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (iii) or (iv) of this section, respectively.
(iii) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing subject printing line from paragraph (h)(1) (i) or (iii) of this section to paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall certify to the Administrator that the printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:
(1) The name and identification number of each printing line which will comply by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section.
(2) The name and identification number of each coating and ink available for use on each printing line.
(3) The VOM content of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.
(4) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.
(5) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(B) of this section.
(6) An example of the format in which the records required in paragraph (h)(4)(iii)(B) of this section will be kept.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall collecting line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on each printing line.
(2) The VOM content and the volume of each coating and ink as applied each day on each printing line.
(3) The daily-weighted average VOM content of all coatings and inks as applied on each printing line.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(1)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) of this section from paragraph (h)(1)(ii) to paragraph (h)(1)(i) or (iii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4)(ii)(A) or (iv)(A), respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(ii) to paragraph (h)(1)(i) or (iii), the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4)(ii) or (iv) of this section, respectively.
(iv) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing printing line from paragraph (h)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section to paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(1) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) Control device monitoring data.
(2) A log of operating time for the capture system, control device, monitoring equipment and the associated printing line.
(3) A maintenance log for the capture system, control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administration in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(iii) to paragraph (h)(1) (i) or (ii), the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (ii)(A) or (iii)(A) of this section, respectively. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(1) from paragraph (h)(1)(iii) to paragraph (h)(1) (i) or (ii) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(4) (ii) or (iii) of this section, respectively.
(5) Heatset-web-offset lithographic printing—(i) Applicability. (A) The limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section apply to all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines at a subject facility. All facilities with heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines are subject facilities unless:
(1) Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, or
(2) A federally enforceable construction permit or SIP or FIP revision for all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line(s) at a facility requires the owner or operator to limit production or capacity of these printing line(s) to reduce total VOM emissions from all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line(s) to 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year or less in the absence of air pollution control equipment, and
(B) Any owner or operator of any heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line that is exempt from the limitations in paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i)(A) of this section shall be subject to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements in paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(A) of this section.
(ii) Specific provisions. No owner or operator of a subject heatset-web-offset printing line may cause or allow the operation of the subject heatset-web-offset printing line unless the owner or operator meets the requirements in paragraph (h)(5)(ii) (A) or (B) of this section and the requirements in paragraphs (h)(5)(ii) (C) and (D) of this section.
(A) An afterburner system is installed and operated that reduces 90 percent of the VOM emissions from the dryer exhaust, or
(B) The fountain solution contains no more than 8 percent, by weight, of VOM and a condensation recovery system is installed and operated that removes at least 75 percent of the non-isopropyl alcohol organic materials from the dryer exhaust, and
(C) The control device is equipped with the applicable monitoring equipment specified in paragraph (a)(4)(iv)(B) of this section and the monitoring equipment is installed, calibrated, operated and maintained according to vendor specifications at all times the control device is in use, and
(D) The control device is operated at all times when the subject printing line is in operation. The owner or operator shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (h)(5) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraphs (a)(4) (i), (iv), and (vi) of this section and by complying with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in paragraph (h)(5)(iii) of this section.
(iii) Recordkeeping and reporting. The VOM content of each fountain solution and ink and the efficiency of each control device shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (h)(5)(iii) of this section.
(A) Any owner or operator of a printing line which is exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section shall comply with the following:
(1) By July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility to which paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(A) of this section is applicable shall certify to the Administrator that the facility is exempt under the provisions of paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section. Such certification shall include:
(i) A declaration that the facility is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section, and
(ii) Calculations which demonstrate that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all heatset-web-offset lithographic printing lines at the facility never exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) per calendar year before the application of air pollution control equipment. Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM for a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing facility is the sum of maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from each heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line at the facility. The following equation shall be used to calculate total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment for each heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line at the facility.
Where:
Ep = Total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from one heatset-web-offset printing line in units of kg/year (lbs/year),
A = Weight of VOM per volume of solids of ink with the highest VOM content as applied each year on the printing line in units of kg VOM/l (lbs VOM/gal) of solids, and
B = Total volume of solids for all inks that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line in units of l/year (gal/year). The instrument or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each ink as applied and the amount that can potentially be applied each year on the printing line shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.
C = The weight percent VOM of the fountain solution with the highest VOM content.
D = The total volume of fountain solution that can potentially be used each year on the printing line in units of l/year (gal/year). The instrument and/or method by which the owner or operator accurately measured or calculated the volume of each fountain solution used and the amount that can potentially be used each year on the printing line shall be described in the certification to the Administrator.
(2) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility to which paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(A) of this section is applicable shall collect and record all of the following information each year for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(i) The name and identification of each fountain solution and ink as applied on each printing line.
(ii) The VOM content and the volume of each fountain solution and ink as applied each year on each printing line.
(3) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a facility exempted from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section shall notify the Administrator of any record showing that total maximum theoretical emissions of VOM from all printing lines exceed 90.7 Mg (100 tons) in any calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days after the exceedance occurs.
(B) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall comply with the following:
(1) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing printing line from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(B) to (ii)(A) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.
(2) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall collect and record the following information each day for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(i) Control device monitoring data.
(ii) A log of operating time for the control device, monitoring equipment and the associated printing line.
(iii) A maintenance log for the control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and nonroutine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.
(3) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(i) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(ii) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(A) to (ii)(B), the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(C)(1) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(A) to (ii)(B) of this section the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(C) of this section.
(C) Any owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall comply with the following:
(1) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new printing line, or upon changing the method of compliance for an existing printing line from paragraph (h)(5) (ii)(A) to (ii)(B) of this section, the owner or operator of the subject printing line shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject printing line will be in compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.
(2) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a printing line subject to the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section and complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall collect and record the following information each day for each printing line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(i) The VOM content of the fountain solution used each day on each printing line.
(ii) A log of operating time for the control device and the associated printing line.
(iii) A maintenance log for the control device detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.
(3) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject printing line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(i) Any record showing violation of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(ii) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section from paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) to (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(B)(1) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section from paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) to (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(B) of this section.
(iv) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line shall comply with the applicable requirements of paragraphs (h)(5) (ii) and (iii) of this section in accordance with the applicable compliance schedule specified in paragraph (h)(5)(iv) (A), (B) or (C) of this section.
(A) No owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line which is exempt from the limitations of paragraph (h)(5)(ii) of this section because of the criteria in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(5)(iii)(A) and (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section.
(B) No owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(A) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraphs (h)(5)(iii)(B) and (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section.
(C) No owner or operator of a heatset-web-offset lithographic printing line complying by means of paragraph (h)(5)(ii)(B) of this section shall operate said printing line on or after July 1, 1991, unless the owner or operator has complied with, and continues to comply with, paragraph (h)(5)(iii)(C) of this section.
(6) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the rotogravure and flexographic presses at General Packaging Products, Inc.'s (GPP) plant in Chicago, Illinois, instead of the requirements in 40 CFR 52.741(h)(1) through 40 CFR 52.741(h)(5).
(i) After July 1, 1992, no inks or other volatile organic material (VOM) containing materials shall at any time be applied or used which have a higher percent VOM by weight than the following:
(A) 8 percent VOM by weight for waterbased inks as applied on GPP's presses.
(B) 82 percent VOM by weight for solvent based inks as applied on GPP's presses.
(C) 100 percent VOM by weight for all other VOM containing materials (besides inks) as used on GPP's presses.
(ii) After July 1, 1992, the weight of ink and other VOM containing materials used shall not exceed the following:
(A) 200,000 pounds per year total for all waterbased inks, as applied (including dilution material). The yearly weight of waterbased inks used is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (h)(6)(iii) of this section.
(B) 100,008 pounds per year total for all solvent based inks, as applied (including dilution material). The yearly weight of solvent based inks used is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (h)(6)(iii) of this section.
(C) 100,000 pounds per year total (based upon the formulation of the material as it is used on the presses) for all other VOM containing materials (besides inks). The yearly weight of other VOM containing materials is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (h)(6)(iii) of this section.
(iii) The yearly weight of ink/material used is to be calculated as follows:
(A) Compute the weight of ink/material used each month by the 15th of the following month.
(B) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly ink/material usage for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly weight of ink/material used).
(iv) Beginning on July 1, 1992, the owner and operator of GPP's plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at GPP for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request:
(A) The name and identification number of each waterbased ink, each solvent based ink, and each other VOM containing material as applied or used on any press.
(B) The pounds of waterbased ink as applied on all presses for each month and the percent VOM by weight for each waterbased ink as applied on any press for each month.
(C) The pounds of solvent based ink as applied on all presses for each month and the percent VOM by weight for each solvent based ink as applied on any press for each month.
(D) The pounds of other (non-ink) VOM containing material used on all presses for each month and the percent VOM by weight for each (non-ink) VOM containing material as used on any press for each month.
(v) Any record showing a violation of paragraph (h)(6)(i) or (h)(6)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days of the violation.
(vi) To determine compliance with paragraphs (h)(6)(i) and (h)(6)(ii) of this section and to establish the records required under paragraph (h)(6)(iv) of this section the percent VOM by weight of each ink and other VOM containing material shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(i) Leaks from synthetic organic chemical and polymer manufacturing equipment—(1) Inspection program for leaks. The owner or operator of a synthetic organic chemical or polymer manufacturing plant subject to paragraph (i) and subpart Q (sections 215.430, 215.431, 215.433, 215.434, 215.435, and 215.437) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) shall, for the purposes of detecting leaks, conduct a component inspection program using the test methods specified in Method 21, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, consistent with the following provisions:
(i) Test annually those components operated near extreme temperature or pressure such that they would be unsafe to routinely monitor and those components which would require the elevation of monitoring personnel higher than two meters above permanent worker access structures or surfaces.
(ii) Test quarterly all other pressure relief valves in gas service, pumps in light liquid service, valves in light liquid service and in gas service, and compressors.
(iii) If less than or equal to 2 percent of the valves in light liquid service and in gas service tested pursuant to paragraph (i)(1)(ii) of this section are found not to leak for five consecutive quarters, no leak tests shall be required for three consecutive quarters. Thereafter, leak tests shall resume for the next quarter. If that test shows less than or equal to 2 percent of the valves in light liquid service and in gas service are leaking, then no tests are required for the next three quarters. If more than 2 percent are leaking, then tests are required for the next five quarters.
(iv) Observe visually all pump seals weekly.
(v) Test immediately any pump seal from which liquids are observed dripping.
(vi) Test any relief valve within 24 hours after it has vented to the atmosphere.
(vii) Routine instrument monitoring of valves which are not externally regulated, flanges, and equipment in heavy liquid service, is not required. However, any valve which is not externally regulated, flange or piece of equipment in heavy liquid service that is found to be leaking on the basis of sight, smell or sound shall be repaired as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days after the leak is found.
(viii) Test immediately after repair any component that was found leaking.
(ix) Within one hour of its detection, a weatherproof, readily visible tag, in bright colors such as red or yellow, bearing an identification number and the date on which the leak was detected must be affixed on the leaking component and remain in place until the leaking component is repaired.
(x) The following components are exempt from the monitoring requirements in paragraph (i)(1) of this section:
(A) Any component that is in vacuum service, and
(B) Any pressure relief valve that is connected to an operating flare header or vapor recovery device.
(2) Alternative program for leaks. The Administrator shall approve an alternative program of monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting to that prescribed in paragraph (i) and subpart Q (sections 215.430, 215.431, 215.433, 215.434, 215.435, and 215.437) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), upon a demonstration by the owner or operator of such plant that the alternative program will provide plant personnel and USEPA personnel with an equivalent ability to identify and repair leaking components. Any alternative program can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(j) Petroleum refining and related industries: asphalt materials—(1) Monitoring program for leaks. (i) The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery subject to subpart R (section 215.445) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) shall, for the purpose of detecting leaks, conduct a component monitoring program consistent with the following provisions:
(A) Test once between March 1 and June 1 of each year, by methods referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(vii) of this section, all pump seals, pipeline valves in liquid service and process drains.
(B) Test once each quarter of each calendar year, by methods referenced in paragraph (a)(4)(vii) of this section, all pressure relief valves in gaseous service, pipeline valves in gaseous service and compressor seals.
(C) Inaccessible valves may be tested once each calendar year instead of once each quarter of each calendar year.
(D) Observe visually all pump seals weekly.
(E) Test immediately any pump seal from which liquids are observed dripping,
(F) Test any relief valve within 24 hours after it has vented to the atmosphere, and
(G) Test immediately after repair any component that was found leaking.
(ii) Storage tank valves and pressure relief devices connected to an operating flare header or vapor recovery device are exempt from the monitoring requirements in paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section.
(iii) The Administrator may require more frequent monitoring than would otherwise be required by paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section for components which are demonstrated to have a history of leaking.
(2) Alternative program for leaks. The Administrator may approve an alternative program of monitoring, recordkeeping or reporting to that prescribed in paragraph (j)(1) of this section and subpart R (sections 215.446, 215.448, and 215.449) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), upon a demonstration by the owner or operator of a petroleum refinery that the alternative program will provide refinery and USEPA personnel with an equivalent ability to identify and repair leaking components. Any alternative program can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(3) Compliance schedule for leaks. The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery shall adhere to the increments of progress contained in the following schedule:
(i) Submit to the Administrator a monitoring program consistent with subpart R (section 215.446) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) prior to September 1, 1990.
(ii) Submit to the Administrator the first monitoring report pursuant to subpart R (section 215.449) of Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) prior to October 1, 1990.
(k)-(l) [Reserved]
(m) Pharmaceutical manufacturing—(1) Applicability. (i) The rules of paragraph (m) of this section, except for paragraphs (m)(4) through (m)(6) of this section, apply to all emission sources of VOM, including but not limited to reactors, distillation units, dryers, storage tanks for VOL, equipment for the transfer of VOL, filters, crystallizers, washers, laboratory hoods, pharmaceutical coating operations, mixing operations and centrifuges used in manufacturing, including packaging, of pharmaceuticals, and emitting more than 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) and more than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year) of VOM. If an emission source emits less than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year) of VOM, the requirements of this paragraph still apply to the emission source if VOM emissions from the emission source exceed 45.4 kg/day (100 lbs/day).
(ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (m)(1)(i) of this section, the air suspension coater/dryer, fluid bed dryers, tunnel dryers, and Accelacotas located in Libertyville Township, Lake County, Illinois shall be exempt from the rules of paragraph (m) of this section, except for paragraphs (m)(4) through (m)(6) of this section, if emissions of VOM not vented to air pollution control equipment do not exceed the following levels:
(A) For the air suspension coater/dryer: 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year);
(B) For each fluid bed dryer: 4,535 kg/year (5.0 tons/year);
(C) For each tunnel dryer: 6,803 kg/year (7.5 tons/year); and
(D) For each Accelacota: 6,803 kg/year (7.5 tons/year).
(iii) Paragraphs (m)(4) through (m)(6) of this section apply to a plant having one or more emission sources that:
(A) Are used to manufacture pharmaceuticals, and
(B) Emit more than 6.8 kg/day (15 lbs/day) of VOM and more than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year) of VOM, or, if less than 2,268 kg/year (2.5 tons/year), these paragraphs still apply if emissions from one or more sources exceed 45.4 kg/day (100 lbs/day).
(iv) No owner or operator shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of an emission source from paragraph (m) of this section.
(v) Any pharmaceutical manufacturing source that becomes subject to the provisions of paragraph (m) of this section at any time shall remain subject to the provisions of paragraph (m) of this section at all times.
(vi) Emissions subject to paragraph (m) of this section shall be controlled at all times consistent with the requirements set forth in paragraph (m) of this section.
(vii) Control devices required pursuant to paragraph (m) of this section shall be operated at all times when the source it is controlling is operated.
(viii) Determinations of daily and annual emissions for purposes of paragraph (m)(1) of this section shall be made using both data on the hourly emission rate (or the emissions per unit of throughput) and appropriate daily and annual data from records of emission source operation (or material throughput or material consumption data). In the absence of representative test data pursuant to paragraph (m)(8) of this section for the hourly emission rate (or the emissions per unit of throughput), such items shall be calculated using engineering calculations, including the methods described in appendix B of “Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacturing of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products” (EPA-450/2-78-029). (This subparagraph shall not affect the Administrator's authority to require emission tests to be performed pursuant to paragraph (m)(8) of this section.)
(2) Control of reactors, distillation units, crystallizers, centrifuges and vacuum dryers. (i) The owner or operator shall equip all reactors, distillation units, crystallizers, centrifuges and vacuum dryers that are used to manufacture pharmaceuticals with surface condensers or other air pollution control equipment listed in paragraph (m)(2)(i)(B) of this section.
(A) If a surface condenser is used, it shall be operated such that the condenser outlet gas temperature does not exceed:
(1) 248.2 K (−13 °F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 40.0kPa (5.8 psi) at 294.3K (70 °F), or
(2) 258.2 K (5 °F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 20.0 kPa (2.9 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F), or
(3) 273.2 K (32 °F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 10.0 kPa (1.5 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F), or
(4) 283.2 K (50 °F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 7.0 kPa (1.0 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F), or
(5) 298.2 K (77 °F) when condensing VOM of vapor pressure greater than 3.45 kPa (0.5 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F).
(B) If a scrubber, carbon adsorption, thermal afterburner, catalytic afterburner, or other air pollution control equipment other than a surface condenser is used, such equipment shall provide a reduction in the emissions of VOM of 90 percent or more.
(ii) The owner or operator shall enclose all centrifuges used to manufacture pharmaceuticals and that have an exposed VOL surface, where the VOM in the VOL has a vapor pressure of 3.45 kPa (0.5 psi) or more at 294.3 K (70 °F), except as production, sampling, maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator access.
(3) Control of air dryers, production equipment exhaust systems and filters. (i) The owner or operator of an air dryer or production equipment exhaust system used to manufacture pharmaceuticals shall control the emissions of VOM from such emission sources by air pollution control equipment which reduces by 90 percent or more the VOM that would otherwise be emitted into the atmosphere.
(ii) The owner or operator shall enclose all rotary vacuum filters and other filters used to manufacture pharmaceuticals and that have an exposed VOL surface, where the VOM in the VOL has a vapor pressure of 3.45 kPa (0.5 psi) or more at 294 K (70 °F), except as production, sampling, maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator access.
(4) Material storage and transfer. The owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant shall:
(i) Provide a vapor balance system that is at least 90 percent effective in reducing VOM emissions from truck or railcar deliveries to storage tanks with capacities equal to or greater than 7.57 m 3 (2,000 gal) that store VOL with vapor pressures greater than 28.0 kPa (4.1 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F), and
(ii) Install, operate, and maintain pressure/vacuum conservation vents set at 0.2 kPa (0.03 psi) or greater on all storage tanks that store VOL with vapor pressures greater than 10 kPa (1.5 psi) at 294.3 K (70 °F).
(5) In-process tanks. The owner or operator shall install covers on all in-process tanks used to manufacture pharmaceuticals and containing a VOL at any time. These covers must remain closed, except as production, sampling, maintenance or inspection procedures require operator access.
(6) Leaks. The owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant shall repair any component from which a leak of VOL can be observed. The repair shall be completed as soon as practicable but no later than 15 days after the leak is found. If the leaking component cannot be repaired until the process unit is shut down, the leaking component must then be repaired before the unit is restarted.
(7) Other emission sources. The owner or operator of a washer, laboratory hood, tablet coating operation, mixing operation or any other process emission source not subject to paragraphs (m)(2) through (m)(6) of this section, and used to manufacture pharmaceuticals shall control the emissions of VOM from such emission sources by:
(i) Air pollution control equipment which reduces by 81 percent or more the VOM that would otherwise be emitted to the atmosphere, or
(ii) A surface condenser which captures all the VOM which would otherwise be emitted to the atmosphere and which meets the requirements of paragraph (m)(2)(i) of this section.
(8) Testing. (i) Upon request by the Administrator, the owner or operator of any VOM emission source subject to paragraph (m) or exempt from paragraph (m) of this section by virtue of the provisions of paragraph (m)(1) of this section shall, at his own expense, demonstrate compliance to the Administrator by the methods or procedures listed in paragraph (a)(vi)(A) of this section.
(ii) A person planning to conduct a VOM emissions test to demonstrate compliance with paragraph (m) of this section shall notify the Administrator of that intent not less than 30 calendar days before the planned initiation of the test.
(9) Monitoring and recordkeeping for air pollution control equipment—(i) Monitoring. (A) At a minimum, continuous monitors for the following parameters shall be installed on air pollution control equipment used to control sources subject to paragraph (m) of this section:
(1) Destruction device combustion temperature.
(2) Temperature rise across a catalytic afterburner bed.
(3) VOM concentration on a carbon absorption unit to determine breakthrough.
(4) Outlet gas temperature of a refrigerated condenser.
(5) Temperature of a non-refrigerated condenser coolant supply system.
(B) Each monitor shall be equipped with a recording device.
(C) Each monitor shall be calibrated quarterly.
(D) Each monitor shall operate at all times while the associated control equipment is operating.
(ii) Recordkeeping. (A) The owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility shall maintain the following records:
(1) Parameters listed in paragraph (m)(9)(i)(A) of this section shall be recorded.
(2) For sources subject to paragraph (m)(2) of this section, the vapor pressure of VOM being controlled shall be recorded for every process.
(B) For any leak subject to paragraph (m)(6) of this section which cannot be readily repaired within one hour after detection, the following records shall be kept:
(1) The name of the leaking equipment,
(2) The date and time the leak is detected,
(3) The action taken to repair the leak, and
(4) The data and time the leak is repaired.
(C) The following records shall be kept for emission sources subject to paragraph (m)(5) of this section which contain VOL:
(1) For maintenance and inspection:
(i) The date and time each cover is opened,
(ii) The length of time the cover remains open, and
(iii) The reason why the cover is opened.
(2) For production and sampling, detailed written procedures or manufacturing directions specifying the circumstances under which covers may be opened and the procedures for opening covers.
(D) For each emission source used in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals for which the owner or operator of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant claims emission standards are not applicable, because the emissions are below the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) of this section or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section the owner or operator shall:
(1) Maintain a demonstration including detailed engineering calculations of the maximum daily and annual emissions for each such emission source showing that the emissions are below the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section, as appropriate, for the current and prior calendar years;
(2) Maintain appropriate operating records for each such emission source to identify whether the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section, as appropriate, are ever exceeded; and
(3) Provide written notification to the Administrator within 30 days of a determination that such an emission source has exceeded the applicability cutoffs in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or paragraph (m)(1)(ii) of this section, as appropriate.
(E) Records required under paragraph (m)(9)(ii)(A) of this section shall be maintained by the owner or operator for a minimum of two years after the date on which they are made.
(F) Copies of the records shall be made available to the Administrator upon verbal or written request.
(n)-(p) [Reserved]
(q) Gasoline distribution—(1) Bulk gasoline plants. (i) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(v) of this section, no person may cause or allow the transfer of gasoline from a delivery vessel into a stationary storage tank located at a bulk gasoline unless:
(A) The delivery vessel and the stationary storage tank are each equipped with a vapor collection system that meets the requirements of paragraph (q)(1)(iv)(D) of this section,
(B) Each vapor collection system is operating,
(C) The delivery vessel displays the appropriate sticker pursuant to the requirements of sections 215.584 (b) or (d) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742),
(D) The pressure relief valve(s) on the stationary storage tank and the delivery vessel are set to release at no less than 0.7 psi or the highest pressure allowed by state or local fire codes or the guidelines of the National Fire Prevention Association, and
(E) The stationary storage tank is equipped with a submerged loading pipe.
(ii) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(vi) of this section, no person may cause or allow the transfer of gasoline from a stationary storage tank located at a bulk gasoline plant into a delivery vessel unless:
(A) The requirements set forth in paragraphs (q) (1)(i)(A) through (1)(i)(D) of this section are met, and
(B) Equipment is available at the bulk gasoline plant to provide for the submerged filling of the delivery vessel or the delivery vessel is equipped for bottom loading.
(iii) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(v) of this section, each owner of a stationary storage tank located at a bulk gasoline plant shall:
(A) Equip each stationary storage tank with a vapor control system that meets the requirements of paragraph (q) (1)(i) or (1)(ii) of this section, whichever is applicable,
(B) Provide instructions to the operator of the bulk gasoline plant describing necessary maintenance operations and procedures for prompt notification of the owner in case of any malfunction of a vapor control system, or
(C) Repair, replace or modify any worn out or malfunctioning component or element of design.
(iv) Subject to paragraph (q)(1)(v) of this section, each operator of a bulk gasoline plant shall:
(A) Maintain and operate each vapor control system in accordance with the owner's instructions,
(B) Promptly notify the owner of any scheduled maintenance or malfunction requiring replacement or repair of a major component of a vapor control system,
(C) Maintain gauges, meters or other specified testing devices in proper working order, and
(D) Operate the bulk plant vapor collection system and gasoline loading equipment in a manner that prevents:
(1) Gauge pressure from exceeding 45.7 cm (18 in.) of water and vacuum from exceeding 15.2 cm (6 in.) of water, as measured as close as possible to the vapor hose connection,
(2) A reading equal to or greater than 100 percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL measured as propane) when tested in accordance with the procedure described in “Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems”, Appendix B, EPA 450/2-78-051 (which is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161), and
(3) Avoidable leaks of liquid during loading or unloading operations.
(E) Provide a pressure tap or equivalent on the bulk plant vapor collection system in order to allow the determination of compliance with paragraph (q)(1)(iv)(D)(1) of this section, and
(F) Within 15 business days after discovery of any leak by the owner, operator, or the Administrator, repair and retest a vapor collection system which exceeds the limits of paragraph (q)(1)(iv)(D) (1) or (2) of this section.
(v) The requirements of paragraphs (q) (1)(i), (1)(iii) and (1)(iv) of this section, shall not apply to:
(A) Any stationary storage tank with a capacity of less than 2,177 l (575 gal), or
(B) Any bulk gasoline plant whose daily gasoline throughtput is less than 15,140 l (4,000 gal/day) on a thirty-day rolling average.
(vi) The requirements of paragraph (q)(1)(ii) of this section shall only apply to bulk gasoline plants:
(A) Whose daily gasoline throughput is greater than or equal to 15,140 l (4,000 gal/day) on a thirty-day rolling average, and
(B) That either distribute gasoline to gasoline dispensing facilities subject to the requirements of section 215.583(a)(2) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742) or that are in Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry or Will County.
(vii) Any bulk gasoline plant which is ever subject to paragraph (q)(1) (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of this section shall always be subject to these paragraphs.
(2) [Reserved]
(r) [Reserved]
(s) Paint and ink manufacturing—(1) Applicability. (i) Paragraph (s) shall apply to all paint and ink manufacturing plants which:
(A) Include process emission sources not subject to subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or to paragraphs (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; and which as a group both:
(1) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and
(2) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM emissions per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or a SIP or FIP revision, or
(B) Produce more than 7,570,820 l (2,000,000 gal) per calendar year of paint or ink formulations, which contain less than 10 percent (by weight) water, and ink formulations not containing as the primary solvents water, Magie oil or glycol.
(ii) For the purposes of paragraph (s) of this section, uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.
(2) Exemption for waterbase material and heatset-offset ink. The requirements of paragraphs (s)(4) and (s)(5) of this section and paragraph (s)(7)(i) of this section shall not apply to equipment while it is being used to produce either:
(i) Paint or ink formulations which contain 10 percent or more (by weight) water, or
(ii) Inks containing Magie oil and glycol as the primary solvent.
(3) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a federally enforceable permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (s).
(4) Open-top mills, tanks, vats or vessels. No person shall operate an open-top mill, tank, vat or vessel with a volume of more than 45 l (12 gal) for the production of paint or ink unless:
(i) The mill, tank, vat or vessel is equipped with a cover which completely covers the mill, tank, vat or vessel opening except for an opening no larger than necessary to allow for safe clearance for a mixer shaft. Such cover shall extend at least 1.27 cm (0.5 in.) beyond the outer rim of the opening or be attached to the rim.
(ii) The cover remains closed except when production, sampling, maintenance or inspection procedures require access.
(iii) The cover is maintained in good condition such that, when in place, it maintains contact with the rim of the opening for at least 90 percent of the circumference of the rim.
(5) Grinding mills. (i) No person shall operate a grinding mill for the production of paint or ink which is not maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
(ii) No person shall operate a grinding mill fabricated or modified after the effective date of paragraph (s) which is not equipped with fully enclosed screens.
(iii) The manufacturer's specifications shall be kept on file at the plant by the owner or operator of the grinding mill and be made available to any person upon verbal or written request during business hours.
(6) Storage tanks. (i) The owner or operator shall equip tanks storing VOL with a vapor pressure greater than 10 kPa (1.5 psi) at 20 °C (68 °F) with pressure/vacuum conservation vents set as a minimum at + /-0.2 kPa (0.029 psi). These controls shall be operated at all times. An alternative air pollution control system may be used if it results in a greater emission reduction than these controls. Any alternative control system can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(ii) Stationary VOL storage containers with a capacity greater than 946 l (250 gal) shall be equipped with a submerged-fill pipe or bottom fill. These controls shall be operated at all times. An alternative control system can only be allowed if approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(7) Leaks. The owner or operator of a paint or ink manufacturing plant shall, for the purpose of detecting leaks, conduct an equipment monitoring program as set forth below:
(i) Each pump shall be checked by visual inspection each calendar week for indications of leaks, that is, liquids dripping from the pump seal. If there are indications of liquids dripping from the pump seal, the pump shall be repaired as soon as practicable, but no later than 15 calendar days after the leak is detected.
(ii) Any pump, valve, pressure relief valve, sampling connection, open-ended valve and flange or connector containing a fluid which is at least 10 percent VOM by weight which appears to be leaking on the basis of sight, smell or sound shall be repaired as soon as practicable, but no later than 15 calendar days after the leak is detected.
(iii) A weather proof, readily visible tag, in bright colors such as red or yellow, bearing an identification number and the date on which the leak was detected shall be attached to leaking equipment. The tag may be removed upon repair, that is, when the equipment is adjusted or otherwise altered to allow operation without leaking.
(iv) When a leak is detected, the owner or operator shall record the date of detection and repair and the record shall be retained at the plant for at least two years from the date of each detection or each repair attempt. The record shall be made available to any person upon verbal or written request during business hours.
(8) Clean up. (i) No person shall clean paint or ink manufacturing equipment with organic solvent unless the equipment being cleaned is completely covered or enclosed except for an opening no larger than necessary to allow safe clearance for proper operation of the cleaning equipment, considering the method and materials being used.
(ii) No person shall store organic wash solvent in other than closed containers, unless closed containers are demonstrated to be a safety hazard, or dispose of organic wash solvent in a manner such that more than 20 percent by weight is allowed to evaporate into the atmosphere.
(9) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (s) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (s) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.
(10) Recordkeeping and reporting. (i) Upon request by the Administrator, the owner or operator of an emission source which claims to be exempt from the requirements of paragraph (s) of this section shall submit records to the Administrator within 30 calendar days from the date of the request which document that the emission source is in fact exempt from paragraph (s) of this section. These records shall include (but are not limited to) the percent water (by weight) in the paint or ink being produced and the quantity of Magie oil, glycol and other solvents in the ink being produced.
(ii) Every owner or operator of an emission source which is subject to the requirements of paragraph (s) of this section shall maintain all records necessary to demonstrate compliance with those requirements at the facility for three years.
(t) [Reserved]
(u) Miscellaneous fabricated product manufacturing processes—(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (u) of this section shall apply to a plant's miscellaneous fabricated product manufacturing process emission sources which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (u) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (u) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:
(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and
(B) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM emissions per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or a SIP or FIP revision.
(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (u)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (u) of this section shall continue to apply to a miscellaneous fabricated products manufacturing process emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (u)(3) of this section.
(iii) No limits under paragraph (u) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 0.91 Mg (1.0 ton) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (u)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.
(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (u) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.
(v) For the purposes of paragraph (u) of this section, uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.
(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (u) of this section.
(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (u) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (u)(3) (i), (ii) or (iii) of this section:
(i) Emission capture and control techniques which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or
(ii) For coating lines, the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed 0.42 kg VOM/l (3.5 lbs VOM/gal) of coating as applied (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) during any day. Owners and Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or
(iii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (u) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (u) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.
(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (u) of this section shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (u)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(6) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the adhesive globe coating operations at Replogle's Broadview facility in Cook County, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (u)(3) of this section.
(i) After October 6, 1991, no coatings shall at any time be applied which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating.
(A) 7.0 lbs VOM per gallon of adhesive coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat globes. Such coating consists of #7879446 Methylene Chloride (RGI #01004100). The Administrator shall be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the use of any replacement adhesive for coating globes.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) After October 6, 1991, the volume of coatings used shall not exceed the following:
(A) 572 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (u)(6)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as follows:
(1) Compute the volume of specified coating used each month by the 15th of the following month.
(2) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly coating use for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of coatings used).
(B) [Reserved]
(iii) Beginning on October 6, 1991, the owner and operator of the Replogle Globes, Inc. plant in Broadview, Illinois shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at Replogle Globes, Inc. for three (3) years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request:
(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on any adhesive globe coating line.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any adhesive globe coating line.
(7) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the glass candle container coating line(s) and silk screening machines at the Candle Corporation of America (CCA), Chicago, Illinois facility, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (u)(3) of this section.
(i) After June 1, 1992, no coatings or inks shall at any time be applied, at any coating or ink applicator, which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating or ink.
(A) 6.04 pounds (lbs) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of clear lacquer/varnish (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat glass candle containers. Such clear lacquer/varnish (multi-color) is identified as LP3500. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement clear lacquers/varnishes.
(B) 5.23 lbs VOM per gallon of translucent coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat glass candle containers. Such translucent coating (multi-color) is identified as LP3603. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement translucent coatings.
(C) 5.84 lbs VOM per gallon of white lacquer (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to coat glass candle containers. Such white lacquer is identified as LP3507. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement white lacquers.
(D) 3.40 lbs VOM per gallon of fast dry enamel silk screen printing ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied to print onto glass candle containers.
(ii) After June 1, 1992, the volume of coating and ink used shall not exceed the following:
(A) 2,164 gallons per month total for all coatings specified in paragraph (u)(7)(i)(A) of this section.
(B) 369 gallons per month total for all coatings specified in paragraph (u)(7)(i)(B) of this section.
(C) 49 gallons per month total for all coatings specified in paragraph (u)(7)(i)(C) of this section.
(D) 50 gallons per month total for all inks specified in paragraph (u)(7)(i)(D) of this Section.
(iii) Beginning on June 1, 1992, the owner and operator of CCA's plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at CCA for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(A) The name and identification number of each coating and ink as applied on any glass candle container coating line or silk screening machine.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating and ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any glass candle container coating line or silk screening machine.
(iv) After June 1, 1992, no more than 100 gallons per month of cleaning solvent is allowed to be used on the glass candle container coating line(s) at CCA. The only cleaning solvents allowed for use are acetone (identified as LP3525) and methyl ethyl ketone (identified as LP3520). Beginning on June 1, 1992, CCA shall keep monthly records of the type and volume of all cleaning solvents used. All such records shall be retained at CCA for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(v) After June 1, 1992, no more than 50 gallons per month of cleaning solvent is allowed to be used on the glass candle container silk screening machines at CCA. The only cleaning solvent allowed for use is petroleum naphtha (identified as light aromatic naphtha with 7.28 lbs VOM per gallon, minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM). Beginning on June 1, 1992, CCA shall keep monthly records of the type and volume and the weight of VOM per volume (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) of all cleaning solvents used on the glass candle container silk screening machines. All such records shall be retained at CCA for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(8) The control, recordkeeping and reporting requirements in this paragraph apply to the cellulose food casing manufacturing operations at the Viskase Corporation plant in Bedford Park, Illinois (Cook County) instead of the requirements in paragraph (v) of this section, the other parts of paragraph (u) of this section, and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (y) of this section. Unless otherwise stated, the following requirements must be met by Viskase on and after November 21, 1995.
(i) VOM emissions shall never exceed 3.30 tons per day.
(ii) VOM emissions shall not exceed 2.22 tons per day, on a monthly average, during June, July, and August.
(iii) VOM emissions shall not exceed 2.44 tons per day during June, July, and August.
(iv) Compliance with the emission limits in paragraphs (u)(8) (i) through (iii) of this section, and the records in paragraph (u)(8)(v) of this section, shall be determined using an emission factor of “0.72 pounds of VOM emissions per pound of carbon disulfide consumed.”
(v) Viskase must keep the following daily records:
(A) The pounds of carbon disulfide per charge for its Fibrous process. If charges with different levels of carbon disulfide per charge are used the same day, a separate record must be kept for each level of carbon disulfide per charge.
(B) The pounds of carbon disulfide per charge for its NOJAX process. If charges with different levels of carbon disulfide per charge are used the same day, a separate record must be kept for each level of carbon disulfide per charge.
(C) The number of charges per day, for each level of carbon disulfide per charge, used in Viskase's Fibrous process.
(D) The number of charges per day, for each level of carbon disulfide per charge, used in Viskase's NOJAX process.
(E) The total quantity of carbon disulfide used per day in Viskase's Fibrous process, the total quantity of carbon disulfide used per day in Viskase's NOJAX process, and the daily VOM emissions resulting from use of the carbon disulfide.
(F) The monthly use of carbon disulfide, and the monthly VOM emissions resulting from use of the carbon disulfide, during June, July, and August.
(vi) Any violation of the emission limits in paragraphs (u)(8) (i) through (iii) of this section must be reported to USEPA within 30 days of its occurrence.
(vii) In order to determine daily and monthly VOM emissions, the test methods in paragraph (a)(4) of this section may be used in addition to, and take precedence over, the emission factor cited in paragraph (u)(8)(iv) of this section. Method 15 is to be used instead of Methods 18, 25, and 25A when the test methods in paragraph (a)(4) of this section are used to determine VOM emissions from Viskase's cellulose food casing facility.
(v) Miscellaneous formulation manufacturing processes—(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (v) of this section shall apply to a plant's miscellaneous formulation manufacturing process emission sources, which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452),(S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (v) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (v) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:
(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and
(B) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM emissions per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or a SIP or FIP revision.
(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (v)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (v) of this section shall continue to apply to a miscellaneous formulation manufacturing process emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (v)(3) of this section.
(iii) No limits under paragraph (v) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 2.3 Mg (2.5 tons) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (v)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.
(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (v) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.
(v) For the purposes of paragraph (v) of this section uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.
(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (v) of this section.
(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (v) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (v)(3) (i) or (ii) of this section.
(i) Emission capture and control techniques which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or
(ii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (v) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (v) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.
(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (v) of this section shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (v)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(6) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the 7 blenders and 3 moguls of the adhesive coating solution formulation (compounding) operations at the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Corporation's (3M) Bedford Park facility in Cook County, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (v)(3) of this section.
(i) After September 1, 1991, the following operating restrictions shall apply to 3M's Bedford Park, Illinois, compounding operations.
(A) The combined operating hours for all blenders shall not exceed 8,400 hours per quarter (rolled on a monthly basis). The combined quarterly operating hours of all blenders are to be calculated as follows:
(1) By the 15th of each month, compute the combined monthly operating hours of all blenders during the previous month.
(2) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly operating hours of all blenders for the 3 previous months (to obtain the combined quarterly operating hours of all blenders).
(B) The combined operating hours for all moguls shall not exceed 4,200 hours per quarter (rolled on a monthly basis). The quarterly operating hours of all moguls are to be calculated as follows:
(1) By the 15th of each month, compute the combined monthly operating hours of all moguls during the previous month.
(2) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly operating hours of all moguls for the 3 previous months (to obtain the combined quarterly operating hours of all moguls).
(ii) Beginning on September 1, 1991, the owner and operator of the 3M Bedford Park Plant in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records. These records shall be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the 3M facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.
(A) Separate monthly records for each of the 7 blenders identifying each batch and the length of each batch as well as the total monthly hours of operation for all blenders.
(B) Separate monthly records for each of the 3 moguls identifying each batch and the length of each batch as well as the total monthly hours of operation for all moguls.
(w) Miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing processes—(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (w) of this section shall apply to a plant's miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing process emission sources which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (w) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (w) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subparts (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:
(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and
(B) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM emissions per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or a SIP or FIP revision.
(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (w)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (w) of this section shall continue to apply to a miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing process emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (w)(3) of this section.
(iii) No limits under paragraph (w) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 0.91 Mg (1.0 ton) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (w)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.
(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (w) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.
(v) For the purposes of paragraph (w) of this section, uncontrolled VOM emissions are the emissions of VOM which would result if no air pollution control equipment were used.
(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusions of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (w) of this section.
(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (w) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (w)(3)(i) or (ii) of this section.
(i) Emission capture and control techniques which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or
(ii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to the control requirements of paragraph (w) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (w) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.
(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (w) shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (w)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(x) Other emission sources—(1) Applicability. (i) The requirements of paragraph (x) of this section shall apply to a plant's VOM emission sources, which are not included within any of the source categories specified in subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or specified in paragraph (d), (e), (h), (i), (j), (q)(1), (s), (u), (v) or (w) of this section; if the plant is subject to paragraph (x) of this section. A plant is subject to paragraph (x) of this section if it contains process emission sources, not regulated by subpart (B), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), or (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or by paragraph (d), (e) of this section (excluding paragraph (e)(1)(i)(L)), (h) (excluding paragraph (h)(5)), (i), (j), or (q)(1) of this section; which as a group both:
(A) Have maximum theoretical emissions of 91 Mg (100 tons) or more per calendar year of VOM if no air pollution control equipment were used, and
(B) Are not limited to less than 91 Mg (100 tons) of VOM emissions per calendar year in the absence of air pollution control equipment, through production or capacity limitations contained in a federally enforceable construction permit or a SIP of FIP revision.
(ii) If a plant ceases to fulfill the criteria of paragraph (x)(1)(i) of this section, the requirements of paragraph (x) of this section shall continue to apply to an emission source which was ever subject to the control requirements of paragraph (x)(3) of this section.
(iii) No limits under paragraph (x) of this section shall apply to emission sources with emissions of VOM to the atmosphere less than or equal to 2.3 Mg (2.5 tons) per calendar year if the total emissions from such sources not complying with paragraph (x)(3) of this section does not exceed 4.5 Mg (5.0 tons) per calendar year.
(iv) For the purposes of paragraph (x) of this section, an emission source shall be considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph if it is subject to the limits of that subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph. An emission source is not considered regulated by a subpart (of the Illinois rules) or paragraph of its emissions are below the applicability cutoff level or if the source is covered by an exemption.
(v) The control requirements in paragraphs (u), (v), (w), and (x) of this section shall not apply to sewage treatment plants, vegetable oil processing plants, coke ovens (including by-product recovery plants), fuel combustion sources, bakeries, barge loading facilities, jet engine test cells, pharmaceutical manufacturing, production of polystyrene foam insulation board (including storage and extrusion of scrap where blowing agent is added to the polystyrene resin at the plant), production of polystyrene foam packaging (not including storage and extrusion of scrap where blowing agent is added to the polystyrene resin at the plant), and iron and steel production.
(2) Permit conditions. No person shall violate any condition in a permit when the condition results in exclusion of the plant or an emission source from paragraph (x) of this section.
(3) Control requirements. Every owner or operator of an emission source subject to paragraph (x) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (x)(3) (i), (ii) or (iii) of this section.
(i) Emission capture and control equipment which achieve an overall reduction in uncontrolled VOM emissions of at least 81 percent, or
(ii) For coating lines, the daily-weighted average VOM content shall not exceed 0.42 kg VOM/l (3.5 lbs VOM/gal) of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied during any day. Owners and operators complying with this paragraph are not required to comply with section 215.301 of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 (incorporated by reference as specified in 40 CFR 52.742), or
(iii) An alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision.
(4) Compliance schedule. Every owner or operator of an emissions source which is subject to paragraph (x) of this section shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (x) of this section on and after July 1, 1991.
(5) Testing. Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to paragraph (x) of this section shall demonstrate compliance with paragraph (x)(3) of this section by using the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(6) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the varnish operations at the General Motors Corporation, Electro-Motive Division Plant (GMC Electro-Motive), LaGrange, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.
(i) After July 1, 1991, no coatings shall at any time be applied which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating.
(A) 8.0 lbs VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied at each coating applicator to coat Nomex rings. Such coating consists of Monsanto Skybond 705 Polyamide Resin (EMD P/N 9088817) and diluents. The Administrator must be notified at least 10 days prior to the use of any replacement coating(s) and/or diluents for coating Nomex rings.
(B) 6.8 lbs VOM per gallon of coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied at each coating applicator for any coatings not specified in paragraph (x)(6)(i)(A) of this section.
(ii) After July 1, 1991, the volume of coatings used shall not exceed the following:
(A) 600 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (x)(6)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as follows:
(1) Compute the volume of specified coating used each month by the 15th of the following month.
(2) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly coating use for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of coatings used).
(B) 28,500 gallons per year total for all coatings other than those specified in paragraph (x)(6)(i)(A) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(6)(ii)(A)(1) and (x)(6)(ii)(A)(2) of this section.
(iii) Beginning on July 1, 1991, the owner and operator of the General Motors Corporation Electro-Motive Division Plant in LaGrange, Illinois shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at General Motors for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on any coating line within the varnish operation.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any coating line within the varnish operation.
(7) The control, recordkeeping, and monitoring requirements in this paragraph apply to the aluminum rolling mills at the Reynolds Metals Company's McCook Sheet & Plate Plant in McCook, Illinois (Cook County) instead of the control requirements and test methods in the other parts of paragraph (x), and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (y) of this section. All of the following requirements must be met by Reynolds on and after July 7, 1995.
(i) Only organic lubricants with initial and final boiling points between 460 degrees F and 635 degrees F, as determined by a distillation range test using ASTM method D86-90, are allowed to be used at Reynolds' aluminum sheet cold rolling mills numbers 1 and 7. All incoming shipments of organic lubricant for the number 1 and 7 mills must be sampled and each sample must undergo a distillation range test to determine the initial and final boiling points using ASTM method D86-90. A grab rolling lubricant sample shall be taken from each operating mill on a monthly basis and each sample must undergo a distillation range test, to determine the initial and final boiling points, using ASTM method D86-90.
(ii) An oil/water emulsion, with no more than 15 percent by weight of petroleum-based oil and additives, shall be the only lubricant used at Reynolds' aluminum sheet and plate hot rolling mills, 120 inch, 96 inch, 80 inch, and 145 inch mills. A grab rolling lubricant sample shall be taken from each operating mill on a monthly basis and each sample shall be tested for the percent by weight of petroleum-based oil and additives by ASTM Method D95-83.
(iii) The temperature of the inlet supply of rolling lubricant for aluminum sheet cold rolling mills numbers 1 and 7 shall not exceed 150 °F, as measured at or after (but prior to the lubricant nozzles) the inlet sump. The temperature of the inlet supply of rolling lubricant for the aluminum sheet and plate hot rolling mills, 120 inch, 96 inch, 80 inch, and 145 inch mills shall not exceed 200 °F, as measured at or after (but prior to the lubricant nozzles) the inlet sump. Coolant temperatures shall be monitored at all the rolling mills by use of thermocouple probes and chart recorders or electronic data recorders.
(iv) All distillation test results for cold mill lubricants, all percent oil test results for hot mill lubricants, all coolant temperature recording charts and/or temperature data obtained from electronic data recorders, and all oil/water emulsion formulation records, shall be kept on file, and be available for inspection by USEPA, for three years.
(8) The control and recordkeeping requirements in this paragraph apply to the silk screen presses and associated ovens, cleaning operations and laminators at Parisian's Novelty Company (Parisian), Chicago, Illinois, facility, instead of the control requirements in paragraphs (x)(8) (u)(3) and (x)(3) of this section and the recordkeeping requirements in paragraph (x)(8)(y) of this section.
(i) After March 1, 1993, no coatings or inks shall at any time be applied, at any coating or ink applicator, which exceed the following emission limitations for the specified coating or ink.
(A) 6.65 pounds (lbs) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on Parisian's silk screen presses.
(B) 6.4 lbs VOM per gallon of adhesive coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on Parisian's laminators. Such adhesive is identified as MIX #963.
(ii) After March 1, 1993, the volume of coating and ink used shall not exceed the following:
(A) 2,556 gallons per year total for all inks. The yearly volume of inks used is to be calculated as follows:
(1) Compute the volume of ink used each month by the 15th of the following month.
(2) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly ink usage for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of ink used).
(B) 780 gallons per year total for all coatings specified in paragraph (x)(8)(i)(B) of this section. The yearly volume of coatings used are to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(8)(ii)(A)(1) and (x)(8)(ii)(A)(2) of this section.
(iii) Beginning on March 1, 1993, the owner and operator of Parisian's plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each month. All records shall be retained at Parisian for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(A) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on any laminator.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any laminator.
(C) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each type of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month on any screen press.
(iv) After March 1, 1993, no more than 84 gallons per year of denatured alcohol may be used for cleaning labels at Parisian. The yearly volume of denatured alcohol used is to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(8)(ii)(A)(1) and (x)(8)(ii)(A)(2) of this section. Beginning on March 1, 1993, Parisian shall keep monthly records of the type, volume, and VOM content of all solvents used for label cleaning. These records shall be retained at Parisian for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(v) After March 1, 1993, no more than 7,932 gallons per year of screen wash #956 may be used on Parisian's screen cleaner. The yearly volume of screen wash #956 used is to be calculated as specified in paragraphs (x)(8)(ii)(A)(1) and (x)(8)(ii)(A)(2) of this section. Beginning on March 1, 1993, Parisian shall keep monthly records of the type, volume, and VOM content of all cleaning compounds used on Parisian's screen cleaner. These records shall be retained at Parisian for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request.
(vi) After March 1, 1993, only those cleaners specifically identified in paragraphs (x)(8)(iv) and (x)(8)(v) of this section may be used at Parisian.
(9) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the process sources listed in paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A) of this section at the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.
(i) Production and Operation Restrictions.
(A) On and after October 1, 1992, the maximum volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions per batch, the 12-month rolling average number of batches per year, and the peak limit of batches per month shall not exceed the following limits:
| Source | Maximum VOC emissions, lb/batch | 12-mo. rolling average limit batch/yr | Peak batch limit, batch/month |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) System 1 charge | 0.16 | 280 | 33 |
| System 1 purge | 1.35 | ||
| (2) 24-T-156, 157 | 2.60 | 300 | 33 |
| (3) 28-T-217, 234 | 0.23 | 402 | 45 |
| (4) 28-T-214-216 | 5.70 | 603 | 65 |
| (5) 20-R-182, 185 | 0.02 | 72 | 8 |
| (6) 20-R-130 | 0.07 | 340 | 38 |
| (7) 20-R-155 | 0.21 | 254 | 29 |
| (8) 20-WT-174 | 0.21 | 254 | 29 |
| (9) 12-T-97-99 | 4.6E-4 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (10) 12-T-95 | 4.0E-6 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (11) 12-T-96 | 7.7E-5 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (12) 12-T-67, 73 | 0.003 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (13) 20-T-121-122 | 0.85 | 312 | 34 |
| (14) 20-T-123-125 | 5.4 | 616 | 68 |
| (15) 20-T-140, 142 | 8.0 | 600 | 65 |
| (16) 20-T-159 | 0.31 | 416 | 46 |
| (17) 20-R-193, 200 | 9.8 | 540 | 59 |
| (18) 32-R-300 | 0.18 | 365 | 41 |
| (19) 32-T-302 | 0.21 | 365 | 41 |
| (20) 32-T-304 | 0.21 | 730 | 81 |
| (21) 32-T-314 | 0.23 | 365 | 41 |
| (22) 32-T-322 | 0.21 | 365 | 41 |
| (23) 32-T-328 | 0.23 | 365 | 41 |
| (24) 10-T-61 | 0.001 | 365—containing organic | 31—containing organic |
| (25) 24-T-441, 166 | 0.12 | 730 | 81 |
| (26) 25-T-284, 440, 443-444 | 0.28 | 730 | 81 |
| (27) 25-T-170 | 4E-6 | 104 | 12 |
| (28) Tank truck loading | 0.12 lb/truck | 1,600 trucks/yr | 134 trucks/mo |
| (29) System 2 | 0.36 | 280 | 33 |
| (30) System 4 | 2.88 | 280 | 33 |
| (31) 25-R-164 | 0.10 | 365 | 41 |
| (32) 25-R-205 | 0.14 | 365 | 41 |
| (33) Drum station | 3.51 | 1,005 | 110 |
| (34) V-4SAC | 1.56 | 254 | 29 |
| (35) 20-CT-155 | 13.90 | 254 | 29 |
| (36) 12-SE-100 | 1.10 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (37) Drum exhaust hood A | 1.00 | 365—involving use of organic material | 31—involving use of organic material |
| (38) 24-T-230 | 0.98 | 730 | 81 |
| (39) 8-CT-1 | 0.002 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (40) 9-CT-1 | 0.002 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (41) 10-CT-1 | 0.005 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (42) 22-CT-1 | 0.003 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (43) 25-CT-1 | 0.005 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (44) 25-CT-2 | 0.002 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (45) 29-CT-1 | 0.002 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (46) 32-CT-1 | 0.005 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (47) 36-CT-1 | 0.002 lb/hr | 8,760 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (48) 32-T-325 | 0 a | 365 | 41 |
| (49) 26-R-195 | 0.1 a | 365 | 41 |
| (50) Continuous polymer-blending | 0.1 lb/hr a | 2,000 hr/yr | |
| (51) Portafeed washer booth 1 | 0.84 lb/hr b | 4,160 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (52) Portafeed washer booth 2 | 0.84 lb/hr b | 8,736 hr/yr | 744 hr/mo |
| (53) 32-T-392 | 4.4E-7 | 104 | 12 |
| a Assumed value. | |||
| b Based on monitoring data. |
(B) The following equation shall be used to calculate maximum VOC emissions per batch for the process sources listed in paragraphs (x)(9)(i)(A)(1) (charge only and (2) through (28) and (53) of this section:
Where:
ER = VOC emission rate;
Qo = Quantity of organic per batch or charge rate;
Mv = Molecular weight of the volatile component;
P = Partial pressure of the volatile component for mixtures of liquid made up with more than one chemical; or vapor pressure for pure liquids made up of only one organic chemical; and
Constant 1 = (7.45 gal/ft 3) × (385 ft 3/mole)x(760 mmHg).
(C) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the process sources listed in paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)(1) of this section (purge only) and (29) through (32) of this section:
Where:
PR = Nitrogen purge rate; and
Constant 2 = (385 ft 3/mole) × (760 mmHg).
(D) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the drum station listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)(33) of this section:
ER(1b/batch) = (0.40 × [ER28-T-217-218]) + (0.60 × [ER28-T-214-216])
(E) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the V-4SAC listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)(34) of this section:
Where:
FR1mmHg = Maximum air flow rate to maintain 1 mmHg;
Ma = Molecular weight of air; and
Pv2 = Vapor pressure of organic at 65 °F and 760 mmHg.
(F) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from 20-CT-155 listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)(35) of this section:
Where:
ERtot = Total system emission rate calculated using the following equation:
Where:
Pv1 = Vapor pressure of organic at 200 °F and 350 mmHg.
(G) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per hour from 12-SE-100 listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)(36) of this section:
ER(lb/hr) = Evap (gm/cm 2 sec) × area (cm 2) × 3600 sec/hr
Where:
Evap = Evaporation rate from a surface 8.93 cm × 8.9 cm (lb/[cm 2] [sec]) calculated using the following equation:
Evap = 10−7 Mv0.71 × [0.034 (Pe − Pd) 1.25 + 156 (Pe − Pd)]
Where:
Pe = Partial pressure of the component from the spilled liquid;
Pd = Partial pressure of the component in the incident air stream, assumed to be 0 mmhg; and
Area = Surface area of the liquid.
(H) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the drum exhaust hood A listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)(37) of this section:
Where:
FR = Air flow rate.
(I) The following equation shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from 24-T-230 listed at paragraph (x)(9)(i)(A)(38) of this section:
Where:
VH = Head space volume at heated temperature 135 °F;
VA = Head space volume at ambient temperature 68 °F;
PP135 °F = Partial pressure of volatile component at 135 °F.
Constant 3 = (434 ft 3/mole)(7.45 gal/ft 3) × (760 mmHg)
(J) The following equations shall be used to calculate the VOC emissions per batch from the process sources listed in paragraph (x)(9)(i) (39) through (47) of this section:
Where:
VR = Refill volume;
t = Time between refills;
org = Fraction of organic component in product;
CB = Concentration of chemical B fed 3 times/week;
VT = Tower volume;
dB = Density of chemical B;
CC = Concentration of chemical C fed continuously;
Evap = Evaporation rate; and
dc = Density of chemical C.
(K) The number of batches for each process source shall be calculated as follows:
(1) Compute the monthly number of batches for each process source by the 15th day of the following month.
(2) By the 15th day of each month, add the monthly number of batches for each process source for the 12 previous months to obtain the total number of batches per year.
(ii) Recordingkeeping. (A) On and after October 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records for all process sources listed in paragraphs (x)(9)(i)(A) (1) through (53) of this section. These records shall be maintained for the units specified in paragraphs (x)(9)(i) (A) through (K) of this section, be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.
(B) [Reserved]
(1) Calculations of the pounds per batch or pounds per hour (as appropriate) for each batch for each process source. This includes the information necessary for each calculation.
(2) The monthly number of batches for each process source.
(3) The total number of batches per year for the 12 previous months for each process source.
(10) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the storage tanks listed in paragraph (x)(10)(i)(A) of this section at the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.
(i) Production and Operation Restrictions. (A) On and after October 1, 1992, the product of the molecular weight of vapor in each storage tank (Mv), the true vapor pressure at bulk liquid conditions for each tank (P), and the paint factor (Fp); the storage tank maximum yearly throughput for each tank; and the maximum monthly throughput for each tank shall not exceed the following limits:
| Tank No. | MV × P × Fp, (lb) (mmhg)/lb-mole | Yearly throughput, gal/yr | Monthly throughput, gal/month |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) 24-T-147 | 45.4 | 56,250 | 4,688 |
| (2) 24-T-150 | 227 | 266,450 | 22,204 |
| (3) 24-T-151 | 227 | 266,450 | 22,204 |
| (4) 24-T-158N | 18.9 | 173,830 | 14,486 |
| (5) 24-T-158C | 18.0 | 110,190 | 9,183 |
| (6) 24-T-158S | 1.17 | 52,010 | 4,334 |
| (7) 24-T-160 | 226.8 | 266,450 | 22,204 |
| (8) 24-T-161 | 227 | 182,450 | 15,204 |
| (9) 24-T-162 | 473 | 93,900 | 7,825 |
| (10) 20-T-101 | 3.72 | 90,290 | 7,525 |
| (11) 20-T-102 | 1.80 | 122,900 | 10,242 |
| (12) 20-T-103 | 420 | 23,960 | 1,997 |
| (13) 20-T-104 | 180 | 475,900 | 39,659 |
| (14) 20-T-105 | 370 | 52,360 | 4,363 |
| (15) 20-T-106 | 1,210 | 623,100 | 51,926 |
| (16) 20-T-107 | 294 | 90,040 | 7,503 |
| (17) 20-T-108 | 1,360 | 81,470 | 6,789 |
| (18) 20-T-109 | 1,390 | 167,060 | 13,922 |
| (19) 20-T-153 | 180 | 35,000 | 2,917 |
| (20) 20-T-131 a | |||
| (21) 20-T-132 a | |||
| (22) 20-T-133 a | |||
| (23) 20-T-134 a | |||
| (24) 20-T-135 a | |||
| (25) 20-T-136 | 29.5 | 307,710 | 26,580 |
| (26) 20-T-137 a | |||
| (27) 20-T-138 | 29.5 | 307,710 | 26,580 |
| (28) 32-T-305 | 288 | 785,550 | 65,462 |
| (29) 32-T-306 | 66.5 | 165,350 | 13,779 |
| (30) 32-T-307 | 66.5 | 294,750 | 24,563 |
| (31) 32-T-308 | 66.5 | 128,470 | 10,706 |
| (32) 32-T-310 | 66.5 | 77,290 | 6,441 |
| (33) 32-T-311 | 66.5 | 182,130 | 15,177 |
| (34) 32-T-319 | 50.0 | 688,950 | 57,413 |
| (35) 32-T-320 | 50.0 | 688,950 | 57,413 |
| (36) 32-T-326 | 70.0 | 248,440 | 20,703 |
| (37) 32-T-331 | 70.0 | 489,540 | 40,795 |
| (38) 32-T-332 | 70.0 | 70,380 | 5,865 |
| (39) 32-T-333 | 70.0 | 270,850 | 22,571 |
| (40) 32-T-334 | 70.0 | 210,610 | 18,267 |
| (41) 32-T-335 | 70.0 | 418,200 | 34,850 |
| (42) 32-T-336 | 70.0 | 632,460 | 52,706 |
| (43) 32-T-337 | 798 | 53,850 | 4,488 |
| (44) 17-T-206 | 27,000 | 300,760 | 25,063 |
| (45) 17-T-208 | 27,000 | 300,760 | 25,063 |
| (46) 17-T-207 | 2.48 | 180,180 | 15,016 |
| (47) 17-T-209 | 2.48 | 180,180 | 15,016 |
| (48) 24-T-515 | 331 | 216,860 | 18,072 |
| (49) 25-T-282 | 1.42 | 1,920,410 | 160,034 |
| (50) 25-T-283 | 1.42 | 1,920,410 | 160,034 |
| (51) 24-T-442 | 18.0 | 90,990 | 7,583 |
| (52) 17-T-210 | 47.9 | 582,990 | 48,583 |
| (53) 17-T-211 | 47.9 | 582,990 | 48,583 |
| (54) 17-T-212 | 508 | 728,420 | 60,702 |
| (55) 17-T-213 | 508 | 728,420 | 60,702 |
| (56) 17-T-401 | 50.0 | 131,970 | 10,998 |
| (57) 17-T-402 | 15.0 | 120,160 | 10,014 |
| (58) 17-T-403 | 6.20 | 127,770 | 10,648 |
| (59) 17-T-404 | 26.5 | 1,601,510 | 133,460 |
| (60) 17-T-405 | 50.0 | 113,830 | 9,486 |
| (61) 17-T-406 | 40.0 | 231,030 | 19,253 |
| (62) 17-T-407 | 206 | 135,180 | 11,265 |
| (63) 17-T-409 | 395 | 327,410 | 27,285 |
| (64) 17-T-410 | 395 | 129,290 | 10,774 |
| (65) 17-T-411 | 50.0 | 213,870 | 17,843 |
| (66) 17-T-412 | 50.0 | 277,840 | 23,153 |
| (67) 17-T-414 | 50.0 | 72,920 | 6,077 |
| (68) 17-T-415 | 50.0 | 56,140 | 4,678 |
| (69) 17-T-416 | 395 | 393,550 | 32,796 |
| (70) 17-T-417 | 23.4 | 233,780 | 19,482 |
| (71) 17-T-418 | 115 | 873,270 | 72,773 |
| (72) 17-T-419 | 119 | 278,460 | 23,205 |
| (73) 17-T-420 | 112 | 730,780 | 60,898 |
| (74) 17-T-421 | 25.2 | 300,010 | 25,001 |
| (75) 17-T-422 | 115 | 873,270 | 72,773 |
| (76) 17-T-423 | 23.4 | 215,060 | 17,922 |
| (77) 17-T-424 | 23.4 | 209,610 | 17,468 |
| (78) 26-T-218 | 50.0 | 64,890 | 5,408 |
| (79) 26-T-219 | 1.50 | 197,900 | 16,492 |
| (80) 26-T-220 | 2,460 | 160,020 | 13,336 |
| (81) 26-T-221 | 50.0 | 74,820 | 6,235 |
| (82) 26-T-222 | 80.0 | 66,590 | 5,550 |
| (83) 26-T-224 | 4.80 | 225,290 | 18,774 |
| (84) 26-T-225 | 50.0 | 36,610 | 3,051 |
| (85) 26-T-226 | 294 | 47,390 | 3,949 |
| (86) 26-T-227 | 50.0 | 63,040 | 5,253 |
| (87) 26-T-228 | 500 | 136,150 | 11,346 |
| (88) 26-T-229 | 50.0 | 112,970 | 9,414 |
| (89) 26-T-231 | 23.4 | 319,610 | 26,634 |
| (90) 26-T-232 | 117 | 564,280 | 47,024 |
| (91) 26-T-233 | 23.4 | 539,700 | 44,975 |
| (92) 27-T-245 | 21.6 | 361,970 | 30,165 |
| (93) 27-T-246 | 348 | 141,820 | 11,818 |
| (94) 27-T-247 | 23.4 | 71,670 | 5,972 |
| (95) 27-T-248 | 198 | 96,010 | 8,001 |
| (96) 27-T-249 | 927 | 51,240 | 4,270 |
| (97) 27-T-250 | 110 | 433,030 | 36,086 |
| (98) 27-T-251 | 396 | 45,440 | 3,787 |
| (99) 27-T-252 | 21.6 | 171,370 | 14,281 |
| (100) 27-T-253 | 348 | 237,900 | 19,825 |
| (101) 26-T-192 | 10.0 | 117,950 | 9,829 |
| (102) 27-T-278 | 0.62 | 74,910 | 6,243 |
| (103) 27-T-279 | 0.18 | 583,760 | 48,647 |
| (104) 27-T-285 | 21.6 | 459,530 | 38,294 |
| (105) 27-T-286 | 21.6 | 459,530 | 38,294 |
| (106) 25-T-201 | 19.8 | 143,550 | 11,963 |
| (107) 32-T-388 | 0.07 | 499,340 | 41,612 |
| (108) 32-T-389 | 0.07 | 499,340 | 41,612 |
| (109) 32-T-390 | 288 | 808,310 | 583,340 |
| (110) 32-T-391 | 1.42 | 800,00 | 583,340 |
| a Tank not in use. |
(B) The throughput shall be calculated as follows:
(1) Compute the monthly throughput for each tank by the 15th day of the following month.
(2) By the 15th day of each month, add the monthly throughputs for the 12 previous months to obtain the yearly throughput.
(ii) Recordkeeping. (A) On and after October 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records for all storage tanks. These records shall be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.
(1) The molecular weight of vapor in each storage tank (Mv), the true vapor pressure at bulk liquid conditions for each tank (P), the paint factor (Fp), and their product. Fp shall be determined from Table 4.3-1 of “Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources,” AP-42, September 1985.
(2) The monthly throughput.
(3) The total throughput per year for the 12 previous months.
(B) [Reserved]
(iii) Test Methods. (A) The true vapor pressure at bulk liquid temperature shall be determined by using the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(8) of this section.
(B) The molecular weight of vapor in the storage tank shall be determined by using Table 4.3-2 “Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources,” AP-42, September 1985, or by analysis of vapor samples. Where mixtures of organic liquids are stored in a tank, Mv shall be estimated from the liquid composition using the following equation:
Where:
Ma = Molecular weight of pure component a;
Pa = Vapor pressure of pure component a;
Xa = Mole fraction of pure component a in the liquid;
Mb = Molecular weight of pure component b;
Pb = Vapor pressure of pure component b;
Xb = Mole fraction of pure component b in the liquid; and
Pt = Pa X2= Pb Xb.
(11) The control requirements in this paragraph apply to the fugitive emission sources listed in paragraph (x)(11)(i)(A) of this section at the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedfore Park, Illinois, instead of the control requirements in paragraph (x)(3) of this section.
(i) Production and Operation Restrictions.
(A) On and after October 1, 1992, all components (e.g., pumps, valves, flanges, pressure relief valves (PRV's), and open end lines) at the specified locations (e.g., Building 32—Tube Reactor System, etc.), and in the specified type of service (e.g., heavy liquid stratified, light liquid stratified, etc.) shall be limited by the maximum monthly hours in the following table:
(ii) Recordkeeping.
(A) On and after October 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the Nalco Chemical Company facility in Bedford Park, Illinois, shall keep the following records for all fugitive emission sources. These records shall be compiled on a monthly basis, be retained at the facility for a period of 3 years, and be made available to the Administrator upon request.
(1) The total number of hours of organic service for each component at each location specified in paragraphs (x)(11)(i)(A) (1) through (10) of this section.
(2) The vapor pressure of each organic compound in each component at each location specified in paragraphs (x)(11)(i)(A) (1) through (10) of this section.
(B) [Reserved]
(12) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the gravure and screen press operations at the Meyercord Corporation (Meyercord) in Carol Stream, Illinois, instead of the requirements in paragraphs (x)(1) through (x)(5) of this section.
(i) After July 1, 1991, no materials which contain volatile organic material (VOM), including coatings, inks, and cleaning material, may be used at any gravure or screen press unless the total VOM emissions remain below 100 tons of VOM for every consecutive 365-day period, or fraction thereof, starting on July 1, 1991. A new 365-day period starts on each day. The VOM emissions, which are to be calculated on a daily basis, are to be added to the VOM emissions for the prior 364 days (but not including any day prior to July 1, 1991). VOM emissions are based upon the VOM content of the material and the volume of material used. The effect of add-on control equipment is not considered in calculating VOM emissions; that is, the VOM emissions are to be determined as if the press(es) do(es) not have add-on control equipment. The applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section are to be used in determining daily VOM emissions.
(ii) The VOM content of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section to establish the records required under paragraph (x)(12)(ii) of this section. Beginning on July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of the subject presses shall collect and record all of the following information each day and maintain the information at the facility for 3 years:
(A) The name and identification number of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution as applied on any press.
(B) The pounds (lbs) of VOM per gallon of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied on any press.
(C) The total gallons of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) used per day.
(D) The total lbs of VOM contained in the volume of each coating, ink, and cleaning solution used per day on any press. The lbs of VOM per day is to be calculated by multiplying the lbs of VOM per gallon (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) times the gallons (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) used per day.
(E) The total lbs of VOM per day from all coatings, inks, and cleaning solutions used on all presses. The total lbs of VOM per day is to be obtained by adding the lbs of VOM per day contained in all coatings, inks, and cleaning solutions.
(F) Within 7 days after each 365-day period, the VOM emissions (as calculated in paragraph (x)(12)(ii)(E)) of this section before add-on control, from the 365-day period, are to be determined.
Starting on July 7, 1992, VOM emissions are to be determined for the 365 days ending 7 days earlier. Each day concludes a new 365-day period. However, no VOM emissions are to be included for any days prior to July 1, 1991. For example, on July 17, 1991, the emissions from July 1, through July 10, 1991, are to be included, whereas on January 7, 1994, the emissions from January 1, 1993, through December 31, 1993, are to be included.
(13) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the sheet fed cold set presses and web heatset presses at the Wallace Computer Services, Inc. (Wallace) printing and binding plant in Hillside, Illinois, instead of the requirements in 40 CFR 52.741(h) and 40 CFR 52.741(x)(1) through 40 CFR 52.741(x)(5).
(i) After July 1, 1991, no inks shall at any time be applied, at the presses indicated below, which exceed the pounds (lbs) volatile organic material (VOM) per gallon of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) limit established for each press. After July 1, 1991, the yearly volume of ink used at each press, in gallons of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) per year, shall not exceed the gallons per year limit established below for each press. The yearly volume of ink used per press is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (x)(13)(iii) of this section.
| Press | Lbs VOM/gallon ink | Gallons/year ink |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 1.68 | 276 |
| 16 | 1.68 | 1896 |
| 22 | 3.01 | 2712 |
| 23 | 3.01 | 13140 |
| 25 | 3.01 | 12720 |
| 26 | 3.01 | 4764 |
(ii) After July 1, 1991, no materials (other than those inks subject to the limits in paragraph (x)(13)(i)) of this section, shall at any time be applied or used, at the presses indicated below, which exceed the lbs VOM per gallon of material (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) limit established for each press. After July 1, 1991, the yearly volume of material (excluding ink and water) used at each press, in gallons of material (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) per year, shall not exceed the gallons per year limit established for each press. The yearly volume of material (excluding ink and water) used per press is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (x)(13)(iii) of this section.
| Press | Lbs VOM/gallon material | Gallons/year material |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 6.9 | 612 |
| 16 | 6.9 | 8,340 |
| 22 | 7.1 | 360 |
| 23 | 7.1 | 480 |
| 25 | 7.1 | 516 |
| 26 | 7.1 | 1,848 |
(iii) The yearly volume of ink/material used is to be calculated as follows:
(A) Compute the volume of ink/material used each month per press by the 15th of the following month.
(B) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly ink/material usage per press for the 12 previous months (to obtain the yearly volume of ink used).
(iv) Beginning on July 1, 1991, the owner and operator of Wallace's plant in Hillside, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each press for each month. All records shall be retained by Wallace for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request:
(A) The name and identification number of each ink, fountain solution, fountain solution additive, cleaning solvent, and other VOM containing material as applied or used.
(B) The weight of VOM per volume of each ink, fountain solution, fountain solution additive, cleaning solvent, and each other VOM containing material (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied or used each month.
(C) The volume of ink (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each month.
(D) The total volume of miscellaneous VOM containing materials (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM), other than inks, that are used each month.
(v) Any record showing a violation of paragraph (x)(13)(i) or (x)(13)(ii) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days of the violation.
(vi) To determine compliance with paragraphs (x)(13)(i) and (x)(13)(ii) of this section and to establish the records required under paragraph (x)(13)(iv) of this section the VOM content of each ink and miscellaneous VOM containing material shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(14) The control and recordkeeping and reporting requirements, as well as the test methods in this paragraph, apply to the power-operated silk screen presses, the hand screen presses, the screen adhesive printing lines, the Andreotti rotogravure press, the Halley Rotogravure press, and the Viking press at the American Decal and Manufacturing Company's plant in Chicago, Illinois, instead of the requirements in paragraphs (h) and (x)(1) through (x)(5) of this section. The emissions from the sources listed above (in paragraph (x)(14) of this section) are to be included in the calculation of “maximum theoretical emissions” for determining applicability for any other sources (for which applicability is based on the quantity of maximum theoretical emissions) at American Decal and Manufacturing Company's Chicago plant not included in paragraph (x)(14) of this section.
(i) After July 24, 1992, no inks, coatings, thinner, clean-up material or other VOC-containing material shall at any time be applied, at the presses/printing lines listed above (in paragraph (x)(14) of this section), which exceed the VOC content (in percent by weight VOC) limit established below. After July 24, 1992, the yearly usage (in weight of material applied) of ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material, shall not exceed the applicable pounds per year limit established below. The yearly weight of ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material is to be calculated according to the procedure in paragraph (x)(14)(ii) of this section.
| Material | Usage (lbs/yr) |
Weight Percent VOC |
|---|---|---|
| #6 ink | 9,076 | 56.8 |
| #7 ink | 1,278 | 54.2 |
| #2 ink | 2,911 | 72.7 |
| Blue N.C. lacq. | 394 | 64.3 |
| Black M lacq. | 753 | 61.6 |
| 4B9L Clear | 2,451 | 77.1 |
| 4B9L H Clear | 3,360 | 75.0 |
| Flow-Out Agent | 1,795 | 97.1 |
| D.S. Stamp lacq. | 1,047 | 62.0 |
| Dull write-on | 86 | 71.6 |
| AH-16 | 621 | 84.5 |
| Thinner (#7,6) | 2,350 | 100.0 |
| Exon 470 | 1,668 | 65.4 |
| 9L Clear | 2,451 | 77.1 |
| White M lacq | 3,467 | 47.0 |
| Tedlar Gr. Vehicle | 1,050 | 66.7 |
| TH-98 | 22,047 | 73.2 |
| TH-57 | 59 | 69.5 |
| TH-14M | 16,520 | 0.7 |
| PS 160 | 10,644 | 3.0 |
| #1 tint | 4,872 | 69.3 |
| #2 tint | 4,256 | 83.7 |
| Roto Color | 13,884 | 62.0 |
| 1st SS White | 25,740 | 51.5 |
| 2nd SS White | 25,740 | 51.5 |
| Clean Up | 108,742 | 100.0 |
| Other Materials | 400 | 100.0 |
(ii) The yearly weight of material used is to be calculated as follows:
(A) Compute the weight of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material used each month by the 15th of the following month.
(B) By the 15th of each month, add the monthly usage (in pounds) for each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material for the twelve previous months (to obtain the yearly weight of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material used). A comparison of these yearly usage levels (in pounds) with purchase records must be made to ensure the accuracy of the monthly usage levels (in pounds) obtained to satisfy paragraph (x)(14)(ii)(A) of this section.
(iii) Beginning on August 1, 1992, the owner and operator of the American Decal and Manufacturing Company plant in Chicago, Illinois, shall keep the following records for each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material for each month. All records shall be kept by the American Decal and Manufacturing Company for 3 years and shall be made available to the Administrator on request:
(A) The name and identification number of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material as applied or used.
(B) The weight percent VOC of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and each other VOC-containing material as applied or used each month.
(C) The as applied weight of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material used each month.
(iv) Any record showing a violation of paragraph (x)(14)(i) of this section after October 20, 1995 shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days of the violation.
(v) To determine compliance with paragraph (x)(14)(i) of this section and to establish the records required under paragraph (x)(14)(iii) of this section, the weight percent VOC of each ink, coating, thinner, clean-up material, and other VOC-containing material shall be determined by the applicable test methods and procedures specified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section. Any material reported to be 100 percent VOC does not have to be tested for weight percent VOC.
(y) Recordkeeping and reporting for non-CTG sources—(1) Exempt emission sources. Upon request by the Administrator, the owner or operator of an emission source which is exempt from the requirements of paragraphs (u), (v), (w), (x), or (e)(3)(ii) of this section shall submit records to the Administrator within 30 calendar days from the date of the request that document that the emission source is exempt from those requirements.
(2) Subject emission sources. (i) Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to the requirements of paragraph (u), (v), (w) or (x) of this section and complying by the use of emission capture and control equipment shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a new emission source, the owner or operator of the subject VOM emission source shall perform all tests and submit to the Administrator the results of all tests and calculations necessary to demonstrate that the subject emission source will be in compliance on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a subject VOM emission source shall collect and record all of the following information each day and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) Control device monitoring data.
(2) A log of operating time for the capture system, control device, monitoring equipment and the associated emission source.
(3) A maintenance log for the capture system, control device and monitoring equipment detailing all routine and non-routine maintenance performed including dates and duration of any outages.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject VOM emission source shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing a violation of the requirements of paragraphs (u), (v), (w), or (x) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section from the use of capture systems and control devices to the use of complying coatings, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(ii)(A) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section from the use of capture systems and control devices to the use of complying coatings, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(ii) of this section.
(ii) Any owner or operator of a coating line which is subject to the requirements of paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section and complying by means of the daily-weighted average VOM content limitation shall comply with the following:
(A) By July 1, 1991, or upon initial start-up of a coating line subject to paragraph (u) or (x) of this section; the owner or operator of the subject coating line shall certify to the Administrator that the coating line will be in compliance on and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date. Such certification shall include:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating line which will comply by means of the daily-weighted average VOM content limitation.
(2) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.
(3) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.
(4) The instrument or method by which the owner or operator will accurately measure or calculate the volume of each coating as applied each day on each coating line.
(5) The method by which the owner or operator will create and maintain records each day as required in paragraph (y)(2)(ii)(B) of this section.
(6) An example of the format in which the records required in paragraph (y)(2)(ii)(B) of this section will be kept.
(B) On and after July 1, 1991, or on and after the initial start-up date, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall collect and record all of the following information each day for each coating line and maintain the information at the facility for a period of three years:
(1) The name and identification number of each coating as applied on each coating line.
(2) The weight of VOM per volume and the volume of each coating (minus water and any compounds which are specifically exempted from the definition of VOM) as applied each day on each coating line.
(3) The daily-weighted average VOM content of all coatings as applied on each coating line as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(C) On and after July 1, 1991, the owner or operator of a subject coating line shall notify the Administrator in the following instances:
(1) Any record showing violation of the requirements of paragraph (u) or (x) of this section shall be reported by sending a copy of such record to the Administrator within 30 days following the occurrence of the violation.
(2) At least 30 calendar days before changing the method of compliance with paragraph (u) or (x) of this section from the use of complying coatings to the use capture systems and control devices, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(i)(A) of this section. Upon changing the method of compliance with paragraphs (u) or (x) of this section from the use of complying coatings to the use capture systems and control devices, the owner or operator shall comply with all requirements of paragraph (y)(2)(i) of this section.
(iii) Any owner or operator of a VOM emission source which is subject to the requirements of paragraphs (u), (v), (w) or (x) of this section and complying by means of an alternative control plan which has been approved by the Administrator as a SIP or FIP revision shall comply with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in the alternative control plan.
(z) Rules stayed. Not withstanding any other provision of this subpart, the effectiveness of the following rules is stayed as indicated below.
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Compliance with all of 40 CFR 52.741 is stayed for 60 days (July 1, 1991, until August 30, 1991) as it pertains to the following parties: The Illinois Environmental Regulatory Group including its approximately 40 member firms; Allsteel, Incorporated; Riverside Laboratories, Incorporated; the Printing Industry of Illinois/Indiana Association including its member firms, and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company; the rules applicable to General Motors Corporation; Reynolds Metals Company; Stepan Company; and Duo-Fast Corporation. Final compliance for these parties is extended 60 days from July 1, 1991 until August 30, 1991.
(3) The following rules are stayed from July 23, 1991, until USEPA completes its reconsideration as indicated:
(i) 40 CFR 52.741(e) only as it applies to Duo-Fast Corporation's Franklin Park, Illinois “power-driven metal fastener” manufacturing facility, and
(ii) 40 CFR 52.741 (w) and (y) only as it applies to Stepan Company's miscellaneous organic chemical manufacturing processes at its manufacturing facility located near Millsdale, Illinois.
When USEPA concludes its reconsideration, it will publish its decision and any actions required to effectuate that decision in the Federal Register.
(4)-(5) [Reserved]
Appendix A to § 52.741—List of Chemicals Defining Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing
OCPDB No.1 Chemical 20 Acetal. 30 Acetaldehyde. 40 Acetaldol. 50 Acetamide. 65 Acetanilide. 70 Acetic acid. 80 Acetic anhydride. 90 Acetone. 100 Acetone cyanohydrin. 110 Acetonitrile. 120 Acetophenone. 125 Acetyl chloride. 130 Acetylene. 140 Acrolein. 150 Acrylamide. 160 Acrylic acid & esters. 170 Acrylonitrile. 180 Adipic acid. 185 Adiponitrile. 190 Alkyl naphthalenes. 200 Allyl alcohol. 210 Allyl chloride. 220 Aminobenzoic acid. 230 Aminoethylethanolamine. 235 p-aminophenol. 240 Amyl acetates. 250 Amyl alcohols. 260 Amyl amine. 270 Amyl chloride. 280 Amyl mercaptans. 290 Amyl phenol. 300 Aniline. 310 Aniline hydrochloride. 320 Anisidine. 330 Anisole. 340 Anthranilic acid. 350 Anthraquinone. 360 Benzaldehyde. 370 Benzamide. 380 Benzene. 390 Benzenedisulfonic acid. 400 Benzene-sulfonic acid. 410 Benzil. 420 Benzilic acid. 430 Benzoic acid. 440 Benzoin. 450 Bennzonitrile. 460 Benzophenone. 480 Benzotrichloride. 490 Benzoyl chloride. 500 Benzyl chalcohol. 510 Benzyl amine. 520 Benzyl benzoate. 530 Benzyl chloride. 540 Benzyl dichloride. 550 Biphenyl. 560 Bisphenol A. 570 Bromobenzene. 580 Bromonaphthalene. 590 Butadiene. 592 1-butene. 600 n-butyl acetate. 630 n-butyl acrylate. 640 n-butyl alcohol. 650 s-butyl alcohol. 660 t-butyl alcohol. 670 n-butylamine. 680 s-butylamine. 690 t-butylamine. 700 p-pert-butyl benzoic acid. 750 n-butyraldehyde. 760 Butyric acid. 770 Butyric anhydride. 780 Butyronitrile. 785 Caprolactam. 790 Carbon disulfide. 800 Carbon tetrabromide. 810 Carbon tetrachloride. 820 Cellulose acetate. 840 Chloroacetic acid. 850 m-chloroaniline. 860 o-chloroaniline. 870 p-chloroaniline. 880 Chlorobenzaldehyde. 890 Chlorobenzene. 900 Chlorobenzoic acid. 905 Chlorobenzotrichloride. 910 Chlorobenzoyl chloride. 920 Chlorodifluoroethane. 921 Chlorodifluoromethane. 930 Chloroform 940 Chloronaphthalene. 950 o-chloronitrobenzene. 951 p-chloronitrobenzene. 960 Chlorophenols. 964 Chloroprene. 965 Chlorosulfonic acid. 970 m-chlorotoluene. 980 o-chlorotoluene. 990 p-chlorotoluene. 992 Chlorotrifluoromethane. 1000 m-cresol. 1010 o-cresol. 1020 p-cresol. 1021 Mixed cresols. 1030 Cresylic acid. 1040 Crontonaldehyde. 1050 Crontonic acid. 1060 Cumene. 1070 Cumene hydroperoxide. 1080 Cyanoacetic acid. 1090 Cyanogen chloride. 1100 Cyanuric acid. 1110 Cyanuric chloride. 1120 Cychohexane. 1130 Cyclohexanol. 1140 Cyclohexanone. 1150 Cyclohexene. 1160 Cyclohexylamine. 1170 Cyclooctadiene. 1180 Decanol. 1190 Diacetone alcohol. 1200 Diaminobenzoic acid. 1210 Dichloroaniline. 1215 m-dichlorobenzene. 1216 o-dichlorobenzene. 1220 p-dichlorobenzene. 1221 Dichlorodifluoromethane. 1240 Dichloroethyl ether 1,2-dichloroethane. 1250 Dichlorohydrin 1270 Dichloropropene. 1280 Dicyclohexylamine. 1290 Diethylamine. 1300 Diethylene glycol. 1304 Diethylene glycol diethyl ether. 1305 Diethylene glycol dimethyl ether. 1310 Diethylene glycolmonobutyl ether. 1320 Diethylene glycolmonobutyl ether acetate. 1330 Diethylene glycolmonoethyl ether. 1340 Diethylene glycolmonoethyl ether acetate. 1360 Diethylene glycolmonomethyl ether. 1420 Diethyl sulfate. 1430 Difluoroethane. 1440 Diisobutylene. 1442 Diisodecyl phthalate. 1444 Diisooctyl phthalate. 1450 Diketene. 1460 Dimethylamine. 1470 N,N-dimethylaniline. 1480 N,N-dimethylether. 1490 N,N-dimethylformamide. 1495 Dimethylhydrazine. 1500 Dimethyl sulfate. 1510 Dimethyl sulfide. 1520 Dimethylsulfoxide. 1530 Dimethylterephthalate. 1540 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid. 1545 Dinitrophenol. 1560 Dioxane. 1570 Dioxolane. 1580 Diphenylamine. 1590 Diphenyl oxide. 1600 Diphenyl thiourea. 1610 Dipropylene glycol. 1620 Dodecene. 1630 Dodecylaniline. 1640 Dodecylphenol. 1650 Epichlorohydrin. 1660 Ethanol. 1661 Ethanolamines. 1670 Ethyl acetate. 1680 Ethyl acetoacetate. 1690 Ethyl acrylate. 1700 Ethylamine. 1710 Ethylbenzene. 1720 Ethyl bromide. 1730 Ethylcellulose. 1740 Ethyl chloride. 1750 Ethyl chloroacetate. 1760 Ethylcyanoacetate. 1770 Ethylene. 1780 Ethylene carbonate. 1790 Ethylene chlorodhydrin. 1800 Ethylenediamine. 1810 Ethylene dibromide. 1830 Ethylene glycol. 1840 Ethylene glycol diacetate. 1870 Ethylene glycol dimethyl ether. 1890 Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether. 1900 Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate. 1910 Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether. 1920 Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate. 1930 Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether. 1940 Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate. 1960 Ethylene glycol monophenyl ether. 1970 Ethylene glycol monopropyl ether. 1980 Ethylene oxide. 1990 Ethyl ether. 2000 2-ethylhexanol. 2010 Ethyl orthoformate. 2020 Ethyl oxalate. 2030 Ethyl sodium oxalacetate. 2040 Formaldehyde. 2050 Formamide. 2060 Formic acid. 2070 Fumaric acid. 2073 Furfural. 2090 Glycerol (Synthetic). 2091 Glycerol dichlorohydrin. 2100 Glycerol triether. 2110 Glycine. 2120 Glyoxal. 2145 Hexachlorobenzene. 2150 Hexachloroethane. 2160 Hexadecyl alcohol. 2165 Hexamethylenediamine. 2170 Hexamethylene glycol. 2180 Hexamethylentetramine. 2190 Hydrogen cyanide. 2200 Hydroquinone. 2210 p-hydroxy-benzoic acid. 2240 Isoamylene. 2250 Isobutanol. 2260 Isobutyl acetate. 2261 Isobutylene. 2270 Isobutyraldehyde. 2280 Isobutyric acid. 2300 Isodecanol. 2320 Isooctyl alcohol. 2321 Isopentane. 2330 Isophorone. 2340 Isophthalic acid. 2350 Isoprene. 2360 Isopropanol. 2370 Isopropyl acetate. 2380 Isopropylamine. 2390 Isopropyl chloride. 2400 Isopropylphenol. 2410 Ketene. 2414 Linear alkylsulfonate. 2417 Linear alkylbenzene. 2420 Maleic acid. 2430 Maleic anhydride. 2440 Malic acid. 2450 Mesityl oxide. 2455 Metanilic acid. 2460 Methacrylic acid. 2490 Methallyl chloride. 2500 Methanol. 2510 Methyl acetate. 2520 Methyl acetoacetate. 2530 Methylamine. 2540 n-methylaniline. 2545 Methyl bromide. 2550 Methyl butynol. 2560 Methyl chloride. 2570 Methyl cyclohexane. 2590 Methyl cyclohexanone. 2620 Methylene chloride. 2630 Methylene dianiline. 2635 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate. 2640 Methyl ethyl ketone. 2644 Methyl formate. 2650 Methyl isobutyl carbinol. 2660 Methyl isobutyl ketone. 2665 Methyl methacrylate. 2670 Methyl pentynol. 2690 a-methyl styrene. 2700 Morpholine. 2710 a-napthalene sulfonic acid. 2720 B-napthalene sulfonic acid. 2730 a-naphthol. 2740 B-naphthol. 2750 Neopentanoic acid. 2756 o-nitroaniline. 2757 p-nitroaniline. 2760 o-nitroanisole. 2762 p-nitroanisole. 2770 Nitrobenzene. 2780 Nitrobenzoic acid (o, m & p). 2790 Nitroethane. 2791 Nitromethane. 2792 Nitrophenol. 2795 Nitropropane. 2800 Nitrotoluene. 2810 Nonene. 2820 Nonyl phenol. 2830 Octyl phenol. 2840 Paraldehyde. 2850 Pentaerythritol. 2851 n-pentane. 2855 l-pentene. 2860 Perchloroethylene. 2882 Perchloromethylmercaptan. 2890 o-phenetidine. 2900 p-phenetidine. 2910 Phenol. 2920 Phenolsulfonic acids. 2930 Phenyl anthranilic acid. 2940 Phenylenediamine. 2960 Phthalic anhydride. 2970 Phthalimide. 2973 b-picoline. 2976 Piperazine. 3000 Polybutenes. 3010 Polyethylene glycol. 3025 Polypropylene glycol. 3063 Propionaldehyde. 3066 Propionic acid. 3070 n-propyl alcohol. 3075 Propylamine. 3080 Propyl chloride. 3090 Propylene. 3100 Propylene chlorohydrin. 3110 Propylene dichloride. 3111 Propylene glycol. 3120 Propylene oxide. 3130 Pyridine. 3140 Quinone. 3150 Resorcinol. 3160 Resorcylic acid. 3170 Salicylic acid. 3180 Sodium acetate. 3181 Sodium benzoate. 3190 Sodium carboxymethylcellulose. 3191 Sodium chloroacetate. 3200 Sodium formate. 3210 Sodium phenate. 3220 Sorbic acid. 3230 Styrene. 3240 Succinic acid. 3250 Succinitrile. 3251 Sulfanilic acid. 3260 Sulfolane. 3270 Tannic acid. 3280 Terephthalic acid. 3290 & 3291 Tetrachloroethanes. 3300 Tetrachlorophthalic anhydride. 3310 Tetraethyllead. 3320 Tetrahydronaphthalene. 3330 Tetrahydrophthalic anhydride. 3335 Tetramethyllead. 3340 Tetramethylenediamine. 3341 Tetramethylethylenediamine. 3349 Toluene. 3350 Toluene-2,4-diamine. 3354 Toluene-2,4-diisocyanate. 3355 Toluene diisocyanates (mixture). 3360 Toluene sulfonamide. 3370 Toluene sulfonic acids. 3380 Toluene sulfonylchloride. 3381 Toluidines. 3393 Trichlorobenzenes. 3395 1,1,1-trichloroethane. 3400 1,1,2-trichloroethane. 3410 Trichloroethylene. 3411 Trichlorofluoromethane. 3420 1,2,3-trichloropropane. 3430 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane. 3450 Triethylamine. 3460 Triethylene glycol. 3470 Triethylene glycoldimethyl ether. 3480 Triisobutylene. 3490 Trimethylamine. 3510 Vinyl acetate. 3520 Vinyl chloride. 3530 Vinylidene chloride. 3540 Vinyl toluene. 3541 Xylene (mixed). 3560 o-xylene. 3570 p-xylene. 3580 Xylenol. 3590 Xylidine, 1,3-butylene glycol, Dinitrotoluene, Methyltertbutyl ether, Phosgene, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Polystyrene, Urea. 1 The OCPDB Numbers are reference indices assigned to the various chemicals in the Organic Chemical Producers Data Base developed by the USEPA. Appendix B to § 52.741—VOM Measurement Techniques for Capture Efficiency
Procedure G.1—Captured VOC Emissions
1. Introduction
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the volatile organic compounds (VOC) content of captured gas streams. It is intended to be used as a segment in the development of liquid/gas or gas/gas protocols for determining VOC capture efficiency (CE) for surface coating and printing operations. The procedure may not be acceptable in certain site-specific situations, e.g., when: (1) Direct fired heaters or other circumstances affect the quantity of VOC at the control device inlet; and (2) particulate organic aerosols are formed in the process and are present in the captured emissions.
1.2 Principle. The amount of VOC captured (G) is calculated as the sum of the products of the VOC content (CGj), the flow rate (QGj), and the sample time (TC) from each captured emissions point.
1.3 Estimated measurement uncertainty. The measurement uncertainties are estimated for each captured or fugitive emissions point as follows: QGj=±5.5 percent and CGj=±5.0 percent. Based on these numbers, the probable uncertainty for G is estimated at about ±7.4 percent.
1.4 Sampling requirements. A capture efficiency test shall consist of at least three sampling runs. The sampling time for each run should be at least 8 hours, unless otherwise approved.
1.5 Notes. Because this procedure is often applied in highly explosive areas, caution and care should be exercised in choosing appropriate equipment and installing and using the equipment. Mention of trade names or company products does not constitute endorsement. All gas concentrations (percent, ppm) are by volume, unless otherwise noted.
2. Apparatus and Reagents
2.1 Gas VOC concentration. A schematic of the measurement system is shown in Figure 1. The main components are described below:
2.1.1 Sample probe. Stainless steel, or equivalent. The probe shall be heated to prevent VOC condensation.
2.1.2 Calibration valve assembly. Three-way valve assembly at the outlet of sample probe to direct the zero and calibration gases to the analyzer. Other methods, such as quick-connect lines, to route calibration gases to the outlet of the sample probe are acceptable.
2.1.3 Sample line. Stainless steel or Teflon tubing to transport the sample gas to the analyzer. The sample line must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.4 Sample pump. A lead-free pump, to pull the sample gas through the system at a flow rate sufficient to minimize the response time of the measurement system. The components of the pump that contact the gas stream shall be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon. The sample pump must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.5 Sample flow rate control. A sample flow rate control valve and rotameter, or equivalent, to maintain a constant sampling rate within 10 percent. The flow rate control valve and rotameter must be heated to prevent condensation. A control valve may also be located on the sample pump bypass loop to assist in controlling the sample pressure and flow rate.
2.1.6 Sample gas manifold. Capable of diverting a portion of the sample gas stream to the flame ionization analyzer (FIA), and the remainder to the bypass discharge vent. The manifold components shall be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon. If captured or fugitive emissions are to be measured at multiple locations, the measurement system shall be designed to use separate sampling probes, lines, and pumps for each measurement location and a common sample gas manifold and FIA. The sample gas manifold and connecting lines to the FIA must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.7 Organic concentration analyzer. An FIA with a span value of 1.5 times the expected concentration as propane; however, other span values may be used if it can be demonstrated that they would provide more accurate measurements.
The system shall be capable of meeting or exceeding the following specifications:
2.1.7.1 Zero drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.2 Calibration drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.3 Calibration error. Less than ±5.0 percent of the calibration gas value.
2.1.7.4 Response time. Less than 30 seconds.
2.1.8 Integrator/data acquisition system. An analog or digital device or computerized data acquisition system used to integrate the FIA response or compute the average response and record measurement data. The minimum data sampling frequency for computing average or integrated values is one measurement value every 5 seconds. The device shall be capable of recording average values at least once per minute.
2.1.9 Calibration and other gases. Gases used for calibration, fuel, and combustion air (if required) are contained in compressed gas cylinders. All calibration gases shall be traceable to NIST standards and shall be certified by the manufacturer to ±1 percent of the tag value. Additionally, the manufacturer of the cylinder should provide a recommended shelf life for each calibration gas cylinder over which the concentration does not change more than ±2 percent from the certified value. For calibration gas values not generally available, alternative methods for preparing calibration gas mixtures, such as dilution systems, may be used with prior approval.
2.1.9.1 Fuel. A 40 percent H2/60 percent He or 40 percent H2/60 percent N2 gas mixture is recommended to avoid an oxygen synergism effect that reportedly occurs when oxygen concentration varies significantly from a mean value.
2.1.9.2 Carrier gas. High purity air with less than 1 ppm of organic material (as propane or carbon equivalent) or less than 0.1 percent of the span value, whichever is greater.
2.1.9.3 FIA Linearity calibration gases. Low-, mid-, and high-range gas mixture standards with nominal propane concentrations of 20-30, 45-55, and 70-80 percent of the span value in air, respectively. Other calibration values and other span values may be used if it can be shown that more accurate measurements would be achieved.
2.1.10 Particulate filter. An in-stack or an out-of-stack glass fiber filter is recommended if exhaust gas particulate loading is significant. An out-of-stack filter must be heated to prevent any condensation unless it can be demonstrated that no condensation occurs.
2.2 Captured emissions volumetric flow rate.
2.2.1 Method 2 or 2A apparatus. For determining volumetric flow rate.
2.2.2 Method 3 apparatus and reagents. For determining molecular weight of the gas stream. An estimate of the molecular weight of the gas stream may be used if it can be justified.
2.2.3 Method 4 apparatus and reagents. For determining moisture content, if necessary.
3. Determinations of Volumetric Flow Rate of Captured Emissions
3.1 Locate all points where emissions are captured from the affected facility. Using Method 1, determine the sampling points. Be sure to check each site for cyclonic or swirling flow.
3.2 Measure the velocity at each sampling site at least once every hour during each sampling run using Method 2 or 2A.
4. Determinations of VOC Content of Captured Emissions
4.1 Analysis duration. Measure the VOC responses at each captured emissions point during the entire test run or, if applicable, while the process is operating. If there are multiple captured emission locations, design a sampling system to allow a single FIA to be used to determine the VOC responses at all sampling locations.
4.2 Gas VOC concentration.
4.2.1 Assemble the sample train as shown in Figure 1. Calibrate the FIA according to the procedure in section 5.1.
4.2.2 Conduct a system check according to the procedure in section 5.3.
4.2.3 Install the sample probe so that the probe is centrally located in the stack, pipe, or duct, and is sealed tightly at the stack port connection.
4.2.4 Inject zero gas at the calibration valve assembly. Allow the measurement system response to reach zero. Measure the system response time as the time required for the system to reach the effluent concentration after the calibration valve has been returned to the effluent sampling position.
4.2.5 Conduct a system check before and a system check after each sampling run according to the procedures in sections 5.2 and 5.3. If the drift check following a run indicates unacceptable performance, the run is not valid. The tester may elect to perform system drift checks during the run not to exceed one drift check per hour.
4.2.6 Verify that the sample lines, filter, and pump temperatures are 120 ±5 °C.
4.2.7 Begin sampling at the start of the test period and continue to sample during the entire run. Record the starting and ending times and any required process information as appropriate. If multiple captured emission locations are sampled using a single FIA, sample at each location for the same amount of time (e.g., 2 minutes) and continue to switch from one location to another for the entire test run. Be sure that total sampling time at each location is the same at the end of the test run. Collect at least 4 separate measurements from each sample point during each hour of testing. Disregard the measurements at each sampling location until two times the response time of the measurement system has elapsed. Continue sampling for at least 1 minute and record the concentration measurements.
4.3 Background concentration.
4.3.1 Locate all NDO's of the TTE. A sampling point shall be centrally located outside of the TTE at 4 equivalent diameters from each NDO, if possible. If there are more than 6 NDO's, choose 6 sampling points evenly spaced among the NDO's.
4.3.2 Assemble the sample train as shown in Figure 2. Calibrate the FIA and conduct a system check according to the procedures in sections 5.1 and 5.3.
4.3.3 Position the probe at the sampling location.
4.3.4 Determine the response time, conduct the system check and sample according to the procedures described in sections 4.2.4 to 4.2.7.
4.4 Alternative procedure. The direct interface sampling and analysis procedure described in section 7.2 of Method 18 may be used to determine the gas VOC concentration. The system must be designed to collect and analyze at least one sample every 10 minutes.
5. Calibration and Quality Assurance
5.1 FIA calibration and linearity check. Make necessary adjustments to the air and fuel supplies for the FIA and ignite the burner. Allow the FIA to warm up for the period recommended by the manufacturer. Inject a calibration gas into the measurement system and adjust the back-pressure regulator to the value required to achieve the flow rates specified by the manufacturer. Inject the zero- and the high-range calibration gases and adjust the analyzer calibration to provide the proper responses. Inject the low- and mid-range gases and record the responses of the measurement system. The calibration and linearity of the system are acceptable if the responses for all four gases are within 5 percent of the respective gas values. If the performance of the system is not acceptable, repair or adjust the system and repeat the linearity check. Conduct a calibration and linearity check after assembling the analysis system and after a major change is made to the system.
5.2 Systems drift checks. Select the calibration gas that most closely approximates the concentration of the captured emissions for conducting the drift checks. Introduce the zero and calibration gas at the calibration valve assembly and verify that the appropriate gas flow rate and pressure are present at the FIA. Record the measurement system responses to the zero and calibration gases. The performance of the system is acceptable if the difference between the drift check measurement and the value obtained in section 5.1 is less than 3 percent of the span value. Conduct the system drift checks at the end of each run.
5.3 System check. Inject the high range calibration gas at the inlet to the sampling probe while the dilution air is turned off. Record the response. The performance of the system is acceptable if the measurement system response is within 5 percent of the value obtained in section 5.1 for the high range calibration gas. Conduct a system check before and after each test run.
5.4 Analysis audit. Immediately before each test analyze an audit cylinder as described in section 5.2. The analysis audit must agree with the audit cylinder concentration within 10 percent.
6. Nomenclature
Ai = area of NDO i, ft 2.
AN = total area of all NDO's in the enclosure, ft 2.
CBi = corrected average VOC concentration of background emissions at point i, ppm propane.
CB = average background concentration, ppm propane.
CGj = corrected average VOC concentration of captured emissions at point j, ppm propane.
CDH = average measured concentration for the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane.
CDO = average system drift check concentration for zero concentration gas, ppm propane.
CH = actual concentration of the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane.
Ci = uncorrected average background VOC concentration measured at point i, ppm propane.
Cj = uncorrected average VOC concentration measured at point j, ppm propane.
G = total VOC content of captured emissions, kg.
K1 = 1.830 × 10−6 kg/ (m 3-ppm).
n = number of measurement points.
QGj = average effluent volumetric flow rate corrected to standard conditions at captured emissions point j, m 3/min.
TC = total duration of captured emissions sampling run, min.
7. Calculations
7.1 Total VOC captured emissions.
7.2 VOC concentration of the captured emissions at point j.
7.3. Background VOC concentration at point i.
7.4 Average background concentration.
Procedure G.2—Captured VOC Emissions (Dilution Technique)
1. Introduction
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the volatile organic compounds (VOC) content of captured gas streams. It is intended to be used as a segment in the development of a gas/gas protocol in which fugitive emissions are measured for determining VOC capture efficiency (CE) for surface coating and printing operations. A dilution system is used to reduce the VOC concentration of the captured emission to about the same concentration as the fugitive emission. The procedure may not be acceptable in certain site-specific situations, e.g., when: (1) Direct fired heaters or other circumstances affect the quantity of VOC at the control device inlet; and (2) particulate organic aerosols are formed in the process and are present in the captured emissions.
1.2 Principle. The amount of VOC captured (G) is calculated as the sum of the products of the VOC content (CGj), the flow rate (QGj), and the sampling time (TC) from each captured emissions point.
1.3 Estimated measurement uncertainty. The measurement uncertainties are estimated for each captured or fugitive emissions point as follows: OGj=±5.5 percent and CGj=±5 percent. Based on these numbers, the probable uncertainty for G is estimated at about ±7.4 percent.
1.4 Sampling requirements. A capture efficiency test shall consist of at least three sampling runs. The sampling time for each run should be at least 8 hours, unless otherwise approved.
1.5 Notes. Because this procedure is often applied in highly explosive areas, caution and care should be exercised in choosing appropriate equipment and installing and using the equipment. Mention of trade names or company products does not constitute endorsement. All gas concentrations (percent, ppm) are by volume, unless otherwise noted.
2. Apparatus and Reagents
2.1 Gas VOC concentration. A schematic of the measurement system is shown in Figure 1. The main components are described below:
2.1.1 Dilution system. A Kipp in-stack dilution probe and controller or similar device may be used. The dilution rate may be changed by substituting different critical orifices or adjustments of the aspirator supply pressure. The dilution system shall be heated to prevent VOC condensation.
2.1.2 Calibration valve assembly. Three-way valve assembly at the outlet of sample probe to direct the zero and calibration gases to the analyzer. Other methods, such as quick-connect lines, to route calibration gases to the outlet of the sample probe are acceptable.
2.1.3 Sample line. Stainless steel or Teflon tubing to transport the sample gas to the analyzer. The sample line must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.4 Sample pump. A leak-free pump, to pull the sample gas through the system at a flow rate sufficient to minimize the response time of the measurement system. The components of the pump that contract the gas stream shall be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon. The sample pump must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.5 Sample flow rate control. A sample flow rate control valve and rotameter, or equivalent, to maintain a constant sampling rate within 10 percent. The flow control valve and rotameter must be heated to prevent condensation. A control valve may also be located on the sample pump bypass loop to assist in controlling the sample pressure and flow rate.
2.1.6 Sample gas manifold. Capable of diverting a portion of the sample gas stream to the flame ionization analyzer (FIA), and the remainder to the bypass discharge vent. The manifold components shall be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon. If captured or fugitive emissions are to be measured at multiple locations, the measurement system shall be designed to use separate sampling probes, lines, and pumps for each measurement location and a common sample gas manifold and FIA. The sample gas manifold and connecting lines to the FIA must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.7 Organic concentration analyzer. An FIA with a span value of 1.5 times the expected concentration as propane; however, other span values may be used if it can be demonstrated that they would provide more accurate measurements.
The system shall be capable of meeting or exceeding the following specifications:
2.1.7.1 Zero drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.2 Calibration drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.3 Calibration error. Less than ±5.0 percent of the calibration gas value.
2.1.7.4 Response time. Less than 30 seconds.
2.1.7.8 Integrator/data acquisition system. An analog or digital device or computerized data acquisition system used to integrate the FIA response or compute the average response and record measurement data. The minimum data sampling frequency for computing average or integrated values is one measurement value every 5 seconds. The device shall be capable of recording average values at least once per minute.
2.1.9 Calibration and other gases. Gases used for calibration, fuel, and combustion air (if required) are contained in compressed gas cylinders. All calibration gases shall be traceable to NIST standards and shall be certified by the manufacturer to ±1 percent of the tag value. Additionally, the manufacturer of the cylinder should provide a recommended shelf life for each calibration gas cylinder over which the concentration does not change more than ±2 percent from the certified value. For calibration gas values not generally available, alternative methods for preparing calibration gas mixtures, such as dilution system, may be used with prior approval.
2.1.9.1 Fuel. A 40 percent H2/60 percent He or 40 percent H2/60 percent N2 gas mixture is recommended to avoid an oxygen synergism effect that reportedly occurs when oxygen concentration varies significantly from a mean value.
2.1.9.2. Carrier gas and dilution air supply. High purity air with less than 1 ppm of organic material (as propane or carbon equivalent) or less than 0.1 percent of the span value, whichever is greater.
2.1.9.3 FIA linearity calibration gases. Low-, mid-, and high-range gas mixture standards with nominal propane concentrations of 20-30, 45-55, and 70-80 percent of the span value in air, respectively. Other calibration values and other span values may be used if it can be shown that more accurate measurements would be achieved.
2.1.9.4 Dilution check gas. Gas mixture standard containing propane in air, approximately half the span value after dilution.
2.1.10 Particulate filter. An in-stack or an out-of-stack glass fiber filter is recommended if exhaust gas particulate loading is significant. An out-of-stack filter must be heated to prevent any condensation unless it can be demonstrated that no condensation occurs.
2.2 Captured emissions volumetric flow rate.
2.2.1 Method 2 or 2A apparatus. For determining volumetric flow rate.
2.2.2 Method 3 apparatus and reagents. For determining molecular weight of the gas stream. An estimate of the molecular weight of the gas stream may be used if it can be justified.
2.2.3 Method 4 apparatus and reagents. For determining moisture content, if necessary.
3. Determination of Volumetric Flow Rate of Captured Emissions
3.1 Locate all points where emissions are captured from the affected facility. Using Method 1, determine the sampling points. Be sure to check each site for cyclonic or swirling flow.
3.2 Measure the velocity at each sampling site at least once every hour during each sampling run using Method 2 or 2A.
4. Determination of VOC Content of Captured Emissions
4.1 Analysis duration. Measure the VOC responses at each captured emissions point during the entire test run or, if applicable, while the process is operating. If there are multiple captured emissions locations, design a sampling system to allow a single FIA to be used to determine the VOC responses at all sampling locations.
4.2 Gas VOC concentration.
4.2.1 Assemble the sample train as shown in Figure 1. Calibrate the FIA according to the procedure in section 5.1.
4.2.2 Set the dilution ratio and determine the dilution factor according to the procedure in section 5.3.
4.2.3 Conduct a system check according to the procedure in section 5.4.
4.2.4 Install the sample probe so that the probe is centrally located in the stack, pipe, or duct, and is sealed tightly at the stack port connection.
4.2.5 Inject zero gas at the calibration valve assembly. Measure the system response time as the time required for the system to reach the effluent concentration after the calibration valve has been returned to the effluent sampling position.
4.2.6 Conduct a system check before and a system drift check after each sampling run according to the procedures in sections 5.2 and 5.4. If the drift check following a run indicates unacceptable performance, the run is not valid. The tester may elect to perform system drift checks during the run not to exceed one drift check per hour.
4.2.7 Verify that the sample lines, filter, and pump temperatures are 120 ±5 °C.
4.2.8 Begin sampling at the start of the test period and continue to sample during the entire run. Record the starting and ending times and any required process information as appropriate. If multiple captured emission locations are sampled using a single FIA, sample at each location for the same amount of time (e.g., 2 minutes) and continue to switch from one location to another for the entire test run. Be sure that total sampling time at each location is the same at the end of the test run. Collect at least 4 separate measurements from each sample point during each hour of testing. Disregard the measurements at each sampling location until two times the response time of the measurement system has elapsed. Continue sampling for at least 1 minute and record the concentration measurements.
4.3 Background concentration.
4.3.1 Locate all NDO's of the TTE. A sampling point shall be centrally located outside of the TTE at 4 equivalent diameters from each NDO, if possible. If there are more than 6 NDO's, choose 6 sampling points evenly spaced among the NDO's.
4.3.2 Assemble the sample train as shown in Figure 2. Calibrate the FIA and conduct a system check according to the procedures in sections 5.1 and 5.4.
4.3.3 Position the probe at the sampling location.
4.3.4 Determine the response time, conduct the system check and sample according to the procedures described in sections 4.2.4 to 4.2.8.
4.4 Alternative procedure. The direct interface sampling and analysis procedure described in section 7.2 of Method 18 may be used to determine the gas VOC concentration. The system must be designed to collect and analyze at least one sample every 10 minutes.
5. Calibration and Quality Assurance
5.1 FIA Calibration and linearity check. Make necessary adjustments to the air and fuel supplies for the FIA and ignite the burner. Allow the FIA to warm up for the period recommended by the manufacturer. Inject a calibration gas into the measurement system after the dilution system and adjust the back-pressure regulator to the value required to achieve the flow rates specified by the manufacturer. Inject the zero- and the high-range calibration gases and adjust the analyzer calibration to provide the proper responses. Inject the low- and mid-range gases and record the responses of the measurement system. The calibration and linearity of the system are acceptable if the responses for all four gases are within 5 percent of the respective gas values. If the performance of the system is not acceptable, repair or adjust the system and repeat the linearity check. Conduct a calibration and linearity check after assembling the analysis system and after a major change is made to the system.
5.2 Systems drift checks. Select the calibration gas that most closely approximates the concentration of the diluted captured emissions for conducting the drift checks. Introduce the zero and calibration gas at the calibration valve assembly and verify that the appropriate gas flow rate and pressure are present at the FIA. Record the measurement system responses to the zero and calibration gases. The performance of the system is acceptable if the difference between the drift check measurement and the value obtained in section 5.1 is less than 3 percent of the span value. Conduct the system drift check at the end of each run.
5.3 Determination of dilution factor. Inject the dilution check gas into the measurement system before the dilution system and record the response. Calculate the dilution factor using Equation 3.
5.4 System check. Inject the high range calibration gas at the inlet to the sampling probe while the dilution air is turned off. Record the response. The performance of the system is acceptable if the measurement system response is within 5 percent of the value obtained in section 5.1 for the high range calibration gas. Conduct a system check before and after each test run.
5.5 Analysis audit. Immediately before each test analyze an audit cylinder as described in section 5.2. The analysis audit must agree with the audit cylinder concentration within 10 percent.
6. Nomenclature
Ai = area of NDO i, ft 2.
AN = total area of all NDO's in the enclosure, ft 2.
CA = actual concentration of the dilution check gas, ppm propane.
CBi = corrected average VOC concentration of background emissions at point i, ppm propane.
CB = average background concentration, ppm propane.
CDH = average measured concentration for the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane.
CDO = average system drift check concentration for zero concentration gas, ppm propane.
CH = actual concentration of the drift check calibration, gas, ppm propane.
Ci = uncorrected average background VOC concentration measured at point i, ppm propane.
Cj = uncorrected average VOC concentration measured at point j, ppm propane.
CM = measured concentration of the dilution check gas, ppm propane.
DF = dilution factor.
G = total VOC content of captured emissions, kg.
K1 = 1.830 × 10−6 kg/(m 3-ppm).
n = number of measurement points.
QGj = average effluent volumetric flow rate corrected to standard conditions at captured emissions point j, m 3/min.
TC = total duration of capture efficiency sampling run, min.
7. Calculations
7.1 Total VOC captured emissions.
7.2 VOC concentration of the captured emissions to point j.
7.3 Dilution factor.
7.4 Background VOC concentration at point i.
7.5 Average background concentration.
Procedure F.2—Fugitive VOC Emissions from Building Enclosures
1. Introduction
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the fugitive volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions from a building enclosure (BE). It is intended to be used as a segment in the development of liquid/gas or gas/gas protocols for determining VOC capture efficiency (CE) for surface coating and printing operations.
1.2 Principle. The total amount of fugitive VOC emissions (FB) from the BE is calculated as the sum of the products of the VOC content (CFj) of each fugitive emissions point, its flow rate (QFj), and time (TF).
1.3 Measurement uncertainty. The measurement uncertainties are estimated for each fugitive emissions point as follows: QFj=±5.0 percent and CFj=±5.0 percent. Based on these numbers, the probable uncertainty for FB is estimated at about ±11.2 percent.
1.4 Sampling requirements. A capture efficiency test shall consist of at least three sampling runs. The sampling time for each run should be at least 8 hours, unless otherwise approved.
1.5 Notes. Because this procedure is often applied in highly explosive areas, caution and care should be exercised in choosing appropriate equipment and installing and using the equipment. Mention of trade names or company products does not constitute endorsement. All gas concentrations (percent, ppm) are by volume, unless otherwise noted.
2. Apparatus and Reagents
2.1 Gas VOC concentration. A schematic of the measurement system is shown in Figure 1. The main components are described below:
2.1.1 Sample probe. Stainless steel, or equivalent. The probe shall be heated to prevent VOC condensation.
2.1.2 Calibration valve assembly. Three-way valve assembly at the outlet of sample probe to direct the zero and calibration gases to the analyzer. Other methods, such as quick-connect lines, to route calibration gases to the outlet of the sample probe are acceptable.
2.1.3 Sample line. Stainless steel or Teflon tubing to transport the sample gas to the analyzer. The sample line must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.4 Sample pump. A leak-free pump, to pull the sample gas through the system at a flow rate sufficient to minimize the response time of the measurement system. The components of the pump that contact the gas stream shall be constructed of staimust be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.5 Sample flow rate control. A sample flow rate control valve and rotameter, or equivalent, to maintain a constant sampling rate within 10 percent. The flow rate control valve and rotameter must be heated to prevent condensation. A control valve may also be located on the sample pump bypass loop to assist in controlling the sample pressure and flow rate.
2.1.6 Sample gas manifold. Capable of diverting a portion of the sample gas stream to the flame ionization analyzer (FIA), and the remainder to the bypass discharge vent. The manifold components shall be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon. If emissions are to be measured at multiple locations, the measurement system shall be designed to use separate sampling probes, lines, and pumps for each measurement location and a common sample gas manifold and FIA. The sample gas manifold must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.7 Organic Concentration Analyzer. An FIA with a span value of 1.5 times the expected concentration as propane; however, other span values may be used if it can be demonstrated that they would provide more accurate measurements. The system shall be capable or exceeding the following specifications:
2.1.7.1 Zero drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.2 Calibration drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.3 Calibration error. Less than ±5.0 percent of the calibration gas value.
2.1.7.4 Response time. Less than 30 seconds.
2.1.8 Integrator/data acquisition system. An analog or digital device or computerized data acquisition system used to integrate the FIA response or compute the average response and record measurement data. The minimum data sampling frequency for computing average or integrated values is one measurement value every 5 seconds. The device shall be capable of recording average values at least once per minute.
2.1.9 Calibration and other gases. Gases used for calibration, fuel, and combustion air (if required) are contained in compressed gas cylinders. All calibration gases shall be traceable to NIST standards and shall be certified by the manufacturer to ±1 percent of the tag value. Additionally, the manufacturer of the cylinder should provide a recommended shelf life for each calibration gas cylinder over which the concentration does not change more than ±2 percent from the certified value. For calibration gas values not generally available, alternative methods for preparing calibration gas mixtures, such as dilution systems, may be used with prior approval.
2.1.9.1 Fuel. A 40 percent H2/60 percent He or 40 percent H2/60 percent N2 gas mixture is recommended to avoid an oxygen synergism effect that reportedly occurs when oxygen concentration varies significantly from a mean value.
2.1.9.2 Carrier gas. High purity air with less than 1 ppm of organic material (propane or carbon equivalent) or less than 0.1 percent of the span value, whichever is greater.
2.1.9.3 FIA linearity calibration gases. Low-, mid-, and high-range gas mixture standards with nominal propane concentrations of 20-30, 45-55, and 70-80 percent of the span value in air, respectively. Other calibration values and other span values may be used if it can be shown that more accurate measurements would be achieved.
2.1.10 Particulate filter. An in-stack or an out-of-stack glass fiber filter is recommended if exhaust gas particulate loading is significant. An out-of-stack filter must be heated to prevent any condensation unless it can be demonstrated that no condensation occurs.
2.2 Fugitive emissions volumetric flow rate.
2.2.1 Flow direction indicators. Any means of indicating inward or outward flow, such as light plastic film or paper streamers, smoke tubes, filaments, and sensory perception.
2.2.2 Method 2 or 2A apparatus. For determining volumetric flow rate. Anemometers or similar devices calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions may be used when low velocities are present. Vane anemometers (Young-maximum response propeller), specialized pitots with electronic manometers (e.g., Shortridge Instruments Inc., Airdata Multimeter 860) are commercially available with measurement thresholds of 15 and 8 mpm (50 and 25 fpm), respectively.
2.2.3 Method 3 apparatus and reagents. For determining molecular weight of the gas stream. An estimate of the molecular weight of the gas stream may be used if it can be justified.
2.2.4 Method 4 apparatus and reagents. For determining moisture content, if necessary.
3. Determination of Volumetric Flow Rate of Fugitive Emissions
3.1 Preliminary determinations. The purpose of this exercise is to determine which exhaust points should be measured for volumetric flow rates and VOC concentrations.
3.1.1 Forced draft openings. Identify all forced draft openings. Determine the volumetric flow rate according to Method 2.
3.1.2 NDO's exhaust points. The NDO's in the roof of a facility are considered to be exhaust points. Determine volumetric flow rate from these NDO's. Divide the cross-sectional area according to Method 1 using 12 equal areas. Use the appropriate velocity measurement devices, e.g., propeller anemometers.
3.1.3 Other NDO's.
3.1.3.1 This step is optional. Determine the exhaust flow rate, including that of the control device, from the enclosure and the intake air flow rate. If the exhaust flow rate divided by the intake air flow rate is greater than 1.1, then all other NDO's are not considered to be significant exhaust points.
3.1.3.2 If the option above is not taken, identify all other NDO's and other potential points through which fugitive emissions may escape the enclosure. Then use the following criteria to determine whether flow rates and VOC concentrations need to be measured:
3.1.3.2.1 Using the appropriate flow direction indicator, determine the flow direction. An NDO with zero or inward flow is not an exhaust point.
3.1.3.2.2 Measure the outward volumetric flow rate from the remainder of the NDO's. If the collective flow rate is 2 percent, or less, of the flow rate from sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2, then these NDO's, except those within two equivalent diameters (based on NDO opening) from VOC sources, may be considered to be non-exhaust points.
3.1.3.2.3 If the percentage calculated in section 3.1.3.2.2 is greater than 2 percent, those NDO's (except those within two equivalent diameters from VOC sources) whose volumetric flow rate totals 2 percent of the flow rate from sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 may be considered as non-exhaust points. All remaining NDO's shall be measured for volumetric flow rate and VOC concentrations during the CE test.
3.1.3.2.4 The tester may choose to measure VOC concentrations at the forced exhaust points and the NDO's. If the total VOC emissions from the NDO's are less than 2 percent of the emissions from the forced draft and roof NDO's, then these NDO's may be eliminated from further consideration.
3.2 Determination of flow rates.
3.2.1 Measure the volumetric flow rate at all locations identified as exhaust points in section 3.1. Divide each exhaust opening into 9 equal areas for rectangular openings and 8 for circular openings.
3.2.2 Measure the velocity at each site at least once every hour during each sampling run using Method 2 or 2A, if applicable, or using the low velocity instruments in section 2.2.2.
4. Determination of VOC Content of Fugitive Emissions
4.1 Analysis duration. Measure the VOC responses at each fugitive emission point during the entire test run or, if applicable, while the process is operating. If there are multiple emissions locations, design a sampling system to allow a single FIA to be used to determine the VOC responses at all sampling locations.
4.2 Gas VOC concentration.
4.2.1 Assemble the sample train as shown in Figure 1. Calibrate the FIA and conduct a system check according to the procedures in sections 5.1 and 5.3, respectively.
4.2.2 Install the sample probe so that the probe is centrally located in the stack, pipe, or duct, and is sealed tightly at the stack port connection.
4.2.3 Inject zero gas at the calibration valve assembly. Allow the measurement system response to reach zero. Measure the system response time as the time required for the system to reach the effluent concentration after the calibration valve has been returned to the effluent sampling position.
4.2.4 Conduct a system check before and a system drift check after each sampling run according to the procedures in sections 5.2 and 5.3. If the drift check following a run indicates unacceptable performance, the run is not valid. The tester may elect to perform drift checks during the run not to exceed one drift check per hour.
4.2.5 Verify that the sample lines, filter, and pump temperatures are 120 ±5 °C.
4.2.6 Begin sampling at the start of the test period and continue to sample during the entire run. Record the starting and ending times and any required process information as appropriate. If multiple emission locations are sampled using a single FIA, sample at each location for the same amount of time (e.g., 2 minutes) and continue to switch from one location to another for the entire test run. Be sure that total sampling time at each location is the same at the end of the test run. Collect at least 4 separate measurements from each sample point during each hour of testing. Disregard the response measurements at each sampling location until two times the response time of the measurement system has elapsed. Continue sampling for at least 1 minute and record the concentration measurements.
4.3 Alternative procedure. The direct interface sampling and analysis procedure described in section 7.2 of Method 18 may be used to determine the gas VOC concentration. The system must be designed to collect and analyze at least one sample every 10 minutes.
5. Calibration and Quality Assurance
5.1 FIA calibration and linearity check. Make necessary adjustments to the air and fuel supplies for the FIA and ignite the burner. Allow the FIA to warm up for the period recommended by the manufacturer. Inject a calibration gas into the measurement system and adjust the back-pressure regulator to the value required to achieve the flow rates specified by the manufacturer. Inject the zero- and the high-range calibration gases and adjust the analyzer calibration to provide the proper responses. Inject the low- and mid-range gases and record the responses of the measurement system. The calibration and linearity of the system are acceptable if the responses for all four gases are within 5 percent of the respective gas values. If the performance of the system is not acceptable, repair or adjust the system and repeat the linearity check. Conduct a calibration and linearity check after assembling the analysis system and after a major change is made to the system.
5.2 Systems drift checks. Select the calibration gas that most closely approximates the concentration of the captured emissions for conducting the drift checks. Introduce the zero and calibration gas at the calibration valve assembly and verify that the appropriate gas flow rate and pressure are present at the FIA. Record the measurement system responses to the zero and calibration gases. The performance of the system is acceptable if the difference between the drift check measurement and the value obtained in section 5.1 is less than 3 percent of the span value. Conduct a system drift check at the end of each run.
5.3 System check. Inject the high range calibration gas at the inlet of the sampling probe and record the response. The performance of the system is acceptable if the measurement system response is within 5 percent of the value obtained in section 5.1 for the high range calibration gas. Conduct a system check before each test run.
5.4 Analysis audit. Immediately before each test analyze an audit cylinder as described in section 5.2. The analysis audit must agree with the audit cylinder concentration within 10 percent.
6. Nomenclature
CDH = average measured concentration for the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane.
CDO = average system drift check concentration for zero concentration gas, ppm propane.
CFj = corrected average VOC concentration of fugitive emissions at point j, ppm propane.
CH = actual concentration of the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane.
Cj = uncorrected average VOC concentration measured at point j, ppm propane.
FB = total VOC content of fugitive emissions from the building, kg.
K1 = 1.830 × 10−6 kg/(m 3-ppm).
n = number of measurement points.
QFj = average effluent volumetric flow rate corrected to standard conditions at fugitive emissions point j, m 3/min.
TF = total duration of capture efficiency sampling run, min.
7. Calculations
7.1 Total VOC fugitive emissions from the building.
7.2 VOC concentration of the fugitive emissions at point j.
Procedure F.1—Fugitive VOC Emissions From Temporary Enclosures
1. Introduction
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the fugitive volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions from a temporary total enclosure (TTE). It is intended to be used as a segment in the development of liquid/gas or gas/gas protocols for determining VOC capture efficiency (CE) for surface coating and printing operations.
1.2 Principle. The amount of fugitive VOC emissions (F) from the TTE is calculated as the sum of the products of the VOC content (CFj), the flow rate (QFj), and the sampling time (TF) from each fugitive emissions point.
1.3 Estimated measurement uncertainty. The measurement uncertainties are estimated for each fugitive emission point as follows: Q=±5.5 percent and CFj=±5.0 percent. Based on these numbers, the probable uncertainty for F is estimated at about ±7.4 percent.
1.4 Sampling requirements. A capture efficiency test shall consist of at least three sampling runs. The sampling time for each run should be at least 8 hours, unless otherwise approved.
1.5 Notes. Because this procedure is often applied in highly explosive areas, caution and care should be exercised in choosing appropriate equipment and installing and using the equipment. Mention of trade names or company products does not constitute endorsement. All gas concentrations (percent, ppm) are by volume, unless otherwise noted.
2. Apparatus and Reagents
2.1 Gas VOC concentration. A schematic of the measurement system is shown in Figure 1. The main components are described below:
2.1.1 Sample probe. Stainless steel, or equivalent. The probe shall be heated to prevent VOC condensation.
2.1.2 Calibration valve assembly. Three-way valve assembly at the outlet of sample probe to direct the zero and calibration gases to the analyzer. Other methods, such as quick-connect lines, to route calibration gases to the outlet of the sample probe are acceptable.
2.1.3 Sample line. Stainless steel or Teflon tubing to transport the sample gas to the analyzer. The sample line must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.4 Sample pump. A leak-free pump, to pull the sample gas through the system at a flow rate sufficient to minimize the response time of the measurement system. The components of the pump that contact the gas stream shall be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon. The sample pump must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.5 Sample flow rate control. A sample flow rate control valve and rotameter, or equivalent, to maintain a constant sampling rate within 10 percent. The flow control valve and rotameter must be heated to prevent condensation. A control valve may also be located on the sample pump bypass loop to assist in controlling the sample pressure and flow rate.
2.1.6 Sample gas manifold. Capable of diverting a portion of the sample gas stream to the flame ionization analyzer (FIA), and the remainder to the bypass discharge vent. The manifold components shall be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon. If emissions are to be measured at multiple locations, the measurement system shall be designed to use separate sampling probes, lines, and pumps for each measurement location and a common sample gas manifold and FIA. The sample gas manifold and connecting lines to the FIA must be heated to prevent condensation.
2.1.7 Organic concentration analyzer. An FIA with a span value of 1.5 times the expected concentration as propane; however, other span values may be used if it can be demonstrated that they would provide more accurate measurements. The system shall be capable of meeting or exceeding the following specifications:
2.1.7.1 Zero drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.2 Calibration drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.1.7.3 Calibration error. Less than ±5.0 percent of the calibration gas value.
2.1.7.4 Response time. Less than 30 seconds.
2.1.8 Integrator/data acquisition system. An analog or digital device or computerized data acquisition system used to integrate the FIA response or compute the average response and record measurement data. The minimum data sampling frequency for computing average or integrated values is one measurement value every 5 seconds. The device shall be capable of recording average values at least once per minute.
2.1.9 Calibration and other gases. Gases used for calibration, fuel, and combustion air (if required) are contained in compressed gas cylinders. All calibration gases shall be traceable to NIST standards and shall be certified by the manufacturer to ±1 percent of the tag value. Additionally, the manufacturer of the cylinder should provide a recommended shelf life for each calibration gas cylinder over which the concentration does not change more than ±2 percent from the certified value. For calibration gas values not generally available, alternative methods for preparing calibration gas mixtures, such as dilution systems, may be used with prior approval.
2.1.9.1 Fuel. A 40 percent H2/60 percent He or 40 percent H2/60 percent N2 gas mixture is recommended to avoid an oxygen synergism effect that reportedly occurs when oxygen concentration varies significantly from a mean value.
2.1.9.2 Carrier gas. High purity air with less than 1 ppm of organic material (as propane or carbon equivalent) or less than 0.1 percent of the span value, whichever is greater.
2.1.9.3 FIA linearity calibration gases. Low-, mid-, and high-range gas mixture standards with nominal propane concentrations of 20-30, 45-55, and 70-80 percent of the span value in air, respectively. Other calibration values and other span values may be used if it can be shown that more accurate measurements would be achieved.
2.1.10 Particulate filter. An in-stack or an out-of-stack glass fiber filter is recommended if exhaust gas particulate loading is significant. An out-of-stack filter must be heated to prevent any condensation unless it can be demonstrated that no condensation occurs.
2.2 Fugitive emissions volumetric flow rate.
2.2.1 Method 2 or 2A apparatus. For determining volumetric flow rate.
2.2.2 Method 3 apparatus and reagents. For determining molecular weight of the gas stream. An estimate of the molecular weight of the gas stream may be used if it can be justified.
2.2.3 Method 4 apparatus and reagents. For determining moisture content, if necessary.
2.3 Temporary total enclosure. The criteria for designing a TTE are discussed in Procedure T.
3. Determination of Volumetric Flow Rate of Fugitive Emissions
3.1 Locate all points where emissions are exhausted from the TTE. Using Method 1, determine the sampling points. Be sure to check each site for cyclonic or swirling flow.
3.2 Measure the velocity at each sampling site at least once every hour during each sampling run using Method 2 or 2A.
4. Determination of VOC Content of Fugitive Emissions
4.1 Analysis duration. Measure the VOC responses at each fugitive emission point during the entire test run or, if applicable, while the process is operating. If there are multiple emission locations, design a sampling system to allow a single FIA to be used to determine the VOC responses at all sampling locations.
4.2 Gas VOC concentration.
4.2.1 Assemble the sample train as shown in Figure 1. Calibrate the FIA and conduct a system check according to the procedures in sections 5.1 and 5.3, respectively.
4.2.2 Install the sample probe so that the probe is centrally located in the stack, pipe, or duct, and is sealed tightly at the stack port connection.
4.2.3 Inject zero gas at the calibration valve assembly. Allow the measurement system response to reach zero. Measure the system response time as the time required for the system to reach the effluent concentration after the calibration valve has been returned to the effluent sampling position.
4.2.4 Conduct a system check before and a system drift check after each sampling run according to the procedures in sections 5.2 and 5.3. If the drift check following a run indicates unacceptable performance, the run is not valid. The tester may elect to perform system drift checks during the run not to exceed one drift check per hour.
4.2.5 Verify that the sample lines, filter, and pump temperatures are 120 ±5 °C.
4.2.6 Begin sampling at the start of the test period and continue to sample during the entire run. Record the starting and ending times and any required process information as appropriate. If multiple emission locations are sampled using a single FIA, sample at each location for the same amount of time (e.g., 2 minutes) and continue to switch from one location to another for the entire test run. Be sure that total sampling time at each location is the same at the end of the test run. Collect at least 4 separate measurements from each sample point during each hour of testing. Disregard the response measurements at each sampling location until two times the response time of the measurement system has elapsed. Continue sampling for at least 1 minute and record the concentration measurements.
4.3 Background concentration.
4.3.1 Determination of VOC background concentration.
4.3.1.1 Locate all NDO's of the TTE. A sampling point shall be centrally located outside of the TTE at 4 equivalent diameters from each NDO, if possible. If there are more than 6 NDO's, choose 6 sampling points evenly spaced among the NDO's.
4.3.1.2 Assemble the sample train as shown in Figure 2. Calibrate the FIA and conduct a system check according to the procedures in sections 5.1 and 5.3.
4.3.1.3 Position the probe at the sampling location.
4.3.1.4 Determine the response time, conduct the system check and sample according to the procedures described in sections 4.2.3 to 4.2.6.
4.4 Alternative procedure. The direct interface sampling and analysis procedure described in section 7.2 of Method 18 may be used to determine the gas VOC concentration. The system must be designed to collect and analyze at least one sample every 10 minutes.
5. Calibration and Quality Assurance
5.1 FIA calibration and linearity check. Make necessary adjustments to the air and fuel supplies for the FIA and ignite the burner. Allow the FIA to warm up for the period recommended by the manufacturer. Inject a calibration gas into the measurement system and adjust the back-pressure regulator to the value required to achieve the flow rates specified by the manufacturer. Inject the zero- and the high-range calibration gases and adjust the analyzer calibration to provide the proper responses. Inject the low- and mid-range gases and record the responses of the measurement system. The calibration and linearity of the system are acceptable if the responses for all four gases are within 5 percent of the respective gas values. If the performance of the system is not acceptable, repair or adjust the system and repeat the linearity check. Conduct a calibration and linearity check after assembling the analysis system and after a major change is made to the system.
5.2 Systems drift checks. Select the calibration gas concentration that most closely approximates that of the fugitive gas emissions to conduct the drift checks. Introduce the zero and calibration gas at the calibration valve assembly and verify that the appropriate gas flow rate and pressure are present at the FIA. Record the measurement system responses to the zero and calibration gases. The performance of the system is acceptable if the difference between the drift check measurement and the value obtained in section 5.1 is less than 3 percent of the span value. Conduct a system drift check at the end of each run.
5.3 System check. Inject the high range calibration gas at the inlet of the sampling probe and record the response. The performance of the system is acceptable if the measurement system response is within 5 percent of the value obtained in section 5.1 for the high range calibration gas. Conduct a system check before each test run.
5.4 Analysis audit. Immediately before each test analyze an audit cylinder as described in section 5.2. The analysis audit must agree with the audit cylinder concentration within 10 percent.
6. Nomenclature
Ai = area of NDO i, ft 2.
AN = total area of all NDO's in the enclosure, ft 2.
CBi = corrected average VOC concentration of background emissions at point i, ppm propane.
CB = average background concentration, ppm propane.
CDH = average measured concentration for the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane.
CDO = average system drift check concentration for zero concentration gas, ppm propane.
CFj = corrected average VOC concentration of fugitive emissions at point j, ppm propane.
CH = actual concentration of the drift check calibration gas, ppm propane.
Ci = uncorrected average background VOC concentration at point i, ppm propane.
Cj = uncorrected average VOC concentration measured at point j, ppm propane.
F = total VOC content of fugitive emissions, kg.
K1 = 1.830 × 10−6 kg/(m 3−ppm).
n = number of measurement points.
QFj = average effluent volumetric flow rate corrected to standard conditions at fugitive emissions point j, m 3/min.
TF = total duration of fugitive emissions sampling run, min.
7. Calculations
7.1 Total VOC fugitive emissions.
7.2 VOC concentration of the fugitive emissions at point j.
7.3 Background VOC concentration at point i.
7.4 Average background concentration.
Procedure L—VOC Input
1. Introduction
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for determining the input of volatile organic compounds (VOC). It is intended to be used as a segment in the development of liquid/gas protocols for determining VOC capture efficiency (CE) for surface coating and printing operations.
1.2 Principle. The amount of VOC introduced to the process (L) is the sum of the products of the weight (W) of each VOC containing liquid (ink, paint, solvent, etc.) used and its VOC content (V). A sample of each VOC containing liquid is analyzed with a flame ionization analyzer (FIA) to determine V.
1.3 Estimated measurement uncertainty. The measurement uncertainties are estimated for each VOC containing liquid as follows: W=±2.0 percent and V=±12.0 percent. Based on these numbers, the probable uncertainty for L is estimated at about ±12.2 percent for each VOC containing liquid.
1.4 Sampling requirements. A capture efficiency test shall consist of at least three sampling runs. The sampling time for each run should be at least 8 hours, unless otherwise approved.
1.5 Notes. Because this procedure is often applied in highly explosive areas, caution and care should be exercised in choosing appropriate equipment and installing and using the equipment. Mention of trade names or company products does not constitute endorsement. All gas concentrations (percent, ppm) are by volume, unless otherwise noted.
2. Apparatus and Reagents
2.1 Liquid weight.
2.1.1 Balances/digital scales. To weigh drums of VOC containing liquids to within 0.2 lb.
2.1.2 Volume measurement apparatus (alternative). Volume meters, flow meters, density measurement equipment, etc., as needed to achieve same accuracy as direct weight measurements.
2.2 VOC content (flame ionization analyzer technique). The liquid sample analysis system is shown in Figures 1 and 2. The following equipment is required:
2.2.1 Sample collection can. An appropriately sized metal can to be used to collect VOC containing materials. The can must be constructed in such a way that it can be grounded to the coating container.
2.2.2 Needle valves. To control gas flow.
2.2.3 Regulators. For carrier gas and calibration gas cylinders.
2.2.4 Tubing. Teflon or stainless steel tubing with diameters and lengths determined by connection requirements of equipment. The tubing between the sample oven outlet and the FIA shall be heated to maintain a temperature of 120 ±5 °C.
2.2.5 Atmospheric vent. A tee and 0- to 0.5-liter/min rotameter placed in the sampling line between the carrier gas cylinder and the VOC sample vessel to release the excess carrier gas. A toggle valve placed between the tee and the rotameter facilitates leak tests of the analysis system.
2.2.6 Thermometer. Capable of measuring the temperature of the hot water bath to within 1 °C.
2.2.7 Sample oven. Heated enclosure, containing calibration gas coil heaters, critical orifice, aspirator, and other liquid sample analysis components, capable of maintaining a temperature of 120 ±5 °C.
2.2.8 Gas coil heaters. Sufficient lengths of stainless steel or Teflon tubing to allow zero and calibration gases to be heated to the sample oven temperature before entering the critical orifice or aspirator.
2.2.9 Water bath. Capable of heating and maintaining a sample vessel temperature of 100 ±5 °C.
2.2.10 Analytical balance. To measure ±0.001 g.
2.2.11 Disposable syringes. 2-cc or 5-cc.
2.2.12 Sample vessel. Glass, 40-ml septum vial. A separate vessel is needed for each sample.
2.2.13 Rubber stopper. Two-hole stopper to accommodate 3.2-mm ( 1/8-in.) Teflon tubing, appropriately sized to fit the opening of the sample vessel. The rubber stopper should be wrapped in Teflon tape to provide a tighter seal and to prevent any reaction of the sample with the rubber stopper. Alternatively, any leak-free closure fabricated of non-reactive materials and accommodating the necessary tubing fittings may be used.
2.2.14 Critical orifices. Calibrated critical orifices capable of providing constant flow rates from 50 to 250 ml/min at known pressure drops. Sapphire orifice assemblies (available from O'Keefe Controls Company) and glass capillary tubing have been found to be adequate for this application.
2.2.15 Vacuum gauge. 0 -to 760-mm (0- to 30-in.) Hg U-Tube manometer or vacuum gauge.
2.2.16 Pressure gauge. Bourdon gauge capable of measuring the maximum air pressure at the aspirator inlet (e.g., 100 psig).
2.2.17 Aspirator. A device capable of generating sufficient vacuum at the sample vessel to create critical flow through the calibrated orifice when sufficient air pressure is present at the aspirator inlet. The aspirator must also provide sufficient sample pressure to operate the FIA. The sample is also mixed with the dilution gas within the aspirator.
2.2.18 Soap bubble meter. Of an appropriate size to calibrate the critical orifices in the system.
2.2.19 Organic concentration analyzer. An FIA with a span value of 1.5 times the expected concentration as propane; however other span values may be used if it can be demonstrated that they would provide more accurate measurements. The system shall be capable of meeting or exceeding the following specifications:
2.2.19.1 Zero drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of the span value.
2.2.19.2 Calibration drift. Less than ±3.0 percent of span value.
2.2.19.3 Calibration error. Less than ±5.0 percent of the calibration gas value.
2.2.20 Integrator/data acquisition system. An analog or digital device or computerized data acquisition system used to integrate the FIA response or compute the average response and record measurement data. The minimum data sampling frequency for computing average or integrated values is one measurement value every 5 seconds. The device shall be capable of recording average values at least once per minute.
2.2.21 Chart recorder (optional). A chart recorder or similar device is recommended to provide a continuous analog display of the measurement results during the liquid sample analysis.
2.2.22 Calibration and other gases. For calibration, fuel, and combustion air (if required) contained in compressed gas cylinders. All calibration gases shall be traceable to NIST standards and shall be certified by the manufacturer to ±1 percent of the tag value. Additionally, the manufacturer of the cylinder should provide a recommended shelf life for each calibration gas cylinder over which the concentration does not change more than ±2 percent from the certified value. For calibration gas values not generally available, alternative methods for preparing calibration gas mixtures, such as dilution systems, may be used with prior approval.
2.2.22.1 Fuel. A 40 percent H2/60 percent He or 40 percent H2/60 percent N2 gas mixture is recommended to avoid an oxygen synergism effect that reportedly occurs when oxygen concentration varies significantly from a mean value.
2.2.22.2 Carrier gas. High purity air with less than 1 ppm of organic material (as propane) or less than 0.1 percent of the span value, whichever is greater.
2.2.22.3 FIA linearity calibration gases. Low-, mid-, and high-range gas mixture standards with nominal propane concentrations of 20-30, 45-55, and 70-80 percent of the span value in air, respectively. Other calibration values and other span values may be used if it can be shown that more accurate measurements would be achieved.
2.2.22.4 System calibration gas. Gas mixture standard containing propane in air, approximately the undiluted VOC concentration expected for the liquid samples.
3. Determination of Liquid Input Weight
3.1 Weight difference. Determine the amount of material introduced to the process as the weight difference of the feed material before and after each sampling run. In determining the total VOC containing liquid usage, account for: (a) The initial (beginning) VOC containing liquid mixture; (b) any solvent added during the test run; (c) any coating added during the test run; and (d) any residual VOC containing liquid mixture remaining at the end of the sample run.
3.1.1 Identify all points where VOC containing liquids are introduced to the process. To obtain an accurate measurement of VOC containing liquids, start with an empty fountain (if applicable). After completing the run, drain the liquid in the fountain back into the liquid drum (if possible), and weigh the drum again. Weigh the VOC containing liquids to ±0.5 percent of the total weight (full) or ±0.1 percent of the total weight of VOC containing liquid used during the sample run, whichever is less. If the residual liquid cannot be returned to the drum, drain the fountain into a preweighted empty drum to determine the final weight of the liquid.
3.1.2 If it is not possible to measure a single representative mixture, then weigh the various components separately (e.g., if solvent is added during the sampling run, weigh the solvent before it is added to the mixture). If a fress drum of VOC containing liquid is needed during the run, then weigh both the empty drum and fresh drum.
3.2 Volume measurement (alternative). If direct weight measurements are not feasible, the tester may use volume meters and flow rate meters (and density measurements) to determine the weight of liquids used if it can be demonstrated that the technique produces results equivalent to the direct weight measurements. If a single representative mixture cannot be measured, measure the components separately.
4. Determination of VOC Content in Input Liquids
4.1 Collection of liquid samples.
4.1.1 Collect a 100-ml or larger sample of the VOC containing liquid mixture at each application location at the beginning and end of each test run. A separate sample should be taken of each VOC containing liquid added to the application mixture during the test run. If a fresh drum is needed during the sampling run, then obtain a sample from the fresh drum.
4.1.2 When collecting the sample, ground the sample container to the coating drum. Fill the sample container as close to the rim as possible to minimize the amount of headspace.
4.1.3 After the sample is collected, seal the container so the sample cannot leak out or evaporate.
4.1.4 Label the container to identify clearly the contents.
4.2 Liquid sample VOC content.
4.2.1 Assemble the liquid VOC content analysis system as shown in Figure 1.
4.2.2 Permanently identify all of the critical orifices that may be used. Calibrate each critical orifice under the expected operating conditions (i.e., sample vacuum and temperature) against a volume meter as described in section 5.3.
4.2.3 Label and tare the sample vessels (including the stoppers and caps) and the syringes.
4.2.4 Install an empty sample vessel and perform a leak test of the system. Close the carrier gas valve and atmospheric vent and evacuate the sample vessel to 250 mm (10 in.) Hg absolute or less using the aspirator. Close the toggle valve at the inlet to the aspirator and observe the vacuum for at least one minute. If there is any change in the sample pressure, release the vacuum, adjust or repair the apparatus as necessary and repeat the leak test.
4.2.5 Perform the analyzer calibration and linearity checks according to the procedure in section 5.1. Record the responses to each of the calibration gases and the back-pressure setting of the FIA.
4.2.6 Establish the appropriate dilution ratio by adjusting the aspirator air supply or substituting critical orifices. Operate the aspirator at a vacuum of at least 25 mm (1 in.) Hg greater than the vacuum necessary to achieve critical flow. Select the dilution ratio so that the maximum response of the FIA to the sample does not exceed the high-range calibration gas.
4.2.7 Perform system calibration checks at two levels by introducing compressed gases at the inlet to the sample vessel while the aspirator and dilution devices are operating. Perform these checks using the carrier gas (zero concentration) and the system calibration gas. If the response to the carrier gas exceeds ±0.5 percent of span, clean or repair the apparatus and repeat the check. Adjust the dilution ratio as necessary to achieve the correct response to the upscale check, but do not adjust the analyzer calibration. Record the identification of the orifice, aspirator air supply pressure, FIA back-pressure, and the responses of the FIA to the carrier and system calibration gases.
4.2.8 After completing the above checks, inject the system calibration gas for approximately 10 minutes. Time the exact duration of the gas injection using a stopwatch. Determine the area under the FIA response curve and calculate the system response factor based on the sample gas flow rate, gas concentration, and the duration of the injection as compared to the integrated response using Equations 2 and 3.
4.2.9 Verify that the sample oven and sample line temperatures are 120 ±5 °C and that the water bath temperature is 100 ±5 °C.
4.2.10 Fill a tared syringe with approximately 1 g of the VOC containing liquid and weigh it. Transfer the liquid to a tared sample vessel. Plug the sample vessel to minimize sample loss. Weigh the sample vessel containing the liquid to determine the amount of sample actually received. Also, as a quality control check, weigh the empty syringe to determine the amount of material delivered. The two coating sample weights should agree within ±0.02 g. If not, repeat the procedure until an acceptable sample is obtained.
4.2.11 Connect the vessel to the analysis system. Adjust the aspirator supply pressure to the correct value. Open the valve on the carrier gas supply to the sample vessel and adjust it to provide a slight excess flow to the atmospheric vent. As soon as the initial response of the FIA begins to decrease, immerse the sample vessel in the water bath. (Applying heat to the sample vessel too soon may cause the FID response to exceed the calibrated range of the instrument, and thus invalidate the analysis.)
4.2.12 Continuously measure and record the response of the FIA until all of the volatile material has been evaporated from the sample and the instrument response has returned to the baseline (i.e., response less than 0.5 percent of the span value). Observe the aspirator supply pressure, FIA back-pressure, atmospheric vent, and other system operating parameters during the run; repeat the analysis procedure if any of these parameters deviate from the values established during the system calibration checks in Section 4.2.7. After each sample perform the drift check described in Section 5.2. If the drift check results are acceptable, calculate the VOC content of the sample using the equations in Section 7. Integrate the area under the FIA response curve, or determine the average concentration response and the duration of sample analysis.
5. Calibration and Quality Assurance
5.1 FIA calibration and linearity check. Make necessary adjustments to the air and fuel supplies for the FIA and ignite the burner. Allow the FIA to warm up for the period recommended by the manufacturer. Inject a calibration gas into the measurement system and adjust the back-pressure regulator to the value required to achieve the flow rates specified by the manufacturer. Inject the zero- and the high-range calibration gases and adjust the analyzer calibration to provide the proper responses. Inject the low- and mid-range gases and record the responses of the measurement system. The calibration and linearity of the system are acceptable if the responses for all four gases are within 5 percent of the respective gas values. If the performance of the system is not acceptable, repair or adjust the system and repeat the linearity check. Conduct a calibration and linearity check after assembling the analysis system and after a major change is made to the system.
5.2 Systems drift checks. After each sample, repeat the system calibration checks in Section 4.2.7 before any adjustments to the FIA or measurement system are made. If the zero or calibration drift exceeds ±3 percent of the span value, discard the result and repeat the analysis.
5.3 Critical orifice calibration.
5.3.1 Each critical orifice must be calibrated at the specific operating conditions that it will be used. Therefore, assemble all components of the liquid sample analysis system as shown in Figure 3. A stopwatch is also required.
5.3.2 Turn on the sample oven, sample line, and water bath heaters and allow the system to reach the proper operating temperature. Adjust the aspirator to a vacuum of 380 mm (15 in.) Hg vacuum. Measure the time required for one soap bubble to move a known distance and record barometric pressure.
5.3.3 Repeat the calibration procedure at a vacuum of 406 mm (16 in.) Hg and at 25-mm (1-in.) Hg intervals until three consecutive determinations provide the same flow rate. Calculate the critical flow rate for the orifice in ml/min at standard conditions. Record the vacuum necessary to achieve critical flow.
6. Nomenclature
AL = area under the response curve of the liquid sample, area count.
AS = area under the response curve of the calibration gas, area count.
CS = actual concentration of system calibration gas, ppm propane.
K = 1.830 × 10−9 g/(ml-ppm).
L = total VOC content of liquid input, kg.
ML = mass of liquid sample delivered to the sample vessel, g.
q = flow rate through critical orifice, ml/min.
RF = liquid analysis system response factor, g/area count.
TS = total gas injection time for system calibration gas during integrator calibration, min.
VFj = final VOC fraction of VOC containing liquid j.
VIj = initial VOC fraction of VOC containing liquid j.
VAj = VOC fraction of VOC containing liquid j added during the run.
V = VOC fraction of liquid sample.
WFj = weight of VOC containing liquid j remaining at end of the run, kg.
WIj = weight of VOC containing liquid j at beginning of the run, kg.
WAj = weight of VOC containing liquid j added during the run, kg.
7. Calculations
7.1 Total VOC content of the input VOC containing liquid.
7.2 Liquid sample analysis system response factor for systems using intergrators, grams/area counts.
7.3 VOC content of the liquid sample.
Procedure T—Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure
1. Introduction
1.1 Applicability. This procedure is used to determine whether a permanent or temporary enclosure meets the criteria of a total enclosure.
1.2 Principle. An enclosure is evaluated against a set of criteria. If the criteria are met and if all the exhaust gases are ducted to a control device, then the volatile organic compounds (VOC) capture efficiency (CE) is assumed to be 100 percent and CE need not be measured. However, if part of the exhaust gas stream is not ducted to a control device, CE must be determined.
2. Definitions
2.1 Natural Draft Opening (NDO)—Any permanent opening in the enclosure that remains open during operation of the facility and is not connected to a duct in which a fan is installed.
2.2 Permanent Total Enclosure (PTE)—A permanently installed enclosure that completely surrounds a source of emissions such that all VOC emissions are captured and contained for discharge through a control device.
2.3 Temporary Total Enclosure (TTE)—A temporarily installed enclosure that completely surrounds a source of emissions such that all VOC emissions are captured and contained for discharge through ducts that allow for the accurate measurement of VOC rates.
3. Criteria of a Temporary Total Enclosure
3.1 Any NDO shall be at least 4 equivalent opening diameters from each VOC emitting point.
3.2 Any exhaust point from the enclosure shall be at least 4 equivalent duct or hood diameters from each NDO.
3.3 The total area of all NDO's shall not exceed 5 percent of the surface area of the enclosure's four walls, floor, and ceiling.
3.4 The average facial velocity (FV) of air through all NDO's shall be at least 3,600 m/hr (200 fpm). The direction of air through all NDO's shall be into the enclosure.
3.5 All access doors and windows whose areas are not included in section 3.3 and are not included in the calculation in section 3.4 shall be closed during routine operation of the process.
4. Criteria of a Permanent Total Enclosure
4.1 Same as sections 3.1 and 3.3-3.5.
4.2 All VOC emissions must be captured and contained for discharge through a control device.
5. Procedure
5.1 Determine the equivalent diameters of the NDO's and determine the distances from each VOC emitting point to all NDO's. Determine the equivalent diameter of each exhaust duct or hood and its distance to all NDO's. Calculate the distances in terms of equivalent diameters. The number of equivalent diameters shall be at least 4.
5.2 Measure the total area (At) of the enclosure and the total area (AN) of all NDO's of the enclosure. Calculate the NDO to enclosure area ratio (NEAR) as follows:
NEAR = AN/At
The NEAR must be ≤0.05.
5.3 Measure the volumetric flow rate, corrected to standard conditions, of each gas stream exiting the enclosure through an exhaust duct or hood using EPA Method 2. In some cases (e.g., when the building is the enclosure), it may be necessary to measure the volumetric flow rate, corrected to standard conditions, of each gas stream entering the enclosure through a forced makeup air duct using Method 2. Calculate FV using the following equation:
FV=[QO−QI]/AN
Where:
QO = the sum of the volumetric flow from all gas streams exiting the enclosure through an exhaust duct or hood.
QI = the sum of the volumetric flow from all gas streams into the enclosure through a forced makeup air duct; zero, if there is no forced makeup air into the enclosure.
AN = total area of all NDO's in enclosure.
The FV shall be at least 3,600 m/hr (200 fpm).
5.4 Verify that the direction of air flow through all NDO's is inward. Use streamers, smoke tubes, tracer gases, etc. Strips of plastic wrapping film have been found to be effective. Monitor the direction of air flow at intervals of at least 10 minutes for at least 1 hour.
6. Quality Assurance
6.1 The success of this protocol lies in designing the TTE to simulate the conditions that exist without the TTE, i.e., the effect of the TTE on the normal flow patterns around the affected facility or the amount of fugitive VOC emissions should be minimal. The TTE must enclose the application stations, coating reservoirs, and all areas from the application station to the oven. The oven does not have to be enclosed if it is under negative pressure. The NDO's of the temporary enclosure and a fugitive exhaust fan must be properly sized and placed.
6.2 Estimate the ventilation rate of the TTE that best simulates the conditions that exist without the TTE, i.e., the effect of the TTE on the normal flow patterns around the affected facility or the amount of fugitive VOC emissions should be minimal. Figure 1 may be used as an aid. Measure the concentration (CG) and flow rate (QG) of the captured gas stream, specify a safe concentration (CF) for the fugitive gas stream, estimate the CE, and then use the plot in Figure 1 to determine the volumetric flowrate of the fugitive gas stream (QF). A fugitive VOC emission exhaust fan that has a variable flow control is desirable.
6.2.1 Monitor the concentration of VOC into the capture device without the TTE. To minimize the effect of temporal variation on the captured emissions, the baseline measurement should be made over as long a time period as practical. However, the process conditions must be the same for the measurement in section 6.2.3 as they are for this baseline measurement. This may require short measuring times for this quality control check before and after the construction of the TTE.
6.2.2 After the TTE is constructed, monitor the VOC concentration inside the TTE. This concentration shall continue to increase and must not exceed the safe level according to OSHA requirements for permissible exposure limits. An increase in VOC concentration indicates poor TTE design or poor capture efficiency.
6.2.3 Monitor the concentration of VOC into the capture device with the TTE. To limit the effect of the TTE on the process, the VOC concentration with and without the TTE must be within ±10 percent. If the measurements do not agree, adjust the ventilation rate from the TTE until they agree within 10 percent.
[55 FR 26856, June 29, 1990; 55 FR 31981, Aug. 6, 1990; 55 FR 39774, 39775, Sept. 28, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 24723, May 31, 1991; 56 FR 33712, July 23, 1991; 57 FR 3946, Feb. 3, 1992; 57 FR 7550, Mar. 3, 1992; 57 FR 27936, June 23, 1992; 58 FR 31653, June 4, 1993; 58 FR 34908, June 30, 1993; 59 FR 14112, Mar. 25, 1994; 59 FR 46569, Sept. 9, 1994; 60 FR 41, Jan. 3, 1995; 60 FR 13045, Mar. 10, 1995; 60 FR 14900, Mar. 21, 1995; 60 FR 43387, 43393, 43395, Aug. 21, 1995; 61 FR 54559, Oct. 21, 1996]
§ 52.742 Incorporation by reference.
The materials listed below are incorporated by reference in the corresponding sections noted. The incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Office of Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. These materials are incorporated as they exist on the date of approval, and a notice of any change in these materials will be published in the Federal Register. The materials are available from the sources listed below.
(a) The following material is available for purchase from the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
(1) ASTM D1475-85, Standard Test Method for Density of Paint, Varnish, Lacquer, and Related Products, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(i).
(2) ASTM D2369-87, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of Coatings, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(ii).
(3) ASTM D3792-86, Standard Test Method for Water Content of Water-Reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(iii).
(4) ASTM D4017-81(Reapproved 1987), Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and Paint Materials by Karl Fischer Method, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(iv).
(5) ASTM D4457-85, Standard Test Method for Determination of Dichloromethane and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in Paints and Coatings by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(v).
(6) ASTM D2697-86, Standard Test Method for Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(vi).
(7) ASTM D3980-87, Standard Practice for Interlaboratory Testing of Paint and Related Materials, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(vi).
(8) ASTM E180-85, Standard Practice for Determining the Precision of ASTM Methods for Analysis and Testing of Industrial Chemicals, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(viii).
(9) ASTM D2372-85, Standard Method of Separation of Vehicle from Solvent-Reducible Paints, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(B)(3)(ix).
(10) ASTM D2879-86, Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope, for § 52.741(a)(3), (a)(8)(ii), (a)(9)(iii), and (a)(10)(iii).
(11) ASTM D323-82, Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products (Reid Method), for § 52.741(a)(3).
(12) ASTM D86-82, Standard Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products, for § 52.741(a)(3).
(13) ASTM D3925-81(Reapproved 1985), Standard Practice for Sampling Liquid Paints and Related Pigment Coatings, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(A)(1).
(14) ASTM E300-86, Standard Practice for Sampling Industrial Chemicals, for § 52.741(a)(4)(i)(A)(2).
(b) The Evaporation Loss From External Floating-Roof Tanks, Publication 2517, second edition, February 1980, for § 52.741(a)(3) is available for purchase from the American Petroleum Institute, 2101 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
(c) The Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987, for § 52.741(a)(3) is available for purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
(d) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 215, June 1989, subparts (B), (E) (sections 215.182, 215.183, and 215.184), (K) (sections 215.301 and 215.302), (Q) (excluding sections 215.432 and 215.436), (R) (excluding sections 215.447, 215.450, and 215.452), (S), (V), (X), (Y) (sections 215.582, 215.583, and 215.584), and (Z) of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215 for § 52.741 (d)(l)-(d)(3); (e)(3), (e)(4); (h)(2); (i)(1), (i)(2); (j)(1)-(j)(3); (q)(1); (s)(1); (u)(1), (3); (v)(1); (w)(1); and (x)(1), (x)(3) is available from the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation Division, Region V, 230 S. Dearborn, Chicago, IL, 60604.
[55 FR 26909, June 29, 1990]
§ 52.743 Continuous monitoring.
(a) Alternative monitoring requirements established under Section 201.402 of Title 35, IAC must be either: Incorporated into a federally enforceable operating permit or construction permit or submitted to USEPA for approval as a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). Illinois shall set forth alternative emissions monitoring and reporting requirements to satisfy the intent of 40 CFR part 51, appendix P whenever Illinois exempts any source subject to Section 201.401 from installing continuous emission monitoring systems. Illinois may exempt a source if the source cannot install a continuous emission monitoring system because of physical plant limitations or extreme economic reasons, according to the criteria of Section 201.402.
(b) As codified at 40 CFR 52.737 (USEPA's approval of the Illinois operating permit program for the purpose of issuing federally enforceable construction and operating permits), USEPA reserves the right to deem an operating permit not federally enforceable. Such a determination will be made according to appropriate procedures including operating permit requirements promulgated at 54 FR 27274 (June 28, 1989) and will be based upon either; the permit, permit approval procedures or state or local permit requirements which do not conform with the operating permit program requirements or the requirements of USEPA's underlying regulations. Among other things, underlying requirements include 40 CFR 51.214 and part 51, appendix P and Illinois' approved SIP, 40 CFR part 52. Should USEPA deem an operating or construction permit containing alternative monitoring requirements not federally enforceable, the underlying continuous monitoring requirements at Section 201.401 of the State rule would be the Federal requirements contained in the SIP to which the source would be subject. This interpretation of the impact of an operating permit deemed not federally enforceable by USEPA on a source to which it was issued was acknowledged by the State in a March 3, 1993, letter from Bharat Mathur, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Stephen Rothblatt, Chief, Regulation Development Branch, Region 5, USEPA.
[58 FR 17783, Apr. 6, 1993]
§ 52.744 Small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
The Illinois program submitted on November 12, 1992, as a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan satisfies the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
[58 FR 45451, Aug. 30, 1993]
§§ 52.745-52.746 [Reserved]
§ 52.750 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identified the original “Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Illinois” and all revisions submitted by Illinois that were Federally-approved prior to June 1, 2017.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 31, 1972.
(c) The plan revision listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) The role of the City of Chicago as a local agent was defined in a letter from the State Environmental Protection Agency on March 13, 1972.
(2) Copies of the Illinois Pollution Control Board Regulations, Chapter 2, Parts I, II and III were submitted May 4, 1972, by the Governor.
(3) A document describing the role of the Chicago Department of Environmental Control was submitted July 28, 1972, by the State Environmental Protection Agency.
(4) Copies of the revisions to the State air episode regulations were submitted on August 29, 1972, by the Governor.
(5) Compliance schedules submitted on March 13, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.
(6) Compliance schedules submitted on April 3, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.
(7) Transportation control plan submitted on April 17, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.
(8) Compliance schedules submitted on May 3, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.
(9) Compliance schedules submitted on June 15, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.
(10) Compliance schedules submitted on August 7, 1973, by the Pollution Control Board.
(11) Information concerning the coal ban in the Chicago area was submitted on October 22, 1973, by Governor Walker.
(12) On July 22, 1976, the Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revised emergency episode regulations.
(13) On November 29, 1977, the Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted grain handling and drying emission limitations as revisions to Rule 203.
(14) Revision consisting of an Illinois Pollution Control Board Order issued on July 20, 1978 to Commonwealth Edison Company, Christian County, Illinois and submitted on August 14, 1978 by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
(15) Revision consisting of an Illinois Pollution Control Board Order issued to Shell Oil Company's Wood River refinery on December 14, 1978 by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
(16) On April 4, 1979, the State submitted its draft nonattainment area plan for all areas designated nonattainment as of March 3, 1978 and as revised on October 5, 1978. This submittal contained a request for extensions of the statutory attainment deadline for CO and 03. The submittal also included a vehicle emission inspection and maintenance program and a new source review plan. Although the State submittal also included the following provisions, U.S. EPA is taking no action to include them in the federally approved SIP at this time: the portions of Rules 101, 103 and 105 relating to the provisions addressing malfunctions, general requirements of the Clean Air Act which are not Part D requirements, and the provisions covering open burning, mobile source emission standards, diesel locomotive emission standards, sulfur dioxide emissions for certain fuel combustion sources located outside major metropolitan areas, compliance dates for organic emission limitations, particulate emissions from low carbon waste incinerators, and adoption of Federal New Source Performance Standards. In addition, U.S. EPA is not rulemaking at this time on those portions of the following rules which contain specified changes made between the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking and the final rulemaking action:
(i)-(iii) [Reserved]
(iv) The new materials in Section 4.11 of the Rules for Issuance of Permits to New or Modified Air Pollution Sources;
(v) The addition of a definition of “reconstruction” in Section 4.7 of the Rules for Issuance of Permits;
(vi) The procedure allowing external offsets contained in Section 10 of the Rules for Issuance of Permits.
(17) On August 29, 1979, the State submitted additional information and clarification for the nonattainment area plan in response to USEPA's July 2, 1979 notice of proposed rulemaking.
(18) On September 20, 1979, the State submitted a summary of public hearing comments on the plan.
(19) On October 30, 1979, the State submitted copies of Illinois Pollution Control Board final orders for control of VOC emissions from stationary sources (Rule 205), sources of fugitive particulate (Rule 203(f)), and particulate emissions from iron and steel sources (Rule 203(d)).
(20) On December 20, 1979, the State submitted a letter containing the dates that most of the regulatory and nonregulatory portions of the nonattainment area plans were finally adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board. Rule 205 containing RACT controls for stationary sources of VOC was effective in the State on July 18, 1979. Rule 203(f) governing fugitive dust emissions was effective in the State on September 18, 1979.
(21) On January 25, 1980, the State submitted a copy of finally enacted “Rules for the Issuance of Permits to New or Modified Air Pollution Sources Affecting Nonattainment Areas.” Sections 5.1(a)(2)(ii) and 5.1(a)(2)(iii) of these rules were reserved by the State. The effective date of these Rules was January 16, 1980.
(22) On March 21, 1979, the State of Illinois submitted to the USEPA revised regulations for control of sulfur dioxide emissions. On September 19, 1979, the State submitted additional information on these revised regulations to the USEPA.
(23) On January 17, 1980 and on February 7, 1980 the State submitted further information and clarifications to Rule 204.
(24) On September 19, 1979, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to Rule 204(e)(1) for the Commonwealth Edison Company. The revision approves an emission limitation of 105,162 lbs SO2/hour for the Kincaid Generating Station in Christian County, Illinois.
(25) On April 30, 1980, the State submitted revisions to the transportation control plan for northeast Illinois (Chicago).
(26) On December 20, 1979, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to provide for modification of the existing air quality surveillance network.
(27) On January 8, 1980, the State submitted an Opinion and Final Order of the Pollution Control Board (dated November 19, 1979) which deletes Rule 206(d) of Chapter 2 from the Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations.
(28) On September 18, 1979, the State submitted a Final Order of the Pollution Control Board (dated April 12, 1979) which amended Rule 205(g)(1) of Chapter 2 of the Illinois Air Pollution Control Regulations.
(29) On July 21, 1981, the State submitted Volume 9 Lead, of the Illinois State Implementation Plan for Air Pollution Control for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This plan covers all areas in Illinois except for Granite City in the St. Louis Interstate AQCR.
(30) On July 29, 1980, the State submitted a May 29, 1980, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board granting a variance from the requirements Rule 203(d)(8)(B) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to Continental Grain Company's grain elevator located in Crossville, White County, Illinois. This variance expired July 1, 1980.
(31) On April 4, 1980, the State submitted a November 29, 1979, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) and Supplementary IPCB Orders dated January 24, 1980, and February 7, 1980. These Orders grant 13 Caterpillar Tractor Company boilers a variance from the requirements of IPCB (A), Rule 203(g)(1)(C)(i) and/or Rule 203(g)(1)(D) which regulate particulate emissions from new and existing sources. No action is taken at this time on variance provisions for Mapleton facility boilers #2, 3, 4, and 5. This variance expired on October 8, 1981.
(32) On August 31, 1981, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a July 9, 1981, Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (R-77-15). This Order creates Rule 204(c)(1)(E) which establishes sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limitations of 5.5 lbs/SO/MMBTU for solid fuel combustion sources having actual heat input not greater than 250 million BTU's per hour owned or operated by Bemis Company, Inc., Celotex Corporation or Sherex Corporation. On November 17, 1981, the State submitted additional information in support of this revision.
(33) On August 20, 1980, and March 20, 1981, the State submitted additional information on the transportation control plans for the Northeast Illinois (Chicago) Area.
(34) On October 15, 1980, the State submitted additional information on the transportation control plans for the Peoria Metropolitan Area.
(35) On April 1, 1981, the State submitted additional information on the transportation control plans for the St. Louis Metropolitan (Illinois) Area.
(36) On December 10, 1980, the State submitted a July 24, 1980, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board and a September 18, 1980, Order of the Board granting Bunge Corporation's Cairo, Illinois soybean processing plant and grain elevator variance from Illinois Pollution Control Board's particulate emission standards under Rules 203(g)(1)(D) and 103(b)(1) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations through October 15, 1981.
(37) On July 17, 1980, the State submitted an April 3, 1980, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board adopting a December 13, 1979, Proposed Opinion and Order of the Board which exempted certain small explosive waste incinerators from the requirements of Rule 203(e) Particulate Emission Standards and Limitations for incinerators and Rule 206(b) Carbon Monoxide Emissions Standards and Limitations for incinerators.
(38) On May 10, 1982, the State submitted a February 4, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board Opinion and Order (PCB 81-184) granting a variance from the requirements of Rules 205(m)(1)(B) and 204(n)(1)(G) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to the Lyon Metal Products, Incorporated, Montgomery, Illinois facility. This variance expires on May 31, 1985.
(39) On October 1, 1981, the State submitted a report in satisfaction of the Total Suspended Particulate Control Strategy approval condition in which the State agreed to conduct an analysis of the potential air quality impact from storage piles with uncontrolled emissions of less than 50 tons per year, to submit the results of any analysis to EPA, to submit any necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board, and promulgate and submit any necessary regulations to EPA. This report concluded that no further regulations were needed.
(40) EPA Study Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Solvent Cleaning Operations in the State of Illinois (EPA 905/4-80-008) was prepared to satisfy the Ozone Control Strategy approval condition in which the State agreed to conduct a study to demonstrate that the three pound per hour, 15 pound per day exemption for solvent metal cleaners contained in Rule 205(k) represents RACT, to submit the results of the study to EPA, to submit the necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board and promulgate and submit any necessary regulations to EPA. The State reviewed this report and in a February 11, 1981, letter to EPA noted their agreement with the findings of the report and indicated that because there was no need for further regulations, this condition is satisfied.
(41) On December 7, 1981, the State submitted a October 8, 1981, Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Order (R79-11). This Final Order amends Rule 203(g)(1) by adding subsection (E).
(42) On January 4, 1983, the State submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of an October 27, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) Opinion and Order (PCB 82-88). This Opinion and Order grants a variance from the requirements of Rule 203(a) of Chapter 2 of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to a proposed fluidized bed combustion boiler at B.F. Goodrich's Henry County, Illinois facility. This variance continues until October 1, 1987, or until the facility is no longer subject to Rule 206(a), whichever comes first.
(43) On July 29, 1982, the State submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a May 28, 1981, Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) Final Opinion of the Board (R78-17). This Final Opinion deletes Rule 204(c)(1)(D) and the reference to it in Rule 204(h) from the IPCB Air Pollution Control Regulations.
(44) On March 17, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to its ozone SIP for Chrysler's Belvidere facility. The revision request contains an alternative compliance time schedule with interim emission limitations which is in the form of a variance for prime coating and prime surface coating operations. Final compliance is changed from December 31, 1982 to December 31, 1987.
(45) On August 19, 1983, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a July 26, 1983, Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (R82-12). This Order creates Rule 313 which establishes 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter, maximum arithmetic mean, averaged over a calendar quarter as the State's ambient air quality standard for lead. The Board also adopted, as part of Rule 313, a measurement method for determining compliance with the standard.
(46) On August 15, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a May 19, 1983, Opinion and Order (PCB-82-147) of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) granting Del Monte Corporation's Can Manufacturing Plant No. 115 located in Rochelle, Ogle County, Illinois, a variance from the IPCB volatile organic compound emission standards under Rule 205(n)(1)(B)(i) and Rule 205(n)(1)(B)(vi) of Chapter 2: Air Pollution Regulations. The variance expires on December 31, 1984.
(47) On March 24, 1983, and May 3, 1983, the State submitted information that indicated that a February 21, 1980 (45 FR 11472), conditional approval of the incorporation of a revised Part D sulfur dioxide control strategy into the Illinois State Implementation Plan has been satisfied for Cincinnati, Pekin and Elm Grove Townships in Tazewell County and for Logan and Limestone Townships in Peoria County. This approval condition required that the SIP include a reanalysis of the Pekin, Illinois area; a submittal of the analysis results to USEPA; the proposal of any necessary regulations to the Illinois Pollution Control Board necessary to insure attainment and maintenance of the sulfur dioxide standard; and the promulgation of any necessary regulations. Any promulgated regulations must be submitted to USEPA.
(48)-(49) [Reserved]
(50) On May 3, 1983, the State requested that USEPA incorporate IPCB Rule 204 (f)(2) into the Illinois SIP. Rule 204(f)(2) was adopted by Illinois as part of a February 24, 1983, Order of the Board (R80-22). USEPA approves the incorporation of Rule 204(f)(2) as it pertains to Pekin Energy, a source in the Peoria major metropolitan area.
(51) On January 30, 1984, the State submitted Rule 204(f) as contained in a February 24, 1983, Order of the IPCB (R80-22) as it applies to sources in the Peoria Major Metropolitan area for incorporation in the SIP. USEPA approves the incorporation of Rule 204(f) into the SIP as it applies to all sources in Peoria and Tazewell Counties except Caterpillar Tractor Mapleton and East Peoria Plants. No action is taken on Rule 204(f) as it applies to the Chicago or St. Louis (Illinois—portion) Major Metropolitan Areas or on Rule 204(f) (1) and (2).
(52) [Reserved]
(53) On September 30, 1983, the State submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a lead plan to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS in the Granite City area. The Illinois plan includes a discussion of air quality data measured since 1978, an emission inventory of three source categories capable of emitting lead, atmospheric modeling analyses and proposed necessary control strategies. On March 19, 1984, the State submitted five consent decrees entered by the State of Illinois with the Circuit Court for the Third Judicial Circuit of Madison County and filed March 16, 1984, for incorporation in the lead plan. These include People of the State of Illinois vs. Taracorp, Inc.; People of the State of Illinois vs. St. Louis Lead Recyclers; People of the State of Illinois vs. First Granite City National Bank; People of the State of Illinois, vs. Stackorp Inc.; and People of the State of Illinois vs. B.V. and G.V. Transport Company.
(54) [Reserved]
(55) On November 14, 1985, the State of Illinois submitted a negative declaration for natural gas/gasoline processing plants.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Letter dated November 14, 1985, from Michael J. Hayes, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
(56) On June 19, 1984, the State submitted Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Rule 252 entitled, “Rules for Governing Public Participation in the Air Pollution Permit Program for Major Source in Nonattainment Areas.”
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Rule 252 entitled, “Rule for Governing Public Participation in the Air Pollution Permit Program for Major Sources in Nonattainment Areas,” published on June 8, 1984.
(57)-(60) [Reserved]
(61) On March 15, 1984 and June 14, 1984 the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted commitments for satisfying several outstanding conditions to the sulfur dioxide [52.724(a)(1)] State Implementation Plan.
(62) On January 16, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a variance from Illinois Rule 206(a).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) June 14, 1984, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB), PCB 84-19. This is a variance from Illinois Rule 206(a) until June 14, 1987, for CO emissions from a fluidized bed combustion boiler at Midwest Solvents Company's facility in Tazewell County, Illinois.
(63) On February 6, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a site-specific revision to its total suspended particulates State Implementation Plan for Villa Grove's “Dump and Boot Pit” emissions in Champaign County, Illinois.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board, Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 84-53, Villa Grove's “Dump and Boot Pit” site-specific TSP revision. This revision extends the compliance date for control requirements on these emissions until September 1, 1987, and was adopted on July 14, 1984.
(64) On May 13, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a variance from Illinois Rule 202(b) for a Brule pathological waste incinerator (BPWI) at NPWC's facility located at the Great Lakes Naval Base, Great Lakes, Shields Township, Illinois, as a revision to its TSP SIP. Shields Township is an attainment area for both the primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for TSP.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board 84-156 adopted on March 22, 1985.
(65) Submitted from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) dated July 22, 1985, requesting an extended compliance schedule for Precision Coatings Incorporated (PCI) coating Machine Number 2.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 84-117, which was adopted on February 20, 1985, and a modification to PCB 84-117 which was adopted on April 14, 1985.
(66) On March 27, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a site-specific revision to its Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan for Anderson Clayton Foods, Inc. (ACF), a variance from 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) 216.121 which governs Carbon Monoxide emissions from the Fluidized Bed Combuster retrofitted boiler at ACF's Jacksonville, Illinois facility. IAC 216.121 was incorporated in the Illinois SIP on May 31, 1972 (37 FR 10862), as Illinois Pollution Control Board Rule 206(a).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 84-147, which was adopted on January 24, 1985.
(67) On April 18, 1983, the State of Illinois submitted a 0.60 lb TSP/MMBTU emission limit for the City of Rochelle Municipal Steam Power Plant. On May 24, 1985, it submitted a revised modeling analysis.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Pollution Control Board Order (R78-15), Rule 203(g)(1)(C)(iii) which is dated February 24, 1983.
(68) On May 8, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a variance until December 31, 1987, from Illinois Rule 205(n)(1)(b)(v) and Rule 205(n)(1)(b)(vi), for American Can Corporation's Hoopeston, Illinois facility in the form of a January 24, 1985, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (PCB 84-106).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) A January 24, 1985, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (ICPB), PCB 84-106. This is a variance until December 31, 1987, for the coating reformulation programs at American Can Corporation's Hoopeston facility located in Hoopeston, Illinois.
(69) On January 28, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a December 30, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board Order (R80-5). Illinois Pollution Control Board Rules 205(l) (4) through (10), 205(t) and 205(u) are approved.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Rules 205(l)(4) through (10), 205(t) and 205(u) as contained in December 30, 1982, Illinois Pollution Control Board Order R80-5.
(ii) Additional material. None.
(70) On February 13, 1986, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to its ozone SIP for the Fedders-USA's facility located in Effingham, Effingham County, Illinois. It grants Fedders-USA a compliance date extension for control requirements from October 1, 1982, to April 1, 1986, and provides for a legally enforceable compliance program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) A January 9, 1986, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB), PCB 83-47.
(71) On October 20, 1983, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site-specific revision to Illinois' sulfur dioxide plan for Illinois Power Company's Baldwin Power Station. The revised SO2 emission limitations are 101,966 lbs/hour, in the aggregate, and 6 lbs/MMBTU.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Emission limits within Paragraph 1 of Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Order PCB 79-7, which was adopted September 8, 1983.
(72) [Reserved]
(73) On May 6, 1985, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, requested an extended compliance schedule for National Can Corporation's Rockford facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board, April 1, 1982, Opinion and Order of the Board, PCB 81-189 and a January 24, 1985, Opinion and Order PCB 84-108. These orders grant National Can Corporation (Rockford Plant) a variance from the existing VOC SIP requirements from December 31, 1982, until December 31, 1983, and from December 31, 1983, until December 31, 1985, respectively.
(74) On October 30, 1986, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a September 25, 1986, Final Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board R85-33 revises the State's coke oven pushing and charging rules and recodifies some related rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board R85-33, which was adopted September 25, 1986.
(75)-(77) [Reserved]
(78) On January 28, 1983, June 25, 1987, August 21, 1987, September 28, 1987, October 2, 1987, December 22, 1987, January 8, 1988, March 29, 1988, and May 2, 1988 the State submitted stationary source control measures for incorporation in the ozone plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) The following sections of title 35, Environmental Protection; subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board of the Illinois Administrative Code, (June 1989): section 211.122 (definitions of bead-dipping; component; dry cleaning facility; external floating roof; gas service; green tire spraying; green tires; heavy liquid; liquid mounted seal; liquid service; pneumatic rubber tire manufacture; refinery unit, process unit, or unit; tread end cementing; undertread cementing; valves not externally regulated; vapor collection system; vapor mounted primary seal; volatile organic liquid; and volatile organic material) of subpart B (part 211); section 215.104 (definitions of continuous process; in vacuum service; material recovery section; open-ended valve; polystyrene plant; polystyrene resin; repaired; styrene devolatilizer unit; and styrene recovery unit) of subpart A (part 215); sections 215.124, 215.125, and 215.126 of subpart B (part 215); section 215.205 of subpart F (part 215); sections 215.240, 215.241, and 215.249 of subpart H (part 215); section 215.408 of subpart P (part 215); sections 215.420 through 215.431, 215.433, 215.434, 215.435, 215.437, and 215.438, all of subpart Q (part 215); section 215.453 of subpart R (part 215); sections 215.465 and 215.466 of subpart S (part 215); sections 215.520, 215.521, 215.525, 215.526, and 215.527 all of subpart V (part 215); sections 215.582, 215,583, and 215.584 of subpart Y (part 215); sections 215.607 through 215.613 of subpart Z (part 215); and sections 215.875, 215.877, 215.879, 215.881, 215.883, and 215.886 all of subpart BB (part 215) are approved.
(ii) Additional material. (79) On March 20, 1986, November 17, 1986, and July 1, 1987, Illinois submitted its vehicle inspection and maintenance plan for the Chicago and East St. Louis areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 276, Procedures To Be Followed in the Performance of Annual Inspections of Motor Vehicle Exhaust Emissions, Adopted at 10 Illinois Register 13954, effective August 13, 1986.
(ii) Additional material. (A) “Technical Procedures Memorandum—Enforcement” between the Illinois Secretary of State and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, as submitted by Michael J. Hayes, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control on July 1, 1987.
(80) [Reserved]
(81) On April 6, 1990, and May 4, 1990, Illinois submitted a regulation which reduced the maximum allowable volatility for gasoline sold in Illinois during July and August 1990 to 9.5 pounds per square inch.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental protection, Subtitle B: Air pollution, Chapter I: Pollution control board, Part 215, Organic material emission standards and limitations, § 215.585, Gasoline volatility standards, Adopted at 14 Illinois register 6434, effective April 11, 1990.
(82)-(83) [Reserved]
(84) On September 18, 1991, and November 18, 1991, the State submitted documents intended to satisfy federal requirements for an operating permit program which can issue federally enforceable operating permits.
(i) Incorporation in reference. (A) Public Act 87-555, an Act to amend the Environmental Protection Act by changing section 9.1, effective September 17, 1991. (Ch. 111 1/2, par. 1009.1) par. 1009.1(a), (b), (c), (d) and (f).
(85) On March 24, 1988, the State submitted rules for issuance of construction permits to new and modified air pollution sources located in or affecting nonattainment areas (New Source Review rules).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35 Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Part 203: Major Stationary Sources.
(86) On February 8, 1991, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide measurement methodology.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart A: General Provisions, section 214.101 Measurement Methods. Adopted December 20, 1990, effective January 15, 1991.
(87) On March 13, 1985, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide limitations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart C: Existing Solid Fuel Combustion Emission Sources, Section 214.141 Sources Located in Metropolitan Areas, through paragraph (a) only, effective March 28, 1983; Subpart F: Alternative Standards for Sources Inside Metropolitan Areas, Section 214.201 Alternative Standards for Sources in Metropolitan Areas and Section 214.202 Dispersion Enhancement Techniques, effective March 28, 1983.
(88) On June 9, 1986, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide limitations in the form of a April 24, 1986, opinion and order of the Illinois Pollution Board in proceeding R84-28.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart C: Existing Solid Fuel Combustion Emission Sources, § 214.141 Sources Located in Metropolitan Areas, paragraphs b), c) and d), and Subpart X: Utilities, § 214.560 Scope and § 214.561 E.D. Edwards Electric Generating Station effective May 20, 1986.
(89) On March 17, 1989, and August 28, 1990, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. The revision is contained in subpart J, § 201.281 and subpart L, §§ 201.401-.408 of part 210 of title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code. This revision provides a legally enforceable procedure for continuously monitoring and recording emissions to determine the status of compliance of certain stationary source categories and complies with 40 CFR 51.214 and part 51, appendix P. The rules were adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board on December 15, 1988, published (13 Ill. Reg. 2066) and became effective February 3, 1989. The rules were corrected for an omission, published on November 15, 1989, (13 Ill Reg. 19444), and became effective December 5, 1989. In a November 18, 1991, letter from Bharat Mathur, then Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to Stephen Rothblatt, Chief, Regulation Development Branch, Region 5, USEPA, Illinois committed to notify USEPA of any pending construction or operating permit application during the 30 day public comment period which is part of Illinois' permit issuance process (Section 203.150). This commitment is part of the administrative record of USEPA's approval of the Illinois' operating permit program for the purpose of issuing federally enforceable operating permits at 40 CFR 52.720 (c) (84) and 52.737 on December 17, 1992 (57 FR 59928). USEPA may deem a permit not federally enforceable if monitoring provisions do not comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.214, part 51, appendix P or § 51.165.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions; Part 201: Permits and General Provisions, Subpart J: Monitoring and Testing, Section 201.281; and Subpart L: Continuous Monitoring, Sections 201.401 through 201.408, adopted at Ill. Reg. 2066, effective February 3, 1989.
(90) On June 11, 1991, Illinois submitted regulations concerning the emission of volatile organic compounds from pharmaceutical manufacturing.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter C: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 215: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations, Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Subpart A: General Provisions: Amendments to sections 215.102 and 215.105 and Creation of section 215.108. Adopted at 15 Illinois Register 80 18, effective May 14, 1991.
(B) Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter C: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions. Adopted at 15 Illinois Register 79 01, effective May 14, 1991.
(91) [Reserved]
(92) On June 4, 1992, the State submitted particulate matter regulations adopted as part of Pollution Control Board Proceeding R91-35. These regulations concern particulate matter ambient limits and episode regulations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board
(A) Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions: Section 212.113 Incorporations by Reference; section 212.424 Fugitive Particulate Matter Control for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Plant and Associated Quarry Operations located in LaSalle County, South of the Illinois River; section 212.443 Coke Plants; section 212.445 Blast Furnace Cast Houses; adopted at 16 Illinois Register 8204, effective May 15, 1992.
(B) Part 243 Air Quality Standards: Section 243.108 Incorporations by Reference; section 243.120 PM−10; section 243.121 Repealed; adopted at 16 Illinois Register 8185, effective May 15, 1992.
(C) Part 244 Episodes: Section 244.101 Definitions; section 244.106 Monitoring; section 244.107 Determination of Areas Affected; section 244.121 Local Agency Responsibilities; section 244.161 Advisory Alert and Emergency Levels; section 244.162 Criteria for Declaring and Advisory; section 244.163 Criteria for Declaring a Yellow Alert; section 244.166 Criteria for Terminating Advisory, Alert and Emergency; section 244.167 Episode Stage Notification; section 244.168 Contents of Episode Stage Notification; section 244.169 Actions During Episode Stages Adopted; section 244 appendix D; adopted at 16 Illinois Register 8191, effective May 15, 1992.
(93) On September 30, 1992, the State submitted rules regulating volatile organic compound emissions from gasoline dispensing facilities' motor vehicle fuel operations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, title 35 Environmental Protection, subtitle B: Air Pollution, chapter I: Pollution Control Board part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area; subpart Y: Gasoline Distribution; § 218.583 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities—Storage Tank Filling Operations, amended at 16 Illinois Register 13864 effective August 24, 1992, and; § 218.586 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities—Motor Vehicle Fueling Operations, added at 16 Illinois Register 13864, effective August 24, 1992.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials. (A) Stage II Vapor Recovery SIP Program Description dated September 29, 1992.
(94) On July 30, 1986, the State submitted particulate boiler rules intended to replace rule 203(g)(1) which was vacated by the Courts. No action is taken on § 212.209 because the variance which it authorized has expired. On July 22, 1988, the State submitted opacity rules intended to replace rule 202(b) which had been vacated by the Courts. Also on July 22, 1988, the State submitted Illinois Pollution Control Board procedural rules for considering Air Adjusted Standard Procedures.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Illinois Administrative Code, Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board; part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions; subpart E: Particulate Matter Emission from Fuel Combustion Emission Sources; §§ 212.201, 212.202, 212.203 and 212.204. Amended or added at 10 Ill Reg. 12637, effective July 9, 1986.
(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Illinois Administrative Code, Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board; part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions; subpart B: Visible Emissions. Amended or added at 12 Ill. Reg 12492, effective July 13, 1988.
(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Illinois Administrative Code; Subtitle A: General Provisions; Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board; part 106: Hearings Pursuant to Specific Rules; subpart E: Air Adjusted Standards Procedures. Added at 12 Ill. Reg 12484, effective July 13, 1988.
(95) On October 16, 1991, and November 13, 1991, the State submitted particulate matter regulations adopted as part of Pollution Control Board Proceeding R91-6. These regulations concern particulate matter controls for LaSalle County, Illinois.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board.
(A) The addition of definitions for “Condensible PM-10”, “PM-10”, “Portland Cement Manufacturing Process Emission Source”, and the modification of the definition of “Portland Cement Process” to Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions: Section 211.122 Definitions; adopted at 15 Illinois Register 15673, effective October 14, 1991.
(B) Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions: Section 212.110 Measurement Methods; the addition of an abbreviation for pounds per hour to Section 212.111 Abbreviations and Units; additions and deletions to Section 212.113 Incorporations by Reference including the addition and/or renumbering of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (h) and the deletion of paragraphs earlier numbered as (a) and (f); Section 212.423 Emission Limits for Portland Cement the Manufacturing Plant Located in LaSalle County, South of the Illinois River; adopted at 15 Illinois Register 15708, effective October 4, 1991.
(96) On November 12, 1992, the State of Illinois submitted a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Assistance Program for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan as required by section 507 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Included in the State's submittal were a program description, newly adopted enabling legislation including new subsection 20 of section 39.5 of the Environmental Protection Act, Public Act 87-1213, and new subsection 46.13(a) of the Civil Administrative Code, Public Act 87-1177, and a May 4, 1992, State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs (DCCA), Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) Interagency Agreement defining the responsibilities of DCCA and IEPA in developing and implementing the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (Program).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Subsection 20 of section 39.5 of the Environmental Protection Act adopted as Public Act 87-1213 signed into law on September 26, 1992, and effective upon signature.
(B) Subsection 46.13(a) of the Civil Administrative Code adopted as Public Act 87-1177 signed into law on September 21, 1992, and effective upon signature.
(ii) Other material. (A) Program description.
(B) May 4, 1992, Interagency Agreement between DCCA and IEPA defining the responsibilities of each agency in developing and implementing the program.
(97) On October 12, 1992, and June 2, 1993, the State of Illinois submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) intended to satisfy the requirements of section 182(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. Included were State rules establishing procedures for the annual reporting of emissions of volatile organic material (VOM) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) as well as other regulated air pollutants by stationary sources in ozone nonattainment areas. Also included was a June 2, 1993, commitment letter from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) to fulfill the reporting requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency by performing the following tasks:
(i) Update the AIRS Facility Subsystem using the annual emissions report data. The 1992 data will be updated by December 31, 1993, and subsequent updates will be made by July 1st of each year.
(ii) Retain annual emissions reports for at least three (3) years.
(iii) Develop and submit Emissions Statement Status Reports (ESSR) on a quarterly basis each year until all applicable sources have submitted the required annual emissions reports. The report will show the total number of facilities from which emission statement data was requested, the number of facilities that met the provisions, and the number of facilities that failed to meet the provisions. Sources that are delinquent in submitting their emissions statements will be individually listed if they emit 500 tons per year or more of VOM or 2500 tons per year or more of NOX. The report will also contain the emission data requested in Appendix F of the July 6, 1992, Draft Guidance on the Implementation of an Emission Statement Program.
(iv) All sources subject to the emission statement requirements must report, at a minimum, the information specified under subpart C of part 254 of chapter II of subtitle B of title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code.
(A) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 254: Annual Emissions Report, adopted at 17 Illinois Register 7782, effective May 14, 1993.
(B) Other material. June 2, 1993, commitment letter.
(98) On July 21, 1986, the State a submitted revision to its particulate matter regulations to incorporate an emission limit for continuous automatic stoking animal pathological waste incinerators.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, subpart D: Particulate Matter Emissions from Incinerators, section 212.185 Continuous Automatic Stoking Animal Pathological Waste Incinerators. Adopted December 18, 1986, added at 11 Ill. Reg. 1410, effective December 30, 1986.
(99) On January 4, 1989, the State submitted revisions to its sulfur dioxide rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart A: General Provisions, section 214.102 Abbreviations and Units. Amended at 12 Ill. Reg. 20778, effective December 5, 1988.
(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart A: General Provisions, section 214.104 Incorporations by Reference. Amended at 15 Ill. Reg. 1017, effective January 15, 1991.
(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214 Sulfur Limitations, Subpart O: Petroleum Refining, Petrochemical and Chemical Manufacturing, section 214.382 Petroleum and Petrochemical Processes. Amended at 12 Ill. Reg. 20778, effective December 5, 1988.
(100) On October 21, 1993, the State submitted definitions codified as part of the Illinois Administrative Code for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart A: General Provisions: Sections 211.101 and 211.102, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.121, 211.130, 211.150, 211.170, 211.210, 211.230, 211.250, 211.290, 211.310, 211.330, 211.350, 211.370, 211.390, 211.410, 211.430, 211.450, 211.470, 211.490, 211.510, 211.530, 211.550, 211.570, 211.590, 211.610, 211.630, 211.650, 211.670, 211.690, 211.710, 211.730, 211.750, 211.770, 211.790, 211.810, 211.830, 211.850, 211.870, 211.890, 211.910, 211.930, 211.950, 211.970, 211.990, 211.1010, 211.1050, 211.1090, 211.1110, 211.1130, 211.1150, 211.1170, 211.1190, 211.1210, 211.1230, 211.1250, 211.1270, 211.1290, 211.1310, 211.1330, 211.1350, 211.1370, 211.1390, 211.1410, 211.1430, 211.1470, 211.1490, 211.1510, 211.1530, 211.1550, 211.1570, 211.1590, 211.1610, 211.1630, 211.1650, 211.1670, 211.1690, 211.1710, 211.1730, 211.1750, 211.1770, 211.1790, 211.1810, 211.1830, 211.1850, 211.1870, 211.1890, 211.1910, 211.1930, 211.1950, 211.1970, 211.1990, 211.2010, 211.2050, 211.2070, 211.2090, 211.2110, 211.2130, 211.2150, 211.2170, 211.2190, 211.2210, 211.2230, 211.2250, 211.2270, 211.2310, 211.2330, 211.2350, 211.2370, 211.2390, 211.2410, 211.2430, 211.2450, 211.2470, 211.2490, 211.2510, 211.2530, 211.2550, 211.2570, 211.2590, 211.2650, 211.2670, 211.2690, 211.2710, 211.2730, 211.2750, 211.2770, 211.2790, 211.2810, 211.2830, 211.2850, 211.2870, 211.2890, 211.2910, 211.2930, 211.2950, 211.2970, 211.2990, 211.3010, 211.3030, 211.3050, 211.3070, 211.3090, 211.3110, 211.3130, 211.3150, 211.3170, 211.3190, 211.3210, 211.3230, 211.3250, 211.3270, 211.3290, 211.3310, 211.3330, 211.3350, 211.3370, 211.3390, 211.3410, 211.3430, 211.3450, 211.3470, 211.3490, 211.3510, 211.3530, 211.3550, 211.3570, 211.3590, 211.3610, 211.3630, 211.3650, 211.3670, 211.3690, 211.3710, 211.3730, 211.3750, 211.3770, 211.3790, 211.3810, 211.3830, 211.3850, 211.3870, 211.3890, 211.3910, 211.3930, 211.3970, 211.3990, 211.4010, 211.4030, 211.4050, 211.4070, 211.4090, 211.4110, 211.4130, 211.4150, 211.4170, 211.4190, 211.4210, 211.4230, 211.4250, 211.4270, 211.4290, 211.4310, 211.4330, 211.4350, 211.4370, 211.4390, 211.4410, 211.4430, 211.4450, 211.4470, 211.4490, 211.4510, 211.4530, 211.4550, 211.4590, 211.4610, 211.4630, 211.4650, 211.4670, 211.4690, 211.4710, 211.4730, 211.4750, 211.4770, 211.4790, 211.4810, 211.4870, 211.4890, 211.4910, 211.4930, 211.4950, 211.4990, 211.5030, 211.5050, 211.5070, 211.5090, 211.5110, 211.5130, 211.5150, 211.5170, 211.5185, 211.5190, 211.5210, 211.5230, 211.5250, 211.5270, 211.5310, 211.5330, 211.5350, 211.5370, 211.5410, 211.5430, 211.5450, 211.5470, 211.5490, 211.5510, 211.5550, 211.5570, 211.5590, 211.5610, 211.5630, 211.5650, 211.5670, 211.5690, 211.5710, 211.5730, 211.5750, 211.5770, 211.5790, 211.5810, 211.5830, 211.5850, 211.5870, 211.5890, 211.5910, 211.5930, 211.5950, 211.5970, 211.5990, 211.6010, 211.6030, 211.6050, 211.6070, 211.6090, 211.6130, 211.6150, 211.6190, 211.6210, 211.6230, 211.6270, 211.6290, 211.6310, 211.6330, 211.6350, 211.6370, 211.6390, 211.6410, 211.6430, 211.6450, 211.6470, 211.6490, 211.6510, 211.6530, 211.6550, 211.6570, 211.6590, 211.6610, 211.6670, 211.6690, 211.6730, 211.6750, 211.6770, 211.6790, 211.6810, 211.6850, 211.6870, 211.6890, 211.6910, 211.6930, 211.6950, 211.6970, 211.6990, 211.7010, 211.7030, 211.7070, 211.7090, 211.7110, 211.7130, 211.7150, 211.7170, 211.7190, 211.7210, 211.7230, 211.7250, 211.7270, 211.7290, 211.7310, 211.7330, 211.7350.
These section were added at 17 Ill. Reg. 16504, effective September 27, 1993.
(101) On October 21, 1993, the state submitted volatile organic compound (VOC) control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area Subparts A, B, C, E, F, G, H, Q, R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, BB, and Section 218.
Appendix A, B, C, and D. These regulations were adopted at R91-7 at 15 Ill. Reg. 12231, effective August 16, 1991; amended in R91-23 at Ill. Reg. 13564, effective August 24, 1992; amended in R91-28 and R91-30 at 16 Ill. Reg. 13864, effective August 24, 1992; amended in R93-9 at 17 Ill. Reg. 16636, effective September 27, 1993. The specific adoption and effective dates of the rules incorporated by reference follow.
(1) Adopted at R91-7 at 15 Ill. Reg. 12231, effective August 16, 1991. Subpart A 218.108; Subpart C: 218.142; Subpart R: 218.442, 218.444, 218.448, 218.451; Subpart T: 218.484, 218.488; Subpart V: 218.526; Subpart X: 218.561, 218.563; Subpart Z: 218.607; Subpart AA: 218.625, 218.626 and 218.630.
(2) Amended in R93-9 at 17 Ill. Reg. 16636, effective September 27, 1993. Subpart A: 218.100, 218.101, 218.102, 218.103, 218.104, 218.105, 218.106, 218.107, 218.109, 218.110, 218.111, 218.112; Subpart B: 218.121, 218.122, 218.123, 218.124; Subpart C: 218.141, 218.143, 218.144; Subpart E: 218.181, 218.182, 218.183, 218.184, 218.186; Subpart F: 218.204, 218.205, 218.206, 218.207, 218.208, 218.209, 218.210, 218.211; Subpart G: 218.301, 218.302, 218.303, 218.304; Subpart H: 218.401, 218.402, 218.403, 218.404, 218.405; Subpart Q: 218.421, 218.422, 218.423, 218.424, 218.425, 218.426, 218.427, 218.428, 218.429; Subpart R: 218.441, 218.443, 218.445, 218.446, 218.447, 218.449, 218.450, 218.452; Subpart S: 218.461, 218.462, 218.463, 218.464; Subpart T: 218.480, 218.481, 218.482, 218.483, 218.485, 218.486, 218.487, 218.489; Subpart V: 218.525; Subpart W: 218.541; Subpart X: 218.562; Subpart Y: 218.581, 218.582, 218.583, 218.584, 218.585, 218.586; Subpart Z: 218.601, 218.602, 218.603, 218.608, 218.609, 218.610, 218.611; Subpart AA: 218.620, 218.621, 218.623, 218.624, 218.628, 218.636, 218.637; Subpart BB: 218.640, 218.642, 218.644, Section 218: Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix D.
(3) Section 218.585 was repealed in 2013 and is removed without replacement; see paragraph (c)(201) of this section.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area Subparts A, B, C, E, F, G, H, Q, R, S, T, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, BB and Section 219 Appendix A, B, C, and D. These regulations were adopted at R91-8 at Ill. Reg. 12491, effective August 16, 1991; amended in R91-24 at 16 Ill. Reg. 13597, effective August 24, 1992; amended in R91-30 at 16 Ill. Reg. 13833, effective August 24, 1992, emergency amendment in R93-12 at Ill. Reg. 8295, effective May 24, 1993, for a maximum of 150 days, amended in R93-9 at 17 Ill. Reg. 16918, effective September 27, 1993 and October 21, 1993. The specific adoption and effective dates of the rules incorporated by reference follow.
(1) Adopted at R91-8 at 15 Ill. Reg. 12491, effective August 16, 1991: Subpart A: 219.103, 219.108; Subpart C: 219.142; Subpart R: 219.442, 219.444, 219.448, 219.451; Subpart T: 219.484, 219.488; Subpart V: 219.526; Subpart X: 219.561, 219.563; Subpart Z: 219.607; Subpart AA: 219.625, 219.626, 219.630.
(2) Amended in R93-9 at 17 Ill. Reg. 16918, effective September 27, 1993:
Subpart A: 219.100, 219.101, 219.102, 219.104, 219.105, 219.106, 219.107, 219.109, 219.110, 219.111, 219.112;
Subpart B: 219.121, 219.122, 219.123, 219.124;
Subpart C: 219.141, 219.143, 219.144;
Subpart E: 219.181, 219.182, 219.183, 219.184, 219.186;
Subpart F: 219.204, 219.205, 219.206, 219.207, 219.208, 219.209, 219.210, 219.211;
Subpart G: 219.301, 219.302, 219.303, 219.304;
Subpart H: 219.401, 219.402, 219.403, 219.404, 219.405;
Subpart Q: 219.421, 219.422, 219.423, 219.424, 219.425, 219.426, 219.427, 219.428, 219.429;
Subpart R: 219.441, 219.443, 219.445, 219.446, 219.447, 219.449, 219.450, 219.452;
Subpart S: 219.461, 219.462, 219.463, 219.464;
Subpart T: 219.480, 219.481, 219.482, 219.483, 219.485, 219.486, 219.487, 219.489;
Subpart V: 219.525;
Subpart W: 219.541;
Subpart X: 219.562;
Subpart Y: 219.581, 219.582, 219.583, 219.584, 219.585, 219.586;
Subpart Z: 219.601, 219.602, 219.603, 219.608, 219.609, 219.610, 219.611;
Subpart AA: 219.620, 219.621, 219.623, 219.624, 219.628, 219.636, 219.637;
Subpart BB: 219.640, 219.642, 219.644;
Section 219: Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix D.
(3) Section 219.585 was repealed in 2013 and is removed without replacement; see paragraph (c)(201) of this section.
(102) On October 21, 1993 and March 4, 1994, the State submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.270, 211.1070, 211.2030, 211.2610, 211.3950, 211.4050, 211.4830, 211.4850, 211.4970, 211.5390, 211.5530, 211.6110, 211.6170, 211.6250, 211.6630, 211.6650, 211.6710, 211.6830, 211.7050. These sections were adopted on January 6, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 1253, and effective January 18, 1994.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart PP: 218.927, 218.928; Subpart QQ: 218.947, 218.948; Subpart RR: 218.967, 218.968; Subpart TT: 218.987, 218.988; Subpart UU: 218.990. These sections were adopted on September 9, 1993, Amended at 17 Ill. Reg. 16636, effective September 27, 1993.
(C) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: 218.106, 218.108, 218.112, 218.114; Subpart H: 218.402; Subpart Z: 218.602, 218.611; Subpart AA: 218.620, 218.623 (repealed); Subpart CC; Subpart DD; Subpart PP: 218.920, 218.926; Subpart QQ: 218.940, 218.946; Subpart RR: 218.960, 218.966; Subpart TT: 218.980, 218.986; Subpart UU: 218.991. These sections were adopted on January 6, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 1945, effective January 24, 1994.
(103) On February 11, 1993, Illinois submitted a site specific revision to its carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for a General Motors Corporation iron foundry located adjacent to Interstate 74 at G Street in Vermilion County, Illinois.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code; Title 35 Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources; P 216: Carbon Monoxide Emissions; Subpart O: Primary and Fabricated Metal Products; Section 216.382 Exception, General Motors Ferris Foundry in Vermilion County. Added at 16 Illinois Register 18075, effective November 13, 1992.
(104) [Reserved]
(105) On February 7, 1994, the State submitted revisions intended to create a permit program for small sources. The purpose of these revisions is to lessen the permitting burden on small sources and the permitting authority by reducing the frequency and/or the requirement of operating permit renewal for sources emitting a total of less than 25 tons per year of regulated air pollutants. A permit obtained through these procedures is intended to continue as a legally binding State document until the source modifies its operations, withdraws its permit or becomes subject to a new applicable requirement. At that time, the State will determine whether the small source procedures continue to be appropriate and issue a revised small source permit or direct the source in following the correct permit procedures. Since small source permits are not subject to a public comment period or review by USEPA, they are not federally enforceable and cannot be used to limit sources' potential to emit and thereby exempt them from the requirements of the title v operating permit program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board.
(A) Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions, Part 201: Permits and General Provisions.
(1) Subpart D: Permit Applications and Review Process, Section 201.162 Duration and Section 201.163 Joint Construction and Operating Permits. Amended at 17 Ill. Reg., effective December 7, 1993.
(2) Subpart E: Special Provisions for Operating Permits for Certain Smaller Sources, Section 201.180 Applicability, Section 201.181 Expiration and Renewal and Section 201.187 Requirement for a Revised Permit Added at 17 Ill. Reg., effective December 7, 1993.
(B) Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.5500 Regulated Air Pollutant. Adopted at 17 Ill. Reg., effective December 7, 1993.
(106) On November 23, 1994, the State submitted amended marine vessel loading rules which consisted of revised definitions, and revisions to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.3480 Loading Event and 211.3660 Marine Vessel added at 18 Ill. Reg. 166769, effective October 25, 1994; Sections 211.3650 Marine Terminal, and 211.6970 Vapor Collection System, and Section 211.6990 Vapor Control System amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16769, effective October 25, 1994.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A; General Provisions, Sections 218.101 Savings Clause and 218.106 Compliance Dates amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16392, effective October 25, 1994; Subpart GG: Marine Terminals, Sections 218.760 Applicability, 218.762 Control Requirements, 218.764 Compliance Certification, 218.766 Leaks, 218.768 Testing and Monitoring, and 218.770 Recordkeeping and Reporting added at 18 Ill. Reg. 16392, effective October 25, 1994; Appendix E: List of Affected Marine Terminals amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16392, effective October 25, 1994.
(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart A; General Provisions, Sections 219.101 Savings Clause and 219.106 Compliance Dates amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16415, effective October 25, 1994; Subpart GG: Marine Terminals, Sections 219.760 Applicability, 219.762 Control Requirements, 219.764 Compliance Certification, 219.766 Leaks, 219.768 Testing and Monitoring, and 219.770 Recordkeeping and Reporting added at 18 Ill. Reg. 16415, effective October 25, 1994.
(D) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Appendix E: List of affected Marine Terminals amended at 20 Ill. Reg. 3848. Effective February 15, 1996.
(107) On October 25, 1994, Illinois submitted a regulation which requires gasoline dispensing operations in the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas that have storage tanks of at least 575 gallons to install pressure/vacuum relief valves on storage tank vent pipes. Tanks installed before January 1, 1979, are exempt from the rule if they have a capacity of less than 2000 gallons, as are tanks that are equipped with floating roofs or equivalent control devices that have been approved by the State and USEPA.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 201 Permits and General Provisions, Section 201.302 Reports. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 15002. Effective September 21, 1994.
(B) Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions, Section 211.5060 Pressure/Vacuum Relief Valve. Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 14962. Effective September 21, 1994.
(C) Part 218 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for Chicago Area, Section 218.583 Gasoline Dispensing Operations-Storage Tank Filling Operations. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 14973. Effective September 21, 1994.
(D) Part 219 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area, Section 219.583 Gasoline Dispensing Operations-Storage Tank Filling Operations. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 14987. Effective September 21, 1994.
(108) On January 25, 1994, the State submitted a revision to its ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Quantum Chemical Corporation's facility located in Morris, Aux Sable Township, Grundy County, Illinois. It grants an adjusted standard from Parts 35 Illinois Administration Code (IAC) 218.966 and 218.986 as they apply to specific units or plants within this facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, AS 92-14, adopted on October 7, 1993, and effective on October 7, 1993.
(109) On October 25, 1994, Illinois submitted a regulation that reduces the maximum allowable volatility for gasoline sold in the Metro-East St. Louis ozone nonattainment area, which includes Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair Counties, to 7.2 pounds per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) during the summer control period. On May 14, 1996, Illinois submitted an amendment to its RVP rule which changes the summer regulatory control period of the program. The summer control period for the Illinois RVP program is June 1 to September 15.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area.
(A) Section 219.112 Incorporation by Reference. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 14987. Effective September 21, 1994.
(B) [Reserved]
(C) Section 219.585 Gasoline Volatility Standards. Amended at 20 Ill. Reg. 3848: Effective February 15, 1996.
(D) Section 219.585 was repealed in 2013 and is removed without replacement; see paragraph (c)(201) of this section.
(110) On September 26, 1994, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to its ozone State Implementation Plan for the J. M. Sweeney Company located in Cicero, Cook County, Illinois. It grants a compliance date extension from Stage II vapor control requirements (35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586) from November 1, 1993, to March 31, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, PCB 93-257, adopted on September 1, 1994, and effective on September 1, 1994. Certification dated 9/23/94 of Acceptance by J. M. Sweeney.
(111) On July 29, 1994, Illinois submitted regulations which require adoption and implementation of particulate matter contingency measures for Illinois' four moderate particulate matter nonattainment areas. Sources in the nonattainment areas which emit at least 15 tons of particulate matter must submit two levels of contingency measures, which will then become Federally enforceable. Sources will be required to implement the contingency measures if an exceedance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Particulate Matter is measured, or if the United States Environmental Protection Agency finds that an area has failed to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board;
(A) Part 106 Hearings Pursuant to Specific Rules, Section 106.930—Applicability, Section 106.931—Petition for Review, Section 106.932—Response and Reply, Section 106.933—Notice and Hearing, Section 106.934—Opinion and Order. Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 11579-11586. Effective July 11, 1994.
(B) Part 212 Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, Section 212.700—Applicability, Section 212.701—Contingency Measure Plans, Submittal and Compliance Date, Section 212.702—Determination of Contributing Sources, Section 212.703—Contingency Measure Plan Elements, Section 212.704—Implementation, Section 212.705—Alternative Implementation. Added at 18 Ill. Reg. 11587-11606. Effective July 11, 1994.
(112) On March 28, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to its ozone State Implementation Plan for P & S, Incorporated's facility located in Wood Dale, Du Page County, Illinois. It grants a compliance date extension from Stage II vapor control requirements (35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586) from November 1, 1994 until April 1, 1996, or 60 days after notification to P & S, Incorporated that the roadway construction complicating the installation of Stage II equipment will be abandoned for any reason, whichever is sooner.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, PCB 94-299, adopted on February 16, 1995, and effective on February 16, 1995. Certification dated March 1, 1995 of Acceptance by P & S, Incorporated.
(113) On April 27, 1995, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency requested a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to the State's New Source Review rules for sources in the Chicago and metropolitan East St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas and are intended to satisfy Federal requirements of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. The State's New Source Review provisions are codified at Title 35: Environmental Protection Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions. Part 203 Major Stationary Sources Construction and Modification is amended as follows:
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 203.101 Definitions, Section 203.107 Allowable Emissions, Section 203.110 Available Growth Margin, Section 203.112 Building, Structure and Facility, Section 203.121 Emission Offset, Section 203.122 Emissions Unit, Section 203.123 federally Enforceable, Section 203.126 Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Section 203.128 Potential to Emit, Section 203.145 Volatile Organic Material, Section 203.150 Public Participation. Effective April 30, 1993.
(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart B: Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.201 Prohibition, Section 203.203 Construction Permit Requirement and Application, Section 203.206 Major Stationary Source, Section 203.207 Major Modification of a Source, Section 203.208 Net Emission Determination, Section 203.209 Significant Emissions Determination. Effective April 30, 1993.
(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart C: Requirements for Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.301 Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Section 203.302 Maintenance of Reasonable Further Progress and Emission Offsets, Section 203.303 Baseline and Emission Offsets Determination, Section 203.306 Analysis of Alternatives. Effective April 30, 1993.
(D) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart H: Offsets for Emission Increases From Rocket Engines and Motor Firing, Section 203.801 Offsetting by Alternative or Innovative Means. Effective April 30, 1993. Published in the Illinois Register, Volume 17, Issue 20, May 14, 1993.
(114) On November 30, 1994, the State submitted an amended Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Air Oxidation Process rule which consisted of extended applicability and tightened control measures to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart V; Air Oxidation Processes, Sections 218.520 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes, 218.522 Savings Clause, 218.523 Compliance, 218.524 Determination of Applicability, and 218.525 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes (Renumbered) at 18 Ill. Reg. 16972, effective November 15, 1994.
(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart V; Air Oxidation Processes, Sections 219.520 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes, 219.522 Savings Clause, 219.523 Compliance, 219.524 Determination of Applicability, and 219.525 Emission Limitations for Air Oxidation Processes (Renumbered) at 18 Ill. Reg. 17001, effective November 15, 1994.
(115) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State submitted an amended coating rule which consisted of a tightened applicability cut-off level for wood furniture coating operations to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 218.208 Exemptions from Emission Limitations, Subsection (b), amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Section 219.208 Exemptions from Emission Limitations, Subsection (b), amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(116) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State submitted a rule for automotive/transportation and business machine plastic parts coating operations, which consisted of new volatile organic compound emission limitations to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, Sections 211.660 Automotive/Transportation Plastic Parts, 211.670 Baked Coatings, 211.820 Business Machine Plastic Parts, 211.1880 Electromagnetic Interference/Radio Frequency Interference Shielding Coatings, 211.1900 Electrostatic Prep Coat, 211.2360 Flexible Coatings, 211.2630 Gloss Reducers, 211.4055 Non-Flexible Coating, 211.4740 Plastic Part, 211.5480 Reflective Argent Coating, 211.5600 Resist Coat, 211.6060 Soft Coat, 211.6140 Specialty Coatings, 211.6400 Stencil Coat, 211.6580 Texture Coat, and 211.6880 Vacuum Metallizing, amended at 19 Ill. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 218.204 Emission Limitations, Subsection (n) Plastic Parts Coating: Automotive/Transportation and (o) Plastic Parts Coating: Business Machine, 218.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, Subsection (g), and 218.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, Subsection (i), amended at 19 Ill. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Section 219.204 Emission Limitations, Subsection (m) Plastic Parts Coating: Automotive/Transportation and (n) Plastic Parts Coating: Business Machine, 219.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, Subsection (f), and 219.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, Subsection (h), amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(117) On May 31, 1995, the State submitted amended lithographic printing rules which consisted of revised definitions, and revisions to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.474 Alcohol, 211.560 As-Applied Fountain Solution, 211.2850 Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Line, 211.4065 Non-Heatset, 211.5980 Sheet-Fed added at 19 Ill. Reg. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart H; Printing and Publishing, Sections 218.405 Lithographic Printing: Applicability, 218.406 Provisions Applying to Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Prior to March 15, 1996, 218.407 Emissions Limitations and Control Requirements for Lithographic Printing Lines On and After March 15, 1996, 218.408 Compliance Schedule for Lithographic Printing on and After March 15, 1996, 218.409 Testing for Lithographic Printing On and After March 15, 1996, 218.410 Monitoring Requirements for Lithographic Printing, 218.411 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Lithographic Printing added at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart H; Printing and Publishing, Sections 219.405 Lithographic Printing: Applicability, 219.406 Provisions Applying to Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Prior to March 15, 1996, 219.407 Emissions Limitations and Control Requirements for Lithographic Printing Lines On and After March 15, 1996, 219.408 Compliance Schedule for Lithographic Printing on and After March 15, 1996, 219.409 Testing for Lithographic Printing On and After March 15, 1996, 219.410 Monitoring Requirements for Lithographic Printing, 219.411 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Lithographic Printing added at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(118) On October 24, 1994, the State submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan establishing lubricant selection and temperature control requirements for Alumax Incorporated, Morris, Illinois facility's hot and cold aluminum rolling mills, as part of the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago area.
(i) Incorporation by reference. September 1, 1994, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 92-13, effective September 1, 1994.
(119) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State submitted a revised rule tightening volatile organic compound emission limitations for certain surface coating operations in the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 218.204 Emission Limitations, 218.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, 218.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, 218.208 Exemptions From Emission Limitations, 218.210 Compliance Schedule, 218.212 Cross-line Averaging to Establish Compliance for Coating Lines, 218.213 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-line Averaging Participating Coating Lines, 218.214 Changing Compliance Methods, 218 Appendix H Baseline VOM Content Limitations for Subpart F, Section 218.212 Cross-Line Averaging, amended at 19 Ill. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart F; Coating Operations, Sections 219.204 Emission Limitations, 219.205 Daily-Weighted Average Limitations, 219.207 Alternative Emission Limitations, 219.208 Exemptions From Emission Limitations, 219.210 Compliance Schedule, 219.212 Cross-line Averaging to Establish Compliance for Coating Lines, 219.213 Recordkeeping and Reporting for Cross-line Averaging Participating Coating Lines, 219.214 Changing Compliance Methods, 219 Appendix H Baseline VOM Content Limitations for Subpart F, Section 219.212 Cross-line Averaging, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(120) On May 5, 1995, and May 31, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a rule for motor vehicle refinishing operations, which consisted of new volatile organic material (VOM) emission limitations to the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago and Metro East St. Louis areas. This State Implementation Plan revision contains rules which establish VOM content limits for certain coatings and surface preparation products used in automobile and mobile equipment refinishing operations in the Chicago and Metro-East area, as well as requires these operations to meet certain equipment and work practice standards to further reduce VOM.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, Sections 211.240 Adhesion Promoter, 211.495 Anti-Glare/Safety Coating, 211.685 Basecoat/Clearcoat System, 211.1875 Elastomeric Materials, 211.3915 Mobile Equipment, 211.3960 Motor Vehicles, 211.3965 Motor Vehicle Refinishing, 211.5010 Precoat, 211.5061 Pretreatment Wash Primer, 211.5080 Primer Sealer, 211.5090 Primer Surfacer Coat, 211.6145 Specialty Coatings for Motor Vehicles, 211.6540 Surface Preparation Materials, 211.6620 Three or Four Stage Coating System, 211.6695 Topcoat System, 211.6720 Touch-Up Coating, 211.6860 Uniform Finish Blender, amended at 19 Ill. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart HH; Motor Vehicle Refinishing, Sections 218.780 Emission Limitations, 218.782 Alternative Control Requirements, 218.784 Equipment Specifications, 218.786 Surface Preparation Materials, 218.787 Work Practices, 218.788 Testing, 218.789 Monitoring and Record keeping for Control Devices, 218.790 General Record keeping and Reporting, 218.791 Compliance Date, 218.792 Registration, amended at 19 Ill. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart HH; Motor Vehicle Refinishing, Sections 219.780 Emission Limitations, 219.782 Alternative Control Requirements, 219.784 Equipment Specifications, 219.786 Surface Preparation Materials, 219.787 Work Practices, 219.788 Testing, 219.789 Monitoring and Record keeping for Control Devices, 219.790 General Record keeping and Reporting, 219.791 Compliance Date 219.792 Registration, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(D) Sections 218.792 and 219.792 were repealed in 2013 and are removed without replacement; see paragraph (c)(201) of this section.
(121) On May 23, 1995, and June 7, 1995, the State submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.695, 211.696, 211.5245, 211.6025. These sections were adopted on May 4, 1995, Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 7344, and effective May 22, 1995.
(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart V: 218.500, 218.501, 218.502, 218.503, 218.504, 218.505, 218.506. These sections were adopted on May 4, 1995, Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 7359, and effective May 22, 1995.
(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart V: 219.500, 219.501, 219.502, 219.503, 219.504, 219.505, 219.506. These sections were adopted on May 4, 1995, Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 7385, and effective May 22, 1995.
(122) On June 26, 1995, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision containing the 1992 enhancements to the Illinois vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. Such enhancements were originally developed to meet the I/M performance standard as called for in the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) proposed ‘post-1987’ I/M SIP policy and specified in the settlement agreement entered into by the parties in Wisconsin v. Reilly, Case No. 87-C-0395, E.D. Wis. The submittal includes authorizing legislation P.A. 86-1433, signed into law on September 12, 1990 and procedural rules published in the Illinois Register on June 26, 1992 at Volume 16, Issue #16.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 276; Sections 276.101, 276.102, 276.204, 276.206, 276.301, 276.303, 276.304, 276.307, 276.308, 276.309, 276.310, 276.311, 276.401, 276.402, 276.701, 276.702, and 276.703 amended or added at 16 Ill. Reg. 10230, effective June 15, 1992.
(ii) Other material. (A) Public Act 86-1433 adopted by the Illinois General Assembly on June 29, 1990, signed into law by Governor Edgar on September 12, 1990 effective September 12, 1990 (Sections 2,3, and 4) and January 1, 1991 (Section 1). (B) June 26, 1995 letter and attachments from the IEPA's Bureau of Air Chief to the USEPA's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director submitting Illinois' revision to the ozone SIP.
(123) On May 5, 1995, May 26, 1995, and May 31, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted miscellaneous revisions to its Volatile Organic Material (VOM) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) rules contained in 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, and Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area. These amendments clarify certain applicability provisions, control requirements, and compliance dates contained within these regulations. Also included in these amendments is an exemption for certain polyethylene foam packaging operations from VOM RACT requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 218.106; Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Section 218.480; Subpart DD: Aerosol Can Filling, Section 218.686; Subpart RR: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Process, Section 218.966; Subpart TT: Other Emission Units, Section 218.980. Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848; effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Section 219.480; Subpart TT: Other Emission Units, Section 219.980. Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(124) The State of Illinois requested a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision is for the purpose of establishing and implementing a Clean-Fuel Fleet Program in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area, which includes Cook, DuPage, Grundy (Aux Sable and Goose Lake townships only), Kane, Kendall (Oswego township only), Lake, McHenry, and Will counties, to satisfy the federal requirements for a Clean Fuel Fleet Program to be part of the SIP for Illinois.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 241; Sections 241.101, 241.102, 241.103, 241.104, 241.110, 241.111, 241.112, 241.113, 241.114, 241.115, 241.130, 241.131, 241.140, 241.141, 241.142, 241. Appendix A, 241. Appendix B adopted in R95-12 at 19 Ill. Reg. 13265, effective September 11, 1995.
(ii) Other material. (A) September 29, 1995 letter and attachments from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Bureau of Air Chief to the USEPA's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director submitting Illinois' revision to the ozone SIP.
(125) On November 14, 1995 the State submitted requested revisions to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to the definitions of Organic Material and Organic Materials, Organic Solvent, Petroleum Liquid and Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) intended to exempt acetone from regulation as a VOC.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.4250 Organic Material and Organic Materials, Section 211.4260 Organic Solvent, Section 211.4610 Petroleum Liquid, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 15176, effective October 19, 1995.
(126) On November 15, 1995 the State submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan in the form of a revision to the definition Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) intended to exempt parachlorobenzotrifluoride and cyclic, branched or linear completely methylated siloxanes from the definition of VOM or VOC and thereby, from regulation as a VOC.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 11066, effective July 12, 1995.
(127) On October 21, 1993, and May 26, 1995, Illinois submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area, Subpart PP: 219.920, 219.923, 219.927, 219.928; Subpart QQ: 219.940, 219.943, 219.947, 219.948; Subpart RR: 219.960, 219.963, 219.967, 219.968; Subpart TT: 219.980, 219.983, 219.987, 219.988; and Subpart UU. These Subparts were adopted on September 9, 1993, Amended at 17 Ill. Reg. 16918, effective September 27, 1993.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for Metro East Area, Subpart PP: 219.926; Subpart QQ: 219.946; Subpart RR: 219.966; and Subpart TT: 219.986. These Subparts were adopted on April 20, 1995, Amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(128) On November 30, 1994, the State submitted volatile organic compound control regulations for incorporation in the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections 211.2300, 211.3695. These sections were adopted on October 20, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16929, and effective November 15, 1994.
(B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart B: 218.119, 218.120, 218.125, 218.127, 218.128, 218.129. These sections were adopted on October 20, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16950, and effective November 15, 1994.
(C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart B: 219.119, 219.120, 219.125, 219.127, 219.128, 219.129. These sections were adopted on October 20, 1994, Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 16980, and effective November 15, 1994.
(129) [Reserved]
(130) On June 29, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the implementation of an enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in the Chicago and East St. Louis ozone nonattainment areas. This revision included the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 (625 ILCS 5/13B), P.A. 88-533, effective January 18, 1995; I/M regulations (R94-19 and R94-20) adopted on December 1, 1994, by the Illinois Pollution Control Board; February 29, 1996, Request-For-Proposals; April 22, 1996, letter of commitment; plus additional support documentation including modeling demonstration.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 1995 (625 ILCS 5/13B), Public Act 88-533, signed into law by Governor Edgar on January 18, 1995 effective January 18, 1995.
(B) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 240; Sections 240.101, 240.102, 240.104, 240.105, 240.106, 240.107, 240.124, 240.125, 240.151, 240.152, 240.153, 240.161, 240.162, 240.163, 240.164, 240.171, 240.Table A, 240.Table B amended or added in R94-19 at 18 Ill. Reg. 18228, effective December 14, 1994.
(C) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 240; Sections 240.172, 240.173 amended in R94-20 at 18 Ill. Reg. 18013, effective December 12, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials. (A) February 29, 1996, Request-For-Proposals submitted on April 22, 1996.
(B) April 22, 1996, letter of commitment and attachments from IEPA's Bureau of Air Chief to the USEPA's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director.
(131) On January 10, 1996, the State of Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request for ozone, which extends the required deadline for the Rexam Medical Packaging Inc. facility in Mundelein, Lake County, Illinois (Rexam), to comply with 35 Illinois Administrative Code, part 218, subpart H, as it applies to its Inline Press Number No.105, Inline Press No. 111, Offline 32-inch Press, Offline 36-inch Press, and Offline 42-inch press. The compliance date is extended from March 15, 1995, until June 15, 1996, or upon submittal of the “certificate of compliance” required under section 218.404 of subpart H, whichever occurs first. The variance includes a compliance plan requiring the installation and use of a catalytic oxidizer to control emissions from Inline Press No. 105, Inline Press No. 111, Offline 32-inch Press, and Offline 42-inch Press. The Offline 36-inch Press is required to convert to water-based ink, or be controlled by the oxidizer if the press is not converted by March 1, 1996. The variance is contingent upon certain compliance milestone conditions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Final Opinion and Order, PCB 95-99, adopted on October 19, 1995, and effective March 15, 1995. Certification of Acceptance dated November 29, 1996, by Rexam.
(132) On January 8, 1996, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan establishing lubricant selection and temperature control requirements for the hot and cold aluminum operations at Reynolds Metals Company's McCook Sheet and Plate Plant in McCook, Illinois (in Cook County), as part of the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago area.
(i) Incorporation by reference. September 21, 1995, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 91-8, effective September 21, 1995.
(133) On July 23, 1996, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan revision request for the Chase Products Company's Broadview (Cook County), Illinois facility located at 19th Street and Gardner Road, as part of the Ozone Control Plan for the Chicago area. The resulting revision revises the control requirements codified at 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 218 Subpart DD Section 218.686 as they apply to the Chase Products Company's Broadview facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. May 16, 1996, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 94-4, effective May 16, 1996.
(134) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted a State Implementation Plan revision request to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for reactor processes and distillation operation processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry as part of the State's control measures for Volatile Organic Material (VOM) emissions for the Chicago and Metro-East (East St. Louis) areas. VOM, as defined by the State of Illinois, is identical to “volatile organic compounds” (VOC), as defined by EPA. This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline documents. The EPA approves the State Implementation Plan revision request as it applies to Stepan Company's Millsdale Facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, 211.980 Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit, 211.1780 Distillation Unit, 211.2365 Flexible Operation Unit, 211.5065 Primary Product.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 218.431 Applicability, 218.432 Control Requirements, 218.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 218.434 Monitoring Requirements, 218.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 218.436 Compliance Date, 218 Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(135) On January 23, 1996, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan which relaxes the volatile organic material (VOM) content limit for fabricated product adhesive operations at Solar Corporation's Libertyville, Illinois facility from 3.5 pounds VOM per gallon to 5.75 pounds VOM per gallon.
(i) Incorporation by reference. July 20, 1995, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 94-2, effective July 20, 1995.
(136) On January 9, 1997, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan which grants a temporary variance from certain automotive plastic parts coating volatile organic material requirements at Solar Corporation's Libertyville, Illinois facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. September 5, 1996, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, PCB 96-239, effective September 13, 1996. Certificate of Acceptance signed September 13, 1996.
(137) Approval—On April 25, 1997, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan for general conformity rules. The general conformity rules enable the State of Illinois to implement the general conformity requirements in the nonattainment or maintenance areas at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 93, subpart B—Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 2: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 255 General Conformity: Criteria and Procedures. Adopted at 21 Ill. Reg. effective March 6, 1997.
(138) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests for reactor processes and distillation operation processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry as part of the State's control measures for Volatile Organic Material emissions for the Metro-East (East St. Louis) area. This State Implementation Plan revision request is approved as it applies to Monsanto Chemical Group's Sauget Facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, 211.980 Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit, 211.1780 Distillation Unit, 211.2365 Flexible Operation Unit, 211.5065 Primary Product, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 219.431 Applicability, 219.432 Control Requirements, 219.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 219.434 Monitoring Requirements, 219.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 219.436 Compliance Date, 219.Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(139) On September 8, 1997, the State of Illinois submitted tightened volatile organic material rules for cold cleaning degreasing operations in the Chicago and the Metro-East ozone nonattainment areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.1885, amended at 21 Ill. 7695, effective June 9, 1997.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 218.182, amended at 21 Ill. 7708, effective June 9, 1997.
(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emissions Standards and Limitations for the Metro-East Area, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 219.182, amended at 21 Ill. 7721, effective June 9, 1997.
(140) On March 5, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted amended rules for the control of volatile organic material emissions from wood furniture coating operations in the Chicago and Metro-East (East St. Louis) ozone nonattainment areas, as a requested revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan. This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline documents.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, 211.1467 Continuous Coater, 211.1520 Conventional Air Spray, 211.6420 Strippable Spray Booth Coating, 211.7200 Washoff Operations, amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 3497, effective February 2, 1998.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations 218.204 Emission Limitations, 218.205 Daily-weighted Average Limitations, 218.210 Compliance Schedule, 218.211 Recordkeeping and Reporting, 218.215 Wood Furniture Coating Averaging Approach, 218.216 Wood Furniture Coating Add-On Control Use, 218.217 Wood Furniture Coating Work Practice Standards, amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 3556, effective February 2, 1998.
(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations 219.204 Emission Limitations, 219.205 Daily-weighted Average Limitations, 219.210 Compliance Schedule, 219.211 Recordkeeping and Reporting, 219.215 Wood Furniture Coating Averaging Approach, 219.216 Wood Furniture Coating Add-On Control Use, 219.217 Wood Furniture Coating Work Practice Standards, amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 3517, effective February 2, 1998.
(141) On November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, June 14, 1996, and February 3, 1997, October 16, 1997, and October 21, 1997, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests to meet commitments related to the conditional approval of Illinois' May 15, 1992, SIP submittal for the Lake Calumet (SE Chicago), McCook, and Granite City, Illinois, Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment areas. The EPA is approving the portion of the SIP revision request that applies to the Granite City area. The SIP revision request corrects, for the Granite City PM nonattainment area, all of the deficiencies of the May 15, 1992, submittal.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 212: Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, Subpart A: General, Sections 212.107, 212.108, 212.109, 212.110; Subpart L: Particulate Matter from Process Emission Sources, Section 212.324; Subpart N: Food Manufacturing, Section 212.362; Subpart Q: Stone, Clay, Glass and Concrete Manufacturing, Section 212.425; Subpart R: Primary and Fabricated Metal Products and Machinery Manufacture, Sections 212.446, 212.458; Subpart S: Agriculture, Section 212.464. Adopted at 20 Illinois Register 7605, effective May 22, 1996.
(B) Joint Construction and Operating Permit: Application Number 95010005, Issued on October 21, 1997, to Granite City Division of National Steel Corporation.
(142) On May 5, 1995, and May 26, 1995, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan revision requests for reactor processes and distillation operations in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry as part of the State's control measures for Volatile Organic Material emissions for the Chicago and Metro-East (East St. Louis) areas. This plan was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act requirement for States to adopt Reasonably Available Control Technology rules for sources that are covered by Control Techniques Guideline documents.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B; Definitions, 211.980 Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit, 211.1780 Distillation Unit, 211.2365 Flexible Operation Unit, 211.5065 Primary Product, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6823, effective May 9, 1995.
(B) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 218.431 Applicability, 218.432 Control Requirements, 218.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 218.434 Monitoring Requirements, 218.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 218.436 Compliance Date, 218.Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6848, effective May 9, 1995.
(C) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart Q: Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plant, Sections 219.431 Applicability, 219.432 Control Requirements, 219.433 Performance and Testing Requirements, 219.434 Monitoring Requirements, 219.435 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, 219.436 Compliance Date, 219.Appendix G, TRE Index Measurement for SOCMI Reactors and Distillation Units, amended at 19 Ill. Reg. 6958, effective May 9, 1995.
(143) [Reserved]
(144) On September 3, 1997, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a temporary, site specific State Implementation Plan revision request for the D.B. Hess Company, Incorporated's (DB Hess) lithographic printing operations located in Woodstock (McHenry County), Illinois. This variance took the form of a March 20, 1997, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board issued in PCB 96-194 (Variance—Air). The variance which will expire on March 30, 1999, grants DB Hess a variance from 35 Illinois Administrative Code Sections 218.407(a)(1)(C),(D),(E) and 218.411(b)(1), (2)and (3) for heatset web offset presses 3, 4, and 5 which are located at the Woodstock (McHenry County), Illinois facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) March 20, 1997, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 96-194 (Variance—Air) which was effective on March 20, 1997 and expires on March 30, 1999.
(ii) The variance is subject to the following conditions (the dates specified indicate the latest start dates of compliance periods terminating on March 30, 1999, when presses 3, 4, and 5 must be replaced by complying presses or must be brought into compliance with the rules from which DB Hess seeks the variance):
(A) On or before March 20, 1997, the combined actual volatile organic material (VOM) emissions from all of the presses in the Woodstock plant shall not exceed 18 tons per year or 1.5 tons per month.
(B) On or before March 20, 1997, DB Hess shall use only cleaning solutions with VOM concentrations less than or equal to 30 percent by weight.
(C) On or before March 20, 1997, DB Hess shall use cleaning solutions on presses 3, 4, and 5 that have a VOM composite partial vapor pressure of less than 10 millimeters (mm) of Mercury (Hg) at 20 degrees Celsius. These cleaning solutions must comply with the requirements of 35 IAC 218.407(a)(4).
(D) On or before March 20, 1997, DB Hess shall store and dispose of all cleaning towels in closed containers.
(E) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall monitor presses 3, 4, and 5 pursuant to 35 IAC 218.410 (b), (c), and (e).
(F) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall use fountain solutions on presses 3, 4, and 5 that are less than 5 percent VOM by volume, as applied, and which contain no alcohol.
(G) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall prepare and maintain records pursuant to 35 IAC 218.411 (b), (c), and (d) for presses 3, 4, and 5 and must show compliance with the requirements of 35 IAC 218.407(a)(1) (C), (D), and (E) and with the requirements of 35 IAC 218.411(b) (1), (2), and (3) for these presses.
(H) On or before May 5, 1997, DB Hess shall submit quarterly reports to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's (IEPA's) Compliance and Systems Management Section demonstrating compliance with the terms of the Illinois Pollution Control Board Order.
(I) On or before March 30, 1998, DB Hess shall cease operation of press 3.
(J) On or before March 30, 1999, DB Hess shall either:
(1) Cease operation of presses 4 and 5, and notify the IEPA of such cessation; or
(2) Retrofit presses 4 and 5 or replace presses 4 and 5 in compliance with 35 IAC 218.407 (a)(1) (C), (D), and (E) and with 35 IAC 218.411(b) (1), (2), and(3). In this case:
(i) DB Hess must apply for and obtain necessary construction permits by March 30, 1998, or six months before retrofitting or replacing presses 4 and 5, whichever is earlier.
(ii) DB Hess must send monthly status reports, due the 15th day of each month, to the IEPA, covering the progress of the installation of the presses and control equipment and testing of the control equipment.
(K) On or before March 30, 1999, DB Hess shall cease operations at presses 3, 4, and 5 except for those presses for which it has obtained permits and installed controls, which have been tested and demonstrated to be in compliance with applicable rules.
(145) On September 16, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted amendments to Volatile Organic Material (VOM) rules affecting Illinois' ozone attainment area (the area of the State not including the Chicago and Metro-East ozone nonattainment areas). The amendments contain various deletions of obsolete provisions, changes of some word usage to comport Part 215 with other Illinois VOM regulations, and the addition of certain exemptions from VOM coating requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 215: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations; Subpart A: General Provisions, 215.104 Definitions, 215.109 Monitoring for Negligibly-Reactive Compounds; Subpart F: Coating Operations, 215.204 Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Plants, 215.205 Alternative Emission Limitations, 215.206 Exemptions from Emission Limitations, 215.207 Compliance by Aggregation of Emissions Units, 215.211 Compliance Dates and Geographical Areas, 215.212 Compliance Plan, and 215.214 Roadmaster Emissions Limitations (Repealed); Subpart Z: Dry Cleaners, 215.601 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners (Repealed), 215.602 Exemptions (Repealed), 215.603 Leaks (Repealed), 215.604 Compliance Dates and Geographical areas (Repealed), 215.605 Compliance Plan (Repealed), and 215.606 Exception to Compliance Plan (Repealed), amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 11427, effective June 19, 1998.
(146) On February 13, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) submitted a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision amends certain sections of the Clean-Fuel Fleet Program (CFFP) in the Chicago ozone nonattainment area to reflect that fleet owners and operators will have an additional year to meet the purchase requirements of the CFFP. The amendment changes the first date by which owners or operators of fleets must submit annual reports to IEPA from November 1, 1998 to November 1, 1999. In addition, this revision corrects two credit values in the CFFP credit program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 35 Illinois Administrative Code 241; Sections 241.113, 241.130, 241.140, 241.Appendix B.Table A, 241.Appendix B.Table D adopted in R95-12 at 19 Ill. Reg. 13265, effective September 11, 1995; amended in R98-8, at 21 Ill. Reg. 15767, effective November 25, 1997.
(ii) Other material. (A) February 13, 1998, letter and attachments from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Bureau of Air Chief to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Regional Air and Radiation Division Director submitting Illinois' amendments to the Clean Fuel Fleet regulations as a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan.
(147) On June 21, 1997, and December 9, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted regulations adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and legislation adopted by the General Assembly and signed by the Governor related to Illinois' vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. The purpose of these submittals was to change the existing program from a basic I/M program to a fully enhanced I/M program. These changes modify the program in both the Chicago and Saint Louis (Illinois Portion) Ozone nonattainment areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources, Except for Section 240. Table C. Adopted at 22 Ill. Reg. 13723, effective July 13, 1998.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources, Section 240. Table C. Corrected at 22 Ill. Reg. 21120, effective July 13, 1998.
(C) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 276 Procedures to be Followed in the Performance of Inspections of Motor Vehicle Emissions. Amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 18867, effective September 28, 1998.
(ii) Other materials. (A) Transmittal letters dated June 21, 1997, and December 9, 1998.
(B) Public Act 90-475, effective August 17, 1997. This Act amends the Illinois Environmental Protection Act by changing Sections 3.32, 3.78, 21, and 22.15 and adding Sections 3.78a and 22.38.
(148) On October 13, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision affecting Volatile Organic Material controls at Central Can Company (CCC), located in Chicago, Illinois. The SIP revision allows CCC to apply can coating control rules to pail coating operations limited to certain conditions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. August 6, 1998, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 94-18, effective July 1, 1991.
(149) On September 17, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site specific State Implementation Plan revision request for W.R. Grace and Company's facility, which manufactures container sealants, lubricant fluids, and concrete additives, and is located at 6050 West 51st Street in Chicago, Illinois (Cook County). This rule revision is contained in R98-16, the July 8, 1998, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, and consists of new Section 218.940(h), which exempts W.R. Grace's facility from the control requirements in 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 218 Subpart QQ.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart QQ: Miscellaneous Formulation Manufacturing Processes, Section 218.940 Applicability, paragraph (h) which was amended in R98-16 at 22 Ill. Reg. 14282, effective July 16, 1998.
(150) On November 14, 1995, May 9, 1996, June 14, 1996, February 1, 1999, and May 19, 1999, the State of Illinois submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision requests to meet commitments related to the conditional approval of Illinois' May 15, 1992, SIP submittal for the Lake Calumet (Southeast Chicago), McCook, and Granite City, Illinois, Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment areas. The EPA is approving the SIP revision request as it applies to the Lake Calumet area. The SIP revision request corrects, for the Lake Calumet PM nonattainment area, all of the deficiencies of the May 15, 1992, submittal.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 212: Visible and Particulate Matter Emissions, Subpart A: General, Section 212.113; Subpart E: Particulate Matter from Fuel Combustion Sources, Section 212.210; Subpart K: Fugitive Particulate Matter, Sections 212.302, 212.309, and 212.316. Adopted at 20 Illinois Register 7605, effective May 22, 1996.
(B) Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit—Special: Application Number 98120091, Issued on May 14, 1999, to LTV Steel Company, Inc.
(151) On July 23, 1998, the State of Illinois submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that included certain “clean-up” amendments to the State's permitting rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board.
(A) Subchapter A: Permits and General Provisions, Part 201: Permits and General Provisions.
(1) Subpart D: Permit Applications and Review Process, Section 201.152 Contents of Application for Construction Permit, 201.153 Incomplete Applications (Repealed), Section 201.154 Signatures (Repealed), Section 201.155 Standards for Issuance (Repealed), Section 201.157 Contents of Application for Operating Permit, Section 201.158 Incomplete Applications, Section 201.159 Signatures, 201.160 Standards for Issuance, Section 201.162 Duration, Section 201.163 Joint Construction and Operating Permits, and Section 201.164 Design Criteria. Amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 11451, effective June 23, 1998.
(2) Subpart E: Special Provisions for Operating Permits for Certain Smaller Sources, Section 201.180 Applicability (Repealed), Section 201.181 Expiration and Renewal (Repealed), Section 201.187 Requirement for a Revised Permit (Repealed), Repealed at 22 Ill. Reg. 11451, effective June 23, 1998.
(3) Subpart F: CAAPP Permits, Section 201.207 Applicability, Amended at 22 Ill. Reg. 11451, effective June 23, 1998.
(152) On February 5, 1998, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This revision provided additional exemptions from State of Illinois permit requirements codified by the State at Part 201 of Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code (35 IAC Part 201). The revision also added a definition of “Feed Mill” to Part 211 of 35 IAC (35 IAC Part 211).
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources.
(A) Part 211 Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.2285 Feed Mill. Added at 21 Ill. Reg. 7856, effective June 17, 1997.
(B) Part 201 Permits and General Conditions, Subpart C: Prohibitions, Section 201.146 Exemptions from State Permit Requirements. Amended at 21 Ill. Reg. 7878, effective June 17, 1997.
(153) On July 9, 1999, the State of Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision affecting Volatile Organic Material control requirements at Sun Chemical Corporation (Sun) in Northlake, Illinois. The SIP revision changes requirements for 17 resin storage tanks operated by Sun. Specifically, the SIP revision exempts the 17 tanks from the bottom or submerged fill pipe requirements, provided that no odor nuisance exists at the Sun Northlake facility, and that the vapor pressures of materials stored in the tanks remain less the 0.5 pounds per square inch absolute at 70 degrees Fahrenheit.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
May 20, 1999, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 99-4, effective May 20, 1999.
(155) On May 21, 1999, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a temporary, site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for sulfur dioxide (SO2) for the Central Illinois Light Company's E.D. Edwards Generating Station in Peoria County, Illinois (CILCO Edwards). The SIP revision took the form of an April 15, 1999, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (PCB 99-80, Variance-Air). In this Opinion and Order, the IPCB granted CILCO Edwards a variance from 35 Illinois Administrative Code 214.141, and provided for a relaxation in the fuel quality limit for one of the facility's three boilers, but added an overall fuel quality limit and retained an overall SO2 emissions cap for the three CILCO Edwards boilers. The variance will expire on February 28, 2002, unless CILCO applies to Illinois for a permanent SIP revision.
(i) Incorporation by reference. An April 15, 1999, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 99-80 (Variance-Air), granting a variance from 35 IAC 214.141 for Boiler No. 2 at the Central Illinois Light Company's E.D. Edwards Generating Station near Peoria, Illinois. The variance expires on February 28, 2002, unless CILCO applies to Illinois for a permanent SIP revision. If CILCO applies for a permanent SIP revision, and the IPCB allows CILCO Edwards' variance to continue unamended through July 31, 2003, as stated in the Opinion and Order, then federal approval of the variance will continue until EPA approves alternate SO2 limits for CILCO Edwards, or until July 31, 2003, whichever is earlier.
(156) On May 8, 2001, the State submitted rules to control Oxides of Nitrogen emissions from electric generating units.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources; Part 217 Nitrogen Oxides Emissions; Subpart V: Electric Power Generation. Adopted at 25 Ill. Reg. 5914, effective April 17, 2001.
(157) On May 8, 2001, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revisions to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 217, Subpart W: NO[x] Trading Program for Electrical Generating Units with a request that these rules be incorporated into the Illinois State Implementation Plan. On June 11, 2001, the Illinois EPA submitted Section 9.9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act as revised by Public Act 92-012 (formerly House Bill 1599) which was approved by both Houses of the Illinois General Assembly on June 7, 2001, approved by the Governor on June 22, 2001, and became effective on July 1, 2001. Section 9.9(f) requires a May 31, 2004 final compliance date for 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215, Subparts T, U and W. This compliance date replaces the compliance date contained in Section 217.756(d)(3).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 217 Nitrogen Oxides Emissions, Subpart W: NO[x] Trading Program for Electrical Generating Units except for 217.756(d)(3) which has been superseded by Section 9.9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. Added at 25 Ill. Reg. 128, January 25, 2001, effective December 26, 2000.
(B) Section 9.9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. Adopted by both Houses of the Illinois General Assembly as part of Public Act 92-0012 (previously House Bill 1599) on May 31, 2001, approved by the Governor of Illinois on June 22, 2001, effective July 1, 2001.
(158) On December 16, 1997, Bharat Mathur, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, submitted rules for a cap and trade program regulating volatile organic compound emissions in the Chicago area. By letter dated August 23, 2001, the state requested that USEPA defer rulemaking on section 205.150(e), which exempts new and modified sources obtaining offsets under the trading program from the requirements for traditional, full year offsets.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter b, Part 205, entitled Emissions Reduction Market System, adopted November 20, 1997, effective November 25, 1997, except section 205.150(e).
(159) On April 9, 2001, David Kolaz, Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, submitted rules regulating NOX emissions from cement kilns. On May 1, 2001, Mr. Kolaz submitted rules regulating NOX emissions from industrial boilers and turbines and requesting two minor revisions to the Illinois NOX emissions budget. On June 18, 2001, Mr. Kolaz submitted a demonstration that Illinois' regulations were sufficient to assure that NOX emissions in Illinois would be reduced to the level budgeted for the state by USEPA. On September 20, 2001, Mr. Kolaz sent a letter clarifying that Illinois' rules for industrial boilers and turbines require compliance on a unit-by-unit basis.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 211, Definitions, sections 211.955, 211.960, 211.1120, 211.3483, 211.3485, 211.3487, 211.3780, 211.5015, and 211.5020, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 4582, effective March 15, 2001.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 217, Subpart A, Section 217.104, Incorporations by Reference, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 4597, effective March 15, 2001.
(C) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 217, Subpart T, Cement Kilns, sections 217.400, 217.400, 217.402, 217.404, 217.406, 217.408, and 217.410, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 4597, effective March 15, 2001.
(D) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 211, Sections 211.4067 and 211.6130, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 5900, effective April 17, 2001.
(E) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35, Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapter c, Part 217, Subpart U, NOX Control and Trading Program for Specified NOX Generating Units, sections 217.450, 217.452, 217.454, 217.456, 217.458, 217.460, 217.462, 217.464, 217.466, 217.468, 217.470, 217.472, 217.474, 217.476, 217.478, 217.480 and 217.482, published at 25 Ill. Reg. 5914, effective April 17, 2001.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated June 18, 2001, from David Kolaz, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Cheryl Newton, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
(B) Letter dated September 20, 2001, from David Kolaz, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Bharat Mathur, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
(160) On March 21, 2001, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Formel Industries, Incorporated in Cook County, Illinois. The revisions consist of a January 18, 2001 Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in the Matter of: Petition of Formel Industries, Inc. for an Adjusted Standard from 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 218.401(a),(b) and (c): AS 00-13 (Adjusted Standard Air). This Opinion and Order grants Formel Industries, Incorporated an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule. The adjusted standard requirements include participation in a market-based emissions trading system, maintaining daily records, conducting trials of compliant inks, and reviewing alternate control technologies.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Volatile organic compound emissions limits contained in a January 18, 2001 Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in the Matter of: Petition of Formel Industries, Inc. for an Adjusted Standard from 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 218.401(a), (b) and (c): AS 00-13 (Adjusted Standard-Air). This Opinion and Order was adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board on January 18, 2001. It became effective under State law on January 18, 2001.
(161) On March 28, 2001, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Bema Film Systems, Incorporated in DuPage County, Illinois. The revisions consist of AS 00-11, an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule, 35 IAC 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). The adjusted standard requirements include reducing the allotment baseline for the Illinois market-based emissions trading system, maintaining daily records, conducting trials of compliant inks, and reviewing alternate control technologies.
(i) Incorporation by reference. AS 00-11, an adjusted standard from the Volatile Organic Compound emission limits for Bema Film Systems, Inc. contained in Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Regulations for the State of Illinois, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). Effective on January 18, 2001.
(ii) Other material. (A) November 14, 2001, letter from Dennis A. Lawler, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to Jay Bortzer, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air and Radiation Division, USEPA, Region 5, indicating that the effective date of the adjusted standard for Bema Film Systems, Inc. AS 00-11, is January 18, 2001, the date that AS 00-11 was adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
(162) On March 28, 2001, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Vonco Products, Incorporated in Lake County, Illinois. The revisions consist of AS 00-12, an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule, 35 IAC 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). The adjusted standard requirements include reducing the allotment baseline for the Illinois market-based emissions trading system, maintaining daily records, conducting trials of compliant inks, and reviewing alternate control technologies.
(i) Incorporation by reference. AS 00-12, an adjusted standard from the Volatile Organic Compound emission limits applicable to Vonco Products, Inc. contained in Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Regulations for the State of Illinois, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218.401 (a), (b), and (c). Effective on January 18, 2001.
(ii) Other material. (A) November 14, 2001, letter from Dennis A. Lawler, Manager, Division of Air Pollution Control, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to Jay Bortzer, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air and Radiation Division, USEPA, Region 5, indicating that the effective date of the adjusted standard for Vonco Products, Inc. AS 00-12, is January 18, 2001, the date that AS 00-12 was adopted by the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
(163) [Reserved]
(164) On October 9, 2001, the State of Illinois submitted new rules regarding emission tests.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) New rules of 35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 283, including sections 283.110, 283.120, 283.130, 283.210, 283.220, 283.230, 283.240, and 283.250, effective September 11, 2000, published in the Illinois Register at 24 Ill. Reg. 14428.
(B) Revised section 283.120 of 35 Ill. Admin. Code, correcting two typographical errors, effective September 11, 2000, published in the Illinois Register at 25 Ill. Reg. 9657.
(165) On April 8, 1999, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revisions to particulate matter control requirements for rural grain elevators in Illinois. The revised requirements exempt rural grain elevators from certain particulate matter control requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Revised grain elevator provisions in Section 9(f) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act. Adopted by both Houses of the Illinois General Assembly as Public Act 89-491 (previously Senate Bill 1633) on April 25, 1996, approved by the Governor of Illinois on May 23, 1996, effective June 21, 1996.
(166) On November 6, 2001, the State of Illinois submitted revisions to its emission reporting rules, restructuring these rules and adding hazardous air pollutant emission reporting for sources in Illinois' Emission Reduction Market System.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised rules of 35 Ill. Admin. Code Part 254, including new or amended sections 254.101, 254.102, 254.103, 254.120, 254.132, 254.134, 254.135, 254.136, 254.137, 254.138, 254.203, 254.204, 254.303, 254.306, and 254.501, effective July 17, 2001, retention of section 254.133, and the repeal of other previously approved sections of 35 Ill. Admin. Code 254. Amended or adopted at 25 Ill. Reg. 9856. Effective July 17, 2001.
(167) On August 31, 1998, Illinois submitted revisions to its major stationary sources construction and modification rules (NSR Rules) as a State Implementation Plan revision request. These revisions apply only in areas in Illinois that have been designated as being in serious or severe nonattainment with the national ambient air quality standards for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter A: Permits and General Provisions, Part 203 Major Stationary Sources Construction and Modification, Subpart B: Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.206 Major Stationary Source and Section 203.207 Major Modification of a Source; and, Subpart C: Requirements for Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.301 Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate. Amended in R98-10 at 22 Ill. Reg. 5674, effective March 10, 1998.
(168) On October 31, 2003, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revisions to the Illinois State Implementation Plan for ozone. The submittal revises the definition for volatile organic material (VOM) or volatile organic compound (VOC) contained in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 211.7150 to incorporate an exemption for perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene); 3,3-dichloro-1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoropropane (HCFC-225ca); 1,3-dichloro-1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HCFC-225cb); decafluoropentane (HFC 43-10mee); difluoromethane (HFC-32); ethylfluoride (HFC-161); 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa); 1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ca); 1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ea); 1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245eb); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC-236ea); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfc); chlorofluoromethane (HCFC-31); 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a); 1-chloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-151a); 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4-nonafluoro-4-methoxybutane (C4F9OCH3); 2-(difluoromethoxymethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane ((CF3)2CFCF2OCH3); 1-ethoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OC2H5); 2-(ethoxydifluoromethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane ((CF3)2CFCF2OC2H5); and methyl acetate from the definition of VOM or VOC and thereby, from regulation as ozone precursors.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), amended at 22 Illinois Register 11405, effective June 22, 1998.
(169) On June 20, 2003, Illinois submitted an Adjusted Standard for Ford Motor Company's Chicago Assembly Plant. This Adjusted Standard from 35 Ill.Adm. Code 218.986 replaces those requirements with the control requirements in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's November 21, 2002, Order.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) The Illinois Pollution Control Board's November 21, 2002, Opinion and Order which granted the Ford Motor Company's Chicago Assembly Plant an adjusted standard (AS 02-3) from 35 Ill. ADM. Code 218.986. The requirements in 35 Ill. ADM. Code 218.986 have been replaced by the requirements in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's November 21, 2002, Order.
(170) On May 28, 2003, Illinois submitted an amendment to its leather coating rules for the Horween Leather Company's Chicago leather manufacturing facility. This adds a test method in Section 218.112(a)(26) and a new Section 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.929. These amendments were incorporated in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's February 20, 2003, Final Order R02-20.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218 Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area.
(A) Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 218.112 Incorporations by Reference, (a) American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-9555, 26) ASTM D2099-00. Amended at 27 Ill. Reg. 7283, effective April 8, 2003.
(B) Subpart PP: Miscellaneous Fabricated Product Manufacturing Processes, Section 218.929 Cementable and Dress or Performance Shoe Leather. Added at 27 Ill. Reg. 7283, effective April 8, 2003.
(171) On July 29, 2003, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for sulfur dioxide (SO2) for the Central Illinois Light Company's E.D. Edwards Generating Station, now known as AmerenEnergy Resources Generating Company, Edwards Power Plant, in Bartonville, Peoria County, Illinois.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 214: Sulfur Limitations, Subpart X: Utilities Section 214.561 E.D. Edwards Electric Generating Station which was amended at 27 Illinois Register 12101, effective July 11, 2003.
(172) On September 19, 2003, Illinois submitted a site-specific revision to the State Implementation Plan which relaxes the volatile organic material (VOM) content limit for the coating operations at Louis Berkman Company, d/b/a/ the Swenson Spreader Company's Lindenwood, Ogle County, Illinois facility from 3.5 pounds VOM per gallon to a monthly average of 4.75 pounds VOM per gallon until May 7, 2008.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Order contained in a May 7, 1998, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 97-5, effective May 7, 1998.
(173) On March 11, 2004, Illinois submitted an Adjusted Standard for Argonne National Laboratory's degreasing operations. Pursuant to this Adjusted Standard from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.182, the applicable vapor pressure and other associated requirements of 35 Ill. Code 218.182 do not apply to cold cleaning involving the preparation of sample materials and associated apparatus used for research and development testing and analysis at Argonne. These revised requirements were adopted in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's December 18, 2003, Adjusted Standard AS 03-4.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) The Illinois Pollution Control Board's December 18, 2003, Opinion and Order which granted the Argonne National Laboratory's degreasing operations an Adjusted Standard (AS 03-4) from 35 Ill. Code 218.182 for its cold cleaning involving the preparation of sample materials and associated apparatus used for research and development testing and analysis at Argonne.
(174) [Reserved]
(175) On January 4, 2006, Illinois submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan revision for the Ford Motor Company (Ford) Chicago Assembly Plant. The revision allows Ford to discontinue use of its Stage II vapor recovery system and requires instead that Ford comply with federal onboard refueling vapor recovery regulations and other conditions.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) September 1, 2005, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 05-5, effective September 1, 2005.
(176) On June 14, 2004, Illinois submitted revisions to volatile organic compound rules for Formel Industries, Incorporated in Cook County, Illinois. The revisions consist of withdrawing an adjusted standard to the Flexographic Printing Rule. Formel Industries has installed a control device and is complying with the Flexographic Printing Rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference. An April 15, 2004, Supplemental Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board AS 00-13, terminating Formel's previously issued (January 18, 2001) adjusted standard from the Flexographic Printing Rule, effective April 15, 2004.
(177) On May 31, 2006, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a requested revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan. This revision provides additional exemptions from State of Illinois permit requirements codified by the State at Part 201 of Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code (35 IAC Part 201).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions, Part 201 Permits and General Provisions, Subpart C: Prohibitions, Section 201.146 Exemptions from State Permit Requirements paragraphs (hhh), (iii), (jjj), (kkk), and (lll). Amended at 30 Ill. Reg. 4901, effective March 3, 2006.
(178) On September 14, 2007, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted rules and related material to address requirements under the Clean Air Interstate Rule. These rules mandate participation of electric generating units in EPA-run trading programs for annual emissions of sulfur dioxide, annual emissions of nitrogen oxides, and ozone season emissions of nitrogen oxides. These rules provide a methodology for allocating allowances to subject sources and require these sources to hold sufficient allowances to accommodate their emissions and to meet various monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. EPA is approving the submitted provisions of Subparts A, C, D, and E of Part 225 of Title 35 of Illinois Administrative Code; EPA is deferring action on Subpart F.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Part 225: Control of Emissions from Large Combustion Sources, effective August 31, 2007, including Subpart A: General Provisions, Subpart C: Clean Air Act Interstate Rule (CAIR) SO2 Trading Program, Subpart D: CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program, and Subpart E: CAIR NOX Ozone Season Trading Program.
(179) On October 31, 2003, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted rules and related materials to address site-specific requirements for Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated, located in Alsip, Illinois. These rules establish an adjusted standard for the corrosion inhibiting packaging production facility of Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated located at this source site. These rules provide a site-specific adjusted standard for this source facility for volume 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code subpart F section 218.204(c). The adjusted standard gives the corrosion inhibiting paper coating lines at the Alsip facility an adjusted volatile organic material (volatile organic compounds) content limit for paper coatings, and places an annual limit on the volatile organic material emissions from the Alsip facility as a whole. The adjusted standard also establishes source administration and reporting requirements for Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated Alsip facility. EPA is approving this site-specific adjusted standard as a revision of the Illinois state implementation plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) September 18, 2003, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 03-5, effective September 18, 2003.
(180) On January 10, 2007, Illinois submitted revisions to its rules for the Emission Reduction Market System. These revisions assure that sources in the Chicago area with potential emissions of VOC between 25 and 100 tons per year will remain subject to the program, irrespective of changes in the area's ozone nonattainment classification or designation and any associated changes in whether such sources are defined to be major sources. EPA is again deferring action on section 205.150(e).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter b: Alternative Reduction Program, Part 205 Emissions Reduction Market System, Sections:
205.120 Abbreviations and Acronyms
205.130 Definitions
205.150 Emissions Management Periods (except for 205.150(e))
205.200 Participating Source
205.205 Exempt Source
205.210 New Participating Source
205.220 Insignificant Emission Units
205.300 Seasonal Emissions Component of the Annual Emissions Report
205.310 ERMS Applications
205.315 CAAPP Permits for ERMS Sources
205.316 Federally Enforceable State Operating Permits for ERMS Sources
205.318 Certification for Exempt CAAPP Sources
205.320 Baseline Emissions
205.330 Emissions Determination Methods
205.335 Sampling, Testing, Monitoring and Recordkeeping Practices
205.337 Changes in Emissions Determination Methods and Sampling, Testing, Monitoring and Recordkeeping Practices
205.400 Seasonal Emissions Allotment
205.405 Exclusions From Further Reductions
205.410 Participating Source Shutdowns
205.500 Emissions Reduction Generator
205.510 Inter-Sector Transaction
205.610 Application for Transaction Account
205.700 Compliance Accounting
205.730 Excursion Reporting
205.750 Emergency Conditions
205.760 Market System Review Procedures
(181) On August 17, 2005 and January 29, 2008, Illinois submitted revised regulations that are consistent with 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), as amended by 69 FR 69298. The compounds 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxypropane (n-C3F7OCH3), 3-ethoxy 1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)hexane (HFE-7500), 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea), and methyl formate were added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds excluded from the definition of VOM in 35 IAC 211.7150(a). Tertiary-butyl acetate is also listed in 35 IAC 211.7150(a) with a notation that it must also meet the requirements of 35 IAC 211.7150(e), which state that tertiary-butyl acetate is considered a VOC for recordkeeping, emissions reporting, modeling, and inventory requirements, but is not considered a VOC for emission limits or content requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150: Volatile Organic Matter (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), Subsections 211.7150(a) and 211.7150(e). Effective January 16, 2008.
(182) On January 29, 2008, Illinois submitted revised regulations that are consistent with 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), as amended by 72 FR 2193. The compound 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-trifluoromethyl-pentane (HFE-7300) was added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds excluded from the definition of VOM in 35 IAC 211.7150(a).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150: Volatile Organic Matter (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), Subsection 211.7150(a). Effective January 16, 2008.
(183) On January 24, 2008, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a revision to its state implementation plan for the packaging production facility of CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC. The revision changes the source name from Cromwell-Phoenix, Incorporated, to CP-D Acquisition Company, LLC.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) November 20, 2003, Supplemental Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 03-05, effective November 20, 2003.
(184) On October 23, 2007, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted revisions to its State implementation plan for the Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) SIP Call Phase II. The State has submitted revisions to 35 Illinois Administrative Code (Ill. Adm. Code) Parts 211 and 217. The rules pertain to definitions and general provisions, and control of Nitrogen Oxides (NOX), respectively. The rules satisfy the requirements of EPA's NOX SIP Call Phase II Rule (the Phase II Rule).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Sections: 211.740 Brakehorsepower; 211.1740 Diesel Engine; 211.1920 Emergency or Standby Unit; 211.3300 Lean-burn Engine; and 211.5640 Rich-burn Engine; effective September 25, 2007. (B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 217: Nitrogen Dioxide Emissions, Subpart A: General Provisions, Sections: 217.101 Measurement Methods; 217.102 Abbreviation and Units; Subpart Q: Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and Turbines, Sections 217.386 Applicability; 217.388 Control and Maintenance Requirements; 217.390 Emissions Averaging Plan; 217.392 Compliance; 217.394 Testing and Monitoring; 217.396 Recordkeeping and Reporting; and 217 Appendix G: Existing Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines Affected by the NOX SIP Call; effective September 25, 2007.
(ii) Additional material. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 217: Nitrogen Dioxide Emissions, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 217.104 Incorporation by Reference; effective September 25, 2007.
(185) On December 7, 2009, Illinois submitted a rule for the sunset of the provisions of 35 IAC 217 Subpart W, regulating electric generating unit participation in the NOX Budget Trading Program, since these provisions have been superseded by provisions established pursuant to the Clean Air Interstate Rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The Illinois rule at 35 IAC 217.751, entitled “Sunset Provisions,” submitted on December 7, 2009, effective on November 2, 2009, is incorporated by reference.
(186) On July 17, 2009, Illinois submitted amendments to its pharmaceutical manufacturing rules for approval into its state implementation plan. These amendments consist of a site-specific rulemaking for certain of Abbott Laboratories' (Abbott) tunnel dryers and fluid bed dryers.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart T: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Section: 218.480 Applicability, effective August 26, 2008.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter from Laurel L. Kroack, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Cheryl Newton, EPA, dated May 12, 2010, with attachments, that establishes how compliance with Abbott's 20.6 tons VOC per year limit is determined as well as Abbott's recordkeeping requirements.
(187) On October 25, 2010, Illinois submitted revised regulations that are consistent with 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1), as amended by 74 FR 3437. The compounds propylene carbonate and dimethyl were added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds excluded from the definition of VOC in 35 IAC 211.7150(a).
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Section 211.7150: Volatile Organic Matter (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), Subsection 211.7150(a). Effective January 11, 2010.
(188) On November 8, 2010, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a revision to its state implementation plan. The revision to the SIP allows an adjusted standard to the general rule, Use of Organic Material Rule, known as the eight pound per hour (8 lb/hr) rule, for volatile organic matter, for Royal Fiberglass Pools, Inc. manufacturing facility located in Dix, Illinois. The adjusted standard is that 35 Ill. Adm. Code 217.301 does not apply to VOM emissions from Royal's Dix, Illinois facility. The facility is subject to emission limit requirements set forth in the MACT under 40 CFR 63 subpart WWWW finalized in 68 FR 19402, April 21, 2003.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) February 18, 2010, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS-09-04, effective February 18, 2010.
(189) On July 29, 2010, September 16, 2011 and September 29, 2011 Illinois submitted VOM RACT rules for the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. These rules are consistent with the Control Technique Guideline documents issued by EPA in 2006, 2007 and 2008 and satisfy the RACT requirements of the Act. On February 28, 2011, Illinois EPA submitted a confirmation that the sewage treatment plant exemption in Subpart TT of Parts 218 and 219 does not apply to industrial wastewater. This clarification clearly establishes that VOM emissions from major non-CTG industrial wastewater operations are regulated by Subpart TT.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, are incorporated by reference:
(A) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Sections 211.1000, 211.1745, 211.1878, 211.1885, 211.2359, 211.2368, 211.2615, 211.2830, 211.2840, 211.2965, 211.3215, 211.3305, 211.3555, 211.3705, 211.3707, 211.4065, 211.5335, 211.5535, 211.5585, 211.5860, 211.5875, 211.5885, 211.6405, 211.6425, 211.6535, 211.7290; effective June 25, 2010.
(B) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Sections 211.101, 211.102, 211.200, 211.233, 211.235, 211.260, 211.481, 211.492, 211.540, 211.715, 211.735, 211.820, 211.825, 211.880, 211.954, 211.965, 211.1128, 211.1455, 211.1560, 211.1565, 211.1655, 211.1700, 211.1872, 211.1876, 211.1877, 211.1880, 211.1882, 211.1883, 211.2040, 211.2055, 211.2210, 211.2310, 211.2320, 211.2360, 211.2369, 211.2415, 211.2525, 211.2622, 211.2825, 211.2955, 211.2956, 211.2958, 211.2960, 211.2980, 211.3095, 211.3120, 211.3240, 211.3505, 211.3665, 211.3760, 211.3775, 211.3785, 211.3820, 211.3925, 211.3961, 211.3966, 211.3967, 211.3968, 211.3969, 211.3975, 211.4052, 211.4080, 211.4220, 211.4285, 211.4455, 211.4540, 211.4735, 211.4760, 211.4765, 211.4768, 211.4769, 211.4895, 211.4900, 211.5012, 211.5061, 211.5062, 211.5075, 211.5090, 211.5400, 211.5520, 211.5550, 211.5800, 211.5890, 211.5985, 211.5987, 211.6012, 211.6015, 211.6017, 211.6020, 211.6063, 211.6065, 211.6400, 211.6427, 211.6460, 211.6585, 211.6640, 211.6670, 211.6690, 211.6720, 211.6740, 211.6780, 211.6825, 211.6885, 211.7220, 211.7240; effective September 14, 2010.
(C) Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Sections 211.493, 211.2200, 211.2358, 211.2800, 211.3985, 211.4460, 211.5140, 211.6587, 211.6635; effective July 27, 2011.
(D) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Section 218.218; effective March 23, 2010.
(E) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 218.181, Subpart H: Printing and Publishing, Sections 218.403, 218.405, 218.406, 218.407, 218.408, 218.410, 218.412, 218.413, 218.416; effective June 25, 2010.
(F) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Sections 218.106, 218.112, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Sections 218.205, 218.208, 218.210, 218.212, 218.219, Subpart II: Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials, Section 218.890, Subpart JJ: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives, Section 218.900; effective September 14, 2010.
(G) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 218.105, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 218.187, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Sections 218.204, 218.207, 218.211, 218.217, Subpart H: Printing and Publishing, Sections 218.401, 218.402, 218.404, 218.409, 218.411, 218.415, 218.417, Subpart II: Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials, Sections 218.891, 218.892, 218.894, Subpart JJ: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives, Sections 218.901, 218.902, 218.903, 218.904; effective July 27, 2011.
(H) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Section 219.218; effective March 23, 2010.
(I) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 219.181, Subpart H: Printing and Publishing, Sections 219.402, 219.403, 219.405, 219.406, 219.407, 219.408, 219.410, 219.412, 219.413, 219.416; effective June 25, 2010.
(J) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Sections 219.106, 219.112, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Sections 219.205, 219.208, 219.210, 219.212, 219.219, Subpart II: Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials, Section 219.890, Subpart JJ: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives, Section 219.900; effective September 14, 2010.
(K) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 219.105, Subpart E: Solvent Cleaning, Section 219.187, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Sections 219.204, 219.207, 219.211, 219.217, Subpart H: Printing and Publishing, Sections 219.401, 219.404, 219.409, 219.411, 219.415, 219.417, Subpart II: Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials, Sections 219.891, 219.892, 219.894, Subpart JJ: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives, Sections 219.901, 219.902, 219.903, 219.904; effective July 27, 2011.
(ii) Additional material. On February 28, 2011, Illinois EPA submitted an email confirmation that the sewage treatment plant exemption in Subpart TT of Parts 218 and 219 does not apply to industrial wastewater.
(190) On June 10, 2011, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a revision to its state implementation plan. The revision to the SIP allows an adjusted standard to the general rule, Use of Organic Material Rule, known as the eight pound per hour (8 lb/hr) rule, for volatile organic matter, for Leisure Properties LLC/D/B/A Crownline Boats manufacturing facility located in West Frankfort, Illinois. The adjusted standard is that the facility takes an alternative standard of the emission limit requirements set forth in the MACT under 40 CFR part 63 subpart VVVV as published in 40 CFR Part 63 (§ 63.1200 to end) revised as of July 1, 2002.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) July 22, 2004, Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS-04-01, (identified in error as July 22, 2002 in the document heading), effective July 22, 2004.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter from Laurel L. Kroack, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, to Cheryl Newton, EPA, dated September 2, 2011, identifying that due to an ownership change to Crownline Boats, the Board transferred the adjusted standard to Leisure Properties LLC D/B/A Crownline Boats, which is the successor to Crownline Boats, by Board order AS04-l, effective October 7, 2010.
(191) On September 14, 2012, Illinois submitted an amendment to its State Implementation Plan at 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 223, which adds new consumer product categories and VOC limits for these products in Subpart B, and amends Subpart C to clarify applicability. 35 IAC Part 223 limits the amount of volatile organic compounds from consumer products and architectural and industrial maintenance coatings.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code; Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitation for Stationary Sources; Part 223: Standards and Limitations for Organic material Emissions for Area Sources, effective May 4, 2012.
(B) Reserved.
(192) On June 24, 2011, Laurel Kroack, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, submitted Illinois' regional haze plan to Cheryl Newton, Region 5, EPA. This plan includes a long-term strategy with emission limits for mandating emission reductions equivalent to the reductions from implementing best available retrofit technology and with emission reductions to provide Illinois' contribution toward achievement of reasonable progress goals at Class I areas affected by Illinois. The plan specifically includes regulations establishing Multi-Pollutant Standards and Combined Pollutant Standards, along with letters from the affected electric utilities establishing the applicability and enforceability of the option that includes sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emission limits. The plan also includes permits establishing sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emission limits for three additional electric generating plants and two consent decrees establishing sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emission limits for two refineries.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) The following sections of Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 225, Control of Emissions from Large Combustion Sources, published at 33 IL Reg 10427, effective June 26, 2009, are incorporated by reference:
(1) Subpart B: Control Of Mercury Emissions From Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units, Section 225.233 Multi-Pollutant Standards (MPS), only subsections (a), (b), (e), and (g), Section 225.291 Combined Pollutant Standard: Purpose, Section 225.292 Applicability of the Combined Pollutant Standard, Section 225.293 Combined Pollutant Standard: Notice of Intent, Section 225.295 Combined Pollutant Standard: Emissions standards for NOX and SO2, and Section 225.296 Combined Pollutant Standard: Control Technology Requirements for NOX, SO2, and PM Emissions, except for 225.296(d).
(2) Section 225.Appendix A Specified EGUs for Purposes of the CPS (Midwest Generation's Coal-Fired Boilers as of July 1, 2006).
(B) Joint Construction and Operating Permit: Application Number 09090046, Issued on June 23, 2011, to City Water, Light & Power, City of Springfield.
(C) Joint Construction and Operating Permit: Application Number 09050022, Issued on June 24, 2011, to Kincaid Generation, LLC.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter from Guy Gorney, Midwest Generation to Dave Bloomberg, Illinois EPA, dated December 27, 2007, choosing to be subject to provisions of the Multi-Pollutant Standards that include emission limits for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.
(B) Letter from R. Alan Kelley, Ameren, to Jim Ross, Illinois EPA, dated December 27, 2007, choosing to be subject to provisions of the Combined Pollutant Standards that include emission limits for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.
(C) Letter from Keith A. McFarland, Dynegy, to Raymond Pilapil, Illinois EPA, dated November 26, 2007, choosing to be subject to provisions of the Combined Pollutant Standards that include emission limits for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.
(193) On June 20, 2012, Illinois submitted an Adjusted Standard for the Greif Packaging, LLC facility located at 5 S 220 Frontenac Road in Naperville, DuPage County. This adjustment to the Standard at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.986(a) for Greif's fiber drum manufacturing facility replaces the VOM capture and control requirements in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.986(a) with the control requirements in the Illinois Pollution Control Board's April 5, 2012 Order.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) April 5, 2012 Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (AS 2011-01), effective April 5, 2012.
(194) On November 14, 2011, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) submitted amendments to 35 Illinois Administrative Code 218.208 and 219.208. These sections add a “small container exemption” for pleasure craft surface coating operations in the Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. These exemptions are consistent with EPA volatile organic compound (VOC) reasonably available control technology (RACT) policy.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, are incorporated by reference.
(A) Part 218: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Section 218.208 Exemptions From Emission Limitations; effective October 25, 2011.
(B) Part 219: Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart F: Coating Operations, Section 219.208 Exemptions From Emission Limitations; effective October 25, 2011.
(195) On June 20, 2012, Illinois submitted an amendment to its State Implementation Plan at 35 Illinois Administrative Code part 243, which updates National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, lead, and particulate matter while correcting various errors in the plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code; Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter l: Air Quality Standards And Episodes; Part 243: Air Quality Standards; Sections 243.101 Definitions, 243.104 Nondegradation, 243.107 Reference Conditions, 243.108 Incorporations by Reference, 243.120 PM10 and PM2.5, 243.122 Sulfur Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide), 243.125 8-Hour Ozone, and 243.126 Lead; effective October 25, 2011.
(196) On April 11, 2013, Illinois submitted a revision to 35 IAC Part 254, Annual Emissions Report. The revision amends the applicability provisions as they relate to greenhouse gases.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency; Part 254: Annual Emission Report, Section 254.102: Applicability, effective April 20, 2012.
(197) On July 3, 2013, Illinois submitted revised regulations that are consistent with 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1). The compound trans-1,3,3,3-tetra-flouropropene (HFO-1234ze) was added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds excluded from the definition of “Volatile Organic Material (VOM)” or “Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)” at 35 IAC 211.7150(a).
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; ChapterI: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter C: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources; Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Section 211.7150: Volatile Organic Matter (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), Subsection 211.7150(a). Effective February 4, 2013.
(198) On January 9, 2014, Illinois submitted modifications to its Federally Enforceable State Operating Permits rules as a revision to the state implementation plan. The revision extends the maximum permit term of Federally Enforceable State Operating Permits from five years to ten years.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions; Part 201: Permits and General Provisions; Subpart D: Permit Applications and Review Process; Section 201.162: Duration; Subsection 201.162(a). Effective December 1, 2010.
(199) On January 8, 2014, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a revision to its state implementation plan. The revision to the SIP substitutes Latham Pool Products, d/b/a Viking Pools, for Royal Fiberglass Pools, Inc. as the holder of the adjusted standard to the general rule, Use of Organic Material Rule, known as the eight pound per hour (8 lb/hr) rule, for volatile organic matter that was granted to Royal Fiberglass Pools, Inc. manufacturing facility located in Dix, Illinois on February 18, 2010 by the Illinois Pollution Control Board. The adjusted standard affected by the name change provides that 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215.301 does not apply to VOM emissions from Viking Pools fiberglass pool manufacturing facility in Dix, Illinois. The facility is subject to emission limit requirements set forth in the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reinforced Plastic Composites Production at 40 CFR 63, subpart WWWW, April 21, 2003.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Supplemental Opinion and Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, AS 09-4, effective September 5, 2013.
(200) On November 29, 2012, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a request to revise Illinois' vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program to reflect changes that have been made to the program since EPA fully approved the I/M program on February 22, 1999.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter k: Emission Standards and Limitations for Mobile Sources, Part 240 Mobile Sources. Effective February 1, 2012.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter II: Environmental Protection Agency, Part 276 Procedures to be Followed in the Performance of Inspections of Motor Vehicle Emissions. Effective January 30, 2012.
(ii) Other materials.
(A) Transmittal letter dated November 29, 2012.
(B) Vehicle Emissions Inspection Law of 2005, as amended, 625 ILCS 5/13C (Public Act 94-526 enacted on August 10, 2005; Public Act 94-848 enacted on June 9, 2006; Public Act 97-106, enacted on July 14, 2011).
(C) Listing of Chicago and Metro-East St. Louis NAA Facility Closures (July 2012).
(201) On March 19, 2013, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a request to repeal the gasoline volatility standards at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 215.585, 218.585, and 219.585, including other related revisions to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 211, 215, 218, and 219, to revise the motor vehicle refinishing equipment specifications at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.784 and 219.784, and to repeal the motor vehicle refinishing registration requirements at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.792 and 219.792.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211, Definitions and General Provisions, Sections 211.101 Incorporations by Reference, 211.2870 Heavy Liquid, and 211.5510 Reid Vapor Pressure. Effective January 28, 2013.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 215, Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations, Sections 215.104 Definitions, and 215.105 Incorporation by Reference. Effective January 28, 2013.
(C) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218, Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Sections 218.112 Incorporations by Reference, 218.128 Monitoring VOL Operations, and 218.784 Equipment Specifications. Effective January 28, 2013.
(D) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219, Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Sections 219.112 Incorporations by Reference, 219.128 Monitoring VOL Operations, and 219.784 Equipment Specifications. Effective January 28, 2013.
(202) On June 10, 2014, Illinois submitted revised regulations that are consistent with 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1). The compounds (difluoromethoxy) (difluoro)methane (CHF2OCHF2 or HFE-134), bis(difluoromethoxy) (difluoro)methane (CHF2OCF2OCHF2 or HFE-236cal2), 1-(difluoromethoxy)-2-[(difluoromethoxy) ((difluoro)methoxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (CHF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCHF2 or HFE-43-10pccc), 1,2-bis(difluoromethoxy)-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (CHF2OCF2CF2OCHF2 or HFE-338pcc13), and trans 1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene (CF3CHCHCl) were added to the list of negligibly reactive compounds excluded from the definition of “Volatile Organic Material (VOM)” or “Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)” at 35 IAC 211.7150(a).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources; Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions; Subpart B: Definitions; Section 211.7150: Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), effective November 27, 2013.
(203) On January 17, 2013, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency submitted a request to phase out Stage II vapor recovery standards at 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586 and to make other related revisions to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 201, 218, and 219.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter a: Permits and General Provisions, Part 201, Permits and General Provisions, Subpart C: Prohibitions, Section 201.146, Exemptions from State Permit Requirements, and Subpart K: Records and Reports, Section 201.302, Reports, effective December 23, 2013.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 218, Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Chicago Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 218.112, Incorporations by Reference, Subpart Y: Gasoline Distribution, Section 218.583, Gasoline Dispensing Operations—Storage Tank Filling Operations and Section 218.586, Gasoline Dispensing Operations—Motor Vehicle Fueling Operations, effective December 23, 2013.
(C) Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 219, Organic Material Emission Standards and Limitations for the Metro East Area, Subpart A: General Provisions, Section 219.105, Test Methods and Procedures, and Section 219.112, Incorporations by Reference, Subpart Y: Gasoline Distribution, Section 219.583, Gasoline Dispensing Operations—Storage Tank Filling Operations, effective December 23, 2013.
(204) On December 2, 2013, Illinois submitted an amendment to its State Implementation Plan at 35 Illinois Administrative Code part 243, which updates Illinois air quality standards to reflect National Ambient Air Quality Standards for sulfur dioxide, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, lead, fine particulate matter, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide and incorporates Federal test procedures for these pollutants.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter l: Air Quality Standards And Episodes; Part 243: Air Quality Standards; Sections 243.101 Definitions, 243.102 Scope, 243.103 Applicability, 243.105 Air Quality Monitoring Data Influenced by Exceptional Events, 243.107 Reference Conditions, 243.108 Incorporations by Reference, 243.120 PM10 and PM2.5, 243.122 Sulfur Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide), 243.123 Carbon Monoxide, 243.124 Nitrogen Oxides (Nitrogen Dioxide as Indicator), 243.125 Ozone, 243.126 Lead, and 243.TABLE A Schedule of Exceptional Event Flagging and Documentation Submission for New or Revised NAAQS, effective July 29, 2013.
(205) On May 16, 2013, and August 18, 2014, Illinois submitted variances to its regional haze state implementation plan affecting the following Midwest Generation, LLC facilities: Crawford Generating Station (Cook County), Joliet Generating Station (Will County), Powerton Generating Station (Tazewell County), Waukegan Generating Station (Lake County), and Will County Generating Station (Will County).
(i) Incorporation by Reference. (A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Order PCB 12-121, adopted on August 23, 2012; Certificate of Acceptance, dated August 24, 2012, filed with the Illinois Pollution Control Board Clerk's Office August 27, 2012.
(B) Illinois Pollution Control Board Order PCB 13-24, adopted on April 4, 2013; Certificate of Acceptance, dated May 16, 2013, filed with the Illinois Pollution Control Board Clerk's Office May 17, 2013.
(206) On December 18, 2014, the state submitted a proposed revision to the Illinois SIP updating the definition of Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) to exclude the chemical compound 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234yf), along with minor administrative revisions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emission Standards and Limitations for Stationary Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), effective June 9, 2014.
(207) On September 3, 2014, Illinois submitted a variance to its regional haze state implementation plan affecting the electrical generating units (EGUs) included in the Ameren Multi-Pollutant Standard Group (Ameren MPS Group). The Ameren MPS Group consists of five facilities owned by Illinois Power Holdings, LLC (IPH) and two facilities owned by AmerenEnergy Medina Valley Cogen, LLC (Medina Valley). The IPH facilities included in the Ameren MPS Group and subject to the variance include: Coffeen Energy Center (Montgomery County), Duck Creek Energy Center (Fulton County), E.D. Edwards Energy Center (Peoria County), Joppa Energy Center (Massac County), and Newton Energy Center (Jasper County). The Medina Valley facilities included in the Ameren MPS Group and subject to the variance are the Meredosia Energy Center (Morgan County) and the Hutsonville Energy Center (Crawford County).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Illinois Pollution Control Board Order PCB 14-10, adopted on November 21, 2013; Certificate of Acceptance, filed with the Illinois Pollution Control Board Clerk's Office December 20, 2013.
(208) On December 18, 2014, and April 23, 2015, Illinois submitted amendments to its State Implementation Plan at 35 Illinois Administrative Code part 243, which updates Illinois air quality standards to reflect National Ambient Air Quality Standards promulgated by EPA through December 17, 2013, and incorporates Federal test procedures for these pollutants.
(i) Incorporation by Reference. (A) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter I: Air Quality Standards And Episodes; Part 243: Air Quality Standards; Sections 243.107 Reference Conditions, 243.120 p.m.10 and PM2.5, 243.122 Sulfur Oxides (Sulfur Dioxide), and 243.Table A Schedule of Exceptional Event Flagging and Documentation Submission for New or Revised NAAQS, effective November 27, 2013.
(B) Illinois Administrative Code Title 35: Environmental Protection; Subtitle B: Air Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Subchapter I: Air Quality Standards And Episodes; Part 243: Air Quality Standards; Section 243.108 Incorporation by Reference, effective June 9, 2014.
(209) On August 9, 2016, the state submitted a proposed revision to the Illinois SIP updating the definition of Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) to exclude the chemical compound 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), along with minor administrative revisions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois Administrative Code, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter c: Emissions Standards and Limitations for Station Sources, Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions, Subpart B: Definitions, Section 211.7150 Volatile Organic Material (VOM) or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), effective March 24, 2015.
[37 FR 10862, May 31, 1972. Redesignated and amended at 82 FR 30638, June 30, 2017]
Subpart P—Indiana
§ 52.769 Identification of plan—conditional approval.
The plan revision commitment listed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section were submitted on the dates specified.
(a)-(b) [Reserved]
[60 FR 22241, 22242, May 4, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 19056, Apr. 18, 1997; 63 FR 35144, June 29, 1998]
§ 52.770 Identification of plan.
Link to an amendment published at 91 FR 57264, Sept. 9, 2026.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Indiana under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, and 40 CFR Part 51 to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to December 31, 2009, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section with an EPA approval date after December 31, 2009, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 5 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by the EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated State rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the SIP as of December 31, 2009.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air Programs Branch, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604; the EPA, Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA Headquarters Library, Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334), EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and the National Archives and Records Administration. If you wish to obtain materials from a docket in the EPA Headquarters Library, please call the Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) Docket/Telephone number: (202) 566-1742. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(c) EPA approved regulations.
| Indiana citation |
Subject | Indiana effective date |
EPA approval date |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 1. General Provisions | ||||
| Rule 1. Provisions Applicable Throughout Title 326 | ||||
| 1-1-2 | References to federal Act | 6/24/1994 | 7/21/1997, 62 FR 38919 | |
| 1-1-3 | References to the Code of Federal Regulations | 10/20/2023 | 12/27/2024,
89 FR 105459 |
|
| 1-1-4 | Severability | 2/18/1982, 47 FR 6622 | ||
| 1-1-5 | Savings clause | 2/18/1982, 47 FR 6622 | ||
| 1-1-6 | Credible evidence | 3/16/2005 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60735. | |
| Rule 2. Definitions | ||||
| 1-2-1 | Applicability of definitions | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-2 | “Allowable emissions” defined | 6/24/1994 | 7/21/1997, 62 FR 38919 | |
| 1-2-3 | Air pollution control equipment | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-4 | “Applicable state and federal regulations” defined | 6/24/1994 | 7/21/1997, 62 FR 38919 | |
| 1-2-5 | “Attainment area” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-6 | “Best available control technology (BACT)” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-6.5 | Board | 8/31/2014 | 12/3/2014, 79 FR 71672 | |
| 1-2-7 | “Bulk gasoline plant” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-8 | “Bulk gasoline terminal” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-9 | “Catalytic cracking unit” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-10 | “Charging” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-11 | “Charge port” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-12 | “Clean Air Act” defined | 6/24/1994 | 7/21/1997, 62 FR 38919 | |
| 1-2-13 | “Coal processing” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-14 | “Coating line” defined | 6/5/1991 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 1-2-16 | “Coke oven battery” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-17 | Coke Oven Topside | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-18 | Coke-Side | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-18.5 | “Cold cleaner degreaser” defined | 3/1/2013 | 7/25/2014, 79 FR 43260 | |
| 1-2-19 | “Combustion for indirect heating” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-20 | Commence Construction | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-21 | Construction | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-21.5 | “Conveyorized degreaser” defined | 5/18/1990 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 1-2-22 | Cutback asphalt | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-22.5 | “Department” defined | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 1-2-23 | “Electric arc furnaces” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-23.5 | “Emissions unit” defined | 12/25/1998 | 10/23/13, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 1-2-24 | EPA | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-25 | Excess air | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-26 | Existing facility | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-27 | Facility | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-28 | Farming operation | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-28.5 | “Federally enforceable” defined | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 1-2-29 | Flare | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-29.5 | “Freeboard height” defined | 5/18/1990 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 1-2-29.6 | “Freeboard ratio” defined | 5/18/1990 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 1-2-30 | Fugitive dust | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-31 | Gas collector main | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-32 | Gasoline | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-32.1 | “Gooseneck cap” defined | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | |
| 1-2-33 | Governmental unit | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-33.1 | “Grain elevator” defined | 6/24/1994 | 7/21/1997, 62 FR 38919 | |
| 1-2-33.2 | “Grain terminal elevator” defined | 6/24/1994 | 7/21/1997, 62 FR 38919 | |
| 1-2-34 | Incinerator | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-34.1 | “Jumper pipe” defined | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | |
| 1-2-35 | Larry car | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-36 | Lowest achievable emission rate | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-37 | Luting material | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-38 | Major facility | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-39 | Malfunction | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-40 | Material | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-41 | Military specifications | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-42 | Modification | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-43 | Natural growth | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-44 | Necessary preconstruction approvals for permits | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-45 | New facility | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-46 | Nonattainment areas | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-47 | “Noncombustible container” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-48 | “Nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbons” or “negligibly photochemically reactive compounds” defined | 10/31/2010 | 5/13/2011, 76 FR 27904 | |
| 1-2-49 | Offtake piping | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-49.5 | “Open top vapor degreaser” defined | 5/18/1990 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 1-2-50 | Oven door | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-51 | “Owner or operator” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-52 | “Particulate matter” defined | 1/19/2005 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60735 | |
| 1-2-52.2 | “PM2.5” defined | 1/19/2005 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60735 | |
| 1-2-52.4 | “PM10” defined | 1/19/2005 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60735 | |
| 1-2-54 | Positive net air quality benefit | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-55 | Potential emissions | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-56 | Pre-carbonization | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-57 | Primary chamber | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-58 | Process | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-59 | Process weight; weight rate | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-60 | Pushing | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-61 | “Push-side” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-62 | “Qualified observer” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-62.1 | “Quench car” defined | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | |
| 1-2-63 | Quenching | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-63.1 | “Quench reservoir” defined | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | |
| 1-2-63.2 | “Quench tower” defined | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | |
| 1-2-64 | Reasonable further progress | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-64.1 | “Reasonably available control technology” or “RACT” defined | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 1-2-65 | Reconstruction | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-66 | Regulated pollutant | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-67 | Reid vapor pressure | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-68 | Related facilities | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-69 | Respirable dust | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-70 | “Secondary chamber” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-71 | “Shutdown condition” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-72 | “Solvent” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-73 | “Source” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-74 | “Stack” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-75 | “Standard conditions” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-76 | “Startup condition” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-77 | “Standpipe lid” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-80 | “Tank wagon” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-81 | “Temporary emissions” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-82 | “Theoretical air” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-82.5 | “Total suspended particulate” or “TSP” defined | 1/19/2005 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60735 | |
| 1-2-83 | “Transfer efficiency” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-84 | “Transport” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-85 | “True vapor pressure” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-86 | “Unclassifiable (unclassified) areas” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-87 | “Underfire” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-88 | “Vapor balance system” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-89 | “Vapor control system” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| 1-2-90 | “Volatile organic compound” or “VOC” defined | 5/26/2007 | 3/18/2008, 73 FR 14389 | |
| 1-2-91 | “Wood products” defined | 9/26/1980 | 11/5/1981, 46 FR 54943 | |
| Rule 3. Ambient Air Quality Standards | ||||
| 1-3-1 | Applicability | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57895 | ||
| 1-3-2 | Sampling Methods and Analysis | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57895 | ||
| 1-3-3 | Quality assurance guidelines | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57895 | ||
| 1-3-4 | Ambient air quality standards | 8/11/2017 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36751 | |
| Rule 4. Attainment Status Designations | ||||
| 1-4-1 | Definitions | 1/18/2013 | 4/19/2013, 78 FR 23492 | |
| Rule 5. Episode Alert Levels | ||||
| 1-5-1 | Air Pollution Forecast | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | ||
| 1-5-2 | Air Pollution Alert | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | ||
| 1-5-3 | Air Pollution Warning | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | ||
| 1-5-4 | Air Pollution Emergency | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | ||
| 1-5-5 | Termination | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842. | ||
| Rule 6. Malfunctions | ||||
| 1-6-1 | Applicability | 1/29/2017 | 8/16/2022, 87 FR 50261 | |
| 1-6-2 | Records; notice of malfunction | 1/29/2017 | 8/16/2022, 87 FR 50261 | |
| 1-6-3 | Preventive maintenance plans | 3/15/1984 | 5/3/1990, 55 FR 18604 | |
| 1-6-4 | Conditions under which malfunction not considered violation | 1/29/2017 | 8/16/2022, 87 FR 50261 | |
| 1-6-5 | Excessive malfunctions; department actions | 1/29/2017 | 8/16/2022, 87 FR 50261 | |
| 1-6-6 | Malfunction emission reduction program | 1/29/2017 | 8/16/2022, 87 FR 50261 | |
| Rule 7. Stack Height Provisions | ||||
| 1-7-1 | Applicability | 8/27/1980 | 3/12/1982, 47 FR 10824. | |
| 1-7-3 | Actual stack height provisions | 8/27/1980 | 3/12/1982, 47 FR 10824 | |
| 1-7-5 | Exemptions; limitations | 8/27/1980 | 3/12/1982, 47 FR 10824 | |
| Article 2. Permit Review Rules | ||||
| Rule 1.1. General Provisions | ||||
| 2-1.1-1 | Definitions | 7/11/12 | 10/29/12, 77 FR 65478 | (2) and (10) only. |
| 2-1.1-6 | Public notice | 6/26/1999 | 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197 | |
| 2-1.1-7 | Fees | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-1.1-8 | Time periods for determination on permit applications | 6/26/1999 | 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197 | |
| 2-1.1-9.5 | General provisions; term of permit | 12/16/2007 | 10/6/2009, 74 FR 51240 | |
| Rule 2. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements | ||||
| 2-2-1 | Definitions | 3/16/2011 | 9/28/2011, 76 FR 59899 | (a) through (e), (f)(2) through (f)(3), (g) through (cc), (dd)(2) through (dd)(3), (ee)(1) through (ee)(2), (ff)(2) through (ff)(6), (gg)(1)(A) through (gg)(1)(B), (gg)(2) through (gg)(3), (hh) through (rr), (ss)(2) through (ss)(6), (tt) through (vv), (ww)(1)(A) through (ww)(1)(E), (ww)(1)(G) through (ww)(1)(W), (ww)(2), (xx) through (aaa). |
| 2-2-1 | Definitions | 7/11/2012 | 10/29/2012, 77 FR 65478 | (dd)(1), (ff)(7), (ss)(1), (ww)(1)(F) and (ww)(1)(G) only. |
| 2-2-1 | Definitions | 7/11/2012 | 7/2/2014, 79 FR 37646 | (f)(1), (ee)(3), and (gg)(1)(C) only. |
| 2-2-1 | Definitions | 9/16/2011 | 4/7/2022, 87 FR 20331 | (ff)(1) only. |
| 2-2-2 | Applicability | 10/31/2010 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242 | |
| 2-2-3 | Control technology review; requirements | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-2-4 | Air quality analysis; requirements | 3/16/2011 | 9/28/2011, 76 FR 59899 | (a), (b)(1), (b)(2)(A)(i) through (b)(2)(A)(iv), (b)(2)(A)(vi) through (b)(2)(A)(xiii), (b)(2)(B), (b)(3), (c)(1) through (c)(3), (c)(5) through (c)(7). |
| 2-2-4 | Air quality analysis; requirements | 7/11/2012 | 10/29/2012, 77 FR 65478 | (b)(2)(A)(vi) only. |
| 2-2-4 | Air quality analysis; requirements | 7/11/2012 | 7/2/2014, 79 FR 37646 | (c)(4) only. |
| 2-2-5 | Air quality impact; requirements | 10/31/2010 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242 | |
| 2-2-6 | Increment consumption; requirements | 7/11/2012 | 8/11/2014, 79 FR 46710 | (b) only |
| 2-2-8 | Source obligation | 10/31/2010 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242 | |
| 2-2-10 | Source information | 10/31/2010 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242 | |
| 2-2-11 | Stack height provisions | 4/22/2001 | 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197 | |
| 2-2-12 | Permit rescission | 4/8/2004 | 5/20/2004, 69 FR 29071 | |
| 2-2-13 | Area designation and redesignation | 4/22/2001 | 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197 | |
| 2-2-14 | Sources impacting federal Class I areas: additional requirements | 7/11/2012 | 7/2/2014, 79 FR 37646 | |
| 2-2-15 | Public participation | 4/22/2001 | 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197 | |
| 2-2-16 | Ambient air ceilings | 4/22/2001 | 6/27/2003, 68 FR 38197 | |
| Rule 3. Emission Offset | ||||
| 2-3-1 | Definitions | 10/31/2010 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242 | |
| 2-3-2 | Applicability | 10/31/2010 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242 | |
| 2-3-3 | Applicable requirements | 10/31/2010 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40242 | |
| 2-3-4 | Banking of emission offsets | 12/13/1993 | 10/7/1994, 59 FR 51108 | |
| 2-3-5 | Location of offsetting emissions | 12/13/1993 | 10/7/1994, 59 FR 51108 | |
| Rule 3.4. Actuals Plantwide Applicability Limitations in Nonattainment Areas | ||||
| 2-3.4-1 | Applicability | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-2 | Definitions | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-3 | Permit application requirements | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-4 | Establishing PALs; general requirements | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-5 | Public participation requirements for PALs | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-6 | Establishing a 10 year actuals PAL level | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-7 | Contents of the PAL permit | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-8 | PAL effective period and reopening of the PAL permit | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-9 | Expiration of a PAL | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-10 | Renewal of a PAL | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-11 | Increasing a PAL during the PAL effective period | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-12 | Monitoring requirements for PALs | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-13 | Record keeping requirements | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-14 | Reporting and notification requirements | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| 2-3.4-15 | Termination and revocation of a PAL | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| Rule 5.1. Construction of New Sources | ||||
| 2-5.1-4 | Transition procedures | 9/10/2004 | 6/18/2007, 72 FR 33395 | |
| Rule 6. Emission Reporting | ||||
| 2-6-1 | Applicability | 4/24/2020 | 6/16/2021, 86 FR 31922 | |
| 2-6-2 | Definitions | 3/27/2004 | 10/29/2004, 69 FR 63069 | |
| 2-6-3 | Compliance schedule | 8/13/2006 | 3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678 | |
| 2-6-4 | Requirements | 8/13/2006 | 3/29/2007, 72 FR 14678 | |
| 2-6-5 | Additional information requests | 3/27/2004 | 10/29/2004, 69 FR 63069 | |
| Rule 7. Part 70 Permit Program | ||||
| 2-7-10.5 | Part 70 permits; source modifications | 10/26/2013 | 3/16/2015, 80 FR 13494 | Indiana made typographical corrections to (f)(2)(C) on 1/11/2014. |
| Rule 8. Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit Program | ||||
| 2-8-1 | Definitions | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-2 | Applicability | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-3 | Permit application | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-4 | Permit content | 12/16/2007 | 10/6/2009, 74 FR 51240 | |
| 2-8-5 | Compliance requirements for FESOPs | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-6 | Federally enforceable requirements | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-7 | Permit issuance, renewal, and revisions | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-8 | Permit reopening | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-9 | Permit expiration | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-10 | Administrative permit amendments | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-11 | Permit modification (Repealed) | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-11.1 | Permit revisions | 10/26/2013 | 3/16/2015, 80 FR 13494 | Indiana made typographical corrections to (d)(4) on 1/11/2014. |
| 2-8-12 | Emergency provision | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-13 | Public notice | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-14 | Review by U.S. EPA | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-15 | Operational flexibility | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-16 | Fees | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| 2-8-17 | Local agencies | 6/24/1994 | 8/18/1995, 60 FR 43008 | |
| Rule 9. Source Specific Operating Agreement Program | ||||
| 2-9-1 | General provisions | 1/29/2017 | 8/16/2022, 87 FR 50261 | |
| 2-9-2 | Source specific restrictions and conditions (Repealed) | 6/24/1994 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14487 | Sec. 2(a), 2(b), and 2(e) |
| Article 3. Monitoring Requirements | ||||
| Rule 1. Continuous Monitoring of Emissions | ||||
| 3-1-1 | Applicability | 9/4/1981, 46 FR 44448 | ||
| Rule 2.1. Source Sampling Procedures | ||||
| 3-2.1-5 | Specific Testing Procedures | 7/15/1995 | 4/9/1996, 61 FR 15704 | |
| Rule 4. General Provisions | ||||
| 3-4-1 | Definitions | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-4-2 | Certification | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-4-3 | Conversion factors | 9/10/2011 | ||
| Rule 5. Continuous Monitoring of Emissions | ||||
| 3-5-1 | Applicability; continuous monitoring requirements for applicable pollutants | 4/24/2020 | 6/25/2021, 86 FR 33525 | |
| 3-5-2 | Minimum performance and operating specifications | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-5-3 | Monitor system certification | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-5-4 | Standard operating procedures | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-5-5 | Quality assurance requirements | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-5-6 | Recordkeeping requirements | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-5-7 | Reporting requirements | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-5-8 | Operation and maintenance of continuous emission monitoring and continuous opacity monitoring systems | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| Rule 6. Source Sampling Procedures | ||||
| 3-6-1 | Applicability; test procedures | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-6-2 | Source sampling protocols | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-6-3 | Emission testing | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-6-4 | Reporting | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-6-5 | Specific testing procedures; particulate matter; PM10; PM2.5; sulfur dioxide; nitrogen oxides; volatile organic compounds | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| Rule 7. Fuel Sampling and Analysis Procedures | ||||
| 3-7-1 | Applicability | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-7-2 | Coal sampling and analysis methods | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-7-3 | Alternate coal sampling and analysis methods | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-7-4 | Fuel oil sampling; analysis methods | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| 3-7-5 | Recordkeeping requirements; standard operating procedures | 9/10/2011 | 10/23/2013, 78 FR 63093 | |
| Article 4. Burning Regulations | ||||
| Rule 1. Open Burning 1 | ||||
| 4-1-0.5 | Definitions | 2/10/2001 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| 4-1-1 | Scope | 2/10/2001 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| 4-1-2 | Prohibition against open burning | 2/10/2001 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| 4-1-3 | Exemptions | 10/28/2011 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| 4-1-4 | Emergency burning | 10/28/2011 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| 4-1-4.1 | Open burning approval; criteria and conditions | 12/15/2002 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| 4-1-4.2 | Open burning; approval revocation | 2/10/2001 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| 4-1-4.3 | Open burning approval; delegation of authority | 2/10/2001 | 12/9/2014, 79 FR 72979 | |
| Rule 2. Incinerators | ||||
| 4-2-1 | Applicability | 12/15/2002 | 11/30/2004, 69 FR 69531 | |
| 4-2-2 | Incinerators | 12/15/2002 | 11/30/2004, 69 FR 69531 | |
| 4-2-3 | Portable incinerators (Repealed) | 12/15/2002 | 11/30/2004, 69 FR 69531 | |
| Article 5. Opacity Regulations | ||||
| Rule 1. Opacity Limitations | ||||
| 5-1-1 | Applicability | 11/8/1998 | 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589 | |
| 5-1-2 | Opacity limitations | 11/8/1998 | 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589 | |
| 5-1-3 | Temporary alternative opacity limitations | 11/8/1998 | 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589 | |
| 5-1-4 | Compliance determination | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | Sec. 4(a). |
| 11/8/1998 | 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589 | Sec. 4(b). | ||
| 5-1-5 | Violations | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | (a) and (c). |
| 5-1-5 | Violations | 11/8/1998 | 7/16/2002, 67 FR 46589 | (b)(1)(A) through (b)(1)(D), (b)(1)(F) through (b)(1)(I), (b)(2) through (b)(11). |
| 5-1-5 | Violations | 7/11/2012 | 7/2/2014, 79 FR 37646 | (b)(1)(E) only. |
| 5-1-7 | State implementation plan revisions | 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | |
| 5-1-8 | Site-specific temporary alternate opacity limitations | 12/8/2021 | 4/25/2024, 89 FR 31645 | |
| Article 6. Particulate Rules | ||||
| Rule 2. Particulate Emission Limitations for Sources of Indirect Heating | ||||
| 6-2-1 | Applicability | 10/21/1983 | 5/17/1985, 50 FR 20569 | |
| 6-2-2 | Emission limitations for facilities specified in 326 IAC 6-2-1(b) | 10/21/1983 | 5/17/1985, 50 FR 20569 | |
| 6-2-3 | Emission limitations for facilities specified in 326 IAC 6-2-1(c) | 10/21/1983 | 5/17/1985, 50 FR 20569 | |
| 6-2-4 | Emission limitations for facilities specified in 326 IAC 6-2-1(d) | 10/21/1983 | 5/17/1985, 50 FR 20569 | |
| Rule 3. Particulate Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Processes | ||||
| 6-3-1 | Applicability | 6/12/2002 | 7/25/2005, 70 FR 42495 | Sec. 1.(a) and (b). |
| 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | only Sec. 1. (c). | ||
| 6-3-1.5 | Definitions | 6/12/2002 | 7/25/2005, 70 FR 42495 | |
| 6-3-2 | Particulate emission limitations, work practices, and control technologies | 6/12/2002 | 7/25/2005, 70 FR 42495 | |
| Rule 4. Fugitive Dust Emissions | ||||
| 6-4-1 | Applicability of rule | 11/16/1973 | 10/28/1975, 40 FR 50032 | Approved as APC-20 Sec. 1. Definitions. |
| 6-4-2 | Emission limitations | 11/16/1973 | 10/28/1975, 40 FR 50032 | Approved as APC-20 Sec. 2. Allowable Emissions. |
| 6-4-3 | Multiple sources of fugitive dust | 11/16/1973 | 10/28/1975, 40 FR 50032 | Approved as APC-20 Sec. 3. Applicability. |
| 6-4-4 | Motor vehicle fugitive dust sources | 11/16/1973 | 10/28/1975, 40 FR 50032 | Approved as APC-20 Sec. 4. Mobile Fugitive Dust Sources. |
| 6-4-5 | Measurement processes | 11/16/1973 | 10/28/1975, 40 FR 50032 | Approved as APC-20 Sec. 5. Methods of Measurement. |
| 6-4-6 | Exceptions | 11/16/1973 | 10/28/1975, 40 FR 50032 | Approved as APC-20 Sec. 6. |
| 6-4-7 | Compliance date | 11/16/1973 | 10/28/1975, 40 FR 50032 | Approved as APC-20 Sec. 3(e). |
| Rule 7. Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company | ||||
| 6-7-1 | Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company (SIGECO) | 8/30/2008 | 11/10/2009, 74 FR 57904 | |
| Article 6.5. Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County | ||||
| Rule 1. General Provisions | ||||
| 6.5-1-1 | Applicability | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.5-1-1.5 | Definitions | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.5-1-2 | Particulate emission limitations; modification by commissioner | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.5-1-3 | Nonattainment area particulate limitations; compliance determination | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.5-1-4 | Compliance schedules | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.5-1-5 | Control strategies | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.5-1-6 | State implementation plan revisions | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.5-1-7 | Scope; affected counties | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| Rule 2. Clark County | ||||
| 6.5-2-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-2-4 | ESSROC Cement Corporation | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-2-8 | Kimball Office-Borden | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-2-9 | PQ Corporation | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 3. Dearborn County | ||||
| 6.5-3-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-3-2 | Anchor Glass Container Corporation | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-3-3 | Dearborn Ready Mix, LLC | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-3-4 | Indiana Michigan Power, Tanners Creek Plant | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-3-5 | Laughery Gravel | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 4. Dubois County | ||||
| 6.5-4-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-2 | Kimball Office—Jasper 15th Street | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-4-3 | Jasper Seating Co., Inc., Plant No. 3 | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-4 | DMI Furniture Plant No. 5 | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-4-5 | Dubois County Farm Bureau Co-op | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-6 | Forest Products No. 1 | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-9 | Indiana Desk Company | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-10 | Indiana Dimension, Indiana Furniture Industries | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-11 | Indiana Furniture Industries (Repealed) | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-15 | Jasper Chair Company, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-16 | Jasper Desk Company, Incorporated | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-17 | Kimball Office—Jasper Cherry Street | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-4-18 | Jasper Municipal Electric Utility | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-19 | JOFCO Inc. Plants 1 and 2 | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-21 | Jasper Seating | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-4-24 | Styline Industries, Inc. Plant #8 | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| Rule 5. Howard County | ||||
| 6.5-5-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-5-2 | Chrysler, LLC-Kokomo Casting Plant and Kokomo Transmission Plant | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-5-5 | Delco Electronics Corporation | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-5-10 | Kokomo Grain Company | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-5-11 | E & B Paving, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-5-16 | Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 6. Marion County | ||||
| 6.5-6-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-2 | Allison Transmission | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-6-5 | Bunge North America (East), Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-18 | Cargill, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-22 | Indiana Veneers Corporation | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-23 | Citizens Thermal Energy C.C. Perry K | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-23.1 | Indianapolis Power and Light Company (IPL) Harding Street Station | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-25 | National Starch and Chemical Company | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-6-26 | International Truck and Engine Corporation & Indianapolis Casting Corporation | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-6-28 | Quemetco Inc. (RSR Corporation) | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-31 | Vertellus Agriculture & Nutrition Specialties LLC | 9/19/2021 | 3/22/2023, 88 FR 17161 | |
| 6.5-6-33 | Rolls-Royce Corporation | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.5-6-34 | St. Vincent's Hospital and Health Care Service | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-6-35 | Belmont Waste Water Sludge Incinerator | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 7. St. Joseph County | ||||
| 6.5-7-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-7-6 | Bosch Braking Systems Corporation | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-7-10 | RACO-Hubbell Electric Products | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-7-11 | Reith Riley Construction Company, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-7-13 | Holy Cross Services Corporation (Saint Mary's Campus) | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-7-14 | Accucast Technology, LLC | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-7-16 | University of Notre Dame du Lac | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-7-18 | Walsh & Kelly, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 8. Vanderburgh County | ||||
| 6.5-8-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-8-11 | Nunn Milling Company, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-8-12 | Land O' Lakes Purina Feed LLC | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-8-13 | Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company, Broadway Avenue Generating Station | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-8-14 | Whirlpool Corporation Highway 41 North | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 9. Vigo County | ||||
| 6.5-9-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-9-10 | S&G Excavating, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-9-11 | Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.—Wabash River Generating Station | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-9-13 | Sisters of Providence | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-9-15 | Terre Haute Grain | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-9-17 | Ulrich Chemical, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 10. Wayne County | ||||
| 6.5-10-1 | General provisions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-2 | Barrett Paving Materials, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-3 | Belden Wire and Cable Company | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-5 | Milestone Contractors LP (Cambridge City) | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-9 | Earlham College | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-11 | Johns Manville International, Inc. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-12 | Joseph H. Hill Co. | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-13 | Land O' Lakes Purina Feed LLC | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-14 | Milestone Contractors Richmond | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-15 | Richmond Power & Light—Whitewater Valley Generating Station | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.5-10-16 | Richmond State Hospital | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County | ||||
| Rule 1. General Provisions | ||||
| 6.8-1-1 | Applicability | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.8-1-1.5 | Definitions | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-1-2 | Particulate emission limitations; modification by commissioner | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.8-1-3 | Compliance determination | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-1-4 | Compliance schedules | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-1-5 | Control strategies | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.8-1-6 | State implementation plan revisions | 4/20/2012 | 6/17/2014, 79 FR 34435 | |
| 6.8-1-7 | Scope | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 2. Lake County: PM 10 Emission Requirements | ||||
| 6.8-2-1 | General provisions and definitions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-2 | Lake County: PM10 and total suspended particulates (TSP) emissions | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-4 | ASF-Keystone, Inc.—Hammond | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-6 | BP Products North America, Inc.—Whiting Refinery | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-7 | Bucko Construction Company, Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-8 | Cargill, Inc | 11/19/2010 | 4/14/2011, 76 FR 20846 | |
| 6.8-2-9 | W.R. Grace and Co.—Conn | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-13 | Hammond Group, Inc. (HGI) Halox Division, Lead Products Division, and Hammond Expander Division | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-14 | Hammond Group, Inc.—Halstab Division | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-16 | Resco Products, Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-17 | Mittal Steel—Indiana Harbor East Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-18 | Jupiter Aluminum Corporation | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.8-2-19 | Dover Chemical Corporation—Hammond | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-20 | LaSalle Steel Company | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-21 | Mittal Steel—Indiana Harbor West Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-22 | Carmeuse Lime Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-24 | Methodist Hospital Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-25 | National Recovery Systems | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-26 | NIPSCo—Dean H. Mitchell Station | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-27 | Praxair Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-28 | Premiere Candy Company | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-29 | Reed Minerals-Plant #14 | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.8-2-30 | Rhodia, Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-31 | Silgan Containers Manufacturing Corporation | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-32 | Smith Ready Mix, Inc | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-33 | State Line Energy, LLC | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-34 | Huhtamaki Foodservice, Inc. | 5/29/2015 | 2/22/2016, 81 FR 8650 | |
| 6.8-2-35 | Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever HPC USA | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-36 | Union Tank Car Company, Plant 1 | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-37 | United States Gypsum Company | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-2-38 | U.S. Steel—Gary Works | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 4. Lake County: Opacity Limits; Test Methods | ||||
| 6.8-4-1 | Test methods | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356. | |
| Rule 8. Lake County: Continuous Compliance Plan | ||||
| 6.8-8-1 | Applicability | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-8-2 | Documentation; operation and maintenance procedures | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-8-3 | Plan requirements | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-8-4 | Plan; schedule for complying with 326 IAC 6.8-7 | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-8-5 | Plan; source categories | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-8-6 | Plan; particulate matter control equipment; operation and maintenance | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-8-7 | Plan; particulate matter control equipment; recording; operation; inspection | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-8-8 | Plan; department review | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| Rule 9. Lake County: PM 10 Coke Battery Emission Requirements | ||||
| 6.8-9-1 | Applicability | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-9-2 | Definitions | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-9-3 | Emission limitations | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| Rule 10. Lake County: Fugitive Particulate Matter | ||||
| 6.8-10-1 | Applicability | 2/22/2008 | 4/30/2008, 73 FR 23356 | |
| 6.8-10-2 | Definitions | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-10-3 | Particulate matter emission limitations | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-10-4 | Compliance requirements; control plans | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| Rule 11. Lake County: Particulate Matter Contingency Measures | ||||
| 6.8-11-1 | Applicability | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-11-2 | “Ambient monitoring data” defined | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-11-3 | Exceedances | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-11-4 | Violation of 24-hour standard | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-11-5 | Violation of annual standard | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| 6.8-11-6 | Reduction measures | 9/9/2005 | 3/22/2006, 71 FR 14383 | |
| Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules | ||||
| Rule 1.1. Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations | ||||
| 7-1.1-1 | Applicability | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-1.1-2 | Sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-1.1-3 | Compliance Date | 10/5/2015 | 3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692 | |
| Rule 2. Compliance | ||||
| 7-2-1 | Reporting Requirements; methods to determine compliance | 10/5/2015 | 3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692 | |
| Rule 3. Ambient Monitoring | ||||
| 7-3-2 | Ambient monitoring | 5/13/1982, 47 FR 20583 | ||
| Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by County | ||||
| 7-4-2.1 | Marion County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 1/1/2017 | 3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692 | |
| 7-4-3.1 | Vigo County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 1/1/2017 | 3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692 | |
| 7-4-4 | Wayne County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 4/10/1988 | 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808 | |
| 7-4-5 | LaPorte County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 4/10/1988 | 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808 | |
| 7-4-6 | Jefferson County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 4/10/1988 | 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808 | |
| 7-4-7 | Sullivan County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 4/10/1988 | 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808 | |
| 7-4-8 | Vermillion County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 4/10/1988 | 1/19/1989, 54 FR 2112 | |
| 7-4-9 | Floyd County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 4/10/1988 | 9/1/1988, 53 FR 33808 | |
| 7-4-10 | Warrick County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 8/30/2008 | 11/10/2009, 74 FR 57904 | |
| 7-4-11.1 | Morgan County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 7/5/2019 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49659 | |
| 7-4-12.1 | Gibson County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 12/5/1990 | 9/19/1994, 59 FR 47804 | |
| 7-4-13 | Dearborn County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 3/16/2005 | 2/28/2006, 71 FR 9936 | |
| 7-4-14 | Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 10/23/1988 | 1/19/1989, 54 FR 2112 | Only Sec. 14. (1). |
| 7-4-14 | Porter County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 3/31/2021 | 9/28/2023, 88 FR 66687 | Except Sec. 14. (1). |
| 7-4-15 | Pike County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 10/5/2015 | 8/17/2020, 85 FR 49967 | Only (a), (b), (d), and (e). EPA is approving a commissioner's order in place of (c). |
| Rule 4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations | ||||
| 7-4.1-1 | Lake County sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-2 | Sampling and analysis protocol | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-3 | BP Products North America Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-4 | Bucko Construction sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-5 | Cargill, Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 11/19/2010 | 4/14/2011, 76 FR 20846 | |
| 7-4.1-6 | Carmeuse Lime sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-7 | Cokenergy LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 8/24/2020 | 6/7/2021, 86 FR 30201 | |
| 7-4.1-8 | Indiana Harbor Coke Company sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 8/24/2020 | 6/7/2021, 86 FR 30201 | |
| 7-4.1-9 | Ironside Energy, LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-10 | ArcelorMittal USA LLC (Indiana Harbor West) sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 3/31/2021 | 9/28/2023, 88 FR 66687 | |
| 7-4.1-11 | ArcelorMittal USA LLC (Indiana Harbor East) sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 3/31/2021 | 9/28/2023, 88 FR 66687 | |
| 7-4.1-12 | Methodist Hospital sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-13 | National Recovery Systems sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-14 | NIPSCO Dean H. Mitchell Generating Station sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-15 | Rhodia sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-16 | Safety-Kleen Oil Recovery Company sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 8/11/2023 | 9/16/2024, 89 FR 75502 | |
| 7-4.1-17 | SCA Tissue North America LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-18 | State Line Energy, LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-19 | Unilever HPC USA sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 6/24/2005 | 9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129 | |
| 7-4.1-20 | U.S. Steel-Gary Works sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 2/21/2018 | 6/27/2019, 84 FR 30628 | |
| 7-4.1-21 | Walsh and Kelly sulfur dioxide emission limitations | 5/29/2015 | 9/11/2015, 80 FR 54723 | |
| Article 8. Volatile Organic Compound Rules | ||||
| Rule 1. General Provisions | ||||
| 8-1-0.5 | Definitions | 10/18/1995 | 11/3/1999, 64 FR 59642 | |
| 8-1-1 | Applicability | 6/5/1991 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 8-1-2 | Compliance methods | 12/15/2002 | 5/5/2003, 68 FR 23604 | |
| 8-1-3 | Compliance schedules | 5/15/2010 | 4/14/2011, 76 FR 20850 | |
| 8-1-4 | Testing procedures | 7/15/2001 | 9/11/2002, 67 FR 57515 | |
| 8-1-5 | Petition for site-specific reasonably available control technology (RACT) plan | 11/10/1988 | 9/6/1990, 55 FR 36635 | |
| 8-1-6 | New facilities; general reduction requirements | 6/24/2006 | 6/13/2007, 72 FR 32531 | |
| 8-1-7 | Military specifications | 10/27/1982, 47 FR 20586 | ||
| 8-1-9 | General recordkeeping and reporting requirements | 5/22/1997 | 6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141 | |
| 8-1-10 | Compliance certification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for certain coating facilities using compliant coatings | 5/22/1997 | 6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141 | |
| 8-1-11 | Compliance certification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for certain coating facilities using daily-weighted averaging | 5/22/1997 | 6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141 | |
| 8-1-12 | Compliance certification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for certain coating facilities using control devices | 5/22/1997 | 6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141 | |
| Rule 2. Surface Coating Emission Limitations | ||||
| 8-2-1 | Applicability | 11/19/2010 | 10/13/11, 76 FR 63549 | |
| 8-2-2 | Automobile and light duty truck coating operations | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-2-3 | Can coating operations | 2/10/1986, 51 FR 4912 | ||
| 8-2-4 | Coil coating operations | 10/27/1982, 47 FR 20586 | ||
| 8-2-5 | Paper coating operations | 12/3/2009 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-2-6 | Metal furniture coating operations | 12/3/2009 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-2-7 | Large appliance coating operations | 12/3/2009 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-2-8 | Magnet wire coating operations | 10/27/1982, 47 FR 20586 | ||
| 8-2-9 | Miscellaneous metal and plastic parts coating operations | 11/19/2010 | 10/13/11, 76 FR 63549 | |
| 8-2-10 | Flat wood panels; manufacturing operations | 12/3/2009 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-2-11 | Fabric and vinyl coating | 10/23/1988 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 8-2-12 | Wood furniture and cabinet coating | 4/10/1988 | 11/24/1990, 55 FR 39141 | |
| Rule 3. Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations | ||||
| 8-3-1 | Applicability and Exemptions | 1/4/2023 | 12/18/2023, 88 FR 87359 | |
| 8-3-2 | Cold cleaner degreaser control equipment and operating requirements | 6/9/2021 | 12/18/2023, 88 FR 87359 | |
| 8-3-3 | Open top vapor degreaser operation | 6/9/2021 | 12/18/2023, 88 FR 87359 | |
| 8-3-4 | Conveyorized degreaser control equipment and operating requirements | 6/9/2012 | 12/18/2023, 88 FR 87359 | |
| 8-3-5 | Cold cleaner degreaser operation and control (Repealed) | 3/1/2013 | 7/25/2014, 79 FR 43260 | |
| 8-3-6 | Open top vapor degreaser operation and control requirements (Repealed) | 3/1/2013 | 7/25/2014, 79 FR 43260 | |
| 8-3-7 | Conveyorized degreaser operation and control (Repealed) | 3/1/2013 | 7/25/2014, 79 FR 43260 | |
| 8-3-8 | Material requirements for cold cleaner degreasers | 6/9/2021 | 12/18/2023, 88 FR 87359 | |
| Rule 4. Petroleum Sources | ||||
| 8-4-1 | Applicability | 3/5/2015 | 6/9/2016, 81 FR 37160 | |
| 8-4-2 | Petroleum refineries | 1/18/1983, 48 FR 2127 | ||
| 8-4-3 | Petroleum liquid storage facilities | 2/10/1986, 51 FR 4912 | ||
| 8-4-4 | Bulk gasoline terminals | 1/18/1983, 48 FR 2127 | ||
| 8-4-5 | Bulk gasoline plants | 1/18/1983, 48 FR 2127 | ||
| 8-4-6 | Gasoline dispensing facilities | 3/5/2015 | 6/9/2016, 81 FR 37160 | |
| 8-4-7 | Gasoline transports | 11/5/1999 | 5/31/2002, 67 FR 38006 | |
| 8-4-8 | Leaks from petroleum refineries; monitoring; reports | 6/5/1991 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 8-4-9 | Leaks from transports and vapor collection systems; records | 11/5/1999 | 5/31/2002, 67 FR 38006 | |
| Rule 5. Miscellaneous Operations | ||||
| 8-5-1 | Applicability of rule | 3/22/2007 | 2/20/2008, 73 FR 9201 | |
| 8-5-2 | Asphalt paving rules | 2/10/1986, 51 FR 4912 | ||
| 8-5-3 | Synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing operations | 5/18/1990 | 3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082 | |
| 8-5-4 | Pneumatic rubber tire manufacturing | 1/18/1983, 48 FR 2124 | ||
| 8-5-5 | Graphic arts operations | 5/22/1997 | 6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141 | |
| 8-5-6 | Fuel grade ethanol production at dry mills | 3/22/2007 | 2/20/2008, 73 FR 9201 | |
| Rule 6. Organic Solvent Emission Limitations | ||||
| 8-6-1 | Applicability of rule | 1/18/1983, 48 FR 2124 | ||
| 8-6-2 | Emission limits; exemptions | 1/18/1983, 48 FR 2124 | ||
| Rule 7. Specific VOC Reduction Requirements for Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties | ||||
| 8-7-1 | Definitions | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-2 | Applicability | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-3 | Emission limits | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-4 | Compliance methods | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-5 | Compliance plan | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-6 | Certification, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for coating facilities | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-7 | Test methods and procedures | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-8 | General recordkeeping and reports | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-9 | Control system operation, maintenance, and testing | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| 8-7-10 | Control system monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting | 1/21/1995 | 7/5/1995, 60 FR 34856 | |
| Rule 8.2. Federal Standards Applicable to Certain Municipal Solid Waste Landfill | ||||
| 8-8.2 | Adoption of federal standards applicable to certain municipal solid waste landfills | 12/8/2021 | 8/16/2024, 89 FR 66607 | |
| Rule 9. Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels | ||||
| 8-9-1 | Applicability | 7/16/2018 | 5/23/2019, 84 FR 23723 | |
| 8-9-2 | Exemptions | 7/16/2018 | 5/23/2019, 84 FR 23723 | |
| 8-9-3 | Definitions | 7/16/2018 | 5/23/2019, 84 FR 23723 | |
| 8-9-4 | Standards | 7/16/2018 | 5/23/2019, 84 FR 23723 | |
| 8-9-5 | Testing and procedures | 7/16/2018 | 5/23/2019, 84 FR 23723 | |
| 8-9-6 | Record keeping and reporting requirements | 7/16/2018 | 5/23/2019, 84 FR 23723 | Includes supplemental information provided on 9/28/2018. |
| Rule 10. Automobile Refinishing | ||||
| 8-10-1 | Applicability | 8/13/1998 | 12/20/1999, 64 FR 7103 | |
| 8-10-2 | Definitions | 11/2/1995 | 6/13/1996, 61 FR 29965 | |
| 8-10-3 | Requirements | 5/23/1999 | 12/20/1999, 64 FR 71031 | |
| 8-10-4 | Means to limit volatile organic compound emissions | 11/2/1995 | 6/13/1996, 61 FR 29965 | |
| 8-10-5 | Work practice standards | 8/13/1998 | 12/20/1999, 64 FR 71031 | |
| 8-10-6 | Compliance procedures | 8/13/1998 | 12/20/1999, 64 FR 71031 | |
| 8-10-7 | Test procedures | 11/2/1995 | 6/13/1996, 61 FR 29965 | |
| 8-10-8 | Control system operation, maintenance, and monitoring (Repealed) | 11/2/1995 | 6/13/1996, 61 FR 29965 | |
| 8-10-9 | Recordkeeping and reporting | 8/13/1998 | 12/20/1999, 64 FR 71031 | |
| Rule 11. Wood Furniture Coating | ||||
| 8-11-1 | Applicability | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-2 | Definitions | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-3 | Emission limits | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-4 | Work practice standards | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-5 | Continuous compliance plan | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-6 | Compliance procedures and monitoring requirements | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-7 | Test procedures | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 5588 | |
| 8-11-8 | Recordkeeping requirements | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-9 | Reporting requirements | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| 8-11-10 | Provisions for sources electing to use emissions averaging | 1/4/1996 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55889 | |
| Rule 12. Shipbuilding or Ship Repair Operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties | ||||
| 8-12-1 | Applicability | 5/1/1996 | 1/22/1997, 62 FR 3216 | |
| 8-12-2 | Exemptions | 7/15/2001 | 4/1/2003, 68 FR 15664 | |
| 8-12-3 | Definitions | 5/1/1996 | 1/22/1997, 62 FR 3216 | |
| 8-12-4 | Volatile organic compound emissions limiting requirements | 06/21/2015 | 08/23/2016, 81 FR 57469 | |
| 8-12-5 | Compliance requirements | 7/15/2001 | 4/1/2003, 68 FR 15664 | |
| 8-12-6 | Test methods and procedures | 7/15/2001 | 4/1/2003, 68 FR 15664 | |
| 8-12-7 | Recordkeeping, notification, and reporting requirements | 7/15/2001 | 4/1/2003, 68 FR 15664 | |
| Rule 13. Sinter Plants | ||||
| 8-13-1 | Applicability | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| 8-13-2 | Definitions | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| 8-13-3 | Emission limit | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| 8-13-4 | Compliance requirements | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| 8-13-5 | Test procedures | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| 8-13-6 | Control measure operation, maintenance, and monitoring | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| 8-13-7 | Recordkeeping and reporting | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| 8-13-8 | Continuous emissions monitoring | 7/24/1998 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41350 | |
| Rule 14. Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings | ||||
| 8-14-1 | Applicability | 12/1/2010 | 8/30/2012, 77 FR 52606 | |
| 8-14-2 | Definitions | 12/1/2010 | 8/30/2012, 77 FR 52606 | |
| 8-14-3 | Standards for AIM coatings | 12/1/2010 | 8/30/2012, 77 FR 52606 | |
| 8-14-4 | Container labeling | 12/1/2010 | 8/30/2012, 77 FR 52606 | |
| 8-14-5 | Recordkeeping and reporting requirements | 12/1/2010 | 8/30/2012, 77 FR 52606 | |
| 8-14-6 | Compliance provisions and test methods | 12/1/2010 | 8/30/2012, 77 FR 52606 | |
| 8-14-7 | Application of traffic marking materials | 12/1/2010 | 8/30/2012, 77 FR 52606 | |
| Rule 15. Standards for Consumer and Commercial Products | ||||
| 8-15-1 | Applicability | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-2 | Definitions | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-3 | Standards | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-4 | Exemptions | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-5 | Innovative products exemption | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-6 | Alternative control plan | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-7 | Administrative requirements | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-8 | Record keeping and reporting requirements | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| 8-15-9 | Test methods | 12/1/2010 | 6/29/2012, 77 FR 38725 | |
| Rule 17. Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations | ||||
| 8-17-1 | Applicability | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-17-2 | Exemptions | 5/3/2012 | 12/27/2013, 78 FR 78726 | |
| 8-17-3 | “Composite partial vapor pressure” defined | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-17-4 | VOC emissions control requirements | 5/3/2012 | 12/27/2013, 78 FR 78726 | |
| 8-17-5 | Compliance dates | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-17-6 | Compliance test methods | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-17-7 | Monitoring and recordkeeping | 5/3/2012 | 12/27/2013, 78 FR 78726 | |
| 8-17-8 | Reporting requirements for monitoring and recordkeeping information | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-17-9 | Requirements on compliance certification | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| 8-17-10 | Recordkeeping requirements for exempt sources | 1/2/2010 | 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 | |
| Article 9. Carbon Monoxide Emission Rules | ||||
| 9-1 | Carbon Monoxide Emission Limits | 12/15/2002 | 11/30/2004, 69 FR 69531 | |
| Article 10. Nitrogen Oxides Rules | ||||
| 10-1 | Nitrogen Oxides Control in Clark and Floyd Counties | 6/12/1996 | 6/3/1997, 62 FR 30253 | |
| 10-2 | NOX Emissions from Large Affected Units | 10/21/2021 | 5/14/2026, 91 FR 27214 | |
| 10-3 | Nitrogen Oxide Reduction Program for Specific Source Categories | 8/26/2018 | 7/24/2020, 85 FR 44738 | |
| 10-5 | Nitrogen Oxide Reduction Program for Internal Combustion Engines (ICE) | 2/26/2006 | 10/1/2007, 72 FR 55664 | |
| 10-6 | Nitrogen Oxides Emission Limitations for Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company | 8/30/2008 | 11/10/2009, 74 FR 57904 | |
| Article 11. Emission Limitations for Specific Types of Operations | ||||
| 11-1 | Existing Foundries | 7/25/1968 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10863 | |
| 11-3 | Coke Oven Batteries | 9/26/1980 | 12/1/1983, 48 FR 54615 | Sec. 1, 3, 5. |
| 6/11/1993 | 6/15/1995, 60 FR 31412 | Sec. 2(a)-(f), 2(i), 4. | ||
| 11-4 | Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing | 9/26/1980 | 4/3/1984, 49 FR 13144 | Sec. 1, 2, 3, 4. |
| 9/27/2002 | 12/9/2002, 67 FR 72844 | Sec. 5. | ||
| 11-5 | Fluoride Emission Limitations for Existing Primary Aluminum Plants | 2/6/1981 | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57892 | |
| Article 13. Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards | ||||
| 13-1.1 | Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Requirements | 1/22/1999 | 9/27/2001, 66 FR 49297 | |
| 13-3 | Control of Gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure | 12/15/2002 | 7/21/2003, 68 FR 42978 | Sec. 1. |
| 8/5/1995 | 2/9/1996, 61 FR 4895 | Sec. 2 to 7. | ||
| Article 14. Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants | ||||
| 14-1 | General Provisions | 5/13/1988 | 9/17/1992, 57 FR 42889 | |
| 14-8 | Emission Standard for Equipment Leaks (Fugitive Emission Sources) | 5/13/1988 | 9/17/1992, 57 FR 42889 | |
| 14-9 | Emission Limitations for Benzene from Furnace Coke Oven By-Product Recovery Plants | 5/13/1988 | 9/17/1992, 57 FR 42889 | |
| Article 15. Lead Rules | ||||
| Rule 1. Lead Emission Limitations | ||||
| 15-1-2 | Source-specific provisions | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 15-1-3 | Control of fugitive lead dust | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 15-1-4 | Compliance | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| Article 16. State Environmental Policy | ||||
| 16-3 | General Conformity | 7/6/1996 | 1/14/1998, 63 FR 2146 | Sec. 1. |
| Article 19. Mobile Source Rules | ||||
| 19-3 | Clean Fuel Fleet Vehicles | 1/18/1996 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11552 | |
| Article 20. Hazardous Air Pollutants | ||||
| Rule 10 Bulk Gasoline Distribution Facilities | ||||
| 20-10-1 | Applicability; incorporation by reference of federal standards | 11/14/1999 | 5/31/2002, 67 FR 38006 | |
| Rule 20-13.1 Secondary Lead Smelters | ||||
| 20-13.1-1 | Applicability | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | Sections (a)-(c), (e), and (f) |
| 20-13.1-2 | Definitions | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 20-13.1-3 | Emission limitations; lead standards for Exide Technologies, Incorporation | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 20-13.1-4 | Emission limitations; lead standards for Quemetco, Incorporated | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 20-13.1-5 | Emission limitations and operating provisions | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | Sections (a)-(c), (e), and (h) |
| 20-13.1-6 | Total enclosure requirements | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 20-13.1-7 | Total enclosure monitoring requirements | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 20-13.1-8 | Fugitive dust source requirements | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 20-13.1-9 | Bag leak detection system requirements | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | |
| 20-13.1-10 | Other requirements | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | Sections (a)-(d), (f) and (g) |
| 20-13.1-11 | Compliance testing | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | Sections (a)-(c), and (f) |
| 20-13.1-12 | Compliance testing methods | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | Section (a) |
| 20-13.1-13 | Notification requirements | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | Sections (b)-(d) |
| 20-13.1-14 | Record keeping and reporting requirements | 3/1/2013 | 7/17/2015, 80 FR 42393 | Sections (a)-(d), (e)(1), and (e)(4)-(e)(14) |
| Article 24. Trading Programs: Nitrogen Oxides (NO X ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) | ||||
| Rule 5. Nitrogen Oxides (NO X ) Annual Trading Program | ||||
| 24-5-1 | Applicability and incorporation by reference | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-5-2 | CSAPR NOX annual trading budget | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-5-3 | CSAPR NOX annual allocation timing | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-5-4 | Baseline heat input and historic emissions | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-5-5 | Existing unit allocations and adjustments | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-5-6 | New unit allocations | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-5-7 | Unallocated new unit set-aside allowances | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| Rule 6. Nitrogen Oxides (NO X ) Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program | ||||
| 24-6-1 | Applicability and incorporation by reference | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-6-2 | CSAPR NOX ozone season group 2 trading budget | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-6-3 | CSAPR NOX ozone season group 2 allocation timing | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-6-4 | Baseline heat input and historic emissions | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-6-5 | Existing unit allocations and adjustments | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-6-6 | New unit allocations | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-6-7 | Unallocated new unit set-aside allowances | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| Rule 7. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Group 1 Trading Program | ||||
| 24-7-1 | Applicability and incorporation by reference | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-7-2 | CSAPRSO2 group 1 trading budget | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-7-3 | CSAPR SO2 group 1 allocation timing | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-7-4 | Baseline heat input and historic emissions | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-7-5 | Existing unit allocations and adjustments | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-7-6 | New unit allocations | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| 24-7-7 | Unallocated new unit set-aside allowances | 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | |
| Article 26. Regional Haze | ||||
| Rule 2. Best Available Retrofit Technology Emission Limitations | ||||
| 26-2-1 | Applicability | 3/9/2011 | 6/11/2012, 77 FR 34218 | |
| 26-2-2 | Alcoa emission limitations and compliance methods | 6/29/2014 | 8/20/2015, 80 FR 50581 | |
| State Statutes | ||||
| IC 13-13-8 | Environmental Rules Board | 1/1/2013 | 12/24/2013, 78 FR 77599 | 1, 2(a), 2(b), 3, 4, and 11 only. |
| 1 EPA is approving this rule for the counties of Adams, Allen, Bartholomew, Benton, Blackford, Boone, Brown, Carroll, Cass, Clay, Clinton, Crawford, Daviess, Dearborn, Decatur, De Kalb, Delaware, Dubois, Elkhart, Fayette, Fountain, Franklin, Fulton, Gibson, Grant, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Harrison, Hendricks, Henry, Howard, Huntington, Jackson, Jasper, Jay, Jefferson, Jennings, Johnson, Knox, Kosciusko, La Porte, Lagrange, Lawrence, Madison, Marion, Marshall, Martin, Miami, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Newton, Noble, Ohio, Orange, Owen, Parke, Perry, Pike, Posey, Pulaski, Putnam, Randolph, Ripley, Rush, St. Joseph, Scott, Shelby, Spencer, Starke, Steuben, Sullivan, Switzerland, Tippecanoe, Tipton, Union, Vanderburgh, Vermillion, Vigo, Wabash, Warren, Warrick, Washington, Wayne, Wells, White, and Whitley. |
(d) EPA approved State source-specific requirements.
| CO date | Title | SIP rule | EPA approval | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/11/2016 | A.B. Brown Generating Station | N.A. | 5/6/2016, 81 FR 27330 | Limitation intended to support attainment designation. |
| 10/1/1999 | ALCOA-Warrick | 5-1-2 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41352 (also see 64 FR 40287) | Alt. opacity limits (permit). |
| 12/15/1999 | ALCOA-Warrick | 5-1-2 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41352 (also see 64 FR 40287) | Alt. opacity limits (permit). |
| 2/1/2016 | Clifty Creek Generating Station | N.A. | 5/6/2016, 81 FR 27330 | Limitation intended to support attainment designation. |
| 10/12/1999 | Crane Naval | 8-2-9 | 12/31/2002, 67 FR 79859 | Exemption. |
| 2/11/2004 | Eli Lilly | 8-5-3 | 11/8/2004, 69 FR 64661 | Exemption. |
| 12/22/2004 | Transwheel | 8-3-5(a)(5)(C) | 4/12/2005, 70 FR 19000 | Equivalent control. |
| 9/8/2015 | Abengoa Bioenergy of Indiana | N.A. | 8/12/2016, 81 FR 53297 | Alternative control technology requirements. |
| 10/20/2016 | SABIC Innovative Plastics | N.A | 5/10/2017, 82 FR 21703 | Limitation intended to support attainment designation. |
| 11/16/2016 | Carmeuse Lime Inc | N.A | 5/10/2017, 82 FR 21708 | Limitation intended to support attainment designation. |
| 7/31/2019 | IP&L-Petersburg | 7-4-15 | 8/17/2020, 85 FR 49967 | 30-day average limits. |
| 2/12/2024 | Isolatek International | N.A | 8/14/2025, 90 FR 39130 | Limitations to support attainment plan. |
| 2/26/2025 | Keystone Automotives Industries | 8-3-2 | 5/29/2026, 91 FR 31939 | Equivalent control. |
(e) EPA approved nonregulatory and quasi-regulatory provisions.
| Title | Indiana date | EPA approval | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allen County 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan | 2/25/2014, 79 FR 10385 | Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets. | |
| Carbon Monoxide Control Strategy—Lake and Porter Co | 1/19/2000, 65 FR 2883 | Paragraph (b). | |
| Carbon Monoxide Control Strategy—Lake and Marion Cos | 1 1/12/2009 | 10/15/2009, 74 FR 52891 | Paragraph (c). |
| Chicago Hydrocarbon Control Strategy | 8/26/2004, 69 FR 52427 | Paragraph (aa). | |
| Chicago-Gary Hydrocarbon Control Strategy | 12/30/2008, 73 FR 79652 | Paragraph (kk). | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN (Dearborn County (part)) | 6/20/2019 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68049 | 2nd maintenance plan. |
| Control Strategy: Particulate Matter | 11/27/2009, 74 FR 62243 | Paragraph (s). | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Evansville, IN (Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties) | 6/20/2019 | 12/27/2019, 84 FR 71306 | 2nd limited maintenance plan. |
| Evansville/Southwest Indiana Area 1997 annual fine particulate matter maintenance plan | 3/19/2014, 79 FR 15224 | Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets. | |
| Fluoride Emission Limitations for Existing Primary Aluminum Plants | 3/11/2003, 68 FR 11472 | Removed from SIP, replaced by NESHAP. | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Fort Wayne, IN (Allen County) | 6/20/2019 | 12/27/2019, 84 FR 71306 | 2nd limited maintenance plan. |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Jackson Co., IN (Jackson County) | 6/20/2019 | 12/27/2019, 84 FR 71306 | 2nd limited maintenance plan. |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Greene Co., IN (Greene County) | 6/20/2019 | 12/27/2019, 84 FR 71306 | 2nd limited maintenance plan. |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Indianapolis, IN (Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Madison, Marion, Morgan, and Shelby Counties) | 6/20/2019 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68049 | 2nd maintenance plan. |
| Indianapolis 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Attainment Plan | 10/2/2015 | 3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692 | |
| Indianapolis 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) maintenance plan | 7/10/2017 | 5/21/2020, 85 FR 30844 | |
| Lake County sulfur dioxide maintenance plan | 3/28/2013 | 9/3/2013, 78 FR 54173 | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN (Lake and Porter Counties) | 6/20/2019 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68049 | 2nd maintenance plan. |
| Lake and Porter Counties 1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plan | 2/1/2013 | 5/15/2013, 78 FR 28503 | Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets. |
| Lake and Porter Counties 2008 8-hour Ozone Moderate Planning Elements | 2/28/2017, 1/9/2018, and 10/25/2018 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68050 | 2011 base year emissions inventory, Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) plan, RFP contingency measure plan, 2017 VOC and NOX motor vehicle emissions budgets, nonattainment new source review certification, VOC RACT Certification, and enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program certification. |
| Lake and Porter Counties 2008 8-hour Ozone Negative Declarations | 10/25/2018 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68050 | Includes: Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG and Oil and Gas Industry CTG. |
| Lake and Porter Counties 2008 8-hour Ozone Serious Planning Elements | 12/29/2020 | 5/20/2022, 87 FR 30821 | 2030 and 2035 VOC and NOX motor vehicle emissions budgets, VOC RACT certification, Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program certification, clean-fuel vehicle programs certification, enhanced monitoring of ozone and ozone precursors certification. |
| Lake and Porter Counties 2008 8-hour Ozone NOX RACT Waiver | 1/18/2022 | 5/20/2022, 87 FR 30821 | |
| Lake and Porter Counties 2008 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan | 9/21/2023 | 1/19/2024, 89 FR 3571 | Updated Onroad Emissions Inventory and Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets. |
| Clark and Floyd Counties 2015 8-hour Ozone Emission Inventory | 1/21/2021 | 7/5/2022, 87 FR 39750 | |
| Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties 2015 8-hour Ozone Emission Statement | 1/21/2021 | 7/5/2022, 87 FR 39750 | |
| Clark and Floyd Counties 2015 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan | 2/21/2022 | 7/5/2022, 87 FR 39750 | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): LaPorte CO., IN (LaPorte County) | 6/20/2019 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68049 | 2nd maintenance plan. |
| Lead Control Strategy—Marion County | 5/10/2000, 65 FR 29959 | Paragraph (d). | |
| Lead Control Strategy—Marion County | 1 4/1/2009 | 9/24/2009, 74 FR 48659 | Paragraph (e). |
| Louisville 1997 Annual PM2.5 Maintenance Plan | 6/16/2011 | 9/9/2016, 81 FR 62390 | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Louisville, KY-IN (Clark and Floyd Counties) | 6/20/2019 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68049 | 2nd maintenance plan. |
| Morgan County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Attainment Plan | 10/2/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49659 | |
| Morgan County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Maintenance Plan | 10/10/2019, 5/5/2020 | 9/16/2020, 85 FR 57736 | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Muncie, IN (Delaware County) | 6/20/2019 | 12/27/2019, 84 FR 71306 | 2nd limited maintenance plan. |
| Muncie 2008 lead emissions inventory | 4/14/2016 | 5/15/2020, 85 FR 29331 | |
| Muncie 2008 lead maintenance plan | 4/14/2016 | 5/15/2020, 85 FR 29331 | |
| Ozone Monitoring Season | 2/19/1991 | 12/10/1991, 56 FR 64482. | |
| PM10 Maintenance Plan for Lake County | 9/25/2002 | 1/10/2003, 68 FR 1370 | Paragraph (r), also redesignation. |
| Particulate Control Strategy—Vermillion County | 8/26/1997, 62 FR 45168 | Paragraph (q). | |
| Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report | 3/30/2016 | 2/2/2018, 83 FR 4847 | |
| Regional Haze Plan | 11/27/2017 | 9/6/2019, 84 FR 46889 | Full Approval. |
| Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period | 12/29/2021 | 1/26/2026, 91 FR 3057 | Full approval. |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | 12/7/2007, 9/19/2008, 3/23/2011, 4/7/2011, and 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | All CAA infrastructure elements have been approved except the visibility portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | 12/7/2007, 9/19/2008, 3/23/2011, 4/7/2011, and 11/24/2017 | 12/17/2018, 83 FR 64472 | All CAA infrastructure elements have been approved except the visibility portion of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS | 10/20/2009, 6/25/2012, 7/12/2012, 5/22/2013, and 11/27/2017 | 9/6/2019, 84 FR 46889 | Full Approval. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead NAAQS | 12/12/2011 | 10/16/2014, 79 FR 62035 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(I), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | 12/12/2011 and 11/27/2017 | 9/6/2019, 84 FR 46889 | Full Approval. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS | 11/2/2018 | 2/13/2023, 88 FR 9336 | All CAA infrastructure elements have been approved except (D)(i)(I) Prongs 1 and 2, which are disapproved, and no action has been taken on the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS | 11/2/2018 | 11/2/2022, 87 FR 66091 | All CAA infrastructure elements have been approved except (D)(i)(I) and the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS | 1/15/2013 and 11/27/2017 | 9/6/2019, 84 FR 46889 | Full Approval. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS | 5/22/2013 and 11/27/2017 | 9/6/2019, 84 FR 46889 | All elements have been addressed except: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS | 6/10/2016 and 12/28/2016 | 10/8/2019, 84 FR 53601 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Small Business Compliance Assistance Program | 9/2/1993, 58 FR 46541. | ||
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): South Bend-Elkhart, IN (Elkhart and St. Joseph Counties) | 6/20/2019 | 12/13/2019, 84 FR 68049 | 2nd maintenance plan. |
| Southwest Indiana 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Attainment Plan | 10/2/2015 | 8/17/2020, 85 FR 49967 | |
| Southwest Indiana Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Maintenance Plan | 10/24/2018, 8/25/2020 | 3/2/2021, 86 FR 12107 | |
| Sulfur Dioxide Control Strategy—LaPorte, Marion, Vigo, and Wayne Counties | 11/15/1996, 61 FR 58482 | Paragraph (f) and (g). | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 1997): Terre Haute, IN (Vigo County) | 6/20/2019 | 12/27/2019, 84 FR 71306 | 2nd limited maintenance plan. |
| Terre Haute 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Attainment Plan | 10/2/2015 | 3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692 | |
| Terre Haute 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) maintenance plan | 7/8/2019, 84 FR 32317 | ||
| Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan | 2/25/2014, 79 FR 10385 | Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets. | |
| Vigo County 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan | 2/25/2014, 79 FR 10385 | Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets. | |
| Huntington County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Attainment Plan | 11/6/2023 | 8/14/2025, 90 FR 39130 | Full approval. |
| Huntington County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Maintenance Plan | 07/30/2024 | 01/9/2026, 91 FR 911 |
[75 FR 58307, Sept. 24, 2010]
§ 52.771 Classification of regions.
(a) The Indiana plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons) | |
| East Central Indiana Intrastate | II | II | III | III | III |
| Evansville (Indiana)-Owensboro-Henderson (Kentucky) Interstate | I | II | III | III | III |
| Louisville Interstate | I | I | III | III | I |
| Metropolitan Chicago Interstate (Indiana-Illinois) | I | I | I | I | I |
| Metropolitan Cincinnati Interstate | I | II | III | III | I |
| Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate | I | I | I | I | I |
| Northeast Indiana Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
| South Bend-Elkhart (Indiana)-Benton Harbor (Michigan) Interstate | I | IA | III | III | III |
| Southern Indiana Intrastate | IA | IA | III | III | III |
| Wabash Valley Intrastate | I | I | III | III | III |
(b) The requirements of § 51.150 of this chapter are not met by the classification of counties in APC-22 for the purposes of attainment and maintenance of the total suspended particulate ambient air quality standards.
(c) The requirements of § 51.150 of this chapter are not met by the classification of counties in APC-22 for the purposes of attainment and maintenance of the photochemical oxidant (hydrocarbon) ambient air quality standards.
(d) The requirements of § 51.150 of this chapter are not met by the classification of Jefferson, LaPorte, Porter, Vigo and Warrick Counties in Indiana in Regulation APC-22 for the purposes of attainment and maintenance of the sulfur dioxide ambient air quality standards.
[37 FR 10863, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974; 40 FR 50033, Oct. 28, 1975; 41 FR 35677, Aug. 24, 1976; 42 FR 34519, July 6, 1977; 51 FR 40675, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.772 [Reserved]
§ 52.773 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves Indiana's plan for attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) The Administrator finds that Indiana's new source review strategy satisfies all requirements of Part D, Title 1 of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977.
(d)-(e) [Reserved]
(f) The Administrator finds ozone strategies for Clark, Elkhart, Floyd, Lake, Marion, Porter, and St. Joseph Counties satisfy all requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act that are required to be submitted by January 1, 1981, except as noted below.
(g) The administrator finds that the total suspended particulate strategies for Clark, Dearborn, Dubois, St. Joseph, Vanderburgh, and Vigo Counties satisfy all the requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act except as noted below.
(h) The Administrator finds that the SO2 strategies for Lake, LaPorte, Marion, Vigo, and Wayne Counties satisfy all requirements of Part D, Title 1 of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977. See § 52.770 (c)(67) and (c)(72).
(i) The Administrator finds that Indiana's ozone plan for Lake and Porter Counties, which was required to be submitted by July 1, 1992, does not satisfy all the requirements of part D, title 1 of the Clean Air Act and, thus, is disapproved. See §§ 52.770(c)(69)and 52.770(d). The disapproval does not affect USEPA's approval (or conditional approval) of individual parts of Indiana's ozone plan and they remain approved.
(j) The Administrator finds that the following portions of Indiana's ozone and CO plans satisfy the related requirements of part D, title 1 of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977:
(1) The transportation control plans for Lake, Porter, Clark and Floyd Counties, submitted on May 14, 1986, June 10, 1986, and April 6, 1987.
(2) The vehicle inspection and maintenance plan for Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties, submitted October 27, 1989, and January l9, 1990.
(3) The demonstration of attainment, submitted December 2, 1983, and the carbon monoxide plan as a whole for the designated nonattainment area in Lake County.
[37 FR 10864, May 31, 1972, as amended at 46 FR 38, Jan. 2, 1981; 47 FR 6275, Feb. 11, 1982; 47 FR 6623, Feb. 16, 1982; 47 FR 10825, Mar. 12, 1982; 47 FR 20586, May 13, 1982; 47 FR 30980, July 16, 1982; 51 FR 4915, Feb. 10, 1986; 53 FR 33811, Sept. 1, 1988; 53 FR 46613, Nov. 18, 1988; 54 FR 2118, Jan. 19, 1989; 55 FR 31052, July 31, 1990; 59 FR 51114, Oct. 7, 1994; 75 FR 82554, Dec. 30, 2010; 76 FR 59901, Sept. 28, 2011]
§ 52.774 Determination of attainment.
(a) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007-2009, EPA determined that the Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana PM2.5 nonattainment Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the Area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the Area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Louisville PM2.5 nonattainment Area is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
(b) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007-2009, EPA determined that the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana PM2.5 nonattainment Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the Area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the Area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana PM2.5 nonattainment Area is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
(c) Based upon air quality modeling, EPA determined that the Huntington County sulfur dioxide (SO2) nonattainment area failed to attain the 2010 SO2 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 9, 2023. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the Area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the Area attained the standard. EPA also determined that Indiana has met the requirements resulting from failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d) for the Huntington County SO2 nonattainment area.
[76 FR 55545, Sept. 7, 2011, as amended at 76 FR 60375, Sept. 29, 2011; 90 FR 39132, Aug. 14, 2025]
§ 52.775 Legal authority.
(a) The requirements of § 51.232(b) of this chapter are not met since the following deficiencies exist in the local agency legal authority:
(1) East Chicago: (i) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(2) Evansville: (i) Authority to prevent construction, modification, or operation of any stationary source at any location where emissions from such source will prevent the attainment or maintenance of a national standard is inadequate (§ 51.230(d) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(iii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(3) Gary: (i) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(4) Hammond: (i) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(5) Indianapolis: (i) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(6) Michigan City: (i) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(7) Wayne County: (i) Authority to require recordkeeping and to make inspections and conduct tests of air pollution sources is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(iii) Authority to prevent construction, modification, or operation of any stationary source at any location where emissions from such source will prevent the attainment or maintenance of a national standard is inadequate (§ 51.230(d) of this chapter).
(8) Lake County: (i) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to prevent construction, modification, or operation of any stationary source at any location where emissions from such source will prevent the attainment or maintenance of a national standard is inadequate (§ 51.230(d) of this chapter).
(9) St. Joseph County: (i) Authority to prevent construction, modification, or operation of any stationary source at any location where emissions from such source will prevent the attainment or maintenance of a national standard is inadequate (§ 51.230(d) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(iii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(10) Vigo County: (i) Authority to require recordkeeping is inadequate (§ 51.230(e) of this chapter).
(ii) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(iii) Authority to prevent construction, modification, or operation of any stationary source at any location where emissions from such source will prevent the attainment or maintenance of a national standard is inadequate (§ 51.230(d) of this chapter).
(11) Anderson County: (i) Authority to require installation of monitoring devices is inadequate (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
[37 FR 10863, May 31, 1972, as amended at 40 FR 55329, Nov. 28, 1975; 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986; 52 FR 24367, June 30, 1987]
§ 52.776 Control strategy: Particulate matter.
(a) The requirements of subpart G of this chapter are not met since the plan does not provide for attainment and maintenance of the secondary standards for particulate matter in the Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate Region.
(b) APC 4-R of Indiana's “Air Pollution Control Regulations” (emission limitation for particulate matter from fuel combustion sources), which is part of the control strategy for the secondary standards for particulate matter, is disapproved for the Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate Region since it does not provide the degree of control needed to attain and maintain the secondary standards for particulate matter. APC 4-R is approved for attainment and maintenance of the primary standards for particulate matter in the Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate Region.
(c) APC-3 of Indiana's Air Pollution Control Regulations (visible emission limitation) is disapproved insofar as the phrase “for more than a cumulative total of 15 minutes in a 24-hour period” will interfere with attainment and maintenance of particulate standards.
(d) [Reserved]
(e) Part D—Conditional Approval—The complete Indiana plan for Clark, Dearborn, Dubois, Marion (except for coke batteries), St. Joseph, Vanderburgh, and Vigo Counties is approved provided that the following condition is satisfied:
(1) The Part D Plan must contain Industrial Fugitive Dust Regulations. The State must submit these by July 31, 1982.
(f) 325 IAC 11-3-2(f), (as amended on August 27, 1981) is not approved as it applies to Lake and Marion Counties, insofar as it does not meet the requirements of section 172(b)(3) of the Clean Air Act.
(g) 325 IAC 11-3-2(g) and 11-3-2(h) (as amended on August 27, 1981) are disapproved insofar as they do not meet the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D) of the Clean Air Act.
(h) Equivalent Visible Emission Limits (EVEL). (1) A 20% 2-hour opacity limit for the underfire stack at Bethlehem Steel Corporation's Coke Battery No. 2 in Porter County is approved as an EVEL to determine compliance with the 325 IAC 6-2 SIP limit of 0.33 lbs/MMBTU. This EVEL is approved for as long as the SIP mass emission limit for this source remains the same as determined by 325 IAC 6-2 (October 6, 1980, submittal). See § 52.770(c)(6), (35), and (42).
(2) Revised opacity limits for the boilers at Olin Corporation in Warren County are approved at § 52.770(c)(51) as an EVEL to determine compliance with the 325 IAC 6-2 SIP limit of 0.80 lbs/MMBTU. This EVEL is approved for as long as the SIP mass emission limit for this source remains the same as determined by 325 IAC 6-2 (October 6, 1980 submittal). See § 52.770(c)(6) and (35).
(i) 325 IAC 6-2.1 is approved with the State's March 27, 1985, commitment that any “bubble” approved by the State under 325 IAC 6-2.1-2(b) and 3(b) will also be subject to the State's general “bubble” regulation, 325 IAC 2-4. The State additionally committed that until such time as 325 IAC 2-4 is approved as a part of the SIP, all such limits approved under the bubbling provisions of 325 IAC 6-2.1-2(b) and 3(b) will be submitted as site specific revisions to the SIP. Unless and until these emission point specific limits are approved as a portion of the SIP, the SIP limit for each individual emission point will remain the general limit calculated by means of the formulae in 325 IAC 6-2.1-2(a) and 3(a), even though a revised emission point specific limit has been adopted by Indiana under 325 IAC 6-2.1-2(b) and 3(b). See 52.770(c)(50).
(j) [Reserved]
(k) On January 18, 1984, Indiana submitted a visible emission limit on coke oven battery doors and a limit on total dissolved solids content of coke quench makeup water for Battery Number One at Citizens Gas and Coke Utility in Marion County. These limits are disapproved because they are impermissible relaxations of requirements for each new major stationary sources, as provided at § 52.21(j)(2) and section 173 of the Clean Air Act. See § 52.770(c)(60).
(l) The revised Porter County TSP plan, as submitted by Indiana on October 15, 1984, is disapproved, because the State did not demonstrate that it assures the attainment and maintenance of the primary TSP NAAQS in Porter County, Indiana. See § 52.770(c)(61).
(m) The Indiana Part D TSP plan is disapproved insofar as it does not contain RACT level opacity limits for certain process fugitive sources in TSP nonattainment areas and, therefore, does not meet the requirements of section 172 of the Clean Air Act.
(n) Approval—On June 23, 1988, and July 17, 1989, the State of Indiana submitted committal SIPs for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 micrometers (PM10) for the Group II areas within Marion and Vigo Counties and all of Porter County, respectively. The committal SIPs meet all the requirements identified in the July 1, 1987, promulgation of the SIP requirements for PM10 at 52 FR 24681.
(o) Approval—On November 16, 1988 and September 10, 1992, Indiana submitted the following list of control measures for particulate matter (PM) already in its State Implementation Plan as a Group III Plan: 326 IAC 1-3-2, its air monitoring network, its list of possible additional sites for PM, its Prevention of Significant Deterioration rules and the following control measures which are part of 325 IAC: 2, Permit Review Rules; 5-1, Opacity Limitations; 6-1-1 to 6-1-6, Nonattainment Area Limitations; 6-1-8, Dearborn County; 6-1-9, Dubois County; 6-1-12, Marion County; 6-1-13, Vigo County; 6-1-14, Wayne County; 6-1-15, Howard County; 6-1-16, Vandenburgh County; 6-1-17, Clark County; 6-1-18, St. Joseph County; 6-2, Particulate Emissions Limitations for Sources of Indirect Heating; 6-3, Process Operations; 6-4, Fugitive Dust Emissions; 11-1, Existing Foundries; 11-4, Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing; 11-5, Fluoride Emission Limitations for Existing Primary Aluminum Plants.
(p) Approval—On January 13, 1993, the State of Indiana submitted a particulate matter State Implementation Plan revision for the Vermillion County nonattainment area. Additional information was submitted on February 22, 1993, and April 8, 1993. These materials demonstrate that the plan will provide for attainment of the National ambient air quality standards for particulate matter by December 31, 1994, in accordance with section 189(a)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act.
(q) Approval—On April 8, 1993, and supplemented on June 17, 1997, the State of Indiana submitted a maintenance plan and a request that sections 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28, 33 and 34 of Clinton Township in Vermillion County be redesignated to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter. The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(r) Approval—EPA is approving the PM10 maintenance plan for Lake County that Indiana submitted on September 25, 2002.
(s) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of November 27, 2009, that the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN PM2.5 nonattainment area, which includes Lake and Porter counties in IN, and the Evansville nonattainment area have attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. These determinations, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspend the requirements for these areas to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress, contingency measures, and other plan elements related to attainment of the standard for as long as the area(s) continue to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(t) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of March 9, 2011, that the Louisville, IN-KY PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. These determinations, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspend the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress, contingency measures, and other plan elements related to attainment of the standards for as long as the area continues to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(u) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving the portions of Indiana's Infrastructure SIP for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS addressing interstate transport, specifically with respect to section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
(v) Approval—The 1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plans for the following areas have been approved:
(1) The Evansville area (Dubois, Vanderburgh, and Warrick Counties, and portions of Gibson, Pike, and Spencer Counties), as submitted on April 8, 2011. The maintenance plan establishes 2015 motor vehicle emission budgets for the Evansville area of 2628.35 tons per year for NOX and 57.05 tons per year for PM2.5, and 2022 motor vehicle emission budgets of 1869.84 tons per year for NOX and 53.83 tons per year for PM2.5.
(2) The Indianapolis area (Hamilton, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion and Morgan Counties), as submitted on October 20, 2009, and supplemented on May 31, 2011, January 17, 2013, and March 18, 2013. The maintenance plan establishes 2015 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Indianapolis area of 853.76 tpy for primary PM2.5 and 25,314.49 tpy for NOX and 2025 motor vehicle emissions budgets of 460.18 tpy for primary PM2.5 and 13,368.60 tpy for NOX.
(3) The Indiana portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton nonattainment area (Lawrenceburg Township in Dearborn County), as submitted on December 9, 2010. The maintenance plan establishes 2015 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton area of 1,678.60 tpy for primary PM2.5 and 35,723.83 tpy for NOX and 2021 motor vehicle emissions budgets of 1,241.19 tpy for primary PM2.5 and 21,747.71 tpy for NOX.
(4) Approval—On February 1, 2013, Indiana submitted a request to revise the motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Lake and Porter County, Indiana maintenance area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2015 motor vehicle emissions budgets for Lake and Porter County, Indiana are 347.30 tpy PM2.5 and 10,486.08 tpy NOX. The 2025 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Lake and Porter County area are 188.73 tpy PM2.5 and 5,472.34 tpy for NOX.
(5) Approval—On July 2, 2013 Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 annual fine particulate matter maintenance plan for the Evansville maintenance area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2015 motor vehicle emissions budgets are 199.93 tpy PM2.5 and 5,642.95 tpy NOX. The 2022 motor vehicle emissions budgets are 100.45 tpy PM2.5 and 3,173 tpy NOX.
(6) Approval—The 1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Indiana portion of the Louisville (KY-IN) (Madison Township, Jefferson County and Clark and Floyd Counties), has been approved as submitted on June 16, 2011. The maintenance plan establishes 2025 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Louisville area to be 324.04 tpy for primary PM2.5 and 9,311.76 tpy for NOX.
(w) Approval—The 1997 annual PM2.5 comprehensive emissions inventories for the following areas have been approved:
(1) Indiana's 2005 NOX, directly emitted PM2.5, and SO2 emissions inventory satisfies the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) for the Evansville area.
(2) Indiana's 2006 NOX, primary PM2.5, and SO2 emissions inventories and 2007/2008 VOC and ammonia emission inventories, as submitted on October 20, 2009 and supplemented on May 31, 2011 and March 18, 2013, satisfy the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for the Indianapolis area.
(3) Indiana's 2005 NOX, directly emitted PM2.5, and SO2 emissions inventory; and 2007 VOCs and ammonia emissions inventory, satisfy the emissions inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) for the Cincinnati-Hamilton area.
(4) Indiana's 2005 NOX, primary PM2.5, and SO2 emissions inventory satisfies the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for Lake and Porter Counties.
(5) Indiana's 2008 NOX, directly emitted PM2.5, SO2, VOC, and ammonia emissions inventory satisfies the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) for the Louisville area.
(x) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of September 29, 2011, that based upon 2007-2009 air quality data, the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana, nonattainment Area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 52.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this Area continues to meet the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
(y) Approval-By submittal dated July 3, 2008, Indiana demonstrated satisfaction of the requirements for reasonably available control measures for its portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN area.
[37 FR 15084, July 27, 1972]
§ 52.777 Control strategy: photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons).
(a) The requirements of subpart G of this chapter are not met because the plan does not provide for attainment and maintenance of the national standards for photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons) in the Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate Region by May 31, 1975.
(b) The requirements of subpart G are not met by Revised APC-15 (November 8, 1974 submission) because it does not provide for attainment and maintenance of the photochemical oxidant (hydrocarbon) standards throughout Indiana.
(c) Part D—Conditional approval—The 1979 Indiana plan for Clark, Floyd, Elkhart, Lake, Marion, Porter, and St. Joseph Counties is approved provided the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) The plan for stationary source volatile organic compound control must contain the following:
(i)-(iv) [Reserved]
(v) For regulation 325 IAC 8-5, Section 6, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning, the State must conduct a study to demonstrate that the 1,500 gallons exemption meets RACT requirements and submit the results to EPA within 6 months of the effective date of final rulemaking on 325 IAC 8 for VOC from Group II CTG source categories. If the demonstrated emissions resulting from the State's exemption are not essentially equivalent to those resulting from the RACT requirements, then the State must submit to EPA by July 1, 1983, a rule which requires control of emissions from dry cleaning sources using less than 1,500 gallons of perchloroethylene per year.
(2) The stationary source volatile organic control measures submitted by the State on October 23, 1990, and August 19, 1991, are approved as described in 40 CFR 52.770(c)(87) with the exception of 326 IAC 8-5-4 Pneumatic Rubber Tire Manufacturing, on which USEPA has taken no action. It should be noted that although the State's control measures provide that equivalent test methods, alternative emission controls, and revisions in rule applicability must be submitted to the USEPA as proposed revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP), such proposed SIP revisions are not part of the SIP unless and until they are approved as such by the USEPA.
(d) Part D—Disapproval. The 1982 Indiana plan for Lake and Porter County is disapproved because it does not assure the attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS there. See §§ 52.770(c)(69) and 52.773(i). The disapproval does not affect USEPA's approval (or conditional approval) of individual parts of Indiana's ozone plan and they remain approved.
(e) Approval—The Administrator approves the incorporation of the photochemical assessment ambient monitoring system submitted by Indiana on November 15, 1993, into the Indiana State Implementation Plan. This submittal satisfies 40 CFR 58.20(f), which requires the State to provide for the establishment and maintenance of photochemical assessment monitoring stations (PAMS) by November 12, 1993.
(f) Approval. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted two ozone redesignation requests and maintenance plans requesting the ozone nonattainment areas to be redesignated to attainment for ozone: South Bend/Elkhart (St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties), submitted on September 22, 1993; Indianapolis (Marion County), submitted on November 12, 1993. The redesignation requests and maintenance plans meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(d) of the Act as amended in 1990. The redesignations meet the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Indiana Ozone State Implementation Plan for the above mentioned counties.
(g) The base year ozone precursor emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for the following areas: Vanderburgh County in the Evansville Metropolitan Area; Marion County in the Indianapolis Metropolitan Area; and St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties in the South Bend Metropolitan Area.
(h) On November 17, 1993, Indiana submitted two of three elements required by section 182(d)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Amendments of 1990 to be incorporated as part of the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) State Implementation Plan intended to offset any growth in emissions from a growth in vehicle miles traveled. These elements are the offsetting of growth in emissions attributable to growth in VMT which was due November 15, 1992, and, any transportation control measures (TCMs) required as part of Indiana's 15 percent reasonable further progress (RFP) plan which was due November 15, 1993. Indiana satisfied the first requirement by projecting emissions from mobile sources and demonstrating that no increase in emissions would take place. Indiana satisfied the second requirement by determining that no TCMs were required as part of Indiana's 15 percent RFP plan.
(i) Approval—EPA is approving the section 182(f) oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT), new source review (NSR), vehicle inspection/maintenance (I/M), and general conformity exemptions for the Indiana portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County severe ozone nonattainment area as requested by the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin in a July 13, 1994 submittal. This approval does not cover the exemption of NOX transportation conformity requirements of section 176(c) for this area. Approval of these exemptions is contingent on the results of the final ozone attainment demonstration expected to be submitted in mid-1997. The approval will be modified if the final attainment demonstration demonstrates that NOX emission controls are needed in the nonattainment area to attain the ozone standard in the Lake Michigan Ozone Study modeling domain.
(j) The base year ozone precursor emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana.
(k) On June 26, 1995, and June 13, 1997, Indiana submitted a 15 percent rate-of-progress plan for the Lake and Porter Counties portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County ozone nonattainment area. This plan satisfies the counties' requirements under section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.
(l) [Reserved]
(m) On July 12, 1995, Indiana submitted a 15 percent rate-of-progress plan for the Clark and Floyd Counties portion of the Louisville ozone nonattainment area. This plan satisfies Clark and Floyd Counties' requirements under section 182(b) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.
(n) On July 12, 1995, Indiana submitted corrections to the 1990 base year emissions inventory for Clark and Floyd Counties. The July 12, 1995, corrections are recognized revisions to Indiana's emissions inventory.
(o) On July 12, 1995, Indiana submitted as a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan a ridesharing transportation control measure which affects commuters in Clark and Floyd Counties.
(p) On August 26, 1996, Indiana submitted a rule for the purpose of meeting oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements under section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act (Act) for the Clark and Floyd Counties moderate ozone nonattainment area. The rule's NOX control requirements meets RACT for major sources of portland cement kilns, electric utility boilers, and industrial, commercial, or institutional boilers. In addition, on April 30, 1997, Indiana certified to the satisfaction of the United States Environmental Protection Agency that, to the best of the State's knowledge, there are no remaining major sources of NOX in Clark and Floyd Counties which need RACT rules. Indiana, therefore, has satisfied the NOX RACT requirements under section 182(f) of the Act for the Clark and Floyd Counties ozone nonattainment area.
(q) Approval—On February 5, 1997, Indiana submitted a transportation control measure under section 108(f)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Amendments of 1990 for Vanderburgh County, Indiana to aid in reducing emissions of precursors of ozone. The transportation control measure being approved as a revision to the ozone state implementation plan is the conversion of at least 40 vehicles from gasoline as a fuel to compressed natural gas.
(r) Indiana's November 15, 1996, request for a 1-year attainment date extension for the Indiana portion of the Louisville moderate ozone nonattainment area which consists of Clark and Floyd Counties is approved. The date for attaining the ozone standard in these counties is November 15, 1997.
(s) Approval—On November 4, 1993, the State of Indiana submitted a maintenance plan and a request that Vanderburgh County be redesignated to attainment of the 1-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Indiana ozone State Implementation Plan.
(t) Approval—On May 24, 1996, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan for Lake and Porter Counties. The submittal pertained to a plan for the implementation of the Federal transportation conformity requirements in accordance with 40 CFR part 51 subpart T—Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded or Approved Under Title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act.
(u) On December 17, 1997, and January 22, 1998, Indiana submitted the Post-1996 rate-of-progress plan for the Lake and Porter Counties portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County ozone nonattainment area. This plan satisfies the counties' requirements under section 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. The plan contains a 1999 mobile source vehicle emission budget for volatile organic compounds of 40,897 pounds per average summer day.
(v) Negative declarations—Aerospace coating operations, industrial clean up solvents, industrial wastewater processes, offset lithography operations, business plastics, automotive plastics, and synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industries (SOCMI) batch processes, reactors and distillation units categories. On November 8, 1999, the State of Indiana certified to the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the nine categories listed above and have a potential to emit 100 tons or more of volatile organic compounds annually are located in Clark or Floyd Counties in southeast Indiana, adjacent to Louisville, Kentucky.
(w) Negative declarations—Aerospace coating operations, industrial clean up solvents, industrial wastewater processes, offset lithography operations, business plastics, automotive plastics, and synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industries (SOCMI) batch processes, reactors and distillation units categories. On November 8, 1999, and January 10, 2000, the State of Indiana certified to the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency that no major sources categorized as part of the nine categories listed above and have a potential to emit 25 tons or more of volatile organic compounds annually are located in Lake or Porter Counties in northwest Indiana.
(x) The request submitted by Indiana on April 11, 2001 and supplemented on August 24, 2001, to redesignate the Indiana portion of the Louisville moderate interstate ozone nonattainment area from nonattainment to attainment was approved on October 23, 2001. The motor vehicle emissions budgets for VOC and NOX in the Indiana portion of the Louisville moderate interstate maintenance plan are adequate for conformity purposes and approvable as part of the maintenance plan. The 1-hour ozone standard maintenance plan motor vehicle emission budgets for the entire interstate Louisville area for the purposes of transportation conformity are now 48.17 tons per summer day of VOC and 92.93 tons per summer day of NOX for the year 2012.
(y) Lake and Porter Counties Attainment Demonstration Approval—On December 21, 2000, Indiana submitted a 1-hour ozone attainment demonstration plan as a requested revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan. This approval includes: A modeled demonstration of attainment, a plan to reduce ozone precursor emissions by 3 percent per year from 2000 to 2007, and associated conformity budgets for 2002 and 2005, a revision to the NOX waiver, a contingency measures plan for both the ozone attainment demonstration and the post-1999 ROP plan, the conformity budgets for the 2007 attainment year, until such time that revised budgets are submitted and found adequate for conformity purposes as called for by the state in its commitment to recalculate and apply a revised budget for conformity within two years of the formal release of MOBILE6, the RACM analysis, the commitment to conduct a mid-course review of the attainment status of the Lake Michigan area, and an agreed order between U.S. Steel (currently USX Corporation) and the IDEM signed by IDEM on March 22, 1996, which requires U.S. Steel to establish a coke plant process water treatment plant at its Gary Works. Today's action finalizes approval of Indiana's 1-hour ozone attainment demonstration SIP revision.
(z) EPA is approving a revision to the Indiana SIP submitted by Indiana on June 26, 2003. The revision is for transportation conformity budgets for the Clark and Floyd portion of the Louisville area. The revised 2012 motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for the total Louisville area are 47.28 tons per day (tpd) for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 111.13 tpd for oxides of nitrogen.
(aa) Approval—On August 6, 2004, Indiana submitted a revision to the 1-hour ozone attainment plan for Lake and Porter Counties. The revision consists of new motor vehicle emission estimates and new MOBILE6 based motor vehicle emissions budgets. The motor vehicle emissions budget for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana for the 2005 interim Rate of Progress year is now 15.18 tons per summer day (tpd). The 2007 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana are now 12.37 tpd VOC and 63.33 tpd oxides of nitrogen.
(bb)(1) Approval—On July 15, 2005, Indiana submitted requests to redesignate Greene and Jackson Counties to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. These requests were supplemented with submittals dated September 6, 2005, September 7, 2005, October 6, 2005, and October 20, 2005. As part of the redesignation requests, the State submitted maintenance plans as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. Also included were motor vehicle emission budgets for use to determine transportation conformity in Greene and Jackson Counties. The 2015 motor vehicle emission budgets for Greene County are 1.46 tpd for VOC and 1.54 tpd for NOX. The 2015 motor vehicle emission budgets for Jackson County are 1.65 tpd for VOC and 3.18 tpd for NOX.
(2) Approval—On July 8, 2013, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Greene County, Indiana area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2015 budgets for Greene County, Indiana are 0.90 tons per day VOC and 2.31 tons per day NOX.
(cc)(1) Approval—On August 25, 2005, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate Delaware County to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. This request was supplemented with a submittal dated October 20, 2005. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. Also included were motor vehicle emission budgets for use to determine transportation conformity in Delaware County. The 2015 motor vehicle emission budgets for Delaware County are 3.50 tons per day for VOC and 4.82 tons per day for NOX.
(2) Approval—On August 17, 2012, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Delaware County (Muncie), Indiana area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2015 budgets for Delaware County, Indiana are 2.53 tons per day volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 7.02 tons per day nitrogen oxides (NOX).
(dd)(1) Approval—On July 5, 2005, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate Vigo County to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. This request was supplemented with submittals dated October 20, 2005 and November 4, 2005. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. Also included were motor vehicle emission budgets for use to determine transportation conformity in Vigo County. The 2015 motor vehicle emission budgets are 2.84 tons per day for VOC and 3.67 tons per day for NOX.
(2) Approval—On July 2, 2013, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Vigo County, Indiana area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2015 budgets for Vigo County, Indiana are 2.17 tons per day VOC and 5.07 tons per day NOX.
(ee)(1) Approval—On June 2, 2005, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. This request was supplemented with a submittal dated October 20, 2005. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. Also included were motor vehicle emission budgets for use to determine transportation conformity in Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties. The 2015 motor vehicle emission budgets are 4.20 tons per day for VOC and 5.40 tons per day for NOX for both counties combined.
(2) Approval—On July 2, 2013, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties, Indiana area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2015 budgets for Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties, Indiana are 5.02 tons per day VOC and 12.61 tons per day NOX.
(ff)(1) Approval—On May 30, 2006, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate Allen County to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in eight years as required by the Clean Air Act. Also included were motor vehicle emission budgets to determine transportation conformity in Allen County. The 2020 motor vehicle emission budgets are 6.5 tons per day for VOC and 7.0 tons per day for NOX.
(2) Approval—On July 2, 2013, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Allen County, Indiana area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2020 budgets for Allen County, Indiana are 4.52 tons per day VOC and 9.72 tons per day NOX.
(gg) Approval—On May 30, 2006, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate LaPorte County to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in eight years as required by the Clean Air Act. The maintenance plan establishes 2020 motor vehicle emission budgets for LaPorte County of 3.40 tons per day for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 6.50 tons per day for oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
(hh)(1) Approval—On May 30, 2006, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in eight years as required by the Clean Air Act. Also included were motor vehicle emission budgets to determine transportation conformity in St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties. The 2020 motor vehicle emission budgets are 6.64 tons per day for volatile organic compounds and 7.73 tons per day for oxides of nitrogen.
(2) Approval—On August 17, 2012, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the South Bend/Elkhart, Indiana area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2020 budgets for South Bend/Elkhart, Indiana are 6.73 tons per day volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 13.95 tons per day nitrogen oxides (NOX).
(ii) Approval—On November 15, 2006, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate the Indiana portion of the Louisville 8-hour ozone nonattainment area (Clark and Floyd Counties) to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in eight years as required by the Clean Air Act. Also included were motor vehicle emission budgets to determine transportation conformity for the entire Louisville area. The 2003 and 2020 motor vehicle emission budgets are 40.97 tons per day for VOC and 95.51 tons per day for NOX, and 22.92 tons per day for VOC and 29.46 tons per day for NOX, respectively.
(jj)(1) Approval—On March 26, 2007, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Madison, Marion, Morgan, and Shelby Counties (the Central Indiana Area) (Indianapolis ozone nonattainment area) to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted an ozone maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Part of the section 175A maintenance plan includes a contingency plan. The ozone maintenance plan establishes 2006 motor vehicle emission budgets for the Central Indiana Area of 54.32 tons per day for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 106.19 tons per day for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and 2020 motor vehicle emission budgets for the Central Indiana Area of 29.52 tons per day for VOC and 35.69 tons per day for NOX.
(2) Approval—On April 16, 2012, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Central Indiana area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2006 budgets for Central Indiana are 64.32 tons per day volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 210.93 tons per day nitrogen oxides (NOX) and 2020 budgets are 25.47 tons per day VOCs and 69.00 tons per day of NOX.
(kk) Approval—On October 25, 2007, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) requested that EPA find that the Indiana portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN nonattainment area, has attained the revoked 1-hour ozone NAAQS. After review of this submission, EPA approves this finding.
(ll) Lake/Porter Co 8-hr Ozone NOX Waiver—On June 5, 2009, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) requested that EPA grant a waiver from the Clean Air Act requirement for Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) in Lake and Porter Counties. After review of this submission, EPA approves and grants this NOX RACT waiver to Lake and Porter Counties.
(mm) Lake/Porter Co 8-hr Ozone Finding of Attainment—On June 5, 2009, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) requested that EPA find that the Indiana portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, Illinois-Indiana (IL-IN) ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). After review of this submission and 2006-2008 ozone air quality data for this ozone nonattainment area, EPA finds that Lake and Porter Counties and the entire Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN area have attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(nn) Approval—Indiana's 2002 inventory satisfies the base year emissions inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for the Indiana portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN area under the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
(oo)(1) Approval—On January 21, 2010, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a request to redesignate the Indiana portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN area to attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. The 2015 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN area are 31.73 tpd for VOC and 49.00 tpd for NOX. The 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the area are 28.82 tpd for VOC and 34.39 tpd for NOX.
(2) Approval—On December 11, 2012, Indiana submitted a request to revise the approved MOBILE6.2 motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Indiana portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN maintenance area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2015 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Ohio and Indiana portions are 56.06 tpd VOC and 94.25 tpd NOX. The 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Ohio and Indiana portions of the area are 42.81 tpd VOC and 73.13 tpd for NOX.
(pp)(1) Approval—On June 5, 2009, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a request to redesignate Lake and Porter Counties to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years, as required by the Clean Air Act. The 2010 motor vehicle emissions budgets for Lake and Porter Counties are 10.5 tpd for VOC and 40.6 tpd for NOX. The 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets for Lake and Porter Counties are 6.0 tpd for VOC and 12.6 tpd for NOX.
(2) Approval—On February 1, 2013, Indiana submitted a request to revise the motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Lake and Porter County, Indiana maintenance area. The budgets are being revised with budgets developed with the MOVES2010a model. The 2010 motor vehicle emissions budgets for Lake and Porter County, Indiana are 13.99 tpd VOC and 47.26 tpd NOX. The 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Lake and Porter County area are 5.99 tpd VOC and 16.69 tpd for NOX.
(qq) Approval—Indiana's 2002 VOC and NOX emissions inventories satisfy the emission inventory requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act for Lake and Porter Counties under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(rr) Approval—EPA is approving a request submitted by the State of Indiana on October 10, 2006, and supplemented on November 15, 2006, November 29, 2007, November 25, 2008, April 23, 2010 and November 19, 2010, to discontinue the vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in Clark and Floyd Counties. The submittal also includes Indiana's demonstration that eliminating the I/M programs in Clark and Floyd Counties will not interfere with the attainment and maintenance of the ozone NAAQS and the fine particulate NAAQS and with the attainment and maintenance of other air quality standards and requirements of the CAA. We are further approving Indiana's request to modify the SIP such that I/M is no longer an active program in these areas and is instead a contingency measure in this area's maintenance plan.
(ss) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving Indiana's December 5, 2012, ozone redesignation request for Lake and Porter Counties for the 2008 ozone standard. EPA is also disapproving Indiana's motor vehicle emission budgets and ozone maintenance plan submitted with the redesignation request.
(tt) Determination of attainment. As required by section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act, the EPA has determined that the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN Marginal 2008 ozone nonattainment area has attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2015.
(uu) Approval—On February 23, 2016, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a request to redesignate the Indiana portion of the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN area to attainment of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. The 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Indiana and Ohio portions of the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN area are 30.02 tons per summer day (TPSD) for VOC and 30.79 TPSD for NOX. The 2030 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Indiana and Ohio portions of the area are 18.22 TPSD for VOC and 16.22 TPSD for NOX.
(vv) On June 15, 2016, Indiana submitted 2011 volatile organic compounds and oxides of nitrogen emissions inventories for the Indiana portion of the Chicago-Naperville, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standard as a revision of the Indiana state implementation plan. The documented emissions inventories are approved as a revision of the state's implementation plan.
(ww) On June 15, 2016, Indiana submitted a certification that sources of volatile organic compounds or oxides of nitrogen located in Lake and Porter Counties are required to annually submit statements documenting these emissions to the state. This certification is approved as a revision to the state's implementation plan.
[38 FR 16565, June 22, 1973]
§ 52.778 Compliance schedules.
(a) The requirements of § 51.262(a) of this chapter are not met since the compliance schedules for sources of nitrogen oxides extend over a period of more than 18 months and periodic increments of progress are not included.
(b)-(c) [Reserved]
(d) The compliance schedule for the source identified below is disapproved as not meeting the requirements of subpart N of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State, unless otherwise noted.
| Source | Location | Regulation involved | Date schedule adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| lake county | |||
| Commonwealth Edison Co. of Indiana, Inc. (State Line Station) | Hammond | APC 13 | Jan. 18, 1973. |
[38 FR 12698 May 14, 1973, as amended at 39 FR 28158, Aug. 5, 1974; 51 FR 40675, 40676, 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 54 FR 25258, June 14, 1989]
§ 52.779 [Reserved]
§ 52.780 Review of new sources and modifications.
(a) The requirements of § 51.160(a) of this chapter are not met in that the plan does not contain procedures to enable the State to determine whether construction or modification of coal burning equipment having a heat input of between 350,000 Btu per hour and 1,500,000 Btu per hour will result in violations of applicable portions of the control strategy and section 4(a)(2)(iii) of APC-19 is disapproved to the extent that it exempts coal burning equipment having a heat input of between 350,000 Btu per hour and 1,500,000 Btu per hour from pre-construction/modification review.
(b)-(c) [Reserved]
(d) Limited regulation for the review of new sources and modifications. (1) This requirement is applicable to any coal burning equipment other than smokehouse generators, having a heat input of between 350,000 Btu per hour (88.2 Mg-cal/h) and 1,500,000 Btu per hour (378.0 MG cal/h), the construction of which was commenced after May 14, 1973.
(2) No owner or operator shall commence construction or modification of any coal burning equipment subject to this regulation without first obtaining approval from the Administrator of the location and design of such source.
(i) Application for approval to construct or modify shall be made on forms furnished by the Administrator,
(ii) A separate application is required for each source.
(iii) Each application shall be signed by the applicant.
(iv) Each application shall be accompanied by site information, plans, descriptions, specifications, and drawings showing the design of the source, the nature and amount of emissions, and the manner in which it will be operated and controlled.
(v) Any additional information, plans, specifications, evidence, or documentation that the Administrator may require shall be furnished upon request.
(3) No approval to construct or modify will be granted unless the applicant shows to the satisfaction of the Administrator that:
(i) The source will operate without causing a violation of any local, State, or Federal regulation which is part of the applicable plan; and
(ii) The source will not prevent or interfere with attainment or maintenance of any national standard.
(4) (i) Within twenty (20) days after receipt of an application to construct, or any addition to such application, the Administrator shall advise the owner or operator of any deficiency in the information submitted in support of the application. In the event of such a deficiency, the date of receipt of the application for the purpose of paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section, shall be the date on which all required information is received by the Administrator.
(ii) Within thirty (30) days after receipt of a complete application, the Administrator shall:
(a) Make a preliminary determination whether the source should be approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved.
(b) Make available in at least one location in each region in which the proposed source would be constructed, a copy of all materials submitted by the owner or operator, a copy of the Administrator's preliminary determination and a copy or summary of other materials, if any, considered by the Administrator in making his preliminary determination; and
(c) Notify the public, by prominent advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation in each region in which the proposed source would be constructed, of the opportunity for written public comment on the information submitted by the owner or operator and the Administrator's preliminary determination on the approvability of the source.
(iii) A copy of the notice required pursuant to this paragraph shall be sent to the applicant and to state and local air pollution control agencies, having cognizance over the location where the source will be situated.
(iv) Public comments submitted in writing within thirty (30) days after the date such information is made available shall be considered by the Administrator in making his final decision on the application. No later than ten (10) days after the close of the public comment period, the applicant may submit a written response to any comment submitted by the public. The Administrator shall consider the applicant's response in making his final decision. All comments shall be made available for public inspection in at least one location in the region in which the source would be located.
(v) The Administrator shall take final action on an application within thirty (30) days after the close of the public comment period. The Administrator shall notify the applicant in writing of his approval, conditional approval, or denial of the application, and shall set forth his reasons for conditional approval or denial. Such notification shall be made available for public inspection in at least one location in the region in which the source would be located.
(vi) The Administrator may extend each of the time periods specified in paragraph (d)(4) (ii), (iv) or (v) of this section by no more than 30 days, or such other period as agreed to by the applicant and the Administrator.
(5) The Administrator may impose any reasonable conditions upon an approval, including conditions requiring the source to be provided with:
(i) Sampling ports of a size, number, and location as the Administrator may require,
(ii) Safe access to each port,
(iii) Instrumentation to monitor and record emission data, and
(iv) Any other sampling and testing facilities.
(6) The Administrator may cancel an approval if the construction is not begun within 2 years from the date of issuance, or if during the construction, work is suspended for 1 year.
(7) Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this regulation shall furnish the Administrator written notification as follows:
(i) A notification of the anticipated date of initial startup of a source not more than 60 days or less than 30 days prior to such date.
(ii) A notification of the actual date of initial startup of a source within 15 days after such date.
(8) Within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the source will be operated but not later than 180 days after initial startup of such source, the owner or operator of such source shall conduct a performance test(s) in accordance with methods and under operating conditions approved by the Administrator and furnish the Administrator a written report of the results of such performance test.
(i) Such test shall be at the expense of the owner or operator.
(ii) The Administrator may monitor such test and may also conduct performance tests.
(iii) The owner or operator of a source shall provide the Administrator 15 days prior notice of the performance test to afford the Administrator the opportunity to have an observer present.
(iv) The Administrator may waive the requirement of performance tests if the owner or operator of a source has demonstrated by other means to the Administrator's satisfaction that the source is being operated in compliance with all local, State, and Federal regulations which are part of the applicable plan.
(9) [Reserved]
(10) Approval to construct or modify shall not relieve any owner or operator of the responsibility to comply with all local, State, and Federal regulations which are part of the applicable plan.
(11) Any owner or operator who constructs, modifies, or operates a stationary source not in accordance with the application, as approved and conditioned by the Administrator, or any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to this paragraph who commences construction or modification without applying for and receiving approval hereunder, shall be subject to enforcement action under section 113 of the Act.
(e) The requirements of subpart I of this chapter are not met because the State failed to submit a plan for review of new or modified indirect sources.
(f) Regulation for review of new or modified indirect sources. The provisions of § 52.22(b) are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of the applicable implementation of the plan for the State of Indiana.
(g) Delegation of authority. (1) The Administrator shall have the authority to delegate responsibility for implementing the procedures for conducting source review pursuant to this section in accordance with paragraphs (f) (2), (3), and (4) of this section.
(2) Where the Administrator delegates the responsibility for implementing the procedures for conducting source review pursuant to this section to any Agency, other than a Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, a copy of the notice pursuant to paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section shall be sent to the Administrator through the appropriate Regional Office.
(3) In accordance with Executive Order 11752, the Administrator's authority for implementing the procedures for conducting source review pursuant to this section shall not be delegated, other than to a Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, for new or modified sources which are owned or operated by the Federal Government or for new or modified sources located on Federal lands; except that, with respect to the latter category, where new or modified sources are constructed or operated on Federal lands pursuant to leasing or other Federal agreements, the Federal Land Manager may at his discretion, to the extent permissible under applicable statutes and regulations, require the lessee or permittee to be subject to new source review requirements which have been delegated to a State or local agency pursuant to this paragraph.
(4) The Administrator's authority for implementing the procedures for conducting source review pursuant to this section shall not be redelegated, other than to a Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, for new or modified sources which are located in Indian reservations except where the State has assumed jurisdiction over such land under other laws, in which case the Administrator may delegate his authority to the States in accordance with paragraphs (g) (2), (3), and (4) of this section.
(h) On March 7, 1994, Indiana requested a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for New Source Review (NSR) to satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. The Indiana 326 IAC regulations do not include a definition of “federally enforceable”. On July 13, 1994, Pamela Carter, Attorney General of the State of Indiana, sent a letter to USEPA clarifying Indiana's interpretation of the definition of federally enforceable. The letter states that federally enforceable, e.g. as used in 326 IAC 2-3-1, should be interpreted in accordance with the federal definition at 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xiv). The USEPA took the opportunity of rulemaking on the State's submittal to recodify the permitting SIP to conform to Title 326 the Indiana Administrative Code.
[37 FR 10863, May 31, 1972, as amended at 38 FR 12698, May 14, 1973; 39 FR 4663, Feb. 6, 1974; 39 FR 7281, Feb. 25, 1974; 40 FR 50270, Oct. 29, 1975; 51 FR 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 59 FR 51114, Oct. 7, 1994]
§ 52.781 Rules and regulations.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) A part of the second sentence in section 3, APC-17, which states “Where there is a violation or potential violation of ambient air quality standards, existing emission sources or any existing air pollution control equipment shall comply with th
(c)-(d) [Reserved]
(e) Section 2(d) of APC-20, Fugitive Dust Emissions, is disapproved because it is unenforceable within the terms of the regulation.
(f) Subsections 3(b)(3) and 3(b)(5) of APC-2 (May 18, 1977) are disapproved because they are unenforceable within the terms of the regulation.
(g) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving 326 IAC 25-2-1, 326 IAC 25-2-3 and 326 IAC 25-2-4 as revisions to the Indiana SIP.
(h) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving the December 10, 2009 submittal of 326 IAC 7-4-14 as a revision to the Indiana SIP.
[37 FR 10863, May 31, 1972, as amended at 37 FR 15084, July 27, 1972; 38 FR 12698, May 14, 1973; 40 FR 50033, Oct. 28, 1975; 43 FR 26722, June 22, 1978; 75 FR 72965, Nov. 29, 2010; 78 FR 78725, Dec. 27, 2013]
§ 52.782 Request for 18-month extension.
(a) The requirements of § 51.341 of this chapter are not met since the request for an 18-month extension for submitting that portion of the plan that implements the secondary standards for particulate matter in the Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate Region does not show that attainment of the secondary standards will require emission reductions exceeding those which can be achieved through the application of reasonably available control technology.
[37 FR 10863, May 31, 1972, as amended at 51 FR 40677, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.783 [Reserved]
§ 52.784 Transportation and land use controls.
(a) To complete the requirements of subpart L and subpart G of this chapter, the Governor of Indiana must submit to the Administrator:
(1) No later than April 15, 1973, transportation and/or land use control strategies and a demonstration that said strategies, along with Indiana's presently adopted stationary source emission limitations for carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and the Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program, will attain and maintain the national standards for carbon monoxide and photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons) in the Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate Region by May 31, 1975. By such date (April 15, 1973), the State also must submit a detailed timetable for implementing the legislative authority, regulations, and administrative policies required for carrying out the transportation and/or land use control strategies by May 31, 1975.
(2) No later than July 30, 1973, the legislative authority that is needed for carrying out such strategies.
(3) No later than December 30, 1973, the necessary adopted regulations and administrative policies needed to implement such strategies.
[38 FR 7326, Mar. 20, 1973, as amended at 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.785 Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
(a) The requirements of subpart G of this chapter are not met because the plan does not provide for attainment and maintenance of the national standards for carbon monoxide in the Metropolitan Indianapolis Intrastate Region by May 31, 1975.
(b) On December 21, 1999, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted carbon monoxide maintenance plans for those portions of Lake and Marion Counties which they requested the Environmental Protection Agency redesignate to attainment of the carbon monoxide national ambient air quality standard.
(c) Approval—The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limited Maintenance Plan Updates for Lake and Marion Counties on January 12, 2009. The updated Limited Maintenance Plans demonstrate attainment of the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for Lake and Marion Counties for an additional ten years.
[38 FR 16565, June 22, 1973, as amended at 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986; 65 FR 2888, Jan. 19, 2000; 74 FR 52893, Oct. 15, 2009]
§ 52.786 Inspection and maintenance program.
(a) Definitions:
(1) Inspection and maintenance program means a program to reduce emissions from in-use vehicles through identifying vehicles that need emission control related maintenance and requiring that such maintenance be performed.
(2) Light-duty vehicle means a motor vehicle rated at 6,000 lb. GVW (gross vehicle weight) or less.
(3) All other terms used in this section that are defined in part 51, subpart G of this chapter, are used herein with the meanings so defined.
(b) This regulation is applicable in the County of Marion, Indiana (including all cities, towns and municipal corporations therein).
(c) The State of Indiana shall establish and cause the implementation of an inspection and maintenance program applicable to all gasoline-powered light duty vehicles which are registered in Marion County. Such program shall conform with this § 52.786. The Consolidated City of Indianapolis, the County of Marion, and other municipalities within the County of Marion, shall take all legislative, executive, or other action necessary to establish and implement the program required by this regulation.
(d) Not later than April 1, 1975, the State of Indiana, the County of Marion and the Consolidated City of Indianapolis shall jointly submit to the Administrator, for his approval, legally adopted legislation and/or regulations establishing the regulatory scheme for the inspection/maintenance program required by paragraph (c) of this section. The legislation and/or regulations shall include:
(1) Provisions requiring inspection of all light-duty motor vehicles subject to the inspection program required by paragraph (c) of this section at periodic intervals no more than 1 year apart by means of an idle test. Any class or category of vehicles that are found to be rarely used on public streets and highways (such as classic or antique vehicles) may be exempted.
(2) Provisions for regulatory criteria that are consistent with achieving an 11 percent reduction of hydrocarbon emissions from light-duty vehicles.
(3) Provisions ensuring that failed vehicles receive, within 30 days, the maintenance necessary to achieve compliance with the inspection standards. These provisions shall impose sanctions against owners of non-complying vehicles, require retest of failed vehicles following maintenance, require a suitable distinctive tag or sticker for display on complying vehicles, and include such other measures as are necessary or appropriate.
(4) Provisions establishing a certification program to ensure that testing stations performing the required tests have the necessary equipment and knowledgeable operators to perform the tests satisfactorily, imposing sanctions against non-complying testing stations, and containing such other measures as necessary or appropriate to a testing program.
(5) Provisions prohibiting vehicles from being intentionally readjusted or modified subsequent to the inspection and/or maintenance in such a way as would cause them no longer to comply with the inspection standards. These may include authorization of spot checks of idle adjustments or of a suitable type of physical seal or tag on vehicles. These provisions shall include appropriate penalties for violation by any person.
(6) Designation of agency or agencies responsible for conducting, overseeing, and enforcing the inspection/maintenance program. Private parties may be designated to conduct parts of the program to certify compliance.
(e) After July 1, 1976, the State of Indiana, County of Marion, the Consolidated City of Indianapolis, and other municipalities in Marion County shall not allow the operation on streets, roads, or highways under their ownership or control of any light duty motor vehicle subject to the inspection program established pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section that does not comply with the applicable standards and procedures adopted in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
(f) After July 1, 1976, no person shall operate or allow the operation of any motor vehicle subject to the inspection program established pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section that does not comply with the applicable standards and procedures adopted in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
(g) No later than October 1, 1974, the State of Indiana, County of Marion, and the Consolidated City of Indianapolis shall jointly submit to the Administrator, for his approval, a detailed compliance schedule showing the steps they will take to establish, operate and enforce the inspection program required by paragraph (c) of this section including:
(1) A detailed description of the inspection program required by paragraph (c) of this section (including a description of the way in which the program will be established, operated, and enforced and the respective responsibilities of the State, county, and municipalities for such tasks).
(2) A description of the legal authority for establishing and enforcing the inspection/maintenance program, including the text of proposed or adopted legislation and regulations.
(3) Specific dates (day, month, and year) by which various steps to implement the inspection/maintenance system will be completed, such steps to include, at a minimum, the following: submitting final plans and specifications for the system to the Administrator for this approval (this date to be no later than February 1, 1975), ordering necessary equipment (this date to be no later than April 15, 1975), commencement of onsite construction and/or installation, and system operational (this date to be no later than April 15, 1975, commencement of onsite construction and/ior installation, and system operational (this date to be no later than July 1, 1975).
(4) An identification of the sources and amounts of funds necessary to implement the system together with written assurances from the chief executive officers of the State, city, and county that they will seek such necessary funding from the appropriate legislative bodies.
(5) Other provisions necessary or appropriate to carry out the program.
(h) The State's December 2, 1992, commitment to timely adopt and implement enhanced inspection and maintenance (I/M) rules for Lake and Porter Counties is disapproved based on the failure of the State of Indiana to meet important milestones pertaining to the development and adoption of necessary authority for the I/M program. This disapproval initiates the sanction process of section 179(a) of the Act.
[39 FR 12348, Apr. 5, 1974, as amended at 46 FR 38, Jan. 2, 1981; 51 FR 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 55 FR 31052, July 31, 1990; 58 FR 62535, Nov. 29, 1993]
§ 52.787 Gasoline transfer vapor control.
(a) Gasoline means any petroleum distillate having a Reid vapor pressure of 4 pounds or greater.
(b) This section is applicable in the County of Marion, Indiana (including all cities, towns and municipal corporations therein).
(c) No person shall transfer or permit the transfer of gasoline from any delivery vessel into any stationary source container with a capacity greater than 250 gallons unless such container is equipped with a submerged fill pipe and unless the displaced vapors from the storage container are processed by a control system that prevents release to the atmosphere of no less than 90 percent by weight of organic compounds in said vapors displaced from the stationary storage container location. The control system shall include one or more of the following:
(1) A vapor-tight return line from the storage container to the delivery vessel and a system that will ensure that the vapor return line is connected before gasoline can be transferred into the container. If a “vapor-balance return” system is used to meet the requirements of this section, the system shall be so constructed as to be readily adapted to retrofit with an adsorption system, refrigeration-condensation system or equivalent system connected to the stationary storage container.
(2) Refrigeration-condensation sys- tem or adsorption system connected to the stationary storage container.
(3) An equivalent system, approved by the Administrator or his designee, designed to recover or eliminate no less than 90 percent by weight of the organic compounds in the displaced vapor.
(d) No person shall own or operate a delivery vessel containing gasoline unless the delivery vessel is so designed and maintained as to be vapor-tight at all times. This paragraph (d) shall not apply to delivery vessels in transit through Marion County which neither are filled nor deliver gasoline therein, nor shall this paragraph (d) be construed to prohibit safety-valves on other devices required by governmental safety regulations. Delivery vessels which are filled in Marion County but do not deliver in Marion County may be controlled only for filling.
(e) No person shall own or operate a facility for the filling of delivery vessels with gasoline unless the facility is equipped with a control system, which can recover or eliminate at least 90 percent by weight of the organic compounds in the vapors displaced from the delivery vessel during refilling. Facilities which have a daily throughput of 20,000 gallons or less are required to have a vapor recovery system in operation no later than May 31, 1977. Delivery vessels and storage containers served exclusively by facilities required to have a vapor recovery system in operation no later than May 31, 1977, also will be required to meet the provisions of this section no later than May 31, 1977.
(f) After March 1, 1976, no person shall intentionally release gasoline vapors from a delivery vessel, except to a control system that can recover or eliminate at least 90 percent by weight of organic compounds in the vapors released.
(g) The provisions of paragraph (c) of this section shall not apply to the following:
(1) Stationary containers having a capacity less than 550 gallons used exclusively for the fueling of farming equipment.
(2) Any stationary container having a capacity less than 2,000 gallons installed prior to promulgation of this paragraph.
(3) Transfer made to storage tanks equipped with floating roofs or their equivalent.
(4) Gasoline storage compartments of 1,000 gallons or less in gasoline delivery vessels in use on the promulgated date of this regulation will not be required to be retrofitted with a vapor return system until January 1, 1977.
(h) The operation of a source, otherwise, subject to paragraph (c), (d), or (e) of this section, shall not be a violation of paragraph (c), (d), or (e), respectively, if the following acts shall be completed with respect to such source before the following dates:
(1) October 1, 1974. The owner of the source or his designee shall submit to the Administrator, a final control plan, which describes at a minimum the steps that will be taken by the source to achieve compliance with the applicable provisions of paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section.
(2) March 1, 1975. Negotiate and sign all necessary contracts for control systems, or issue orders for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control.
(3) May 1, 1975. Initiate on-site construction or installation of control system equipment.
(4) February 1, 1976. Complete on-site construction or installation of control system equipment.
(5) March 1, 1976. Achieve final compliance with the applicable provisions of paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section.
(6) Any owner of a source subject to the compliance schedule in this paragraph shall certify to the Administrator, within 5 days after the deadline for each increment of progress, whether or not the required increment of progress has been met.
(i) As an alternative to compliance with the schedule under paragraph (h) of this section:
(1) The owner of a source which is in compliance with the provisions of paragraph (c), (d), or (e) of this section, shall certify such compliance to the Administrator by October 1, 1974. The Administrator may request whatever supporting information he considers necessary for proper certification.
(2) A source for which a compliance schedule is adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator may operate in conformity with such compliance schedule.
(3) The owner of a source may submit to the Administrator, by October 1, 1974, a proposed alternative compliance schedule. No such schedule may provide for compliance after March 1, 1976. Until promulgated by the Administrator, such source shall conform with applicable portions of paragraph (c), (d), (e), or (h) of this section. Upon promulgation of the compliance schedule by the Administrator, no person shall own or operate the source except in conformity with the promulgated schedule.
(j) Nothing in this section shall preclude the Administrator from promulgating a separate schedule for any source to which the application of the compliance schedule in paragraph (h) of this section fails to satisfy the requirements of § 51.15 (b) and (c) of this chapter.
(k) Any new container, facility, or vessel subject to this regulation that is placed in operation after October 1, 1974, shall within 30 days of commencing operation submit a compliance schedule in conformity with paragraph (i) of this section and shall otherwise comply with this section. Any facility subject to this regulation that is placed in operation after March 1, 1976, shall comply with the applicable requirements of this section immediately upon commencing operation.
[39 FR 12349, Apr. 5, 1974, as amended at 39 FR 41253, Nov. 26, 1974; 41 FR 56643, Dec. 29, 1976; 42 FR 29004, June 7, 1977]
§ 52.788 Operating permits.
Emission limitations and other provisions contained in operating permits issued by the State in accordance with the provisions of the federally approved permit program shall be the applicable requirements of the federally approved State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Indiana for the purpose of sections 112(b) and 113 of the Clean Air Act and shall be enforceable by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and any person in the same manner as other requirements of the SIP. USEPA reserves the right to deem an operating permit not federally enforceable. Such a determination will be made according to appropriate procedures, and be based upon the permit, permit approval procedures or permit requirements which do not conform with the operating permit program requirements or the requirements of USEPA's underlying regulations.
[60 FR 43012, Aug. 18, 1995]
§ 52.789 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Indiana and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Indiana's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Indiana's SIP revision described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Indiana and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program in subpart BBBBB of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2015 and 2016.
(2) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Indiana and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 through 2020. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Indiana's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(ii), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional, provided that because the CSAPR FIP was promulgated as a partial rather than full remedy for an obligation of the State to address interstate air pollution, the SIP revision likewise will constitute a partial rather than full remedy for the State's obligation unless provided otherwise in the Administrator's approval of the SIP revision.
(3) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Indiana and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program in subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2021 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Indiana's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(iii), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Indiana's SIP revision described in paragraph (b)(2) or (3) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances or CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances under subpart EEEEE or GGGGG, respectively, of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of such subpart authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of such allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, after 2020 the provisions of § 97.826(c) of this chapter (concerning the transfer of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances between certain accounts under common control), the provisions of § 97.826(d) of this chapter (concerning the conversion of amounts of unused CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances allocated for control periods before 2021 to different amounts of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances), and the provisions of § 97.811(d) of this chapter (concerning the recall of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances equivalent in quantity and usability to all such allowances allocated to units in the State for control periods after 2020) shall continue to apply.
(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (b)(3) of this section is stayed with regard to emissions occurring in 2024 and thereafter, provided that while such stay remains in effect, the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall apply with regard to such emissions.
(c)(1) The owner and operator of each source located in the State of Indiana and for which requirements are set forth in § 52.40 and § 52.41, § 52.42, § 52.43, § 52.44, § 52.45, or § 52.46 must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2026 and each subsequent year.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (c)(1) of this section is stayed.
[76 FR 48364, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586 and 74594, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 65924, Dec. 21, 2018; 86 FR 23174, Apr. 30, 2021; 88 FR 36890, June 5, 2023; 89 FR 87969, Nov. 6, 2024]
§ 52.790 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Indiana and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 1 Trading Program in subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Indiana's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39 except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Indiana's SIP revision described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances under subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48364, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586, Oct. 26, 2016]
§ 52.791 Visibility protection.
(a) Regional Haze. The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met because the regional haze plan submitted by Indiana on January 14, 2011, and supplemented on March 10, 2011, does not include fully approvable measures for meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(d)(3) and 51.308(e) with respect to emissions of NOX and SO2 from electric generating units. EPA has given limited approval and limited disapproval to the plan provisions addressing these requirements.
(b) Measures Addressing Limited Disapproval Associated with NOX. The deficiencies associated with NOX identified in EPA's limited disapproval of the regional haze plan submitted by Indiana on January 14, 2011, and supplemented on March 10, 2011, are satisfied by § 52.789.
(c) Measures Addressing Limited Disapproval Associated with SO2. The deficiencies associated with SO2 identified in EPA's limited disapproval of the regional haze plan submitted by Indiana on January 14, 2011 and supplemented on March 10, 2011 are satisfied by § 52.790.
[77 FR 33657, June 7, 2012]
§ 52.792 [Reserved]
§ 52.793 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not met, since the plan does not include approvable procedures for preventing the significant deterioration of air quality.
(b) Regulations for preventing significant deterioration of air quality. The provisions of § 52.21(a)(2) and (b) through (bb) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable state plan for the State of Indiana.
(c) All applications and other information required pursuant to § 52.21 of this part from sources located in the State of Indiana shall be submitted to the state agency, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, rather than to EPA's Region 5 office.
[45 FR 52741, Aug. 7, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 18985, May 26, 1988; 68 FR 11323, Mar. 10, 2003; 75 FR 55275, Sept. 10, 2010]
§ 52.794 Source surveillance.
(a) The requirements of 51.212 of this chapter are not met by the phrase “for more than a cumulative total of 15 minutes in a 24-hour period” contained in section 1 of APC-3 of the Indiana Air Pollution Control Regulations.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) 325 IAC 5-1 (October 6, 1980, submittal—§ 52.770(c)(53)) is disapproved for the Lake County sources specifically listed in Table 2 of 325 IAC 6-1-10.2 (§ 52.770(c)(57)); for pushing and quenching sources throughout the State (August 27, 1981, 325 IAC 11-3-2 (g) and (h)—§ 52.770(c)(42)); and for coke oven doors in Lake and Marion Counties (325 IAC 11-3-2(f)—§ 52.770(c)(42)). Applicability of this regulation to these sources is being disapproved because 325 IAC 5-1 does not meet the enforceability requirements of § 51.22 as it applies to these sources. Opacity limits in 325 IAC 6-1-10.2 and certain opacity limits in 325 IAC 11-3 supersede those in 325 IAC 5-1, and USEPA has previously disapproved these superseding regulations (§ 52.776 (j), (g), and (f), respectively).
[40 FR 50033, Oct. 28, 1975; 41 FR 3475, Jan. 23, 1976, as amended at 48 FR 55860, Dec. 16, 1983; 51 FR 40676, 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 52 FR 3644, Feb. 5, 1987; 52 FR 23038, June 17, 1987]
§ 52.795 Control strategy: Sulfur dioxide.
(a) Revised APC-13 (December 5, 1974 submission) of Indiana's Air Pollution Control regulations (sulfur dioxide emission limitation) is disapproved insofar as the provisions identified below will interfere with the attainment and maintenance of the suffix dioxide ambient air quality standards:
(1) The phrase “equivalent full load” in section 1(b)(2).
(2) The formula “Ep = 17.0 Qm 0.67 where Ep = Em × Qm” in section 2(a).
(3) The phrase “Direct fired process operations” in sections 2(a), 3(c), 4(b), and 4(c).
(4) The modification of Qm for non-Indiana coal as expressed in Section 2(a).
(b) The requirements of § 51.281 are not met by Warrick and Culley electrical generating stations enforcement orders which would revise the sulfur dioxide emission limitations for these two stations.
(c) The requirements of § 51.110(e) are not met by Wayne, Dearborn, Jefferson, Porter, and Warrick Counties.
(d)-(e) [Reserved]
(f) Approval—On March 14, 1996, the State of Indiana submitted a maintenance plan for Lawrence, Washington, and Warren Townships in Marion County and the remainder of the county, and requested that it be redesignated to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for sulfur dioxide. The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(g) Approval—On June 17, 1996, the State of Indiana submitted a maintenance plan for LaPorte, Vigo, and Wayne Counties and requested redesignation to attainment for the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for sulphur dioxide for each county in its entirety. The redesignation requests and maintenance plans satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(h) Approval—On June 21, 2005, and as supplemented on August 11, 2005, the State of Indiana submitted a request to redesignate the Lake County sulfur dioxide (SO2) nonattainment area to attainment of the NAAQS. In its submittal, the State also requested that EPA approve the maintenance plan for the area into the Indiana SO2 SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(i) Approval—On March 28, 2013 the State of Indiana submitted a maintenance plan update for the Lake County, Indiana SO2 maintenance area. This plan update demonstrates that Lake County will maintain attainment of the 1971 SO2 NAAQS through 2025. This maintenance plan update satisfies section 175A of the Act.
[41 FR 35677, Aug. 24, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 34519, July 6, 1977; 47 FR 10825, Mar. 12, 1982; 47 FR 39168, Sept. 7, 1982; 49 FR 585, Jan. 5, 1984; 51 FR 40676, 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 53 FR 1358, Jan. 19, 1988; 54 FR 2118, Jan. 19, 1989; 61 FR 58486, Nov. 15, 1996; 70 FR 56131, Sept. 26, 2005; 78 FR 54176, Sept. 3, 2013]
§ 52.796 Industrial continuous emission monitoring.
(a) APC-8, Appendix I 1.2.3, 3.3, and 6.0 are disapproved because they do not meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.214.
(b)(1) The requirements of 40 CFR 51, Appendix P 3.3 are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable implementation plan for the State of Indiana.
(2) APC-8 does not apply to any source scheduled for retirement by October 6, 1980, or within five years after the promulgation of continuous emission monitoring requirements for that source category in 40 CFR part 51, Appendix P 1.1, provided that adequate evidence and guarantees are provided that clearly show that the source will cease operations on or before such date.
[43 FR 26722, June 22, 1978, as amended at 51 FR 40677, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.797 Control strategy: Lead.
(a)-(b) [Reserved]
(c) On January 12, 1988, Indiana'a Office of Air Management (OAM), Indiana Department of Environmental Management, agreed to review all relevant hood designs and performance guidance to determine which criteria to use in determining ongoing compliance with the capture efficiency provisions in 326 IAC 15-1 for Quemetco, Inc., and Refined Metals. Because these efficiencies are closely related to equipment design, OAM believes that a review of the process and control equipment designs and operating paramenters should provide the necessary determination of compliance. OAM will work with the Indianapolis local agency, the Indianapolis Air Pollution Control Division, on viable alternatives and will keep USEPA up to date on its progress. OAM anticipates that specific criteria for determining compliance will be incorporated into the sources' operation permits (and forwarded to USEPA for informational purposes), and, should the opportunity arise, 326 IAC 15-1 will be revised to similarly incorporate capture efficiency criteria.
(d) On March 2, 2000, Indiana submitted a maintenance plan for Marion County as part of its request to redesignate the County to attainment of the lead standard.
(e) On April 1, 2009, Indiana submitted an updated maintenance plan under section 175A of the CAA for Marion County for the continued attainment of the 1.5 µg/m 3 lead standard.
(f) Approval—Indiana's 2008 lead emissions inventory for the Muncie area, as submitted on April 14, 2016, satisfying the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for the Muncie area.
(g) Approval — The 2008 lead maintenance plan for the Muncie, Indiana nonattainment area has been approved as submitted on April 14, 2016.
[53 FR 12905, Apr. 19, 1988, as amended at 53 FR 38722, Oct. 3, 1988; 54 FR 33896, Aug. 17, 1989; 65 FR 29963, May 10, 2000; 74 FR 48662, Sept. 24, 2009; 85 FR 29337, May 15, 2020]
§ 52.798 Small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
The Indiana program submitted on January 14, 1993, as a requested revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan satisfies the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
[58 FR 46544, Sept. 2, 1993]
§ 52.799 Transportation conformity.
On June 4, 2010, Indiana submitted the Transportation Conformity Consultation SIP consisting of Metropolitan Planning Organization resolutions and Memorandums of Understanding to address interagency consultation and enforceability of certain transportation related control measures and mitigation measures. EPA is approving the Transportation Conformity SIP from Indiana.
[75 FR 50710, Aug. 17, 2010]
§ 52.800 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Indiana” and all revisions submitted by Indiana that were Federally approved prior to December 31, 2009.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 31, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted a SO2 control strategy for the City of Indianapolis on March 16, 1972.
(2) The Governor submitted Pub. L. 100, Regulation APC 12-R and 13 through 17 on April 11, 1972.
(3) On May 1, 1972, the Governor's office submitted an errata sheet and revised pages for the State plan.
(4) A request for a nine month extension to achieve secondary SO2 standards in the Indianapolis Region was made by the Governor on May 16, 1972.
(5) The State Air Pollution Control Board submitted additional information on surveillance methodology (non-regulatory) on May 17, 1972.
(6) Regulation APC 4-R was transmitted by the Governor on June 30, 1972.
(7) Assurance that emission data for sources was available for public inspection was given on July 24, 1972, by the Technical Secretary to the Indiana Board.
(8) Clarification of a policy on availability of emission data to the public sent August 17, 1972, by the Technical Secretary to the Indiana Board.
(9) On September 15, 1972, amendments to State control regulations 13, 15 and 16 were submitted to the Governor.
(10) On May 8, 1973, the Governor submitted a new regulation (APC-19) which replaced APC-1.
(11) The Governor submitted a transportation control plan for Marion County on October 19, 1973.
(12) On March 7, 1974, the Technical Secretary of the Air Pollution Control Board, acting for the Governor of Indiana, submitted new regulation APC-20.
(13) On October 3, 1974, the Technical Secretary submitted revised regulations APC-16 covering CO, APC-17 covering NO2 and a new regulation APC-22 covering classification of counties for SO2, oxidants, particulates, NO2 and CO.
(14) On November 8, 1974, the Technical Secretary submitted revised regulation APC-3 covering visible emissions and revised regulation APC-15 covering hydrocarbons.
(15) On December 5, 1974, the Technical Secretary submitted revised regulation APC-13 covering SO2. On July 18, 1975, an updated Technical Support Document on APC-13 was submitted by the Technical Secretary.
(16) On June 14, 1976, the Technical Secretary submitted enforcement orders varying the final sulfur dioxide emission limitations for the Warrick and Culley electrical generating stations in Warrick County.
(17) On March 16, 1977, the Technical Secretary submitted new regulation APC-8, Continuous Emission Monitoring; and revised regulations APC-7, Incinerators; and APC-14, Indiana Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(18) On May 18, 1977, the Technical Secretary submitted revised regulation APC-2, Open Burning.
(19) On June 26, 1979, the Governor submitted a revised sulfur dioxide strategy, including regulation APC 13 with appendix, which was promulgated by the State on June 19, 1979 for all areas of the State. This included the Part D sulfur dioxide regulations for Lake, LaPorte, and Marion Counties. On August 27, 1980 and July 16, 1981 the State committed itself to correct conditionally approved items within their strategy. On October 6, 1980, the State submitted a recodified version of APC 13 which was promulgated by the State on August 27, 1980. This included 325 IAC 7, 325 IAC 1.1-6, 325 IAC 1.1-7-2 and 4, 325 IAC 12-5-1 and 2(a), 325 IAC 12-9-1 and 4, and 325 IAC 12-18-1 and 2. EPA is not taking action on: (i) 325 IAC 7 as it applies to Floyd and Vigo Counties, (ii) the 30-day averaging compliance method contained in 325 IAC 7-1-3, and (iii) the stack height provision for NIPSCO's Mitchell Station in the Lake County SO2 strategy and (4) the stack height provisions for IPALCO's Stout Generating Chemicals Company, and Detroit Diesel Allison's Plant #8 in the Marion County SO2 strategy.
(20) On June 26, 1979, the State of Indiana submitted to EPA revisions to the ozone and carbon monoxide portions (section 3.3.24) of its Marion County State Implementation Plan. On March 11, 1980, the state submitted revisions to the Marion County technical appendix to section 3.3.24. On May 19, 1980, the state submitted ozone and carbon monoxide attainment demonstrations for Marion County (section 1.5). On September 8, 1980 the state submitted its memoranda of understanding. On October 9 and October 15, 1980, the state submitted documentation concerning interagency coordination and the analysis of transportation control measures. On January 7, 1981, the state submitted corrections and clarifications in response to EPA's notice of proposed rulemaking (45 FR 81070).
(21) On June 26, 1979 Indiana submitted a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program for Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties. Additional commitments were submitted on April 7, 1980; June 12, 1980; August 27, 1980; November 13, 1980 and November 24, 1980.
(22) On June 26, 1979, Indiana made submittals pertaining to section 121 Consultation, section 110(a)(2)(K)—Permit Fees, section 126—Interstate Pollution, section 127—Public Notification, section 128—State Boards and section 110(a)(2)(F) (ii) and (iii)—Continuous Emission Monitoring Additional commitments were secured on April 17, 1980, June 25, 1980, August 1, 1980, November 10, 1980, December 9, 1980, and December 31, 1980. A revised version of Indiana's continuous emission monitoring regulation (325 IAC 3) was submitted on October 6, 1980.
(23) On June 26, 1979, the State of Indiana submitted a revision to provide for modification of the existing air quality surveillance network.
(24) On June 26, 1979, the Governor submitted a revised new source review regulation, APC-19. Additional information and commitments were submitted on June 25, 1980 and May 19, 1981. EPA is not taking action on section 7 of APC-19, Prevention of Significant deterioration.
(25) On June 26, 1979 the Governor submitted revised emission limits for Knauf Fiberglass, Shelby County. Additional information was submitted by November 21, 1979. The emission limitations were recodified as 325 IAC 11-4 and 11-4 Appendix A and were resubmitted on October 6, 1980.
(26) On June 26, 1979 the Governor submitted Indiana's definition regulation, APC-1. The definitions were recodified as 325 IAC 1.1-1 and resubmitted on October 6, 1980. On January 21, 1981 Indiana submitted a revised definition for “positive net air quality benefit.” EPA is taking no action on 325 IAC 1.1-1-82, definition of “State Implementation Plan (SIP).”
(27) On October 6, 1980, Indiana submitted Regulation 325 IAC 1.1-2 (formerly APC 14) which includes the primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for ozone and lead.
(28) On February 26, 1981, Indiana submitted a revision to its plan waiving the State's sulfur dioxide air monitoring requirement of section 4(a) of Regulation 325 IAC 7-1 for the area around Public Service of Indiana's Noblesville Generating Station.
(29) On June 26, 1979, May 19, 1980, September 24, 1980, October 9, 1980 and October 15, 1980, Indiana submitted transportation control plans and ozone demonstrations of attainment for Lake, Porter, Clark, Floyd, St. Joseph, Elkhart and Allen Counties. It also submitted a carbon monoxide demonstration of attainment for Lake County. EPA is taking no action on the ozone demonstration of attainment for St. Joseph, Elkhart and Allen Counties.
(30) On April 10, 1981, Indiana submitted revised emission limits for Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Association's Beech Grove plant.
(31) On February 11, 1980, Indiana submitted a revised sulfur dioxide strategy for Vigo County. Technical information was submitted on December 10, 1979 and on May 30, 1980. On October 6, 1980, the State submitted a recodified version of the Vigo County Regulations, 325 IAC Article 7, which was promulgated by the State on August 27, 1980. EPA is not taking action on the 30-day averaging compliance method contained in 325 IAC 7-1-3 as it applies to Vigo County.
(32) On November 24, 1981, Indiana submitted site specific emission limitations for Tecumseh Pipe Line Company, Schererville; and Wayne Transportation Division, Richmond.
(33) On February 11, 1980, Indiana submitted APC 15. EPA is taking no action the “bubble” provisions contained in Section 8(a)(2) of revised APC 15.
(34) On June 26, 1979, the Governor of Indiana submitted general TSP RACT emission limits for nonattainment areas. These regulations were amended and recodified as 325 IAC 6-1 and resubmitted on October 6, 1980. On October 6, 1980, the State submitted a revised TSP regulation for process sources, 325 IAC 6-3; a source specific Dearborn County strategy (amendments were submitted on August 10, 1981), 325 IAC 6-1-8; a source specific Dubois County strategy, 325 IAC 6-1-9; and a source specific Wayne County strategy (amendments were submitted on January 29, 1981), 325 IAC 6-1-14. On February 11, 1980, Indiana submitted a source specific Marion County strategy (amendments were submitted on October 28, 1981), 325 IAC 6-1-12. EPA is deferring rulemaking at this time on the coke battery emission limitations in the Marion County strategy. On January 29, 1981, the State submitted a source specific Vigo County strategy (amendments were submitted on October 28, 1981 and May 7, 1982), 325 IAC 6-1-13; a source specific Howard County strategy, 325 IAC 6-1-15; and a source specific Vanderburgh County strategy (amendments were submitted on October 28, 1981), 325 IAC 6-1-16. EPA is deferring rulemaking at this time on the coke battery emission limitations in the Vigo County strategy and on whether the Howard County strategy currently contains all the elements required by the Clean Air Act. On July 8, 1981, the State submitted a source specific Clark County strategy, 325 IAC 6-1-17, and a source specific St. Joseph County strategy, 325 IAC 6-1-18. On January 29, 1981 and May 7, 1982, the State submitted additional information and commitments.
(35) On October 6, 1980, Indiana submitted its regulations as recodified. Amendments were submitted on January 29, 1981 and March 18, 1981. EPA's approval is directed specifically to the codification numbering system change, not to the substance within each of the codified rules.
(36) [Reserved]
(37) On May 10, 1982, Indiana submitted source specific emission limits contained in operating permits for the Bunge Corporation, Globe Industries, Skyline Corporation, and Dubois County Farm Bureau Co-op Assn., Inc. as revisions to the Indiana SIP.
(38) On April 27, 1982, Indiana submitted source specific TSP emission limits for Huntingburg Wood Products, Jasper Desk Company, Jasper Office Furniture Company, Arist-O-Kraft Company, Mohr Construction Company, Dana Corporation, and Allis Chalmers Corporation. On April 29, 1982, Indiana submitted source specific VOC emission limits for McGee Refining Corporation, Hesco Industries, and Clark Oil and Refining Corporation.
(39) On November 25, 1980, Indiana submitted 325 IAC Article 8, Volatile Organic Compound Regulations. This regulation adds Group II CTG requirements to Indiana's VOC plan and was State promulgated on October 15, 1980. EPA is not taking action on 325 IAC 8-1.1 Section 2(b), Bubble Approach.
(40) On November 24, 1981, Indiana submitted site specific emission limitations for Jeffboat, Inc., Jeffersonville.
(41) On November 23, 1982, Indiana submitted source-specific emission limits for Paul H. Rohe Company, Inc.
(42) On June 26, 1979, Indiana submitted its coke oven battery regulation, APC 9. On October 6, 1980 Indiana resubmitted this regulation recodified as 325 IAC 11-3. On August 27, 1981, Indiana submitted amendments to 325 IAC 11-3. EPA is taking no action on 325 IAC 11-3-2(a), Pre-Carbonization Emissions. It is taking no action on 325 IAC 11-3-2(i), Underfire Particulate and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions, as it applies to Lake County.
(43) On February 26, 1981 and June 22, 1982, Indiana submitted a 9.57 lbs/MMBTU sulfur dioxide emission limit for IMEC's Breed Generating Station in Sullivan County. This limit supersedes that approved at paragraph (c)(19).
(44) On June 28, 1982, Indiana submitted new open burning regulations for Marion County. An amendment was submitted on August 25, 1982.
(45) On March 15, 1983, Indiana submitted a revision to the TSP and SO2 portions of its SIP in the form of operating permits for the Sisters of Providence Convent in St. Mary-of-the-Woods, Indiana.
(46) On November 29, 1982, and December 9, 1982, Indiana submitted amendments to 325 IAC 11-4, Fiber Glass Insulation Manufacturing (Superfine Process) Limitations.
(47) On August 17, 1983, Indiana submitted emission limits of 1.8 lbs/hr and 2.4 tons/yr for the boilers at Jasper Cabinet Co., Dubois County. The 1.8 lbs/hr limit replaces the 7.6 lbs/hr limit approved for this source in subparagraph 34.
(48) [Reserved]
(49) On March 28, 1983, Indiana submitted a 20% 2-hour opacity limit as an “equivalent visible emission limit” (EVEL) for the underfire stack at Bethlehem Steel Corporation's Coke Battery No. 2 in Porter County. This EVEL is approved for as long as the SIP mass emission limit determined from 325 IAC 6-2 (October 6, 1980, submittal) for this source remains in the SIP See (c)(6), (35), and (42).
(50) On December 21, 1983, the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board submitted Indiana Rule 325 IAC 6-2.1, Particulate Emission Limitations for Sources of Indirect Heating. This rule repeals and replaces Indiana Rule 325 IAC 6-2. See §§ 52.770(c)(4) and (c)(35) and § 52.776(i).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 325 IAC 6-2.1, revised regulation establishing Particulate Emission Limitations for Sources of Indirect Heating.
(ii) Additional material. (A) December 21, 1983, submittal of Finding of Facts and Recommendations of Hearing Officer R. W. James on 325 IAC 6-2.1.
(B) March 27, 1985, commitment letter from the State concerning the procedures the State will use in processing “bubbles” under 325 IAC 6-2.1-2(B) and 3(b). See § 52.776(i).
(51) On February 7, 1983, Indiana submitted revised opacity limits for existing boilers at Olin Corporation, located in Covington, Indiana. These “equivalent visible emission limits” (EVEL) are approved for as long as the SIP mass emission limit determined from 325 IAC 6-2 (October 6, 1980 submittal) for this source remains in the SIP. See § 52.770(c) (6) and (35) and § 52.776(h)(2).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) EVELs for Olin Corporation contained in Operating Permits issued by IAPCB, dated October 6, 1981.
(ii) Additional material. (A) September 1, 1983, transmittal by IAPCD's A. Sunderland of Olin's Mass Emission Tests, dated August 26, 1983.
(B) April 5, 1984, letter from IAPCD's E. Stresino transmitting original petition, including Method 9 opacity data.
(52) On February 23, 1984, the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board submitted a revision to Indiana's SO2 SIP waiving the self-monitoring requirement for Public Service Indiana's Edwardsport Generating Station, as set forth in section 4(a) of Rule 325 IAC 7-1. See (c)(19). This revision becomes effective once the Edwardsport Station achieves an annual operating capacity of no greater than 10%.
(53) On October 6, 1980, Indiana submitted revised opacity regulation 325 IAC 5-1. It replaces 1972 APC 3 for process sources, approved at paragraph (b), and SIP 1974 APC 3 for combustion sources, approved in part at subparagraph (c)(14). Indiana does not intend 325 IAC 5-1 to regulate the emission points in Lake County listed in Table 2 of 325 IAC 6-1-110.2 (subparagraph (c)(57)). USEPA is disapproving 325 IAC 5-1 for these sources. Indiana does not intend 325 IAC 5-1 to regulate certain coke battery emission sources listed in 325 IAC 11-3 (subparagraph (c)(42)). USEPA is disapproving 325 IAC 5-1 as it applies to the provisions of 325 IAC 11-3 which USEPA disapproved at (c)(42), i.e., pushing and quenching sources throughout the State and coke oven doors in Lake and Marion Counties. Additionally, Indiana has modified 325 IAC 5-1 as it applies to the stack emission points in Porter County listed at 325 IAC 6-6-4. USEPA disapproved 325 IAC 5-1 as it applies to these Porter County sources on February 5, 1987 (52 FR 3640). For those source categories where USEPA is disapproving 325 IAC 5-1, they remain regulated by the previously approved opacity SIP which consists of SIP 1974 APC 3 for combustion sources and 1972 APC 3 for process sources. Additionally, as long as the Bethlehem Steel Corporation No. 2 Coke Oven Battery Underfire Stack EVEL (subparagraph (c)(49)) remains approved, it replaces 325 IAC 5-1.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) A letter dated October 6, 1980 from the State of Indiana Air Pollution Control Board and 325 IAC 5-1, Visible Emission Limitations, State promulgated on August 26, 1980.
(ii) Additional material. (A) February 12, 1985, letter from the Technical Secretary of the Air Pollution Control Board committing the State to make certain technical changes to 325 IAC 5-1.
(54) On March 28, 1984, Indiana submitted a revised TSP emission limitation for Richmond State Hospital, Wayne County, Indiana. This limitation replaces the one in 325 IAC 6-1-14 which was previously approved at (c)(34).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) On January 13, 1984, Indiana issued to Richmond State Hospital an amendment to operating permit, 89-04-85-0153, which revised its TSP emission limitations for the four boilers to 0.60 lbs/MMBTU with an annual total limit of 452 tons/yr.
(55) On January 30, 1985, Indiana submitted revised VOC regulations 325 IAC 8-1.1, 8-2, 8-3, 8-4 and 8-5 to satisfy certain conditions of USEPA's approval. Those regulations amended those approved at (c)(33) and (c)(34). In addition, the applicability of the regulations was extended to cover St. Joseph and Elkhart Counties. USEPA is taking no action on changes to 325 IAC 8-1.1-2(f), Methods of Compliance, and the repeal of 325 IAC 8-5-6, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning, because these exempt the compound perchloroethylene from control without the State justifying that such exemption is consistent with the Part D reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana's Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) RACT I and II regulations, Title 325 Air Pollution Control Board:
(1) 325 IAC 8-1.1, Establishes Volatile Organic Compound Emission Limitations. State promulgated on June 21, 1984, and amended November 7, 1984.
(2) 325 IAC 8-2 Surface Coating Emission Limitations. State promulgated on June 21, 1984, and amended November 7, 1984.
(3) 325 IAC 8-3 Solvent Metal Cleaning Operating Requirements. State promulgated on October 15, 1984, and amended November 7, 1984.
(4) 325 IAC 8-4 Petroleum Sources. State promulgated on June 21, 1984, and amended November 7, 1984.
(5) 325 IAC 8-5 Miscellaneous Operations. State promulgated on June 21, 1984, and amended November 7, 1984.
(56) On September 2, 1983, the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board (Board) submitted revised emission limitations for Occidental Chemical Corporation (OCC), located in Clark County, Indiana. Amendments to these operating permits were submitted by the State on December 21, 1983. These emission limits replace those approved for OCC (under its former name, Hooker Chemical) at (c)(34).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Air Pollution Control Board Operation Permits:
(1) Control Number 16113, date issued December 27, 1982.
(2) Control Number 16114, date issued December 27, 1982.
(3) Control Number 16115, date issued December 27, 1982.
(ii) Additional material. (A) OCC corrected emissions dated September 13, 1984.
(B) OCC's new modeled data, dated November 6, 1984.
(C) State's modeling for OCC and surrounding area, dated July 2, 1984 and August 7, 1984.
(57) On October 11, 1983, October 24, 1983, and April 16, 1984, Indiana submitted a revised Lake County Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) Plan, including regulations 325 IAC 6-1-10.2 and 6-1-11.1. This plan is disapproved. See § 52.776(j).
(58) On November 13, 1984, Indiana submitted 325 IAC 13-2, Motor Vehicle Tampering and Fuel Switching.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Rule 325 IAC 13-2, promulgated by the State on September 24, 1984.
(59) On March 24, 1986, the State of Indiana submitted a negative declaration for synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry (SOCMI) source leaks and oxidation, and for natural gas/gasoline processing plants. On April 14, 1986, the State of Indiana submitted a negative declaration for manufacturers of high-density polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene resins, and for large petroleum dry cleaners.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Letter dated March 24, 1986, from Harry D. Williams, Director, Air Pollution Control Division, Indiana State Board of Health. Letter dated April 14, 1986, from Walter J. Kulakowski, Assistant Commissioner for Air Management, Department of Environmental Management.
(60) On January 18, 1984, Indiana submitted as a revision to the TSP SIP certain operating conditions and limits for three coke oven batteries at Citizens Gas and Coke Utility in Marion County. The operating permits included conditions and limits for Batteries E, H and Number One with respect to visible emissions from coke oven doors and pushing operations and allowable content of total dissolved solids in quench makeup water. EPA disapproves the limit on coke oven door visible emissions and total dissolved solids content for quench makeup water on Battery Number One, because the limits are inconsistent with that battery's Part C Prevention of Significant Deterioration requirements and Part D Lowest Achievable Emission Rate requirements. See subparagraphs (c)(34) and (c)(42) for further background on actions concerning coke oven batteries.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Certificates of Operation Numbers 06895, 06896, and 06897 for Citizens Gas and Coke Utility issued by the City of Indianapolis, dated June 30, 1980, with addition of operating conditions and emission limits, dated September 12, 1983, as adopted by the State on January 4, 1984, and transmitted on January 18, 1984.
(ii) Additional information. (A) September 7, 1983, letter from the City of Indianapolis to the State concerning quarterly analysis of coke quenching makeup water.
(61) On October 15, 1984, Indiana submitted a revision to the Porter County total suspended particulate (TSP) plan, including regulation 325 IAC 6-6, which was promulgated by Indiana on November 7, 1984. This plan is disapproved. See § 52.776(l).
(62) On March 4, 1985, Indiana submitted a revision to the Marion County carbon monoxide (CO) plan. USEPA approved this plan based on monitoring and modeling data and a commitment to implement a one-way street pair in the Indianapolis central business district. These elements demonstrate attainment of the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standards by December 31, 1987.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Marion County CO plan for attainment and maintenance of the CO NAAQS from Indianapolis Air Pollution Control Division, Sections 1.0, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.4, 5.1, 5.5.4, 6.1, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.3, and 6.4, dated November 12, 1984.
(B) Letter from Indiana forwarding Marion County CO plan to USEPA, dated March 4, 1985.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Portion of additional technical information from Indianapolis Air Pollution Control Division, including Section 1.0, dated August 28, 1985.
(B) Letter from Indiana forwarding additional technical information, dated October 7, 1985.
(63) On January 23, 1986, the State submitted revisions to its Stage I Gasoline Dispensing regulations, which replace those conditionally approved at (c)(33), (c)(35)—Codification only, and (c)(55).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Letter of January 23, 1986 to EPA from the State of Indiana, and Title 325 Air Pollution Control Board Rule 325 IAC 8-4-6, Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, which was promulgated on January 14, 1986.
(B) Title 325 Air Pollution Control Board Rule 8-1.1-3, Compliance Schedules, subsections (f), (g), and (h), which was promulgated on January 14, 1986.
(64) On January 23, 1986, the State of Indiana submitted to USEPA a revision to the Indiana Lead State Implementation Plan in order to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR 51.160 through 51.163 and 51.165(b) (formerly 40 CFR 51.18 (a) through (i) and 51.18(k)) for a new source review program, USEPA approved this revision for lead new source review only.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Construction and Operating Permit Requirements, 325 IAC 2-1.1 promulgated on January 8, 1986.
(B) Letter of November 17, 1987, to EPA from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
(65) On November 30, 1981, Indiana established its air quality surveillance network for lead. On November 21, 1983, Indiana notified USEPA that Corning Glass was shut down. On February 18, 1987, Indiana submitted its regulation to control lead emissions, 325 IAC 15-1.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 325 IAC 15-1, Lead Emission Limitations, effective February 27, 1987.
(B) Letter of February 18, from the State of Indiana to EPA.
(ii) Additional material. (A) A November 30, 1981, letter from Harry Williams, Technical Secretary, Indiana Air Pollution Control Board establishing Indiana's air quality surveillance network for lead.
(B) A November 21, 1983, letter from Harry Williams, Technical Secretary, confirming that the Corning Glass facility in Wells County was permanently shut down and had been taken out of the State's emission inventory.
(C) A June 9, 1987, letter from Timothy Method, Acting Assistant Commissioner, submitting a general strategy and additional increments of progress required of Hammond Lead.
(66) On October 21, 1987, the State of Indiana submitted 325 IAC 7-1-3.1, Reporting Requirements and Methods to Determine Compliance, as a revision to its SO2 plan. At paragraph (c)(19) of this section, USEPA approved/conditionally approved Indiana's SO2 plan, 325 IAC 7-1, for most areas of the State. However, the emission limits in this plan were set aside by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit because USEPA took no action on the State's 30-day averaging compliance method in 325 IAC 7-1-3. New compliance method 325 IAC 7-1-3.1 replaces former 325 IAC 7-1-3. Therefore, with EPA's approval of 325 IAC 7-1-3.1, USEPA is reinstating its March 12, 1982, approval of Indiana's October 6, 1980, SO2 rule, 325 IAC 7-1-1,7-1-2 (except for any emission limits in the below named counties), 7-1-4, 7-1-5, 7-1-6, and 7-1-7. Other than these general provisions and 325 IAC 7-1-3.1, USEPA is not acting on or approving today Indiana's SO2 plan for Dearborn, Floyd, Gibson, Jefferson, Lake, LaPorte, Marion, Morgan, Porter, Sullivan, Vermillion, Vigo, Warrick, and Wayne Counties. Indiana recodified 325 IAC 7-1-1 through 7-1-7 to 326 IAC 7-1-1 through 7-1-7 and submitted the recodified rules on November 16, 1988.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 IAC 7-1-1 through 326 7-1-7, Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published in the April 1, 1988, Indiana Register (IR) at 11 IR 2511.
(67) On February 3, 1988, Indiana submitted its SO2 plan for Jefferson, LaPorte, Marion, Sullivan, and Wayne Counties; on March 23, 1988, it submitted its SO2 plan for Vermillion County; and on August 1, 1988, it submitted its SO submitted the same rules in its plans for Jefferson, LaPorte, Marion, Sullivan, and Wayne Counties, as recodified into Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code. These plans consist of the provisions and requirements in 326nIAC 7-1 approved or reinstated for these counties at paragraph (c)(66), any SO2 emission limits in 326 IAC 7-1-2 applicable in these counties (as incorporated by reference at (c)(66)(i)(C)), and the site-specific SO2 emission limits and other requirements in 326 IAC 7-1-13 (Jefferson County), 326 IAC 7-1-12 (LaPorte County), 326 IAC 7-1-9 (Marion County), 326 IAC 7-1-14 (Sullivan County), 326 IAC 7-1-15 (Vermillion County), 326 IAC 7-1-10.1 (Vigo County), and 326 IAC 7-1-11 (Wayne County).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 IAC 7-1-13, Jefferson County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published in the April 1, 1988, Indiana Register (IR) at 11 IR 2526.
(B) 326 IAC 7-1-12, LaPorte County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on April 1, 1988, at 11 IR 2526.
(C) 326 IAC 7-1-9, Marion County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on April 1, 1988, at 11 IR 2518.
(D) 326 IAC 7-1-14, Sullivan County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on April 1, 1988, at 11 IR 2526.
(E) 326 IAC 7-1-15, Vermillion County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on March 1, 1988, at 11 IR 1735.
(F) 326 IAC 7-1-10.1, Vigo County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on August 1, 1988, at 11 IR 3785.
(G) 325 IAC 7-1-11, Wayne County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on April 1, 1988, at 11 IR 2525.
(68) On December 2, 1983, Indiana submitted its transportation control plans as an element in its ozone strategy for Lake and Porter Counties. Further information was submitted on June 10, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Chapter 7, Mobile Source Strategies and Reductions, Sections A.1.a, 2, and 3 and Exhibits 7-1 and 7-3 of Indiana's 1982 ozone and carbon monoxide plan, as adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board at its November 2, 1983, metting.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional material. (A) On June 10, 1986, Indiana submitted a May 23, 1986, letter from the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission discussing the Lake and Porter Counties' transportation control plans and their implementation.
(B) [Reserved]
(69) On December 2, 1983, Indiana submitted its ozone plan for Lake and Porter Counties, as adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on November 2, 1983. On March 2, 1984, Indiana submitted as its attainment demonstration for Lake and Porter Counties, Illinois' attainment demonstration for the greater Chicago area. The greater Chicago attainment demonstration, as submitted by Indiana, and Indiana's overall ozone plan for Lake and Porter Counties is disapproved. See §§ 52.773(i) and 52.777(d). The disapproval does not affect USEPA's approval (or conditional approval) of individual parts of Indiana'a ozone plan, and they remain approved. See § 52.770(c) (20), (21), (29), (33), (38), (39), (55), (58), and (59).
(70) On February 3, 1988, and August 23, 1988, Indiana submitted its lead plans for Quemetco, Inc., in Indianapolis; Exide Corporation in Logansport; C and D Power System in Attica; and General Battery Corporation in Frankfort. This included a recodification of its former lead rule, 325 IAC 15-1 (40 CFR 52.770(c)(65)), to 326 IAC 15-1 and revisions to this rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326—Air Pollution Control Board—Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 15-1, Lead Emission Limitations, as published in the Indiana Register (IR) on April 1, 1988, at 11 IR 2564.
(B) Corrections of typographical, clerical, or spelling errors to the document printed at 11 IR 2368 (Indiana's recodified air rules, including 326 IAC 15-1), as published on August 1, 1988, at 11 IR 3921.
(71) On March 23, 1988, Indiana submitted its SO2 plan for Morgan County; on July 12, 1988, it submitted its SO2 plan for Floyd County, and on November 16, 1988, it submitted its SO2 plan for Warrick County. On December 6, 1988, it submitted its Warrick County rule as published in the Indiana Register. These plans consist of the provisions and requirements in 326 IAC 7-1 approved or reinstated for these counties at paragraph (c)(66), and SO2 emission limits in 326 IAC 7-1-2 applicable in these counties (as incorporated by reference at paragraph (c)(66)(i)(C) of this section), and the site-specific SO2 emission limits and other requirements in 326 IAC 7-1-16 (Floyd County), 326 IAC 7-1-18 (Morgan County), and 326 IAC 7-1-17 (Warrick County).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 IAC 7-1-16, Floyd County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published in the March 1, 1988, Indiana Register (IR) at 11 IR 1737.
(B) 326 IAC 7-1-18, Morgan County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on June 1, 1988, at 11 IR 3018.
(C) 326 IAC 7-1-17, Warrick County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on December 1, 1988, at 12 IR 553.
(72) On November 16, 1988, Indiana submitted its SO2 plan for Dearborn County; on July 12, 1988, it submitted its SO2 plan for Gibson County; on November 16, 1988, and December 6, 1988, it submitted its SO2 plan for Lake County, and on November 16, 1988, and December 6, 1988, it submitted its SO2 plan for Porter County. These plans consist of the provisions and requirements in 326 IAC 7-1 approved or reinstated for these counties at paragraph (c)(66), any SO2 emission limits in 326 IAC 7-1-2 applicable in these counties (as incorporated by reference at paragraph (c)(66)(i)(C) of this section, and the site-specific SO2 emission limits and other requirements in 326 IAC 7-1-20 (Dearborn County), 326 IAC 7-1-8.1 (Lake County), 326 IAC 7-1-19 (Gibson County), and 326 IAC 7-1-21 (Porter County).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 IAC 7-1-20, Dearborn County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published in the August 1, 1988, Indiana Register (IR) at 11 IR 3784.
(B) 326 IAC 7-1-19, Gibson County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on June 1, 1988, at 11 IR 3019.
(C) 326 IAC 7-1-8.1, Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on November 1, 1988, at 12 IR 262, and corrected on December 1, 1988, at 12 IR 597.
(D) 326 IAC 7-1-21, Porter County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, as published on November 1, 1988, at 12 IR 259, and corrected on December 1, 1988, at 12 IR 597.
(E) 326 IAC 7-1-1, Applicability, as published on December 1, 1988, at 12 IR 552.
(73) [Reserved]
(74) On July 23, 1987, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted to USEPA a request for a site-specific revision to Indiana's ozone SIP. This revision consists of compliance date extensions until November 7, 1987, for Uniroyal's two fabric coaters and four vinyl printers at its Mishawaka plant, located in St. Joseph County, Indiana.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Air pollution Operation Permits Numbers: U 2 33-15A, U 2 34-23, U 2 33-14C, U 2 34-3C, U 2 33-16, U 2 33-18, Date issued December 1, 1988, and Date Expires December 1, 1990.
(75) [Reserved]
(76) On October 21, 1987, the State submitted 325 IAC 8-1.1-5, Petition for alternative controls, which gives the provisions and requirements for petitioning for reasonably available control technology volatile organic compound plans. On November 16, 1988, the State submitted this rule recodified as 326 IAC 8-1-5, Petition for site-specific reasonably available control technology (RACT) plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 Air Pollution Control Board, Indiana Administration Code (IAC) 8-1-5, Petition for site-specific reasonably available control technology (RACT) plan, as published in the April 1, 1988, Indiana Register, at Volume 11 IR 2530. Filed with the Secretary of State on March 10, 1988.
(77) [Reserved]
(78) On January 18, 1989, and June 23, 1989, Indiana submitted its revised lead plan for the HLP-Lead Plant of Hammond Lead Products, Inc. in Hammond Indiana. Additionally, minor changes were made to Indiana's overall lead rule, 326 IAC 15-1, Lead Emission Limitations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326—Air Pollution Control Board—Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 15-1, as published in the Indiana Register (IR) on July 1, 1989, at 1850. This rule was effective for State purposes on July 14, 1989.
(79) [Reserved]
(80) On October 15, 1987, the State submitted 325 IAC 8-2-13, Wood Furniture and Cabinet Coating, as a portion of its 1982 ozone plan, which gives provisions and requirements for controlling volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from sources located in Clark, Floyd, Lake and Porter Counties. On November 16, 1988, the State submitted this rule recodified as 326 IAC 8-2-12, Wood Furniture and Cabinet Coating.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 Air Pollution Control Board, Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 8-2-1, Applicability of rule; and 326 IAC 8-2-12, Wood furniture and cabinet coating, as published in the April 1, 1988, “Indiana Register” (IR), at 11 IR 2536 and corrected on March 1, 1989, at 12 IR 1394. Filed with the Secretary of State on March 10, 1988.
(81) On April 11, 1988, the State submitted, as a portion of its 1982 ozone plan, rules to control volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions in Lake and Porter Counties. These rules consist of the provisions and requirements in 326 IAC 14-1, General Provisions; 326 IAC 14-8, Emission Standards for Equipment Leaks; and 326 IAC 14-9, Emission Limitations for Benzene from Furnace Coke Oven By-product Recovery Plants.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendments to title 326, Air Pollution Control Board, Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 14-1 General Provisions; 326 IAC 14-8 Emission Standards for Equipment Leaks; (Fugitive Emission Sources); and 326 IAC 14-9 Emission Limitations for Benzene from Furnace Coke Oven By-Product Recovery Plants, as published in the June 1, 1988, Indiana Register (IR) at 11 IR 3011. Filed with the Secretary of State on April 13, 1988.
(82) [Reserved]
(83) On January 21, 1981, the State submitted its revised Malfunctions Rule 325 IAC 1.1-5. On November 16, 1988, Indiana submitted its recodified regulations. This rule was renumbered 326 IAC 1-6, Malfunctions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), Rule 326 IAC 1-6: Malfunctions as published in the April 1, 1988, Indiana Register (IR) at 11 IR 2380. Filed with the Secretary of State on March 10, 1988.
(ii) Additional materials. (A) On July 2, 1982, the State submitted clarifications of its intent for 325 IAC 1.1-5.
(84) On October 27, 1989, and January 19, 1990, Indiana submitted its vehicle inspection and maintenance plan for Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326, Air Pollution Control Board, of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), Rule 13-1, Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Requirements, Adopted at 13 Indiana Register 500, effective January l, 1990.
(85) On December 2, 1983, Indiana submitted its transportation control plan for Clark and Floyd Counties as one element in its ozone plan for the area. Additional material was submitted on May 14, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Chapter 7, Mobile Source Strategies and Reductions, sections A.1.b and exhibits 7-2 and 7-4, as adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board at its November 2, 1983, meeting.
(ii) Additional material. (A) On May 14, 1986, Indiana submitted an April 23, 1986, Letter from Jim Thorne, Transportation Director, Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency, discussing the Clark and Floyd Counties portion of the Louisville, Kentucky transportation control plan.
(86) On February 15, 1990, Indiana submitted an amended rule which updates the applicable edition of the Code of Federal Regulations from the 1987 edition to the 1988 edition.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326, Air Pollution Control Board, Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 1-1-3, References to the Code of Federal Regulations, as published in the February 1, 1990, Indiana Register (IR), Volume 13 at IR 867. Filed with the Secretary of State on December 14, 1989.
(87) On October 23, 1990, and August 19, 1991, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted regulations adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board as part of title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code and intended incorporation to the Indiana ozone plan as part of the stationary source control strategy.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) The following volatile organic compound rules adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board as part of title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) and intended to partially satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(1) Effective October 23, 1988: 326 IAC 8-1-.05 Coating Definition, 326 IAC 8-2-11 Fabric and Vinyl Coating.
(2) Effective February 15, 1990: 326 IAC 1-2-48 Non-Photochemically Reactive Hydrocarbon Defined; 326 IAC 8-2-5 Paper Coating Operations.
(3) Effective May 18, 1990: 326 IAC 1-2-18.5 Cold Cleaner Degreaser Defined; 326 IAC 1-2-21.5 Conveyorized Degreaser Defined; 326 IAC 1-2-29.5 Freeboard Height Defined; 326 IAC 1-2-29.6 Freeboard Ratio Defined; 326 IAC 1-2-49.5 Open Top Vapor Degreaser Defined; 326 IAC 8-2-9 Miscellaneous Metal Coating Operations; 326 IAC 8-3-1 Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations; 326 IAC 8-5-3 Synthesized Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations; 326 IAC 8-5-5 Graphic Arts Operations.
(4) Effective June 8, 1990: 326 IAC 8-1-2 Compliance Methods; 326 IAC 1-2-90 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Definition; 326 IAC 8-1-4 Testing Procedures.
(5) Effective June 5, 1991: 326 IAC 1-2-14 Coating Line Definition; 326 IAC 8-1-1 Applicability of Rule; 326 IAC 8-1-2 Compliance Methods; 326 IAC 8-1-4 Testing Procedures; 326 IAC 8-2-1 Applicability; 326 IAC 8-3-5 Cold Cleaner Degreaser Operation and Control; 326 IAC 8-3-6 Open Top Vapor Degreaser Operation and Control Requirements; 326 IAC 8-3-7 Conveyorized Degreaser Operation and Control; 326 IAC 8-4-8 Leaks from Petroleum Refineries, Monitoring, Reports; 326 IAC 8-5-5 Graphic Arts Operations.
(88) On February 15, 1990, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a request to revise the Indiana State Implementation Plan by adding a site specific particulate matter revision for Navistar International Transportation Corporation (Navistar) gray iron foundry and engine plant in Indianapolis, Indiana.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 Air Pollution Control Board, Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 6-1-12 as amended, effective January 13, 1990.
(89) On July 22, 1991, as supplemented on April 18, 1994, the State submitted regulations adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board as part of Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code for incorporation into the Indiana sulfur dioxide State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 7-4-12.1: Gibson County sulfur dioxide emission limitations; effective December 5, 1990. Published in the Indiana Register, Volume 14, Number 3, December 1, 1990.
(90) On March 3, 1989, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a request to revise the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) by adding an emission trade or bubble for Joseph E. Seagram and Sons which is located in Lawrenceburg, Indiana. This requested SIP revision repeals rule 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 6-1-8, adds a new Section, 326 IAC 6-1-8.1, and amends 326 IAC 6-1-7 to include a reference for the new Section and a recodification of the applicable rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 IAC 6-1-7 as published in the Indiana Register Volume 12, Number 6, March 1, 1989, effective April 9, 1989.
(B) Title 326, IAC 6-1-8.1, repeal of 326 IAC 6-1-8 as published in the Indiana Register, Volume 12, Number 6, March 1, 1989, effective March 1, 1989.
(91) [Reserved]
(92) On February 25, 1994, Indiana submitted an employee commute option rule intended to satisfy the requirements of section 182(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code, Article 19 MOBILE SOURCE RULES, Rule 1, Employee Commute Options. Filed with the Secretary of State, October 28, 1993, effective November 29, 1993. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 17, Number 3, December 1, 1993.
(93) On February 25, 1994, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management requested a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan in the form of Stage II Vapor Recovery Rules as amendments to Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 8-1-0.5 and 8-4-6.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 IAC 8-1-0.5 Definitions and 8-4-6 Gasoline dispensing facilities. Filed with the Secretary of State October 28, 1993, effective November 29, 1993. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 17, Number 3, December 1, 1993.
(94) On February 25, 1994, Indiana requested a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) in the form of amendments to Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 2-1-1 and 2-1-3 which were intended to satisfy the additional new source review requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. The USEPA, at this time, is also approving the incorporation of permitting rules Recodified as Article 2. Permit Review Rules of 326 IAC into the SIP to replace APC 19 which was incorporated into the Indiana SIP at 40 CFR 52.770 (c)(24).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendments to Title 326 IAC 2-1-1, 2-1-2, 2-1-3, 2-3-1, 2-3-2, 2-3-3, and 2-3-5. Filed with the Secretary of State November 12, 1993, effective December 13, 1993.
(B) Amendments to Title 326 IAC 2-1-4, 2-1-5, 2-1-6, 2-1-7, 2-1-9, 2-1-10, 2-1-11, 2-1-12, 2-1-13, 2-3-4. Filed with the Secretary of State March 10, 1988, effective April 9, 1988.
(95) On May 22, 1994, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a request to revise the Indiana State Implementation Plan by adding a lead plan for Marion County which consists of a source specific revision to Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) for Refined Metals.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendments to 326 IAC 15-1-2 Source-specific provisions. Filed with the Secretary of State March 25, 1994. Effective April 24, 1994. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 17, Number 8, May 1, 1994.
(96) On August 3, 1994 and February 6, 1995, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a requested SIP revision to the ozone plan for ozone nonattainment areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code, Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 2: Definitions, Section 22.5 “Department” definition, Section 28.5 “Federally enforceable” definition, and Section 64.1 “Reasonably available control technology” or “RACT” definition. Added at 18 Indiana Register 1223-4, effective January 21, 1995.
(B) Indiana Administrative Code, Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 7: Specific VOC Reduction Requirements for Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties. Added at 18 Indiana Register 1224-9, effective January 21, 1995.
(97) On October 25, 1994, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management requested a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to State Operating Permit Rules intended to satisfy Federal requirements for issuing federally enforceable State operating permits (FESOP) and thereby exempt certain small emission sources from review under the State's title V operating permit program. This FESOP rule is also approved for the purpose of providing federally enforceable emissions limits on hazardous air pollutants listed under section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act. This revision took the form of an amendment to Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 2-8 Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit Program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 IAC 2-8 Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit Program. Sections 1 through 17. Filed with the Secretary of State May 25, 1994. Effective June 24, 1994. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 17, Number 10, July 1, 1994.
(98) On October 25, 1994, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management requested a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to State Operating Permit Rules intended to allow State permitting authorities the option of integrating requirements determined during preconstruction permit review with those required under title V. The State's Enhanced New Source Review provisions are codified at Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board (326 IAC) 2-1-3.2 Enhanced New Source Review.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 IAC 2-1-3.2 Enhanced new source review. Filed with the Secretary of State May 25, 1994. Effective June 24, 1994. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 17, Number 10, July 1, 1994.
(99) On June 16, 1993, December 9, 1993, September 8, 1994, and November 17, 1994, Indiana submitted a part D particulate matter (PM) nonattainment area plan for the Lake County moderate nonattainment area.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 2: Definitions, Section 32.1: “Gooseneck cap” definition, Section 34.1: “Jumper pipe” definition, Section 62.1: “Quench car” definition, Section 63.1: “Quench reservoir” definition, and Section 63.2: “Quench tower” definition. Added at 16 Indiana Register 2363, effective June 11, 1993.
(B) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 5: Opacity Regulations, Rule 1: Opacity Limitations, Section 1: Applicability of rule, Section 2: Visible emissions limitations, Section 3: Temporary exemptions, Section 4: Compliance determination, Section 5: Violations, and Section 7: State implementation plan revisions. Amended at 16 Indiana Register 2363, effective June 11, 1993.
(C) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Opacity Limitations, Section 10.1: Lake County PM10 emissions requirements (subsections a through k), Section 10.2: Lake County PM10 coke battery emissions requirements, and Section 11.1: Lake County fugitive particulate matter control requirements. Added at 16 Indiana Register 2363, effective June 11, 1993.
(D) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 11: Emissions Limitations for Specific Types of Operations, Rule 3: Coke Oven Batteries, Section 2: Emissions limitations (subsections a through f, and i), and Section 4: Compliance determination. Amended at 16 Indiana Register 2363, effective June 11, 1993.
(100) On August 25, 1995, Indiana submitted a regulation which bans residential open burning in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties in Indiana. The regulation allows residential open burning, with certain restrictions, in other parts of the State, and describes other types of open burning which are allowed in Indiana.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 4: Burning Regulations, Rule 1: Open Burning, Section 3: Exemptions. Added at 18 In. Reg. 2408 Effective June 23, 1995.
(101) On August 25, 1995, Indiana submitted a regulation which reduced the maximum allowable volatility for gasoline sold in Clark and Floyd Counties to 7.8 psi during the summer control period. The summer control period is June 1, to September 15, for retail outlets and wholesale customers, and May 1, to September 15, for all others.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 13-3 Control of Gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure. Sections 1 through 7. Finally adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board January 11, 1995. Signed by the Secretary of State July 6, 1995. Effective August 5, 1995. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 18, Number 11, August 1, 1995.
(102) On June 6, 1995, and on September 28, 1995 the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions establishing an enhanced inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. The new enhanced I/M program replaces the basic I/M programs in operation in Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties. The Air Pollution Control Board adopted new rule 326 IAC 13-1.1 and repealed existing 326 IAC 13-1, thereby putting in place a revised I/M program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 13-1.1 adopted April 5, 1995, effective October 1, 1995.
(ii) Other material. (A) June 6, 1995 letter and enclosures from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) Commissioner to the Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) submitting Indiana's revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP).
(B) September 28, 1995 letter and enclosures from the IDEM Assistant Commissioner to the Regional Administrator of USEPA submitting supplemental vehicle inspection and maintenance SIP revision information and documentation.
(103) On August 25, 1995, the State submitted regulations adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board as part of title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code for incorporation into the Indiana sulfur dioxide State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 7-4-13(3); Dearborn County sulfur dioxide emission limitations; effective May 18, 1995. Published in the Indiana Register, Volume 18, Number 9, June 1, 1995.
(104) On December 20, 1995, and February 14, 1996, Indiana submitted a Clean-Fuel Fleet Program for Lake and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 19-3 Clean Fuel Fleet Vehicles, Sections 1 through 7. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board October 4, 1995. Signed by the Secretary of State December 19, 1995. Effective January 18, 1996. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 5, February 1, 1996.
(105) On October 25, 1994, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a requested revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan in the form of Source Specific Operating Agreement (SSOA) regulations. The SSOA regulations are intended to limit the potential to emit for a source to below the threshold level of Title V of the Clean Air Act. This revision took the form of an amendment to title 326: Air Pollution Control Board of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 2-9-1, 2-9-2(a), 2-9-2(b), and 2-9-2(e) Source Specific Operating Agreement Program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 2-9. Sections 1, 2(a), 2(b), and 2(e). Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board March 10, 1994. Signed by the Secretary of State May 25, 1994. Effective June 24, 1994. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 17, Number 10, July 1, 1994.
(106) On September 19, 1995, and November 8, 1995, Indiana submitted automobile and mobile equipment refinishing rules for Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan. This rule requires suppliers and refinishers to meet volatile organic compound content limits or equivalent control measures for coatings used in automobile and mobile equipment refinishing operations in the four counties, as well as establishing certain coating applicator and equipment cleaning requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-10: Automobile refinishing, Section 1: Applicability, Section 2: Definitions, Section 3: Requirements, Section 4: Means to limit volatile organic compound emissions, Section 5: Work practice standards, Section 6: Compliance procedures, Section 7: Test procedures, Section 8: Control system operation, maintenance, and monitoring, and Section 9: Record keeping and reporting. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board June 7, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State October 3, 1995. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 2, November 1, 1995. Effective November 2, 1995.
(107) On August 8, 1995, Indiana submitted a site specific SIP revision request for Richmond Power and Light in Wayne County Indiana. The submitted revisions provide for revised particulate matter and opacity limitations on the number 1 and number 2 coal fired boilers at Richmond Power and Light's Whitewater Generating Station. The revisions also allow for time weighted averaging of stack test results at Richmond Power and Light to account for soot blowing. Indiana is making revisions to 326 IAC 3-2-1, which currently allows Indiana to authorize alternative emission test methods for Richmond Power and Light. Until the rule is revised to remove this authority, and approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, no alternate emission test method, changes in test procedures or alternate operating load levels during testing is to be granted to Richmond Power and Light.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 3: Monitoring Requirements, Rule 2.1: Source Sampling Procedures, Section 5: Specific Testing Procedures; Particulate Matter; Sulfur Dioxide; Nitrogen Oxides; Volatile Organic Compounds; Article 5: Opacity Regulations, Rule 1: Opacity Limitations, Section 2: Visible Emission Limitations; and Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 14: Wayne County. Added at 18 In. Reg. 2725. Effective July 15, 1995.
(ii) Additional information. (A) August 8, 1995 letter from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management to USEPA Region 5 regarding submittal of a state implementation plan revision for Richmond Power and Light.
(108) On August 29, 1995, Indiana submitted a site specific SIP revision request for Allison Engine Company in Marion County, Indiana. The revision provides limits of 0 tons per year for boilers 2 and 11, which have shut down. The hourly mass limits remain unchanged at 0.337 pounds per million British Thermal Units (lbs/MMBTU) for boilers 1-4 of plant 5, 0.15 lbs/MMBTU for boilers 3-6 of plant 8, and 0.15 lbs/MMBTU for boilers 7-10 of plant 8. The rule provides for a combined limit of 130.0 tons per year for the boilers mentioned above, as well as new limits on the types and amounts of fuel which may be burned at the boilers, and a recordkeeping requirement to document compliance.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 12: Marion County. Added at 19 In. Reg. 186. Effective November 3, 1995.
(109) On October 25, 1994, and April 29, 1997, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management requested a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to the General Provisions and Permit Review Rules intended to update and add regulations which have been effected by recent SIP revisions, and to change regulations for streamlining purposes. This revision took the form of an amendment to Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 1-1 Provisions Applicable Throughout Title 326, 1-2 Definitions, 1-6 Malfunctions, 2-1 Construction and Operating Permit Requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 IAC 1-1-2 and 1-1-3. 326 IAC 1-2-2, 1-2-4, 1-2-12, 1-2-33.1, and 1-2-33.2. 326 IAC 1-6-1. 326 IAC 2-1-1, 2-1-3, and 2-1-10. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board March 10, 1994. Filed with the Secretary of State May 25, 1994. Effective June 24, 1994. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 17, Number 10, July 1, 1994.
(110) On November 21, 1995, and February 14, 1996, Indiana submitted Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfill rules for Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan. This rule requires MSW landfills that emit greater than fifty-five tons per day of non-methane organic compound, or that have a minimum design capacity of one hundred eleven thousand tons (one hundred thousand megagrams) of solid waste, to install a landfill gas collection and control system that either incinerates the gas or recovers the gas for energy use.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-8 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, Section 1 Applicability, Section 2 Definitions, Section 3 Requirements; incorporation by reference of federal standards, Section 4 Compliance deadlines. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board July 12, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State December 19, 1995. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 5, February 1, 1996. Effective January 18, 1996.
(111) On November 21, 1995, and February 14, 1996, Indiana submitted a rule for the control of volatile organic compound emissions from volatile organic liquid storage operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-9: Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels, Section 1: Applicability, Section 2: Exemptions, Section 3: Definitions, Section 4: Standards, Section 5: Testing and procedures, Section 6: Record keeping and reporting requirements. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board May 3, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State December 19, 1995. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 5, February 1, 1996. Effective January 18, 1996.
(112) [Reserved]
(113) On February 13, 1996, and June 27, 1996, Indiana submitted rules for the control of volatile organic compound emissions from shipbuilding and ship repair operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-12: Shipbuilding or Ship Repair operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties, Section 1: Applicability, Section 2: Exemptions, Section 3: Definitions, Section 4: Volatile organic compound emissions limiting requirements, Section 5: Compliance requirements, Section 6: Test methods and procedures, and Section 7: Record keeping, notification, and reporting requirements. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board September 6, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State April 1, 1996. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 8, May 1, 1996. Effective May 1, 1996.
(114) On November 21, 1995, and February 14, 1996, Indiana submitted regulations for wood furniture coating operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-11 Wood Furniture Coatings, Section 1 Applicability, Section 2 Definitions, Section 3 Emission limits, Section 4 Work practice standards, Section 5 Continuous compliance plan, Section 6 Compliance procedures and monitoring requirements, Section 7 Test procedures, Section 8 Recordkeeping requirements, Section 9 Reporting requirements, Section 10 Provisions for sources electing to use emission averaging. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board May 3, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State December 5, 1996. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 5, February 1, 1996. Effective January 4, 1996.
(115) [Reserved]
(116) On September 20, 1996 the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a request to revise the Indiana State Implementation Plan by adding parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF), cyclic, branched or linear completely methylated siloxanes and acetone to the definition of “nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbon,” and by deleting “vegetable oil” from a list of compounds not considered to be volatile organic compounds (VOC) from the definition of VOC (thus including “vegetable oil” as a “VOC”).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 IAC 1-2-48 “nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbon”. Sections 48(a)(22) “parachlorobenzotrifluoride” and (23) “cyclic, branched, or linear completely methylated siloxanes.” 326 IAC 1-2-90 “volatile organic compound (VOC)” definition. Section 90. Published in Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 1, October 1, 1995, page 29. Filed with the Secretary of State September 5, 1995, effective October 5, 1995.
(B) 326 IAC 1-2-48 “nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbon.” Section 48(a)(24) “acetone” (CAS Number 67-64-1). Published in Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 10, July 1, 1996, page 2856. Filed with the Secretary of State, May 13, 1996, effective June 12, 1996.
(117) [Reserved]
(118) On July 12, 1995, Indiana submitted as a revision to the State Implementation Plan construction permits CP 019-2110, CP 019-2696, and CP 019-4362, issued under Indiana rule 326 IAC 2-1. The permits establish volatile organic compound control requirements for Rhodes Incorporated's heatset web offset printing presses.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Construction Permit CP 019-2110, issued and effective October 15, 1991; Construction Permit CP 019-2696, issued and effective December 18, 1992; Construction permit CP 019-4362, issued and effective April 21, 1995.
(119) Approval—On October 2, 1996, the State of Indiana submitted a State Implementation Plan revision request to eliminate references to total suspended particulates (TSP) while maintaining the existing opacity requirements. The SIP revision became effective July 19, 1996. The SIP revision request satisfies all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 5-1: Opacity Limitations, Section 1: Applicability of Rule, Section 2: Visible emission limitations. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board April 3, 1996. Filed with the Secretary of State June 19, 1996. Published at the Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 11, August 1, 1996 (19 IR 3049). Effective July 19, 1996.
(120) On August 26, 1996, Indiana submitted a rule requiring an oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT) rule for the Clark and Floyd Counties moderate ozone nonattainment area as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 10: Nitrogen Oxides Rules. Rule 1: Nitrogen Oxides Control in Clark and Floyd Counties. Section 1: Applicability, Section 2: Definitions, Section 3: Requirements, Section 4: Emission limits, Section 5: Compliance procedures, Section 6: Emissions monitoring, and Section 7: Certification, record keeping, and reports. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board February 7, 1996. Filed with the Secretary of State May 13, 1996. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 10, July 1, 1996. Effective June 12, 1996.
(121) On January 23, 1997, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the general conformity rules. The general conformity SIP revision enables the State of Indiana to implement and enforce the Federal general conformity requirements in the nonattainment and maintenance areas at the State and local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 51, subpart W—Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 16-3: General Conformity, Section 1: Applicability; incorporation by reference of Federal standards. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board April 3, 1996. Filed with the Secretary of State June 6, 1996. Published at the Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 11, August 1, 1996 (19 IR 3050). Effective July 6, 1996.
(122) On July 24, 1997, Indiana submitted rules requiring record keeping and reporting requirements for graphic arts sources of volatile organic compounds and amended source applicability requirements for graphic arts sources located in Lake and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 IAC 8-1-9 General record keeping and reporting requirements. 326 IAC 8-1-10 Compliance certification, record keeping, and reporting requirements for certain coating facilities using compliant coatings. 326 IAC 8-1-11 Compliance certification, record keeping, and reporting requirements for certain coating facilities using daily weighted averaging. 326 IAC 8-1-12 Compliance certification, record keeping, and reporting requirements for certain coating facilities using control devices. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board November 6, 1996. Filed with the Secretary of State April 22, 1997. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 20, Number 9, June 1, 1997. Effective May 22, 1997.
(B) 326 IAC 8-5-5 Graphic arts operations. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board November 6, 1996. Filed with the Secretary of State April 22, 1997. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 20, Number 9, June 1, 1997. Effective May 22, 1997.
(123) On July 9, 1997, Indiana submitted a site specific SIP revision request for the University of Notre Dame in Saint Joseph County, Indiana. The submitted revision amends 326 IAC 6-1-18, and provides for revised particulate matter and heat input limitations on the five boilers at Notre Dame's power plant.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 18: St. Joseph County. Added at 20 In. Reg. 2299. Effective May 22, 1997.
(124) On February 3, 1999, and May 17, 2000, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter emissions regulations for Allison Transmission in Marion County, Indiana. The submittal amends 326 IAC 6-1-12, and includes the combination of annual emissions limits for 5 boilers into one overall limit as well as new recordkeeping requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Emissions limits and recordkeeping requirements for Allison Transmission in Marion County contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 12: Marion County. Added at 22 In. Reg. 416. Effective October 16, 1998.
(125) On April 6, 1999, Indiana submitted amended rules for the control of volatile organic compound emissions from vehicle refueling in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-1: General Provisions, Section 0.5: Definitions and 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-4: Petroleum Sources, Section 6: Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board May 3, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State September 18, 1995. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 2, November 1, 1995. Effective October 18, 1995.
(126) On August 18, 1999, Indiana submitted amendments to the State's automobile refinishing rule for Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-10: Automobile Refinishing, Section 1: Applicability, Section 5: Work practice standards, Section 6: Compliance procedures, Section 9: Recordkeeping and reporting. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board February 4, 1998. Filed with the Secretary of State July 14, 1998. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 21, Number 12, page 4518, September 1, 1998. Effective August 13, 1998.
(127) On August 18, 1999, Indiana submitted rules for controlling Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions in Vanderburgh County. The rules contain control requirements for Stage I gasoline vapor recovery equipment, and a requirement for automobile refinishers to use special coating application equipment (automobile refinishing spray guns) to reduce VOC.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-4: Petroleum Sources, Section 1: Applicability, Subsection (c). Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board November 4, 1998. Filed with the Secretary of State April 23, 1999. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 22, Number 9, June 1, 1999. Effective May 23, 1999.
(B) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-10: Automobile Refinishing, Section 1: Applicability, Section 3: Requirements. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board November 4, 1998. Filed with the Secretary of State April 23, 1999. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 22, Number 9, June 1, 1999. Effective May 23, 1999.
(128) [Reserved]
(129) On May 18, 1999, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted revised site-specific lead emission limits for Hammond Group—Halstab Division located in Hammond (Lake County), Indiana. The revised emission limits are expressed as pounds-per-hour limits ranging from 0.04 to 0.07 applicable to sixteen separate emissions points. The revised emission limits will result in the reduction of total allowable lead emissions from 31,546 pounds per year as provided for in the current federally-approved State Implementation Plan to 6,832.8 pounds per year.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 15 Lead, Rule 1 Lead Emissions Limitations, Section 2—Source Specific Provisions, subsection (a), subdivision 7, clauses (A) through (G). Amended at 22 Indiana Register 1427, effective February 5, 1999.
(130) On February 3, 1999, Indiana submitted a site specific SIP revision request for the Central Soya Company, Incorporated, Marion County, Indiana. The submitted revision amends 326 IAC 6-1-12(a), and provides for revised particulate matter emission totals for a number of source operations at the plant. The revision reflects the closure of nine operations and the addition of five new ones, resulting in a net reduction in particulate matter emissions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The entry for Central Soya Company, Incorporated contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 12: Marion County. Subsection (a) amended at 22, Indiana Register 416, effective October 16, 1998.
(131) On April 6, 1999, Indiana submitted rules for the control of volatile organic compound emissions from steel mill sinter plant operations in Lake and Porter Counties as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-13: Sinter Plants. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board March 4, 1998. Filed with the Secretary of State June 24, 1998. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 21, Number 11, August 1, 1998. Effective July 24, 1998.
(132) On February 3, 1999, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter emissions regulations for Dubois County, Indiana. The submitted revision amends 326 IAC 6-1-9, and includes relaxation of some PM limits, the elimination of limits for boilers which are no longer operating, updated facility names, and changes to boiler fuel types.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 9: Dubois County. Added at 22 In. Reg. 423. Effective October 18, 1998.
(133) On November 22, 1999, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter emissions regulations for Indianapolis Power and Light Company in Marion County, Indiana. The submittal amends 326 IAC 6-1-12, and includes relaxation of some PM limits, tightening of other limits, and the elimination of limits for several boilers which are no longer operating. The revisions also include the combination of annual emissions limits for several boilers, and correction of a typographical error in one limit.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Emissions limits for Indianapolis Power and Light in Marion County contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 12: Marion County, subsection (a). Added at 22 In. Reg. 2857. Effective May 27, 1999.
(134) On February 3, 1999, the State of Indiana submitted a revision to particulate matter limitations for the Lever Brothers facility in Lake County. On December 28, 1999, Indiana submitted revisions to particulate matter and sulfur dioxide limitations for NIPSCo's Dean Mitchell Station.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 6-1-10.1 (d)(28) and (d)(33), filed with the Secretary of State on May 13, 1999, effective June 12, 1999. Published at Indiana Register Volume 22, Number 10, July 1, 1999 (22 IR 3047).
(B) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 7-4-1.1 (c)(17), filed with the Secretary of State on May 13, 1999, effective June 12, 1999. Published at Indiana Register Volume 22, Number 10, July 1, 1999 (22 IR 3070).
(135) On January 1, 2000, Indiana submitted revised opacity limits for three processes at ALCOA Warrick Operations. The revised limits allow higher opacity emissions during fluxing operations at three casting complexes. This action does not change mass emissions limits for these sources.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Modifications to Operating Permits OP 87-07-91-0112 thru 0116: Permit I.D. 173-10913, Issued on October 1, 1999, to ALCOA, Inc.—Warrick Operations. Effective October 1, 1999.
(B) Modifications to Operating Permit OP 87-07-91-0113: Permit I.D. 173-11414, Issued on December 15, 1999, to ALCOA, Inc.—Warrick Operations. Effective December 15, 1999.
(136) On August 30, 1999, and May 17, 2000, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions regulations for National Starch in Marion County, Indiana. The submittal amends 326 IAC 6-1-12, and includes elimination of shut down sources from the rules, increases in some limits, and a decrease in one limit.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(a) Emissions limits for National Starch in Marion County contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 12: Marion County. Added at 22 In. Reg. 1953. Effective March 11, 1999.
(b) Emissions limits for National Starch in Marion County contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 7: Sulfur Dioxide Rules, Rule 4: Emission Limitations and Requirements by County, Section 2: Marion County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations. Added at 22 In. Reg. 1953. Effective March 11, 1999.
(138) On August 2, 2000, Indiana submitted revised total suspended particulate emissions regulations for Illinois Cereal Mills, Incorporated in Marion County, Indiana. The submittal amends 326 IAC 6-1-12(a). It includes an increase in the annual particulate matter limit from 0.7 tons per year (TPY) to 1.0 TPY for a boiler and a decrease in the annual limit from 6.3 TPY to 6.0 TPY for a grain elevator.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Emissions limits for Illinois Cereal Mills, Incorporated in Marion County contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, Section 12: Marion County, subsection (a). Filed with the Secretary of State on May 26, 2000 and effective on June 25, 2000. Published in 23 Indiana Register 2414 on July 1, 2000.
(139) On December 30, 1999, Indiana submitted revised total suspended particulate emissions regulations for Johns Manville Corporation in Wayne County. The submittal appends 326 IAC 6-1-14. It includes raising seven long-term emissions limits, lowering one short-term limit, removing one emissions source, and a name change for the company. The long-term limits are being raised to allow to facility to operate 8760 hours annually. Switching fuel for a boiler allows its short-term limit to be decreased. One emissions source was removed from this facility. The Johns Manville, Wayne County, facility was formerly known as Schuller International, Incorporated.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Emissions limits for Johns Manville Corporation in Wayne County contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, Section 14: Wayne County. Filed with the Secretary of State on September 24, 1999, and effective on October 24, 1999. Published in 23 Indiana Register 301 on November 1, 1999.
(140) On August 31, 2000, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter emissions regulations for Rolls-Royce Allison in Marion County, Indiana. The submittal amends 326 IAC 6-1-12(a). It includes a name change for the company from the Allison Engine Company to Rolls-Royce Allison and the addition of an alternate fuel, landfill gas. Landfill gas can be used in boilers 1 through 4 of plant 5 and boilers 3, 4, and 7 through 10 of plant 8. These state implementation plan revisions do not change the particulate matter emissions limits.
(i) Incorporated by reference. Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, Section 12: Marion County, subsection (a). Filed with the Secretary of State on May 26, 2000 and effective on June 25, 2000. Published in 23 Indiana Register 2419 on July 1, 2000.
(141) On February 16, 2001 Indiana submitted revised particulate matter emissions regulations for Cerestar USA, Inc. The submittal amends 326 IAC 6-1-10.1, and includes the elimination of 18 emission points, the addition of 39 new emission points, and a change in the way the short-term emission limits are expressed (from pounds of particulate matter per ton of product to grains per dry standard cubic feet). The revision also changes the name of the facility listed in the rules from American Maize Products (Amaizo) to Cerestar USA, Inc.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Emissions limits for Cerestar USA, Inc. in Lake County contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, Section 10.1: Lake County PM10 emission requirements. Added at 24 In. Reg. 1308. Effective January 13, 2001.
(142) On June 8, 2000 the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision amending certain provisions of the Indiana vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in operation in Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties. Among the most significant changes being made to the program include: the exemption of the current calendar year model vehicle plus the (3) previous model years vehicles from emission testing; the inclusion of language that allows the use of the IM93 alternative vehicle emission test currently being used in the program; language that updates the requirement to test vehicles equipped with second generation on-board diagnostics systems (OBDII); and the elimination of the off-cycle test, which is the emission test currently required when there is a change in possession of motor vehicle titles. The Air Pollution Control Board amended 326 IAC 13-1.1 and repealed 326 IAC 13-1.1-17, thereby putting in place the revisions to the I/M program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 13-1.1 adopted December 2, 1998, effective January 22, 1999.
(ii) Other material. (A) June 8, 2000 letter and enclosures from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) Commissioner to the Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) submitting Indiana's revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP).
(143) On November 15, 2000, the State submitted rules to reduce volatile organic compound emissions from cold cleaning degreasing.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-3: Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations, Section 1, Applicability, and Section 8, Material Requirements for Cold Cleaning Degreasers. Final adoption by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on November 4, 1998. Filed with the Secretary of State on April 27, 1999. Effective May 27, 1999. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 22, Number 9, June 1, 1999.
(144) On August 20, 2001 and September 19, 2001, Indiana submitted a plan in response to Phase I of the NOX SIP Call. The plan includes Indiana's Phase I NOX Budget Demonstration and supporting documentation including initial unit allocations and two new rules: 326 IAC 10-3 and 326 IAC 10-4.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 10; Ozone rules, Rule 3: Nitrogen Oxide Reduction Program for Specific Source Categories (326 IAC 10-3). Adopted June 6, 2001. Submitted August 20, 2001 and September 19, 2001. State effective September 16, 2001.
(B) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 10; Ozone rules, Rule 4: Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program (326 IAC 10-4). Adopted June 6, 2001. Submitted August 20, 2001 and September 19, 2001. State effective September 16, 2001.
(145) Indiana submitted on December 17, 1997, as part of the 9% Rate of Progress Plan, an agreed order between U.S. Steel and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Section 3 of Exhibit E requires U.S. Steel to establish a coke plant process water treatment plant at its Gary Works.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Section 3 of Exhibit E of the March 22, 1996, Agreed Order between U.S. Steel (currently USX Corporation) and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
(146) On October 21, 1999, Indiana submitted revised state opacity regulations. The submittal amends 326 IAC 5-1-1, 5-1-2, 5-1-3, 5-1-4(b), and 5-1-5(b). The revisions address provisions concerning the startup and shutdown of operations, averaging period terminology, temporary exemptions, alternative opacity limits, and conflicts between continuous opacity monitor and visual readings.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Opacity limits for Indiana contained in Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 5: Opacity Regulations. Filed with the Secretary of State on October 9, 1998 and effective on November 8, 1998. Published in 22 Indiana Register 426 on November 1, 1998.
(ii) Additional material. Letter of October 10, 2001, from Janet McCabe, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Assistant Commissioner of the Office of Air Quality, to Stephen Rothblatt, US EPA Region 5, Chief of Air Programs Branch. The letter adds the technical justification and air quality analysis required for alternate opacity limits.
(147) On February 1, 2002, Indiana submitted its Prevention of Significant Deterioration rules as a revision to the State implementation plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code, Rules 2-2-1, 2-2-2, 2-2-3, 2-2-4, 2-2-5, 2-2-6, 2-2-7, 2-2-9, 2-2-12, and 2-2-14. Filed with the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001, effective January 19, 2002.
(B) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code, Rules 2-2-8, 2-2-10, 2-2-11, 2-2-13, 2-2-15 and 2-2-16. Filed with the Secretary of State on March 23, 2001, effective April 22, 2001.
(C) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code, Rules 2-1.1-6 and 2-1.1-8. Filed with the Secretary of State on November 25, 1998, effective December 25, 1998. Errata filed with the Secretary of State on May 12, 1999, effective June 26, 1999.
(148) On August 8, 2001, the State submitted rules to incorporate by reference Federal capture efficiency test methods. The submittal amends 326 IAC 8-1-4.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board; Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules; Rule 1: General Provisions; Section 4: Testing procedures. Filed with the Secretary of State on June 15, 2001 and effective on July 15, 2001. Published in 24 Indiana Register 3619 on August 1, 2001.
(149) [Reserved]
(150) On July 18, 2000 the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision amending certain provisions of Indiana's gasoline transport testing requirements with additional material submitted on January 11, 2002 and March 13, 2002. The Air Pollution Control Board amended 326 IAC 8-4-7 and 326 IAC 8-4-9 and added 326 IAC 20-10.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-4-7; 8-4-9; and 20-10-01 adopted May 5, 1999, effective November 5, 1999.
(ii) Additional materials. (A) July 18, 2000 letter and enclosures from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) Commissioner to the Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) submitting Indiana's revision to the ozone SIP.
(B) January 11, 2002 letter and enclosures from IDEM to EPA submitted as an addendum to the July 18, 2000 revision to the ozone SIP.
(C) March 13, 2002 letter and enclosures from IDEM to EPA submitted as an addendum to the July 18, 2000 revision to the ozone SIP.
(151) On March 5, 2002, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management requested a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan in the form of revisions to the Permit Review Rules intended to add regulations to assure that construction permit conditions exist independently of title V permits. This revision took the form of an amendment to Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board of the Indiana Administrative Code (326 IAC) 2-1.1-9.5 General Provisions; Term of Permit.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Rules 326 IAC 2-1.1-9.5. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board October 3, 2001. Filed with the Secretary of State December 20, 2001. Effective January 19, 2002. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 25, Number 5, February 1, 2002.
(152) On December 19, 2001, Indiana submitted revised Particulate Matter (PM) control requirements. A March 17, 2003 letter from Indiana clarified what portions of the original submission the State was seeking revisions for. EPA is approving revisions for certain natural gas combustion sources in Indiana and various cleanup revisions to Indiana's PM rules. One revision eliminates PM emissions limits on specified natural gas combustion sources and replaces the limits with a requirement that such sources may only burn natural gas. The submission also contains many cleanup provisions such as eliminating limits for sources which have shut down and updating names of sources.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Nonattainment Area Limitations, IAC 6-1-1.5: Definitions; IAC 6-1-2: Particulate emission limitations; fuel combustion steam generators, asphalt concrete plant, grain elevators, foundries, mineral aggregate operations; modification by commissioner; IAC 6-1-3: Non-attainment area particulate limitations; compliance determination; IAC 6-1-4: Compliance schedules; IAC 6-1-5: Control strategies; IAC 6-1-6: State Implementation Plan revisions; IAC 6-1-8.1: Dearborn County particulate matter emissions limitations; IAC 6-1-9: Dubois County; IAC 6-1-10.1: Lake County PM10 emission requirements, Subsections (a) through (k); IAC 6-1-11.1: Lake County fugitive particulate matter control requirements; IAC 6-1-12: Marion County; IAC 6-1-13: Vigo County; IAC 6-1-14: Wayne County; IAC 6-1-15: Howard County; IAC 6-1-16: Vanderburgh County; IAC 6-1-17: Clark County; and, IAC 6-1-18: St. Joseph County. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board August 1, 2001. Filed with the Secretary of State November 8, 2001. Published in the Indiana Register, Volume 25, Number 3, December 1, 2001 at 709. State effective December 8, 2001.
(B) Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, 6-1-1: Applicability. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board August 1, 2001. Filed with the Secretary of State November 8, 2001. Published in the Indiana Register, Volume 25, Number 3, December 1, 2001 at 709. State effective, December 8, 2001. Amended by Errata filed with the Secretary of State January 10, 2002. Published in the Indiana Register, Volume 25, Number 5, February 1, 2002 at 1644. State effective, February 24, 2002. And amended by Errata filed with the Secretary of State October 2, 2002. Published in the Indiana Register, Volume 26, Number 2, November 1, 2002 at 383. State effective, November 16, 2002.
(153) On April 30, 2002 and September 6, 2002, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter regulations for Union Tank Car's railcar manufacturing facility in Lake County, Indiana. The submittal amends 326 IAC 6-1-10.1. The revisions consist of relaxing the limits for the grit blaster. The new limits are 0.01 grains per dry standard cubic foot and 9.9 pounds per hour.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, Section 10.1: Lake County PM10 emission requirements. Filed with the Secretary of State on July 26, 2002 and effective on August 25, 2002. Published in 25 Indiana Register 4076 on September 1, 2002.
(154) On August 08, 2001, Indiana submitted revised volatile organic Compound control requirements for certain facilities in the Indiana shipbuilding and ship repair industry. This submittal changes the individual and plantwide coating exemption levels and makes revisions to the compliance requirements, test methods and recordkeeping requirements. On October 1, 2002, Indiana submitted a letter providing its interpretation of certain of the above requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compounds, Rule 12: Shipbuilding or Ship Repair Operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties, Section 2: Exemptions, Section 4: Volatile organic compound emissions limiting requirements, Section 5: Compliance requirements, Section 6: Test methods and procedures, Section 7: Recordkeeping, notification, and reporting requirements. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on February 7, 2001. Filed with the Secretary of State June 15, 2001, effective July 15, 2001.
(B) An October 1, 2002, letter from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management which provides background information on its shipbuilding and ship repair rule revisions and its interpretation of certain of these requirements.
(155) On October 17, 2002, the State submitted revised particulate matter emission limits for the Knauf Fiber Glass in Shelby County for incorporation into the Indiana SIP.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 11 Emission Limitations for Specific Types of Operations, Rule 4 Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing, Paragraph 5 Shelby County (326 IAC 11-4-5). Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on May 1, 2002. Filed with the Secretary of State on August 28, 2002. Published in the Indiana Register, Volume 26, Number 1, October 1, 2002, effective September 27, 2002.
(156) On April 3, 2000 the State submitted a revision to Indiana's State Implementation Plan to allow the Department of the Navy use of military specification coatings containing volatile organic compound (VOC) control requirements with content up to 5.45 pounds of VOC per gallon of coating less water for the projectile renovations operations in Building 2728 at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Part 70 Significant Source Modification No.: 101-11153-00005 as issued by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on October 12, 1999.
(157) On December 19, 2001, and February 11, 2004, Indiana submitted revised volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions regulations for Eli Lilly and Company in Marion County. The submission provides alternate VOC control requirements for reactors, vacuum dryers, centrifuges, and filters in the pilot plant. The alternate control requirements are being approved under site-specific Reasonably Available Control Technology standards.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Commissioner's Order #2003-02 as issued by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management on February 11, 2004.
(158) On October 21, 2002 and January 10, 2003, Indiana submitted revised volatile organic compound regulations for dip and flow coating operations. The revisions include replacing daily compliance with a rolling thirty day average and adding new equivalent emission limits.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 1: General Provisions, Section 2: Compliance Methods. Filed with the Secretary of State on November 15, 2002, and effective on December 15, 2002. Published in 26 Indiana Register 1073 on January 1, 2003.
(159) On January 31, 2003, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter regulations for Richmond Power and Light Company's coal burning power plant in Wayne County, Indiana. The submission amends 326 IAC 6-1-14. The revisions make the long-term emission limits consistent with the short-term limits approved by EPA on April 9, 1996. The new limits are 320 tons per years for boiler number 1 and 700 tons per years for boiler number 2.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, Section 14: Wayne County PM emission requirements. Filed with the Secretary of State on March 10, 2003 and effective on April 9, 2003. Published in 26 Indiana Register 2318-19 on April 1, 2003.
(160) On July 9, 2002, Indiana submitted revised process weight rate rules as a requested revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan. The changes clarify rule applicability, correct errors in the process weight rate table, allow sources to substitute work standard practices instead of the process weight rate table. They clarify the definitions of particulate and particulate matter. They also reduce duplicative recordkeeping.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules Rule 3: Particulate Emission Limitations for Manufacturing Process. 6-3-1 Applicability, 6-3-1.5 Definitions and 6-3-2 Particulate emission limitations, work practices, and control technologies. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on February 6, 2002. Filed with the Secretary of State May 13, 2002, effective June 12, 2002.
(161) On October 30, 2002 and January 10, 2003, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted revisions to Chapter 326 IAC 4-2 and 9-1 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), an incineration plan for selected sources in Indiana, with a request that the Indiana State Implementation Plan be revised to include these amended carbon monoxide and particulate matter rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana rule: 326 IAC 4-2-1 and 326 IAC 4-2-2 (particulate matter), published at Indiana Register, January 1, 2003, 26 IR 1070, with an effective date of December 15, 2002.
(B) Indiana rule: 326 IAC 9-1-1 and 326 IAC 9-1-2 (carbon monoxide), published at Indiana Register, January 1, 2003, 26 IR 1072, with an effective date of December 15, 2002.
(162) On January 7, 2003 the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision amending certain provisions of Indiana's 326 IAC 8-2-9 (Miscellaneous metal coating operations) and 326 IAC 13-3-1 (Applicability, Control of gasoline Reid vapor pressure).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-2-9; and 13-3-1 adopted August 7, 2002, effective December 15, 2002.
(ii) Additional materials. (A) January 7, 2003 letter and enclosures from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) Commissioner to the Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) submitting Indiana's revisions to the ozone SIP.
(163) On June 26, 2003, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted revisions to 326 IAC 10-3 (NOX Reduction Program for Specific Source Categories) and 326 IAC 10-4 (NOX Budget Trading Program) of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC). Also, on August 4, 2003, IDEM submitted a letter containing the Legislative Service Agency Document #00-54(F) as published in the Indiana Register on August 1, 2003, 26 IR 3550, containing the legal and approving signatures. The revised rules change the Indiana Phase I NOX budget to 233,548 tons per ozone season for 2007.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Pollution Control Board rules: 326 IAC 10-3-1 and 326 IAC 10-4-1, 10-4-2, 10-4-9, 10-4-10, 10-4-13, 10-4-14 and 10-4-15. Adopted by the Indiana Pollution Control Board on May 7, 2003. Filed with the Secretary on July 7, 2003. Published at Indiana Register Volume 26, Number 11, August 1, 2003 (26 IR 3550). Effective August 6, 2003.
(164) On June 13, 2003, and as supplemented on October 3, 2003, Indiana submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the control of emissions of particulate matter (PM10) in the state of Indiana. Revisions to 326 IAC 6-1-10.1 and 326 IAC 6-1-10.2 amend the PM10 emission limits at U.S. Steel-Gary Works and U.S. Steel-Gary Coke Operations, located in Lake County, Indiana, and should result in decreased PM10 emissions of approximately 350 tons per year.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, Section 10.1: Lake County PM10 emission requirements. Filed with the Secretary of State on August 6, 2003 and effective on September 5, 2003. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 27, Number 1, October 1, 2003 (27 IR 61).
(B) Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: Non-attainment Area Limitations, Section 10.2: Lake County PM10 coke battery emission requirements. Filed with the Secretary of State on August 6, 2003 and effective on September 5, 2003. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 27, Number 1, October 1, 2003 (27 IR 85).
(165) On January 16, 2004 Indiana submitted revised Prevention of Significant Deterioration rules as a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendments to the Indiana Administrative Code, Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board; Article 2: Permit Review Rules; Rule 2: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements; Section 2-2-1 Definitions; Section 2-2-6 Increment consumption; requirements; and Section 2-2-12 Permit rescission. Filed with the Secretary of State on March 9, 2004, effective April 8, 2004. Published at 27 Indiana Register 2216; April 1, 2004.
(166)-(167) [Reserved]
(168) On October 7, 2004, Indiana submitted a request revision to particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emission limits as an amendment to its State Implementation Plan. The particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emission limits were deleted for the five boilers removed from the Pfizer, Incorporated facility in Vigo County, Indiana. These limits were listed in 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 6-1-13 and 326 IAC 7-4-3.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 1: County Specific Particulate Limitations, Section 13: Vigo County and Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 7: Sulfur Dioxide Rules, Rule 4: Emission Limitations and Requirements by County, Section 3: Vigo County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations. Filed with the Secretary of State on August 31, 2004 and effective September 30, 2004. Published in 28 Indiana Register 115-18 on October 1, 2004.
(169) On December 22, 2004, Indiana submitted a request to revise the volatile organic compound requirements for Transwheel Corporation of Huntington County, Indiana. EPA is approving the oil cover as an equivalent control device under 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-3-5 (a)(5)(C).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Commissioner's Order #2004-04 as issued by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management on December 22, 2004.
(170) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted revisions to Indiana's State Implementation plan on February 18, 2005, February 21, 2005, and April 8, 2005. Revisions to 326 IAC 1-2-52, 326 IAC 1-2-82.5, and 326 IAC 1-3-4 amend the definition of “particulate matter” to include the definition of PM2.5 and amends the section that specifies the national ambient air quality standards. Revisions to 326 IAC 1-1-3 and 326 IAC 1-1-6 update the references to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) from the 2000 edition to the 2002 edition and add “credible evidence provisions” into state rules consistent with federal requirements, respectively.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 2: Definitions, Section 52: “ ‘Particulate matter’ ” defined,” Section 52.2: “ ‘PM2.5’ defined,” Section 52.4:“ ‘PM10’ defined,” Section 82.5: “ ‘Total suspended particulate’ or ‘TSP’ defined.” Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 3: Ambient Air Quality Standards, Section 4: “Ambient air quality standards.” Filed with the Secretary of State on December 20, 2004 and effective on January 19, 2005. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 28, Number 5, February 1, 2005 (28 IR 1471-1473).
(B) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 1: Provisions Applicable Throughout Title 326, Section 3: “References to the Code of Federal Regulations.” Filed with the Secretary of State on August 26, 2004 and effective on September 25, 2004. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 28, Number 1, October 1, 2004 (28 IR 17).
(C) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 1: Provisions Applicable Throughout Title 326, Section 6: “Credible evidence.” Filed with the Secretary of State on February 14, 2005 and effective on March 16, 2005. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 28, Number 7, April 1, 2005 (28 IR 2045).
(171) On April 8, 2005, Indiana submitted final adopted revisions for the Dearborn County sulfur dioxide emission limitations in 326 IAC 7-4-13 as a requested revision to the Indiana state implementation plan. EPA is approving these revisions, which remove obsolete rule language for Indiana Michigan Tanners Creek Station and update information for other companies listed in the rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 7: Sulfur Dioxide Rules, Rule 4: Emission Limitations and Requirements by County, Section 13: Dearborn County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations. Filed with the Secretary of State on February 14, 2005, and effective March 16, 2005. Published in the Indiana Register on April 1, 2005 (28 IR 2021).
(172) On April 8, 2005, and as supplemented on July 6, 2005, Indiana submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the control of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions in Lake County, Indiana. The SIP revision submitted by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) amends 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) Article 7. Indiana's revised SO2 rule consists of changes to 326 IAC 7-4 which sets forth facility-specific SO2 emission limitations and recordkeeping requirements for Lake County. The rule revision also reflects updates to company names, updates to emission limits currently in permits, deletion of facilities that are already covered by natural gas limits, and other corrections and updates. Due to changes in section numbers, references to citations in other parts of the rule have also been updated.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 7 SULFUR DIOXIDE RULES, Rule 1.1 Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations, sections 326 IAC 7-1.1-1, “Applicability”, 326 IAC 7-1.1-2 “Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations”, and 326 IAC 7-2-1 “Reporting Requirements: Methods to Determine Compliance”; newly created 326 IAC 7-4.1, “Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations”, adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on March 2, 2005. Filed with the Secretary of State May 25, 2005, effective June 24, 2005.
(173) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted amendments to Indiana's State Implementation Plan on September 1, 2005. The amendments include the repeal of 326 IAC 6-1, which is replaced with new articles 326 IAC 6.5, “Particulate Matter Limitations for all Counties Except Lake County” and 326 IAC 6.8, “Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County.”
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) Amendments to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5 Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, and Article 6.8 Particulate Matter Limitations For Lake County. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board on May 4, 2005. Filed with the Secretary of State on August 10, 2005 and effective on September 9, 2005. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 28, Number 12, September 1, 2005 (3454).
(174) [Reserved]
(175) On December 15, 2005, Indiana submitted revised particulate matter (PM10) regulations for ASF Keystone, Inc. in Lake County. The emission limit for the small coil manufacturing unit is increased while the limits for the medium and large coil manufacturing units are decreased. The result of these revisions is a net decrease in PM10 emission limits. The emission limits for miscellaneous coil manufacturing are removed because the unit no longer operates. EPA also removed the process weight rate emission limits for the four units.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 2: Lake County: PM10 Emission Requirements, Section 4: ASF Keystone, Inc.-Hammond. Filed with the Secretary of State on October 20, 2005 and effective November 19, 2005. Published in 29 Indiana Register 794 on December 1, 2005.
(176) On December 21, 2005, Indiana submitted revised regulations to the EPA. As a result, the compounds, 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxy-propane, 3-ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)hexane, 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane, and methyl formate, are added to the list of “nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbons” or “negligibly photochemically reactive compounds” in 326 IAC 1-2-48 and these compounds are deleted from the list of VOCs in 326 IAC 1-2-90. Companies producing or using the four compounds will no longer need to follow the VOC rules for these compounds. The requirements in 326 IAC 1-2-48 and 1-2-90 were also modified for the compound t-butyl acetate. It is not considered a VOC for emission limits and content requirements. T-butyl acetate will still be considered a VOC for the recordkeeping, emissions reporting, and inventory requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 2: Definitions, Section 48: “‘Nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbon’ or ‘negligibly photochemically reactive compounds’ defined”, and Section 90: “ ‘Volatile organic compound’ or ‘VOC’ defined”. Filed with the Secretary of State on October 20, 2005 and effective November 19, 2005. Published in 29 Indiana Register 795-797 on December 1, 2005.(177) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted revisions to Indiana's State Implementation plan on December 21, 2005, and June 27, 2006. Revisions to 326 IAC 1-3-4 provide consistency between State (326 IAC 1-3-4) and Federal (40 CFR 50.3) reference conditions for measurements of particulate matter air quality; and amendments to 326 IAC 1-1-3 update the references to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) from the 2002 edition to the 2004 edition.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 1: Provisions Applicable Throughout Title 326, Section 3: References to the Code of Federal Regulations. Filed with the Secretary of State on October 14, 2005 and effective on November 13, 2005. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 29, Number 3, December 1, 2005 (29 IR 795).
(B) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 1: General Provisions, Rule 3: Ambient Air Quality Standards, Section 4: Ambient Air Quality Standards. Filed with the Secretary of State on March 6, 2006 and effective on April 5, 2006. Published at Indiana Register, Volume 29, Number 7, April 1, 2006 (29 IR 2179).
(178) On August 25, 2006, Indiana submitted final adopted revisions to its emission reporting requirement rules as a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 2: Permit Review Rules, Rule 6 Emission Reporting, Section 1: Applicability, Section 3: Compliance schedule, and Section 4: Requirements. Approved by the Attorney General June 29, 2006. Approved by the Governor July 13, 2006. Filed with the Publisher July 14, 2006. Published on the Indiana Register Web site August 9, 2006, Document Identification Number (DIN):20060809-IR-326050078FRA. Effective August 13, 2006.
(179) On July 17, 2006, Indiana submitted final adopted revisions, which add 326 IAC 8-1-6 (3)(B) and (C), to its VOC rules for new facilities in 326 IAC 8-1-6 as a requested revision to the Indiana state implementation plan. EPA is approving these revisions, which exempt boat manufacturers subject to NESHAPS for boat manufacturing, or reinforced plastics composites manufacturers subject to NESHAPS for reinforced composites production facilities, from the requirement to do a best available control technology analysis provided they comply with the applicable NESHAPS.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 1: General Provisions, Section 6: New facilities; general reduction requirements. Final adopted by the Air Pollution Control Board on March 1, 2006. Filed with the Secretary of State on May 25, 2006, and became effective June 23, 2006. Published in the Indiana Register on July 1, 2006 (29 IR 3350).
(180) On November 1, 2005, and supplemented on March 20, 2007, the State of Indiana submitted a source specific revision to its state implementation plan for control of particulate matter in Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), Rule 6.5-7, Section 13, which contains particulate matter emission limits for Holy Cross Services Corporation, to reflect current operating conditions of the boilers at St. Mary's College, located in Notre Dame, Indiana. The revision in 326 IAC 6.5-7-13 also changes the source name from St. Mary's to Holy Cross Services Corporation (Saint Mary's Campus).
(i) Incorporation by reference. Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: PM Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 7: St. Joseph County, Section 13: Holy Cross Services Corporation (Saint Mary's Campus). Approved by the Attorney General January 18, 2007. Approved by the Governor January 23, 2007. Filed with the Publisher January 26, 2007. Published on the Indiana Register Web site February 14, 2007, Document Identification Number (DIN):20070214-IR-326060121FRA. Effective February 25, 2007.
(181) On September 2, 2004, Indiana submitted modifications to its Prevention of Significant Deterioration and nonattainment New Source Review rules as a revision to the state implementation plan. On October 25, 2005, and January 17, 2007, Indiana submitted revisions to the September 2, 2004 submittal.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code, Rules 2-1.1-7, 2-2-1(a) through (l), 2-2-1(n) through (kk), 2-2-1(mm) through (tt), 2-2-1(uu)(1) through (4), 2-2-1(vv) through (aaa), 2-2-2(a) through (d)(4), 2-2-2(d)(6) through (e), 2-2-2(g) through (i), 2-2-3, 2-2-4, 2-2-5(a), 2-2-5(c) through (e), 2-2-6, 2-2-8, 2-2.4, 2-3-1(a) through (i), 2-3-1(k) through (ff), 2-3-1(hh) through (uu), 2-3-2(a) through (c)(4), 2-3-2(c)(6) through (k), 2-3-2(m), 2-3-3(a) through (b)(11), 2-3-3(b)(14), 2-3.4, 2-5.1-4. Filed with the Secretary of State on August 10, 2004, effective September 10, 2004. Published in the Indiana Register on September 1, 2004 (27 IR 3887).
(182) On March 30, 2007, Indiana submitted final adopted revisions, which amend 326 IAC 8-5-1, concerning rule applicability, and add 326 IAC 8-5-6, fuel grade ethanol production at dry mills, to its VOC rules as a requested revision to the Indiana state implementation plan. By letter of December 19, 2007, Indiana stated that it would be acceptable to measure the concentration limits in 326 IAC 8-5-6 using EPA Method 25(a) expressed as equivalent ethanol with the calibration gas being a mixture of ethanol in air. EPA is approving these revisions, authorizing Indiana to establish an industry-specific State BACT standard for fuel grade ethanol production at dry mill facilities that emit 25 tons or more of VOC per year.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) are incorporated by reference. 326 IAC 8-5-1, “Applicability of Rule”, and 326 IAC 8-5-6 “Fuel Grade Ethanol Production at Dry Mills”. Approved by the Attorney General February 16, 2007. Approved by the Governor February 16, 2007. Filed with the Publisher February 20, 2007. Published on the Indiana Register Web site March 21, 2007, Document Identification Number (DIN):20070321-IR-326050197FRA. Effective March 22, 2007.
(ii) Additional materials. A December 19, 2007, letter from Daniel Murray, Assistant Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental management, Office of Air Quality, which states that it would be acceptable to measure the concentration limits in 326 IAC 8-5-6 using EPA Method 25(a) expressed as equivalent ethanol with the calibration gas being a mixture of ethanol in air.
(183) On February 7, 2002, Indiana submitted revisions to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) for lead (Pb) as part of the State's incorporation of a Federal standard for secondary lead smelters. On October 3, 2006, and November 27, 2007, Indiana supplemented its request as it pertained to Quemetco, Incorporated, in Marion County. This revision removes from the Indiana SIP the source-specific provisions for Quemetco found in article 326 IAC 15, previously approved in paragraph (c)(95) of this section, and replaces them with the corresponding provisions of article 326 IAC 20-13.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) are incorporated by reference:
(A) 326 IAC 15-1-2(c) “Source-specific provisions” and 326 IAC 15-1-3 “Control of fugitive lead dust”. Filed with the Secretary of State on December 1, 2000, effective December 30, 2000. Published in the Indiana Register on January 1, 2001 (24 IR 954).
(B) 326 IAC 20-13-1(c) “Applicability; incorporation by reference of federal standards”, 326 IAC 20-13-2(a) “Emission limitations lead standards for Quemetco, Incorporated”, and 326 IAC 20-13-6 “Compliance testing”. Filed with the Secretary of State on December 1, 2000, effective December 30, 2000. Published in the Indiana Register on January 1, 2001 (24 IR 958).
(184) Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted amendments to the State Implementation Plan to control nitrogen oxide emissions from internal combustion engines in 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 10-5 and corrections to 326 IAC 10-3-3 and 326 IAC 10-4 on March 8, 2006.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) are incorporated by reference.
(A) Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 10: Nitrogen Oxides Rules, Rule 3: Nitrogen Oxide Reduction Program for Specific Source Categories, Section 3: Emissions limits. Filed with the Secretary of State on January 27, 2006, effective February 26, 2006. Published in the Indiana Register on March 1, 2006 (29 IR 1876).
(B) Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 10: Nitrogen Oxides Rules, Rule 4: Nitrogen Oxides Budget Trading Program, Section 1: Applicability, Section 2: Definitions, Section 3: Retired unit exemption, Section 9: NOX allowance allocations, Section 13: Individual opt-ins, Section 14: NOX allowance banking, and Section 15: Compliance supplement pool. Filed with the Secretary of State on January 27, 2006, effective February 26, 2006. Published in the Indiana Register on March 1, 2006 (29 IR 1877).
(C) Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 10: Nitrogen Oxides Rules, Rule 5: Nitrogen Oxide Reduction Program for Internal Combustion Engines (ICE). Filed with the Secretary of State on January 27, 2006, effective February 26, 2006. Published in the Indiana Register on March 1, 2006 (29 IR 1899).
(185) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted amendments on September 20, 2007 to the State Implementation Plan to Control Emissions from electric generating units (EGU) and non-EGUs. Rules affecting these units include: 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 24-1-2, 326 IAC 24-1-8, 326 IAC 24-1-12, 326 IAC 24-2-11, 326 IAC 24-3-1, 326 IAC 24-3-2, 326 IAC 24-3-8 and 326 IAC 24-3-12 respectively.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) are incorporated by reference: 326 IAC 24-1-2(36) “Control period”; 326 IAC 24-1-2(38) “Energy efficiency or renewable energy projects”; 326 IAC 24-1-2(60) “Rated energy efficiency”; 326 IAC 24-1-8 “CAIR NOX allowance allocations”; 326 IAC 24-1-12 “CAIR NOX opt-in units”; 326 IAC 24-2-11 “CAIR SO2 opt-in units”; 326 IAC 24-3-1 “Applicability”; 326 IAC 24-3-2(38) “Energy efficiency or renewable energy projects”; 326 IAC 24-3-2(49) “Large affected unit”; 326 IAC 24-3-2(61) “Rated energy efficiency”; 326 IAC 24-3-8 “CAIR NOX ozone season allowance”; and 326 IAC 24-3-12 “CAIR NOX ozone season opt-in units”. Approved by the Attorney General January 12, 2007. Approved by the Governor January 23, 2007. Filed with the Publisher January 26, 2007. Published on the Indiana Register Web site February 28, 2007, Document Identification Number (DIN): 20070221-IR-326050117FRA. Effective February 25, 2007.
(186) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted revisions to Indiana's State Implementation plan on July 20, 2007, as revised on December 19, 2007, to amend 326 IAC 1-1-3, “References to the Code of Federal Regulations”; 326 IAC 1-2-48, “nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbons” or “negligibly photochemically reactive compounds” defined; and 326 IAC 1-2-90, “volatile organic compound” or “VOC” defined. The revision to 326 IAC 1-1-3 updates the references to CFR from the 2005 edition to the 2006 edition. In 326 IAC 1-2-48, and 326 IAC 1-2-90, the SIP revision deletes references to outdated Federal Register citations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) are incorporated by reference.
(A) 326 IAC 1-1-3, “References to the Code of Federal Regulations”. Filed with the Secretary of State on April 26, 2007, and effective on May 26, 2007. Published in the Indiana Register, on May 23, 2007 (DIN: 20070523-IR-326060412FRA).
(B) 326 IAC 1-2-48, “nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbons” or “negligibly photochemically reactive compounds” defined; and 326 IAC 1-2-90, “volatile organic compound” or “VOC” defined. Filed with the Secretary of State on April 26, 2007, and effective on May 26, 2007. Published in the Indiana Register, on May 23, 2007 (DIN: 20070523-IR-326060412FRA).
(ii) Additional Materials. A December 19, 2007, letter from Daniel Murray, Assistant Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Quality, which limits the July 20, 2007, SIP revision request to the following definitions: 326 IAC 1-1-3, “References to the CFR”; 326 IAC 1-2-48, “nonphotochemically reactive hydrocarbons” or “negligibly photochemically reactive compounds” defined; and 326 IAC 1-2-90, “volatile organic compound” or “VOC” defined.
(187) On February 21, 2008, Indiana submitted revisions to its particulate matter SIP. On March 27, 2008, Indiana submitted a corrected copy of its rules. The submittal revises 326 IAC 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County and 326 IAC 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County. This SIP revision updates facility names, revises formatting, removes sources no longer in operation, and revises some emission limits.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) are incorporated by reference:
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 1, General Provisions, sections 326 IAC 6.5-1-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-1-7, filed August 10, 2005, effective on September 9, 2005 and previously incorporated by reference (see paragraph (c)(173)(i)(A) of this section).
(B) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 2, Clark County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-2-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-2-12, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008 (326 IAC 6.5-2-8 Kimball Office-Borden, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008, errata filed on February 29, 2008).
(C) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 3, Dearborn County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-3-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-3-9, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(D) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 4, Dubois County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-4-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-4-24, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(E) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 5, Howard County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-5-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-5-16, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(F) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 6, Marion County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-6-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-6-36, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008 (326 IAC 6.5-6-18, Cargill, Inc., filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008, errata filed on January 31, 2008).
(G) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 7, St. Joseph County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-7-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-7-20, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008 (326 IAC 6.5-7-14 Accucast Technology, LLC, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008, errata filed on February 5, 2008).
(H) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 8, Vanderburgh County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-8-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-8-15, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(I) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 9, Vigo County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-9-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-9-20, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(J) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.5: Particulate Matter Limitations Except Lake County, Rule 10, Wayne County, sections 326 IAC 6.5-10-1 through 326 IAC 6.5-10-19, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(K) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations For Lake County, Rule 1, General Provisions, sections 326 IAC 6.8-1-1, Applicability, 6.8-1-5, Control strategies, and 6.8-1-7, Scope, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008; and Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations For Lake County, Rule 1, General Provisions, sections 326 IAC 6.8-1-1.5, Definitions, 6.8-1-2, Particulate emission limitations; fuel combustion steam generators, asphalt concrete plant, grain elevators, foundries, mineral aggregate operations; modification by commission, 6.8-1-3, Compliance Determination, 6.8-1-4, Compliance schedules, and 6.8-6-6, State implementation plan revisions, filed August 10, 2005, effective on September 9, 2005 and previously incorporated by reference (see paragraph (c)(173)(i)(A) of this section).
(L) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 2, Lake County: PM10 Emission Requirements, sections 326 IAC 6.8-2-1 through 326 IAC 6.8-2-38, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008 (326 IAC 6.8-2-6 BP Products North America, Inc.-Whiting Refinery, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008, errata filed on February 29, 2008).
(M) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 3, Lake County: Opacity Limits; Exceptions to 326 IAC 5-1-2, sections 326 IAC 6.8-3-1 through 326 IAC 6.8-3-4, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(N) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 4, Lake County: Opacity Limits; Test Methods, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(O) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 5, Lake County: Opacity Continuous Emissions Monitors, Installation and operation of continuous emissions monitors (Repealed), filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(P) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 6, Lake County: Combustion Sources; Natural Gas, sections 326 IAC 6.8-6-1 through 326 IAC 6.8-6-20), filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(Q) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 7, Lake County: Site-Specific Control Requirements, sections 326 IAC 6.8-7-1 through 326 IAC 6.8-7-8, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008.
(R) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 8, Lake County: Continuous Compliance Plan, section 326 IAC 6.8-8-1 Applicability, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008; and Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 8, Lake County: Continuous Compliance Plan, sections 326 IAC 6.8-8-2 Documentation; operation and maintenance procedures, 326 IAC 6.8-8-3 Plan requirements, 326 IAC 6.8-8-4 Plan; schedule for complying with 326 IAC 6.8-7, 326 IAC 6.8-8-5 Plan; source categories, 326 IAC 6.8-8-6 Plan; particulate matter control equipment; operation and maintenance, 326 IAC 6.8-8-7 Plan; particulate matter control equipment; recording; operation; inspection, 326 IAC 6.8-8-8 Plan; department review, filed August 10, 2005, effective on September 9, 2005 and previously incorporated by reference (see paragraph (c)(173)(i)(A) of this section).
(S) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 9, Lake County: PM10 Coke Battery Emission Requirements, section 326 IAC 6.8-9-3 Emission limitations, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008; and Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 9, Lake County: PM10 Coke Battery Emission Requirements, sections 326 IAC 6.8-9-1 Applicability, and 326 IAC 6.8-9-2 Definitions, filed August 10, 2005, effective on September 9, 2005 and previously incorporated by reference (see paragraph (c)(173)(i)(A) of this section).
(T) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 10, Lake County: Fugitive Particulate Matter, section 326 IAC 6.8-10-1 Applicability, filed January 23, 2008, effective on February 22, 2008; and Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 10, Lake County: Fugitive Particulate Matter, sections 326 IAC 6.8-10-2 Definitions, 326 IAC 6.8-10-3 Particulate matter emission limitations, and 326 IAC 6.8-10-4 Compliance requirements; control plans, filed August 10, 2005, effective on September 9, 2005 and previously incorporated by reference (see paragraph (c)(173)(i)(A) of this section).
(U) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6.8: Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County, Rule 11, Lake County: Particulate Matter Contingency Measures, sections 326 IAC 6.8-11-1 through 326 IAC 6.8-11-6, filed August 10, 2005, effective on September 9, 2005 and previously incorporated by reference (see paragraph (c)(173)(i)(A) of this section).
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Certificate of Authenticity, Indiana Administrative Code, (As Updated Through March 26, 2008), signed by John M. Ross, Executive Director, Legislative Services Agency.
(188) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a revision to Indiana's State Implementation plan on May 22, 2008, to amend 326 IAC 1-1-3, “References to the Code of Federal Regulations”. The revision to 326 IAC 1-1-3 updates the references to CFR from the 2006 edition to the 2007 edition.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), section 1-1-3, “References to the Code of Federal Regulations” is incorporated by reference. The rule was filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on April 1, 2008, and became effective on May 1, 2008. Published in the Indiana Register, on April 30, 2008 (DIN: 20080430-IR-32607037FRA).
(189) On December 19, 2007, Indiana submitted modifications to its Federally Enforceable State Operating Permits rules as a revision to the state implementation plan. The revision extends the maximum permit term for renewals of Federally Enforceable State Operating Permits from five years to ten years. EPA has determined that this revision is approvable under the Clean Air Act.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326, Article 2: Permit Review Rules, sections 2-1.1-9.5, “General provisions; term of permit”, and 2-8-4, “Permit content”, are incorporated by reference. Filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 16, 2007, and became effective on December 16, 2007. Published in the Indiana Register on December 13, 2007 (20071212-IR-326060487FRA).
(190) On September 11, 2008, Indiana submitted a revision to its SIP. The revisions add particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides control and emission limitations on the Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company's F.B. Culley Generating Station, a power plant located in Warrick County, Indiana.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 6: Particulate Rules, Rule 7: Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company, Section 1: “Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company (SIGECO)”; Article 7: Sulfur Dioxide Rules, Rule 4: Emission Limitations and Requirements by County, Section 10: “Warrick County sulfur dioxide emission limitations”; and Article 10: Nitrogen Oxides Rules, Rule 6: Nitrogen Oxides Emission Limitations for Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company, Section 1: “Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company (SIGECO)”.
Filed with the Secretary of State on July 31, 2008 and effective on August 30, 2008. Published in Indiana Register 326070309 on August 28, 2008, LSA Document #07-309(F).
(191) The Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted a revision to Indiana's State Implementation plan on September 25, 2009, to amend 326 IAC 1-1-3, “References to the Code of Federal Regulations”. The revision to 326 IAC 1-1-3 updates the references to CFR from the 2007 edition to the 2008 edition.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Title 326 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), section 1-1-3, “References to the Code of Federal Regulations” is incorporated by reference. The rule was filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on July 1, 2009, and became effective on July 31, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register, on July 29, 2009 (DIN: 20090729-IR-326080901FRA).
(192) On April 25, 2008, Indiana submitted regulations that incorporate its continuous emission monitoring requirements into its SIP. Indiana also submitted Commissioner's Orders that provide an alternative monitoring plan for a Warrick County source. The alternative monitoring requirements allow the use of a particulate matter continuous emissions monitoring system in place of a continuous opacity monitor.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 3: Monitoring Requirements, Rule 5: Continuous Monitoring of Emissions, Section 1: Applicability; monitoring requirements for applicable pollutants. Filed with the Secretary of State on January 30, 1998, and effective on March 1, 1998. Published in 21 Indiana Register 2062-2079 on March 1, 1998. (B) Commissioner's Order #2008-01 as issued by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management on February 11, 2008.
(193) On December 10, 2009, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted several volatile organic compound rules for approval into the Indiana State Implementation Plan for the Lake and Porter County portion of the Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN, 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. This includes both revisions to existing rules and also new rules. Also submitted were subsequent technical corrections to typographical, clerical, or spelling errors for some of these rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 1: General provisions, Section 0.5: Definitions, Section 2: Compliance Methods, and Section 4: Testing procedures, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090220FRA).
(B) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 2: Surface Coating Emission Limitations, Section 1: Applicability, Section 2: Automobile and light duty truck coating regulations, Section 5: Paper coating operations, Section 6: Metal furniture coating operations, Section 7: Large appliance coating operations, Section 9: Miscellaneous metal and plastic parts coating operations, and Section 10: Flat wood panels; manufacturing operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090220FRA).
(C) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 5: Miscellaneous Operations, Section 5: Graphic arts operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090220FRA).
(D) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 16: Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090221FRA).
(E) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 17: Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090221FRA).
(F) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 18: Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Air Oxidation, Distillation, and Reactor Processes, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090222FRA).
(G) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 19: Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Process Vents in Batch Operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090222FRA).
(H) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 20: Industrial Wastewater, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090222FRA).
(I) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 21: Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090222FRA).
(J) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 22: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 3, 2009, and became effective on December 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 2, 2009 (DIN: 20091202-IR-326090221FRA).
(K) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 1: General provisions, Section 2: Compliance Methods and Section 4: Testing procedures, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 18, 2009, and became effective on January 2, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090220ACA).
(L) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 2: Surface Coating Emission Limitations, Section 2: Automobile and light duty truck coating operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 18, 2009, and became effective on January 2, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090220ACA).
(M) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 16: Offset Lithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 18, 2009, and became effective on January 2, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090221ACA).
(N) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 17: Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 18, 2009, and became effective on January 2, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090221ACA).
(O) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 18: Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Air Oxidation, Distillation, and Reactor Processes, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 19, 2009, and became effective on January 3, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090222ACA).
(P) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 19: Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Process Vents in Batch Operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 19, 2009, and became effective on January 3, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090222ACA).
(Q) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 20: Industrial Wastewater, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 19, 2009, and became effective on January 3, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090222ACA).
(R) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 21: Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 19, 2009, and became effective on January 3, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090222ACA).
(S) Corrections to Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 22: Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on November 18, 2009, and became effective on January 2, 2010. Published in the Indiana Register on December 16, 2009 (DIN: 20091216-IR-326090221ACA).
(194) On December 31, 2008, Indiana submitted a Commissioner's Order that provided an alternative monitoring plan for Indianapolis Power and Light—Harding Street Generating Station in Marion County that is being incorporated into its SIP. The alternative monitoring requirements allow the use of a particulate matter continuous emissions monitoring system in place of a continuous opacity monitor.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Commissioner's Order #2008-02 for Indianapolis Power and Light as issued by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management on October 31, 2008.
(195) On June 5, 2009, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management submitted amendments to Indiana's automobile refinishing rule for approval into its state implementation plan (SIP). These rule revisions extend the applicability of Indiana's approved volatile organic compound (VOC) automobile refinishing rules to all persons in Indiana who sell or manufacture automobile refinishing coatings or who refinish motor vehicles.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Indiana Administrative Code Title 326: Air Pollution Control Board, Article 8: Volatile Organic Compound Rules, Rule 10: Automobile Refinishing, filed with the Publisher of the Indiana Register on March 27, 2009, and became effective on April 26, 2009. Published in the Indiana Register on April 22, 2009 (DIN: 20090422-IR-326060603FRA).
[37 FR 10863, May 31, 1972]
Subpart Q—Iowa
§ 52.820 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable SIP for Iowa under section 110 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7401, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet NAAQS.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to December 31, 2014, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with EPA approval dates after December 31, 2014, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 7 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the SIP as of December 31, 2014.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). If you wish to obtain material from the EPA Regional Office, please call (913) 551-7089. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(c) EPA-approved regulations.
| Iowa citation | Title | State effective date | EPA approval date | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission [567] | ||||
| Chapter 21—Compliance, Excess Emissions, and Measurement of Emissions | ||||
| 567-21.1 | Definitions and compliance requirements | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.2 | Variances | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.4 | Circumvention of rules | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.5 | Evidence used in establishing that a violation has occurred or is occurring | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.6 | Temporary electricity generation for disaster situations | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.7 | Excess emission reporting | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.8 | Maintenance and repair requirements | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.10 | Testing and sampling of new and existing equipment | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.13 | Methodology and qualified observer | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.14 | Prevention of air pollution emergency episodes—general | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.15 | Episode criteria | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.16 | Preplanned abatement strategies | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-21.17 | Actions taken during episodes | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| Chapter 22—Controlling Air Pollution | ||||
| 567-22.1 | Definitions and permit requirements for new or existing stationary sources | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | The definitions for “anaerobic lagoon,” “odor,” “odorous substance,” “odorous substance source” are not SIP approved. |
| 567-22.2 | Processing permit applications | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-22.3 | Issuing permits | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | Subrule 22.3(6) is not SIP approved. |
| 567-22.4 | Major stationary sources located in areas designated attainment or unclassified (PSD) | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-22.5 | Major stationary sources located in areas designated nonattainment | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-22.8 | Permit by rule | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-22.9 | Special requirements for visibility protection | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-22.10 | Permitting requirements for country grain elevators, country grain terminal elevators, grain terminal elevators and feed mill equipment | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-22.11 | Ambient air quality standards | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| Chapter 23—Air Emission Standards | ||||
| 567-23.1 | Emission standards | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | Subrules 23.1(1)-(5) are not SIP approved |
| 567-23.2 | Open burning | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | Subrule 23.2(3)j is not SIP approved. Variances from opening burning rule 23.2(2) are subject to EPA approval. |
| 567-23.3 | Specific contaminants | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | Subrule 23.3(3)”(d)” is not SIP approved. |
| 567-23.4 | Specific processes | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | Subrule 23.4(10) is not SIP approved. |
| Chapter 24-Operating Permits | ||||
| 567-24.105 | Title V permit applications | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | Only subparagraph 24.105(2)i(5) is SIP approved. |
| 567-24.300 | Operating permit by rule for small sources | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| Chapter 31—Nonattainment New Source Review | ||||
| 567-31.1 | Permit requirements relating to nonattainment area | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-31.3 | Nonattainment new source review (NNSR) requirements for areas designated nonattainment | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-31.4 | Preconstruction review permit program | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-31.9 | Actuals PALs | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-31.10 | Validity of rules | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| Chapter 33—Construction Permit Requirements for Major Stationary Sources—Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) | ||||
| 567-33.1 | Purpose | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-33.3 | PSD construction permit requirements for major stationary sources | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | Provisions of the 2010 PM2.5 PSD-Increments, SILs, and SMCs rule are excluded from 33.3(20) and are not SIP approved. |
| 567-33.9 | Plantwide applicability limitations | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| 567-33.10 | Exceptions to adoption by reference | 6/19/2024 | 7/16/2026, 91 FR 43550 | |
| Linn County | ||||
| Chapter 10 | Linn County Air Quality Ordinance, Chapter 10 | 5/14/2022 | 7/1/2024, 89 FR 54362 | The following definitions are not SIP-approved in Chapter 10-55; Anaerobic lagoon, Biomass, Chemical processing plants (ethanol production facilities that produce ethanol by natural fermentation included in NAICS code 325193 or 312140 are not included in this definition); Greenhouse gases; The following sections are not SIP approved: 10-57(a), Title V Permits; 10-59(c), Fees Associated with PSD Applications; 10-61, Emissions From Fuel-Burning Equipment, (b)(2); 10-61, Emissions From Fuel-Burning Equipment, (c) Exemptions for Residential Heaters Burning Solid Fuels; 10-61, Emissions from Fuel-Burning Equipment, (d) Nuisance Conditions for Fuel Burning Equipment; 10-62, Emission Standards,(b) NSPS; 10-62(c), Emission Standards for HAPs; 10-62(d), Emission Standards for HAPs for Source Categories; 10-63, Open Burning, (a)(3)e.3. Variance from Rules; 10-64, Emission of Objectionable Odors; 10-68, Variances; 10-70, Testing and Sampling of New and Existing Equipment, (k) Continuous Emissions Monitoring from Acid Rain Program; and 10-77, Penalty. |
| Polk County | ||||
| Chapter V | Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations Air Pollution Chapter V | 11/30/2018 | 9/21/2021, 86 FR 52413 | Article I, Section 5-2, definition of “anaerobic lagoon” and “variance;” Article III, Incineration and Open Burning, Section 5-7(d) Variance Application; Article VI, Sections 5-16(n), (o) and (p); Article VIII; Article IX, Sections 5-27(3) and (4); Article X, Section 5-28, subsections (a) through (c), and Article X, Section 5-35(b)(5); Article XIII; Article XIV; and Article XVI, Section 5-75 B are not part of the SIP. |
(d) EPA-approved State source-specific permits.
| Name of source | Order/Permit No. | State effective date |
EPA Approval date |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Archer-Daniels Midland Company | 90-AQ-10 | 3/25/1991 | 11/1/1991, 56 FR 56158 | |
| (2) Interstate Power Company | 89-AQ-04 | 2/21/1990 | 11/1/1991, 56 FR 56158 | |
| (3) [Reserved] | ||||
| (4) [Reserved] | ||||
| (5) [Reserved] | ||||
| (6) [Reserved] | ||||
| (7) [Reserved] | ||||
| (8) [Reserved] | ||||
| (9) [Reserved] | ||||
| (10) [Reserved[ | ||||
| (11) IES Utilities, Inc | 97-AQ-20 | 11/20/1998 | 3/11/1999, 64 FR 12087 | SO2 Control Plan for Cedar Rapids. |
| (12) Archer-Daniels-Midland Corporation | SO2 Emission Control Plan | 9/14/1998 | 3/11/1999, 64 FR 12087 | ADM Corn Processing SO2 Control Plan for Cedar Rapids. |
| (13) Linwood Mining and Minerals Corporation | 98-AQ-07 | 3/13/1998 | 3/18/1999, 64 FR 13343 | PM10 control plan for Buffalo. |
| (14) Lafarge Corporation | 98-AQ-08 | 3/13/1998 | 3/18/1999, 64 FR 13343 | PM10 control plan for Buffalo. |
| (15) Holnam, Inc | A.C.O. 1999-AQ-31 | 9/2/1999 | 11/6/2002, 67 FR 67563 | For a list of the 47 permits issued for individual emission points see IDNR letters to Holnam, Inc., dated 7/24/01. |
| (16) Holnam, Inc | Consent Amendment to A.C.O. 1999-AQ-31 | 5/16/2001 | 11/6/2002, 67 FR 67563 | For a list of the 47 permits issued for individual emission points see IDNR letters to Holnam, Inc., dated 7/24/01. |
| (17) Holnam, Inc | Permits for 17-01-009, Project Nos. 99-511 and 00-468. | 7/24/2001 | 11/6/2002, 67 FR 67563 | For a list of the 47 permits issued for individual emission points see IDNR letters to Holnam, Inc., dated 7/24/01. |
| (18) Lehigh Portland Cement Company | A.C.O. 1999-AQ-32 | 9/2/1999 | 11/6/2002, 67 FR 67563 | For a list of the 41 permits issued for individual emission points see IDNR letters to Lehigh dated 7/24/01 and 2/18/02. |
| (19) Lehigh Portland Cement Company | Permits for plant No. 17-01-005, Project Nos. 99-631 and 02-037 | 2/18/2002 | 11/6/2002, 67 FR 67563 | For a list of the 41 permits issued for individual emission points see IDNR letters to Lehigh dated 7/24/01 and 2/18/02. |
| (20) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | A.C.O. 03-AQ-51 | 12/4/2003 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Together with the permits listed below this order comprises the PM10 control strategy for Davenport, Iowa. |
| (21) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 02-A-116 (Cold Box Core Machine) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (22) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 02-A-290(Wheelabrator #2 and Casting Sorting) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (23) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 02-A-291 (Mold Sand Silo) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (24) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 02-A-292 (Bond Storage) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (25) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 02-A-293 (Induction Furnace and Aluminum Sweat Furnace) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (26) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 77-A-114-S1 (Wheelabrator #1 & Grinding) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (27) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 84-A-055-S1 (Cupola ladle, Pour deck ladle, Sand shakeout, Muller, Return sand #1, Sand cooler, Sand screen, and Return sand #2) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (28) Blackhawk Foundry and Machine Company | Permit No. 72-A-060-S5 (Cupola) | 8/19/2002 | 6/10/2004, 69 FR 32454 | Provisions of the permit that relate to pollutants other than PM10 are not approved by EPA as part of this SIP. |
| (29) Grain Processing Corporation | Administrative Consent Order No. 2014-AQ-A1 | 1/16/2017 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025; amendment approved 6/28/2018, 83 FR 30348 | The last sentence of Paragraph 5, Section III and Section VI are not approved by EPA as part of the SIP. |
| (30) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 74-A-175-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (31) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-006-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (32) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-007-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (33) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-191-P2 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (34) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-193-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (35) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-194-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (36) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-197-S2 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (37) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-200-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (38) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-201-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (39) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-202-S2 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (40) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 93-A-283-S2 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (41) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 93-A-288-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (42) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 93-A-289-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (43) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 93-A-290-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (44) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 93-A-373-P2 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (45) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 00-A-638-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (46) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 00-A-639-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (47) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 00-A-689-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (48) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 00-A-684-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (49) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 00-A-686-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (50) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 00-A-687-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (51) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 01-A-193-S2 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (52) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 01-A-218-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (53) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 01-A-456-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (54) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 01-A-617-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (55) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 04-A-618-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (56) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 04-A-619-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (57) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 11-A-562-S1 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (58) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-139 | 7/23/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (59) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-140 | 7/23/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (60) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-141 | 7/23/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (61) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-142 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (62) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-143 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (63) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-146 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (64) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-147 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (65) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-148 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (66) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-150 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (67) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-151 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (68) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-152 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (69) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-153 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (70) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-154 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (71) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-155 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (72) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-157 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (73) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-158 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (74) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-159 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (75) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-161 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (76) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 80-A-196-S3 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (77) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 93-A-286-S4 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (78) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 01-A-457-S4 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (79) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 06-A-650-S2 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (80) Muscatine Power and Water | Permit No. 13-A-160 | 7/22/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (81) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 93-A-251-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (82) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 93-A-252-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (83) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 93-A-253-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (84) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 93-A-254-S3 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (85) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-1086-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (86) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-1087-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (87) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-1088-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (88) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 93-A-255-S7 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (89) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-629-S3 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (90) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-630-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (91) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-631-S3 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (92) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-636-S3 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (93) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-529-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (94) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-530-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (95) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-531-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (96) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-532-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (97) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-533-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (98) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 93-A-256-S6 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (99) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-632-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (100) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-633-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (101) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-634-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (102) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 96-A-635-S5 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (103) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-1089-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (104) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-1090-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (105) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 00-A-1091-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (106) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 10-A-043-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (107) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 09-A-009-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (108) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 09-A-010-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (109) Union Tank Car Company | Permit No. 94-A-434-S2 | 4/8/2013 | 12/1/2014, 79 FR 71025 | |
| (110) Griffin Pipe Products Co., LLC | Administrative Consent Order No. 2015-AQ-02 | 1/29/2015 | 2/26/2016, 81 FR 9770 | |
| (111) Alter Metal Recycling | Permit No. 14-A-521-S1 | 6/30/2017 | 8/14/2025, 90 FR 39135 | 2008 Pb NAAQS Attainment Plan; condition 11 of the permit is not part of the SIP. |
| (112) Grain Processing Corporation | 95-A-374-S4 | 12/10/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (113) Grain Processing Corporation | 17-A-298 | 4/12/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (114) Grain Processing Corporation | 17-A-299 | 4/12/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (115) Grain Processing Corporation | 19-A-515-S1 | 12/22/2020 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (116) Grain Processing Corporation | 18-A-136 | 5/30/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (117) Grain Processing Corporation | 72-A-199-S2 | 12/10/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (118) Grain Processing Corporation | 17-A-112 | 5/2/2017 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (119) [Reserved] | ||||
| (120) Grain Processing Corporation | 75-A-353-S2 | 7/6/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (121) [Reserved] | ||||
| (122) Grain Processing Corporation | 80-A-149-S6 | 2/21/2017 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (123) Grain Processing Corporation | 80-A-150-S6 | 2/21/2017 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (124) Grain Processing Corporation | 85-A-031-S5 | 5/19/2020 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (125) Grain Processing Corporation | 85-A-032-S5 | 5/19/2020 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (126) Grain Processing Corporation | 85-A-038-P1 | 12/10/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (127) Grain Processing Corporation | 85-A-135-P1 | 12/10/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (128) Grain Processing Corporation | 90-A-111-S1 | 7/6/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (129) Grain Processing Corporation | 91-A-068-S3 | 11/4/2019 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (130) Grain Processing Corporation | 93-A-110-P1 | 12/10/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (131) Grain Processing Corporation | 92-A-383-S3 | 10/11/2016 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (132) Grain Processing Corporation | 92-A-385-S2 | 10/11/2016 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (133) Grain Processing Corporation | 94-A-055-S3 | 5/13/2021 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (134) Grain Processing Corporation | 94-A-061-S3 | 5/13/2021 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (135) Grain Processing Corporation | 02-A-781-S3 | 2/8/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (136) Grain Processing Corporation | 02-A-782-S3 | 2/8/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (137) Grain Processing Corporation | 09-A-482-S2 | 12/10/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (138) Grain Processing Corporation | 10-A-563-S2 | 7/25/2017 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (139) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-200-S1 | 4/12/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (140) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-201-S1 | 4/12/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (141) [Reserved] | ||||
| (142) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-203 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (143) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-204 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (144) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-205 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (145) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-206 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (146) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-207 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (147) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-208 | 12/10/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (148) [Reserved] | ||||
| (149) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-480 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (150) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-481 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (151) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-482 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (152) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-483 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQ Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (153) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-213-S2 | 12/22/2020 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (154) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-484 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (155) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-485 | 2/15/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (156) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-486-S1 | 11/4/2019 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (157) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-326-S1 | 3/4/2020 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (158) Grain Processing Corporation | 03-A-471-S3 | 5/30/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (159) [Reserved] | ||||
| (160) Grain Processing Corporation | 06-A-1261-S2 | 12/22/2020 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (161) [Reserved] | ||||
| (162) [Reserved] | ||||
| (163) Grain Processing Corporation | 15-A-199-S1 | 1/11/2021 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (164) Muscatine Power and Water | 13-A-152-S1 | 3/2/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (165) Muscatine Power and Water | 74-A-175-S4 | 3/2/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (166) Muscatine Power and Water | 95-A-373-P4 | 6/1/2016 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (167) Muscatine Power and Water | 80-A-191-P4 | 6/1/2016 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (168) Monsanto | 82-A-092-P12 | 11/1/2016 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-02-R7. |
| (169) Monsanto | 88-A-001-S3 | 5/13/2015 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Attainment Plan; Condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP; EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (170) MidAmerican Energy Company—Louisa Station | 05-A-031-P6 | 7/20/2023 | 8/5/2025, 90 FR 37389 | Regional Haze Plan for the second implementation period; condition 11 of the permit is not part of the SIP. |
| (171) MidAmerican Energy Company—Walter Scott Jr. Energy Center | 75-A-357-P9 | 7/20/2023 | 8/5/2025, 90 FR 37389 | Regional Haze Plan for the second implementation period; condition 11 of the permit is not part of the SIP. |
| (172) MidAmerican Energy Company—Walter Scott, Jr. Energy Center | 03-A-425-P4 | 12/5/2011 | 8/5/2025, 90 FR 37389 | Regional Haze Plan for the second implementation period; condition 6 of the permit is not part of the SIP. |
(e) The EPA approved nonregulatory provisions and quasi-regulatory measures.
| Name of nonregulatory SIP provision |
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area |
State submittal date |
EPA Approval date |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Air Pollution Control Implementation Plan | Statewide | 1/27/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| (2) Request for a Two Year Extension to Meet the NAAQS | Council Bluffs | 1/27/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | Correction notice published 3/2/1976. |
| (3) Revisions to Appendices D and G | Statewide | 2/2/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | Correction notice published 3/2/1976. |
| (4) Source Surveillance and Record Maintenance Statements | Statewide | 4/14/1972 | 3/2/1976, 41 FR 8956 | [FRL 484-4]. |
| (5) Statement Regarding Public Availability of Emissions Data | Statewide | 5/2/1972 | 3/2/1976, 41 FR 8956 | [FRL 484-4]. |
| (7) Letter Describing the Certificates of Acceptance for Local Air Pollution Control Programs | Linn County, Polk County | 12/14/1972 | 10/1/1976, 41 FR 43406 | [FRL 616-1]. |
| (8) High Air Pollution Episode Contingency Plan | Statewide | 6/20/1973 | 10/1/1976, 41 FR 43406 | [FRL 616-1]. |
| (9) Summary of Public Hearing on Revised Rules Which Were Submitted on July 17, 1975 | Statewide | 9/3/1975 | 10/1/1976, 41 FR 43406 | [FRL 616-1]. |
| (10) Air Quality Modeling to Support Sulfur Dioxide Emission Standards | Statewide | 3/4/1977 | 6/1/1977, 42 FR 27892 | [FRL 739-1]. |
| (11) Nonattainment Plans | Mason City, Davenport, Cedar Rapids, Des Moines | 6/22/1979 | 3/6/1980, 45 FR 14561 | [FRL 1427-5]. |
| (12) Information on VOC Sources to Support the Nonattainment Plan | Linn County | 10/8/1979 | 3/6/1980, 45 FR 14561 | [FRL 1427-5]. |
| (13) Information and Commitments Pertaining to Legally Enforceable RACT Rules to Support the Nonattainment Plan | Linn County | 11/16/1979 | 3/6/1980, 45 FR 14561 | [FRL 1427-5]. |
| (14) Lead Plan | Statewide | 8/19/1980 | 3/20/1981, 46 FR 17778 | [A-7-FRL-1776-5]. |
| (15) Letter to Support the Lead Plan | Statewide | 1/19/1981 | 3/20/1981, 46 FR 17778 | [A-7-FRL-1776-5]. |
| (16) Nonattainment Plans to Attain Secondary Standards | Mason City, Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, Davenport, Keokuk, Council Bluffs, Fort Dodge, Sioux City, Clinton, Marshalltown, Muscatine, Waterloo | 4/18/1980 | 4/17/1981, 46 FR 22368 | [A-7-FRL 1792-2]. |
| (17) Information to Support the Particulate Matter Nonattainment Plan | Mason City, Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, Davenport, Keokuk, Council Bluffs, Fort Dodge, Sioux City, Clinton, Marshalltown, Muscatine, Waterloo | 9/16/1980 | 4/17/1981, 46 FR 22368 | [A-7-FRL 1792-2]. |
| (18) Information to Support the Particulate Matter Nonattainment Plan | Mason City, Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, Davenport, Keokuk, Council Bluffs, Fort Dodge, Sioux City, Clinton, Marshalltown, Muscatine, Waterloo | 11/17/1980 | 4/17/1981, 46 FR 22368 | [A-7-FRL 1792-2]. |
| (19) Schedule for Studying Nontraditional Sources of Particulate Matter and for Implementing the Results | Mason City, Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, Davenport, Keokuk, Council Bluffs, Fort Dodge, Sioux City, Clinton, Marshalltown, Muscatine, Waterloo | 6/26/1981 | 3/5/1982, 47 FR 9462 | [A-7-FRL-2057-7]. |
| (20) Air Monitoring Strategy | Statewide | 7/15/1981 | 4/12/1982, 47 FR 15583 | [A-5-FRL-2076-5]. |
| (21) Letter of Commitment to Revise Unapprovable Portions of Chapter 22 | Statewide | 5/14/1985 | 9/12/1985, 50 FR 37176 | [EPA Action IA 1582; A-7-FRL-2895-9]. |
| (22) Letter of Commitment to Submit Stack Height Regulations and to Implement the EPA's Regulations until the State's Rules Are Approved | Statewide | 4/22/1986 | 7/11/1986, 51 FR 25199 | [EPA Action IA 2060; A-7-FRL-3046-8]. |
| (23) Letter of Commitment to Implement the Stack Height Regulations in a Manner Consistent with the EPA's Stack Height Regulations with Respect to NSR/PSD Regulations | Statewide | 4/22/1987 | 6/26/1987, 52 FR 23981 | [A-7-FRL-3216-5]. |
| (24) PM10 SIP | Statewide | 10/28/1988 | 8/15/1989, 54 FR 33536 | [FRL-3627-7]. |
| (25) Letter Pertaining to NOX Rules and Analysis Which Certifies the Material Was Adopted by the State on October 17, 1990 | Statewide | 11/8/1990 | 2/13/1991, 56 FR 5757 | [FRL-3903-5]. |
| (26) SO2 Plan | Clinton | 3/13/1991 | 11/1/1991, 56 FR 56158 | [IA-21-5182; FRL-4014-4]. |
| (27) Letter Withdrawing Variance Provisions | Polk County | 10/23/1991 | 11/29/1991, 56 FR 60924 | [FRL-IA-4-1-5308; FRL-4034-5] Correction notice published 1/26/1993. |
| (28) Letter Concerning Open Burning Exemptions | Statewide | 10/3/1991 | 1/22/1992, 57 FR 2472 | [IA5-1-5380; FRL-4039-5]. |
| (29) Compliance Sampling Manual | Statewide | 1/5/1993 | 5/12/1993, 58 FR 27939 | [IA-8-1-5750; FRL-4618-6]. |
| (30) Small Business Assistance Plan | Statewide | 12/22/1992 | 9/27/1993, 58 FR 50266 | [IA-9-1-5859; FRL-4734-5]. |
| (31) Voluntary Operating Permit Program | Statewide | 12/8/1994, 2/16/1996, 2/27/1996 | 4/30/1996, 61 FR 18958 | [IA 003-1003, FRL-5455-4]. |
| (32) SO2 Plan | Muscatine | 6/19/1996 5/21/1997 |
12/1/1997, 62 FR 63454 | [IA 036-1036, FRL-5929-3]. |
| (33) SO2 Maintenance Plan | Muscatine | 4/25/1997 | 3/19/1998, 63 FR 13343 | [IA 040-1040(a), FRL-5980-2]. |
| (34) SO2 Control Plan | Cedar Rapids | 9/11/1998 | 3/11/1999, 64 FR 12087 | [IA 058-1058a; FRL-6308-5]. |
| (35) PM10 Control Plan | Buffalo, Iowa | 10/1/1998 | 3/18/1999, 64 FR 13346 | [IA 059-1059a; FRL-6310-7]. |
| (36) CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i) SIP—Interstate Transport | Statewide | 11/22/2006 | 3/8/2007, 72 FR 10380 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2006-1015; FRL-8285-1]. |
| (37) SO2 Maintenance Plan for the Second 10-year Period | Muscatine | 4/5/2007 | 8/1/2007; 72 FR 41900 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2007-0477, FRL-8448-5]. |
| (38) CAA 110(a)(1) and (2)-Ozone Infrastructure SIP | Statewide | 6/15/2007 | 3/4/2008; 73 FR 11554 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2007-1180, FRL-8535-9]. |
| (39) Regional Haze plan for the first implementation period | Statewide | 3/25/2008 | 6/26/2012, 77 FR 38007 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2012-0153, FRL-9688-1] § 52.842(a); Limited Approval. |
| (40) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 2008 Lead NAAQS | Statewide | 11/4/2011 | 11/2/2015; Correction 3/25/2016, 81 FR 16094 |
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. |
| (41) Section 128 Declaration: Conflicts of Interest Provisions; | ||||
| Constitution of the State of Iowa, Article 1, Section 2. | This action addresses the following sections of the Constitution of the State of Iowa, Article 1, section 2; | |||
| Iowa Code: 4.4.(5), 7E.4, Chapter 68B | Iowa Code : 4.4 (5), 7e.4, Chapter 68B; | |||
| Iowa Administrative Code: 351 IAC 6.11, 351 IAC 6.14(2), 351 IAC 6.19, 351 IAC 7.1-7.2, 567 IAC 1.11 (1-9) | Statewide | 5/11/2015 | 11/2/2015; Correction 3/25/2016, 81 FR 16094 |
Iowa Administrative Code: 351 IAC 6.11, 351 IAC 6.14(2), 351 IAC 6.19, 351 IAC 7.1-7.2, 567 IAC 1.11(1-9). |
| (42) Lead attainment SIP | Portions of Pottawattamie County | 1/30/2015 | 2/26/2016, 81 FR 9770 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0582; FRL-9942-79-Region 7]. |
| (43) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 2008 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 1/17/2013 | 9/20/2016, 81 FR 64347 | This action approves the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—prong 3 only, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4 is disapproved. 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. [EPA-R07-OAR-2016-0407; FRL-9952-55-Region 7]. |
| (44) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision for the Attainment and Maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Regional Haze (2013 Five-Year Progress Report) | Statewide | 7/19/2013 | 8/15/2016, 81 FR 53924 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0365; FRL-9949-82-Region 7. |
| (45) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 3/21/2008 | 8/16/2016, 81 FR 54502 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. |
| (46) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 7/23/2013 | 8/16/2016, 81 FR 54502 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. |
| (47) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS | Statewide | 7/23/2013 | 3/22/2018, 83 FR 12486 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), D(i)(II) prong 3 only, D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). [EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0267; FRL-9975-78-Region 7]. |
| (48) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS | Statewide | 7/23/2013, 3/1/2017 | 3/22/2018, 83 FR 12491 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(I) prongs 1 and 2, D(i)(II) prong 3 only, D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). [EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0208; FRL-9975-69—Region 7]. |
| (49) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 2012 annual fine Particulate Matter NAAQS | Statewide | 12/15/2015 | 3/22/2018, 83 FR 12488 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), D(i)(II) prong 3 only, D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). [EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0517; FRL-9975-68- Region 7]. |
| (50) Lead Redesignation SIP and Maintenance Plan | Portions of Pottawattamie County | 9/18/2017 | 10/4/2018, 83 FR 50024 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2018-0532; FRL-9984-64-Region 7]. |
| (51) Section 110(a)(2) (D)(i)(I)—significant contribution to nonattainment (prong 1), and interfering with maintenance of the NAAQs (prong 2) (Interstate Transport) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) NAAQS | Statewide | 12/15/2015 | 9/6/2019, 84 FR 46887 | This action approves the following CAA elements: 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2 (D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2 [EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0332; FRL-9998-89-Region 7]. |
| (52) Sections 110 (a)(2) Infrastructure Prong 4 Requirements for the 2006 Fine Particulate Matter, 2012 Fine Particulate Matter, 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide, 2010 Sulfur Dioxide, 2008 Ozone, and 2015 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 1/17/2013; 7/28/2013; 7/29/2013; 7/29/2013; 12/22/2015; 11/30/2018; 5/14/2019 | 12/3/2019, 84 FR 66075 | This action approves the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)—prong 4. [EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0468; FRL-10001-89-Region 7.]. |
| (53) 2010 1-hour SO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard Attainment Plan | A portion of Muscatine County | 5/26/2016 | 11/17/2020, 85 FR 73218 | EPA-R07-OAR-2017-0416; FRL-10016-10-Region 7. |
| (54) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 O3 NAAQS | Statewide | 11/30/2018 | 8/23/2021, 86 FR 46984 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0378; FRL-8704-02-Region 7]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—prongs 3 and 4, (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2 will be addressed in a separate action. 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. |
| (55) Transport SIP for the 2015 Ozone Standard | Statewide | 11/30/2018 | 4/15/2022, 87 FR 22463 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0870; EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0663; FRL-9468-02-R7]. This transport SIP shows that Iowa does not significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment or maintenance in any other state. This submittal is approved as meeting the requirements of Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| (56) Iowa Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period | Statewide | 8/15/2023 | 8/5/2025, 90 FR 37389 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2024-0313; FRL-12096-02-R7] |
| (57) 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS Maintenance Plan | A portion of Muscatine County | 11/17/2021 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51554 | EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0818; FRL-12901-01-R7. |
[64 FR 7094, Feb. 12, 1999]
§ 52.821 Classification of regions.
The Iowa plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classification:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons) | |
| Metropolitan Omaha-Council Bluffs Interstate | I | II | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Sioux Falls Interstate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Sioux City Interstate | III | III | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Dubuque Interstate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Quad Cities Interstate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Burlington-Keokuk Interstate | I | I | III | III | III |
| Northwest Iowa Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
| North Central Iowa Intrastate | IA | III | III | III | III |
| Northeast Iowa Intrastate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Southwest Iowa Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
| South Central Iowa Intrastate | I | III | III | III | I |
| Southeast Iowa Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10865, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974]
§ 52.822 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves Iowa's plan for the attainment and maintenance of the national standards. Further, the Administrator finds the plan satisfies all requirements of Part D, Title I, of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977, except as noted below.
(b) [Reserved]
[45 FR 14567, Mar. 6, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 47546, Sept. 29, 1981; 75 FR 82555, Dec. 30, 2010; 76 FR 67070, Oct. 31, 2011]
§ 52.823 PM10 State Implementation Plan Development in Group II Areas.
The Iowa Department of Natural Resources committed to comply with the PM10 regulations as set forth in 40 CFR part 51. In a letter to Morris Kay, EPA, dated October 28, 1988, Mr. Larry J. Wilson, Director, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, stated:
Three groups within the State of Iowa have been classified as Group II areas for fine particulate (PM-10) State Implementation Plan (SIP) development purposes. This includes portions of the cities of Des Moines, Mason City, and Cedar Rapids. The specific boundaries of these areas were identified in a letter of October 13, 1987, from Peter R. Hamlin to Carl Walter. The remainder of the State was classified as Group III.
In accordance with the SIP development procedures identified in the preamble of the PM-10 regulations for Implementing Revised Particulate Matter Standards, promulgated July 1, 1987, the State of Iowa commits to perform the following activities in these three Group II areas of the state:
(a) Gather ambient PM-10 data, to an extent consistent with minimum EPA requirements (note the network description contained in a letter of January 26, 1988, from Peter R. Hamlin to John Helvig).
(b) Analyze and verify the ambient PM-10 data and report exceedances of the 24-hour PM-10 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to the Regional Office within 60 days of each exceedance.
(c) Immediately notify the Regional Office:
(1) Upon the availability of an appropriate number of verifiable 24-hour NAAQS exceedances to indicate a violation (see Section 2.0 of the PM-10 SIP development guideline) or
(2) when an annual arithmetic mean (AAM) above the annual PM-10 NAAQS becomes available.
(d) Within thirty (30) days of any notification of the Regional Office pursuant to (c) above (or upon collection of thirty-six (36) months of PM-10 ambient air quality data acceptable to EPA, whichever comes first) determine whether the measures in the existing SIP will assure timely attainment and maintenance of the primary PM-10 NAAQS and immediately notify the Regional Office of the results of this determination.
(e) Within six (6) months of any notification pursuant to (d) above, adopt and submit to EPA a PM-10 control strategy that assures attainment as expeditiously as practicable but not later than three (3) years from approval of the Committal SIP.
Because of the uncertainty about when the determination can be made pursuant to (d) above, it is difficult to determine if that control strategy could provide for the attainment of the PM-10 NAAQS within three years from the date EPA approves this Committal SIP. Therefore, I reserve the right to request a two-year extension of the attainment date as provided in Section 110(e) of the Clean Air Act, if and when the State of Iowa submits a SIP revision for any of these areas of the state.
The State of Iowa also commits to develop a PM-10 emission inventory for the areas submitted as part of any PM-10 SIP pursuant to items (c), (d), and (e) above. If the PM-10 NAAQS are not violated, the State of Iowa will proceed with this inventory for the three Group II areas in accordance with the following schedule:
October 1, 1988—Request special assistance funds from EPA to perform the inventory.
October 1, 1989—Initiate inventory.
August 1, 1990—Complete inventory.
October 31, 1990 * —Submit inventory as part of a determination of adequacy that the current SIP will attain and maintain the PM-10 NAAQS.
* Presuming that sufficient ambient data acceptable to EPA are collected by July 31, 1990, and available by September 30, 1990.
[54 FR 33539, Aug. 15, 1989]
§ 52.824 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Iowa” and all revisions submitted by Iowa that were Federally approved prior to July 1, 1998.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 27, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified:
(1) Request for a two-year extension to meet the National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards for nitrogen dioxide in the Metropolitan Omaha-Council Bluffs Interstate Air Quality Control Region was submitted by the Governor on January 27, 1972. (Non-regulatory)
(2) Revisions of Appendices D and G of the plan were submitted on February 2, 1972, by the State Department of Health. (Non-regulatory)
(3) Source surveillance and record maintenance statements were submitted on April 14, 1972, by the State Department of Health. (Non-regulatory)
(4) Revised statement regarding public availability of emission data was submitted on May 2, 1972, by the State Department of Health. (Non-regulatory)
(5) State submitted Senate File 85 which created the Department of Environmental Quality and replaced the Iowa air pollution control statute which appeared as Chapter 136B of the Code of Iowa, on May 4, 1972. (Regulatory)
(6) A letter describing the issuance of a Certificate of Acceptance for the local air pollution control programs conducted by the Linn County Board of Health for the jurisdictions of the City of Cedar Rapids and Linn County, and the Des Moines-Polk County Health Department for the jurisdictions of the City of Des Moines and Polk County was submitted by the State Department of Health on December 14, 1972. (Non-regulatory)
(7) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in February 1973. (Regulatory)
(8) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in May 1973. (Regulatory)
(9) The State of Iowa High Air Pollution Episode Contingency Plan was submitted on June 20, 1973, by the Governor.
(10) The letter which requested the inclusion of the Linn County Health Department Rules and Regulations, the City of Cedar Rapids Air Pollution Control Ordinance, the Polk County Rules and Regulations—Air Pollution Control, and the City of Des Moines Air Pollution Control Regulations in the State of Iowa implementation plan was submitted by the State Department of Environmental Quality on June 25, 1974. (No approval action was taken on the request because it did not meet the procedural requirements specified in 40 CFR part 51.)
(11) Revisions of Rules 2.1, 3.1, 3.4, 4.1, 4.3(3) and 4.3(4) of the Iowa Rules and Regulations Relating to Air Pollution Control were submitted on April 24, 1974 (by the Governor's office). (No approval or disapproval action was taken on amended Subrule 4.3(3)a., which restricts emissions of sulfur oxides from fuel-burning sources.) (Regulatory)
(12) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in May 1974.
(13) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in May 1974.
(14) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in July 1974.
(15) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in August 1974.
(16) A letter from the Director of the Department of Environmental Quality, dated August 29, 1974, which requested that no further action be taken on Subrule 4.3(3) a. as submitted on April 24, 1974. (Regulatory)
(17) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in September 1974.
(18) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in November 1974.
(19) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in February 1975.
(20) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in April 1975.
(21) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State in June 1975.
(22) Revisions of Rules 1.2, 2.1, 3.1, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 7.1, 8.3 and 8.4 of the Iowa Rules and Regulations Relating to Air Pollution Control were submitted on July 17, 1975, by the Governor's office. (Regulatory) (No approval or disapproval action was taken on Subrules 4.3(2)c. or 4.3(3)b.)
(23) Summary of the public hearing which was held on the revised rules which were submitted on July 17, 1975, by the Governor's office was submitted by the Iowa Department of Environmental Quality on September 3, 1975. (non-regulatory)
(24) Letter which withdrew amended Subrule 4.3(2)c. from the proposed Iowa plan revision submitted on July 17, 1975, was submitted by the Governor's office on January 20, 1976.
(25) Revisions to Rules 1.2, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, and new Chapters 14 and 52 of the Iowa Administrative Code Relating to Air Pollution Control were submitted June 9, 1976, by the Department of Environmental Quality (Subrules 4.3(3)a(1) and 4. 3(3)a(5) were disapproved).
(26) Additional air quality modeling to support the sulfur dioxide emission standards of Subrules 4.3(3)a(1) and 4.3(3)a(2) was submitted March 4, 1977, by the Department of Environmental Quality (Non-regulatory).
(26a) Revisions of Rules 1.2, 4.3(2)b, 4.4(6), 4.4(12) and of Chapter 7 of the Iowa Administrative Code relating to Air Pollution Control were submitted June 20, 1977, by the Department of Environmental Quality.
(27) Nonattainment plan provisions as required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 were submitted on June 22, 1979, by the Department of Environmental Quality. The submission included amended rule 4.3(2) relating to fugitive dust and new rule 4.5 relating to offsets for particulate matter. The revisions included attainment plans for particulate in Mason City and Davenport, particulate and ozone in Cedar Rapids and particulate and carbon monoxide in Des Moines. The submission was disapproved in part for failure to meet the requirements of Section 173 and was conditionally approved with respect to several requirements.
(28) On October 8, 1979, the Iowa Department of Environmental Quality submitted additional information to support the June 22, 1979, submission.
(29) On November 16, 1979, the Iowa Air Quality Commission submitted additional information and commitments to allow approval or conditional approval of portions of the June 22, 1979, submission.
(30) Nonattainment plan provisions as required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 were submitted on April 18, 1980, by the Department of Environmental Quality. The submission included amended rule 4.3(2) relating to fugitive dust and amended rule 3.5 relating to particulate matter offsets. The revisions included plans to attain the secondary particulate standards for all areas designated nonattainment as of March 6, 1980. The submission was conditionally approved with respect to several requirements.
(31) The State of Iowa Lead State Implementation Plan was submitted on August 19, 1980 by the Director of the Department of Environmental Quality.
(32) Additional information to support the April 18, 1980 submission was submitted on September 16, 1980, by the Department of Environmental Quality.
(33) Additional information to support the April 18, 1980 submission was submitted on November 17, 1980, by the Department of Environmental Quality.
(34) A revised Chapter 5, dealing with excess emissions and malfunctions was submitted on December 23, 1980, by the Department of Environmental Quality.
(35) [Reserved]
(36) A letter was submitted dated January 19, 1981 by the Director of the Department of Environmental Quality which provided additional information concerning the Iowa Lead State Implementation Plan.
(37) A variance from 400—4.2(1) of the Iowa Administrative Code for the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant at Middletown, Iowa, was submitted on October 19, 1979 by the Executive Director.
(38) Revisions to Subrule 400—4.3(2)“c” relating to fugitive emissions control and a document describing how this subrule is to be enforced were submitted on June 1, 1981, by the Department of Environmental Quality.
(39) A schedule for studying nontraditional sources of particulate matter and for implementing the results of the studies in the form of control strategies was submitted on June 26, 1981 by the Department of Environmental Quality. (Non-Regulatory).
(40) Revisions to Subrule 400—4.3(2)“b” relating to particulate emissions from fuel burning sources were submitted on July 31, 1981, by the Department of Environmental Quality.
(41) The Iowa Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy was submitted July 15, 1981, by the Department of Environmental Quality (non-regulatory).
(42) A conditional permit containing an alternative emission reduction program for the Progressive Foundry, Inc., of Perry, Iowa, under 400-3.7 and 400-4.6 of the Iowa Administrative Code; and an administrative order setting forth a compliance schedule, were submitted on December 18, 1981, by the Executive Director. The conditional permit specifies particulate emissions not to exceed 16.3 pounds per hour from the gray iron cupola with a process weight rate not to exceed 8534 pounds per hour and specifies the casting shakeout exhaust system shall not exceed 0.05 grains per standard cubic foot nor 12.8 pounds per hour of particulate matter. The compliance schedule specifies a final compliance date of September 1, 1983.
(43) On July 1, 1983, the State's air pollution control regulations were recodified at Department 900, Title II, Chapters 20 through 29.
(44) Revised Chapter 22 regulations, dealing with new source review in nonattainment areas, were submitted on July 18, 1984, by the Iowa Department of Water, Air and Waste Management. Subrules 22.5(4) g, i, and j remain unapproved. EPA will temporarily defer action on these subrules pending a May 14, 1985, commitment from the State to submit appropriate revisions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Revised Chapter 22 regulations, dealing with new source review in nonattainment areas, adopted by the State on July 17, 1984.
(ii) Additional material.May 14, 1985, letter of commitment from the State to revise unapprovable portions of their Chapter 22 air pollution regulations.
(45) Revised Chapter 22 subrules 22.5(2) a and b; and revised subrules 22.5(4) g, i, and j, all relating to new source review in nonattainment areas, were submitted on December 31, 1985, by the Iowa Department of Water, Air and Waste Management.
(a) Incorporation by reference.
(i) Revised Chapter 22 subrules 22.5(2) a and b; and subrules 22.5(4) g, i, and j, adopted by the State on December 17, 1985.
(ii) April 22, 1986, letter of commitment from the Iowa Department of Water, Air and Waste Management to submit stack height regulations by May 30, 1986, and to implement EPA's stack height requirements until such time that the regulations are fully approved.
(46) Revised Chapter 22 regulations pertaining to new source review in attainment and unclassified areas of the state (PSD) were submitted on March 9, 1987, by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Iowa Administrative Bulletin (ARC 7446), amendments to Chapter 22, “Controlling Pollution,” adopted by the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission on February 17, 1987.
(B) Letter from Iowa dated April 22, 1987, committing to implementation of its stack height regulations in a manner consistent with EPA's stack height regulations with respect to new source review/PSD regulations.
(47) Revised Chapters 22 and 23 regulations pertaining to stack height credits for modeling purposes were submitted on May 20, 1986, by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Revised definition of “emission limitation” and “emission standard” at Iowa regulation 567.20.2(455B), Definitions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Iowa Administrative Bulletin (ARC 6566), amendments to Chapter 22, “Controlling Pollution” and Chapter 23, “Emission Standards for Contaminants” adopted by the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission on April 22, 1986, effective June 25, 1986.
(B) Iowa Administrative Bulletin (ARC 8023) amendment to 567-20.2(455B). Effective September 22, 1987.
(48) Revised Chapter 22, subrule 22.1(2)“d” exemptions from permit requirements were submitted on September 13, 1988, by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. The revision clarifies permit exemptions for certain grain roasting equipment.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendment to Chapter 22, “Controlling Pollution,” Iowa Administrative Code, subrule 22.1(2)“d”, effective September 14, 1988.
(49) Revised Polk County, Iowa, Board of Health Rules and Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution, submitted by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on February 3, 1988. EPA approves these regulations with the provision that any operating permit which changes any requirement of the Iowa SIP, including requirements in any construction permit, must be submitted to EPA, and approved, as a SIP revision. In the absence of such approval, the enforceable requirements shall be those in the Iowa SIP.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Ordinance No. 28, Amendment to Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations chapter V, Air Pollution, Article I, 5-1 and 5-2 (except for variance); Article II, 5-3; and Article X, 5-28 through 5.50-1 (except for 5-49 and 5-50), effective October 8, 1987.
(ii) Additional material. (A) None.
(50) Revised Linn County, Iowa, Chapter 10 Ordinance “Air Pollution Control” submitted as a SIP revision by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on February 3, 1988. EPA approves these regulations with the provision that any operating permit which changes any requirement of the Iowa SIP, including requirements in any construction permit, must be submitted to EPA, and approved, as a SIP revision. In the absence of such approval, the enforceable requirements shall be those in the Iowa SIP.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Linn County Chapter 10 Ordinance “Air Pollution Control” sections 10.1 (except for 10.1(50)), 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4, adopted by the Linn County Board of Supervisors on September 2, 1987.
(ii) Additional material. (A) None.
(51) Revised Iowa regulations pertaining to PM10 were submitted by the state on October 28, 1988. These rules became effective on December 21, 1988.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amended Iowa Administrative Code pertaining to the prevention, abatement, and control of air pollution: Chapter 20, “Scope of Title—Definitions—Forms—Rules of Practice;” Chapter 22, “Controlling Pollution;” Chapter 26, “Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes;” and Chapter 28, “Ambient Air Quality Standards,” effective December 21, 1988.
(ii) Additional information. (A) None.
(52) Revised chapter 22, subrule 22.4(1), submitted on May 7, 1990, incorporates by reference revised EPA Modeling Guideline Supplement A, July 1987, and recodified air quality rules chapter 20-29.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendment to chapter 22, “Controlling Pollution,” Iowa Administrative Code, subrule 22.4(1). Effective March 14, 1990.
(B) Recodification of Iowa Administrative Code, title II—Air Quality, chapters 20-29, effective December 3, 1986.
(53) Revised chapter 22, rule 22.4(455B), submitted on November 8, 1990, incorporates by reference revised EPA PSD rules pertaining to NO X increments.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendment to chapter 22, “Controlling Pollution,” Iowa Administrative Code, subrule 22.4, adopted by the Environmental Protection Commission on October 17, 1990, effective November 21, 1990.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter from the state dated November 8, 1990, pertaining to NO X rules and analysis which certifies the material was adopted by the state on October 17, 1990.
(54) On March 13, 1991, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) submitted a plan revision pertaining to major SO2 sources in Clinton County, Iowa.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Administrative Consent Order #90-AQ-10, signed by Larry Wilson, Director, IDNR, dated July 5, 1990, and revision dated March 25, 1991. Also, three letters to Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) Company dated June 20, 1990, signed by Michael Hayward, IDNR, which contain or reference new or revised permit conditions for ADM sources, and a letter to ADM from IDNR dated February 26, 1991, correcting certain permit provisions.
(B) Administrative Consent Order #89-AQ-04, signed by Larry Wilson, Director, IDNR, dated February 21, 1990. Also, two letters to Interstate Power Company dated January 25 and 29, 1990, and signed by Michael Hayward, IDNR, which contain supplemental permit condition for permits 74-A-117-S and 78-A-157-S.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter and supplemental material from Larry J. Wilson to Morris Kay dated March 13, 1991.
(55) Revised Polk County, Iowa Board of Health Rules and Regulations, chapter V, Air Pollution, submitted by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources on May 23, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations, chapter V, Air Pollution, Ordinances 28, 72 and 85, effective May 1, 1991, except for the following: Article I, definition of variance; Article VI, Section 5-16 (n), (o), and (p); Article VI, Section 5-17(d), variance provision; Article VIII; Article IX, Sections 5-27(3) and 5-27(4); and Article X, Division 5—Variance.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter from Allan Stokes to William A. Spratlin dated October 23, 1991.
(56) Revised Chapter 23, rule 23.2, submitted on October 3, 1991, incorporates changes to the open burning rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Amendment to Chapter 23, “Emission Standards for Contaminants, “Iowa Administrative Code, subrule 23.2, adopted by the Environmental Protection Commission, effective September 12, 1990.
(ii) Additional information. (A) Letter from Allan Stokes, IDNR, to William Spratlin, dated October 3, 1991.
(57) On January 5, 1993, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) submitted air quality rule revisions to Iowa Administrative Code, Chapters 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, and revisions to the Compliance Sampling Manual.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to Chapter 20 (20.2), Scope of Title-Definitions-Forms-Rules of Practice; Chapter 22 (22.3(1), 22.4, 22.5(2)), Controlling Pollution; Chapter 23 (23.2(3), 23.3(2), 23.3(3), 23.4(12)), Emission Standards for Contaminants; Chapter 24 (24.1(1), 24.1(5)), Excess Emission; Chapter 25, (25.1(7), 25.1(9)), Measurement of Emissions and rescind 25.1(10)d; and Chapter 29 (29.1), Qualification in Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions. These revisions were adopted by the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission on December 21, 1992, and became effective on February 24, 1993.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter from Larry Wilson, IDNR, to Morris Kay, EPA, dated January 5, 1993, and the Compliance Sampling Manual, revised December 1992.
(58) A plan for implementation of the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program was submitted by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources as a revision to the Iowa SIP on December 22, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to the Iowa State Implementation Plan for the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program dated December 1992.
(59) On May 5, 1994, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to update the state's incorporation by reference and conformity to various federally approved regulations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised rules, “Iowa Administrative Code,” effective January 12, 1994. This revision approves an amendment to paragraph 23.2(3)g pertaining to open fires burned for the purpose of training fire-fighting personnel.
(B) Revised rules, “Iowa Administrative Code,” effective April 20, 1994. This revision approves amendments to rules 22.4; 23.3(2)d (3) and (4); 23.4(6); and 25.1(9). These rules concern the update of the state's incorporation of prevention of significant deterioration and test method requirements.
(ii) Additional material.None.
(60) On May 5, 1994, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to update the state's incorporation by reference and conformity to various Federally approved regulations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised rules, “Polk County Ordinance No. 132—Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations,” effective December 2, 1993. This revision approves all articles in Chapter V, except for Article VI, Section 5-16(n) and (p), Article VIII, and Article XIII.
(ii) Additional material. (A) None.
(61) On October 18, 1994, and January 26, 1995, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources submitted revisions to the state implementation plan (SIP) to include special requirements for nonattainment areas, provisions for use of compliance, and enforcement information and adoption of EPA definitions. These revisions fulfill Federal regulations which strengthen maintenance of established air quality standards.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised rules “Iowa Administrative Code,” effective November 16, 1994. This revision approves revised rules 567-20.2, 567-22.5(1)a, 567-22.5(1)f(2), 567-22.5(1)m, 567-22.5(2), 567-22.5(3), 567-22.5(4)b, 567-22.5(6), 567-22.5(7), 567-22.105(2), and new rule 567-21.5. These rules provide for special requirements for nonattainment areas, provisions for use of compliance and enforcement information and adopts EPA's definition of volatile organic compound.
(B) Revised rules, “Iowa Administrative Code,” effective February 22, 1995. This revision approves new definitions to rule 567-20.2. This revision adopts EPA's definitions of “EPA conditional method” and “EPA reference method.”
(ii) Additional material. None.
(62) [Reserved]
(63) On December 8, 1994; February 16, 1996; and February 27, 1996, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to create a voluntary operating permit program as an alternative to Title V. These revisions strengthen maintenance of established air quality standards.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) “Iowa Administrative Code,” sections 567-22.200-22.208, effective December 14, 1994. These rules create the voluntary operating permit program.
(B) “Iowa Administrative Code,” sections 567-22.201(1)“a” and 22.206(1)“h”, effective January 11, 1995.
(C) “Iowa Administrative Code,” section 567-22.203(1)“a”(1), effective February 24, 1995.
(D) “Iowa Administrative Code,” sections 567-20.2; 22.200; 22.201(1)“a” and “b”; 22.201(2)“a”; and 22.206(2)“c”, effective October 18, 1995.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter from Allan E. Stokes, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, to William A. Spratlin, U.S. EPA, dated February 16, 1995. This letter outlines various commitments by the state to meet requirements outlined by the EPA.
(64) In correspondence dated February 16, 1996, February 19, 1996, and February 27, 1996, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan concerning open burning, new source review (NSR) requirements for nonattainment areas, test method and definition updates.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) “Iowa Administrative Code,” section 567-22.8(1), effective July 12, 1995, containing a permit by rule for spray booths.
(B) “Iowa Administrative Code,” sections 567-23.2(3); 23.2(4), effective April 19, 1995, addressing open burning.
(C) “Iowa Administrative Code,” sections 567-22.5 (2)-(6), (8)-(10), effective March 20, 1996. These rules address NSR requirements in nonattainment areas.
(D) “Iowa Administrative Code,” sections 567-20.2; 22.4(1); and 25.1(9), effective July 12, 1995. These rules address test method and definition updates.
(E) “Iowa Administrative Code,” section 567-31.1, effective February 22, 1995. This rule addresses permit requirements relating to nonattainment areas.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated July 11, 1997, from Pete Hamlin, IDNR, to Wayne Leidwanger, EPA, requesting approval under 112(l).
(65) On June 13, 1996, and April 25, 1997, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) which included permits containing source specific emission limits and conditions for three sources in Muscatine, Iowa.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Grain Processing Corporation permits #95-A-374, #74-A-015-S, #79-A-194-S, #79-A-195-S, signed September 18, 1995.
(B) Muscatine Power and Water permits #74-A-175-S, #95-A-373 signed September 14, 1995.
(C) Monsanto Corporation permits #76-A-265S3, #76-A-161S3, signed July 18, 1996.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letters from Allan E. Stokes, IDNR, to Dennis Grams, Environmental Protection Agency, dated June 13, 1996, and April 21, 1997, containing supporting SIP information.
(66) On April 2, 1997, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State's two local agencies: the Polk County Public Works Department and Linn County Health Department.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised rules, “Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations: Chapter V, Air Pollution,” effective December 18, 1996. This revision approves all articles insofar as they pertain to the SIP. Article XIII is specifically excluded from this approval. No action is taken on Sections 5-16(n), 5-16(p), 5-20, and 5-27(3) and (4).
(B) Revised rules, “Linn County Air Pollution Control Code of Ordinances,” effective March 7, 1997. This revision approves all sections insofar as they pertain to the SIP. Sections 10.4(1.), 10.11, and 10.15 are specifically excluded from this approval. No action is taken on Sections 10.9(2.), 10.9(3.), 10.9(4.), and the definition of “federally enforceable” in Section 10.2.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter from Allan E. Stokes, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, to William A. Spratlin, Environmental Protection Agency, dated May 15, 1997. This letter provides additional information regarding various administrative requirements outlined in 40 CFR part 51.
(67) In correspondence dated October 21, 1997, and January 21, 1998, the Director of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) “Iowa Administrative Code” sections567-22.8(1) “b,” “c,” and “e,”567-22.203(1) “a,” 567-22.300, 567-22.300(1) through 567-22.300(11), 567-23.3(2) “d,” and 567-29.1, effective June 12, 1996.
(B) “Iowa Administrative Code”section 567-20.2, effective October 16, 1996.
(C) “Iowa Administrative Code” sectuibs 567-22.300(40 “b”(1), 567-22.300(8) “a”(1), and 567-22.300(8)“b”(2), effective December 25, 1996. (D) “Iowa Administrative Code” sections 567-20.2, 567-22.2(1), 567-22.201(1) “a,” 567-22.201(2) “b,” 567-22.202, 567-22.203(1), 567-22.300(3) “b” and “c,” 567-22.300(8) “a,” effective May 14, 1997.
(ii) Additional material. (A) “Iowa Administrative Code” section 567-23.1(5), Calculation of emission limitations based upon stack height, was renumbered to section 567-23.1(6), effective August 20, 1997.
[37 FR 10865, May 31, 1972. Redesignated at 64 FR 7094, Feb. 12, 1999]
§ 52.825 Compliance schedules.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) Regulation for increments of progress. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the owner or operator of any stationary source subject to regulation 4.3.(3)(b), “Rules and Regulations Relating to Air Pollution Control of the Iowa Air Pollution Control Commission” shall, no later than December 31, 1972, submit to the Administrator for approval, a proposed compliance schedule that demonstrates compliance with the applicable regulation as expeditiously as practicable but no later than January 1, 1975. The compliance schedule shall provide for periodic increments of progress towards compliance. The dates for achievement of such increments shall be specified. Increments of progress shall include, but not be limited to: Letting of necessary contract for construction or process changes, if applicable; initiation of construction; completion and start-up of control system; performance tests; and submittal of performance test analysis and results.
(2) Where any such owner or operator demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Administrator that compliance with the applicable regulations will be achieved on or before December 31, 1973, no compliance schedule shall be required.
(3) Any owner or operator who submits a compliance schedule pursuant to this paragraph shall, within 5 days after the deadline for each increment of progress, certify to the Administrator whether or not the required increment of the approved compliance schedule has been met.
(4) Any compliance schedule adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(c) The compliance schedules for the sources identified below are approved as revisions to the plan pursuant to § 51.104 and subpart N of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State, unless otherwise noted.
| Source | Location | Regulation involved | Date adopted | Variance expiration date | Final compliance date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa Army Ammunition Plant (explosive contaminated waste burning) | Middletown, Iowa | 400—4.2(1) | June 14, 1979 | Feb. 28, 1982 | Feb. 1982. |
| Progressive Foundry, Inc., cupola and casting shakeout area | Perry | 400-4.6 | Nov. 6, 1981 | Sept. 1, 1983. | |
| Note 1: Linn County Health Department does not issue variances if source(s) is on an approvable compliance schedule. | |||||
| Note 2: Polk County Department of Health does not issue variances if source(s) is on an accepted and approved compliance schedule. | |||||
| Note 3: City of Des Moines, Department of Public Health does not issue variances if source(s) is on an accepted and approved compliance schedule. |
[37 FR 10865, May 31, 1972]
§§ 52.826-52.827 [Reserved]
§ 52.828 Enforcement.
(a) Sections 23(1)(b) and 13(7) of Senate File 85, Division II for Iowa are disapproved insofar as they permit the Air Quality Commission of the Iowa Department of Environmental Quality to issue abatement orders (1) that defer compliance with plan requirements beyond the dates required for attainment of the national standards, (2) without the approval of the Administrator, and (3) for reasons not permitted by the Clean Air Act.
(b) Regulation limiting administrative abatement orders:
(1) No order deferring compliance with a requirement of the Iowa Implementation Plan shall be issued by the Air Quality Commission of the Iowa Department of Environmental Quality which does not meet the following requirements:
(i) An order must require compliance with the plan requirement within the times and under the conditions specified in § 51.261 (a) and (b) of this chapter.
(ii) An order may not defer compliance beyond the last date permitted by section 110 of the Act for attainment of the national standard which the plan implements unless the procedures and conditions set forth in section 110(f) of the Act are met.
(iii) An order shall not be effective until it has been submitted to and approved by the Administrator in accordance with §§ 51.104, 51.105, 51.261 and 51.262(a).
(2) Notwithstanding the limitations of paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, an order may be granted which provides for compliance beyond the statutory attainment date for a national standard where compliance is not possible because of breakdowns or malfunctions of equipment, acts of God, or other unavoidable occurrences. However, such order may not defer compliance for more than three (3) months unless the procedures and conditions set forth in section 110(f) of the Act are met.
[38 FR 30877, Nov. 8, 1973, as amended at 51 FR 40675, 40676, 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 52 FR 24367, June 30, 1987]
§§ 52.829-52.832 [Reserved]
§ 52.833 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are met, except for sources seeking permits to locate on Indian lands in the state of Iowa; and certain sources affected by the stack height rules described in a letter from Iowa dated April 22, 1987.
(b) Regulations for preventing significant deterioration of air quality. The provisions of § 52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable State plan for the State of Iowa for sources wishing to locate on Indian lands; and certain sources as identified in Iowa's April 22, 1987, letter.
[71 FR 16053, Mar. 30, 2006]
§ 52.834 Control strategy: Sulfur dioxide.
(a) Approval. On April 21, 1997, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) submitted a maintenance plan and redesignation request for the Muscatine County nonattainment area for the 1971 SO2 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The maintenance plan and redesignation request satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(b) Determination of attainment by the attainment date. As of May 9, 2022, the EPA has determined that the Muscatine, Iowa SO2 nonattainment area has attained the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of October 4, 2018.
(c) Redesignation to attainment. EPA has determined, as of November 18, 2025, that the Muscatine County 2010 SO2 nonattainment area is redesignated to attainment of the 2010 SO2 1-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in accordance with the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 107(d)(3) and has approved its maintenance plan and supplemental modeling demonstration analyses as meeting the requirements of CAA section 175A.
[87 FR 20331, Apr. 7, 2022, as amended at 90 FR 51559, Nov. 18, 2025]
§ 52.840 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Iowa and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Iowa's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Iowa's SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Iowa's SIP revision described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Iowa and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program in subpart BBBBB of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2015 and 2016.
(2) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Iowa and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Iowa's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Iowa's SIP.
(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Iowa's SIP revision described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances under subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48364, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 76 FR 80774, Dec. 27, 2011; 81 FR 74586 and 74595, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 65924, Dec. 21, 2018]
§ 52.841 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Iowa and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 1 Trading Program in subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Iowa's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39 for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Iowa's SIP.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Iowa's SIP revision described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances under subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48365, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586 and 74595, Oct. 26, 2016]
§ 52.842 Visibility protection.
(a) The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act (CAA) are met because the Regional Haze plan submitted by Iowa on March 25, 2008, and supplemented on May 14, 2019, includes fully approvable measures for meeting the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule including 40 CFR 51.308(d)(3) and (e) with respect to emissions of NOX and SO2 from electric generating units.
(b) The requirements of section 169A of the CAA are met because the Regional Haze plan submitted by Iowa on August 15, 2023, includes fully approvable measures for meeting the requirements of the Regional Haze Rule in 40 CFR 51.308.
[90 FR 37403, Aug. 5, 2025]
Subpart R—Kansas
§ 52.869 [Reserved]
§ 52.870 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable SIP for Kansas under Section 110 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. and 40 CFR Part 51 to meet NAAQS.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to December 31, 2014, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with EPA approval dates after December 31, 2014, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 7 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the SIP as of December 31, 2014.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; at the EPA, Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). If you wish to obtain material from the EPA Regional Office, please call (913) 551-7089. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(c) EPA-approved regulations.
| Kansas citation | Title | State effective date |
EPA approval date | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas Department of Health and Environment Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control | ||||
| General Regulations | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-6 | Statement of Policy | 1/1/72 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | Kansas revoked this rule 5/1/82. |
| K.A.R. 28-19-8 | Reporting Required | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-9 | Time Schedule for Compliance | 5/1/84 | 12/21/87, 52 FR 48265 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-10 | Circumvention of Control Regulations | 1/1/71 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-11 | Exceptions Due to Breakdowns or Scheduled Maintenance | 1/1/74 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-12 | Measurement of Emissions | 1/1/71 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-13 | Interference with Enjoyment of Life and Property | 1/1/74 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-14 | Permits Required | 1/24/94 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-15 | Severability | 1/1/71 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| Nonattainment Area Requirements | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-16 | New Source Permit Requirements for Designated Nonattainment Areas | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16a | Definitions | 10/10/97 | 1/11/00, 65 FR 1545 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16b | Permit Required | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16c | Creditable Emission Reductions | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | EPA deferred action on the state's current definition of the terms “building, structure, facility, or installation”; “installation”; and “reconstruction.” |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16d | Fugitive Emission Exemption | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16e | Relaxation of Existing Emission Limitations | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16f | New Source Emission Limits | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16g | Attainment and Maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16h | Compliance of Other Sources | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16i | Operating Requirements | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16j | Revocation and Suspension of Permit | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16k | Notification Requirements | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16l | Failure to Construct | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-16m | Compliance with Provisions of Law Required | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| Attainment Area Requirements | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-17 | Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality | 11/22/02 | 2/26/03, 68 FR 8845 | K.A.R. 28-19-17a through 28-19-17q revoked. Provision moved to K.A.R. 28-19-350. |
| Stack Height Requirements | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-18 | Stack Heights | 5/1/88 | 4/20/89, 54 FR 15934 | The state regulation has stack height credit. EPA has not approved that part. |
| K.A.R. 28-19-18b | Definitions | 5/1/88 | 4/20/89, 54 FR 15934 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-18c | Methods for Determining Good Engineering Practice Stack Height | 5/1/88 | 4/20/89, 54 FR 15934 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-18d | Fluid Modeling | 5/1/88 | 4/20/89, 54 FR 15934 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-18e | Relaxation of Existing Emission Limitations | 5/1/88 | 4/20/89, 54 FR 15934 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-18f | Notification Requirements | 5/1/88 | 4/20/89, 54 FR 15934 | |
| Continuous Emission Monitoring | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-19 | Continuous Emission Monitoring | 6/8/92 | 1/12/93, 58 FR 3847 | |
| Processing Operation Emissions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-20 | Particulate Matter Emission Limitations | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-21 | Additional Emission Restrictions | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-23 | Hydrocarbon Emissions—Stationary Sources | 12/27/72 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-24 | Control of Carbon Monoxide Emissions. | 1/1/72 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | |
| Indirect Heating Equipment Emissions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-30 | General Provisions | 1/1/72 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-31 | Emission Limitations | 11/8/93 | 10/18/94, 59 FR 52425 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-32 | Exemptions—Indirect Heating Equipment | 11/8/93 | 10/18/94, 59 FR 52425 | |
| Incinerator Emissions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-40 | General Provisions | 1/1/71 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-41 | Restriction of Emission | 12/27/72 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-42 | Performance Testing | 1/1/72 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-43 | Exceptions | 1/1/71 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| Air Pollution Emergencies | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-55 | General Provisions | 1/1/72 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-56 | Episode Criteria | 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-57 | Emission Reduction Requirements | 1/1/72 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-58 | Emergency Episode Plans | 1/1/72 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| Volatile Organic Compound Emissions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-61 | Definitions | 10/7/91 | 6/23/92, 57 FR 27936 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-62 | Testing Procedures | 10/7/71 | 6/23/92, 57 FR 27936 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-63 | Automobile and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating | 11/8/93 | 10/18/94, 59 FR 52425 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-64 | Bulk Gasoline Terminals | 5/1/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-65 | Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Liquid Storage in Permanent Fixed Roof Type Tanks | 5/1/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-66 | Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks | 5/1/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-67 | Petroleum Refineries | 5/1/86 | 1/2/87, 52 FR 53 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-68 | Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment | 5/1/86 | 1/2/87, 52 FR 53 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-69 | Cutback Asphalt | 5/1/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-70 | Leaks from Gasoline Delivery Vessels and Vapor Collection Systems | 5/15/98 | 1/11/00, 65 FR 1545 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-71 | Printing Operations | 5/1/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-72 | Gasoline Dispensing Facilities | 5/1/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-73 | Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products and Metal Furniture | 6/8/92 | 1/12/93, 58 FR 3847 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-74 | Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing | 5/1/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-76 | Lithography Printing Operations | 10/7/91 | 6/23/92, 57 FR 27936 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-77 | Chemical Processing Facilities That Operate Alcohol Plants or Liquid Detergent Plants | 10/7/91 | 6/23/92, 57 FR 27936 | |
| General Provisions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-200 | General Provisions; definitions | 1/2/11 | 2/22/11, 76 FR 9658 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-201 | General Provisions; Regulated Compounds List | 10/10/97 | 1/11/00, 65 FR 1545 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-204 | Permit Issuance and Modification; Public Participation | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-210 | Calculation of Actual Emissions | 11/22/93 | 1/11/00, 65 FR 1545 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-212 | Approved Test Methods and Emission Compliance Determination Procedures | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-274 | Nitrogen Oxide allocations | 11/6/15 | 6/29/16 and 81 FR 42256 | Approval of EGU-specific NOX allocations does not include KAR 28-19-274(a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(B). |
| Construction Permits And Approvals | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-300 | Applicability | 11/18/2016 | 11/3/2018, 83 FR 49826 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-301 | Application and Issuance | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-302 | Additional Provisions; Construction Permits | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-303 | Additional Provisions; Construction Approvals | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-304 | Fees | 11/18/2016 | 11/3/2018, 83 FR 49826 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-350 | Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) of Air Quality | 12/28/2012 | 4/17/2020, 85 FR 21329 | Provisions of the 2010 PM2.5 PSD-Increments, SILs and SMCs rule relating to SILs and SMCs that were affected by the January 22, 2013, U.S. Court of Appeals decision are not SIP approved. Provisions of the 2002 NSR reform rule relating to the Clean Unit Exemption, Pollution Control Projects, and exemption from recordkeeping provisions for certain sources using the actual-to-projected-actual emissions projections test are not SIP approved. In addition, we have not approved Kansas rule incorporating EPA's 2008 “fugitive emissions rule” (published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2008). |
| General Permits | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-400 | General Requirements | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-401 | Adoption by the Secretary | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-402 | Availability of Copies; Lists of Sources to Which Permits Issued | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-403 | Application to Construct or Operate Pursuant to Terms of General Permits | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-404 | Modification, Revocation | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| Operating Permits | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-500 | Applicability | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-501 | Emissions Limitations and Pollution Control Equipment for Class I and Class II Operating Permits; Conditions | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-502 | Identical Procedural Requirements | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| Class II Operating Permits | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-540 | Applicability | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-541 | Application Timetable and Contents | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-542 | Permit-by-Rule | 9/23/05 | 2/8/08, 73 FR 7468 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-543 | Permit Term and Content; Operational Compliance | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-544 | Modification of Sources or Operations | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-545 | Application Fee | 1/23/95 | 7/17/95, 60 FR 36361 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-546 | Definitions Class II operating permits; annual emission inventory | 12/23/2022 | 4/28/2025, 90 FR 17556 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-561 | Permit-by-Rule; Reciprocating Engines | 9/23/05 | 2/8/08, 73 FR 7468 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-562 | Permit-by-Rule; Organic Solvent Evaporative Sources | 9/23/05 | 2/8/08, 73 FR 7468 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-563 | Permit-by-Rule; Hot Mix Asphalt Facilities | 9/23/05 | 2/8/08, 73 FR 7468 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-564 | Permit-by-Rule; Sources with Actual Emissions Less Than 50 Percent of Major Source Thresholds | 12/23/2022 | 4/28/2025, 90 FR 17556 | |
| Open Burning Restrictions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-645 | Open Burning Prohibited | 3/1/96 | 10/2/96, 61 FR 51366 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-646 | Responsibility for Open Burning | 3/1/96 | 10/2/96, 61 FR 51366 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-647 | Exceptions to Prohibition on Open Burning | 3/1/96 | 10/2/96, 61 FR 51366 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-648 | Agricultural Open Burning | 3/1/96 | 10/2/96, 61 FR 51366 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-650 | Emissions Opacity Limits | 1/29/99 | 12/12/01, 66 FR 64148 (correction). 1/11/00, 65 FR 1545 | |
| Nitrogen Oxide Emissions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-712 | Definitions | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-712a | Applicability | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-712b | General requirement for heavy-duty diesel vehicles | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-712c | General requirement for load and unload locations | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-712d | Exemptions | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-713 | Applicability | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-713a | Emission limitation requirements | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-713b | Alternate emissions limit | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-713c | Control measures and equipment | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-713d | Compliance demonstration, monitoring, and reporting requirements | 6/25/10 | 2/20/13, 78 FR 11751 | |
| Volatile Organic Compound Emissions | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-714 | Control of Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning | 9/1/02 | 10/30/02, 67 FR 66058 | |
| K.A.R. 28-19-717 | Control of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from Commercial Bakery Ovens in Johnson and Wyandotte Counties | 12/22/00 | 12/12/01, 66 FR 64148 | |
| Conformity | ||||
| K.A.R. 28-19-800 | General Conformity of Federal Actions | 3/15/96 | 10/2/96, 61 FR 51366 |
(d) EPA-approved State source-specific permits.
| Name of source | Permit or case No. | State effective date |
EPA approval date | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Board of Public Utilities, Quindaro Power Station | 2090048 | 10/20/93 | 10/18/94, 59 FR 52425 | |
| (2) Board of Public Utilities, Kaw Power Station | 2090049 | 10/20/93 | 10/18/94, 59 FR 52425 | |
| (3) Kansas City Power and Light Company | 12/5/07 | 12/27/11, 76 FR 80754 | Certain provisions withdrawn from plan as identified in letter dated 12/1/11 from Kansas. | |
| (4) Westar Energy, Inc. | 2/29/08 | 12/27/11, 76 FR 80759 | Certain provisions withdrawn from plan as identified in letter dated 12/1/11 from Kansas. | |
| (5) Exide Technologies | 1690035 | 8/18/14 | 7/20/16, 81 FR 47034 | |
| (6) Stryten Salina LLC. (formerly known as Exide) | 1690035 | 12/27/2018 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51551 |
(e) EPA-approved nonregulatory provisions and quasi-regulatory measures.
| Name of nonregulatory SIP provision |
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area | State submittal date | EPA approval date | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Implementation Plan for Attainment and Maintenance of the National Air Quality Standards | Statewide | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72, 37 FR 10867 | |
| (2) Comments on the Plan in Response to EPA Review | Kansas City | 3/24/72 | 6/22/73, 38 FR 16550 | Correction notice published 3/2/76. |
| (3) Emergency Episode Operations/Communications Manual | Kansas City | 4/6/72 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | Correction notice published 3/2/76. |
| (4) Emergency Episode Operations/Communications Manual | Statewide except Kansas City | 2/15/73 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | Correction notice published 3/2/76. |
| (5) Letter Concerning Attainment of CO Standards | Kansas City | 5/29/73 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | Correction notice published 3/2/76. |
| (6) Amendment to State Air Quality Control Law Dealing with Public Access to Emissions Data | Statewide | 7/27/73 | 11/8/73, 38 FR 30876 | Correction notice published 3/2/76. |
| (7) Analysis and Recommendations Concerning Designation of Air Quality Maintenance Areas | Statewide | 2/28/74 | 3/2/76, 41 FR 8956 | [FRL 484-4]. |
| (8) Ozone Nonattainment Plan | Kansas City | 9/17/79 | 4/3/81, 46 FR 20164 | [A-7-FRL 1788-5]. |
| (9) Ozone Nonattainment Plan | Douglas County | 10/22/79 | 4/3/81, 46 FR 20164 | [A-7-FRL 1788-5]. |
| (10) TSP Nonattainment Plan | Kansas City | 3/10/80 | 4/3/81, 46 FR 20164 | [A-7-FRL 1788-5]. |
| (11) Lead Plan | Statewide | 2/17/81 | 10/22/81, 46 FR 51742 | [A-7-FRL-1938-8]. |
| (12) CO Nonattainment Plan | Wichita | 4/16/81 | 12/15/81, 46 FR 61117 | [A-7-FRL-1990-3]. |
| (13) Air Monitoring Plan | Statewide | 10/16/81 | 1/22/82, 47 FR 3112 | [A-7-FRL-2024-8]. |
| (14) Letter and Supporting Documentation Relating to Reasonably Available Control Technology for Certain Particulate Matter Sources | Kansas City | 9/15/81 | 6/18/82, 47 FR 26387 | [EPA Action KS 276; FRL 2137-6]. Correction notice published 1/12/84. |
| (15) Letter Agreeing to Follow EPA Interim Stack Height Policy for Each PSD Permit Issued Until EPA Revises the Stack Height Regulations | Statewide | 6/20/84 | 12/11/84, 49 FR 48185 | [A-7-FRL-2734-4; EPA No 1163]. |
| (16) Letters Pertaining to Permit Fees | Statewide | 3/27/86, 9/15/87 | 12/21/87, 52 FR 48265 | [FRL 3299-4]. |
| (17) Revisions to the Ozone Attainment Plan | Kansas City | 7/2/86, 4/16/87, 8/18/87, 8/19/87, 1/6/88 | 5/18/88, 53 FR 17700 | [3375-5]. |
| (18) Revised CO Plan | Wichita | 3/1/85, 9/3/87 | 10/28/88, 53 FR 43691 | [FRL-3449-1]. |
| (19) Letter Pertaining to the Effective Date of Continuous Emission Monitoring Regulations | Statewide | 1/6/88 | 11/25/88, 53 FR 47690 | [FRL-3473-9]. |
| (20) Letters Pertaining to New Source Permit Regulations, Stack Height Regulations, and Stack Height Analysis and Negative Declarations | Statewide | 3/27/86, 12/7/87 1/6/88 | 4/20/89, 54 FR 15934 | [FRL-3558-5]. |
| (21) PM10 Plan | Statewide | 10/5/89, 10/16/89 | 1/16/90, 55 FR 1420 | [FRL-3704-3]. |
| (22) Ozone Maintenance Plan | Kansas City | 10/23/91 | 6/23/92, 57 FR 27936 | [KS1-1-5439; FRL 4126-6]. |
| (23) Letter Pertaining to PSD NOX Requirements | Statewide | 9/15/92 | 1/12/93, 58 FR 3847 | [KS-2-1-5640; FRL-4552-3]. |
| (24) Small Business Assistance Plan | Statewide | 1/25/94 | 5/12/94, 59 FR 24644 | [KS-3-1-8332; FRL-4882-4]. |
| (25) Letter Regarding Compliance Verification Methods and Schedules Pertaining to the Board of Public Utilities Power Plants | Kansas City | 12/11/92 | 10/18/94, 59 FR 52425 | [KS-4-1-6508a; FRL-5079-2]. |
| (26) Emissions Inventory Update Including a Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget | Kansas City | 5/11/95 | 4/25/96, 61 FR 18251 | [KS-6-1-6985, MO-31-1-7153; FRL 5448-9]. |
| (27) Air monitoring plan | Statewide | 1/6/02 | 8/30/02, 67 FR 55726 | [KS 162-1162a; FRL-7270-4]. |
| (28) Maintenance Plan for the 1-hour ozone standard in the Kansas portion of the Kansas City maintenance area for the second ten-year period | Kansas City | 1/9/03 | 1/13/04, 69 FR 1919 | [KS 202-1202; FRL-7608-9]. |
| (29) Revision to Maintenance Plan for the 1-hour ozone standard in the Kansas portion of the Kansas City maintenance area for the second ten-year period | Kansas City | 2/10/06 | 6/26/06, 71 FR 36213 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2006-0365; FRL-8188-4]. |
| (30) CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i) SIP—Interstate Transport | Statewide | 1/7/07 | 3/9/07, 72 FR 10608 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2007-0141; FRL-8286-3]. |
| (31) Maintenance Plan for the 8-hour ozone standard in the Kansas portion of the Kansas City area | Kansas City | 5/23/07 | 8/9/07, 72 FR 44781 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2007-0620; FRL-8450-5] This plan replaces numbers (28) and (29). |
| (32) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 1/8/08 7/20/09 | 7/11/11, 76 FR 40624 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2011-0304; FRL-9434-3]. This action addresses the following CAA elements as applicable: 111(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| (33) Regional Haze Plan for the first implementation period | Statewide | 11/9/09 | 12/27/11, 76 FR 80754 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2011-0675; FRL-9611-3]. Certain provisions withdrawn from plan as identified in letter dated 12/1/11 from Kansas. |
| (34) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 1/08/08 | 6/20/13, 78 FR 37126 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0233; FRL-9825-6]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (prongs 3 and 4), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), except as noted. |
| (35) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 4/12/10 | 6/20/13, 78 FR 37126 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0233; FRL-9825-6]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (prongs 3 and 4), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M), except as noted. |
| (36) Section 128 Declaration: Kansas Department of Health and Environment Representation and Conflicts of Interest Provisions, Kansas Revised Statutes (KSA). KSA 46-221, KSA 46-229, KSA 46-247(c) | Statewide | 3/19/13 | 6/20/13, 78 FR 37126 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0233; FRL-9825-6]. |
| (37) Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS | Statewide | 1/13/12 | 9/15/14, 79 FR 54908 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0271; FRL-9916-50-Region 7]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| (38) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 O3 NAAQS | Statewide | 3/19/13 | 10/21/14, 79 FR 62861 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0401; FRL-9918-19-Region 7]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (prongs 3 and 4), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M) except as noted. |
| (39) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 3/19/13 | 10/22/14, 79 FR 63044 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0500; FRL-9918-11-Region 7]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110 (a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| (40) Cross State Air Pollution Rule—State-Determined Allowance Allocations for the 2016 control periods | Statewide | 3/30/2015 | 8/21/2015, 80 FR 50789 | |
| (41) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 O3 NAAQS | Statewide | 3/19/2013 | 8/27/2015, 80 FR 51955 | This action addresses the visibility protection portion of section 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA. |
| (42) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision for the Attainment and Maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Regional Haze (2014 Five-Year Progress Report) | Statewide | 3/10/2015 | 9/14/2015, 80 FR 55030 | |
| (43) Attainment plan for 2008 lead NAAQS | Salina | 2/3/2015 | 7/20/2016, 81 FR 47034 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0708; 9949-13-Region 7]. |
| (44) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 11/16/2015 | 9/9/2016, 81 FR 62373 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. [EPA-R07-OAR-2016-0313; FRL- ] |
| (45) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 O3 NAAQS | Statewide | 9/27/2018 | 1/15/2021, 86 FR 3818 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0422; FRL-10013-71-Region 7]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)—prongs 3 and 4, (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). EPA intends to act on 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2, in a separate action. 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. |
| (46) Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—significant contribution to nonattainment (prong 1), and interfering with maintenance of the NAAQs (prong 2) (Interstate Transport) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 4/7/2020 | 8/11/2021, 86 FR 43960 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0365; FRL-8705-02-Region 7]. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2. |
| (47) Transport SIP for the 2015 Ozone Standard | Statewide | 9/27/2018 | 4/4/2022, 87 FR 19390 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2022-0075; FRL-9428-02-R7]. This transport SIP shows that Kansas does not significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment or maintenance in any other state. This submittal is approved as meeting the requirements of Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| (48) Lead Redesignation SIP and Maintenance Plan | Portions of Saline County, Salina, Kansas | 3/20/2025 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51551 | [EPA-R07-OAR-2025-0693; FRL-12887-02-R7]. |
[64 FR 7098, Feb. 12, 1999]
§ 52.871 Classification of regions.
The Kansas plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons) | |
| Metropolitan Kansas City Interstate | I | III | III | I | I |
| South Central Kansas Intrastate | I | III | III | III | I |
| Northeast Kansas Intrastate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Southeast Kansas Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
| North Central Kansas Intrastate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Northwest Kansas Intrastate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Southwest Kansas Intrastate | I | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10867, May 31, 1972]
§ 52.872 Operating permits.
Emission limitations and related provisions which are established in Kansas operating permits as Federally enforceable conditions shall be enforceable by EPA. EPA reserves the right to deem permit conditions not Federally enforceable. Such a determination will be made according to appropriate procedures and be based upon the permit, permit approval procedures, or permit requirements which do not conform with the operating permit program requirements or the requirements of EPA underlying regulations.
[60 FR 36364, July 17, 1995]
§ 52.873 Approval status.
(a) Kansas rule K.A.R. 28-19-719 was rescinded on April 12, 2021.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) The Administrator approves Rule K.A.R. 28-19-31 as identified at § 52.870(c)(29), with the understanding that any alternative compliance plans issued under this rule must be approved by EPA as individual SIP revisions.
[37 FR 10867, May 31, 1972, as amended at 46 FR 20170, Apr. 3, 1981; 46 FR 61118, Dec. 15, 1981; 57 FR 27939, June 23, 1992; 59 FR 52427, Oct. 18, 1994; 61 FR 16061, Apr. 11, 1996; 86 FR 14002, Mar. 12, 2021]
§ 52.874 Legal authority.
(a) The requirements of § 51.230(f) of this chapter are not met since authority to make emission data available to the public is inadequate. Kansas Statutes Annotated 65-3015 would require confidential treatment if the data related to processes or production unique to the owner or would tend to affect adversely the competitive position of the owner.
(b) The requirements of § 51.232(b) of this chapter are not met since the following deficiencies exist in the local agency legal authority:
(1) Kansas City, Kans.-Wyandotte County Health Department. (i) Authority to make emission data available to the public is inadequate because the Kansas Statutes Annotated 65-3016 provides a designated local air quality conservation authority with the same authority as the State (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(2) Topeka-Shawnee County Health Department. (i) Authority to make emission data available to the public is inadequate because the Kansas Statutes Annotated 65-3016 provides a designated air quality conservation authority with the same authority as the State (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(3) Wichita-Sedgwick County Health Department. (i) Authority to make emission data available to the public is inadequate because the Kansas Statutes Annotated 65-3016 provides a designated local air quality conservation authority with the same authority as the State (§ 51.230(f) of this chapter).
(c) The requirements of § 51.230(d) of this chapter are not met since statutory authority to prevent construction, modification, or operation of a facility, building, structure, or installation, or combination thereof, which indirectly results or may result in emissions of any air pollutant at any location which will prevent the maintenance of a national air quality standard is not adequate.
[37 FR 10867, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 7281, Feb. 25, 1974; 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.875 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Kansas” and all revisions submitted by Kansas that were Federally approved prior to July 1, 1998.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 31, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) Various comments on the plan in response to the Regions review were submitted on March 24, 1972, by the State Department of Health. (Non-regulatory)
(2) The Emergency Episode Operations/Communications Manual for the Kansas City Interstate AQCR was submitted on April 6, 1972, by the State Department of Health. (Non-regulatory)
(3) Emergency Episode Operations/Communications Manual for all Kansas Intrastate AQCR's was submitted on February 15, 1973, by the State Department of Health. (Non-regulatory)
(4) Revisions of sections 28-19-6 through 15, 20-24, 30-32, 40-47, 50-52 and 55-58 of the State air pollution control regulations were submitted by the State Department of Health on April 17, 1973.
(5) Letter from the Governor, dated May 29, 1973, concerning the attainment of CO emission standards. (Non-regulatory)
(6) An amendment to the State air quality control law, Senate Bill No. 30, dealing with public access to emission data was submitted on July 27, 1973, by the Governor.
(7) Revisions of sections 28-19-8, 9, 14, 22, 25 and 47 of the State air pollution control regulations were submitted on February 6, 1974, by the Governor.
(8) Copy of the State's analysis and recommendations concerning the designation of Air Quality Maintenance Areas was submitted by letter from the State Department of Health on February 28, 1974. (Non-regulatory)
(9) Kansas submitted State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards on September 17, 1979 for Wyandotte and Johnson Counties, on October 22, 1979 for Douglas County, and on March 10, 1980 for Kansas City of the state designated nonattainment areas under section 107 of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977. On September 22 and 25, 1980, the state submitted revised regulations on the control of volatile organic compounds and a regulation on the new source permit review program. Included in the plan are the following approved state air pollution control regulations:
(i) The VOC regulations which EPA approved as RACT: 28-19-61 Definitions, 28-19-62 Testing Procedures, 28-19-63 Automobile and Light Duty Trunk Surface Coating, 28-19-65 Petroleum Liquid Storage Tanks, 28-19-66 Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks, 28-19-67 Petroleum Refineries, 28-19-68 Leaks from Petroleum Refinery Equipment, 28-19-69 Cutback Asphalt.
(ii) The New Source Permit Review regulation 28-19-16 through 16m which EPA conditionally approved as meeting the requirements of sections 172(b)(6); 172(b)(11)(A), and 173.
(iii) The Kansas City-Wyandotte County air pollution control regulations which have been adopted by both the Kansas City, Kansas Board of City Commissioners and the Wyandotte County Board of County Commissioners:
2A-1 Jurisdiction, 2A-2 Purpose, 2A-3 Definitions, 2A-4 Powers of the Board, 2A-5 Facts and Circumstances Pertinent to Orders of Joint Board, 2A-6 Right of Entry for Inspection, 2A-7 Time for Compliance Schedule, 2A-8 Variance, 2A-9 Circumvention of Chapter or Regulations, 2A-10 Air Pollution Nuisances Prohibited; Additional Emission Restrictions; Interference with the Enjoyment of Life and Property, 2A-11 Reserved, 2A-12 Confidential Information, 2A-13 Registration and Permit System; Exemptions, 2A-14 Review of New or Altered Sources, 2A-15 Public Hearings, 2A-16 Installations in which Fuel is Burned, 2A-17 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes, 2A-18 Open Burning Prohibition, 2A-19 Opacity Requirements, 2A-20 Exceptions Due to Breakdowns or Scheduled Maintenance, 2A-21 Preventing Particulate Matter from Becoming Air-Borne, 2A-22 Measurement of Emissions, 2A-23 Restriction of Emission of Odors, 2A-24 Sulfur Compound Emissions, 2A-24.1 Hydrocarbon Emissions; Stationary Sources, 2A-25 Control of Carbon Monoxide Emissions, 2A-26 Control of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions, 2A-26.1 Incinerators, 2A-27 Air Pollution Emergencies—General Provisions, 2A-28 Air Pollution Emergencies—Episode Criteria, 2A-29 Emission Reduction Requirements, 2A-30 Emergency Episode Plans, 2A-31 Penalties for Violation of Chapter or Air Pollution Control Regulations, and 2A-32 Conflict of Ordinances, Effect Partial Invalidity.
(10) The Kansas State Implementation Plan for lead was submitted on February 17, 1981, by the Governor of Kansas, along with a submittal letter which provided additional information concerning the Kansas State Implementation Plan for lead.
(11) Kansas submitted SIP revisions to attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for carbon monoxide on April 16, 1981, for the South Central Kansas Interstate Air Quality Control Region, Wichita nonattainment area. The plan included commitments to complete transportation control measures for the reduction of carbon monoxide from transportation related sources for the attainment of the national standards by December 31, 1982.
(12) A plan revision which makes modifications to the existing Kansas air quality surveillance network was submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on October 16, 1981.
(13) Additional information to correct two plan deficiencies was submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on May 12, 1981.
(14) Letter and supporting documents submitted on September 15, 1981, from the Director of Air Quality and Occupational Health relating to reasonably available control technology for certain particulate matter sources in the Kansas City, Kansas area.
(15) New regulations 28-19-70 and 28-19-62 applicable to tank trucks operating at bulk gasoline terminals were submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on June 15, 1982. State regulation 28-19-51 is revoked. Revised regulations 28-19-16, 28-19-16a, 28-19-16b, 28-19-16c, 28-19-16f, 28-19-16g, 28-19-16h, and 28-19-16i, applicable to new sources in nonattainment areas were included with the June 15, 1982 submittal. Action is deferred on the following regulations: 28-19-16a(d), 28-19-16a(v), 28-19-16, 28-19-16b, 28-19-16c, 28-19-16f, 28-19-16h, 28-19-16i, and 28-19-16a(o). The remainder of the provisions are approved.
(16) New regulations K.A.R. 28-19-17 through K.A.R. 28-19-171 applicable to stationary sources subject to prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permit requirements were submitted on May 5, 1983. Regulation K.A.R. 28-19-171 pertaining to the use of innovative control technology is not approved. By letter dated June 20, 1984, the State of Kansas agrees to follow the EPA interim stack height policy for each PSD permit issued until such time as EPA revises its general stack height regulations.
(17) Revised regulation K.A.R. 28-19-69, applicable to the use of cutback asphalt, was submitted by the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on February 21, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised regulation K.A.R. 28-19-69 as approved by the Kansas Attorney General on December 5, 1985.
(18) Revised regulations K.A.R. 28-19-63 applicable to automobile and light-duty truck surface coating; K.A.R. 28-19-64 applicable to bulk gasoline terminals; K.A.R. 28-19-67 applicable to petroleum refineries; and K.A.R. 28-19-68 applicable to leaks at petroleum refineries, were submitted by the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on February 21, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised regulations K.A.R. 28-19-63, K.A.R. 28-19-64, K.A.R. 28-19-67, and K.A.R. 28-19-68 as approved by the Kansas Attorney General on October 30, 1985.
(19) Revised Kansas regulations pertaining to fees for permits to construct and operate were submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on March 27, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Kansas Administrative Regulations (KAR) 28-19-7, 28-19-8, 28-19-9, 28-19-14, 14(a) and 14(b), 28-19-31, 28-19-45, which became effective on May 1, 1986.
(B) Letter of March 27, 1986 to EPA from the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
(C) Letter of September 15, 1987 to EPA from the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
(20) Revisions to the ozone attainment plan for the Kansas City metropolitan area were submitted by the Governor on July 2, 1986. Pursuant to this plan, revised regulations for the control of volatile organic compound emissions were submitted by the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on January 6, 1988. In numerous instances, the revised Kansas regulations provide for departmental discretion to approve compliance plans and test methods which are alternatives to the EPA reference methods. EPA approves these regulations with the understanding that all such alternative compliance plans and test methods must be submitted to EPA, and approved, as individual SIP revisions. In the absence of such approval, the enforceable requirements of the SIP shall be the emission limits or reduction requirements stated in the regulations. Also, the Kansas regulations contain provisions whereby testing is required when the facility intends to demonstrate compliance by improved operations or new emission controls, yet no test procedures are specified. Examples of such provisions are transfer efficiency (TE) and vapor processing systems. Test methods which are developed by the state must be approved by EPA before facilities may demonstrate compliance through alternative controls and/or TE.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised regulations K.A.R. 28-19-8, Reporting required; K.A.R. 28-19-61, Definitions; K.A.R. 28-19-62, Testing procedures; K.A.R. 28-19-63, Automobile and light-duty truck surface coating; K.A.R. 28-19-64, Bulk gasoline terminals; K.A.R. 28-19-65, VOC liquid storage in permanent fixed roof type tanks; K.A.R. 28-19-66, VOC liquid storage in external floating roof tanks; K.A.R. 28-19-69, Cutback asphalt; K.A.R. 28-19-70, Leaks from gasoline delivery vessels and vapor collection systems; K.A.R. 28-19-71, Printing operations; K.A.R. 28-19-72, Gasoline dispensing facilities; K.A.R. 28-19-73, Surface coating of miscellaneous metal parts and products and metal furniture; K.A.R. 28-19-74, Wool fiberglass manufacturing; and K.A.R. 28-19-75, Solvent metal cleaning. Temporary versions of these regulations are effective December 16, 1987, through April 30, 1988. The permanent regulations are effective May 1, 1988.
(B) Letter of January 6, 1988, from the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. This letter establishes the effective dates for the revised regulations referenced in subparagraph (20)(i)(A) above.
(ii) Additional material. (A) State of Kansas Implementation Plan, Part A—Kansas City Metropolitan Area, Ozone, dated June 1986, submitted by the Governor on July 2, 1986. The plan contains an attainment demonstration, emissions inventories, and a control strategy.
(B) Supplemental information, pursuant to the above referenced plan, was submitted on August 19, 1987.
(C) Negative declarations for certain VOC source categories were submitted on April 16 and August 18, 1987.
(21) Revised Kansas regulations applicable to air quality models and definitions were submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on January 6, 1988.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Kansas Administrative Regulations (K.A.R.) 28-19-17(f) and 28-19-7 (a) through (f) and (h) through (w) which became effective December 16, 1987. EPA is deferring action on 28-19-7(g), Emission Limitation and Standard.
(22) On March 1, 1985, the Governor of Kansas submitted a revised carbon monoxide state implementation plan for Wichita, Kansas. On September 3, 1987, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment submitted two new transportation control measures as part of the revised Wichita carbon monoxide control plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Letter of September 3, 1987, from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and attached transportation control measures adopted August 18, 1987.
(B) Revision of the Wichita-Sedgwick County Portion of the Kansas State Implementation Plan for Carbon Monoxide submitted by the Governor on March 1, 1985. The plan contains an attainment demonstration, emissions inventory, and a control strategy.
(23) Kansas Administrative Regulations (K.A.R.) 28-19-19(a) through 28-19-19(o) pertaining to continuous emission monitoring at certain stationary sources were submitted on January 6, 1988, by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. K.A.R. 28-19-19(o) allows for departmental discretion on use of different but equivalent procedures than those specified in 28-19-19(a) through 28-19-19(n). EPA approves this rule with the understanding that all such equivalent procedures and requirements must be submitted to EPA as individual SIP revisions. In the absence of such approval, the enforceable provisions of K.A.R. 28-19-19(a) through 28-19-19(n) shall be applicable.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) K.A.R. 28-19-19(a) through 28-19-19(o), continuous emission monitoring, as submitted by the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. These regulations became effective on May 1, 1988.
(B) Letter of January 6, 1988, from the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. This letter establishes the effective date for the revised regulations referenced in paragraph (23)(i)(A) of this section.
(24) Revised regulations K.A.R. 28-19-7(g), K.A.R. 28-19-16, and K.A.R. 28-19-17 pertaining to new source permit requirements, were submitted by the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on March 27, 1986. Revised regulation K.A.R. 28-19-18 pertaining to stack heights was submitted by the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on January 6, 1988.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised regulations, K.A.R. 28-19-16, 28-19-16b, 28-19-16d, 28-19-16g, 28-19-16i, 28-19-161, 28-19-17, 28-19-17a, and 28-19-17b, which became effective on May 1, 1986.
(B) Revised regulations K.A.R. 28-19-7(g), and K.A.R. 28-19-18 through 28-19-18f. The temporary regulations became effective December 16, 1987, and became permanently effective on May 1, 1988.
(ii) Additional material. (A) KDHE letter of March 27, 1986, to EPA pertaining to new source permit regulations.
(B) KDHE letter of January 6, 1988, and June 9, 1988, to EPA pertaining to stack height regulations.
(C) KDHE letters of December 7, 1987, and December 23, 1987, pertaining to the state's stack heights analysis and negative declarations.
(25) Revised Kansas Administrative Regulations (K.A.R.) pertaining to PM10 regulations and the PM10 committal SIP were submitted by Kansas on October 5, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised regulations Article 19—Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control, K.A.R. 28-19-7, 28-19-8, 28-19-14, 28-19-16a, 28-19-17a, 28-19-17b, 28-19-17c, 28-19-17g, 28-19-17i, 28-19-20, 28-19-21, and 28-19-56, published August 31, 1989, effective October 16, 1989.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter of October 5, 1989, from the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE).
(B) Memorandum of October 16, 1989, from the Secretary of State (Kansas) to Stanley Grant (KDHE).
(C) Revised Air Quality Surveillance Monitoring Plan—Section E.
(26) Revisions to the state implementation plan for the Kansas City metropolitan area were submitted by the Governor on October 23, 1991. Revisions include a maintenance plan which demonstrates continued attainment of the NAAQS for ozone through the year 2002. Rule revisions were also submitted on October 23, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Article 19—Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control, revised Kansas Administrative Regulations (K.A.R.) 28-19-61, Definitions, and K.A.R. 28-19-62, Testing procedures; and new rules K.A.R. 28-19-76, Lithography printing facilities, and K.A.R. 28-19-77, Chemical processing facilities that operate alcohol plants or liquid detergent plants. These rules were published August 22, 1991, and became effective October 7, 1991.
(ii) Additional material. (A) State of Kansas Implementation Plan, Kansas City Metropolitan Area Maintenance Provisions, October 1991.
(27) On September 15, 1992, the Secretary of KDHE submitted rule revisions to K.A.R. 28-19-17, the PSD rule; to K.A.R. 28-19-19, the CEM rule; and to K.A.R. 28-19-73, a surface coating rule. These rule revisions were adopted by KDHE on April 3, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised regulations K.A.R. 28-19-17 through 28-19-171, K.A.R. 28-19-19 and K.A.R. 28-19-73, and new regulations K.A.R. 28-19-17m through 28-19-17q, effective June 8, 1992.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter and attachment from KDHE dated September 15, 1992 pertaining to PSD NOX requirements.
(28) A plan for implementation of the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program was submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment as a revision to the Kansas State Implementation Plan (SIP) on January 25, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Kansas SIP, Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program, dated November 15, 1993.
(29) On May 16, 1994 the Secretary of KDHE submitted revisions to rules K.A.R. 28-19-31, 28-19-32, 28-19-63, and operating permits #20090048 (BPU Quindaro station) and #20090049 (BPU Kaw station).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised regulations K.A.R. 28-19-31, K.A.R. 28-19-32, K.A.R. 28-19-63, effective November 8, 1993.
(B) Operating permits; Kansas City, Kansas, Board of Public Utilities Quindaro permit #20090048, and Kaw permit #20090049, effective October 20, 1993.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter from BPU to KDHE dated December 11, 1992, regarding compliance verification methods and schedules.
(30) On February 17, 1995, the Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) submitted for approval numerous rule revisions which add and revise definitions, revise the Kansas construction permit program, and create a class II operating permit program.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revised rules K.A.R. 28-19-7 effective November 22, 1993; K.A.R. 28-19-8 effective January 23, 1995; K.A.R. 28-19-14 effective January 24, 1994; and the revocation of K.A.R. 28-19-14a effective January 23, 1995; and the revocation of K.A.R. 28-19-14b effective January 24, 1994.
(B) New rules K.A.R. 28-19-204, 212, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 500, 501, 502, 540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 561, 562, and 563 effective January 23, 1995.
(31) On May 11, 1995, the Kansas Department of Health and Environment submitted an emissions inventory update to the Kansas City maintenance plan approved by EPA on June 23, 1992. The submittal also establishes a motor vehicle emissions budget for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of the Federal Transportation Conformity rule.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Kansas City Ozone Maintenance State Implementation Plan Revision: Emissions Inventories and Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area, adopted on May 11, 1995.
(32) A Plan revision was submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) on June 6, 1996, which incorporates by reference the EPA's regulations relating to determining conformity of general Federal actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans, and which revokes old and adopts new open burning regulations.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Regulation K.A.R. 28-19-800, adopted by the Secretary of the KDHE on February 21, 1996, effective March 15, 1996.
(B) Regulations K.A.R. 28-19-645 to K.A.R. 28-19-648, adopted by the Secretary of KDHE on February 6, 1996, effective March 1, 1996.
(C) Regulations K.A.R. 28-19-45 to K.A.R. 28-19-47, revoked by the Secretary of KDHE on February 6, 1996, effective March 1, 1996.
(33) A revision to the Kansas SIP was submitted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment on May 23, 1997, pertaining to fuel volatility.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) K.A.R. 28-19-79, Fuel Volatility, effective May 2, 1997.
(d) Plan revisions were submitted on April 17, 1974, and February 17, 1974.
[37 FR 10867, May 31, 1972]
§ 52.876 Compliance schedules.
(a) The requirements of § 51.260 and of § 51.15(a)(2) of this chapter as of September 19, 1976 (40 FR 43216), are not met since the plan does not contain legally enforceable compliance schedules setting forth the dates by which all stationary sources or categories of such sources must be in compliance with applicable portions of the control strategy. Paragraphs C and D of Kansas Regulation 28-19-9 specify that all sources not in compliance must submit an acceptable compliance schedule within 120 days after receiving notification from the State. There are no assurances that all sources will be notified by the State in a timely manner, therefore, paragraphs C and D of Regulation 28-19-9 are disapproved.
(b) Federal compliance schedule. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this paragraph (b), the owner or operator of any stationary source subject to any emission regulation which is part of the approved plan shall be in compliance on or before January 31, 1974.
(i) Any owner or operator in compliance with any such applicable regulation on the effective date of this paragraph shall certify such compliance to the Administrator no later than December 31, 1972.
(ii) Any owner or operator who achieves compliance with any such applicable regulation after the effective date of this paragraph shall certify such compliance to the Administrator within 5 days of the date compliance is achieved.
(2) An owner or operator of a stationary source subject to any emission regulation approved by the Administrator may no later than December 31, 1972, submit to the Administrator for approval a proposed compliance schedule that demonstrates compliance with such regulation as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than July 31, 1975. The compliance schedule shall provide for periodic increments of progress toward compliance. The dates for achievement of such increments shall be specified. Increments of progress shall include, but not be limited to: Letting of necessary contracts for construction or process changes, if applicable; initiation of construction; completion and startup of control systems; performance tests; and submittal of performance test analysis and results.
(3) Any owner or operator who submits a compliance schedule pursuant to this paragraph shall, within 5 days after the deadline for each increment of progress, certify to the Administrator whether or not the required increment of the approved compliance schedule has been met.
(4) Any compliance schedule adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(c) State compliance schedules. (1) [Reserved]
(2) The compliance schedules identified below are disapproved as not meeting the requirements of § 51.102 or subpart N of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the state, unless otherwise noted.
| Source | Location | Regulation involved | Date adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chanute Manufacturing Co., Inc.: sand blasting | Chanute | 28-19-50 | Dec. 14, 1973. |
| Kansas City Power & Light, coal transfer houses | LaCygne | 28-19-50 | Nov. 22, 1974. |
| Pence Food Center, incinerator | Chanute | 28-19-40 | Do. |
| Rodney Milling Co.: | |||
| “A” house gallery and tunnel system | Topeka | 28-19-50 | Do. |
| “B” & “C” house gallery | ......do | 28-19-50 | Do. |
| Western Alfalfa Corp., alfalfa dehydrator | Deerfield | 28-19-20 | Do. |
| Do | Tice | 28-19-20 | Do. |
| Pence Food Center, incinerator | Humboldt | 28-19-40 | Do. |
| Sherwin-Williams Chemicals, Ozark P.M. Mill | Coffeyville | 28-19-50B | Oct. 8, 1974. |
| Continental Grain Co., rail car loading | Hutchinson | 28-19-50 | Aug. 15, 1974. |
| Far-Mar-Co, Inc., headhouse cyclones | Topeka | 28-19-50 | Sept. 5, 1974. |
| Do | Hutchinson | 28-19-50 | Aug. 15, 1974. |
| Western Iron & Foundry, cupola | Wichita | 28-19-20A, 28-19-50A | Oct. 4, 1974. |
| Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, open burning | Parsons | 28-19-45 | Jan. 24, 1975. |
| Reid Grain, headhouse | Goodland | 28-19-50 | Do. |
| Sherwin-Williams Chemicals, black ash kiln | Coffeyville | 28-19-50A | Do. |
| Cooperative Farm Chemicals, No. 1 NH4 NO3 99-percent evaporator and prilling tower | Lawrence | 28-19-20 | Mar. 28, 1975. |
| Sherwin-Williams Chemical Co., ozide calciner exhaust | Coffeyville | 28-19-50A | Do. |
| Kaw Dehydrating Co., alfalfa dehydrator | Lawrence | 28-19-20 | Do. |
| Empire Dist. Electric Co.: Boilers Nos. 7 and 8 | Riverton | 28-19-31C | May 23, 1975. |
| Gulf Oil Chemicals Co.: Coal-fired boiler | Pittsburg | 28-19-31 | Do. |
| Kansas City Power & Light: Main boiler | La Cygne | 28-19-31B | Do. |
| Mid-America Dairymen: Spray dryers Nos. 1 and 2 | Sabetha | 28-19-20 | Do. |
| Tower Metal Products: Reverberatory furnace C | Fort Scott | 28-19-50A | Do. |
| U.S. Steel—Universal Atlas Cement | Independence | ||
| Clay storage bin | 28-19-50A | Do. | |
| Stone storage bin | 28-19-50A | Do. | |
| Krupp Ball Mill No. 2 | 28-19-50A | Do. | |
| Krupp Ball Mill No. 3 | 28-19-50A | Do. |
[37 FR 19809, Sept. 22, 1972]
§§ 52.877-52.880 [Reserved]
§ 52.881 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
The state has submitted a committal SIP for Kansas City, Kansas. The committal SIP contains all the requirements identified in the July 1, 1987, promulgation of the SIP requirements for PM10 at 52 FR 24681, except the state will report the PM10 data which exceed the standard within 60 days of the exceedance, rather than 45 days.
[55 FR 1423, Jan. 16, 1990]
§ 52.882 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kansas and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kansas' State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kansas' SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Kansas' SIP revision described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kansas and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kansas' State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kansas' SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Kansas' SIP revision described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances under subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48365, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 50793, Aug. 21, 2015; 81 FR 74586 and 74595, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 65924, Dec. 21, 2018]
§ 52.883 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kansas and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 2 Trading Program in subpart DDDDD of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated with regard to sources and units in the State by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kansas' State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39 for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kansas' SIP.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Kansas' SIP revision described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 2 allowances under subpart DDDDD of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart DDDDD of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 2 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48365, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586 and 74596, Oct. 26, 2016]
§ 52.884 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of section 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act, as amended are met; except that:
(1) EPA retains PSD permit authority for Indian lands in the State of Kansas.
[49 FR 48186, Dec. 11, 1984, as amended at 54 FR 15935, Apr. 20, 1989; 58 FR 3848, Jan. 12, 1993]
Subpart S—Kentucky
§ 52.919 [Reserved]
§ 52.920 Identification of plan.
Link to an amendment published at 91 FR 60845, Sept. 25, 2026.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan for Kentucky under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet national ambient air quality standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to September 30, 2022, for the Commonwealth of Kentucky and September 30, 2022, for Jefferson County, Kentucky, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraph (c), Tables 1 and 2, and paragraph (d) of this section with EPA approval dates after September 30, 2022, for the Commonwealth of Kentucky and September 30, 2022, for Jefferson County, Kentucky, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 4 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated State rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the State Implementation Plan as of the dates referenced in paragraph (b)(1).
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Region 4 EPA office at 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303. To obtain the material, please call (404) 562-9022. You may also inspect the material with an EPA approval date prior to September 30, 2022, for the Commonwealth at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.
(c) EPA-approved laws and regulations.
| State citation | Title/subject | State
effective date |
EPA approval date | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chapter 50 Division for Air Quality; General Administrative Procedures | ||||
| 401 KAR 50:005 | General application | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 50:010 | Definitions and abbreviations of terms used in Title 401 Chapters 50, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, and 65 | 11/8/2006 | 9/13/2007, 72 FR 52282 | |
| 401 KAR 50:012 | General application | 11/12/1997 | 7/24/1998, 63 FR 39739 | |
| 401 KAR 50:015 | Documents incorporated by reference | 4/14/1988 | 2/7/1990, 55 FR 4169 | |
| 401 KAR 50:020 | Air quality control regions | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 50:025 | Classification of counties | 6/1/1983 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14489 | |
| 401 KAR 50:030 | Registration of sources | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 50:040 | Air quality models | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 50:042 | Good engineering practice stack height | 6/10/1986 | 9/4/1987,52 FR 33592 | |
| 401 KAR 50:045 | Performance tests | 7/13/2005 | 10/17/2007, 72 FR 58759 | |
| 401 KAR 50:047 | Test procedures for capture efficiency | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 50:050 | Monitoring | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 50:055 | General compliance requirements | 9/22/1982 | 12/4/1986, 51 FR 43742 | Except for Section 1(1) and 1(4), which were removed from the SIP by EPA on 8/11/2022. |
| 401 KAR 50:060 | Enforcement | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 50:065 | Conformity of general federal actions | 10/11/1995 | 7/27/1998, 63 FR 40044 | |
| 401 KAR 50:066 | Conformity of transportation plans, programs, and projects (Amendment) | 11/12/2008 | 4/21/2010, 75 FR 20780 | |
| Chapter 51 Attainment and Maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards | ||||
| 401 KAR 51:001 | Definitions for 401 KAR Chapter 51 | 12/7/2012 | 11/3/2014, 79 FR 65143 | Except the phrase “except ethanol production facilities producing ethanol by natural fermentation under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes 325193 or 312140” in 401 KAR 51:001 Section 1(118)(a)(2)(a) and the phrase “except ethanol production facilities producing ethanol by natural fermentation under NAICS codes 325193 or 312140” in 401 KAR 51:001 Section 1(118)(c)(20). |
| 401 KAR 51:005 | Purpose and general provisions | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 51:010 | Attainment status designations | 6/9/2022 | 6/3/2024,
89 FR 47468 |
|
| 401 KAR 51:017 | Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality | 12/7/2012 | 11/3/2014, 79 FR 65143 | With the exception of the SILs and SMC provisions for PM2.5, and except the phrase “except ethanol production facilities producing ethanol by natural fermentation under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes 325193 or 312140” in 401 KAR 51:017 Section 7(1)(c)20. |
| 401 KAR 51:052 | Review of new sources in or impacting upon nonattainment areas | 12/7/2012 | 10/8/2015, 80 FR 60805 | With the exception of the SILs and SMC provisions for PM2.5, and except the phrase “except ethanol production facilities producing ethanol by natural fermentation under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes 325193 or 312140” in 401 KAR 51:052 Section 2(3)(t). |
| 401 KAR 51:150 | NOX requirements for stationary internal combustion engines | 2/3/2006 | 10/23/2009, 74 FR 54755 | |
| 401 KAR 51:160 | NOX requirements for large utility and industrial boilers | 2/3/2006 | 10/23/2009, 74 FR 54755 | |
| 401 KAR 51:170 | NOX requirements for cement kilns | 8/15/2001 | 4/11/2002, 67 FR 17624 | |
| 401 KAR 51:180 | NOX credits for early reduction and emergency | 8/15/2001 | 4/11/2002, 67 FR 17624 | |
| 401 KAR 51:190 | Banking and trading NOX allowances | 8/15/2001 | 4/11/2002, 67 FR 17624 | |
| 401 KAR 51:195 | NOX opt-in provisions | 8/15/2001 | 4/11/2002, 67 FR 17624 | |
| 401 KAR 51:210 | CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program | 2/2/2007 | 10/4/2007, 72 FR 56623 | |
| 401 KAR 51:220 | CAIR NOX Ozone Season Trading Program | 6/13/2007 | 10/4/2007, 72 FR 56623 | |
| 401 KAR 51:230 | CAIR SO2 Trading Program | 2/2/2007 | 10/4/2007, 72 FR 56623 | |
| 401 KAR 51:240 | Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) NOX annual trading program | 7/5/2018 | 2/10/2020, 85 FR 7449 | |
| 401 KAR 51:260 | Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) SO2 group 1 trading program | 7/5/2018 | 2/10/2020, 85 FR 7449 | |
| Chapter 52 Permits, Registrations, and Prohibitory Rules | ||||
| 401 KAR 52:001 | Definitions for 401 KAR Chapter 52 | 11/18/2006 | 9/13/2007, 72 FR 52282 | |
| 401 KAR 52:020 | Title V permits | 1/15/2001 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4896 | Only adding the first sentence of Section 22 entitled “Annual Emissions Certification”, and introductory paragraph text and subsection (4) of Section 23 entitled “Certification by Responsible Official”. |
| 401 KAR 52:030 | Federally enforceable permits for non-major sources | 1/15/2001 | 9/6/2006, 71 FR 52460 | |
| 401 KAR 52:040 | State-origin permits | 1/15/2001 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4896 | Only adding subsection (2) introductory text, subsection (2)(c), and subsection (3) of Section 3 entitled “General Provisions”; subsection (1) of Section 20 entitled “Annual Emissions Certification for Specified Sources”; and introductory text and subsection (4) of Section 21 entitled “Certification by Responsible Official”. |
| 401 KAR 52:070 | Registration of designated sources | 1/15/2001 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4896 | Only adding subsection (2) introductory text, subsection (2)(a)(1), and first sentence of subsection (2)(a)(2) of Section 3 entitled “General Provisions”. |
| 401 KAR 52:090 | Prohibitory rule for hot mix asphalt plants | 1/15/2001 | 9/6/2006, 71 FR 52460 | |
| 401 KAR 52:100 | Public, affected state, and U.S. EPA review | 6/2/2020 | 10/1/2021, 86 FR 54379 | |
| Chapter 53 Ambient Air Quality | ||||
| 401 KAR 53:005 | General provisions | 4/14/1988 | 2/7/1990, 55 FR 4169 | |
| 401 KAR 53:010 | Ambient air quality standards | 7/19/2016 | 9/12/2017, 82 FR 42746 | Except for references to hydrogen sulfide, fluorides, and odor. |
| Chapter 55 Emergency Episodes | ||||
| 401 KAR 55:005 | Significant harm criteria | 4/14/1988 | 2/7/1990, 55 FR 4169 | |
| 401 KAR 55:010 | Episode criteria | 4/14/1988 | 2/7/1990, 55 FR 4169 | |
| 401 KAR 55:015 | Episode declaration | 6/6/1979 | 1/25/1980, 45 FR 6092 | |
| 401 KAR 55:020 | Abatement strategies | 6/6/1979 | 1/25/1980, 45 FR 6092 | |
| Chapter 59 New Source Standards | ||||
| 401 KAR 59:001 | Definitions for abbreviations of terms used in the Title 401, Chapter 59 | 11/18/2006 | 9/13/2007, 72 FR 52282 | |
| 401 KAR 59:005 | General provisions | 12/1/1982 | 12/4/1986, 51 FR 43742 | |
| 401 KAR 59:010 | New process operations | 4/14/1988 | 2/7/1990, 55 FR 4169 | |
| 401 KAR 59:015 | New indirect heat exchangers | 1/7/1981 | 3/22/1983, 48 FR 11945 | |
| 401 KAR 59:020 | New incinerators | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 59:046 | Selected new petroleum refining processes and equipment | 6/29/1979 | 8/7/1981, 46 FR 40188 | |
| 401 KAR 59:050 | New storage vessels for petroleum liquids | 2/4/1981 | 3/30/1983, 48 FR 13168 | |
| 401 KAR 59:080 | New kraft (sulfate) pulp mills | 6/6/1979 | 1/25/1980, 45 FR 6092 | |
| 401 KAR 59:085 | New sulfite pulp mills | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 59:090 | New ethylene producing plants | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 59:095 | New oil-effluent water separators | 6/29/1979 | 8/7/1981, 46 FR 40188 | |
| 401 KAR 59:101 | New bulk gasoline plants | 9/28/1994 | 6/28/1996, 61 FR 33674 | |
| 401 KAR 59:105 | New process gas streams | 4/7/1982 | 3/22/1983, 48 FR 11945 | |
| 401 KAR 59:174 | Stage II controls at gasoline dispensing facilities | 5/3/2016 | 10/14/2016, 81 FR 70966 | |
| 401 KAR 59:175 | New service stations | 2/8/1993 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:185 | New solvent metal cleaning equipment | 1/4/2005 | 10/4/2005, 70 FR 57750 | |
| 401 KAR 59:190 | New insulation of magnet wire operations | 6/24/1992 | ||
| 401 KAR 59:210 | New fabric, vinyl and paper surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:212 | New graphic arts facilities using rotogravure and flexography | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:214 | New factory surface coating operations of flat wood paneling | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:225 | New miscellaneous metal parts and products surface coating operation | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:230 | New synthesized pharmaceutical product manufacturing operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:235 | New pneumatic rubber tire manufacturing plants | 2/4/1981 | 3/30/1983, 48 FR 13168 | |
| 401 KAR 59:240 | New perchloroethylene dry cleaning systems | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:315 | Specific new sources | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 59:760 | Commercial Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Refinishing Operations | 3/11/2005 | 10/4/2005, 70 FR 57750 | |
| Chapter 61 Existing Source Standards | ||||
| 401 KAR 61:001 | Definitions for 401 KAR Chapter 61 | 11/18/2006 | 9/13/2007, 72 FR 52282 | |
| 401 KAR 61:005 | General provisions | 12/1/1982 | 5/4/1989, 54 FR 19169 | |
| 401 KAR 61:010 | Existing incinerators | 6/6/1979 | 5/4/1989, 54 FR 19169 | |
| 401 KAR 61:015 | Existing indirect heat exchangers | 6/1/1983 | 4/2/1996, 61 FR 14489 | |
| 401 KAR 61:020 | Existing process operations | 4/14/1988 | 2/7/1990, 55 FR 4169 | |
| 401 KAR 61:025 | Existing kraft (sulfate) pulp mills | 6/6/1979 | 5/26/1982, 47 FR 22955 | |
| 401 KAR 61:030 | Existing sulfuric acid plants | 6/6/1979 | 3/22/1983, 48 FR 11945 | |
| 401 KAR 61:035 | Existing process gas streams | 4/7/1982 | 3/22/1983, 48 FR 11945 | |
| 401 KAR 61:040 | Existing ethylene producing plants | 6/6/1979 | 1/25/1980, 45 FR 6092 | |
| 401 KAR 61:045 | Existing oil-effluent water separators | 6/29/1979 | 8/7/1981, 46 FR 40188 | |
| 401 KAR 61:050 | Existing storage vessels for petroleum liquids | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32345 | |
| 401 KAR 61:055 | Existing loading facilities at bulk gasoline terminals | 8/24/1982 | 3/30/1983, 48 FR 13168 | |
| 401 KAR 61:056 | Existing bulk gasoline plants | 9/28/1994 | 6/28/1996, 61 FR 33674 | |
| 401 KAR 61:060 | Existing sources using organic solvents | 6/29/1979 | 1/25/1980, 45 FR 6092 | |
| 401 KAR 61:065 | Existing nitric acid plants | 6/6/1979 | 7/12/1982, 47 FR 30059 | |
| 401 KAR 61:070 | Existing ferroalloy production facilities | 6/6/1979 | 5/3/1984, 49 FR 18833 | |
| 401 KAR 61:075 | Steel plants and foundries using existing electric arc furnaces | 12/1/1982 | 5/4/1989, 54 FR 19169 | |
| 401 KAR 61:080 | Steel plants using existing basic oxygen process furnaces | 4/1/1984 | 5/4/1989, 54 FR 19169 | |
| 401 KAR 61:085 | Existing service stations | 2/8/1993 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:090 | Existing automobile and light-duty truck surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:095 | Existing solvent metal cleaning equipment | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:100 | Existing insulation of magnet wire operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:105 | Existing metal furniture surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:110 | Existing large appliance surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:120 | Existing fabric, vinyl and paper surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:122 | Existing graphic arts facilities using rotogravure and flexography | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:124 | Existing factory surface coating operations of flat wood paneling | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:125 | Existing can surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:130 | Existing coil surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:132 | Existing miscellaneous metal parts and products surface coating operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:135 | Selected existing petroleum refining processes and equipment | 6/29/1979 | 1/25/1980, 45 FR 6092 | |
| 401 KAR 61:137 | Leaks from existing petroleum refinery equipment | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:140 | Existing by-product coke manufacturing plants | 9/4/1986 | 5/4/1989, 54 FR 19169 | |
| 401 KAR 61:145 | Existing petroleum refineries | 1/7/1981 | 3/22/1983, 48 FR 11945 | |
| 401 KAR 61:150 | Existing synthesized pharmaceutical product manufacturing operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:155 | Existing pneumatic rubber tire manufacturing plants | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:160 | Existing perchloroethylene dry cleaning systems | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 61:165 | Existing primary aluminum reduction plants | 6/4/1985 | 12/2/1986, 51 FR 43395 | |
| 401 KAR 61:170 | Existing blast furnace casthouses | 4/14/1988 | ||
| 401 KAR 61:175 | Leaks from existing synthetic organic chemical and polymer manufacturing equipment | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| Chapter 63 General Standards of Performance | ||||
| 401 KAR 63:001 | Definitions and abbreviations of terms used in 401 KAR Chapter 63 | 11/18/2006 | 9/13/2007, 72 FR 52282 | |
| 401 KAR 63:005 | Open burning | 7/13/2005 | 10/17/2007, 72 FR 58759 | |
| 401 KAR 63:010 | Fugitive emissions | 6/30/2020 | 5/9/2022, 87 FR 27524 | Except for the nuisance provision found in Section 3, Paragraph (4). |
| 401 KAR 63:015 | Flares | 6/6/1979 | 12/24/1980, 45 FR 84999 | |
| 401 KAR 63:025 | Asphalt paving operations | 6/24/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| 401 KAR 63:031 | Leaks from gasoline tank trunks | 2/8/1993 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32343 | |
| Chapter 65 Mobile Source-Related Emissions | ||||
| 401 KAR 65:001 | Definitions and abbreviations of terms used in 401 KAR Chapter 65 | 11/18/2006 | 9/13/2007, 72 FR 52282 | |
| 401 KAR 65:005 | Liquefied petroleum gas carburetion systems | 6/6/1979 | 1/25/1980, 45 FR 6092 | |
| Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) | ||||
| KRS Chapter 11A.020 | Public servant prohibited from certain conduct—Exception—Disclosure of personal or private interest | 7/15/1998 | 10/3/2012, 77 FR 60307 | |
| KRS Chapter 11A.030 | Considerations in determination to abstain from action on official decision—Advisory opinion | 7/14/1992 | 10/3/2012, 77 FR 60307 | |
| KRS Chapter 11A.040 | Acts prohibited for public servant or officer—exception | 7/16/2006 | 10/3/2012, 77 FR 60307 | |
| KRS Chapter 224.10-020 | Department within the cabinet—Offices and divisions within the departments—Appointments | 7/15/2010 | 10/3/2012, 77 FR 60307 | |
| KRS Chapter 224.10-100 | Powers and duties of cabinet | 8/30/2007 | 10/3/2012, 77 FR 60307 |
| Reg | Title/subject | EPA
approval date |
Federal Register
notice |
District
effective date |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reg 1—General Provisions | |||||
| 1.01 | General Application of Regulations and Standards | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/17/1999 | |
| 1.02 | Definitions | May 13, 2024 | 89 FR 41319 | 3/15/2023 | Except for the definition of “Acute noncancer effect.” |
| 1.03 | Abbreviations and Acronyms | 8/31/2017 | 82 FR 41335 | 1/16/2008 | |
| 1.04 | Performance Tests | 7/10/2020 | 85 FR 41399 | 6/19/2019 | |
| 1.05 | Compliance with Emission Standards and Maintenance Requirements | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/18/1992 | |
| 1.06 | Stationary Source Self-Monitoring, Emissions Inventory Development, and Reporting | 1/10/2024 | 89 FR 1461 | 3/16/2022 | Except Section 5 and any references to Section 5 in this regulation. |
| 1.07 | Excess Emissions During Startups, Shutdowns, and Upset Conditions | 6/10/2014 | 79 FR 33101 | 7/21/2005 | |
| 1.08 | Administrative Procedures | 10/21/2020 | 85 FR 66876 | 11/20/2019 | |
| 1.09 | Prohibition of Air Pollution | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/16/1983 | |
| 1.10 | Circumvention | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 4/19/1972 | |
| 1.11 | Control of Open Burning | 12/27/24 | 89 FR 105463 | 3/15/2023 | |
| 1.14 | Control of Fugitive Particulate Emissions | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 1/20/1988 | |
| 1.18 | Rule Effectiveness | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53686 | 9/21/1994 | |
| 1.19 | Administrative Hearings | 8/31/2017 | 82 FR 41335 | 1/16/2008 | |
| Reg 2—Permit Requirements | |||||
| 2.01 | General Application | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 4/21/1982 | |
| 2.02 | Air Pollution Regulation Requirements and Exemptions | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/21/1995 | |
| 2.03 | Permit Requirements—Non-Title V Construction and Operating Permits and Demolition/Renovation Permits | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 12/15/1993 | Except for paragraphs 1.3, 5.3 and 5.6 regarding asbestos demolition, which were removed from the federally approved SIP by EPA on 5/7/2021. |
| 2.04 | Construction or Modification of Major Sources in or Impacting upon Non-Attainment Areas (Emission Offset Requirements) | 3/7/2024 | 89 FR 16460 | 3/16/2022 | Except for the ethanol production facilities exclusion in Sections 1.4.3.20 and 5.20. Additionally, EPA is retaining Sections 2.2.20 and 10 from Version 7 of Regulation 2.04, locally effective on March 17, 1993. |
| 2.05 | Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality | 9/16/2020 | 85 FR 57707 | 1/17/2018 | This approval does not include Jefferson County's revisions to incorporate by reference the Fugitive Emissions Rule (December 19, 2008). |
| 2.06 | Permit Requirements—Other Sources | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/16/1983 | |
| 2.07 | Public Notification for Title V, PSD, and Offset Permits; SIP Revisions; and Use of Emission Reduction Credits | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/21/1995 | |
| 2.09 | Causes for Permit Suspension | 11/3/2003 | 68 FR 62236 | 6/19/2002 | |
| 2.10 | Stack Height Considerations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 7/19/1989 | |
| 2.11 | Air Quality Model Usage | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/19/1999 | |
| 2.17 | Federally Enforceable District Origin Operating Permits | 3/1/2023 | 88 FR 12831 | 3/16/2022 | |
| Reg 3—Ambient Air Quality Standards | |||||
| 3.01 | Ambient Air Quality Standards | 5/11/2018 | 83 FR 21907 | 2/15/2017 | |
| Reg 4—Emergency Episodes | |||||
| 4.01 | General Provisions for Emergency Episodes | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/13/1979 | |
| 4.02 | Episode Criteria | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 4/20/1988 | |
| 4.03 | General Abatement Requirements | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 2/16/1983 | |
| 4.04 | Particulate and Sulfur Dioxide Reduction Requirements | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 4/19/1972 | |
| 4.05 | Hydrocarbon and Nitrogen Oxides Reduction Requirements | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 2/16/1983 | |
| 4.06 | Carbon Monoxide Reduction Requirements | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 2/16/1983 | |
| 4.07 | Episode Reporting Requirements | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/13/1979 | |
| Reg 6—Standards of Performance for Existing Affected Facilities | |||||
| 6.01 | General Provisions | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/16/1983 | |
| 6.02 | Emission Monitoring for Existing Sources | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/16/1983 | |
| 6.07 | Standards of Performance for Existing Indirect Heat Exchangers | 10/1/2019 | 84 FR 52003 | 1/17/2018 | |
| 6.08 | Standard of Performance for Existing Incinerators | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/13/1979 | |
| 6.09 | Standards of Performance for Existing Process Operations | 5/21/2019 | 84 FR 22982 | 1/17/2018 | |
| 6.10 | Standard of Performance for Existing Process Gas Streams | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/16/1983 | |
| 6.12 | Standard of Performance for Existing Asphalt Paving Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.13 | Standard of Performance for Existing Storage Vessels for Volatile Organic Compounds | 3/10/2021 | 86 FR 13655 | 6/19/2019 | |
| 6.14 | Standard of Performance for Selected Existing Petroleum Refining Processes and Equipment | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 4/21/1982 | |
| 6.15 | Standard of Performance for Gasoline Transfer to Existing Service Station Storage Tanks (Stage I Vapor Recovery) | 1/25/1980 | 45 FR 6092 | 6/13/1979 | |
| 6.16 | Standard of Performance for Existing Large Appliance Surface Coating Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.17 | Standard of Performance for Existing Automobile and Truck Surface Coating Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/18/1992 | |
| 6.18 | Standards of Performance for Existing Solvent Metal Cleaning Equipment | 8/31/2017 | 82 FR 41335 | 5/9/2003 | |
| 6.19 | Standard of Performance for Existing Metal Furniture Surface Coating Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.20 | Standard of Performance for Existing Bulk Gasoline Plants | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 11/16/1983 | |
| 6.21 | Standard of Performance for Existing Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Terminals | 3/11/2021 | 86 FR 13816 | 6/19/2019 | Except for the phrase “or an alternate procedure approved by District” in subsection 3.6.4.2. |
| 6.22 | Standard of Performance for Existing Volatile Organic Materials Loading Facilities | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/17/1993 | |
| 6.24 | Standard of Performance for Existing Sources Using Organic Materials | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/17/1993 | |
| 6.26 | Standards of Performance for Existing Volatile Organic Compound Water Separators | 7/11/2019 | 84 FR 33004 | 1/17/2018 | |
| 6.27 | Standards of Performance for Existing Liquid Waste Incinerators | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/13/1979 | |
| 6.28 | Standard of Performance for Existing Hot Air Aluminum Atomization Processes | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/18/1981 | |
| 6.29 | Standards of Performance for Existing Graphic Arts Facilities Using Rotogravure and Flexography | 10/12/2017 | 82 FR 47376 | 8/21/2013 | |
| 6.30 | Standard of Performance for Existing Factory Surface Coating Operations of Flat Wood Paneling | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.31 | Standards of Performance for Existing Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Surface Coating Operations | 9/2/2020 | 85 FR 54510 | 6/19/2019 | |
| 6.32 | Standard of Performance for Leaks from Existing Petroleum Refinery Equipment | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.33 | Standard of Performance for Existing Synthesized Pharmaceutical Product Manufacturing Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.34 | Standard of Performance for Existing Pneumatic Rubber Tire Manufacturing Plants | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.35 | Standard of Performance for Existing Fabric, Vinyl and Paper Surface Coating Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 6.38 | Standard of Performance for Existing Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industries | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 12/17/1986 | |
| 6.39 | Standard of Performance for Equipment Leaks of Volatile Organic Compounds in Existing Synthetic Organic Chemical and Polymer Manufacturing Plants | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 7/17/1996 | |
| 6.40 | Standards of Performance for Gasoline Transfer to Motor Vehicles (Stage II Vapor Recovery and Control System) | 9/18/2017 | 82 FR 43489 | 11/10/2016 | |
| 6.42 | Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirements for Major Volatile Organic Compound- and Nitrogen Oxides-Emitting Facilities | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/17/1999 | |
| 6.43 | Volatile Organic Compound Reduction Requirements | 8/31/2017 | 82 FR 41335 | 2/15/2006 | |
| 6.44 | Standards of Performance for Existing Commercial Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Refinishing Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 9/20/1995 | |
| 6.45 | Standards of Performance for Existing Solid Waste Landfills | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53686 | 2/2/1994 | |
| 6.46 | Standards of Performance for Existing Ferroalloy and Calcium Carbide Production Facilities | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 12/21/1994 | |
| 6.48 | Standard of Performance for Existing Bakery Oven Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 7/19/1995 | |
| 6.49 | Standards of Performance for Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53664 | 6/20/2001 | |
| 6.50 | NOX Requirements for Portland Cement Kilns | 11/19/2002 | 67 FR 69688 | 3/20/2002 | |
| Reg 7—Standards of Performance for New Affected Facilities | |||||
| 7.01 | General Provisions | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/17/2000 | |
| 7.06 | Standards of Performance for New Indirect Heat Exchangers | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 4/21/1982 | |
| 7.07 | Standard of Performance for New Incinerators | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 9/15/1993 | |
| 7.08 | Standards of Performance for New Process Operations | 5/21/2019 | 84 FR 22982 | 1/17/2018 | |
| 7.09 | Standards of Performance for New Process Gas Streams | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/18/1997 | |
| 7.11 | Standard of Performance for New Asphalt Paving Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 7.12 | Standard of Performance for New Storage Vessels of Volatile Organic Compounds | 3/10/2021 | 86 FR 13655 | 6/19/2019 | |
| 7.14 | Standard of Performance for Selected New Petroleum Refining Processes and Equipment | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/13/1979 | |
| 7.15 | Standards of Performance for Gasoline Transfer to New Service Station Storage Tanks (Stage I Vapor Recovery) | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 4/20/1988 | |
| 7.20 | Standard of Performance for New Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Plants | 3/11/2021 | 86 FR 13816 | 6/19/2019 | Except for the phrase “or an alternate procedure approved by the District” in subsection 3.11.1.2. |
| 7.22 | Standard of Performance for New Volatile Organic Materials Loading Facilities | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/17/1993 | |
| 7.25 | Standard of Performance for New Sources Using Volatile Organic Compounds | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/17/1993 | |
| 7.34 | Standard of Performance for New Sulfite Pulp Mills | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/13/1979 | |
| 7.35 | Standard of Performance for New Ethylene Producing Plants | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 6/13/1979 | |
| 7.36 | Standards of Performance for New Volatile Organic Compound Water Separators | 7/11/2019 | 84 FR 33004 | 1/17/2018 | |
| 7.51 | Standard of Performance for New Liquid Waste Incinerators | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 1/20/1988 | |
| 7.52 | Standard of Performance for New Fabric, Vinyl, and Paper Surface Coating Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 7.55 | Standard of Performance for New Insulation of Magnet Wire | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 3/17/1993 | |
| 7.56 | Standard of Performance for Leaks from New Petroleum Refinery Equipment | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 7.58 | Standard of Performance for New Factory Surface Coating Operations of Flat Wood Paneling | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 7.59 | Standards of Performance for New Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Surface Coating Operations | 9/2/2020 | 85 FR 54510 | 6/19/2019 | |
| 7.60 | Standard of Performance for New Synthesized Pharmaceutical Product Manufacturing Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/15/1991 | |
| 7.77 | Standards of Performance for New Blast Furnace Casthouses | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 10/20/1993 | |
| 7.79 | Standards of Performance for New Commercial Motor Vehicles and Mobile Equipment Refinishing Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53686 | 2/2/1994 | |
| 7.81 | Standard of Performance for New or Modified Bakery Oven Operations | 10/23/2001 | 66 FR 53658 | 5/17/2000 |
(d) EPA-approved source-specific requirements.
| Name of source | Permit No. | State
effective date |
EPA approval
date |
Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bubble action at Kentucky Utilities Green River Plant | N/A | 12/1/1980 | 6/15/1981, 46 FR 31260 | |
| Bubble action at Corning Glassworks | N/A | 5/18/1981 | 10/29/1981, 46 FR 53408 | |
| Bubble action at National Distillers Company's, Old Crow Plant | N/A | 12/24/1980 | 9/14/1981, 46 FR 45610 | |
| Bubble action at Borden Chemical CO in Jefferson CO | N/A | 3/5/1982 | 5/11/1982, 47 FR 20125 | |
| Variance for seven perchloroethylene dry cleaners | N/A | 7/30/1982 | 5/2/1983, 48 FR 19716 | |
| Variance for two dry cleaners | N/A | 1/12/1983 | 5/5/1983, 48 FR 20233 | |
| Variance for Jiffy and Hiland Dry Cleaners | N/A | 3/30/1984 | 4/18/1985, 50 FR 15421 | |
| Opacity variance for boiler Units 1 and 2 of TVA's Paradise Steam Plant | KDEPDAQ Permit 0-86-75 | 7/24/1986 | 8/17/1988, 53 FR 30998 | |
| Operating Permit requiring VOC RACT for Calgon CO | KDEPDAQ Permit 0-94-020 | 11/17/1994 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411 | |
| Alternative Averaging Period for American Greetings Corporation | KDEPDAQ Permit V-98-049 | 7/7/1999 | 5/9/2001, 66 FR 23615 | |
| Title V permit requiring VOC RACT for Publisher's Printing, Inc., Bullitt County | KDEPDAQ Permit 21-029-00019 | 7/20/2001 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53662 | |
| Board Order E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company | NOX RACT Plan 02/21/01 | 3/1/2001 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53665 | |
| Board Order Ford Louisville Assembly Plant | NOX RACT Plan 11/08/99 | 1/1/2000 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53665 | |
| Board Order General Electric Company | NOX RACT Plan 01/17/01 | 3/1/2001 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53665 | |
| Board Order Kosmos Cement Company | NOX RACT Plan 05/03/04 | 5/3/2004 | 5/18/2005, 70 FR 28429 | |
| Board Order Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Cane Run Generating Station | NOX RACT Plan 10/18/00 | 1/1/2001 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53665 | |
| Board Order Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Mill Creek Generating Station | NOX RACT Plan 10/18/00 | 1/1/2001 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53665 | |
| Board Order Louisville Medical Center Steam Plant | NOX RACT Plan 1/18/2017 | 1/18/2017 | 10/12/2017, 82 FR 47376 | |
| Board Order Oxy Vinyls, LP | NOX RACT Plan 12/20/00 | 1/1/2001 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53665 | |
| Board Order Rohm and Haas Company | NOX RACT Plan 12/20/00 | 1/1/2001 | 10/23/2001, 66 FR 53665 | |
| Board Order Texas Gas Transmission | NOX RACT Plan 5/18/2016 | 5/18/2016 | 10/12/2017, 82 FR 47376 | |
| Lawson Mardon Packaging, USA, Inc | N/A | 8/11/2003 | 7/10/2003, 68 FR 41083 | |
| Calgon Carbon Corporation | V-00-015 | 5/13/2005 | 5/24/2006, 71 FR 29786 | The only parts of the permit being approved and incorporated are the SO2 emission limits from the following emissions points: 12, 14, 21, 31, 32, 34, 39, 40, 42, and 64. |
| TVA Paradise Permit | KDEPDAQ Permit 0-87-012 | 10/19/2007 | 4/29/2008, 73 FR 23105 | Emission Rates Units 1 and 2 are 1.2 lb/MMBTU and Unit 3 is 1.2 lb/MMBTU or * 3.1 lb/MMBTU. |
| Source-Specific SIP Revision for Avis Budget Car Rental Group | N/A | 8/9/2007 | 11/30/2009, 74 FR 62499 | Removal of stage II requirements. |
| LG & E Cane Run Generating Station NOX RACT Plan Amendment 2 | N/A | 7/18/2012 | 8/30/2016, 81 FR 59488 | |
| Louisville Gas and Electric Mill Creek Electric Generating Station | 145-97-TV(R3) | 6/23/2017 | 6/28/2019, 84 FR 30920 | Plant-wide Specific condition S1-Standards, S2-Monitoring and Record Keeping and S3-Reporting in title V permit 145-97-TV(R3) for EGU U1, U2, U3 and U4. |
| Board Order for the American Synthetic Rubber Company—Amendment 2 | N/A | 11/17/2021 | 6/7/2022, 87 FR 34577 | Including the attached VOC/NOX RACT Plan. |
| Board Order for LL Flex, LLC | N/A | 11/18/2020 | 9/30/2022, 87 FR 59309 | |
| * Bypass of the scrubber shall be limited to 720 operating hours in any 12 consecutive months. |
(e) EPA-approved non-regulatory provisions.
| Name of non-regulatory SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area | State submittal date/effective date |
EPA approval date | Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Quality surveillance plan | Commonwealth of Kentucky | 11/15/79 | 11/16/81, 46 FR 56198. | |
| Protection Visibility in Class I Areas | Mammoth Cave National Park (Class I area) | 08/31/97 | 07/12/88, 53 FR 26253. | |
| Small Business Assistance Program | Commonwealth of Kentucky | 07/15/93 | 06/19/95, 60 FR 31915. | |
| Lexington Maintenance Plan | Fayette County, Scott County | 08/24/04 | 09/16/04, 69 FR 55751. | |
| Ashland-Huntington Maintenance Plan | Boyd County, Greenup County | 05/24/95 | 06/29/95, 60 FR 33752. | |
| Maintenance Plan for Owensboro & Edmonson County Area | Daviess County, Hancock County, Edmonson County | 04/14/98 | 09/03/98, 63 FR 46898. | |
| Northern Kentucky 15% Plan & I/M | Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties | 09/11/98 | 12/08/98, 63 FR 67591. | |
| Negative Declarations for the nonattainment portions of Bullitt and Oldham Counties in Louisville 1-hour moderate ozone nonattainment area for CTG rules for aerospace, SOCMI, shipbuilding, and wood furniture manufacturing | Jefferson County, Bullitt County, Oldham County | 12/14/99 | 10/23/01, 66 FR 53665. | |
| Negative Declarations submitted by the Air Pollution Control District of Jefferson County for the Louisville 1-hour moderate ozone nonattainment area for CTG rules for aerospace, shipbuilding, and wood furniture manufacturing | Jefferson County, Bullitt County, Oldham County | 02/26/01 | 10/23/01, 66 FR 53665. | |
| Louisville 1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan | Jefferson County and portions of Bullitt and Oldham Counties | 11/1/03 | 05/18/05, 70 FR 28429. | |
| Maintenance Plan for Paducah Area | Marshall County and a portion of Livingston County | 06/14/01 | 08/20/01, 66 FR 43488. | |
| Northern Kentucky 1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan | Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties | 02/09/05 | 10/04/05, 70 FR 57750 | |
| 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for the Christian County, Kentucky area | Christian County | 05/20/05 | 01/25/06, 71 FR 4047 | |
| Kentucky portion of the Ashland-Huntington Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance Plan | Boyd County | 05/13/05 | 05/24/06, 71 FR 29786 | |
| Louisville 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan | Bullitt County, Jefferson County, Oldham County | 09/26/2006 | 07/05/07, 72 FR 36601 | |
| Huntington-Ashland 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan | Boyd County | 09/29/06 | 08/03/07, 71 FR 43172 | |
| Northern Kentucky 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance plan | Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties in Kentucky | 1/29/2010 | 8/5/2010, 75 FR 47218 | For the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. |
| Paducah 8-Hour Ozone Attainment/1-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Section 110(a)(1) | Marshall and Livingston Counties | May 27, 2008 | 8/26/2010, 75 FR 52467 | |
| Huntington—Ashland 8-Hour Ozone Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan | A portion of Greenup County | May 27, 2008 | 4/14/11, 76 FR 20853 | For the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. |
| Lexington 8-Hour Ozone Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan Section 110(a)(1) | Fayette and Scott Counties | May 27, 2008 | 4/14/11, 76 FR 20853 | For the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. |
| Edmonson County 8-Hour Ozone Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan | Edmonson County | May 27, 2008 | 4/14/11, 76 FR 20853 | For the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. |
| Owensboro 8-Hour Ozone Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan | Daviess County and a portion of Hancock County | May 27, 2008 | 4/14/11, 76 FR 20853 | For the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Commonwealth of Kentucky | 12/13/2007 | 7/13/2011, 76 FR 41088 | For the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. |
| 1997 Annual PM2.5 Maintenance Plan for the Northern Kentucky Area | Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties (Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Area) | 1/27/11 | 12/15/2011, 76 FR 77903 | For the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. |
| Huntington-Ashland 1997 PM2.5 Attainment Plan | Boyd County; Portion of Lawrence County | 12/03/2008 | 4/11/2012, 77 FR 21663 | For the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. |
| Regional Haze Plan and Plan Amendment | Statewide | 06/25/08 and 05/28/10 | 03/30/12, 77 FR 19098 | Source-specific BART requirements are summarized in Table 7.5.3-2 of the Commonwealth's May 28, 2010 submittal. |
| Louisville; 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory | Bullitt and Jefferson Counties | 12/03/2008 | 8/2/12, 77 FR 45956. | |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 1997 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Kentucky | 8/26/2008 | 10/3/2012, 77 FR 60307 | With the exception of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), With respect to sections 110(a)(2)(C) related to PSD requirements and 110(a)(2)(J) related to PSD requirements, EPA conditionally approved these requirements. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Kentucky | 7/17/2012 | 10/3/2012, 77 FR 60307 | With the exception of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), With respect to sections 110(a)(2)(C) related to PSD requirements and 110(a)(2)(J) related to PSD requirements, EPA conditionally approved these requirements. |
| 1997 Annual PM2.5 Maintenance Plan for the Kentucky portion of the Huntington-Ashland Area | Boyd County and Lawrence County (part) (Kentucky portion of the Huntington-Ashland WV-KY-OH Area) | 2/9/12 | 12/26/12, 77 FR 75865 | For the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Commonwealth of Kentucky | 7/17/2012 | 3/7/2013 78 FR 14681 |
With the exception of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) concerning interstate transport which is being disapproved and, the portions of sections 110(a)(2)(C), prong 3 of 110(a)(2)(D)(i), and 110(a)(2)(J) related to structural PSD requirements, which are being conditionally approved. |
| MVEB Update for the 1997 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for Northern Kentucky | Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties, KY | 8/9/12 | 6/5/13, 78 FR 33726 | |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 1997 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Kentucky | 8/26/2008 | 5/7/2014, 79 FR 26143 | Addressing prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Kentucky | 7/17/2012 | 5/7/2014, 79 FR 26143 | Addressing prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead NAAQS | Kentucky | 7/17/2012 | 3/18/2015, 80 FR 14019 | Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 4/26/2013 | 3/18/2015, 80 FR 14019 | Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Commonwealth of Kentucky | July 17, 2012 | 10/9/2015, 80 FR 61107 | With the exception of provisions pertaining to PSD permitting requirements in sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 4/26/2013 | 11/21/2016, 81 FR 83152 | With the exception of the regulation of new minor sources and minor modifications under section 110(a)(2)(C), section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs 1-4) and the PSD requirements of section 110(a)(2)(J). |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 04/26/2013 | 12/6/2016 | With the exception of the minor source program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) and the interstate transport requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs 1, 2, and 4). |
| 2010 1-hour SO2 Maintenance Plan for the Kentucky Portion of the Campbell-Clermont, KY-OH Area | Campbell County portion of Campbell-Clermont, KY-OH Nonattainment Area | 2/22/2016 | 3/10/2017 | This includes the 172(c)(1) RACM determination and the 172(c)(3) base-year emissions inventory. |
| RACM for the Kentucky portion of Louisville, KY-IN Area for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS | Bullitt and Jefferson Counties | 08/09/2016 | 12/27/2016, 82 FR 95041 | |
| 1997 Annual PM2.5 Maintenance Plan for the Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville Area | Bullitt and Jefferson Counties | 3/5/2012 | 4/7/2017, 82 FR 16943 | |
| 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements for the Kentucky Portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton OH-KY-IN Area | Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties (part) (Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Area) | 8/26/2016 | 4/10/2017, 82 FR 17131 | |
| 2008 8-hour ozone Maintenance Plan for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Area | Portions of Boone (2000 Census tracts: 702, 703.05, 703.06, 703.07, 703.08, 703.09, 704.01, 704.02, 705.01, 705.02, 706.01, 706.03, 706.04), Campbell (2000 Census tracts: 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 512, 513, 519.01, 519.03, 519.04, 520.01, 520.02, 521, 522, 523.01, 523.02, 524, 525, 526, 528, 529, 530, 531), and Kenton (2000 Census tracts: 603, 607, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 616, 636.03, 636.04, 636.05, 636.06, 638, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653, 654, 655.01, 655.02, 656, 657, 658, 659, 668, 669, 670, 671) Counties, KY | 8/26/2016 | 7/5/2017, 82 FR 30976 | |
| 2008 8-hour ozone base year emissions inventory for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Area | Portions of Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties in Kentucky | 8/26/2016 | 7/5/2017, 82 FR 30976 | 182(a)(1) base-year emissions inventory |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual Fine PM2.5 NAAQS | Kentucky | 2/8/2016 | 8/8/2017, 82 FR 37012 | With the exception of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs 1, 2 and 4) and the minor source program requirement of section 110(a)(2)(C). |
| September 2014 Regional Haze Progress Report | Kentucky | 9/17/2014 | 10/12/2017, 82 FR 47378 | |
| Removal of Reliance on Reformulated Gasoline in the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton, OH-KY-IN Area | Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties (Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton Area) | 9/13/2017 | 4/2/2018, 83 FR 13872 | |
| 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) Infrastructure Requirement for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Commonwealth of Kentucky | 5/10/2018 | 7/17/2018, 83 FR 33730 | |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS | Kentucky | 2/8/2016 | 9/25/2018, 83 FR 48387 | Addressing Prongs 1 and 2 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 4/26/2013 | 3/28/2019, 84 FR 11652 | Only addresses the minor source program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C). |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 4/26/2013 | 3/28/2019, 84 FR 11652 | Only addresses the minor source program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C). |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS | Kentucky | 2/8/2016 | 3/28/2019, 84 FR 11652 | Only addresses the minor source program requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C). |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS | Kentucky | 12/13/2007 | 4/8/2019, 84 FR 13800 | Addressing prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 4/26/2013 | 4/8/2019, 84 FR 13800 | Addressing prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 4/26/2013 | 4/8/2019, 84 FR 13800 | Addressing prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS | Kentucky | 2/8/2016 | 4/8/2019, 84 FR 13800 | Addressing prong 4 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) only. |
| Regional Haze Plan Revision | Kentucky | 11/16/2018 | 4/8/2019, 84 FR 13800 | |
| 2010 1-hour SO2 Attainment Demonstration for the Jefferson County Area | Jefferson County | 6/23/2017 | 6/28/2019, 84 FR 30920 | |
| 2010 1-hour SO2 Jefferson County Nonattainment Plan for 172(c)(3) 2011 Base-Year Emissions Inventory | Jefferson County | 6/23/2017 | 6/28/2019, 84 FR 30920 | |
| 2010 1-hour SO2 Jefferson County Nonattainment Plan for 172(c)(5) New Source Review Requirements | Jefferson County | 6/23/2017 | 6/28/2019, 84 FR 30920 | |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS | Kentucky | 11/16/2018 | 7/31/2019, 84 FR 37101 | Addressing Prongs 1 and 2 of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) only. |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Kentucky | 1/9/2019 | 6/1/2020, 85 FR 33021 | With the exception of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2), PSD provisions related to major sources under sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J), and air quality modeling under section 110(a)(2)(K). |
| 2010 1-hour SO2 Maintenance Plan for the Jefferson County Area | Jefferson County | 12/9/2019 | 8/6/2020, 85 FR 47670 | |
| 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Kentucky | 1/11/2019 | 9/2/2020, 85 FR 54507 | Addressing PSD provisions related to major sources under sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J), and air quality modeling under section 110(a)(2)(K). |
| 2015 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements | Bullitt and Oldham Counties in the Louisville, KY-IN Marginal nonattainment area and portions of Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties in the Cincinnati, OH-KY Marginal nonattainment area | 10/15/2020 | 4/5/2022, 87 FR 19649 | |
| Emissions Statement Requirements for the 2015 8-hour Ozone NAAQS | Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties (partial) in Kentucky portion of Cincinnati, OH-KY Area, and Bullitt and Oldham Counties (entire) in Kentucky portion of Louisville, KY-IN Area | 10/15/2020 | 4/26/2022, 87 FR 24429. | |
| 1997 8-Hour Ozone Second 10-Year Limited Maintenance Plan for the Kentucky portion of the Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY Maintenance Area | Boyd County | 3/29/2021 | 9/30/2022, 87 FR 59311 | |
| 1997 8-Hour Ozone Second 10-Year Limited Maintenance Plan for the Kentucky portion of the Clarksville-Hopkinsville, TN-KY Maintenance Area | Christian County | 3/29/2021 | 9/30/2022, 87 FR 59311 | |
| Emissions Inventory for the 2015 8-hour Ozone NAAQS for Northern Kentucky | Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties (partial) in Kentucky portion of Cincinnati, OH-KY Area | 10/15/2021 | 9/30/2022, 87 FR 59320 | |
| Emissions Inventory for the 2015 8-hour Ozone NAAQS for Louisville | Jefferson County in its entirety, and Bullitt and Oldham Counties (partial) in Kentucky portion of Louisville, KY-IN Area | 10/15/2021 | 9/30/2022, 87 FR 59320 | |
| 2015 8-hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for the Kentucky Portion of the Cincinnati, OH-KY Area | Portions of Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties | 9/21/2022 | 10/4/2023, 88 FR 68471 | |
| 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements | Portions of Henderson and Webster Counties in Kentucky | 1/26/2024 | 1/8/2026, 90 FR 609 | |
| Emissions Inventory for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS | Portions of Henderson and Webster Counties in Kentucky | 2/15/2024 | 1/8/2026, 90 FR 609 |
[64 FR 28750, May 27, 1999]
§ 52.921 Classification of regions.
The Kentucky plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons) | |
| Appalachian Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Bluegrass Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Evansville (Indiana)-Owensboro-Henderson (Kentucky) Interstate | I | II | III | III | III |
| Huntington (West Virginia)-Ashland (Kentucky)-Portsmouth-Ironton (Ohio) Interstate | I | III | III | III | III |
| Louisville Interstate | I | I | III | III | I |
| Metropolitan Cincinnati Interstate | I | II | III | III | I |
| North Central Kentucky Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Paducah (Kentucky)-Cairo (Illinois) Interstate | I | II | III | III | III |
| South Central Kentucky Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10868, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974]
§ 52.922 [Reserved]
§ 52.923 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves Kentucky's plan for the attainment and maintenance of the national standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds that the plan satisfies all requirements of part D, title 1, of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977.
(b) New Source review permits issued pursuant to Section 173 of the Clean Air Act will not be deemed valid by EPA unless the provisions of Section V of Appendix S of 40 CFR part 51 are met.
[45 FR 72157, Oct. 31, 1980, as amended at 79 FR 30050, May 27, 2014]
§ 52.924 Legal authority.
(a) The requirements of § 51.230(f) of this chapter are not met since K.R.S. 224.380 of the Air Pollution Control Law of the Commonwealth of Kentucky (June 18, 1970) does not provide for the release, under certain circumstances, of emission data to the public.
(b) Delegation of Authority: Pursuant to section 114 of the Act, Kentucky requested a delegation of authority to enable it to collect, correlate, and release emission data to the public. The Administrator has determined that Kentucky is qualified to receive a delegation of the authority it requested. Accordingly, the Administrator delegates to Kentucky his authority under section 114(a) (1) and (2) and section 114(c) of the Act, i.e., authority to collect, correlate, and release emission data to the public.
[37 FR 10868, May 31, 1972, as amended at 37 FR 15084, July 27, 1972; 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.925 General requirements.
(a) The requirements of § 51.116(c) of this chapter are not met since the legal authority to provide for public availability of emission data is inadequate.
[39 FR 34536, Sept. 26, 1974, as amended at 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.926 Attainment dates for national standards.
The following table presents the latest dates by which the national standards are to be attained. The dates reflect the information presented in Kentucky's plan, except where noted.
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Ozone | |||
| Primary | Secondary | Primary | Secondary | ||||
| Appalachian Intrastate: | |||||||
| a. Bell County | g | h | b | b | b | b | b |
| b. Perry County | g | h | b | b | b | b | b |
| c. Whitley County | g | h | b | b | b | b | b |
| d. Rest of AQCR | c | c | b | b | b | b | b |
| Bluegrass Intrastate: | |||||||
| a. Fayette County | a | c | b | b | b | b | g |
| b. Madison County | g | h | b | b | b | b | b |
| c. Rest of AQCR | a | c | b | b | b | b | b |
| Evansville (Indiana)-Ownsboro-Henderson (Kentucky) Interstate: | |||||||
| a. Daviess County | g | i | g | g | b | b | b |
| b. Henderson County | g | i | a | e | b | b | g |
| c. Webster County | c | c | g | g | b | b | b |
| d. Rest of AQCR | c | c | a | e | b | b | b |
| Huntington (West Virginia)-Ashland (Kentucky)-Portsmouth-Ironton (Ohio) Interstate: | |||||||
| a. Boyd County | g | i | g | b | b | b | g |
| b. Lawrence County | g | h | b | b | b | b | b |
| c. Rest of AQCR | c | c | b | b | b | b | b |
| Louisville Interstate | g | i | j | j | b | h | h |
| Metropolitan Cincinnati Interstate: | |||||||
| a. Boone County | c | c | a | d | b | d | h |
| b. Campbell County | g | h | a | d | b | d | h |
| c. Kenton County | c | c | a | d | b | d | h |
| d. Rest of AQCR | c | c | a | d | b | d | c |
| North Central Kentucky Intrastate: | |||||||
| a. Bullitt County | g | h | b | b | b | b | b |
| b. Rest of AQCR | a | c | b | b | b | b | b |
| Paducah (Kentucky) Cairo (Illinois) Interstate: | |||||||
| a. McCracken County | g | h | g | f | b | b | b |
| b. Marshall County | c | g | a | f | b | b | b |
| c. Muhlenberg County | g | h | g | g | b | b | b |
| d. Rest of AQCR | c | c | a | f | b | b | b |
| South Central Kentucky Intrastate | b | b | b | b | b | b | b |
| See § 81.318 of this chapter to identify the specific nonattainment area. | |||||||
| Note: Dates or footnotes in italics are prescribed by the Administrator because the plan did not provide a specific date or the dates provided were not acceptable. Sources subject to plan requirements and attainment dates established under section 110(a)(2)(A) prior to the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments remain obligated to comply with those requirements by the earlier deadlines. The earlier attainment dates are set out at 40 CFR 52.926 (1979 edition). | |||||||
| a. Air quality levels presently below primary standards or area is unclassifiable. | |||||||
| b. Air quality levels presently below secondary standards or area is unclassifiable. | |||||||
| c. April 1975. | |||||||
| d. July 1975. | |||||||
| e. July 1977. | |||||||
| f. July 1978. | |||||||
| g. December 31, 1982. | |||||||
| h. December 31, 1987. | |||||||
| i. 18 month extension for plan submittal granted: attainment date not yet established. | |||||||
| j. January 1, 1985. |
[45 FR 85002, Dec. 24, 1980]
§ 52.927 Compliance schedule.
(a) The information in this section is available in the 40 CFR, part 52 edition revised as of July 1, 1999, the 40 CFR, part 52, Volume 1 of 2 (§§ 52.01 to 52.1018) editions revised as of July 1, 2000 through July 1, 2011, and the 40 CFR, part 52, Volume 1 of 3 (§§ 52.01 to 52.1018) editions revised as of July 1, 2012.
(b) [Reserved]
[79 FR 30050, May 27, 2014]
§ 52.928 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides.
The revised SO2 emission limit for large coal-fired boilers in Bell, Clark, and Woodford Counties, submitted on June 29, 1979, is disapproved since it does not provide for attainment and maintenance of all SO2 NAAQS. The limit approved by EPA on May 10, 1976 (41 FR 19105), remains the limit applicable to these sources.
[49 FR 11091, Mar. 23, 1984]
§ 52.929 Determination of attainment.
(a) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007-2009, EPA determined that the Huntington-Ashland, West Virginia-Kentucky-Ohio PM2.5 nonattainment Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the Area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the Area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Huntington-Ashland PM2.5 nonattainment Area is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
(b) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007-2009, EPA determined that the Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana PM2.5 nonattainment Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the Area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the Area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Louisville PM2.5 nonattainment Area is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
(c) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007-2009, EPA determined that the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana PM2.5 nonattainment Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the Area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the Area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana PM2.5 nonattainment Area is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
[76 FR 55543, Sept. 7, 2011, as amended at 76 FR 55546, Sept. 7, 2011; 76 FR 60375, Sept. 29, 2011]
§ 52.930 Control strategy: Ozone.
(a) The VOC bubble for Alcan Foil Products in Louisville submitted as a SIP revision on March 3, 1986, is disapproved. The source must continue to meet all the requirements of Jefferson County Regulation 6.29.
(b) Part D—disapproval—(1) Campbell and Kenton Counties nonattainment area. The 1979 SIP revisions for these two counties are disapproved because the Commonwealth failed to submit evidence of legal authority to implement a vehicle inspection and maintenance program as required under section 172(b)(11)(B) of the Clean Air Act. No major new or modified sources of volatile organic compounds can be built in these two counties by virtue of the provisions of section 110(a)(2)(l) of the Clean Air Act.
(2) Northern Kentucky (Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties) ozone nonattainment area. The demonstration of attainment of the ozone standards by the end of 1982, submitted as part of Kentucky's ozone SIP revision on June 23, 1982, (draft), September 27, 1982, and November 3, 1982, is disapproved. As a result, the extension of the attainment deadline until December 31, 1987, remains in effect, along with the related requirement to submit a SIP revision addressing all requirements of Part D extension areas.
(c) The redesignation request submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, on November 11, 1994, for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Northern Kentucky moderate interstate ozone nonattainment area from nonattainment to attainment was disapproved on September 27, 1996.
(d) Kentucky's November 15, 1996, request for a 1-year attainment date extension for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton metropolitan moderate ozone nonattainment area which consists of Kenton, Boone, and Campbell Counties is approved. The date for attaining the ozone standard in these counties is November 15, 1997.
(e) Kentucky's November 15, 1996, request for a 1-year attainment date extension for the Kentucky portion of the Louisville moderate ozone nonattainment area which consists of Jefferson County and parts of Bullitt and Oldham Counties is approved. The date for attaining the ozone standard in these counties is November 15, 1997.
(f) Kentucky's January 7, 1998, request for a 1-year attainment date extension for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton metropolitan moderate ozone nonattainment area which consists of Kenton, Boone, and Campbell Counties is approved. The date for attaining the ozone standard in these counties is November 15, 1998.
(g) The redesignation request submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, on October 29, 1999, for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton moderate interstate ozone nonattainment area from nonattainment to attainment was approved on July 5, 2000. The mobile source budgets for the Kentucky portion of the area for the purposes of transportation conformity are now 5.83 tons per summer day of volatile organic compounds and 15.13 tons per summer day of nitrogen oxides for the year 2010.
(h) Determination—EPA is determining that as of July 5, 2000, the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton ozone nonattainment area (which includes the Counties of Boone, Kenton, and Campbell) has attained the 1-hour ozone standard and that the attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1), 182(j), and 172(c)(1), along with the section 172(c)(9) contingency measure requirements, do not apply to the area.
(i) Approval—EPA is approving an exemption from the requirements contained in section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act. This approval exempts Boone, Kenton, and Campbell counties in Kentucky from the NOX related general conformity provisions; nonattainment NSR for new sources and modifications that are major for NOX; NOX RACT; and the requirement for a demonstration of compliance with the enhanced I/M performance standard for NOX.
(j) [Reserved]
(k) The redesignation request submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, on March 30, 2001, and supplemented on July 9, 2001, for the Kentucky portion of the Louisville moderate interstate ozone nonattainment area from nonattainment to attainment was approved on October 23, 2001. The motor vehicle emissions budgets for VOC and NOX in the Kentucky portion of the Louisville moderate interstate maintenance plan are adequate for conformity purposes and approvable as part of the maintenance plan. The 1-hour ozone standard maintenance plan motor vehicle emission budgets for the entire interstate Louisville area for the purposes of transportation conformity are now 48.17 tons per summer day of VOC and 92.93 tons per summer day of NOX for the year 2012.
(l) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving in part, the Commonwealth of Kentucky's Infrastructure SIP for the 2008 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards addressing section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) concerning interstate transport requirements, submitted July 17, 2012.
(m) Determination of attainment. The EPA has determined, as of June 3, 2016, that based on 2012 to 2014 ambient air quality data, the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 2008 ozone Marginal nonattainment area has attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Therefore, the EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality data as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. The EPA also determined that the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date under section 181(b)(2)(A).
(n) Disapproval. The state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted on January 11, 2019, addressing Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (prongs 1 and 2) for the 2015 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) is disapproved.
[46 FR 58082, Nov. 30, 1981]
§ 52.931 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) Regulations for preventing significant deterioration of air quality. The provisions of § 52.21 (b) through (w) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable state plan for the State of Kentucky only as they apply to permits issued pursuant to § 52.21 prior to final approval of Kentucky's Regulation for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), Visibility Monitoring, and Visibility New Source Review in Attainment Areas. The provisions of § 52.21 (b) through (w) are rescinded for permits issued after final approval of Kentucky's Regulation for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), Visibility Monitoring, and Visibility New Source Review in Attainment Areas.
(b) The Commonwealth of Kentucky has committed to revising the state's regulations accordingly when EPA amends the federal vessel emissions provisions contained in 40 CFR 51.166. In a letter dated October 17, 1986, Kentucky stated:
As requested, the Division of Air Pollution Control hereby commits to changing the definition of “building, structure, facility, or installation,” and any other applicable definitions, when the issue of vessel emissions is resolved at the federal level, and after the federal regulation, 40 CFR 51.24, is amended.
(c) In a letter dated May 3, 1988, EPA informed Kentucky that the following caveat must be included in all potentially affected permits due to a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (NRDC v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1224):
In approving this permit, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality has determined that the application complies with the applicable provisions of the stack height regulations as revised by the EPA on July 8, 1985 (50 FR 27892). Portions of the regulations have been remanded by a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in NRDC v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1224 (D.C. Cir. 1988). Consequently, this permit may be subject to modification if and when the EPA revises the regulation in response to the court decision. This may result in revised emission limitations or may affect other actions taken by the source owners or operators.
Kentucky responded with a letter dated May 11, 1988, stating in part:
This is in response to your letter dated May 3, 1988 * * *. As requested by your letter, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality agrees to include the condition set forth in your letter, in all potentially affected permits issued under regulation 401 KAR 51:017 or 401 KAR 51:052. Therefore, we request that you consider this letter as our commitment that the required caveat will be included in all potentially affected permits * * *.
(d) All applications and other information required pursuant to § 52.21 from sources located in the Commonwealth of Kentucky shall be submitted to the appropriate state or local agency for which the source is located, rather than to EPA's Region 4 office: Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection, Division for Air Quality, 300 Sower Boulevard, 2nd Floor, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601; or Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, 701 W. Ormsby Ave., Suite 303, Louisville, Kentucky 40203.
[54 FR 36311, Sept. 1, 1989, as amended at 74 FR 55143, Oct. 27, 2009; 79 FR 30050, May 27, 2014; 82 FR 32645, July 17, 2017]
§ 52.932 Rules and regulations.
(a) The last sentence of section 3(1) of Kentucky regulation 401 KAR 3:050, which specifies that a new fossil fuel fired steam electric generator's allowable SO2 emissions may be calculated by averaging SO2 emissions from existing units of this type and from new ones, is disapproved since it contravenes subpart D of 40 CFR part 60, New Source Performance Standards.
(b) Section 8(2)(a) of regulation 401 KAR 61:015 is disapproved in that it allows the Tennessee Valley Authority's Shawnee power plant until October 1, 1981, to achieve compliance with emissions limits which are not made more stringent by the 1979 Part D revisions, and which the source was previously required to meet by July 1, 1977.
(c) Section 8(2)(d) of regulation 401 KAR 61:015 is disapproved in that it allows sources until December 31, 1982, to achieve compliance with emission limits which are not made more stringent by the 1979 Part D revisions, and which the sources were previously required to meet prior to 1979.
[41 FR 19106, May 10, 1976, as amended at 46 FR 40188, Aug. 7, 1981]
§ 52.933 Control Strategy: Sulfur oxides and particulate matter.
(a) In a letter dated March 27, 1987, the Kentucky Department for Natural Resources and Environmental Protection certified that no emission limits in the State's plan are based on dispersion techniques not permitted by EPA's stack height rules. This certification does not apply to: Big Rivers-Green #1 & 2, Kentucky Utilities-Ghent #3 & 4, and Ashland Oil, Inc.-Catlettsburg.
(b) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of March 9, 2011, that the Louisville, IN-KY PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. These determinations, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspend the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress, contingency measures, and other plan elements related to attainment of the standards for as long as the area continues to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(c) Disapproval. EPA is disapproving portions of Kentucky's Infrastructure SIP for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS addressing interstate transport, specifically with respect to section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
(d) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of September 7, 2011, that based upon 2007-2009 air quality data, the Huntington-Ashland, West Virginia-Kentucky-Ohio, nonattainment Area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 52.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this Area continues to meet the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
(e) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of September 29, 2011, that based upon 2007-2009 air quality data, the Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana nonattainment Area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 52.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this Area continues to meet the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
[54 FR 23478, June 1, 1989, as amended at 76 FR 12862, Mar. 9, 2011; 76 FR 43143, July 20, 2011; 76 FR 55543, Sept. 7, 2011; 76 FR 60376, Sept. 29, 2011]
§ 52.934 [Reserved]
§ 52.935 PM10 State implementation plan development in group II areas.
On July 7, 1988, the State submitted a committal SIP for the cities of Ashland and Catlettsburg in Boyd County. The committal SIP contains all the requirements identified in the July 1, 1987, promulgation of the SIP requirements for PM10 at 52 FR 24681. The SIP commits the State to submit an emissions inventory, continue to monitor for PM10, report data and to submit a full SIP if a violation of the PM10 National Ambient Air Quality Standards is detected.
[55 FR 4172, Feb. 7, 1990]
§ 52.936 [Reserved]
§ 52.937 Review of new sources and modifications.
(a) Approval—EPA is approving the section 182(f) oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT) exemption request submitted by the Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection on August 16, 1994, for the Kentucky portion of the Huntington-Ashland ozone (O3) moderate nonattainment area. This approval exempts this area from implementing NOX RACT on major sources of NOX. If a violation of the O3 NAAQS occurs in the area, the exemption from the requirement of section 182(f) of the CAA in the applicable area shall not apply.
(b) Approval—EPA is approving the section 182(f) oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT) exemption for the Kentucky portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton ozone (O3) moderate nonattainment area. This approval exempts this area from implementing NOX RACT on major sources of NOX.
[60 FR 21717, May 3, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 37898, June 19, 2000]
§ 52.938 General conformity.
The General Conformity regulations were submitted on November 10, 1995, and adopted into the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP). The Commonwealth of Kentucky incorporated by reference regulations 40 CFR part 51, subpart W—determining conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.
[63 FR 40046, July 27, 1998]
§ 52.939 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identified the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Kentucky” and all revisions submitted by Kentucky that were federally approved prior to March 1, 1999. The information in this section is available in the 40 CFR, part 52 edition revised as of July 1, 1999, the 40 CFR, part 52, Volume 1 of 2 (§§ 52.01 to 52.1018) editions revised as of July 1, 2000 through July 1, 2011, and the 40 CFR, part 52, Volume 1 of 3 (§§ 52.01 to 52.1018) editions revised as of July 1, 2012. The Jefferson County portion of the Commonwealth of Kentucky's SIP previously identified in section 52.934(a) and (b) is also available in the above editions.
[79 FR 30051, May 27, 2014]
§ 52.940 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kentucky and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kentucky's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Kentucky's SIP revision described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kentucky and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program in subpart BBBBB of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2015 and 2016.
(2) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kentucky and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 through 2020.
(3) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kentucky and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program in subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2021 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kentucky's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(iii), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(3) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Kentucky's SIP revision described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances under subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, after 2020 the provisions of § 97.826(c) of this chapter (concerning the transfer of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances between certain accounts under common control), the provisions of § 97.826(d) of this chapter (concerning the conversion of amounts of unused CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances allocated for control periods before 2021 to different amounts of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances), and the provisions of § 97.811(d) of this chapter (concerning the recall of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances equivalent in quantity and usability to all such allowances allocated to units in the State for control periods after 2020) shall continue to apply.
(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (b)(3) of this section is stayed with regard to emissions occurring in 2023 and thereafter, provided that while such stay remains in effect, the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall apply with regard to such emissions.
(c)(1) The owner and operator of each source located in the State of Kentucky and for which requirements are set forth in § 52.40 and § 52.41, § 52.42, § 52.43, § 52.44, § 52.45, or § 52.46 must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2026 and each subsequent year.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (c)(1) of this section is stayed.
[76 FR 48365, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586 and 74596, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 33760, July 17, 2018; 86 FR 23174, Apr. 30, 2021; 88 FR 36890, June 5, 2023; 88 FR 49303, July 31, 2023]
§ 52.941 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Kentucky and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 1 Trading Program in subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Kentucky's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Kentucky's SIP revision described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances under subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48366, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586, Oct. 26, 2016]
Subpart T—Louisiana
§ 52.970 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Louisiana under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet national ambient air quality standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c),(d) and (e) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to July 1, 1998, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) of this section with EPA approval dates after July 1, 1998, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 6 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated State rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the State Implementation Plan as of July 1, 1998.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at https://www.epa.gov/sips-la or the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270-2102. If you wish to obtain material from the EPA Regional Office, please call (800) 887-6063 or (214) 665-2760.
(c) EPA approved regulations.
| State citation | Title/subject | State approval date | EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC Title 33. Environmental Quality Part III. Air | ||||
| Chapter 1—General Provisions | ||||
| Section 101 | Authority, Matter Incorporated by Reference, and Permit Fee System | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 103 | Scope and Severability of Air Regulations | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 107 | Procedure for Handling Investigations, Complaints and Confidentiality | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 109 | Necessary Changes for Approval of Compliance Schedules and Annual Report Requirements | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 111 | Definitions | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Chapter 2—Rules and Regulations for the Fee System of the Air Quality Control Programs | ||||
| Section 201 | Scope and Purpose | 10/20/1993 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 203 | Authority | 9/20/1988 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 205 | Definitions | 9/20/1988 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 207 | Application Fees | 2/20/2000 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 209 | Annual Fees | 2/20/2000 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 211 | Methodology | 4/20/2011 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | SIP does NOT include LAC 33:III.211.B.15. |
| Section 213 | Determination of Fee | 9/20/1988 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 215 | Method of Payment | 10/20/2009 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 217 | Late Payment | 3/20/1999 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 219 | Failure to Pay | 3/20/1999 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Section 221 | Effective Date | 9/20/1988 | 4/21/2016, 81 FR 23425 | |
| Chapter 5—Permit Procedures | ||||
| Section 501 | Scope and Applicability | 5/20/2011 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III.501.B.1.d. and LAC 33:III.501.B.2.d.i.(a). |
| Section 502 | Definitions | 5/20/2011 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 503 | Minor Source Permit Requirements | 4/20/2011 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 504 | Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) Procedures | 11/20/2012 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III.504.M. |
| Section 505 | For Emissions Below PSD de minimis Levels | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Correction 3/6/1992, 57 FR 08076 |
Ref 52.999(c)(58) | |||
| Section 506(A) | Clean Air Interstate Rule Requirements—Nitrogen Oxide Annual Program | 6/20/2008 | 4/17/2014, 79 FR 21631 | |
| Section 506(B) | Clean Air Interstate Rule Requirements—Nitrogen Oxide Ozone Season Program | 6/20/2008 | 4/17/2014, 79 FR 21631 | |
| Section 506(C) | Clean Air Interstate Rule Requirements—Annual Sulfur Dioxide | 6/20/2008 | 4/17/2014, 79 FR 21631 | |
| Section 506(D) | Documentation | 9/20/2006 | 9/28/2007, 72 FR 55064 | |
| Section 506(E) | Modifications or Exceptions | 9/20/2006 | 9/28/2007, 72 FR 55064 | |
| Section 507 | Notification Requirement (for Emission Reduction) | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 509 | Prevention of Significant Deterioration | 3/20/2016 | 10/28/2016, 81 FR 74923 | SIP does not include provisions for permitting of GHGs as effective on 4/20/2011 at LAC 33:III.509(B) definition of “carbon dioxide equivalent emissions”, “greenhouse gases”, “major stationary source”, and “significant”. |
| Section 511 | Emission Reductions | 11/20/1993 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 513 | General Permits, Temporary Sources, and Relocation of Portable Facilities | 10/20/2006 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III.513.A.1. |
| Section 515 | Oil and Gas Wells and Pipelines Permitting Provisions | 11/20/1993 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 517 | Permit Applications and Submittal of Information | 12/20/1997 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 519 | Permit Issuance Procedures for New Facilities, Initial Permits, Renewals and Significant Modifications | 11/20/1993 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III.519.C. |
| Section 521 | Administrative Amendments | 5/20/2005 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 523 | Procedures for Incorporating Test Results | 4/20/2011 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 525 | Minor Modifications | 11/20/1993 | 5/31/2017, 82 FR 24862 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III.525.A.2., B.2.c, B.3., B.4, B.5.a.-d., B.6., B.7., and B.8. |
| Section 527 | Significant Modifications | 11/20/1994 | 5/31/2017, 82 FR 24862 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III. 527.B.5. |
| Section 529 | Reopenings for Cause | 11/20/1993 | 5/31/2017, 82 FR 24862 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III.529.B., B.1., B.2., B.3., and B.4. |
| Section 531 | Public Notice and Affected State Notice | 10/20/2006 | 5/31/2017, 82 FR 24862 | The SIP does not include LAC 33:III.531.A.1., A.2., A.3., A.4., B.1.a., B.1.b., and B.1.c. |
| Chapter 6—Regulations on Control of Emissions Reduction Credits Banking | ||||
| Section 601 | Purpose | 11/20/2012 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 603 | Applicability | 11/20/2012 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 605 | Definitions | 11/20/2012 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 607 | Determination of Creditable Emission Reductions | 11/20/2012 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 613 | ERC Balance Sheet | 10/20/2007 | 11/5/2015, 80 FR 68451 | |
| Section 615 | Schedule for Submitting Applications | 11/20/2012 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Section 617 | Procedures for Review and Approval of ERCs | Feb. 2002, LR 28:304 | 9/27/2002, 67 FR 60877 | |
| Section 619 | Emission Reduction Credit Bank | 11/20/2012 | 8/4/2016, 81 FR 51341 | |
| Chapter 7—Ambient Air Quality | ||||
| Section 701 | Purpose | 3/20/2008 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 703 | Scope | 3/20/2008 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 705 | Standards: Description of Ambient Air Quality Standards | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49). |
| Section 707 | Degradation of Ambient Air Having Higher Quality than Set Forth in these Sections Restricted | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49). |
| Section 709 | Measurement of Concentrations PM10, SO2, CO, Atmospheric Oxidants, NOX, and Pb | 9/20/2006 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | Ref 52.999(c)(50). |
| Section 711 | Tables 1, 1a, and 2—Air Quality | 9/20/2006 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | PM2.5 and PM10 standards. |
| Chapter 9—General Regulations on Control of Emissions and Emission Standards | ||||
| Section 901 | Purpose | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 903 | Scope | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 905 | Control Facilities to be Installed When Feasible | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 909 | Responsible Person to have Test Made | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 911 | Department May Make Tests | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 913 | New Sources to Provide Sampling Ports | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 915 | Emission Monitoring Requirements: Applicability, Special Considerations, Exemptions, and Circumvention | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 917 | Variances | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 918 | Recordkeeping and Annual Reporting | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 919 | Emission Inventory | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 921 | Stack Heights | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 923 | Maintenance of Pay | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 925 | Mass Emission Rate Control Plan | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 927 | Notification Required (Emergency Occurrences) | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 929 | Violation of Emission Regulation Cannot be Authorized | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Chapter 11—Control of Emissions From Smoke | ||||
| Section 1101 | Control of Air Pollution from Smoke: Purpose and Control of Smoke | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49). |
| Section 1101.A | Control of Air Pollution from Smoke. Purpose | 10/20/1995 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 1103 | Impairment of Visibility on Public Roads Prohibited | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 1105.A | Smoke from Flaring Shall Not Exceed 20 Percent Opacity | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 1109 | Stack Heights | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49). |
| Section 1109.A | Control of Air Pollution from Outdoor Burning | 10/20/1995 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 1109.B | Control of Air Pollution from Outdoor Burning | 4/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 1109.E.-ll09.F | Control of Air Pollution from Outdoor Burning | 4/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 1111 | Exclusion: Variance, Unpopulated Areas and Water Vapor | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Chapter 13—Emission Standards for Particulate Matter | ||||
| Subchapter A. General | ||||
| Section 1301 | Emission Standards for Particulate Matter | Jun 1988, LR14:348 | 6/15/1989, 54 FR 25451 | Ref 52.999(c)(50) |
| Section 1303.A | Toxic Substances | 10/20/1995 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 1305 | Control of Fugitive Emissions | Jun 1988, LR14:348 | 6/15/1989, 54 FR 25451 | Ref 52.999(c)(50) |
| Section 1307 | Degradation | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 1309 | Measurements of Concentrations | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Subchapter B. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units | ||||
| Section 1311.C.-1311.D | Emission Limits | 6/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter C. Fuel Burning Equipment | ||||
| Section 1313 | Emissions from Fuel Burning Equipment | Jun 1988, LR14:348 | 6/15/1989, 54 FR 25451 | Ref 52.999(c)(50) |
| Section 1315 | More Stringent Regulations may be Prescribed if Particulates are Toxic | Jun 1988, LR14:348 | 6/15/1989, 54 FR 25451 | Ref 52.999(c)(50) |
| Section 1317 | Exclusions | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Subchapter D. Refuse Incinerators | ||||
| Section 1319 | Refuse Incinerators | 10/20/1994 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter E. Leadened Particulate Matter | ||||
| Section 1321 | Emission Standards for Leaded Particulate Matter | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Table 3 | Allowable Rate of Emissions Based on Process Weight Rate | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Subchapter F. Abrasive Blasting | ||||
| Section 1323 | Emissions from Abrasive Blasting | 1/17/2012 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 1325 | Definitions | 5/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 1327 | Blasting Operations | 7/20/2009 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 1329 | Performance Standard | 5/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 1331 | Best management Practices (BMP) Plans | 5/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 1333 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 7/20/2009 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Chapter 14—Conformity | ||||
| Subchapter A. Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementations Plans | ||||
| Section 1401 | Purpose | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1402 | Scope | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1403 | Prohibition | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1404 | Definitions | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section: | ||||
| 1405 | Applicability | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| 1405.B | 6/20/1997, LR23:720 | 3/9/1998, 63 FR 11372 | Ref 52.999(c)(75) | |
| Section 1406 | Conformity Analysis | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1407 | Reporting Requirements | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1408 | Public Participation | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1409 | Frequency of Conformity Determinations | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1410.A.5.a.i | Criteria for Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 1411 | Procedures for Conformity Determinations of General Federal Actions | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1412 | Mitigation of Air Quality Impacts | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1413 | Department Review | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1414 | Enforcement Provisions | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Section 1415 | Savings Provision | Nov. 1994, LR20:1268 | 9/13/1996, 61 FR 48409 | Ref 52.999(c)(67) |
| Subchapter B. Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded, or Approved under Title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act | ||||
| Section 1431 | Purpose | Sept. 1998, LR24:1684 | 12/29/1999, 64 FR 72938 | |
| Section 1432 | Incorporation by Reference | March 20, 2005, LR31:640 | 10/30/2006, 71 FR 63250 | |
| Section 1434 | Consultation | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Chapter 15—Emission Standards for Sulfur Dioxide | ||||
| Section 1501 | Degradation of Existing Emission Quality Restricted | Apr. 1992, LR18:374 | 7/15/1993, 58 FR 38060 | Ref 52.999(c)(59) |
| Section 1503 | Emission Standards for Sulfur Dioxide. Emission Limitations | 7/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 1505 | Variance | Apr. 1992, LR18:374 | 7/15/1993, 58 FR 38060 | Ref 52.999(c)(59) |
| Section 1509 | Reduced Sulfur Compounds (New and Existing Sources) | Apr. 1992, LR18:374 | 7/15/1993, 58 FR 38060 | Ref 52.999(c)(59) |
| Section 1511.B | Continuous Emission Monitoring | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 1513 | Recordkeeping and Reporting | Apr. 1992, LR18:374 | 7/15/1993, 58 FR 38060 | Ref 52.999(c)(59) |
| Table 4 | Emissions—Methods of Contaminant Measurement | Apr. 1992, LR18:374 | 7/15/1993, 58 FR 38060 | Ref 52.999(c)(59) |
| Chapter 17—Control of Emissions of Carbon Monoxide (New Sources) | ||||
| Subchapter A. General | ||||
| Section 1701 | Degradation of Existing Emission Quality Restricted | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Subchapter B. Ferrous Metal Emissions | ||||
| Section 1703 | Ferrous Metal Emissions | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Subchapter C. Petroleum Refinery Emissions | ||||
| Section 1705 | Petroleum Refinery Emissions | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Chapter 21—Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds | ||||
| Subchapter A. General | ||||
| Section 2101 | Compliance Schedules | Nov. 1990, LR16:959 | 5/5/1994, 59 FR 23166 | Ref 52.999(c)(60) |
| Section 2103 | Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds | 10/20/2010 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | 2103.E.3 is not included in the SIP. |
| Section 2104.A | Crude Oil and Condensate | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2104.B.-2104.C.1 | Crude Oil and Condensate | 11/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2104.C.2.-2104.C.4 | Crude Oil and Condensate | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2104.D | Crude Oil and Condensate | 11/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2104.E | Crude Oil and Condensate | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2104.F.-2104.F.2.d | Crude Oil and Condensate | 11/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2104.G | Crude Oil and Condensate | 11/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2105 | Storage of Volatile Organic Components (Small Tanks) | NOT IN SIP | ||
| Section 2107 | Volatile Organic Compounds—Loading | 9/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | E.1.b., E.1.d. and E.1.e. have not been submitted for approval into the SIP. |
| Section 2108 | Marine Vapor Recovery | 9/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Section 2109.C,1-4 | Oil/Water—Separation | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2111 | Pumps and Compressors | Apr. 1991, LR17:360 | 5/5/1994, 59 FR 23166 | Ref 52.999(c)(60) |
| Section 2113.A | Housekeeping | 5/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2113.A.4 | Housekeeping | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2115 | Waste Gas Disposal Introductory paragraph | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2115.A.-2115.G | Waste Gas Disposal | 2/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2115.H.1.a | Waste Gas Disposal | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2115.H.2.-2115.H.3 | Waste Gas Disposal | 2/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2115.I.1-4 | Waste Gas Disposal | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2115.J | Waste Gas Disposal | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2115.K.4 | Waste Gas Disposal | 2/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2115.M | Waste Gas Disposal | 2/10/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2116 | Glycol Dehydrators | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2117 | Exemptions | 2/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2119 | Variances | Feb. 1990, LR16:116 | 5/5/1994, 59 FR 23166 | Ref 52.999(c)(60) |
| Section 2121.A | Fugitive Emission Control | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Section 2121.B.1 | Fugitive Emission Control | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2121.C.1.a.ii | Fugitive Emission Control | 7/20/2000 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2121.C.3.b.-2121.C.3.c | Fugitive Emission Control | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2121.C.4.h.i | Fugitive Emission Control | 1/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2121.D.1 | Fugitive Emission Control | 12/20/1995 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2121.F | Fugitive Emission Control | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2121.G | Fugitive Emission Control | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.A.-2122A.1 | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.A.2-A.5 | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 8/20/2002 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122A.6-6.d | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 7/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122B | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas Definitions | 11/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | naccessible Valve/Connector. |
| Section 2122B | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas Definitions | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | Good Performance Level. |
| Section 2122B | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas Definitions | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | Instrumentation System. |
| Section 2122C.1.a.-2122.C.1.b | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.C.1.c | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 11/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.C.1.d | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 7/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.C.4 | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas and Specified Parishes | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.D.1.a | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 11/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.D.1.d-f | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas and Specified Parishes | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.D.3.b | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.D.3.d | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 11/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.D.3.e | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas and Specified Parishes | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.D.4.h | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 1/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.D.4.k.-1 | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 11/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.E.1.g | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas and Specified Parishes | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.E.3.-5 | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas and Specified Parishes | 8/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2122.G | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas and Specified Parishes | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Subchapter B. Organic Solvents | ||||
| Section 2123 | Organic Solvents | 4/20/2011 | 12/2/2011, 76 FR 75467 | Revisions to Section 2123 approved in the Louisiana Register April 20, 2011 (LR 37:1150). |
| Section 2123.B.1 | Organic Solvents | 7/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.B.2 | Organic Solvents | 1/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.C | Organic Solvents | 1/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.C.11 | Organic Solvents | 5/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.C.11.b | Organic Solvents | 12/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.D.1 | Organic Solvents | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2123.D.6 | Organic Solvents | 8/20/2002 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.D.7.a | Organic Solvents | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.E.1.-4 | Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas and Specified Parishes | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.E.6 | Organic Solvents | 7/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.G | Organic Solvents Definitions | 12/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.G | Organic Solvents Definitions | 1/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2123.H | Organic Solvents | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter C. Solvent Degreasers | ||||
| Section 2125 | Solvent Degreasers | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Subchapter D. Cutback Paving Asphalt | ||||
| Section 2127 | Cutback Paving Asphalt | Apr. 1991, LR17:360 | 5/5/1994, 59 FR 23166 | Ref 52.999(c)(60) |
| Subchapter F. Gasoline Handling | ||||
| Section 2131 | Filling of Gasoline Storage Vessels | 7/20/2010 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Section 2132 | Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems for Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities | 7/20/2018 | 6/3/2020, 85 FR 34108 | |
| Subchapter G. Petroleum Refinery Operations | ||||
| Section 2139.C | Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems | 5/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2141 | Refinery Process Unit Turnarounds. | Jul. 1991, LR17:654 | 5/5/1994, 59 FR 23166 | Ref 52.999(c)(60) |
| Subchapter H. Graphic Arts | ||||
| Section 2143 | Graphic Arts (Printing) by Rotogravure and Flexographic Processes. Control Requirements | 6/20/2009 | 12/2/2011, 76 FR 75467 | Revisions to Section 2143 approved in the Louisiana Register June 20, 2009 (LR 35:1101). |
| Section 2143.A | Graphic Arts (Printing) by Rotogravure and Flexographic Processes. Control Requirements | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2143.A.1 | Graphic Arts (Printing) by Rotogravure and Flexographic Processes. Control Requirements | 10/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2143.B | Applicability Exemption | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2143.C.1.-3 | Compliance | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2143.E | Timing | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter I. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Facilities | ||||
| Section 2145 | Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Facilities | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Subchapter J. Limiting Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions From Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) | ||||
| Section 2147 | Limiting VOC Emissions from SOCMI Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Subchapter K. Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Batch Processing | ||||
| Section 2149.A.1 | Applicability | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2149.E.2.a.-c.i | Performance Testing | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter L. Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Cleanup Solvent Processing | ||||
| Section 2151.A | Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Cleanup Solvent Processing | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2151.B., 2151.C., 2151.C.2-C.3., 2151.D.-E | Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Cleanup Solvent Processing | 1/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | Closed-Loop Recycling; Cleaning of Parts. |
| Section 2151.F | Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Cleanup Solvent Processing | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter M. Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Industrial Wastewater | ||||
| Section 2153.A | Definitions | 5/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | Chemical Manufacturing Process Unit; Plant; Point of Determination; Properly Operated Biotreatment Unit. |
| Section 2153.A | Definitions | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | Affected Source Category. |
| Section 2153.B., 2153.B.1.d. -d.ii., 2153.B.3.-4.b | Control Requirements | 5/20/1999, 10/20/2016 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 10/5/2022, 87 FR 60292. |
Section 2153.B.1.i is no longer in SIP, 10/5/2022. |
| Section 2153.D.2.c., 2153.D.3.h.iii.(b)-4.b | Inspection and Monitoring Requirements | 5/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2153.E.1.-5 | Approved Test Methods | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2153.E.7.-10 | Approved Test Methods | 5/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2153.F.5 | Recordkeeping Requirements | 5/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2153.G.4.b-c | Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Industrial Wastewater | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2153.G.5.a-c | Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Industrial Wastewater | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2153.H.1 | Determination of Wastewater Characteristics | 5/20/1999 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2153.I | Limiting VOC Emissions From Industrial Wastewater | 4/20/2004 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Table 8 | Untitled [List of Synthetic Organic Chemicals] | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 5/5/1994, 59 FR 23166 | Ref 52.999(c) (49) and (60). Table approved at (c)(49) included CAS numbers. Table approved at (c)(60) did not include CAS numbers |
| Subchapter N. Method 43 Capture Efficiency Test Procedures | ||||
| Subchapter N | Subchapter N | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2155 | Principle | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2156.A | Definitions | 12/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | PTE; TTE. |
| Section 2156.A | Definitions | 10/20/2003 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | BE. |
| Section 2157.A | Applicability | 12/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2157.B | Applicability | 8/20/2001 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2158 | Specific Requirements | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2158.C.1.-4 | Specific Requirements | 8/20/2001 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2159.A-C | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2159.D.-E | Recordkeeping and Reporting | 8/20/2001 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2160 | Procedures | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2160.A.-2160.B | Procedures | 8/20/2001 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2160.C.4.d | Procedures | 7/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2160.D.4.d | Procedures | 7/20/1998 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2199 | Appendix A | 11/20/1997 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Chapter 22—Control of Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) | ||||
| Section 2201 | Affected Facilities in the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area and the Region of Influence | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Section 2202 | Contingency Plan | 1/20/2010 | 11/30/2011, 76 FR 74000 | Section 2202 approved in the Louisiana Register January 20, 2010 (LR 36:63). |
| Chapter 23—Control of Emissions from Specific Industries | ||||
| Subchapter A. Chemical Woodpulping Industry | ||||
| Section 2301.D. and 2301.D.3 | Control of Emissions from the Chemical Woodpulping Industry. Emission Limitations | 12/20/1993 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 2301.D.4.a | Control of Emissions From Chemical Woodpulping Industry. Compliance | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2301.E | Exemptions | 10/20/2006 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter B. Aluminum Plants | ||||
| Section 2303.E | Standards for Horizontal Stud Soderberg Primary Aluminum Plants and Prebake Primary Aluminum Plants. Monitoring | 10/20/2007 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4891 | |
| Section 2303.F.1.d.2 | Standards for Horizontal Study Doderberg Primary Aluminum Plants and Prebake Primary Aluminum Plants. Reporting | 10/20/2005 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter C. Phosphate Fertilizer Plants | ||||
| Section 2305 | Fluoride Emissions Standards for Phosphate Fertilizer Plants | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Chapter 25—Miscellaneous Incinerator Rules | ||||
| Section 2511 | Standards of Performance for Biomedical Waste Incinerators | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Section 2521 | Refuse Incinerators | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Section 2531 | Standards of Performance for Crematories | 1/20/2008 | 8/29/2017, 82 FR 40949 | |
| Chapter 30. Standards of Performance from New Stationary Sources (NSPS) | ||||
| Chapter 30 | Standards of Performance from New Stationary Sources (NSPS) | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Section 3001 | Repeal and Renumbering | 12/20/1996 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Subchapter A. Incorporation by Reference | ||||
| Section 3003 | IBR 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 60 | 12/20/2006 | 7/5/2011, 76 FR 38977 | |
| Chapter 56—Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes | ||||
| Section 5601 | Purpose | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 5603 | Scope | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 5605 | Episode Criteria and Air Pollution Forecast | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 5607 | Administrative Authority Will Determine When Criteria Level Has Been Reached | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Section 5609 | Preplanning Strategies Required: Alert Level, Warning Level, and Emergency Level | Jun. 1988, LR14:348 | 6/15/1989, 54 FR 25451 | Ref 52.999(c)(50) |
| Section 5611 | Standby Plans to be Submitted When Requested by Administrative Authority | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Table 5 | Emission Reduction Plans—Alert Level | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Table 6 | Emission Reduction Plans—Warning Level | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Table 7 | Emission Reduction Plans—Emergency Level | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| Chapter 63—Test Methods—LESHAP Division's Source Test Manual | ||||
| 6301 to 6401 | 40 CFR 61, Appendix B Test Methods | Dec. 1987, LR13:741 | 3/8/1989, 54 FR 9795 | Ref 52.999(c)(49) |
| LAC Title 55. Part III. Motor Vehicles, Chapter 8. Motor Vehicle Inspections | ||||
| Subchapter A. General | ||||
| Section 801 | Definitions | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2421 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 803 | Forward | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2421 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Subchapter B. Safety Inspections | ||||
| Section 805 | Requirements, Duties, Responsibilities | Dec. 2001, LR 27:2260 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 807 | Operation as an Official Motor Vehicle Inspection Station | Dec. 2001, LR 27:2260 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 809 | General Inspection Requirements | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2426 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 811 | Inspection Procedures | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2427 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 813 | Required Equipment | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2428 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 815 | Miscellaneous Inspection Procedures | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2433 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Subchapter C. Vehicle Emission Inspection and Maintenance Program | ||||
| Section 817 | General Information | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2433 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 819 | Anti-tampering and Inspection and Maintenance Parameters | May 5, 2006 | 11/13/2006, 71 FR 66113 | |
| Subchapter E. Administrative and Audit Procedures | ||||
| Section 833 | Investigations; Administrative Actions; Sanctions | Dec. 2001, LR 27:2260 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 | |
| Section 835 | Declaratory Orders and Rulings | Dec. 1999, LR 25:2442 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60594 |
(d) EPA-approved State source-specific requirements.
| Name of source | Permit or order number | State approval/effective date | EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead SIP for Ethyl Corp. in Baton Rouge | Compliance order | 1/27/1989 | 6/27/1989, 54 FR 27002 | Amended Compliance order dated 01/31/86. Modeling 05/27/88. State letter 01/27/89. Ref 52.999(c)(51) |
| Vulcan Materials Company Facility in Geiser, Ascension Parish | 1829T(M-2) | 7/28/1989 | 10/10/1989, 54 FR 41444 | Revision of Bubble Permit. Issued 03/24/83, amended 07/28/89. Ref 52.999(c)(52) |
| American Cyanamid Company Fortier Plant in Westwego, Jefferson Parish | 1896(M-2) | 7/20/1989 | 11/27/1989, 54 FR 48743 | Revision of Bubble Permit. Issued 10/17/84, amended 07/20/89. Ref 52.999(c)(53) |
| Vista Chemical Company Facility in Westlake, Louisiana | 1828(M-2) | 9/25/1986 | 2/2/1990, 55 FR 03598 | Bubble Permit. Submitted by Governor on 11/22/83, amended 09/25/86. Ref 52.999(c)(54) |
| Dow Chemical Facility in Plaquemine, Iberville Parish | 1838T(M-2) | 10/16/1991 | 10/4/1994, 59 FR 50500 | Revision of Bubble Permit. Issued 7/28/83, amended 10/16/91. Ref 52.999(c)(62) |
| Exxon Compliance Date Extension, Baton Rouge Refinery | N/A | 9/12/1997 | 5/11/1998, 63 FR 25773 | Extension of compliance date to LAC 33:III, 2103.D.4 Ref 52.999(c)(79). |
| Borden Chemicals and Plastics in Baton Rouge | Reasonable Further Progress Agreed To Order | 10/24/1996 | 7/2/1999, 64 FR 35939 | Submitted as part of the Baton Rouge, LA Post-1996 ROP Plan |
| Phillips 66 Alliance Refinery | Administrative Order on Consent No. AE-AOC-14-00211A | 4/29/2016 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | |
| EcoServices LLC. | EcoServices AOC No. AE-14-00957 and through the applicability of the New Source Performance Standards for Sulfuric Acid Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart H) | 8/8/2016 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | |
| Mosaic | Mosaic AOC No. AE-AOC-14-00274A | 6/6/2016 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | |
| NRG Big Cajun II | In the Matter of Louisiana Generating LLC, Point Coupee Parish, Big Cajun II Power Plant | 2/9/2017 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Units 1 and 2. |
| Cleco Power, LLC Brame Energy Center | In the Matter of Cleco Power, LLC, Rapides Parish, Brame Energy Center | 2/9/2017 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Unit 1 (Nesbitt 1) and Unit 2 (Rodemacher 2). |
| Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Little Gypsy Generating Plant | In the Matter of Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Little Gypsy Generating Plant, St. Charles Parish | 2/13/2017 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Units 2, 3, and the Auxiliary Boiler. |
| Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Ninemile Point Electric Generating Plant | In the Matter of Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Ninemile Point Electric Generating Plant, Jefferson Parish | 2/9/2017 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Units 4 and 5. |
| Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Waterford | In the Matter of Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Waterford 1 & 2 Electrical Generating Plant, St. Charles Parish | 2/9/2017 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Units 1 and 2. |
| Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Willow Glen Generating Plant | In the Matter of Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Willow Glen Generating Plant, Iberville Parish | 2/9/2017 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Units 2, 3, 4, 5, and the Auxiliary Boiler. |
| Entergy Louisiana, LLC, R. S. Nelson Generating Plant | In the Matter of Entergy Louisiana, LLC, R. S. Nelson Generating Plant, Calcasieu Parish | 10/26/2017 | 12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Units 4, 6, and the Unit 4 Auxiliary Boiler. |
| Rain CII Carbon in St. Bernard Parish | In the Matter of Rain CII Carbon LLC, St. Bernard Parish | 8/2/2018 | 5/29/2019, 84 FR 24712 | Amended Administrative order on Consent dated 8/2/2018. Pyroscrubber (EQT 004) and Waste Heat Boiler/Baghouse (EQT 0003). |
| Cabot Corporation, Ville Platte Plant | 2025-AP-SO2-00 | 3/28/2025 | 7/10/2025, 90 FR 30591 | Administrative Order on Consent dated 3/28/2025. Operate according to two categories. Part of the Evangeline Parish SO2 Nonattainment Area Plan. |
(e) EPA approved nonregulatory provisions and quasi-regulatory measures.
| State citation | Title/subject | State approval/effective date | EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA. R.S. of 1992. Title 30 and 36, Subtitle II. Environmental Quality, Chapter 3. Louisiana Air Control Law | ||||
| 30:2060 N.6 | Toxic air pollution emission control program | 10/22/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32359 | Ref 52.999(c)(63) |
| 30:2061 | Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program | 10/22/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32359 | Ref 52.999(c)(63) |
| 30:2062 | Louisiana Small Business Compliance Advisory panel | 10/22/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32359 | Ref 52.999(c)(63) |
| 36:239(H) | Transfer of agencies and functions to the Department of Environmental Quality | 10/22/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32359 | Ref 52.999(c)(63). |
| Louisiana Revised Statutes (La. R.S. of 1993). Title 30, Minerals, oil, gas and environmental quality, Subtitle II. Environmental Quality, Chapter 2. Department of Environment Quality; Permit Review; Prohibition | ||||
| Title 30: Subtitle II, Permit Review, Ch. 2, Permit Review; Prohibition, Section 2014.1(A) and (B) | Permit review; Prohibition | 6/10/1993 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| Louisiana Revised Statutes (La. R.S. of 1972). Title 42, Public Officers and Employees, Chapter 15 Code of Governmental Ethics Part 1, General Provisions and Part 2 Ethical Standards for Public Servants | ||||
| Title 42 Part 1, General Provisions | Definitions | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| 1102(3) | Agency Head | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| 1102(13) | Immediate Family | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| 1102(19) | Public Servant | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| 1102(22)(a) | Thing of Economic Value | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| 1102(23) | Transaction Involving Government Entity | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| Section 1112 | Participation in Certain Transactions Involving the Governmental Entity | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| Title 42 Part 2, Ethical Standards for Public Servants | Financial disclosure | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| Section 1114(A)(1-4) | Financial Disclosures | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 | |
| Section 1114(C) | Financial Disclosures | 4/1/1980 | 12/28/2016, 82 FR 95477 |
| Name of SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area | State submittal date/effective date | EPA approval date | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Hydrocarbon Standards | Region 106, SE LA-SE TX AQCR | 3/30/1973 | 6/22/1973 38 FR 16565 | Ref 52.999(c)(04) |
| PM Strategy | Region 106, SE LA-SE TX AQCR | 1/2/1973 | 7/19/1977, 42 FR 37000 | Ref 52.999(c)(06) |
| Air Quality Maintenance Area for PM | Shreveport, LA | 12/9/1977 | 8/18/1978, 43 FR 36628 | Ref 52.999(c)(09) |
| Air Quality Surveillance Network | New Orleans, LA | 4/3/1978 | 1/29/1979, 44 FR 05601 | Ref 52.999(c)(10) Change of sampling site location |
| Louisiana Ozone SIP | Nonattainment areas, AQCR 022 and 106 | 4/30/1979 | 2/14/1980, 45 FR 09909 | Ref 52.999(c)(15) Part D requirement |
| Evidence of Notice and Public Hearing | Statewide | 6/20/1979 | 2/10/1982, 47 FR 06017 | Ref 52.999(c)(16) |
| Emission Inventory | Nonattainment areas | 8/28/1978 | 2/14/1980, 45 FR 09909 | Ref 52.999(c)(17) |
| Air Quality Surveillance Network | Statewide | 1/10/1980 | 8/6/1981, 46 FR 40006 | Ref 52.999(c)(20) Final Revisions to ambient monitoring |
| Lead SIP | Baton Rouge, LA | 10/31/1983 | 5/1/1984, 49 FR 18485 | Ref 52.999(c)(40) |
| NSR and Visibility Monitoring | Class I Federal Areas in LA | 10/14/1985 | 6/10/1986, 51 FR 20969 | Ref 52.999(c)(44) |
| Small Business Program | Statewide | 10/22/1992 | 6/23/1994, 59 FR 32359 | Ref 52.999(c)(63) |
| Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan | Pointe Coupe Parish | 12/20/1995 | 1/6/1997, 61 FR 00648 | Ref 52.999(c)(70) |
| VOC RACT Negative Declarations | Baton Rouge nonattainment area | 12/15/1995 | 10/30/1996, 61 FR 55894 | Ref 52.999(c)(72) |
| Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan | Calcasieu Parish | 12/20/1995 | 5/2/1997, 62 FR 24036 | Ref 52.999(c)(73). |
| Contingency Plan | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/28/2001 | 9/26/2002, 67 FR 60590 | Substitute measure to replace the measure approved on 7/2/1999, 64 FR 35939 |
| Clean Fuel Fleet Program Substitution | Baton Rouge, LA | 3/21/1999 | 7/19/1999 64 FR 38580 | Substituted above RACT VOC emission reductions from storage tank rule LAC 33:III.2103 |
| Attainment Demonstration for the 1-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| Ozone Attainment Date Extension to 11/15/2005 | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| 2005 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| Enforceable Transportation Control Measure Appendix F | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| Enforceable commitment to perform a mid-course review and submit a SIP and revision by 05/1/2004 | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| Post 1996 Rate of Progress Plan Revisions | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| 15% Rate of Progress Plan Revisions | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| 1990 VOC Base Year Inventory Revisions | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| Reasonable Available Control Measure Analysis | Baton Rouge, LA | 12/31/2001 | 10/2/2002, 67 FR 61786 | |
| Air Quality Improvement Plan, 8-hour ozone standard attainment demonstration and associated control measures for the Shreveport-Bossier City EAC area | Bossier, Caddo and Webster Parishes, LA | 12/28/2004 | 8/22/2005, 70 FR 48880 | |
| Vehicle Miles Traveled Offset Analysis | Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area | 3/22/2005 | 11/21/2006, 71 FR 67308 | |
| Clean Air Interstate Rule Sulfur Dioxide Trading Program | Statewide | 9/22/2006 | 7/20/2007, 72 FR 39741 | Acid Rain Program Provisions NOT in SIP. |
| Clean Air Interstate Rule Nitrogen Oxides Annual and Ozone Season Trading Programs | Statewide | 9/28/2007, 72 FR 55064 | SIP revision also addresses CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i)—Interstate Transport. The protection of visibility requirement will be re-evaluated after submission of the regional haze SIP. | |
| 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | Beauregard Parish, LA | 8/23/2006 | 11/6/2007, 72 FR 62579 | |
| 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | Grant Parish, LA | 8/23/2006 | 11/6/2007, 72 FR 62579 | |
| 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | St. Mary Parish, LA | 9/27/2006 | 11/6/2007, 72 FR 62579 | |
| 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | Lafayette Parish, LA | 10/13/2006 | 3/24/2008, 73 FR 15411 | |
| 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | Lafourche Parish, LA | 12/19/2006 | 3/24/2008, 73 FR 15411 | |
| 1997 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | New Orleans Ozone Maintenance Area (including Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard and St. Charles Parishes), LA | 6/29/2007 | 9/16/2008, 73 FR 53373 | |
| 1997 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | Calcasieu Parish (Lake Charles Area), LA | 7/20/2007 | 10/9/2008, 73 FR 59518 | |
| 1997 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | St. James Parish, LA | 8/24/2007 | 10/9/2008, 73 FR 59518 | |
| 2002 Emission Inventory | Baton Rouge, LA | 7/31/2007 | 9/3/2009, 74 FR 45561 | |
| Infrastructure for the 1997 Ozone and 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 12/11/2007 1/7/2008 3/24/2011 |
7/19/2011, 76 FR 42549 | Approval for CAA sections 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Baton Rouge Ozone Nonattainment Area Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan | Baton Rouge, LA | 8/31/2010 | 11/30/2011, 76 FR 74000 | |
| 1997 8-Hour Ozone Section 110 Maintenance Plan | Pointe Coupee Parish, LA | 2/28/2007 | 5/9/2013, 78 FR 27058 | |
| Interstate transport for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS (contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance) | Statewide | 5/16/2011 5/21/2013 |
4/15/2014, 79 FR 21142 | SIP submission dated 5/16/2011, technical supplement dated 5/21/2013. |
| 2011 Emissions Inventory for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS | Baton Rouge Ozone Nonattainment Area | 5/2/2016 | 7/5/2016, 81 FR 43490 | |
| Infrastructure for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 5/16/2011 | 10/4/2016, 81 FR 68322 | Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i) (portion pertaining to PSD), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| Infrastructure for the 2008 Pb NAAQS | Statewide | 10/10/2011 | 10/4/2016, 81 FR 68322 | Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| Infrastructure for the 2008 O3 NAAQS | Statewide | 6/4/2013 | 10/4/2016, 81 FR 68322 | Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i) (portion pertaining to PSD), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| Infrastructure for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 6/4/2013 | 10/4/2016, 81 FR 68322 | Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i) (portions pertaining to nonattainment, interference with maintenance and PSD), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| Infrastructure for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 6/4/2013 | 10/4/2016, 81 FR 68322 | Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i) (portion pertaining PSD), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| Infrastructure for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 12/17/2015 | 10/4/2016, 81 FR 68322 | Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i) (portion pertaining to PSD), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan | Baton Rouge Area | 5/2/2015 | 12/27/2016, 82 FR 95051 | |
| Louisiana Regional Haze | Statewide | 6/13/2008 8/11/2016 2/10/2017 10/26/2017 |
12/21/2017, 82 FR 60520 | Supplemental information provided 10/9/2017 regarding Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Michoud Electric Generating Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3, Permit no. 2140-00014-V4, effective 4/28/15. |
| Interstate transport for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS (contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance) | Statewide | 12/11/2015 7/7/2017 |
5/3/2018, 83 FR 19438 | Adequate provisions prohibiting emissions which will contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance of the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS in any other State. |
| 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Revised Maintenance Plan | Baton Rouge Area | 1/31/2018 | 5/25/2018, 83 FR 24226 | |
| St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana Nonattainment Area Plan for the 2010 Primary 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS | St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana SO2 Nonattainment Area | 11/9/2017 2/8/2018 8/24/2018 10/9/2018 |
5/29/2019, 84 FR 24712 | Revised AOC dated 8/2/2018 submitted 8/24/2018. Revised modeling submitted 10/9/2018. |
| Infrastructure for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 2/7/2019, 11/8/2019 | 6/3/2020, 85 FR 34106 | Approval for 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(I) (portion pertaining to PSD), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). |
| Stage II Vapor Recovery Decommissioning | Statewide | 5/30/2019 | 6/3/2020, 85 FR 34108 | |
| Visibility Transport SIP for the 2015 ozone, 2012 PM2.5, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, 2008 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 11/4/2020 | 5/10/2021, 86 FR 24715 | Adequate provisions prohibiting emissions which interfere with visibility protection measures in any other State with respect to the 2015 ozone, 2012 PM2.5, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, 2008 ozone and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. |
| Louisiana Regional Haze Progress Report | Statewide | 3/25/2021 | 9/24/2021, 86 FR 52991 | |
| Interstate transport for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS (contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance) | Statewide | 6/4/2013 | 7/7/2025, 90 FR 29743 | Adequate provisions prohibiting emissions which will contribute significantly to nonattainment in or interfere with maintenance of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS in any other State. |
| Evangeline Parish Nonattainment Area Plan and Attainment Demonstration for the 2010 Primary 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS | Evangeline Parish, Louisiana SO2 Nonattainment Area | 4/2/2025 | 7/10/2025, 90 FR 30591 |
[63 FR 63183, Nov. 12, 1998]
§ 52.971 Classification of regions.
The Louisiana plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Ozone | |
| Southern Louisiana-Southeast Texas Interstate | II | I | III | III | I |
| Shreveport-Texarkana-Tyler Interstate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Monroe-El Dorado Interstate | II | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10869, May 31, 1972, as amended at 45 FR 9909, Feb. 14, 1980]
§§ 52.972-52.974 [Reserved]
§ 52.975 Redesignations and maintenance plans; ozone.
(a) Approval. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted redesignation requests and maintenance plans for the areas of Beauregard, Lafourche, and St. Mary Parishes on June 14, 1993. Redesignation requests and maintenance plans were submitted for the areas of Grant and Lafayette on May 25, 1993. The EPA deemed these requests complete on September 10, 1993. Several approvability issues existed, however. The LDEQ addressed these approvability issues in supplemental ozone redesignation requests and revised maintenance plans. These supplemental submittals were received for the areas of Beauregard, Grant, Lafayette, Lafourche, and St. Mary Parishes on March 27, 1995, December 12, 1994, October 21, 1994, November 18, 1994, and November 23, 1994, respectively. The redesignation requests and maintenance plans meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act as amended in 1990. The redesignations meet the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for these areas. The EPA therefore approved the request for redesignation to attainment with respect to ozone for the areas of Beauregard, Grant, Lafayette, Lafourche, and St. Mary Parishes on October 17, 1995.
(b) Approval—The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted a redesignation request and maintenance plan for St. James Parish on May 25, 1993. The EPA deemed this request complete on September 10, 1993. Several approvability issues existed, however. The LDEQ addressed these approvability issues in a supplemental ozone redesignation request and revised maintenance plan. This supplemental submittal was received for St. James Parish on December 15, 1994. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act as amended in 1990. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for this parish. The EPA therefore approved the request for redesignation to attainment with respect to ozone for St. James Parish on November 13, 1995.
(c) Approval—The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted a redesignation request and maintenance plan for the New Orleans CMSA on April 23, 1993. The EPA deemed this request complete on September 10, 1993. Several approvability issues existed, however. The LDEQ addressed these approvability issues in a supplemental ozone redesignation request and revised maintenance plan. This supplemental submittal was received on October 14, 1994. The redesignation request and maintenance plans meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act as amended in 1990. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Charles Parishes. The EPA therefore approved the request for redesignation to attainment with respect to ozone for 7Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Charles Parishes on December 1, 1995.
(d) Approval—The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality submitted a redesignation request and maintenance plan for Pointe Coupee Parish on December 20, 1995. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act as amended in 1990. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for Pointe Coupee Parish. The EPA therefore approved the request for redesignation to attainment with respect to ozone for Pointe Coupee Parish on December 20, 1996.
(e) Approval—The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality submitted a redesignation request and maintenance plan for Calcasieu Parish on December 20, 1995. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for Calcasieu Parish. The EPA therefore approved the request for redesignation to attainment with respect to ozone for Calcasieu Parish on June 2, 1997.
(f) Approval—The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted minimal maintenance plans for Lafourche Parish on November 18, 1994. The LDEQ submitted a redesignation request on August 9, 2000. The maintenance plans meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act as amended in 1990. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for Lafourche Parish.
(g) Approval—The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted to the EPA a request on December 4, 2000, to revise the Louisiana SIP for Beauregard, St. Mary, Lafayette, and Grant Parishes and the New Orleans Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area ozone maintenance area. The revision involves changes to the approved contingency plans. The contingency measures and the schedule for implementation satisfy the requirements of section 175A(d) of the Act. The EPA therefore approved this request on June 20, 2003.
(h) Approval. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted 8-hour ozone maintenance plans for the areas of Beauregard, Grant, and St. Mary Parishes on August 23, 2006, August 23, 2006, and October 10, 2006, respectively. The three areas are designated unclassifiable/attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA determined these requests for Beauregard, Grant, and St. Mary Parishes were complete on October 9, 2006, October 9, 2006, and November 30, 2006, respectively. The maintenance plans meet the requirements of section 110(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, and are consistent with EPA's maintenance plan guidance document dated May 20, 2005. The EPA therefore approved the 8-hour ozone maintenance plans for the areas of Beauregard, Grant, and St. Mary parishes on November 6, 2007.
(i) Approval. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted 8-hour ozone maintenance plans for the Lafayette and Lafourche Parish areas on October 13, 2006 and December 19, 2006, respectively. The two areas are designated unclassifiable/attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA determined these requests for Lafayette and Lafourche Parishes were complete on November 30, 2006 and May 2, 2007, respectively. These maintenance plans meet the requirements of section 110(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, and are consistent with EPA's maintenance plan guidance document dated May 20, 2005. The EPA therefore approved the 8-hour ozone maintenance plans for the Lafayette and Lafourche Parish areas on March 24, 2008.
(j) Approval. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance plans for the areas of Calcasieu and St. James Parishes on July 20, 2007, and August 24, 2007, respectively. The two areas are designated unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. EPA determined these requests for Calcasieu and St. James Parishes were complete on October 5, 2007, and October 16, 2007, respectively. The maintenance plans meet the requirements of section 110(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, and are consistent with EPA's maintenance plan guidance document dated May 20, 2005. The EPA therefore approved the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance plans for the areas of Calcasieu and St. James Parishes on October 9, 2008.
(k) Approval. The LDEQ submitted a maintenance plan addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for the New Orleans Ozone Maintenance Area on June 29, 2007. This area is designated unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 ozone standard. EPA determined this request for the New Orleans Ozone Maintenance Area was complete on August 8, 2007. This maintenance plan meets the requirements of section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, and is consistent with EPA's maintenance plan guidance document dated May 20, 2005. The EPA therefore approved the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance plan for the New Orleans Ozone Maintenance Area including the parishes of Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard and St. Charles on September 16, 2008.
(l) Approval. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) submitted a 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance plan for the area of Pointe Coupee Parish on February 28, 2007. The area is designated unclassifiable/attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. EPA determined this request for Pointe Coupee Parish was complete on May 2, 2007. The maintenance plan meets the requirements of section 110(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, and is consistent with EPA's maintenance plan guidance document dated May 20, 2005. The EPA therefore approved the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS maintenance plan for the area of Pointe Coupee Parish on May 9, 2013.
[60 FR 43025, Aug. 18, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 47285, Sept. 12, 1995; 60 FR 51360, Oct. 2, 1995; 62 FR 652, Jan. 6, 1997; 62 FR 24038, May 2, 1997; 62 FR 64286, Dec. 5, 1997; 66 FR 66321, Dec. 26, 2001; 68 FR 19375, Apr. 21, 2003; 72 FR 62584, Nov. 6, 2007; 73 FR 15416, Mar. 24, 2008; 73 FR 53378, Sept. 16, 2008; 73 FR 59523, Oct. 9, 2008; 78 FR 27062, May 9, 2013]
§ 52.976 Review of new sources and modification.
(a) Section 6.7 of Regulation 6.0 is disapproved since it could conflict with the preconstruction requirements for the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) of air quality.
(b) Section 6.9 of Regulation 6.0 is disapproved since it could conflict with the preconstruction requirements for the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) of air quality and the Administrator's Interpretative on Rule of December 21, 1976.
[44 FR 18491, Mar. 28, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 6017, Feb. 10, 1982]
§ 52.977 Control strategy and regulations: Ozone.
(a) Determination of Attainment. Effective March 12, 2010 EPA has determined the Baton Rouge 1-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Under the provisions of EPA's Clean Data Policy, this determination suspends the requirements for this area to submit a severe attainment demonstration, a severe reasonable further progress plan, applicable contingency measures plans, and other planning Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements related to attainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for so long as the area continues to attain the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
(b) Determination of Attainment. Effective October 12, 2010 EPA has determined that the Baton Rouge 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Under the provisions of 40 CFR 51.918 this determination suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, applicable contingency measures, and other planning Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) requirements related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for so long as the area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(c) Determination to Terminate the Clean Air Act Section 185 Penalty Fee Requirement. Effective September 6, 2011 EPA has determined that the State of Louisiana is no longer required to submit a section 185 fee program State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area to satisfy anti-backsliding requirements for the 1-hour ozone standard. This determination is based on EPA's determination that the area has attained the 1-hour ozone standard due to permanent and enforceable emissions reductions.
(d) Redesignation for the 1997 8-hour Ozone Standard. Effective December 30, 2011, EPA has redesignated the Baton Rouge area to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. With this final redesignation to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the final determination of attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS in paragraph (a) of this section, the 1-hour anti-backsliding obligations to submit planning SIPs to meet the attainment demonstration and reasonably available control measures requirements, the rate of progress and contingency measures requirements, and any other outstanding 1-hour requirements, cease to apply.
(e) Clean Data Determination. Effective June 16, 2014 EPA has determined that the Baton Rouge, Louisiana, marginal 2008 8-hour ozone nonattainment area is currently attaining the 2008 8-hour NAAQS for ozone.
(f) The EPA has determined that the Baton Rouge Marginal 2008 ozone NAAQS nonattainment area attained the NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2015.
[75 FR 6575, Feb. 10, 2010, as amended at 75 FR 54779, Sept. 9, 2010; 76 FR 39777, July 7, 2011; 76 FR 74002, Nov. 30, 2011; 79 FR 21142, Apr. 15, 2014; 81 FR 26709, May 4, 2016]
§ 52.978 Control strategy and regulations: Sulfur dioxide.
(a) Determination of failure to attain. Effective November 4, 2022, the EPA has determined that the St. Bernard Parish nonattainment area failed to attain the 2010 1-hour primary sulfur dioxide (SO2) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of October 4, 2018. This determination triggers the requirements of CAA section 179(d) for the State of Louisiana to submit a revision to the Louisiana SIP for the St. Bernard Parish nonattainment area to the EPA by October 5, 2023. The SIP revision must, among other elements, provide for attainment of the 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS in the St. Bernard Parish SO2 nonattainment area as expeditiously as practicable but no later than October 5, 2027.
(b) Determination of failure to attain. Effective January 15, 2025, the EPA has determined that the Evangeline Parish nonattainment area failed to attain the 2010 1-hour primary sulfur dioxide (SO2) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) by the applicable statutory attainment date of April 9, 2023. This determination triggers the requirements of CAA section 179(d) for the State of Louisiana to submit a revision to the Louisiana SIP for the Evangeline Parish nonattainment area to the EPA December 16, 2024. The SIP revision must, among other elements, provide for attainment of the 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS in the Evangeline Parish SO2 nonattainment area as expeditiously as practicable but no later than December 16, 2029.
[87 FR 60292, Oct. 5, 2022, as amended at 89 FR 101477, Dec. 16, 2024]
§§ 52.979-52.983 [Reserved]
§ 52.984 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source located within the State of Louisiana and for which requirements are set forth under the Federal CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program in subparts AA through II of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such applicable requirements. The obligation to comply with these requirements in part 97 of this chapter will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) as meeting the requirements of CAIR for PM2.5 relating to NOX under § 51.123 of this chapter, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional or unless such approval is under § 51.123(p) of this chapter.
(2) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of such approval of the State's SIP, the Administrator has already allocated CAIR NOX allowances to sources in the State for any years, the provisions of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation of CAIR NOX allowances for those years shall continue to apply, unless the Administrator approves a SIP provision that provides for the allocation of the remaining CAIR NOX allowances for those years.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each NOX source located within the State of Louisiana and for which requirements are set forth under the Federal CAIR NOX Ozone Season Trading Program in subparts AAAA through IIII of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such applicable requirements. The obligation to comply with these requirements in part 97 of this chapter will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) as meeting the requirements of CAIR for ozone relating to NOX under § 51.123 of this chapter, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional or unless such approval is under § 51.123(ee) of this chapter.
(2) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, if, at the time of such approval of the State's SIP, the Administrator has already allocated CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances to sources in the State for any years, the provisions of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation of CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances for those years shall continue to apply, unless the Administrator approves a SIP provision that provides for the allocation of the remaining CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances for those years.
(c) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and subparts AA through II and AAAA through IIII of part 97 of this chapter to the contrary:
(1) With regard to any control period that begins after December 31, 2014,
(i) The provisions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section relating to NOX annual or ozone season emissions shall not be applicable; and
(ii) The Administrator will not carry out any of the functions set forth for the Administrator in subparts AA through II and AAAA through IIII of part 97 of this chapter;
(2) The Administrator will not deduct for excess emissions any CAIR NOX allowances or CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances allocated for 2015 or any year thereafter;
(3) By March 3, 2015, the Administrator will remove from the CAIR NOX Allowance Tracking System accounts all CAIR NOX allowances allocated for a control period in 2015 and any subsequent year, and, thereafter, no holding or surrender of CAIR NOX allowances will be required with regard to emissions or excess emissions for such control periods; and
(4) By March 3, 2015, the Administrator will remove from the CAIR NOX Ozone Season Allowance Tracking System accounts all CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances allocated for a control period in 2015 and any subsequent year, and, thereafter, no holding or surrender of CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances will be required with regard to emissions or excess emissions for such control periods.
(d)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Louisiana and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program in subpart BBBBB of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2015 and 2016.
(2) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Louisiana and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 through 2020.
(3) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Louisiana and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program in subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2021 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State and areas of Indian country within the borders of the State subject to the State's SIP authority will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Louisiana's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(iii) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in areas of Indian country within the borders of the State not subject to the State's SIP authority will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Louisiana's SIP.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (d)(3) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Louisiana's SIP revision described in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances under subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State and areas of Indian country within the borders of the State subject to the State's SIP authority for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances to such units for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section, after 2020 the provisions of § 97.826(c) of this chapter (concerning the transfer of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances between certain accounts under common control), the provisions of § 97.826(d) of this chapter (concerning the conversion of amounts of unused CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances allocated for control periods before 2021 to different amounts of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances), and the provisions of § 97.811(d) of this chapter (concerning the recall of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances equivalent in quantity and usability to all such allowances allocated to units in the State and Indian country within the borders of the State for control periods after 2020) shall continue to apply.
(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (d)(3) of this section is stayed with regard to emissions occurring in 2023 and thereafter, provided that while such stay remains in effect, the provisions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section shall apply with regard to such emissions.
(e)(1) The owner and operator of each source located in the State of Louisiana and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth in § 52.40 and § 52.41, § 52.42, § 52.43, § 52.44, § 52.45, or § 52.46 must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2026 and each subsequent year.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (e)(1) of this section is stayed.
[72 FR 62348, Nov. 2, 2007, as amended at 76 FR 48366, Aug. 8, 2011; 79 FR 71671, Dec. 3, 2014; 81 FR 74596, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 65924, Dec. 21, 2018; 86 FR 23175, Apr. 30, 2021; 88 FR 36890, June 5, 2023; 88 FR 49303, July 31, 2023]
§ 52.985 Visibility protection.
(a) Measures addressing best available retrofit technology (BART) for electric generating unit (EGU) emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX). The BART requirements for EGU NOX emissions are satisfied by § 52.984.
(b) Other measures addressing BART. The BART requirements for emissions other than EGU NOX emissions are satisfied by the Louisiana Regional Haze SIP approved December 21, 2017.
[82 FR 60543, Dec. 21, 2017]
§ 52.986 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The plan submitted by the Governor of Louisiana on August 14, 1984 (as adopted by the Secretary of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) on May 23, 1985), July 26, 1988 (as revised and adopted by the LDEQ on May 5, 1988), and October 26, 1990 (as revised and adopted by the LDEQ on July 20, 1990), LAC:33:III: § 509 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and its Supplement documents, is approved as meeting the requirements of Part C, Clean Air Act for preventing significant deterioration of air quality.
(b) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not met for federally designated Indian lands since the plan (specifically LAC: 33:III:509.A.1) excludes all federally recognized Indian lands from the provisions of this regulation. Therefore, the provisions of § 52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable implementation plan, and are applicable to sources located on land under the control of Indian governing bodies.
(c) The revisions to the Louisiana SIP adopted on April 20, 2011, and submitted on December 21, 2011, establishing PSD permitting requirements for sources that are classified as major and thus required to obtain a PSD permit based solely on their potential GHG emissions (“Step 2” sources) at the definition of “major stationary source” paragraph (c) and the definition of “significant” at LAC 33:III.509(B), are disapproved as inconsistent with federal law for the regulation and permitting of GHGs.
[56 FR 20139, May 2, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 11323, Mar. 10, 2003; 68 FR 74489, Dec. 24, 2003; 75 FR 82555, Dec. 30, 2010; 81 FR 46608, July 18, 2016]
§ 52.987 Control of hydrocarbon emissions.
(a) Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in the Louisiana Implementation Plan, the control measures listed in paragraphs (b) through (n) of this section shall be implemented in accordance with the schedule set forth below.
(b) Removal from service of a 10,000 barrel capacity crude oil storage tank at the Belcher Station of the Exxon Pipeline Company, Belcher, Louisiana, with a final compliance date of January 1, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 208 tons per year.
(c) Removal from service of a 55,000 barrel capacity crude oil storage tank at the Weller Station of the Exxon Pipeline Company, near Minden, Louisiana, with a final compliance date of January 1, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 263 tons per year.
(d) Installation of emission control systems on three 3,000 barrel capacity distillate storage tanks, at the Jones O'Brien Inc., Keatchie, Louisiana, with a final compliance date of January 1, 1978. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 23 tons per year.
(e) Installation of emission control systems on crude oil storage tanks TK-43, TK-44, T-45 and T-49, and distillate tanks T-46 and T-50 at the Atlas Processing Company, Shreveport, Louisiana with a final compliance date of January 2, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 881 tons per year.
(f) Installation of emission control systems on crude oil storage tanks TK-19-74, TK-HC-74, TK-571-74 and TK-15-74 and agreement to store only nonvolatile organic solvent in tanks TK-F2-74, TK-41-74 and TK-40-74 at the Cotton Valley Solvents Company, Cotton Valley, Louisiana with a final compliance date of January 2, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 934 tons per year.
(g) Discontinue use of residue gas in pneumatic instrumentation and control systems at the Kerr-McGee Corporation, Devon Corporation, and Eason Oil Company, Calhoun Plant, Calhoun, Louisiana with a final compliance date of July 1, 1978. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 21 tons per year.
(h) Discontinue use of residue gas in pneumatic instrumentation and control systems with a final compliance date of July 1, 1978, and install emission control systems on distillate storage tanks 2-7 and 2-13 with a final compliance date of January 2, 1980, at the Kerr-McGee Corp., Devon Corp., and Eason Oil Co., Dubach Plant, Dubach, Louisiana. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon reduction of at least 367 tons per year.
(i) Installation of emission control systems on a 37,500 barrel capacity crude oil storage tank at Cities Service Pipeline Company, Oil City, Louisiana with a final compliance date of February 1, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 208 tons per year.
(j) Installation of emission control systems on a 25,000 barrel capacity crude oil storage tank at Cities Service Pipeline Company, Haynesville, Louisiana with a final compliance date of February 1, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 28 tons per year.
(k) Installation of emission control systems on a 10,000 barrel capacity crude oil storage tank at Cities Service Pipeline Company, Summerfield, Louisiana with final compliance achieved in August 1977. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 162 tons per year.
(l) Installation of emission control systems on a 30,000 barrel capacity crude oil storage tank at the Scurlock Oil Company, Lake End, Louisiana, with a final compliance date of January 15, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 90 tons per year.
(m) Installation of emission control systems on a 55,000 barrel capacity crude oil storage tank at the Scurlock Oil Company, Dutchtown Oil Field near Minden, Louisiana, with a final compliance date of January 15, 1980. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 186 tons per year.
(n) Installation of emission control systems on distillate storage tank No. 414 with a final compliance date of September 1, 1979, and the removal from service of tank No. 450 with final compliance achieved on December 1, 1977, at the Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, Sarepta, Louisiana. This shall result in an estimated hydrocarbon emission reduction of at least 355 tons per year.
[44 FR 15705, Mar. 15, 1979]
§ 52.988 [Reserved]
§ 52.990 Stack height regulations.
The State of Louisiana has committed to submit to EPA a SIP revision whenever a new or revised emission limitation for a specific source exceeds the height allowed by Section 921(A) “Good Engineering Practice (GEP) Stack Height 1 or 2” of the State regulations. A letter from the Secretary of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, dated September 23, 1986, stated that:
In specific, the State regulation, Section 17.14.2 [now LAC 33: Part III, Section 921(B)], provides that the degree of emission limitation required of any source for control of any air pollutant must not be affected by so much of any source's stack height that exceeds good engineering practice or by any other dispersion technique. In reference to this requirement, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality or the Administrative Authority will submit to EPA a SIP revision whenever the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality adopts a new or revised emission limitation for a specific source that is based on a stack height that exceeds the height allowed by Section 17.14.1(e)(1) [now LAC 33: Part III, Section 921(A) “Good Engineering Practice (GEP) Stack Height 1”] or Section 17.14.1(e)(2) [now LAC 33: Part III, Section 921(A) “Good Engineering Practice (GEP) Stack Height 2”].
[53 FR 36010, Sept. 16, 1988]
§ 52.991 Small business assistance program.
The Governor of Louisiana submitted on October 22, 1992, a plan revision to develop and implement a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program to meet the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act by November 15, 1994. The plan commits to provide technical and compliance assistance to small businesses, hire an Ombudsman to serve as an independent advocate for small businesses, and establish a Compliance Advisory Panel to advise the program and report to EPA on the program's effectiveness.
[59 FR 32360, June 23, 1994]
§ 52.992 Area-wide nitrogen oxides exemptions.
(a) The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality submitted to the EPA on August 5, 1994, a petition requesting that the nonclassifiable ozone nonattainment areas in the State of Louisiana be exempted from the requirement to meet the NOX provisions of the Federal transportation conformity rule. The exemption request was based on monitoring data which demonstrated that the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone had been attained in this area for the 3 years prior to the petition. The parishes for which the NOX exemption was requested include: Beauregard, Grant, Lafayette, Lafourche, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. James, and St. Mary. The EPA approved this exemption request on March 2, 1995.
(b) The LDEQ submitted to the EPA on November 17, 1994, a petition requesting that the Baton Rouge serious ozone nonattainment area be exempted from the NOX control requirements of the CAA. In addition, supplemental information was submitted to the EPA by the LDEQ on January 26, 1995, June 6, 1995, and June 16, 1995. The Baton Rouge nonattainment area consists of East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, Pointe Coupee, Livingston, Iberville, and Ascension Parishes. The exemption request was based on photochemical grid modeling which shows that reductions in NOX would not contribute to attainment in the nonattainment area. On January 18, 1996, the EPA approved the State's request for an areawide exemption from the following requirements: NOX new source review, NOX reasonably available control technology, NOX general conformity, and NOX inspection and maintenance requirements.
(c) The LDEQ submitted to the EPA on July 25, 1995, a revision to the SIP, pursuant to section 182(b)(1), requesting that the Baton Rouge serious ozone nonattainment area be exempted from the transportation conformity NOX requirements of the CAA. The Baton Rouge nonattainment area consists of East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, Pointe Coupee, Livingston, Iberville, and Ascension Parishes. The exemption request was based on photochemical grid modeling which shows that additional reductions in NOX would not contribute to attainment in the nonattainment area. On February 12, 1996, the EPA approved the State's request for an areawide exemption from the transportation conformity NOX requirements.
(d) The LDEQ submitted to the EPA on October 28, 1994, a petition requesting that the Lake Charles marginal ozone nonattainment area be exempted from the NOX control requirements of the Act. The Lake Charles nonattainment area consists of Calcasieu Parish. The exemption request was based on photochemical grid modeling which shows that reductions in NOX would not contribute to attainment in the nonattainment area. On May 27, 1997, the EPA approved the State's request for an area-wide exemption from the following requirements: NOX new source review, NOX general conformity, and NOX transportation conformity requirements. The waiver was granted on the basis of modeling, and ambient air quality data demonstrating the area has attained the ozone NAAQS.
(e) On September 24, 2001, and on December 31, 2001, the LDEQ requested that EPA rescind the Baton Rouge section 182(f) and 182(b)(1) NOX exemptions that were approved by EPA, and published in the Federal Register on January 26, 1996 (61 FR 2438), and February 27, 1996 (61 FR 7218). The State based its request on photochemical grid modeling recently performed for the Baton Rouge State Implementation Plan (SIP) which indicates that controlling NOX sources will assist in bringing the Baton Rouge area into attainment with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. On May 7, 2002, EPA proposed approval of the State's request to rescind both NOX exemptions. Based on our review of the State's request and the supporting photochemical grid modeling the NOX exemptions are rescinded on May 5, 2003.
[60 FR 5864, Jan. 31, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 2446, Jan. 26, 1996; 61 FR 7221, Feb. 27, 1996; 62 FR 29078, May 29, 1997; 68 FR 23604, May 5, 2003]
§ 52.993 Emissions inventories.
(a) The Governor of the State of Louisiana submitted the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Baton Rouge (BTR) and Calcasieu Parish (CAL) ozone nonattainment areas on November 16, 1992 as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 1990 base year emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for each of these areas.
(b) The inventories are for the ozone precursors which are volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide. The inventories cover point, area, non-road mobile, on-road mobile, and biogenic sources.
(c) The BTR nonattainment area is classified as Serious and includes Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, Point Coupee, and West Baton Rouge Parishes; the CAL nonattainment area is classified as Marginal and includes Calcasieu Parish.
(d) On December 15, 1995, the Governor of the State of Louisiana submitted a revision to the 1990 base year volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions inventory for the Baton Rouge, Louisiana ozone nonattainment area. The revised inventory was submitted as part of the revised Baton Rouge 15 Percent Rate-of-Progress Plan. This revision to the base year inventory modified the point source VOC emissions. The revisions satisfy the requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.
(e) On January 2, 1997, the Governor of the State of Louisiana submitted a revision to the 1990 base year volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions inventory for the Baton Rouge, Louisiana ozone nonattainment area. The revised inventory was submitted as part of the revised Baton Rouge Post-1996 Rate-of-Progress Plan. This revision to the base year inventory modified the point, area, non-road mobile, on-road mobile, and biogenic sources of VOC emissions. The revisions satisfy the requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990.
[60 FR 13911, Mar. 15, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 35941, July 2, 1999]
§ 52.994 [Reserved]
§ 52.995 Enhanced ambient air quality monitoring.
(a) The Governor of the State of Louisiana submitted the photochemical assessment monitoring stations (PAMS) State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area on September 10, 1993. This SIP submittal satisfies 40 CFR 58.20(f), which requires the State to provide for the establishment and maintenance of PAMS.
(b) The Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area is classified as Serious and includes Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, Pointe Coupee, and West Baton Rouge Parishes.
[61 FR 31037, June 19, 1996]
§ 52.996 Disapprovals.
(a) The portion of the SIP submitted on June 4, 2013 addressing Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS is disapproved.
(b) The SIP submittal from November 13, 2019, addressing Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2015 ozone NAAQS is disapproved.
[81 FR 53309, Aug. 12, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 68334, Oct. 4, 2016; 86 FR 24716, May 10, 2021; 88 FR 9382, Feb. 13, 2023]
§ 52.999 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “The Louisiana Air Control Commission Implementation Plan” and all revisions submitted by Louisiana that were federally approved prior to July 1, 1998.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 28, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) Certification that public hearings were held on the State's implementation plan was submitted on February 28, 1972. (Non-regulatory)
(2) Response to comments by Region VI on the plan was transmitted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on May 8, 1972. (Non-regulatory)
(3) Revisions to Louisiana Air Control Regulations 6, 8, 18, 19, 22, A22, 27, 28, control strategy for photochemical oxidants-hydrocarbons, prevention of air pollution emergency episodes, source surveillance, and procedures for submission and approval and compliance schedules were submitted by the Governor on July 17, 1972.
(4) Revisions concerning the control strategy for photochemical oxidants and hydrocarbon for Region 106 was submitted by the Governor on March 30, 1973. (Regulatory)
(5) Revision of Section 6.1 of the State air control regulations was submitted by the Governor on April 25, 1973.
(6) A revision concerning the control strategy for particulate matter for the Southern Louisiana-Southeast Texas AQCR was submitted by the Governor on January 2, 1973.
(7) Variances to Emission Limiting Regulations adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on October 29, 1975, December 12, 1975, and April 6, 1976, and submitted by the Governor on April 22, 1976.
(8) Commission Orders creditable as emission offsets for the GM Plant in Shreveport were submitted by the Governor on January 25, 1978 as amendments to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan.
(9) A proposed dedesignation of the Shreveport area as an AQMA for particulate matter was submitted by the Governor on December 9, 1977.
(10) An administrative revision of the Air Quality Surveillance Network was submitted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on April 3, 1978. (Non regulatory)
(11) Revisions to Regulation 19.0, Emission Standards for Particulate Matter, as adopted on November 30, 1977, were submitted by the Governor on December 9, 1977.
(12) Minor changes and administrative revisions to regulations 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 13.0, 14.0, 15.0, 16.0, and 17.0 of the Louisiana SIP were submitted by the Governor on December 9, 1977.
(13) A variance to Regulation 19.5 for Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation at Norco, Louisiana was submitted by the Governor on August 31, 1978.
(14) Revisions to the Air Control Regulations 18.1, 18.3, 18.5, 18.6-18.6.2, 18.7, 20.1-20.8, 21.1-21.6.4, 23.0-23.4.2, 24.1-24.5, 24.6.2, 24.7-24.7.3, 24.8, 25.0-25.6.2, 26.0-26.2, 26.4-26.8.2, 27.0-27.5.4, 28.0-28.6.2 and 30.0, as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on November 30, 1977, were submitted by the Governor on December 9, 1977.
(15) Revisions to the plan for attainment of standards for ozone (Part D requirements) were submitted by the Governor on April 30, 1979.
(16) Evidence of notice and public hearing for the April 30, 1979 plan was submitted by the Governor on June 20, 1979.
(17) Emission inventory information, emission reduction information, a certification of the lack of major degreasing sources, and a commitment to adopt future regulations were submitted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on August 28, 1979 (non-regulatory).
(18) Schedule for the modification and submittal of regulations 22.6 and regulation 6.3.8 were submitted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on October 11, 1979 (non-regulatory).
(19) Regulations 22.17 and 22.18, adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on September 25, 1979 were submitted by the Governor on October 18, 1979.
(20) On January 10, 1980, the Governor submitted final revisions to the ambient monitoring portion of the plan.
(21) Revised Regulation 22.8(c) was submitted by the Governor on June 20, 1979. This regulation was adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on March 27, 1979.
(22) Revised Regulation 22.5 was submitted by the Governor on April 30, 1979. This regulation was adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on March 27, 1979. A second revision to Regulation 22.5 was submitted by the Governor on July 7, 1979, as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on June 26, 1979.
(23) Revised Regulations 6.3.8, 22.3, 22.6.1, 22.6.2, 22.10, and 22.12.4 were submitted by the Governor on December 10, 1979. These regulations were adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on November 27, 1979. A second revision to Regulation 6.3.8 was submitted by the Governor on October 23, 1980. The second revision was adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on September 25, 1980.
(24) Revisions to the Air Control Regulations 24.6.1 and 24.7.4, as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on March 27, 1979, were submitted by the Governor on April 30, 1979.
(25) Revised Regulations 22.9.2, 22.9.3(b), 22.19, 22.20, 22.21, 22.22 and 22.23 and revised Regulation 4.0 (i.e. sections 4.99 through 4.116) were adopted by the State on November 27, 1979 and submitted by the Governor on December 10, 1979; and revised Regulations 22.3 and 22.20.2 were adopted by the State on July 22, 1980 and submitted by the Governor on September 12, 1980.
(26) Revised Regulations 22.9.3(b), 22.20.3, and 22.23.7 were adopted by the State on December 11, 1980 and submitted by the Governor on January 12, 1981; revised Regulation 22.21.2(E) was adopted by the State on April 23, 1981 and submitted by the Governor on June 3, 1981; and, revised Regulation 22.19.2(B) was adopted by the State on June 25, 1981 and submitted by the Governor on July 22, 1981.
(27) Revisions to the Air Control Regulations 6.1.1, 18.2, 18.4, 18.6.3, 19.5.1, 24.9.1, 24.9.2, 26.3.1, 26.3.2 and 51.11, as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on September 25, 1980, were submitted by the Governor on October 23, 1980.
(28) Revisions to the plan for permit fee systems, interstate pollution abatement, public availability of emission data, maintenance of pay, permit public comment, and public notification of exceedances of the primary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), were submitted by the Governor on April 30, 1979. In addition, revised submittals for permit fee schedules were submitted on July 7, 1979; September 12, 1980; October 23, 1980; and January 12, 1981. The September 12, 1980 letter also included a new § 51.285 (a), (b) and (c). Finally, the State sent a notification letter on August 7, 1979, which corrected a typographical error in the maintenance of pay revision.
(29) A revision to the Air Control Regulations 22.9.3(d) as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on December 11, 1980, was submitted by the Governor on January 12, 1981.
(30) Revisions to the Air Control Regulations 8.5.1, 22.3.1.1, 22.3.1.2, and 22.10, as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on April 23, 1981, were submitted by the Governor on June 3, 1981.
(31) A revision to the Air Control Regulation 22.9.3(a), as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on May 28, 1981, was submitted by the Governor on June 3, 1981.
(32) A revision to the Air Control Regulation 22.3.2, as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on July 23, 1981, was submitted by the Governor on August 17, 1981.
(33) The Louisiana State Implementation Plan for lead and Regulations for—the Control of Air Pollution from lead, 10.0-10.3 and 19A.0, were submitted to EPA on July 27, 1979, by the Governor of Louisiana as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on July 24, 1979. Letters of Clarification dated January 6, 1982, April 1, 1982 and May 4, 1982 also were submitted. No action is taken on the Baton Rouge area.
(34) Section 6.1 of Regulation 6.0 amended and adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on October 22, 1981, was submitted by the Governor on November 30, 1981.
(35) Revisions to the Air Control Regulations 4.102, 4.110, 22.20.2 and 22.21.2(D), as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on December 11, 1980, were submitted by the Governor on January 12, 1981.
(36) [Reserved]
(37) Revisions to the Air Control Regulations 4.14, 4.36, 6.6, 22.3.1.1, and 22.3.1.2, as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on February 26, 1981, were submitted by the Governor on March 25, 1981.
(38) Revisions to the Air Control Regulations 17.13, 23.4.1.1 and 23.4.4, as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on January 28, 1982, were submitted by the Governor on February 15, 1982.
(39) A revision to section 2210 of the Louisiana Air Control Law was submitted to EPA on March 10, 1982. The Section was renamed Section 1077 of the Environmental Affairs Act, by the Louisiana Legislature, and was effective January 1, 1980.
(40) The Louisiana State Implementation Plan for lead for the Baton Rouge area was submitted on July 27, 1979, with letters of clarification and revisions dated January 4, 1983, September 15, 1983, September 30, 1983. The final lead control plan was submitted in a letter dated October 31, 1983, as adopted by the Louisiana Air Control Commission on October 20, 1983.
(41) Revisions to sections 2.3, 3.1, 3.4, and 4.1 of the Rules and Regulations for the Fee System of the Air Quality Control Program, as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on January 26, 1983, were submitted by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (now the Department of Environmental Quality), Air Quality Division, on November 17, 1983.
(42) Deletion of Air Control Regulation 14.0, and deletion of hydrocarbon guideline standard from Table 1, 1a, and 2, as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on July 28, 1983, was submitted by the Governor on October 19, 1983.
(43) Revisions to the Air Control Regulation 22.22 as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on September 23, 1982, and submitted by the Governor on July 14, 1983.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Regulation 22.22.1(A) and 22.22.2(A) Letter dated July 14, 1983, from the State of Louisiana and which change the reference for the test methods from a CTG document to the Louisiana Air Quality Regulations Division's Source Test Manual. These regulations were adopted on September 23, 1982.
(44) On October 4, 1985, the Governor submitted a revision entitled, “Protection of Visibility for Mandatory Class I Federal Areas,” July 12, 1985. This submittal included new source review and visibility monitoring strategy as adopted by the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality in October 1985.
(45) On August 14, 1985, the Governor of Louisiana submitted a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Plan including Air Quality Regulations—Part V, (sections 90.1-90.19) as adopted by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality on May 23, 1985. Air Quality Regulations—Part V provides authority for the State to implement the PSD program in certain areas of the State. Letters of commitment for air quality modeling (dated September 30, 1985) and Federal stack height and dispersion technique regulation (dated June 3, 1986) were submitted by the Secretary of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana Air Quality Regulations—Part V, Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality, except that no provision of this part applies to Indian Reservations meaning any Federally recognized reservation established by Treaty, Agreement,Executive Order, or Act of Congress, as adopted on May 23, 1985.
(B) A letter from the Secretary of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality dated September 30, 1985, which commits the Department to use only the EPA approved air quality models in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 51.24(1) [now 40 CFR 51.166(1)] and to submit a stack height and dispersion techniques SIP revision by April 8, 1986.
(C) A letter from the Secretary of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality dated June 3, 1986, which certifies that the Department interprets the provisions of section 90.8 of Louisiana PSD regulations as having the same meaning as the Federal stack height and dispersion technique regulation, 40 CFR 51.1(hh)-(kk) [now 40 CFR 51.100(hh)-(kk)], promulgated by EPA in the Federal Register of July 8, 1985, and that the State will apply, implement, and enforce these requirements in the PSD permitting process.
(D) A narrative explanation and additional requirements entitled “Prevention of Significant Deterioration Revisions to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan”.
(46) On January 6, 1988, the Governor of Louisiana submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) that contained Air Quality Regulations, LAC 33: Part III, Section 921, Stack Heights, as adopted by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality on December 20, 1987. Section 921, Stack Heights, enables the State to ensure that the degree of emission limitation required for the control of any air pollutant under its SIP is not affected by that portion of any stack height which exceeds GEP or by any other dispersion technique.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana Air Quality Regulations—LAC 33: Part III, Section 921, Stack Heights, as adopted by the Secretary of the Department of Environmental Quality on December 20, 1987.
(ii) Other material—none.
(47) A revision exempting four rural carbon black plants—Ashland Chemical, Louisa, LA; Cabot Corporation, Centerville, LA; Cabot Corporation, Ville Platte, LA; and Columbian Chemicals, Franklin, LA—from further controls on acetylene emissions as required under Louisiana Air Quality Regulation 22.8 received from the Governor on January 12, 1987, and amended May 13, 1987.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) A letter dated May 29, 1987, from Martha Madden, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, to the Governor of Louisiana approving the exemptions from further controls on acetylene emissions for the four rural carbon black plants and ordering each facility to maintain its emissions at or below the levels specified in the attached summary of emissions.
(ii) Additional material. (A) A summary of VOC emissions for each of the four rural carbon black plants exempted from further controls on acetylene emissions under Louisiana Air Quality Regulation 22.8.
(48) Part II of the Visibility Protection Plan was submitted by the Governor on October 26, 1987.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revision entitled, “Louisiana State Implementation Plan Revision: Protection of Visibility: Proposed Part II Long-Term Strategy, October 26, 1987”. This submittal includes a visibility long-term strategy and general plan provisions as approved and adopted by the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality on October 26, 1987.
(B) Letter dated October 26, 1987, from Secretary of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ), to the Governor approving the SIP revision.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated June 16, 1988, from Administrator, Air Quality Division, LDEQ, to Chief, SIP/New Source Section (6T-AN), EPA Region 6, committing to make its three-year periodic review report available to the public as well as to EPA.
(49) The recodified and revised regulations of the Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 33, Part 3 (LAC:33:III) that were adopted by the State effective December 20, 1987, and submitted by the Governor by letters dated January 6, 1988, and October 4, 1988, for inclusion in the SIP. These regulations include LAC:33:III: Chapters 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 23, 56, 60, 63, and 65, except LAC:33:III:111 “Particulate matter,” and “Suspended particulate matter,” LAC:33:III:505.J, and LAC:33:III:505.L, which were previously disapproved, and LAC:33:III:6099, which was withdrawn by the Governor.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 33, Part 3, Chapters 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 23, 56, 60, 63, and 65 as adopted by Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality on December 20, 1987, except LAC:33:III: section 111 “Particulate matter,” “Suspended particulate matter,” section 505.J, section 505.L, and section 6099.
(ii) Additional material. (A) A letter dated December 16, 1987, from Martha Madden, Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, to the Governor of Louisiana, approving the codified air quality regulations effective December 20, 1987.
(50) The Louisiana State Implementation Plan for PM10 as submitted by the Governor in a letter dated July 26, 1988, and adopted by the State effective June 20, 1988.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to the Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 33, Chapter III, Sections 111, 509.B, 509.I.8.a, 709, 1301.B, 1303.A, 1305.A., 1311.B, 1311.C, 1313.C, 1315, 1319.G, 5609.A.1, 5609.A.2, 5609.A.3, and Tables 1, 1a, and 2 of chapter 7 as adopted effective June 20, 1988.
(B) A letter dated May 22, 1989, from Mike D. McDaniel, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, to William B. Hathaway, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(ii) Additional material. (A) A letter dated July 26, 1988, from Paul H. Templet, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, to the Governor of Louisiana approving the adoption of amendments to the Louisiana Air Quality Regulations to implement the new PM10 standard effective June 20, 1988.
(B) A narrative supplement to the Louisiana PM10 submitted by the Governor in a letter dated July 26, 1988.
(51) Revision to the Louisiana Lead State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Governor in a letter dated July 18, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) An amended Compliance Order dated January 31, 1986, issued by the Secretary of the State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality in the matter of Ethyl Corporation, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Computer modeling submitted by letter dated May 27, 1988, from Doug Walters, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, to Joe Winkler, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(B) Explanatory letter dated January 27, 1989, from Gustave Von Bodungen, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, to Gerald Fontenot, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(52) On October 31, 1983, the Governor submitted a request to revise the Louisiana SIP to include an Alternative Emission Reduction Plan for the Vulcan Materials Company facility located at Geismar, Ascension Parish. A permit was issued by LDEQ on March 24, 1983 (#1829T), but after several revisions, the final permit for the trade is #1829T (M-2), issued July 28, 1989. This Bubble uses credits obtained from installation of a vapor recovery system on a tank farm of five VOC storage tanks in lieu of controls on one process vent and one VOC storage tank.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) LDEQ Permit number 1829T (M-2), Revision of Bubble Permit—Vulcan Chemicals Company, Geismar, Ascension Parish, Louisiana, issued July 28, 1989.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated June 28, 1989, from the Administrator of the Louisiana Office of Air Quality, giving assurances that the State has resources and plans necessary to strive toward attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS for ozone taking into account the influence of this Bubble on air quality.
(53) On May 5, 1986, the Governor submitted a request to revise the Louisiana SIP to include an alternate Emission Reduction Plan for the American Cyanamid Company Fortier Plant located at Westwego, Jefferson Parish. A permit was issued by LDEQ on October 17, 1984 (#1896), but after several revisions, the final permit for the trade is #1896 (M-2), issued July 20, 1989. This Bubble uses credits obtained from the change of service of three storage tanks from VOC to non-VOC usage to offset reductions required by controlling one methanol storage tank.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) LDEQ permit number 1896 (M-2) issued July 20, 1989, a Revision to Bubble Permit No. 1896 (M-1)—American Cyanamid Company, Westwego, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated June 6, 1989, from the Administrator of the Louisiana Office of Air Quality, giving the State position that the Volatile Organic Compounds that have been shifted out of the emission reduction credit donating tanks have not been shifted elsewhere in the nonattainment area.
(B) Letter received by EPA on March 31, 1989, from Mr. Addison Tatum of the State of Louisiana, including calculations for the permit.
(54) A revision to allow an alternative emission reduction plan (“bubble”) for the Vista Chemical Company facility in Westlake, Louisiana, as submitted by the Governor on November 22, 1983, and amended by Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division permit #1828 M-2 issued September 25, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division permit #1828 M-2 issued September 25, 1986.
(ii) Additional material.—None.
(55) A revision to allow an alternative emission reduction plan [“bubble”] for the Union Carbide facility in Hahnville, Louisiana, as submitted by the Governor on October 19, 1983, and amended by Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division permit #1836T(M-1) issued April 23, 1987, and revised on May 5, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division permit #1836T(M-1) issued April 23, 1987, and revised on May 5, 1990.
(ii) Additional material.—None.
(56) Revisions to Louisiana's volatile organic compound regulations were submitted by the Governor on June 13, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21. Control of Emission of Volatile Organic Compounds, Subchapter B. Organic Solvents, Section 2123. Organic Solvents, paragraphs C.6. and D.3., effective February 20, 1990.
(57) Revisions to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan for LAC:33:III: Section 509 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) sections (509)(B) (Baseline Area) (1), 509(B) (Baseline Area) (2), 509(B) (Baseline Concentration) (1), (509)(B) (Baseline Concentration) (1)(b), 509(B) (Baseline Concentration) (2)(a), 509(B) (Baseline Concentration) (2)(b), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (1)(a), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (1)(b), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (2), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (2)(a), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (2)(b), 509(B) (Net Emission Increases) (4), 509(D), and 509(P)(4), as adopted by the Secretary of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) on July 20, 1990, were submitted by the Governor on October 26, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) LAG:33:III: Section 509 Prevention of Significant Deterioration Sections (509)(B) (Baseline Area) (1), 509(B) (Baseline Area) (2), 509(B) (Baseline Concentration) (1)(a), (509)(B) (Baseline Concentration) (1)(b), 509(B) (Baseline Concentration) (2)(a), 509(B) (Baseline Concentration) (2)(b), 509(B) (Baseline Date (1)(a), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (1)(b), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (2), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (2)(a), 509(B) (Baseline Date) (2)(b), 509(B) (Net Emission Increase) (4), 509(D), and 509(P)(4) as amended on July 20, 1990.
(ii) Additional material.—None.
(58) Louisiana Air Quality Regulation section 6.6 as revised and adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on February 26, 1981, submitted by the Governor on March 25, 1981, and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency on June 9, 1982.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana Air Quality Regulation section 6.6 as revised and adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on February 26, 1981, submitted by the Governor on March 25, 1981, and approved by the Environmental Protection Agency on June 9, 1982.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated March 24, 1981, from the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources to the Governor of Louisiana acknowledging approval of Louisiana Air Quality Regulation section 6.6 by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission effective on February 26, 1981.
(59) A revision to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) to include revisions to LAC, Title 33, “Environmental Quality,” Part III. Air, Chapter 15. Emission Standards for Sulfur Dioxide, effective April 20, 1992, and submitted by the Governor by cover letter dated August 5, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, “Environmental Quality,” Part III. Air, Chapter 15. Emission Standards for Sulfur Dioxide, Section 1501, “Degradation of Existing Emission Quality Restricted;” Section 1503, “Emission Limitations;” Table 4, “Emissions—Methods of Contaminant Measurement;” Section 1505, “Variances;” Section 1507, “Exceptions;” Section 1509, “Reduced Sulfur Compounds (New and Existing Sources);” Section 1511, “Continuous Emissions Monitoring;” and Section 1513, “Recordkeeping and Reporting,” effective April 20, 1992.
(60) A revision to the Louisiana State Implementation plan (SIP) to include revisions to Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC), Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 1, Chapter 21, and Chapter 61 as submitted by the Governor on June 13, 1990, October 26, 1990, May 24, 1991, and March 24, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21 (December 1987). Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, except section 2105. Storage of Volatile Organic Components (Small Tanks).
(B) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 1. General Provisions, section 111. Definitions—Administrator, Administrative Authority*, Attainment Areas, Nonattainment Areas, SIP, Volatile Organic Compound, and Chapter 21. Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General, section 2103. Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds paragraphs A., C., D.1., D.1.a. through D.1.d., D.2., D.2.a., D.2.b., D.3., E., F., H.1., H.2., I. effective January 20, 1990.
(C) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21. Control of Emission of Organic Compounds Subchapter A. General, section 2107. Volatile Organic Compounds-Loading, section 2109. Oil/Water-Separation, paragraphs A.1. through A.4., B. through D., section 2113. Housekeeping, paragraphs A.1 through A.3., A.5., section 2117. Exemptions, section 2119. Variances B., and Subchapter D. Cutback Paving Asphalt section 2127. Cutback Paving Asphalt, paragraphs A., B., C.1., C.2., C.3., D., D.1., D.1.b., D.1.c., D.1.d., and D.2., effective February 20, 1990.
(D) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21. Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, Subchapter B. Organic Solvents, section 2123. Organic Solvents, paragraphs C., C.1. through C.5., C.7. through C.9., effective February 20, 1990.
(E) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21. Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, Subchapter F. Gasoline Handling, section 2131. Filling of Gasoline Storage Vessels, paragraphs A., B., B.1., B.3., D., D.1., D.4., D.5., E., F., and G., section 2133. Gasoline Bulk Plants paragraphs A., A.1., A.3. through A.6., B., B.3., B.4., C. and D., section 2135. Bulk Gasoline Terminals paragraphs A., B., B.1.a., B.1.a.i., B.1.a.iii., B.1.d., B.2. through B.5., and C. through E., E.1. through E.4., and section 2137. Gasoline Terminal Vapor-Tight Control Procedure. effective July 20, 1990.
(F) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21. Control of Emission of Organic Compounds Subchapter A. General, section 2101. Compliance Schedules, section 2115. Waste Gas Disposal paragraphs A., B., C., D., F., G., H., I.1. through I.5., J. through K., section 2121. Fugitive Emission Control paragraphs B., B.1, B.2., C., C.1.b., C.1.b.i., C.1.b.ii., C.1.b.iii., C.1.c, C.2., C.2.b., C.2.b.i., C.4., C.4.c., C.4.d., C.5. and G., Subchapter C. Vapor Degreasers, section 2125. Vapor Degreasers paragraphs A., A.1., A.2., A.2.i. through A.2.m., A.3., A.3.a. through A.3.d., B., B.1., B.7., B.8., C., C.1., C.1.a. through C.1.c., C.1.i., C.1.j., and D. through G., Subchapter E. Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems, section 2129. Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems paragraphs A., A.1., A.2., A.2.a. through A.2.c., C., and D., Subchapter H. Graphic Arts, section 2143. Graphic Arts (Printing) by Rotogravure and Flexographic Processes paragraphs A., A.1., A.3., A.5., B., C. and D., Subchapter I. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Facilities, section 2145. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Facilities, paragraphs A., A.1., A.1.c., and E. through G. effective November 20, 1990.
(G) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds Subchapter A. General, section 2103. Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds paragraphs B.,D., D.2.c. through D.2.e., G., H.3., I.2.c., I.4. and I.5., section 2107. Volatile Organic Compounds-Loading paragraphs D.3. and D.4., section 2109. Oil/Water Separation paragraphs A., B.4., and B.5., section 2111. Pumps and Compressors, section 2113. Housekeeping paragraph A.4., section 2119. Variances paragraph A.; Subchapter D. Cutback Paving Asphalt, section 2127. Cutback Paving Asphalt paragraphs C. and D.1.a. effective April 20, 1991.
(H) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 21. Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, section 2115. Waste Gas Disposal paragraphs I., K., and K.4., section 2121. Fugitive Emission Control paragraphs A., C.1., C.1.b.iv. through C.1.b.vi., C.4.a., C.4.b., C.4.h., D., D.1., D.1.b. through D.1.f., and D.2., section 2123. Organic Solvents paragraphs A., A.1. through A.3., B., B.1., B.1.a. through B.1.c., C.11., D., D.1. through D.9., E., E.1. through E.7., F., and F.1. through F.4., Subchapter F. Gasoline Handling, section 2131. Filling of Gasoline Storage Vessels paragraphs D.2. and D.3., section 2135. Bulk Gasoline Terminals paragraph E.5., Subchapter G-Petroleum Refinery Operations, section 2139. Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems paragraphs A. and B. and section 2141. Refinery Process Unit Turnarounds effective July 20, 1991.
(I) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air, Chapter 61. Division's Sources Test Manual, Subchapter A. Method 43-Capture Efficiency Test Procedures section 6121 through section 6131 effective July 20, 1991.
(J) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air Chapter 1. General Provisions, section 111. Definitions-Coating, Department, Distance from Source to Property Line, Exceedance, Hydrocarbon, Leak, Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coating, Nonattainment Area, Ozone Exceedance, SIP effective August 20, 1991.
(61) A revision to the Louisiana SIP to include revisions to LAC, Title 33, “Environmental Quality,” Part III. Air, Chapter 21, Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, Section 2132—Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems for Control of Vehicle Refuelling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities effective November 20, 1992, and submitted by the Governor by cover letter dated November 10, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, “Environmental Quality,” Part III. Air, Chapter 21, Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, Section 2132—Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems for Control of Vehicle Refuelling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, effective November 20, 1992; and Chapter 65, Section 6523—Fee Schedule Listing, effective November 20, 1992.
(ii) Additional materials. (A) November 15, 1993, narrative plan addressing: Legal authority, control strategy, compliance schedules, air quality surveillance, public notice, determination of regulated universe, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality recordkeeping, facility recordkeeping, annual in-use above ground inspections, program penalties, training, and benefits.
(62) Alternative emission reduction (bubble) plan for the Dow Chemical facility located in Plaquemine, Iberville Parish, as adopted by the Louisiana Environmental Control Commission on July 28, 1983, submitted by the Governor on October 19, 1983, and amended by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality with permit number 1838T(M-2) issued on October 16, 1991.
(ii) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Permit number 1838T(M-2) as issued by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality on October 16, 1991.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated September 17, 1991, from the Administrator of the Office of Air Quality at the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality to the Chief of the Planning Section at the Air Programs Branch of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region 6, furnishing State assurances.
(63) The State is required to implement a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program (PROGRAM) as specified in the plan revision submitted by the Governor on October 22, 1992. This plan submittal, as adopted by the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) on October 22, 1992, was developed in accordance with section 507 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Enrolled House Bill No. 1319 (Act 1037, Regular Session, 1992), signed into law by the Governor on July 13, 1992, and effective upon signature, enacting Louisiana Revised Statutes (R.S.) 30:2061 and 2062 and R.S. 36:239(H). Included in Act 1037 are provisions establishing a small business stationary source compliance assistance program; creating the State Ombudsman Office for small business; creating a Compliance Advisory Panel (CAP); establishing membership of the CAP; and establishing CAP powers, duties, and functions.
(B) Louisiana R.S. 30:2060N.(6), “Toxic air pollutant emission control program”, (the small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program subsection), as in effect on October 22, 1992.
(C) State of Louisiana Executive Order No. EWE 92-4 dated February 10, 1992, and effective upon signature, creating and establishing an Office of Permits within the Executive Department, Office of the Governor.
(D) Letter from Louisiana Governor Edwards to Mr. Kai Midboe, Secretary, LDEQ, dated February 20, 1992, designating the Governor's Office of Permits as the official State office to serve as Ombudsman for the PROGRAM per the mandate of section 507 of the Federal CAA. The Coordinator of the Office of Permits will be responsible for administering the Small Business Ombudsman portion of the PROGRAM.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Narrative SIP Revision entitled, “Louisiana SIP, Concerning CAA Amendments of 1990, Section 507, Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance (Program); November 15, 1992.”
(B) “State of Louisiana Memorandum of Understanding Between the Governor's Office of Permits and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality”, signed (and effective) on April 7, 1992, by Mr. Kai David Midboe, Secretary, LDEQ, and Ms. Martha A. Madden, Coordinator, Governor's Office of Permits.
(C) Legal opinion letter dated October 22, 1992, from James B. Thompson, III, Assistant Secretary for Legal Affairs and Enforcement, LDEQ, to Mr. B. J. Wynne, Regional Administrator, EPA Region VI, regarding “Appointment to Small Business Advisory Panel”.
(64) Revisions to the Louisiana SIP addressing VOC RACT catch-up requirements were submitted by the Governor of Louisiana by letters dated December 21, 1992, and April 14, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2103. Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds, paragraphs G., I., I.4.; section 2109. Oil/Water Separation, paragraph B.4.; Subchapter B. Organic Solvents; section 2123. Organic Solvents, paragraph D.6.; Subchapter C. Vapor Degreasers; section 2125. Vapor Degreasers, paragraph D.; Subchapter F. Gasoline Handling; section 2131. Filling of Gasoline Storage Vessels, paragraphs D., D.1., D.3., G.; section 2135. Bulk Gasoline Terminals, paragraph A.; Subchapter H. Graphic Arts; section 2143. Graphic Arts (Printing) by Rotogravure and Flexographic Processes, paragraph B, as adopted by LDEQ on October 20, 1992.
(B) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2115. Waste Gas Disposal, introductory paragraph, paragraphs H., H.1., H.1.a through H.1.d, H.2, H.2.a, H.2.b, H.3, L., as adopted by LDEQ on March 20, 1993.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letters dated November 10, 1992 and December 21, 1992, signed by Edwin Edwards, Governor of Louisiana.
(B) Letter dated April 14, 1993, signed by Edwin Edwards, Governor of Louisiana.
(C) Letter of negative declaration dated March 29, 1994, signed by Gustave Von Boduungen, P.E., Assistant Secretary, LDEQ.
(65) Revisions to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Regulation Title 33, Part III, Chapter 9, Section 919, (February 2, 1993), and a technical correction (October 20, 1994). These revisions are for the purpose of implementing an emission statement program for stationary sources within the ozone nonattainment areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to LAC, title 33, Part III, Chapter 9, General Regulations on Control of Emissions and Emissions Standards, Section 919, Emission Inventory, adopted in the Louisiana Register, Vol. 19, No. 2, 184-186, February 20, 1993. All subsections except B.2.a. and B.2.d.
(B) Revisions to LAC, title 33, Part III, Chapter 9, General Regulations on Control of Emissions and Emissions standards, Section 919, Emission Inventory, adopted in the Louisiana Register, Vol 20, No. 10, 1102, October 20, 1994. Subsections B.2.a. and B.2.d.
(66) Revisions to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Regulation Title 33, Part III, Chapter 2, Section 223 and Chapter 19, Sections 1951-1973. These revisions are for the purpose of implementing a Clean Fuel Fleet Program to satisfy the Federal requirements for a Clean Fuel Fleet Program to be part of the SIP for Louisiana.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revision to LAC, Title 33, Part III, Chapter 2, Rules and Regulations for the Fee System of the Air Quality Control Programs, Section 223, Fee Schedule Listing, adopted in the Louisiana Register, Vol. 20, No. 11, 1263, November 20, 1994.
(B) Revision to LAC, Title 33, Part III, Chapter 19, Mobile Sources, Subchapter B, Clean Fuel Fleet Program, Sections 1951-1973, adopted in the Louisiana Register, Vol. 20, No. 11, 1263-1268, November 20, 1994.
(67) A revision to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan for General Conformity: LAC 33:III. CHAPTER 14. SUBCHAPTER A “Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plan” as adopted by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Secretary and published in the Louisiana Register, Vol. 20, No. 11, 1268, November 20, 1994, was submitted by the Governor on November 10, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana General Conformity: LAC 33:III. CHAPTER 14. SUBCHAPTER A “Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plan” as adopted by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Secretary and published in the Louisiana Register, Vol. 20, No. 11, 1268, November 20, 1994.
(68) A revision to the Louisiana SIP addressing the nonattainment NSR program for Louisiana was submitted by the Governor of Louisiana on March 3, 1993, and November 15, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revision to LAC, Title 33, Part III. Air, Chapter 5. Permit Procedures, by the addition of Section 504. Nonattainment New Source Review Procedures, as promulgated in the Louisiana Register, Volume 19, Number 2, 176-183, February 20, 1993; effective February 20, 1993, and submitted by the Governor on March 3, 1993.
(B) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Part III. Air, Chapter 5. Permit Procedures, Section 504. Nonattainment New Source Review Procedures, Subsections: A., Applicability, Paragraphs A(1), A(2), A(3), A(4); D., Nonattainment New Source Requirements, Paragraph D(4); Delete G., Permit Procedures, Public Participation and Notification; Reletter H., Definitions, to G., and revise definitions for Major Modification (paragraphs: a., c.iii, c.iv, c.v.(a)(b), c.vi, c.vii), Major Stationary Source (paragraphs: a., d.i); Delete Table 1; Renumber Table 2, Major Stationary Source/Major Modification Emission Thresholds, to Table 1, and revise Footnote 1., as promulgated in the Louisiana Register, Volume 19, Number 11, 1420-1421, November 20, 1993; effective November 20, 1993, and submitted by the Governor on November 4, 1993.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated January 7, 1994, signed by the Governor of Louisiana, which clarifies that section 504 is to be reviewed under the SIP program.
(69) The Governor of Louisiana submitted revisions to Regulation Louisiana Administrative Code on March 22, 1995 to incorporate changes in the Federal PSD permitting regulations for PM-10 increments.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to Regulation Louisiana Administrative Code 33:III.Chapter 5, Section 509, effective February 20, 1995: Section B. Definitions: Baseline Date; Section B. Definitions: Net Emissions Increase; Section D. Ambient Air Increments; Section I.8.a.; Section K.2.; and Section P.4.
(70) The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality submitted a redesignation request and maintenance plan for Pointe Coupee Parish on December 20, 1995. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act as amended in 1990. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for Pointe Coupee Parish. The EPA therefore approved the request for redesignation to attainment with respect to ozone for Pointe Coupee Parish on December 20, 1996.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Letter dated August 31, 1995, from Mr. Gustave Von Bodungen, P.E., Assistant Secretary, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, transmitting a copy of the Pointe Coupee Parish maintenance plan for the EPA's approval.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter dated August 28, 1995, from Governor Edwin E. Edwards of Louisiana to Ms. Jane Saginaw, Regional Administrator, requesting the reclassification and redesignation of Pointe Coupee Parish to attainment for ozone.
(B) The ten year ozone maintenance plan, including emissions projections and contingency measures, submitted to EPA as part of the Pointe Coupee Parish redesignation request on December 20, 1995.
(71) A revision to the Louisiana SIP addressing the 15 percent rate-of-progress requirements was submitted by the Governor of Louisiana by cover letter dated December 15, 1995. This revision, submitted to satisfy the requirements of section 182(b) of the Clean Air Act (Act), will aid in ensuring that reasonable further progress is made towards attaining the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2108. Marine Vapor Recovery, paragraphs B.1., B.2., B.3., B.3.a. through B.3.d., B.4.a., B.4.b., B.5., B.6., D.1.a., D.1.a.i., D.1.a.ii., D.1.b., D.2., D.3., D.4.a., D.4.b., D.4.c., D.4.c.i., D.4.c.ii., D.4.d., D.4.e., D.4.e.i., D.4.e.ii., D.4.f., D.4.g., E.2., E.2.a. through E.2.c., F.1., F.2., F.3., G.1., G.2., as adopted by LDEQ on October 20, 1988.
(B) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2108. Marine Vapor Recovery, paragraphs A., B. Definitions-Barge, Crude Oil, Gasoline, Ship, C., C.1., C.2., C.3., C.3.a. through C.3.d. (note: paragraphs B.1., B.2., B.3., and B.3.a. through B.3.d., as adopted on October 20, 1988, were moved to C.1., C.2., C.3., and C.3.a. through C.3.d. without repromulgating), C.4., C.4.a., C.4.b., C.5., C.6. (note: paragraphs B.4.a., B.4.b., B.5., and B.6., as adopted on October 20, 1988, were moved to C.4.a., C.4.b., C.5., and C.6. without repromulgating), D.1., D.1.a. through D.1.c., D.2., D.2.a. through D.2.c., D.3., E., E.1., E.1.a., E.1.a.i., E.1.a.ii., E.1.b., E.2., E.3. (note: D.1.a., D.1.a.i., D.1.a.ii., D.1.b., D.2., and D.3., as adopted October 20, 1988, were moved to E.1.a., E.1.a.i., E.1.a.ii., E.1.b., E.2., and E.3. without repromulgating), E.4., E.4.a., E.4.b., E.4.c., E.4.c.i., E.4.c.ii., E.4.d., E.4.e., E.4.e.i., E.4.e.ii., E.4.f., E.4.g. (note: D.4.a., D.4.b., D.4.c., D.4.c.i., D.4.c.ii., D.4.d., D.4.e., D.4.e.i., D.4.e.ii., D.4.f., and D.4.g, as adopted on October 20, 1988, were moved to E.4.a., E.4.b., E.4.c., E.4.c.i., E.4.c.ii., E.4.d., E.4.e., E.4.e.i., E.4.e.ii., E.4.f., and E.4.g. without repromulgating), E.5., F., F.1., F.2., F.2.a. through F.2.e. (note: E.2. and E.2.a. through E.2.c., as adopted on October 20, 1988, were moved to F.2. and F.2.a through F.2.c. without repromulgating), G., G.1., G.2., G.3. (note: F.1., F.2., and F.3., as adopted October 20, 1988, were moved to G.1., G.2., and G.3. without repromulgating), H., H.1., H.2. (note: G.1. and G.2., as adopted on October 20, 1988, were moved to H.1. and H.2. without repromulgating), as adopted by LDEQ on November 20, 1990.
(C) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2122. Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas, paragraphs A., A.1. through A.5., A.6., A.6.a. through A.6.d., B. Definitions-Connector, Good Performance Level, Heavy Liquid Service, Inaccessible Valve/Connector, In Vacuum Service, Light Liquid, Light Liquid Service, Liquid Service, Process Unit, Process Unit Shutdown, Unrepairable Component, C., C.1., C.1.a. through C.1.c., C.2. through C.5., D., D.1., D.1.a., D.1.a.i., D.1.a.ii., D.1.b., D.1.b.i. through D.1.b.v., D.1.c. through D.1.e., D.2., D.2.a., D.2.b., D.2.b.i. through D.2.b.iii., D.3., D.3.a. through D.3.d., D.4., D.4.a. through D.4.k., D.5., E.1.a. through E.1.f., E.2., E.3., E.3.a., E.3.a.i. through E.3.a.v., E.3.b., E.3.b.i. through E.3.b.v., F., F.1., F.2., F.2.a. through F.2.j., F.3., G., G.1. through G.13., as adopted by LDEQ on October 20, 1994.
(D) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2122. Fugitive Emission Control for Ozone Nonattainment Areas, paragraphs E., E.1., E.1.g., as adopted by LDEQ on November 20, 1994.
(E) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2103. Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds, paragraphs A., B., D.1., D.1.a. through D.1.d., D.2., D.2.a. through D.2.e., E., F., G., G.1. through G.4., H., H.1., H.2., H.2.a. through H.2.e., H.3., I., I.1., I.2., I.2.a. through I.2.c., I.3. through I.5., as adopted by LDEQ on December 20, 1994.
(F) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air;
Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2103. Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds, paragraphs C., D., D.3., as adopted by LDEQ on November 20, 1995.
(G) Revisions to LAC, Title 33, Environmental Quality, Part III. Air; Chapter 21. Control of Emissions of Organic Compounds, Subchapter A. General; section 2103. Storage of Volatile Organic Compounds, paragraph D.4., as adopted by LDEQ on December 20, 1995.
(H) Reasonable Further Progress Agreed To Order, dated December 16, 1994, issued by the Assistant Secretary of the State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality in the matter of BASF Corporation, Geismar, Louisiana.
(I) Reasonable Further Progress Agreed To Order, dated August 22, 1994, issued by the Assistant Secretary of the State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality in the matter of CosMar Company, Inc., Carville, Louisiana.
(J) Reasonable Further Progress Agreed To Order, dated September 26, 1994, issued by the Assistant Secretary of the State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality in the matter of Shell Chemical Company, Geismar, Louisiana.
(K) Reasonable Further Progress Agreed To Order, dated September 8, 1994, issued by the Assistant Secretary of the State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality in the matter of Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc., Geismar, Louisiana.
(L) Reasonable Further Progress Agreed To Order, dated September 8, 1994, issued by the Assistant Secretary of the State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality in the matter of Vulcan Chemicals, Geismar, Louisiana.
(M) SIP narrative plan entitled, “Revision to the 15% Rate of Progress Plan and 1990 Emissions Inventory,” dated December 28, 1995, page 11, Section 2.2, 1996 Target Level Emissions, first paragraph; page 23, Section 5, Table 2—Reductions in Plan; page 173, Appendix G, table—Reductions from Industrial Sources through 1996 Used for the 15% Requirement, which ends on page 174.
(ii) Additional materials. (A) SIP narrative plan entitled, “Revision to 15% Rate of Progress Plan and 1990 Emissions Inventory,” submitted by the Governor of Louisiana on December 15, 1995, except Section 6. Contingency Measures Documentation, Appendix M. Contingency Reductions Documentation, and Appendix N. Banking Regulations.
(B) Letter dated May 3, 1996, from Gustave Von Bodungen, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, to Thomas Diggs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, transmitting supplemental documentation for the 15 Percent Rate of Progress Plan.
(72) Revisions to the Louisiana SIP addressing VOC RACT Negative Declarations. The Governor of Louisiana submitted the negative declarations for reasonably available control technology (RACT) for the Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area on December 15, 1996. Section 172(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act requires nonattainment areas to adopt, at a minimum, RACT to reduce emissions from existing sources. Pursuant to section 182(b)(2) of the Act, for moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas, the EPA has identified 13 categories for such sources and developed the Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs) or Alternate Control Techniques (ACTs) documents to implement RACT at those sources. When no major volatile organic compound (VOC) sources for a CTG/ACT category exist in a nonattainment area, a State may submit a negative declaration for that category. Louisiana's submittal included two negative declaration letters from Mr. Gustave Von Bodungen to Ms. Karen Alvarez dated April 6, 1994, and June 20, 1994, for the following source categories: offset lithography, plastic parts-business machines, plastic parts-others, wood furniture, aerospace coatings, autobody refinishing, and shipbuilding coatings/repair. This submittal satisfies section 182(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 for these particular CTG/ACT source categories for the Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The letter dated December 15, 1995, from the Governor of Louisiana to the Regional Administrator, submitting a revision to the Louisiana SIP for VOC RACT rules, which included VOC RACT negative declarations.
(ii) Additional material. (A) The negative declaration letter dated April 16, 1994, from Mr. Gustave Von Bodungen to Ms. Karen Alvarez.
(B) The negative declaration letter dated June 20, 1994, from Mr. Gustave Von Bodungen to Ms. Karen Alvarez.
(73) The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality submitted a redesignation request and maintenance plan for Calcasieu Parish on December 20, 1995. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Act as a revision to the Louisiana ozone State Implementation Plan for Calcasieu Parish. The EPA therefore approved the request for redesignation to attainment with respect to ozone for Calcasieu Parish on June 2, 1997.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Letter dated December 20, 1995, from Governor Edwin E. Edwards of Louisiana to Ms. Jane Saginaw, Regional Administrator, transmitting a copy of the Calcasieu Parish maintenance plan and requesting the redesignation of Calcasieu Parish to attainment for ozone.
(ii) Additional material.The ten year ozone maintenance plan, including emissions projections and contingency measures, submitted to EPA as part of the Calcasieu Parish redesignation request on December 20, 1995.
(74) Revisions to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Regulation Title 33, Part III, Chapter 21, Control of Emission of Organic Compounds, submitted by the Governor on December 15, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) LAC, Title 33, Part III, Chapter 21, Section 2147, Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry, adopted in the Louisiana Register on April 20, 1995 (LR 21:380).
(B) LAC, Title 33, Part III, Chapter 21, Section 2149, Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Batch Processing, adopted in the Louisiana Register on April 20, 1995 (LR 21:387).
(C) LAC, Title 33, Part III, Chapter 21, Section 2151, Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Cleanup Solvent Processing, adopted in the Louisiana Register on April 20, 1995 (LR 21:391).
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter of negative declaration for wood furniture dated January 21, 1997, from the State of Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality.
(75) A revision to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan for General Conformity: LAC 33:III. Chapter 14. Subchapter A “Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plan,” Section 1405.B as adopted by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Secretary and published in the Louisiana Register, Vol. 23, No. 6, 720, June 20, 1997, was submitted by the Governor on September 8, 1997.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Louisiana General Conformity: LAC 33:III. Chapter 14. Subchapter A “Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plan”, Section 1405.B as adopted by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Secretary and published in the Louisiana Register, Vol. 23, No. 6, 720, June 20, 1997.
(76) [Reserved]
(77) Revisions to the Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 33, Part III, Chapter 21, Section 2149 (LAC 33:III.2149), “Limiting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Batch Processing,” submitted by the Governor on March 23, 1998.
(i) Incorporation by reference. LAC 33:III Chapter 21, revised paragraph 2149.A.2.b; paragraphs 2149.C.2.a, b, and c become paragraphs 2149.C.2.d, e, and f respectively; and add new paragraphs 2149.C.2.a, b, and c, as adopted in the Louisiana Register on November 20, 1997 (LR 23:1507).
(ii) Additional material.None.
(78) [Reserved]
(79) Site-specific revision to the 15% Rate-of-Progress plan submitted by the Governor in a letter dated December 20, 1997. The revision provides for a schedule extension for installation of guide pole sliding cover gaskets on 33 external floating roof tanks located at the Baton Rouge refinery of Exxon Company U.S.A.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Letters dated July 17, 1997, and September 12, 1997, from the LDEQ to Exxon Company U.S.A. approving the compliance date extension; which are included in the State Implementation Plan submittal entitled, “Summary of 15% Rate-of-Progress State Implementation Plan Revision,” dated December 20, 1997.
(ii) Additional material. (A) Letter from the Governor of Louisiana dated December 20, 1997, transmitting a copy of the State Implementation Plan revision.
(B) Letters dated November 13, 1996; May 14, 1997; and July 3, 1997; from Exxon Company U.S.A. to the LDEQ requesting the compliance date extension and including a list of the subject tanks, the date of the next maintenance downtime, and emissions estimates for the tanks; which are included in the State Implementation Plan submittal entitled, “Summary of 15% Rate-of-Progress State Implementation Plan Revision,” dated December 20, 1997.
[37 FR 10869, May 31, 1972]
§§ 52.1000-52.1018 [Reserved]
Subpart U—Maine
§ 52.1019 Identification of plan—conditional approval.
(a) 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS: The SIP submitted September 10, 2008, with a supplement submitted on June 1, 2011, was previously conditionally approved (see Final Rule published October 16, 2012; 77 FR 63228) for Clean Air Act (CAA) elements 110(a)(2)(A), (C) only as it relates to the PSD program, (D)(i)(II) only as it relates to the PSD program, (D)(ii), (E)(ii), and (J) only as it relates to the PSD program. This conditional approval is contingent upon Maine taking actions to meet requirements of these elements within one year of conditional approval, as committed to in letters from the state to EPA Region 1 dated June 13, 2012, and June 30, 2012. EPA approved a submittal, related to the Conflict of Interest requirements, and converted the conditional approval of elements 110(a)(2)(A) and E(ii) on May 13, 2021; and
(b) 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS: The SIP submitted July 27, 2009, with a supplement submitted on June 1, 2011, was previously conditionally approved (see Final Rule published October 16, 2012; 77 FR 63228) for CAA elements 110(a)(2)(A), (C) only as it relates to the PSD program, (D)(i)(II) only as it relates to the PSD program, (D)(ii), (E)(ii), and (J) only as it relates to the PSD program. This conditional approval is contingent upon Maine taking actions to meet requirements of these elements within one year of conditional approval, as committed to in letters from the state to EPA Region 1 dated June 13, 2012, and June 30, 2012. EPA approved a submittal, related to the Conflict of Interest requirements, and converted the conditional approval of elements 110(a)(2)(A) and E(ii) on May 13, 2021.
(c)-(g) [Reserved]
[86 FR 26182, May 13, 2021]
§ 52.1020 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan for Maine under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410 and 40 CFR part 51 to meet national ambient air quality standards or other requirements under the Clean Air Act.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to September 1, 2008, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as submitted by the state to EPA, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries for paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with EPA approval dates after September 1, 2008, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 1 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the State Implementation Plan as of September 1, 2008.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square—Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109-3912; Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). If you wish to obtain materials from a docket in the EPA Headquarters Library, please call the Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) Docket/Telephone number (202) 566-1742. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(c) EPA approved regulations.
| State citation | Title/Subject | State effective date |
EPA Approval Date EPA approval date and citation 1 |
Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chapter 1 | Regulations for the Processing of Applications | 5/20/1985 | 3/23/1993, 58 FR 15422 | Portions of Chapter 1. EPA did not approve the following sections of Chapter One: Section 1(A) through 1(Q), and 1(U) through 1(EE); Section 2; Section 4 (C) and (D); last sentence of Section 5(B); last sentence of Section 6(B); Section 6(D); Section 7(B)(1), (B)(2), and (B)(4) through (B)(11); Section 8(A), and 8(E) through 8(L); Sections 9, 10 and 11; Section 13; and Sections 15 and 16. |
| Chapter 100 | Definitions | 2/9/2021 | 11/4/2021, 86 FR 60775 | Amend the definition of Ozone Transport Region. |
| Chapter 101 | Visible Emissions | 10/10/1979 | 2/17/1982, 47 FR 6829 | |
| Chapter 102 | Open Burning | 3/17/2005 | 2/21/2008, 73 FR 9459 | |
| Chapter 103 | Fuel Burning Equipment Particular Emission Standard | 1/24/1983 | 2/26/1985, 50 FR 7770 | |
| Chapter 104 | Incinerator Particulate Emission Standard | 1/31/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| Chapter 105 | General Process Source Particulate Emission Standard | 1/31/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| Chapter 106 | Low Sulfur Fuel Regulations | 2/8/1978 | 1/8/1982, 47 FR 947 | |
| Chapter 107 | Sulfur Dioxide Emission Standards for Sulfate Pulp Mills | 1/31/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10842 | |
| Chapter 109 | Emergency Episode Regulation | 8/14/1991 | 1/12/1995, 60 FR 2885 | |
| Chapter 110 | Ambient Air Quality Standards | 3/27/2019 | 5/13/2021, 86 FR 26181 | This submittal converts to full approval pre-existing conditional approvals for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A) for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 standards. |
| Chapter 111 | Petroleum Liquid Storage Vapor Control | 9/29/1999 | 11/5/2014, 79 FR 65589 | |
| Chapter 112 | Bulk Terminal Petroleum Liquid Transfer Requirements | 2/22/1998 | 11/5/2014, 79 FR 65589 | |
| Chapter 113 | Growth Offset Regulation | 1/14/2019 | 11/4/2021, 86 FR 60775 | Revisions to Sections 1 and 2 of the previously approved rule. |
| Chapter 114 | Classification of Air Quality Control Regions | 8/29/2012 | 6/24/2014, 79 FR 35698 | |
| Chapter 115 | Emission License Regulation | 11/6/2012 | 8/1/2016, 81 FR 50357 | |
| Chapter 116 | Prohibited Dispersion Techniques | 10/25/1989 | 3/23/1993, 58 FR 15422 | |
| Chapter 117 | Source Surveillance | 8/9/1988 | 3/21/1989, 54 FR 11524 | |
| Chapter 118 | Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control | 1/1/2012 | 7/14/2017, 82 FR 32480 | Includes decommissioning of Stage II vapor recovery systems. |
| Chapter 119 | Motor Vehicle Fuel Volatility Limit | 7/15/2015 | 6/2/2021, 86 FR 29520 | Removes references from the SIP for the requirement to sell reformulated gasoline in York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox and Lincoln counties. |
| Chapter 120 | Gasoline Tank Trucks | 6/22/1994 | 6/29/1995, 60 FR 33730 | |
| Chapter 123 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Paper, Film, and Foil Coating Operations | 5/18/2010 | 5/22/2012, 77 FR 30216. | |
| Chapter 126 | Capture Efficiency Test Procedures | 5/22/1991 | 3/22/1993, 58 FR 15281 | |
| Chapter 126 Appendix A | Capture Efficiency Test Procedures | 5/22/1991 | 3/22/1993, 58 FR 15281 | Appendix. |
| Chapter 127 and Appendix A | New Motor Vehicle Emission Standards | 5/19/2015 | 9/7/2017, 82 FR 42233 | Includes LEV II GHG and ZEV provisions, and Advanced Clean Cars program (LEV III, updated GHG and ZEV standards). |
| Chapter 129 | Surface Coating Facilities | 7/7/2015 | 5/26/2016, 81 FR 33397 | Added requirements for metal parts and plastic parts coating operations. |
| Chapter 129 Appendix A | Surface Coating Facilities | 1/6/1993 | 6/17/1994, 59 FR 31154 | Appendix. |
| Chapter 130 | Solvent Cleaners | 6/17/2004 | 5/26/2005, 70 FR 30367 | |
| Chapter 131 | Cutback Asphalt and Emulsified Asphalt | 9/15/2009 | 5/22/2012, 77 FR 30216. | |
| Chapter 132 | Graphic Arts: Rotogravure and Flexography | 1/6/1993 | 6/17/1994, 59 FR 31154 | |
| Chapter 132 Appendix A | Graphic Arts: Rotogravure and Flexography | 1/6/1993 | 6/17/1994, 59 FR 31154 | Appendix. |
| Chapter 133 | Gasoline Bulk Plants | 6/22/1994 | 6/29/1995, 60 FR 33730 | |
| Chapter 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 2/8/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | Regulations fully approved for the following counties: York, Sagadahoc, Cumberland, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox, Lincoln, Hancock, Waldo, Aroostock, Franklin, Oxford, and Piscataquis. Regulation granted a limited approval for Washington, Somerset, and Penobscot Counties. |
| Chapter 137 | Emission Statements | 11/8/2008 | 5/1/2017, 82 FR 20257 | The entire chapter is approved with the exception of HAP and greenhouse gas reporting requirements which were withdrawn from the State's SIP revision: Sections 1(C), (E), and (F); Definitions 2(A) through (F) and (I); Sections 3(B) and (C); the last sentence of Section 4(D)(5); and Appendix A and B. |
| Chapter 138 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Nitrogen Oxides | 8/3/1994 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Affects sources in York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Lincoln, and Knox counties. |
| Chapter 139 | Transportation Conformity | 9/19/2007 | 2/8/2008, 73 FR 7465 | |
| Chapter 145 | NOX Control Program | 6/21/2001 | 3/10/2005, 70 FR 11879 | |
| Chapter 148 | Emissions from Smaller-Scale Electric Generating Resources | 7/15/2004 | 5/26/2005, 70 FR 30373 | |
| Chapter 149 | General Permit Regulation for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants | 4/27/2014 | 10/9/2015, 80 FR 61118 | All of Chapter 149 is approved with the exception of the “director discretion” provisions in sections 5(A)(8), 5(A)(9)(a), and 5(A)(9)(b), and the opacity provisions in sections 5(A)(15), 5(C)(7), and 5(E), which were formally withdrawn from consideration as part of the SIP. |
| Chapter 150 | Control of Emissions from Outdoor Wood Boilers | 4/11/2010 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| Chapter 151 | Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings | 10/6/2005 | 3/17/2006, 71 FR 13767 | |
| Chapter 152 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products | 12/15/2007 | 5/22/2012, 77 FR 30216. | |
| Chapter 153 | Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing | 2/5/2004 | 5/26/2005, 70 FR 30367 | |
| Chapter 154 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Flexible Package Printing | 7/20/2010 | 11/5/2014, 79 FR 65589 | |
| Chapter 155 | Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control | 7/14/2004 | 2/7/2005, 70 FR 6352 | With the exception of the word “or” in Subsection 7C which Maine did not submit as part of the SIP revision. |
| Chapter 159 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Adhesives and Sealants | 6/2/2014 | 11/5/2014, 79 FR 65589 | |
| Chapter 161 | Graphic Arts—Offset Lithography and Letterpress Printing | 4/6/2010 | 5/22/2012, 77 FR 30216. | |
| Chapter 162 | Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials | 7/30/2013 | 5/26/2016, 81 FR 33397 | |
| Chapter 164 | General Permit Regulation for Concrete Batch Plants | 4/27/2014 | 10/9/2015, 80 FR 61118 | All of Chapter 164 is approved with the exception of the “director discretion” provisions in sections 5(C)(2), 5(C)(3)(a), and 5(C)(3)(b), and the opacity provisions in sections 5(A)(10), 5(B)(3), 5(B)(4), 5(E), 5(F)(5) and 5(G)(4), which were formally withdrawn from consideration as part of the SIP. |
| Vehicle I/M | Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance | 7/9/1998 | 1/10/2001, 66 FR 1871 | “Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection Manual,” revised in 1998, pages 1-12 through 1-14, and page 2-14, D.1.g. |
| Vehicle I/M | Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance | 7/9/1998 | 1/10/2001, 66 FR 1871 | Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance authorizing legislation effective July 9, 1998 and entitled L.D. 2223, “An Act to Reduce Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles and to Meet Requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act.” |
| 38 MRSA § 603-A sub § 2(A) | “An Act To Improve Maine's Air Quality and Reduce Regional Haze at Acadia National Park and Other Federally Designated Class I Areas” | 9/12/2009 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | Only approving Sec. 1. 38 MRSA § 603-A, sub-§ 2, (2) Prohibitions. |
| 5 MRSA Section 18 | Disqualification of Executive Employees from Participation in Certain Matters | 7/1/2003 | 6/18/2018, 83 FR 28157 | Conflict of Interest Provisions. |
| 38 MRSA Section 341-C(7) | Board Membership Conflict of Interest | 8/11/2000 | 6/18/2018, 83 FR 28157 | Conflict of Interest Provisions. |
| 38 MRSA Section 341-A(3)(D) | Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner | 6/15/2011 | 5/13/2021, 86 FR 26181 | Conflict-of-interest provisions. |
| 38 MRSA Section 341-C(2) and 341-C(8) | Board Membership qualifications and requirements and federal standards | 9/19/2019 | 5/13/2021, 86 FR 26181 | Conflict-of-interest provisions. Sections 341-C(2) and 341-C(8) are approved except 341-C(8)(A). |
| Chapter 166 | Industrial Cleaning Solvents | 8/22/2018 | 8/7/2019, 84 FR 38558 | |
| 38 M.R.S. § 585-N as amended by Public Law 2019, c. 55, § 1 | Reformulated gasoline | 11/1/2020 | 6/2/2021, 86 FR 29520 | Repeals the section of the statute which requires retailers in York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox and Lincoln counties in Maine to only sell reformulated gasoline. |
| 1 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. |
(d) EPA-approved State Source specific requirements.
| Name of source | Permit number | State effective date |
EPA approval date 2 | Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central Maine Power, W.F. Wyman Station, Cousins Island, Yarmouth, Maine | Department Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License | 1/1/1977 | 1/8/1982, 47 FR 947 | |
| Lincoln Pulp and Paper Company, Kraft Pulp Mill, (Lincoln, Maine) | Air Emission License Renewal; and New License for No. 6 Boiler | 3/9/1983 | 5/1/1985, 50 FR 18483 | |
| Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, York County, Kittery, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #4 A-452-71-F-M | 7/25/1997 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on July 25, 1997. |
| Pioneer Plastics Corporation, Androscoggin County, Auburn, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #3 A-448-71-P-A | 6/16/1997 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on June 16, 1997. |
| Champion International Corporation, Hancock County, Bucksport, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #5 A-22-71-K-A | 1/19/1996 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on January 18, 1996. |
| International Paper Company, Franklin County, Jay, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #8 A-203-71-R-A | 10/4/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on October 4, 1995. |
| International Paper Company, Franklin County, Jay, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #9 A-203-71-S-M | 12/13/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on December 13, 1995. |
| James River Corporation, Penobscot County, Old Town, Maine | Air Emission License Minor Revision/ Amendment #6 A-180-71-R-M | 12/11/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on December 8, 1995. |
| Lincoln Pulp and Paper Company, Penobscot County, Lincoln, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #8 A-177-71-J-M | 12/19/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on December 18, 1995. |
| S.D. Warren Paper Company, Cumberland County, Westbrook, Maine | Air Emission License Minor Revision/ Amendment #14 A-29-71-Z-M | 12/19/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on December 18, 1995. |
| S.D. Warren Paper Company, Somerset County, Skowhegan, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #14 A-19-71-W-M | 10/4/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on October 4, 1995. |
| S.D. Warren Paper Company, Somerset County, Skowhegan, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #15 A-19-71-Y-M | 1/10/1996 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on January 9, 1996. |
| Boise Cascade Corporation, Oxford County, Rumford, Maine | Air Emission License Amendment #11 A-214-71-X-A | 12/21/1995 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | VOC RACT Determination issued by ME DEP on December 20, 1995. |
| Bath Iron Works Corporation, Sagadahoc County, Bath, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #10 A-333-71-M-M | 4/11/2001 | 5/20/2002, 67 FR 35439 | VOC RACT determination for Bath Iron Works. |
| United Technologies Pratt & Whitney, York County, North Berwick, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #6 A-453-71-N-M | 4/26/2001 | 5/20/2002, 67 FR 35439 | VOC RACT determination for Pratt & Whitney. |
| United Technologies Pratt & Whitney, York County, North Berwick, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #7 A-453-71-O-M | 7/2/2001 | 5/20/2002, 67 FR 35439 | VOC RACT determination for Pratt & Whitney. |
| Central Maine Power Company, W.F. Wyman Station, Cumberland County, Yarmouth, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #1 A-388-71-C-A | 5/18/1995 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-388-71-C-A, Amendment #1, condition (q) for FPL Energy's (formerly Central Maine Power) W.F. Wyman Station. |
| Central Maine Power Company, W.F. Wyman Station, Cumberland County, Yarmouth, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #1 A-388-71-D-M | 2/16/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-388-71-D-M, amendment #1, conditions 19 and 23 for FPL Energy's (formerly Central Maine Power) W.F. Wyman Station. |
| Tree Free Fiber Company, LLC, Kennebec County, Augusta, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #1 A-195-71-G-M | 6/12/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-195-71-G-M, Amendment #1, for Tree Free Fiber Company, LLC, (formerly Statler Industries Inc.). |
| Tree Free Fiber Company, LLC, Kennebec County, Augusta, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #1 A-195-71-D-A/R | 6/16/1995 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-195-71-D-A/R, section (II)(D), paragraphs (II)(F)(1) and (3), and conditions 12(A), 12(C), (13), (14) and (15) for Tree Free Fiber Company, LLC, (formerly Statler Industries Inc.). |
| Pioneer Plastics Corporation, Androscoggin County, Auburn, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License A-448-72-K-A/R | 8/23/1995 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-448-72-K-A/R, paragraphs (II)(D)(2), (II)(D)(3) and conditions (13)(f) and 14(k) for Pioneer Plastics Corporation. |
| Pioneer Plastics Corporation, Androscoggin County, Auburn, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #2 A-448-71-O-M | 3/10/1997 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-448-71-O-M, Amendment #2, condition (14)(k), for Pioneer Plastics Corporation. |
| Scott Paper Company, Kennebec County, Winslow, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #2 A-188-72-E-A | 11/15/1995 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-188-72-E-A, Amendment #2, conditions 8, paragraph 1, and 9, paragraphs 1, 2 and 4, for Scott Paper Company. |
| The Chinet Company, Kennebec County, Waterville, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License A-416-72-B-A | 1/18/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-416-72-B-A, conditions (l) 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3e, and (m) for The Chinet Company. |
| FMC Corporation-Food Ingredients Division, Knox County, Rockland, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #5 A-366-72-H-A | 2/7/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-366-72-H-A, Amendment #5, conditions 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 18 for FMC Corporation-Food Ingredients Division. |
| Dragon Products Company, Inc., Knox County, Thomaston, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #5 A-326-72-N-A | 6/5/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. |
| Dragon Products Company, Inc., Knox County, Thomaston, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #7 A-326-71-P-M | 3/5/1997 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. |
| S.D. Warren Paper Company, Cumberland County, Westbrook, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #13 A-29-71-Y-A | 6/12/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-29-71-Y-A, Amendment #13, conditions (k)2, (k)3, (q)8 and (p) for S.D. Warren Company. |
| Mid-Maine Waste Action Corporation, Androscoggin County, Auburn, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #2 A-378-72-E-A | 10/16/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. |
| Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, York County, Kittery, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #2 A-452-71-D-A | 10/21/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-452-71-D-A, Amendment #2, conditions 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. |
| Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, York County, Kittery, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #4 A-452-71-F-M | 7/25/1997 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. Air emission license A-452-71-F-M, Amendment #4, condition 4 for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. |
| Maine Energy Recovery Company, York County, Biddeford, Maine | Departmental Finding of Fact and Order Air Emission License Amendment #4 A-46-71-L-A | 11/12/1996 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Case-specific NOX RACT. |
| Katahdin Paper Company | A-406-77-3-M | 7/8/2009 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | Approving license conditions (16) A, B, G, and H. |
| Rumford Paper Company | A-214-77-9-M | 1/8/2010 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| Verso Bucksport, LLC | A-22-77-5-M | 11/2/2010 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| Woodland Pulp, LLC | A-214-77-2-M | 11/2/2010 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| FPL Energy Wyman, LLC & Wyman IV, LLC | A-388-77-2-M | 11/2/2010 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| S. D. Warren Company | A-19-77-5-M | 11/2/2010 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| Verso Androscoggin, LLC | A-203-77-11-M | 11/2/2010 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| Red Shield Environmental, LLC | A-180-77-1-A | 11/29/2007 | 4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| Reckitt Benckiser's Air Wick Air Freshener Single Phase Aerosol Spray | Alternative Control Plan | 4/23/2013 | 7/19/2017, 82 FR 33014 | Issued pursuant to Chapter 152 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products. |
| 2 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. |
(e) Nonregulatory.
| Name of non regulatory SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area |
State submittal date/effective date | EPA approved date 3 | Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact of Projected Growth for Next 10 Years on Air Quality for Maine Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas | Maine's Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas | 6/26/1974 | 4/29/1975, 40 FR 18726 | |
| Incinerator Emission Standard—Regulation Implementation Plan Change, Findings of Fact and Order | Maine | 5/21/1975 | 4/10/1978, 43 FR 14964 | Revision to incinerator particulate emission standard which would exempt wood waste cone burners from the plan until 1980. |
| Incinerator Emission Standard—Regulation and Implementation Plan Change, Findings of Fact and Order | Maine | 9/24/1975 | 4/10/1978, 43 FR 14964 | Revision to incinerator particulate emission standard which would exempt municipal waste cone burners from the plan until 1980. |
| Air Quality Surveillance | Maine | 3/10/1978 | 3/23/1979, 44 FR 17674 | Revision to Chapter 5 of the SIP. |
| New Sources and Modifications | Maine | 3/10/1978 | 3/23/1979, 44 FR 17674 | Revision to Chapter 6 of the SIP. |
| Review of New Sources and Modifications | Maine | 12/19/1979 | 1/30/1980, 45 FR 6784 | Revision to Chapter 6 of the SIP. |
| Revisions to State Air Implementation Plan as Required by the Federal Clean Air Act | Maine | 3/28/1979 | 2/19/1980, 45 FR 10766 | Includes Control Strategies for Particulates, Carbon Monoxide, and ozone. |
| Plan for Public Involvement in Federally Funded Air Pollution Control Activities | Maine | 5/28/1980 | 9/9/1980, 45 FR 59314 | A plan to provide for public involvement in federally funded air pollution control activities. |
| Air Quality Surveillance | Maine | 7/1/1980 | 1/22/1981, 46 FR 6941 | Revision to Chapter 5 of the SIP. |
| Attain and Maintain the NAAQS for Lead | Maine | 11/5/1980 | 8/27/1981, 46 FR 43151 | Control Strategy for Lead. Revision to Chapter 2.5. |
| Establishment of Air Quality Control Sub-Region | Metropolitan Portland Air Quality Control Region | 10/30/1975 | 1/8/1982, 47 FR 947 | Department Findings of Fact and Order—Sulfur Dioxide Control Strategy. |
| Sulfur Dioxide Control Strategy—Low Sulfur Fuel Regulation | Portland-Peninsula Air Quality Control Region | 10/30/1975 | 1/8/1982, 47 FR 947 | Department Findings of Fact and Order—Implementation Plan Revision. |
| Letter from the Maine DEP documenting the December 1990 survey conducted to satisfy the 5 percent demonstration requirement in order to justify the 3500 gallon capacity cut-off in Chapter 112 | Maine | 6/3/1991 | 2/3/1992, 57 FR 3046. | |
| Withdrawal of Air Emission Licenses for: Pioneer Plastics; Eastern Fine Paper; and S.D. Warren, Westbrook | Maine | 10/3/1990 | 2/3/1992, 57 FR 3046 | Department of Environmental Protection Letter dated December 5, 1989, withdrawing three source-specific licenses as of October 3, 1990. |
| Portions of Chapter 1 entitled “Regulations for the Processing of Applications” | Maine | 2/8/1984 | 3/23/1993, 58 FR 15422. | |
| Review of New Sources and Modifications | Maine | 11/6/1989 | 3/23/1993, 58 FR 15422 | Revision to Chapter 6 of the SIP. |
| Letter from the Maine DEP regarding implementation of BACT | Maine | 5/1/1989 | 3/23/1993, 58 FR 15422. | |
| Review of New Sources and Modifications | Maine | 11/2/1990 | 3/18/1994, 59 FR 12853 | Revision to Chapter 6 of the SIP. |
| Joint Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Among: City of Presque Isle; ME DOT and ME DEP | City of Presque Isle, Maine | 3/11/1991 | 1/12/1995, 60 FR 2885 | Part B of the MOU which the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (ME DEP) entered into with the City of Presque Isle, and the Maine Department of Transportation (ME DOT). |
| Maine State Implementation Plan to Attain the NAAQS for Particulate Matter (PM10) Presque Isle Maine | City of Presque Isle, Maine | 8/14/1991 | 1/12/1995, 60 FR 2885 | An attainment plan and demonstration which outlines Maine's control strategy for attainment of the PM10 NAAQS and implement RACM and RACT requirements for Presque Isle. |
| Memorandum of Understanding among: City of Presque Isle; ME DOT and ME DEP | City of Presque Isle, Maine | 5/25/1994 | 8/30/1995, 60 FR 45056 | Revisions to Part B of the MOU which the ME DEP entered into (and effective) on May 25, 1994, with the City of Presque Isle, and the ME DOT. |
| Maintenance Demonstration and Contingency Plan for Presque Isle | City of Presque Isle, Maine | 4/27/1994 | 8/30/1995, 60 FR 45056 | A maintenance demonstration and contingency plan which outline Main's control strategy maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS and contingency measures and provision for Presque Isle. |
| Letter from the Maine DEP dated July 7, 1994, submitting Small Business Technical Assistance Program | Maine | 7/7/1994 | 9/12/1995, 60 FR 47285 | Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection submitting a revision to the Maine SIP. |
| Revisions to the SIP for the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program | Maine Statewide | 5/12/1994 | 9/12/1995, 60 FR 47285 | Revisions to the SIP for the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program Dated July 12, 1994 and effective on May 11, 1994. |
| Corrected page number 124 of the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program SIP | Maine | 8/16/1994 | 9/12/1995, 60 FR 47285 | Letter from ME DEP dated August 16, 1994 submitting a corrected page to the July 12, 1994 SIP revision. |
| Negative Declaration for Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Distillation and Reactors Control Technique Guideline Categories | Maine Statewide | 11/15/1994 | 4/18/2000, 65 FR 20749 | Letter from ME DEP dated November 15, 1994 stating a negative declaration for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Distillation and Reactors Control Technique Guideline Categories. |
| Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection regarding Control of Motor Vehicle Pollution (Inspection and Maintenance Program) | Greater Portland Metropolitan Statistical Area | 11/19/1998 | 1/10/2001, 66 FR 1875 | Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated November 19, 1998 submitting a revision to the Maine SIP. |
| State of Maine Implementation Plan for Inspection/Maintenance dated November 11, 1998 | Greater Portland Metropolitan Statistical Area | 11/11/1998 | 1/10/2001, 66 FR 1875 | Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program. |
| Letter from the Maine DEP submitting additional technical support and an enforcement plan for Chapter 119 as an amendment to the SIP | Southern Maine | 5/29/2001 | 3/6/2002, 67 FR 10099 | Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated May 29, 2001 submitting additional technical support and an enforcement plan for Chapter 119 as an amendment to the State Implementation Plan. |
| Application for a Waiver of Federally-Preempted Gasoline Standards | Southern Maine | 5/25/2001 | 3/6/2002, 67 FR 10099 | Additional technical support. |
| Letter from the Maine DEP dated July 1, 1997, submitting case-specific NOX RACT determinations | Maine | 7/1/1997 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection submitting a revision to the Maine SIP. |
| Letter from the Maine DEP dated October 9, 1997, submitting case-specific NOX RACT determinations | Maine | 10/9/1997 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection submitting a revision to the Maine SIP. |
| Letter from the Maine DEP dated August 14, 1998, submitting case-specific NOX RACT determinations | Maine | 8/14/1998 | 9/9/2002, 67 FR 57148 | Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection submitting a revision to the Maine SIP. |
| Chapter 127 Basis Statement | Maine | 12/31/2000 | 4/28/2005, 70 FR 21959. | |
| Correspondence from Maine DEP indicating which portions of Chapter 137 should not be incorporated into the State's SIP | Maine | 6/6/2006 | 11/21/2007, 72 FR 65462 | Correspondence from David W. Wright of the Maine DEP indicating which portions of Chapter 137 Emission Statements should not be incorporated into the State's SIP. |
| State of Maine MAPA 1 form for Chapter 139 Transportation Conformity | Maine nonattainment areas, and attainment areas with a maintenance plan | 9/10/2007 | 2/08/2008, 73 FR 7465 | Certification that the Attorney General approved the Rule as to form and legality. |
| Amendment to Chapter 141 Conformity of General Federal Actions | Maine nonattainment areas, and attainment areas with a maintenance plan | 4/19/2007 | 2/20/2008, 73 FR 9203 | Maine Department of Environmental Protection amended its incorporation-by-reference within Chapter 141.2 to reflect EPA's revision to the Federal General Conformity Rule for fine particulate matter promulgated on July 17, 2006 (71 FR 40420-40427); specifically 40 CFR 51.852 Definitions and 40 CFR 51.853 Applicability. |
| State of Maine MAPA 1 form for Chapter 102 Open Burning Regulation | Maine | 1/3/2003 | 2/21/2008, 73 FR 9459 | Certification that the Attorney General approved the Rule as to form and legality. |
| Submittal to meet Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | State of Maine | 1/3/2008 | 7/8/2011, 76 FR 40258 | This action addresses the following Clean Air Act requirements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Maine Regional Haze SIP and its supplements | Statewide | 12/9/2010 supplements submitted 9/14/2011 11/9/2011 |
4/24/2012, 77 FR 24385 | |
| Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration (RACT) for the 1997 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Statewide | Submitted 8/27/2009 |
5/22/2012, 77 FR 30216. | |
| Submittal to meet Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 9/10/2008; supplement submitted 6/1/2011 |
10/16/2012, 77 FR 63228 | This submittal is approved with respect to the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2) (B), (C) (enforcement program only), (D)(i)(I), (D)(i)(II) (visibility only), (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) (consultation and public notification only), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Submittal to meet Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 7/27/2009; supplement submitted 6/1/2011 |
10/16/2012, 77 FR 63228 | This submittal is approved with respect to the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2) (B), (C) (enforcement program only), (D)(i)(I), (D)(i)(II) (visibility only), (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) (consultation and public notification only), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Negative Declarations for Large Appliance Coatings and Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings Control Technique Guidelines | Maine Statewide | 4/23/2013 | 5/26/2016, 81 FR 33397 | |
| Transport SIP for the 2008 Ozone Standard | Statewide | Submitted 10/26/2015 |
10/13/2016, 81 FR 70632 | State submitted a transport SIP for the 2008 ozone standard which shows it does not significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment or maintenance in any other state. EPA approved this submittal as meeting the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| Transport SIP for the 1997 Ozone Standard | Statewide | Submitted 4/24/2008 |
4/10/2017, 82 FR 17124 | State submitted a transport SIP for the 1997 ozone standards which shows it does not significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment or maintenance in any other state. EPA approved this submittal as meeting the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| Demonstration of Compliance with the Comparable Measures Requirement of CAA section 184(b)(2) | York, Cumberland, and Sagadahoc Counties | 4/13/2016 | 7/14/2017, 82 FR 32480 | Emission calculations and narrative associated with Stage II Decommissioning SIP revision. |
| Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report | Statewide | 2/23/2016 | 9/19/2017, 82 FR 43699 | Progress report for the first regional haze planning period ending in 2018. |
| Submittal to meet Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standard | State of Maine | 8/21/2012 | 6/18/2018, 83 FR 28157 | This action addresses the following Clean Air Act requirements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E) except for State Boards, (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Submittal to meet Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | State of Maine | 6/7/2013 | 6/18/2018, 83 FR 28157 | This action addresses the following Clean Air Act requirements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D) except for D(1), (E) except for State Boards, (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Submittal to meet Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard | State of Maine | 4/23/2013 | 6/18/2018, 83 FR 28157 | This action addresses the following Clean Air Act requirements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D) except for D(1), (E) except for State Boards, (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Interstate Transport SIP to meet Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 2/21/2018 | 8/13/2018, 83 FR 39892 | This approval addresses Prongs 1 and 2 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) only. |
| Submittals to meet Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 7/6/2016 | 10/1/2018, 83 FR 49295 | These submittals are approved with respect to the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E)(i), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), and conditionally approved with respect to (E)(ii) regarding State Boards and Conflicts of Interest. |
| Submittal to meet Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards. | State of Maine | 4/19/2017 | 4/30/2019, 84 FR 18142 | This submittal is approved with respect to the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E)(i), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), and conditionally approved with respect to E(ii) regarding State Boards and Conflicts of Interest. |
| Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for the 2008 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Statewide | Submitted 9/4/2018 | 8/7/2019, 84 FR 38558 | |
| Portland Area Second 10-Year Limited Maintenance Plans for 1997 Ozone NAAQS | Portland Area | 2/18/2020 | 10/14/2020, 85 FR 64969 | 2nd maintenance plan for 1997 ozone standard. |
| Midcoast Area Second 10-Year Limited Maintenance Plans for 1997 Ozone NAAQS | Midcoast area | 2/18/2020 | 10/14/2020, 85 FR 64969 | 2nd maintenance plan for 1997 ozone standard. |
| Submittal to meet Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Statewide | 2/14/2020 | 5/13/2021, 86 FR 26181 | This submittal is approved with respect to the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(A); (B); (C); (D), except (D)(i)(I); (E); (F); (G); (H); (J); (K); (L); and (M). |
| Conflict of Interest Statute | Statewide | Submitted
9/4/2019 |
5/13/2021, 86 FR 26181 | This submittal converts to full approval pre-existing conditional approvals for CAA section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii), regarding State Boards and Conflict of interest for the following standards: 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, 1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, and 2012 PM2.5. |
| Negative declaration for the 2016 Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry for the 2008 and 2015 ozone standards | Statewide | 5/18/2020 | 5/13/2021, 86 FR 26181 | Letter from ME DEP dated May 18, 2020, stating a negative declaration for the 2016 Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. |
| 3 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. |
[73 FR 56973, Oct. 1, 2008, as amended at 76 FR 40257, July 8, 2011; 76 FR 49671, Aug. 11, 2011; 77 FR 24390, Apr. 24, 2012; 77 FR 30217, May 22, 2012; 77 FR 63232, Oct. 16, 2012; 79 FR 35698, June 24, 2014; 79 FR 65589, Nov. 5, 2014; 80 FR 61118, Oct. 9, 2015; 80 FR 73122, Nov. 24, 2015; 81 FR 33397, May 26, 2016; 81 FR 50357, Aug. 1, 2016; 81 FR 70632, Oct. 13, 2016; 82 FR 17126, Apr. 10, 2017; 82 FR 20259, May 1, 2017; 82 FR 32482, July 14, 2017; 82 FR 33013, 33016, July 19, 2017; 82 FR 42235, Sept. 7, 2017; 82 FR 43701, Sept. 19, 2017; 83 FR 28160, June 18, 2018; 83 FR 39894, Aug. 13, 2018; 83 FR 49296, Oct. 1, 2018; 84 FR 18144, Apr. 30, 2019; 84 FR 38560, Aug. 7, 2019; 85 FR 64970, Oct. 14, 2020; 86 FR 26183, May 13, 2021; 86 FR 29522, June 2, 2021; 86 FR 60775, Nov. 4, 2021]
§ 52.1021 Classification of regions.
The Maine plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Ozone | |
| Metropolitan Portland Intrastate | I | II | III | III | III |
| Androscoggin Valley Interstate | IA | IA | III | III | III |
| Down East Intrastate | IA | IA | III | III | III |
| Aroostook Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
| Northwest Maine Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10870, May 31, 1972, as amended at 45 FR 10774, Feb. 19, 1980]
§ 52.1022 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves Maine's plan, as identified in § 52.1020, for the attainment and maintenance of the national standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
(b)(1) Insofar as the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions found in this subpart apply to stationary sources of greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions, the Administrator approves that application only to the extent that GHGs are “subject to regulation”, as provided in this paragraph (b), and the Administrator takes no action on that application to the extent that GHGs are not “subject to regulation.”
(2) Beginning January 2, 2011, the pollutant GHGs is subject to regulation if:
(i) The stationary source is a new major stationary source for a regulated NSR pollutant that is not GHGs, and also will emit or will have the potential to emit 75,000 tpy CO2e or more; or
(ii) The stationary source is an existing major stationary source for a regulated NSR pollutant that is not GHGs, and also will have an emissions increase of a regulated NSR pollutant, and an emissions increase of 75,000 tpy CO2e or more; and,
(3) Beginning July 1, 2011, in addition to the provisions in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the pollutant GHGs shall also be subject to regulation:
(i) At a new stationary source that will emit or have the potential to emit 100,000 tpy CO2e; or
(ii) At an existing stationary source that emits or has the potential to emit 100,000 tpy CO2e, when such stationary source undertakes a physical change or change in the method of operation that will result in an emissions increase of 75,000 tpy CO2e or more.
(4) For purposes of this paragraph (b)—
(i) The term greenhouse gas shall mean the air pollutant defined in 40 CFR 86.1818-12(a) as the aggregate group of six greenhouse gases: Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride.
(ii) The term tpy CO2 equivalent emissions (CO2e) shall represent an amount of GHGs emitted, and shall be computed as follows:
(A) Multiplying the mass amount of emissions (tpy), for each of the six greenhouse gases in the pollutant GHGs, by the gas's associated global warming potential published at Table A-1 to subpart A of 40 CFR part 98—Global Warming Potentials.
(B) Sum the resultant value from paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(A) of this section for each gas to compute a tpy CO2e.
(iii) the term emissions increase shall mean that both a significant emissions increase (as calculated using the procedures in 06-096 1. of Chapter 100 of Maine's Bureau of Air Quality Control regulations) and a significant net emissions increase (as defined in 06-096, paragraphs 89 and 144 A of Chapter 100 of Maine's Bureau of Air Quality Control regulations) occur. For the pollutant GHGs, an emissions increase shall be based on tpy CO2e, and shall be calculated assuming the pollutant GHGs is a regulated NSR pollutant, and “significant” is defined as 75,000 tpy CO2e instead of applying the value in 06-096, paragraphs 143 and 144 D of Chapter 100 of Maine's Bureau of Air Quality Control regulations.
[75 FR 82555, Dec. 30, 2010]
§ 52.1023 Control strategy: Ozone.
(a) Determination. EPA is determining that, as of July 21, 1995, the Lewiston-Auburn ozone nonattainment area has attained the ozone standard and that the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act do not apply to the area for so long as the area does not monitor any violations of the ozone standard. If a violation of the ozone NAAQS is monitored in the Lewiston-Auburn ozone nonattainment area, these determinations shall no longer apply.
(b) Determination. EPA is determining that, as of July 21, 1995, the Knox and Lincoln Counties ozone nonattainment area has attained the ozone standard and that the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act do not apply to the area for so long as the area does not monitor any violations of the ozone standard. If a violation of the ozone NAAQS is monitored in the Knox and Lincoln Counties ozone nonattainment area, these determinations shall no longer apply.
(c) Approval. EPA is approving an exemption request submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on September 7, 1995, for the Northern Maine area from the NOX requirements contained in Section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act. This approval exempts Oxford, Franklin, Somerset, Piscataquis, Penobscot, Washington, Aroostook, Hancock and Waldo Counties from the requirements to implement controls beyond those approved in § 52.1020(c)(41) for major sources of nitrogen oxides (NOX), nonattainment area new source review (NSR) for new sources and modifications that are major for NOX, and the applicable NOX-related requirements of the general and transportation conformity provisions.
(d) Approval. EPA is approving an exemption request from the NOX requirements contained in Section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act for northern Maine. The exemption request was submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on March 24, 2005, and supplemented on April 19 and June 28, 2005. This approval exempts major sources of nitrogen oxides in Aroostook, Franklin, Oxford, Penobscot, Piscataquis, Somerset, Washington, and portions of Hancock and Waldo Counties from the requirements to implement controls meeting reasonably available control technology under the Clean Air Act, and nonattainment area new source review (NSR) for new sources and modifications. In Waldo County, this area includes only the following towns: Belfast, Belmont, Brooks, Burnham, Frankfort, Freedom, Jackson, Knox, Liberty, Lincolnville, Monroe, Montville, Morrill, Northport, Palermo, Prospect, Searsmont, Searsport, Stockton Springs, Swanville, Thorndike, Troy, Unity, Waldo, and Winterport. In Hancock County, this area includes only the following towns and townships: Amherst, Aurora, Bucksport, Castine, Dedham, Eastbrook, Ellsworth, Franklin, Great Pond, Mariaville, Orland, Osborn, Otis, Penobscot, Verona, Waltham, Oqiton Township (T4 ND), T3 ND, T39 MD, T40 MD, T41 MD, T32 MD, T34 MD, T35 MD, T28 MD, T22 MD, T16 MD, T8 SD, T9 SD, T10 SD, and T7 SD.
(e) Approval. EPA is approving a revision to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 9 and 13, 2005. The revision is for purposes of satisfying the rate of progress requirements of section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act for the Portland Maine one-hour ozone nonattainment area.
(f) Approval. EPA is approving a revision to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 9, 13, and 14, 2005. The revision is for purposes of satisfying the 5 percent increment of progress requirement of 40 CFR 51.905(a)(1)(ii)(B) for the Portland Maine eight-hour ozone nonattainment area. The revision establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2007 of 20.115 tons per summer day (tpsd) of volatile organic compound (VOC) and 39.893 tpsd of nitrogen oxide (NOX) to be used in transportation conformity in the Portland Maine 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.
(g) Approval. EPA is approving a redesignation request for the Portland, Maine 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Maine submitted this request on August 3, 2006. The request contains the required Clean Air Act Section 175A maintenance plan. The plan establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2016 of 16.659 tons per summer day (tpsd) of volatile organic compound and 32.837 tpsd of nitrogen oxide (NOX) to be used in transportation conformity determinations in the Portland area.
(h) Approval. EPA is approving a redesignation request for the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Maine submitted this request on August 3, 2006. The request contains the required Clean Air Act Section 175A maintenance plan. The plan establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2016 of 3.763 tons per summer day (tpsd) of volatile organic compound and 6.245 tpsd of nitrogen oxide (NOX) to be used in transportation conformity determinations in the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties area.
(i) Approval: EPA is approving the 110(a)(1) 8-hour ozone maintenance plans in the four areas of the state required to have a 110(a)(1) maintenance plan for the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. These areas are as follows: portions of York and Cumberland Counties; portions of Androscoggin County and all of Kennebec County; portions of Knox and Lincoln Counties; and portions of Hancock and Waldo Counties. These maintenance plans were submitted to EPA on August 3, 2006.
(j) Approval. EPA is approving an exemption request from the nitrogen oxides (NOx) requirements contained in Section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act for the entire state of Maine for purposes of the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The exemption request was submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 13, 2012. This approval exempts, for purposes of the 2008 ozone standard, major sources of nitrogen oxides in Maine from:
(1) The requirement to implement controls meeting reasonably available control technology (RACT) for NOX; and
(2) Nonattainment area new source review requirements for major new and modified sources as they apply to emissions of NOX.
[60 FR 29766, June 6, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 66755, Dec. 26, 1995; 71 FR 5794, Feb. 3, 2006; 71 FR 14816, Mar. 24, 2006; 71 FR 71490, Dec. 11, 2006; 73 FR 5101, Jan. 29, 2008; 79 FR 43955, July 29, 2014]
§ 52.1024 Attainment dates for national standards.
The following table presents the latest dates by which the national standards are to be attained.
| Air quality control region and nonattainment area | Pollutant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO2 | PM-10 | NO2 | CO | O3 | ||
| Primary | Secondary | |||||
| AQCR 107: | ||||||
| Androscoggin County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (g) |
| Kennebec County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (g) |
| Knox County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (g) |
| Lincoln County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (g) |
| Waldo County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (d) |
| Oxford Cnty. (Part) See 40 CFR 81.320 | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (e) |
| Franklin Cnty. (Part) See 40 CFR 81.320 | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (e) |
| Somerset Cnty. (Part) See 40 CFR 81.320 | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (e) |
| AQCR 108: | ||||||
| Aroostook Cnty. (Part) See 40 CFR 81.320 | (a) | (b) | (c) | (a) | (a) | (a) |
| Remainder of AQCR | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) |
| AQCR 109: | ||||||
| Hancock County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (d) |
| Millinocket | (e) | (e) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) |
| Remainder of AQCR | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) |
| AQCR 110: | ||||||
| York County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (g) |
| Cumberland County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (g) |
| Sagadahoc County | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (g) |
| Oxford Cnty. (Part) See 40 CFR 81.320 | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (e) |
| AQCR 111 | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (a) |
| a Air quality levels presently below primary standards or area is unclassifiable. | ||||||
| b Air quality levels presently below secondary standards or area is unclassifiable. | ||||||
| c 12/31/94. | ||||||
| d 11/15/94 (one-year extension granted). | ||||||
| e 11/15/95. | ||||||
| g 11/15/96. |
[60 FR 33352, June 28, 1995]
§ 52.1025 Control strategy: Particulate matter.
(a) The revisions to the control strategy resulting from the modification to the emission limitations applicable to the sources listed below or resulting from the change in the compliance date for such sources with the applicable emission limitation is hereby approved. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State unless otherwise noted. (See § 52.1023 for compliance schedule approvals and disapprovals pertaining to one or more of the sources below.)
| Source | Location | Regulation involved | Date of adoption |
|---|---|---|---|
| All sources subject to Regulation 100.3.1(b) with a maximum heat input from three million up to but not including ten million Btu per hour | Maine | 100.3.1(b) | 3/29/73 |
(b) The revision to the incinerator particulate emission standard submitted on August 26, 1976 is disapproved because of provisions therein which would interfere with the attainment and maintenance of national ambient air quality standards.
(c) The revision to the incinerator particulate emission standard submitted on November 18, 1976 is disapproved because of provisions therein which would interfere with the attainment and maintenance of national ambient air quality standards.
(d) The revision to the open burning regulation submitted on December 7, 1976 is disapproved because of provisions therein which would interfere with the attainment and maintenance of national ambient air quality standards.
[38 FR 22474, Aug. 21, 1973, as amended at 43 FR 14964, Apr. 10, 1978; 43 FR 15424, Apr. 13, 1978; 47 FR 6830, Feb. 17, 1982]
§ 52.1026 Review of new sources and modifications.
The program to review operation and construction of new and modified major stationary sources in non-attainment areas is approved as meeting the requirements of part D as amended by the CAAA of 1990.
[45 FR 10775, Feb. 19, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 5694, Feb. 14, 1996]
§ 52.1027 Rules and regulations.
(a) Part D—Conditional Approval.
(b) Non-Part D—No Action. EPA is neither approving nor disapproving the following elements of the revisions identified in § 52.1020(C)(10):
(1) Intergovernmental consultation.
(2) Interstate pollution notification requirements.
(3) Public notification requirements.
(4) Conflict of Interest requirements.
(5) Permit fees.
[45 FR 10775, Feb. 19, 1980, as amended at 45 FR 59314, Sept. 9, 1980]
§ 52.1028 [Reserved]
§ 52.1029 Significant deterioration of air quality.
The program to review operation and construction of new and modified major stationary sources in attainment areas is approved as meeting the requirements of Part C.
[45 FR 6786, Jan. 30, 1980]
§ 52.1030 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides.
(a) The revision to Regulation 100.6 (Chapter 106) “Low Sulfur Fuel Regulation” for the Metropolitan Portland Air Quality Control Region, submitted by the Governor of Maine on August 25, 1977, is approved with the exception of paragraph 100.6.5(b) which allows the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection to grant variances to Regulation 100.6.
[47 FR 948, Jan. 8, 1982]
§ 52.1031 EPA-approved Maine regulations.
The following table identifies the State regulations which have been submitted to and approved by EPA as revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan. This table is for informational purposes only and does not have any independent regulatory effect. To determine regulatory requirements for a specific situation consult the plan identified in § 52.1020. To the extent that this table conflicts with §§ 52.1020, 52.1020 governs.
| State citation | Title/Subject | Date adopted by State | Date approved by EPA | Federal Register citation | 52.1020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chapter: | ||||||
| 1 | Regulations for the Processing of Applications. | 02/08/84 | 03/23/93 | 58 FR 15430 | (c)(26) | Portions of chapter 1. |
| 100 | 5/7/79 | 1/3/80 | 45 FR 6784 | (c)(10) | PSD Plan Only. | |
| 100 | Definitions Regulations | 12/24/79 | 2/19/80 | 45 FR 10766 | (c)(11) | |
| 2/6/80 | ||||||
| 100 | Definitions. | 10/3/89 | 3/23/93 | 58 FR 15430 | (c)(26) | All except for the definition of VOC in chapter 100(76). Note that this definition is approved in another paragraph below. In addition, Maine withdrew the definition of fuel burning equipment in chapter 100(29) from its SIP submittal. This definition is approved in another paragraph below. |
| (c)(27) | Approval of definition of VOC in chapter 100(76) only. | |||||
| 100 | Definitions Regulations | 11/26/91 | 6/21/93 | 58 FR 33768 | (c)(31) | Revised “volatile organic compound (VOC)” and “federally enforceable.” Added “particulate matter emissions” and “PM10 emissions.” |
| 100 | Definitions | 7/10/90 | 3/18/94 | 59 FR 12855 | (c)(29) | Changes to the following definitions: Actual emissions, baseline concentration and fuel burning equipment in Chapter 100(1), (9), and (29). |
| 100 | Definitions | 1/6/93 | 6/17/94 | 59 FR 31157 | (c)(33) | Revised to add definitions associated with VOC RACT rules. |
| 100 | Definitions | 11/10/93 | 1/10/95 | 60 FR 2526 | (c)(34) | Revised to add definitions associated with emission statement rules. |
| 100 | Definitions | 6/22/94 | 6/29/95 | 60 FR 33734 | 36 | Gasoline marketing definitions added |
| 100 | Definitions Regulation | 6/22/94 | 2/14/96 | 61 FR 5694 | (c)(37) | Addition of 1990 Part D NSR and other CAAA requirements. |
| 100 | Definitions | 7/19/95 | 10/15/96 | 61 FR 53639 | (c)(42) | Definition of “VOC” revised. |
| 100 | Definitions | 12/1/2005 | 11/21/07 | 72 FR 65462 | (c)(62) | Revised to add definitions associated with SIP submittals made between 7/19/95 and 12/1/05. |
| 101 | Visible Emissions | 10/10/79 | 2/17/82 | 47 FR 6829 | (c)(17) | |
| 102 | Open Burning | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72 | 37 FR 10842 | (b) | |
| 102 | Open Burning | 3/17/05 | 2/21/08 | 73 FR 9459 | (c)(61) | |
| 103 | Fuel Burning Equipment Particulate Emission Standard | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72 | 37 FR 10842 | (b) | |
| 1/24/83 | 2/26/85 | 50 FR 7770 | (c)(19) | |||
| 104 | Incinerator Particulate Emission Standard | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72 | 37 FR 10842 | (b) | |
| 105 | General Process Source Particulate Emission Standard | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72 | 37 FR 10842 | (b) | |
| 106 | Low Sulfur Fuel | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72 | 37 FR 10842 | (b) | |
| 2/08/78 | 1/8/82 | 47 FR 947 | (c)(15) | Revised limits for Portland Peninsula only. | ||
| 107 | Sulfur Dioxide Emission Standards for Sulfite Pulp Mills | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72 | 37 FR 10842 | (b) | |
| 109 | Emergency Episode Regulation | 1/31/72 | 5/31/72 | 37 FR 10842 | (b) | |
| 109 | Emergency Episode Regulation | 8/14/91 | 1/12/95 | 60 FR 2887 | (c)(28) | Revisions which incorporate the PM10 alert, warning, and emergency levels. |
| 110 | Ambient Air Quality Standards | 5/7/79 | 1/30/80 | 45 FR 6784 | (c)(10) | |
| 110 | Ambient Air Quality Standards | 10/25/89 | 3/23/93 | 58 FR 15430 | (c)(26) | All of chapter 110 except for chapter 110(2) which is approved in another paragraph, below. Note that Maine did not submit its Chromium standard in chapter 110(12) for approval. |
| (c)(27) | Chapter 110(2) only. | |||||
| 110 | Ambient Air Quality Standards | 7/10/90 | 3/18/94 | 59 FR 12855 | (c)(29) | Addition of NO2 increments for class I and II areas in Chapter 110(10). Note that class III increment in Chapter 110(10)(C)(3) is not part of submittal. |
| 110 | Ambient Air Quality Standards | 7/24/96 | 3/22/04 | 69 FR 13231 | (c)(52) | Adopts PSD increments based on PM10, in place of increments based on TSP. |
| 111 | Petroleum Liquid Storage Vapor Control | 5/7/79 | 2/19/80 | 45 FR 10766 | (c)(11) | |
| 9/27/89 | 2/3/92 | 57 FR 3948 | (c)(30) | |||
| 112 | Petroleum Liquids Transfer Recovery | 2/19/80 | 45 FR 10766 | (c)(11) | ||
| 5/7/79 | 3/5/82 | 47 FR 9462 | (c)(16) | Irving Oil, Searsport exempted. | ||
| 7/22/86 | 2/2/87 | 52 FR 3117 | (c)(22) | Bulk Gasoline Terminal Test methods. | ||
| 5/22/91 | 2/3/92 | 57 FR 3948 | (c)(30) | The exemption for Irving Oil Corporation in Searsport, Maine incorporated by reference at 40 CFR 52.1020(c)(16) is removed. | ||
| 112 | Petroleum liquids transfer recover | 6/22/94 | 6/29/95 | 60 FR 33734 | 36 | Deleted exemption for tank trucks less than 3500 gallons. |
| 112 | Gasoline Bulk Terminals | 7/19/95 | 10/15/96 | 61 FR 53639 | (c)(42) | Emission limit lowered from 80 mg/l to 35 mg/l. |
| 113 | Growth Offset Regulation | 5/7/79 | 2/19/80 | 45 FR 10766 | (c)(11) | Part of New Source Review program. |
| 12/18/85 | 12/23/86 | 51 FR 45886 | (c)(21) | Deletes Thomaston. | ||
| 113 | Growth Offset Regulation | 10/25/89 | 3/23/93 | 58 FR 15430 | (c)(26) | |
| 113 | Growth Offset Regulation | 7/10/90 | 3/18/94 | 59 FR 12855 | (c)(29) | Change to Chapter 113(II)(A) to include NO2. |
| 113 | Growth Offset Regulation | 6/22/94 | 2/14/96 | 61 FR 5694 | (c)(37) | Addition of 1990 Part D NSR requirements. |
| 114 | Classification of Air Quality Control Regions | 5/7/79 | 1/30/80 | 45 FR 6874 | (c)(10) | |
| 114 | Designation of Air Quality Control Regions | 10/25/89 | 3/23/93 | 58 FR 15430 | (c)(26) | All except for chapter 114(11) and (111) which are approved in another paragraph below. |
| (c)(27) | Chapter 114(11)and (111) only. | |||||
| 114 | Classification of Air Quality Control Regions | 4/27/94 | Aug. 30, 1995 | 60 FR 45060 | (c)(40) | Revision to remove Presque Isle as nonattainment for PM10. |
| 115 | Emission License Regulation. | 5/7/79 | 1/30/80 | 45 FR 6784 | (c)(10) | PSD |
| 12/24/79 | 2/19/80 | 45 FR 10766 | (c)(11) | New Source Review. | ||
| 10/25/89 | 3/23/93 | 58 FR 15430 | (c)(26) | Note Maine did not submit references to nonregulated pollutants for approval. Also note that this chapter was formerly chapter 108. | ||
| 115 | Emission License Regulation | 7/10/90 | 3/18/94 | 59 FR 12855 | (c)(29) | Changes to Chapter 115(I)(B), (VII)(A), VII)(B)(3), and (VII)(D)(3) to remove Chapter 108 and to incorporate NO2 increments requirements. |
| 115 | Emission License Regulation | 6/22/94 | 2/14/96 | 61 FR 5694 | (c)(37) | Addition of 1990 Part D NSR and other CAAA requirements. |
| 116 | Prohibited Dispersion Techniques. | 10/25/89 | 3/23/93 | 58 FR 15430 | (c)(26) | |
| 117 | Source Surveillance | 8/9/88 | 3/21/89 | 54 FR 11525 | 24 | |
| 118 | Gasoline Dispensing Facilities | 6/22/94 | 6/29/95 | 60 FR 33734 | 36 | |
| 7/19/95 | 10/15/96 | 61 FR 53639 | (c)(43) | Stage II vapor recovery requirements added. | ||
| 119 | Motor Vehicle Fuel Volatility Limit | 6/1/00 | 3/6/02 | 67 FR 10100 | (c)(49) | Controls fuel volatility in the State. 7.8 psi RVP fuel required in 7 southern counties. |
| 120 | Gasoline Tank Trucks | 6/22/94 | 6/29/95 | 60 FR 33734 | 35 | |
| 123 | Paper Coater Regulation | 9/27/89 | 2/3/92 | 57 FR 3949 | (c)(30) | The operating permits for S.D. Warren of Westbrook, Eastern Fine Paper of Brewer, and Pioneer Plastics of Auburn incorporated by reference at 40 CFR § 52.1020 (c)(11), (c)(11), and (c)(18), respectively, are withdrawn. |
| 126 | Capture Efficiency Test Procedures | 5/22/91 | 3/22/93 | 58 FR 15282 | (c)(32) | |
| 127 | New Motor Vehicle Emission Standards | 12/31/00 | 4/28/05 | 70 FR 21962 | (c)(58) | Low emission vehicle program, with no ZEV requirements. Program achieves 90% of full LEV benefits. |
| 129 | Surface coating Facilities | 1/6/93 | 6/17/94 | 59 FR 31157 | (c)(33) | Includes surface coating of: Cans, fabric, vinyl, metal furniture, flatwood paneling, and miscellaneous metal parts and products. |
| 130 | Solvent Degreasers | 1/6/93 | 6/17/94 | 59 FR 31157 | (c)(33) | |
| 130 | Solvent Cleaners | 6/17/04 | 5/26/05 | 70 FR 30369 | (c)(54) | |
| 131 | Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt | 1/6/93 | 6/17/94 | 59 FR 31157 | (c)(33) | |
| 132 | Graphic Arts: Rotogravure and Flexography | 1/6/93 | 6/17/94 | 59 FR 31157 | (c)(33) | |
| 133 | Gasoline Bulk Plants | 6/22/94 | 6/29/95 | 60 FR 33734 | 36 | |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 2/8/95 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | Regulation fully approved for the following counties: York, Sagadahoc, Cumberland, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox, Lincoln, Hancock, Waldo, Aroostook, Franklin, Oxford, and Piscataquis. Regulation granted a limited approval for Washington, Somerset, and Penobscot Counties. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 2/25/97 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for JJ Nissen Baking Company. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 7/23/97 10/27/97 |
4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Prime Tanning. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 7/25/97 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 12/5/96 10/20/97 |
4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Dexter Shoe. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 6/16/97 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Pioneer Plastics. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 1/4/96 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Georgia Pacific. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 1/18/96 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Champion International. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 10/4/95 12/13/95 |
4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for International Paper. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 12/8/95 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20753 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for James River. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 12/18/95 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20754 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Lincoln Pulp and Paper. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 12/18/95 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20754 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for SD Warren Paper Company's Westbrook, Maine facility. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 10/4/95 1/9/96 |
4/18/00 | 65 FR 20754 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for SD Warren Paper Company's Skowhegan, Maine facility. |
| 134 | Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds | 12/20/95 | 4/18/00 | 65 FR 20754 | (c)(45) | VOC RACT determination for Boise Cascade. |
| 134 | Reasonably available control technology for facilities that emit volatile organic compounds | 4/11/01 | 5/20/02 | 67 FR 35441 | (c)(51) | VOC RACT determination for Bath Iron Works. |
| 134 | Reasonably available control technology for facilities that emit volatile organic compounds | 4/26/01 7/2/01 |
5/20/02 | 67 FR 35441 | (c)(51) | VOC RACT determination for Pratt & Whitney. |
| 134 | Reasonably available control technology for facilities that emit volatile organic compounds | 5/10/01 | 5/20/02 | 67 FR 35441 | (c)(51) | VOC RACT determination for Moosehead Manufacturing's Dover-Foxcroft plant. |
| Reasonably available control technology for facilities that emit volatile organic compounds | 5/10/01 | 5/20/02 | 67 FR 35441 | (c)(51) | VOC RACT determination for Moosehead Manufacturing's Monson plant. | |
| 137 | Emission Statements | 12/17/04 | 11/21/07 | 72 FR 65462 | (c)(62) | Revised to incorporate changes required by EPA's consolidated emissions reporting rule. The entire rule is approved with the exception of HAP and greenhouse gas reporting requirements which were not included in the state's SIP revision request. |
| 138 | Reasonably Available Control Technology For Facilities That Emit Nitrogen Oxides | 8/3/94 | December 26, 1995 | 60 FR 66755 | (c)(41) | Affects sources only in Oxford, Franklin, Somerset, Piscataquis, Penobscot, Washington, Aroostook, Hancock and Waldo Counties (excepted portions of rule include Sections 1.A.1. and 3.B.). |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 8/3/94 | 9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(46) | Affects sources in York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Lincoln, and Knox counties. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 5/18/95 & 2/16/96 |
9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for FPL Energy's (formerly Central Maine Power) W.F. Wyman Station. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 6/16/95 & 6/12/96 |
9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for Tree Free Fiber Company, LLC. (formerly Statler Tissue). |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 8/23/95 & 3/10/97 |
9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for Pioneer Plastics Corporation. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 11/15/95 | 9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for Scott Paper Company. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 1/18/96 | 9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for Chinet Company. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 2/7/96 | 9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for FMC Corporation—Food from Ingredients Division. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 6/5/96 & 3/5/97 |
9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX FR RACT for Dragon Products Company, Inc. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 6/12/96 | 9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for S.D. Warren Company. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 10/16/96 | 9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for Mid-Maine Waste Action Corporation. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 10/21/96 & 7/25/97 |
9/9/92 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. |
| 138 | NOX RACT | 11/12/96 | 9/9/02 | 67 FR 57154 | (c)(47) | Case-specific NOX RACT for Maine Energy Recovery Company. |
| 139 | Transportation Conformity | 9/19/07 | 2/08/08 | 73 FR 7465 | (c) 64 | |
| 141 | Conformity of General Federal Actions | 9/11/96 | 9/23/97 | 62 FR 49611 | (c)(44) | “Chapter 141: Conformity of General Federal Actions”. |
| 141 | Conformity of General Federal Actions | 4/19/07 | 2/20/08 | 73 FR 9203 | (c)(63) | Amendment to incorporate new fine particulate matter provisions. |
| 145 | NOX Control Program | 6/21/01 | 4/10/05 | 70 FR 11882 | (c)(56). | |
| 148 | Emissions from Smaller-Scale Electric Generating Resources | 7/15/04 | 5/26/05 | 70 FR 30376 | (c)(55) | |
| 151 | Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings | 10/06/05 | 3/17/06 | 71 FR 13767 | (c)(59) | |
| 152 | Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products | 8/19/04 | 10/24/05 | 70 FR 61384 | (c)(57) | |
| 153 | Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing | 2/5/04 | 5/26/05 | 70 FR 30369(c)(54) | ||
| 155 | Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control | 6/3/04 | 2/7/05 | 70 FR 6354 | (c)(53) | All of Chapter 155 is approved with the exception of the word “or” in Subsection 7C which Maine did not submit as part of the SIP revision. |
| “Vehicle I/M” | Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance | 7/9/98 | 1/10/01 | 66 FR 1875 | (c)(48) | Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection Manual,” revised in 1998, pages 1-12 through 1-14, and page 2-14, D.1.g. Also, Authorizing legislation effective July 9, 1998 and entitled L.D. 2223, “An Act to Reduce Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles and to Meet Requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act.” |
| Note. 1. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments section. |
[50 FR 3336, Jan. 24, 1985]
§ 52.1033 Visibility protection.
(a)-(c) [Reserved]
[52 FR 45138, Nov. 24, 1987, as amended at 58 FR 15431, Mar. 23, 1993; 82 FR 3129, Jan. 10, 2017]
§ 52.1034 Stack height review.
The State of Maine has declared to the satisfaction of EPA that no existing emission limitations have been affected by stack height credits greater than good engineering practice or any other prohibited dispersion techniques as defined in EPA's stack height regulations as revised on July 8, 1985. Such declarations were submitted to EPA on December 17, 1985; May 30, 1986; October 2, 20, and 24, 1986; August 6, 1987; September 8 and 30, 1988.
[54 FR 8190, Feb. 27, 1989]
§ 52.1035 Requirements for state implementation plan revisions relating to new motor vehicles.
Maine must comply with the requirements of § 51.120.
[60 FR 4737, Jan. 24, 1995]
§ 52.1036 Emission inventories.
(a) The Governor's designee for the State of Maine submitted 1990 base year emission inventories for the Knox and Lincoln Counties area, the Lewiston and Auburn area, the Portland area, and the Hancock and Waldo Counties area on July 25, 1995 as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). An amendment to the 1990 base year emission inventory for the Portland area was submitted on June 9, 2005. The 1990 base year emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for these areas.
(b) The inventory is for the ozone precursors which are volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide. The inventory covers point, area, non-road mobile, on-road mobile, and biogenic sources.
(c) The Knox and Lincoln Counties nonattainment area is classified as moderate. The Lewiston and Auburn nonattainment area is classified as moderate and consists of Androscoggin and Kennebec Counties. The Portland nonattainment area is classified as moderate and consists of Cumberland, Sagadahoc and York Counties. The Hancock and Waldo Counties nonattainment area is classified as attainment.
(d) The Governor's designee for the State of Maine submitted 1993 periodic year emission inventories for the Hancock and Waldo Counties area on May 13, 1996 as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 1993 periodic year emission inventory requirement of section 182(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for the Hancock and Waldo counties area.
(e) On June 24, 1997, the Maine Department of Environmental Protection submitted a revision to establish explicit year 2006 motor vehicle emissions budgets [6.44 tons per summer day of VOC, and 8.85 tons per summer day of NOX] for the Hancock and Waldo counties ozone maintenance area to be used in determining transportation conformity.
(f) The Governor's designee for the State of Maine submitted a 2002 base year emission inventory for Cumberland, Sagadahoc, and York counties, to represent emissions for the Portland 8-hour ozone nonattainment area on June 9, 2005, as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 2002 base year emission inventory requirement of 40 CFR 51.915 has been satisfied for this area.
[62 FR 9086, Feb. 28, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 41277, Aug. 1, 1997; 71 FR 14816, Mar. 24, 2006]
§ 52.1037 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Maine” and all revisions submitted by Maine that were federally approved prior to September 1, 2008.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 28, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) Miscellaneous non-regulatory changes to the plan submitted on March 17, 1972, by the Environmental Improvement Commission for the State of Maine.
(2) Regulation 10.8.4(g) establishing compliance schedules for sources in Maine submitted on July 28, 1972, by the Environmental Improvement Commission for the State of Maine.
(3) A revision removing fuel burning sources with a maximum heat input from three million up to 10 million BTU/hr from the particulate matter control strategy submitted on March 29, 1973, by the Governor.
(4) Changes in the Open Burning Regulation 100.2 submitted on September 4, 1973, by the State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
(5) An AQMA proposal submitted on June 26, 1974, by the Governor.
(6) Revision to incinerator particulate emission standard, submitted on August 26, 1976 by the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, which would exempt woodwaste cone burners from the plan until 1980.
(7) Revision to incinerator particulate emission standard, submitted on November 18, 1976 by the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, which would exempt municipal waste cone burners from the plan.
(8) Revision to open burning regulation submitted on December 7, 1976 by the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
(9) Revisions to Chapter 5—State Implementation Plan Air Quality Surveillance, and Chapter 6—Revision of New Sources and Modifications, submitted by the Governor on March 10, 1978.
(10) Plans to meet various requirements of the Clean Air Act, including Part C, were submitted on May 1, 1979, October 26, 1979 and December 20, 1979. Included in the revisions is a plan for review of construction and operation of new and modified major stationary sources of pollution in attainment areas.
(11) Attainment plans to meet the requirements of Part D and the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977, were submitted on May 1, 1979; October 26, 1979; December 20, 1979; July 9, 1980; July 31, 1980; December 18, 1980; March 17, 1981. Included are plans to attain: The secondary TSP standard for Augusta, Thomaston, Bangor and Brewer; the primary and secondary SO2 standard for Millinocket; the carbon monoxide standard for Lewiston and Bangor and the ozone standard for AQCRS 107 and 110. A program was also submitted for the review of construction and operation of new and modified major stationary sources of pollution in non-attainment areas. Certain miscellaneous provisions are also included.
(12) A plan to provide for public involvement in federally funded air pollution control activities was submitted on May 28, 1980.
(13) Revisions to Chapter 5—State Implementation Plan—Air Quality Surveillance, intended to meet requirements of 40 CFR part 58, were submitted by the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 1, 1980.
(14) Revisions to attain and maintain the NAAQS for lead were submitted on August 7, and November 5, 1980.
(15) A revision to Regulation 100.6 (Chapter 106) “Low Sulfur Fuel Regulation” for the Metropolitan Portland Air Quality Control Region, submitted by the Governor of Maine on August 25, 1977.
(16) Department Regulation Chapter 112, Petroleum Liquid Transfer Vapor Recovery, is amended to exempt the town of Searsport, Maine from this regulation. This amendment was submitted by Henry E. Warren, Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection on October 23, 1981, in order to meet Part D requirements for ozone.
(17) Regulatory revisions to the plan containing changes to Chapter 101 “Visible Emissions Regulation” submitted August 7, 1980.
(18) On May 12, 1982 and February 11, 1983 the Maine Department of Environmental Protection submitted an emission limit contained in an air emissions license which requires Pioneer Plastics, Auburn, Maine to reduce its volatile organic compound emissions by at least 85%.
(19) On January 11, 1983 and March 29, 1984 and December 4, 1984 the Maine Department of Environmental Protection submitted revisions to Chapter 103 “Fuel Burning Equipment Particulate Emission Standard.”
(20) A plan to attain the primary TSP standard in Lincoln, consisting of particulate emission limitations contained in an air emission license issued to the Lincoln Pulp and Paper Company, Inc., submitted by the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on December 18, 1984.
(21) A revision to approve the deletion of Thomaston from the list of applicable municipalities in Maine regulation 29 M.R.S.A. Chapter 113, submitted by the Commissioner on February 20, 1986.
(22) Revision to federally-approved regulation Chapter 112, Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery [originally approved on February 19, 1980, see paragraph (c)(11), of this section, was submitted on August 4, 1986, by the Department of Environmental Protection.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulation Chapter 112(6), Emission Testing, is amended by incorporating test methods and procedures as stated in 40 CFR part 60, subpart XX, § 60.503 to determine compliance with emission standards for volatile organic compound emissions from bulk gasoline terminals. This revision to Regulation Chapter 112(6) became effective on July 22, 1986 in the State of Maine.
(ii) Additional material. The nonregulatory portions of the state submittals.
(23) [Reserved]
(24) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 22, 1988.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated August 19, 1988 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 117 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Air Regulations entitled, “Source Surveillance,” effective in the State of Maine on August 9, 1988.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal.
(25) Revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone submitted on February 14, 1989 and May 3, 1989 by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for its state gasoline volatility control program, including any waivers under the program that Maine may grant. The control period will begin May 1, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Maine Department Regulation chapter 119, Rules and Regulations of the State of Maine, entitled “Motor Vehicle Fuel Volatility Limit,” adopted August 10, 1988, amended September 27, 1989 and effective October 25, 1989.
(26) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 27, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated October 27, 1989 submitting revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 100 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection's Air Regulations entitled “Definitions Regulations,” except for the definition of volatile organic compounds in Chapter 100(76) which is being incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 52.1020(c)(27). This regulation was effective in the State of Maine on October 3, 1989. Note, the definition of fuel burning equipment in Chapter 100(29) is not part of Maine's submittal.
(C) Chapter 110 except for Chapter 110(2) which is being incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 52.1020(c)(27), Chapter 113, Chapter 114 except for Chapter 114(II) and (III) which are being incorporated by reference in 40 CFR 52.1020(c)(27), Chapter 115, and Chapter 116 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection's Air Regulations entitled, “Ambient Air Quality Standards,” “Growth Offset Regulation,” “Classification of Air Quality Control Regions,” “Emission License Regulations,” and “Prohibited Dispersion Techniques,” respectively. These regulations were effective in the State of Maine on October 25, 1989. Chapter 108, originally approved on January 30, 1980 and February 19, 1980 in paragraphs (c)(10) and (c)(11) of this section, is being withdrawn and replaced with Chapter 115.
(D) Portions of Chapter 1 entitled “Regulations for the Processing of Applications,” effective in the State of Maine on February 8, 1984.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A State Implementation Plan narrative contained in Chapter 6 entitled “Review of New Sources and Modifications.”
(B) Letter dated May 1, 1989 from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection regarding implementation of BACT.
(C) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal.
(27) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 31, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated October 31, 1989 submitting revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) The definition of volatile organic compounds in Chapter 100(76) of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection's “Definitions Regulations” effective in the State of Maine on October 3, 1989.
(C) Chapter 110(2) and Chapter 114 (II) and (III) of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection's “Ambient Air Quality Standards” and “Classification of Air Quality Control Regions” Regulations effective in the State of Maine on October 25, 1989. Note that Millinocket remains designated as a nonattainment area for SO2 until redesignated at 40 CFR 51.320.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A State Implementation Plan narrative contained in Chapter 6 entitled “Review of New Sources and Modifications.”
(B) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal.
(28) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 14 and October 22, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated August 14 and October 22, 1991 submitting revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Revisions to Chapter 109 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Emergency Episode Regulations,” effective in the State of Maine on September 16, 1991.
(C) Part B of the Memorandum of Understanding which the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) entered into (and effective) on March 11, 1991, with the City of Presque Isle, and the Maine Department of Transportation.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) An attainment plan and demonstration which outlines Maine's control strategy for attainment of the PM10 NAAQS and implements and meets RACM and RACT requirements for Presque Isle.
(B) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(29) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 16, 1990, September 5, 1990, and November 2, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated July 16, 1990, September 5, 1990, and November 2, 1990, submitting revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) The definitions of actual emissions, baseline concentration, and fuel burning equipment in Chapter 100(1), 100(9), and 100(29) of Maine's “Definitions Regulation,” Chapter 110(10) (except for Chapter 110(10)(C)(3)) of Maine's “Ambient Air Quality Standards Regulation,” Chapter 113(II)(A) of Maine's “Growth Offset Regulation,” and Chapter 115(I)(B), (VII)(A), (VII)(B)(3), and (VII)(D)(3) of Maine's “Emission License Regulations,” effective in the State of Maine on July 10, 1990. Note that the revised state statute which contains the underlying authority to implement the NO2 increments became effective on July 14, 1990.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A state implementation plan narrative contained in Chapter 6 entitled “Review of New Sources and Modifications.”
(B) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal.
(30) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on September 29, 1989, December 5, 1989 and June 3, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated September 29, 1989, and June 3, 1991 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 111 “Petroleum Liquid Storage Vapor Control” and Chapter 123 “Paper Coater Regulation,” effective in the state of Maine on October 3, 1989.
(C) Chapter 112 “Petroleum Liquid Transfer Vapor Recovery,” effective in the State of Maine on June 9, 1991.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated June 3, 1991 documenting the December 1990 survey conducted to satisfy the 5 percent demonstration requirement in order to justify the 3500 gallon capacity cut-off in chapter 112.
(B) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated December 5, 1989 requesting the withdrawal of operating permits for S.D. Warren of Westbrook, Eastern Fine Paper of Brewer, and Pioneer Plastics of Auburn incorporated by reference at 40 CFR 52.1020 (c)(11) and (c)(18).
(C) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(31) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on April 20, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated April 8, 1992 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 100(54)(b) “particulate matter emissions,” Chapter 100(57)(b) “PM10 emissions,” and revisions to Chapter 100(28) “federally enforceable” and to Chapter 100(76) “volatile organic compound (VOC)” effective in the State of Maine on January 18, 1992.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(32) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 5, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated June 3, 1991 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 126 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Capture Efficiency Test Procedures” effective in the State of Maine on June 9, 1991.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(33) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on January 8, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated January 8, 1993, submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Revised Chapter 100 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Definitions” effective in the State of Maine on February 10, 1993.
(C) Chapter 129 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Surface Coating Facilities” effective in the State of Maine on February 10, 1993.
(D) Chapter 130 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Solvent Degreasers” effective in the State of Maine on February 10, 1993.
(E) Chapter 131 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt” effective in the State of Maine on February 10, 1993.
(F) Chapter 132 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Graphic Arts—Rotogravure and Flexography” effective in the State of Maine on February 10, 1993.
(G) Appendix A “Volatile Organic Compounds Test Methods and Compliance Procedures” incorporated into Chapters 129 and 132 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, effective in the State of Maine on February 10, 1993.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(34) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on January 3, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated January 3, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Revised Chapter 100 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Definitions” effective in the State of Maine on December 12, 1993.
(ii) Additional Information.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(35) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 3, 1991, November 25, 1991, and July 6, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated June 3, 1991, November 25, 1991, and July 6, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 120 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Gasoline Tank Truck Tightness Self-Certification,” effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(36) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 6, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated July 6, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 100 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Definitions,” effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994, with the exception of the definitions of the following terms: “curtailment,” “federally enforceable,” “major modification,” “ major source,” “nonattainment pollutant,” “shutdown,” “significant emissions,” and “significant emissions increase.”
(C) Chapter 112 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery,” effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(D) Chapter 118 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control,” effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(E) Chapter 133 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery at Bulk Gasoline Plants,” effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(37) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 12, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated July 5, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Maine's Chapter 100 entitled, “Definition Regulations.” This regulation was effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(C) Maine's Chapter 113 entitled, “Growth Offset Regulation.” This regulation was effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(D) Maine's Chapter 115 entitled, “Emission License Regulation,” except for Section 115(VII)(E) of this Chapter and all references to this Section. This regulation was effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(38) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan establishing a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program were submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 7, and August 16, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated July 7, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan for the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program dated July 12, 1994 and effective on May 11, 1994.
(C) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated August 16, 1994 submitting a corrected page to the July 12, 1994 SIP revision.
(39) [Reserved]
(40) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 1, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated June 1, 1994 submitting revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Revisions to Chapter 114 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Classification of Air Quality Control Regions,” adopted by the Board of Environmental Protection on April 27, 1994 and accepted by the Secretary of State with an effective date of May 9, 1994.
(C) Revisions to Part B of the Memorandum of Understanding which the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) entered into (and effective) on May 25, 1994, with the City of Presque Isle, and the Maine Department of Transportation.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A maintenance demonstration and contingency plan which outline Maine's control strategy for maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS and contingency measures and provision for Presque Isle.
(B) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(41) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 5, 1994 related to NOX controls in Oxford, Franklin, Somerset, Piscataquis, Penobscot, Washington, Aroostook, Hancock and Waldo Counties.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) A Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated August 5, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 138 of the Maine DEP's regulations, “Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Nitrogen Oxides” for sources only in Oxford, Franklin, Somerset, Piscataquis, Penobscot, Washington, Aroostook, Hancock and Waldo Counties (excepted portions include Sections 1.A.1. and 3.B.). This rule was effective August 3, 1994.
(42) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 24, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Two letters from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated July 24, 1995 submitting revisions to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 100 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Definitions Regulation,” definition of “volatile organic compounds (VOC)” effective in the State of Maine on July 25, 1995.
(C) Chapter 112 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Bulk Terminal Petroleum Liquid Transfer Requirements,” effective in the State of Maine on July 25, 1995.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(43) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 24, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated July 24, 1995 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 118 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control,” effective in the State of Maine on July 25, 1995.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated May 6, 1996.
(B) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(44) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 11, 1996.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated October 11, 1996 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 141 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Air Regulation entitled, “Conformity of General Federal Actions,” effective in the State of Maine on September 28, 1996.
(45) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on April 28, 1995, January 10, 1996, July 1, 1997, October 9, 1997, November 14, 1997, and December 10, 1997.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 134 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection regulations entitled “Reasonably Available Control Technology for Facilities that Emit Volatile Organic Compounds,” effective in the State of Maine on February 15, 1995, is granted a full approval for the following counties: York, Sagadahoc, Cumberland, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox, Lincoln, Hancock, Waldo, Aroostook, Franklin, Oxford, and Piscataquis. This rule is granted a limited approval for Washington, Somerset, and Penobscot Counties.
(B) License Amendment #5 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Prime Tanning Company on July 23, 1997.
(C) License Amendment #6 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Prime Tanning Company on October 27, 1997.
(D) License issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to JJ Nissen Baking Company on February 25, 1997.
(E) License Amendment #4 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on July 25, 1997.
(F) License issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Dexter Shoe Company on December 5, 1996.
(G) License Amendment #1 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Dexter Shoe Company on October 20, 1997.
(H) License Amendment #3 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Pioneer Plastics Corporation on June 16, 1997.
(I) License Amendment #10 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Georgia Pacific Corporation on January 4, 1996.
(J) License Amendment #5 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Champion International Corporation on January 18, 1996.
(K) License Amendment #8 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to International Paper Company on October 4, 1995.
(L) License Amendment #9 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to International Paper Company on December 13, 1995.
(M) License Amendment #6 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to James River Corporation on December 8, 1995.
(N) License Amendment #8 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Lincoln Pulp and Paper Co. on December 18, 1995.
(O) License Amendment #14 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to S.D. Warren Paper Company's Westbrook, Maine facility on December 18, 1995.
(P) License Amendment #14 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to S.D. Warren Paper Company's Skowhegan, Maine facility on October 4, 1995.
(Q) License Amendment #15 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to S.D. Warren Paper Company's Skowhegan, Maine facility on January 9, 1996.
(R) License Amendment #11 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Boise Cascade Corporation on December 20, 1995.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated November 15, 1994 stating a negative declaration for the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Distillation and Reactors Control Technique Guideline categories.
(B) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(46) Revision to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 5, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 138 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Reasonably Available Control Technology For Facilities That Emit Nitrogen Oxides.” Affects sources in York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Lincoln, and Knox counties. This rule was adopted and effective in the State of Maine on August 3, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated August 5, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(47) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 1, 1997, October 9, 1997, and August 14, 1998.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Air emission license A-388-71-C-A, Amendment #1, condition (q); and A-388-71-D-M, amendment #1, conditions 19 and 23 for FPL Energy's (formerly Central Maine Power) W.F. Wyman Station issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on May 18, 1995, and February 16, 1996, respectively.
(B) Air emission licenses A-195-71-G-M, Amendment #1, and A-195-71-D-A/R, section (II)(D), paragraphs (II)(F)(1) and (3), and conditions 12(A), 12(C), (13), (14) and (15) for Tree Free Fiber Company, LLC, (formerly Statler Industries Inc.) issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 12, 1996, and, June 16, 1995, respectively.
(C) Air emission licenses A-448-72-K-A/R, paragraphs (II)(D)(2), (II)(D)(3) and conditions (13)(f) and 14(k); and A-448-71-O-M, Amendment #2, condition (14)(k), for Pioneer Plastics Corporation issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 23, 1995, and March 10, 1997, respectively.
(D) Air emission license A-188-72-E-A, Amendment #2, conditions 8, paragraph 1, and 9, paragraphs 1, 2 and 4, for Scott Paper Company issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on November 15, 1995.
(E) Air emission license A-416-72-B-A, conditions (l) 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3e, and (m) for The Chinet Company issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on January 18, 1996.
(F) Air emission license A-366-72-H-A, Amendment #5, conditions 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 18 for FMC Corporation—Food Ingredients Division issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on February 7, 1996.
(G) Air emission licenses A-326-72-N-A, Amendment #5, and A-326-71-P-M, Amendment #7, for Dragon Products Company, Inc., issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 5, 1996, and March 5, 1997, respectively.
(H) Air emission license A-29-71-Y-A, Amendment #13, conditions (k)2, (k)3, (q)8 and (p) for S.D. Warren Company issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 12, 1996.
(I) Air emission license A-378-72-E-A, Amendment #2, for Mid-Maine Waste Action Corporation issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 16, 1996.
(J) Air emission licenses A-452-71-D-A, Amendment #2, conditions 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20; and A-452-71-F-M, Amendment #4, condition 4 for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 21, 1996, and July 25, 1997, respectively.
(K) Air emission license A-46-71-L-A, Amendment #4, for Maine Energy Recovery Company issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection on November 12, 1996.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letters from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated July 1, 1997, October 9, 1997, and August 14, 1998, submitting case-specific NOX RACT determinations.
(48) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on November 19, 1998.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) “Maine Motor Vehicle Inspection Manual,” as revised in 1998, pages 1-12 through 1-14, and page 2-14, D.1.g.
(B) Authorizing legislation effective July 9, 1998 and entitled H.P. 1594—L.D. 2223, “An Act to Reduce Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles and to Meet Requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act.”
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Document entitled “State of Maine Implementation Plan for Inspection/Maintenance” dated November 11, 1998.
(B) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated November 19, 1998 submitting a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(49) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 7, 2000 and May 29, 2001.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Maine Chapter 119, entitled “Motor Vehicle Fuel Volatility Limit” as amended and effective on June 1, 2000.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated June 7, 2000 submitting Chapter 119 as a revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection dated May 29, 2001 submitting additional technical support and an enforcement plan for Chapter 119 as an amendment to the State Implementation Plan.
(50) [Reserved]
(51) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 11, 2001.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) License Amendment #10 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Bath Iron Works Corporation on April 11, 2001.
(B) License Amendment #6 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Pratt & Whitney on April 26, 2001.
(C) License Amendment #7 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Pratt & Whitney on July 2, 2001.
(D) License Amendment #2 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Moosehead Manufacturing Co.'s Dover-Foxcroft plant on May 10, 2001.
(E) License Amendment #2 issued by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection to Moosehead Manufacturing Co.'s Monson plant on May 10, 2001.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(52) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 23, 1996.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 110 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection regulations, “Ambient Air Quality Standards,” adopted by the Board of Environmental Protection on July 24, 1996, and effective August 6, 1996.
(B) [Reserved]
(53) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on December 29, 2003, October 22, 2004, and December 9, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 155 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control,” effective in the State of Maine on July 14, 2004, with the exception of the word “or” in Subsection 7C which Maine did not submit as part of the SIP revision.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(54) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on March 8, 2004, and June 28, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 153 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing,” effective in the State of Maine on February 25, 2004.
(B) Chapter 130 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Solvent Cleaners,” effective in the State of Maine on June 28, 2004.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(55) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 29, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 148 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Emissions from Smaller-Scale Electric Generating Resources” effective in the State of Maine on August 9, 2004.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(56) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on February 12, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 145 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “NOX Control Program,” effective in the State of Maine on July 22, 2001.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(57) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on August 27, 2004, and September 8, 2004.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 152 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Consumer Products,” effective in the State of Maine on September 1, 2004.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(58) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on February 25, 2004 and December 9, 2004 submitting Maine's Low Emission Vehicle Program.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 127 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection rules entitled “New Motor Vehicle Emission Standards” with an effective date of December 31, 2000, including the Basis Statements and Appendix A.
(59) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on December 3, 2004, January 5, 2005, October 31, 2005, and November 9, 2005.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 151 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings,” effective in the State of Maine on November 1, 2005.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(60) [Reserved]
(61) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on April 27, 2005.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 102 of Maine Department of Environmental Protection Rules, entitled “Open Burning,” effective in the State of Maine on April 25, 2005.
(B) State of Maine MAPA 1 form which provides certification that the Attorney General approved the rule as to form and legality, dated April 12, 2005.
(62) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 14, 2004, and February 8, 2006.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 100 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Definitions,” effective in the State of Maine December 24, 2005.
(B) Chapter 137 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Emission Statements,” effective in the State of Maine on July 6, 2004, with the exception of the following sections which the state did not include in its SIP revision request: section 137.1.C; section 137.1.E; section 137.1.F; section 137.2.A through F; section 137.2.H; section 137.3.B; section 137.3.C; section 137.4.D(4), from the sentence beginning with “Greenhouse gases” to the end of this section; the note within section 137.D(5); section 137(E), and; Appendix A.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of these submittals.
(B) Correspondence from David W. Wright of the Maine DEP dated June 6, 2006, indicating which portions of Chapter 137 should not be incorporated into the State's SIP.
(63) Revision to Chapter 141 “Conformity of General Federal Actions,” submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 29, 2007 and effective in the State of Maine on May 21, 2007.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapter 141 “Conformity of General Federal Actions” 1. Definition. Effective in the State of Maine on May 21, 2007.
(ii) Additional Materials.
(A) Chapter 141 “Conformity of General Federal Actions,” 2. Conformity to State and Federal Implementation Plans. The Maine Department of Environmental Protection amended its incorporation-by-reference within Chapter 141.2 to reflect EPA's revision to the Federal General Conformity Rule for fine particulate matter promulgated on July 17, 2006 (71 FR 40420-40427); specifically 40 CFR 51.852 Definitions and 40 CFR 51.853 Applicability.
(64) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection on October 3, 2007.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Maine Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA) 1 Form which provides certification that the Attorney General approved Chapter 139 “Transportation Conformity,” as to form and legality, dated September 10, 2007.
(B) Chapter 139 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection Regulations, “Transportation Conformity,” effective in the State of Maine on September 19, 2007.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
[37 FR 10870, May 31, 1972]
Subpart V—Maryland
§ 52.1070 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State implementation plan for Maryland under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet national ambient air quality standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to December 26, 2018, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Entries in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with the EPA approval dates after December 26, 2018 for the State of Maryland, have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the State implementation plan and for incorporation by reference into the plan as it is contained in this section, and will be considered by the Director of the Federal Register for approval in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region III certifies that the following materials provided by EPA at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated State rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the State implementation plan as of the dates referenced in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference into the State implementation plan may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. To obtain the material, please call the Regional Office at (215) 814-3376. You may also inspect the material with an EPA approval date prior to December 26, 2018 for the State of Maryland at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(c) EPA approved regulations.
| Citation | Title/subject | State effective date |
EPA approval date | Additional explanation/ citation at 40 CFR 52.1100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code of Maryland Administrative Regulations (COMAR) | ||||
| 26.11.01 General Administrative Provisions | ||||
| 26.11.01.01 | Definitions | 4/23/2018 | 10/11/2018, 83 FR 51366 | Section .01B is revised to remove definition 24-1 for “NOX ozone season allowance” Previous approval 7/17/2017. |
| 26.11.01.02 | Relationship of Provisions in this Subtitle | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(1). |
| 26.11.01.03 | Delineation of Areas | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(1). |
| 26.11.01.04 | Testing and Monitoring | 3/5/2012 | 1/25/2013, 78 FR 5290 | Amended section 04C. |
| 26.11.01.05 | Records and Information | 5/17/2010 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | (c)(172) Administrative changes to reporting and recordkeeping requirements. |
| 26.11.01.05-1 | Emission Statements | 12/7/1992 | 10/12/1994, 59 FR 51517 | (c)(109). |
| 26.11.01.06 | Circumvention | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(1). |
| 26.11.01.07 | Malfunctions and Other Temporary Increases in Emissions | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(1). |
| 26.11.01.08 | Determination of Ground Level Concentrations—Acceptable Techniques | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(5). |
| 26.11.01.09 | Vapor Pressure of Gasoline | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(5) |
| 26.11.01.10 | Continuous Opacity Monitoring Requirements | 2/15/2016 | 12/14/2018, 83 FR 64282 | 1. Add new subsections A(6), B(5) and B(6). 2. Revise subsection B(3). 3. Remove subsection F. |
| 26.11.01.11 | Continuous Emissions Monitoring | 8/22/2010 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.02 Permits, Approvals, and Registration | ||||
| 26.11.02.01 | Definitions | 5/8/1995 | 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182); Exceptions:26.11.02.01B(1), (1-1), (4)-(6), (10), (15), (16), (22), (29)-(33), (37),(39), (42), (46), (49), (50), (54) |
| 26.11.02.01 | Definitions | 3/5/2012 | 2/28/2013, 78 FR 13497 | Revised .01B(44) and .01C(1). |
| 26.11.02.02 | General Provisions | 5/8/1995 | 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182); Exception: .02D. |
| 26.11.02.03 | Federally Enforceable Permits to Construct and State Permits to Operate | 5/8/1995 | 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182). |
| 26.11.02.04 | Duration of Permits | 5/8/1995 | 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182); Exception: .04C(2). |
| 26.11.02.05 | Violation of Permits and Approvals | 5/8/1995 | 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182). |
| 26.11.02.06 | Denial of Applications for State Permits and Approvals | 5/8/1995, 6/16/1997 |
2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182). |
| 26.11.02.07 | Procedures for Denying, Revoking, or Reopening and Revising a Permit or Approval | 12/10/2015 | 8/28/2017, 82 FR 40710 | Previous Approval 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012, (c) (182) |
| 26.11.02.08 | Late Applications and Delays in Acting on Applications | 5/8/1995 | 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182). |
| 26.11.02.09 | Sources Subject to Permits to Construct | 7/8/2013 | 7/6/2015, 80 FR 38404 | .09A(3) and .09A(4) are amended. Limited approval remains in effect. |
| 26.11.02.10 | Sources Exempt from Permits to Construct and Approvals | 8/11/2011 | 6/12/2012, 77 FR 34808 | Revised .10X |
| 26.11.02.11 | Procedures for Obtaining Permits to Construct Certain Significant Sources | 12/10/2015 | 8/28/2017, 82 FR 40710 | Previous Approval 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012, (c) (182) |
| 26.11.02.12 | Procedures for Obtaining Approvals of PSD Sources and NSR Sources, Certain Permits to Construct, and Case-by-Case MACT Determinations in Accordance with 40 CFR part 63, Subpart B | 12/10/2015 | 8/28/2017, 82 FR 40710 | Previous Approval 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 |
| 26.11.02.13 | Sources Subject to State Permits to Operate | 5/8/1995 | 2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182). |
| 26.11.02.14 | Procedures for Obtaining State Permits to Operate and Permits to Construct Certain Sources and Permits to Construct Control Equipment on Existing Sources | 5/8/1995, 6/16/1997 |
2/27/2003, 68 FR 9012 | (c)(182). |
| 26.11.04 Ambient Air Quality Standards | ||||
| 26.11.04.02 | Ambient Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Reference Conditions, and Methods of Measurement | 9/17/2012 | 2/11/2013, 78 FR 9593 | |
| 26.11.05 Air Quality Episode System | ||||
| 26.11.05.01 | Definitions | 6/18/1990 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17698 | (c)(100). |
| 26.11.05.02 | General Requirements | 6/18/1990 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17698 | (c)(100). |
| 26.11.05.03 | Air Pollution Episode Criteria | 6/18/1990 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17698 | (c)(100). |
| 26.11.05.04 | Standby Emissions Reduction Plan | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(4). |
| 26.11.05.05 | Control Requirements and Standby Orders | 6/18/1990 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17698 | (c)(100). |
| 26.11.05.06 | Tables | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(4). |
| 26.11.06 General Emissions Standards, Prohibitions, and Restrictions | ||||
| 26.11.06.01 | Definitions | 5/8/1991 | 11/29/1994, 59 FR 60908 | (c)(102)(i)(B)(14). |
| 26.11.06.02 [Except: .02A(1)(e), (1)(g), (1)(h), (1)(i)] | Visible Emissions | 11/24/2003 | 8/1/2007, 72 FR 41891 | Revised paragraph 26.11.06.02A(2). |
| 26.11.06.03 | Particulate Matter | 11/11/2002 | 8/6/2003, 68 FR 46487 | (c)(181). |
| 26.11.06.04 | Carbon Monoxide in Areas III and IV | 1/5/1988; recodified, 8/1/1988 |
4/7/1993, 58 FR 18010 | (c)(92). |
| 26.11.06.05 | Sulfur Compounds from Other than Fuel Burning Equipment | 11/11/2002 | 8/6/2003, 68 FR 46487 | (c)(181). |
| 26.11.06.06 | Volatile Organic Compounds | 9/22/1997 | 5/7/2001, 66 FR 22924 | (c)(156) Note: On 2/27/2003 (68 FR 9012), EPA approved a revised rule citation with a State effective date of 5/8/1995 [(c)(182)(i)(C)]. |
| 26.11.06.10 | Refuse Burning Prohibited in Certain Installations | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(5). |
| 26.11.06.14 | Control of PSD Sources | 7/8/2013 | 11/25/2014, 79 FR 70099 | Revised .14B(1). |
| 26.11.06.15 | Nitrogen Oxides from Nitric Acid Plants | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(5). |
| 26.11.06.16 | Tables | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(5). |
| 26.11.07 Open Fires | ||||
| 26.11.07.01 | Definitions | 5/22/1995 | 6/11/2002, 67 FR 39856 | (c)(173). |
| 26.11.07.02 | General | 5/22/1995 | 2/25/1997, 62 FR 8380 | (c)(120). |
| 26.11.07.03 | Control Officer May Authorize Certain Open Fires | 8/11/1997 | 6/11/2002, 67 FR 39856 | (c)(173). |
| 26.11.07.04 | Public Officers May Authorize Certain Fires | 5/22/1995 | 2/25/1997, 62 FR 8380 | (c)(120). |
| 26.11.07.05 | Open Fires Allowed Without Authorization of Control Officer or Public Officer | 5/22/1995 | 2/25/1997, 62 FR 8380 | (c)(120) .05A(3) & (4), and .05B(3) are State-enforceable only. |
| 26.11.07.06 | Safety Determinations at Federal Facilities | 8/11/1997 | 6/11/2002, 67 FR 39856 | (c)(173). |
| 10.18.08/26.11.08 Control of Incinerators | ||||
| 10.18.08/26.11.08.01 | Definitions | 9/12/2005 | 9/15/2008, 73 FR 53130 | Definition of “crematory” is added. |
| 10.18.08.02 | Applicability | 7/18/1980 | 8/5/1981, 46 FR 39818 | (c)(45). |
| 10.18.08.03 | Prohibition of Certain Incinerators in Areas III and IV | 6/8/1981 | 5/11/1982, 47 FR 20126 | (c)(58). |
| 10.18.08/26.11.08.04 | Visible Emissions | 2/15/2016 | 12/14/2018, 83 FR 64282 | Add new subsection D. Previous approval 8/1/2007 (72 FR 41891). |
| 10.18.08/26.11.08.05 | Particulate Matter | 9/12/2005 | 9/15/2008, 73 FR 53130 | Sections .05A(3) and .05B(2)(a) are revised. |
| 10.18.08.06 | Prohibition of Unapproved Hazardous Waste Incinerators | 3/25/1984 | 7/2/1985, 50 FR 27245 | (c)(82). |
| 26.11.09 Control of Fuel Burning Equipment, Stationary Internal Combustion Engines, and Certain Fuel-Burning Installations | ||||
| 26.11.09.01 | Definitions | 4/28/2014 | 6/9/2015, 80 FR 32474 | Definition of “biomass” is added. |
| 26.11.09.02 | Applicability | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(7). |
| 26.11.09.03 | General Conditions for Fuel Burning Equipment | 6/21/2004 | 7/6/2005, 70 FR 38774 | Revised paragraphs 26.11.09.03C(1) and .03C(2). |
| 26.11.09.04 | Prohibition of Certain New Fuel Burning Equipment | 4/28/2014 | 6/9/2015, 80 FR 32474 | Revised (C)(1). |
| 26.11.09.05 | Visible Emissions | 11/24/2003 | 8/1/2007, 72 FR 41891 | Revised paragraph 26.11.09.05A(3). |
| 26.11.09.06 | Control of Particulate Matter | 4/28/2014 | 6/9/2015, 80 FR 32474 | Revised (D)(1) and (D)(2). |
| 26.11.09.07 | Control of Sulfur Oxides from Fuel Burning Equipment | 4/28/2014 | 6/9/2015, 80 FR 32474 | Revised (B)(5). |
| 26.11.09.08 | Control of NOX Emissions for Major Stationary Sources | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | 1. Revise H, H(1) and H(3), remove H(2), and recodify H(4) to H(3) 2. Revise I and remove I(3) and I(4). Previous approval (8/30/2016). |
| 26.11.09.09 | Tables and Diagrams | 4/28/2014 | 6/9/2015, 80 FR 32474 | Amended incorrect reference. |
| 26.11.09.10 | Requirements to Burn Used Oil and Waste Combustible Fluid as Fuel | 4/28/2014 | 6/9/2015, 80 FR 32474 | New regulation. |
| 26.11.09.12 | Standards for Biomass Fuel-Burning Equipment Equal to or Greater Than 350,000 Btu/hr | 4/28/2014 | 6/9/2015, 80 FR 34274 | New regulation. |
| 26.11.10 Control of Iron and Steel Production Installations | ||||
| 26.11.10.01 | Definitions | 12/25/2000 | 11/7/2001, 66 FR 56222 | (c)(163). |
| 26.11.10.02 | Applicability | 11/2/1998 | 9/7/2001, 66 FR 46727 | (c)(153). |
| 26.11.10.03 | Visible Emissions | 6/29/2009 | 7/27/2012, 77 FR 44146 | Revised paragraphs A. and D. of 26.11.10.03 for Sintering Plants. |
| 26.11.10.04 | Control of Particulate Matter | 11/2/1998 | 9/7/2001, 66 FR 46727 | (c)(153). |
| 26.11.10.05 | Sulfur Content Limitations for Coke Oven Gas | 11/2/1998 | 9/7/2001, 66 FR 46727 | (c)(153). |
| 26.11.10.05-1 | Control of Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Basic Oxygen Furnaces | 9/12/2005 | 2/9/2010, 75 FR 6307 | |
| 26.11.10.06 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Iron and Steel Production Installations | 5/9/2016 | 7/28/2017, 82 FR 35104 | Removed reference to TM 90-01 from C(3)(b) and added reference to COMAR 26.11.01.11. |
| 26.11.10.07 | Testing and Observation Procedures | 12/25/2000 | 11/7/2001, 66 FR 56222 | (c)(163). |
| 26.11.11 Control of Petroleum Products Installations, Including Asphalt Paving, Asphalt Concrete Plants, and Use of Waste Oils | ||||
| 26.11.11.01 | Applicability | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(9). |
| 26.11.11.02 | Asphalt Paving | 4/26/1993 | 1/6/1995, 60 FR 2018 | (c)(113)(i)(B)(1). |
| 26.11.11.03 | Asphalt Concrete Plants in Areas I, II, V, and VI | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(9). |
| 26.11.11.06 | Use of Waste Oils as Fuel | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(9). |
| 26.11.12 Control of Batch Type Hot-Dip Galvanizing Installations | ||||
| 26.11.12.01 | Definitions | 5/8/1995 | 7/25/2000, 64 FR 45743 | (c)(149). |
| 26.11.12.02 | Applicability | 5/8/1995 | 7/25/2000, 64 FR 45743 | (c)(149). |
| 26.11.12.03 | Prohibitions and Exemptions | 5/8/1995 | 7/25/2000, 64 FR 45743 | (c)(149). |
| 26.11.12.04 | Visible Emissions | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(10). |
| 26.11.12.05 | Particulate Matter | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(10). |
| 26.11.12.06 | Reporting Requirements | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(10). |
| 26.11.13 Control of Gasoline and Volatile Organic Compound Storage and Handling | ||||
| 26.11.13.01 | Definitions | 10/18/2007 | 7/18/2008, 73 FR 41268 | |
| 26.11.13.02 | Applicability and Exemption | 4/26/1993 | 1/6/1995, 60 FR 2018 | (c)(113)(i)(B)(3). |
| 26.11.13.03 | Large Storage Tanks | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(12). |
| 26.11.13.04 | Loading Operations | 5/28/2014 | 8/3/2015, 80 FR 45892 | Addition of alternative compliance procedure and administrative changes. |
| 26.11.13.05 | Gasoline Leaks from Tank Trucks | 5/28/2014 | 8/3/2015, 80 FR 45892 | Administrative changes. |
| 26.11.13.06 | Plans for Compliance | 4/26/1993 | 1/6/1995, 60 FR 2018 | (c)(113)(i)(B)(5). |
| 26.11.13.07 | Control of Gasoline and VOC Emissions from Portable Fuel Containers | 6/18/2007 | 7/17/2008, 73 FR 40970 | |
| 26.11.13.08 | Control of VOC Emissions from Marine Vessel Loading | 10/18/2007 | 7/18/2008, 73 FR 41268 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.14 Control of Emissions From Kraft Pulp Mills | ||||
| 26.11.14.01 | Definitions | 1/8/2001, 10/15/2001 |
11/7/2001, 66 FR 56220 | (c)(170). |
| 26.11.14.02 | Applicability | 1/8/2001 | 11/7/2001, 66 FR 56220 | (c)(170). |
| 26.11.14.06 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds | 3/3/2014 | 7/17/2017, 82 FR 32641 | Amended to clarify volative organic compound (VOC) control system and requirements at Kraft pulp mills (8/30/2016). |
| 26.11.14.07 | Control of NOX Emissions from Fuel Burning Equipment | 4/23/2018 | 10/11/2018, 83 FR 51366 | Sections .07A and .07B are revised, Section .07C is removed, Section .07D is revised and recodified as Section .07C. |
| 26.11.17 Requirements for Major New Sources and Modifications | ||||
| 26.11.17.01 | Definitions | 7/8/2013 | 7/13/2015, 80 FR 39969 | |
| 26.11.17.02 | Applicability | 7/8/2013 | 7/13/2015, 80 FR 39969 | |
| 26.11.17.03 | General Conditions | 10/22/2007 | 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949. | |
| 26.11.17.04 | Creating Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs) | 10/22/2007 | 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | Revised; Former Regulation .04 is repealed and replaced in its entirety. |
| 26.11.17.05 | Information on Emission Reductions and Certification | 10/22/2007 | 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | Revised; Former Regulation .05 is repealed and replaced in its entirety. |
| 26.11.17.06 | Transferring Emission Reduction Credits | 10/22/2007 | 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | Added. |
| 26.11.17.07 | Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL)—General | 10/22/2007 | 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | Added. |
| 26.11.17.08 | Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL)—Permits | 10/22/2007 | 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | Added. |
| 26.11.17.09 | Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL)—Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting | 10/22/2007 | 8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | Added. |
| 26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds From Specific Processes | ||||
| 26.11.19.01 | Definitions | 6/5/1995 | 9/2/1997, 62 FR 46199 | (c)(126) Note: On 5/13/1998 (63 FR 26462), EPA approved the revised definition of “major stationary source of VOC “ with a State effective date of 5/8/1995 [(c)(128)]. |
| 26.11.19.02 | Applicability, Determining Compliance, Reporting, and General Requirements | 3/5/2012 | 1/25/2013, 78 FR 5290 | Amended sections .02D, .02E, .02G and .02I. |
| 26.11.19.03 | Automotive and Light-Duty Truck Coating | 9/22/1997 | 11/5/1998, 63 FR 59720 | (c)(140). |
| 26.11.19.04 | Can Coating | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (C)(90)(i)(B)(12). |
| 26.11.19.05 | Coil Coating | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (C)(90)(i)(B)(12). |
| 26.11.19.06 | Large Appliance Coating | 10/1/2010 | 5/12/2011, 76 FR 27610. | |
| 26.11.19.07 | Paper, Fabric, Film, and Foil Coating | 5/16/2011 | 10/17/2011, 76 FR 64022 | Revisions to Section title and Sections .07A and .07C(3). |
| 26.11.19.07-1 | Control of VOC Emissions from Solid Resin Decorative Surface Manufacturing | 6/15/1998 | 6/17/1999, 64 FR 32415 | (c)(142). |
| 26.11.19.07-2 | Plastic Parts and Business Machines Coating | 5/16/2011 | 10/17/2011, 76 FR 64022 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.19.08 | Metal Parts and Products Coating | 5/26/2014 | 10/1/2015, 80 FR 59056 | Amends section title. Adds definitions. Section 26.11.19.08(B), Emission Standards, removed. Section 26.11.19.08(B), Incorporation by Reference, added. Section 26.11.19.08(C), Applicability and Exemptions, added. Section 26.11.19.08(D), Emission Standards, added. |
| 26.11.19.09 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions from Cold and Vapor Degreasing | 6/5/1995 | 8/4/1997, 62 FR 41853 | (c)(123). |
| 26.11.19.09-1 | Control of VOC Emissions from Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations Other Than Cold and Vapor Degreasing. | 4/19/2010 | 2/22/2011, 76 FR 9656 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.19.10 | Flexographic and Rotogravure Printing | 4/19/2010 | 9/27/2010, 75 FR 59086 | Revision to section .10B(2). |
| 26.11.19.10-1 | Flexible packaging printing | 4/19/2010 | 9/27/2010, 75 FR 59086 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.19.11 | Lithographic and Letterpress Printing | 5/16/2011 | 7/23/2012, 77 FR 43001 | Sections .11A through .11E are revised; sections .11F through .11H are added. |
| 26.11.19.12 | Dry Cleaning Installations | 9/22/1997 | 9/2/1998, 63 FR 46662 | (c)(131). |
| 26.11.19.13 | Drum and Pail Coating | 5/16/2011 | 10/17/2011, 76 FR 64017 | Revisions to Section title and Sections .13A, .13B, and .13C and addition of new Section .13D. |
| 26.11.19.13-1 | Aerospace Coating Operations | 10/2/2000, 10/15/2001 |
11/7/2001, 66 FR 56220 | (c)(169). |
| 26.11.19.13-2 | Brake Shoe Coating Operations | 8/24/1998 | 6/17/1999, 64 FR 32415 | (c)(142). |
| 26.11.19.13-3 | Control of VOC Emissions from Structural Steel Coating Operations | 6/29/1998 | 6/17/1999, 64 FR 32415 | (c)(142). |
| 26.11.19.14 | Manufacture of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products | 5/8/1991 | 11/29/1994, 59 FR 60908 | (c)(102)(i)(B)(14). |
| 26.11.19.15 | Paint, Resin, and Adhesive Manufacturing and Adhesive and Sealant Applications | 4/19/2010 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | Amendments to Sections .15A and .15C. |
| 26.11.19.16 | Control of VOC Equipment Leaks | 8/19/1991 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46180 | (c)(103)(i)(B)(9). |
| 26.11.19.17 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions from Yeast Manufacturing | 9/12/2005 | 3/31/2006, 71 FR 16237 | |
| 26.11.19.18 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions from Screen Printing and Digital Imaging | 6/10/2002 | 1/15/2003, 68 FR 1972 | (c)(177). |
| 26.11.19.19 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions from Expandable Polystyrene Operations | 10/2/2000 | 5/7/2001, 66 FR 22924 | (c)(156). |
| 26.11.19.21 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions from Commercial Bakery Ovens | 7/3/1995 | 10/15/1997, 62 FR 53544 | (c)(125)(i)(B)(4). |
| 26.11.19.22 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions from Vinegar Generators | 8/11/1997 | 9/23/1999, 64 FR 41445 | (c)(137). |
| 26.11.19.23 | Control of VOC Emissions from Vehicle Refinishing | 4/16/2012 | 9/26/2012, 77 FR 59093 | Entire regulation revised. |
| 26.11.19.24 | Control of VOC Emissions from Leather Coating | 8/11/1997 | 9/23/1999, 64 FR 41445 | (c)(137). |
| 26.11.19.25 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Explosives and Propellant Manufacturing | 8/11/1997 | 1/26/1999, 64 FR 3852 | (c)(141). |
| 26.11.19.26 | Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Reinforced Plastic Manufacturing | 9/28/2015 | 12/23/2016, 81 FR 94259 | Amendment to .26A. |
| 26.11.19.26-1 | Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing | 9/28/2015 | 12/23/2016, 81 FR 94259 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.19.27 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Marine Vessel Coating Operations | 10/20/1997 | 9/5/2001, 66 FR 46379 | (c)(166). |
| 26.11.19.27-1 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Pleasure Craft Coating Operations | 10/12/2012 | 9/26/2013, 78 FR 59240 | Regulation Added. |
| 26.11.19.28 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Bread and Snack Food Drying Operations | 10/2/2000 | 5/7/2001, 66 FR 22924 | (c)(157). |
| 26.11.19.29 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Distilled Spirits Facilities | 10/2/2000, 10/15/2001 |
11/7/2001, 66 FR 56220 | (c)(160). |
| 26.11.19.30 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Chemical Production and Flouropolymer Material Installations | 4/21/2008 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | Amendments to Sections .30A, .30B, .30C and .30E. |
| 26.11.19.31 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Medical Device Manufacturing | 6/5/2006 | 1/11/2007, 72 FR 1289 | |
| 26.11.19.33 | Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Flat wood Paneling Coatings | 4/19/2010 | 1/26/2011, 76 FR 4534 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.20 Mobile Sources | ||||
| 26.11.20.02 | Motor Vehicle Emission Control Devices | 8/1/1988 | 11/3/1992, 57 FR 49651 | (c)(90)(i)(B)(13) [as 26.11.20.06]. |
| 26.11.20.03 | Motor Vehicle Fuel Specifications | 10/26/1992 | 6/10/1994, 59 FR 29957 | (c)(101)(i)(B)(3). |
| 26.11.20.04 | National Low Emission Vehicle Program | 3/22/1999 | 12/28/1999, 64 FR 72564 | (c)(146). |
| 26.11.24 Stage II Vapor Recovery at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities | ||||
| 26.11.24.01 | Definitions | 11/23/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49667 | Add to B. definitions 8-1 “major modification,” 14-1 “Stage I vapor balance system,” and 16-1 “Tank System.” Revise definition (14) “Owner.” Previous approval 1/17/2008. |
| 26.11.24.01-1 | Incorporation by Reference | 11/23/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49667 | Incorporate new test methods B.6, B.7, and B.8. Previous approval (c)(178). |
| 26.11.24.02 | Applicability, Exemptions, and Effective Date | 11/23/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49667 | Remove paragraphs E and F. Previous approval (c)(178). |
| 26.11.24.03 | General Requirements | 11/23/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49667 | Revise paragraph A, add paragraph A-1, revise paragraph B, and add paragraph J. Prior approval (c)(178). |
| 26.11.24.03-1 | Decommissioning of the Stage II Vapor Recovery System | 11/23/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49667 | |
| 26.11.24.04 | Testing Requirements | 11/23/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49667 | Revise paragraph A and add A.6 and A.7. Add paragraph A-1. Revise C.2. |
| 26.11.24.05 | Inspection Requirements | 2/15/1993 | 6/9/1994, 59 FR 29730 | (c)(107). |
| 26.11.24.05-1 | Inspections by a Certified Inspector | 1/29/2007 | 1/17/2008, 73 FR 3187 | Added Section. |
| 26.11.24.06 | Training Requirements for Operation and Maintenance of Approved Systems | 2/15/1993 | 6/9/1994, 59 FR 29730 | (c)(107). |
| 26.11.24.07 | Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements | 11/23/2015 | 9/23/2019, 84 FR 49667 | Revise paragraph E and revise E.3. |
| 26.11.24.08 | Instructional Signs | 2/15/1993 | 6/9/1994, 59 FR 29730 | (c)(107). |
| 26.11.24.09 | Sanctions | 2/15/1993 | 6/9/1994, 59 FR 29730 | (c)(107). |
| 26.11.25 Control of Glass Melting Furnaces | ||||
| 26.11.25.01 | Definitions | 10/5/1998 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60738 | |
| 26.11.25.02 | Applicability and Exemptions | 10/5/1998 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60738 | |
| 26.11.25.03 | Visible Emissions from Glass Melting Furnaces | 10/5/1998 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60738 | |
| 26.11.25.04 | Particulate Matter Emissions from Glass Melting Furnaces | 10/5/1998 | 10/19/2005, 70 FR 60738 | |
| 26.11.26 Conformity | ||||
| 26.11.26.01 | Purpose | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.26.02 | Definitions | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | Definitions added for transportation conformity; definitions for general conformity were approved at (c)(136). |
| 26.11.26.03 | Transportation Conformity | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.26.04 | Transportation Conformity—Consultation in General | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.26.05 | Transportation Conformity—Interagency Consultation Requirements | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.26.06 | Transportation Conformity—Dispute Resolution | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.26.07 | Transportation Conformity—Public Consultation Procedures | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.26.08 | Transportation Conformity—Interagency Consultation | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.26.09 | General Conformity | 6/30/2008 | 9/26/2011, 76 FR 59254 | Formerly SIP regulation 26.11.26.03. |
| 26.11.27 Emission Limitations for Power Plants | ||||
| 26.11.27.01 | Definitions | 7/16/2007 | 9/4/2008, 73 FR 51599 | |
| 26.11.27.02 | Applicability and Exceptions | 7/16/2007 | 9/4/2008, 73 FR 51599 | |
| 26.11.27.03 | General Requirements | 7/16/2007 | 9/4/2008, 73 FR 51599 | Exceptions: Paragraphs .03B(7)(a)(iii) and .03D; the word “and” at the end of paragraph .03B(7)(a)(ii). |
| 26.11.27.05 | Monitoring and Reporting Requirements | 7/16/2007 | 9/4/2008, 73 FR 51599 | |
| 26.11.27.06 | Judicial Review of Penalty Waivers | 7/16/2007 | 9/4/2008, 73 FR 51599 | |
| 26.11.29 Control of NO X Emissions from Natural Gas Pipeline Stations | ||||
| 26.11.29.01 | Definitions | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.29.02 | Applicability and General Requirements | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.29.03 | Monitoring Requirements | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.29.04 | Demonstrating Compliance | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.29.05 | Maintaining Records | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30 Control of Portland Cement Manufacturing Plants | ||||
| 26.11.30.01 | Scope | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30.02 | Applicability | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30.03 | Definitions | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30.04 | Particulate Matter | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30.05 | Visible Emissions Standards | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30.06 | Sulfur Compounds | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30.07 | Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.30.08 | NOX Continuous Emissions Monitoring Requirements | 7/20/2015 | 3/28/2018, 83 FR 13192 | |
| 26.11.31 Quality Assurance Requirements for Opacity Monitors (COMs) | ||||
| 26.11.31.01 | Scope | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.02 | Applicability | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.03 | Incorporation by Reference | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.04 | Definitions | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.05 | Principle | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.06 | Quality Control Requirements | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.07 | Opacity Calibration Drift Assessment | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.08 | Audit Frequency | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.09 | Performance Audit | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.10 | Calibration Error Methods | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.11 | Zero Alignment Audit | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.31.12 | Corrective Actions | 6/13/2011 | 11/7/2016, 81 FR 78048 | |
| 26.11.32 Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds From Consumer Products | ||||
| 26.11.32.01 | Applicability and Exemptions | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.02 | Incorporation by Reference | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.03 | Definitions | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. Previous Approval dated 12/10/2007. |
| 26.11.32.04 | Standards—General | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.05 | Standards—Requirements for Charcoal Lighter Materials | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.05-1 | Requirements for Flammable and Extremely Flammable Multi-Purpose Solvent and Paint Thinner | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.32.06 | Standards—Requirements for Aerosol Adhesives | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.07 | Standards—Requirements for Floor Wax Strippers | 8/18/2003 | 12/9/2003, 68 FR 68523 | (c)(185). |
| 26.11.32.08 | Requirements for Contact Adhesives, Electronic Cleaners, Footwear, or Leather Care Products, and General Purpose Cleaners | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.09 | Requirements for Adhesive Removers, Electrical Cleaners, and Graffiti Removers | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.32.10 | Requirements for Solid Air Fresheners and Toilet and Urinal Care Products | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | New Regulation. |
| 26.11.32.11 | Innovative Products—CARB Exemption | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .08. |
| 26.11.32.12 | Innovative Products—Department Exemption | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.13 | Administrative Requirements | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .10; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.14 | Reporting Requirements | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. existing Regulation .11; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.15 | Variances | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .12; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.16 | Test Methods | 10/9/2017 | 4/2/2019, 84 FR 12508 | Revised. |
| 26.11.32.17 | Alternative Control Plan (ACP) | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .14; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.18 | Approval of an ACP Application | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .15; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.19 | Record Keeping and Availability of Requested Information | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .16. |
| 26.11.32.20 | Violations | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .17. |
| 26.11.32.21 | Surplus Reduction and Surplus Trading | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .18; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.22 | Limited-use surplus reduction credits for early formulations of ACP Products | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .19; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.23 | Reconciliation of Shortfalls | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .20; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.24 | Modifications to an ACP | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .21; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.25 | Cancellation of an ACP | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .22; Amended. |
| 26.11.32.26 | Transfer of an ACP | 6/18/2007 | 12/10/2007, 72 FR 69621 | Recodification of existing Regulation .23 |
| 26.11.34 Low Emissions Vehicle Program | ||||
| 26.11.34.01 | Purpose | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.02 (except .02B(20)) | Incorporation by Reference | 2/16/2015 | 7/14/2015, 80 FR 40921 | Update to incorporate by reference California's Advanced Clean Car Program rules, with the exception of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 2, Article 5, Section 2030. |
| 26.11.34.03 | Applicability and Exemptions | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.04 | Definitions | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.05 | Emissions Requirements | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.06 | Fleet Average NMOG Requirements | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.07 | Initial NMOG Credit Account Balances | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.08 | Fleet Average Greenhouse Gas Requirements | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.09 | Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Requirements | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.10 | Initial ZEV Credit Account Balances | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.11 | Vehicle Testing | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.12 | Warranty | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.13 | Manufacturer Compliance Demonstration | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.34.14 | Enforcement | 12/17/2007 | 6/11/2013, 78 FR 34911 | |
| 26.11.35 Volatile Organic Compounds from Adhesives and Sealants | ||||
| 26.11.35.01 | Applicability and Exemptions | 4/21/2008 6/1/2009 |
10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | New Section. |
| 26.11.35.02 | Incorporation by Reference | 4/21/2008 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | New Section. |
| 26.11.35.03 | Definitions | 4/21/2008 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | New Section. |
| 26.11.35.04 | Standards | 4/21/2008 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | New Section. |
| 26.11.35.05 | Administrative Requirements | 4/21/2008 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | New Section. |
| 26.11.35.06 | Compliance Procedures and Test Methods | 4/21/2008 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | New Section. |
| 26.11.35.07 | Container Labeling | 4/21/2008 | 10/18/2011, 76 FR 64237 | New Section. |
| 26.11.38 Control of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units | ||||
| 26.11.38.01 | Definitions | 8/31/2015 | 5/30/2017, 82 FR 24546 | |
| 26.11.38.02 | Applicability | 8/31/2015 | 5/30/2017, 82 FR 24546 | |
| 26.11.38.03 | 2015 NOX Emission Control Requirements | 8/31/2015 | 5/30/2017, 82 FR 24546 | |
| 26.11.38.04 | Compliance Demonstration Requirements | 8/31/2015 | 5/30/2017, 82 FR 24546 | |
| 26.11.38.05 | Reporting Requirements | 8/31/2015 | 5/30/2017, 82 FR 24546 | |
| 26.11.39 Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings | ||||
| 26.11.39.01 | Applicability and Exemptions | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.39.02 | Test Methods-Incorporation by Reference | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.39.03 | Definitions | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.39.04 | General Requirements and Standards | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.39.05 | VOC Content Limits | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.39.06 | Container Labeling Requirements | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.39.07 | Reporting Requirements | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.39.08 | Compliance Procedures | 4/25/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21312 | |
| 26.11.40 NO X Ozone Season Emission Caps for Non-trading Large NO X Units | ||||
| 26.11.40.01 | Definitions | 4/23/2018 | 10/11/2018, 83 FR 51366 | |
| 26.11.40.02 | Applicability. | 4/15/2024 | 7/24/2025, 90 FR 34763 | |
| 26.11.40.03 | NOX Ozone Season Emission Caps | 4/15/2024 | 7/24/2025, 90 FR 34763 | |
| 26.11.40.04 | Monitoring and Reporting Requirements | 4/23/2018 | 10/11/2018, 83 FR 51366 | |
| 11.14.08 Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program | ||||
| 11.14.08.01 | Title | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.02 | Definitions | 1/2/1995, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.03 | Applicability | 6/10/2002 | 1/16/2003, 68 FR 2208 | (c)(179). |
| 11.14.08.04 | Exemptions | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.05 | Schedule of the Program | 1/2/1995, 12/16/1996 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.06 | Certificates | 6/10/2002 | 1/16/2003, 68 FR 2208 | (c)(179). |
| 11.14.08.07 | Extensions | 1/2/1995, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.08 | Enforcement | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.09 | Inspection Standards | 6/10/2002 | 1/16/2003, 68 FR 2208 | (c)(179). |
| 11.14.08.10 | General Requirements for Inspection and Preparation for Inspection | 1/2/1995, 12/16/1996, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.11 | Idle Exhaust Emissions Test and Equipment Checks | 10/18/1998 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.11-1 | Transient Exhaust Emissions Test and Evaporative Purge Test Sequence | 12/16/1996, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.12 | Evaporative Integrity Test, Gas Cap Leak Test, and On-Board Diagnostics Interrogation Procedures | 6/10/2002 | 1/16/2003, 68 FR 2208 | (c)(179). |
| 11.14.08.13 | Failed Vehicle and Reinspection Procedures | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.14 | Dynamometer System Specifications | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.15 | Constant Volume Sampler, Analysis System, and Inspector Control Specifications | 1/2/1995, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.16 | Evaporative Test Equipment, Gas Cap Leak Test Equipment, and On-Board Diagnostics Interrogation Equipment Specifications | 6/10/2002 | 1/16/2003, 68 FR 2208 | (c)(179). |
| 11.14.08.17 | Quality Assurance and Maintenance—General Requirements | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.18 | Test Assurance Procedures | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.19 | Dynamometer Periodic Quality Assurance Checks | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.20 | Constant Volume Sampler Periodic Quality Assurance Checks | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.21 | Analysis System Periodic Quality Assurance Checks | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.22 | Evaporative Test Equipment, Gas Cap Leak Test Equipment and On-Board Diagnostics Interrogation Equipment Periodic Quality Assurance Checks | 1/2/1995, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.23 | Overall System Performance Quality Assurance | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.24 | Control Charts | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.25 | Gas Specifications | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.26 | Vehicle Emissions Inspection Station | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.27 | Technician's Vehicle Report | 1/2/1995, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.28 | Feedback Reports | 1/02/1995, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.29 | Certified Emissions Technician | 1/2/1995, 12/16/1996 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.30 | Certified Emissions Repair Facility | 1/2/1995, 12/16/1996 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.31 | On-Highway Emissions Test | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.32 | Fleet Inspection Station | 1/2/1995, 12/16/1996, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.33 | Fleet Inspection Standards | 1/02/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.34 | Fleet Inspection and Reinspection Methods | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.35 | Fleet Equipment and Quality Assurance Requirements | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.36 | Fleet Personnel Requirements | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.37 | Fleet Calibration Gas Specifications and Standard Reference Materials | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.38 | Fleet Recordkeeping Requirements | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.39 | Fleet Fees | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.40 | Fleet License Suspension and Revocation | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.41 | Audits | 1/2/1995 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 11.14.08.42 | Fleet Inspection After 1998 | 1/2/1995, 2/16/1996, 10/19/1998 |
10/29/1999, 64 FR 58340 | (c)(144). |
| 03.03.05 Motor Fuel Inspection [Contingency SIP Measure] | ||||
| 03.03.05.01 | Definitions | 12/18/1995 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2982 | (c)(101)(i)(B)(4); Approved as a contingency SIP measure as part of the CO Maintenance Plans for Baltimore and DC. [(c)(117) and (c)(118)]. |
| 03.03.05.01-1 | Standard Specifications for Gasoline | 12/18/1995 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2982 | |
| 03.03.05.02-1 | Other Motor Vehicle Fuels | 10/26/1992 | 6/10/1994, 58 FR 29957 | |
| 03.03.05.05 | Labeling of Pumps | 12/18/1995 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2982 | |
| 03.03.05.08 | Samples and Test Tolerance | 10/26/1992 | 6/10/1994, 58 FR 29957 | |
| 03.03.05.15 | Commingled Products | 10/26/1992 | 6/10/1994, 58 FR 29957 | |
| 03.03.06 Emissions Control Compliance [Contingency SIP Measure] | ||||
| 03.03.06.01 | Definitions | 12/18/1995 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2982 | (c)(101)(i)(B)(5); Approved as a contingency SIP measure as part of the CO Maintenance Plans for Baltimore and DC. [(c)(117) and (c)(118)]. |
| 03.03.06.02 | Vapor Pressure Determination | 10/26/1992 | 6/10/1994, 58 FR 29957 | |
| 03.03.06.03 | Oxygen Content Determination | 12/18/1995 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2982 | |
| 03.03.06.04 | Registration | 10/26/1992 | 6/10/1994, 58 FR 29957 | |
| 03.03.06.05 | Record Keeping | 10/26/1992 | 6/10/1994, 58 FR 29957 | |
| 03.03.06.06 | Transfer Documentation | 12/18/1995 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2982 | |
| 20.79.01 Applications Concerning the Construction or Modification of Generating Stations and Overhead Transmission Lines—General | ||||
| 20.79.01.01A, .01C, and .01D | Scope | 12/28/2009 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| 20.79.01.02A and .02B(1) through (13), (14)(a), (15), (16), and (18) through (20) | Definitions | 12/28/2009 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| 20.79.01.06 | Modifications to Facilities at a Power Plant | 12/28/2009 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| 20.79.02 Applications Concerning the Construction or Modification of Generating Stations and Overhead Transmission Lines—Administrative Provisions | ||||
| 20.79.02.01 | Form of Application | 2/10/1997 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| 20.79.02.02 | Distribution of Application | 2/10/1997, 11/8/2004 |
2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| 20.79.02.03 | Proceedings on the Application | 2/10/1997, 11/8/2004 |
2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; Limited approval. |
| 20.79.03 Applications Concerning the Construction or Modification of Generating Stations and Overhead Transmission Lines—Details of Filing Requirements—Generating Stations | ||||
| 20.79.03.01 | Description of Generating Station | 2/10/1997, 11/8/2004 |
2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| 20.79.03.02A and .02B(1) and (2) | Environmental Information | 2/10/1997, 11/8/2004 |
2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| TM Technical Memoranda | ||||
| TM91-01 [Except Methods 1004A through E] | Test Methods and Equipment Specifications for Stationary Sources | 11/2/1998 | 9/7/2001, 66 FR 46727 | (c)(153)(i)(D)(5) (Supplement 3 is added). |
| Annotated Code of Maryland | ||||
| Public Utility Companies Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland | ||||
| Section 7-205 | Electric Companies—Modification of Power Plant | 7/01/2006 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| Section 7-207(a), (b)(1), (c), (d), and (e) | Generating Stations or Transmission Lines—General Certification Procedure | 7/01/2007 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| Section 7-207.1(a) and (e) | Generating Stations or Transmission Lines—Onsite Generated Electricity; Approval Process | 7/1/2007 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| Section 7-208 (a)(1), (b) through (f), and (h)(2) | Generating Stations or Transmission Lines—Joint Construction of Station and Associated Lines | 7/1/2001 | 2/10/2012, 77 FR 6963 | Added; limited approval. |
| General Provisions Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland (formerly cited at Section 15 of State Government Article) | ||||
| Section 5-101 (a),(e),(f), (g)(1)and (2), (h), (i), (j), (m), (n), (p), (s),(t),(bb), (ff),(gg), (ll) | Definitions | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-103(a) through (c) | Designation of Individuals as Public Officials | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-208(a) | Determination of public official in executive agency | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-501(a) and (c) | Restrictions on participation | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-601(a) | Individuals required to file statement | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-602(a) | Financial Disclosure Statement—Filing Requirements | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-606(a) | Public Records | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-607(a) through (j) | Content of statements | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
| Section 5-608(a) through (c) | Interests attributable to individual filing statement | 10/1/2014 | 5/2/2016, 81 FR 26135 | Added; addresses CAA section 128. |
(d) EPA approved state source-specific requirements.
| Name of source | Permit number/type | State effective date | EPA approval date | Additional explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO)—Dickerson | #49352 Amended Consent Order | 7/26/1978 | 12/6/1979, 44 FR 70141 | 52.1100(c)(25). |
| Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority | Secretarial Order | 11/20/1981 | 7/7/1982, 47 FR 29531 | 52.1100(c)(65) (Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc.). |
| Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority and Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. and the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and BEDCO Development Corp | Secretarial Order | 2/25/1983 | 8/24/1983, 48 FR 38465 | 52.1100(c)(70) (Shutdown of landfill for offsets). |
| Westvaco Corp | Consent Order | 9/6/1983; Rev. 1/26/1984 |
12/20/1984, 49 FR 49457 | 52.1100(c)(74). |
| Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO) | Administrative Consent Order | 9/13/1999 | 12/15/2000, 65 FR 78416 | 52.1100(c)(151). |
| Thomas Manufacturing Corp | Consent Decree | 2/15/2001 | 11/15/2001, 66 FR 57395 | 52.1100(c)(167). |
| Kaydon Ring and Seal, Inc | Consent Order | 3/5/2004 | 8/31/2004, 69 FR 53002 | (c)(190). |
| Perdue Farms, Inc | Consent Order | 2/1/2005 | 1/11/2007, 72 FR 1291 | 52.1070(d)(1). |
| GenOn Chalk Point Generating Station | The 2011 Consent Decree for Chalk Point | 3/10/2011 | 5/4/2012, 77 FR 26438 | Docket No. 52.1070(d). The SIP approval includes specific provisions of the 2011 Consent Decree for which the State of Maryland requested approval on October 12, 2011. |
| Raven Power Fort Smallwood, LLC—Brandon Shores units 1 and 2; and H. A. Wagner units 1, 2, 3, and 4 | Consent Agreement and NOX Averaging Plan | 2/28/2016 | 5/8/2017, 82 FR 21309 | |
| National Gypsum Company (NGC) | Departmental Order | 3/11/2016 | 5/14/2018 83 FR 22203 | The SIP approval includes specific alternative volatile organic compound emission limits and other conditions for NGC as established by the Departmental Order. |
| Raven Power Fort Smallwood LLC—Brandon Shores Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2; and H.A. Wagner Electric Generating Station Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 | Consent Order for Brandon Shores and Wagner Generating Stations for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Limits and Operational Constraints | 12/4/2019 | 11/2/2022, 87 FR 66086 | Consent Order approved via Docket EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0325, as an element of Maryland's January 30, 2020 attainment plan for the Anne Arundel-Baltimore Nonattainment Area under the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. |
| C.P. Crane LLC—C.P. Crane Electric Generating Station Units 1 and 2 | Consent Order for Crane Generating Station for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Limits and Cessation of Coal-fired Combustion | 10/9/2019 | 11/2/2022, 87 FR 66086 | Consent Order approved via Docket EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0325, as an element of Maryland's January 30, 2020 attainment plan for the Anne Arundel-Baltimore Nonattainment Area under the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. |
| Raven Power Fort Smallwood, LLC—H.A. Wagner Generating Station | Consent Order | 7/6/2021 | 4/1/2024, 89 FR 22337 | Consent Order approved via Docket EPA-R03-OAR-2022-0912, as an element of Maryland's February 8, 2022 Regional Haze Plan from 2018-2028, Appendix 19. |
(e) EPA-approved nonregulatory and quasi-regulatory material.
| Name of non-regulatory SIP revision | Applicable geographic area | State submittal date | EPA approval date | Additional explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base Year Emissions Inventory | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area 1990 | 9/20/1995 | 10/30/1995, 60 FR 55321 | 52.1075(a) CO. |
| 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory | Metropolitan Washington Ozone Nonattainment Area | 3/21/1994 10/12/1995 |
1/30/1996, 61 FR 2931 | 52.1075(b) CO. |
| 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory | All ozone nonattainment areas | 3/21/1994 | 9/27/1996, 61 FR 50715 | 52.1075(c) VOC, NOX, CO. |
| 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory | Kent & Queen Anne's Counties | 3/21/1994 | 9/27/1996, 61 FR 50715 | 52.1075(d) VOC, NOX, CO. |
| 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory | Metropolitan Washington Ozone Nonattainment Area | 3/21/1994 | 4/23/1997, 62 FR 19676 | 52.1075(e) VOC, NOX, CO. |
| 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory | Metropolitan Washington Ozone Nonattainment Area | 12/24/1997 | 7/8/1998, 63 FR 36854 | 52.1075(f) VOC, NOX. |
| 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area | 12/24/1997 | 2/3/2000, 65 FR 5245 | 52.1075(g) VOC, NOX. |
| 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory | Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Ozone Nonattainment Area (Cecil County) | 12/24/1997, 4/29/1998, 12/21/1999, 12/28/2000 |
2/3/2000, 65 FR 5252, 9/19/2001, 66 FR 48209 |
52.1075(h) VOC, NOX. |
| 15% Rate of Progress Plan | Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Ozone Nonattainment Area (Cecil County) | 7/12/1995, #95-20 | 7/29/1997, 62 FR 40457 | 52.1076(a). |
| Stage II Vapor Recovery Comparability Plan | Western Maryland & Eastern Shore Counties | 11/5/1997 | 12/9/1998, 63 FR 67780 | 52.1076(b). |
| 15% Rate of Progress Plan | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area | 10/7/1998 | 2/3/2000, 65 FR 5245 | 52.1076(c). |
| 15% Rate of Progress Plan | Metropolitan Washington Ozone Nonattainment Area | 5/5/1998 | 7/19/2000, 65 FR 44686 | 52.1076(d). |
| Post-1996 Rate of Progress Plan & contingency measures | Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Ozone Nonattainment Area (Cecil County) | 12/24/1997, 4/24/1998 |
2/3/2000, 65 FR 5252 | 52.1076(f). |
| 8/18/1998, 12/21/1999 |
9/19/2001, 66 FR 44809 | |||
| 12/28/2000, 3/8/2004 |
4/15/2004, 69 FR 19939 | 52.1076(f)(3). | ||
| Ozone Attainment Plan | Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Ozone Nonattainment Area (Cecil County) | 4/29/1998, 8/18/1998, 12/21/1999, 12/28/2000, 8/31/2001 |
10/29/2001, 66 FR 54578 | 52.1076(h). |
| 9/2/2003 | 10/27/2003, 68 FR 61103 | |||
| Transportation Conformity Budgets | Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Ozone Nonattainment Area (Cecil County) | 4/29/1998, 8/18/1998, 12/21/1999, 12/28/2000 |
10/29/2001, 66 FR 54578 | 52.1076(i). |
| Post-1996 Rate of Progress Plan & contingency measures | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area | 12/24/1997, 4/24/1998, 8/18/1998, 12/21/1999, 12/28/2000 |
9/26/2001, 66 FR 49108 | 52.1076(j). |
| Ozone Attainment Plan | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area | 4/29/1998, 8/18/1998, 12/21/1999, 12/28/2000, 8/31/2001 |
10/30/2001, 66 FR 54666 | 52.1076(k). |
| 9/2/2003 | 10/27/2003, 68 FR 61103 | 52.1076(k). | ||
| Mobile budgets | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area | 8/31/2001 | 10/30/2001, 66 FR 54666 | 52.1076(l). |
| 9/2/2003 | 10/27/2003, 68 FR 61103 | |||
| Mobile budgets (2005) | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area | 9/2/2003 | 10/27/2003, 68 FR 61103 | 52.1076(m). |
| Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Ozone Nonattainment Area (Cecil County) | ||||
| Mobile budgets (2005 Rate of Progress Plan) | Metropolitan Baltimore Ozone Nonattainment Area | 11/3/2003 | 2/13/2004, 69 FR 7133 | 52.1076(n). |
| Extension for incorporation of the on-board diagnostics (OBD) testing program into the Maryland I/M SIP | All ozone nonattainment areas | 7/9/2002 | 1/16/2003, 68 FR 2208 | 52.1078(b). |
| Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Program | Metropolitan Baltimore and Metropolitan Washington Ozone Nonattainment Areas | 3/24/1994 | 9/11/1995, 60 FR 47081 | 52.1080. |
| Consultation with Local Officials (CAA Sections 121 & 127) | All nonattainment & PSD areas | 10/8/1981 | 4/8/1982, 47 FR 15140 | 52.1100(c)(63). |
| Lead (Pb) SIP | City of Baltimore | 10/23/1980 | 2/23/1982, 47 FR 7835 | 52.1100(c)(60), (61). |
| Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan | City of Baltimore—Regional Planning District 118 | 9/20/1995 7/15/2004 7/15/2004 |
10/31/1995, 60 FR 55321 4/4/2005, 70 FR 16958 |
52.1100(c)(117). Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan Base Year Emissions Inventory using MOBILE6. |
| Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan | Montgomery County Election Districts 4, 7, and 13; Prince Georges County Election Districts 2, 6, 12, 16, 17, and 18 | 10/12/1995 3/3/2004 |
1/30/1996, 61 FR 2931 4/04/2005, 70 FR 16958 |
52.1100(c)(118). Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan Base Year Emissions Inventory using MOBILE6. |
| Ozone Maintenance Plan | Kent and Queen Anne's Counties | 2/4/2004 | 10/21/2004, 69 FR 61766 | 52.1100(c)(187); SIP effective date is 11/22/04. |
| 1996-1999 Rate-of-Progress Plan SIP and the Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) in Appendix H | Washington DC 1-hour ozone nonattainment area | 12/20/1997, 5/20/1999 |
5/16/2005, 70 FR 25688 | Only the TCMs in Appendix H of the 5/20/1999 revision. |
| 1999 motor vehicle emissions budgets of 128.5 tons per day (tpy) of VOC and 196.4 tpy of NOX. | ||||
| 1990 Base Year Inventory Revisions | Washington DC 1-hour ozone nonattainment area | 9/2/2003, 2/24/2004 |
5/16/2005, 70 FR 25688 | . |
| 1999-2005 Rate-of-Progress Plan SIP Revision and the Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) in Appendix J | Washington DC 1-hour ozone nonattainment area | 9/2/2003, 2/24/2004 |
5/16/2005, 70 FR 25688 | Only the TCMs in Appendix J of the 2/24/2004 revision 2002 motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) of 125.2 tons per day (tpy) for VOC and 290.3 tpy of NOX, and, 2005 MVEBs of 97.4 tpy for VOC and 234.7 tpy of NOX. |
| VMT Offset SIP Revision | Washington DC 1-hour ozone nonattainment area | 9/2/2003, 2/24/2004 |
5/16/2005, 70 FR 25688 | |
| Contingency Measure Plan | Washington, DC Area | 9/2/2003, 2/24/2004 |
5/16/2005, 70 FR 25688 | |
| 1-hour Ozone Modeled Demonstration of Attainment | Washington DC 1-hour ozone nonattainment area | 9/2/2003, 2/24/2004 |
5/16/2005, 70 FR 25688 | |
| Attainment Demonstration and Early Action Plan for the Washington County Ozone Early Action Compact Area | Washington County | 12/20/2004, 2/28/2005 |
8/17/2005, 70 FR 48283 | |
| 1-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan | Washington DC 1-hour ozone nonattainment area | 9/2/2003, 2/24/2004 |
11/16/2005, 70 FR 69440 | |
| 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan for the Kent and Queen Anne's Area | Kent and Queen Anne's Counties | 5/2/2006, 5/19/2006 |
12/22/2006, 71 FR 76920 | |
| Reasonable Further Progress Plan (RFP), Reasonably Available Control Measures, and Contingency Measures | Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/4/2007 | 6/4/2010, 75 FR 31709 | |
| 2002 Base Year Inventory for VOC, NOX, and CO | Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/4/2007 | 6/4/2010, 75 FR 31709 | |
| 2008 RFP Transportation Conformity Budgets | Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/4/2007 | 6/4/2010, 75 FR 31709 | |
| Reasonable Further Progress Plan (RFP), Reasonably Available Control Measures, and Contingency Measures | Maryland portion of the Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/4/2007 | 6/11/2010, 75 FR 33172 | |
| 2002 Base Year Inventory for VOC, NOX, and CO | Maryland portion of the Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/4/2007 | 6/11/2010, 75 FR 33172 | |
| 2008 RFP Transportation Conformity Budgets | Maryland portion of the Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/4/2007 | 6/11/2010, 75 FR 33172 | |
| Reasonable Further Progress Plan (RFP), Reasonably Available Control Measures, and Contingency Measures | Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/12/2007 | 9/20/2011, 76 FR 58116. | |
| 2002 Base Year Inventory for VOC, NOX, and CO | Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/12/2007 | 9/20/2011, 76 FR 58116. | |
| 2008 RFP Transportation Conformity Budgets | Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area | 6/12/2007 | 9/20/2011, 76 FR 58116 | |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 7/27/07, 11/30/2007, |
11/25/2011, 76 FR 72624 | This action addresses the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| 7/31/2009, 6/23/2011 |
8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | This action addresses the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J). | ||
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 4/3/2008, 4/16/2010 |
11/25/2011, 76 FR 72624 | This action addresses the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| 7/31/2009, 6/23/2011 |
8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | This action addresses the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J). | ||
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 4/16/2010, 7/21/2010 |
11/25/2011, 76 FR 72624 | This action addresses the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| 7/31/2009, 6/23/2011 |
8/2/2012, 77 FR 45949 | This action addresses the following CAA elements or portions thereof: 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J). | ||
| RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 10/17/2011 | 7/13/2012, 77 FR 41278 | |
| Maryland Regional Haze Plan | Statewide | 2/13/2012 | 7/6/2012, 77 FR 33938 | |
| Maryland Regional Haze Plan | Statewide | 11/28/2016 | 7/31/2017, 82 FR 35451 | Establishes the alternative BART limits for Verso Luke Paper Mill power boiler 24 of 0.28 lb/MMBtu, measured as an hourly average for SO2; and 0.4 lb/MMBtu, measured on a 30-day rolling average for NOX; and 9,876 SO2 cap on power boiler 25. Also incorporates by reference monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements. These requirements replace BART measure originally approved on 2/13/12 for Luke Paper Mill. |
| 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standard | Maryland portion of the Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area | 4/3/2008 | 10/10/2012, 77 FR 61513 | § 52.1075(l) |
| Attainment Demonstration for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard and its Associated Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets | Maryland-Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Moderate Nonattainment Area | 6/4/2007 | 10/29/2012, 77 FR 65488 | |
| 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standard | Washington County, Maryland 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area | 6/6/2008 | 12/7/2012, 77 FR 72966 | § 52.1075(m) |
| 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standard | Baltimore, Maryland 1997 PM2.5 nonattainment area | 6/8/2008 | 12/10/2012, 77 FR 73313 | § 52.1075(n) |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS | Statewide. | 8/14/2013 | 7/14/2014, 79 FR 40665 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2) (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead NAAQS | Statewide | 1/3/2013 8/14/2013 |
7/16/2014, 79 FR 41437 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M) |
| Maintenance plan for the Maryland Portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Statewide | 7/10/2013 7/26/2013 |
10/6/2014, 79 FR 60084 | See § 52.1081(d) |
| Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 12/27/2012 | 10/16/2014,79 FR 62018 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) |
| 1997 Annual fine particulate (PM2.5) Maintenance Plan for the Baltimore, MD Area | Baltimore, MD 1997 annual PM2.5 nonattainment area | 12/12/2013 | 12/16/2014, 79 FR 75033 | See § 52.2526(k) and § 52.2531(h). |
| 1997 Annual fine particulate (PM2.5) Maintenance Plan for the Maryland portion of the Martinsburg WV-Hagerstown, MD Area | Washington County | 12/12/2013 | 12/16/2014, 79 FR 75037 | See § 52.2526(k) and § 52.2531(h). |
| Attainment Demonstration Contingency Measure Plan | Washington, DC-MD-VA 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area | 6/4/2007 | 4/10/2015, 80 FR 19218 | 2010 motor vehicle emissions budgets of 144.3 tons per day (tpd) NOX. |
| 8-hour Ozone Modeled Demonstration of Attainment and Attainment Plan for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standards | Washington, DC-MD-VA 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area | 6/4/2007 | 4/10/2015, 80 FR 19218 | 2009 motor vehicle emissions budgets of 66.5 tons per day (tpd) for VOC and 146.1 tpd of NOX. |
| 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 2008 8-hour Ozone standard | Maryland portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 ozone nonattainment area | 8/4/2014 | 5/13/2015, 80 FR 27258 | § 52.1075(o). |
| Negative Declaration for the Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings CTG | Statewide | 6/25/2015 | 12/11/2015, 80 FR 76862 | |
| Serious Area Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) Plan and 2012 RFP Contingency Measures | Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious nonattainment area | 7/22/2013 | 8/1/2016, 81 FR 50362 | § 52.1076(cc) |
| Updates to the 2002 Base Year Inventory for VOC, NOX and CO | Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious nonattainment area | 7/22/2013 | 8/1/2016, 81 FR 50362 | § 52.1075(p) |
| 2012 Transportation Conformity Budgets | Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious nonattainment area | 7/22/2013 | 8/1/2016, 81 FR 50362 | § 52.1076(dd) |
| 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements | The Baltimore Area (includes Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties and the city of Baltimore), the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area (includes Cecil County in Maryland), and the Washington, DC Area (includes Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland) | 5/8/2017 | 1/29/2018, 83 FR 3982 | |
| 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD 2008 ozone nonattainment area | 1/19/2017 | 3/1/2018, 83 FR 8752 | § 52.1075(q). |
| Emission statement requirement certification for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standard | State-wide | 9/25/2017 | 7/16/2018, 83 FR 32796 | Certification that Maryland's previously approved regulation at COMAR 26.11.01.05-1 meets the emission statement requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. |
| 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Baltimore, Maryland 2008 Ozone Moderate Nonattainment Area | 12/30/2016 | 8/9/2018, 83 FR 39365 | See § 52.1075(r). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 8/18/2018 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44482 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(I), (D)(i)(II), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). This action does not address the portion of CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) related to NNSR nor CAA section 110(a)(2)(I). |
| Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report | Statewide | 8/9/2017 | 11/26/2018, 83 FR 60363 | |
| Reasonably Available Control Technology under 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Statewide | 8/18/2016 | 2/20/2019, 84 FR 5004 | |
| Maintenance plan for the Maryland portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's Counties | 9/6/2023 | 10/4/2024, 89 FR 80745 | § 52.1076(hh). |
| Basic vehicle emission inspection and maintenance (I/M) program requirement certification for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standard | Baltimore | 3/15/2018 | 7/11/2019, 84 FR 33006 | Certification that Maryland's previously approved regulation at COMAR 11.14.08 meets the requirement for a basic I/M program in the Baltimore Area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 10/10/2018 | 9/18/2019, 84 FR 49062 | Part 52.1070 is amended. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). This action does not address CAA sections 110(a)(D)(i)(I) and 110(a)(2)(I), nor does it address the portion of section 110(a)(2)(C) related to NNSR. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 8/17/2016 | 6/16/2020, 85 FR 36343 | § 52.1070 is amended. This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). This action does not address CAA sections 110(a)(D)(i)(I) and 110(a)(2)(I), nor does it address the portion of section 110(a)(2)(C) related to NNSR. |
| 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Limited Maintenance Plan for the Kent and Queen Anne's Counties Area | Kent and Queen Anne's Counties | 12/18/2019 | 7/22/2020, 85 FR 44212 | |
| Emissions Statement Certification for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | State-wide | 7/6/2020 | 9/7/2021, 86 FR 49925 | Certification that Maryland's previously approved regulation at COMAR 26.11.01.05-1 meets the emission statement requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. |
| Negative Declaration for the 2016 Oil and Gas CTG | Statewide | 6/18/2020 | 9/24/2021, 86 FR 52993 | Negative declaration submitted for the 2008 and 2015 ozone national ambient air quality standards. |
| Baltimore Area Base Year Inventory for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Baltimore Area in Maryland | 7/30/2020 | 11/5/2021, 86 FR 61075 | The Baltimore Area consists of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties and the City of Baltimore. |
| Philadelphia Area Base Year Inventory for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards | Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD 2015 ozone nonattainment area. | 7/30/2020 | 3/22/2022, 87 FR 16101 | Maryland's portion of the Philadelphia Area consists of Cecil County, Maryland. |
| 2017 Base Year Emissions Inventories for the Washington, DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard | Maryland portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 2015 ozone NAAQS | 10/7/2020 | 4/13/2022, 87 FR 21752 | The Maryland portion consists of Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's counties. |
| 2015 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements | The Baltimore Area (includes Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties and the city of Baltimore), the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City Area (includes Cecil County in Maryland), and the Washington, DC Area (includes Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland) | 6/3/2020 | 6/10/2022, 87 FR 35421 | |
| 2014 SO2 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County Area for the 2010 SO2 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS | Anne Arundel- Baltimore County SO2 Nonattainment Area, as defined at 40 CFR 81.321 | 1/30/2020 | 11/2/2022, 87 FR 66086 | |
| 2010 1-Hour SO2 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements | Anne Arundel- Baltimore County SO2 Nonattainment Area | 1/30/2020 | 11/2/2022, 87 FR 66086 | EPA approved Maryland's Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) program under COMAR 26.11.17 into the Maryland SIP most recently on August 2, 2012 and July 13, 2015. |
| Regional Haze Plan from 2018-2028 | State-wide | 2/8/2022 | 4/1/2024, 89 FR 22337 |
[69 FR 69306, Nov. 29, 2004]
§ 52.1071 Classification of regions.
The Maryland plans were evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Ozone | |
| Cumberland-Keyser Interstate | I | I | III | III | III |
| Central Maryland Intrastate | II | II | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Baltimore Intrastate | I | I | I | I | I |
| National Capital Interstate | I | I | III | I | I |
| Southern Maryland Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
| Eastern Shore Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10870, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974; 45 FR 53475, Aug. 12, 1980]
§ 52.1072 [Reserved]
§ 52.1073 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves Maryland's plans for the attainment and maintenance of the national standards.
(b)-(g) [Reserved]
[38 FR 33716, Dec. 6, 1973, as amended at 45 FR 53475, Aug. 12, 1980; 47 FR 20128, May 11, 1982; 56 FR 23808, May 24, 1991; 58 FR 50848, Sept. 29, 1993; 61 FR 16061, Apr. 11, 1996; 63 FR 47179, Sept. 4, 1998; 70 FR 25718, 25724, May 13, 2005; 70 FR 69443, Nov. 16, 2005; 74 FR 24705, May 26, 2009; 75 FR 82556, Dec. 30, 2010; 77 FR 52605, Aug. 30, 2012; 78 FR 33984, June 6, 2013]
§ 52.1074 [Reserved]
§ 52.1075 Base year emissions inventory.
(a) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 1990 base year emission inventory for the Baltimore Metropolitan Statistical Area, submitted by the Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment, on September 20, 1995. This submittal consists of the 1990 base year stationary, area, off-road mobile and on-road mobile emission inventories in the Baltimore Metropolitan Statistical Area for the pollutant, carbon monoxide (CO).
(b) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland Implementation Plan the 1990 base year emission inventory for the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area, submitted by Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment, on March 21, 1994 and October 12, 1995. This submittal consist of the 1990 base year stationary, area and off-road mobile and on-road mobile emission inventories in the Washington Statistical Area for the pollutant, carbon monoxide (CO).
(c) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Maryland ozone nonattainment areas submitted by the Secretary of Maryland Department of Environment on March 21, 1994. This submittal consists of the 1990 base year point, area, non-road mobile, biogenic and on-road mobile source emission inventories for the following pollutants: volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), and oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
(d) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Maryland ozone nonattainment areas: Baltimore nonattainment areas, Cecil County, and Kent and Queen Anne's Counties submitted by the Secretary of Maryland Department of Environment on March 21, 1994. This submittal consists of the 1990 base year point, area, non-road mobile, biogenic and on-road mobile source emission inventories for the following pollutants: volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), and oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
(e) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 1990 base year emission inventory for the Maryland portion of the Metropolitan Washington DC ozone nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of MDE on March 21, 1994. This submittal consists of the 1990 base year point, area, highway mobile, non-road mobile, and biogenic source emission inventories in the area for the following pollutants: Volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), and oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
(f) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan an amendment to the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Maryland portion of the Metropolitan Washington DC ozone nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of Maryland of the Department Environment on December 24, 1997. This submittal consists of amendments to the 1990 base year point, area, highway mobile, and non-road mobile source emission inventories in the area for the following pollutants: Volatile organic compounds (VOC), and oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
(g) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan amending the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Baltimore ozone nonattainment area, submitted by the Secretary of Maryland Department of the Environment on December 24, 1997. This submittal consists of amendments to the 1990 base year point, area, highway mobile and non-road mobile source emission inventories for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the Baltimore ozone nonattainment area.
(h) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan amending the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Cecil County portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton ozone nonattainment area, submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on December 24, 1997. This submittal consists of amendments to the 1990 base year point, area, highway mobile and non-road mobile source emission inventories for volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the Cecil County portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton ozone nonattainment area.
(i) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 2002 base year emissions inventories for the Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007. This submittal consists of the 2002 base year point, area, non-road mobile, and on-road mobile source inventories in area for the following pollutants: Volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOX).
(j) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 2002 base year emissions inventories for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007. This submittal consists of the 2002 base year point, area, non-road mobile, and on-road mobile source inventories in area for the following pollutants: volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOX).
(k) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 2002 base year emissions inventories for the Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007. This submittal consists of the 2002 base year point, area, non-road mobile, and on-road mobile source inventories in area for the following pollutants: volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOX).
(l) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 2002 base year emissions inventory for the Maryland portion of the Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area submitted by the Maryland Department of Environment on April 3, 2008. The 2002 base year emissions inventory includes emissions estimates that cover the general source categories of point sources, non-road mobile sources, area sources, on-road mobile sources, and biogenic sources. The pollutants that comprise the inventory are nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PM2.5, coarse particles (PM10), ammonia (NH3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2).
(m) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 2002 base year emissions inventory for the Washington County, Maryland 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area submitted by the Maryland Department of Environment on June 6, 2008. The 2002 base year emissions inventory includes emissions estimates that cover the general source categories of point sources, non-road mobile sources, area sources, on-road mobile sources, and biogenic sources. The pollutants that comprise the inventory are nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PM2.5, coarse particles (PM10), ammonia (NH3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2).
(n) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 2002 base year emissions inventory for the Baltimore, Maryland 1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment area submitted by the Maryland Department of Environment on June 6, 2008. The 2002 base year emissions inventory includes emissions estimates that cover the general source categories of point sources, non-road mobile sources, area sources, on-road mobile sources, and biogenic sources. The pollutants that comprise the inventory are nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), PM2.5, coarse particles (PM10), ammonia (NH3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2).
(o) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Maryland portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 8-hour ozone nonattainment area submitted by the Maryland Department of Environment on August 4, 2014. The 2011 base year emissions inventory includes emissions estimates that cover the general source categories of point sources, non-road mobile sources, area sources, on-road mobile sources, and biogenic sources. The pollutants that comprise the inventory are carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile organic compounds (VOC).
(p) EPA approves, as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan, updates to the 2002 base year emissions inventories previously approved under paragraph (i) of this section for the Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious nonattainment area (Area) submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on July 22, 2013. This submittal consists of updated 2002 base year point, area, non-road mobile, and on-road mobile source inventories in the Area for the following pollutants: Volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOX).
(q) EPA approves, as a revision to the Maryland state implementation plan the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment on January 19, 2017, as amended July 20, 2017. The 2011 base year emissions inventory includes emissions estimates that cover the general source categories of stationary point, area (nonpoint), nonroad mobile, onroad mobile, and Marine-Air-Rail (M-A-R). The inventory included actual annual emissions and typical summer day emissions for the months of May through September for the ozone precursors, VOC and NOX.
(r) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland state implementation plan the 2011 base year emissions inventory for the Baltimore, Maryland moderate nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment on December 30, 2016. The 2011 base year emissions inventory includes emissions estimates that cover the general source categories of stationary point, quasi-point, area (nonpoint), nonroad mobile, onroad mobile, and Marine-Air-Rail (M-A-R). The inventory includes actual annual emissions and typical summer day emissions for the months of May through September for the ozone precursors, VOC and NOX.
[60 FR 55326, Oct. 31, 1995]
§ 52.1076 Control strategy plans for attainment and rate-of-progress: Ozone.
(a) EPA is approving as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan the 15 Percent Rate of Progress Plan and associated contingency measures for the Cecil County ozone nonattainment area, submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on July 21, 1995.
(b) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan, the Stage II vapor recovery comparability plan for the counties of Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, Somerset, St. Mary's, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, and Worcester Counties submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment on November 5, 1997.
(c) EPA approves as a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan, the 15 Percent Rate of Progress Plan for the Baltimore ozone nonattainment area, submitted by the Secretary of Maryland Department of the Environment on October 7, 1998.
(d) EPA approves the Maryland's 15 Percent Rate of Progress Plan for the Maryland portion of the Metropolitan Washington, D.C. ozone nonattainment area, submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on May 5, 1998.
(e) [Reserved]
(f)(1) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan for post 1996 rate of progress plans for milestone years 1999, 2002 and 2005 for the Cecil County portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton ozone nonattainment area. These revisions were submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on December 24, 1997, as revised on April 24 and August 18, 1998, December 21, 1999 and December 28, 2000.
(2) EPA approves the contingency plans for failure to meet rate of progress in the Cecil County portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton ozone nonattainment area for milestone years 1999, 2002 and 2005. These plans were submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on December 24, 1997, as revised on April 24 and August 18, 1998, December 21, 1999 and December 28, 2000.
(3) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan, submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on March 8, 2004, for the rate-of-progress (ROP) plan for year 2005 for the Cecil County portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton 1-hour ozone nonattainment area. These revisions update Cecil County's 2005 ROP plan's 1990 and 2005 motor vehicle emissions inventories and motor vehicle emissions budgets to reflect the use of the MOBILE6 emissions model, establish motor vehicle emissions budgets of 3.0 tons per day (tpd) of volatile organic compounds and 11.3 tpd of nitrogen oxides, and amend the contingency measures associated with the 2005 ROP plan for Cecil County.
(g) [Reserved]
(h) EPA approves the attainment demonstration for the Philadelphia area submitted as a revision to the State Implementation Plan by the Maryland Department of the Environment on April 29, 1998, August 18, 1998, December 21, 1999, December 28, 2000, August 31, 2001, and September 2, 2003 including its RACM analysis and determination. EPA is also approving the revised enforceable commitments made to the attainment plan for the Baltimore severe ozone nonattainment area which were submitted on December 28, 2000. The enforceable commitments are to submit measures by October 31, 2001 for additional emission reductions as required in the attainment demonstration test, and to revise the SIP and motor vehicle emissions budgets by October 31, 2001 if the additional measures affect the motor vehicle emissions inventory; and to perform a mid-course review by December 31, 2003.
(i) EPA approves the following mobile budgets of Maryland's attainment plan for the Philadelphia area:
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) | NOX (TPD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attainment Demonstration | 2005 | 3.0 | 11.3 |
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Similarly, EPA is approving the 2005 attainment demonstration and its current budgets because Maryland has provided an enforceable commitment to submit new budgets as a SIP revision to the attainment plan consistent with any new measures submitted to fill any shortfall, if the new additional control measures affect on-road motor vehicle emissions.
(j)(1) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan for post 1996 rate of progress plans for milestone years 1999, 2002 and 2005 for the Baltimore severe ozone nonattainment area. These revisions were submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on December 24, 1997, as revised on April 24 and August 18, 1998, December 21, 1999 and December 28, 2000.
(2) EPA approves the contingency plans for failure to meet rate of progress in the Baltimore severe ozone nonattainment area for milestone years 1999, 2002 and 2005. These plans were submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on December 24, 1997, as revised on April 24 and August 18, 1998, December 21, 1999 and December 28, 2000.
(k) EPA approves the attainment demonstration for the Baltimore area submitted as a revision to the State Implementation Plan by the Maryland Department of the Environment on April 29, 1998, August 18, 1998, December 21, 1999, December 28, 2000, August 20, 2001, and September 2, 2003 including its RACM analysis and determination. EPA is also approving the revised enforceable commitments made to the attainment plan for the Baltimore severe ozone nonattainment area which were submitted on December 28, 2000. The enforceable commitments are to submit measures by October 31, 2001 for additional emission reductions as required in the attainment demonstration test, and to revise the SIP and motor vehicle emissions budgets by October 31, 2001 if the additional measures affect the motor vehicle emissions inventory; and to perform a mid-course review by December 31, 2003.
(l) EPA approves the following mobile budgets of the Baltimore area attainment plan:
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) | NOX (TPD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attainment Demonstration | 2005 | 55.0 | 146.9 |
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Similarly, EPA is approving the 2005 attainment demonstration and its current budgets because Maryland has provided an enforceable commitment to submit new budgets as a SIP revision to the attainment plan consistent with any new measures submitted to fill any shortfall, if the new additional control measures affect on-road motor vehicle emissions.
(m) EPA approves the State of Maryland's revised 1990 and the 2005 VOC and NOX highway mobile emissions inventories and the 2005 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the one-hour ozone attainment plans for the Baltimore severe ozone nonattainment area and the Cecil County portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton severe ozone nonattainment area. These revisions were submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment on September 2, 2003. Submission of these revised MOBILE6-based motor vehicle emissions inventories was a requirement of EPA's approval of the attainment demonstration under paragraphs (h) and (k) of this section.
(n) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan for Post-1996 Rate of Progress (ROP) Plans for the Baltimore severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area. These revisions were submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on December 23, 2003 and consist of the following:
(1) Revisions to the base year 1990 emissions inventory which reflect the use of the MOBILE6 motor vehicle emissions model. These revisions establish motor vehicle emissions inventories for 1990 of 165.14 tons per day of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 228.21 tons per day of oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
(2) Revisions to the year 2005 motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for transportation conformity purposes, reflecting the use of the MOBILE6 motor vehicle emissions model. These revisions establish a motor vehicle emissions budget of 55 tons per day of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 144.5 tons per day of oxides of nitrogen (NOX). EPA approved new 2005 MOBILE6-based MVEBs for the Baltimore area's 1-hour ozone attainment demonstration on October 27, 2003 (68 FR 61106). Those MVEBs became effective on November 26, 2003. The approved 2005 attainment plan MVEBs budgets are 55.3 tons per day of VOC and 146.9 tons per day of NOX. The MVEBs of the 2005 ROP plan are less than the MVEBs in the approved attainment demonstration. These more restrictive MVEBs, contained in the ROP plan, are the applicable MVEBs to be used in transportation conformity demonstrations for the year 2005 for the Baltimore area.
(3) Revisions to the 2005 ROP plan to reallocate some of the contingency measures established in prior SIP revisions to the control measures portion of the plan. EPA guidance allows states an additional year to adopt new contingency measures to replace those reallocated to the control measures portion of the plan. The State of Maryland's December 23, 2003 SIP revision submittal includes an enforceable commitment to replace those contingency measures reallocated to the control measures portion of the 2005 ROP plan and to submit these additional contingency measures by October 31, 2004.
(o) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2003 to 2005, EPA has determined that the Washington, DC severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area attained the 1-hour ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of November 15, 2005. EPA also has determined that the Washington, DC severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area is not subject to the imposition of the section 185 penalty fees.
(p) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2003 to 2005, EPA has determined that that the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area attained the 1-hour ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of November 15, 2005. EPA also has determined that the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area is not subject to the imposition of the section 185 penalty fees.
(q) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan consisting of the 2008 reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, reasonably available control measures, and contingency measures for the Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007.
(r) EPA approves the following 2008 RFP motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007:
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) |
NOX (TPD) | Effective date of adequacy determination or SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of Progress Plan | 2008 | 41.2 | 106.8 | April 13, 2009, (74 FR 13433), published March 27, 2009. |
(s) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan consisting of the 2008 reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, reasonably available control measures, and contingency measures for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007.
(t) EPA approves the following 2008 RFP motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007:
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) |
NOX (TPD) |
Effective date of adequacy determination or SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of Progress Plan | 2008 | 2.3 | 7.9 | April 13, 2009, (74 FR 13433), published March 27, 2009. |
(u) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan consisting of the 2008 reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, reasonably available control measures, and contingency measures for the Washington DC-MD-VA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007.
(v) EPA approves the following 2008 RFP motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Washington, DC-MD-VA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Director of the Virginia Department of Environment Quality on June 12, 2007:
| Type of control strategy SIP |
Year | VOC (TPD) |
NOX (TPD) |
Effective date of adequacy determination or SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of Progress Plan | 2008 | 70.8 | 159.8 | September 21, 2009 (74 FR 45853), published September 4, 2009. |
(w) EPA has determined, as of February 28, 2012, that based on 2007 to 2009 and 2008 to 2010 ambient air quality data, the Washington, DC-MD-VA moderate nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.918, suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(x) EPA has determined, as of March 26, 2012, that based on 2008 to 2010 ambient air quality data, Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.918, suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 1997 annual 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(y) Determination—EPA has determined that, as of July 12, 2012, the Baltimore 1-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1-hour ozone standard and that this determination obviates the requirement for Maryland to submit for the Baltimore area the 1-hour ozone contingency measure requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act.
(z) EPA approves the attainment demonstration portion of the attainment plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Philadelphia Area submitted as a revision to the State Implementation Plan by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007. EPA also approves the 2009 motor vehicle emissions budgets associated with the attainment demonstration for Cecil County, Maryland.
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) |
NOX (TPD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attainment Demonstration | 2009 | 7.3 | 2.2 |
(aa) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan consisting of the attainment demonstration required under 40 CFR 51.908 demonstrating attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010 and the failure to attain contingency measures for the Washington, DC-MD-VA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007.
(bb) EPA approves the following 2009 attainment demonstration and 2010 motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Washington, DC-MDVA 1997 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on June 4, 2007:
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) | NOX (TPD) | Effective date of adequacy determination or SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attainment Demonstration | 2009 | 66.5 | 146.1 | February 22, 2013 (78 FR 9044), published February 7, 2013. |
| Contingency Measures Plan | 2010 | 144.3 | February 22, 2013 (78 FR 9044), published February 7, 2013. |
(cc) EPA approves revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan consisting of the serious area reasonable further progress (RFP) plan for the Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious nonattainment area, including 2011 and 2012 RFP milestones, updates to the 2008 RFP milestones previously approved by EPA under paragraph (q) of this section, and contingency measures for failure to meet 2012 RFP, submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on July 22, 2013.
(dd) EPA approves the following 2012 RFP motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious nonattainment area, in tons per day (tpd) of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX), submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on July 22, 2013:
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (tpd) |
NOX (tpd) |
Effective date of adequacy determination or SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of Progress Plan | 2012 | 40.2 | 93.5 | March 8, 2016 (81 FR 8711), published February 22, 2016. |
(ee) EPA approves the maintenance plan for the Maryland portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment on February 5, 2018. The maintenance plan includes 2014, 2025, and 2030 motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for VOC and NOX to be applied to all future transportation conformity determinations and analyses for the entire Washington, DC-MD-VA area for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The maintenance plan includes two sets of VOC and NOX MVEBs: The MVEBs without transportation buffers are effective as EPA has determined them adequate for transportation conformity purposes; the MVEBs with transportation buffers will be used only as needed in situations where the conformity analysis must be based on different data, models, or planning assumptions, including, but not limited to, updates to demographic, land use, or project-related assumptions, than were used to create the set of MVEBs without transportation buffers. The technical analyses used to demonstrate compliance with the MVEBs and the need, if any, to use transportation buffers will be fully documented in the conformity analysis and follow the Transportation Planning Board's (TPB) interagency consultation procedures.
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) |
NOX (TPD) |
Effective date of adequacy determination of SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Plan | 2014 2025 2030 |
61.3 33.2 40.7 |
136.8 24.1 27.4 |
5/15/2019. |
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | VOC (TPD) |
NOX (TPD) |
Effective date of adequacy determination of SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Plan | 2014 2025 2030 |
61.3 39.8 28.9 |
136.8 48.8 32.9 |
Contingent and effective upon interagency consultation. |
(ff) The EPA has determined that the Baltimore, Maryland Moderate nonattainment area attained the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2018, based upon complete quality-assured and certified data for the calendar years 2015-2017.
(gg) EPA is disapproving Maryland's October 16, 2019, State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision intended to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) interstate transport requirements for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
(hh) EPA approves updates to the 2008 8-Hour Ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) maintenance plan for the Maryland portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Maintenance Area. The updates include revised motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) and updates to the applicable onroad and nonroad mobile emissions for VOC and NOX for the years 2025 and 2030. EPA also approves the allocation of a portion of the safety margins for VOC and NOX in the ozone maintenance plan to the 2025 and 2030 MVEBs. The revised MVEBs for VOC and NOX applies to all future transportation conformity determinations and analyses for the entire Washington, DC-MD-VA Maintenance Area for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS.
| Year | VOC onroad emissions (tpd) |
NOX onroad emissions (tpd) |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 Attainment Year | 61.25 | 136.84 |
| 2025 Predicted Emissions without Safety Margin | 27.92 | 46.52 |
| 2025 Safety Margin | 5.58 | 9.30 |
| 2025 Interim Budget with Safety Margin | 33.50 | 55.82 |
| 2030 Predicted Emissions without Safety Margin | 21.75 | 34.26 |
| 2030 Safety Margin | 4.35 | 6.85 |
| 2030 Final Budget with Safety Margin | 26.10 | 41.11 |
(ii) EPA has determined, as of April 4, 2025, that based on 2021 to 2023 ambient air quality data, the Washington, DC-MD-VA moderate nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (2015 ozone NAAQS) has attained the 2015 ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.5138, suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
(jj) EPA has determined, as of May 29, 2026, that based on 2022 to 2024 ambient air quality data, the Baltimore, MD serious nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (2015 ozone NAAQS) has attained the 2015 ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.5138, suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
(kk) EPA has determined, as of June 4, 2026, that based on 2022 to 2024 ambient air quality data, the Cecil County, MD marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (2008 ozone NAAQS) has attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1118, suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
(ll) EPA has determined, as of June 4, 2026, that based on 2022 to 2024 ambient air quality data, the Cecil County, MD serious nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (2015 ozone NAAQS) has attained the 2015 ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1318, suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
[62 FR 40458, July 29, 1997]
§§ 52.1077-1079 [Reserved]
§ 52.1080 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Program.
On March 24, 1994 Maryland's Department of the Environment submitted a plan for the establishment and implementation of a Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Program as a state implementation plan (SIP) revision, as required by section 182(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act. EPA approved the Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) Program on September 11, 1995 and made it part of Maryland SIP. As with all components of the SIP, Maryland must implement the program as submitted and approved by EPA.
[60 FR 47084, Sept. 11, 1995]
§ 52.1081 Control strategy: Particulate matter.
(a) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of January 12, 2009, the Maryland portion of the Metropolitan Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 52.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration and associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as the area continues to attain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(b) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of November 20, 2009, the Martinsburg-Hagerstown, WV-MD PM2.5 nonattainment area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 52.1004(c), suspend the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(c) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of May 22, 2012, based on ambient air quality data of 2008 to 2010 and the preliminary data of 2011, that the PM2.5 nonattainment area of Baltimore, Maryland has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
(d) Maintenance Plan and Transportation Conformity Budgets. EPA approves the maintenance plan for the Maryland portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS submitted by the State of Maryland for the entire Area on July 10, 2013 and supplemented on July 26, 2013. The maintenance plan includes motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) to be applied to all future transportation conformity determinations and analyses for the entire Washington, DC-MD-VA PM2.5 Area for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. The MVEBs are based on a tiered approach: Tier 1 MVEBs are effective as EPA has determined them adequate for transportation conformity purposes; Tier 2 mobile budgets will become effective upon the completion of the interagency consultation process and fully documented within the first conformity analysis that uses the Tier 2 MVEBs.
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | NOX | PM2.5 | Effective date of SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Plan | 2017 | 41,709 | 1,787 | 11/5/14 |
| 2025 | 27,400 | 1,350 |
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | NOX | PM2.5 | Effective date of SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Plan | 2017 | 50,051 | 2,144 | Contingent and effective upon interagency consultation. |
| 2025 | 32,880 | 1,586 |
(e) Maintenance Plan and Transportation Conformity Budgets. EPA approves the maintenance plan for the Baltimore, MD nonattainment area for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS submitted by the State of Maryland on December 12, 2013. The maintenance plan includes motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) to be applied to all future transportation conformity determinations and analyses for the Baltimore, MD Area for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | NOX | PM2.5 | Effective date of SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Plan | 2017 | 29,892.01 | 1,218.60 | 12/16/14 |
| 2025 | 21,594.96 | 1,051.39 |
(f) Maintenance Plan and Transportation Conformity Budgets. EPA approves the maintenance plan for the Maryland portion of the Martinsburg, WV-Hagerstown, MD nonattainment area for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS submitted by the State of Maryland on December 12, 2013. The maintenance plan includes motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) to be applied to all future transportation conformity determinations and analyses for the Maryland portion of the Martinsburg, WV-Hagerstown, MD Area for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
| Type of control strategy SIP | Year | NOX | PM2.5 | Effective date of SIP approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Plan | 2017 2025 |
4,057.00 2,774.63 |
149.63 93.35 |
12/16/14 |
[74 FR 1148, Jan. 12, 2009, as amended at 74 FR 60203, Nov. 20, 2009; 77 FR 30212, May 22, 2012; 79 FR 60084, Oct. 6, 2014; 79 FR 75034, 75037, Dec. 16, 2014]
§ 52.1082 Determinations of attainment.
(a) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007 to 2009, EPA determined that the Metropolitan Washington, District of Columbia-Maryland-Virginia (DC-MD-VA) fine particle (PM2.5) nonattainment area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Metropolitan Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
(b) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007 to 2009, EPA determined that the Martinsburg-Hagerstown, West Virginia-Maryland (WV-MD) fine particle (PM2.5) nonattainment area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Martinsburg-Hagerstown, WV-MD nonattainment area is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
(c) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007 to 2009, Washington, DC-MD-VA moderate nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Washington, DC-MD-VA moderate nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date pursuant to section 181(b)(2)(A).
(d) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2008 to 2010, EPA determined that Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE 8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment area (the Philadelphia Area) attained the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of June 15, 2011. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Philadelphia Area nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date under section 181(b)(2)(A).
(e) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2007 to 2009, EPA determined that the PM2.5 nonattainment area of Baltimore, Maryland attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of April 5, 2010. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 179(c) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the NAAQS. EPA has also determined that the PM2.5 nonattainment area of Baltimore, Maryland is not subject to the consequences of failing to attain pursuant to section 179(d).
(f) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2003 to 2005, EPA determined, as of July 12, 2012, that the Baltimore 1-hour ozone nonattainment area did not attain the 1-hour ozone standard as of its applicable 1-hour ozone attainment date of November 15, 2005.
(g) Based on 2009-2011 complete, quality-assured ozone monitoring data at all monitoring sites in the Baltimore 1-hour ozone nonattainment area, EPA determined, as of July 12, 2012, that the Baltimore 1-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1-hour ozone standard.
(h) EPA has determined, as of May 26, 2015, that based on 2012 to 2014 ambient air quality data, the Baltimore nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1118, suspends the requirement for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(i) EPA has determined, as of June 1, 2015, that based on 2012 to 2014 ambient air quality data, the Baltimore nonattainment area has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1118, suspends the requirement for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(j) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2013 to 2015, Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE marginal ozone nonattainment area has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2016. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE marginal ozone nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date pursuant to section 181(b)(2)(A).
(k) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2013 to 2015, the Washington, DC-MD-VA marginal ozone nonattainment area has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2016. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to Clean Air Act section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Washington, DC-MD-VA marginal nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date pursuant to section 181(b)(2)(A).
(l) EPA has determined, as of November 2, 2022, that based on 2019 to 2021 ambient air quality monitoring data and air dispersion modeling, the Anne Arundel-Baltimore County nonattainment area has attained the 2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide NAAQS. This clean data determination suspends the requirement for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other sulfur dioxide NAAQS attainment plan SIP elements for as long as this area continues to meet the 2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide NAAQS.
(m) The EPA has determined, as of January 6, 2025, that based on 2018-2020 monitoring data, relevant modeling analysis, and additional emissions inventory information, the Anne Arundel and Baltimore County SO2 nonattainment area has attained the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of September 12, 2021.
(n) Based upon EPA's review of the ambient air quality data for the 3-year period 2021 to 2023, the Washington, DC-MD-VA moderate nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (2015 ozone NAAQS) has attained the 2015 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of August 3, 2024. Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to Clean Air Act section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. EPA also determined that the Washington, DC-MD-VA moderate nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date pursuant to section 181(b)(2)(A).
[77 FR 1413, Jan. 10, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 11741, Feb. 28, 2012; 77 FR 17344, Mar. 26, 2012; 77 FR 30212, May 22, 2012; 77 FR 34819, June 12, 2012; 80 FR 29972, May 26, 2015; 80 FR 30946, June 1, 2015; 82 FR 50820, Nov. 2, 2017; 82 FR 52655, Nov. 14, 2017; 87 FR 66091, Nov. 2, 2022; 89 FR 96906, Dec. 6, 2024, 90 FR 14735, Apr. 4, 2025]
§ 52.1083 [Reserved]
§ 52.1084 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Maryland and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Maryland's SIP revision described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Maryland and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program in subpart BBBBB of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2015 and 2016.
(2) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Maryland and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 through 2020.
(3) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Maryland and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program in subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2021 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(iii), except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(3) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Maryland's SIP revision described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances under subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, after 2020 the provisions of § 97.826(c) of this chapter (concerning the transfer of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances between certain accounts under common control), the provisions of § 97.826(d) of this chapter (concerning the conversion of amounts of unused CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances allocated for control periods before 2021 to different amounts of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances), and the provisions of § 97.811(d) of this chapter (concerning the recall of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances equivalent in quantity and usability to all such allowances allocated to units in the State for control periods after 2020) shall continue to apply.
(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (b)(3) of this section is stayed with regard to emissions occurring in 2024 and thereafter, provided that while such stay remains in effect, the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall apply with regard to such emissions.
(c)(1) The owner and operator of each source located in the State of Maryland and for which requirements are set forth in § 52.40 and § 52.41, § 52.42, § 52.43, § 52.44, § 52.45, or § 52.46 must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2026 and each subsequent year.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (c)(1) of this section is stayed.
[76 FR 48366, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586, 74596, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 65924, Dec. 21, 2018; 86 FR 23175, Apr. 30, 2021; 88 FR 36890, June 5, 2023; 89 FR 87969, Nov. 6, 2024]
§ 52.1085 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Maryland and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 1 Trading Program in subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Maryland's SIP revision described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances under subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[76 FR 48367, Aug. 8, 2011, as amended at 81 FR 74586, Oct. 26, 2016]
§§ 52.1086-52.1099 [Reserved]
§ 52.1100 Original identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Maryland” and all revisions submitted by Maryland that were federally approved prior to November 1, 2004. The information in this section is available in the 40 CFR, part 52, Volume 2 of 2 (§§ 52.1019 to the end of part 52) editions revised as of July 1, 2005 through July 1, 2011, and the 40 CFR, part 52, Volume 2 of 3 (§§ 52.1019 to 52.2019) edition revised as of July 1, 2012.
(b) [Reserved]
[78 FR 33984, June 6, 2013]
§§ 52.1101-52.1109 [Reserved]
§ 52.1110 Small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
On November 13, 1992, the Acting Director of the Air and Radiation Management Administration, Maryland Department of the Environment submitted a plan for the establishment and implementation of a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program as a state implementation plan (SIP) revision, as required by title V of the Clean Air Act Amendments. EPA approved the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program on May 16, 1994, and made it part of the Maryland SIP. As with all components of the SIP, Maryland must implement the program as submitted and approved by EPA.
[59 FR 25333, May 16, 1994]
§§ 52.1111-52.1115 [Reserved]
§ 52.1116 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not met, since the plan does not include approvable procedures for preventing the significant deterioration of air quality.
(b) The following provisions of 40 CFR 52.21 are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable State plan for the State of Maryland.
(1) Definition of federally enforceable (40 CFR 52.21(b)(17)),
(2) Exclusions from increment consumption (40 CFR 52.21(f)(1)(v), (3), (4)(i)),
(3) Redesignation of areas (40 CFR 52.21(g) (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6)),
(4) Approval of alternate models (40 CFR 52.21(1)(2)),
(5) Disputed permits or redesignation (40 CFR 52.21(t), and
(6) Delegation of Authority (40 CFR 52.21(u)(1), (2)(ii), (3), and (4)).
[45 FR 52741, Aug. 7, 1980 and 47 FR 7835, Feb. 23, 1982]
§ 52.1117 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) The requirements of § 51.112(a) of this chapter are not met because the State did not submit an adequate control strategy demonstration to show that the Maryland Regulation 10.03.36.04B (1) and (2) would not interfere with the attainment and maintenance of the national sulfur dioxide standards.
[40 FR 56889, Dec. 5, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 8770, Mar. 1, 1976; 41 FR 54747, Dec. 15, 1976; 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.1118 [Reserved]
Subpart W—Massachusetts
§ 52.1119 Identification of plan—conditional approval.
(a) The following plan revisions were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) On November 13, 1992, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection submitted a small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program (PROGRAM). On July 22, 1993, Massachusetts submitted a letter clarifying portions of the November 13, 1992 submittal. In these submissions, the State commits to submit adequate legal authority to establish and implement a compliance advisory panel and to have a fully operational PROGRAM by November 15, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 13, 1992 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) State Implementation Plan Revision for a Small Business Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Program dated November 13, 1992.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 22, 1993 clarifying portions of Massachusetts' November 13, 1992 SIP revision.
(2)-(5) [Reserved]
(b) [Reserved]
[59 FR 41708, Aug. 15, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 43976, Aug. 27, 1996; 65 FR 19326, Apr. 11, 2000; 81 FR 93630, Dec. 21, 2016; 84 FR 24721, May 29, 2019; 84 FR 29383, June 24, 2019]
§ 52.1120 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Massachusetts under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to January 20, 2017, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Entries in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with the EPA approval date after January 20, 2017 have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan and for incorporation by reference into the plan as it is contained in this section, and will be considered by the Director of the Federal Register for approval in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 1 certifies that the materials provided by EPA at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the SIP as of the dates referenced in paragraph (b)(1).
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference into the SIP may be inspected at the EPA Region 1 Office, 5 Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109-3912. You may also inspect the material with an EPA approval date prior to January 20, 2017 at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(c) EPA-approved regulations.
| State citation | Title/subject | State effective date | EPA approval date 1 | Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 310 CMR 6.04 | Standards | 7/25/1990 | 10/4/2002, 67 FR 62184 | Adopted PM10 as the criteria pollutant for particulates. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 3/9/2018 and 3/20/2020 | 10/15/2020, 85 FR 65236 | Approved 90 new definitions, updated 6 definitions, and deleted definitions for: Automotive Surface Coating, Manufacturing Plant, and Propanol Substitute. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix A | Emission Offsets and Nonattainment Review | October 22, 1999 | May 29, 2019, 84 FR 24719 | Approves revisions for consistency with underlying federal regulations that make the Commonwealth's SIP-approved NNSR program applicable to certain sources of NOX and VOC statewide. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B | Emission Banking, Trading, and Averaging | 3/9/2018 | 10/15/2020, 85 FR 65236 | Revises (4)(b) Applicability. |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 1 General Regulations to Prevent Air Pollution | 1/27/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10841 | |
| Regulations for Prevention And/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air Pollution Incident Emergencies | Regulation 1 Introduction | 8/28/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 2 Plans Approval and Emission Limitations | 2/1/1978 | 3/15/1979, 44 FR 15703 | Regulation 2 is now known as 310 CMR 7.02. |
| Regulations for Prevention And/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air Pollution Incident Emergencies | Regulation 2 Definitions | 8/28/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | |
| 310 CMR 7.02 | Plans Approval and Emission Limitations | 6/6/1994 | 4/5/1995, 60 FR 17226 | |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 3 Nuclear Energy Utilization Facilities | 6/1/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | |
| 310 CMR 7.03 | Plan Application Exemption Construction Requirements. Paint Spray Booths 310 CMR 7.03(13) | 2/17/1993 | 9/3/1999, 64 FR 48297 | |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 4 Fossil Fuel Utilization Facilities | 1/27/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 4 is now known as 310 CMR 7.04. |
| 310 CMR 7.04 | U Fossil Fuel Utilization Facilities | 12/28/2007 | 4/24/2014, 79 FR 22774 | Only approved 7.04(2) and 7.04(4)(a). |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 5 Fuels | 8/31/1978 | 3/7/1979, 44 FR 12421 | Regulation 5 is now known as 310 CMR 7.05. Portions of Regulation 5 have been replaced with the approval of 310 CMR 7.05. |
| 310 CMR 7.05 | Fuels All Districts | 9/23/2005 | 5/29/2014, 79 FR 30741 | Removed landfill gas from requirements of section. |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 6 Visible Emissions | 8/28/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 6 is now known as 310 CMR 7.06. |
| 310 CMR 7.07 | Open Burning | 9/28/1979 | 6/17/1980, 45 FR 40987 | |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 8 Incinerators | 8/28/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 8 is now known as 310 CMR 7.08. |
| 310 CMR 7.08 | Incinerators. Municipal Waste Combustors 310 CMR 7.08(2) | 3/20/2020 | 10/15/2020, 85 FR 65236 | |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 9 Dust and Odor | 12/9/1977 | 9/29/1978, 43 FR 44841 | Regulation 9 is now known as 310 CMR 7.09. |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 10 Noise | 6/1/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 10 is now known as 310 CMR 7.10. |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 11 Transportation Media | 6/1/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 11 is now known as 310 CMR 7.11. This regulation restricts idling. |
| 310 CMR 7.12 | U Source Registration | 3/9/2018 | 3/4/2019, 84 FR 7299 | Revisions made to existing requirements and procedures for emissions reporting. |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 13 Stack Testing | 6/1/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 13 is now known as 310 CMR 7.13. |
| 310 CMR 7.14 | Monitoring Devices and Reports | 11/21/1986 1/15/1987 |
3/10/1989, 54 FR 10147 | |
| Regulations for Prevention And/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air Pollution Incident Emergencies | Regulation 15. Asbestos | 8/28/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 15 is now known as 310 CMR 7.15. |
| 310 CMR 7.16 | Reduction of Single-Occupant Commuter Vehicle Use | 12/31/1978, 5/16/1979 |
9/16/1980, 45 FR 61293 | |
| 310 CMR 7.17 | Conversions to Coal | 1/22/1982 | 6/9/1982, 47 FR 25007 | |
| 310 CMR 7.18 | Volatile and Halogenated Organic Compounds | 3/20/2020 | 10/15/2020, 85 FR 65236 | Withdraws subsection (7) Automobile Surface Coating; adds new subsections (1)(g) and (h), (31) Industrial Cleaning Solvents, (32) Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing; revises subsections (2) Compliance with Emission Limitations, (3) Metal Furniture Surface Coating, (5) Large Appliance Surface Coating, (11) Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products, (12) Packaging Rotogravure and Packaging Flexographic Printing, (14) Paper, Film and Foil Surface Coating, (20) Emission Control Plans for Implementation of Reasonably Available Control Technology, (21) Surface Coating of Plastic Parts, (24) Flat Wood Paneling Surface Coating, (25) Offset Lithographic Printing; and adds subsections, (30) Adhesives and Sealants. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) | 3/20/2020 | 10/15/2020, 85 FR 65236 | Revises subsection (1) Applicability, (2) General Provisions, (3) Emission Control Plans for Implementation of RACT, (4) Large Boilers, (5) Medium-size Boilers, (6) Small Boilers, (7) Stationary Combustion Turbines, (8) Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines, and (9) Municipal Waste Combustor Units. |
| 310 CMR 7.24 | Organic Material Storage and Distribution | 1/2/2015 | 11/29/2016, 81 FR 85897 | Revised to require the decommissioning of Stage II vapor recovery systems and require Stage I Enhanced Vapor Recovery systems certified by the California Air Resources Board. |
| 310 CMR 7.25 | Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial Products | 10/19/2007 | 10/9/2015, 80 FR 61101 | Approved amended existing consumer products related requirements, added provisions concerning AIM coatings. |
| 310 CMR 7.26 | Industry Performance Standards | 3/9/2018 | 10/15/2020, 85 FR 65236 | Adds Environmental Results Program for Lithographic, Gravure, Letterpress, and Flexographic Printing subsections 20 through 25 and 27 through 29, except 28(a). |
| 310 CMR 7.27 | NOX Allowance Program | 11/19/1999 | 12/27/2000, 65 FR 81743 | |
| 310 CMR 7.28 | NOX Allowance Trading Program | 3/30/2007 | 12/3/2007, 72 FR 67854 | |
| 310 CMR 7.29 | Emissions Standards for Power Plants | 1/25/2008, 6/29/2007 |
9/19/2013 78 FR 57487 | Only approving the SO2 and NOX requirements. |
| The following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART were not approved: | ||||
| (1) In 310 CMR 7.29(1), the reference to mercury (Hg), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the first sentence and the phrase “ . . . and CO2 and establishing a cap on CO2 and Hg emissions from affected facilities. CO2 emissions standards set forth in 310 CMR 7.29(5)(a)5.a. and b. shall not apply to emissions that occur after December 31, 2008” in the second sentence. | ||||
| (2) In 310 CMR 7.29(2), the definitions of Alternate Hg Designated Representative, Automated Acquisition and Handling System or DAHS, Mercury (Hg) Designated Representative, Mercury Continuous Emission Monitoring System or Mercury CEMS, Mercury Monitoring System, Sorbent Trap Monitoring System, and Total Mercury; | ||||
| (3) 310 CMR 7.29(5)(a)(3) through (5)(a)(6); | ||||
| (4) In 310 CMR 7.29(5)(b)(1), reference to compliance with the mercury emissions standard in the second sentence; | ||||
| (5) 310 CMR 7.29(6)(a)(3) through (6)(a)(4); | ||||
| (6) 310 CMR 7.29(6)(b)(10); | ||||
| (7) 310 CMR 7.29(6)(h)(2); | ||||
| (8) The third and fourth sentences in 310 CMR 7.29(7)(a); | ||||
| (9) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(1), the reference to CO2 and mercury; | ||||
| (10) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(1)(a), the reference to CO2 and mercury; | ||||
| (11) 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(1)(b) through 7.29(7)(b)(1)(d); | ||||
| (12) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(3), the reference to CO2 and mercury; | ||||
| (13) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(4)(b), the reference to CO2 and mercury; and | ||||
| (14) 310 CMR 7.29(7)(e) through 7.29(7)(i). | ||||
| 310 CMR 7.30 | Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze | 6/30/2017 | 3/6/2018, 83 FR 9438 | Revises the existing commercial parking freeze limits and requires the Massachusetts Port Authority to complete several studies to evaluate ways to further support alternative transit options. |
| 310 CMR 7.31 | City of Boston/East Boston Parking Freeze | 12/26/2000 | 3/12/2001, 66 FR 14318 | Applies to the parking of motor vehicles within the area of East Boston. |
| 310 CMR 7.32 | Massachusetts Clean Air Interstate Rule (Mass CAIR) | 3/30/2007 | 12/3/2007, 72 FR 67854 | |
| 310 CMR 7.33 | City of Boston/South Boston Parking Freeze | 7/30/1993 | 10/15/1996, 61 FR 53628 | Applies to the parking of motor vehicles within the area of South Boston, including Massport property in South Boston. |
| 310 CMR 7.36 | Transit System Improvements | 10/25/2013 | 12/8/2015, 80 FR 76225 | Removes from the SIP the commitment to design the Red Line/Blue Line Connector project. |
| 310 CMR 7.37 | High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes | 4/5/1996 | 3/20/2019, 84 FR 10264 | Technical revisions to SIP approved regulation. |
| 310 CMR 7.38 | Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District | 12/30/2005 | 2/15/2008, 73 FR 8818 | |
| 310 CMR 7.40 | Low Emission Vehicle Program | 12/24/1999 | 12/23/2002, 67 FR 78179 | “Low Emission Vehicle Program” (LEV II) except for 310 CMR 7.40(2)(a)(5), 310 CMR 7.40(2)(a)(6), 310 CMR 7.40(2)(c)(3), 310 CMR 7.40(10), and 310 CMR 7.40(12). |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 50 Variances | 9/14/1974 | 2/4/1977, 42 FR 6812 | Regulation 50 is now known as 310 CMR 7.50. |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 51 Hearings Relative To Orders and Approvals | 8/28/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 51 is now known as 310 CMR 7.51. |
| Regulations for the Control of Air Pollution | Regulation 52 Enforcement Provisions | 8/28/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Regulation 52 is now known as 310 CMR 7.52. |
| 310 CMR 8.00 | The Prevention and/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air Pollution Incident Emergencies | 4/1/1994 | 3/4/2019, 84 FR 7299 | Incorporates full version of 310 CMR 8.00 into the Massachusetts SIP, and converts conditional approval at § 52.1119(a)(5) to full approval. |
| 310 CMR 60.02 | Regulations for the Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program | 9/5/2008 | 1/25/2013, 78 FR 5292 | Revises enhanced I/M test requirements to consist of “OBD2-only” testing program. Approving submitted regulation with the exception of subsection 310 CMR 60.02(24)(f). |
| 540 CMR 4.00 | Annual Safety and Combined Safety and Emissions Inspection of all Motor Vehicles, Trailers, Semi-trailers and converter Dollies | 9/5/2008 | 1/25/2013, 78 FR 5292 | Revises Requirement for Inspection and Enforcement of I/M Program. |
| Massachusetts General Laws, Part IV, Title I, Chapter 268A, Sections 6 and 6A | Conduct of Public Officials and Employees | Amended by Statute in 1978 and 1984 | 12/21/2016, 81 FR 93624 | Approved Section 6: Financial interest of state employee, relative or associates; disclosure, and Section 6A: Conflict of interest of public official; reporting requirement. |
| Executive Order 145 | Consultation with Cities and Towns on Administrative Mandates | 11/20/1978 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Approval as part of 2012 PM2.5 infrastructure SIP. |
| 1 To determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. |
(d) EPA-approved State Source specific requirements.
| Name of source | Permit number | State effective date | EPA approval date 2 | Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cambridge Electric Light Company's Kendall Station, First Street, Cambridge, MA | Cambridge Electric Light Company Variance | Submitted 12/28/78 |
6/17/1980, 45 FR 40987 | Regulation 310 CMR 7.04(5), Fuel Oil Viscosity; Revision for Cambridge Electric Light Company's Kendall Station, First Street, Cambridge, MA. |
| Blackstone Station, Blackstone Street, Cambridge, MA | Cambridge Electric Light Company Variance | Submitted 12/28/1978 |
6/17/1980, 45 FR 40987 | Regulation 310 CMR 7.04(5), Fuel Oil Viscosity; Revision for Cambridge Electric Light Company's Blackstone Station, Blackstone Street, Cambridge, MA. |
| Holyoke Water Power Company, Mount Tom Plant, Holyoke, MA | Holyoke Water Power Company Operations | Submitted 1/22/1982 |
6/9/1982, 47 FR 25007 | A revision specifying the conditions under which coal may be burned at the Holyoke Water Power Company, Mount Tom Plant, Holyoke, MA. |
| Esleeck Manufacturing Company, Inc., Montague, MA | Esleek Manufacturing Emission Limit | Submitted 2/8/1983 |
4/28/1983, 48 FR 19173 | Source specific emission limit allowing the Company to burn fuel oil having a maximum sulfur content of 1.21 pounds per million Btu heat release potential provided the fuel firing rate does not exceed 137.5 gallons per hour. |
| Erving Paper company, Erving, MA | Erving Paper Company Operations | Submitted 7/18/1984, 4/17/1985, and 11/25/1987 |
2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | A revision approving sulfur-in-fuel limitations. |
| Monsanto Chemical Company in Indian Orchard, MA | Monsanto Chemical Company Operations | 6/20/1989 | 2/21/1990, 55 FR 5986 | Revisions which define and impose reasonably available control technology to control volatile organic compound emissions from Monsanto Chemical Company in Indian Orchard, MA. Including a final RACT Compliance Plan. |
| Spalding Sports Worldwide in Chicopee, MA | PV-85-IF-019 | 7/12/1989 and 10/7/1985 | 11/8/1989, 54 FR 46894 | Amendments to the Conditional Plans imposing reasonably available control technology. |
| Duro Textile Printers, Incorporated in Fall River, MA | SM-85-168-IF | 8/1/1989 and 8/8/1989 | 11/8/1989, 54 FR 46896 | Amended Conditional Plan Approval (SM-85-168-IF) dated and effective August 1, 1989 and an Amendment to the Amended Conditional Plan Approval (SM-85-168-IF Revision) dated and effective August 8, 1989 imposing reasonably available control. |
| Acushnet Company, Titleist Golf Division, Plant A in New Bedford, MA | SM-85-151-IF and 4-P-90-104 | 6/1/1990 | 2/27/1991, 56 FR 8130 | An Amended Plan imposing reasonably available control technology. |
| General Motors Corporation in Framingham, MA | General Motors Operations | 6/8/1990 | 2/19/1991, 56 FR 6568 | An Amended Plan imposing reasonably available control technology. |
| Erving Paper Mills in Erving, MA | Erving Paper Company Operations | 10/16/1990 | 3/20/1991, 56 FR 11675 | Revisions which define and impose RACT to control volatile organic compound emissions. Including a conditional final plan approval issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP). |
| Erving Paper Mills in Erving, MA | Erving Paper Company Operations | 4/16/1991 | 10/8/1991, 56 FR 50659 | Revisions which clarify the requirements of RACT to control volatile organic compound emissions. Including a conditional final plan approval amendment that amends the October 16, 1990 conditional plan approval. |
| Brittany Dyeing and Finishing of New Bedford, MA | 4-P-92-012 | 3/16/1994 | 3/6/1995, 60 FR 12123 | Final Plan Approval No. 4P92012, imposing reasonably available control technology. |
| Specialty Minerals, Incorporated, Adams, MA | 1-P-94-022 | 6/16/1995 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | Emission Control Plan (Reasonably Available Control Technology for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen). |
| Monsanto Company's Indian Orchard facility, Springfield, MA | 1-E-94-106 | 10/28/1996 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | Emission Control Plan (Reasonably Available Control Technology for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen). |
| Medusa Minerals Company in Lee, MA | 1-E-94-110 | 4/17/1998 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | Emission Control Plan (Reasonably Available Control Technology for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen). |
| Gillette Company Andover Manufacturing Plant | MBR-92-IND-053 | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Approval issued on June 17, 1999. |
| Norton Company | C-P-90-083 | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Approval issued on August 5, 1999. |
| Barnet Corporation | Barnet Corporation Operations | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | Reasonably Available Control Technology Plan Approval issued on May 14, 1991. |
| Solutia | 1-P-92-006 | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | 310 CMR 7.02 BACT plan approvals issued by the MassDEP. |
| Saloom Furniture | Saloom Winchendon Operations | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | 310 CMR 7.02 BACT plan approvals issued by the MassDEP. |
| Eureka Manufacturing | 4-P-95-094 | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | 310 CMR 7.02 BACT plan approvals issued by the MassDEP. |
| Moduform | Moduform Operations | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | 310 CMR 7.02 BACT plan approvals issued by the MassDEP. |
| Polaroid | MBR-99-IND-001 | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | 310 CMR 7.02 BACT plan approvals issued by the MassDEP. |
| Globe | 4-P-96-151 | Submitted 2/17/1993, 4/16/1999, and 10/7/1999 |
10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | 310 CMR 7.02 BACT plan approvals issued by the MassDEP. |
| Wheelabrator Saugus, Inc | MBR-98-ECP-006 | Submitted 12/30/2011, 8/9/2012, and 8/28/2012 |
9/19/2013, 78 FR 57487 | The sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and PM2.5 provisions of the MassDEP Emission Control Plan “Saugus—Metropolitan, Boston/Northeast Region, 310 CMR 7.08(2)—Municipal Waste Combustors, Application No. MBR-98-ECP-006, Transmittal No. W003302, Emission Control Plan Modified Final Approval” dated March 14, 2012 to Mr. Jairaj Gosine, Wheelabrator Saugus, Inc. and signed by Cosmo Buttaro and James E. Belsky, with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART. |
| General Electric Aviation | MBR-94-COM-008 | Submitted 12/30/2011, 8/9/2012, and 8/28/2012 |
9/19/2013, 78 FR 57487 | The MassDEP Emission Control Plan “Lynn—Metropolitan, Boston/Northeast Region, 310 CMR 7.19, Application No. MBR-94-COM-008, Transmittal No. X235617, Modified Emission Control Plan Final Approval” dated March 24, 2011 to Ms. Jolanta Wojas, General Electric Aviation and signed by Marc Altobelli and James E. Belsky. Note, this document contains two section V; V. RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS and V. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS/PROVISIONS. |
| Mt. Tom Generating Company, LLC | 1-E-01-072 | Submitted 12/30/2011, 8/9/2012, and 8/28/2012 |
9/19/2013, 78 FR 57487 | The MassDEP Emission Control Plan, “Holyoke Western Region 310 CMR 7.29 Power Plant Emission Standards, Application No. 1-E-01-072, Transmittal No. W025214, Amended Emission Control Plan” dated May 15, 2009 to Mr. John S. Murry, Mt. Tom Generating Company, LLC and signed by Marc Simpson, with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART. |
| Dominion Energy Salem Harbor, LLC | NE-12-003 | Submitted 12/30/2011, 8/9/2012, and 8/28/2012 |
9/19/2013, 78 FR 57487 | The MassDEP Emission Control Plan “Salem—Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Region, 310 CMR 7.29 Power Plant Emission Standards, Application No. NE-12-003, Transmittal No. X241756, Final Amended Emission Control Plan Approval” dated March 27, 2012 to Mr. Lamont W. Beaudette, Dominion Energy Salem Harbor, LLC and signed by Edward J. Braczyk, Cosmo Buttaro, and James E. Belsky with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART. |
| Dominion Energy Brayton Point, LLC | SE-12-003 | Submitted 12/30/2011, 8/9/2012, and 8/28/2012 |
9/19/2013, 78 FR 57487 | MassDEP Emission Control Plan “Amended Emission Control Plan Final Approval Application for: BWP AQ 25, 310 CMR 7.29 Power Plant Emission Standards, Transmittal Number X241755, Application Number SE-12-003, Source Number: 1200061” dated April 12, 2012 to Peter Balkus, Dominion Energy Brayton Point, LLC and signed by John K. Winkler, with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART. |
| Somerset Power LLC | Facility Shutdown | Submitted 12/30/2011, 8/9/2012, and 8/28/2012 |
9/19/2013, 78 FR 57487 | MassDEP letter “Facility Shutdown, FMF Facility No. 316744” dated June 22, 2011 to Jeff Araujo, Somerset Power LLC and signed by John K. Winkler. |
| Canal Generating Station | 21-AQ02F-011-APP | May 26, 2022 | 7/8/2024, 89 FR 55891 | Regional Haze SIP Revision Supplement: fuel oil purchased for EU1 restricted to 0.3% sulfur content limit. |
| 2 To determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. |
(e) Nonregulatory.
| Name of non regulatory SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area |
State submittal date/effective date | EPA approved date 3 | Explanations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miscellaneous non-regulatory changes to the plan submitted by the Division of Environmental Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health | 4/27/72 | 10/28/72, 37 FR 23085 | ||
| Miscellaneous non-regulatory additions to the plan submitted by the Bureau of Air Quality Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health | 5/5/72 | 10/28/72, 37 FR 23085 | ||
| Letter of concurrence on AQMA identifications submitted on July 23, 1974, by the Governor | 7/23/74 | 6/2/75, 40 FR 23746 | ||
| Letter dated February 8, 1979 from Kenneth Hagg of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE) to Frank Ciavattieri of the Environmental Protection Agency | 2/8/79 | 5/14/79, 44 FR 27991 | ||
| Non-attainment area plan for Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) in Worcester | 3/30/1979 and 4/23/1979 | 1/10/1980, 45 FR 2036 | ||
| Miscellaneous statewide regulation changes | 3/30/1979 and 4/23/1979 | 1/10/1980, 45 FR 2036 | ||
| An extension request for the attainment of TSP secondary standards for areas designated non-attainment as of March 3, 1978 | 3/30/1979 and 4/23/1979 | 1/10/1980, 45 FR 2036 | ||
| Revision entitled “Massachusetts Implementation Plan, Amended Regulation—All Districts, New Source Review Element,” relating to construction and operation of major new or modified sources in non-attainment areas | 5/3/1979, 8/7/1979, and 5/17/1980 |
1/10/1980, 45 FR 2036 | ||
| Revision to the state ozone standard and adoption of an ambient lead standard | 8/21/79 | 6/17/1980, 45 FR 40987 | ||
| Attainment plans to meet the requirements of Part D for carbon monoxide and ozone and other miscellaneous provisions | 12/31/1978 and 5/16/1979 | 9/16/1980, 45 FR 61293 | ||
| Supplemental information to the Attainment plans to meet the requirements of Part D for carbon monoxide and ozone and other miscellaneous provisions | 9/19/1979, 11/13/1979, and 3/20/1980 |
9/16/1980, 45 FR 61293 | ||
| Supplemental information to the Attainment plans to meet the requirements of Part D for carbon monoxide and ozone and other miscellaneous provisions | 12/7/1979 and 4/7/1980 | 8/27/1981, 46 FR 43147 | ||
| A revision entitled “Appendix J Transportation Project Level Guidelines” relating to policy guidance on the preparation of air quality analysis for transportation projects | 1/5/1981 | 9/3/1981, 46 FR 44186 | ||
| A comprehensive air quality monitoring plan, intended to meet requirements of 40 CFR part 58 | 1/28/1980 | 3/4/1981, 46 FR 15137 | ||
| Revisions to meet the requirements of Part D and certain other sections of the Clean Air Act, as amended, for making a commitment to public transportation in the Boston urban region | 7/9/1981 and 7/30/1981 | 9/28/1981, 46 FR 47450 | ||
| Letter clarifying State procedures | 11/12/1981 | 3/29/82, 47 FR 13143 | ||
| The Massachusetts DEQE submitted an updated VOC emissions inventory | 9/3/1981 | 1/25/1982, 47 FR 3352 | ||
| Procedures to annually update the VOC emission inventory on November 4, 1981 | 11/4/1981 | 1/25/1982, 47 FR 3352 | ||
| Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 9/9/1982 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| MassDEP submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 11/2/1982 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| MassDEP submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 11/17/1982 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| MassDEP submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 2/2/1983 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| MassDEP submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 3/21/1983 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| MassDEP submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 4/7/1983 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| MassDEP submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 4/26/1983 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| MassDEP submittal for attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone | Statewide | 5/16/1983 | 11/09/1983, 48 FR 51480 | |
| A revision to exempt the Berkshire Air Pollution Control District from Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(12)(b)(2) | Berkshire | 3/25/1983 | 7/7/1983, 48 FR 31200 | |
| Revisions to the State's narrative, entitled New Source Regulations on page 117 and 118 | Statewide | 9/9/1982 | 7/7/1983, 48 FR 31197 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated June 7, 1991, submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 6/7/1991 | 6/30/1993, 58 FR 34908 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated November 13, 1992 submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 11/13/1992 | 6/30/1993, 58 FR 34908 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated February 17, 1993 submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 2/17/1993 | 6/30/1993, 58 FR 34908 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal | Statewide | 11/13/1992 | 6/30/1993, 58 FR 34908 | |
| Letter from Massachusetts DEQE | Statewide | 2/14/1985 | 9/25/1985, 50 FR 38804 | |
| Letter from Massachusetts DEQE | Statewide | 5/22/1985 | 9/25/1985, 50 FR 38804 | |
| Enforcement manual including Method 27, record form, potential leak points, major tank truck leak sources, test procedure for gasoline vapor leak detection procedure by combustible gas detector, instruction manual for Sentox 2 and Notice of Violation | Statewide | 5/22/1985 | 9/25/1985, 50 FR 38804 | |
| Letter from Massachusetts DEQE stating authority to undertake preconstruction review of new stationary sources of air pollution with potential to emit 5 tons or more of lead | Statewide | 8/17/1984 | 10/30/1984, 49 FR 43546 | |
| Letter from Massachusetts DEQE submitting the Massachusetts Lead Implementation Plan | Statewide | 7/13/1984 | 10/30/1984, 49 FR 43546 | |
| Massachusetts attainment and maintenance plans for lead | Statewide | 7/13/1984 | 10/30/1984, 49 FR 43546 | |
| Memorandum from Donald C. Squires to Bruce K. Maillet, subject: Response to EPA questions regarding Phillips Academy, outlines the permanent energy conservation measures to be used | Merrimack Valley | 10/4/1985 | 4/1/1986, 51 FR 11019 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE dated December 3, 1985 | Statewide | 12/3/1985 | 11/25/1986, 51 FR 42563 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE dated January 31, 1986 | Statewide | 1/31/1986 | 11/25/1986, 51 FR 42563 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE dated February 11, 1986. The nonregulatory portions of the state submittals | Statewide | 2/11/1986 | 11/25/1986, 51 FR 42563 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE dated November 21, 1986 | Statewide | 11/21/1986 | 3/10/1989, 54 FR 10147 | |
| The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regulation Filing document dated January 15, 1987 states that these regulatory changes became effective on February 6, 1987 | Statewide | 1/15/1987 | 3/10/1989, 54 FR 10147 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts Massachusetts DEQE dated February 21, 1986 | Statewide | 2/21/1986 | 8/31/1987, 52 FR 32791 | |
| A Regulation Filing and Publication document from the Massachusetts DEQE, dated February 25, 1986 | Statewide | 2/25/1986 | 8/31/1987, 52 FR 32791 | |
| A letter from the Massachusetts DEQE, dated June 23, 1986 | Statewide | 6/23/1986 | 8/31/1987, 52 FR 32791 | |
| Implementation Guidance, 310 CMR 7.18(18), Polystyrene Resin Manufacturing, dated February 1986 | Statewide | 2/01/1986 | 8/31/1987, 52 FR 32791 | |
| Massachusetts DEQE certification that there are no polypropylene and polyethylene manufacturing sources located in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, dated November 8, 1985 | Statewide | 11/8/1985 | 8/31/1987, 52 FR 32791 | |
| Letter dated November 5, 1986 from the Massachusetts DEQE submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 11/5/1986 | 11/19/1987, 52 FR 44394 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE dated December 10, 1986. Letter states that the effective date of Regulations 310 CMR 7.00, “Definitions” and 310 CMR 7.18(19), “Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacture,” is November 28, 1986 | Statewide | 11/28/1986 | 11/19/1987, 52 FR 44394 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE dated September 20, 1988 for a SIP revision involving regulations 310 CMR 7.18(2)(e) and 7.18(17) | Statewide | 7/5/1988 | 3/6/1989, 54 FR 9212 | |
| A Regulation Filing and Publication document from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts dated July 5, 1988 which states that the effective date of the regulatory amendments to 310 CMR 7.18(2)(e) and 310 CMR 7.18(17)(d), is July 22, 1988 | Statewide | 7/5/1988 | 3/6/1989, 54 FR 9212 | |
| Letter dated October 14, 1987 for the American Fiber and Finishing Company facility from Stephen F. Joyce, Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer, Massachusetts DEQE | Pioneer Valley | 10/14/1987 | 2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | |
| Letter dated October 14, 1987 for the Erving Paper Company facility from Stephen F. Joyce, Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer, Massachusetts DEQE | Pioneer Valley | 10/14/1987 | 2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | |
| Letter dated October 14, 1987 for the Westfield River Paper Company facility from Stephen F. Joyce, Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer, Massachusetts DEQE | Pioneer Valley | 10/14/1987 | 2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | |
| Statement of agreement signed May 29, 1987 by Schuyler D. Bush, Vice President of Erving Paper Company | Pioneer Valley | 5/29/1987 | 2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | |
| Statement of agreement signed May 27, 1987 by Francis J. Fitzpatrick, President of Westfield River Paper Company | Pioneer Valley | 5/27/1987 | 2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | |
| Statement of agreement signed May 22, 1987 by Robert Young, Vice President of American Fiber and Finishing Company | Pioneer Valley | 5/22/1987 | 2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | |
| Letter dated April 22, 1987 for the Erving Paper Company facility from Stephen F. Joyce, Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer, Massachusetts DEQE | Pioneer Valley | 5/22/1987 | 2/15/1990, 55 FR 5447 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated July 18, 1989 submitting a revision to the SIP | Pioneer Valley | 7/18/1987 | 2/21/1990, 55 FR 5986 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Pioneer Valley | 7/18/1989 | 11/8/1989, 54 FR 46894 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE submitting a revision to the SIP | Central Massachusetts | 7/18/1989 | 11/3/1989, 54 FR 46386 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal. Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Central Massachusetts | 2/4/1988 | 11/3/1989, 54 FR 46386 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal. List of documents in the February 4, 1988 RACT SIP submittal to EPA.t | Central Massachusetts | 2/10/88 | 11/3/1989, 54 FR 46386 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Southeastern Massachusetts | 8/8/1989 | 11/8/1989, 54 FR 46896 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 8/24/1989 | 4/19/1990, 55 FR 14831 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 10/16/1989 | 4/19/1990, 55 FR 14831 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 8/27/1982 | 2/23/1993, 58 FR 10964 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP certifying that it did not rely on a dual definition in its attainment demonstration | Statewide | 6/22/1987 | 2/23/1993, 58 FR 10964 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting additional assurances that it is making reasonable efforts to develop a complete and approve SIP | Statewide | 12/27/1989 | 2/23/1993, 58 FR 10964 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 11/28/1989 | 8/3/1990, 55 FR 31587 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 11/28/1989 | 8/3/1990, 55 FR 31590 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 11/20/1989 | 8/27/1990, 55 FR 34914 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Southeastern Massachusetts | 6/13/1990 | 2/27/1991, 56 FR 8130 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 7/9/1990 | 2/19/1991, 56 FR 6568 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Pioneer Valley | 10/25/1990 | 3/20/1991, 56 FR 11675 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Pioneer Valley | 4/22/1991 | 10/8/1991, 56 FR 50659 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 8/17/1989 | 10/8/1992, 57 FR 46313 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 6/7/1991 | 10/8/1992, 57 FR 46313 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP withdrawing the emission limit for the Primer-surfacer application from the June 7, 1991 submittal | Statewide | 12/17/1991 | 10/8/1992, 57 FR 46313 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of state submittal. MassDEP's Decision Memorandum for Proposed amendments to 310 CMR 7.00 | Statewide | 5/24/1991 | 10/8/1992, 57 FR 46313 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of state submittal. MassDEP's Decision Memorandum for Proposed amendments to 310 CMR 7.00, 7.18 and 7.24 | Statewide | 2/25/1991 | 10/8/1992, 57 FR 46313 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 8/27/1982 | 1/11/1993, 58 FR 3492 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 4/12/1985 | 1/11/1993, 58 FR 3492 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 8/17/1989 | 1/11/1993, 58 FR 3492 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 6/7/1991 | 1/11/1993, 58 FR 3492 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE submitting 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix B | Statewide | 6/27/1984 | 1/11/1993, 58 FR 3492 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE submitting additional information on 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix B and referencing 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b) | Statewide | 3/6/1985 | 1/11/1993, 58 FR 3492 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP withdrawing the emission limit for the Primer-surfacer application in 310 CMR 7.18(7)(b) from the June 7, 1991 submittal | Statewide | 12/17/1991 | 1/11/1993, 58 FR 3492 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 8/4/1989 | 3/16/1993, 58 FR 14153 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 12/6/1989 | 3/16/1993, 58 FR 14153 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 3/23/1990 | 3/16/1993, 58 FR 14153 | |
| Technical amendments to regulation (310 CMR 7.31) submitted by the MassDEP | Metropolitan Boston | 3/30/1990 | 3/16/1993, 58 FR 14153 | |
| Appendix 5D, Baseline and Future Case CO Compliance Modeling, dated June 1986 | Metropolitan Boston | 6/1/1986 | 3/16/1993, 58 FR 14153 | |
| Policy Statement Regarding the Proposed Amendment to the Logan Airport Parking Freeze | Metropolitan Boston | 11/14/1988 | 3/16/1993, 58 FR 14153 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated May 15, 1992 submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 5/15/1991 | 12/14/1992, 57 FR 58991 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated January 30, 1991 submitting a revision to the SIP. Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in Boston | Metropolitan Boston | 1/30/1991 | 10/8/1992, 57 FR 46310 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated May 17, 1990 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 5/17/1990 | 12/14/1992, 57 FR 58993 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated June 7, 1991, submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 6/7/1991 | 12/14/1992, 57 FR 58993 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated July 5, 1990, requesting the withdrawal of amendments to subsection 310 CMR 7.24(2)(c) which require Stage I vapor recovery in Berkshire County from the SIP revision package submitted on May 17, 1990 | Statewide | 7/5/1990 | 12/14/1992, 57 FR 58993 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated April 21, 1992, submitting an implementation policy statement regarding its Stage II program | Statewide | 4/21/1992 | 12/14/1992, 57 FR 58993 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the SIP submittal. March 2, 1992 Division of Air Quality Control Policy certified vapor collection and control system for Stage II Vapor Recovery Program | Statewide | 4/21/1992 | 12/14/1992, 57 FR 58993 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 11/13/1992 | 9/15/1993, 58 FR 48315 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 1/15/1993 | 9/15/1993, 58 FR 48315 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 2/17/1993 | 9/15/1993, 58 FR 48315 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the SIP submittal. MassDEP's Listing of Response to Comments dated January 1993 | Statewide | 2/17/1993 | 9/15/1993, 58 FR 48315 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the SIP submittal. MassDEP's Background Document for Proposed Amendments to 310 CCMR 7.00, et. al. “50 Ton VOC RACT Regulations” dated September 1992 | Statewide | 2/17/1993 | 9/15/1993, 58 FR 48315 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 8/26/1992 | 7/28/1994, 59 FR 38372 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 11/2/1990 | 7/28/1994, 59 FR 38372 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | 7/19/1993 | 1/6/1995, 60 FR 2016 | ||
| Letter dated October 27, 1993 from MassDEP submitting certification of a public hearing | 10/27/1993 | 1/6/1995, 60 FR 2016 | ||
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 12/9/1991 | 10/4/1994, 59 FR 50495 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP which substitutes the California Low Emission Vehicle program for the Clean Fuel Fleet program | Statewide | 11/15/1993 | 2/1/1995, 60 FR 6027 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP which substitutes the California Low Emission Vehicle program for the Clean Fuel Fleet program | Statewide | 5/11/1994 | 2/1/1995, 60 FR 6027 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 3/31/1994 | 3/6/1995, 60 FR 12123 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated June 6, 1994 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts SIP | Statewide | 6/6/1994 | 4/1/1995, 60 FR 17226 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated December 9, 1994 | Statewide | 12/9/1994 | 4/1/1995, 60 FR 17226 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 6/28/1990 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11556 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 9/30/1992 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11556 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated July 15, 1994, submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 7/15/1994 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11556 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP assuring EPA that the data elements noted in EPA's December 13, 1994 letter were being incorporated into the source registration forms used by Massachusetts emission statement program | Statewide | 12/30/1994 | 3/21/1996, 61 FR 11556 | |
| Letter which included the oxygenated gasoline program, amendments to the Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulations, 310 CMR 7.00, with an effective date of March 1, 1994, requesting that the submittal be approved and adopted as part of the SIP | Statewide | 10/29/1993 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2918 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 12/12/1994 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2918 | |
| The Technical Support Document for the Redesignation of the Boston Area as Attainment for Carbon Monoxide | Metropolitan Boston | 12/12/1994 | 1/30/1996, 61 FR 2918 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated January 9, 1995 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 1/9/1995 | 12/19/1995, 60 FR 65240 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated January 9, 1995, submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 1/9/1995 | 2/14/1996, 61 FR 5696 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 3/29/1995 | 7/5/2000, 65 FR 41344 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP (City of Boston/South Boston Parking Freeze) | Metropolitan Boston | 7/30/1993 | 10/15/1996, 61 FR 53628 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 2/9/1994 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41335 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 3/29/1995 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41335 | |
| Letter and attachments from the MassDEP submitting supplemental information concerning the demonstration of balance between credit creation and credit use | Statewide | 2/8/1996 | 8/8/1996, 61 FR 41335 | |
| Massachusetts PAMS Network Plan, which incorporates PAMS into the ambient air quality monitoring network of State or Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) and National Air Monitoring Stations (NAMS) | Statewide | 11/15/1993 | 7/14/1997, 62 FR 37510 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated December 30, 1993 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 12/30/1993 | 7/14/1997, 62 FR 37510 | |
| The Commonwealth, committed in a letter dated March 3, 1997 to correct deficiencies for an enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program within one year of conditional interim approval by EPA | Statewide | 3/3/1997 | 7/14/1997, 62 FR 37510 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 10/17/1997 | 4/11/2000, 65 FR 19323 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 7/30/1996 | 4/11/2000, 65 FR 19323 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 8/9/2000 | 12/18/2000, 65 FR 78974 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 9/11/2000 | 12/18/2000, 65 FR 78974 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 7/25/1995 | 12/18/2000, 65 FR 78974 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 2/17/1993 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48297 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 12/19/1997 | 6/2/1999, 64 FR 29567 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP clarifying the program implementation process | Statewide | 3/9/1998 | 6/2/1999, 64 FR 29567 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 7/15/1994 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 10/4/1996 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 12/2/1996 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 1/11/1999 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 4/16/1999 | 9/2/1999, 64 FR 48095 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the SIP submittal | Statewide | 1/11/1995 | 4/11/2000, 65 FR 19323 | |
| Nonregulatory portions of the SIP submittal | Statewide | 3/29/1995 | 4/11/2000, 65 FR 19323 | |
| A September 17, 1999, Notice of Correction submitted by the Secretary of State indicating the effective date of the regulations | Statewide | 9/17/1999 | 11/15/2000, 65 FR 68898 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 5/14/1999 | 11/15/2000, 65 FR 68898 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 2/1/2000 | 11/15/2000, 65 FR 68898 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 3/15/2000 | 11/15/2000, 65 FR 68898 | |
| Test Procedures and Equipment Specifications | Statewide | 2/1/2000 | 11/15/2000, 65 FR 68898 | |
| Acceptance Test Protocol | Statewide | 3/15/2000 | 11/15/2000, 65 FR 68898 | |
| Letter from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental Protection submitting an amendment to SIP | Statewide | 11/19/1999 | 12/27/2000, 65 FR 81743 | |
| Background Document and Technical Support for Public Hearings on the Proposed Revisions to the SIP for Ozone, July, 1999 | Statewide | 7/1/1999 | 12/27/2000, 65 FR 81743 | |
| Supplemental Background Document and Technical Support for Public Hearings on Modifications to the July 1999 Proposal to Revise the SIP for Ozone, September, 1999 | Statewide | 9/1/1999 | 12/27/2000, 65 FR 81743 | |
| Table of Unit Allocations | Statewide | 9/1/1999 | 12/27/2000, 65 FR 81743 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP | Statewide | 4/10/2002 | 6/20/2003, 68 FR 36921 | |
| The SIP narrative “Technical Support Document for Public Hearings on Revisions to the State Implementation Plan for Ozone for Massachusetts, Amendments to Statewide Projected Inventory for Nitrogen Oxides,” dated March 2002 | Statewide | 3/21/2002 | 6/20/2003, 68 FR 36921 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 7/15/1994 | 10/27/2000, 65 FR 64360 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting revisions to the SIP | Statewide | 3/29/1995 | 10/27/2000, 65 FR 64360 | |
| Plan Approval issued by the MassDEP to the Gillette Company Andover Manufacturing Plant | Statewide | 6/17/1999 | 10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting negative declarations for certain VOC source categories | Statewide | 4/16/1999 | 10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP discussing wood furniture manufacturing and aerospace coating requirements in Massachusetts | Statewide | 7/24/2002 | 10/4/2002, 67 FR 62179 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 12/8/2000 | 3/12/2001, 66 FR 14318 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting the final state certified copies of State regulations 310 CMR 7.30 “Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze” and 310 CMR 7.31 “City of Boston/East Boston Parking Freeze.” | Metropolitan Boston | 12/26/2000 | 3/12/2001, 66 FR 14318 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, in which it submitted the Low Emission Vehicle Program adopted on December 24, 1999 | Statewide | 8/9/2002 | 12/23/2002, 67 FR 78179 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP which clarified the August 9, 2002 submittal to exclude certain sections of the Low Emission Vehicle Program from consideration | Statewide | 8/26/2002 | 12/23/2002, 67 FR 78179 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 7/12/2006 | 2/15/2008, 73 FR 8818 | |
| Massachusetts Regulation Filing amending 310 CMR 7.38 entitled “Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District.” | Metropolitan Boston | 12/13/2005 | 2/15/2008, 73 FR 8818 | |
| Massachusetts Regulation Filing amending 310 CMR 7.28 entitled “NOx Allowance Trading Program,” and adopting 310 CMR 7.32 entitled “Massachusetts Clean Air Interstate Rule (Mass CAIR).” | Statewide | 4/19/2007 | 12/3/2007, 72 FR 67854 | |
| Massachusetts Regulation Filing substantiating December 1, 2006, State effective date for amended 310 CMR 7.00 entitled “Definition,” (addition of term “Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization,” which appears on the replaced page 173 of the State's Code of Massachusetts Regulations,) and 310 CMR 7.36 entitled “Transit System Improvements.” | Metropolitan Boston | 11/16/2006 | 7/31/2008, 73 FR 44654 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP dated December 13, 2006 submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 12/13/2006 | 7/31/2008, 73 FR 44654 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP submitting a revision to the SIP | Metropolitan Boston | 6/1/2007 | 7/31/2008, 73 FR 44654 | |
| Letter from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation identifying its commitment to the Green Line extension and to make every effort to accelerate the planning, design and environmental review and permitting of the project in order to work towards the 2014 completion date | Metropolitan Boston | 9/4/2007 | 7/31/2008, 73 FR 44654 | |
| Letter from the Chair of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization concurring in the finding that the transit system improvements projects will achieve emission benefits equivalent to or greater than the benefits from the original transit system improvements projects being replaced | Metropolitan Boston | 5/1/2008 | 7/31/2008, 73 FR 44654 | |
| Letter from EPA New England Regional Administrator concurring in the finding that the transit system improvements projects will achieve emission benefits equivalent to or greater than the benefits from the original transit system improvements projects being replaced | Metropolitan Boston | 7/5/2008 | 7/31/2008, 73 FR 44654 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated June 1, 2009, submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 6/1/2009 | 01/25/2013, 78 FR 5292 | |
| Letter from the MassDEP, dated November 30, 2009, amending the June 1, 2009 SIP submittal | Statewide | 11/30/2009 | 01/25/2013, 78 FR 5292 | |
| Massachusetts June 1, 2009 SIP Revision Table of Contents Item 7, “Documentation of IM SIP Revision consistent with 42 USC Section 7511a and Section 182(c)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act.” | Statewide | 6/1/2009 | 01/25/2013, 78 FR 5292 | |
| “Massachusetts Regional Haze State Implementation Plan” dated August 9, 2012 | Statewide | 8/9/2012 | 9/19/2013, 78 FR 57487 | |
| A letter from the MassDEP dated August 9, 2001 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 8/9/2001 | 4/24/2014, 79 FR 22774 | |
| A letter from the MassDEP dated September 14, 2006 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 9/14/2006 | 4/24/2014, 79 FR 22774 | |
| A letter from the MassDEP dated February 13, 2008 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 2/13/2008 | 4/24/2014, 79 FR 22774 | |
| A letter from the MassDEP dated January 18, 2013 withdrawing certain outdated and obsolete regulation submittals and replacing them with currently effective versions of the regulation for approval and inclusion into the SIP | Statewide | 1/18/2013 | 4/24/2014, 79 FR 22774 | |
| A letter from the MassDEP dated November 6, 2013 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 11/6/2013 | 12/8/2015, 80 FR 76225 | |
| A letter from the MassDEP dated May 5, 2015 submitting a revision to the SIP | Statewide | 5/5/2015 | 11/29/2016, 81 FR 85897 | |
| Massachusetts Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report | Statewide | Submitted 2/9/2018 | 3/29/2019, 84 FR 11885 | |
| Infrastructure SIP for 1997 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 5/29/2019, 84 FR 24719 | Certain aspects relating to PSD for prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) which were conditionally approved on 12/21/2016 are now fully approved. |
| Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Lead NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 5/29/2019, 84 FR 24719 | Certain aspects relating to PSD for prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) which were conditionally approved on 12/21/2016 are now fully approved. |
| Infrastructure SIP for 2008 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 5/29/2019, 84 FR 24719 | Certain aspects relating to PSD for prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) which were conditionally approved on 12/21/2016 are now fully approved. |
| Infrastructure SIP for 2010 NO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 5/29/2019, 84 FR 24719 | Certain aspects relating to PSD for prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) which were conditionally approved on 12/21/2016 are now fully approved. |
| Infrastructure SIP for 2010 SO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 5/29/2019, 84 FR 24719 | Certain aspects relating to PSD for prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) which were conditionally approved on 12/21/2016 are now fully approved. |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Approved with respect to requirements for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) with the exception of the PSD-related requirements of (C), (D), and (J). Approval includes interstate transport requirements. |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 1/1/2008 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Converts conditional approval to full approval for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A) and E(ii). Approves interstate transport, visibility protection, and international air pollution abatement requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D). |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 9/21/2009 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Converts conditional approval to full approval for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A) and E(ii). Approves interstate transport, visibility protection, and international air pollution abatement requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D). |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 1997 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Converts conditional approval for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), which was conditionally approved December 21, 2016, to full approval. |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2008 Lead NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Converts conditional approval for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), which was conditionally approved December 21, 2016, to full approval. |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2008 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Converts conditional approval for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), which was conditionally approved December 21, 2016, to full approval. |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2010 NO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Converts conditional approval for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), which was conditionally approved December 21, 2016, to full approval. |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2010 SO2 NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 6/24/2019, 84 FR 29380 | Converts conditional approval for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), which was conditionally approved December 21, 2016, to full approval. |
| Carbon Monoxide 2nd 10-Year Limited Maintenance Plan | Boston Metropolitan Area, Lowell, Springfield, Waltham, and Worcester | 2/9/2018 | 7/1/2019, 84 FR 31206 | |
| Interstate transport requirements of CAA for 1997 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 1/31/2008 | 11/6/2019, 84 FR 59728 | Approved with respect to requirements for CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| Interstate transport requirements of CAA for 2008 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 11/6/2019, 84 FR 59728 | Approved with respect to requirements for CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| Interstate transport requirements of CAA for 2015 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 9/27/2018 | 1/31/2020, 85 FR 5572 | Approved with respect to requirements for CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). |
| Certification of Adequacy of Massachusetts 2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS Infrastructure SIP to Address the Good Neighbor Requirements of Clean Air Act 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) | Statewide | 2/9/2018 | 10/13/2019, 84 FR 61560 | |
| Negative declaration for the 2016 Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry | Statewide | 10/18/2018 | 8/21/2020, 85 FR 51666 | Negative declaration |
| Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan Revision 2008 and 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards and RACT SIP Revision | Statewide | Submitted 10/18/2018 and 5/28/2020 | 10/15/2020, 85 FR 65236 | Includes negative declarations for 10 CTGs. |
| Infrastructure SIP submittal for 2015 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 9/27/2018 | 2/9/2021, 86 FR 8693 | Approved with respect to requirements for CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) with the exception of the PSD-related requirements of (C), (D), and (J). |
| Massachusetts Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Revision for the Second Planning Period (2018-2028) | Statewide | Submitted July 22, 2021 | 7/8/2024, 89 FR 55891 | |
| 3 To determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. |
[83 FR 3967, Jan. 29, 2018, as amended at 83 FR 9439, Mar. 6, 2018; 84 FR 7301, Mar. 4, 2019; 84 FR 10265, Mar. 20, 2019; 84 FR 11887, Mar. 29, 2019; 84 FR 24721, May 29, 2019; 84 FR 29383, June 24, 2019; 84 FR 31207, July 1, 2019; 84 FR 59730, Nov. 6, 2019; 84 FR 61562, Nov. 13, 2019; 85 FR 5573, Jan. 31, 2020; 85 FR 51667, Aug. 21, 2020; 85 FR 65238, Oct. 15, 2020; 86 FR 8696, Feb. 9, 2021; 89 FR 55895, July 8, 2024]
§ 52.1121 Classification of regions.
The Massachusetts plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Ozone | |
| Metropolitan Boston Intrastate | I | I | III | I | I |
| Merrimack Valley-Southern New Hampshire Interstate | I | I | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Providence Interstate | I | I | III | III | III |
| Central Massachusetts Intrastate | I | II | III | III | III |
| Hartford-New Haven-Springfield Interstate | I | I | III | I | I |
| Berkshire Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10872, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974; 45 FR 61303, Sept. 16, 1980; 84 FR 29383, June 24, 2019]
§ 52.1122 [Reserved]
§ 52.1123 Approval status.
(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart the Administrator approves the Massachusetts plan as identified in § 52.1120 for attainment and maintenance of the national standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds that the plan identified in § 52.1120 satisfies all requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977, except as noted below. In addition, continued satisfaction of the requirements of Part D of the ozone portion of the SIP depends on the adoption and submittal of RACT requirements by July 1, 1980 for the sources covered by CTGs issued between January 1978 and January 1979 and adoption and submittal by each subsequent January of additional RACT requirements for sourceovered by CTGs issued by the previous January.
(b) The above requirements for continued satisfaction of Part D are fulfilled by Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(17) and a narrative commitment to review CTG IIIs issued in the future. Both were submitted on September 9, 1982. Additionally, each individual RACT determination made under 310 CMR 7.18(17) will be submitted as a SIP revision to incorporate the limitation into the SIP, and DEQE will propose regulations for CTG III category controls if the controls are appropriate for the State.
[45 FR 61303, Sept. 16, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 51485, Nov. 9, 1983]
§ 52.1124 Review of new sources and modifications.
(a) Revisions to Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(2)(d) submitted on March 30, 1979 are disapproved because they do not satisfy the requirements of § 51.161.
[39 FR 7281, Feb. 25, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 47495, Oct. 9, 1975; 45 FR 2043, Jan. 10, 1980; 51 FR 40677, Nov. 7, 1986; 60 FR 33923, June 29, 1995]
§ 52.1125 Emission inventories.
(a) The Governor's designee for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts submitted the 1990 base year emission inventories for the Springfield nonattainment area and the Massachusetts portion of the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester ozone nonattainment area on November 13, 1992 as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Revisions to the inventories were submitted on November 15, 1993, and November 15, 1994, and March 31, 1997. The 1990 base year emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for these areas.
(b) The inventories are for the ozone precursors which are volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide. The inventories covers point, area, non-road mobile, on-road mobile, and biogenic sources.
(c) Taken together, the Springfield nonattainment area and the Massachusetts portion of the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester nonattainment area encompass the entire geographic area of the State. Both areas are classified as serious ozone nonattainment areas.
(d) The state of Massachusetts submitted base year emission inventories representing emissions for calendar year 2002 from the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area and the Springfield moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area on January 31, 2008 as revisions to the State's SIP. The 2002 base year emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for these areas. The inventories consist of emission estimates of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides, and cover point, area, non-road mobile, on-road mobile and biogenic sources. The inventories were submitted as revisions to the SIP in partial fulfillment of obligations for nonattainment areas under EPA's 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
(e) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts submitted base year emission inventories representing emissions for calendar year 2011 for the Dukes county marginal 8-hour ozone nonattainment area on February 9, 2018, as a revision to the Massachusetts SIP. The 2011 base year emission inventory requirement of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for this area. The inventory consists of emission estimates of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides, and applies to point, area, non-road mobile, on-road mobile and biogenic sources. The inventories were submitted as revisions to the Massachusetts SIP in partial fulfillment of obligations for nonattainment areas under EPA's 2008 8-hour ozone standard.
[62 FR 37514, July 14, 1997, as amended at 77 FR 50601, Aug. 22, 2012; 84 FR 7301, Mar. 4, 2019]
§ 52.1126 Control strategy: Sulfur oxides.
(a) The revisions to the control strategy resulting from the modification to the emission limitations applicable to the sources listed below or resulting from the change in the compliance date for such sources with the applicable emission limitation is hereby approved. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State, unless otherwise noted. (See § 52.1125 for compliance schedule approvals and disapprovals pertaining to one or more of the sources listed below.)
| Source | Location | Regulation involved | Date of adoption |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc | Monroe Bridge | 5.1.2 | Oct. 17, 1972. |
| Hollingsworth & Vose Co | East Walpole | 5.1.2 | June 29, 1972. |
| Pepperell Paper Co | Pepperell | 5.1.2 | Nov. 29, 1972. |
| Stevens Paper Mills, Inc | Westfield and South Hadley | 5.1.2 | July 27, 1972. |
| Tileston and Hollingsworth Co | Hyde Park | 5.1.1 | Nov. 21, 1972. |
| All sources in Berkshire APCD | 5.1.2 | Do. |
(b)(1) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) for the Pioneer Valley Air Pollution Control District, which allows a relaxation of sulfur in fuel limitations under certain conditions, is approved for the following sources. All other sources remain subject to the previously approved requirements of Regulation 7.05(1) which stipulate that sources are required to burn residual fuel oil having a sulfur content not in excess of 0.55 pounds per million Btu heat release potential (approximately equivalent to 1 percent sulfur content.)
Deerfield Specialty Paper Company, Monroe Bridge; Amherst College, Amherst; Brown Company, Holyoke; Monsanto Polymer and Petrochemical Company, Building 21, Springfield; Monsanto Polymer and Petrochemical Company, Building 49, Springfield; Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley; Uniroyal Tire Inc., Chicopee; Smith College, Northampton; West Springfield Generating Station, Western Massachusetts Electric, West Springfield.
Pioneer Valley APCD
Belchertown State School, Belchertown
James River Graphics (formerly Scott Graphics), south Hadley (conditioned upon operation of the boilers on only one of the two stacks at any given time, and operation being so restricted in the source's operating permit granted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.)
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Springfield.
Northampton State Hospital, Northampton.
Springfield Technical Community College, Springfield.
Stanley Home Products, Easthampton.
Stevens Elastomeric Industries, Easthampton.
Ware Industries, Ware.
Westfield State College, Westfield.
Westover Air Force Base (Building 1411), Chicopee.
University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Mount Tom Generating Station, Holyoke.
(2) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1)(e)(3) for Pioneer Valley, as submitted on March 2, 1979, and May 5, 1981, which allows sources in Hampshire and Franklin Counties rated at less than 100 million Btu per hour heat input capacity to burn fuel oil having a sulfur content of not more than 1.21 pounds per million Btu heat release potential (approximately equivalent to 2.2% sulfur content) is approved for all such sources with the exception of:
Strathmore Paper Co., Montague.
(c) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) which allows a relaxation of sulfur in fuel limitations for the Central Massachusetts Air Pollution Control District, except in the City of Worcester, is approved for the following sources. All other sources remain subject to the previously approved requirements of Regulation 7.05(1) which stipulate that sources are required to burn residual fuel oil having a sulfur content not in excess of 0.55 pounds per million BTU heat release potential (approximately equivalent to 1 percent sulfur content fuel oil).
American Optical Company, Southbridge, Wyman Gordon Company, Grafton, James River—Massachusetts Inc., Fitchburg, Fitchburg Paper Company, Fitchburg (only boilers which emit through the 55 meter stack).
Central Massachusetts APCD
Borden, Inc., Chemical Division, Leominster (conditioned upon first completing construction of new stack and certification of completion to the EPA by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.).
Gardner State Hospital, Gardner.
Grafton State Hospital, Grafton.
Haywood-Shuster Woolen, E. Douglas.
Cranston Prints Works, Webster.
Baldwinville products, Templeton—(conditioned upon first completing construction of new stack, and certification of completion to the EPA by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.).
(d) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) for the Southeastern Massachusetts Air Pollution Control District, which allows a relaxation of sulfur in fuel limitations under certain conditions is approved for the following sources. All other sources remain subject to the previously approved requirements of Regulation 7.05(1) which stipulate that sources are required to burn residual fuel oil having a sulfur content not in excess of 0.55 pounds per million Btu heat release potential (approximately equivalent to 1 percent sulfur content.)
New England Power Company, Brayton Point Station, Somerset; Montaup Electric Company, Somerset Station, Somerset (limited to 75% capacity while burning higher sulfur fuels.) Canal Electric Company, Sandwich; Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant, Somerset Avenue, Taunton.
Southeastern Massachusetts APCD
L&O Realty Trust, Taunton.
New Bedford Gas and Electric, New Bedford.
Texas Instruments, Attleboro.
Arkwright Finishing Incorporated, Fall River.
Foster Forbes Glass Company, Milford.
Owens Illinois Inc., Mansfield.
Harodite Finishing Corporation, Dighton—(conditioned upon prior removal of rain-caps from stack, and certification of completion to the EPA by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.)
Polaroid Corporation, New Bedford.
(e) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) for the Merrimack Valley Air Pollution Control District, excluding the City of Lawrence and the towns of Andover, Methuen, and North Andover, which allows a relaxation of sulfur in fuel limitations under certain conditions, is approved for the following sources. All other sources remain subject to the previously approved requirements of Regulation 7.05(1) which stipulates that sources are required to burn residual fuel oil having a sulfur content not in excess of 0.55 pounds per million Btu heat release potential (approximately equivalent to 1 percent sulfur content).
Hollingsworth and Vose, West Groton; James River Paper, Pepperell; Haverhill Paperboard Corp., Haverhill. Residual oil burning facilities less than 100 million Btu's per hour heat input capacity, except in the City of Lawrence, and Towns of Andover, Methuen, and North Andover.
(f) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) for the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District, which allows a relaxation of sulfur in fuel limitations under certain conditions, is approved for the following sources. All other sources remain subject to the previously approved requirements of Regulation 7.05(1) which stipulate that sources in Arlington, Belmont, Boston, Brookline, Cambridge, Chelsea, Everett, Malden, Medford, Newton, Somerville, Waltham, and Watertown (the Boston Core Area) are limited to burn fuel with a sulfur content not in excess of 0.28 pounds per million Btu heat release potential (approximately 0.5% sulfur content residual oil; sources in the remaining APCD are limited to burn fuel with a sulfur content not in excess of 0.55 pounds per million Btu heat release potential (approximately 1% sulfur content residual oil).
Metropolitan Boston APCD
General Motors, Framingham.
Polaroid Corporation, Norwood.
Bird and Son, East Walpole.
Massachusetts Correctional Institute, South Walpole.
Bridgewater State College, Bridgewater.
Hanscom Field, Bedford.
Wellesley College, Wellesley.
National Tanning and Trading, Peabody.
General Tire, Reading.
General Food Corporation, Atlantic Gelatin, Woburn.
Massachusetts Correctional Institute, Bridgewater.
W. R. Grace, Acton.
Massachusetts Correctional Institute, Concord.
Danvers State Hospital, Danvers.
New England Power Company, Salem Harbor Station, Salem; Boston Edison, L Street, New Boston Station, Boston; Boston Edison, Mystic Station, Everett; Ventron Corporation, Danvers; General Electric, Lynn River Works, Lynn; U.S.M. Corporation, Beverly; Medfield State Hospital, Medfield; General Dynamics, Quincy; Hollingsworth and Vose, East Walpole; Kendal Company, Walpole; Dennison Manufacturing Company, Framingham.
Procter and Gamble Company, Quincy.
Natick Paperboard Corporation, Natick.
[38 FR 9089, Apr. 10, 1973]
§ 52.1127 Attainment dates for national standards.
The following table presents the latest dates by which the national standards are to be attained. The table reflects the new information presented in the approved Massachusetts plan.
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO 2 | PM 10 | NO 2 | CO | O 3 | ||
| Primary | Secondary | |||||
| AQCR 42: Hartford-New Haven-Springfield Interstate Area (See 40 CFR 81.26) | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (c) |
| AQCR 117: Berkshire Intrastat Area (See 40 CFR 81.141) | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (c) |
| AQCR 118: Central Mass Intrastate Area (See 4r0 CFR 81.142) | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (d) |
| AQCR 119: Metropolitan Boston Intrastate Area (See 40 CFR 81.19) | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (d) |
| AQCR 120: Metropolitan Providence Interstate Area (See 40 CFR 81.31) | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (d) |
| AQCR 121: Merrimack Valley-Southern NH Interstate Area (See 40 CFR 81.81) | (a) | (b) | (a) | (a) | (a) | (d) |
| a. Air quality presently below primary standards or area is unclassifiable. | ||||||
| b. Air quality levels presently secondary standards or area is unclassifiable. | ||||||
| c. December 31, 2003. | ||||||
| d. November 15, 2007. |
[45 FR 61303, Sept. 16, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 33524, June 30, 1981; 66 FR 693, Jan. 3, 2001; 67 FR 7278, Feb. 19, 2002; 67 FR 72579, Dec. 6, 2002]
§ 52.1128 Transportation and land use controls.
(a) For purposes of this subpart, the definitions herein are applicable.
(b) Definitions:
(1) Register as applied to a motor vehicle, means the licensing of such motor vehicle for general operation on public roads or highways by the appropriate agency of the Federal Government or by the Commonwealth.
(2) Boston Intrastate Region means the Metropolitan Boston Intrastate Air Quality Control Region, as defined in § 81.19 of this part.
(3) [Reserved]
(4) Freeze area means that portion of the Boston Intrastate Region enclosed within the following boundaries:
The City of Cambridge; that portion of the City of Boston from the Charles River and the Boston Inner Harbor on north and northeast of pier 4 on Northern Avenue; by the east side of pier 4 to B Street, B Street extension of B Street to B Street, B Street, Dorchester Avenue, and the Preble Street to Old Colony Avenue, then east to the water, then by the water's edge around Columbia Point on various courses generally easterly, southerly, and westerly to the center of the bridge on Morrissey Boulevard, on the east and southeast; then due west to Freeport Street, Freeport Street, Dorchester Avenue, Southeast Expressway, Southampton Street, Reading Street, Island Street, Chadwick Street, Carlow Street, Albany Street, Hunneman Street, Madison Street, Windsor Street, Cabot Street, Ruggles Street, Parker Street, Ward Street, Huntington Avenue, Brookline-Boston municipal boundary, Mountford Street to the Boston University Bridge on the southwest and west; and the Logan International Airport. Where a street or roadway forms a boundary the entire right-of-way of the street is within the freeze area as defined.
(5) Boston proper means that portion of the City of Boston, Massachusetts, contained within the following boundaries: The Charles River and Boston Inner Harbor on the northwest, north, and northeast, the Inner Harbor, Fort Point Channel, Fitzgerald Expressway, and the Massachusetts Avenue Expressway access branch on the east and southeast, and Massachusetts Avenue on the west. Where a street or roadway forms a boundary, the entire right-of-way of the street is within the Boston proper area as here defined.
(6) Regional Administrator means the Administrator of Region I of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(7) Governor means the Governor of the Commonwealth or the head of such executive office of the Commonwealth as the Governor shall designate as responsible for carrying out specific provisions of this subpart.
(8) Commonwealth means the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
[40 FR 25161, June 12, 1975]
§ 52.1129 Control strategy: Ozone.
(a) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on April 1, 1999, and supplemented on June 25, 1999 and September 9, 1999. The revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the rate of progress requirements of sections 182(b)(1) and 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act for the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment area.
(b) Approval—Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 27, 1998, October 1, 1998 and August 13, 1999. The revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(c)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act, for the Springfield (Western Massachusetts) serious ozone nonattainment area. The revision establishes an attainment date of December 31, 2003 for the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment area. This revision establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2003 of 23.77 tons per day of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 49.11 tons per day of nitrogen oxides (NOX) to be used in transportation conformity in the Springfield, Massachusetts serious ozone nonattainment area.
(c) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on April 10, 2002 and amended on July 26, 2002. The revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the rate of progress requirements of sections 182(b)(1) and 182(c)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act for the Massachusetts portion of the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester serious ozone nonattainment area.
(d) Approval—Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental protection on July 27, 1998, and September 6, 2002. The revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the one-hour ozone attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(c)92)(A) of the Clean Air Act, for the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA-NH serious ozone nonattainment area. The revision establishes a one-hour attainment date of November 15, 2007l, for the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA-NH serious ozone nonattainment area. This revision establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2007 of 86.7 tons per day of volatile organic compounds and 226.363 tons per day of nitrogen oxides to be used in transportation conformity in the Massachusetts portion of the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA-NH serious ozone nonattainment area.
(e) Determination of Attainment for the One-Hour Ozone Standard. Effective May 30, 2012, EPA is determining that the Springfield (Western Massachusetts) one-hour ozone nonattainment area did not meet its applicable one-hour ozone attainment date of December 31, 2003, based on 2001-2003 complete, quality-assured ozone monitoring data. Separate from and independent of this determination, EPA is determining that the Springfield (Western Massachusetts) one-hour ozone nonattainment area met the one-hour ozone standard, based on 2007-2009 complete, quality-assured ozone monitoring data at all monitoring sites in the area. EPA's review of the ozone data shows that the area began attaining the one-hour ozone standard during the 2007-2009 monitoring period, and has continued attaining the one-hour standard through the 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 monitoring periods.
(f) Determination of Attainment for the One-Hour Ozone Standard. Effective June 28, 2012, EPA is determining that the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA-NH one-hour ozone nonattainment area met the one-hour ozone standard, by the area's applicable attainment date of November 15, 2007, based on 2005-2007 complete, certified, quality-assured ozone monitoring data at all monitoring sites in the area.
(g) Determination of Attainment. (1) Determination of Attainment by Attainment Date; and
(2) Determination of Attainment. Effective June 28, 2012.
(i) Determination of Attainment by the Area's Attainment Date. EPA is determining that the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA eight-hour ozone nonattainment area met the applicable June 15, 2010 attainment deadline for the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard.
(ii) EPA is determining that the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA eight-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard. Under the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR 51.918), this determination suspends the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act for as long as the area continues to attain the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard. If EPA determines, after notice-and comment rulemaking, that the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA area no longer meets the 1997 ozone NAAQS, this determination shall be withdrawn.
(h) Determinations of Attainment: Effective July 19, 2012.
(1) Determination of Attainment. EPA is determining that the Springfield (Western Massachusetts) 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. Under the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR 51.918), this determination suspends the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act for as long as the area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. If EPA determines, after notice-and comment rulemaking, that the Western Massachusetts area no longer meets the 1997 ozone NAAQS, this determination shall be withdrawn.
(2) Determination of Attainment by the Area's Attainment Date. EPA has determined that the Springfield (Western Massachusetts) 8-hour ozone nonattainment area met the applicable June 15, 2010 attainment deadline for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
(i) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on January 31, 2008. These revisions are for the purpose of satisfying the rate of progress requirement of section 182(b)(1) from 2002 through 2008, and the contingency measure requirement of sections 172(c)(9) and of the Clean Air Act, for the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester (E. MA) moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area, and the Springfield (W. MA) moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. These revisions establish motor vehicle emission budgets for 2008 of 68.30 tons per day of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 191.30 tons per day of nitrogen oxides (NOX) to be used in transportation conformity in the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester (E. MA) moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. These revisions also establish motor vehicle emission budgets for 2008 for the Springfield (W. MA) moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area of 11.80 tons per day for VOCs, and 31.30 tons per day for NOX.
(j) Approval—Reasonably Available Control Technology Demonstration for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on January 31, 2008. The revision consists of the state's certification that with regard to the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, Reasonably Available Control Technology controls have been implemented for all sources in the state covered by EPA's Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) and for all major sources of volatile organic compound and nitrogen oxide emissions. The submittal also includes negative declaration for several CTG categories.
(k) Determination of attainment for the eight-hour ozone standard. Effective June 3, 2016, the EPA is determining that complete quality-assured and certified ozone monitoring data for 2012 to 2014 show the Dukes County, Massachusetts eight-hour ozone nonattainment area attained the 2008 eight-hour ozone standard by its July 20, 2015 attainment deadline. Therefore, the EPA has met the requirement pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) to determine, based on the area's air quality data as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the standard. The EPA also determined that the Dukes County nonattainment area will not be reclassified for failure to attain by its applicable attainment date under section 181(b)(2)(A).
(l) On February 9, 2018, Massachusetts submitted a certification that its air emissions reporting requirements applicable to stationary sources meet the emission statement requirements of section 182(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act. The certification was submitted as a SIP revision in partial fulfillment of obligations for nonattainment areas under EPA's 2008 8-hour ozone standard.
[65 FR 68898, Nov. 15, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 693, Jan. 3, 2001; 67 FR 55125, Aug. 28, 2002; 67 FR 72579, Dec. 6, 2002; 77 FR 25363, Apr. 30, 2012; 77 FR 31498, May 29, 2012; 77 FR 36405, June 19, 2012; 77 FR 50601, Aug. 22, 2012; 78 FR 54961, Sept. 9, 2013; 81 FR 26709, May 4, 2016; 84 FR 7301, Mar. 4, 2019]
§ 52.1130 [Reserved]
§ 52.1131 Control strategy: Particulate matter.
(a) Revisions to the following regulations submitted on March 30, 1979 are disapproved:
(1) Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(8), Table 2, new facilities greater than 250 million Btu/hr input burning solid fuel.
(2) Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(9), Table 5.
(b) Approval—Submittal from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 4, 2008 to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This submittal satisfies requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(B), (C) (enforcement program only), (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) (consultation and public notification only), (K), (L), and (M).
(c) Conditional Approval (satisfied)—Submittal from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 4, 2008, to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS is conditionally approved for CAA elements 110(a)(2)(A) and (E)(ii). This conditional approval is contingent upon Massachusetts taking actions to meet requirements of these elements within one year of conditional approval, as committed to in a letter from the state to EPA Region 1 dated July 12, 2012. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection made a submittal to satisfy these conditions on February 9, 2018. EPA approved the submittal and converted the conditional approval to a full approval on June 24, 2019.
(d) Disapproval—Submittal from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 4, 2008, to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. This submittal does not satisfy requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C) (PSD program only), (D)(i)(II) (PSD program only), (D)(ii), and (J) (PSD program only).
(e) Approval—Submittal from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated September 21, 2009, with supplements submitted on January 13, 2011, and August 19, 2011, to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. This submittal satisfies requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(B), (C) (enforcement program only), (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J) (consultation and public notification only), (K), (L), and (M).
(f) Conditional Approval (satisfied)—Submittal from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated September 21, 2009, with supplements submitted on January 13, 2011, and August 19, 2011, to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS is conditionally approved for CAA elements 110(a)(2)(A) and (E)(ii). This conditional approval is contingent upon Massachusetts taking actions to meet requirements of these elements within one year of conditional approval, as committed to in a letter from the state to EPA Region 1 dated July 12, 2012. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection made a submittal to satisfy these conditions on February 9, 2018. EPA approved the submittal and converted the conditional approval to a full approval on June 24, 2019.
(g) Disapproval—Submittal from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated September 21, 2009, with supplements submitted on January 13, 2011, and August 19, 2011, to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. This submittal does not satisfy requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C) (PSD program only), (D)(i)(II) (PSD program only), (D)(ii), and (J) (PSD program only).
(h) Approval—Submittal from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated February 9, 2018, to address the Clean Air Act (CAA) infrastructure requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. This submittal satisfies requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M), with the exception of PSD-related requirements of (C), (D), and (J). Approval includes interstate transport requirements. EPA approved the submittal on June 24, 2019.
[45 FR 2044, Jan. 10, 1980, as amended at 77 FR 63233, Oct. 16, 2012; 84 FR 29384, June 24, 2019]
§ 52.1132 Control strategy: Carbon Monoxide.
(a) Approval—On November 13, 1992, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year emission inventory. The inventory was submitted by the State of Massachusetts to satisfy Federal requirements under section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, as a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan.
(b) Approval—On December 12, 1994, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection submitted a request to redesignate the Boston Area carbon monoxide nonattainment area to attainment for carbon monoxide. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a base year (1993 attainment year) emission inventory for carbon monoxide, a demonstration of maintenance of the carbon monoxide NAAQS with projected emission inventories to the year 2010 for carbon monoxide, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the carbon monoxide NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the State), Massachusetts will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are contained in the contingency plan. The menu of contingency measures includes an enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program and implementation of the oxygenated fuels program. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the Act as amended in 1990, respectively. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Massachusetts Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan for the above mentioned area.
(c) Approval—On May 25, 2001, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for the 1996 base year emission inventory. The inventory was submitted by the State of Massachusetts to satisfy Federal requirements under section 172(c) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, as a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan.
(d) Approval—On May 25, 2001, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) submitted a request to redesignate the cities of Lowell, Springfield, Waltham, and Worcester from nonattainment area to attainment for carbon monoxide. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a 1996 emission inventory for carbon monoxide, a demonstration of maintenance of the carbon monoxide NAAQS with projected emission inventories to the year 2012 for carbon monoxide, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If an area records an exceedance or violation of the carbon monoxide NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the MADEP), Massachusetts will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are contained in the contingency plan. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the Act as amended in 1990, respectively.
(e) Approval—On April 14, 2010, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection submitted a modification to the Lowell maintenance plan approved in paragraph (c) of this section. Massachusetts will not conduct CO monitoring in Lowell, but instead commits to continue to collect and review CO monitoring data from nearby Worcester, MA on an on-going basis. In the event the second highest CO concentration in any calendar year monitored in Worcester reaches 75 percent of the federal 1-hour or 8-hour national ambient air quality standard for CO, Massachusetts will, within 9 months of recording such concentrations, re-establish a CO monitoring site in Lowell consistent with EPA citing criteria, and resume analyzing and reporting those data. Massachusetts commits to implement its contingency program in Lowell in the event that a CO violation is monitored at the re-established Lowell monitoring site at any time during the maintenance period. If the Worcester CO monitor measures a violation of either the federal 1-hour or 8-hour NAAQS for CO, contingency measures will be implemented in Lowell as well, until a re-established CO monitor in Lowell shows that the area is in attainment of the CO standard.
[61 FR 2923, Jan. 30, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 7278, Feb. 19, 2002; 76 FR 27910, May 13, 2011]
§ 52.1133 [Reserved]
§ 52.1134 Regulation limiting on-street parking by commuters.
(a) On-street parking means parking a motor vehicle on any street, highway, or roadway, except for legal stops within designated loading zones or areas defined for loading purposes, at or before intersections, as caution, safety and emergencies require, whether or not a person remains in the vehicle.
(b) Commencing on or before June 30, 1974, the Commonwealth, the City of Boston, the City of Cambridge, and administrative bodies of any of them having jurisdiction over any streets, highways, or roadways within the City of Cambridge or Boston proper, and the principal officials and administrative bodies thereof having responsibility over parking on such streets, highways, or roadways, shall adopt all necessary administrative and enforcement procedures and regulations to effect a prohibition of on-street parking within Boston proper between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9:30 a.m., and within the City of Cambridge between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 a.m., except Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. The regulations shall state that violation of the prohibition shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $15. The City of Boston shall at a minimum eliminate 50 percent of on-street parking during the hours specified by January 1, 1976; 66 2/3 percent by September 1, 1976; and 100 percent by March 1, 1977. The City of Cambridge shall at a minimum eliminate 33 1/3 percent of on-street parking during the hours specified by September 30, 1974; 66 2/3 percent by July 1, 1975; and 100 percent by March 1, 1977. Any other affected entity shall at a minimum eliminate 33 1/3 percent of such parking during the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. by January 1, 1976; 66 2/3 percent by September 1, 1976, and 100 percent by March 1, 1977.
(c) The following classes of vehicles shall be exempt from the requirements of this section, provided that on-street parking by such vehicles is in compliance with local and state regulations:
(1) Vehicles owned by residents of that portion of Boston included within Boston proper that are registered in Boston and display a resident parking sticker for that area issued by the City of Boston;
(2) Vehicles owned by residents of Cambridge that are registered in and parked within Cambridge and display an appropriate parking sticker issued by the City of Cambridge;
(3) Vehicles owned and operated by handicapped persons with HP license plates; and
(4) Vehicles registered as “commercial vehicles” by the Commonwealth and displaying appropriate license plates.
(d) On or before June 30, 1974, no owner or operator of a motor vehicle shall park, or permit the on-street parking of, said vehicle within Cambridge or Boston proper except in conformity with the provisions of this section and the measures implementing it.
(e) The Governor and the chief executive of any other governmental entity on which obligations are imposed by paragraph (b) of this section should, on or before April 15, 1974, submit to the Regional Administrator for his approval a detailed statement of the legal and administrative steps selected to effect the prohibition provided for in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section, and a schedule of implementation consistent with the requirements of this section. Such schedule shall include as a minimum the following:
(1) Designation of one or more agencies responsible for the administration and enforcement of the program;
(2) The procedures by which the designated agency will enforce the prohibition provided for in paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section;
(3) The procedures by which vehicles exempt from the requirements of this section will be marked; and
(4) A map showing which streets will be subject to the ban according to the schedule of implementation.
(f) Upon a finding that substantial hardship would otherwise be experienced by employees of employment facilities located in Cambridge, the Director of Traffic and Parking of the City of Cambridge may issue special parking stickers to such employees which shall entitle vehicles to park during the hours of the ban. Such stickers shall be valid only for those streets and areas of streets clearly identified on the face of such stickers, shall be issued with preference being given to carpools and vanpools and shall be subject to immediate revocation if the vehicle is cited for a parking violation on a street or area other than those designated. A list of all persons receiving such stickers shall be sent to the Regional Administrator on or before July 1 of each year.
(g) The ban shall not apply to any street space which is subject to metered parking with a maximum allowable time limit of one hour.
[40 FR 25162, June 12, 1975]
§ 52.1135 Regulation for parking freeze.
(a) Definitions:
(1) The phrase to commence construction means to engage in a continuous program of on-site construction including site clearance, grading, dredging, or land filling specifically designed for a parking facility in preparation for the fabrication, erection, or installation of the building components of the facility. For the purpose of this paragraph, interruptions resulting from acts of God, strikes, litigation, or other matters beyond the control of the owner shall be disregarded in determining whether a construction or modification program is continuous.
(2) The phrase to commence modification means to engage in a continuous program of on-site modification including site clearance, grading, dredging, or land filling in preparation for a specific modification of the parking facility.
(3) The phrase commercial parking space means a space used for parking a vehicle in a commercial parking facility.
(4) [Reserved]
(5) Commercial parking facility (also called facility) means any lot, garage, building or structure, or combination or portion thereof, on or in which motor vehicles are temporarily parked for a fee, excluding (i) a parking facility, the use of which is limited exclusively to residents (and guests of residents) of a residential building or group of buildings under common control, and (ii) parking on public streets.
(6) Freeze means to maintain at all times after October 15, 1973, the total quantity of commercial parking spaces available for use at the same amounts as were available for use prior to said date; Provided, That such quantity may be increased by spaces the construction of which commenced prior to October 15, 1973, or as specifically permitted by paragraphs (n), (p) and (q) of this section; provided further that such additional spaces do not result in an increase of more than 10 percent in the total commercial parking spaces available for use on October 15, 1973, in any municipality within the freeze area or at Logan International Airport (“Logan Airport”). For purposes of the last clause of the previous sentence, the 10 percent limit shall apply to each municipality and Logan Airport separately.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) There is hereby established a freeze, as defined by paragraph (a)(6) of this section, on the availability of commercial parking facilities in the freeze area effective October 15, 1973. In the event construction in any municipality, commenced prior to October 15, 1973, results in a number of spaces which exceeds the 10 percent limit prescribed by paragraph (a)(6) of this section, then the Governor shall immediately take all necessary steps to assure that the available commercial spaces within such municipality shall be reduced to comply with the freeze. In the event that such limit is exceeded at Logan Airport, then the provisions of paragraph (m) of this section shall apply.
(d) [Reserved]
(e) After August 15, 1973, no person shall commence construction of any commercial parking facility or modification of any such existing facility in the freeze area unless and until he has obtained from the Governor or from an agency approved by the Governor a permit stating that construction or modification of such facility will be in compliance with the parking freeze established by paragraph (c) of this section. This paragraph shall not apply to any proposed parking facility for which a general construction contract was finally executed by all appropriate parties on or before August 15, 1973.
(f) The Governor shall notify the Regional Administrator in writing within 10 days of approval of any agency pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section. In order for any agency to be approved by the Governor for purposes of issuing permits pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section, such agency shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Governor that:
(1) Requirements for permit application and issuance have been established. Such requirements shall include but not be limited to a condition that before a permit may be issued the following findings of fact or factually supported projections must be made:
(i) The location of the facility; and
(ii) The total motor vehicle capacity before and after the proposed construction or modification of the facility.
(2) Criteria for issuance of permits have been established and published. Such criteria shall include, but not be limited to:
(i) Full consideration of all facts contained in the application.
(ii) Provisions that no permit will be issued if construction or modification of the facility will not comply with the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.
(3) Agency procedures provide that no permit for the construction or modification of a facility covered by this section shall be issued without notice and opportunity for public hearing. The public hearing may be of a legislative type; the notice shall conform to the requirements of 40 CFR 51.4(b); and the agency rules or procedures may provide that if no notice of intent to participate in the hearing is received from any member of the public (other than the applicant) prior to 7 days before the scheduled hearing date, no hearing need be held. If notice of intent to participate is required, the fact shall be noted prominently in the required hearing notice.
(g)-(l) [Reserved]
(m) On or before January 30, 1975, the Massachusetts Port Authority (“Massport”) shall prepare and submit to the Governor for his approval a plan showing the manner in which the number of commercial parking spaces at Logan Airport which exceeds the number of such spaces permitted under the freeze shall be removed from use. The Governor shall approve such plan if he determines that (1) implementation of such plan would result in reducing the aggregate number of commercial parking spaces to the level of such spaces permitted by this section, (2) Massport has adequate legal authority to implement such plan and (3) adequate commitments have been made by Massport to assure the Governor that such plan will be fully implemented and maintained on and after May 1, 1976. In the event that the Governor does not approve such plan by April 1, 1976, then the owner or operator of each commercial parking facility located at Logan Airport shall, on or before July 1, 1976, reduce the number of commercial parking spaces available for use at each such facility by an amount which bears the same proportion to the number of spaces exceeding the limit imposed by this section as the number of spaces available at such facility bears the total number of such spaces which were available for use at Logan Airport on April 1, 1976.
(n) Where an agency approved by the Governor under paragraph (e) of this section to issue permits for new construction in the City of Cambridge demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Governor that (1) specific on-street parking spaces in use as of October 15, 1973, were being legally and regularly used as of such date for parking by commuters (as that term is defined in § 52.1161(a)(6)) who are not residents of Cambridge and that (2) effective measures have been implemented (including adequate enforcement) to prevent such spaces from being used by such commuters, then such approved agency may issue permits for construction of additional new commercial parking spaces equal to one-half of the number of spaces removed from regular use by such commuters and the total quantity of commercial parking spaces allowable in Cambridge under this section shall be raised accordingly.
(o) On or before July 31, 1976, and on or before each succeeding July 31, the Governor and the chief executive officer of any agency approved by the Governor under paragraph (e) of this section shall submit a report to the Regional Administrator setting forth:
(1) The names and addresses of all persons who received permits during the previous twelve-month period ending June 30 and number of spaces allocated to each such person;
(2) The number of commercial parking spaces available for use as of the June 30 prior to the date of the report;
(3) The number of commercial parking spaces which remain available for allocation by the Governor or such agency as of the June 30 prior to the date of the report, including those spaces made available because of retirement of existing commercial parking spaces as well as those spaces made available because of the effects of paragraphs (n), (p) and (q) of this section; and
(4) The location and capacity of any park-and-ride facility designated under paragraph (p) of this section.
(p) The Governor and any approved agency may issue a permit to construct a commercial parking facility which is designated by the Governor as a park-and-ride facility to be operated in conjunction with mass transit service without regard to the limitations on number of spaces imposed by this section.
(q) Where an agency approved by the Governor can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Governor that there have been physically eliminated through permanent modification or demolition any legal on-street parking spaces within a municipality then such agency may issue permits for construction within that municipality of additional new commercial parking spaces equal to the number of spaces thus eliminated and the total quantity of commercial parking spaces allowable for such municipality under this section shall be increased accordingly.
(r) The provisions of this regulation shall cease to be effective as to that portion of the freeze area lying within the City of Boston and not included within Boston proper or Logan Airport at such time as the City of Boston implements a program, approved by the Governor, which shall include effective measures to control the construction of additional commercial parking spaces within that area, including procedures for issuance of conditional use permits under applicable zoning regulations and for assuring compliance with all air quality requirements under state and Federal law.
[40 FR 25162, June 12, 1975, as amended at 40 FR 39863, Aug. 29, 1975]
§§ 52.1136-52.1144 [Reserved]
§ 52.1145 Regulation on organic solvent use.
(a) Definitions:
(1) Organic solvents include diluents and thinners and are defined as organic materials which are liquids at standard conditions and which are used as dissolvers, viscosity reducers, or cleaning agents, except that such materials which exhibit a boiling point higher than 220 °F. at 0.5 millimeters of mercury absolute pressure or having an equivalent vapor pressure shall not be considered to be solvents unless exposed to temperatures exceeding 220 °F.
(2) Solvent of high photochemical reactivity means any solvent with an aggregate of more than 20 percent of its total volume composed of the chemical compounds classified below or which exceeds any of the following individual percentage composition limitations in reference to the total volume of solvent:
(i) A combination of hydrocarbons, alcohols, aldehydes, esters, ethers, or ketones having an olefinic or cycloolefinic type of unsaturation: 5 percent;
(ii) A combination of aromatic compounds with eight or more carbon atoms to the molecule except ethylbenzene: 8 percent;
(iii) A combination of ethylbenzene, ketones having branched hydrocarbon structures, trichloroethylene or toluene: 20 percent. Whenever any organic solvent or any constituent of an organic solvent may be classified from its chemical structure into more than one of the above groups of organic compounds, it shall be considered as a member of the most reactive chemical group, that is, that group having the least allowable percentage of total volume of solvents.
(3) Organic materials are chemical compounds of carbon excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides, metallic carbonates, and ammonium carbonate.
(b) This section is applicable throughout the Boston Intrastate Region. The requirements of this section shall be in effect in accordance with § 52.1147.
(c) No person shall cause, allow, suffer, or permit the discharge into the atmosphere of more than 15 pounds of organic materials in any 1 day, nor more than 3 pounds of organic materials in any 1 hour, from any article, machine, equipment, or other contrivance, in which any organic solvent or any material containing organic solvent comes into contact with flame or is baked, heat-cured, or heat-polymerized, in the presence of oxygen, unless said discharge has been reduced as a result of the installation of abatement controls by at least 85 percent. Those portions of any series of articles, machines, equipment, or other contrivances designed for processing a continuous web, strip, or wire that emit organic materials and use operations described in this section shall be collectively subject to compliance with this section.
(d) No person shall cause, suffer, allow, or permit the discharge into the atmosphere of more than 40 pounds of organic materials in any 1 day, nor more than 8 pounds in any 1 hour, from any article, machine, equipment, or other contrivance used under conditions other than described in paragraph (c) of this section for employing, or applying any solvent of high photochemical reactivity or material containing such photochemically reactive solvent, unless said discharge has been reduced as a result of the installation of abatement controls by at least 85 percent. Emissions of organic materials into the atmosphere resulting from air or heated drying of products for the first 12 hours after their removal from any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance described in this section shall be included in determining compliance with this section. Emissions resulting from baking, heat-curing, or heat-polymerizing as described in paragraph (c) of this section shall be excluded from determination of compliance with this section. Those portions of any series of articles, machines, equipment, or other contrivances designed for processing a continuous web, strip, or wire that emit organic materials and use operations described in this section shall be collectively subject to compliance with this section.
(e) Emissions of organic materials to the atmosphere from the clean-up with a solvent of high photochemical reactivity, or any article, machine, equipment, or other contrivance described in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section or in this paragraph, shall be included with the other emissions of organic materials from that article, machine, equipment or other contrivance for determining compliance with this section.
(f) No person shall cause, suffer, allow, or permit during any one day disposal of a total of more than 1.5 gallons of any solvent of high photochemical reactivity, or of any material containing more than 1.5 gallons of any such photochemically reactive solvent by any means that will permit the evaporation of such solvent into the atmosphere.
(g) Emissions of organic materials into the atmosphere required to be controlled by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section shall be reduced by:
(1) Incineration, provided that 90 percent or more of the carbon in the organic material being incinerated is converted to carbon dioxide, or
(2) Adsorption, or
(3) The use of other abatement control equipment determined by the Regional Administrator to be no less effective than either of the above methods.
(h) A person incinerating, adsorbing, or otherwise processing organic materials pursuant to this section shall provide, properly install and maintain in calibration, in good working order, and in operation, devices as specified in the authority to construct, or as specified by the Regional Administrator, for indicating temperatures, pressures, rates of flow, or other operating conditions necessary to determine the degree and effectiveness of air pollution control.
(i) Any person using organic solvents or any materials containing organic solvents shall supply the Regional Administrator upon request and in the manner and form prescribed by him, written evidence of the chemical composition, physical properties, and amount consumed for each organic solvent used.
(j) The provisions of this rule shall not apply to:
(1) The manufacture of organic solvents, or the transport or storage of organic solvents or materials containing organic solvents.
(2) The spraying or other use of insecticides, pesticides, or herbicides.
(3) The employment, application, evaporation, or drying of saturated halogenated hydrocarbons or perchloroethylene.
(4) The use of any material, in any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance described in paragraph (c), (d), or (e) of this section if:
(i) The volatile content of such material consists only of water, and organic solvents;
(ii) The organic solvents comprise not more than 30 percent by volume of said volatile content;
(iii) The volatile content is not a solvent of high photochemical reactivity as defined in paragraph (a) of this section; and
(iv) The organic solvent or any material containing organic solvent does not come into contact with flame. This last stipulation applies only for those articles, machines, equipment or other contrivances that are constructed or modified after November 8, 1973.
(5) The use of any material, in any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance described in paragraph (c), (d), or (e) of this section if:
(i) The organic solvent content of such material does not exceed 30 percent by volume of said material;
(ii) The volatile content is not a solvent of high photochemical reactivity; and
(iii) [Reserved]
(iv) The organic solvent or any material containing organic solvent does not come into contact with flame. This last stipulation applies only for those articles, machines, equipment or other contrivances that are constructed or modified after November 8, 1973.
(6) [Reserved]
(7) An article, machine, equipment or other contrivance described in paragraph (c), (d) or (e) of this section used exclusively for chemical or physical analyses or determination of product quality and commercial acceptance provided that—
(i) The exemption is approved in writing by the Regional Administrator;
(ii) The operator of said article, machine, equipment or contrivance is not an integral part of the production process; and
(iii) The emissions from said article, machine, equipment or other contrivance do not exceed 800 lbs. in any calendar month.
(8) Sources subject to the provisions of Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.18 which has been federally approved.
(k) [Reserved]
(l) All determinations of emission rates shall be conducted in a manner approved in writing by the Regional Administrator.
[40 FR 25165, June 12, 1975, as amended at 47 FR 28373, June 30, 1982]
§ 52.1146 [Reserved]
§ 52.1147 Federal compliance schedules.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the owner or operator of a source subject to regulation under paragraph (c)(1) of § 52.1144 and § 52.1145 shall comply with the increments of progress contained in the following schedule:
(1) Final control plans for emission control systems or process modifications must be submitted on or before June 1, 1974, for sources subject to § 52.1144(c)(1) and on or before May 1, 1974 for sources subject to § 52.1145.
(2) Contracts for emission control systems or process modifications must be awarded or orders must be issued for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modifications on or before March 1, 1975, for sources subject to § 52.1144(c)(1) and on or before July 1, 1974, for sources subject to § 52.1145.
(3) Initiation of on-site construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification must begin on or before May 1, 1975, for sources subject to § 52.1144(c)(1) and on or before August 15, 1974, for sources subject to § 52.1145.
(4) On-site construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification must be completed prior to April 15, 1975, except for purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of § 52.1144, the applicable date shall be February 1, 1976.
(5) Final compliance is to be achieved prior to May 31, 1975, except for sources subject to paragraph (c)(1) of § 52.1144 of this subpart. Final compliance for sources subject to paragraph (c)(1) of § 52.1144 is to be achieved by June 1, 1976.
(i) Facilities subject to paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of § 52.1144 of this subpart which have a daily throughput of 20,000 gallons of gasoline or less are required to have a vapor recovery system in operation no later than May 31, 1977. Delivery vessels and storage containers served exclusively by facilities required to have a vapor recovery system in operation no later than May 31, 1977, also are required to meet the provisions of this section no later than May 31, 1977.
(6) Any owner or operator of stationary sources subject to compliance schedule in this paragraph shall certify to the Administrator within 5 days after the deadline for each increment of progress, whether or not the required increment of progress has been met.
(7) Any gasoline dispensing facility subject to paragraph (c)(1) of § 52.1144 which installs a storage tank after October 15, 1973, shall comply with such paragraph by March 1, 1976. Any facility subject to such paragraph which installs a storage tank after March 1, 1976 shall comply with such paragraph at the time of installation.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the owner or operator of a source subject to paragraph (d)(1) of § 52.1144 shall comply with the increments of progress contained in the following compliance schedule:
(1) Final control plans for emission control systems or process modifications must be submitted prior to January 1, 1975.
(2) Contracts for emission control systems or process modifications must be awarded or orders must be issued for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or process modification prior to March 1, 1975.
(3) Initiation of on-site construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification must begin not later than May 1, 1975.
(4) On-site construction or installation of emission control equipment or process modification must be completed prior to May 1, 1977.
(5) Federal compliance is to be achieved prior to May 31, 1977.
(6) Any owner or operator of stationary sources subject to the compliance schedule in this paragraph shall certify to the Administrator, within 5 days after the deadline for each increment of progress, whether or not the required increment of progress has been met.
(7) Any gasoline dispensing facility subject to paragraph (d)(1) of § 52.1144 which installs a gasoline dispensing system after the effective date of this regulation shall comply with the requirements of such paragraph by May 31, 1977. Any facility subject to such paragraph which installs a gasoline dispensing system after May 31, 1977, shall comply with such paragraph at the time of installation.
(c) Paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply:
(1) To a source which is presently in compliance with all requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of § 52.1144 and § 52.1145 and which has certified such compliance to the Administrator by June 1, 1974. The Administrator may request whatever supporting information he considers necessary for proper certification.
(2) To a source for which a compliance schedule is adopted by the Commonwealth and approved by the Administrator.
(3) To a source subject to § 52.1144(c)(1) whose owner or operator submits to the Administrator by June 1, 1974, a proposed alternative compliance schedule. No such schedule may provide for compliance after March 1, 1976. If promulgated by the Administrator, such schedule shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(4) To a source subject to § 52.1145 whose owner or operator submits to the Administrator by May 1, 1974, a proposed alternative compliance schedule. No such schedule may provide for compliance after May 31, 1975. If promulgated by the Administrator, such schedule shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(d) Paragraph (b) of this section shall not apply:
(1) To a source which is presently in compliance with paragraph (d)(1) of § 52.1144 and which has certified such compliance to the Administrator by January 1, 1975. The Administrator may request whatever supporting information he considers necessary for proper certification.
(2) To a source for which a compliance schedule is adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator.
(3) To a source whose owner or operator submits to the Administrator by June 1, 1974, a proposed alternative schedule. No such schedule may provide for compliance after May 31, 1977. If promulgated by the Administrator, such schedule shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(e) Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude the Administrator from promulgating a separate schedule for any source to which the application of the compliance schedule in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section fails to satisfy and requirements of 40 CFR 51.15 (b) and (c).
[38 FR 30970, Nov. 8, 1973]
§§ 52.1148-52.1158 [Reserved]
§ 52.1159 Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance.
(a) Revisions submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on October 20, 2000, to the motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program are approved:
(1) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated October 20, 2000 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(2) Document entitled “Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan For the Massachusetts Enhanced Emissions and Safety Inspection Program,” dated October 16, 2000.
(3) Document entitled “Program Evaluation Plans For the Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Program,” dated October 2000, and supporting contracts.
[65 FR 69257, Nov. 16, 2000]
§ 52.1160 [Reserved]
§ 52.1161 Incentives for reduction in single-passenger commuter vehicle use.
(a) Definitions:
(1) Employer means any person or entity which employs 50 or more employees at any time during a calendar year at an employment facility located in the Boston Intrastate Region.
(2) Educational institution means any person or entity which has 250 or more employees and students at any time during the academic year at an educational facility offering secondary level or higher training including vocational training located in the Boston Intrastate Region.
(3) Employee means any person who performs work for an employer thirty-five or more hours per week and for more than twenty weeks per year for compensation and who travels to and from work by any mode of travel.
(4) Student means any full-time day student who does not live at the educational institution and who travels to and from classes by any mode of travel.
(5) Affected facility means any employment facility at which 50 or more persons are employees or any educational facility at which 250 or more persons are students and employees.
(6) Commuter means both an employee and a student.
(7) Single-passenger commuter vehicle means a motor-driven vehicle with four or more wheels with capacity for a driver plus one or more passengers which is used by a commuter traveling alone to work or classes and is not customarily required to be used in the course of his employment or studies.
(8) Base date means the date set forth in paragraph (d) of this section as of which the base number of single-passenger commuter vehicles at a particular employment facility or educational institution must be determined.
(9) The Secretary means the Secretary of Transportation and Construction of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
(b) Commencing with the effective date of this section, each employer and educational institution (except as provided below) shall diligently and expeditiously implement and thereafter continuously maintain the following mandatory measures which are designed to achieve a goal of reducing the number of single-passenger commuter vehicles customarily commuting daily to each affected facility as of its base date by 25 percent (or as adjusted pursuant to paragraph (g) of this section):
(1) Making available to commuters any pass program offered by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, if any commuter to the facility uses the mass transit facilities of such Authority as part of his daily commuting trip, including making all administrative arrangements for commuters to purchase the pass and thereby participate in the pass program and encouraging commuters to participate by such means as publicizing the availability of the pass program and the cost advantages thereof.
(2)-(8) [Reserved]
[40 FR 25166, June 12, 1975, as amended at 47 FR 28373, June 30, 1982; 41 FR 10223, Mar. 10, 1976]
§ 52.1162 Regulation for bicycle use.
(a) Definitions:
(1) Bicycle means a two-wheel nonmotor-powered vehicle.
(2) Bike path means a route for the exclusive use of bicycles separated by grade or other physical barrier from motor traffic.
(3) Bike lane means a street lane restricted to bicycles and so designated by means of painted lanes, pavement coloring or other appropriate markings. A peak hour bike lane means a bike lane effective only during times of heaviest auto commuter traffic.
(4) Bike route means a route in which bicycles share road space with motorized vehicles.
(5) Bikeway means bike paths, bike lanes and bike routes.
(6) Bicycle parking facility means any facility for the temporary storage of bicycles which allows the frame and both wheels of the bicycle to be locked so as to minimize the risk of theft and vandalism.
(7) Parking facility means a lot, garage, building, or portion thereof in or of which motor vehicles are temporarily parked.
(8) Parking space means the area allocated by a parking facility for the temporary storage of one automobile.
(9) MBTA means the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.
(b) Application. This section shall be applicable in the Boston Intrastate Region.
(c) Study. The Commonwealth, according to the schedule set forth in paragraph (d) of this section, shall conduct a comprehensive study of, and in that study recommend, the establishment of permanent bikeways and related facilities within the area described in paragraph (b) of this section. The study shall consider or include at least the following elements:
(1) The physical design for bikeways, intersections involving bikeways, and means of bicycle link-ups with other modes of transportation;
(2) The location of bikeways, including ascertaining high accident or pollution areas and developing means of avoiding or ameliorating those situations as well as means of providing intersection safety generally;
(3) The location of bicycle parking facilities, including bus stops;
(4) The rules of the road for bicyclists, and to the extent that present rules must be modified because of bikeways, new rules of the road for motorists. Also the feasibility of mandatory adult bicycle registration to minimize theft and increase recovery of stolen bicycles;
(5) Bicycle safety education for bicyclists, motorists, children, students, street maintenance personnel and policemen, including requiring bicycle safety principles and safe street riding skills to be taught in high school automobile driver(s) education programs;
(6) Methods for publicizing bicycles or bicycles plus mass transit as alternatives to automobile transportation, including the preparation, perhaps in conjunction with bicentennial efforts, of a master Boston area transit map, indicating the kind, extent and location of bicycle facilities, public baths, showers, toilet facilities, water fountains, as well as routes and stops for MBTA, common carriers and private bus lines, such map to be distributed by the Registry of Motor Vehicles with each automobile new registration and automobile registration renewal;
(7) Requiring or providing incentives for common carriers and mass transit carriers, especially the Blue Line of the MBTA, to provide bicycle parking facilities at their respective terminals and stations and bicycle carrying facilities on their respective vehicles;
(8) The creation of roadway zones in which all vehicles, except mass transit, emergency and service vehicles, and bicycles, would be excluded;
(9) Requiring or providing incentives for office buildings and employers to install and to provide free shower and locker facilities for cyclists;
(10) A bicycle user and potential user survey, which shall at a minimum determine:
(i) For present bicycle riders, the origin, destination, frequency, travel time, distance and purpose of bicycle trips;
(ii) In high density employment areas, the present modes of transportation of employees and the potential modes of transportation, including the numbers of employees who would use a bicycle for a significant portion of their commuting transportation were suitable facilities available to them. This section of the study shall seek to ascertain the size of the working population that would move from automobiles to mass transit and bicycles or bicycles alone as a significant form of transportation. It shall also seek to ascertain what bicycle facilities or mix thereof would produce the greatest conversion from auto use;
(11) The special problems related to the design and incorporation in the bikeway facilities described in paragraph (f) of this section of feeder bikeways to bridges, on-bridge bikeways, feeder bikeways to MBTA and railroad stations, feeder bikeways to fringe parking areas, and bicycle passage through rotaries and squares;
(12) The conversion of railroad beds, power lines, flood control channels or similar corridors to bikepaths;
(13) Removing barriers to employees bringing their bicycles into their offices;
(14) Removal or alteration of drain grates with bars so placed as to catch bicycle wheels;
(15) Bicycle rentals at appropriate locations; and
(16) The feasibility of constructing bikeways along at least each of the corridors set forth in paragraph (g) of this section.
In conducting the study, opportunity shall be given for public comments and suggestions. Input shall also be solicited from state, regional and local planning staffs, state, regional and local agencies, bicycle organizations and other interested groups and be related to comprehensive transportation planning for the area designated in paragraph (b) of this section. The study shall, using as a goal a minimum of 180 miles of bikeways, examine as large a network of facilities as is practicable within the area described in paragraph (b) of this section and shall recommend physical designs for said facilities. The study shall also propose a compliance schedule for establishing any recommended permanent bicycle facilities.
(d) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts shall submit to the Regional Administrator no later than October 1, 1975, a detailed compliance schedule showing the steps that will be taken to carry out the study required by paragraph (c) of this section. The compliance schedule shall at a minimum include:
(1) Designation of the agency responsible for conducting the study;
(2) A date for initiation of the study, which date shall be no later than October 1, 1975; and
(3) A date for completion of the study, and submittal thereof to the Administrator, which date shall be no later than June 30, 1976.
(e) On or before September 1, 1976, the Administrator shall publish in the Federal Register his response to the study required by paragraph (c) of this section, and shall, in that response, either approve the facility location and designs and other requirements as well as the proposed compliance schedule for permanent facilities recommended in the study, or shall designate alternative and/or additional facility locations and designs and other requirements as well as modify the proposed compliance schedule for permanent facilities. The Administrator may provide, if he deems it necessary, for a public comment period prior to the effective date of his response.
(f) Permanent bicycle facilities. At the conclusion of the study required by paragraph (c) of this section and the Administrator's response thereto, the Commonwealth shall, together with the municipalities and other authorities having jurisdiction over affected roadways and areas establish permanent bicycle facilities as required by the Administrator's response to the study.
(g) The potential bikeway corridors to be studied pursuant to paragraph (c)(16) are as follows:
(1) Central Square, Cambridge to Boston University;
(2) Harvard Square, Cambridge to Union Square, Allston;
(3) Union Square, Somerville to Central Square, Cambridge;
(4) Union Square, Allston to Government Center;
(5) Harvard Square, Cambridge to Government Center;
(6) Brookline Village to Government Center;
(7) Boston University to Longwood Avenue Hospital Zone;
(8) Egleston Square to Government Center;
(9) Columbus Park to Boston Common;
(10) L Street Beach to Government Center;
(11) Powder House Circle, Somerville to Harvard Square;
(12) Everett to Government Center;
(13) Porter Square, Cambridge to Columbus Park, Boston;
(14) Cleveland Circle to Government Center;
(15) Porter Square, Cambridge to Government Center;
(16) Harvard Square, Cambridge to Boston City Hospital; and
(17) Charlestown, Longfellow, Harvard, Boston University, River Street, Western Avenue, Anderson, Summer Street, and Broadway Bridges.
(h) The MBTA shall provide bicycle parking facilities at each major MBTA station adequate to meet the needs of MBTA riders within the area designated in paragraph (b) of this section. Said parking facilities shall at a minimum be located at:
(1) All stations of the Riverside portion of the Green Line;
(2) Reasonably spaced stops on other portions of the Green Line;
(3) All stations of the Red, Orange, and Blue Lines; and shall have spaces for at least six bicycles per station, except for facilities at terminal stations which shall have spaces for at least 24 bicycles.
(i) The Commonwealth shall provide for advertisement of bikeways and bicycle parking facilities in use within the area designated in paragraph (b) of this section to potential users by means of media advertisement, the distribution and posting of bikeway maps and bike safety information, as well as for a program of bicycle safety education including the motor vehicle operators license examination and public service advertisement.
[40 FR 25168, June 12, 1975]
§ 52.1163 Additional control measures for East Boston.
(a) On or before December 31, 1975, the Governor, the Mayor of the City of Boston, the Chairman of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, the Chairman of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority and the Chairman of the Massachusetts Port Authority (“Massport”) shall each submit to the Regional Administrator a study or studies of various alternative strategies to minimize the number of vehicle trips to and from Logan International Airport (“Logan Airport”) and to reduce the amount of carbon monoxide in the vicinity of the Callahan and Sumner Tunnels to a level consistent with the national primary ambient air quality standards. These studies may be combined into one or more joint studies. These studies shall contain recommendations for control measures to be implemented prior to May 31, 1977. Measures to be studied shall include but need not be limited to, the following:
(1) Incentives and programs for reductions in the use of single-passenger vehicles through the Callahan and Sumner Tunnels;
(2) Alterations in traffic patterns in the tunnel area;
(3) Use of exclusive lanes for buses, carpools, taxis and limousines during peak travel hours;
(4) Reduction of parking spaces at Logan Airport and increased parking charges at remaining spaces;
(5) Construction of satellite terminal facilities for Logan Airport;
(6) Use of alternate modes of transportation for trips to and from Logan Airport, and establishment of facilities at Logan Airport to accommodate such modes;
(7) Improved transit service between the Blue Line subway stop and airline terminals at Logan Airport; and
(8) Any other measures which would be likely to contribute to achieving the required reductions.
(b) Massport shall monitor the number of vehicles entering and leaving Logan Airport so as to provide the Secretary of Transportation for the Commonwealth (the “Secretary”) with reports on a semi-annual basis, beginning on January 30, 1976, showing total vehicle trips per day for the six-month period ending on the previous December 31 or June 30, presented and tabulated in a manner prescribed by the Secretary.
(c) Massport shall, on or before June 30, 1976, prepare and submit to the Secretary draft legislation which, if enacted into law, would alleviate local licensing problems of bus and limousine companies in order to facilitate increased and improved bus and limousine service for travelers using Logan Airport.
(d) Massport shall negotiate with the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority to increase the convenience of the mass transit services currently available to travelers to Logan Airport.
(e) Massport shall, on or before June 30, 1976, establish and maintain a program (which shall include the enclosure of this information in tickets or folders mailed by airlines using Logan Airport) to publicize the advantages in costs and convenience of the use of mass transit or other available transportation services by travelers using the airport, and making known to such persons the schedules, routes, connections, and other information necessary for them to conveniently use mass transit and such other services.
(f) Massport shall, on or before October 15, 1975, establish a carpool program at Logan Airport, which shall include the elements specified in paragraphs (b)(7) (A) through (C) of § 52.1161. For the purpose of applying the requirements of § 52.1161 to the present paragraph:
(1) The definitions in § 52.1161 shall apply;
(2) Each employer with any employment facility at Logan Airport shall cooperate with Massport in the development and implementation of the program;
(3) Any such employer (including Massport) may fulfill its obligations under paragraph (b)(7) of § 52.1161 by fully cooperating with and participating in the Logan Airport carpool program (including bearing its proportional share of the program's cost); and
(g) Massport shall, on or before October 15, 1975, implement a program of systematic dissemination to employers and employees at Logan Airport of information regarding the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority pass program, bus and train schedules and rates, park-and-ride facilities, and other transportation programs and services available to employees at Logan Airport.
(h) Massport shall, on or before January 1, 1976, implement and maintain a program to allow all employees at Logan Airport, regardless of the size of the particular employment facility at which they work, to participate in any available pass program made available by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, including the use of Massport as a central clearinghouse for the purpose of aggregating employees and for fiscal management of such pass program.
[40 FR 25169, June 12, 1975]
§ 52.1164 Localized high concentrations—carbon monoxide.
(a) Not later than October 1, 1975, the Commonwealth shall have developed and have begun to implement a program to identify urban and suburban core areas and roadway/intersection complexes within the Boston Intrastate Region which violate the national ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide. Once such localized areas have been identified, the Commonwealth, in cooperation with the affected local municipalities, shall develop and implement appropriate control strategies to insure that such air quality standards will be achieved at such areas. Plans shall be developed to include provisions for the entire municipality in order to insure that the implemented strategies will not create carbon monoxide violations elsewhere in the vicinity after the measures have been applied.
(b) To accomplish the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, the Commonwealth shall do the following:
(1) Identify areas of potentially high carbon monoxide concentrations by reviewing all available traffic data, physical site data and air quality and meteorological data for all major intersections and roadway complexes within the Region. The Regional Administrator will provide general guidance on area designations to assist in the initial identification process.
(2) Areas identified under paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall be studied in further detail, including meteorological modeling, traffic flow monitoring, air quality monitoring and other measures necessary to accurately quantify the extent and actual levels of carbon monoxide in the area. A report containing the results of these analyses and identifying such areas shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator no later than March 1, 1976.
(3) If, after the completion of actions required by paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an area shows or is predicted to have violations of the carbon monoxide standard, the Commonwealth, in cooperation with the affected municipality, shall submit a plan to the Regional Administrator containing measures to regulate traffic and parking so as to reduce carbon monoxide emissions to achieve air quality standards in the area. Such plan shall include: the name of the agency responsible for implementing the plan, all technical data and analyses supporting the conclusions of the plan, all control strategies adopted as part of the plan, and other such information relating to the proposed program as may be required by the Regional Administrator. The Regional Administrator shall provide general guidance on applicable control strategies and reporting formats to assist in plan development and submittal. Such a plan shall be submitted for each municipality which contains one or more identified areas no later than October 1, 1975 for Waltham and October 1, 1976, for other areas.
(4) All measures called for in the plan submitted under paragraph (b)(3) of this section shall be subject to the approval of the Regional Administrator and shall be implemented by May 31, 1977.
(c) The Commonwealth shall annually review the effectiveness of the control strategies developed pursuant to this section and modify them as necessary to insure that such carbon monoxide standards will be attained and maintained. The results of this review and any changes in the measures which the Commonwealth recommends as a result thereof shall be reported to the Regional Administrator annually as required under § 52.1160.
(d) Prior to submitting any plan to the Regional Administrator under paragraph (b)(3), the Commonwealth shall give prominent public notice of the general recommendations of such plan, shall make such plan available to the public for at least 30 days and permit any affected public agency or member of the public to comment in writing on such plan. The Commonwealth shall give the Regional Administrator timely notice of any public hearing to be held on such plan and shall make all comments received available to the Regional Administrator for inspection and copying.
[40 FR 25170, June 12, 1975]
§ 52.1165 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not met, since the plan does not include approvable procedures for preventing the significant deterioration of air quality.
(b) Regulation for preventing significant deterioration of air quality. The provisions of § 52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable State plan for the State of Massachusetts.
[43 FR 26410, June 19, 1978, as amended at 68 FR 11323, Mar. 10, 2003; 68 FR 74489, Dec. 24, 2003]
§ 52.1166 Original identification of plan.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Massachusetts” and all revisions submitted by Massachusetts that were federally approved prior to January 20, 2017.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 27, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) Emergency episode regulations submitted on February 22, 1972, by the Bureau of Air Quality Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
(2) Miscellaneous non-regulatory changes to the plan, wording changes in regulations 2.5 and 2.1 and clarification of Regulations 2.5.1 through 2.5.4 submitted on April 27, 1972, by the Division of Environmental Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
(3) Miscellaneous non-regulatory additions to the plan submitted on May 5, 1972, by the Bureau of Air Quality Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
(4) Miscellaneous changes affecting regulations 2.1, 2.5, 4.2, 4.5.1, 5.6.1, 6.1.2, 6.3.1, 8.1.6, 9.1, 15.1, 51.2, 52.1 and 52.2 of the regulations for all six Air Pollution Control Districts submitted on August 28, 1972 by the Governor.
(5) Letter of concurrence on AQMA identifications submitted on July 23, 1974, by the Governor.
(6) Revision to Regulation No. 5, increasing allowable sulfur content of fuels in the Boston Air Pollution Control District submitted on July 11, 1975, by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs, and on April 1, 1977 and April 20, 1978 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(7) Revision to Regulation 50—Variances, Regulations for Control of Air Pollution in the six Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Districts, submitted by letter dated November 14, 1974, by the Governor.
(8) Regulation 5.1, Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof, for the Merrimack Valley Air Pollution Control District submitted on January 28, 1976 by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs and on August 22, 1977 by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, and additional technical information pertinent to the Haverhill Paperboard Corp., Haverhill, Mass., submitted on December 30, 1976 by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs.
(9) Regulation 5.1, Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof, for the Pioneer Valley Air Pollution Control District submitted on July 22, 1976 by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs and on August 22, 1977 by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, and additional technical information pertinent to Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc., Monroe, Mass., submitted on December 27, 1977 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(10) Regulation 5.1, Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof, for the Central Massachusetts Air Pollution Control District submitted on June 25, 1976 by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs and on August 22, 1977 by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(11) Regulation 5.1, Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof, for the Central Massachusetts Air Pollution Control District (revised and adopted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on March 29, 1976, with specific provisions for the City of Fitchburg) submitted on June 25, 1976, by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs.
(12) A revision to Regulation 5.1, Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof, for the Southeastern Massachusetts Air Pollution Control District, submitted on December 30, 1976 by the Secretary of Environmental Affairs and on January 31, 1978 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(13) A revision to Regulation 5.1, Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof, for the Berkshire Air Pollution Control District, submitted by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on April 14, 1977, and additional technical information submitted on August 11, 1978, pertaining to the Schweitzer Division, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Columbia Mill, Lee, and on August 31, 1978, pertaining to Crane and Company, Inc., Dalton.
(14) Revisions to “Regulations for the Prevention and/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air Pollution Incident Emergencies,” submitted on September 15, 1976 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(15) A revision to Regulation 2.5, Compliance with Emission Limitations, and to Regulation 16, Reduction of Single Passenger Commuter Vehicle Use, for the Pioneer Valley Air Pollution Control District, submitted on May 20, 1977, by the Acting Commissioner of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(16) Revision to regulation 7 and regulation 9, submitted on December 9, 1977, by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality and Engineering.
(17) Revision to Regulations 310 CMR 7.05, Sulfur-in-Fuel, and 310 CMR 7.06, Visible Emissions, allowing burning of a coal-oil slurry at New England Power Company, Salem Harbor Station, Massachusetts, submitted on July 5, 1978 by the Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering and an extension to 310 CMR 7.06, Visible Emissions, submitted on December 28, 1979.
(18) Revision to Regulation 7.02(11) (formerly Regulation 2.5.3)—Emission Limitation to Incinerators, submitted February 1, 1978 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(19) The addition of Regulation 7.17, for the Southeastern Massachusetts Air Pollution Control District, Coal Conversion—Brayton Point Station, New England Power Company, submitted by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on September 7, 1978. Compliance with this revision shall be determined by methods consistent with New Source Performance Standards, proposed Test Method 19, as stated in a letter dated February 8, 1979 from Kenneth Hagg of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering to Frank Ciavattieri of the Environmental Protection Agency.
(20) A revision permanently extending Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof” and a revision for the Metropolitan Boston APCD, and Merrimack Valley APCD submitted on December 28, 1978, by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(21) A revision permanently extending Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1), “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof” and a revision to Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(4) “Ash Content of Fuels” for the Pioneer Valley Air Pollution Control District, submitted on January 3, 1979 by the Acting Com0missioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(22) A revision permanently extending Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1), “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof” for the Southeastern Massachusetts APCD, submitted on January 31, 1979 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(23) A revision to Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(4) “Ash Content of Fuels” for the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District, submitted on July 20, 1978 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(24) A revision permanently extending Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof” for the Central Massachusetts APCD, submitted on March 2, 1979 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, and a revision removing the seasonal restriction in Fitchburg for Fitchburg Paper Company (55 meter stacks only) and James River-Massachusetts submitted on September 28, 1979 by the Commissioner.
(25) On March 30, 1979 and on April 23, 1979 the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering submitted the non-attainment area plan for Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) in Worcester, miscellaneous statewide regulation changes, and an extension request for the attainment of TSP secondary standards for areas designated non-attainment as of March 3, 1978.
(26) On May 3, 1979, August 7, 1979, and April 17, 1980, the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering submitted a revision entitled “Massachusetts Implementation Plan, Amended Regulation—All Districts, New Source Review Element,” relating to construction and operation of major new or modified sources in non-attainment areas.
(27) Revisions to Regulation 310 CMR 7.07, Open Burning, submitted on September 28, 1979 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(28) Revision to the state ozone standard and adoption of an ambient lead standard was submitted by Thomas F. McLoughlin, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on August 21, 1979.
(29) A revision varying the provisions of Regulation 310 CMR 7.04(5), Fuel Oil Viscosity, for Cambridge Electric Light Company's Kendall Station, First Street, Cambridge, and Blackstone Station, Blackstone Street, Cambridge, submitted on December 28, 1978 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(30) Attainment plans to meet the requirements of Part D for carbon monoxide and ozone and other miscellaneous provisions were submitted by the Governor of Massachusetts on December 31, 1978 and on May 16, 1979 by the Acting Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. Supplemental information was submitted on September 19, November 13 and December 7, 1979; and March 20 and April 7, 1980 by DEQE.
(31) A temporary variance to the Provisions of Regulation 310 CMR 7.05, Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof, for Seaman Paper Company, Otter River. Submitted on March 20, 1980 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(32) A revision to Regulation 7.05(1) “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof” for the Metropolitan Boston APCD submitted on November 27, 1979 by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(33) A revision to Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) (formerly Regulation 5.1) “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof” for the Pioneer Valley Air Pollution Control District submitted by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on March 2, 1979 and May 5, 1981.
(34) A revision to Regulation 7.05(1) “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof” for the Metropolitan Boston APCD submitted on April 25, 1980 by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(35) On January 5, 1981, the Acting Director of the Division of Air Quality Control, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering submitted a revision entitled “Appendix J Transportation Project Level Guidelines” relating to policy guidance on the preparation of air quality analysis for transportation projects.
(36) A comprehensive air quality monitoring plan, intended to meet requirements of 40 CFR part 58, was submitted by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on January 28, 1980.
(37) A revision submitted by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on September 12, 1980 adding a new regulation 310 CMR 7.19 “Interim Sulfur-in-Fuel Limitations for Fossil Fuel Utilization Facilities Pending Conversion to an Alternate Fuel or Implementation of Permanent Energy Conservation Measures.”
(38) A variance of Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1)(d)(2) “Sulfur Control of Fuels and Control Thereof” for the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District, submitted on November 25, 1980, by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(39) Revisions to meet the requirements of Part D and certain other sections of the Clean Air Act, as amended, for making a commitment to public transportation in the Boston urban region which were submitted on July 9, 1981 and on July 30, 1981.
(40) Regulations 310 CMR (14), (15), and (16), for paper, fabric, and vinyl surface coaters to meet the requirements of Part D for ozone were submitted by the Governor of Massachusetts on March 6, 1981.
(41) A revision to Regulation 7.05(1)(c) “Sulfur Content of Fuels Control Thereof for the Merrimack Valley Air Pollution Control District” allowing the burning of higher sulfur content fuel oil at Haverhill Paperboard Corporation, Haverhill.
(42) Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b), to allow existing surface coating lines regulated under 310 CMR 7.18 (4), (5), (6), (7), (10), (11), (12), (14), (15) and (16) to bubble emissions to meet the requirements of Part D for ozone was submitted by the Governor on March 6, 1981, and a letter clarifying state procedures was submitted on November 12, 1981. The emission limitations required by the federally-approved portion of 310 CMR 7.18 are the applicable requirements of the Massachusetts SIP for the purpose of section 113 of the Clean Air Act and shall be enforceable by EPA and by citizens in the same manner as other requirements of the SIP; except that emission limitations adopted by the state under and which comply with 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b) and the procedures set out in the letter of November 12, 1981 shall be the applicable requirements of the Massachusetts SIP in lieu of those contained elsewhere in 310 CMR 7.18 and shall be enforceable by EPA and by citizens.
(43) A revision to Regulation 7.05(1)(d) “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof for the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District” allowing the burning of higher sulfur content fuel oil at Eastman Gelatine Corporation, Peabody, submitted on September 24, 1981 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(44) The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering submitted an updated VOC emissions inventory on September 3, 1981, and the procedures to annually update this inventory on November 4, 1981.
(45) A revision to Regulation 7.05(1)(e) “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof for the Pioneer Valley Air Pollution Control District” allowing the burning of higher sulfur content fuel oil at the Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, Holyoke.
(46) A revision submitted on December 29, 1981 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering allowing the burning of higher sulfur content fuel oil at the ATF Davidson Company, Northbridge, until December 1, 1983.
(47) Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(10) for metal coil coating was submitted on June 24, 1980 by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, in order to meet Part D requirements for ozone.
(48) Regulations 310 CMR 7.18(11), Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products and (12), Graphic Arts—Rotogravure and Flexography with test methods; and (13) Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems without test methods, were submitted on July 21, 1981 and March 10, 1982 by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering to meet Part D requirements for ozone attainment.
(49) A revision to Regulation 7.17 “Conversions to Coal” submitted by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on January 22, 1982 specifying the conditions under which coal may be burned at the Holyoke Water Power Company, Mount Tom Plant, Holyoke, Massachusetts.
(50) [Reserved]
(51) A revision submitted on September 29, 1982 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering allowing the burning of fuel oil having a sulfur content of 0.55 pounds per million Btu heat release potential at the Northeast Petroleum Corporation, Chelsea, Massachusetts.
(52) A revision submitted on September 28, 1982 by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering allowing the burning of higher sulfur content fuel oil at the Polaroid Corporation for a period of up to 30 months commencing on December 1, 1982.
(53)(i) Attainment plans for carbon monoxide and ozone submitted by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on September 9, November 2 and November 17, 1982; February 2, March 21, April 7, April 26 and May 16, 1983. These revisions amend Regulations 310 CMR 7.18 (3)-(7), (9)-(16); and add Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(17), 7.20 (1)-(14), and 540 CMR 4.00.
(ii) Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(3) for the surface coating of metal furniture submitted on September 9, 1982 as part of the attainment plan identified in § 52.1120(c)(53)(i), is added to the VOC surface coating bubble Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b) identified in § 52.1120(c)(42).
(iii) Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(13) for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning systems submitted on September 9, 1982 as part of the attainment plan identified in section 52.1120(53)(i), is amended by adding EPA test methods to the no action identified in 52.1120(48).
(54) On February 8, 1983, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering submitted a source specific emission limit in the letter of approval to the Esleeck Manufacturing Company, Inc., Montague, allowing the Company to burn fuel oil having a maximum sulfur content of 1.21 pounds per million Btu heat release potential provided the fuel firing rate does not exceed 137.5 gallons per hour.
(55) A revision to exempt the Berkshire Air Pollution Control District from Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(12)(b)2 was submitted on March 25, 1983 by Kenneth A. Hagg, Director of the Division of Air Quality Control of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(56) A revision to Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(12)(a)1(e) for petroleum liquid storage in external floating roof tanks submitted on December 2, 1983.
(57) Revisions to the State's narrative, entitled New Source Regulations on page 117 and 118, the regulatory definitions of BACT, NSPS and NESHAPS and Regulation 310 CMR 7.02 (2)(a)(6) and 7.02 (13), submitted by Anthony D. Cortese, Commissioner, in August, 1982 and received on September 9, 1982.
(58) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 7, 1991, November 13, 1992 and February 17, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated June 7, 1991, November 13, 1992 and February 17, 1993 submitting revisions to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Amendments and additions to 310 CMR 7.00 submitted on June 7, 1991 and effective on April 12, 1991.
(C) Amendments and additions to 310 CMR 7.00 submitted on June 7, 1991 and effective on June 21, 1991.
(D) Addition of 310 CMR 7.24(4)(j) submitted on November 13, 1992 and February 17, 1993 and effective on February 12, 1993.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal.
(59) A revision submitted on May 3, 1983, allowing the burning of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil at the Stanley Woolen Company, a facility in Uxbridge, Massachusetts for a period of up to 30 months, commencing on March 23, 1984.
(60) On May 27, 1982 and September 9, 1982 the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering submitted a revised plan for new source review in nonattainment areas. The submittal included 310 CMR Appendix A, “Emission Offsets and Nonattainment Review,” additions to 310 CMR 7.00, “General Definitions,” and revisions to 310 CMR 7.02(2)(b)(4) and 7.02(2)(b)(5), “Plan Approval and Emission Limitations.”
(61) A revision submitted on October 31, 1983, allowing the burning of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil at the Reed and Barton Silversmiths facility in Taunton, Massachusetts for a period of up to 30 months, commencing on March 23, 1984.
(62) A revision submitted on November 16, 1983 allowing the burning of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil at the ATF Davidson Company in Northbridge, Massachusetts.
(63) A revision submitted on February 2, 1984, allowing the burning of 1.0% sulfur content fuel oil at The Biltrite Corporation facility in Chelsea, Massachusetts for a period of up to 30 months, commencing on June 15, 1984.
(64) A revision to the Ozone Attainment Plan was submitted by S. Russell Sylva, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on February 14, and May 22, 1985 to control emissions from gasoline tank trucks and bulk terminal vapor recovery systems.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendments to Regulations 310 CMR 7.00 and 7.02(12) (c) and (d), “Motor Vehicle Fuel Tank Trucks”, adopted December 1984.
(B) The May 22, 1985 letter from Massachusetts DEQE, and the enforcement manual submitted and adopted on May 22, 1985, including Method 27, record form, potential leak points, major tank truck leak sources, test procedure for gasoline vapor leak detection procedure by combustible gas detector, instruction manual for Sentox 2 and Notice of Violation.
(65) A temporary variance to 310 CMR 7.05(1)(d)2 of “Sulfur Content of Fuels and Control Thereof for Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District” submitted on January 6, 1984 to allow for the use of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil in boiler unit 7 of the Boston Edison Company Mystic Station facility in Everett for thirty months commencing on September 25, 1984.
(66) Attainment and maintenance plans for lead, submitted on July 13 and August 17, 1984 by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(67) A revision submitted on July 11, 1984 allowing the burning of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil at the James River Corporation Hyde Park Mill facility in Boston, Massachusetts for a period of up to 30 months, commencing on September 25, 1984.
(68) A revision submitted on February 8 and October 23, 1985 allowing the burning of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil at the Phillips Academy facility in Andover, Massachusetts for a period of up to 30 months, commencing on April 1, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from Richard J. Chalpin, Acting Regional Engineer, to Phillips Academy, dated December 27, 1984 allowing the temporary use of less expensive 2.2% sulfur fuel oil (for 30 months from the date of publication), the savings from which will be used to implement permanent energy conservation measures to reduce on-site consumption of petroleum products by at least 50,000 gallons per year (estimated 82,000 gallons per year). At the end of the temporary use period, Phillips Academy will return to the use of 1.0% sulfur fuel oil. The particulate emission rate for the facility will not exceed 0.15 lbs. per million Btu.
(B) These specific requirements of Regulation 310 CMR 7.19 were agreed to in a Statement of Agreement, signed February 19, 1985.
(C) Memorandum to Donald C. Squires from Bruce K. Maillet dated October 4, 1985; subject: Response to EPA questions regarding Phillips Academy, outlines the permanent energy conservation measures to be used.
(69) Revisions to federally approved regulations 310 CMR 7.02(2)(b) and 310 CMR 7.05(4) were submitted on December 3, 1985, January 31, 1986 and February 11, 1986 by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(2)(b), Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Air Pollution Control, is corrected to include the word “major” before the word “modification”.
(B) Regulation 310 CMR 7.05(4), Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Air Pollution Control, Ash Content of Fuels.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) The nonregulatory portions of the state submittals.
(70) A revision submitted on February 19, 1986 allowing the burning of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil at the Boston Housing Authority, Mary Ellen McCormick and Maverick Family Development facilities in Boston, Massachusetts for a period of up to 30 months, commencing on August 12, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters dated August 30, 1985 and July 11, 1985 for the Mary Ellen McCormick and Maverick Family Development Facilities, respectively, from Richard J. Chalpin, Acting Regional Engineer, allowing the temporary use of less expensive 2.2% sulfur fuel oil for 30 months from August 12, 1986, the savings from which will be used to implement permanent energy conservation measures to reduce the on-site consumption of the petroleum products. At the end of the temporary use period, the Boston Housing Authority, Mary Ellen McCormick and Maverick Family Development facilities will return to the use of 0.5% sulfur fuel oil. The particulate emission rate for these facilities will not exceed 0.12 lbs per million BTU.
(B) Statements of Agreement both signed October 28, 1985 by Doris Bunte, Administrator of Boston Housing Authority.
(C) Memorandum from Bruce K. Maillet to S. Russell Sylva dated January 9, 1986, subject: Decision Memo.
(71) A revision submitted on May 12, 1986 allowing the burning of 2.2% sulfur content fuel oil at the Boston Housing Authority, Mission Hill Extension Family Development facility in Boston, Massachusetts for a period of up to 30 months, commencing on November 25, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter dated March 5, 1986 for the Mission Hill Extension Family Development facility, from Richard J. Chalpin, Acting Regional Engineer, allowing the temporary use of less expensive 2.2% sulfur fuel oil (for 30 months from the date of publication), the savings from which will be used to implement permanent energy conservation measures to reduce the on-site consumption of petroleum products. At the end of the temporary use period, the Boston Housing Authority, Mission Hill Extension Family Development facility will return to the use of 0.5% sulfur fuel oil. The particulate emission rate for this facility will not exceed 0.12 lbs per million Btu.
(B) Statements of Agreement signed April 4, 1986 by Doris Bunte, Administrator of Boston Housing Authority.
(C) Memorandum from Bruce K. Maillet to S. Russell Sylva dated April 18, 1986, subject: Decision Memo.
(72) Revisions involving regulations 310 CMR 7.02(2)(b) 4, 5, and 6; 7.02(12)(b)3; 7.02(12)(d); and 7.14 were submitted on November 21, 1986 and January 15, 1987, by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(2)(b) 4, 5, and 6 are amended and became effective on February 6, 1987.
(B) Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(12)(b)3 is deleted and became effective on February 6, 1987.
(C) Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(12)(d) is amended and became effective on February 6, 1987.
(D) Regulations 310 CMR 7.14 (2) and (3) are added and became effective on February 6, 1987.
(E) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regulation Filing document dated January 15, 1987 is provided and states that these regulatory changes became effective on February 6, 1987.
(ii) Additional materials. The nonregulatory portions of the state submittals.
(73) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on February 21, February 25, and June 23, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) A letter from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering dated February 21, 1986 and amendments to 310 CMR 7.00 and 310 CMR 7.18 of the Regulations for the control of Air Pollution in the Berkshire, Central Massachusetts, Merrimack Valley, Metropolitan Boston, Pioneer Valley and Southeastern Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Districts.
(B) A letter from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE), dated June 23, 1986 and the Implementation Guidance, 310 CMR 7.18(18), Polystyrene Resin Manufacturing, dated February 1986.
(C) A Regulation Filing and Publication document from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, dated February 25, 1986.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittals.
(74) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan were submitted by the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on November 5, 1986 and December 10, 1986.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter dated November 5, 1986 from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE) submitting revisions to the State Implementation Plan for EPA approval.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts DEQE dated December 10, 1986, which states that the effective date of Regulations 310 CMR 7.00, “Definitions” and 310 CMR 7.18(19), “Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacture,” is November 28, 1986.
(C) Massachusetts' Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(19) entitled, “Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacture,” and amendments to 310 CMR 7.00, “Definitions,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on November 28, 1986.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(75) [Reserved]
(76) Revisions involving regulations 310 CMR 7.18(2)(e) and 7.18(17) submitted by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on September 20, 1988.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendment to Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(2)(e)—effective July 22, 1988.
(B) Amendments to Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(17)(d)—effective July 22, 1988.
(C) A Regulation Filing and Publication document from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering dated July 5, 1988 which states that the effective date of the regulatory amendments to 310 CMR 7.18(2)(e) and 310 CMR 7.18(17)(d), incorporated above, is July 22, 1988.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal.
(77) Revisions to federally approved regulation 310 CMR 7.05(1) submitted on July 18, 1984, April 17, 1985, March 16, 1987, and November 25, 1987 by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering approving sulfur-in-fuel limitations for the following sources: American Fiber and finishing Company (formerly known as Kendall Company), Colrain; Erving Paper company, Erving; and Westfield River Paper Company, Russell.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters dated October 14, 1987 for the American Fiber and Finishing Company, Erving Paper Company, and Westfield River Paper Company facilities from Stephen F. Joyce, Deputy Regional Environmental Engineer, Department of Environmental Quality Engineering.
(B) Statements of agreement signed November 6, 1987 by Schuyler D. Bush, Vice President of Erving Paper Company; 1987 by Francis J. Fitzpatrick, President of Westfield River Paper Company; and November 16, 1987 by Robert Young, Vice President of American Fiber and Finishing Company.
(78) Revisions to federally approved regulation 310 CMR 7.02(12) submitted on July 13, 1988, September 15, 1988, and April 12, 1989, by the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, limiting the volatility of gasoline from May 1 through September 15, beginning 1989 and continuing every year thereafter, including any waivers to such limitations that Massachusetts may grant. In 1989, the control period will begin on June 30.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.02(12)(e), entitled, “gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP),” and amendments to 310 CMR 7.00, “Definitions,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 11, 1988.
(B) Massachusetts Emergency Regulation Amendment to 310 CMR 7.02(12)(e) 2.b entitled “gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on April 11, 1989, with excerpt from the Manual for Promulgating Regulations, Office of the Secretary of State.
(79) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on February 4, 1988 and July 16, 1989 which define and impose reasonably available control technology to control volatile organic compound emissions from Monsanto Chemical Company in Indian Orchard, Massachusetts.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 18, 1989 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) A final RACT Compliance Plan Conditional Approval issued to Monsanto Chemical Company by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated and effective June 20, 1989.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the state submittal.
(80) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 18, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 18, 1989 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Amendments to the Conditional Plan Approval dated and effective July 12, 1989 and the Conditional Plan Approval dated and effective October 7, 1985 imposing reasonably available control technology on Spalding Sports Worldwide in Chicopee, Massachusetts.
(81) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering on July 18, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering dated July 18, 1989 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) RACT Approval Addendum for Cranston Print Works Company, Webster Division Facility in Webster, Massachusetts dated and effective June 20, 1989.
(ii) Additional materials. Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(82) Revision to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection August 8, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 8, 1989 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Amended Conditional Plan Approval (SM-85-168-IF) dated and effective August 1, 1989 and an Amendment to the Amended Conditional Plan Approval (SM-85-168-IF Revision) dated and effective August 8, 1989 imposing reasonably available control technology on Duro Textile Printers, Incorporated in Fall River, Massachusetts.
(83) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on August 24, 1989 and October 16, 1989 regulating gasoline volatility.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated October 16, 1989 and a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan containing revised Massachusetts gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure regulation 310 CMR 7.24(5)(b)2, effective September 15, 1989.
(84) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on August 27, 1982, June 22, 1987, and December 27, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 27, 1982, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Amendments to 310 CMR 7.00, “Definitions” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 18, 1982 which add the definitions of the terms “stationary source” and “building, structure, facility, or installation.”
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated June 22, 1987 certifying that it did not rely on a dual definition in its attainment demonstration.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated December 27, 1989 submitting additional assurances that it is making reasonable efforts to develop a complete and approve SIP.
(C) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(85) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 28, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 28, 1989 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) A Plan Approval 4P89005 Correction dated and effective November 17, 1989 and the Amended Plan Approval, 4P89005 dated and effective October 19, 1989 imposing reasonably available control technology on Boston Whaler Inc., in Norwell, Massachusetts.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(86) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 28, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 28, 1989 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) A Plan Approval 4P89006 Correction dated and effective November 17, 1989 and the Amended Plan Approval (4P89006) dated and effective October 19, 1989 imposing reasonably available control technology on Boston Whaler Inc. in Rockland, Massachusetts.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(87) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 20, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 20, 1989 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) 2nd Amendment to the Final Approval/RACT Approval for the Philips Lighting Company dated November 2, 1989.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(88) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 13, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated June 13, 1990 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) An Amended Plan Approval dated and effective June 1, 1990 imposing reasonably available control technology on Acushnet Company, Titleist Golf Division, Plant A in New Bedford, Massachusetts.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(89) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 9, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 9, 1990 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) An Amended Plan Approval dated and effective June 8, 1990 imposing reasonably available control technology on General Motors Corporation in Framingham, Massachusetts.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the State submittal.
(90) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on October 25, 1990 which define and impose RACT to control volatile organic compound emissions from Erving Paper Mills in Erving, Massachusetts.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated October 25, 1990 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) A conditional final plan approval issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to Erving Paper Mills dated and effective October 16, 1990.
(91) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on April 22, 1991 which clarify the requirements of RACT to control volatile organic compound emissions from Erving Paper Mills in Erving, Massachusetts.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated April 22, 1991 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) A conditional final plan approval amendment issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to Erving Paper Mills dated and effective April 16, 1991. This amended conditional plan approval amends the October 16, 1990 conditional plan approval incorporated at paragraph (c)(90) of this section.
(92) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on August 17, 1989, June 7, 1991 and December 17, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 17, 1989 and June 7, 1991 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Portions of regulation 310 CMR 7.18(7) for automobile surface coating as submitted on August 17, 1989 effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on September 15, 1989.
(C) Portions of regulation 310 CMR 7.18(7) for automobile surface coating as submitted on June 7, 1991 effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 21, 1991.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A letter dated December 17, 1991 from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection withdrawing the emission limit for the Primer-surfacer application from the June 7, 1991 submittal.
(B) Nonregulatory portions of state submittal.
(93) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on August 27, 1982, June 27, 1984, March 6, 1985, April 12, 1985, August 17, 1989, June 7, 1991 and December 17, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 27, 1982, April 12, 1985, August 17, 1989, and June 7, 1991, submitting revisions to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Amendment to 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b) submitted on August 27, 1982 and effective on September 16, 1982.
(C) Addition of 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix B submitted on April 12, 1985 and effective on September 30, 1984.
(D) Amendments to portions of 310 CMR 7.00 submitted on August 17, 1989 and effective September 15, 1989.
(E) Amendments to portions of 310 CMR 7.00 submitted on June 7, 1991 and effective on April 12, 1991.
(F) Amendments to portions of 310 CMR 7.00 submitted on June 7, 1991 and effective on June 21, 1991.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering dated June 27, 1984 submitting 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix B.
(B) A letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering dated March 6, 1985 submitting additional information on 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix B and referencing 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b).
(C) A letter dated December 17, 1991 from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection withdrawing the emission limit for the Primer-surfacer application in 310 CMR 7.18(7)(b) from the June 7, 1991 submittal.
(D) Nonregulatory portions of state submittal.
(94) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on August 4, 1989, December 6, 1989 and March 23, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 4, 1989, December 6, 1989 and March 23, 1990 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Massachusetts' Air Pollution Control Regulations 310 CMR 7.30 (excluding 310 CMR 7.30(8)(a)), and 310 CMR 7.31 entitled, “MB Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze” and “MB City of Boston/East Boston Parking Freeze” respectively, effective in the State of Massachusetts on 11/24/89, and technical amendments to that regulation submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on March 23, 1990, effective 3/30/90.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Appendix 5D, Baseline and Future Case CO Compliance Modeling, dated June 1986.
(B) Policy Statement Regarding the Proposed Amendment to the Logan Airport Parking Freeze, dated November 14, 1988.
(95) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection of May 15, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated May 15, 1992 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Final Plan Approval No. 4P89051, dated and effective May 13, 1991 imposing reasonably available control technology on Dartmouth Finishing Corporation, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
(96) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on January 30, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated January 30, 1991 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.38, entitled “Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District,” and amendment to 310 CMR 7.00, entitled “Definitions,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on January 18, 1991.
(97) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on May 17, 1990, July 5, 1990, June 7, 1991, and April 21, 1992.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated May 17, 1990 and June 7, 1991, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Definition of “motor vehicle fuel,” “motor vehicle fuel dispensing facility,” “substantial modification,” and “vapor collection and control system,” added to 310 CMR 7.00 and effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on October 27, 1989.
(C) 310 CMR 7.24(6) “Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on October 27, 1989.
(D) Amendments to 310 CMR 7.24(6)(b) “Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel” and to the definition of “substantial modification” in 310 CMR 7.00, effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 21, 1991.
(E) Amendment to the definition of “motor vehicle fuel dispensing facility” in 310 CMR 7.00, effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on April 12, 1991.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated July 5, 1990, requesting the withdrawal of amendments to subsection 310 CMR 7.24(2)(c) which require Stage I vapor recovery in Berkshire County from the SIP revision package submitted on May 17, 1990.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 21, 1992, submitting an implementation policy statement regarding its Stage II program. This policy statement addresses the installation of California Air Resources Board (CARB) certified systems, Stage II testing procedures, and defects in State II equipment.
(C) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(98) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 13, 1992, January 15, 1993, and February 17, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 13, 1992, January 15, 1993, and February 17, 1993, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) 310 CMR 7.24(6) “Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel,” effective in the State of Massachusetts on February 12, 1993.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(99) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 3, 1990 and August 26, 1992 which define and impose reasonably available control technology to control volatile organic compound emissions from S. Bent & Brothers in Gardner, Massachusetts.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 26, 1992 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Final Air Quality Approval RACT issued to S. Bent by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated and effective May 22, 1992.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 3, 1990 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Final Air Quality Approval RACT issued to S. Bent by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated and effective October 17, 1990.
(C) Nonregulatory portions of the November 3, 1990 and August 26, 1992 state submittals.
(100) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 19, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 19, 1993 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Plan approval no. C-P-93-011, effective June 30, 1993, which contains emissions standards, operating conditions, and recordkeeping requirements applicable to Nichols & Stone Company in Gardner, Massachusetts.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter dated October 27, 1993 from Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection submitting certification of a public hearing.
(101) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 9, 1991.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated December 9, 1991 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.36, entitled “Transit System Improvements”, Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.37, entitled “High Occupancy Vehicle Facilities”, and amendments to 310 CMR 7.00, entitled “Definitions,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 6, 1991.
(102) [Reserved]
(103) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 15, 1993 and May 11, 1994, substituting the California Low Emission Vehicle program for the Clean Fuel Fleet program.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 15, 1993 and May 11, 1994, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan which substitutes the California Low Emission Vehicle program for the Clean Fuel Fleet program.
(B) A regulation dated and effective January 31, 1992, entitled “U Low Emission Vehicle Program”, 310 CMR 7.40.
(C) Additional definitions to 310 CMR 7.00 “Definitions” (dated and effective 1/31/92) to carry out the requirements set forth in 310 CMR 7.40.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Additional nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(104) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on March 31, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated March 31, 1994 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Final Plan Approval No. 4P92012, dated and effective March 16, 1994 imposing reasonably available control technology on Brittany Dyeing and Finishing of New Bedford, Massachusetts.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(105) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 6, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated June 6, 1994 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) 310 CMR 7.02(12) “U Restricted Emission Status” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on February 25, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(106) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 28, 1990, September 30, 1992, and July 15, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated June 28, 1990, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated September 30, 1992, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(C) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated July 15, 1994, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(D) Regulation 310 CMR 7.12 entitled “Inspection Certification Record Keeping and Reporting” which became effective on July 1, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of submittal.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated December 30, 1994, assuring EPA that the data elements noted in EPA's December 13, 1994 letter were being incorporated into the source registration forms used by Massachusetts emission statement program.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of submittal.
(107) Massachusetts submitted the Oxygenated Gasoline Program on October 29, 1993. This submittal satisfies the requirements of section 211(m) of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter dated October 29, 1993 which included the oxygenated gasoline program, amendments to the Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulations, 310 CMR 7.00, with an effective date of March 1, 1994, requesting that the submittal be approved and adopted as part of Massachusetts' SIP.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) The Technical Support Document for the Redesignation of the Boston Area as Attainment for Carbon Monoxide submitted on December 12, 1994.
(108) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on January 9, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated January 9, 1995 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) The following portions of the Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts effective on November 18, 1994: 310 Code of Massachusetts Regulations Section 7.25 U Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial Products.
(109) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on January 9, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated January 9, 1995, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) The following portions of the Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts effective on December 16, 1994: 310 Code of Massachusetts Regulations Section 7.18(28) Automotive Refinishing.
(110) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on March 29, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated March 29, 1995 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) The following portions of the Rules Governing the Control of Air Pollution for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts effective on January 27, 1995: 310 Code of Massachusetts Regulations Section 7.18(29), Bakeries.
(111) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 30, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 30, 1993 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulation 310 CMR 7.33, entitled “City of Boston/South Boston Parking Freeze,” and the following amendments to 310 CMR 7.00, entitled “Definitions,” which consist of adding or amending four definitions; motor vehicle parking space; off-peak parking spaces; remote parking spaces; and restricted use parking, effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on April 9, 1993.
(112) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on February 9, 1994, and April 14, 1995, concerning emissions banking, trading, and averaging.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated February 9, 1994, and March 29, 1995, submitting revisions to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Regulations 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(1); 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(2); 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(3), except 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(3)(e)5.h; and, 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(5); effective on January 1, 1994. Also, regulations 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(4); 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(6); 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b); 310 CMR 7.19(2)(d); 310 CMR 7.19(2)(g); and, 310 CMR 7.19(14); effective on January 27, 1995.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter and attachments from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated February 8, 1996, submitting supplemental information concerning the demonstration of balance between credit creation and credit use.
(113) A revision to the Massachusetts SIP regarding ozone monitoring. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts will modify its SLAMS and its NAMS monitoring systems to include a PAMS network design and establish monitoring sites. The Commonwealth's SIP revision satisfies 40 CFR 58.20(f) PAMS requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts PAMS Network Plan, which incorporates PAMS into the ambient air quality monitoring network of State or Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) and National Air Monitoring Stations (NAMS).
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated December 30, 1993 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(114) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts' March 27, 1996 submittal for an enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program, as amended on June 27, 1996 and July 29, 1996, and November 1, 1996, is conditionally approved based on certain contingencies, for an interim period to last eighteen months. If the Commonwealth fails to start its program according to schedule, or by November 15, 1997 at the latest, this conditional approval will convert to a disapproval after EPA sends a letter to the state. If the Commonwealth fails to satisfy the following conditions within 12 months of this rulemaking, this conditional approval will automatically convert to a disapproval as explained under section 110(k) of the Clean Air Act.
(i) The conditions for approvability are as follows:
(A) The time extension program as described and committed to in the March 3, 1997 letter from Massachusetts must be further defined and submitted to EPA as a SIP revision by no later than one year after the effective date of this interim approval. Another program which meets the requirements of 40 CFR 51.360 (Waivers and Compliance via Diagnostic Inspection) and provides for no more than a 1% waiver rate would also be approvable.
(B) Other major deficiencies as described in the proposal must also be corrected in 40 CFR 51.351 (Enhanced I/M Performance Standard), § 51.354 (Adequate Tools and Resources), § 51.357 (Test Procedures and Standards), § 51.359 (Quality Control), and § 51.363 (Quality Assurance). The Commonwealth, committed in a letter dated March 3, 1997 to correct these deficiencies within one year of conditional interim approval by EPA.
(ii) In addition to the above conditions for approval, the Commonwealth must correct several minor, or de minimis deficiencies related to CAA requirements for enhanced I/M. Although satisfaction of these deficiencies does not affect the conditional approval status of the Commonwealth's rulemaking granted under the authority of section 110 of the Clean Air Act, these deficiencies must be corrected in the final I/M SIP revision prior to the end of the 18-month interim period granted under the National Highway Safety Designation Act of 1995:
(A) The SIP lacks a detailed description of the program evaluation element as required under 40 CFR 51.353;
(B) The SIP lacks a detailed description of the test frequency and convenience element required under 40 CFR 51.355;
(C) The SIP lacks a detailed description of the number and types of vehicles included in the program as required under 40 CFR 51.356;
(D) The SIP lacks a detailed information concerning the enforcement process, and a commitment to a compliance rate to be maintained in practice required under 40 CFR 51.361.
(E) The SIP lacks the details of the enforcement oversight program including quality control and quality assurance procedures to be used to insure the effective overall performance of the enforcement system as required under 40 CFR 51.362;
(F) The SIP lacks a detailed description of procedures for enforcement against contractors, stations and inspectors as required under 40 CFR 51.364;
(G) The SIP lacks a detailed description of data analysis and reporting provisions as required under 40 CFR 51.366;
(H) The SIP lacks a public awareness plan as required by 40 CFR 51.368; and
(I) The SIP lacks provisions for notifying motorists of required recalls prior to inspection of the vehicle as required by 40 CFR 51.370.
(iii) EPA is also approving this SIP revision under section 110(k), for its strengthening effect on the plan.
(115) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on October 17, 1997 and July 30, 1996.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) 310 CMR 7.24(8) “Marine Volatile Organic Liquid Transfer” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on October 5, 1997.
(B) Definition of “volatile organic compound” in 310 CMR 7.00 “Definitions” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 28, 1996.
(C) Definition of “waterproofing sealer” in 310 CMR 7.25 “Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial Products” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 28, 1996.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(116) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on August 9, 2000, September 11, 2000 and July 25, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) 310 CMR 7.24(6) “Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on September 29, 2000.
(B) 310 CMR 7.00 definitions of the following terms associated with 310 CMR 7.24(6) and effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on September 29, 2000: “commence operation”; “emergency situation”; “executive order”; “Stage II system”; “substantial modification”; “vacuum assist system”; and “vapor balance system.”
(C) 310 CMR 7.00 definitions of the following terms associated with 310 CMR 7.24(6) and effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 30, 1995: “emergency motor vehicle;” and “tank truck.”
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(117) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on February 17, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated February 17, 1993 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Regulations 310 CMR 7.00, Definitions; 310 CMR 7.03(13), Paint spray booths; 310 CMR 7.18(2), Compliance with emission limitations; 310 CMR 7.18(7), Automobile surface coating; 310 CMR 7.18(8), Solvent Metal Degreasing; 310 CMR 7.18(11), Surface coating of miscellaneous metal parts and products; 310 CMR 7.18(12), Graphic arts; 310 CMR 7.18(17), Reasonable available control technology (as it applies to the Springfield ozone nonattainment area only); 310 CMR 7.18(20), Emission control plans for implementation of reasonably available control technology; 310 CMR 7.18(21), Surface coating of plastic parts; 310 CMR 7.18(22), Leather surface coating; 310 CMR 7.18(23), Wood products surface coating; 310 CMR 7.18(24), Flat wood paneling surface coating; 310 CMR 7.18(25), Offset lithographic printing; 310 CMR 7.18(26), Textile finishing; 310 CMR 7.18(27), Coating mixing tanks; and 310 CMR 7.24(3), Distribution of motor vehicle fuel all effective on February 12, 1993.
(118) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 19, 1997.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated December 19, 1997 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Regulation 310 CMR 7.27, NOX Allowance Program, effective on June 27, 1997.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated March 9, 1998 clarifying the program implementation process.
(119) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 15, 1994, October 4, 1996, December 2, 1996, January 11, 1999, and April 16, 1999.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 15, 1994, October 4, 1996, December 2, 1996, January 11, 1999, and April 16, 1999 submitting revisions to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Regulation, 310 CMR 7.19, “Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX)” as adopted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on June 29, 1994 and effective on July 1, 1994.
(C) Emission Control Plan for Specialty Minerals, Incorporated, in Adams, issued by Massachusetts and effective on June 16, 1995.
(D) Emission Control Plan for Monsanto Company's Indian Orchard facility in Springfield, issued by Massachusetts and effective on October 28, 1996.
(E) Emission Control Plan for Turners Falls Limited Partnership/Indeck Energy Services Turners Falls, Inc., in Montague, issued by Massachusetts and effective on March 10, 1998.
(F) Emission Control Plan for Medusa Minerals Company in Lee, issued by Massachusetts and effective on April 17, 1998.
(G) Regulation 310 CMR 7.08(2), “Municipal Waste Combustors, adopted on July 24, 1998 and effective on August 21, 1998, excluding the following sections which were not submitted as part of the SIP revision: (a); the definition of “Material Separation Plan” in (c); (d)1; (d)2; (d)3; (d)4; (d)5; (d)6; (d)8; (f)1; (f)2; (f)5; (f)6; (f)7; (g)1; (g)2; (g)3; (g)4; (h)2.a; (h)2.b; (h)2.d; (h)2.e; (h)2.g; (h)2.h; (h)4; (h)5.a; (h)5.c; (h)5.d; (h)9; (h)10; (h)13; (i)1.b; (i)1.g; (i)2.c; (i)2.d; (i)2.e; and (k)3.
(H) Amendments to regulation 310 CMR 7.19, “Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX)” as adopted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on January 5, 1999 and effective on January 22, 1999.
(120) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 25, 1990.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) 310 CMR 6.04, 7.00, and 8.02 and 8.03 (August 17, 1990).
(121) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on January 11, 1995 and March 29, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Definitions of “combustion device,” “leak,” “leaking component,” “lightering or lightering operation,” “loading event,” “marine tank vessel,” “marine terminal,” “marine vessel,” “organic liquid,” and “recovery device” in 310 CMR 7.00 “Definitions” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on January 27, 1995.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(122) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on May 14, 1999, February 1, 2000 and March 15, 2000.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulation 310 CMR 60.02 entitled “Regulations for the Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program” which became effective on October 1, 1999, and a September 17, 1999, Notice of Correction submitted by the Secretary of State indicating the effective date of the regulations.
(B) Sections 4.01, 4.02, 4.03, 4.04(1), (2), (3), (5), (15) 4.05(1), (2), (12)(d), (12)(e), (12)(o) 4.07, 4.08, and 4.09 of Regulation 540 CMR 4.00 entitled “Periodic Annual Staggered Safety and Combined Safety and Emissions Inspection of All Motor Vehicles, Trailers, Semi-trailers and Converter Dollies' which became effective on May 28, 1999.”
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated May 14, 1999, February 1, 2000, and March 15, 2000, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Test Procedures and Equipment Specifications submitted on February 1, 2000.
(C) Acceptance Test Protocol submitted on March 15, 2000.
(123) [Reserved]
(124) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 19, 1999.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendments revising regulatory language in 310 CMR 7.19(13)(b), Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems, which became effective on December 10, 1999.
(B) Amendments to 310 CMR 7.27, NOX Allowance Program, adding paragraphs 7.27(6)(m), 7.27(9)(b), 7.27(11)(o), 7.27(11)(p) and 7.27(15)(e), which became effective December 10, 1999.
(C) Regulations 310 CMR 7.28, NOX Allowance Trading Program, which became effective on December 10, 1999.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental Protection dated November 19, 1999, submitting amendment to SIP.
(B) Background Document and Technical Support for Public Hearings on the Proposed Revisions to the State Implementation Plan for Ozone, July, 1999.
(C) Supplemental Background Document and Technical Support for Public Hearings on Modifications to the July 1999 Proposal to Revise the State Implementation Plan for Ozone, September, 1999.
(D) Table of Unit Allocations.
(E) Letter from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Department of Environmental Protection dated April 10, 2002.
(F) The SIP narrative “Technical Support Document for Public Hearings on Revisions to the State Implementation Plan for Ozone for Massachusetts, Amendments to Statewide Projected Inventory for Nitrogen Oxides,” dated March 2002.
(125)-(126) [Reserved]
(127) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 15, 1994 and April 14, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Amendments to 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix A entitled, “Emission Offsets and Nonattainment Review,” effective July 1, 1994.
(B) Massachusetts Amendments to 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix A entitled, “Emission Offsets and Nonattainment Review” paragraph (3)(g) effective July 1, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letters from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 15, 1994 and March 29, 1995 submitting revisions to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(128) [Reserved]
(129) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on February 17, 1993, April 16, 1999, and October 7, 1999.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) 310 CMR 7.18(17) “Reasonable Available Control Technology,” as it applies to the eastern Massachusetts ozone nonattainment area, effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on February 12, 1993.
(B) Plan Approval issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to the Gillette Company Andover Manufacturing Plant on June 17, 1999.
(C) Plan Approval issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to Norton Company on August 5, 1999 and letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated October 7, 1999, identifying the effective date of this plan approval.
(D) Plan Approval issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to Rex Finishing Incorporated on May 10, 1991 and letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 16, 1999, identifying the effective date of this plan approval.
(E) Plan Approval issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to Barnet Corporation on May 14, 1991.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated April 16, 1999, submitting negative declarations for certain VOC source categories.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated July 24, 2002, discussing wood furniture manufacturing and aerospace coating requirements in Massachusetts.
(C) 310 CMR 7.02 BACT plan approvals issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection to Solutia, Saloom Furniture, Eureka Manufacturing, Moduform, Polaroid, and Globe.
(130) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 8, 2000 and December 26, 2000.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts State Regulation 310 CMR 7.30 “Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 22, 2000.
(B) Massachusetts State Regulation 310 CMR 7.31 “City of Boston/East Boston Parking Freeze,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 22, 2000.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated December 8, 2000 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated December 26, 2000 submitting the final state certified copies of State regulations 310 CMR 7.30 “Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze” and 310 CMR 7.31 “City of Boston/East Boston Parking Freeze.”
(131) [Reserved]
(132) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan regarding the Low Emission Vehicle Program submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on August 9 and August 26, 2002.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 9, 2002, in which it submitted the Low Emission Vehicle Program adopted on December 24, 1999.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 26, 2002 which clarified the August 9, 2002 submittal to exclude certain sections of the Low Emission Vehicle Program from consideration.
(C) December 24, 1999 version of 310 CMR 7.40, the “Low Emission Vehicle Program” except for 310 CMR 7.40(2)(a)5, 310 CMR 7.40(2)(a)6, 310 CMR 7.40(2)(c)3, 310 CMR 7.40(10), and 310 CMR 7.40(12).
(133) [Reserved]
(134) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on July 12, 2006.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.38, entitled “Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 30, 2005.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation Filing, dated December 13, 2005, amending 310 CMR 7.38 entitled “Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District.”
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated July 12, 2006, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(135) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on March 30, 2007.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) 310 CMR 7.32 entitled “Massachusetts Clean Air Interstate Rule (Mass CAIR),” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 4, 2007.
(B) Amendments to 310 CMR 7.28 entitled “NOX Allowance Trading Program,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 4, 2007.
(C) Massachusetts Regulation Filing, dated April 19, 2007, amending 310 CMR 7.28 entitled “NOX Allowance Trading Program,” and adopting 310 CMR 7.32 entitled “Massachusetts Clean Air Interstate Rule (Mass CAIR).”
(136) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 13, 2006 and June 1, 2007.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00 entitled “Definitions,” adding the definition for the term “Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 1, 2006.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.36 entitled “Transit System Improvements,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 1, 2006.
(C) Massachusetts Regulation Filing, dated November 16, 2006, substantiating December 1, 2006, State effective date for amended 310 CMR 7.00 entitled “Definition,” (addition of term “Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization,” which appears on the replaced page 173 of the State's Code of Massachusetts Regulations,) and 310 CMR 7.36 entitled “Transit System Improvements.”
(ii) Additional Materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated December 13, 2006 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated June 1, 2007 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(C) Letter from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation dated September 4, 2007 identifying its commitment to the Green Line extension and to make every effort to accelerate the planning, design and environmental review and permitting of the project in order to work towards the 2014 completion date.
(D) Letter from the Chair of the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization dated May 1, 2008 concurring in the finding that the transit system improvements projects will achieve emission benefits equivalent to or greater than the benefits from the original transit system improvements projects being replaced.
(E) Letter from EPA New England Regional Administrator dated July 5, 2008 concurring in the finding that the transit system improvements projects will achieve emission benefits equivalent to or greater than the benefits from the original transit system improvements projects being replaced.
(137) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 1, 2009 and November 30, 2009.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulation 310 CMR 60.02 entitled “Massachusetts Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Program,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on September 5, 2008, with the exception of subsection 310 CMR 60.02(24)(f).
(B) Regulation 540 CMR 4.00 entitled “Annual Safety and Combined Safety and Emissions Inspection of All Motor Vehicles, Trailers, Semi-trailers and Converter Dollies,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on September 5, 2008.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated June 1, 2009, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(B) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated November 30, 2009, amending the June 1, 2009 State Implementation Plan submittal.
(C) Massachusetts June 1, 2009 SIP Revision Table of Contents Item 7, “Documentation of IM SIP Revision consistent with 42 USC Section 7511a and Section 182(c)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act.”
(138) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 1, 2010.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(8), “U Solvent Metal Degreasing,” effective on March 6, 2009.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.24(6), “U Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel,” effective on March 1, 2009.
(C) The definitions of the following terms contained in Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00, “Statutory Authority; Legend; Preamble; Definitions,” effective on March 1, 2009: isolate; minor modification; routine maintenance; solvent metal degreasing; special and extreme solvent metal cleaning; substantial modification.
(139) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan regarding Regional Haze submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 30, 2011, August 9, 2012, and August 28, 2012.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00, “Definitions,” amended definition of SULFUR IN FUEL, effective August 3, 2012.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05, “U Fuels All Districts,” effective August 3, 2012, with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART:
(1) 310 CMR 7.05(1)(a)(3);
(2) 310 CMR 7.05(2) through (4); and
(3) 310 CMR 7.05(7) through (9).
(C) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.29, “Emissions Standards for Power Plants,” effective on January 25, 2008 (which includes previous sections effective on June 29, 2007), with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART:
(1) In 310 CMR 7.29(1), the reference to mercury (Hg), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the first sentence and the phrase “. . . and CO2 and establishing a cap on CO2 and Hg emissions from affected facilities. CO2 emissions standards set forth in 310 CMR 7.29(5)(a)5.a. and b. shall not apply to emissions that occur after December 31, 2008” in the second sentence;
(2) In 310 CMR 7.29(2), the definitions of Alternate Hg Designated Representative, Automated Acquisition and Handling System or DAHS, Mercury (Hg) Designated Representative, Mercury Continuous Emission Monitoring System or Mercury CEMS, Mercury Monitoring System, Sorbent Trap Monitoring System, and Total Mercury;
(3) 310 CMR 7.29(5)(a)(3) through (5)(a)(6);
(4) In 310 CMR 7.29(5)(b)(1), reference to compliance with the mercury emissions standard in the second sentence;
(5) 310 CMR 7.29(6)(a)(3) through (6)(a)(4);
(6) 310 CMR 7.29(6)(b)(10);
(7) 310 CMR 7.29(6)(h)(2);
(8) The third and fourth sentences in 310 CMR 7.29(7)(a);
(9) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(1), the reference to CO2 and mercury;
(10) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(1)(a), the reference to CO2 and mercury;
(11) 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(1)(b) through 7.29(7)(b)(1)(d);
(12) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(3), the reference to CO2 and mercury;
(13) In 310 CMR 7.29(7)(b)(4)(b), the reference to CO2 and mercury; and
(14) 310 CMR 7.29(7)(e) through 7.29(7)(i).
(D) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.26, “Industry Performance Standards, Outdoor Hydronic Heaters” paragraphs (50) through (54) and related footnotes effective December 26, 2008.
(1) 310 CMR 7.26(50) Outdoor Hydronic Heaters—Applicability;
(2) 310 CMR 7.26(51) Definitions;
(3) 310 CMR 7.26(52) Requirements for Operators;
(4) 310 CMR 7.26(53) Requirements for Sellers; and
(5) 310 CMR 7.26(54) Requirements for Manufacturers.
(E) The sulfur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and PM2.5 provisions of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Emission Control Plan “Saugus—Metropolitan, Boston/Northeast Region, 310 CMR 7.08(2)—Municipal Waste Combustors, Application No. MBR-98-ECP-006, Transmittal No. W003302, Emission Control Plan Modified Final Approval” dated March 14, 2012 to Mr. Jairaj Gosine, Wheelabrator Saugus, Inc. and signed by Cosmo Buttaro and James E. Belsky, with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART.
(1) In Table 2, the EU1 and EU2 Unit Load Restriction/Operating Practices;
(2) In Table 2, the EU1 and EU2 Emission Limit/Standard for Opacity, HCl, Dioxin/Furon, Cd, Pb, CO, Hg, NH3, and associated footnotes;
(3) In Table 2, EU3 Fugitive Ash requirement and associated footnote.
(4) In Table 2, Footnote 1 which is a State Only Requirement.
(F) The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Emission Control Plan “Lynn—Metropolitan, Boston/Northeast Region, 310 CMR 7.19, Application No. MBR-94-COM-008, Transmittal No. X235617, Modified Emission Control Plan Final Approval” dated March 24, 2011 to Ms. Jolanta Wojas, General Electric Aviation and signed by Marc Altobelli and James E. Belsky. Note, this document contains two section V; V. RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS and V. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS/PROVISIONS.
(G) The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Emission Control Plan, “Holyoke Western Region 310 CMR 7.29 Power Plant Emission Standards, Application No. 1-E-01-072, Transmittal No. W025214, Amended Emission Control Plan” dated May 15, 2009 to Mr. John S. Murry, Mt. Tom Generating Company, LLC and signed by Marc Simpson, with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART:
(1) In Table 2, the EU 1 Emission Limit/Standard for Hg, CO, CO2, and PM2.5 and related footnotes;
(2) In Table 3, the EU1 Monitoring/Testing Requirements for CO2, CO, PM2.5, and Hg;
(3) In Table 4, the EU 1 Record Keeping Requirements for CO2, CO, PM2.5, and Hg;
(4) In Table 5, the EU1 Reporting Requirements for Hg;
(5) In Table 5, the Facility Reporting requirements
(6) In Table 6, the Compliance Paths for Hg and CO2 and related footnote;
(7) In Section 4, Special Conditions for ECP, Item 4, applicable to CO2;
(8) Section 6, Modification to the ECP;
(9) Section 7, Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act; and
(10) Section 8, Appeal of Approval.
(H) The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Emission Control Plan “Salem—Metropolitan Boston/Northeast Region, 310 CMR 7.29 Power Plant Emission Standards, Application No. NE-12-003, Transmittal No. X241756, Final Amended Emission Control Plan Approval” dated March 27, 2012 to Mr. Lamont W. Beaudette, Dominion Energy Salem Harbor, LLC and signed by Edward J. Braczyk, Cosmo Buttaro, and James E. Belsky with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART:
(1) In Table 2, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Emission Limit/Standard for Hg and related footnotes;
(2) In Table 2, the EU 1, EU 2, EU 3, and EU 4 Emission Limit/Standard for CO, CO2, PM2.5 and related footnotes;
(3) In Table 3, the EU 1, EU 2, EU 3, and EU 4 Monitoring/Testing Requirements for CO2, CO, and PM2.5;
(4) In Table 3, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Monitoring/Testing Requirements for Hg;
(5) In Table 4, the EU 1, EU 2, EU 3, and EU 4 Record Keeping Requirements for CO2, CO, and PM2.5;
(6) In Table 4, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Record Keeping Requirements for Hg;
(7) In Table 5, the EU 1, EU 2, EU 3, and EU 4 Reporting Requirements for CO2;
(8) In Table 5, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Reporting Requirements for Hg;
(9) In Section 3, Compliance Schedule, the 3rd paragraph text which reads “In order to meet the regulatory Hg limits which are effective on October 1, 2012, the facility owner/operator has proposed using a combination strategy involving fuel mix optimization (for SO2 compliance but this action will benefit Hg compliance as well) and installation of a Calcium Bromide injection system. In order to meet the 310 CMR 7.29 CO2 emission targets, the Dominion Energy Salem Harbor, LLC facility owner/operator procured offset credits from both its Dominion Energy Brayton Point facility and third party contacts and paid into the Greenhouse Gas Expendable Trust;”
(10) Section 6, Modification to the ECP;
(11) Section 7, Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act; and
(12) Section 8, Appeal of Approval.
(I) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Emission Control Plan “Amended Emission Control Plan Final Approval Application for: BWP AQ 25, 310 CMR 7.29 Power Plant Emission Standards, Transmittal Number X241755, Application Number SE-12-003, Source Number: 1200061” dated April 12, 2012 to Peter Balkus, Dominion Energy Brayton Point, LLC and signed by John K. Winkler, with the following exceptions which are not applicable to the Massachusetts Alternative to BART:
(1) In Table 2, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Emission Limit/Standard for Hg;
(2) In Table 2, the EU 1, EU 2, EU 3, EU 4 Emission Limit/Standard for CO, CO2, PM2.5 and related footnotes;
(3) In Table 3, the EU 1, EU 2, EU 3, and EU 4 Monitoring/Testing Requirements for CO2, Hg, CO, and PM2.5;
(4) In Table 3, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Monitoring/Testing Requirements for Hg;
(5) In Table 4, the EU 1, EU 2, EU 3, and EU 4 Record Keeping Requirements for CO2, Hg, CO, and PM2.5;
(6) In Table 4, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Record Keeping Requirements for Hg;
(7) In Table 5, the EU 1, EU 2, and EU 3 Reporting Requirements for Hg and CEMS monitoring and certification;
(8) In Table 5, the Facility Reporting Requirements;
(9) In Table 6, the Compliance Path for CO2, and Hg;
(10) In Section 4, Special Conditions for ECP, the CO2 requirement in Item 2;
(11) Section 6, Modification to the ECP;
(12) Section 7, Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act; and
(13) Section 8, Appeal of Approval.
(J) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection letter “Facility Shutdown, FMF Facility No. 316744” dated June 22, 2011 to Jeff Araujo, Somerset Power LLC and signed by John K. Winkler.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) “Massachusetts Regional Haze State Implementation Plan” dated August 9, 2012.
(140) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on Protection on August 9, 2001, September 14, 2006, and February 18, 2008.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Provision 310 CMR 7.12(1)(a)1 of 310 CMR 7.12, “U Source Registration” effective on August 3, 2001.
(B) Provisions 310 CMR 7.12(2)(c), 7.12(3), and 7.12(4) of 310 CMR 7.12, “U Source Registration” effective on September 23, 2005.
(C) Provision 310 CMR 7.00, Table entitled, “Massachusetts Cities & Towns with Corresponding DEP Regional Offices and Air Pollution Districts” effective on December 28, 2007.
(D) Provisions 310 CMR 7.04(2) and 7.04(4)(a) of 310 CMR 7.04, “U Fossil Fuel Utilization Facilities” effective on December 28, 2007.
(E) Provisions 310 CMR 7.12(1)(a)2 through 9, (1)(b), (1)(c), (2)(a) and (b) of 310 CMR 7.12, “U Source Registration” effective on December 28, 2007.
(F) Provisions 310 CMR 7.26(30) through (37) of 310 CMR 7.26 “Industry Performance Standards” effective on December 28, 2007.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated August 9, 2001 submitting a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(B) A letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated September 14, 2006 submitting a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(C) A letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated February 13, 2008 submitting a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
(D) A letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated January 18, 2013 withdrawing certain outdated and obsolete regulation submittals and replacing them with currently effective versions of the regulation for approval and inclusion into the SIP.
(141) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted to EPA by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00, “Statutory Authority; Legend; Preamble; Definitions,” effective on August 3, 2001, the definition for compliance certification.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00, “Statutory Authority; Legend; Preamble; Definitions,” effective on September 23, 2005, the definitions for adhesion promoter, Administrator, anti-glare safety coating, aqueous cleaner, automotive refinishing facility, bakery, capture efficiency, CEMS, CFR, combined cycle combustion turbine, dry bottom, duct burner, elastomeric coating, emergency or standby engine, emission statement, energy input capacity, EPA, existing facility, face firing, facility, federally enforceable, federal potential to emit or federal potential emissions, ferrous cupola foundry, four-stage coating system, fuel cell, fugitive emissions, glass, glass melting furnace, halogenated organic compound, hardener, hazardous air pollutant (HAP), heat release rate, impact-resistant coating, lean burn engine, lowest achievable emission rate (LAER), malfunction, maximum achievable control technology, maximum design capacity, mobile equipment, MW, natural draft opening, nonattainment area, nonattainment review, non-criteria pollutant, potential emissions or potential to emit, pretreatment wash primer, primer sealer, primer surfacer, reducer, simple cycle combustion turbine, single-stage topcoat, soap, specialty coating, stationary combustion turbine, stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine, stencil coating, stoker, surface preparation product, tangential firing, three-stage coating system, touch-up coating, two-stage topcoat, underbody coating, uniform finish blender.
(C) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00, “Statutory Authority; Legend; Preamble; Definitions,” effective on June 2, 2006, the definitions for water hold-out coating, weld-through primer, VOC composite partial pressure.
(D) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.05, “U Fuels All Districts,” paragraph (2), “U Use of Residual Fuel Oil or Hazardous Waste Fuel,” effective on September 23, 2005.
(E) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.18, “U Volatile and Halogenated Organic Compounds,” effective on September 23, 2005, paragraph (1), “U Applicability and Handling Requirements,” subparagraphs (a) and (c) through (f); paragraph (2), “U Compliance with Emission Limitations” (as corrected in Massachusetts Register 1037, October 21, 2005); paragraph (3), U Metal Furniture Coating, subparagraph (a); paragraph (4), U Metal Can Surface Coating, subparagraph (a); paragraph (11), “U Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products,” subparagraphs (a) through (d)(4.); paragraph (19), “Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacture,” subparagraphs (h) and (i); paragraph (20), “Emission Control Plans for Implementation of Reasonably Available Control Technology;” paragraph (21), “Surface Coating of Plastic Parts,” subparagraphs (a) through (d) and (f) through (i); paragraph (22), “Leather Surface Coating,” subparagraphs (a) through (c); paragraph (23), “Wood Products Surface Coating,” subparagraphs (b) through (i); paragraph (24), “Flat Wood Paneling Surface Coating,” subparagraphs (a) through (c) and subparagraphs (h) and (i); paragraph (25), “Offset Lithographic Printing,” subparagraphs (a) through (c); paragraph (26), “Textile Finishing,” subparagraphs (c) through (i); paragraph (27), “Coating Mixing Tanks;” paragraph (28), “Automotive Refinishing,” and paragraph (29), “Bakeries,” subparagraph (c) 2.
(F) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.19, “U Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX),” effective on August 3, 2001; paragraph (1), “Applicability,” subparagraph (c) 9. (as corrected in Massachusetts Register 938, January 4, 2002); paragraph (4), “Large Boilers,” subparagraphs (b)3.d. (as corrected in Massachusetts Register 938, January 4, 2002), (c) 2., and (f); paragraph (5), “Medium-size Boilers,” subparagraph (d).
(G) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.19, “U Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX),” paragraph (13), “Testing, Monitoring, Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements,” subparagraphs (a), “Applicability,” and (c), “Stack Testing”, effective September 23, 2005.
(H) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.24, “U Organic Material Storage and Distribution,” subparagraph (1), “Organic Material Storage Tanks,” effective September 23, 2005.
(I) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.24, “U Organic Material Storage and Distribution,” subparagraph (4), “Motor Vehicle Fuel Tank Trucks,” effective June 2, 2006.
(142) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00, “Statutory Authority; Legend; Preamble; Definitions,” the definition for volatile organic compound, effective on March 6, 2009.
(B) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.00, Appendix B, “U Emissions Banking, Trading, and Averaging,” section (4), “Emissions Averaging (Bubble),” paragraph (b)7, effective August 30, 2013.
(C) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.18, “U Volatile and Halogenated Organic Compounds,” section (1), “U Applicability and Handling Requirements,” paragraphs (d) and (f); section (2), “U Compliance with Emission Limitations,” paragraphs (b), (e), and (f); section (20), “Emission Control Plans for Implementation of Reasonably Available Control Technology,” paragraph (a); and section (30), “Adhesives and Sealants;” effective August 30, 2013.
(D) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.19, “U Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX),” section (1), “Applicability,” paragraph (c)9, effective August 30, 2013.
(E) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.25, “U Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial Products,” effective October 19, 2007.
(143) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on November 6, 2013.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.36 entitled “U Transit System Improvements,” effective in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on October 25, 2013.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection dated November 6, 2013 submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(144) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on May 5, 2015.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Regulation 310 CMR 7.00 entitled “Air Pollution Control: Definitions,” the definitions listed below, effective January 2, 2015, as published in the Massachusetts Register, Issue S1277, January 2, 2015:
(1) Aboveground Storage Tank or AST;
(2) Business Day;
(3) California Air Resources Board (or California ARB or CARB);
(4) Commence Operations;
(5) Emergency Motor Vehicle;
(6) Emergency Situation;
(7) Executive Order;
(8) Minor Modification;
(9) Monthly Throughput;
(10) Motor Vehicle;
(11) Motor Vehicle Fuel;
(12) Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Facility;
(13) Responsible Official;
(14) Routine Maintenance;
(15) Stage I CARB Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) Component or EVR;
(16) Stage I CARB Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) System;
(17) Stage I Component Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) System;
(18) Stage I Minor Modification;
(19) Stage I Non-Enhanced Vapor Recovery System;
(20) Stage I Routine Maintenance;
(21) Stage I Substantial Modification;
(22) Stage I System;
(23) Stage II Minor Modification;
(24) Stage II Routine Maintenance;
(25) Stage II Substantial Modification;
(26) Stage II System;
(27) Submerged Filling;
(28) Tank Truck;
(29) Vacuum Assist System;
(30) Vapor;
(31) Vapor Balance System;
(32) Vapor-Mounted Seal; and
(33) Vapor-Tight.
(B) Regulation 310 CMR 7.24, “Organic Material Storage and Distribution,” the sections listed below, effective January 2, 2015, as published in the Massachusetts Register, Issue S1277, January 2, 2015:
(1) 7.24(3) “Distribution of Motor Vehicle Fuel”;
(2) 7.24(4) “Motor Vehicle Fuel Tank Trucks”; and
(3) 7.24(6) “Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel”.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, dated May 5, 2015, submitting a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan.
(145) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 14, 2007. The submittal consists of an Infrastructure SIP for the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard.
(146) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on December 4, 2012. The submittal consists of an Infrastructure SIP for the 2008 lead national ambient air quality standard.
(147) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection on June 6, 2014. The submittal consists of Infrastructure SIPs for the 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, and 2010 SO2 national ambient air quality standards.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Section 6, “Financial interest of state employee, relative, or associates; disclosure,” of the Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, chapter 268A, “Conduct of Public Officials and Employees,” as amended by Statute 1978, chapter 210, § 9.
(B) Section 6A, “Conflict of interest of public officials; reporting requirement,” of the Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, chapter 268A, “Conduct of Public Officials and Employees,” as amended by Statute 1984, chapter 189, § 163.
[37 FR 10871, May 31, 1972. Redesignated at 83 FR 3967, Jan. 29, 2018]
§ 52.1167 EPA-approved Massachusetts State regulations.
The following table identifies the State regulations which have been submitted to and approved by EPA as revisions to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan. This table is for informational purposes only and does not have any independent regulatory effect. To determine regulatory requirements for a specific situation consult the plan identified in § 52.1120. To the extent that this table conflicts with § 52.1120, § 52.1120 governs.
| State citation | Title/subject | Date submitted by State | Date approved by EPA | Federal Register citation | 52.1120(c) | Comments/unapproved sections |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 310 CMR 6.04 | Standards | 7/25/90 | 10/04/02 | 67 FR 62187 | 120 | Adopt PM10 as the criteria pollutant for particulates. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 2/14/85 | 9/25/85 | 50 FR 38804 | 64 | Motor vehicle fuel. |
| 2/21/86; 2/25/86; 6/23/86 | 8/31/87 | 52 FR 32792 | 73 | Two new definitions and one amended definition. | ||
| Statutory authority; legend; preamble; definitions | 11/5/86; 12/10/86 | 11/19/87 | 52 FR 44395 | 74 | Approving the addition of definitions for synthetic organic chemical manufacturing facility, component, in gas service, light liquid, in light liquid service, leak, leaking component, monitor, repair, unit turnaround, in VOC service, quarterly, and pressure relief valve. | |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 7/18/88 | 5/4/89 | 54 FR 19184 | 78 | Includes bulk plant and terminal, gasoline market. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 1/30/91 | 10/8/92 | 57 FR 46312 | 96 | Definitions of no-build alternative, project area, project roadway, and tunnel ventilation system. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 05/17/90, 06/07/91 | 12/14/92 | 57 FR 58996 | 97 | Added “motor vehicle fuel,” “motor vehicle fuel dispensing facility,” “substantial modification,” and “vapor collection and control system.” |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Approving the following amended or additional definitions: Application area, asphalt, automobile, bottom filling, bulk terminal, coating line(s), commissioner, condensate, continuous compliance, crude oil, department, end sealing compound, exterior base coat, extreme environmental conditions, flashoff area, freeboard height, freeboard ratio, halogenated organic compound, interior base coat, interior body spray, knife coating, lease custody transfer, light duty truck, manufacturing plant, miscellaneous metal parts and products, overvarnish, paper surface coating, penetrating prime coat, petroleum liquids, prime coat, publication rotogravure printing, quench area, refrigerated chiller, Reid vapor pressure, roll printing, roll coating, single coat, solids, specialty printing, splash filling, standard conditions, submerged filling, three piece can side seam spray, topcoat, transfer efficiency, two piece can exterior end coating, vinyl surface coating, volatile organic compound, waxy, heavy pour crude oil. The definitions of “coating application system” and “bulk plants and terminals” have been deleted. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 8/27/82, 6/22/87, 12/27/89 | 2/23/93 | 58 FR 10970 | 84 | Approving the definitions of “stationary source” and “building, structure, facility, or installation.” |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 6/7/91 | 6/30/93 | 58 FR 34911 | 58 | Definitions: Bulk plants, vapor balance systems. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 12/9/91 | 10/4/94 | 59 FR 50498 | 101 | Definitions of baseline roadway conditions, high occupancy vehicle, high occupancy vehicle lane, peak hour, performance standard, and roadway threshold standard. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 11/15/93 05/11/94 |
2/1/95 | 60 FR 6030 | 103 | Approving additional definitions for. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 7/30/93 | 10/15/96 | 61 FR 53632 | 111 | Adding or amending the following definitions: motor vehicle parking space; off-peak parking spaces; remote parking spaces; and restricted use parking. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48303 | c(117) | |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 7/30/96 | 4/11/00 | 65 FR 19326 | 115 | Definition of “volatile organic compound” revised. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 1/11/95 3/29/95 |
4/11/00 | 65 FR 19326 | 121 | Definitions associated with marine vessel rule. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 07/25/95 08/09/00 9/11/00 | 12/18/00 | 65 FR 78976 | 116 | Definitions associated with State II vapor recovery rule. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 6/1/10 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Approved update to definition for volatile organic compound. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix A | Emission Offsets and Nonattainment Review | 7/15/94 and 4/14/95 | 10/27/00 | 65 FR 64363 | (c)(127) | Approving 1990 CAAA revisions and general NSR permit requirements |
| 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B | U Emissions Banking, Trading, and Averaging. | 7/10/14 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Approved amended language regarding emissions averaging bubbles. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B (except 310 CMR 7.00 Appendix B(3)(e)5.h) | Emissions Banking, Trading, and Averaging | 2/9/94 3/29/95 |
8/8/96 | 61 FR 41338 | 112 | Replaces earlier emissions averaging rules with emissions banking, trading, and averaging. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 and 7.02(12)(c) | 2/14 and 5/22/85 | 9/25/85 | 50 FR 38806 | 64 | Motor vehicle fuel tank trucks. | |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 7/25/90 | 10/04/02 | 67 FR 62187 | 120 | Add a definition of PM10. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 8/9/01 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Approved the definition for compliance certification. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Approving the following definitions, effective 9/23/05: adhesion promoter, Administrator, anti-glare safety coating, aqueous cleaner, automotive refinishing facility, bakery, capture efficiency, CEMS, CFR, combined cycle combustion turbine, dry bottom, duct burner, elastomeric coating, emergency or standby engine , emission statement, energy input capacity, EPA, existing facility, face firing, facility, federally enforceable, federal potential to emit or federal potential emissions, ferrous cupola foundry, four-stage coating system, fuel cell, fugitive emissions, glass, glass melting furnace, halogenated organic compound, hardener, hazardous air pollutant (HAP), heat release rate, impact resistant coating, lean burn engine, lowest achievable emission rate (LAER), malfunction, maximum achievable control technology, maximum design capacity, mobile equipment, MW, natural draft opening, nonattainment area, nonattainment review, non-criteria pollutant, potential emissions or potential to emit, pretreatment wash primer, primer sealer, primer surfacer, reducer, simple cycle combustion turbine, single-stage topcoat, soap, specialty coating, stationary combustion turbine, stationary reciprocating internal combustion engine, stencil coating, stoker, surface preparation product, tangential firing, three-stage coating system, touch-up coating, two-stage topcoat, underbody coating, uniform finish blender. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Approving the following amended or added definitions, effective 6/2/06: water hold-out coating, weld-through primer, VOC composite partial pressure. |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 12/13/06 | 07/31/08 | 73 FR 44654 | 136 | Addition of the term, “Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization.” |
| 12/13/06 | 07/31/08 | 73 FR 44654 | 136 | Massachusetts Regulation Filing, dated November 16, 2006, substantiating December 1, 2006, State effective date for amended 310 CMR 7.00 entitled “Definition,” (addition of term “Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization,” which appears on the replaced page 173 of the State's Code of Massachusetts Regulations.). | ||
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Definitions | 8/9/12 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Approving the definition of “Sulfur in Fuel.” |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Table of MA cities and towns with corresponding DEP Regional offices | 11/13/07 | 4/24/14 | 79 FR 22774 | 140 | |
| 310 CMR 7.00 | Air Pollution Control: Definitions | 5/5/15 | 11/29/16 | 81 FR 85901 | 144 | Revises definitions that relate to Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery systems. |
| 310 CMR 7.02 | Plans and approval and emission limitations | 4/27/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 2 | |
| 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 4 | |||
| 5/27/82 9/9/82 |
1/10/84 | 49 FR 1187 | 60 | 7.02(2)(b)(4) and 7.02(2)(5) for new source review. | ||
| 12/3/85 1/31/86 2/11/86 |
11/25/86 | 51 FR 42564 | 69 | Adds the word “major” before the word “modification” at 7.02(2)(b). | ||
| 310 CMR 7.02 | Plans and approval and emission limitation | |||||
| 11/21/86 1/15/87 |
3/10/89 | 54 FR 10148 | 72 | 7.02(2)(b) 4, 5 and 6-new source review. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.02(11) | Emission limitations for incinerators | 2/1/78 | 3/15/79 | 44 FR 15704 | 18 | Adds an emission limitation for sewage sludge incinerators. |
| 310 CMR 7.02(12) | U Organic Material | 8/17/89 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | 310 CMR 7.02(12) has been recodified and relocated in 310 CMR 7.24, “U Organic Material Storage and Distribution.” All subsections and references in 310 CMR 7.02(12) have been recodified accordingly. |
| 310CMR 7.02(12) | U Restricted Emission Status | 6/6/94 | 4/5/95 | 60 FR 17229 | 105 | This rule limits a source's potential to emit, therefore avoiding RACT, title V operating permits |
| 310 CMR 7.02(12)(a)(b) | Organic material, bulk plants and terminals handling organic material | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |
| 310 CMR 7.02(12)(a)1e | Gasoline liquid storage in external floating roof tanks | 12/2/83 | 3/8/84 | 49 FR 8611 | 56 | Approved for secondary seals or equivalent weather roofs. |
| 310 CMR 7.02(12)(b)2 | Stage I vapor recovery | 5/20/77 | 5/25/78 | 43 FR 22356 | 15 | Provisions for Pioneer APCD Stage I vapor recovery. |
| 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |||
| 3/25/83 | 7/7/83 | 48 FR 31200 | 55 | Exempt Berkshire APCD. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.02(12)(b)3 | Stage I vapor recovery | 11/21/86 1/15/87 |
3/10/89 | 54 FR 10148 | 72 | 7.02(12)(b)3 is deleted. |
| 310 CMR 7.02(12) (c) and (d) | Gasoline Tank Trucks | 2/14/85 5/22/85 |
9/25/85 | 50 FR 38804 | 64 | Tank trucks. |
| 310 CMR 7.02(12)(d) | Test Methods applicable to 310 CMR 7.02(12) | 11/21/86 1/15/87 |
3/10/89 | 54 FR 10148 | 72 | Requires EPA approved test methods or EPA approved alternatives. |
| 310 CMR 7.02(12)(e) | Gasoline Volatility | 7/18/88 9/15/88 4/12/89 |
5/4/89 | 54 FR 19184 | 78 | Approves a limitation on volatility of gasoline from June 30 for Sept. 15, 1989, and May 1 to Sept. 15 in subsequent years. |
| 310 CMR 7.03(13) | Paint spray booths | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48303 | c(117) | Adds the following coating operations: plastic parts surface coating, leather surface coating, wood product surface coating, and flat wood paneling surface coating. |
| 310 CMR 7.04(2) | U Fossil fuel Utilization Facilities | 11/13/07 | 4/24/14 | 79 FR 22774 | 140 | Clarifies new applicability requirements for smoke density instrument removal for certain facilities. |
| 310 CMR 7.04(4)(a) | U Fossil Fuel Utilization Facilities | 11/13/07 | 4/24/14 | 79 FR 22774 | 140 | Requires inspection, maintenance testing at facilities with heat inputs over 3 MMBtu/ hr (excluding combustion turbines and engines); requires posting of test results near facilities. |
| 310 CMR 7.04(5) | Fuel oil viscosity | 12/28/78 | 6/17/80 | 45 FR 40987 | 29 | For Cambridge Electric Light Company's Kendal Station, and Blackstone Station. |
| 12/28/78 | 10/18/80 | 45 FR 48131 | 29 | Correction notice. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05 | Sulfur-in-fuel | 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23058 | 4 | |
| 7/5/78 | 2/7/79 | 44 FR 7712 | 17 | Approves the burning of coal/oil slurry at New England Power Company, Salem Harbor Station, MA. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05 | U Fuels All Districts | 8/9/12 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Approves the sulfur content of fuel oil. The following sections were not submitted as part of the SIP: (1)(a)(3), (2), (3), (4), (7), (8), (9). |
| 310 CMR 7.05(1)(a) | Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for Berkshire APCD | 4/14/77 | 3/24/78 | 43 FR 12324 | 13 | Approves the burning of 1% for all but: Crane and Company Inc., and Schweitzer Division, Kimberly Clark Corporation, Columbia Mill. |
| 4/14/77 8/11/78 8/31/78 |
3/7/79 | 44 FR 12422 | 13 | Approves the burning of 2.2% at Crane & Co., Inc., and Schweitzer Division, Kimberly-Clark Corp., Columbia Mill. | ||
| 11/8/82 | 4/28/83 | 48 FR 19172 | 54 | Approves burning of 2.2% at Esleek Manufacturing Company, Inc., provided the fuel firing rate does not exceed 137.5 gallons per hour. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05(1)(b) | Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for Central APCD | 6/25/76 | 2/15/77 | 42 FR 9176 | 10 | Approves the burning of 2.2% until 7/1/78 for 100 mBtu sources listed in 52.1126. |
| 3/29/76 5/25/76 |
5/19/77 | 42 FR 25730 | 11 | Approves burning of 2.2% at James River Associates, Inc. and part of Fitchburg Paper Company, April through October. November through March, they are limited to burning 1% sulfur-in-fuel oil. | ||
| 6/25/76 8/22/77 |
6/21/78 | 43 FR 26573 | 10 | Extends expiration date to 6/21/78. | ||
| 3/2/79 | 7/16/79 | 44 FR 41180 | 24 | Permanent extension for certain sources to burn 2.2% under specified conditions. | ||
| Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for central APCD | 9/28/79 | 6/17/80 | 45 FR 40987 | 24 | Approves the burning of 2.2% at Fitchburg Paper (55 Meter stacks only) for James River, Massachusetts, Inc., year round. | |
| 3/20/80 | 9/10/80 | 45 FR 59578 | 31 | Approves the temporary burning of 2.2% at Seaman Paper Co., Templeton. | ||
| 3/2/79 5/5/81 |
9/17/81 | 46 FR 46133 | 33 | Approves the burning of 2.2% at Millers Falls Paper Co. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05(1)(c) | Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for Merrimack Valley | 6/4/76 | 12/30/76 | 41 FR 56804 | 8 | Approves the burning of 2.2% except at those sources listed in 52.1126. |
| 1/28/76 12/30/76 |
7/12/77 | 42 FR 35830 | 8 | Approves burning of 1.4% at Haverhill Paperboard Corp., Haverhill, MA. | ||
| 1/28/76 | ||||||
| 8/22/77 12/30/76 |
6/21/78 | 43 FR 26573 | 8 | Extends expiration date to 7/1/79. | ||
| 12/28/78 | 5/21/79 | 44 FR 29453 | 20 | Permanent extension to burn 2.2%. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05(1)(d) | Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for Metropolitan Boston APCD | 7/11/75 9/16/75 |
12/5/75 | 40 FR 56889 | 6 | Approves burning of 1% for large electric generating facilities in certain cities and towns and 2.2% for smaller facilities. Effective 7/1/75 to 7/1/77. |
| 7/11/75 4/1/77 |
8/22/77 | 42 FR 42218 | 6 | Extends expiration date from 7/1/77 to 7/1/78 except for Eastman Gelatin Corp., which must burn 1%. | ||
| 4/20/78 | 11/30/78 | 43 FR 56040 | 6 | Extends expiration date from 7/1/78 to 7/1/79. | ||
| Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for Metropolitan Boston APCD | 12/28/78 | 5/21/79 | 44 FR 29453 | 20 | Permanent extension to burn 2.2%. | |
| 4/25/80 | 1/27/81 | 46 FR 8476 | 34 | Approves the burning of 2.2% at Natick Paperboard Corp. | ||
| 11/25/80 | 8/11/81 | 46 FR 40688 | 38 | Approves the increase to 2.2% at Boston Edison Mystic Generating Station for 30 months from 8/11/81 (expires 2/11/84). | ||
| 7/14/81 | 12/16/81 | 46 FR 61123 | 41 | Approves burning of 2.2% at Haverhill Paper Corp. | ||
| 11/27/79 | 12/15/80 | 45 FR 82251 | 32 | Allows the burning of 2.2% at Proctor and Gamble. | ||
| 9/24/81 | 12/15/81 | 46 FR 61118 | 43 | Approves burning of 2.2% at Eastman Gelatin Corp. | ||
| 12/7/83 | 9/25/84 | 49 FR 37592 | 65 | Approves burning of 2.2% at Boston Edison Mystic Generating Station until 3/25/87. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05(1)(e) | Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for Pioneer Valley APCDs | 7/22/77 | 2/1/77 | 42 FR 5957 | 9 | Approves 2.2% except for sources listed in 52.1125. |
| 7/22/76 | ||||||
| 8/22/77 12/27/77 |
6/21/78 | 43 FR 26573 | 9 | Extends expiration date to 7/1/79. | ||
| 1/3/79 | 5/21/79 | 44 FR 29453 | 21 | Permanent extension to burn 2.2% | ||
| 3/2/80 | 1/19/81 | 45 FR 4918 | 33 | Approves the burning of 2.2% at all sources in Franklin and Hampshire Counties rated at less than 100 mBtu except Esleek Manufacturing Co., and Millers Falls Paper Co. | ||
| 10/13/81 | 2/10/82 | 47 FR 6011 | 45 | Approves the burning of 2.2% at Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, Holyoke, MA. | ||
| 7/18/84 4/17/85 3/16/87 11/25/87 |
2/15/90 | 55 FR 5449 | 77 | Approves the burning of 2.2% and imposes fuel use limits at American Fiber and Finishing Co., Erving Paper Co., and Westfield River Paper Co. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05(1)(f) | Sulfur content of fuels and control thereof for Southeastern APCD | 12/30/76 | 9/2/77 | 42 FR 44235 | 12 | Approves burning of 2.2% for sources listed in 52.1126, all others must continue to burn 1%. |
| 12/30/76 1/31/78 |
9/8/78 | 43 FR 40010 | 12 | Extends expiration date from 5/1/78 to 7/1/79. | ||
| 1/31/79 | 5/21/79 | 44 FR 29453 | 22 | Permanent extension to burn 2.2%. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.05(2) | U Fuels All Districts; U Use of Residual Fuel Oil or Hazardous Waste Fuel | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Removed landfill gas from requirements of section. |
| 310 CMR 7.05(4) | Ash content of fuels for Pioneer Valley for APCD | 1/3/79 | 5/21/79 | 44 FR 29453 | 21 | |
| Ash content of fuels for Metropolitan Boston APCD | 7/20/79 | 5/21/79 | 44 FR 29453 | 23 | ||
| Ash content of fuels | 12/3/85 1/31/86 2/11/86 |
11/25/86 | 51 FR 42564 | 69 | Includes Berkshire Air Pollution Control District to 7.05(4)(b)(2) so facilities in that district can apply to burn fossil fuel with an ash content in excess of 9 pct bydry weight. | |
| 310 CMR 7.06 | Visible emissions | 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 4 | |
| 7/5/78 | 2/7/79 | 44 FR 7712 | 17 | Approves New England Power Company, Salem Harbor Station to burn a coal oil slurry. | ||
| 12/28/79 | 8/12/80 | 45 FR 53476 | 17 | Extension of temporary revision to allow exceedance of 20% capacity limit at New England Power Company's Salem Harbor Station, Salem, MA Unit 1 so can burn 30% coal/70% oil mixture until 12/31/80. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.07 | Open burning | 12/9/77 | 9/29/78 | 43 FR 44841 | 16 | Two revisions with conditions to permit open burning of brush cane, driftwood and forest debris for 2 months of the year. |
| Open burning | 9/28/79 | 6/17/80 | 45 FR 40987 | 27 | Approves open burning (as in (c) 16) from 1/15 to 5/1 in certain areas of the State. | |
| 310 CMR 7.08 | Incinerators | 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 4 | |
| 310 CMR 7.08(2), except sections: (a); the definition of “Material Separation Plan” in (c); (d)1; (d)2; (d)3; (d)4; (d)5; (d)6; (d)8; (f)1; (f)2; (f)5; (f)6; (f)7; (g)1; (g)2; (g)3; (g)4; (h)2.a; (h)2.b; (h)2.d; (h)2.e; (h)2.g; (h)2.h; (h)4; (h)5.a; (h)5.c; (h)5.d; (h)9; (h)10; (h)13; (i)1.b; (i)1.g; (i)2.c; (i)2.d; (i)2.e; and (k)3. | MWC NOX requirements | 1/11/99 | 9/2/99 | 64 FR 48098 | 119 | Only approved NOX related requirements of state plan for MWCs. The following sections were not submitted as part of the SIP: (a), the definition of “Material Separation Plan” in (c), (d)1, (d)2, (d)3, (d)4, (d)5, (d)6, (d)8, (f)1, (f)2, (f)5, (f)6, (f)7, (g)1, (g)2, (g)3, (g)4, (h)2.a, (h)2.b, (h)2.d, (h)2.e, (h)2.g, (h)2.h, (h)4, (h)5.a, (h)5.c, (h)5.d, (h)9, (h)10, (h)13, (i)1.b, (i)1.g, (i)2.c, (i)2.d, (i)2.e, and (k)3. |
| 310 CMR 7.08(2) | MWC NOX requirements | 8/9/12 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Facility specific MWC Emission Control Plan for Wheelabrator Saugus revises the NOX limits to 185 ppm by volume at 7% O2 dry basis (30-day rolling average). |
| 310 CMR 7.09 | Dust and odor | 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 4 | |
| 12/9/77 | 9/29/78 | 43 FR 44841 | 16 | Adds a requirement that mechanized street sweeping equipment must be equipped and operated with a suitable dust collector or suppression system. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.12 | Inspection Certificate Record Keeping and Reporting | 6/28/90; 9/30/92; 7/15/94 | 3/21/96 | 61 FR 11560 | 106 | The 6/28/90 and 9/30/92 submittals deal with the permitting process. The 7/15/94 submittal develops 7.12 to comply with emission statement requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.12 | U Source Registration | 5/31/01, 8/23/05 & 11/13/07 | 4/24/14 | 79 FR 22774 | 140 | Revises applicability threshold emission levels, expands list of sources required to report emissions, and clarifies types of information reported. |
| 310 CMR 7.12 | U Source Registration | 5/10/2018 | 4/3/2019 | 84 FR 7299 | Revisions made to existing requirements and procedures for emissions reporting. | |
| 310 CMR 7.14(2) | Continuous Emissions Monitoring | 11/21/86 1/15/85 |
3/10/89 | 54 FR 10148 | 72 | References 40 CFR part 51, Appendix P. |
| 310 CMR 7.14(3) | Continuous Emissions Monitoring | 11/21/86 1/15/87 |
3/10/89 | 54 FR 10148 | 72 | Establishes compliance date for meeting the requirements of 7.14(2). |
| 310 CMR 7.15 | Asbestos application | 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 4 | |
| 310 CMR 7.16 | Reduction to single passenger commuter vehicle use | 5/20/77 | 5/25/78 | 43 FR 22356 | 15 | For Pioneer Valley APCD. |
| 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | Reduction of single occupant commuter vehicles. | |||
| 310 CMR 7.17 | Coal conversion | 9/7/78 | 5/14/79 | 44 FR 27991 | 19 | Brayton Point Station, New England Power Company. |
| 1/22/82 | 6/9/82 | 47 FR 25007 | 49 | Mount Tom Plant, Holyoke, MA Holyoke Water Power Company. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(1) | U Applicability and Handling Requirements | 8/17/89 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Approval of 310 CMR CMR 7.18(1), (a), (c), (d) and (e). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(1)(a), (c)-(f). | U Applicability and Handling Requirements | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Added requirements for proper storage of volatile organic compounds. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(1)(d) and (f). | U Applicability and Handling Requirements | 7/10/14 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Revisions made to clarify applicability requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(2) | U Compliance with Emission Limitations | 8/27/82; 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Approval of 310 CMR 7.18(2), (2)(a), (2)(b), (2)(c) and (2)(e). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(2) | Compliance with emission limitations | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds an exemption for coatings used in small amounts, and a section on daily weighted averaging. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(2) | U Compliance with Emission Limitations | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Addition of daily weighted averaging provision. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b) | Generic VOC bubble for surface coaters | 3/6/81 11/12/81 |
3/29/82 | 47 FR 13143 | 42 | Includes surface coating of metal cans, large appliances, magnet wire insulation, automobiles, paper fabric and vinyl. |
| Generic VOC bubble for surface coaters | 6/24/80 | 7/12/82 | 47 FR 30060 | 47 | Adds metal coils. | |
| Generic VOC bubble for surface coaters | 3/29/95 | 8/8/96 | 61 FR 41338 | 112 | Replaces earlier emissions averaging rules for surface coaters. | |
| 7/21/81 3/10/81 |
6/2/82 | 47 FR 23927 | 48 | Adds miscellaneous metal parts and products and graphic arts-rotogravure and flexography. | ||
| 9/9/82 | 2/3/83 | 48 FR 5014 | 53 | Adds metal furniture. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b), (e), (f). | U Compliance with Emission Limitations | 7/10/14 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Revisions made clarifying eligibility for bubbling coating lines together for compliance purposes. |
| 310 CMR 7.18 (2)(e) | Compliance with emission limitations | 3/6/89 | 54 FR 9213 | Testing requirements for plan approvals issued under 310 CMR 7.18(17). | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(3) | Metal furniture surface coating | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(3) | U Metal Furniture Surface Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(3). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(3)(a) | U Metal Furniture Coating | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Minor wording change. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(4) | Metal can surface coating | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(4) | U Metal Can Surface Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(4). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(4)(a) | U Metal Can Surface Coating | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Minor wording change. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(5) | Large appliances surface coating | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(5) | U Large Appliance Surface Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(5). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(6) | Magnet wire insulation surface coating | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(6) | U Magnet Wire Insulation Surface Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(6). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(7) | Automobile surface coating | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 45 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(7) | Automobile Surface Coating | 8/17/89, 6/7/91 | 10/8/92 | 57 FR 46316 | 92 | |
| 310 CMR 7.18(7) | Automobile surface coating | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Revises a limit for primer surface coating. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(8) | Solvent metal degreasing | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | Conditional approval requiring controls for small solvent metal degreasers. |
| 8/13/83 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Approves public education program for small degreasers and removes conditional approval. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(8) | Solvent Metal Degreasing | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds a typographical correction. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(8) | U Solvent Metal Degreasing | 8/17/89 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Approval of 310 CMR 7.18(8), (8)(d), (8)(d)1., (8)(e), (8)(f) and (8)(g). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(8) | U Solvent Metal Degreasing | 6/7/91 | 6/30/93 | 58 FR 34911 | 58 | Approval of 310 CMR 7.18 (8), (8)(a), (8)(a)1., (8)(a)2., (8)(a)3., (8)(a)4., (8)(a)5., (8)(a)6., (8)(b), (8)(b)1., (8)(b)2., (8)(b)3., (8)(b)4., (8)(b)5., (8)(b)6., (8)(b)7., (8)(b)8., (8)(b)9., (8)(b)10., (8)(b)11., (8)(b)12., (8)(b)13., (8)(c), (8)(c)1., (8)(c)2., (8)(c)3., (8)(c)4., (8)(c)5., (8)(c)6., (8)(c)7., (8)(c)8., (8)(c)9., (8)(d)2., (8)(d)3. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(8) | Solvent Metal Degreasing | 6/1/10 | 9/13/2013 | 78 FR 54960 | 138 | |
| 310 CMR 7.18(9) | Cutback asphalt | 12/31/78 5/16/79 |
9/16/80 | 45 FR 61293 | 30 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds an exemption. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(9) | U Cutback Asphalt | 8/17/89 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(9). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(10) | Surface coating of metal coils | 6/24/80 | 7/12/82 | 47 FR 30060 | 47 | Approves and adds to 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b). |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods and removes extended compliance schedule. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(10) | U Metal Coil Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(10). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(11) | Surface coating of miscellaneous metal parts and products | 7/21/81 3/10/82 |
6/2/82 | 47 FR 23927 | 48 | Adds to 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b). |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(11) | Surface coating of miscellaneous metal parts and products | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Revises a reference. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(11) | U Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products | 8/17/89 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Approval of 310 CMR 7.18(11), (11)(b), (11)(c), (11)(d) and (11)(e). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(11) | U Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products | 6/7/91 | 6/30/93 | 58 FR 34911 | 58 | Approval of 310 CMR 7.18 (11), (11)(a), (11)(a)1., (11)(a)2., (11)(a)3. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(11)(a)-(d)4. | U Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Wording revision to clarify exemption requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(12) | Graphic arts | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Amends applicability to 50 tons per year VOC. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(12) | Graphic arts-rotogravure and flexography | 7/21/81 3/10/82 |
6/2/82 | 47 FR 23927 | 48 | Adds to 310 CMR 7.18(2)(b). |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | |||
| 310 CMR 7.18(12) | U Graphic Arts | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(12). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(13) | Perchloroethylene dry cleaning systems | 7/21/81 3/10/82 |
6/2/82 | 47 FR 23927 | 48 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(13) | U Dry Cleaning Systems-Percholor-ethylene | 8/17/89 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Approval of 310 CMR 7.18(13), (13)(c), (13)(d) and (13)(e). 310 CMR 7.18(13)(a) 8. has been deleted. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(14) | Paper surface coating | 3/6/81 | 3/8/82 | 47 FR 9836 | 40 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(14) | U Paper Surface Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(14). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(15) | Fabric surface coating | 3/6/81 | 3/8/82 | 47 FR 9836 | 40 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(15) | U Fabric Surface Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(15). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(16) | Vinyl surface coating | 3/6/81 | 3/8/82 | 47 FR 9836 | 40 | |
| 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | Adds test methods. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.18(16) | U Vinyl Surface Coating | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(16). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | RACT | 9/9/82 | 11/9/83 | 48 FR 51480 | 53 | All 100 ton per year sources not covered by a CTG. |
| RACT | 3/6/89 | 54 FR 9213 | Enforceability of plan approvals issued under 310 CMR 7.18(17). | |||
| 6/20/89 | 11/3/89 | 54 FR 46388 | 81 | RACT for Cranston Print Works Company dated June 20, 1989. | ||
| 7/12/89 | 11/8/89 | 54 FR 46895 | 80 | RACT for Spalding Corporation Plan Approval dated October 7, 1985 and amended Plan Approval dated July 12, 1989. | ||
| 8/8/89 | 11/8/89 | 54 FR 46897 | 82 | RACT for Duro Textile Printers (SM-85-168-IF). | ||
| 6/20/89 | 2/21/90 | 55 FR 5990 | 79 | RACT Compliance Plan Conditional Approval for Monsanto Chemical Company in Indian Orchard dated 6/20/89. | ||
| 11/17/89 | 8/3/90 | 55 FR 31590 | 85 | RACT for Boston Whaler in Norwell. Amended Plan Approval 4P89005 dated October 19, 1989 and Plan Approval 4P89005 Correction dated Nov. 17, 1989. | ||
| 11/17/89 | 8/3/90 | 55 FR 31593 | 86 | RACT for Boston Whaler in Rockland. Amended Plan Approval (4P89006) dated October 19, 1989 and Plan Approval 4P89006 Correction dated November 17, 1989. | ||
| Non-CTG RACT determination | 11/2/89 | 11/27/90 | 55 FR 34915 | 87 | RACT for Philips Lighting Company in Lynn, MA, dated November 2, 1989. | |
| RACT | 7/9/90 | 2/19/91 | 56 FR 6569 | 89 | RACT for General Motors Corporation in Framingham. Amended Plan Approval dated June 8, 1990. | |
| RACT | 6/13/90 | 2/27/91 | 56 FR 8132 | 88 | RACT for Acushnet Company, Titleist Golf Division, Plant A in New Bedford. Amended Plan Approval dated June 1, 1990. | |
| RACT | 10/16/90 | 3/20/91 | 56 FR 11677 | 90 | RACT for Erving Paper Mills. | |
| RACT | 4/22/90 | 10/8/91 | 56 FR 50660 | 91 | RACT amendment for Erving. | |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | RACT | 5/13/91 | 12/14/92 | 57 FR 58993 | 95 | RACT for Dartmouth Finishing Corporation. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | U Reasonable Available Control Technology | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Approval of 310 CMR 7.18(17), (17)(a), (17)(b), (17)(c), (17)(d), (17)(e) and (17)(f). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | RACT | 5/22/92 | 7/28/94 | 59 FR 38374 | (99) | RACT Approval for S. Bent & Bros. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | RACT | 7/19/93 1993 | 1/6/95 | 60 FR 2017 | 100 | RACT Approval for Nichols & Stone Co. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | Reasonably Available Control Technology | 3/31/94 | 3/6/95 | 60 FR 12125 | 104 | RACT for Brittany Dyeing and Finishing of New Bedford, MA. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | Reasonable available control technology | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds new VOC RACT requirements in the Springfield, Mass. ozone nonattainment area only. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | Reasonable Available Control Technology | 2/17/93 | 10/4/02 | 67 FR 62183 | 129 | Approves VOC RACT requirements for the eastern Massachusetts ozone nonattainment area. (These requirements were previously approved for the western Massachusetts ozone nonattainment area.) |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | Reasonable Available Control Technology | 10/7/99 | 10/4/02 | 67 FR 62183 | 129 | VOC RACT plan approval for Gilette. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | Reasonable Available Control Technology | 10/7/99 | 10/4/02 | 67 FR 62183 | 129 | VOC RACT plan approval for Norton. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | Reasonable Available Control Technology | 4/16/99 | 10/4/02 | 67 FR 62183 | 129 | VOC RACT plan approval for Rex. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(17) | Reasonable Available Control Technology | 4/16/99 | 10/4/02 | 67 FR 62183 | 129 | VOC RACT plan Available for Barnet. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(18) | Polystyrene Resin Manufacture | 2/21/86; 2/25/86; 6/23/86 | 8/31/87 | 52 FR 32792 | 73 | Regulation pursuant to Group III CTG, “Control of VOC Emissions from the Manufacture of Polystyrene Resins”. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(18) | U Polystyrene Resin Manufacturing Technology | 8/17/89; 6/7/91 | 1/11/93 | 58 FR 3495 | 93 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.18(18). |
| 310 CMR 7.18(19) | Synthetic organic chemical manufacture | 11/5/86; 12/10/86 | 11/19/87 | 52 FR 44395 | 74 | |
| 310 CMR 7.18(19)(h), (i) | Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacture | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Clarification of quarterly reporting submittal date. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(20) | Emission Control Plans for implementa-tion of reasonably available control technology | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds new VOC RACT requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(20) | Emission Control Plans for Implementation Reasonably Available Control Technology | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Clarification of exemption requirements, and inclusion of provision allowing for additional requirements such as stack testing or emissions monitoring. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(20)(a), (b) | Emission Control Plans for Implementation of RACT | 7/10/14 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Clarification of entities required to submit emission control plans. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(21) | Surface coating of plastic parts | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds VOC RACT for plastic parts surface coating. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(21)(a)-(d), (f)-(i) | Surface Coating of Plastic Parts | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Added language strengthening compliance obligations. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(22) | Leather surface coating | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds VOC RACT for leather surface coating. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(22)(a)-(c) | Leather Surface Coating | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Added language strengthening compliance obligations. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(23) | Wood products surface coating | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds VOC RACT for wood product surface coating. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(23)(b)-(i) | Wood Products Surface Coating | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Added language strengthening compliance obligations. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(24) | Flat wood paneling surface coating | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds VOC RACT for flat wood paneling surface coating. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(24)(a)-(c), (h), (i) | Flat Wood Paneling Surface Coating | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Added language strengthening compliance obligations. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(25) | Offset lithographic printing | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds VOC RACT for offset lithographic printing. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(25)(a)-(c) | Offset Lithographic Printing | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Added language strengthening compliance obligations. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(26) | Textile finishing | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds VOC RACT for textile finishing. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(26)(c)-(i) | Textile Finishing | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Added language strengthening compliance obligations. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(27) | Coating mixing tanks | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Adds VOC RACT for coating mixing tanks. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(27) | Coating Mixing Tanks | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Minor wording changes to improve clarity of regulation. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(28) | Automotive Refinishing | 01/09/95 | 2/14/96 | 61 FR 5699 | 109 | Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirement (RACT) for automotive refinishing. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(28) | Automotive Refinishing | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | New emission limits, labeling, recordkeeping requirements, and exemptions added. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(29) | Bakeries | 03/29/95 | 7/5/00 | 65 FR 41346 | 110 | Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirement (RACT) for bakeries. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(29)(c)(2) | Bakeries | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Updated cross reference. |
| 310 CMR 7.18(30) | Adhesives and Sealants | 7/10/14 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Regulation limiting emissions from adhesives and sealants. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | Interim sulfur-in-fuel limitations for fossil fuel utilization facilities pending conversion to an alternate fuel or implementation of permanent energy conservation measures | 9/12/80 | 3/19/81 | 46 FR 17551 | 37 | Energy/environment initiative. |
| 12/29/81 | 4/13/82 | 47 FR 15790 | 46 | ATF Davidson Company, Northbridge, MA temporary sulfur-in-fuel revision until 12/1/83. | ||
| 9/28/82 | 12/1/82 | 47 FR 54072 | 52 | Polaroid Corp., Waltham, MA temporary sulfur/in/fuel relaxation until 6/1/85. | ||
| 6/2/83 | 48 FR 24689 | 52 | Correction notice. | |||
| 9/29/82 | 11/23/82 | 47 FR 52704 | 51 | Northeast Petroleum Corp., Chelsea, MA sulfur content increase from 0.28 to 0.55 lbs/mBtu heat release potential permanently. | ||
| 4/4/83 | 3/23/84 | 49 FR 11092 | 59 | Stanley Woolen Co., Uxbridge, to burn 2.2% until 9/23/86. | ||
| 10/31/83 | 3/23/84 | 49 FR 11091 | 61 | Reed and Barton Silversmiths, Taunton, to burn 2.2% until 9/23/86. | ||
| 11/16/83 | 7/30/84 | 49 FR 30306 | 62 | ATF Davidson Company, Northbridge, to burn 2.2% permanently. | ||
| 2/2/84 | 6/15/84 | 49 FR 24723 | 63 | American Biltrite Corporation, Chelsea, to burn 1.0% until 12/15/86. | ||
| 7/11/84 | 9/25/84 | 49 FR 37591 | 67 | James River Corporation, Hyde Park Mill, Boston to burn 2.2% until 3/25/87. | ||
| 2/8/85, 10/23/85 | 4/1/86 | 51 FR 11021 | 68 | Phillips Academy, Andover, MA to burn 2.2% until September 1, 1988. | ||
| Interim sulfur-in-fuel limitations for fossil fuel utilities pending conversion to an alternative fuel or implementation of permanent energy conservation measures | 2/19/86 | 8/12/86 | 51 FR 28814 | 70 | Mary Ellen McCormick and Malverick Family Development facilities in the Boston Housing Authority, Boston to burn 2.2% until February 12, 1989. | |
| 5/12/86 | 11/25/86 | 51 FR 42565 | 71 | Mission Hill Extension Family Development facility, in the Boston Housing Authority, Boston, MA to burn 2.2% until May 25, 1989. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.19 | NOX RACT | 7/15/94 | 9/2/99 | 64 FR 48098 | 119 | NOX RACT regulations. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | NOX RACT | 10/4/96 | 9/2/99 | 64 FR 48098 | 119 | Facility specific NOX RACT for Specialty Minerals, Incorporated. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | NOX RACT | 12/2/96 | 9/2/99 | 64 FR 48098 | 119 | Facility specific NOX RACT for Monsanto Company's Indian Orchard facility. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | NOX RACT | 4/16/99 | 9/2/99 | 64 FR 48098 | 119 | Facility specific NOX RACT for Turners Falls Limited Partnership/Indeck Energy Services Turners Falls, Inc., in Montague. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | NOX RACT | 4/16/99 | 9/2/99 | 64 FR 48099 | 119 | Facility specific NOX RACT for Medusa Minerals Company in Lee. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | NOX RACT | 4/16/99 | 9/2/99 | 64 FR 48099 | 119 | Approval of the replacement of section 310 CMR 7.19(1)(c)1, (1)(c)8, (2)(b), (3)(a), (3)(c)2, (4)(a)3.b, (7)(a)4, (9), (13)(a), (13)(a)3, (13)(a)9, and (13)(a)13. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 | NOX RACT | 12/30/11 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Facility specific NOX RACT for General Electric Aviation Boiler No. 3 to cap annual SO2 and NOX emissions at 249.0 tons each. |
| 310 CMR 7.19(1)(c)(9) | NOx RACT | 7/10/14 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Update made to section 1, applicability. |
| 310 CMR 7.19(1)(c)(9), (4)(b)(3)d, (f), (5)d | NOX RACT | 8/9/01; 1/18/02 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Updates to sections pertaining to applicability, large boilers, and medium size boilers. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 (2)(d) | Generic NOX bubbling and trading for RACT sources | 3/29/95 | 8/8/96 | 61 FR 41338 | 112 | Adds credit creation option for NOX RACT sources. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 (2)(g) | Generic NOX bubbling and trading for RACT sources | 3/29/95 | 8/8/96 | 61 FR 41338 | 112 | Adds credit use option for NOX RACT sources. |
| 310 CMR 7.19(13)(a), (c) | NOX RACT | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Updates to applicability and stack testing requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.19(13)(b) | Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems | 11/19/99 | 12/27/00 | 65 FR 81747 | 124 | revisions to regulatory language. |
| 310 CMR 7.19 (14) | Generic NOX bubbling for RACT sources | 3/29/95 | 8/8/96 | 61 FR 41338 | 112 | Adds quantification, testing, monitoring, record keeping, reporting, and emission control plan requirements for averaging NOX RACT sources. |
| 310 CMR 7.24 | U Organic Material Storage and Distribution | 6/7/91, 11/13/92, 2/17/93 | 6/30/93 | 58 FR 34911 | 58 | Replacement of 310 CMR 7.24, 7.24(1), 7.24(2), 7.24(3), and 7.24(4). |
| 310 CMR 7.24(1) | U Organic Material Storage and Distribution | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Updates to requirements for organic material storage tanks, effective 9/23/05. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(3) | Distribution of motor vehicle fuel | 2/17/93 | 9/3/1999 | 64 FR 48304 | c(117) | Amends distribution of motor fuel requirements, applicability, recordkeeping and testing requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(3) | Distribution of Motor Vehicle Fuel | 5/5/15 | 11/29/16 | 81 FR 85901 | 144 | Revised to require Stage I Enhanced Vapor Recovery systems certified by the California Air Resources Board. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(4) | U Organic Material Storage and Distribution | 9/14/06 | 5/29/14 | 79 FR 30737 | 141 | Updates to requirements for motor vehicle fuel tank trucks, effective 6/2/06. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(4) | Motor Vehicle Fuel Tank Trucks | 5/5/15 | 11/29/16 | 81 FR 85901 | 144 | Revised to make minor clarifying amendments. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(5)(b)2 | Revision to gasoline volatility testing regulation | 10/16/89 | 4/19/90 | 55 FR 14832 | 83 | |
| 310 CMR 7.24(6) | “Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel” (Stage II) | 05/17/90, 06/07/91 | 12/14/92 | 57 FR 58996 | 97 | |
| 310 CMR 7.24(6) | Dispensing of motor vehicle fuel | 2/17/93 | 9/15/93 | 58 FR 48318 | 98 | Previous version of rule approved as strengthening the Massachusetts SIP. Revised rule being approved as meeting the Clean Air Act requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(6) | Dispensing Motor Vehicle Fuel | 08/09/00 09/11/00 | 12/18/00 | 65 FR 78976 | 116 | Rule revised to include annual compliance testing and certification. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(6) | Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel | 6/1/10 | 9/13/2013 | 78 FR 54960 | 138 | |
| 310 CMR 7.24(6) | Dispensing of Motor Vehicle Fuel | 5/5/15 | 11/29/16 | 81 FR 85901 | 144 | Revised to require the decommissioning of Stage II vapor recovery systems. |
| 310 CMR 7.24(8) | Marine Volatile Organic Liquid Transfer | 10/17/97 | 4/11/00 | 65 FR 19326 | 115 | |
| 310 CMR 7.25 | Best available controls for consumer and commercial products | 11/18/94 | 12/19/95 | 60 FR 65242 | 108 | Includes architectural & industrial maintenance coatings. |
| 310 CMR 7.25 | Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial Products | 7/30/96 | 4/11/00 | 65 FR 19327 | 115 | Definition of “waterproofing sealer” revised. |
| 310 CMR 7.25 | Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial Products | 6/1/10 | 10/9/15 | 80 FR 61101 | 142 | Amended existing consumer products related requirements, added provisions concerning AIM coatings. |
| 310 CMR 7.26 | Industry Performance Standards | 12/30/11 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Only approving the Outdoor Hydronic Heaters (50)-(54). |
| 310 CMR 7.26(30)-(37) | Industry Performance Standards—U Boilers | 11/13/07 | 4/24/14 | 79 FR 22774 | 140 | Sets standards for certain types of new boilers: replaces requirements to obtain a plan approval under 310 CMR 7.02(2). |
| 310 CMR 7.27 | NOX Allowance Program | 12/19/97 | 6/2/99 | 64 FR 29569 | (c)(118) | Approval of NOx cap and allowance trading regulations |
| 11/19/99 | 12/27/00 | 65 FR 81747 | 124 | adding paragraphs 7.27(6)(m), 7.27(9)(b), 7.27(11)(o), 7.27(11)(p) and 7.27(15)(e). | ||
| 310 CMR 7.28 | NOX Allowance Trading Program | January 7, 2000 | 12/27/00 | 65 FR 81747 | 124 | |
| 310 CMR 7.28 | NOX Allowance Trading Program | 03/30/07 | 12/3/07 | 72 FR 67854 | 135 | |
| 03/30/07 | 12/3/07 | 72 FR 67854 | 135 | Massachusetts Regulation Filing, dated April 19, 2007, sub-stantiating May 4, 2007, State effective date for amended 310 CMR 7.28 “NOX Allowance Trading Program.” | ||
| 310 CMR 7.29 | Emissions Standards for Power Plants | 8/9/2012 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Only approving the SO2 and NOX requirements. |
| 310 CMR 7.29 | Emission Standards for Power Plants | 8/9/2012 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Facility specific Emission Control Plan requirement for Brayton Point Station Unit 1, 2, 3, and 4 which disallows the use of 310 CMR 7.29 SO2 Early Reduction Credits or Federal Acid Rain allowances for compliance with 310 CMR 7.29 after June 1, 2014. |
| 310 CMR 7.29 | Emission Standards for Power Plants | 8/9/2012 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Facility specific Emission Control Plan requirement for Mt. Tom Station which disallows the use of 310 CMR 7.29 SO2 Early Reduction Credits or Federal Acid Rain allowances for compliance with 310 CMR 7.29 after October 1, 2009. |
| 310 CMR 7.29 | Emission Standards for Power Plants | 8/9/2012 | 9/19/13 | 78 FR 57487 | 137 | Facility specific Emission Control Plan for Salem Harbor Station Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 which limits NOX emissions from Unit 1 to 276 tons per rolling 12 month period starting 1/1/2012, limits NOX emissions for Unit 2 to 50 tons per rolling 12 month period starting 1/1/2012, limits SO2 emissions form Unit 2 to 300 tons per rolling 12 month period starting 1/1/2012, shuts down units 3 and 4 effective 6/1/2014. |
| 310 CMR 7.30 | Massport/Logan Airport Parking Freeze | 12/26/00 | March 12, 2001 | 66 FR 14319 | 130 | Applies to the parking of motor vehicles on Massport property. |
| 310 CMR 7.31 | City of Boston/East Boston Parking Freeze | 12/26/00 | March 12, 2001 | 66 FR 14319 | 130 | Applies to the parking of motor vehicles within the area of East Boston. |
| 310 CMR 7.32 | Massachusetts Clean Air Interstate Rule (Mass CAIR) | 03/30/07 | 12/3/07 | 72 FR 67854 | 135 | |
| 03/30/07 | 12/3/07 | 72 FR 67854 | 135 | Mass-achusetts Regulation Filing, dated April 19, 2007, sub-stantiating May 4, 2007, State effective date for adopted 310 CMR 7.32 “ Mass-achusetts Clean Air Interstate Rule (Mass CAIR).” | ||
| 310 CMR 7.33 | City of Boston/South Boston Parking Freeze | 7/30/93 | 10/15/96 | 61 FR 53633 | 111 | Applies to the parking of motor vehicles within the area of South Boston, including Massport property in South Boston. |
| 310 CMR 7.36 | Transit system improvements regulations | 12/9/91 | 10/4/94 | 59 FR 50498 | 101 | Transit system improvement regulation for Boston metropolitan area. |
| 310 CMR 7.36 | Transit system improvements regulation | 12/13/06 | 07/31/08 | 73 FR 44654 | 136 | Amendments to Transit System Improvements Regulation. |
| 12/13/06 | 07/31/08 | 73 FR 44654 | 136 | Massachusetts Regulation Filing, dated November 16, 2006, substantiating December 1, 2006, State effective date for amended 310 CMR 7.36 entitled “Transit System Improvements.” | ||
| 310 CMR 7.36 | Transit System improvements | 11/6/13 | 12/8/15 | 80 FR 76225 | 143 | Removes from the SIP the commitment to design the Red Line/Blue Line Connector project. |
| 310 CMR 7.37 | High occupancy vehicle lanes regulation | 12/9/91 | 10/4/94 | 59 FR 50498 | 101 | High occupancy vehicle lanes regulation for Boston metropolitan area. |
| 310 CMR 7.38 | Tunnel vent certification regulation | 1/30/91 | 10/8/92 | 57 FR 46312 | 96 | Tunnel ventilation certification regulation for Boston metropolitan area. |
| 310 CMR 7.38 | Tunnel vent certification regulation | 7/12/06 | 2/15/08 | 73 FR 8818 | 134 | Amendments to Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District. |
| 7/12/06 | 2/15/08 | 73 FR 8818 | 134 | Massachusetts Regulation Filing, dated December 13, 2005, substantiating December 30, 2005, State effective date for amended 310 CMR 7.38 “Certification of Tunnel Ventilation Systems in the Metropolitan Boston Air Pollution Control District.” | ||
| 310 CMR 7.40 | Low emission vehicle | 11/15/93 05/11/94 |
2/1/95 | 60 FR 6030 | 103 | Substitute for CFFP. |
| 310 CMR 7.40 | Low Emission Vehicle Program | 12/24/99 | 12/23/02 | 67 FR 78181 | 132 | “Low Emission Vehicle Program” (LEV II) except for 310 CMR 7.40(2)(a)5, 310 CMR 7.40(2)(a)6, 310 CMR 7.40(2)(c)3, 310 CMR 7.40(10), and 310 CMR 7.40(12) |
| 310 CMR 7.50 | Variances, regulations for control of air pollution in the six MA APCDs | 9/14/74 | 10/8/76 | 41 FR 44395 | 7 | |
| 9/14/74 | 2/4/77 | 42 FR 6812 | 7 | Correction. | ||
| 310 CMR 7.51 | Hearings relative to orders and approvals | 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 4 | |
| 310 CMR 7.52 | Enforcement provisions | 8/28/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 4 | |
| 310 CMR 8 | Regulations for the prevention and/or abatement of air pollution episode and air pollution incident emergencies | 2/22/72 | 10/28/72 | 37 FR 23085 | 1 | |
| 12/30/76 | 9/2/77 | 42 FR 44235 | 12 | Changes significant harm and alert levels. | ||
| 310 CMR 8 | The Prevention and/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air Pollution Incident Emergencies | 2/9/2018 | 4/3/2019 | 84 FR 7299 | Incorporates full version of 310 CMR 8.00 into the Massachusetts SIP, and converts conditional approval at § 52.1119(a)(5) to full approval. | |
| 310 CMR 8.02 | Definitions | 7/25/90 | 10/04/02 | 67 FR 62187 | 120 | Add a definition of PM10. |
| 310 CMR 8.03 | Criteria | 7/25/90 | 10/04/02 | 67 FR 62187 | 120 | Make PM10 the particulate criteria for determining emergeny episodes. |
| 310 CMR 60.02 | Massachusetts Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Program | 6/1/09 | 1/25/13 | 78 FR 5300 | 137 | Revises enhanced I/M test requirements to consist of “OBD2-only” testing program. Approving submitted regulation with the exception of subsection 310 CMR 60.02(24)(f). |
| 540 CMR 4.00 | Annual Safety and Combined Safety and Emissions Inspection of All Motor Vehicles, Trailers, Semi-trailers and Converter Dollies | 6/1/09 | 1/25/13 | 78 FR 5300 | 137 | Revises requirements for inspections and enforcement of I/M program. |
| M.G.L. c. 268A, sections 6 and 6A | Conduct of Public Officials and Employees | June 6, 2014 | 12/21/16 | 81 FR 93630 | 147 | Approved Section 6: Financial interest of state employee, relative or associates; disclosure, and Section 6A: Conflict of interest of public official; reporting requirement. |
| Notes: | ||||||
| 1. This table lists regulations adopted as of 1972. It does not depict regulatory requirements which may have been part of the Federal SIP before this date. | ||||||
| 2. The regulations are effective statewide unless stated otherwise in comments or title section. |
[49 FR 49454, Dec. 20, 1984]
§ 52.1168 Certification of no sources.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has certified to the satisfaction of EPA that no sources are located in the Commonwealth which are covered by the following Control Techniques Guidelines:
(a) Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners.
(b) Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants.
(c) Air Oxidation Processes/SOCMI.
(d) Polypropylene/Polyethylene Manufacturing.
[52 FR 32792, Aug. 31, 1987]
§ 52.1168a Part D—Disapproval of Rules and Regulations.
On December 30, 1985, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE) submitted a revision to the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the automobile surface coating regulation. This revision requested an extension of the final compliance dates to implement reasonably available control technology (RACT) on topcoat and final repair applications. As a result of EPA's disapproval of this revision, the existing compliance date of December 31, 1985 specified in the automobile surface coating regulation contained in the Massachusetts SIP will remain in effect (Massachusetts Regulation 310 CMR 7.18(7) as approved by EPA and codified at 40 CFR 52.1120(c)(30) and (53)).
[53 FR 36014, Sept. 16, 1988]
§ 52.1169 Stack height review.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has declared to the satisfaction of EPA that no existing emission limitations have been affected by stack height credits greater than good engineering practice or any other prohibited dispersion technique as defined in EPA's stack height regulations, as revised on July 8, 1985. This declaration was submitted to EPA on April 8, 1986. The commonwealth has further declared in a letter from Bruce K. Maillet, dated June 24, 1986, that, “[A]s part of our new source review activities under the Massachusetts SIP and our delegated PSD authority, the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering will follow EPA's stack height regulations, as revised in the Federal Register on July 8, 1985 (50 FR 27892).” Thus, the Commonwealth has satisfactorily demonstrated that its regulations meet 40 CFR 51.118 and 51.164.
[52 FR 49407, Dec. 31, 1987]
Subpart X—Michigan
§ 52.1170 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Michigan under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference. (1) Material listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to May 1, 2016, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section with the EPA approval dates after May 1, 2016, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 5 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by the EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the SIP as of May 1, 2016.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air Programs Branch, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, and the National Archives and Records Administration. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
(c) EPA approved regulations.
| Michigan citation | Title | State effective date |
EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Reporting | ||||
| R 336.202 | Annual reports | 11/11/1986 | 3/8/1994, 59 FR 10752 | |
| Part 1. General Provisions | ||||
| R 336.1101 | Definitions; A | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | All except for (a) Act and (h) Air pollution. |
| R 336.1102 | Definitions; B | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1103 | Definitions; C | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1104 | Definitions; D | 3/28/2008 | 12/16/2013, 78 FR 76064 | R 336.1104. |
| R 336.1105 | Definitions; E | 3/28/2008 | 12/16/2013, 78 FR 76064 | R 336.1105. |
| R 336.1106 | Definitions; F | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1107 | Definitions; G | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1108 | Definitions; H | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1109 | Definitions; I | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1112 | Definitions; L | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1113 | Definitions; M | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1114 | Definitions; N | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1115 | Definitions; O | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | All except for (d) “ ' Oral reference dose' or 'RfD' ”. |
| R 336.1116 | Definitions; P | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1118 | Definitions; R | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1119 | Definitions; S | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | All except for (c) Secondary risk screening level, (q) State-only enforceable, and (x) Sufficient evidence. |
| R 336.1120 | Definitions; T | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | All except for (f) “ ' Toxic air contaminant' or 'TAC' ”. |
| R 336.1121 | Definitions; U | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1122 | Definitions; V | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | |
| R 336.1123 | Definitions; W | 12/20/2016 | 3/12/2019, 84 FR 8809 | All except for (c) Weight of evidence. |
| R 336.1127 | Terms defined in the act | 1/19/1980 | 5/6/1980, 45 FR 29790 | |
| Part 2. Air Use Approval | ||||
| R 336.1201 | Permits to install | 6/20/2008 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1201a | General permits to install | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1202 | Waivers of approval | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1203 | Information required | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1204 | Authority of agents | 7/1/2003 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1205 | Permit to install; approval | 6/20/2008 | 5/31/2019, 84 FR 25180 | |
| R 336.1206 | Processing of applications for permits to install | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1207 | Denial of permits to install | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1209 | Use of old permits to limit potential to emit | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1214a | Consolidation of permits to install within renewable operating permit | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1219 | Amendments for change of ownership or operational control | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1240 | Required air quality models | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1241 | Air quality modeling demonstration requirements | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1278 | Exclusion from exemption | 12/20/2016 | 4/27/2023, 88 FR 25498 | |
| R 336.1278a | Scope of permit exemptions | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1280 | Permit to install exemptions; cooling and ventilating equipment | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1281 | Permit to install exemptions; cleaning, washing, and drying equipment | 12/20/2016 | 08/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1282 | Permit to install exemptions; furnaces, ovens, and heaters | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1283 | Permit to install exemptions; testing and inspection equipment | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1284 | Permit to install exemptions; containers | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1285 | Permit to install exemptions; miscellaneous | 1/2/2019 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51518 | |
| R 336.1286 | Permit to install exemptions; plastic processing equipment | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1287 | Permit to install exemptions; surface coating equipment | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1288 | Permit to install exemptions; oil and gas processing equipment | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1289 | Permit to install exemptions; asphalt and concrete production equipment | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1290 | Permit to install exemptions; emission units with limited emissions | 12/20/2016 | 8/31/2018, 83 FR 44485 | |
| R 336.1291 | Permit to install exemptions; emission units with “de minimis” emissions | 1/2/2019 | 11/18/2025, 90 FR 51518 | |
| Part 3. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Particulate Matter | ||||
| R 336.1301 | Standards for density of emissions | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1303 | Grading visible emissions | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1310 | Open burning | 4/1/2013 | 6/2/2015, 80 FR 31305 | |
| R 336.1331 | Emissions of particulate matter | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | All except Table 31, section C.8. |
| R 336.1331, Table 31 | Particulate matter emission schedule | 1/19/1980 | 5/22/1981, 46 FR 27923 | Only Section C.7, preheater equipment. |
| R 336.1350 | Emissions from larry-car charging of coke ovens | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1351 | Charging hole emissions from coke ovens | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1352 | Pushing operation fugitive emissions from coke ovens | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1353 | Standpipe assembly emissions during coke cycle from coke ovens | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1354 | Standpipe assembly emissions during decarbonization from coke ovens | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1355 | Coke oven gas collector main emissions from slot-type coke ovens | 1/19/1980 | 5/22/1981, 46 FR 27923 | |
| R 336.1356 | Coke oven door emissions from coke ovens; doors that are 5 meters or shorter | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1357 | Coke oven door emissions from coke oven doors; doors that are taller than 5 meters | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1358 | Roof monitor visible emissions at steel manufacturing facilities from electric arc furnaces and blast furnaces | 4/30/1998 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1359 | Visible emissions from scarfer operation stacks at steel manufacturing facilities | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1360 | Visible emissions from coke oven push stacks | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1361 | Visible emissions from blast furnace casthouse operations at steel manufacturing facilities | 4/30/1998 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1362 | Visible emissions from electric arc furnace operations at steel manufacturing facilities | 4/30/1998 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1363 | Visible emissions from argon-oxygen decarburization operations at steel manufacturing facilities | 4/30/1998 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1364 | Visible emissions from basic oxygen furnace operations | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1365 | Visible emissions from hot metal transfer operations at steel manufacturing facilities | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1366 | Visible emissions from hot metal desulphurization operations at steel manufacturing facilities | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1367 | Visible emissions from sintering operations | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.1370 | Collected air contaminants | 2/18/1981 | 11/15/1982, 47 FR 51398 | |
| R 336.1371 | Fugitive dust control programs other than areas listed in Table 36 | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1372 | Fugitive dust control program; required activities; typical control methods | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1374 | Particulate matter contingency measures: Areas listed in Table 37 | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| Part 4. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Sulfur-Bearing Compounds | ||||
| R 336.1401 | Emission of sulfur dioxide from power plants | 10/24/2019 | 4/24/2023, 88 FR 24691 | |
| R 336.1401a | Definitions | 10/24/2019 | 4/24/2023, 88 FR 24691 | |
| R 336.1402 | Emission of SO2 from fuel-burning equipment at a stationary source other than power plants | 10/24/2019 | 4/24/2023, 88 FR 24691 | |
| R 336.1403 | Oil- and natural gas-producing or transporting facilities and natural gas-processing facilities; emissions; operation | 3/19/2002 | 4/17/2015, 80 FR 21183 | |
| R 336.1404 | Emission of SO2 and sulfuric acid mist from sulfuric acid plants | 10/24/2019 | 4/24/2023, 88 FR 24691 | |
| R 336.1405 | Emissions from sulfur recovery plants located within Wayne county | 1/31/2008 | 4/17/2015, 80 FR 21183 | |
| R 336.1406 | Hydrogen sulfide emissions from facilities located within Wayne county | 1/31/2008 | 4/17/2015, 80 FR 21183 | |
| R 336.1407 | Sulfur compound emissions from sources located within Wayne county and not previously specified | 3/11/2013 | 4/17/2015, 80 FR 21183 | |
| Part 6. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Existing Sources of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions | ||||
| R 336.1601 | Definitions | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | All except for (a). |
| R 336.1602 | Existing sources of volatile organic compound emissions generally | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1604 | Storage of organic compounds having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.5 psia, but less than 11 psia, in existing fixed roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000 gallon capacity | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1605 | Storage of organic compounds having a true vapor pressure of 11 or more psia in existing stationary vessels of more than 40,000 gallon capacity | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1606 | Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels of more than 2,000 gallon capacity at dispensing facilities | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1607 | Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels of more than 2,000 capacity at loading facilities | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1608 | Loading gasoline into existing delivery vessels at loading facilities handling less than 5,000,000 gallons per year | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1609 | Loading delivery vessels with organic compounds having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.5 psia at existing loading facilities handling 5,000,000 or more gallons of the compounds per year | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1610 | Existing coating lines; emission of volatile organic compounds from existing automobile, light-duty truck, and other product and material coating lines | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1610a | Existing coating lines; emission of volatile organic compounds from existing automobile, light-duty truck; and paper, film, and foil; cans, coils, and fabrics; insulation of magnet wire; metal furniture coating lines in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1611 | Existing cold cleaners | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1612 | Existing open top vapor degreasers | 3/29/2017 | 6/29/2018, 83 FR 30571 | |
| R 336.1613 | Existing conveyorized cold cleaners | 3/29/2017 | 6/29/2018, 83 FR 30571 | |
| R 336.1614 | Existing conveyorized vapor degreasers | 3/29/2017 | 6/29/2018, 83 FR 30571 | |
| R 336.1615 | Existing vacuum-producing system at petroleum refineries | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1616 | Process unit turnarounds at petroleum refineries | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1617 | Existing organic compound-water separators at petroleum refineries | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| 336.1618 | Use of cutback or emulsified paving asphalt | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1619 | Standards for perchloroethylene dry cleaning equipment | 3/29/2017 | 6/29/2018, 83 FR 30571 | |
| 336.1620 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing flat wood paneling coating lines | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1620a | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing flat wood paneling coating lines in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1621 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing metallic surface coating lines | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1621a | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing metal parts, metal products, and motor vehicle material surface coating lines in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1622 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing components of petroleum refineries; refinery monitoring program | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1623 | Storage of petroleum liquids having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.0 psia but less than 11.0 psia, in existing external floating roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000 gallon capacity | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1624 | Emission of volatile organic compound from an existing graphic arts lines | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1624a | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing flexographic printing lines located in the 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1625 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing equipment utilized in manufacturing synthesized pharmaceutical products | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1627 | Delivery vessels; vapor collection systems | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1628 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in manufacturing synthetic organic chemicals and polymers; monitoring program | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1629 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in processing natural gas; monitoring program | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1630 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing paint manufacturing processes | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1631 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing process equipment utilized in manufacture of polystyrene of other organic resins | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1632 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing automobile, truck, and business machine plastic part coating lines | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | All except for (9). |
| 336.1633 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing plastic parts and products surface coating; and pleasure craft coating operations in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1634 | Emissions of volatile organic compounds from existing industrial solvent cleaning in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1635 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing offset lithographic and letterpress printing lines in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1636 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing miscellaneous industrial adhesives operations in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1637 | Emissions of volatile organic compounds from existing fiberglass boat manufacturing in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1638 | Emissions of volatile organic compounds from existing wood furniture manufacturing in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1639 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing aerospace manufacturing and rework operations in 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1640 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing storage vessels in the oil and natural gas industry located in the 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1641 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing pneumatic controllers in the oil and natural gas industry located in the 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1642 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing pneumatic pumps in the oil and natural gas industry located in the 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1643 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing compressors in the oil and natural gas industry located in the 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1644 | Emission of volatile organic compounds from fugitive emissions from the oil and natural gas industry located in the 2015 ozone nonattainment areas | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| R 336.1651 | Standards for degreasers | 3/29/2017 | 6/29/2018, 83 FR 30571 | |
| 336.1660 | Standards for volatile organic compounds emissions from consumer products | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1661 | Rescinded | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1662 | Standards for volatile organic compounds emissions from architectural and industrial maintenance coatings | April 18, 2023 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| Part 7. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—New Sources of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions | ||||
| R 336.1702 | General provisions for new sources of volatile organic compound emissions | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1705 | Loading gasoline into delivery vessels at new loading facilities handling less than 5,000,000 gallons per year | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.1706 | Loading delivery vessels with organic compounds having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.5 psia at new loading facilities handling 5,000,000 or more gallons of such compounds per year | 6/15/1997 | 7/21/1999, 64 FR 39034 | |
| R 336.1707 | New cold cleaners | 6/15/1997 | 7/21/1999, 64 FR 39034 | |
| R 336.1708 | New open top vapor degreasers | 6/15/1997 | 7/21/1999, 64 FR 39034 | |
| R 336.1709 | New conveyorized cold cleaners | 6/15/1997 | 7/21/1999, 64 FR 39034 | |
| R 336.1710 | New conveyorized vapor degreasers | 6/15/1997 | 7/21/1999, 64 FR 39034 | |
| Part 8. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Oxides of Nitrogen | ||||
| R 336.1801 | Emission of oxides of nitrogen from non-SIP call stationary sources | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1802 | Applicability under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 5/20/2004 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1802a | Adoption by reference | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1803 | Definitions | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1804 | Retired unit exemption from oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 5/20/2004 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1805 | Standard requirements of oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1806 | Computation of time under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1807 | Authorized account representative under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1808 | Permit requirements under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1809 | Compliance certification under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1810 | Allowance allocations under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1811 | New source set-aside under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 5/20/2004 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1812 | Allowance tracking system and transfers under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1813 | Monitoring and reporting requirements under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1814 | Individual opt-ins under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1815 | Allowance banking under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1816 | Compliance supplement pool under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1817 | Emission limitations and restrictions for Portland cement kilns | 12/4/2002 | 5/4/2005, 70 FR 23029 | |
| R 336.1818 | Emission limitations for stationary internal combustion engines | 11/20/2006 | 1/29/2008, 73 FR 5101 | |
| R 336.1821 | CAIR NOX ozone and annual trading programs; applicability determinations | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1822 | CAIR NOX ozone season trading program; allowance allocations | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1823 | New EGUs, new non-EGUs, and newly affected EGUs under CAIR NOX ozone season trading program; allowance allocations | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1824 | CAIR NOX ozone season trading program; hardship set-aside | 6/25/2007 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1825 | CAIR NOX ozone season trading program; renewable set-aside | 6/25/2007 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1826 | CAIR NOX ozone season trading program; opt-in provisions | 6/25/2007 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1830 | CAIR NOX annual trading program; allowance allocations | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1831 | New EGUs under CAIR NOX annual trading program; allowance allocations | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1832 | CAIR NOX annual trading program; hardship set-aside | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1833 | CAIR NOX annual trading program; compliance supplement pool | 5/28/2009 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| R 336.1834 | Opt-in provisions under the CAIR NOX annual trading program | 6/25/2007 | 8/18/2009, 74 FR 41637 | |
| 336.1840 | Definitions for the NOX RACT rules | April 28, 2025 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1841 | RACT emission limitations for engines | April 28, 2025 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | All except for (8). |
| 336.1842 | RACT emission limitations for boilers | April 28, 2025 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | All except for (10). |
| 336.1843 | RACT emission limitations for combustion turbines | April 28, 2025 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1844 | RACT emission limitations for miscellaneous process specific combustion sources | April 28, 2025 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | All except for (9). |
| 336.1845 | RACT requirements for alternative RACT | April 28, 2025 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| 336.1846 | RACT requirements for miscellaneous large sources at major sources of NOX | April 28, 2025 | 8/27/2026, 91 FR 55274 | |
| Part 9. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Miscellaneous | ||||
| R 336.1902 | Adoption of standards by reference | 11/18/2018 | 6/16/2021, 86 FR 31924 | |
| R 339.1906 | Diluting and concealing emissions | 5/20/2015 | 12/19/2016, 81 FR 91839 | |
| R 339.1910 | Air-cleaning devices | 1/19/1980 | 5/6/1980, 45 FR 29790 | |
| R 339.1911 | Malfunction abatement plans | 5/20/2015 | 12/19/2016, 81 FR 91839 | |
| R 336.1912 | Abnormal conditions, start-up, shutdown, and malfunction of a source, process, or process equipment, operating, notification, and reporting requirements | 5/20/2015 | 12/19/2016, 81 FR 91839 | |
| R 339.1915 | Enforcement discretion in instances of excess emission resulting from malfunction, start-up, or shutdown | 5/28/2002 | 2/24/2003, 68 FR 8550 | |
| R 339.1930 | Emission of carbon monoxide from ferrous cupola operations | 12/20/2016 | 7/19/2018, 83 FR 34050 | |
| Part 10. Intermittent Testing and Sampling | ||||
| R 336.2001 | Performance tests by owner | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2002 | Performance tests by commission | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2003 | Performance test criteria | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2004 | Appendix A; reference test methods; adoption of federal reference test methods | 2/22/2006 | 8/3/2007, 72 FR 43169 | |
| R 336.2005 | Reference test methods for state-requested tests of delivery vessels | 2/22/2006 | 8/3/2007, 72 FR 43169 | |
| R 336.2006 | Reference test method serving as alternate version of federal reference test method 25 by incorporating Byron analysis | 4/28/1993 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46182 | |
| R 336.2007 | Alternate version of procedure L, referenced in R 336.2040(10) | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2011 | Reference test method 5B | 4/29/2005 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2012 | Reference test method 5C | 10/15/2004 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2013 | Reference test method 5D | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2014 | Reference test method 5E | 10/15/2004 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2021 | Figures | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2030 | Reference test method 9A | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.2031 | Reference test method 9B | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.2032 | Reference test method 9C | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.2033 | Test methods for coke oven quench towers | 2/22/1985 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| R 336.2040 | Method for determination of volatile organic compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | All except sections (9) and (10). |
| R 336.2041 | Recording requirements for coating lines and graphic arts lines | 4/28/1993 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46182 | |
| Part 11. Continuous Emission Monitoring | ||||
| R 336.2101 | Continuous emission monitoring, fossil fuel-fired steam generators | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2102 | Continuous emission monitoring, sulfuric acid-producing facilities | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2103 | Continuous emission monitoring, fluid bed catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerators at petroleum refineries | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2150 | Performance specifications for continuous emission monitoring systems | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2151 | Calibration gases for continuous emission monitoring systems | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2152 | Cycling time for continuous emission monitoring systems | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2153 | Zero and drift for continuous emission monitoring systems | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2154 | Instrument span for continuous emission monitoring systems | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2155 | Monitor location for continuous emission monitoring systems | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2159 | Alternative continuous emission monitoring systems | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2170 | Monitoring data reporting and recordkeeping | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2175 | Data reduction procedures for fossil fuel-fired steam generators | 11/15/2004 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2176 | Data reduction procedures for sulfuric acid plants | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2189 | Alternative data reporting or reduction procedures | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2190 | Monitoring System Malfunctions | 3/19/2002 | 6/1/2006, 71 FR 31093 | |
| R 336.2199 | Exemptions from continuous emission monitoring requirements | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | All except section (c), which was removed 7/21/1999, 64 FR 39034. |
| Part 16. Organization, Operation and Procedures | ||||
| R 336.2606 | Declaratory rulings requests | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2607 | Consideration and disposition of declaratory rulings requests | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| Part 17. Hearings | ||||
| R 336.2701 | Procedures from Administrative Procedures Act | 4/10/2000 | 6/28/2002, 67 FR 43548 | |
| R 336.2702 | Service of notices and orders; appearances | 4/10/2000 | 6/28/2002, 67 FR 43548 | |
| R 336.2704 | Hearing commissioner's hearings | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2705 | Agency files and records, use in connection with hearings | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| R 336.2706 | Commission hearings after hearing commissioner hearings | 1/19/1980 | 11/2/1988, 53 FR 44189 | |
| Part 18. Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality | ||||
| R 336.2801 | Definitions | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2802 | Applicability | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2803 | Ambient Air Increments | 11/30/2012 | 4/4/2014, 79 FR 18802 | |
| R 336.2804 | Ambient Air Ceilings | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2805 | Restrictions on Area Classifications | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2806 | Exclusions from Increment Consumption | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2807 | Redesignation | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2808 | Stack Heights | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2809 | Exemptions | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2810 | Control technology review | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2811 | Source Impact Analysis | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2812 | Air Quality Models | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2813 | Air quality analysis | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2814 | Source Information | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2815 | Additional Impact Analyses | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2816 | Sources impacting federal class I areas; additional requirements | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2817 | Public Participation | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2818 | Source Obligation | 9/11/2008 | 9/27/2010, 75 FR 59081 | |
| R 336.2819 | Innovative Control Technology | 12/4/2006 | 3/25/2010, 75 FR 14352 | |
| R 336.2823 | Actuals plantwide applicability limits (PALs) | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| Part 19. New Source Review for Major Sources Impacting Nonattainment Areas | ||||
| R 336.2901 | Definitions | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2902 | Applicability | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2903 | Additional permit requirements for sources impacting nonattainment areas | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2907 | Actuals plant wide applicability limits or PALs | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| R 336.2908 | Conditions for approval of a major new source review permit in a nonattainment area | 1/2/2019 | 5/12/2021, 86 FR 25954 | |
| Executive Orders | ||||
| 1991-31 | Commission of Natural Resources, Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Executive Reorganization | 1/7/1992 | 11/6/1997, 62 FR 59995 | Introductory and concluding words of issuance; Title I: General, Part A Sections 1, 2, 4 & 5 and Part B; Title III: Environmental Protection, Part A Sections 1 & 2 and Part D; Title IV: Miscellaneous, Parts A & B, Part C Sections 1, 2 & 4 and Part D. |
| 1995-18 | Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Executive Reorganization | 9/30/1995 | 11/6/1997, 62 FR 59995 | Introductory and concluding words of issuance; Paragraphs 1, 2, 3(a) & (g), 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, and 18. |
| State Statutes | ||||
| Act 12 of 1993 | Small Business Clean Air Assistance Act | 4/1/1993 | 6/3/1994, 59 FR 28785 | |
| Act 44 of 1984, as amended | Michigan Motor Fuels Quality Act | 11/13/1993 | 5/5/1997, 62 FR 24341 | Only 290.642, 643, 645, 646, 647, and 649. |
| Act 127 of 1970 | Michigan Environmental Protection Act | 7/27/1970 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10841 | |
| Act 250 of 1965, as amended | Tax Exemption Act | 1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10841 | |
| Act 283 of 1964, as amended | Weights and Measures Act | 8/28/1964 | 5/5/1997, 62 FR 24341 | Only 290.613 and 290.615. |
| Act 348 of 1965, as amended | Air Pollution Act | 1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10841 | |
| Act 348 of 1965, as amended | Air Pollution Act | 1986 | 2/17/1988, 53 FR 4622 | Only section 7a. |
| Act 451 of 1994, as amended | Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act | 3/30/1995 | 7/6/2022, 87 FR 40097 | Only sections 324.5503, 324.5524 and 324.5525. |
| House Bill 4165 | Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Program Act | 11/13/1993 | 6/21/1996, 61 FR 31831 | |
| House Bill 4898 | An Act to amend section 3 of Act 44 of 1984 | 11/13/1993 | 10/11/1994, 59 FR 51379 | |
| House Bill 5016 | Motor Vehicle Emissions Testing Program Act | 11/13/1993 | 3/7/1995, 60 FR 12459 | |
| House Bill 5508 | Amendment to Motor Fuels Quality Act, Act 44 of 1984 | 4/6/2006 | 3/2/2007, 72 FR 4432 | |
| Michigan Civil Service Commission Rule 2-8.3(a)(1) | Disclosure | 10/1/2013 | 8/31/2015, 80 FR 52399 | |
| Michigan Civil Service Commission Rule 2-8.3(a)(1) | Disclosure | 10/1/2013 | 8/31/2015, 80 FR 52399 | |
| Senate Bill 726 | An Act to amend sections 2, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of Act 44 of 1984 | 11/13/1993 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46182 | |
| Michigan Civil Service Commission Rule 2-8.3(a)(1) | Disclosure | 10/1/2013 | 8/31/2015, 80 FR 52399 | |
| Local Regulations | ||||
| City of Grand Rapids Ordinance 72-34 | City of Grand Rapids Air Pollution Control Regulations | 1972 | 5/31/1972, 57 FR 10841 | Ordinance amends sections 9.35 and 9.36 of article 4, Chapter 151 Title IX of the Code of the City of Grand Rapids. |
| Muskegon County Air Pollution Control Rules | Muskegon County Air Pollution Control Rules and Regulations, as amended | 3/27/1973 | 5/16/1984, 49 FR 20650 | Only article 14, section J. |
| Wayne County Air Pollution Control Ordinance | Wayne County Air Pollution Control Ordinance | 11/18/1985 | 5/13/1993, 58 FR 28359 | Only: chapters 1, 2, 3, 5 (except for the portions of section 501 which incorporate by reference the following parts of the state rules: the quench tower limit in R 336.1331, Table 31, section C.8; the deletion of the limit in R 336.1331 for coke oven coal preheater equipment; and R 336.1355), 8 (except section 802), 9, 11, 12, 13, and appendices A and D. |
| Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulations | Wayne County Air Pollution Control Regulations | 3/20/1969 and amended 7/22/1971 |
5/6/1980, 45 FR 29790 | All except for Section 6.3 (A-H), which was removed 4/17/2015, 80 FR 21186. |
(d) EPA approved state source-specific requirements.
| Name of source | Order number | State effective date | EPA Approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allied Signal, Inc., Detroit Tar Plant, Wayne County | 4-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| American Colloid Plant | Permit 341-79 |
12/18/1979 | 9/15/1983, 48 FR 41403 | |
| American Colloid Plant | Permit 375-79 |
11/23/1979 | 9/15/1983, 48 FR 41403 | |
| Asphalt Products Company, Plant 5A, Wayne County | 5-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Carmeuse Lime, Wayne County | Permit 193-14A | 3/18/2016 | 3/19/2021, 86 FR 14827 | |
| Clark Oil and Refining Corporation, Calhoun County | 6-1981 | 6/24/1982 | 12/13/1982, 47 FR 55678 | |
| Clawson Concrete Company, Plant #1, Wayne County | 6-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Corporation, Wayne County | MI-ROP-A8640-2016a | 1/19/2017 | 5/19/2025, 90 FR 21228 | |
| Conoco, Inc., Berrien County | 17-1981 | 9/28/1981 | 2/17/1982, 47 FR 6828 | |
| Consumers Power Company, B. C. Cobb Plant, Muskegon County | 6-1979 | 12/10/1979 | 5/1/1981, 46 FR 24560 | |
| Consumers Power Company, J.H. Campbell Plant, Units 1 and 2, Ottawa County | 12-1984 | 10/1/1984 | 1/12/1987, 52 FR 1183 | |
| Continental Fibre Drum, Inc., Midland County | 14-1987 | 12/9/1987 | 6/11/1992, 57 FR 24752 | |
| Cummings-Moore Graphite Company, Wayne County | 7-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| CWC Castings Division of Textron, Muskegon County | 12-1979 | 2/15/1980 | 5/16/1984, 49 FR 20650 | |
| Dearborn Industrial Generation, LLC | 253-02A | 9/25/2003 | 5/19/2025, 90 FR 21228 | Cover sheet, section 5.1d, and sections 5.2 through 5.10. |
| Dearborn Industrial Generation, LLC | 109-23 | 9/26/2023 | 5/19/2025, 90 FR 21228 | |
| Delray Connecting Railroad Company, Wayne County | 8-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Detroit Edison Company, Boulevard Heating Plant, Wayne County | 7-1981 | 4/28/1981 | 5/4/1982, 47 FR 19133 | |
| Detroit Edison Company, City of St. Clair, St. Clair County | 4-1978 | 11/14/1978 | 8/25/1980, 45 FR 56344 | |
| Detroit Edison Company, Monroe County | 9-1977 | 7/7/1977 | 12/21/1979, 44 FR 75635 (correction: 3/20/1980, 45 FR 17997) |
|
| Detroit Edison Company, River Rouge Power Plant, Wayne County | 9-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 7/24/2023, 88 FR 47377 | Includes revised Fugitive Dust Control Plan. |
| Detroit Edison Company, Sibley Quarry, Wayne County | 10-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Wastewater Treatment Plant, Wayne County | 11-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Diamond Crystal Salt Company, St. Clair County | 13-1982 | 9/8/1982 | 3/14/1983, 48 FR 9256 | |
| Dow Chemical Company, Midland County | 12-1981 | 6/15/1981 | 3/24/1982, 47 FR 12625 | |
| Dow Chemical Company, West Side and South Side Power Plants, Midland County | 19-1981 | 7/21/1981 | 3/24/1982, 47 FR 12625 | Only sections A(3), B, C, D, and E. |
| DTE Electric—Belle River Power Plant | 51-22 | 4/26/2022, revised 5/25/2023 | 7/9/2026, 91 FR 42356 | |
| DTE Energy—Trenton Channel, Wayne County | Permit 125-11C | 4/29/2016 | 3/19/2021, 86 FR 14827 | |
| Dundee Cement Company, Monroe County | 8-1979 | 10/17/1979 | 8/11/1980, 45 FR 53137 | |
| Dundee Cement Company, Monroe County | 16-1980 | 11/19/1980 | 12/3/1981, 46 FR 58673 | |
| Eagle Ottawa Leather Company, Ottawa County | 7-1994 | 7/13/1994 | 10/23/1995, 60 FR 54308 | |
| Edward C. Levy Company, Detroit Lime Company, Wayne County | 15-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Edward C. Levy Company, Plant #1, Wayne County | 16-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Edward C. Levy Company, Plant #3, Wayne County | 17-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Edward C. Levy Company, Plant #4 and 5, Wayne County | 19-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Edward C. Levy Company, Plant #6, Wayne County | 18-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Edward C. Levy Company, Scrap Up-Grade Facility, Wayne County | 20-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| EES Coke Battery, LLC | 51-08C | 11/21/2014 | 5/19/2025, 90 FR 21228 | |
| EES Coke Battery, LLC | 108-23 | 9/26/2023 | 5/19/2025, 90 FR 21228 | |
| Enamalum Corporation, Oakland County | 6-1994 | 6/27/1994 | 2/21/9196, 61 FR 6545 | |
| Ferrous Processing and Trading Company, Wayne County | 12-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Ford Motor Company, Rouge Industrial Complex, Wayne County | 13-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Ford Motor Company, Utica Trim Plant, Macomb County | 39-1993 | 11/12/1993 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46182 | |
| Ford Motor Company, Vulcan Forge, Wayne County | 14-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Buick Motor Division Complex, Flint, Genesee County | 10-1979 | 5/5/1980 | 2/10/1982, 47 FR 6013 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Buick Motor Division, Genesee County | 8-1982 | 4/2/1984 | 8/22/1988, 53 FR 31861 | Original order effective 7/12/1982, as altered effective 4/2/1982. |
| General Motors Corporation, Cadillac Motor Car Division, Wayne County | 12-1982 | 7/22/1982 | 7/5/1983, 48 FR 31022 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Central Foundry Division, Saginaw Malleable Iron Plant, Saginaw County | 8-1983 | 6/9/1983 | 12/13/1985, 50 FR 50907 | Supersedes paragraph 7.F of order 6-1980. |
| General Motors Corporation, Central Foundry Division, Saginaw Malleable Iron Plant, Saginaw County | 6-1980 | 7/30/1982 | 8/15/1983, 48 FR 36818 | Paragraph 7.F superseded by order 8-1983. Original order effective 6/3/1980, as altered effective 7/30/1982. |
| General Motors Corporation, Chevrolet Flint Truck Assembly, Genesee County | 10-1982 | 7/12/1982 | 7/5/1983, 48 FR 31022 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Chevrolet Motor Division, Saginaw Grey Iron Casting Plant and Nodular Iron Casting Plant, Saginaw County | 1-1980 | 4/16/1980 | 2/10/1982, 47 FR 6013 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Fisher Body Division, Fleetwood, Wayne County | 11-1982 | 7/22/1982 | 7/5/1983, 48 FR 31022 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Fisher Body Division, Flint No. 1, Genesee County | 9-1982 | 7/12/1982 | 7/5/1983, 48 FR 31022 | |
| General Motors Corporation, GM Assembly Division, Washtenaw County | 5-1983 | 5/5/1983 | 12/13/1984, 49 FR 5345 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Hydra-Matic Division, Washtenaw County | 3-1982 | 6/24/1982 | 3/4/1983, 48 FR 9256 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Oldsmobile Division, Ingham County | 4-1983 | 5/5/1983 | 12/13/1984, 49 FR 5345 | |
| General Motors Corporation, Warehousing and Distribution Division, Genesee County | 18-1981 | 7/28/1983 | 5/16/1984, 49 FR 20649 | Original order effective 12/1/1981, as altered effective 7/28/1983. |
| Hayes-Albion Corporation Foundry, Calhoun County | 2-1980 | 2/2/1982 | 9/15/1983, 48 FR 41403 | Original order effective 2/15/1980, as altered effective 2/2/1982. |
| J. H. Campbell Plant, Ottawa County | 5-1979 | 2/6/1980 | 12/24/1980, 45 FR 85004 (correction: 3/16/1981 46 FR 16895) |
Original order effective 6/25/1979, as altered effective 2/6/1980. |
| Keywell Corporation, Wayne County | 31-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Lansing Board of Water and Light | 4-1979 | 5/23/1979 | 12/17/1980, 45 FR 82926 | All except sections 7 A, B, C1, D, E, F, and section 8. |
| Marathon Oil Company, Muskegon County | 16-1981 | 7/31/1981 | 2/22/1982, 47 FR 7661 | |
| Marblehead Lime Company, Brennan Avenue Plant, Wayne County | 21-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Marblehead Lime Company, River Rouge Plant, Wayne County | 22-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| McLouth Steel Company, Trenton Plant, Wayne County | 23-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Michigan Foundation Company, Cement Plant, Wayne County | 24-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Michigan Foundation Company, Sibley Quarry, Wayne County | 25-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Monitor Sugar Company, Bay County | 21-1981 | 10/29/1981 | 5/19/1982, 47 FR 21534 | |
| Morton International, Inc., Morton Salt Division, Wayne County | 26-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| National Steel Corporation, Great Lakes Division, Wayne County | 27-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| National Steel Corporation, Transportation and Materials Handling Division, Wayne County | 28-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| New Haven Foundry, Inc., Macomb County | 12-1980 | 8/14/1980 | 2/10/1982, 47 FR 6013 | |
| Northern Michigan Electric Cooperative Advance Steam Plant, Charlevoix County | 16-1979 | 1/10/1980 | 7/2/1981, 46 FR 34584 | |
| Packaging Corporation of America, Manistee County | 23-1984 | 7/8/1985 | 5/4/1987, 52 FR 16246 | |
| Peerless Metal Powders, Incorporated, Wayne County | 29-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Rouge Steel Company, Wayne County | 30-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| S. D. Warren Company, Muskegon | 9-1979 | 10/31/1999 | 1/27/1981, 46 FR 8476 | |
| St. Marys Cement Company, Wayne County | 32-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| Traverse City Board of Light and Power, Grand Traverse County | 23-1981 | 1/4/1982 | 5/19/1982, 47 FR 21534 | |
| Union Camp Corporation, Monroe County | 14-1979 | 1/3/1980 | 5/14/1981, 46 FR 26641 | |
| United States Gypsum Company, Wayne County | 33-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | |
| United States Steel Corporation—Great Lakes Works | 110-23 | 9/26/2023 | 5/19/2025, 90 FR 21228 | |
| VCF Films, Inc., Livingston County | 3-1993 | 6/21/1993 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46182 | |
| Woodbridge Corporation, Washtenaw County | 40-1993 | 11/12/1993 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46182 | |
| Wyandotte Municipal Power Plant, Wayne County | 34-1993 | 10/12/1994 | 1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 |
(e) EPA approved nonregulatory and quasi-regulatory provisions.
| Name of nonregulatory SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area | State submittal date | EPA Approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation plan for the control of suspended particulates, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and photochemical oxidants in the state of Michigan | Statewide | 2/3/1972 | 5/31/1972, 37 FR 10841 | Sections include: Air quality control regions, legal authority, air quality data, emission data, control strategy, control regulations, compliance plans and schedules, prevention of air pollution emergency episodes, air quality surveillance program, control of emission sources, organization and resources, and intergovernmental cooperation. |
| Reevaluation of control strategies | Berrien and Ingham Counties | 3/3/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | |
| Reasons and justifications | Statewide | 7/12/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | Concerning general requirements of control strategy for nitrogen dioxide, compliance schedules, and review of new sources and modifications. |
| Compliance schedules | Alpena, Baraga, Charlevoix, Huron, Ionia, Marquette, Midland, Muskegon, Oakland, Otsego, and St. Clair Counties | 5/4/1973, 9/19/1973, 10/23/1973, and 12/13/1973 |
8/5/1974, 39 FR 28155 | |
| Compliance schedules | Allegan, Eaton, Emmet, Genesee, Huron, Ingham, Macomb, Monroe, Ottawa, Saginaw, and St. Clair Counties | 2/16/1973 and 5/4/1973 | 9/10/1974, 39 FR 32606 | |
| Carbon monoxide control strategy | Saginaw area | 4/25/1979 | 5/6/1980, 45 FR 29790 | |
| Transportation control plans | Detroit urban area | 4/25/1979, 7/25/1979, 10/12/1979, 10/26/1979, 11/8/1979, 12/26/1979 |
6/2/1980, 45 FR 37188 | |
| Ozone control strategy for rural ozone nonattainment areas | Marquette, Muskegon, Gratiot, Midland, Saginaw, Bay, Tuscola, Huron, Sanilac, Ottawa, Ionia, Shiawassee, Lapeer, Allegan, Barry, Van Buren, Kalamazoo, Calhoun, Jackson, Berrien, Cass, Branch, Hillsdale, and Lenawee Counties | 4/25/1979, 7/25/1979, 10/12/1979, 10/26/1979, 11/8/1979, 12/26/1979 |
6/2/1980, 45 FR 37188 | |
| Transportation control plan | Niles | 4/25/1979, 10/26/1979, 11/8/1979, 12/26/1979, 8/4/1980, and 8/8/1980 |
4/17/1981, 46 FR 22373 | |
| Total suspended particulate studies | Detroit area | 3/7/1980 and 4/21/1981 | 2/18/1982, 47 FR 7227 | |
| Lead plan | Statewide | 12/27/1979 and 2/9/1981 | 4/13/1982, 47 FR 15792 | |
| Reduction in size of Detroit ozone area | Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, Monroe, St. Clair, and Washtenaw Counties | 9/1/1982 | 7/7/1983, 48 FR 31199 | |
| Information relating to order 8-1982: letter dated 9/6/84 from Michigan Department of Natural Resources to EPA | Genesee County | 9/6/1984 | 8/22/1988, 53 FR 31861 | |
| Information relating to order 14-1987: letter dated 12/17/87 from Michigan Department of Natural Resources to EPA | Midland County | 12/17/1987 | 10/3/1989, 54 FR 40657 | |
| Appendices A and D of Wayne County Air Pollution Control Ordinance | Wayne County | 10/10/1986 | 5/13/1993, 58 FR 28359 | Effective 11/18/1985. |
| Information supporting emissions statement program | Statewide | 12/18/2020 | 7/6/2022, 87 FR 40097 | 2020 version of AQD-013, 2019 version of MAERS form SB-101 Submit, 2019 version of MAERS form S-101 Source, 2019 version of MAERS form A-101 Activity, 2019 version of MAERS form EU-101 Emission Unit, 2019 version of MAERS form E-101 Emissions, January 2020 MAERS User Guide. |
| I/M program | Grand Rapids and Muskegon areas | 11/12/1993 and 7/19/1994 | 10/11/1994, 59 FR 51379 | Includes: document entitled “Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Program for Southeast Michigan, Grand Rapids MSA, and Muskegon MSA Moderate Nonattainment Areas,” RFP, and supplemental materials. |
| PM-10 implementation plan | Wayne County | 6/11/1993, 4/7/1994, and 10/14/1994 |
1/17/1995, 60 FR 3346 | Reasonable further progress, RACM, contingency measures, 1985 base year emission inventory. |
| General conformity | Statewide | 11/29/1994 | 12/18/1996, 61 FR 66607 | |
| Transportation conformity | Statewide | 11/24/1994 | 12/18/1996, 61 FR 66609 | |
| 7.8 psi Reid vapor pressure gasoline-supplemental materials | Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Washtenaw, Livingston, St. Clair, and Monroe Counties | 5/16/1996, 1/5/1996, and 5/14/1996 |
5/5/1997, 62 FR 24341 | Includes: letter from Michigan Governor John Engler to Regional Administrator Valdas Adamkus, dated 1/5/1996, letter from Michigan Director of Environmental Quality Russell Harding to Regional Administrator Valdas Adamkus, dated 5/14/1996, and state report entitled “Evaluation of Air Quality Contingency Measures for Implementation in Southeast Michigan”. |
| Regional Haze Plan | Statewide | 11/5/2010 | 12/3/2012, 77 FR 71533 | Addresses all regional haze plan elements except BART emission limitations for EGUs, St. Marys Cement, Escanaba Paper, and Tilden Mining. |
| Regional Haze Progress Report | Statewide | 1/12/2016 | 6/1/2018, 83 FR 25375 | |
| Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Plan | Statewide | 8/23/2021, 7/24/2025. |
9/5/2025, 90 FR 42833 | Full Approval. |
| List of permit applications; list of consent order public notices; notice, opportunity for public comment and public hearing required for certain permit actions | Statewide | 12/19/2018 | 5/31/2019, 84 FR 25180 | Includes: Letter from Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Director C. Heidi Grether to Regional Administrator Cathy Stepp, dated 12/19/2018, along with an enclosed selection of Section 5511 (3) of Part 55, Air Pollution Control, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended. |
| 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Clean Data Determination | St. Clair area | 7/24/2020 | 12/7/2021, 86 FR 69173 | EPA's final determination suspends the requirements for EGLE to submit an attainment demonstration and other associated nonattainment planning requirements for the St. Clair nonattainment area requirements for the nonattainment area for as long as the area continues to attain the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. |
| 2010 SO2 Nonattainment New Source Review Certification | St. Clair County (part) | 6/30/2021 | 2/9/2022, 87 FR 7387 | |
| 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date | St. Clair County (part) | 12/26/2024, 89 FR 104884 | ||
| Determination of failure to attain the 2010 SO2 standard | Detroit area (Wayne County, part) | 1/28/2022, 87 FR 4501 | Triggers requirements of CAA section 179(d) for the State of Michigan to submit by January 30, 2023, a revision to its SIP for the Detroit area that, among other elements, provides for expeditious attainment of the 2010 SO2 standard within the time period specified in CAA sections 179(d)(3) and 172(a)(2). | |
| Ozone (8-hour, 2015) Nonattainment New Source Review Certification | Statewide | 1/24/2023 | 6/9/2023, 88 FR 37766 | |
| 2015 Ozone Clean Data Determination | Detroit area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 5/19/2023, 88 FR 32584 | EPA's final determination suspends the requirements for EGLE to submit an attainment demonstration and other associated nonattainment planning requirements for the Detroit nonattainment area for as long as the area continues to attain the 2015 ozone NAAQS. | |
| 2015 8-hour ozone Moderate RFP plans and motor vehicle emission budgets | Allegan County (part), Berrien County, and Muskegon County (part) | 10/16/2023 | 2/26/2026, 91 FR 9453 | |
| Attainment Demonstrations | ||||
| 1-hour ozone attainment demonstrations and transportation control plans | Flint, Lansing and Grand Rapids urban areas | 4/25/1979, 7/25/1979, 10/12/1979, 10/26/1979, 11/8/1979, 12/26/1979 |
6/2/1980, 45 FR 37188 | |
| Carbon monoxide and 1-hour ozone attainment demonstrations and I/M program | Detroit urban area | 4/25/1979, 7/25/1979, 10/12/1979, 10/26/1979, 11/8/1979, 12/26/1979, 3/20/1980, 5/12/1980, and 5/21/1980 |
6/2/1980, 45 FR 37192 | |
| SO2 (2010) | Detroit area (Wayne County, part) | 12/20/2022, 2/21/2023, 12/14/2023, and 4/2/2024 |
5/19/2025, 90 FR 21228 | |
| Emissions Inventories | ||||
| 1-hour ozone 1990 base year | Grand Rapids (Kent and Ottawa Counties) and Muskegon areas | 1/5/1993 | 7/26/1994, 59 FR 37944 | |
| 1-hour ozone 1990 base year | Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 1/5/1993 and 11/29/1993 | 3/7/1995, 60 FR 12459 | |
| 1-hour ozone 1990 base year | Flint (Genesee County) and Saginaw-Midland-Bay City (Bay, Midland, and Saginaw Counties) | 5/9/2000 | 11/13/2000, 65 FR 67629 | |
| 1-hour ozone 1991 base year | Allegan County | 9/1/2000 and 10/13/2000 | 11/24/2000, 65 FR 70490 | |
| 1997 8-hour ozone 2005 base year | Detroit-Ann Arbor (Lenawee, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 3/6/2009 | 6/29/2009, 74 FR 30950 | |
| 2015 8-hour ozone 2017 base year | Detroit area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 12/18/2020 | 7/6/2022, 87 FR 40097 | |
| 2015 8-hour ozone 2017 base year | Allegan County (part), Berrien County, and Muskegon County (part) | 10/16/2023 | 2/26/2026, 91 FR 9453 | |
| 1997 annual PM2.5 2005 base year | Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 6/13/2008 | 11/6/2012, 77 FR 66547 | |
| 2008 lead (Pb) 2013 base year | Belding area (Ionia County, part) | 1/12/2016 | 5/31/2017, 82 FR 24864 | |
| 2010 SO2 Standard 2012 base year | Detroit area (Wayne County, part) | 5/31/2016 | 3/19/2021, 86 FR 14827 | |
| 2010 SO2 Standard 2014 base year | St. Clair County (part) | 6/30/2021 | 2/9/2022, 87 FR 7387 | |
| Infrastructure | ||||
| Public availability of emissions data | Statewide | 7/24/1972 | 10/28/1972, 37 FR 23085 | |
| Ambient air quality monitoring, data reporting, and surveillance provisions | Statewide | 12/19/1979 | 3/4/1981, 46 FR 15138 | |
| Provisions addressing sections 110(a)(2)(K), 126(a)(2), 127, and 128 of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 | Statewide | 4/25/1979 and 10/12/1979 | 6/5/1981, 46 FR 30082 | Concerns permit fees, interstate pollution, public notification, and state boards. |
| Section 121, intergovernmental consultation | Statewide | 5/25/1979 | 11/27/1981, 46 FR 57893 | |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 12/6/2007, 7/19/2008, and 4/6/2011 |
7/13/2011, 76 FR 41075 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 12/6/2007, 7/19/2008, and 4/6/2011 |
7/13/2011, 76 FR 41075 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 8/15/2011, 7/9/2012, 7/10/2014 |
10/20/2015, 80 FR 63451 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 2008 lead (Pb) NAAQS | Statewide | 4/3/2012, 8/9/2013, 7/10/2014 |
10/20/2015, 80 FR 63451 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 7/10/2014 | 10/13/2015, 80 FR 61311 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on (D)(i)(I) and the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2) NAAQS | Statewide | 7/10/2014 | 10/13/2015, 80 FR 61311 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 sulfur dioxide (SO2) NAAQS | Statewide | 7/10/2014 | 10/13/2015, 80 FR 61311 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on (D)(i)(I) and the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS | Statewide | 7/10/2014 and 3/23/2017. |
3/12/2019, 84 FR 8812 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 3/8/2019 | 5/14/2026, 91 FR 27205 | Approved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II) Prong 3, D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). Disapproved CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) Prongs 1 and 2, and 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) Prong 4. |
| Maintenance Plans | ||||
| Carbon monoxide | Detroit area (portions of Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb Counties) | 3/18/1999 | 6/30/1999, 64 FR 35017 | |
| Carbon monoxide | Detroit area (portions of Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb Counties) | 12/19/2003 | 1/28/2005, 64 FR 35017 | Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets. |
| 1-hour ozone | Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 11/12/1994 | 3/7/1995, 60 FR 12459 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Grand Rapids area | 3/9/1995 | 6/21/1996, 61 FR 31831 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Muskegon County | 3/9/1995 | 8/30/2000, 65 FR 52651 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Allegan County | 9/1/2000 and 10/13/2000 | 11/24/2000, 65 FR 70490 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Flint (Genesee County) and Saginaw-Midland-Bay City (Bay, Midland, and Saginaw Counties) | 5/9/2000 | 11/13/2000, 65 FR 67629 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Muskegon County | 3/22/2001 | 8/6/2001, 66 FR 40895 | Revision to motor vehicle emission budgets. |
| 1-hour ozone update | Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 12/19/2003 | 5/20/2005, 70 FR 29202 | |
| 1997 8-hour ozone | Benzie County, Flint, Grand Rapids, Huron County, Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, Lansing-East Lansing, and Mason County | 7/24/2019 | 3/6/2020, 85 FR 13057 | 2nd limited maintenance plan. |
| 1997 8-hour ozone | Benton Harbor, Cass County, and Muskegon | 6/13/2006, 8/25/2006, and 11/30/2006 |
5/16/2007, 72 FR 27425 | |
| 1997 8-hour ozone | Detroit-Ann Arbor | 3/6/2009 | 6/29/2009, 74 FR 30950 | |
| Ozone (8-Hour, 2015) | Detroit area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 1/3/2022 | 5/19/2023, 88 FR 32594 | |
| Particulate matter | Macomb, Oakland, Wayne and Monroe Counties | 6/27/1974 and 10/18/1974 | 6/2/1975, 40 FR 23746 | |
| PM-10 | Wayne County | 7/24/1995 | 8/5/1996, 61 FR 40516 | |
| 1997 Annual PM2.5 | Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 7/05/2011 | 8/29/2013, 78 FR 53274 | |
| 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 | Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 7/05/2011 | 8/29/2013, 78 FR 53274 | |
| 2008 lead (Pb) | Belding area (Ionia County, part) | 1/12/2016 | 5/31/2017, 82 FR 24864 | |
| 2010 SO2 | Detroit area (Wayne County, part) | 5/5/2025 | 4/2/2026, 91 FR 16562 | |
| SO2 (2010) | St. Clair County (part) | 12/14/2023 and 7/24/2025 | 7/9/2026, 91 FR 42356 | |
| Negative Declarations | ||||
| Negative declarations | Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties | 10/10/1983, 5/17/1985, and 6/12/1985 |
11/24/1986, 51 FR 42221 | Includes large petroleum dry cleaners, high-density polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene resin manufacturers, and synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry—oxidation. |
| Negative declarations | Detroit-Ann Arbor Area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw and Wayne Counties) Grand Rapids Area (Kent and Ottawa Counties), and Muskegon County | 3/30/1994 | 9/7/1994, 59 FR 46182 | Includes: Large petroleum dry cleaners, SOCMI air oxidation processes, high-density polyethylene and polypropylene resin manufacturing and pneumatic rubber tire manufacturing. |
| Section 182(f) NO X Exemptions | ||||
| 1-hour ozone | Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) | 11/12/1993 | 8/10/1994, 59 FR 40826 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Clinton, Ingham, Eaton, and Genesee Counties | 7/1/1994 and 7/8/1994 | 4/27/1995, 60 FR 20644 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Kent, Ottawa, Muskegon, Allegan, Barry, Bay, Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, Clinton, Eaton, Gratiot, Genesee, Hillsdale, Ingham, Ionia, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Lenawee, Midland, Montcalm, St. Joseph, Saginaw, Shiawassee, and Van Buren Counties | 7/13/1994 | 1/26/1996, 61 FR 2428 | |
| 1-hour ozone | Muskegon County | 11/22/1995 | 9/26/1997, 62 FR 50512 | |
| 1997 8-hour ozone | Grand Rapids (Kent and Ottawa Counties), Kalamazoo-Battle Creek (Calhoun, Kalamazoo, and Van Buren Counties), Lansing-East Lansing (Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties), Benzie County, Huron County and Mason County | 1/17/2015 | 6/6/2006, 71 FR 32448 |
[71 FR 52469, Sept. 6, 2006]
§ 52.1171 Classification of regions.
The Michigan plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Ozone | |
| Metropolitan Detroit-Port Huron Intrastate | I | I | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Toledo Interstate | I | I | III | III | I |
| South Central Michigan Intrastate | II | II | III | III | III |
| South Bend-Elkhart (Indiana)-Benton Harbor (Michigan) Interstate | I | IA | III | III | III |
| Central Michigan Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Upper Michigan Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10873, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974; 45 FR 29801, May 6, 1980]
§ 52.1172 Approval status.
With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves Michigan's plan for the attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds the plan satisfies all requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977, except as noted below. In addition, continued satisfaction of the requirements of Part D for the ozone portion of the SIP depends on the adoption and submittal of RACT requirements by July 1, 1980 for the sources covered by CTGs between January 1978 and January 1979 and adoption and submittal by each subsequent January of additional RACT requirements for sources covered by CTGs issued by the previous January.
[45 FR 29801, May 6, 1980]
§ 52.1173 Control strategy: Particulates.
(a) Part D—Disapproval. The following specific revisions to the Michigan Plan are disapproved:
(1) Rule 336.1331, Table 31, Item C: Emission limits for Open Hearth Furnaces, Basic Oxygen Furnaces, Electric Arc Furnaces, Sintering Plants, Blast Furnaces, Heating and Reheating Furnaces.
(2) Rules 336.1371 (Fugitive dust control programs other than areas listed in table 36.), 336.1372 (Fugitive dust control programs; required activities; typical control methods.) and 336.1373 (Fugitive dust control programs; areas listed in table 36.) for control of industrial fugitive particulate emissions sources.
(b) Part D—Conditional Approval—The Michigan overall Plan for primary and secondary nonattainment areas is approved provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) The State officially adopts final industrial fugitive regulations that represent RACT for traditional sources and submits these finally effective regulations to USEPA by January 31, 1981.
(2) The State adopts and submits regulations reflecting RACT for Basic Oxygen Furnaces, Electric Arc Furnaces, Sintering Plants, Blast Furnaces and Heating and Reheating Furnaces.
(3) Rule 336.1331, Table 31, Item C: Coke Oven Preheater Equipment Effective After July 1, 1979—The State clarifies the compliance test method to include measurement of the whole train.
(4) Rule 336.1349—The State submits consent orders containing enforceable increments insuring reasonable further progress for each source subject to Rules 336.1350 through 336.1357.
(5) Rule 336.1350—The State adopts and submits an acceptable inspection method for determining compliance with the rule.
(6) Rule 336.1352—The State adopts and submits the following clarifications to the rule: (a) The rule regulates emissions from the receiving car itself during the pushing operation; (b) in the phrase “eight consecutive trips,” “consecutive” is defined as “consecutively observed trips”; (c) the word “trips” is defined as “trips per battery” or “trips per system”; (d) the 40% opacity fugitive emissions limitation refers to an instantaneous reading and not an average; (e) the method of reading opacity is defined.
(7) Rule 336.1353—The State adopts and submits: (a) An acceptable test methodology for determining compliance with the rule; and (b) a clarification that the exception to the visible emission prohibition of 4% of standpipe emission points refers to “operating” ovens.
(8) Rule 336.1356—The State adopts and submits a clarification of the test methodology to determine compliance with the rule.
(9) Rule 336.1357—The State adopts and submits a clarification of the test methodology to determine compliance with the rule.
(10) The State adopts and submits a regulation reflecting RACT for coke battery combustion stacks.
(11) The State adopts and submits an acceptable test method for application of Rule 336.1331, Table 32 to quench towers, or, in the alternative, adopts and submits a limitation reflecting RACT for quench tower emissions based on the quantity of total dissolved solids in the quench water.
(12) The State adopts and submits rules requiring RACT for scarfing emissions.
(13) Part 10 Testing—The State adopts and submits the following clarifications to the test methods: (a) Testing of fugitive emissions from blast furnaces are conducted during the cast; (b) the starting and ending period is specified for basic oxygen furnaces (for both primary and secondary emissions generating operations), electric arc furnaces and for each of the three emission points at sinter plants.
(14) The State conducts additional particulate studies in the Detroit area by September, 1980.
(c) Disapprovals. EPA disapproves the following specific revisions to the Michigan Plan:
(1) The State submitted Consent Order No. 16-1982 on June 24, 1982, Great Lakes Steel, a Division of the National Steel Corporation as a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan. EPA disapproves this revision, because it does not satisfy all the requirements of EPA's proposed Emission Trading Policy Statement of April 7, 1982 (47 FR 15076).
(d) Approval—On April 29, 1988, the State of Michigan submitted a committal SIP for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 micrometers (PM10) for Michigan's Group II areas. The Group II areas of concern are in the City of Monroe and an area surrounding the City of Carrollton. The committal SIP contains all the requirements identified in the July 1, 1987, promulgation of the SIP requirements for PM10 at 52 FR 24681.
(e) [Reserved]
(f) On July 24, 1995, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources requested the redesignation of Wayne County to attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter. The State's maintenance plan is complete and the redesignation satisfies all of the requirements of the Act.
(g) Approval—On November 29, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the particulate State Implementation Plan for general conformity rules. The general conformity SIP revisions enable the State of Michigan to implement and enforce the Federal general conformity requirements in the nonattainment or maintenance areas at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 93, subpart B—Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.
(h) Determination of Attainment. EPA has determined, as of November 6, 2012, that based on 2009-2011 ambient air quality data, the Detroit-Ann Arbor nonattainment area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This determination, in accordance with 40 CFR 51.1004(c), suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
(i) Pursuant to Clean Air Act section 179(c), EPA has determined that the Detroit-Ann Arbor area attained the annual 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date, April 5, 2010.
(j) Approval—The 1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plans for the Detroit-Ann Arbor nonattainment area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties), has been approved as submitted on July 5, 2011. The maintenance plan establishes 2023 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Detroit-Ann Arbor area of 4,360 tpy for primary PM2.5 and 119,194 tpy for NOX.
(k) Approval—The 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 maintenance plans for the Detroit-Ann Arbor nonattainment area (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties), has been approved as submitted on July 5, 2011. The maintenance plan establishes 2023 motor vehicle emissions budgets for the Detroit-Ann Arbor area of 16 tpd for primary PM2.5 and 365 tpd for NOX.
(l) Approval—On October 3, 2016, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to their Particulate Matter State Implementation Plan. The submittal established transportation conformity “Conformity” criteria and procedures related to interagency consultation, and enforceability of certain transportation related control and mitigation measures.
[46 FR 27931, May 22, 1981, as amended at 49 FR 11834, Mar. 28, 1984; 50 FR 33540, Aug. 20, 1985; 55 FR 17752, Apr. 27, 1990; 61 FR 40519, Aug. 5, 1996; 61 FR 66609, Dec. 18, 1996; 77 FR 66547, Nov. 6, 2012; 78 FR 53274, Aug. 29, 2013; 82 FR 17135, Apr. 10, 2017]
§ 52.1174 Control strategy: Ozone.
(a) Part D—Conditional Approval—Michigan Rules 336.1603 and 336.1606 are approved provided that the following conditions are satisfied:
(1) Rule 336.1606—The State either promulgates a rule with a 120,000 gallon per year throughput exemption for gasoline dispensing facilities for sources located in Wayne, Macomb and Oakland Counties. The State must either submit the rule to USEPA or demonstrate that the allowable emissions resulting from the application of its existing rule with 250,000 gallon per year throughput exemption for gasoline dispensing facilities are less than five percent greater than the allowable emissions resulting from the application of the CTG presumptive norm. The State must comply with this condition by May 6, 1981, and any necessary regulations must be finally promulgated by the State and submitted to USEPA by September 30, 1981.
(b) Approval—On November 16, 1992, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted Natural Resources Commission Rule 336.202 (Rule 2), Sections 5 and 14a of the 1965 Air Pollution Act 348, and the 1991 Michigan Air Pollution Reporting Forms, Reference Tables, and General Instructions as the States emission statement program. Natural Resources Commission Rule 336.202 (Rule 2) became effective November 11, 1986. Section 5 and 14a of the 1965 Air Pollution Act 348 became effective July 23, 1965. These rules have been incorporated by reference at 40 CFR 52.1170(c)(93). On October 25, 1993, the State submitted the 1993 Michigan Air Pollution Reporting Forms, Reference Tables, and General Instructions, along with an implementation strategy for the State's emission statement program.
(c)(1) Approval—On January 5, 1993, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 1990 base year inventory. The inventory was submitted by the State of Michigan to satisfy Federal requirements under section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (the Act), as a revision to the ozone SIP for the Grand Rapids and Muskegon areas in Michigan designated nonattainment, classified as moderate. These areas include counties of Muskegon, and the two county Grand Rapids area (which are the counties of Kent and Ottawa).
(2) Approval—On November 12, 1993, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a petition for exemption from the oxides of nitrogen requirements of the Clean Air Act for the Detroit-Ann Arbor ozone nonattainment area. The submittal pertained to the exemption from the oxides of nitrogen requirements for conformity, inspection and maintenance, reasonably available control technology, and new source review. These are required by sections 176(c), 182(b)(4), and 182(f) of the 1990 amended Clean Air Act, respectively.
(d) In a letter addressed to David Kee, EPA, dated March 30, 1994, Dennis M. Drake, State of Michigan, stated:
(1) Michigan has not developed RACT regulations for the following industrial source categories, which have been addressed in Control Techniques Guidance (CTG) documents published prior to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, because no affected sources are located in the moderate nonattainment counties:
(i) Large petroleum dry cleaners;
(ii) SOCMI air oxidation processes;
(iii) High-density polyethylene and polypropylene resin manufacturing; and
(iv) Pneumatic rubber tire manufacturing.
(2) (Reserved)
(e) Approval—On July 1, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a petition for exemption from the oxides of nitrogen requirements of the Clean Air Act for the East Lansing ozone nonattainment area. The submittal pertained to the exemption from the oxides of nitrogen requirements for conformity and new source review. Theses are required by sections 176(c) and 182(f) of the 1990 amended Clean Air Act, respectively. If a violation of the ozone standard occurs in the East Lansing ozone nonattainment area, the exemption shall no longer apply.
(f) Approval—On July 8, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a petition for exemption from the oxides of nitrogen requirements of the Clean Air Act for the Genesee County ozone nonattainment area. The submittal pertained to the exemption from the oxides of nitrogen requirements for conformity and new source review. These are required by sections 176(c) and 182(f) of the 1990 amended Clean Air Act, respectively. If a violation of the ozone standard occurs in the Genesee County ozone nonattainment area, the exemption shall no longer apply.
(g) [Reserved]
(h) Approval—On January 5, 1993, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan for the 1990 base year emission inventory. The inventory was submitted by the State of Michigan to satisfy Federal requirements under section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, as a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan for the Detroit-Ann Arbor moderate ozone nonattainment area. This area includes Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne counties.
(i) Approval—On November 12, 1993, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a request to redesignate the Detroit-Ann Arbor (consisting of Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne counties) ozone nonattainment area to attainment for ozone. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a base year (1993 attainment year) emission inventory for NOX and VOC, a demonstration of maintenance of the ozone NAAQS with projected emission inventories (including interim years) to the year 2005 for NOX and VOC, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the ozone NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the State), Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are contained in the contingency plan. Appropriateness of a contingency measure will be determined by an urban airshed modeling analysis. The Governor or his designee will select the contingency measure(s) to be implemented based on the analysis and the MDNR's recommendation. The menu of contingency measures includes basic motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program upgrades, Stage I vapor recovery expansion, Stage II vapor recovery, intensified RACT for degreasing operations, NOX RACT, and RVP reduction to 7.8 psi. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the Act as amended in 1990, respectively. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Michigan Ozone State Implementation Plan for the above mentioned counties.
(j) [Reserved]
(k) Determination—USEPA is determining that, as of July 20, 1995, the Grand Rapids and Muskegon ozone nonattainment areas have attained the ozone standard and that the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act do not apply to the areas for so long as the areas do not monitor any violations of the ozone standard. If a violation of the ozone NAAQS is monitored in either the Grand Rapids or Muskegon ozone nonattainment area, the determination shall no longer apply for the area that experiences the violation.
(l) Approval—EPA is approving the section 182(f) oxides of nitrogen (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT), new source review (NSR), vehicle inspection/maintenance (I/M), and general conformity exemptions for the Grand Rapids (Kent and Ottawa Counties) and Muskegon (Muskegon County) moderate nonattainment areas as requested by the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin in a July 13, 1994 submittal. This approval also covers the exemption of NOX transportation and general conformity requirements of section 176(c) for the Counties of Allegan, Barry, Bay, Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, Clinton, Eaton, Gratiot, Genesee, Hillsdale, Ingham, Ionia, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Lenawee, Midland, Montcalm, St. Joseph, Saginaw, Shiawasse, and Van Buren.
(m) Approval—On November 24, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan. The submittal pertained to a plan for the implementation and enforcement of the Federal transportation conformity requirements at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 51, subpart T—Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded or Approved Under Title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act.
(n) Approval—On November 29, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the ozone State Implementation Plan for general conformity rules. The general conformity SIP revisions enable the State of Michigan to implement and enforce the Federal general conformity requirements in the nonattainment or maintenance areas at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 93, subpart B—Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.
(o) Approval—On March 9, 1996, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted a request to redesignate the Grand Rapids ozone nonattainment area (consisting of Kent and Ottawa Counties) to attainment for ozone. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include an attainment emission inventory for NOX and VOC, a demonstration of maintenance of the ozone NAAQS with projected emission inventories to the year 2007 for NOX and VOC, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and a commitment to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If a violation of the ozone NAAQS, determined not to be attributable to transport from upwind areas, is monitored, Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) contained in the contingency plan. Once a violation of the ozone NAAQS is recorded, the State will notify EPA, review the data for quality assurance, and conduct a technical analysis, including an analysis of meteorological conditions leading up to and during the exceedances contributing to the violation, to determine local culpability. This preliminary analysis will be submitted to EPA and subjected to public review and comment. The State will solicit and consider EPA's technical advice and analysis before making a final determination on the cause of the violation. The Governor or his designee will select the contingency measure(s) to be implemented within 6 months of a monitored violation attributable to ozone and ozone precursors from the Grand Rapids area. The menu of contingency measures includes a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program, Stage II vapor recovery, RVP reduction to 7.8 psi, RACT on major non-CTG VOC sources in the categories of coating of plastics, coating of wood furniture, and industrial cleaning solvents. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the Act as amended in 1990, respectively. The redesignation meets the Federal requirements of section 182(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as a revision to the Michigan Ozone State Implementation Plan for the above mentioned counties.
(p) Approval—On November 22, 1995 the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a petition for exemption from transportation conformity requirements for the Muskegon ozone nonattainment area. This approval exempts the Muskegon ozone nonattainment area from transportation conformity requirements under section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act. If a violation of the ozone standard occurs in the Muskegon County ozone nonattainment area, the exemption shall no longer apply.
(q) Correction of approved plan—Michigan air quality Administrative Rule, R336.1901 (Rule 901)—Air Contaminant or Water Vapor, has been removed from the approved plan pursuant to section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act (as amended in 1990).
(r) Approval—On March 9, 1995, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted a request to redesignate the Muskegon County ozone nonattainment area to attainment. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, determined not to be attributable to transport from upwind areas, Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are in the contingency plan. The menu of contingency measures includes a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program, stage II vapor recovery, a low Reid vapor pressure gasoline program, and rules for industrial cleanup solvents, plastic parts coating, and wood furniture coating.
(s) Approval—On May 9, 2000, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for ozone containing a section 175A maintenance plan for the Flint and Saginaw-Midland-Bay City areas as part of Michigan's request to redesignate the areas from nonattainment to attainment for ozone. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If monitors in any of these areas record a violation of the ozone NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the State), Michigan will adopt, submit to EPA, and implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are in the contingency plan and will submit a full maintenance plan under section 175A of the Clean Air Act. The menu of contingency measures includes a low Reid vapor pressure gasoline program, stage I gasoline vapor recovery, and rules for industrial cleanup solvents, plastic parts coating, and wood furniture coating.
(t) Approval—On March 9, 1995, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted a request to redesignate the Allegan County ozone nonattainment area to attainment. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, determined not to be attributable to transport from upwind areas, Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are in the contingency plan. The menu of contingency measures includes rules for plastic parts coating, wood furniture coating, and gasoline loading (Stage I vapor recovery).
(u) Approval—On March 22, 2001, Michigan submitted a revision to the ozone maintenance plan for the Muskegon County area. The revision consists of allocating a portion of the Muskegon County area's Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) safety margin to the transportation conformity Motor Vehicle Emission Budget (MVEB). The MVEB for transportation conformity purposes for the Muskegon County area are now: 8.5 tons per day of VOC emissions and 10.2 tons per day of NOX emissions for the year 2010. This approval only changes the VOC and NOX transportation conformity MVEB for Muskegon County.
(v) Approval—On December 19, 2003, Michigan submitted an update to the Section 175(A) maintenance plan for the Southeast Michigan 1-hour ozone maintenance area, which consists of Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne counties. This update addresses the second 10-year period of maintenance of the ozone standard in Southeast Michigan, which spans the years 2005 through 2015. The maintenance plan also revises the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (MVEB). For the year 2005, the MVEB for VOC is 218.1 tons per day (tpd), and the MVEB for NOX is 412.9 tpd. For the year 2015, the MVEB for VOC is 172.8 tpd, and the MVEB for NOX is 412.9 tpd.
(w) Approval—On June 17, 2005, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted a petition requesting the exemption from Clean Air Act oxides of nitrogen control requirements in six 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas. The Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo/Battle Creek, Lansing/East Lansing, Benzie County, Huron County, and Mason County nonattainment areas each receive an exemption. Section 182(f) of the 1990 amended Clean Air Act authorizes the exceptions. The exemption will no longer apply in an area if it experiences a violation of the 8-hour ozone standard.
(x) Approval—On May 9, 2006, Michigan submitted requests to redesignate the Grand Rapids (Kent and Ottawa Counties), Kalamazoo-Battle Creek (Calhoun, Kalamazoo, and Van Buren Counties), Lansing-East Lansing (Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties), Benzie County, Huron County, and Mason County areas to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The State supplemented its redesignation requests on May 26, 2006, and August 25, 2006. As part of its redesignation requests, the State submitted maintenance plans as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit subsequent maintenance plan revisions in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If monitors in any of these areas record a violation of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, Michigan will adopt and implement one or more contingency measures. The list of possible contingency measures includes: Lower Reid vapor pressure gasoline requirements; reduced volatile organic compound (VOC) content in architectural, industrial, and maintenance coatings rule; auto body refinisher self-certification audit program; reduced VOC degreasing rule; transit improvements; diesel retrofit program; reduced VOC content in commercial and consumer products rule; and a program to reduce idling. Also included in the Michigan's submittal were motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for use to determine transportation conformity in the areas. For the Grand Rapids area, the 2018 MVEBs are 40.70 tpd for VOC and 97.87 tpd for oxides of nitrogen (NOX). For the Kalamazoo-Battle Creek area, the 2018 MVEBs are 29.67 tpd for VOC and 54.36 tpd for NOX. For the Lansing-East Lansing area, the 2018 MVEBs are 28.32 tpd for VOC and 53.07 tpd for NOX. For the Benzie County area, the 2018 MVEBs are 2.24 tpd for VOC and 1.99 tpd for NOX. For the Huron County area, the 2018 MVEBs are 2.34 tpd for VOC and 7.53 tpd for NOX. For the Mason County area, the 2018 MVEBs are 1.81 tpd for VOC and 2.99 tpd for NOX.
(y) Approval—On June 13, 2006, Michigan submitted requests to redesignate the Flint (Genesee and Lapeer Counties), Muskegon (Muskegon County), Benton Harbor (Berrien County), and Cass County areas to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The State supplemented its redesignation requests on August 25, 2006, and November 30, 2006. As part of its redesignation requests, the State submitted maintenance plans as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit subsequent maintenance plan revisions in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If monitors in any of these areas record a violation of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, Michigan will adopt and implement one or more contingency measures. The list of possible contingency measures includes: Lower Reid vapor pressure gasoline requirements; reduced volatile organic compound (VOC) content in architectural, industrial, and maintenance coatings rule; auto body refinisher self-certification audit program; reduced VOC degreasing rule; transit improvements; diesel retrofit program; reduced VOC content in commercial and consumer products rule; and a program to reduce idling. Also included in the Michigan's submittal were motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for use to determine transportation conformity in the areas. For the Flint area, the 2018 MVEBs are 25.68 tpd for VOC and 37.99 tpd for oxides of nitrogen (NOX). For the Muskegon area, the 2018 MVEBs are 6.67 tpd for VOC and 11.00 tpd for NOX. For the Benton Harbor area, the 2018 MVEBs are 9.16 tpd for VOC and 15.19 tpd for NOX. For the Cass County area, the 2018 MVEBs are 2.76 tpd for VOC and 3.40 tpd for NOX.
(z) Approval—On March 6, 2009, Michigan submitted a request to redesignate the Detroit-Ann Arbor area (Lenawee, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). As part of its redesignation requests, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Elements of the section 175 maintenance plan include a contingency plan and an obligation to submit subsequent maintenance plan revisions in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If monitors in any of these areas record a violation of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, Michigan will adopt and implement one or more contingency measures. The list of possible contingency measures includes: Reduced VOC content in architectural, industrial, and maintenance (AIM) coatings rule; auto body refinisher self-certification audit program; reduced VOC degreasing/solvent cleaning rule; diesel retrofit program; reduced idling program; portable fuel container replacement rule; and, food preparation flame broiler control rule. Also included in the Michigan's submittal were a 2005 base year emissions inventory and motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for use to determine transportation conformity in the area. For the Detroit-Ann Arbor area, Michigan has established separate MVEBS for the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) region (Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties) and for Lenawee County. MDEQ has determined the 2020 MVEBs for the SEMCOG region to be 106 tons per day for VOC and 274 tpd for NOX. MDEQ has determined the 2020 MVEBs for Lenawee County to be 2.1 tpd for VOC and 4.4 tpd for NOX.
[45 FR 58528, Sept. 4, 1980]
§ 52.1175 Compliance schedules.
(a) The requirements of § 51.15(a)(2) of this chapter as of May 31, 1972, (36 FR 22398) are not met since Rule 336.49 of the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission provides for individual compliance schedules to be submitted to the State Agency by January 1, 1974. This would not be in time for submittal to the Environmental Protection Agency with the first semiannual report.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) The requirements of § 51.262(a) of this chapter are not met since compliance schedules with adequate increments of progress have not been submitted for every source for which they are required.
(d) Federal compliance schedules. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, the owner or operator of any stationary source subject to the following emission-limiting regulations in the Michigan implementation plan shall comply with the applicable compliance schedule in paragraph (d)(2) of this section: Air Pollution Control Commission, Department of Public Health, Michigan Rule 336.49.
(2) Compliance schedules. (i) The owner or operator of any boiler or furnace of more than 250 million Btu per hour heat input subject to Rule 336.49 and located in the Central Michigan Intrastate AQCR, South Bend-Elkhart-Benton Harbor Interstate AQCR, or Upper Michigan Intrastate AQCR (as defined in part 81 of this title) shall notify the Administrator, no later than October 1, 1973, of his intent to utilize either low-sulfur fuel or stack gas desulfurization to comply with the limitations effective July 1, 1975, in Table 3 or Table 4 of Rule 336.49.
(ii) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section who elects to utilize low-sulfur fuel shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the dates specified.
(a) November 1, 1973—Submit to the Administrator a projection of the amount of fuel, by types, that will be substantially adequate to enable compliance with Table 3 of Rule 336.49 on July 1, 1975, and for at least one year thereafter.
(b) December 31, 1973—Sign contracts with fuel suppliers for projected fuel requirements.
(c) January 31, 1974—Submit a statement as to whether boiler modifications will be required. If modifications will be required, submit plans for such modifications.
(d) March 15, 1974—Let contracts for necessary boiler modifications, if applicable.
(e) June 15, 1974—Initiate onsite modifications, if applicable.
(f) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite modifications, if applicable.
(g) July 1, 1975—Achieve final compliance with the applicable July 1, 1975, sulfur-in-fuel limitation listed in Table 3 of Rule 336.49.
(iii) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section who elects to utilize stack gas desulfurization shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the dates specified.
(a) November 1, 1973—Let necessary contracts for construction.
(b) March 1, 1974—Initiate onsite construction.
(c) March 31, 1975—Complete onsite construction.
(d) July 1, 1975—Achieve final compliance with the applicable July 1, 1975, emission limitation listed in Table 4 of Rule 336.49.
(e) If a performance test is necessary for a determination as to whether compliance has been achieved, such a test must be completed by July 1, 1975. Ten days prior to such a test, notice must be given to the Administrator to afford him the opportunity to have an observer present.
(iv) The owner or operator of any boiler or furnace of more than 250 million Btu per hour heat input subject to Rule 336.49 and located in the Central Michigan Intrastate AQCR. South Bend-Elkhart-Benton Harbor Interstate AQCR, or Upper Michigan Intrastate AQCR shall notify the Administrator, no later than January 31, 1974, of his intent to utilize either low-sulfur fuel or stack gas desulfurization to comply with the limitation effective July 1, 1978, in Table 3 or Table 4 of Rule 336.49.
(v) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section who elects to utilize low-sulfur fuel shall take the following actions with respect to the source no later than the dates specified.
(a) October 15, 1976—Submit to the Administrator a projection of the amount of fuel, by types, that will be substantially adequate to enable compliance with Table 3 of Rule 336.49 on July 1, 1978, and for at least one year thereafter.
(b) December 31, 1976—Sign contracts with fuel suppliers for projected fuel requirements.
(c) January 31, 1977—Submit a statement as to whether boiler modifications will be required. If modifications will be required, submit plans for such modifications.
(d) March 15, 1977—Let contracts for necessary boiler modifications, if applicable.
(e) June 15, 1977—Initiate onsite modifications, if applicable.
(f) March 31, 1978—Complete onsite modifications, if applicable.
(g) July 1, 1978—Achieve final compliance with the applicable July 1, 1978, sulfur-in-fuel limitation listed in Table 3 of Rule 336.49.
(vi) Any owner or operator of a stationary source subject to paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section who elects to utilize stack gas desulfurization shall take the following actions with regard to the source no later than the dates specified.
(a) November 1, 1976—Let necessary contracts for construction.
(b) March 1, 1977—Initiate onsite construction.
(c) March 31, 1978—Complete onsite construction.
(d) July 1, 1978—Achieve final compliance with the applicable July 1, 1978, mission limitation listed in Table 4 of Rule 336.49.
(e) If a performance test is necessary for a determination as to whether compliance has been achieved, such a test must be completed by July 1, 1978. Ten days prior to such a test, notice must be given to the Administrator to afford him the opportunity to have an observer present.
(vii) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule above shall certify to the Administrator, within five days after the deadline for each increment of progress in that schedule, whether or not the increment has been met.
(3)(i) Paragraphs (d) (1) and (2) of this section shall not apply to a source which is presently in compliance with Table 3 or Table 4 of Rule 336.49 and which has certified such compliance to the Administrator by October 1, 1973. The Administrator may request whatever supporting information he considers necessary for proper certification.
(ii) Any compliance schedule adopted by the State and approved by the Administrator shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(iii) Any owner or operator subject to a compliance schedule in this paragraph may submit to the Administrator no later than October 1, 1973, a proposed alternative compliance schedule. No such compliance schedule may provide for final compliance after the final compliance date in the applicable compliance schedule of this paragraph. If promulgated by the Administrator, such schedule shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph for the affected source.
(4) Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude the Administrator from promulgating a separate schedule for any source to which the application of the compliance schedule in paragraph (d)(2) of this section fails to satisfy the requirements of §§ 51.261 and 51.262(a) of this chapter.
(e) The compliance schedules for the sources identified below are approved as meeting the requirements of § 51.104 and subpart N of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State, unless otherwise noted.
| Source | Location | Regulations involved | Date schedule adopted | Final compliance date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| berrien county | ||||
| Conoco, Inc. | Berrien | R336.1603, R336.1609 | Sept. 26, 1981 | Dec. 31, 1982. |
| calhoun county | ||||
| Clark Oil and Refining Corp | Calhoun | R336.1603 R336.1609 | May 14, 1982 | Dec. 31, 1982. |
| charlevoix county | ||||
| Northern Michigan Electric Cooperative Advance Steam Plant | Boyne City | 336.1401 (336.49) | Jan. 10, 1980 | Jan. 1, 1985. |
| genesee county | ||||
| Buick Motor Division | City of Flint | R336.1301 | May 5, 1980 | Dec. 31, 1982. |
| GM Warehousing Dist. Div. Boilers 1 and 2 | Genesee | R336.1331 | Dec. 31, 1981 | Oct. 15, 1983. |
| GM Warehousing Dist. Div. Boilers 3 and 4 | ......do | R336.1331 | Dec. 1, 1981 | Oct. 15, 1981. |
| macomb county | ||||
| New Haven Foundry | Macomb County | R336.1301, R336.1331, R336.1901 | Aug. 14, 1980 | June 30, 1985. |
| midland county | ||||
| Dow Chemical | Midland | R336.1301 and R336.1331 | July 21, 1982 | Dec. 31, 1985. |
| monroe county | ||||
| Detroit Edison (Monroe plant) | Monroe | 336.49 | July 7, 1977 | Jan. 1, 1985. |
| Dundee Cement Company | Dundee | 336.41, 44 (336.1301, 336.1331) |
Oct. 17, 1979 | Dec. 31, 1983. |
| Union Camp | Monroe | 336.1401 (336.49) |
Jan. 3, 1980 | Jan. 1, 1985. |
| muskegon county | ||||
| Consumers Power Company (B. C. Cobb) | Muskegon | 336.1401 (336.49) |
Dec. 10, 1979 | Jan. 1, 1985. |
| S. D. Warren Co | Muskegon | 336.49 (336.1401) | Oct. 31, 1979 | Nov. 1, 1984. |
| Marathon Oil | ......do | 336.1603 | July 31, 1981 | Dec. 31, 1982. |
| saginaw county | ||||
| Grey Iron Casting and Nodular Iron Casting Plants | Saginaw | R336.1301 | Apr. 16, 1980 | Dec. 31, 1982. |
| wayne county | ||||
| Boulevard Heating Plant | Wayne | R336.1331 | Apr. 28, 1981 | Dec. 31, 1982. |
| Footnotes: | ||||
| 1 For the attainment of the primary standard. | ||||
| 2 For the attainment of the secondary standard. | ||||
| 3 For the maintenance of the secondary standard. |
(f) The compliance schedules for the sources identified below are disapproved as not meeting the requirements of § 51.15 of this chapter. All regulations cited are air pollution control regulations of the State, unless otherwise noted.
| Source | Location | Regulation involved | Date schedule adopted |
|---|---|---|---|
| bay county | |||
| Consumer Power (Karn Plant) | Essexville | 336.44 | Sept. 18, 1973. |
| ottawa county | |||
| Consumer Power Co. (Campbell Plant Units 1, 2) | West Olive | 336.44 | Sept. 18, 1973. |
[37 FR 10873, May 31, 1972]
§ 52.1176 Review of new sources and modifications. [Reserved]
§§ 52.1177-52.1178 [Reserved]
§ 52.1179 Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
(a) Approval—On March 18, 1999, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted a request to redesignate the Detroit CO nonattainment area (consisting of portions of Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties) to attainment for CO. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a base year (1996 attainment year) emission inventory for CO, a demonstration of maintenance of the ozone NAAQS with projected emission inventories to the year 2010, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the CO NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the State), Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are contained in the contingency plan. The menu of contingency measures includes enforceable emission limitations for stationary sources, transportation control measures, or a vehicle inspection and maintenance program. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the Act as amended in 1990.
(b) Approval—On December 19, 2003, Michigan submitted a request to revise its plan for the Southeast Michigan CO maintenance area (consisting of portions of Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties). The submittal contains updated emission inventories for 1996 and 2010, and an update to the 2010 motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB). The 2010 MVEB is 3,842.9 tons of CO per day.
(c) Approval—On October 3, 2016, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to their Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan. The submittal established transportation conformity “Conformity” criteria and procedures related to interagency consultation, and enforceability of certain transportation related control and mitigation measures.
[70 FR 4023, Jan. 28, 2005, as amended at 82 FR 17136, Apr. 10, 2017]
§ 52.1180 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not met, since the plan does not include approvable procedures for preventing the significant deterioration of air quality.
(b) Regulations for preventing significant deterioration of air quality. The provisions of § 52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable State plan for the State of Michigan.
(c) All applications and other information required pursuant to § 52.21 of this part from sources located in the State of Michigan shall be submitted to the state agency, Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Air Quality Division, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, Michigan 48909, rather than to EPA's Region 5 office.
[45 FR 8299, Feb. 7, 1980; 45 FR 52741, Aug. 7, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 11323, Mar. 10, 2003; 68 FR 74489, Dec. 24, 2003; 75 FR 55275, Sept. 10, 2010]
§ 52.1181 Interstate pollution.
(a) The requirements of Section 126(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 are not met since the state has not submitted to EPA, as a part of its State Implementation Plan, the procedures on which the state is relying to notify nearby states of any proposed major stationary source which may contribute significantly to levels of air pollution in excess of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards in that state.
[46 FR 30084, June 5, 1981]
§ 52.1182 State boards.
(a) The requirements of Section 128 of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 are not met since the state has not submitted to EPA, as a part of its State Implementation Plan, the measures on which the state is relying to insure that the Air Pollution Control Commission contains a majority of members who represent the public interest and do not derive a significant portion of their income from persons subject to permits or enforcement orders under the Act and that the board members adequately disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
[46 FR 30084, June 5, 1981]
§ 52.1183 Visibility protection.
(a) [Reserved]
(b) Regulation for visibility monitoring and new source review. The provisions of § 52.28 are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable plan for the State of Michigan.
(c) [Reserved]
(d) Regional Haze. The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met because the regional haze plan submitted by Michigan on November 5, 2010, does not include fully approvable measures for meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(d)(3) and 51.308(e) with respect to emissions of NOX and SO2 from electric generating units. EPA has given limited approval and limited disapproval to the plan provisions addressing these requirements.
(e) Measures Addressing Limited Disapproval Associated With NOX. The deficiencies associated with NOX identified in EPA's limited disapproval of the regional haze plan submitted by Michigan on November 5, 2010, are satisfied by § 52.1186.
(f) Measures Addressing Limited Disapproval Associated With SO2. The deficiencies associated with SO2 identified in EPA's limited disapproval of the regional haze plan submitted by Michigan on November 5, 2010, are satisfied by § 52.1187.
(g) The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met because the regional haze plan submitted on November 5, 2010, does not meet the best available retrofit technology requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(e) with respect to emissions of NOX and SO2 from Saint Marys Cement in Charlevoix and NOX from Escanaba Paper Company in Escanaba. These requirements for these two facilities are satisfied by 40 CFR 52.1183(h) and 40 CFR 52.1183(i), respectively.
(h)(1) For the 30-day period beginning January 1, 2017, and thereafter, Saint Marys Cement, or any subsequent owner or operator of the Saint Marys Cement facility located in Charlevoix, Michigan, shall not cause or permit the emission of oxides of nitrogen (expressed as NO2) to exceed 2.80 lb per ton of clinker as a 30-day rolling average.
(2) For the 12-month period beginning January 1, 2017, and thereafter, Saint Marys Cement, or any subsequent owner or operator of the Saint Marys Cement facility located in Charlevoix, Michigan, shall not cause or permit the emission of NOX (expressed as NO2) to exceed 2.40 lb per ton of clinker as a 12-month average.
(3) Saint Marys Cement, or any subsequent owner or operator of the Saint Marys Cement facility located in Charlevoix, Michigan, shall not cause or permit the emission of SO2 to exceed 7.50 lb per ton of clinker as a 12-month average.
(4) Saint Marys Cement, or any subsequent owner or operator of the Saint Marys Cement facility located in Charlevoix, Michigan, shall operate continuous emission monitoring systems to measure NOX and SO2 emissions from its kiln system in conformance with 40 CFR part 60 appendix F procedure 1.
(5) The reference test method for assessing compliance with the limit in paragraph (h)(1) of this section shall be use of a continuous emission monitoring system operated in conformance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, procedure 1. A new 30-day average shall be computed at the end of each calendar day in which the kiln operates, based on the following procedure: First, sum the total pounds of NOX (expressed as NO2) emitted during the operating day and the previous twenty-nine operating days, second, sum the total tons of clinker produced during the same period, and third, divide the total number of pounds by the total clinker produced during the thirty operating days.
(6) The reference test method for assessing compliance with the limit in paragraphs (h)(2) and (h)(3) of this section shall be use of a continuous emission monitoring system operated in conformance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, procedure 1. A new 12-month average shall be computed at the end of each calendar month, based on the following procedure: First, sum the total pounds of NOX or SO2, as applicable, emitted from the unit during the month and the previous eleven calendar months, second, sum the total tons of clinker production during the same period, and third, divide the total number of pounds of emissions of NOX or SO2, as applicable, by the total clinker production during the twelve calendar months.
(7) Recordkeeping. The owner/operator shall maintain the following records for at least five years:
(i) All CEMS data, including the date, place, and time of sampling or measurement; parameters sampled or measured; and results.
(ii) All records of clinker production, which shall be monitored in accordance with 40 CFR 60.63.
(iii) Records of quality assurance and quality control activities for emissions measuring systems including, but not limited to, any records required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1.
(iv) Records of all major maintenance activities conducted on emission units, air pollution control equipment, CEMS and clinker production measurement devices.
(v) Any other records required by 40 CFR part 60, subpart F, or 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, procedure 1.
(8) Reporting. All reports under this section shall be submitted to Chief, Air Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Mail Code AE-17J, 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604-3590.
(i) The owner/operator shall submit quarterly excess emissions reports for SO2 and NOX BART limits no later than the 30th day following the end of each calendar quarter. Excess emissions means emissions that exceed the emissions limits specified in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of this section. The reports shall include the magnitude, date(s), and duration of each period of excess emissions, specific identification of each period of excess emissions that occurs during startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the unit, the nature and cause of any malfunction (if known), and the corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted.
(ii) Owner/operator of each unit shall submit quarterly CEMS performance reports, to include dates and duration of each period during which the CEMS was inoperative (except for zero and span adjustments and calibration checks), reason(s) why the CEMS was inoperative and steps taken to prevent recurrence, and any CEMS repairs or adjustments.
(iii) The owner/operator shall also submit results of any CEMS performance tests required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1 (Relative Accuracy Test Audits, Relative Accuracy Audits, and Cylinder Gas Audits).
(iv) When no excess emissions have occurred or the CEMS has not been inoperative, repaired, or adjusted during the reporting period, such information shall be stated in the quarterly reports required by paragraphs (h)(7)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(i) Escanaba Paper Company, or any subsequent owner or operator of the Escanaba Paper Company facility in Escanaba, Michigan, shall meet the following requirements and shall not cause or permit the emission of NOX (expressed as NOX) to exceed the following limits:
(1) For Boiler 8, designated as EU8B13, a rolling 30-day average limit of 0.35 lb per MMBTU.
(2) A continuous emission monitoring system shall be operated to measure NOX emissions from Boiler 8 in conformance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F.
(3) The reference test method for assessing compliance with the limit in paragraph (i)(1) of this section shall be a continuous emission monitoring system operated in conformance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F. A new 30-day average shall be computed at the end of each calendar day in which the boiler operated, based on the following procedure: first, sum the total pounds of NOX emitted from the unit during the operating day and the previous twenty-nine operating days, second sum the total heat input to the unit in MMBTU during the same period, and third, divide the total number of pounds of NOX emitted by the total heat input during the thirty operating days.
(4) For Boiler 9, also identified as EU9B03, a limit of 0.27 lb per MMBTU.
(5) The reference test method for assessing compliance with the limit in paragraph (i)(4) of this section shall be a test conducted in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 7.
(6) Recordkeeping. The owner/operator shall maintain the following records regarding Boiler 8 and Boiler 9 for at least five years:
(i) All CEMS data, including the date, place, and time of sampling or measurement; parameters sampled or measured; and results.
(ii) All stack test results.
(iii) Daily records of fuel usage, heat input, and data used to determine heat content.
(iv) Records of quality assurance and quality control activities for emissions measuring systems including, but not limited to, any records required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1.
(v) Records of all major maintenance activities conducted on emission units, air pollution control equipment, and CEMS.
(vi) Any other records identified in 40 CFR 60.49b(g) or 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1.
(7) Reporting. All reports under this section shall be submitted to the Chief, Air Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Mail Code AE-17J, 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604-3590.
(i) Owner/operator of Boiler 8 shall submit quarterly excess emissions reports for the limit in paragraph (i)(1) no later than the 30th day following the end of each calendar quarter. Excess emissions means emissions that exceed the emissions limit specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this section. The reports shall include the magnitude, date(s), and duration of each period of excess emissions, specific identification of each period of excess emissions that occurs during startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the unit, the nature and cause of any malfunction (if known), and the corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted.
(ii) Owner/operator of Boiler 8 shall submit quarterly CEMS performance reports, to include dates and duration of each period during which the CEMS was inoperative (except for zero and span adjustments and calibration checks or when Boiler 8 is not operating), reason(s) why the CEMS was inoperative and steps taken to prevent recurrence, and any CEMS repairs or adjustments.
(iii) Owner/operator of Boiler 8 shall also submit results of any CEMS performance tests required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, procedure 1 (Relative Accuracy Test Audits, Relative Accuracy Audits, and Cylinder Gas Audits).
(iv) When no excess emissions have occurred or the CEMS has not been inoperative, repaired, or adjusted during the reporting period, such information shall be stated in the quarterly reports required by paragraph (i)(7) of this section.
(v) Owner/operator of Boiler 9 shall submit reports of any compliance test measuring NOX emissions from Boiler 9 within 60 days of the last day of the test. If owner/operator commences operation of a continuous NOX emission monitoring system for Boiler 9, owner/operator shall submit reports for Boiler 9 as specified for Boiler 8 in paragraphs (i)(7)(i) to (i)(7)(iv) of this section.
(j) [Reserved]
(k) Tilden Mining Company, or any subsequent owner/operator of the Tilden Mining Company facility in Ishpeming, Michigan, shall meet the following requirements:
(1) NOX Emission Limits. (i) An emission limit of 3.0 lbs NOX/MMBTU, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to Tilden Grate Kiln Line 1 (EUKILN1) beginning February 2, 2026.
(ii) Compliance with this emission limit shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for NOX.
(2) SO2 Emission Limits. A fuel sulfur content limit of no greater than 1.20 percent sulfur content by weight shall apply to fuel combusted in Process Boiler #1 (EUBOILER1) and Process Boiler #2 (EUBOILER2) beginning three months from March 8, 2013. A fuel sulfur content limit of no greater than 1.50 percent sulfur content by weight shall apply to fuel combusted in the Line 1 Dryer (EUDRYER1) beginning 3 months from March 8, 2013. The sampling and calculation methodology for determining the sulfur content of fuel must be described in the monitoring plan required at paragraph (n)(8)(x) of this section.
(3) The owner or operator of the Tilden Grate Kiln Line 1 (EUKILN1) furnace shall meet an emission limit of 189.0 lbs SO2/hr, based on a 30-day rolling average, beginning on February 2, 2026. Compliance with this emission limit shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for SO2. Beginning November 12, 2016, any coal burned on Tilden Grate Kiln Line 1 shall have no more than 0.60 percent sulfur by weight based on a monthly block average. The sampling and calculation methodology for determining the sulfur content of coal must be described in the monitoring plan required for this furnace.
(4) Emissions resulting from the combustion of fuel oil are not included in the calculation of the 30-day rolling average. However, if any fuel oil is burned after the first day that SO2 CEMS are required to be operational, then the information specified in (k)(5) must be submitted, for each calendar year, to the Regional Administrator at R5ARDReporting@epa.gov no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year so that a limit can be set.
(5) Records shall be kept for any day during which fuel oil is burned as fuel (either alone or blended with other fuels) in Grate Kiln Line 1. These records must include, at a minimum, the gallons of fuel oil burned per hour, the sulfur content of the fuel oil, and the SO2 emissions in pounds per hour. If any fuel oil is burned after the first day that SO2 CEMS are required to be operational, then the records must be submitted, for each calendar year, to the Regional Administrator at R5ARDReporting@epa.gov no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year.
(l) Testing and monitoring. (1) The owner or operator shall install, certify, calibrate, maintain, and operate a CEMS for NOX on Tilden Grate Kiln Line 1. Compliance with the emission limits for NOX shall be determined using data from the CEMS.
(2) The owner or operator shall install, certify, calibrate, maintain, and operate a CEMS for SO2 on Tilden Grate Kiln Line 1. Compliance with the emission standard selected for SO2 shall be determined using data from the CEMS.
(3) The owner or operator shall install, certify, calibrate, maintain, and operate one or more continuous diluent monitor(s) (O2 or CO2) and continuous stack gas flow rate monitor(s) on Tilden Grate Kiln Line 1 to allow conversion of the NOX and SO2 concentrations to units of the standard (lbs/MMBTU and lbs/hr, respectively) unless a demonstration is made that a diluent monitor and/or continuous flow rate monitor are not needed for the owner or operator to demonstrate compliance with applicable emission limits in units of the standard.
(4) For purposes of this section, all CEMS required by this section must meet the requirements of paragraphs (l)(4)(i) through (xiv) of this section.
(i) All CEMS must be installed, certified, calibrated, maintained, and operated in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, Performance Specification 2 (PS-2) and appendix F, Procedure 1.
(ii) All CEMS associated with monitoring NOX (including the NOX monitor and necessary diluent and flow rate monitors) must be installed and operational upon May 12, 2016. All CEMS associated with monitoring SO2 must be installed and operational no later than six months after May 12, 2016. Verification of the CEMS operational status shall, as a minimum, include completion of the manufacturer's written requirements or recommendations for installation, operation, and calibration of the devices.
(iii) The owner or operator must conduct a performance evaluation of each CEMS in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, PS-2. The performance evaluations must be completed no later than 60 days after the respective CEMS installation.
(iv) The owner or operator of each CEMS must conduct periodic Quality Assurance, Quality Control (QA/QC) checks of each CEMS in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1. The first CEMS accuracy test will be a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) and must be completed no later than 60 days after the respective CEMS installation.
(v) The owner or operator of each CEMS must furnish the Regional Administrator a written report of the results of each quarterly performance evaluation and a data accuracy assessment pursuant to 40 CFR part 60 appendix F within 60 days after the calendar quarter in which the performance evaluation was completed. These reports shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator at R5AirEnforcement@epa.gov.
(vi) The owner or operator of each CEMS must check, record, and quantify the zero and span calibration drifts at least once daily (every 24 hours) in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1, Section 4.
(vii) Except for CEMS breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, all CEMS required by this section shall be in continuous operation during all periods of process operation of the indurating furnaces, including periods of process unit startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
(viii) All CEMS required by this section must meet the minimum data requirements at paragraphs (l)(4)(viii)(A) through (C) of this section.
(A) Complete a minimum of one cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive 15-minute quadrant of an hour.
(B) Sample, analyze, and record emissions data for all periods of process operation except as described in paragraph (l)(4)(viii)(C) of this section.
(C) When emission data from CEMS are not available due to continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, or zero and span adjustments, emission data must be obtained using other monitoring systems or emission estimation methods approved by the EPA. The other monitoring systems or emission estimation methods to be used must be incorporated into the monitoring plan required by this section and provide information such that emissions data are available for a minimum of 18 hours in each 24-hour period and at least 22 out of 30 successive unit operating days.
(ix) Owners or operators of each CEMS required by this section must reduce all data to 1-hour averages. Hourly averages shall be computed using all valid data obtained within the hour but no less than one data point in each 15-minute quadrant of an hour. Notwithstanding this requirement, an hourly average may be computed from at least two data points separated by a minimum of 15 minutes (where the unit operates for more than one quadrant in an hour) if data are unavailable as a result of performance of calibration, quality assurance, preventive maintenance activities, or backups of data from data acquisition and handling systems and recertification events.
(x) The 30-day rolling average emission rate determined from data derived from the CEMS required by this section (in lbs/MMBTU or lbs/hr depending on the emission standard selected) must be calculated in accordance with paragraphs (l)(4)(x)(A) through (F) of this section.
(A) Sum the total pounds of the pollutant in question emitted from the unit during an operating day and the previous 29 operating days.
(B) Sum the total heat input to the unit (in MMBTU) or the total actual hours of operation (in hours) during an operating day and the previous 29 operating days.
(C) Divide the total number of pounds of the pollutant in question emitted during the 30 operating days by the total heat input (or actual hours of operation depending on the emission limit selected) during the 30 operating days.
(D) For purposes of this calculation, an operating day is any day during which fuel is combusted in the BART affected unit regardless of whether pellets are produced. Actual hours of operation are the total hours a unit is firing fuel regardless of whether a complete 24-hour operational cycle occurs (i.e., if the furnace is firing fuel for only five hours during a 24-hour period, then the actual operating hours for that day are five. Similarly, total number of pounds of the pollutant in question for that day is determined only from the CEMS data for the five hours during which fuel is combusted.)
(E) If the owner or operator of the CEMS required by this section uses an alternative method to determine 30-day rolling averages, that method must be described in detail in the monitoring plan required by this section. The alternative method will only be applicable if the final monitoring plan and the alternative method are approved by EPA.
(F) A new 30-day rolling average emission rate must be calculated for the period ending each new operating day.
(xi) The 720-hour rolling average emission rate determined from data derived from the CEMS required by this section (in lbs/MMBTU) must be calculated in accordance with paragraphs (l)(4)(xi)(A) through (C) of this section.
(A) Sum the total pounds of NOX emitted from the unit every hour and the previous (not necessarily consecutive) 719 hours for which that type of fuel (either natural gas or mixed coal and natural gas) was used.
(B) Sum the total heat input to the unit (in MMBTU) every hour and the previous (not necessarily consecutive) 719 hours for which that type of fuel (either natural gas or mixed coal and natural gas) was used.
(C) Divide the total number of pounds of NOX emitted during the 720 hours, as defined above, by the total heat input during the same 720-hour period. This calculation must be done separately for each fuel type (either for natural gas or mixed coal and natural gas).
(xii) Data substitution must not be used for purposes of determining compliance under this regulation. If CEMS data is measuring only a portion of the NOX or SO2 emitted during startup, shutdown, or malfunction conditions, the CEMS data may be supplemented, but not modified, by the addition of calculated emission rates using procedures set forth in the site specific monitoring plan.
(xiii) All CEMS data shall be reduced and reported in units of the applicable standard.
(xiv) A Quality Control Program must be developed and implemented for all CEMS required by this section in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1, Section 3. The program will include, at a minimum, written procedures and operations for calibration checks, calibration drift adjustments, preventative maintenance, data collection, recording and reporting, accuracy audits/procedures, periodic performance evaluations, and a corrective action program for malfunctioning CEMS.
(m) Recordkeeping requirements. (1)(i) Records required by this section must be kept in a form suitable and readily available for expeditious review.
(ii) Records required by this section must be kept for a minimum of five years following the date of creation.
(iii) Records must be kept on site for at least two years following the date of creation and may be kept offsite, but readily accessible, for the remaining three years.
(2) The owner or operator of the BART affected unit must maintain the records identified in paragraphs (m)(2)(i) through (xi) of this section.
(i) A copy of each notification and report developed for and submitted to comply with this section including all documentation supporting any initial notification or notification of compliance status submitted, according to the requirements of this section.
(ii) Records of the occurrence and duration of each startup, shutdown, and malfunction of the BART affected unit, air pollution control equipment, and CEMS required by this section.
(iii) Records of activities taken during each startup, shutdown, and malfunction of the BART affected unit, air pollution control equipment, and CEMS required by this section.
(iv) Records of the occurrence and duration of all major maintenance conducted on the BART affected unit, air pollution control equipment, and CEMS required by this section.
(v) Records of each excess emission report, including all documentation supporting the reports, dates and times when excess emissions occurred, investigations into the causes of excess emissions, actions taken to minimize or eliminate the excess emissions, and preventative measures to avoid the cause of excess emissions from occurring again.
(vi) Records of all CEMS data including, as a minimum, the date, location, and time of sampling or measurement, parameters sampled or measured, and results.
(vii) All records associated with quality assurance and quality control activities on each CEMS as well as other records required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1 including, but not limited to, the quality control program, audit results, and reports submitted as required by this section.
(viii) Records of the NOX emissions during all periods of BART affected unit operation, including startup, shutdown, and malfunction, in the units of the standard. The owner or operator shall convert the monitored data into the appropriate unit of the emission limitation using appropriate conversion factors and F-factors. F-factors used for purposes of this section shall be documented in the monitoring plan and developed in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 19. The owner or operator may use an alternate method to calculate the NOX emissions upon written approval from EPA.
(ix) Records of the SO2 emissions or records of the removal efficiency (based on CEMS data), depending on the emission standard selected, during all periods of operation, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, in the units of the standard.
(x) Records associated with the CEMS unit including type of CEMS, CEMS model number, CEMS serial number, and initial certification of each CEMS conducted in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, Performance Specification 2 must be kept for the life of the CEMS unit.
(xi) Records of all periods of fuel oil usage as required in paragraph (k)(4) of this section.
(n) Reporting requirements. (1) Unless instructed otherwise, all requests, reports, submittals, notifications, and other communications required by this section shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator at R5AirEnforcement@epa.gov. References in this section to the Regional Administrator shall mean the EPA Regional Administrator for Region 5.
(2) The owner or operator of each BART affected unit identified in this section and CEMS required by this section must provide to the Regional Administrator the written notifications, reports, and plans identified at paragraphs (n)(2)(i) through (viii) of this section.
(i) A notification of the date construction of control devices and installation of burners required by this section commences postmarked no later than 30 days after the commencement date.
(ii) A notification of the date the installation of each CEMS required by this section commences postmarked no later than 30 days after the commencement date.
(iii) A notification of the date the construction of control devices and installation of burners required by this section is complete postmarked no later than 30 days after the completion date.
(iv) A notification of the date the installation of each CEMS required by this section is complete postmarked no later than 30 days after the completion date.
(v) A notification of the date control devices and burners installed by this section startup postmarked no later than 30 days after the startup date.
(vi) A notification of the date CEMS required by this section postmarked no later than 30 days after the startup date.
(vii) A notification of the date upon which the initial CEMS performance evaluations are planned. This notification must be submitted at least 60 days before the performance evaluation is scheduled to begin.
(viii) A notification of initial compliance signed by the responsible official, who shall certify its accuracy, attesting to whether the source has complied with the requirements of this section, including, but not limited to, applicable emission standards, control device and burner installations, and CEMS installation and certification. This notification must be submitted before the close of business on the 60th calendar day following the completion of the compliance demonstration and must include, at a minimum, the information in paragraphs (n)(2)(viii)(A) through (F) of this section.
(A) The methods used to determine compliance.
(B) The results of any CEMS performance evaluations and other monitoring procedures or methods that were conducted.
(C) The methods that will be used for determining continuing compliance, including a description of monitoring and reporting requirements and test methods.
(D) The type and quantity of air pollutants emitted by the source, reported in units of the standard.
(E) A description of the air pollution control equipment and burners installed as required by this section for each emission point.
(F) A statement by the owner or operator as to whether the source has complied with the relevant standards and other requirements.
(3) The owner or operator must develop and implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for NOX and SO2. The plan must include, at a minimum, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and a program of corrective action for a malfunctioning process and air pollution control and monitoring equipment used to comply with the relevant standard. The plan must ensure that, at all times, the owner or operator operates and maintains each affected source, including associated air pollution control and monitoring equipment, in a manner which satisfies the general duty to minimize or eliminate emissions using good air pollution control practices. The plan must ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicable after their occurrence.
(4) The written reports of the results of each performance evaluation and QA/QC check in accordance with and as required in paragraph (l)(4)(v) of this section.
(5) Compliance reports. The owner or operator of each BART affected unit must submit semiannual compliance reports. The semiannual compliance reports must be submitted in accordance with paragraphs (n)(5)(i) through (iv) of this section, unless the Regional Administrator has approved a different schedule.
(i) The first compliance report must cover the period beginning on the compliance date that is specified for the affected source through June 30 or December 31, whichever date comes first after the compliance date that is specified for the affected source.
(ii) The first compliance report must be postmarked no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period covered by that report (July 30 or January 30), whichever comes first.
(iii) Each subsequent compliance report must cover the semiannual reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual reporting period from July 1 through December 31.
(iv) Each subsequent compliance report must be postmarked no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period covered by that report (July 30 or January 30).
(6) Compliance report contents. Each compliance report must include the information in paragraphs (n)(6)(i) through (vi) of this section.
(i) Company name and address.
(ii) Statement by a responsible official, with the official's name, title, and signature, certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness of the content of the report.
(iii) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period.
(iv) Identification of the process unit, control devices, and CEMS covered by the compliance report.
(v) A record of each period of a startup, shutdown, or malfunction during the reporting period and a description of the actions the owner or operator took to minimize or eliminate emissions arising as a result of the startup, shutdown, or malfunction and whether those actions were or were not consistent with the source's startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan.
(vi) A statement identifying whether there were or were not any deviations from the requirements of this section during the reporting period. If there were deviations from the requirements of this section during the reporting period, then the compliance report must describe in detail the deviations which occurred, the causes of the deviations, actions taken to address the deviations, and procedures put in place to avoid such deviations in the future. If there were no deviations from the requirements of this section during the reporting period, then the compliance report must include a statement that there were no deviations. For purposes of this section, deviations include, but are not limited to, emissions in excess of applicable emission standards established by this section, failure to continuously operate an air pollution control device in accordance with operating requirements designed to assure compliance with emission standards, failure to continuously operate CEMS required by this section, and failure to maintain records or submit reports required by this section.
(7) Each owner or operator of a CEMS required by this section must submit quarterly excess emissions and monitoring system performance reports to the Regional Administrator for each pollutant monitored for each BART affected unit monitored. All reports must be postmarked by the 30th day following the end of each 3-month period of a calendar year (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December) and must include, at a minimum, the requirements of paragraphs (n)(7)(i) through (xv) of this section.
(i) Company name and address.
(ii) Identification and description of the process unit being monitored.
(iii) The dates covered by the reporting period.
(iv) Total source operating hours for the reporting period.
(v) Monitor manufacturer, monitor model number, and monitor serial number.
(vi) Pollutant monitored.
(vii) Emission limitation for the monitored pollutant.
(viii) Date of latest CEMS certification or audit.
(ix) A description of any changes in continuous monitoring systems, processes, or controls since the last reporting period.
(x) A table summarizing the total duration of excess emissions, as defined in paragraphs (n)(7)(x)(A) through (B) of this section, for the reporting period broken down by the cause of those excess emissions (startup/shutdown, control equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, unknown causes), and the total percent of excess emissions (for all causes) for the reporting period calculated as described in paragraph (n)(7)(x)(C) of this section.
(A) For purposes of this section, an excess emission is defined as any 30-day or 720-hour rolling average period, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, during which the 30-day or 720-hour (as appropriate) rolling average emissions of either regulated pollutant (SO2 and NOX), as measured by a CEMS, exceeds the applicable emission standards in this section.
(B)(1) For purposes of this section, if a facility calculates a 30-day rolling average emission rate in accordance with this section which exceeds the applicable emission standards of this section, then it will be considered 30 days of excess emissions. If the following 30-day rolling average emission rate is calculated and found to exceed the applicable emission standards of this section as well, then it will add one more day to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 31 days). Similarly, if an excess emission is calculated for a 30-day rolling average period and no additional excess emissions are calculated until 15 days after the first, then that new excess emission will add 15 days to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 30 + 15 = 45). For purposes of this section, if an excess emission is calculated for any period of time within a reporting period, there will be no fewer than 30 days of excess emissions but there should be no more than 121 days of excess emissions for a reporting period.
(2) For purposes of this section, if a facility calculates a 720-hour rolling average emission rate in accordance with this section which exceeds the applicable emission standards of this section, then it will be considered 30 days of excess emissions. If the 24th following 720-hour rolling average emission rate is calculated and found to exceed the applicable emission standards of the rule as well, then it will add one more day to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 31 days). Similarly, if an excess emission is calculated for a 720-hour rolling average period and no additional excess emissions are calculated until 360 hours after the first, then that new excess emission will add 15 days to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 30+15 = 45). For purposes of this section, if an excess emission is calculated for any period of time with a reporting period, there will be no fewer than 30 days of excess emissions but there should be no more than 121 days of excess emissions for a reporting period.
(C) For purposes of this section, the total percent of excess emissions will be determined by summing all periods of excess emissions (in days) for the reporting period, dividing that number by the total BART affected unit operating days for the reporting period, and then multiplying by 100 to get the total percent of excess emissions for the reporting period. An operating day, as defined previously, is any day during which fuel is fired in the BART affected unit for any period of time. Because of the possible overlap of 30-day rolling average excess emissions across quarters, there are some situations where the total percent of excess emissions could exceed 100 percent. This extreme situation would only result from serious excess emissions problems where excess emissions occur for nearly every day during a reporting period.
(xi) A table summarizing the total duration of monitor downtime, as defined in paragraph (n)(7)(xi)(A) of this section, for the reporting period broken down by the cause of the monitor downtime (monitor equipment malfunctions, non-monitor equipment malfunctions, quality assurance calibration, other known causes, unknown causes), and the total percent of monitor downtime (for all causes) for the reporting period calculated as described in paragraph (n)(7)(xi)(B) of this section.
(A) For purposes of this section, monitor downtime is defined as any period of time (in hours) during which the required monitoring system was not measuring emissions from the BART affected unit. This includes any period of CEMS QA/QC, daily zero and span checks, and similar activities.
(B) For purposes of this section, the total percent of monitor downtime will be determined by summing all periods of monitor downtime (in hours) for the reporting period, dividing that number by the total number of BART affected unit operating hours for the reporting period, and then multiplying by 100 to get the total percent of excess emissions for the reporting period.
(xii) A table which identifies each period of excess emissions for the reporting period and includes, at a minimum, the information in paragraphs (n)(7)(xii)(A) through (F) of this section.
(A) The date of each excess emission.
(B) The beginning and end time of each excess emission.
(C) The pollutant for which an excess emission occurred.
(D) The magnitude of the excess emission.
(E) The cause of the excess emission.
(F) The corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted to minimize or eliminate the excess emissions and prevent such excess emission from occurring again.
(xiii) A table which identifies each period of monitor downtime for the reporting period and includes, at a minimum, the information in paragraphs (n)(7)(xiii)(A) through (D) of this section.
(A) The date of each period of monitor downtime.
(B) The beginning and end time of each period of monitor downtime.
(C) The cause of the period of monitor downtime.
(D) The corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted for system repairs or adjustments to minimize or eliminate monitor downtime and prevent such downtime from occurring again.
(xiv) If there were no periods of excess emissions during the reporting period, then the excess emission report must include a statement which says there were no periods of excess emissions during this reporting period.
(xv) If there were no periods of monitor downtime, except for daily zero and span checks, during the reporting period, then the excess emission report must include a statement which says there were no periods of monitor downtime during this reporting period except for the daily zero and span checks.
(8) The owner or operator of each CEMS required by this section must develop and submit for review and approval by the Regional Administrator a site specific monitoring plan. The purpose of this monitoring plan is to establish procedures and practices which will be implemented by the owner or operator in its effort to comply with the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements of this section. The monitoring plan must include, at a minimum, the information in paragraphs (n)(8)(i) through (x) of this section.
(i) Site specific information including the company name, address, and contact information.
(ii) The objectives of the monitoring program implemented and information describing how those objectives will be met.
(iii) Information on any emission factors used in conjunction with the CEMS required by this section to calculate emission rates and a description of how those emission factors were determined.
(iv) A description of methods to be used to calculate emission rates when CEMS data are not available due to downtime associated with QA/QC events.
(v) A description of the QA/QC program to be implemented by the owner or operator of CEMS required by this section. This can be the QA/QC program developed in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1, Section 3.
(vi) A list of spare parts for CEMS maintained on site for system maintenance and repairs.
(vii) A description of the procedures to be used to calculate 30-day rolling averages and 720-hour rolling averages and example calculations which show the algorithms used by the CEMS to calculate 30-day rolling averages and 720-hour rolling averages.
(viii) A sample of the document to be used for the quarterly excess emission reports required by this section.
(ix) A description of the procedures to be implemented to investigate root causes of excess emissions and monitor downtime and the proposed corrective actions to address potential root causes of excess emissions and monitor downtime.
(x) A description of the sampling and calculation methodology for determining the percent sulfur by weight as a monthly block average for coal used during that month.
(o) The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met because the regional haze plan submitted by the state on November 5, 2010, does not meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(e) with respect to NOX and SO2 emissions from Tilden Mining Company L.C. of Ishpeming, Michigan. The requirements for this facility are satisfied by complying with § 52.1183(k-n)
(p) [Reserved]
[50 FR 28553, July 12, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 45137, Nov. 24, 1987; 77 FR 33657, June 7, 2012; 77 FR 71550, Dec. 3, 2012; 78 FR 8733, Feb. 6, 2013; 78 FR 59839, Sept. 30, 2013; 81 FR 21681, Apr. 12, 2016; 82 FR 3129, Jan. 10, 2017; 91 FR 50, Jan. 2, 2026]
§ 52.1184 Small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program.
The Michigan program submitted on November 13, 1992, January 8, 1993, and November 12, 1993, as a requested revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan satisfies the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
[59 FR 28788, June 3, 1994]
§ 52.1185 Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
(a) Approval—On November 24, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan. The submittal pertained to a plan for the implementation and enforcement of the Federal transportation conformity requirements at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 51, subpart T—Conformity to State or Federal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Developed, Funded or Approved Under Title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act.
(b) Approval—On November 29, 1994, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted a revision to the carbon monoxide State Implementation Plan for general conformity rules. The general conformity SIP revisions enable the State of Michigan to implement and enforce the Federal general conformity requirements in the nonattainment or maintenance areas at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 93, subpart B—Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.
[61 FR 66609, 66611, Dec. 18, 1996]
§ 52.1186 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source located within the State of Michigan and for which requirements are set forth under the Federal CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program in subparts AA through II of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such applicable requirements. The obligation to comply with these requirements in part 97 of this chapter will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP) as meeting the requirements of CAIR for PM2.5 relating to NOX under § 51.123 of this chapter, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional or unless such approval is under § 51.123(p) of this chapter.
(2) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of such approval of the State's SIP, the Administrator has already allocated CAIR NOX allowances to sources in the State for any years, the provisions of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation of CAIR NOX allowances for those years shall continue to apply, unless the Administrator approves a SIP provision that provides for the allocation of the remaining CAIR NOX allowances for those years.
(b)(1) The owner and operator of each NOX source located within the State of Michigan and for which requirements are set forth under the Federal CAIR NOX Ozone Season Trading Program in subparts AAAA through IIII of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such applicable requirements. The obligation to comply with these requirements in part 97 of this chapter will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP) as meeting the requirements of CAIR for ozone relating to NOX under § 51.123 of this chapter, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional or unless such approval is under § 51.123(ee) of this chapter.
(2) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, if, at the time of such approval of the State's SIP, the Administrator has already allocated CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances to sources in the State for any years, the provisions of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation of CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances for those years shall continue to apply, unless the Administrator approves a SIP provision that provides for the allocation of the remaining CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances for those years.
(c) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and subparts AA through II and AAAA through IIII of part 97 of this chapter to the contrary:
(1) With regard to any control period that begins after December 31, 2014,
(i) The provisions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section relating to NOX annual or ozone season emissions shall not be applicable; and
(ii) The Administrator will not carry out any of the functions set forth for the Administrator in subparts AA through II and AAAA through IIII of part 97 of this chapter;
(2) The Administrator will not deduct for excess emissions any CAIR NOX allowances or CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances allocated for 2015 or any year thereafter;
(3) By March 3, 2015, the Administrator will remove from the CAIR NOX Allowance Tracking System accounts all CAIR NOX allowances allocated for a control period in 2015 and any subsequent year, and, thereafter, no holding or surrender of CAIR NOX allowances will be required with regard to emissions or excess emissions for such control periods; and
(4) By March 3, 2015, the Administrator will remove from the CAIR NOX Ozone Season Allowance Tracking System accounts all CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances allocated for a control period in 2015 and any subsequent year, and, thereafter, no holding or surrender of CAIR NOX Ozone Season allowances will be required with regard to emissions or excess emissions for such control periods.
(d)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Michigan and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Michigan's SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Michigan's SIP revision described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(e)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Michigan and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 1 Trading Program in subpart BBBBB of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2015 and 2016.
(2) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Michigan and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program in subpart EEEEE of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2017 through 2020.
(3) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Michigan and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program in subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2021 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State and areas of Indian country within the borders of the State subject to the State's SIP authority will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(iii) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in areas of Indian country within the borders of the State not subject to the State's SIP authority will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Michigan's SIP.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e)(3) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Michigan's SIP revision described in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances under subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State and areas of Indian country within the borders of the State subject to the State's SIP authority for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances to such units for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (e)(2) of this section, after 2020 the provisions of § 97.826(c) of this chapter (concerning the transfer of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances between certain accounts under common control), the provisions of § 97.826(d) of this chapter (concerning the conversion of amounts of unused CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances allocated for control periods before 2021 to different amounts of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances), and the provisions of § 97.811(d) of this chapter (concerning the recall of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 allowances equivalent in quantity and usability to all such allowances allocated to units in the State and Indian country within the borders of the State for control periods after 2020) shall continue to apply.
(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (e)(3) of this section is stayed with regard to emissions occurring in 2024 and thereafter, provided that while such stay remains in effect, the provisions of paragraph (e)(2) of this section shall apply with regard to such emissions.
(f)(1) The owner and operator of each source located in the State of Michigan and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth in § 52.40 and § 52.41, § 52.42, § 52.43, § 52.44, § 52.45, or § 52.46 must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2026 and each subsequent year.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (f)(1) of this section is stayed.
[72 FR 62350, Nov. 2, 2007, as amended at 76 FR 48367, Aug. 8, 2011; 76 FR 80774, Dec. 27, 2011; 79 FR 71671, Dec. 3, 2014; 81 FR 74586, 74597, Oct. 26, 2016; 83 FR 65924, Dec. 21, 2018; 86 FR 23175, Apr. 30, 2021; 88 FR 36891, June 5, 2023; 89 FR 87969, Nov. 6, 2024]
§ 52.1187 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each SO2 source located within the State of Michigan and for which requirements are set forth under the Federal CAIR SO2 Trading Program in subparts AAA through III of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such applicable requirements. The obligation to comply with these requirements in part 97 of this chapter will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan as meeting the requirements of CAIR for PM2.5 relating to SO2 under § 51.124 of this chapter, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional or unless such approval is under § 51.124(r) of this chapter.
(b) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraph (a) of this section and subparts AAA through III of part 97 of this chapter and any State's SIP to the contrary:
(1) With regard to any control period that begins after December 31, 2014,
(i) The provisions of paragraph (a) of this section relating to SO2 emissions shall not be applicable; and
(ii) The Administrator will not carry out any of the functions set forth for the Administrator in subparts AAA through III of part 97 of this chapter; and
(2) The Administrator will not deduct for excess emissions any CAIR SO2 allowances allocated for 2015 or any year thereafter.
(c)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Michigan and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 1 Trading Program in subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39 for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Michigan's SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Michigan's SIP revision described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances under subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart CCCCC of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 1 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[72 FR 62350, Nov. 2, 2007, as amended at 76 FR 48368, Aug. 8, 2011; 79 FR 71671, Dec. 3, 2014; 81 FR 74586, 74597, Oct. 26, 2016]
§ 52.1188 Control strategy: Lead (Pb).
(a) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the three-year period 2012 to 2014, EPA determined that the Belding, MI Pb nonattainment area has attained the 2008 Pb National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). This clean data determination suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard as long as this area continues to meet the 2008 Pb NAAQS.
(b) Michigan's 2013 lead emissions inventory for the Belding area as submitted on January 12, 2016, satisfying the emission inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for the Belding area.
(c) Approval. The 2008 lead maintenance plan for the Belding, Michigan nonattainment area has been approved as submitted on January 12, 2016.
[80 FR 43960, July 24, 2015, as amended at 82 FR 24870, May 31, 2017]
§ 52.1189 Control strategy: Sulfur dioxide (SO2).
(a) The plan submitted by the State on May 31, 2016 to attain the 2010 1-hour primary sulfur dioxide (SO2) national ambient air quality standard for the Detroit SO2 nonattainment area does not meet the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 172 with respect to SO2 emissions from the U.S. Steel (Ecorse and Zug Island), EES Coke, Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Corporation (formerly AK or Severstal Steel), and Dearborn Industrial Generation (DIG) facilities in the Detroit, Michigan area. These requirements for these four facilities are satisfied by paragraphs (b)through(e) of this section, respectively.
(b) This section addresses and satisfies CAA section 172 requirements for the Detroit SO2 nonattainment area by specifying the necessary emission limits and other control measures applicable to the U.S. Steel Ecorse and Zug Island facilities. This section applies to the owner(s) and operator(s) of the facilities located at 1 Quality Drive and 1300 Zug Island Road in Detroit, Michigan. The requirements in this section for the Hot Strip Mill Slab Reheat Furnaces 1-5, No. 2 Baghouse, Main Plant Boiler No. 8, and Main Plant Boiler No. 9 apply to the owner and operator of the U.S. Steel Ecorse facility, and the requirements in this section for Boilerhouse 1, Boilerhouse 2, A1 Blast Furnace, B2 Blast Furnace, D4 Blast Furnace, A/B Blast Furnace Flares, and D Furnace Flare apply to the owner and operator of the U.S. Steel Zug Island facility.
(1) SO2 emission limits. (i) Beginning on the effective date of the FIP, no owner or operator shall emit SO2 from the following units in excess of the following limits:
| Unit | SO2 emission limit
(lbs/hr) |
|---|---|
| Boilerhouse 1 (all stacks combined) | 55.00 |
| Hot Strip Mill—Slab Reheat Furnace 1 | 0.31 |
| Hot Strip Mill—Slab Reheat Furnace 2 | 0.31 |
| Hot Strip Mill—Slab Reheat Furnace 3 | 0.31 |
| Hot Strip Mill—Slab Reheat Furnace 4 | 0.31 |
| Hot Strip Mill—Slab Reheat Furnace 5 | 0.31 |
| No. 2 Baghouse | 3.30 |
| Main Plant Boiler No. 8 | 0.07 |
| Main Plant Boiler No. 9 | 0.07 |
| A1 Blast Furnace | 0.00 |
| B2 Blast Furnace | 40.18 |
| D4 Blast Furnace | 40.18 |
| A/B Blast Furnace Flares | 60.19 |
| D Furnace Flare | 60.19 |
(ii) Beginning two years after the effective date of the FIP, no owner or operator shall emit SO2 from Boilerhouse 2 in excess of the following limits:
(A) Boilerhouse 2 shall emit less than 750.00 lbs/hr unless Boilerhouse 1, A1 Blast Furnace, B2 Blast Furnace, D4 Blast Furnace, A/B Blast Furnace Flares, or D Furnace Flare is operating, in which case it shall emit less than 81.00 lbs/hr.
(B) [Reserved]
(2) Stack restrictions and permit requirements. (i) The owner or operator shall construct a stack for Boilerhouse 2. The stack emission point must be at least 170 feet above ground level. The owner or operator shall submit a construction permit application for the stack to the State of Michigan within 90 days of the effective date of the FIP. Where any compliance obligation under this section requires any other state or local permits or approvals, the owner or operator shall submit timely and complete applications and take all other actions necessary to obtain all such permits or approvals.
(ii) Beginning two years after the effective date of the FIP, no owner or operator shall emit SO2 from Boilerhouse 2, except from the stack emission point at least 170 feet above ground level.
(3) Monitoring requirements. (i) Not later than two years after the effective date of the FIP, the owner or operator shall install and continuously operate an SO2 continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) to measure SO2 emissions from Boilerhouse 2 in conformance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F procedure 1.
(ii) The owner or operator shall determine SO2 emissions from Boilerhouse 1, Hot Strip Mill Slab Reheat Furnaces 1-5, No. 2 Baghouse, Main Plant Boiler No. 8, Main Plan Boiler No. 9, A1 Blast Furnace, B2 Blast Furnace, D4 Blast Furnace, A/B Blast Furnace Flares, and D Furnace Flare using mass balance calculations as described in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(iii) Within 180 days of the installation of the CEMS specified in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, the owner or operator shall perform an initial compliance test for SO2 emissions from Boilerhouse 2 while the boilerhouse is operating in accordance with the applicable emission limit during the period of testing identified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section. The initial compliance test shall be performed using EPA Test Method 6 at 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-4.
(4) Compliance assurance plan. To determine compliance with the limits in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, the owner or operator shall calculate hourly SO2 emissions using all raw material sulfur charged into each affected emission unit and assume 100 percent conversion of total sulfur to SO2. The owner or operator shall implement a compliance assurance plan (CAP) for all units except Boilerhouse 2 and any idled units that shall specify the calculation methodology, procedures, and inputs used in these calculations and submit the plan to EPA within 30 days after the effective date of the FIP. The owner or operator must submit a list of idled units to EPA within 30 days of the effective date of the FIP. The owner or operator must submit a CAP for any idled units prior to resuming operations.
(5) Recordkeeping. The owner/operator shall maintain the following records continuously for five years beginning on the effective date of the FIP:
(i) All records of production for each affected emission unit.
(ii) All records of hourly emissions calculated in accordance with the CAP.
(iii) In accordance with paragraphs (b)(3) of this section, all CEMS data, including the date, place, and time of sampling or measurement; parameters sampled or measured; and results.
(iv) Records of quality assurance and quality control activities for emission monitoring systems including, but not limited to, any records required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F Procedure 1.
(v) Records of all major maintenance activities performed on emission units, air pollution control equipment, CEMS, and other production measurement devices.
(vi) Any other records required by the Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination rule at 40 CFR part 60, appendix F Procedure 1 or the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing Facilities rule at 40 CFR part 63, subpart FFFFF.
(6) Reporting. Beginning on the effective date of the FIP, all reports under this section shall be submitted quarterly to Compliance Tracker, Air Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Mail Code AE-17J, 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604-3590.
(i) The owner or operator shall submit a CAP in accordance with paragraph (b)(4) of this section within 30 days of the effective date of the FIP.
(ii) The owner or operator shall report CEMS data and hourly mass balance calculations quarterly in accordance with CEMS requirements in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and the CAP requirements set forth in paragraph (b)(4) of this section no later than the 30th day following the end of each calendar quarter.
(iii) The owner or operator shall report the results of the initial compliance test for the Boilerhouse 2 stack within 60 days of conducting the test.
(iv) The owner or operator shall submit quarterly excess emissions reports for all units identified in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section no later than the 30th day following the end of each calendar quarter. Excess emissions means emissions that exceed the emission limits specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The reports shall include the magnitude, date(s), and duration of each period of excess emissions, specific identification of each period of excess emissions that occurs during all periods of operation including startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions of the unit, the nature and cause of any malfunction (if known), and the corrective action taken, or preventative measures adopted.
(v) The owner or operator of each unit shall submit quarterly CEMS performance reports, to include dates and duration of each period during which the CEMS was inoperative (except for zero and span adjustments and calibration checks), reason(s) why the CEMS was inoperative and steps taken to prevent recurrence, and any CEMS repairs or adjustments no later than the 30th day following the end of each calendar quarter.
(vi) The owner or operator shall also submit results of any CEMS performance tests required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1 (e.g., Relative Accuracy Test Audits, Relative Accuracy Audits, and Cylinder Gas Audits) no later than 30 days after the test is performed.
(vii) When no excess emissions have occurred or the CEMS has not been inoperative, repaired, or adjusted during the reporting period, such information shall be stated in the quarterly reports required by paragraphs (b)(6) of this section.
(c) This section addresses and satisfies CAA section 172 requirements for the Detroit SO2 nonattainment area by specifying the necessary emission limits and other control measures applicable to the EES Coke facility. This section applies to the owner and operator of the facility located at 1400 Zug Island Road in Detroit, Michigan.
(1) SO2 emission limits. Beginning on the effective date of the FIP, no owner or operator shall emit SO2 from the Underfire Combustion Stack EUCoke-Battery in excess of 544.6 lbs/hr, as a 3-hour average, and 2071 tons per year, on a 12-month rolling basis as determined at the end of each calendar month, and 0.702 pounds per 1000 standard cubic feet of coke oven gas, as a 1-hour average.
(2) Monitoring requirements. The owner or operator shall maintain and operate in a satisfactory manner a device to monitor and record the SO2 emissions from the Underfire Combustion Stack EUCoke-Battery on a continuous basis. The owner or operator shall use Continuous Emission Rate Monitoring (CERM) data for determining compliance with the hourly limit in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The owner or operator shall operate the CERM system in conformance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F.
(d) This section addresses and satisfies CAA section 172 requirements for the Detroit SO2 nonattainment area by specifying the necessary emission limits and other control measures applicable to the Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Corporation (formerly AK or Severstal Steel) facility. This section applies to the owner and operator of the facility located at 4001 Miller Road in Dearborn, Michigan.
(1) SO2 emission limits. Beginning on the effective date of the FIP, no owner or operator shall emit SO2 from the following units in excess of the following limits:
| Unit | SO2 emission limit | Time period/operating scenario |
|---|---|---|
| “B” Blast Furnace Baghouse Stack | 71.9 lbs/hr | Calendar day average. |
| “B” Blast Furnace Stove Stack | 38.75 lbs/hr | Calendar day average. |
| “B” Blast Furnace Baghouse and Stove Stacks (combined) | 77.8 lbs/hr | Calendar day average. |
| “B” Blast Furnace Baghouse and Stove Stacks (combined) | 340 tons per year | 12-month rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month. |
| “C” Blast Furnace Baghouse Stack | 179.65 lbs/hr | Calendar day average. |
| “C” Blast Furnace Stove Stack | 193.6 lbs/hr | Calendar day average. |
| “C” Blast Furnace Baghouse and Stove Stacks (combined) | 271.4 lbs/hr | Calendar day average. |
| “C” Blast Furnace Baghouse and Stove Stacks (combined) | 1188 tons per year | 12-month rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month. |
(2) Monitoring requirements. The owner or operator shall maintain and operate in a satisfactory manner a device to monitor and record the SO2 emissions and flow from “B” Blast Furnace and “C” Blast Furnace Baghouse and Stove Stacks on a continuous basis. The owner or operator shall use CERM data for determining compliance with the hourly limits in paragraph (d)(1) of this section. The owner or operator shall operate the CERM system in conformance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F.
(e) This section addresses and satisfies CAA section 172 requirements for the Detroit SO2 nonattainment area by specifying the necessary emission limits and other control measures applicable to the Dearborn Industrial Generation (DIG) facility. This section applies to the owner and operator of the facility located at 2400 Miller Road in Dearborn, Michigan.
(1) SO2 emission limits. (i) Beginning on the effective date of the FIP, no owner or operator shall emit SO2 from the following units in excess of the following limits:
| Unit | SO2 emission limit | Time period/operating scenario |
|---|---|---|
| Boilers 1, 2, and 3 (combined) | 420 lbs/hr | Daily average. |
| Boilers 1, 2, and 3 (combined) | 1839.6 tons per year | 12-month rolling time period. |
| Boilers 1, 2, and 3 and Flares 1 and 2 (combined) | 840 lbs/hr | Daily average. |
| Boilers 1, 2, and 3 and Flares 1 and 2 (combined) | 2947.7 tons per year | 12-month rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month. |
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) Monitoring requirements. (i) The owner or operator shall maintain and operate in a satisfactory manner a device to monitor and record the SO2 emissions from Boilers 1, 2, and 3 on a continuous basis. Installation and operation of each CEMS shall meet the timelines, requirements and reporting detailed in 40 CFR part 60, appendix F. If the owner or operator chooses to use a Predictive Emissions Monitoring System (PEMS) in lieu of a CEMS to monitor SO2 emissions, the permittee shall follow the protocol delineated in Performance Specification 16 in appendix B of 40 CFR part 60.
(ii) The owner or operator shall verify compliance with the emission limits for Boilers 1, 2 and 3 and Flares 1 and 2 (combined) by following the procedures and methodologies contained in the document entitled “Protocol for Demonstrating Continuous Compliance with the Emission Limitations of ROP MI-ROP-N6631-2004” dated May 31, 2011, or subsequent revisions to this document approved by EPA.
[87 FR 61528, Oct. 12, 2022]
§ 52.1190 Original Identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Michigan” and all revisions submitted by Michigan that were federally approved prior to August 1, 2006.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on February 3, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) Re-evaluation of control strategies for Berrien and Ingham Counties were submitted on March 3, 1972, by the State Air Pollution Office.
(2) Amendments to the Michigan air pollution rules for the control of SO2 emissions (Part 3) and the prevention of air pollution episodes (Part 6) submitted by the Governor on March 30, 1972.
(3) An amendment to the Grand Rapids air pollution ordinance (section 9.35 and section 9.36) was submitted on May 4, 1972, by the Grand Rapids Department of Environmental Protection.
(4) Reasons and justifications concerning general requirements of control strategy for nitrogen dioxide, compliance schedules, and review of new sources and modifications submitted on July 12, 1972, by the Governor.
(5) A letter from the State Department of Public Health submitted on July 24, 1972, described how emissions data would be made available to the public.
(6) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources on February 16, 1973.
(7) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources on May 4, 1973.
(8) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources on September 19, 1973.
(9) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources on October 23, 1973.
(10) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources on December 13, 1973.
(11) Air Quality Maintenance Area identifications were submitted on June 27, 1974, by the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
(12) Air Quality Maintenance Area identifications were submitted on October 18, 1974, by the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
(13) Provisions to disapprove an installation permit if the applicant source would interfere with the attainment or maintenance of national air quality standards were submitted by the Governor on January 25, 1974.
(14) Order extending the final compliance dates for meeting the sulfur dioxide emission limitation was submitted by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for the Karn, Weadock and Cobb Plant Units of the Consumers Power Co.
(15) Order extending compliance date for meeting the sulfur dioxide emission limitation was submitted by the State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources for the Detroit Edison Company, Monroe County Plant on December 12, 1977.
(16) On April 25, 1979, the State submitted its nonattainment area plan for areas designated nonattainment as of March 3, 1978 and as revised on October 5, 1978. This submittal contained Michigan's Part D attainment plans for particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, transportation and new source review, plus a copy of Michigan's existing and proposed regulations. USEPA is not taking action at this time to include in the federally approved SIP certain portions of the submittal: Provisions in R 336.1310 concerning open burning; 336.1331, insofar as it may pertain to process sources in the iron and steel category and site specific revisions; 1349, 1350, 1351, 1352, 1353, 1354, 1355, 1356 and 1357 as they pertain to specific iron and steel source operations; Part 5, Extension of Sulfur Dioxide Compliance Date for Power Plants Past January 1, 1980; Part 7, Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—New Sources of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions; R336.1701-1710 controlling minor sources of volatile organic compounds; Part 11, Continuous Emission Monitoring; Part 13, Air Pollution Episodes; Part 16, Organization and Procedures; and Part 17, Hearings.
(17) On October 12, 1979, the State submitted comments and commitments in response to USEPA's notice of proposed rulemaking.
(18) On January 9, 1980, the State submitted a copy of the finally adopted rules of the Commission. These rules became fully effective on January 18, 1980. These finally adopted rules are identical to the rules submitted on April 25, 1979, as part of Michigan's Part D nonattainment area plan except for a modification in the numbering system. Paragraph (c)(16) of this subpart identifies those rules on which USEPA has not taken action.
(19) On February 6, 1980, the State submitted the visible emission test method for stationary sources referenced in Rule 336.1303 as being on file with the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. On March 7, 1980, the State submitted clarifications to the visible emissions test method.
(20) On March 31, 1980, the State submitted revisions to the conditional approval schedules for total suspended particulates.
(21) On July 25, 1979, the State submitted the official ozone attainment plan as part of the State Implementation Plan.
(22) On October 26, 1979, the State submitted comments and revisions to the transportation plans and vehicle inspection/maintenance portions of the State Implementation Plan for ozone in response to USEPA's notice of proposed rulemaking (45 FR 47350).
(23) On November 8, 1979, the State submitted revisions to the ozone attainment plan.
(24) On December 26, 1979, the State submitted comments and additional information from the lead local agencies on the transportation control plans for the Flint, Lansing, Grand Rapids and Detroit urban areas.
(25) On May 12, 1980, the State submitted corrections and comments in response to USEPA's notice of proposed rulemaking (45 FR 25087).
(26) On March 20, 1980, the State submitted commitments and additional revisions to the Inspection/Maintenance program for the Detroit urban area.
(27) On February 23, 1979, compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources to USEPA for the Detroit Edison, St. Clair Power Plant. Additional material concerning the Final Order issued to the Detroit Edison, St. Clair Power Plant was submitted on June 17, 1979 and August 14, 1979.
(28) On August 22, 1979, the State of Michigan submitted to USEPA an Administrative Order, for the Lansing Board of Water and Light (Order No. 4-1979, adopted May 23, 1979). In letters dated February 13, 1980 and April 1, 1980, the State of Michigan withdrew certain paragraphs (sections A, B, C1, D, E, F, and G) of the Order from consideration by USEPA.
(29) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources to USEPA on October 26, 1979, for the Dundee Cement Company, Monroe County (Michigan Final Order, APC No. 08-1979, adopted October 17, 1979).
(30) On July 26, 1979, the State of Michigan submitted to USEPA a revision to Rule 336.49 for the Consumers Power Company's J. H. Campbell Plant. The revision is a Final Order (No. 05-1979) extending the compliance date until January 1, 1985 for the Campbell Plant to meet the sulfur dioxide emission limitations in Rule 336.49. On February 14, 1980, the State of Michigan submitted to USEPA an amendment to Order No. 05-1979.
(31) Compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources to USEPA on November 13, 1979, for the S. D. Warren Company, Muskegon County (Michigan Final Order, No. 09-1979, adopted October 31, 1979).
(32) On December 19, 1979, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to provide for modification of the existing air quality surveillance network.
(33) On December 10, 1979, the State of Michigan submitted to USEPA a Final Order (APC No. 6-1979) issued by the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission to the Consumers Power Company B.C. Cobb Plant. The Order requires the source to utilize 2.5% sulfur on an annual basis until January 1, 1985 when the company must meet the sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limitation in Michigan Rule 336.1401.
(34) On January 8, 1980, the State of Michigan submitted to USEPA a Final Order (APC No. 14-1979) requested of the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission (MAPCC) by the Union Camp Corporation in Monroe County, Michigan. The Order permitted the Union Camp Corporation to burn 2.7% sulfur fuel on an annual average and 4.0% sulfur fuel on a daily average between January 1, 1980 and July 1, 1980. Beginning July 1, 1980 until July 1, 1982 the Company is permitted to burn 2.5% sulfur fuel on an annual average and 4.0% sulfur fuel daily average. Beginning July 1, 1982 until January 1, 1985, the Company is allowed to burn 2.2% sulfur fuel annual average and 3.5% sulfur fuel daily average. After January 1, 1985; the Company has agreed to comply with the SO2 emission limitations of 1.5% sulfur fuel required in Michigan Rule 336.1401.
(35) On August 4, 1980 and August 8, 1980, the State of Michigan submitted to EPA additional information on the transportation control plan for the Niles, Michigan urbanized area.
(36) On January 10, 1980, the State of Michigan submitted to USEPA a Final Order (APC No. 16-1979) issued by the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission to the Northern Michigan Electric Cooperative Advance Steam Plant. The Order allows the source to continue burning 2.0% sulfur coal (maximum daily average) until January 1, 1985 when the Company must meet the sulfur dioxide (S02) emission limitations in Michigan Rule 336.1401.
(37) On November 26, 1980, the State submitted a schedule to correct plan deficiencies cited by USEPA in its September 9, 1980 notice of proposed rulemaking on a portion of Michigan's Part D TSP control strategy pertaining to iron and steel sources. On April 1, 1981, the State submitted a revised schedule. USEPA has not taken action on the schedule submitted by the State.
(38) On April 10, 1981 the Governor of Michigan committed to annually administer and submit the questionnaire developed for the purposes of section 128.
(39) On July 28, 1980, the State of Michigan submitted to EPA, as revisions to the Michigan SIP, amendments to Rules 283 and 610 of the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission.
(40) Revised compliance schedules were submitted by the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) to EPA on January 14, 1981, for the Dundee Cement Company, Monroe County (Michigan Final Order, APC No. 16—1980, adopted November 19, 1980). The revised Order provides an earlier final compliance date of December 31, 1980 for reducing the particulate matter emissions to 0.20 pounds per 1,000 pounds of exhaust gases and December 31, 1981 for visible emission reductions from the Company's cement kilns.
(41) On April 25, 1979, the State submitted materials which satisfy the intergovernmental consultation process.
(42) On July 28, 1980, the State submitted an amendment to Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission Rule 221 which exempts minor sources of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide from the offset requirements.
(43) On August 25, 1981, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), submitted to EPA Consent Order No. 16-1981 for the Marathon Oil Company in Muskegon County. Consent Order No. 16-1981 satisfies USEPA's conditional approval of R336.1603 by providing detailed compliance schedules containing the increments of progress required by 40 CFR 51.15.
(44) On September 1, 1981, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) submitted to USEPA a revision to its R336.1220 requiring offsets in ozone nonattainment areas to exempt the same compounds listed in EPA's Federal Register of July 22, 1980 (45 FR 48941). The revised R336.1220 also allows offsets of emissions for new sources in any of the seven counties in the southeastern Michigan ozone nonattainment area to be obtained from any of those counties, not just the county in which the new source is locating (Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, St. Clair, Washtenaw, Livingston, and Monroe).
(45) On May 24, 1980, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) submitted Consent Order APC No. 10-1979 for the Buick Motor Division Complex (BMDC) of the Buick Motors Division, General Motors Corporation. The BMDC is located in the City of Flint, Genesee County, a primary nonattainment area. On December 2, 1980, supplementary information was submitted by MDNR. The Consent Order contains enforceable emission limitations and control measures for the attainment of the primary TSP standards in Genesee County by December 31, 1982.
(46) On July 17, 1980, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) submitted Consent Order APC No. 01-1980 for the Grey Iron Casting Plant and the Nodular Iron Casting Plant, of the Chevrolet Motor Division, General Motors Corporation. The two plants are located in Saginaw County, a primary nonattainment area. On September 5, 1980 and February 6, 1981, supplementary information was submitted by MDNR. The Consent Order contains enforceable emission limitations and control measures for the attainment of the primary TSP standards in Saginaw County by December 31, 1982.
(47) On March 4, 1981, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) submitted Consent Order APC No. 12-1980 for the New Haven Foundry located in Macomb County, a secondary nonattainment area. The Consent Order contains enforceable emission reductions to achieve the secondary TSP standards by June 30, 1985.
(48) On May 1, 1981, the State of Michigan, through the Department of Natural Resources, submitted Consent Order 07-1981 for the Detroit Edison Company, Boulevard Heating Plant located in the City of Detroit, Wayne County. Under Michigan Rule 336.1331(1)(a), the plant was restricted to a particulate emission limit of 0.45 pounds of particulate per 1000 pounds flue gas or an equivalent of 410 tons per year. The Consent Order, pursuant to Michigan Rule 333.1331(1)(d), establishes a new limitation for the Boulevard Plant of 0.65 pounds per 1000 pounds of flue gas with a daily limit of 0.9 tons per day and 10 tons per year.
Pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator certified on January 27, 1981 (46 FR 8709) that the attached rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
(49) On March 7, 1980 and April 21, 1981 the State of Michigan submitted particulate studies for the Detroit area. These studies satisfy EPA's conditional approval and the State's commitment.
(50) On October 22, 1981, the State of Michigan submitted as a SIP revision Consent Order No. 17-1981, between Conoco, Inc., and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. The Consent Order establishes a compliance schedule for Conoco, Inc. to achieve the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) limitations in R336.1609 by December 31, 1982.
(51) On December 27, 1979, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), submitted to EPA a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Lead. On February 9, 1981, the State of Michigan submitted a letter clarifying provisions of its Lead SIP. The SIP provides for the implementation of measures for controlling lead emissions for the attainment and maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards for lead in Michigan by October 31, 1982.
(52) On June 26, 1981, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, submitted to EPA Consent Order No. 12-1981 for controlling particulate emissions from the liquid waste incinerator in Building 830 at the Dow Chemical Company's Midland plant. The Consent Order provides a schedule which establishes a final particulate emissions compliance date of October 1, 1982.
(53) On August 24, 1981, the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, submitted to EPA Consent Order APC No. 19-1981 for controlling particulate emissions from Dow's West Side and South Side powerplants. On October 16, 1981, the State of Michigan submitted a letter to EPA clarifying specific sections intended for EPA's rulemaking action. All particulate emission sources at Dow must comply with various parts of Michigan's SIP by December 31, 1985. The Consent Order does not interfere with the attainment of the primary particulate NAAQS standard by December 31, 1982 or the secondary particulate NAAQS by October 1, 1984.
(54) On December 16, 1981, the State of Michigan submitted to EPA Consent Order APC No. 21-1981 for the Monitor Sugar Company. Consent Order APC No. 21-1981 provides for additional controls on its coal-fired boilers, 1, 2, 3, and 4 and establishes a final compliance date of October 15, 1982 for attaining the primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(55) On January 7, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted to EPA Consent Order APC No. 23-1981 for the Traverse City Board of Light and Power. Consent Order APC No. 23-1981 limits the company's operation of its No. 1 and No. 2 coal-fired boilers after December 31, 1982; provides for additional controls on its No. 4 coal-fired boiler; and establishes a final compliance date of December 31, 1982.
(56) On September 2, 1981, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the ozone plan consisting of RACT requirements for the control of volatile organic compound emissions from stationary industrial sources (Group II) referenced in Rules R336.1101-3, 5-9, 14-16, 18-21, 23; R336.1601, 3-4, 10, 19-27; and R336.2005.
(57) On March 3, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted a modification to its schedule for submitting by December 31, 1982 regulations developed to correct the State's deficiencies in its Part D State Implementation Plan for the attainment of the total suspended particulate air quality standards in its nonattainment areas containing iron and steel sources.
(58) On December 16, 1981, the State of Michigan submitted as a SIP revision consent order APC No. 18-1981 between General Motors Warehousing and Distribution Division and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. On March 16, 1982, Michigan submitted an amendment to consent order APC No. 18-1981. The Consent Order provides a one year extension from October 15, 1982 until October 15, 1983 for the Company's No. 1 and No. 2 boilers and establishes a compliance date of October 15, 1981, for boilers 3 and 4. The Consent Order contains a schedule for compliance which specifies emission limits of 0.45 pounds of particulate per 1,000 pounds of gas as required in Michigan's rule 336.1331(c) Table 31.
(59) [Reserved]
(60) On April 5, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted Consent Order APC No. 02-1980 along with alterations to Section 5(D) of the Consent Order for the Hayes-Albion foundry in Calhoun County. The Consent Order contains control measures beyond the present requirements of Michigan's R336.1301 and R336.1331 for Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) emissions and evaluation methods for determining significant particulate emission sources from the foundry. On June 18, 1982, the State of Michigan also submitted a Fugitive Dust Control Plan and a Malfunction Abatement Plan for the Hayes-Albion foundry. On September 21, 1982, the State of Michigan formally submitted Permits 314-79 and 375-79 for the American Colloid Plant.
(61) On March 6, 1981, the State of Michigan submitted as a SIP revision general rules for fugitive dust control. These rules were approved by the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission on January 20, 1981, and became effective at the State level on February 17, 1981. On January 25, 1982, May 3, 1982, and August 24, 1982, Michigan submitted additional information and commitments. The submittal of March 6, 1981, along with the additional information and commitments satisfies the State's commitment to submit industrial fugitive dust regulations that represent reasonably available control techniques for industrial fugitive dust sources.
(62) On July 28, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted Consent Order No. 06-1981 for the Clark Oil and Refining Corporation for volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. This revision is a detailed compliance schedule containing increments of progress with a final compliance date of December 31, 1982 and an emission limitation of 0.7 pound of organic vapor per 1000 gallons of organic compound load.
(63) On September 8, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted as a SIP revision Consent Order No. 03-1982, between the Hydra-Matic Division, General Motors Corporation and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. The Consent Order establishes a compliance schedule containing increments of progress dates and a final date of November 1, 1982 for Boiler No. 5 to comply with Michigan's R336.331.
(64) On September 21, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted as a SIP revision Consent Order No. 13-1982, between the Diamond Crystal Salt and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission, the Consent Order establishes a compliance schedule containing increments of progress dates and a final date of December 18, 1982 for Boiler No. 5 to comply with Michigan's R336.331.
(65) [Reserved]
(66) On September 8, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision consent order No. 08-1982, between the General Motors, Buick Motor Division and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. The Consent Order establishes a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions compliance schedule as required under Michigan's Rule 336.1603 and 336.1610, and extends the final compliance date for surface coating operations until December 31, 1987. On November 29, 1982, and March 10, 1983, the State submitted additional information.
(67) On September 8, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted Consent Order No. 09-1982, between the General Motors, Fisher Body Division and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. The Consent Order establishes a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emission compliance schedule as required under Michigan's Rule 336.1603 and 336.1610, and extends the compliance date for surface coating operations until December 31, 1987. On November 29, 1982, and March 10, 1983, the State submitted additional information.
(68) On September 8, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision Consent Order No. 10-1982, between Chevrolet Truck Assembly and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. The Consent Order establishes a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emission compliance schedule as required under Michigan's Rule 336.1603 and 336.1610, and extends the compliance date for surface coating operations until December 31, 1987. On November 29, 1982, and March 10, 1983, the State submitted additional information.
(69) On September 8, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision Consent Order No. 11-1982, between the General Motors Fisher Body Division, Fleetwood Plant and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. On March 10, 1983, the State submitted additional information for this SIP revision. The Consent Order establishes a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions compliance schedule as required under Michigan's Rules 336.1603 and 336.1610, and extends the final compliance date for surface coating operations until December 31, 1987.
(70) On September 8, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision Consent Order No. 12-1982, between the General Motors, Cadillac Motors Car Division and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. On March 10, 1983, the State submitted additional information for this SIP revision. The Consent Order establishes a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emission compliance schedule as required under Michigan's Rule 336.1603 and R336.1610, and extends the compliance date for surface coating operations until December 31, 1987.
(71) On September 1, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted a request to reduce the size of the ozone demonstration area for Southeast Michigan from the seven-county area of Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, Monroe, St. Clair and Washtenaw to a three-county area consisting of Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb Counties.
(72) On November 18, 1982, the State of Michigan submitted Consent Order APC No. 06-1980, along with alterations for the General Motors Corporation (GMC) Central Foundry Division, Saginaw Malleable Iron Plant in the City of Saginaw, County of Saginaw as a revision to the Michigan SIP. Consent Order No. 06-1980, as amended, reflects an interim and final particulate emission limit more stringent than Michigan's rule 336.1331; extends the final date of compliance with Michigan's Rule 336.1301 for opacity on the oil quench facilities from December 31, 1982, to December 15, 1983, which is as expeditiously as practicable and before the July 31, 1985, attainment date for the secondary TSP NAAQS in Michigan.
(73) On June 30, 1983, the State of Michigan submitted as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. Consent Order No. 4-1983 between the General Motors Corporation's Oldsmobile Division and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. The Consent Order establishes a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions compliance schedule as required under Michigan's Rule 336.1603 and 336.1610, and extends the final compliance dates for prime, primer-surfacer, topcoat, and final repair operations until December 31, 1987.
(74) On June 30, 1983, the State of Michigan submitted as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. Consent Order No. 5-1983, between the General Motors Corporation's Assembly Division and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission. The Consent Order established a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emission compliance schedule as required under Michigan's Rule 336.1603 and R336.1610, and provides interim compliance limits to be achieved by December 31, 1984, and extends the final compliance dates for topcoating and final repair coating operations until December 31, 1987.
(75) On October 4, 1983, the State of Michigan submitted: (1) A revised Consent Order APC No. 12-1979 between CWC Castings Division of Textron and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission and (2) Article 14, Section J of the Muskegon County APC Rules. Consent Order APC No. 12-1979 requires reductions of point source emissions and fugitive emissions and extends the installation schedule of specified control devices to December 31, 1984. Article 14, Section J, provides a ban on open residential and leaf burning in Muskegon County. EPA approves the additional control measures contained in Consent Order APC No. 12-1979 and the open burning ban. EPA takes no action on the overall approval of Michigan's Part D secondary nonattainment area for Muskegon County.
(76) On August 24, 1983, the State of Michigan submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request for an extension of the compliance date for Boiler No. 2 for the General Motors Corporation Warehousing and Distribution Division, in Swartz Creek County. Consent Order No. 18-1981 extends the compliance date until October 15, 1985 for GMC to install mechanical collectors on Boiler No. 2.
(77) On March 8, 1984, the State of Michigan submitted a report which demonstrated that Rule 336.1606 contains emission limits equivalent to Reasonable Available Control Technology (RACT) for Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties. Therefore, USEPA remove its conditional approval of Rule 336.1606 and fully approves the State's rule.
(78) On September 6, 1984, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for the General Motors Corporation Buick Motor Division in the form of an Alteration of Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order, No. 8-1982. The original Consent Order No. 8-1982 was federally approved on July 6, 1983. This alteration revises Consent Order No. 8-1982, in that it accelerates the final compliance dates for prime and prime-surfacer operations and extends an interim compliance date for topcoat operations.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan, Air Pollution Control Commission, Alteration of Stipulation for Entry Consent Order and Final Order SIP No. 8-1983, which was approved by the Air Pollution Control Commission on April 2, 1984.
(B) Letter of September 6, 1984, from the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, to EPA.
(79) On December 2, 1983, USEPA proposed to withdraw its approval of Michigan's fugitive dust regulations. On April 25, 1985, the State of Michigan submitted revised Rule 336.1371, existing Rule 336.1372, and new Rule 336.1373. However, they did not meet the requirements of Part D of section 172(b); and USEPA, therefore, withdrew its approval of these submittals, disapproved these submittals, and instituted new source restrictions for major sources in the Michigan primary Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) nonattainment areas on August 20, 1985. USEPA incorporates revised Rule 336.1371 and newly submitted Rule 336.1373 into the Michigan State Implementation Plan because they provide a framework for the development of fugitive dust control programs at the State level in Michigan. USEPA retains Rule 336.1372, which is already incorporated into the Michigan SIP, insofar as it applies to sources in TSP attainment areas. This paragraph supersedes paragraph (C)(61) of this section.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Michigan Department of Natural Resources Rules 336.1371 and 336.1373 (Fugitive Dust Regulations), as adopted on April 23, 1985.
(80) On July 27, 1983, the State of Michigan submitted Consent Order No. 08-1983 for the General Motors Corporation Central Foundry Division's Saginaw Malleable Iron Plant, as a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for Total Suspended Particulates. Consent Order No. 08-1983 amends control strategy provisions of federally approved (November 18, 1982 and August 15, 1983) Consent Order No. 06-1980 and its alteration.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order No. 08-1983 for the General Motors Corporation Central Foundry Division's Saginaw Malleable Iron Plant amending Control Strategy Provisions issued June 9, 1983.
(81) On October 1, 1984, the State of Michigan submitted the Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order, SIP No. 12-1984, between the Consumer Power Company's J.H. Campbell and the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission as a revision to the Michigan SO2 SIP. Consent Order No. 12-1984 provides a 3-year compliance date extension (January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1987) for the J.H. Campbell Units 1 and 2 to emit SO2 at an allowable rate on a daily basis of 4.88 lbs/MMBTU in 1985, 4.78 lbs/MMBTU in 1986, and 4.68 lbs/MMBTU in 1987.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) October 1, 1984, Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order, SIP No. 12-1984, establishing interim daily average SO2 emission limitations and quarterly average limits on percent sulfur is fuel fired.
(82) The State of Michigan submitted negative declarations for several volatile organic compound source categories, as follows:
October 10, 1983—Large petroleum dry cleaners;
May 17, 1985—High-density polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene resin manufacturers;
June 12, 1985—Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry sources (SOCMI) oxidation.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters dated October 10, 1983, May 17, 1985, and June 12, 1985, from Robert P. Miller, Chief, Air Quality Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources. The letter dated June 12, 1985, includes pages 2-119 and 2-120 from the revised 1982 Air Quality Implementation Plan for Ozone and Carbon Monoxide in Southeast Michigan.
(83) On September 16, 1985, the State of Michigan submitted a SIP revision requesting alternate opacity limits for the Packaging Corporation of America (PCA) bark boiler. The request is in the form of a Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order (No. 23-1984). The Consent Order contains an extended schedule for the PCA's bark boiler to comply with Michigan's Rule 336.1301.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order No. 23-1984 for the Packaging Corporation of America, approved on July 8, 1985.
(84) On April 29, 1986, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP) for total suspended particulates (TSP). The revision, in the form of Air Pollution Control Act (APCA) No. 65, revises the State's 1965 APCA No. 348 contained in the TSP portion of the Michigan SIP with respect to: car ferries having the capacity to carry more than 110 motor vehicles; and coal-fired trains used in connection with tourism.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Act No. 65 of the Public Acts of 1986, as approved by the Governor of Michigan on March 30, 1986.
(85) On April 25, 1979, the State of Michigan submitted as revisions to the Air Quality Implementation Plan, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Air Pollution Control Commission General Rules for Open Burning; Continuous Emission Monitoring; Air Pollution Episodes; Organization, Operation and Procedures; and Hearings.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) R 336.1310, Open Burning, effective January 18, 1980.
(B) R 336.2101-3, R 336.2150-5, R 336.336-2159, R 336.2170, R336.2175-6, R 336.2189-90, and R 336.2199; Continuous Emission Monitoring, effective January 18, 1980.
(C) R 336.2301-8, Air Pollution Episodes, effective January 18, 1980.
(D) R 336.2601-8, Organization, Operating, and Procedures, effective January 18, 1980.
(E) R 336.2701-6, Hearings, effective January 18, 1980.
(86) On May 25, 1988, the State of Michigan submitted an SIP revision in the form of an addendum to the State's Rule 336.1122, effective at the State level on May 20, 1988. The amendment will allow coating companies to exclude methyl chloroform from the VOC emission calculation when it is not technically or economically reasonable. This exemption applies only to the surface coating operations that are subject to Part 6 (Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Existing Sources of VOC Emissions) or Part 7 (Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—New Sources of VOC Emissions) of the State's regulations.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) R336.1122, Methyl Chloroform; effective at the State level on May 20, 1988.
(87)-(89) [Reserved]
(90) On December 17, 1987, the State of Michigan submitted to USEPA a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for the Continental Fiber Drum, Inc., which limits volatile organic compound emissions from the surface coating operations at the facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan, Air Pollution Control Commission, Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order No. 14-1987, which was adopted by the State on December 9, 1987.
(B) Letter of December 17, 1987, from the State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources to USEPA.
(91) On May 17, 1985, the State submitted revised rules for the control of particulate matter from iron and steel sources and from other sources in Michigan. These rules were submitted to fulfill conditions of USEPA's May 22, 1981, approval (46 FR 27923 of the State's part D total suspended particulates (TSP) State Implementation Plan (SIP). USEPA is approving these revised rules in the Michigan submittal except for the following provisions: The quench tower limit in rule 336.1331, Table 31, Section C.8, because allowing water quality limits to apply only to makeup water is a relaxation; the deletion of the limit in rule 336.1331 for coke oven coal preheater equipment, because it is a relaxation, and rule 336.1355, because it provides an unlimited exemption for emissions from emergency relief valves in coke oven gas collector mains.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Revision to parts 1, 3, and 10 of Michigan's administrative rules for air pollution control (Act 348 of 1967, as amended) as adopted by the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission on December 18, 1984. These rules became effective in Michigan on February 22, 1985.
(92) On October 10, 1986, the State of Michigan supported portions of the revised Wayne County Air Pollution Control Division Air Pollution Control Ordinance as approved by Wayne County on September 19, 1985, as a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5 (except for the portions of Chapter 5, section 501, of the Wayne County Ordinance which incorporate by reference the following parts of the State rules: The quench tower limit in Rule 336.1331, Table 31, Section C.8; the deletion of the limit in Rule 336.1331 for coke oven coal preheater equipment; and Rule 336.1355), 8 (except section 802), 9, 11, 12, 13 and appendices A and D of the Wayne County Air Pollution Control Division (WCAPCD) Air Pollution Control Ordinance as approved by WCAPCD on September 19, 1985.
(93) On November 16, 1992, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources submitted Natural Resources Commission Rule 336.202 (Rule 2), Sections 5 and 14a of the 1965 Air Pollution Act 348, and the 1991 Michigan Air Pollution Reporting Forms, Reference Tables, and General Instructions as the States emission statement program. Natural Resources Commission Rule 336.202 (Rule 2) became effective November 11, 1986. Section 5 and 14a of the 1965 Air Pollution Act 348 became effective July 23, 1965.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Natural Resources Commission Rule 336.202 (Rule 2) became effective November 11, 1986. Section 5 and 14a of the 1965 Air Pollution Act 348 became effective July 23, 1965.
(94) On November 13, 1992, January 8, 1993, and November 12, 1993, the State of Michigan submitted a Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Assistance Program for incorporation in the Michigan State Implementation Plan as required by section 507 of the Clean Air Act.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Small Business Clean Air Assistance Act, Act No. 12, Public Acts of 1993, approved by the Governor on April 1, 1993, and effective upon approval.
(95) On November 15, 1993, the State of Michigan requested revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP) to incorporate miscellaneous technical rule changes that the State had made effective April 20, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Michigan Air Pollution Control Rules: R 336.1107 (except paragraph (c)); R 336.1121, R 336.1403. R 336.1606, R 336.1607, R 336.1608, R 336.1609, R 336.1616, R 336.1626 (deleted), and R 336.1705, effective April 20, 1989.
(96) Revisions to the Michigan Regulations submitted on June 12, 1993 and November 12, 1993 by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources:
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission General Rules filed with the Secretary of State on April 12, 1993 and effective on April 27, 1993:
(1) R 336.1101 Definitions; A—Revised definitions of the following terms: actual emissions, air-dried coating, air quality standard, allowable emissions and alternate opacity.
(2) R 336.1103 Definitions; C—Added definition of coating category. Revised definitions of the following terms: calendar day, class II hardboard paneling finish, coating line, coating of automobiles and light-duty trucks coating of fabric, coating of large appliances, coating of paper, coating of vinyl, component, component in field gas service, component in gaseous volatile organic compound service, component in heavy liquid service, component in light liquid service, component in liquid volatile organic compound service, condenser, conveyorized vapor degreaser, and creditable.
(3) R 336.1105 Definitions; E—Added definition of the term extreme environmental conditions. Revised definitions of the following terms: electrostatic prep coat, equivalent method and extreme performance coating.
(4) R 336.1116 Definitions; P—Revised definitions of the following terms: packaging rotogravure printing, printed interior panel, process unit turnaround, publication rotogravure printing and pushside. Deleted definition of the term pneumatic rubber tire manufacturing.
(5) R 336.1122 Definitions; V—Added definition of the term vapor collection system. Revised definitions of the following terms: very large precipitator and volatile organic compound.
(6) R 336.1602 General provisions for existing sources of volatile organic compound emissions (entire rule).
(7) R 336.1610 Existing coating lines; emission of volatile organic compounds from exiting automobile, light-duty truck, and other product and material coating lines (entire rule).
(8) R 336.1611 Existing cold cleaners (entire rule).
(9) R 336.1619 Perchloroethylene; emission from existing dry cleaning equipment (entire rule).
(10) R 336.1620 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing flat wood paneling coating lines (entire rule).
(11) R 336.1621 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing metallic surface coating lines (entire rule).
(12) R 336.1622 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing components of petroleum refineries; refinery monitoring program (entire rule).
(13) R 336.1623 Storage of petroleum liquids having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.0 psia, but less than 11.0 psia, in existing external floating roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity (entire rule).
(14) R 336.1625 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing equipment utilized in manufacturing synthesized pharmaceutical products (entire rule).
(15) R 336.1627 Delivery vessels; vapor collection systems (entire rule).
(16) R 336.1630 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing paint manufacturing processes (entire rule).
(17) R 336.1631 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing process equipment utilized in manufacture of polystyrene or other organic resins (entire rule).
(18) R 336.1632 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing automobile, truck, and business machine plastic part coating lines (entire rule).
(19) R 336.1702 General provisions of new sources of volatile organic compound emissions (entire rule).
(20) R 336.2004 Appendix A; reference test methods; adoption of federal reference test methods (entire rule).
(21) R 336.2006 Reference test method serving as alternate version of federal reference test method 25 by incorporating Byron analysis (entire rule).
(22) R 336.2007 Alternate version of procedure L, referenced in R 336.2040(10) (entire rule).
(23) R 336.2040 Method for determination of volatile organic compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines (except R 336.2040(9) and R 336.2040(10)).
(24) R 336.2041 Recordkeeping requirements for coating lines and graphic arts lines (entire rule).
(B) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan Air Pollution Control Commission General Rules filed with the Secretary of State on November 3, 1993 and effective on November 18, 1993:
(1) R 336.1601 Definitions—Added definition of the term person responsible.
(2) R 336.1602 General provisions for existing sources of volatile organic compound emissions—Addition of provisions requiring submittal of site-specific SIP revisions to EPA for the use of equivalent control methods allowed under rules 336.1628(1) and 336.1629(1).
(3) R 336.1624 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing graphic arts lines (entire rule).
(4) R 336.1628 Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in manufacturing synthetic organic chemicals and polymers; monitoring program (entire rule).
(5) R 336.1629 Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in processing natural gas; monitoring program (entire rule).
(C) Senate Bill No. 726 of the State of Michigan 87th Legislature for Stage I controls signed and effective on November 13, 1993.
(D) State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order No. 39-1993 which was adopted by the State on November 12, 1993.
(E) State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order No. 40-1993 which was adopted by the State on November 12, 1993.
(F) State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order No. 3-1993 which was adopted by the State on June 21, 1993.
(97) On November 12, 1993, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the implementation of a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in the Grand Rapids and Muskegon ozone nonattainment areas. This revision included House Bill No. 4165 which establishes an I/M program in Western Michigan, SIP narrative, and the State's Request for Proposal (RFP) for implementation of the program. House Bill No. 4165 was signed and effective on November 13, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) House Bill No. 4165; signed and effective November 13, 1993.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) SIP narrative plan titled “Motor Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Program for Southeast Michigan, Grand Rapids MSA, and Muskegon MSA Moderate Nonattainment Areas,” submitted to the EPA on November 12, 1993.
(B) RFP, submitted along with the SIP narrative on November 12, 1993.
(C) Supplemental materials, submitted on July 19, 1994, in a letter to EPA.
(98) [Reserved]
(99) On July 13, 1994, the State of Michigan requested a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP). The State requested that a consent order for the Eagle-Ottawa Leather Company of Grand Haven be included in the SIP.
(i) Incorporation by reference. State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Stipulation for Entry of Consent Order and Final Order No. 7-1994 which was adopted on July 13, 1994.
(100) On June 11, 1993 the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) submitted a plan, with revisions submitted on April 7, 1994 and October 14, 1994 for the purpose of bringing about the attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM) in the Wayne County moderate PM nonattainment area.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Consent Order 4-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Allied Signal, Inc., Detroit Tar Plant.
(B) Consent Order 5-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Asphalt Products Company, Plant 5A.
(C) Consent Order 6-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Clawson Concrete Company, Plant #1.
(D) Consent Order 7-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Cummings-Moore Graphite Company.
(E) Consent Order 8-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Delray Connecting Railroad Company.
(F) Consent Order 9-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Detroit Edison Company, River Rouge Plant.
(G) Consent Order 10-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Detroit Edison Company, Sibley Quarry.
(H) Consent Order 11-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the city of Detroit, Detroit Water and Sewage Department, Wastewater Treatment Plant.
(I) Consent Order 12-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Ferrous Processing and Trading Company.
(J) Consent Order 13-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Ford Motor Company, Rouge Industrial Complex.
(K) Consent Order 14-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Ford Motor Company, Vulcan Forge.
(L) Consent Order 15-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Edward C. Levy Company, Detroit Lime Company.
(M) Consent Order 16-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Edward C. Levy Company, Plant #1.
(N) Consent Order 17-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Edward C. Levy Company, Plant #3.
(O) Consent Order 18-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Edward C. Levy Company, Plant #6.
(P) Consent Order 19-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Edward C. Levy Company, Plant 4 and 5.
(Q) Consent Order 20-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Edward C. Levy Company, Plant Scrap Up-Grade Facility.
(R) Consent Order 21-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Marblehead Lime, Brennan Avenue Plant.
(S) Consent Order 22-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Marblehead Lime, River Rouge Plant.
(T) Consent Order 23-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the McLouth Steel Company, Trenton Plant.
(U) Consent Order 24-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Michigan Foundation Company, Cement Plant.
(V) Consent Order 25-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Michigan Foundation Company, Sibley Quarry.
(W) Consent Order 26-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Morton International, Inc., Morton Salt Division.
(X) Consent Order 27-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the National Steel Corporation, Great Lakes Division.
(Y) Consent Order 28-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the National Steel Corporation, Transportation and Materials Handling Division.
(Z) Consent Order 29-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Peerless Metals Powders, Incorporated.
(AA) Consent Order 30-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Rouge Steel Company.
(BB) Consent Order 31-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Keywell Corporation.
(CC) Consent Order 32-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the St. Marys Cement Company.
(DD) Consent Order 33-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the United States Gypsum Company.
(EE) Consent Order 34-1993 effective October 12, 1994 issued by the MDNR. This Order limits the PM emissions for the Wyandotte Municipal Power Plant.
(101) On November 15, 1993, the State of Michigan submitted as a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for ozone a State Implementation Plan for a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program for the Detroit-Ann Arbor area. Michigan submitted House Bill No. 5016, signed by Governor John Engler on November 13, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan House Bill No. 5016 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(102) On November 12, 1993, the State of Michigan submitted as a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for ozone a State Implementation Plan for a section 175A maintenance plan for the Detroit-Ann Arbor area as part of Michigan's request to redesignate the area from moderate nonattainment to attainment for ozone. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a base year (1993 attainment year) emission inventory for NOX and VOC, a demonstration of maintenance of the ozone NAAQS with projected emission inventories (including interim years) to the year 2005 for NOX and VOC, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the ozone NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the State), Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are contained in the contingency plan. Appropriateness of a contingency measure will be determined by an urban airshed modeling analysis. The Governor or his designee will select the contingency measure(s) to be implemented based on the analysis and the MDNR's recommendation. The menu of contingency measures includes basic motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program upgrades, Stage I vapor recovery expansion, Stage II vapor recovery, intensified RACT for degreasing operations, NOX RACT, and RVP reduction to 7.8 psi. Michigan submitted legislation or rules for basic I/M in House Bill No 5016, signed by Governor John Engler on November 13, 1993; Stage I and Stage II in Senate Bill 726 signed by Governor John Engler on November 13, 1993; and RVP reduction to 7.8 psi in House Bill 4898 signed by Governor John Engler on November 13, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan House Bill No. 5016 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(B) State of Michigan Senate Bill 726 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(C) State of Michigan House Bill No. 4898 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(103) On August 26, 1994 Michigan submitted a site-specific SIP revision in the form of a consent order for incorporation into the federally enforceable ozone SIP. This consent order determines Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) specifically for the Enamalum Corporation Novi, Michigan facility for the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following Michigan Stipulation for Entry of Final Order By Consent.
(A) State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources, Stipulation for Entry of Final Order By Consent No. 6-1994 which was adopted by the State on June 27, 1994.
(104) On July 13, 1995, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) submitted a contingency measures plan for the Wayne County particulate matter nonattainment area.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan Administrative Rule 374 (R 336.1374), effective July 26, 1995.
(105) [Reserved]
(106) On March 9, 1995, the State of Michigan submitted as a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for ozone a State Implementation Plan for a section 175A maintenance plan for the Grand Rapids area as part of Michigan's request to redesignate the area from moderate nonattainment to attainment for ozone. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include an attainment emission inventory for NOX and VOC, a demonstration of maintenance of the ozone NAAQS with projected emission inventories to the year 2007 for NOX and VOC, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and a commitment to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If a violation of the ozone NAAQS, determined not to be attributable to transport from upwind areas, is monitored, Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) contained in the contingency plan. Once a violation of the ozone NAAQS is recorded, the State will notify EPA, review the data for quality assurance, and conduct a technical analysis, including an analysis of meteorological conditions leading up to and during the exceedances contributing to the violation, to determine local culpability. This preliminary analysis will be submitted to EPA and subjected to public review and comment. The State will solicit and consider EPA's technical advice and analysis before making a final determination on the cause of the violation. The Governor or his designee will select the contingency measure(s) to be implemented within six months of a monitored violation attributable to ozone and ozone precursors from the Grand Rapids area. The menu of contingency measures includes a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program, Stage II vapor recovery, gasoline RVP reduction to 7.8 psi, RACT on major non-CTG VOC sources in the categories of coating of plastics, coating of wood furniture, and industrial cleaning solvents. Michigan submitted legislation or rules for I/M in House Bill No 4165, signed by Governor John Engler on November 13, 1993; Stage II in Senate Bill 726 signed by Governor John Engler on November 13, 1993; and RVP reduction to 7.8 psi in House Bill 4898 signed by Governor John Engler on November 13, 1993.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan House Bill No. 4165 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(B) State of Michigan Senate Bill 726 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(C) State of Michigan House Bill No. 4898 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(107) [Reserved]
(108) On May 16, 1996, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision is for the purpose of establishing a gasoline Reid vapor pressure (RVP) limit of 7.8 pounds per square inch (psi) for gasoline sold in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Washtenaw, Livingston, St. Clair, and Monroe counties in Michigan.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) House Bill No. 4898; signed and effective November 13, 1993.
(B) Michigan Complied Laws, Motor Fuels Quality Act, Chapter 290, Sections 642, 643, 645, 646, 647, and 649; all effective November 13, 1993.
(C) Michigan Complied Laws, Weights and Measures Act of 1964, Chapter 290, Sections 613, 615; all effective August 28, 1964.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from Michigan Governor John Engler to Regional Administrator Valdas Adamkus, dated January 5, 1996.
(B) Letter from Michigan Director of Environmental Quality Russell Harding to Regional Administrator Valdas Adamkus, dated May 14, 1996.
(C) State report titled “Evaluation of Air Quality Contingency Measures for Implementation in Southeast Michigan,” submitted to the EPA on May 14, 1996.
(109) On December 13, 1994 and January 19, 1996, Michigan submitted correspondence and Executive Orders 1991-31 and 1995-18 which indicated that the executive branch of government had been reorganized. As a result of the reorganization, delegation of the Governor's authority under the Clean Air Act was revised. The Environmental Protection Agency's approval of these Executive Orders is limited to those provisions affecting air pollution control. The Air Pollution Control Commission was abolished and its authority was initially transferred to the Director of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Subsequently, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources of Environmental Quality (DEQ) was created by elevating eight program divisions and two program offices previously located within the DNR. The authority then earlier vested to the Director of the Michigan DNR was then transferred to the Director of the Michigan DEQ with the exception of some administrative appeals decisions.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan Executive Order 1991-31 Commission of Natural Resources, Department of Natural Resources, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Executive Reorganization. Introductory and concluding words of issuance and Title I: General; Part A: Sections 1, 2, 4 and 5, Part B. Title III: Environmental Protection; Part A: Sections 1 and 2, Part B. Title IV: Miscellaneous; Parts A and B, Part C: Sections 1, 2, 4, Part D. Signed by John Engler, Governor, November 8, 1991. Filed with the Secretary of State November 8, 1991. Effective January 7, 1992.
(B) State of Michigan Executive Order No. 1995-18 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Michigan Department of Natural Resources Executive Reorganization. Introductory and concluding words of issuance. Paragraphs 1, 2, 3(a) and (g), 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18. Signed by John Engler, Governor, July 31, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State on August 1, 1995. Effective September 30, 1995.
(110) A revision to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP), containing part of Michigan's Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, was submitted by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on May 16, 1996, and supplemented on September 23, 1997. On December 30, 1997, MDEQ withdrew much of the original submittal. The revision incorporated below contains control requirements and applicable definitions for fugitive dust sources.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of Part 55 of Act 451 of 1994, the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act are incorporated by reference.
(A) 324.5524 Fugitive dust sources or emissions, effective March 30, 1995.
(B) 324.5525 Definitions, effective March 30, 1995.
(111) On March 18, 1999, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for carbon monoxide containing a section 175A maintenance plan for the Detroit area as part of Michigan's request to redesignate the area from nonattainment to attainment for carbon monoxide. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a base year (1996 attainment year) emission inventory for CO, a demonstration of maintenance of the ozone NAAQS with projected emission inventories to the year 2010, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the CO NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the State), Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are in the contingency plan. The menu of contingency measures includes enforceable emission limitations for stationary sources, transportation control measures, or a vehicle inspection and maintenance program.
(112) The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) submitted a revision to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) on August 20, 1998, and supplemented it on November 3, 1998. The revision removed from the SIP the following rules, which the State rescinded effective May 28, 1997: R 336.91 Purpose; R 336.92 Suspension of enforcement; requests by local agencies; R 336.93 Local agency requirements prior to suspension of enforcement; R 336.94 Commission public hearings on applications; R 336.95 Suspension of enforcement; procedures and public notice; R 336.96 Suspension of enforcement; conditions; R 336.97 Commission review of local agency programs; renewal of suspended enforcement; R 336.601 Affected counties and areas; R 336.602 Attainment of national ambient air quality standards; exemption from inspection and maintenance program requirements; R 336.603 Ozone and carbon monoxide attainment status determination; R 336.1373 Fugitive dust control requirements; areas listed in table 36; R 336.1501 Emission limits; extension of compliance date past January 1, 1980, generally; R 336.1502 Application; copies; R 336.1503 Application; contents; R 336.1504 Denial of request for extension past January 1, 1980; R 336.1505 Grant of extension past January 1, 1980; R 336.1506 Receipt of full and complete application; public notice; inspection; public hearing; R 336.1507 Modification or revocation of order granting extension; immediate effect; R 336.1603 Compliance program; R 336.2010 Reference test method 5A; R 336.2199(c); R 336.2601 Organization; R 336.2602 Offices and meetings; R 336.2603 Documents available for inspection and copying; R 336.2604 Document inspection and copying procedures; tape recording transcriptions; R 336.2605 Functions; R 336.2608 Hearings and informal conferences; R 336.2301 Definition of air pollution episode; R 336.2302 Definition of air pollution forecast; R 336.2303 Definition of air pollution alert; R 336.2304 Definition of air pollution warning; R 336.2305 Definition of air pollution emergency; R 336.2306 Declaration of air pollution episodes; R 336.2307 Episode emission abatement programs; and R 336.2308 Episode orders. The rules incorporated below contain revisions to degreasing, perchloroethylene dry cleaning, petroleum refinery, synthetic organic chemical manufacturing, and delivery vessel loading rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Michigan Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) R 336.1611 Existing cold cleaners, effective June 13, 1997.
(B) R336.1612 Existing open top vapor degreasers, effective June 13, 1997.
(C) R 336.1613 Existing conveyorized cold cleaners, effective June 13, 1997.
(D) R 336.1614 Existing conveyorized vapor degreasers, effective June 13, 1997.
(E) R 336.1619 Standards for perchloroethylene dry cleaning equipment, effective June 13, 1997.
(F) R 336.1622 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing components of petroleum refineries; refinery monitoring program, effective June 13, 1997.
(G) R 336.1628 Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in manufacturing synthetic organic chemicals and polymers; monitoring program, effective June 13, 1997.
(H) R 336.1651 Standards for Degreasers, effective June 13, 1997.
(I) R 336.1706 Loading delivery vessels with organic compounds having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.5 psia at new loading facilities handling 5,000,000 or more gallons of such compounds per year, effective June 13, 1997.
(J) R 336.1707 New cold cleaners, effective June 13, 1997.
(K) R 336.1708 New open top vapor degreasers, effective June 13, 1997.
(L) R 336.1709 New conveyorized cold cleaners, effective June 13, 1997.
(M) R 336.1710 New conveyorized vapor degreasers, effective June 13, 1997.
(113) On March 9, 1995, the State of Michigan submitted a revision to the Michigan State Implementation Plan for ozone containing a section 175A maintenance plan for the Muskegon County area as part of Michigan's request to redesignate the area from nonattainment to attainment for ozone. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, determined not to be attributable to transport from upwind areas, Michigan will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are in the contingency plan. The menu of contingency measures includes a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program, stage II vapor recovery, a low Reid vapor pressure gasoline program, and rules for industrial cleanup solvents, plastic parts coating, and wood furniture coating.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) State of Michigan House Bill No. 4165 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(B) State of Michigan House Bill No. 726 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(C) State of Michigan House Bill No. 4898 signed by the Governor and effective on November 13, 1993.
(114)-(115) [Reserved]
(116) The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted revisions to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) on July 7, 2000 and supplemented them with letters dated January 29, 2001, and February 6, 2002. They include revisions to definitions, open burning rules, general volatile organic compound provisions, and administrative procedures. The revision removed from the SIP rules R 336.1320 and R 336.2703, which the State rescinded effective April 10, 2000.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Michigan Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) R 336.1104 Definitions; D, effective April 10, 2000.
(B) R 336.1310, Open burning, effective February 3, 1999.
(C) R 336.1602 General provisions for existing sources of volatile organic compound emissions, effective April 10, 2000.
(D) R 336.2701 Petitions for review and for contested case hearings; hearing procedure; “duly authorized agent” defined, effective April 10, 2000.
(E) R 336.2702 Appearances, effective April 10, 2000.
(117) [Reserved]
(118) The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted revisions to Michigan's State Implementation Plan (SIP) on September 23, 2002. They include rules to address excess emissions occurring during startup, shutdown or malfunction as well as revisions to definitions.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Michigan Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) R 336.1102 Definitions; B, effective May 27, 2002.
(B) R 336.1104 Definitions; D, effective May 27, 2002.
(C) R 336.1105 Definitions; E, effective May 27, 2002.
(D) R 336.1107 Definitions; G, effective May 27, 2002.
(E) R 336.1108 Definitions; H, effective May 27, 2002.
(F) R 336.1113 Definitions; M, effective May 27, 2002.
(G) R 336.1118 Definitions; R, effective May 27, 2002.
(H) R 336.1120 Definitions; T, effective May 27, 2002.
(I) R 336.1915 Enforcement discretion in instances of excess emissions resulting from malfunction, start-up, or shutdown, effective May 27, 2002.
(J) R 336.1916 Affirmative defense for excess emissions during start-up or shutdown, effective May 27, 2002.
(119) The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality submitted a revision to Michigan's State Implementation Plan for ozone on April 25, 2003. This submittal contained a revised definition of volatile organic compound.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) R 336.1122 Definitions; V, effective March 13, 2003.
(120) [Reserved]
(121) On April 3, 2003, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) submitted regulations restricting emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX) to address the Phase I NOX SIP Call requirements. EPA conditionally approved Michigan's April 3, 2003, SIP revision on April 16, 2004. On May 27, 2004 and August 5, 2004, Michigan subsequently submitted for EPA approval SIP revisions to address the requirements found in EPA's conditional approval. These additional submittals, in combination with the original SIP revision, fulfill the Phase I NOX SIP Call requirements.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Michigan Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) R336.1802 Applicability under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective May 20, 2004.
(B) R336.1803 Definitions for oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(C) R336.1804 Retired unit exemption from oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective May 20, 2004.
(D) R336.1805 Standard requirements of oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(E) R336.1806 Computation of time under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(F) R336.1807 Authorized account representative under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(G) R336.1808 Permit requirements under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(H) R336.1809 Compliance certification under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(I) R336.1810 Allowance allocations under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(J) R336.1811 New source set-aside under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective May 20, 2004.
(K) R336.1812 Allowance tracking system and transfers under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(L) R336.1813 Monitoring and reporting requirements under oxides of nitrogen budget trading, effective December 4, 2002.
(M) R336.1814 Individual opt-ins under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(N) R336.1815 Allowance banking under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(O) R336.1816 Compliance supplement pool under oxides of nitrogen budget trading program, effective December 4, 2002.
(P) R336.1817 Emission limitations and restrictions for Portland cement kilns, effective December 4, 2002.
(122) On April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003, September 17, 2004, October 25, 2004 and June 8, 2005, Michigan submitted revisions to the State Implementation Plan which affect the following sections of the Michigan Administrative Code: Part 3: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Particulate Matter; Part 4: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Sulfur-bearing Compounds; Part 6: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Existing Sources of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions; Part 7: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—New Sources of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions; Part 9: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions—Miscellaneous; Part 10: Intermittent Testing and Sampling; and Part 11: Continuous Emission Monitoring.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Michigan Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
(A) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan Administrative Code, effective April 30, 1998:
(1) R 336.1358 Roof monitor visible emissions at steel manufacturing facilities from electric arc furnaces and blast furnaces.
(2) R 336.1361 Visible emissions from blast furnace casthouse operations at steel manufacturing facilities.
(3) R 336.1362 Visible emissions from electric arc furnace operations at steel manufacturing facilities.
(4) R 336.1363 Visible emissions from argon-oxygen decarburization operations at steel manufacturing facilities.
(B) R 336.1625 Emission of volatile organic compound from existing equipment utilized in manufacturing synthesized pharmaceutical products, filed with the Secretary of State on November 14, 2000 and effective November 30, 2000.
(C) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan Administrative Code, filed with the Secretary of State March 11, 2002 and effective March 19, 2002:
(1) R 336.1301 Standards for density of emissions.
(2) R 336.1303 Grading visible emissions.
(3) R 336.1330 Electrostatic precipitator control systems.
(4) R 336.1331 Emission of particulate matter, except C8 of Table 31.
(5) R 336.1371 Fugitive dust control programs other than areas listed in table 36.
(6) R 336.1372 Fugitive dust control program; required activities; typical control methods.
(7) R 336.1374 Particulate matter contingency measures; area listed in table 37.
(8) R 336.1401 Emission of sulfur dioxide from power plants.
(9) R 336.1403 Oil- and natural gas-producing or transporting facilities and natural gas-processing facilities; emissions; operation.
(10) R 336.1601 Definitions.
(11) R 336.1604 Storage of organic compounds having true vapor pressure of more than 1.5 psia, but less than 11 psia, in existing fixed roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity.
(12) R 336.1605 Storage of organic compounds having true vapor pressure of 11 or more psia in existing stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity.
(13) R 336.1606 Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels of more than 2,000-gallon capacity at dispensing facilities handling 250,000 or more gallons per year.
(14) R 336.1607 Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels of more than 2,000-gallon capacity at loading facilities.
(15) R 336.1608 Loading gasoline into delivery vessels at existing loading facilities handling less than 5,000,000 gallons per year.
(16) R 336.1615 Existing vacuum-producing systems at petroleum refineries.
(17) R 336.1616 Process unit turnarounds at petroleum refineries.
(18) R 336.1617 Existing organic compound-water separators at petroleum refineries.
(19) R 336.1618 Use of cutback paving asphalt.
(20) R 336.1619 Standards for perchloroethylene dry cleaning equipment; adoption of standards by reference.
(21) R 336.1622 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing components of petroleum refineries; refinery monitoring program.
(22) R 336.1623 Storage of petroleum liquids having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.0 psia, but less than 11.0 psia, in existing external floating roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity.
(23) R 336.1627 Delivery vessels; vapor collection systems.
(24) R 336.1628 Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in manufacturing synthetic organic chemicals and polymers; monitoring program.
(25) R 336.1629 Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in processing natural gas; monitoring program.
(26) R 336.1630 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing paint manufacturing processes.
(27) R 336.1631 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing process equipment utilized in manufacture of polystyrene or other organic resins.
(28) R 336.1702 New sources of volatile organic compound emissions generally.
(29) R 336.1705 Loading gasoline into delivery vessels at new loading facilities handling less than 5,000,000 gallons per year.
(30) R 336.1906 Diluting and concealing emissions.
(31) R 336.1911 Malfunction abatement plans.
(32) R 336.1930 Emission of carbon monoxide from ferrous cupola operations.
(33) R 336.2001 Performance tests by owner.
(34) R 336.2002 Performance tests by department.
(35) R 336.2003 Performance test criteria.
(36) R 336.2004 Appendix A; reference test methods; adoption of Federal reference test methods.
(37) R 336.2005 Reference test methods for delivery vessels.
(38) R 336.2007 Alternate version of procedure L, referenced in R 336.2040(10).
(39) R 336.2013 Reference test method 5D.
(40) R 336.2021 Figures.
(41) R 336.2040 Method for determination of volatile organic compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines, except subrules (9) and (10).
(42) R 336.2101 Continuous emission monitoring, fossil fuel-fired steam generators.
(43) R 336.2150 Performance specifications for continuous emission monitoring systems.
(44) R 336.2155 Monitor location for continuous emission monitoring systems.
(45) R 336.2159 Alternative continuous emission monitoring systems.
(46) R 336.2170 Monitoring data reporting and recordkeeping.
(47) R 336.2189 Alternative data reporting or reduction procedures.
(48) R 336.2190 Monitoring system malfunctions.
(D) Revisions to the following provisions of the Michigan Administrative Code, effective October 15, 2004:
(1) R 336.2012 Reference test method 5C.
(2) R 336.2014 Reference test method 5E.
(3) R 336.2175 Data reduction procedures for fossil fuel-fired steam generators.
(E) R 336.2011 Reference test method 5B, filed with the Secretary of State on April 21, 2005 and effective April 29, 2005.
[37 FR 10873, May 31, 1972. Redesignated at 71 FR 52469, Sept. 6, 2006]
Subpart Y—Minnesota
§ 52.1219 Identification of plan—conditional approval.
(a) On November 12, 1993, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision request to Minnesota's carbon monoxide SIP for approval of the State's basic inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. The basic I/M program requirements apply to sources in the State's moderate nonattainment areas for carbon monoxide and includes the following counties: Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington Counties. The USEPA is conditionally approving Minnesota's basic I/M program provided that the State adopt specific enforceable measures as outlined in its July 5, 1994 letter from Charles W. Williams, Commissioner, Minnesota Air Pollution Control Agency.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota Rules relating to Motor Vehicle Emissions parts 7023.1010 to 7023.1105, effective January 8, 1994.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter from the State of Minnesota to USEPA dated July 5, 1994.
(b) On February 9, 1996, the State of Minnesota submitted a request to revise its particulate matter (PM) State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Saint Paul area. This SIP submittal contains administrative orders which include control measures for three companies located in the Red Rock Road area—St. Paul Terminals, Inc., Lafarge Corporation and AMG Resources Corporation. Recent exceedances were attributed to changes of emissions/operations that had occurred at particular sources in the area. The results from the modeling analysis submitted with the Red Rock Road SIP revision, preliminarily demonstrate protection of the PM National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). However, due to the lack of emission limits and specific information regarding emission distribution at Lafarge Corporation following the installation of the pneumatic unloader, EPA is conditionally approving the SIP revision at this time. Final approval will be conditioned upon EPA receiving a subsequent modeled attainment demonstration with specific emission limits for Lafarge Corporation, corrected inputs for Peavey/Con-Agra, and consideration of the sources in the 2-4 km range which have experienced emission changes that may impact the Red Rock Road attainment demonstration.
[59 FR 51863, Oct. 13, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 39123, July 22, 1997]
§ 52.1220 Identification of plan.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Minnesota under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference.
(1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to December 1, 2004, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with the EPA approval dates after December 1, 2004, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 5 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by the EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the SIP as of December 1, 2004.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air Programs Branch, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604; the EPA, Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Room B108, Washington, DC 20460; or the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(c) EPA approved regulations.
| Minnesota citation |
Title/subject | State adoption date |
EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAPTER 7000 PROCEDURAL RULES | ||||
| 7000.0300 | DUTY OF CANDOR | 4/12/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7000.5000 | DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY | 4/12/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CHAPTER 7002 PERMIT FEES | ||||
| 7002.0005 | SCOPE | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7002.0015 | DEFINITIONS | 8/5/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CHAPTER 7005 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS | ||||
| 7005.0100 | DEFINITIONS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7005.0110 | ABBREVIATIONS | 11/29/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CHAPTER 7007 AIR EMISSION PERMITS | ||||
| 7007.0050 | SCOPE | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0100 | DEFINITIONS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | All except for paragraphs 9b through 9f, 12c, 24a and 24b. |
| 7007.0150 | PERMIT REQUIRED | 12/27/1994 | 5/18/1999, 64 FR 26880. | |
| 7007.0200 | SOURCES REQUIRED OR ALLOWED TO OBTAIN A PART 70 PERMIT | 12/27/1994 | 5/18/1999, 64 FR 26880. | |
| 7007.0250 | SOURCES REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A STATE PERMIT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0300 | SOURCES NOT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN PERMIT | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.0350 | EXISTING SOURCE APPLICATION DEADLINES AND SOURCE OPERATION DURING TRANSITION | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0400 | APPLICATIONS TO REISSUE PERMIT AFTER TRANSITION; NEW SOURCE AND PERMIT AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS; TOTAL FACILITY APPLICATIONS FOR SOURCES NEWLY SUBJECT TO PART 70 OR STATE PERMIT TOTAL FACILITY REQUIREMENT | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.0450 | PERMIT REISSUANCE APPLICATIONS AND CONTINUATION OF EXPIRING PERMITS | 10/11/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0500 | CONTENT OF PERMIT APPLICATION | 8/10/1993 | 5/2/1995, 60 FR 21447. | |
| 7007.0550 | CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION | 10/11/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0600 | COMPLETE APPLICATION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0650 | WHO RECEIVES AN APPLICATION | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0700 | COMPLETENESS REVIEW | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0750 | APPLICATION PRIORITY AND ISSUANCE TIMELINES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | Subparts 1-7 only. |
| 7007.0800 | PERMIT CONTENT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0850 | PERMIT APPLICATION NOTICE AND COMMENT | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.0900 | REVIEW OF PART 70 PERMITS BY AFFECTED STATES | 10/11/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.0950 | EPA REVIEW AND OBJECTION | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1000 | PERMIT ISSUANCE AND DENIAL | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1050 | DURATION OF PERMITS | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1100 | GENERAL PERMITS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1110 | REGISTRATION PERMIT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1115 | REGISTRATION PERMIT OPTION A | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1120 | REGISTRATION PERMIT OPTION B | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1125 | REGISTRATION PERMIT OPTION C | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1130 | REGISTRATION PERMIT OPTION D | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1140 | CAPPED PERMIT ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1141 | CAPPED PERMIT EMISSION THRESHOLDS | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1142 | CAPPED PERMIT ISSUANCE AND CHANGE OF PERMIT STATUS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1143 | CAPPED PERMIT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS | 11/29/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1144 | CAPPED PERMIT; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.1145 | CAPPED PERMIT APPLICATION | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.1146 | CAPPED PERMIT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1147 | CAPPED PERMIT; CALCULATING ACTUAL EMISSIONS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.1148 | AMBIENT AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT | 11/29/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1150 | WHEN A PERMIT AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1200 | CALCULATING EMISSION CHANGES FOR PERMIT AMENDMENTS | 11/12/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1250 | INSIGNIFICANT MODIFICATIONS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.1300 | INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES LIST | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7007.1350 | CHANGES WHICH CONTRAVENE CERTAIN PERMIT TERMS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1400 | ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT AMENDMENTS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1450 | MINOR AND MODERATE PERMIT AMENDMENTS | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1500 | MAJOR PERMIT AMENDMENTS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1600 | PERMIT REOPENING AND AMENDMENT BY AGENCY | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1650 | REOPENINGS FOR CAUSE BY EPA | 10/11/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1700 | PERMIT REVOCATION BY AGENCY | 10/11/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1750 | FEDERAL ENFORCEABILITY | 10/11/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1800 | PERMIT SHIELD | 10/11/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.1850 | EMERGENCY PROVISION | 12/24/2012 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.3000 | PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION OF AIR QUALITY | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| OFFSETS | ||||
| 7007.4000 | SCOPE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.4010 | DEFINITIONS | 5/24/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.4020 | CONDITIONS FOR PERMIT | 6/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.4030 | LIMITATION ON USE OF OFFSETS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7007.5000 | BEST AVAILABLE RETROFIT TECHNOLOGY | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CHAPTER 7008 CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT STATIONARY SOURCES AND CONDITIONALLY INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 7008.0050 | SCOPE | 4/23/2003 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7008.0100 | DEFINITIONS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.0200 | GENERAL REQUIREMENTS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.0300 | PERMITS | 4/21/2003 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7008.2000 | CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT STATIONARY SOURCES; ELIGIBILITY | 4/21/2003 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7008.2100 | GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS; TECHNICAL STANDARDS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.2200 | CONCRETE MANUFACTURING; TECHNICAL STANDARDS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.2250 | RECORD KEEPING FOR CONCRETE MANUFACTURING PLANTS | 4/21/2003 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7008.2300 | AUTO-BODY REFINISHING; TECHNICAL STANDARDS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.2400 | COATING FACILITY; TECHNICAL STANDARDS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.2500 | WOODWORKING FACILITY; TECHNICAL STANDARDS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.2600 | INSIGNIFICANT FACILITY; TECHNICAL STANDARDS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.4000 | CONDITIONALLY INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.4100 | CONDITIONALLY INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY; MATERIAL USAGE | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7008.4110 | CONDITIONALLY INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITY; MECHANICAL FINISHING OPERATIONS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| CHAPTER 7009 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS | ||||
| 7009.0010 | DEFINITIONS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.0020 | PROHIBITED EMISSIONS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.0050 | INTERPRETATION AND MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY, EXCEPT FOR HYDROGEN SULFIDE | 6/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.0090 | NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| AIR POLLUTION EPISODES | ||||
| 7009.1000 | AIR POLLUTION EPISODES | 3/18/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1010 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1020 | EPISODE LEVELS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1030 | EPISODE DECLARATION | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1040 | CONTROL ACTIONS | 1/12/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1050 | EMERGENCY POWERS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1060 | TABLE 1 | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1070 | TABLE 2: EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR PARTICULATE MATTER | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1080 | TABLE 3: EMISSION OBJECTIVES FOR SULFUR OXIDES | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1090 | TABLE 4: EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR NITROGEN OXIDES | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1100 | TABLE 5: EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR HYDROCARBONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7009.1110 | TABLE 6: EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR CARBON MONOXIDE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| ADOPTION OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS | ||||
| 7009.9000 | DETERMINING CONFORMITY OF GENERAL FEDERAL ACTIONS TO STATE OR FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS | 11/13/1995 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CHAPTER 7011 STANDARDS FOR STATIONARY SOURCES | ||||
| 7011.0010 | APPLICABILITY OF STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE | 6/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0020 | CIRCUMVENTION | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CONTROL EQUIPMENT | ||||
| 7011.0060 | DEFINITIONS | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0061 | INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0065 | APPLICABILITY | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0070 | LISTED CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCIES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0072 | REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFIED HOODS | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0075 | LISTED CONTROL EQUIPMENT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0080 | MONITORING AND RECORD KEEPING FOR LISTED CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| EMISSION STANDARDS FOR VISIBLE AIR CONTAMINANTS | ||||
| 7011.0100 | SCOPE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0105 | VISIBLE EMISSION RESTRICTIONS FOR EXISTING FACILITIES | 6/13/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0110 | VISIBLE EMISSION RESTRICTIONS FOR NEW FACILITIES | 1/12/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0115 | PERFORMANCE TESTS | 11/29/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CONTROLLING FUGITIVE PARTICULATE MATTER | ||||
| 7011.0150 | PREVENTING PARTICULATE MATTER FROM BECOMING AIRBORNE | 3/18/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| INDIRECT HEATING FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNING EQUIPMENT | ||||
| 7011.0500 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0505 | DETERMINATION OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0510 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING INDIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0515 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW INDIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0520 | ALLOWANCE FOR STACK HEIGHT FOR INDIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0525 | HIGH HEATING VALUE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0530 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0535 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0540 | DERATE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0545 | TABLE I: EXISTING INDIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0550 | TABLE II: NEW INDIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0551 | RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING FOR INDIRECT HEATING UNITS COMBUSTING SOLID WASTE | 9/22/2014 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0553 | NITROGEN OXIDES EMISSION REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR AFFECTED SOURCES | 2/6/1995 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0561 | CONTROLLING MERCURY FROM ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| DIRECT HEATING FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNING EQUIPMENT | ||||
| 7011.0600 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0605 | DETERMINATION OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0610 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNING DIRECT HEATING EQUIPMENT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0615 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0620 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0625 | RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING FOR DIRECT HEATING UNITS COMBUSTING SOLID WASTE | 9/22/2014 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| INDUSTRIAL PROCESS EQUIPMENT | ||||
| 7011.0700 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0705 | SCOPE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0710 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR PRE-1969 INDUSTRIAL PROCESS EQUIPMENT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0715 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR POST-1969 INDUSTRIAL PROCESS EQUIPMENT | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0720 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0730 | TABLE 1 | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0735 | TABLE 2 | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CONCRETE MANUFACTURING PLANT STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE | ||||
| 7011.0850 | DEFINITIONS | 4/21/2003 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0852 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CONCRETE MANUFACTURING PLANTS | 11/23/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0854 | CONCRETE MANUFACTURING PLANT CONTROL EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS | 11/23/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0857 | PREVENTING PARTICULATE MATTER FROM BECOMING AIRBORNE | 11/23/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0858 | NOISE | 11/23/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0859 | SHUTDOWN AND BREAKDOWN PROCEDURES | 11/23/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0865 | INCORPORATIONS BY REFERENCE | 4/21/2003 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0870 | STAGE-ONE VAPOR RECOVERY | 4/21/2003 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANTS | ||||
| 7011.0900 | DEFINITIONS | 6/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0903 | COMPLIANCE WITH AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS | 3/4/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0905 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PLANTS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0909 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANTS | 3/4/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0911 | MAINTENANCE OF DRYER BURNER | 3/4/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0913 | HOT MIX ASPHALT PLANT MATERIALS, FUELS, AND ADDITIVES OPERATING REQUIREMENTS | 5/24/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0917 | ASPHALT PLANT CONTROL EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS | 11/29/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0920 | PERFORMANCE TESTS | 3/4/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.0922 | OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS FROM PERFORMANCE TESTS | 3/4/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| BULK AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY FACILITIES | ||||
| 7011.1000 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1005 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR DRY BULK AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY FACILITIES | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1010 | NUISANCE | 1/12/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1015 | CONTROL REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| COAL HANDLING FACILITIES | ||||
| 7011.1100 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1105 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR CERTAIN COAL HANDLING FACILITIES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1110 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING OUTSTATE COAL HANDLING FACILITIES | 1/12/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1115 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR PNEUMATIC COAL-CLEANING EQUIPMENT AND THERMAL DRYERS AT ANY COAL HANDLING FACILITY | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1120 | EXEMPTION | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1125 | CESSATION OF OPERATIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1135 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1140 | DUST SUPPRESSANT AGENTS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| WASTE COMBUSTORS | ||||
| 7011.1201 | DEFINITIONS | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7011.1205 | INCORPORATIONS BY REFERENCE | 9/22/2014 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| INCINERATORS | ||||
| 7011.1300 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1305 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING SEWAGE SLUDGE INCINERATORS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1310 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW SEWAGE SLUDGE INCINERATORS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1315 | MONITORING OF OPERATIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1320 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1325 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 11/29/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| PETROLEUM REFINERIES | ||||
| 7011.1400 | DEFINITIONS | 10/18/1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | |
| 7011.1405 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING AFFECTED FACILITIES AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1410 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW AFFECTED FACILITIES AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1420 | EMISSION MONITORING | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1425 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1430 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 11/29/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| LIQUID PETROLEUM AND VOLATILE ORGANIC LIQUID STORAGE VESSELS | ||||
| 7011.1500 | DEFINITIONS | 6/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1505 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR STORAGE VESSELS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1510 | MONITORING OF OPERATIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1515 | EXCEPTION | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| SULFURIC ACID PLANTS | ||||
| 7011.1600 | DEFINITIONS | 1/12/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1605 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING SULFURIC ACID PRODUCTION UNITS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1615 | CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1620 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1625 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 11/29/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1630 | EXCEPTIONS | 11/29/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| NITRIC ACID PLANTS | ||||
| 7011.1700 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1705 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR EXISTING NITRIC ACID PRODUCTION UNITS | 1/12/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1715 | EMISSION MONITORING | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1720 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.1725 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 11/29/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| EMISSION STANDARDS FOR INORGANIC FIBROUS MATERIALS | ||||
| 7011.2100 | DEFINITIONS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7011.2105 | SPRAYING OF INORGANIC FIBROUS MATERIALS | 8/23/1993 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES | ||||
| 7011.2300 | STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| CHAPTER 7017 MONITORING AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| 7017.0100 | ESTABLISHING VIOLATIONS | 2/21/1995 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE MONITORING | ||||
| 7017.0200 | INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE | 5/24/2004 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS | ||||
| 7017.1002 | DEFINITIONS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1004 | APPLICABILITY | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1006 | REQUIREMENT TO INSTALL MONITOR | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1010 | INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS BY REFERENCE | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1020 | CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING BY AFFECTED SOURCES | 2/6/1995 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1030 | AGENCY ACCESS TO WITNESS OR CONDUCT TESTS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1035 | TESTING REQUIRED | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1040 | INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1050 | MONITOR CERTIFICATION AND RECERTIFICATION TEST | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1060 | PRECERTIFICATION TEST REQUIREMENTS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1070 | CERTIFICATION TEST PROCEDURES | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1080 | CERTIFICATION TEST REPORT REQUIREMENTS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1090 | MONITOR OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1100 | EVIDENCE OF NONCOMPLIANCE | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1110 | EXCESS EMISSIONS REPORTS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1120 | SUBMITTALS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1130 | RECORD KEEPING | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1135 | APPLICABILITY | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1140 | CEMS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1150 | CEMS TESTING COMPANY REQUIREMENT | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1160 | CEMS MONITORING DATA | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1170 | QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR CEMS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1180 | QUALITY CONTROL REPORTING AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CEMS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1185 | APPLICABILITY | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1190 | COMS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1200 | COMS MONITORING DATA | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1215 | QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.1220 | QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR COMS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| PERFORMANCE TESTS | ||||
| 7017.2001 | APPLICABILITY | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2005 | DEFINITIONS | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2010 | INCORPORATION OF TEST METHODS BY REFERENCE | 3/4/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2015 | INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL TESTING REQUIREMENTS BY REFERENCE | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2017 | SUBMITTALS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2020 | PERFORMANCE TESTS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2025 | OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2030 | PERFORMANCE TEST PRETEST REQUIREMENTS | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2035 | PERFORMANCE TEST REPORTING REQUIREMENTS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2040 | CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS | 3/18/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2045 | QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS | 7/13/1998 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2050 | PERFORMANCE TEST METHODS | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7017.2060 | PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURES | 12/19/2016 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| CHAPTER 7019 EMISSION INVENTORY REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| 7019.1000 | SHUTDOWNS AND BREAKDOWNS | 6/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3000 | EMISSION INVENTORY | 9/22/2014 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | Subparts 1 and 2 only |
| 7019.3020 | CALCULATING ACTUAL EMISSIONS FOR EMISSION INVENTORY | 1/7/2019 | 11/20/2025, 90 FR 52245 | |
| 7019.3030 | METHOD OF CALCULATION | 9/22/2014 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3040 | CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR (CEM) DATA | 3/1/1999 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3050 | PERFORMANCE TEST DATA | 9/22/2014 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3060 | VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC) MATERIAL BALANCE | 8/5/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3070 | SO2 MATERIAL BALANCE | 8/5/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3080 | EMISSION FACTORS | 11/19/2007 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3090 | ENFORCEABLE LIMITATIONS | 8/5/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| 7019.3100 | FACILITY PROPOSAL | 8/5/1996 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| MINNESOTA STATUTES | ||||
| 10A.07 | CONFLICTS OF INTEREST | 5/25/2013 | 11/2/2017, 82 FR 50807. | |
| 10A.09 | STATEMENTS OF ECONOMIC INTEREST | 5/23/2015 | 11/2/2017, 82 FR 50807. | |
| 17.135 | FARM DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE | 1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | Only item (a). |
| 88.01 | DEFINITIONS | 1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | Only Subd. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 14, 20, 23, 24, 25, and 26. |
| 88.02 | CITATION, WILDFIRE ACT | 1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | |
| 88.03 | CODIFICATION | 1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | |
| 88.16 | STARTING FIRES; BURNERS; FAILURE TO REPORT A FIRE | 1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | Only Subd. 1 and 2. |
| 88.17 | PERMISSION TO START FIRES; PROSECUTION FOR UNLAWFULLY STARTING FIRES | 1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | |
| 88.171 | OPEN BURNING PROHIBITIONS | 1993 | 5/24/1995, 60 FR 27411. | Only Subd. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. |
| 116.11 | EMERGENCY POWERS | 1983 | 7/27/2020, 85 FR 45094. | |
| TWIN CITIES NONATTAINMENT AREA FOR CARBON MONOXIDE | ||||
| 116.60 | 1999 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58344 | Only Subd. 12. | |
| 116.61 | 1999 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58344 | Only Subd. 1 and 3. | |
| 116.62 | 1999 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58344 | Only Subd. 2, 3, 5, and 10. | |
| 116.63 | 1999 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58344 | Only Subd. 4. |
(d) EPA approved state source-specific requirements.
| Name of source | Permit No. | State effective date | EPA approval date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aggregate Industries | 12300007-002 | 4/3/2009 | 3/11/2010, 75 FR 11461 | Only conditions cited as “Title I condition: SIP for PM10 NAAQS.” |
| BAE Technology Center | 00300245-003 | 1/20/2016 | 6/9/2016, 81 FR 37164 | Only conditions cited as “[Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4(SO2 SIP), Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51, Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y]”. |
| Bulk Silos | 12300391-102 | 6/3/2021 | 4/7/2022, 87 FR 20324 | Only conditions cited as “Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.6 (PM10 SIP).” |
| Commercial Asphalt CO, Plant 905 | 12300347-002 | 9/10/1999 | 7/12/2000, 65 FR 42861 | Title I conditions only. |
| 2/25/1994 | 9/9/1994, 59 FR 46553 | Amendment One to Findings and Order. | ||
| Federal Cartridge Company | 00300156-003 | 12/28/2007 | 4/24/2009, 74 FR 18634 | Only conditions cited as “Title I condition: SIP for SO2 NAAQS.” |
| Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC | 03700011-102 | 10/5/2018 | 8/19/2019, 84 FR 42825 | Only conditions cited as “Title I Condition: 40 CFR Section 50.4(SO2 SIP); Title I Condition: 40 CFR 51; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y”. |
| GAF Building Materials | 5/27/1992 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17703 | Findings and Order. | |
| 9/18/1997 | 2/8/1999, 64 FR 5936 | Amendment Two to Findings and Order. | ||
| Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc | 12300055-004 | 9/10/2008 | 5/20/2009, 74 FR 23632 | Only conditions cited as “Title I condition: SIP for PM10 NAAQS.” |
| Gopher Resource, LLC | 03700016-003 | 6/29/2010 | 1/13/2011, 76 FR 2263 | Only conditions cited as “Title I condition: SIP for Lead NAAQS.” |
| Great Lakes Coal & Dock Co. | 8/25/1992 | 2/15/1994, 59 FR 7218 | Amended Findings and Order. | |
| 12/21/1994 | 6/13/1995, 60 FR 31088 | Amendment One to Amended Findings and Order. | ||
| Harvest States Cooperatives | 1/26/1993 | 2/15/1994, 59 FR 7218 | Findings and Order. | |
| 12/21/1994 | 6/13/1995, 60 FR 31088 | Amendment One to Findings and Order. | ||
| Hoffman Enclosures | 00300155-001 | 1/31/2008 | 4/24/2009, 74 FR 18634 | Only conditions cited as “Title I condition: SIP for SO2 NAAQS.” |
| Lafarge Corp., Red Rock Terminal | 12300353-002 | 5/7/2002 | 8/19/2004, 68 FR 51371 | Title I conditions only. |
| Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment | 12300053-102 | 1/4/2024 | 5/14/2026, 91 FR 27217 | Only conditions cited as “Title I condition: SIP for PM10 NAAQS.” |
| Minneapolis Energy Center Inc | 5/27/1992 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17706 | Findings and Order for Main Plant, Baker Boiler Plant, and the Soo Line Boiler Plant. | |
| 12/21/1994 | 6/13/1995, 60 FR 31088 | Amendment One to Third Amended Findings and Order. | ||
| 9/23/1997 | 2/8/1999, 64 FR 5936 | Amendment Two to Third Amended Findings and Order. | ||
| Northern States Power Co., Riverside Plant | 05300015-001 | 5/11/1999 | 2/26/2002, 67 FR 8727 | Title I conditions only. |
| Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake Plant | 10900011-005 | 11/25/2015 | 3/10/2017, 82 FR 13230 | Only conditions cited as “Title I Condition: 40 CFR Section 50.4, SO2 SIP; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y” and “Title I Condition: 40 CFR Section 50.6, PM10 SIP; Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y”. |
| Saint Paul Park Refining Co., LLC | 16300003-021 | 11/25/2015 | 4/7/2017, 82 FR 16923 | Only conditions cited as “Title I Condition: 40 CFR 50.4 (SO2 SIP), Title I Condition: 40 CFR pt. 52, subp. Y” |
| St. Paul Terminals | 2/2/1996 | 7/22/1997, 62 FR 39120 | Findings and Order. | |
| Xcel Energy-Inver Hills Generating Plant | 03700015-004 | 7/16/2014 | 1/28/2016, 81 FR 4886 | Only conditions cited as “Title I condition: SIP for SO2 NAAQS.” |
| Xcel Energy—Northern States Power Company, Sherburne County Generating Station | Administrative Order | 5/2/2012 | 6/12/2012, 77 FR 34801 | See Final Rule for details. |
(e) EPA approved nonregulatory provisions.
| Name of nonregulatory SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area | State submittal date/ effective date |
EPA approved date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Quality Surveillance Plan | Statewide | 5/8/1980, 6/2/1980 | 3/4/1981, 46 FR 15138 | |
| Carbon Monoxide 1993 periodic Emission Inventory | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright Counties | 9/28/1995 | 10/23/1997, 62 FR 55170 | |
| Deletion of TSP Designations | Statewide | 7/10/2002, 67 FR 45637 | ||
| Duluth Carbon Monoxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | St. Louis County (part) | 10/30/1992 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17708 | |
| Duluth Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | St. Louis County | 7/3/1979 and 7/27/1979 | 6/16/1980, 45 FR 40579 | |
| 10/30/1992 | 4/14/1994, 59 FR 17706 | Removal of transportation control measure. | ||
| Lead Maintenance Plan | Dakota County | 6/22/1993 | 10/18/1994, 59 FR 52431 | Corrected codification information on 5/31/1995 at 60 FR 28339. |
| Lead Monitoring Plan | Statewide | 4/26/1983, 2/15/1984, and 2/21/1984 | 7/5/1984, 49 FR 27502 | Entire Lead Plan except for the New Source Review portion. |
| Oxygenated Fuels Program—Carbon Monoxide Contingency Measure | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright Counties | 4/29/1992 | 2/21/1996, 61 FR6547 | Laws of Minnesota for 1992 Chapter 575, section 29(b). |
| Regional Haze Plan | statewide | 12/30/2009 and 5/8/2012 | 6/12/2012, 77 FR 34801 | Includes all regional haze plan elements except BART emission limitations for the taconite facilities. |
| Regional Haze Progress Report | statewide | 12/30/2014 | 6/28/2018, 83 FR 30350 | |
| Rochester Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | Olmstead County | 7/3/1979 and 7/27/1979 | 6/16/1980, 45 FR 40579 | |
| Rochester PM-10 Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Olmstead County | 9/7/1994 | 5/31/1995, 60 FR 28339 | |
| Rochester Sulfur Dioxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Olmstead County | 11/4/1998 | 3/9/2001, 66 FR 14087 | |
| Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Plan | Statewide | 4/29/1992 | 3/16/1994, 59 FR 12165 | MN Laws Ch 546 sections 5 through 9. |
| St. Cloud Carbon Monoxide Redesignation | Benton, Sherbourne, and Stearns Counties | 8/31/1989 | 6/28/1993, 58 FR 34532 | |
| St. Cloud Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | Benton, Sherbourne, and Stearns Counties | 5/17/1979 | 12/13/1979, 44 FR 72116 | |
| 8/31/1989 | 6/28/1993, 58 FR 34529 | |||
| St. Paul PM-10 Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Ramsey County | 6/20/2002 | 7/26/2002, 67 FR 48787 | |
| Twin Cities Carbon Monoxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright Counties | 3/23/1998 | 10/29/1999, 64 FR 58347 | |
| Twin Cities Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington Counties | 7/3/1979 and 7/27/1979 7/21/1981 5/20/1985 and 4/17/1986 |
6/16/1980, 45 FR 40579 12/8/1981, 46 FR 59972 12/31/1986, 51 FR 47237 |
|
| Twin Cities / Pine Bend Sulfur Dioxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, and Washington Counties | 9/7/1994 10/3/1995 |
5/31/1995, 60 FR 28339 5/13/1997, 62 FR 26230 |
Except for St. Paul Park area. St. Paul Park area. |
| Alternative Public Participation Process | Statewide | 12/7/2005 | 7/5/2006, 71 FR 32274 | |
| Lead Maintenance Plan | Dakota County | 11/18/2002 and 11/19/2007 | 8/4/2008, 73 FR 31614 | Maintenance plan update. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 10/23/2007, 11/29/2007, 5/26/2016 and 10/4/2016 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36748 | Fully approved for all CAA elements. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 10/23/2007, 11/29/2007, 5/26/2016 and 10/4/2016 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36748 | Fully approved for all CAA elements. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 5/23/2011, 5/26/2016 and 10/4/2016 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36748 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except (D)(i)(I), which has been remedied with a FIP, and the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 lead (Pb) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/19/2012, 5/26/2016 and 10/4/2016 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36748 | Fully approved for all CAA elements. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014, 5/26/2016 and 10/4/2016 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36748 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014, 5/26/2016 and 10/4/2016 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36748 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014, 5/26/2016 and 10/4/2016 | 7/31/2018, 83 FR 36748 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except (D)(i)(I) and the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014, 5/26/2016 and 1/23/2017 | 10/10/2018, 83 FR 50849 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 10/1/2018 | 2/13/2023, 88 FR 9336 | Fully approved for all CAA elements except transport elements of (D)(i)(I) Prong 2, which are disapproved, and no action has been taken on the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II). |
[70 FR 8932, Feb. 24, 2005]
§ 52.1221 Classification of regions.
The Minnesota plan was evaluated on the basis of the following classifications:
| Air quality control region | Pollutant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particulate matter | Sulfur oxides | Nitrogen dioxide | Carbon monoxide | Photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons) | |
| Central Minnesota Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Southeast Minnesota-La Crosse (Wisconsin) Interstate | II | Ia | III | III | III |
| Duluth (Minnesota)-Superior (Wisconsin) Interstate | I | II | III | III | III |
| Metropolitan Fargo-Moorhead Interstate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Minneapolis-St. Paul Intrastate | I | I | III | I | III |
| Northwest Minnesota Intrastate | II | III | III | III | III |
| Southwest Minnesota Intrastate | III | III | III | III | III |
[37 FR 10874, May 31, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 16346, May 8, 1974]
§ 52.1222 Original Identification of plan section.
(a) This section identifies the original “Air Implementation Plan for the State of Minnesota” and all revisions submitted by Minnesota that were federally approved prior to December 1, 2004.
(b) The plan was officially submitted on January 28, 1972.
(c) The plan revisions listed below were submitted on the dates specified.
(1) A revised copy of the State emergency episode criteria was forwarded on February 7, 1972. (Non-regulatory)
(2) Information concerning intergovernmental cooperation was submitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on March 27, 1972.
(3) Certification that the State had adopted amendments to APC-1, 3, 4, 11, and 15, adopted a new air pollution control regulation (APC-16) and projected manpower resources was submitted by the State on April 28, 1972.
(4) An opinion on the availability of emission data to the public and evaluation of regulation concerning new construction was submitted by the State Attorney General's office on June 15, 1972. (Non-regulatory)
(5) A revised version of the State's regulation APC-3 was submitted by the Governor on July 25, 1972.
(6) On June 8, 1973, the Governor of Minnesota submitted a transportation control plan for the Minneapolis-St. Paul Intrastate Air Quality Control Region.
(7) Information concerning the transportation control plan was submitted on June 18, 1973, by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
(8) Compliance schedules were submitted on June 28, 1973, by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
(9) Information concerning the transportation control plan was submitted on July 30, 1973, by the Metropolitan Transit Commission.
(10) Information concerning the transportation control plan was submitted on August 1, 1973, by the Minnesota Department of Highways.
(11) Compliance schedules were submitted on August 9, 1973, by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
(12) On November 15, 1974, the Governor of Minnesota submitted recommended Air Quality Maintenance Area identifications.
(13) A request for an extension of the statutory timetable for the submittal of the portion of the Minnesota State Implementation Plan implementing the National Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards for total suspended particulates was submitted by the Executive Director of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on January 8, 1979, and was supplemented with additional information on March 9, 1979.
(14) A transportation control plan for the St. Cloud Metropolitan Area was submitted on May 17, 1979, by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
(15) Transportation control plans for the Metropolitan Areas of Duluth, Rochester and Minneapolis-St. Paul were submitted on July 3, 1979, and July 23, 1979, by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
(16) On March 5, 1980, the State of Minnesota submitted a revision to provide for modification of the existing air quality surveillance network. An amendment to the revision was submitted by the State of Minnesota on June 2, 1980.
(17) The sulfur dioxide control plan and revised operating permits for the Rochester and Twin Cities nonattainment areas were submitted by the State of Minnesota on July 17, 1980, and August 4, 1980. Amendments to the control plans were submitted on September 4, 1980. EPA's approval of the control plan includes approval of the emission limitations contained in the revised operating permits.
(18) Stipulation Agreement between the State Pollution Control Agency and Erie Mining Company submitted by the State on February 20, 1981.
(19) On July 29, 1981, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted an amendment to the transportation control plan for the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area.
(20) On August 4, 1980, and October 17, 1980, the State submitted its total suspended particulate Part D control plans for the Twin Cities Seven County Metropolitan Area and the City of Duluth. As part of the control strategies the State on January 5, 1981 submitted rule APC-33 and on January 23, 1981 further submitted amended and new rules. The amended and new rules that control total suspended particulate (TSP) emissions are: Amended APC-2, APC-4, APC-5, APC-7, APC-11; and new APC-18, APC-21, APC-22, APC-23, APC-24, APC-25, APC-26, APC-28, APC-29, and APC-32. Regulations APC-4, APC-24, and APC-32 are only approved as they apply to TSP emissions.
(21) On January 23, 1981, the State submitted new rules and amendments to some of their previously approved rules. On November 17, 1981, the State submitted amendments to APC-33. On May 6, 1982 (47 FR 19520), EPA approved some of the rules insofar as they applied to the total suspended particulate strategy for the Twin Cities Seven County Metropolitan Area and the City of Duluth. The remainder of the rules are:
(i) Those portions of APC-4, APC-24, and APC-32 which control emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide; (ii) the amendments to APC-33; and (iii) APC-8, APC-12, APC-13, APC-15, APC-16, APC-19 and APC-39.
(22) On April 28, 1983, Minnesota submitted its Lead SIP. Additional information was submitted on February 15, 1984, and February 21, 1984.
(23) On May 20, 1985, and on April 17, 1986, the State submitted a carbon monoxide plan for the intersection of Snelling and University Avenues in the City of St. Paul. The plan committed to improved signal progression through the intersection by December 31, 1987, and a parking ban on University Avenue within 1 block in either direction of the intersection with Snelling Avenue by December 31, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendment to Air Quality Control Plan for Transportation for the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area dated January 28, 1985.
(B) Letter from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, dated April 17, 1986, and letter from the City of St. Paul, dated April 1, 1986, committing to implementing of transportation control measures.
(24) On January 7, 1985, the State of Minnesota submitted a consolidated permit rule (CPR) to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR 51.160 through 51.164 for a general new source review (NSR) program, including lead. On October 25, 1985, the State submitted a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which remedied certain deficiencies (40 CFR 52.1225(d)). On October 1, 1986, and January 14, 1987, the State committed to implement its NSR program using USEPA's July 8, 1985 (50 FR 27892), regulations for implementing the stack height requirements of Section 123 of the Clean Air Act (40 CFR 52.1225(e)). USEPA is approving the above for general NSR purposes for all sources, except it is disapproving them for those few sources subject to an NSPS requirement (40 CFR Part 60) and exempted from review under 6 MCAR section 4.4303 B.3. For these sources, NSR Rule APC 3 (40 CFR 52.1220(c)(5)), will continue to apply. Additionally, USEPA is taking no action on the CPR in relationship to the requirements of Section 111, Part C, and Part D of the Clean Air Act.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Within Title 6 Environment, Minnesota Code of Administrative Rules, Part 4 Pollution Control Agency (6 MCAR 4), Rule 6 MCAR 4 section 4.0002, Parts A, B, C, and E—Definitions, Abbreviations, Applicability of Standards, and Circumvention (formerly APC 2) Proposed and Published in Volume 8 of the State of Minnesota STATE REGISTER (8 S.R.) on October 17, 1983, at 8 S.R. 682 and adopted as modified on April 16, 1984, at 8 S.R. 2275.
(B) Rules 6 MCAR section 4.4001 through section 4.4021—Permits (formerly APC 3)—Proposed and Published on December 19, 1983, at 8 S.R. 1419 (text of rule starting at 8 S.R. 1420) and adopted as modified on April 16, 1984, at 8 S.R. 2278.
(C) Rules 6 MCAR section 4.4301 through section 4.4305—Air Emission Facility Permits—Proposed and Published on December 19, 1983, at 8 S.R. 1419 (text of rule starting at 8 S.R. 1470) and adopted as proposed on April 16, 1984, at 8 S.R. 2276.
(D) Rules 6 MCAR section 4.4311 through section 4.4321—Indirect Source Permits (formerly APC 19)—Proposed and Published on December 19, 1983, at 8 S.R. 1419 (text of rule starting at 8 S.R. 1472) and adopted as modified on April 16, 1984, at 8 S.R. 2277.
(25) On July 9, 1986, the State of Minnesota submitted Rules 7005.2520 through 7005.2523, submitted to replace the rule APC-29 in the existing SIP (see paragraph (20)). This submittal also included State permits for three sources, but these permits were withdrawn from USEPA consideration on February 24, 1992. This submittal provides for regulation of particulate matter from grain handling facilities, and was submitted to satisfy a condition on the approval of Minnesota's Part D plan for particulate matter.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota Rule 7005.2520, Definitions; Rule 7005.2521, Standards of Performance for Dry Bulk Agricultural Commodity Facilities; Rule 7005.2522, Nuisance; and Rule 7005.2523, Control Requirements Schedule, promulgated by Minnesota on January 16, 1984, and effective at the State level on January 23, 1984.
(ii) Additional Material.
(A) Appendix E to Minnesota's July 9, 1986, submittal, which is a statement signed on April 18, 1986, by Thomas J. Kalitowski, Executive Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, interpreting Rules 7005.2520 through 7005.2523 in the context of actual barge loading practices in Minnesota.
(26) On March 13, 1989, the State of Minnesota requested that EPA revise the referencing of regulations in the SIP to conform to the State's recodification of its regulations. On November 26, 1991, and September 18, 1992, the State submitted an official version of the recodified regulations to be incorporated into the SIP. The recodified regulations are in Chapter 7001 and Chapter 7005 of Minnesota's regulations. Not approved as part of the SIP are recodified versions of regulations which EPA previously did not approve. Therefore, the SIP does not include Rules 7005.1550 through 7005.1610 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for asbestos), Rules 7005.2300 through 7005.2330 (limits for iron and steel plants), Rules 7005.2550 through 7005.2590 (NESHAP for beryllium), Rules 7005.2650 through 7005.2690 (NESHAP for mercury), Rule 7005.0116 (Opacity Standard Adjustment) and Rule 7005.2910 (Performance Test Methods for coal handling facilities). Similarly, the SIP continues to exclude the exemption now in Rule 7001.1210 as applied to small sources subject to new source performance standards, and the SIP is approved only for “existing sources” in the case of Rules 7005.1250 through 7005.1280 (Standards of Performance for Liquid Petroleum Storage Vessels), Rules 7005.1350 through 7005.1410 (Standards of Performance for Sulfuric Acid Plants), Rules 7005.1450 through 7005.1500 (Standards of Performance for Nitric Acid Plants), and Rules 7005.2100 through 7005.2160 (Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries). The SIP also does not include changes in the State's Rule 7005.0100 (relating to offsets) that were withdrawn by the State on February 24, 1992, and does not include the new rules 7005.0030 and 7005.0040.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota regulations in Chapter 7005 as submitted November 26, 1991, and in Chapter 7001 as submitted September 18, 1992, except for those regulations that EPA has not approved as identified above.
(27) On August 16, 1982, the MPCA submitted an amendment to the St. Cloud Area Air Quality Control Plan for Transportation as a State Implementation Plan revision. This revision to the SIP was adopted by the Board of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on July 27, 1982. On August 31, 1989, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision to the Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP) for carbon monoxide deleting the Lake George Interchange roadway improvement project (10th Avenue at First Street South) from its St. Cloud transportation control measures. This revision to the SIP was approved by the Board on June 27, 1989.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter dated August 16, 1982, from Louis J. Breimburst, Executive Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Valdas V. Adamkus, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency—Region 5 and its enclosed amendment to the Air Quality Plan for Transportation for the St. Cloud Metropolitan Area entitled, “Staff Resolution,” measures 1, 4 and 5 adopted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on July 27, 1982.
(B) Letter dated August 31, 1989, from Gerald L. Willet, Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Valdas V. Adamkus, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency—Region 5.
(28) On November 9, 1992, the State of Minnesota submitted the Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance plan. This submittal satisfies the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota Laws Chapter 546, sections 5 through 9 enacted by the Legislature, and signed into Law on April 29, 1992.
(29) On November 26, 1991, August 31, 1992, November 13, 1992, February 3, 1993, April 30, 1993, and October 15, 1993, the State of Minnesota submitted revisions to its State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for particulate matter for the Saint Paul and Rochester areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) An administrative order for Ashbach Construction Company, dated August 25, 1992, submitted August 31, 1992, for the facility at University Avenue and Omstead Street.
(B) An administrative order for Commercial Asphalt, Inc., dated August 25, 1992, submitted August 31, 1992, for the facility at Red Rock Road.
(C) An administrative order for Great Lakes Coal & Dock Company dated August 25, 1992, submitted August 31, 1992, for the facility at 1031 Childs Road.
(D) An administrative order for Harvest States Cooperatives dated January 26, 1993, submitted February 3, 1993, for the facility at 935 Childs Road.
(E) An administrative order for LaFarge Corporation dated November 30, 1992, submitted in a letter dated November 13, 1992, for the facility at 2145 Childs Road.
(F) An administrative order for the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the Metropolitan Council dated November 30, 1992, submitted in a letter dated November 13, 1992, for the facility at 2400 Childs Road.
(G) An administrative order for North Star Steel Company dated April 22, 1993, submitted April 30, 1993, for the facility at 1678 Red Rock Road.
(H) An administrative order for PM Ag Products, Inc., dated August 25, 1992, submitted August 31, 1992, for the facility at 2225 Childs Road.
(I) An administrative order for Rochester Public Utilities dated November 30, 1992, submitted in a letter dated November 13, 1992, for the facility at 425 Silver Lake Drive.
(J) An amendment to the administrative order for Rochester Public Utilities, dated October 14, 1993, submitted October 15, 1993, for the facility at 425 Silver Lake Drive.
(K) An administrative order for J.L. Shiely Company dated August 25, 1992, submitted August 31, 1992, for the facility at 1177 Childs Road.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated November 26, 1991, with attachments.
(B) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated August 31, 1992, with attachments.
(C) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated November 13, 1992, with attachments.
(D) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated February 3, 1993, with attachments.
(E) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated April 30, 1993, with attachments.
(F) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated October 15, 1993, with attachments.
(30) On June 4, 1992, March 30, 1993, and July 15, 1993, the State of Minnesota submitted revisions to its State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for sulfur dioxide for Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) 131 (excluding the Dakota County Pine Bend area and an area around Ashland Refinery in St. Paul Park).
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) An administrative order, received on June 4, 1992, for FMC Corporation and U.S. Navy, located in Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. The administrative order became effective on May 27, 1992. Amendment One, which was received on March 30, 1993, became effective on March 5, 1993. Amendment Two, which was received on July 15, 1993, became effective on June 30, 1993.
(B) An administrative order, received on June 4, 1992, for Federal Hoffman, Incorporated, located in Anoka, Anoka County, Minnesota. The administrative order became effective on May 27, 1992. Amendment one, received on July 15, 1993, became effective on June 30, 1993.
(C) An administrative order, received on June 4, 1992, for GAF Building Materials Corporation (Asphalt Roofing Products Manufacturing Facility) located at 50 Lowry Avenue, Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The administrative order became effective on May 27, 1992. Amendment One, received on July 15, 1993, became effective on June 30, 1993.
(D) An administrative order, received on June 4, 1992, for Northern States Power Company-Riverside Generating Plant, located in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The administrative order became effective on May 27, 1992. Amendment One, received on July 15, 1993, became effective on June 30, 1993.
(E) An administrative order for Minneapolis Energy Center, received on July 15, 1993, Inc.'s Main Plant, Baker Boiler Plant, and the Soo Line Boiler Plant all located in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The administrative order became effective on June 30, 1993.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated May 29, 1992, with enclosures providing technical support (e.g., computer modeling) for the revisions to the administrative orders for five facilities.
(B) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated March 26, 1993, with enclosures providing technical support for an amendment to the administrative order for FMC Corporation and U.S. Navy.
(C) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated July 12, 1993, with enclosures providing technical support for amendments to administrative orders for four facilities and a reissuance of the administrative order to Minneapolis Energy Center, Inc.
(31) In a letter dated October 30, 1992, the MPCA submitted a revision to the Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan for Duluth, Minnesota. This revision contains a maintenance plan that the area will use to maintain the CO NAAQS. The maintenance plan contains park and ride lots and an oxygenated fuels program as the contingency measure.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter dated October 30, 1992, from Charles Williams, Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Valdas Adamkus, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 and its enclosures entitled Appendix E.
(ii) Additional information.
(A) Letter dated November 10, 1992, from Charles Williams, Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Valdas Adamkus, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5.
(B) Letter dated December 22, 1993, from Charles Williams, Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Valdas Adamkus, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5.
(32) In a letter dated October 30, 1992, the MPCA submitted a revision to the Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan for Duluth, Minnesota. This revision removes a transportation control measure (TCM) from the State Implementation Plan. The TCM is an increased turning radius at 14th Avenue and 3rd Street East.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter dated October 30, 1992, from Charles Williams, Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Valdas Adamkus, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 and its enclosure entitled Appendix D.
(ii) Additional information.
(A) Letter dated November 10, 1992, from Charles Williams, Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Valdas Adamkus, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5.
(33) On August 5, 1992, and August 26, 1993, the State of Minnesota submitted its “Offset Rules” as revisions to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) for new source review in nonattainment areas.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Rules 7005.3020, 7005.3030, and 7005.3040, with amendments effective August 24, 1992.
(B) Amendments to Rule 7005.3040, effective June 28, 1993.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated August 5, 1992, with attachments.
(B) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated August 26, 1993, with attachments.
(34) On November 9, 1992, the State of Minnesota submitted the Oxygenated Gasoline Program. This submittal satisfies the requirements of section 211(m) of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota Laws Chapter 2509, sections 1 through 31, except for sections 29 (b) and (c), enacted by the Legislature and signed into Law on April 29, 1992.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter dated August 12, 1994, from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), to the United States Environmental Protection Agency that withdraws the MPCA Board resolution dated October 27, 1992, and any reference to it, from the oxygenated gasoline State Implementation Plan revision request of 1992.
(35) On July 29, 1992, February 11, 1993, and February 25, 1994, the State of Minnesota submitted revisions to its State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for sulfur dioxide for Dakota County Pine Bend area of Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) 131.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) For Continental Nitrogen and Resources Corporation, located in Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota:
(1) An administrative order, dated and effective July 28, 1992, submitted July 29, 1992.
(2) Amendment One to the administrative order, dated and effective February 25, 1994, submitted February 25, 1994.
(B) For Northern States Power Company, Inver Hills Generating Facility, located in Dakota County, Minnesota:
(1) An administrative order, dated and effective July 28, 1992, submitted July 29, 1992.
(2) Amendment one to the administrative order, dated and effective February 25, 1994, submitted February 25, 1994.
(C) For Koch Refining Company and Koch Sulfuric Acid Unit, located in the Pine Bend area of Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota:
(1) An administrative order, identified as Amendment One to Findings and Order by Stipulation, dated and effective March 24, 1992, submitted July 29, 1992.
(2) Amendment two to the administrative order, dated and effective January 22, 1993, submitted February 11, 1993.
(3) Amendment three to the administrative order, dated and effective February 25, 1994, submitted February 25, 1994.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated July 29, 1992, with enclosures providing technical support (e.g., computer modeling) for the revisions to the administrative orders for three facilities.
(B) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated February 11, 1993, submitting Amendment Two to the administrative order for Koch Refining Company.
(C) A letter from Charles Williams to Valdas Adamkus dated February 25, 1994, with enclosures providing technical support for amendments to administrative orders for three facilities.
(36) On June 22, 1993, and September 13, 1994, the State of Minnesota submitted revisions to its State Implementation Plan for lead for a portion of Dakota County.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) For Gopher Smelting and Refining Company, located in the city of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota:
(1) An administrative order, dated, submitted, and effective June 22, 1993.
(2) Amendment One to the administrative order, dated, submitted, and effective, September 13, 1994.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) A letter from Charles W. Williams to Valdas V. Adamkus, dated June 22, 1993, with enclosures providing technical support (e.g., computer modeling) for the revisions to the State Implementation Plan for lead.
(B) A letter from Charles W. Williams to Valdas V. Adamkus, dated September 13, 1994, with enclosures providing technical support for the revised administrative order for Gopher Smelting and Refining Company.
(37) On March 9, 1994, the State of Minnesota submitted a revision to its particulate matter plan for the Saint Paul area, providing substitute limits for an aggregate heater at the J.L. Shiely facility.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) An amendment dated January 12, 1994, amending the administrative order of August 25, 1992, for the J.L. Shiely facility at 1177 Childs Road, Saint Paul.
(37) On November 23, 1993, the State of Minnesota submitted updated air permitting rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Rules 7007.0050 through 7007.1850, effective August 10, 1993.
(B) Rules 7001.0020, 7001.0050, 7001.0140, 7001.0180, 7001.0550, 7001.3050, 7002.0005, 7002.0015, and 7005.0100, effective August 10, 1993.
(38)-(39) [Reserved]
(40) On November 23, 1993, the State of Minnesota requested recodification of the regulations in its State Implementation Plan, requested removal of various regulations, and submitted recodified regulations containing minor revisions.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota regulations in Chapters 7005, 7007, 7009, 7011, 7017, 7019, and 7023, effective October 18, 1993.
(B) Submitted portions of Minnesota Statutes Sections 17.135, 88.01, 88.02, 88.03, 88.16, 88.17, and 88.171, effective 1993.
(41) On December 22, 1994, Minnesota submitted miscellaneous amendments to 11 previously approved administrative orders. In addition, the previously approved administrative order for PM Ag Products (dated August 25, 1992) is revoked.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendments, all effective December 21, 1994, to administrative orders approved in paragraph (c)(29) of this section for: Ashbach Construction Company; Commercial Asphalt, Inc.; Great Lakes Coal & Dock Company; Harvest States Cooperatives; LaFarge Corporation; Metropolitan Council; North Star Steel Company; Rochester Public Utilities; and J.L. Shiely Company.
(B) Amendments, effective December 21, 1994, to the administrative order approved in paragraph (c)(30) of this section for United Defense, LP (formerly FMC/U.S. Navy).
(C) Amendments, effective December 21, 1994, to the administrative order approved in paragraph (c)(35) of this section for Northern States Power-Inver Hills Station.
(42) On September 7, 1994, the State of Minnesota submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) for particulate matter for the Rochester area of Olmsted County, Minnesota.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendment Two to the administrative order for the Silver Lake Plant of Rochester Public Utilities, located in Rochester, Minnesota, dated and effective August 31, 1994, submitted September 7, 1994.
(43) On November 12, 1993, the State of Minnesota submitted a contingency plan to control the emissions of carbon monoxide from mobile sources by use of oxygenated gasoline on a year-round basis. The submittal of this program satisfies the provisions under section 172(c)(9) and 172(b) of the Clean Air Act as amended.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Laws of Minnesota for 1992, Chapter 575, section 29(b), enacted by the legislature and signed into law on April 29, 1992.
(44) This revision provides for data which have been collected under the enhanced monitoring and operating permit programs to be used for compliance certifications and enforcement actions.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota Rules, sections 7007.0800 Subpart 6.C(5), 7017.0100 Subparts 1 and 2, both effective February 28, 1995.
(45) On December 15, 1995, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision to the State Implementation Plan for the general conformity rules. The general conformity SIP revisions enable the State of Minnesota to implement and enforce the Federal general conformity requirements in the nonattainment or maintenance areas at the State or local level in accordance with 40 CFR part 93, subpart B—Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota rules Part 7009.9000, as created and published in the (Minnesota) Register, November 13, 1995, number 477, effective November 20, 1995.
(46) On April 24, 1997, the State of Minnesota submitted Administrative Order amendments for sulfur dioxide for two Northern States Power facilities: Inver Hills and Riverside.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendment Two, dated and effective November 26, 1996, to administrative order approved in paragraph (c)(30) of this section for Northern States Power-Riverside Station.
(B) Amendment Three, dated and effective November 26, 1996, to administrative order and amendments approved in paragraphs (c)(35) and (c)(41), respectively, of this section for Northern States Power-Inver Hills Station.
(47) On October 17, 1997, the State of Minnesota submitted amendments to three previously approved Administrative Orders for North Star Steel Company, LaFarge Corporation, and GAF Building Materials, all located in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendments, both dated and effective September 23, 1997, to administrative orders and amendments approved in paragraphs (c)(29) and (c)(41) of this section, respectively, of this section for: LaFarge Corporation (Childs Road facility) and North Star Steel Company.
(B) Amendment Two, dated and effective September 18, 1997, to administrative order and amendment approved in paragraph (c)(30) of this section for GAF Building Materials.
(48) On January 12, 1995, Minnesota submitted revisions to its air permitting rules. The submitted revisions provide generally applicable limitations on potential to emit for certain categories of sources.
(i) Incorporation by reference. Submitted portions of Minnesota regulations in Chapter 7007, and 7011.0060 through 7011.0080 effective December 27, 1994.
(49) [Reserved]
(50) On July 22, 1998 the State of Minnesota submitted a supplemental SIP revision for the control of particulate matter emissions from certain sources located along Red Rock Road, within the boundaries of Ramsey County. This supplemental SIP revision is in response to EPA's July 22, 1997 conditional approval (62 FR 39120), of a February 9, 1996 SIP revision for Red Rock Road. In addition, the previously approved administrative order for Lafarge Corporation (dated February 2, 1996) is revoked.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Air Emission Permit No. 12300353-001, issued by the MPCA to Lafarge Corporation—Red Rock Terminal on April 14, 1998, Title I conditions only.
(B) Revocation of Findings and Order, dated and effective July 21, 1998, to Findings and Order issued to Lafarge Corporation on February 2, 1996.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Letter submitting vendor certifications of performance for the pollution control equipment at Lafarge Corporation's facility on Red Rock Road in St. Paul, Minnesota, dated May 4, 1998, from Arthur C. Granfield, Regional Environmental Manager for Lafarge Corporation, to Michael J. Sandusky, MPCA Air Quality Division Manager.
(B) Letter submitting operating ranges for the pollution control equipment at Lafarge Corporation's facility on Red Rock Road in St. Paul, Minnesota, dated July 13, 1998, from Arthur C. Granfield, Regional Environmental Manager for Lafarge Corporation, to Michael J. Sandusky, MPCA Air Quality Division Manager.
(51) On November 14, 1995, July 8, 1996, September 24, 1996, June 30, 1999, and September 1, 1999, the State of Minnesota submitted revisions to its State Implementation Plan for carbon monoxide regarding the implementation of the motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program in the Minneapolis/St. Paul carbon monoxide nonattainment area. This plan approves Minnesota Statutes Sections 116.60 to 116.65 and Minnesota Rules 7023.1010-7023.1105. This plan also removes Minnesota Rules Part 7023.1010, Subp. 35(B), Part 7023.1030, Subp. 11(B,C), and Part 7023.1055, Subp. 1 (E)(2) from the SIP.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Minnesota Statutes Sections 116.60 to 116.65;
(B) Minnesota Rules 7023.1010-7023.1105 (except Part 7023.1010, Subp. 35(B), Part 7023.1030, Subp. 11(B,C), and Part 7023.1055, Subp. 1 (E)(2)).
(52) [Reserved]
(53) On September 29, 1998, the State of Minnesota submitted a site-specific revision to the particulate matter (PM) SIP for LTV Steel Mining Company (LTV), formerly known as Erie Mining Company, located in St. Louis County, Minnesota. This SIP revision was submitted in response to a request from LTV that EPA remove the Stipulation Agreement for Erie Mining Company from the State SIP, as was approved by EPA in paragraph (c)(18) of this section. Accordingly the Stipulation Agreement for Erie Mining Company referenced in paragraph (c)(18) of this section is removed from the SIP without replacement.
(54) On December 7, 1999, the State of Minnesota submitted to remove an Administrative Order and replace it with a federally enforceable State operating permit for Commercial Asphalt's facility located on Red Rock Road in the city of St. Paul. EPA approved a federally enforceable State operating permit (FESOP)(60 FR 21447) for the State of Minnesota on May 2, 1995.
(i) Incorporation by reference
(A) Air Emission Permit No. 12300347-002, issued by the MPCA to Commercial Asphalt CO-Plant 905, on September 10, 1999. Title I conditions only.
(55) On February 6, 2000, the State of Minnesota submitted a site-specific revision to the Minnesota Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) SIP for Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC (Marathon Ashland), located in the cities of St. Paul Park and Newport, Washington County, Minnesota. Specifically, EPA is only approving into the SIP only those portions of the Marathon Ashland Title V Operating permit cited as “Title I condition: SIP for SO2 NAAQS 40 CFR pt.50 and Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP).” In this same action, EPA is removing from the state SO2 SIP the Marathon Ashland Administrative Order previously approved in paragraph (c)(38) and revised in paragraph (c)(49) of this section.
(i) Incorporation by reference
(A) AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 16300003-003, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC on October 26, 1999, Title I conditions only.
(56) On November 4, 1998, the State of Minnesota submitted a SIP revision for Olmsted County, Minnesota, for the control of emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the city of Rochester. The state also submitted on that date a request to redesignate the Rochester nonattainment area to attainment of the SO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The state's maintenance plan is complete and the submittals meet the SO2 nonattainment area SIP and redesignation requirements of the Clean Air Act.
(i) Incorporation by reference
(A) Air Emission Permit No. 10900011-001, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to City of Rochester—Rochester Public Utilities—Silver Lake Plant on July 22, 1997, Title I conditions only.
(B) Air Emission Permit No. 00000610-001, issued by the MPCA to City of Rochester—Rochester Public Utilities—Cascade Creek Combustion on January 10, 1997, Title I conditions only.
(C) Air Emission Permit No. 10900010-001, issued by the MPCA to Associated Milk Producers, Inc. on May 5, 1997, Title I conditions only.
(D) Air Emission Permit No. 10900008-007 (989-91-OT-2, AMENDMENT No. 4), issued by the MPCA to St. Mary's Hospital on February 28, 1997, Title I conditions only.
(E) Air Emission Permit No. 10900005-001, issued by the MPCA to Olmsted County—Olmsted Waste-to-Energy Facility on June 5, 1997, Title I conditions only.
(F) Amendment No. 2 to Air Emission Permit No. 1148-83-OT-1 [10900019], issued by the MPCA to Franklin Heating Station on June 19, 1998, Title I conditions only.
(G) Air Emission Permit No. 10900006-001, issued by the MPCA to International Business Machine Corporation—IBM—Rochester on June 3, 1998, Title I conditions only.
(57) [Reserved]
(58) On December 16, 1998, the State submitted an update to the Minnesota performance test rule, which sets out the procedures for facilities that are required to conduct performance tests to demonstrate compliance with their emission limits and/or operating requirements. In addition, EPA is removing from the state SIP Minnesota Rule 7017.2000 previously approved as APC 21 in paragraph (c)(20) and amended in paragraph (c)(40) of this section.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Amendments to Minnesota Rules 7011.0010, 7011.0105, 7011.0510, 7011.0515, 7011.0610, 7011.0710, 7011.0805, 7011.1305, 7011.1405, 7011.1410, 7017.2001, 7017.2005, 7017.2015, 7017.2018, 7017.2020, 7017.2025, 7017.2030, 7017.2035, 7017.2045, 7017.2050 and 2060, published in the Minnesota State Register April 20, 1998, and adopted by the state on July 13, 1998.
(59) On September 1, 1999, the State of Minnesota submitted a site-specific revision to the Minnesota Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) SIP for the Northern States Power Company (NSP) Riverside Plant, located in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Specifically, EPA is approving into the SO2 SIP only those portions of the NSP Riverside Plant Title V Operating Permit cited as “Title I condition: State Implementation Plan for SO2.” In this same action, EPA is removing from the state SO2 SIP the NSP Riverside Plant Administrative Order previously approved and amended in paragraphs (c)(30) and (c)(46) of this section respectively.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Air Emission Permit No. 05300015-001, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to Northern States Power Company—Riverside Plant on May 11, 1999, Title I conditions only.
(60) [Reserved]
(61) On June 1, 2001, the State of Minnesota submitted a site-specific revision to the Minnesota particulate matter (PM) State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Metropolitan Council Environmental Service's (MCES) Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant located on Childs Road in St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Specifically, EPA is only approving into the SIP those portions of the MCES federally enforceable state operating permit cited as “Title I Condition: State Implementation Plan for PM10.” In this same action, EPA is removing from the state PM SIP the MCES Administrative Order previously approved in paragraph (c)(29) of this section.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Air Emission Permit No. 12300053-001, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to MCES's Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant at 2400 Childs Road on March 13, 2001, Title I conditions only.
(62) On March 13, 2003, the State of Minnesota submitted a site-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the control of emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) for Flint Hills Resources, L.P., located in the Pine Bend Area of Rosemount, Dakota County, Minnesota. Specifically, EPA is approving into the SO2 SIP Amendment No. 6 to the Administrative Order previously approved in paragraph (c)(35) and revised in paragraphs (c)(57) and (c)(60) of this section.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) An administrative order identified as Amendment Six to Findings and Order by Stipulation, for Flint Hills Resources, L.P., dated and effective March 11, 2003, submitted March 13, 2003.
(63) On August 9, 2002, the State of Minnesota submitted a revision to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide (SO2) State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Xcel Energy's Inver Hills Generating Plant (Xcel) located in the city of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota. Specifically, EPA is only approving into the SO2 SIP those portions of the Xcel Title V operating permit cited as “Title I Condition: State Implementation Plan for SO2” and is removing from the state SO2 SIP the Xcel Administrative Order previously approved in paragraph (c)(46) and modified in paragraphs (c)(35) and (c)(41) of this section. In this same action, EPA is removing from the state particulate matter SIP the Administrative Order for Ashbach Construction Company previously approved in paragraph (c)(29) and modified in paragraph (c)(41) of this section.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 03700015-001, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to Northern States Power Company Inver Hills Generating Plant on July 25, 2000, Title I conditions only.
(64) On July 18, 2002, the State of Minnesota submitted a site-specific revision to the Minnesota particulate matter (PM) SIP for the Lafarge Corporation (Lafarge) Red Rock Road facility, located in Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Specifically, EPA is approving into the PM SIP only those portions of the Lafarge Red Rock Road facility state operating permit cited as “Title I condition: SIP for PM10 NAAQS.”
(i) Incorporation by reference. AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 12300353-002, issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to Lafarge Corporation—Red Rock Terminal on May 7, 2002, Title I conditions only.
(65) The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a revision to Minnesota's State Implementation Plan for sulfur dioxide on December 19, 2002. This revision consists of a Title V permit for the United Defense, LP facility located in Anoka County at 4800 East River Road, Fridley, Minnesota. The Permit contains non-expiring Title I SIP conditions.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Title I conditions contained in the November 25, 2002, Title V permit (permit number 00300020-001) issued to the United Defense, LP facility located in Anoka County at 4800 East River Road, Fridley, Minnesota.
[37 FR 10874, May 31, 1972. Redesignated at 70 FR 8932, Feb. 24, 2005]
§ 52.1223 Approval status.
With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves Minnesota's plans for the attainment and maintenance of the national standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds the plan satisfies all requirements of Part D, Title 1, of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1977, except as noted below.
[45 FR 40581, June 16, 1980]
§ 52.1224 General requirements.
(a) The requirements of § 51.116(c) of this chapter are not met since the plan does not provide for public availability of emission data.
(b) Regulation for public availability of emission data. (1) Any person who cannot obtain emission data from the Agency responsible for making emission data available to the public, as specified in the applicable plan, concerning emissions from any source subject to emission limitations which are part of the approved plan may request that the appropriate Regional Administrator obtain and make public such data. Within 30 days after receipt of any such written request, the Regional Administrator shall require the owner or operator of any such source to submit information within 30 days on the nature and amounts of emissions from such source and any other information as may be deemed necessary by the Regional Administrator to determine whether such source is in compliance with applicable emission limitations or other control measures that are part of the applicable plan.
(2) Commencing after the initial notification by the Regional Administrator pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the owner or operator of the source shall maintain records of the nature and amounts of emissions from such source and any other information as may be deemed necessary by the Regional Administrator to determine whether such source is in compliance with applicable emission limitations or other control measures that are part of the plan. The information recorded shall be summarized and reported to the Regional Administrator, on forms furnished by the Regional Administrator, and shall be submitted within 45 days after the end of the reporting period. Reporting periods are January 1 to July 30 and July 1 to December 31.
(3) Information recorded by the owner or operator and copies of this summarizing report submitted to the Regional Administrator shall be retained by the owner or operator for 2 years after the date on which the pertinent report is submitted.
(4) Emission data obtained from owners or operators of stationary sources will be correlated with applicable emission limitations and other control measures that are part of the applicable plan and will be available at the appropriate regional office and at other locations in the state designated by the Regional Administrator.
(5) Authority of the Regional Administrator to make available information and data was delegated to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency effective October 6, 1977.
[37 FR 10874, May 31, 1972, as amended at 40 FR 55330, Nov. 28, 1975; 43 FR 10, Jan. 3, 1978; 51 FR 40676, Nov. 7, 1986]
§ 52.1225 Review of new sources and modifications.
(a) Part D—Approval. The State of Minnesota has satisfied the requirements of sections 173 and 189(a)(1)(A) for permitting of major new sources and modifications in nonattainment areas.
(b)-(d) [Reserved]
(e) The State of Minnesota has committed to conform to the Stack Height Regulations, as set forth in 40 CFR part 51. In a January 14, 1987, letter to David Kee, USEPA, Thomas J. Kalitowski, Executive Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, stated:
Minnesota does not currently have a stack height rule, nor do we intend to adopt such a rule. Instead, we will conform with the Stack Height Regulations as set forth in the July 8, 1985, Federal Register in issuing permits for new or modified sources. In cases where that rule is not clear, we will contact USEPA Region V and conform to the current federal interpretation of the item in question.
[53 FR 17037, May 13, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 21941, Apr. 28, 1994; 60 FR 21451, May 2, 1995]
§§ 52.1226-52.1229 [Reserved]
§ 52.1230 Control strategy and rules: Particulates.
(a) Part D—(1) Approval. The State of Minnesota has satisfied the requirements of sections 189(a)(1)(B) and 189(a)(1)(C) and paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of section 172(c) for the Saint Paul and Rochester areas. The Administrator has determined pursuant to section 189(e) that secondary particulate matter formed from particulate matter precursors does not contribute significantly to exceedances of the NAAQS.
(2) No action. USEPA takes no action on the alternative test method provision of Rule 7005.2910.
(b) Approval—On May 31, 1988, the State of Minnesota submitted a committal SIP for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 10 micrometers (PM10) for Minnesota's Group II areas. The Group II areas of concern are in Minneapolis, Hennepin County; Duluth and Iron Range, St. Louis County; Iron Range, Itasca County; Two Harbors, Lake County; and St. Cloud, Stearns County. The committal SIP contains all the requirements identified in the July 1, 1987, promulgation of the SIP requirements for PM10 at 52 FR 24681.
(c) Approval—On June 20, 2002, the State of Minnesota submitted a request to redesignate the Saint Paul, Ramsey County particulate matter nonattainment area to attainment of the NAAQS for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM). In its submittal, the State also requested that EPA approve the maintenance plan for the area into the Minnesota PM SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements of the Clean Air Act.
[47 FR 19522, May 6, 1982, as amended at 47 FR 32118, July 26, 1982; 55 FR 21022, May 22, 1990; 57 FR 46308, Oct. 8, 1992; 59 FR 7222, Feb. 15, 1994; 67 FR 48790, July 26, 2002]
§§ 52.1231-52.1232 [Reserved]
§ 52.1233 Operating permits.
(a) Emission limitations and related provisions which are established in Minnesota permits as federally enforceable conditions in accordance with Chapter 7007 rules shall be enforceable by USEPA. USEPA reserves the right to deem permit conditions not federally enforceable. Such a determination will be made according to appropriate procedures, and be based upon the permit, permit approval procedures or permit requirements which do not conform with the permit program requirements or the requirements of USEPA's underlying regulations.
(b) For any permitting program located in the State, insofar as the permitting threshold provisions in Chapter 7007 rules concern the treatment of sources of greenhouse gas emissions as major sources for purposes of title V operating permits, EPA approves such provisions only to the extent they require permits for such sources where the source emits or has the potential to emit at least 100,000 tpy CO2 equivalent emissions, as well as 100 tpy on a mass basis, as of July 1, 2011.
[60 FR 21451, May 2, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 82266, Dec. 30, 2010]
§ 52.1234 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air Act are met, except for sources seeking permits to locate in Indian country within the State of Minnesota.
(b) Regulations for the prevention of the significant deterioration of air quality. The provisions of § 52.21 except paragraph (a)(1) are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable State plan for the State of Minnesota for sources wishing to locate in Indian country; and sources constructed under permits issued by EPA.
[82 FR 44736, Sept. 26, 2017]
§ 52.1235 Regional haze.
(a) [Reserved]
(b)(1) NOX emission limits—(i) United States Steel Corporation, Keetac—(A) Emission limitations—(1) Natural gas limit. An emission limit of 3.4 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 720-hr rolling average, shall apply to the Keetac Grate Kiln indurating furnace (EU030) when burning exclusively natural gas. This emission limit shall become enforceable beginning July 8, 2029.
(2) Limit when burning fuel other than exclusively natural gas. An emission limit of 2.0 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 720-hr rolling average, shall apply to the Keetac Grate Kiln indurating furnace when burning any fuel or combination of fuels other than exclusively natural gas. This emission limit shall become enforceable beginning July 8, 2029, unless before July 8, 2031, EPA promulgates a modified limit in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C) of this section. The emission limit in this paragraph shall apply unless adjusted as described in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(3) of this section, and only if the data submitted to EPA pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(1) of this section support such an adjustment.
(B) Installation of NOX reduction technology. The NOX reduction technology shall be installed no later than July 8, 2029.
(C) Process to modify emission limit when burning fuel other than exclusively natural gas. If the owner or operator of Keetac requests to modify the emission limit that applies when burning fuel other than natural gas, then the owner or operator shall collect and submit data and an engineering report to EPA in accordance with the following process.
(1) Collection and reporting of data. The owner or operator of Keetac shall submit to EPA data collected when burning any fuel or combination of fuels other than exclusively natural gas during the period following installation of the NOX reduction technology until completion of 5,100 hours of data collection. Data shall be submitted to EPA no later than 30 days after completion of 5100 hours of data collection and in any case no later than November 8, 2030. The data shall include hourly NOX emissions recorded by CEMS in lbs NOX/MMBtu; hourly values of the operating parameters identified in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(2) of this section; hourly process and CEMS information and codes; and hourly heat input in MMBtu by fuel type. EPA will consider the data submitted in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph and (b)(1)(i)(C)(3) of this section. Data collected during the first 720 hours burning fuel other than exclusively natural gas are considered the optimization period and shall be submitted to EPA but shall not be included in the 4380 hours of data considered for limit adjustment purposes. If the owner or operator wishes to exclude any data from consideration due to pellet quality concerns, then the owner or operator shall, to the extent applicable, submit to EPA information regarding the following factors: compression, reducibility, before tumble, after tumble, low temperature disintegration, clustering, and swelling. For each of the pellet quality analysis factors, the owner or operator must explain the pellet quality analysis factor, as well as the defined acceptable range for each factor using the applicable product quality standards based upon customers' pellet specifications that are contained in Keetac's ISO 9001 quality management system. The owner or operator shall also provide to EPA pellet quality analysis testing results that state the date and time of the analysis and, in order to define the time period when pellets were produced outside of the defined acceptable range for the pellet quality factors listed, include copies of the production logs that clearly define which hours of operation correspond to the production of the pellets tested, and document which hours produced pellets that met specifications and which hours produced pellets that failed to meet specifications. The owner or operator shall report all raw data in a format consistent with and able to be manipulated by Microsoft Excel including formulas, as appropriate, in each cell.
(2) Engineering report. No later than 30 days after completion of 5100 hours of data collection and in any case no later than November 8, 2030, the owner or operator of Keetac shall submit to EPA a final report including modeling demonstrating the selected NOX reduction technology is designed to achieve NOX emissions no greater than the emission limits specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A)(2) of this section and identifying the operating parameters and set points upon which the modeling was based.
(3) Emission limit adjustment. If EPA determines that the data submitted in accordance with paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(1) of this section satisfy the criteria in that paragraph, then EPA shall use the applicable equation set forth in paragraph (f) of this section to determine whether adjustment of the emission limit set forth in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A)(2) of this section is appropriate. If revised, the NOX emission limit when burning any fuel or combination of fuels other than exclusively natural gas may be no greater than 2.5 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 720-hr rolling average. The data set used for the determination shall include only data that meet both pellet quality specifications and optimized operating parameters related to process and NOX reduction technology operation as identified in paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(2) of this section. If the data submitted pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(1) of this section are normally distributed and statistically independent, EPA shall use the upper predictive limit (UPL) equation provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this section. If the data submitted pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(1) of this section are not normally distributed or are normally distributed but not statistically independent, EPA shall use the non-parametric equation provided in paragraph (f)(2) of this section. If, after receiving complete data from the owner or operator as specified in (b)(1)(i)(C)(1) of this section, the results of the equation support an emission limit other than 2.0 lbs NOX/MMBtu when burning any fuel or combination of fuels other than exclusively natural gas, EPA shall initiate a rulemaking to adjust the emission limit. If the results of the equation do not support an adjustment of the 2.0 lbs NOX/MMBtu emission limit, then EPA shall take final agency action to notify the owner or operator of Keetac in writing. If the owner or operator does not submit data to EPA by January 8, 2031 in accordance with paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(1) of this section for burning any fuel or combination of fuels other than exclusively natural gas or if EPA determines that the owner or operator did not provide complete data supporting such an adjustment in accordance with paragraph (b)(1)(i)(C)(1) of this section, then the 2.0 lbs NOX/MMBtu emission limit shall remain in place and applicable.
(D) Compliance demonstration. Compliance with the emission limits shall be demonstrated with hourly data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system for NOX. The CEMS shall be continuously operated and maintained in accordance with 40 CFR part 60 Appendix F. CEMS records shall be maintained onsite for a period no less than 5 years.
(ii) Hibbing Taconite Company—(A) An aggregate emission limit of 1.5 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the combined NOX emissions from the three indurating furnaces, Line 1 (EU020), Line 2 (EU021), and Line 3 (EU022), beginning on February 2, 2026. To determine the aggregate emission rate, the combined NOX emissions from Lines 1, 2, and 3 shall be divided by the total heat input to the three lines (in MMBtu) during every rolling 30-day period.
(B) Compliance with this emission limit shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for NOX.
(iii) United States Steel Corporation, Minntac: An aggregate emission limit of 1.6 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the combined NOX emissions from the five indurating furnaces: Line 3 (EU225), Line 4 (EU261), Line 5 (EU282), Line 6 (EU315), and Line 7 (EU334). To determine the aggregate emission rate, the combined NOX emissions from lines 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 shall be divided by the total heat input to the five lines (in MMBTU) during every rolling 30-day period commencing either upon notification of a starting date by United States Steel Corporation, Minntac, or with the 30-day period from September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019, whichever occurs first. The aggregate emission rate shall subsequently be determined on each day, 30 days after the starting date contained in such notification or September 30, 2019, whichever occurs first.
(iv) United Taconite—(A) An aggregate emission limit of 3.0 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the combined NOX emissions from the two indurating furnaces, Grate Kiln Line 1 (EU040) and Grate Kiln Line 2 (EU042), beginning on February 2, 2026. To determine the aggregate emission rate, the combined NOX emissions from Grate Kiln Line 1 and Grate Kiln Line 2 shall be divided by the total heat input to the two lines (in MMBtu) during every rolling 30-day period.
(B) Compliance with this emission limit shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for NOX.
(v) Minorca Mine—(A) An emission limit of 1.6 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the Minorca Mine indurating furnace (EU026). This emission limit will become enforceable on February 2, 2026.
(B) Compliance with this emission limit will be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for NOX.
(vi) Northshore Mining Company—Silver Bay: An emission limit of 1.5 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to Furnace 11 (EU100/EU104) beginning October 10, 2018. An emission limit of 1.5 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to Furnace 12 (EU110/114) beginning October 11, 2019. However, for any 30, or more, consecutive days when only natural gas is used at either Northshore Mining Furnace 11 or Furnace 12, a limit of 1.2 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply. An emission limit of 0.085 lbs NOX/MMBtu, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to Process Boiler #1 (EU003) and Process Boiler #2 (EU004) beginning October 10, 2021. The 0.085 lbs NOX/MMBtu emission limit for each process boiler applies at all times a unit is operating, including periods of start-up, shut-down and malfunction.
(2) SO2 emission limits. (i) United States Steel Corporation, Keetac: An emission limit of 225 lbs SO2/hr, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the Grate Kiln pelletizing furnace (EU030). Any coal burned at Keetac shall have a sulfur content of 0.60 percent sulfur by weight or less based on a monthly block average. The sampling and calculation methodology for determining the sulfur content of fuel must be described in the monitoring plan required at paragraph (e)(8)(x) of this section. Compliance with these requirements for EU030 is required beginning 3 months from March 8, 2013.
(ii) Hibbing Taconite Company—(A) An aggregate emission limit of 247.8 lbs SO2/hour, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the combined SO2 emissions from the three indurating furnaces, Line 1 (EU020), Line 2 (EU0021), and Line 3 (EU022), beginning on February 10, 2017. To determine the aggregate emission rate, the combined SO2 emissions from Lines 1, 2, and 3 shall be divided by the total hours of operation of the three lines during every rolling 30-day period.
(B) Compliance with this emission limit shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for SO2.
(C) Emissions resulting from the combustion of fuel oil are not included in the calculation of the 30-day rolling average. However, if any fuel oil is burned after the first day that SO2 CEMS are required to be operational, then the information specified in (b)(2)(vii) must be submitted, for each calendar year, to the Regional Administrator at R5ARDReporting@epa.gov no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year so that a limit can be set.
(iii) United States Steel Corporation, Minntac: An aggregate emission limit for indurating furnace Lines 3-7 (EU225, EU261, EU282, EU315, and EU334) of 498 lbs SO2/hr shall apply when all lines are producing flux pellets. An aggregate emission limit of 630 lbs SO2/hr shall apply to Lines 3-7 when Line 3-5 are producing acid pellets and Lines 6 and 7 are producing flux pellets. An aggregate emission limit of 800 lbs SO2/hr shall apply to Lines 3-7 when all lines are producing acid pellets. The SO2 emission limits are based on a 30-day rolling average and apply beginning 3 months from March 8, 2013. The emission limit for a given 30-day rolling average period is calculated using a weighted average as follows:
Where:
L30 = the limit for a given 30 day averaging period
nf = the number of days in the 30 day period that the facility is producing flux pellets on lines 3-7
naf = the number of days in the 30 day period that the facility is producing acid pellets on lines 3-5 and flux pellets on lines 6 and 7
na = the number of days in the 30 day period that the facility is producing acid pellets on lines 3-7
Also, beginning 3 months from March 8, 2013, any coal burned at Minntac's Lines 3-7 shall have a sulfur content of 0.60 percent sulfur by weight or less based on a monthly block average. The sampling and calculation methodology for determining the sulfur content of fuel must be described in the monitoring plan required at paragraph (e)(8)(x) of this section.
(iv) United Taconite: An aggregate emission limit of 529.0 lbs SO2/hr, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the Line 1 pellet furnace (EU040) and Line 2 pellet furnace (EU042) beginning six months after May 12, 2016. Compliance with this aggregate emission limit shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for SO2. The owner or operator must start collecting CEMS data for SO2 beginning six months after May 12, 2016 and submit the data to EPA no later than 30 days from the end of each calendar quarter. Beginning six months after May 12, 2016, any coal burned on UTAC Grate Kiln Line 1 or Line 2 shall have no more than 1.5 percent sulfur by weight based on a monthly block average. The sampling and calculation methodology for determining the sulfur content of coal must be described in the monitoring plan required for this furnace.
(v) Minorca Mine—(A) An emission limit of 68.2 lbs SO2/hr, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to the indurating furnace (EU026) beginning February 2, 2026.
(B) Compliance with this emission limit shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for SO2.
(C) Emissions resulting from the combustion of fuel oil are not included in the calculation of the 30-day rolling average. However, if any fuel oil is burned after the first day that SO2 CEMS are required to be operational, then the information specified in (b)(2)(vii) must be submitted, for each calendar year, to the Regional Administrator at R5ARDReporting@epa.gov no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year so that a limit can be set.
(vi) Northshore Mining Company—Silver Bay—(A) An aggregate emission limit of 17.0 lbs SO2/hr, based on a 30-day rolling average, shall apply to Furnace 11 (EU100/EU104) and Furnace 12 (EU110/EU114) beginning February 2, 2026. To determine the aggregate emission rate, the combined SO2 emissions from Furnace 11 and Furnace 12 shall be divided by the total hours of operation of the two furnaces during every rolling 30-day period.
(B) Compliance with these emission limits shall be demonstrated with data collected by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) for SO2.
(C) Emissions resulting from the combustion of fuel oil are not included in the calculation of the 30-day rolling average. However, if any fuel oil is burned after the first day that SO2 CEMS are required to be operational, then the information specified in (b)(2)(vii) must be submitted, for each calendar year, to the Regional Administrator at R5ARDReporting@epa.gov no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year so that a limit can be set.
(D) The owner or operator may submit to EPA for approval an alternative monitoring procedure request. The request shall include at least one year of CEMS data demonstrating consistent values at or below 5 lbs SO2/hr. The alternative monitoring procedure request shall not remove the obligation to maintain and operate a flow rate monitor in the stack. If approved, the owner or operator would not be required to operate the SO2 CEMS and may demonstrate continuous compliance using an emission factor derived from the average of at least one year of existing SO2 data using the procedure set forth in the site specific monitoring plan, and verified by annual stack tests using EPA approved test methods, multiplied by the daily measured flow rate as recorded by the flow rate monitor and recorded as the daily lb/hr SO2 emission rate.
(vii) Starting with the first day that SO2 CEMS are required to be operational, for the facilities listed in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)-(b)(2)(vi) of this section, records shall be kept for any day during which fuel oil is burned (either alone or blended with other fuels) in one or more of a facility's indurating furnaces. These records must include, at a minimum, the gallons of fuel oil burned per hour, the sulfur content of the fuel oil, and the SO2 emissions in pounds per hour. If any fuel oil is burned after the first day that SO2 CEMS are required to be operational, then the records must be submitted, for each calendar year, to the Regional Administrator no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year.
(c) Testing and monitoring. (1) The owner or operator of the respective facility shall install, certify, calibrate, maintain and operate continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) for NOX on United States Steel Corporation, Keetac unit EU030; Hibbing Taconite Company units EU020, EU021, and EU022; United States Steel Corporation, Minntac units EU225, EU261, EU282, EU315, and EU334; United Taconite units EU040 and EU042; Minorca Mine unit EU026; and Northshore Mining Company-Silver Bay units Furnace 11 (EU100/EU104) and Furnace 12 (EU110/EU114). Compliance with the emission limits for NOX shall be determined using data from the CEMS.
(2) The owner or operator shall install, certify, calibrate, maintain, and operate CEMS for SO2 on United States Steel Corporation, Keetac unit EU030; Hibbing Taconite Company units EU020, EU021, and EU022; United States Steel Corporation, Minntac units EU225, EU261, EU282, EU315, and EU334; United Taconite units EU040 and EU042; Minorca Mine unit EU026; and Northshore Mining Company-Silver Bay units Furnace 11 (EU100/EU104) and Furnace 12 (EU110/EU114).
(3) The owner or operator shall install, certify, calibrate, maintain, and operate one or more continuous diluent monitor(s) (O2 or CO2) and continuous stack gas flow rate monitor(s) on the BART affected units to allow conversion of the NOX and SO2 concentrations to units of the standard (lbs/MMBTU and lbs/hr, respectively) unless a demonstration is made that a diluent monitor and/or continuous flow rate monitor are not needed for the owner or operator to demonstrate compliance with applicable emission limits in units of the standards.
(4) For purposes of this section, all CEMS required by this section must meet the requirements of paragraphs (c)(4)(i) through (xiv) of this section.
(i) All CEMS must be installed, certified, calibrated, maintained, and operated in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, Performance Specification 2 (PS-2) and appendix F, Procedure 1.
(ii) CEMS must be installed and operational such that the operational status of the CEMS identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section shall be verified by, as a minimum, completion of the manufacturer's written requirements or recommendations for installation, operation, and calibration of the devices.
(iii) The owner or operator must conduct a performance evaluation of each CEMS in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, PS-2. The performance evaluations must be completed no later than 60 days after the respective CEMS installation.
(iv) The owner or operator of each CEMS must conduct periodic Quality Assurance, Quality Control (QA/QC) checks of each CEMS in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1. The first CEMS accuracy test will be a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) and must be completed no later than 60 days after the respective CEMS installation.
(v) The owner or operator of each CEMS must furnish the Regional Administrator a written report of the results of each quarterly performance evaluation and a data accuracy assessment pursuant to 40 CFR part 60 appendix F within 60 days after the calendar quarter in which the performance evaluation was completed. These reports shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator at R5AirEnforcement@epa.gov.
(vi) The owner or operator of each CEMS must check, record, and quantify the zero and span calibration drifts at least once daily (every 24 hours) in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1, Section 4.
(vii) Except for CEMS breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments, all CEMS required by this section shall be in continuous operation during all periods of BART affected process unit operation, including periods of process unit startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
(viii) All CEMS required by this section must meet the minimum data requirements at paragraphs (c)(4)(viii)(A) through (C) of this section.
(A) Complete a minimum of one cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, and data recording) for each successive 15-minute quadrant of an hour.
(B) Sample, analyze, and record emissions data for all periods of process operation except as described in paragraph (c)(4)(viii)(C) of this section.
(C) When emission data from CEMS are not available due to continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks, or zero and span adjustments, emission data must be obtained using other monitoring systems or emission estimation methods approved by the EPA. The other monitoring systems or emission estimation methods to be used must be incorporated into the monitoring plan required by this section and provide information such that emissions data are available for a minimum of 18 hours in each 24-hour period and at least 22 out of 30 successive unit operating days.
(ix) Owners or operators of each CEMS required by this section must reduce all data to 1-hour averages. Hourly averages shall be computed using all valid data obtained within the hour but no less than one data point in each 15-minute quadrant of an hour. Notwithstanding this requirement, an hourly average may be computed from at least two data points separated by a minimum of 15 minutes (where the unit operates for more than one quadrant in an hour) if data are unavailable as a result of performance of calibration, quality assurance, preventive maintenance activities, or backups of data from data acquisition and handling systems and recertification events.
(x) The 30-day rolling average emission rate determined from data derived from the CEMS required by this section (in lbs/MMBTU or lbs/hr depending on the emission standard selected) must be calculated in accordance with paragraphs (c)(4)(x)(A) through (F) of this section.
(A) Sum the total pounds of the pollutant in question emitted from the unit during an operating day and the previous 29 operating days.
(B) Sum the total heat input to the unit (in MMBTU) or the total actual hours of operation (in hours) during an operating day and the previous 29 operating days.
(C) Divide the total number of pounds of the pollutant in question emitted during the 30 operating days by the total heat input (or actual hours of operation depending on the emission limit selected) during the 30 operating days.
(D) For purposes of this calculation, an operating day is any day during which fuel is combusted in the BART affected unit regardless of whether pellets are produced. Actual hours of operation are the total hours a unit is firing fuel regardless of whether a complete 24-hour operational cycle occurs (i.e. if the furnace is firing fuel for only five hours during a 24-hour period, then the actual operating hours for that day are five. Similarly, total number of pounds of the pollutant in question for that day is determined only from the CEMS data for the five hours during which fuel is combusted.)
(E) If the owner or operator of the CEMS required by this section uses an alternative method to determine 30-day rolling averages, that method must be described in detail in the monitoring plan required by this section. The alternative method will only be applicable if the final monitoring plan and the alternative method are approved by EPA.
(F) A new 30-day rolling average emission rate must be calculated for each new operating day.
(xi) The 720-hour rolling average emission rate determined from data derived from the CEMS required by this section (in lbs/MMBTU) must be calculated in accordance with (c)(4)(xi)(A) through (C).
(A) Sum the total pounds of NOX emitted from the unit every hour and the previous (not necessarily consecutive) 719 hours for which that type of fuel (either natural gas or mixed coal and natural gas) was used.
(B) Sum the total heat input to the unit (in MMBTU) every hour and the previous (not necessarily consecutive) 719 hours for which that type of fuel (either natural gas or mixed coal and natural gas) was used.
(C) Divide the total number of pounds of NOX emitted during the 720 hours, as defined above, by the total heat input during the same 720 hour period. This calculation must be done separately for each fuel type (either for natural gas or mixed coal and natural gas).
(xii) Data substitution must not be used for purposes of determining compliance under this section. If CEMS data is measuring only a portion of the NOX or SO2 emitted during startup, shutdown, or malfunction conditions, the CEMS data may be supplemented, but not modified, by the addition of calculated emission rates using procedures set forth in the site specific monitoring plan.
(xiii) All CEMS data shall be reduced and reported in units of the applicable standard.
(xiv) A Quality Control Program must be developed and implemented for all CEMS required by this section in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1, Section 3. The program will include, at a minimum, written procedures and operations for calibration checks, calibration drift adjustments, preventative maintenance, data collection, recording and reporting, accuracy audits/procedures, periodic performance evaluations, and a corrective action program for malfunctioning CEMS.
(d) Recordkeeping requirements. (1)(i) Records required by this section must be kept in a form suitable and readily available for expeditious review.
(ii) Records required by this section must be kept for a minimum of five years following the date of creation.
(iii) Records must be kept on site for at least two years following the date of creation and may be kept offsite, but readily accessible, for the remaining three years.
(2) The owner or operator of the BART affected units must maintain the records at paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (xi) of this section.
(i) A copy of each notification and report developed for and submitted to comply with this section including all documentation supporting any initial notification or notification of compliance status submitted according to the requirements of this section.
(ii) Records of the occurrence and duration of startup, shutdown, and malfunction of the BART affected units, air pollution control equipment, and CEMS required by this section.
(iii) Records of activities taken during each startup, shutdown, and malfunction of the BART affected unit, air pollution control equipment, and CEMS required by this section.
(iv) Records of the occurrence and duration of all major maintenance conducted on the BART affected units, air pollution control equipment, and CEMS required by this section.
(v) Records of each excess emission report, including all documentation supporting the reports, dates and times when excess emissions occurred, investigations into the causes of excess emissions, actions taken to minimize or eliminate the excess emissions, and preventative measures to avoid the cause of excess emissions from occurring again.
(vi) Records of all CEMS data including, as a minimum, the date, location, and time of sampling or measurement, parameters sampled or measured, and results.
(vii) All records associated with quality assurance and quality control activities on each CEMS as well as other records required by 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1 including, but not limited to, the quality control program, audit results, and reports submitted as required by this section.
(viii) Records of the NOX emissions during all periods of BART affected unit operation, including startup, shutdown, and malfunction in the units of the standard. The owner or operator shall convert the monitored data into the appropriate unit of the emission limitation using appropriate conversion factors and F-factors. F-factors used for purposes of this section shall be documented in the monitoring plan and developed in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, Method 19. The owner or operator may use an alternate method to calculate the NOX emissions upon written approval from EPA.
(ix) Records of the SO2 emissions in lbs/MMBTUs or lbs/hr(based on CEMS data), depending on the emission standard selected, during all periods of operation, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, in the units of the standard.
(x) Records associated with the CEMS unit including type of CEMS, CEMS model number, CEMS serial number, and initial certification of each CEMS conducted in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, Performance Specification 2 must be kept for the life of the CEMS unit.
(xi) Records of all periods of fuel oil usage as required at paragraph (b)(2)(vii) of this section.
(e) Reporting requirements. (1) Unless instructed otherwise, all requests, reports, submittals, notifications, and other communications required by this section shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator at R5AirEnforcement@epa.gov. References in this section to the Regional Administrator shall mean the EPA Regional Administrator for Region 5.
(2) The owner or operator of each BART affected unit identified in this section and CEMS required by this section must provide to the Regional Administrator the written notifications, reports and plans identified at paragraphs (e)(2)(i) through (viii) of this section.
(i) A notification of the date construction of control devices and installation of burners required by this section commences postmarked no later than 30 days after the commencement date.
(ii) A notification of the date the installation of each CEMS required by this section commences postmarked no later than 30 days after the commencement date.
(iii) A notification of the date the construction of control devices and installation of burners required by this section is complete postmarked no later than 30 days after the completion date.
(iv) A notification of the date the installation of each CEMS required by this section is complete postmarked no later than 30 days after the completion date.
(v) A notification of the date control devices and burners installed by this section startup postmarked no later than 30 days after the startup date.
(vi) A notification of the date CEMS required by this section startup postmarked no later than 30 days after the startup date.
(vii) A notification of the date upon which the initial CEMS performance evaluations are planned. This notification must be submitted at least 60 days before the performance evaluation is scheduled to begin.
(viii) A notification of initial compliance, signed by the responsible official who shall certify its accuracy, attesting to whether the source has complied with the requirements of this section, including, but not limited to, applicable emission standards, control device and burner installations, CEMS installation and certification. This notification must be submitted before the close of business on the 60th calendar day following the completion of the compliance demonstration and must include, at a minimum, the information at paragraphs (e)(2)(viii)(A) through (F) of this section.
(A) The methods used to determine compliance.
(B) The results of any CEMS performance evaluations, and other monitoring procedures or methods that were conducted.
(C) The methods that will be used for determining continuing compliance, including a description of monitoring and reporting requirements and test methods.
(D) The type and quantity of air pollutants emitted by the source, reported in units of the standard.
(E) A description of the air pollution control equipment and burners installed as required by this section, for each emission point.
(F) A statement by the owner or operator as to whether the source has complied with the relevant standards and other requirements.
(3) The owner or operator must develop and implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for NOX and SO2. The plan must include, at a minimum, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction; and a program of corrective action for a malfunctioning process and air pollution control and monitoring equipment used to comply with the relevant standard. The plan must ensure that, at all times, the owner or operator operates and maintains each affected source, including associated air pollution control and monitoring equipment, in a manner which satisfies the general duty to minimize or eliminate emissions using good air pollution control practices. The plan must ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicable after their occurrence.
(4) The written reports of the results of each performance evaluation and QA/QC check in accordance with and as required by paragraph (c)(4)(v) of this section.
(5) Compliance reports. The owner or operator of each BART affected unit must submit semiannual compliance reports. The semiannual compliance reports must be submitted in accordance with paragraphs (e)(5)(i) through (iv) of this section, unless the Administrator has approved a different schedule.
(i) The first compliance report must cover the period beginning on the compliance date that is specified for the affected source through June 30 or December 31, whichever date comes first after the compliance date that is specified for the affected source.
(ii) The first compliance report must be postmarked no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period covered by that report (July 30 or January 30), whichever comes first.
(iii) Each subsequent compliance report must cover the semiannual reporting period from January 1 through June 30 or the semiannual reporting period from July 1 through December 31.
(iv) Each subsequent compliance report must be postmarked no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period covered by that report (July 30 or January 30).
(6) Compliance report contents. Each compliance report must include the information in paragraphs (e)(6)(i) through (vi) of this section.
(i) Company name and address.
(ii) Statement by a responsible official, with the official's name, title, and signature, certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness of the content of the report.
(iii) Date of report and beginning and ending dates of the reporting period.
(iv) Identification of the process unit, control devices, and CEMS covered by the compliance report.
(v) A record of each period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction during the reporting period and a description of the actions the owner or operator took to minimize or eliminate emissions arising as a result of the startup, shutdown or malfunction and whether those actions were or were not consistent with the source's startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan.
(vi) A statement identifying whether there were or were not any deviations from the requirements of this section during the reporting period. If there were deviations from the requirements of this section during the reporting period, then the compliance report must describe in detail the deviations which occurred, the causes of the deviations, actions taken to address the deviations, and procedures put in place to avoid such deviations in the future. If there were no deviations from the requirements of this section during the reporting period, then the compliance report must include a statement that there were no deviations. For purposes of this section, deviations include, but are not limited to, emissions in excess of applicable emission standards established by this section, failure to continuously operate an air pollution control device in accordance with operating requirements designed to assure compliance with emission standards, failure to continuously operate CEMS required by this section, and failure to maintain records or submit reports required by this section.
(7) Each owner or operator of a CEMS required by this section must submit quarterly excess emissions and monitoring system performance reports for each pollutant monitored for each BART affected unit monitored. All reports must be postmarked by the 30th day following the end of each three-month period of a calendar year (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December) and must include, at a minimum, the requirements at paragraphs (e)(7)(i) through (xv) of this section.
(i) Company name and address.
(ii) Identification and description of the process unit being monitored.
(iii) The dates covered by the reporting period.
(iv) Total source operating hours for the reporting period.
(v) Monitor manufacturer, monitor model number, and monitor serial number.
(vi) Pollutant monitored.
(vii) Emission limitation for the monitored pollutant.
(viii) Date of latest CEMS certification or audit.
(ix) A description of any changes in continuous monitoring systems, processes, or controls since the last reporting period.
(x) A table summarizing the total duration of excess emissions, as defined at paragraphs (e)(7)(x)(A) through (B) of this section, for the reporting period broken down by the cause of those excess emissions (startup/shutdown, control equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, unknown causes), and the total percent of excess emissions (for all causes) for the reporting period calculated as described at paragraph (e)(7)(x)(C) of this section.
(A) For purposes of this section, an excess emission is defined as any 30-day or 720-hour rolling average period, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, during which the 30-day or 720-hour (as appropriate) rolling average emissions of either regulated pollutant (SO2 and NOX), as measured by a CEMS, exceeds the applicable emission standards in this section.
(B)(1) For purposes of this rule, if a facility calculates a 30-day rolling average emission rate in accordance with this rule which exceeds the applicable emission standards of this rule, then it will be considered 30 days of excess emissions. If the following 30-day rolling average emission rate is calculated and found to exceed the applicable emission standards of this rule as well, then it will add one more day to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 31 days). Similarly, if an excess emission is calculated for a 30-day rolling average period and no additional excess emissions are calculated until 15 days after the first, then that new excess emission will add 15 days to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 30 + 15 = 45). For purposes of this section, if an excess emission is calculated for any period of time within a reporting period, there will be no fewer than 30 days of excess emissions but there should be no more than 121 days of excess emissions for a reporting period.
(2) For purposes of this section, if a facility calculates a 720-hour rolling average emission rate in accordance with this rule which exceeds the applicable emission standards of this section, then it will be considered 30 days of excess emissions. If the 24th following 720-hour rolling average emission rate is calculated and found to exceed the applicable emission standards of the rule as well, then it will add one more day to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 31 days). Similarly, if an excess emission is calculated for a 720-hour rolling average period and no additional excess emissions are calculated until 360 hours after the first, then that new excess emission will add 15 days to the total days of excess emissions (i.e. 30+15 = 45). For purposes of this section, if an excess emission is calculated for any period of time with a reporting period, there will be no fewer than 30 days of excess emissions but there should be no more than 121 days of excess emissions for a reporting period.
(C) For purposes of this section, the total percent of excess emissions will be determined by summing all periods of excess emissions (in days) for the reporting period, dividing that number by the total BART affected unit operating days for the reporting period, and then multiplying by 100 to get the total percent of excess emissions for the reporting period. An operating day, as defined previously, is any day during which fuel is fired in the BART affected unit for any period of time. Because of the possible overlap of 30-day rolling average excess emissions across quarters, there are some situations where the total percent of excess emissions could exceed 100 percent. This extreme situation would only result from serious excess emissions problems where excess emissions occur for nearly every day during a reporting period.
(xi) A table summarizing the total duration of monitor downtime, as defined at paragraph (e)(7)(xi)(A) of this section, for the reporting period broken down by the cause of the monitor downtime (monitor equipment malfunctions, non-monitor equipment malfunctions, quality assurance calibration, other known causes, unknown causes), and the total percent of monitor downtime (for all causes) for the reporting period calculated as described at paragraph (e)(7)(xi)(B) of this section.
(A) For purposes of this section, monitor downtime is defined as any period of time (in hours) during which the required monitoring system was not measuring emissions from the BART affected unit. This includes any period of CEMS QA/QC, daily zero and span checks, and similar activities.
(B) For purposes of this section, the total percent of monitor downtime will be determined by summing all periods of monitor downtime (in hours) for the reporting period, dividing that number by the total number of BART affected unit operating hours for the reporting period, and then multiplying by 100 to get the total percent of excess emissions for the reporting period.
(xii) A table which identifies each period of excess emissions for the reporting period and includes, at a minimum, the information in paragraphs (e)(7)(xii)(A) through (F) of this section.
(A) The date of each excess emission.
(B) The beginning and end time of each excess emission.
(C) The pollutant for which an excess emission occurred.
(D) The magnitude of the excess emission.
(E) The cause of the excess emission.
(F) The corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted to minimize or eliminate the excess emissions and prevent such excess emission from occurring again.
(xiii) A table which identifies each period of monitor downtime for the reporting period and includes, at a minimum, the information in paragraphs (e)(7)(xiii)(A) through (D) of this section.
(A) The date of each period of monitor downtime.
(B) The beginning and end time of each period of monitor downtime.
(C) The cause of the period of monitor downtime.
(D) The corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted for system repairs or adjustments to minimize or eliminate monitor downtime and prevent such downtime from occurring again.
(xiv) If there were no periods of excess emissions during the reporting period, then the excess emission report must include a statement which says there were no periods of excess emissions during this reporting period.
(xv) If there were no periods of monitor downtime, except for daily zero and span checks, during the reporting period, then the excess emission report must include a statement which says there were no periods of monitor downtime during this reporting period except for the daily zero and span checks.
(8) The owner or operator of each CEMS required by this section must develop and submit for review and approval by the Regional Administrator a site specific monitoring plan. The purpose of this monitoring plan is to establish procedures and practices which will be implemented by the owner or operator in its effort to comply with the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements of this section. The monitoring plan must include, at a minimum, the information at paragraphs (e)(8)(i) through (x) of this section.
(i) Site specific information including the company name, address, and contact information.
(ii) The objectives of the monitoring program implemented and information describing how those objectives will be met.
(iii) Information on any emission factors used in conjunction with the CEMS required by this section to calculate emission rates and a description of how those emission factors were determined.
(iv) A description of methods to be used to calculate emission rates when CEMS data are not available due to downtime associated with QA/QC events.
(v) A description of the QA/QC program to be implemented by the owner or operator of CEMS required by this section. This can be the QA/QC program developed in accordance with 40 CFR part 60, appendix F, Procedure 1, Section 3.
(vi) A list of spare parts for CEMS maintained on site for system maintenance and repairs.
(vii) A description of the procedures to be used to calculate 30-day rolling averages and 720-hour rolling averages and example calculations which show the algorithms used by the CEMS to calculate 30-day rolling averages and 720-hour rolling averages.
(viii) A sample of the document to be used for the quarterly excess emission reports required by this section.
(ix) A description of the procedures to be implemented to investigate root causes of excess emissions and monitor downtime and the proposed corrective actions to address potential root causes of excess emissions and monitor downtime.
(x) A description of the sampling and calculation methodology for determining the percent sulfur by weight as a monthly block average for coal used during that month.
(f) Equations for establishing the upper predictive limit—(1) Equation for normal distribution and statistically independent data.
Where:
x = average or mean of hourly test run data;
t[(n−1),(0.99)] = t score, the one-tailed t value of the Student's t distribution for a specific degree of freedom (n−1) and a confidence level (0.99, to reflect the 99th percentile)
s 2 = variance of the hourly data set;
n = number of values (e.g., 5,760 if 8 months of valid lbs NOX/MMBTU hourly values)
m = number of values used to calculate the test average (m = 720 as per averaging time)
(i) To determine if statistically independent, use the Rank von Neumann Test on p. 137 of data Quality Assessment: Statistical Methods for Practitioners EPA QA/G-9S.
(ii) Alternative to Rank von Neumann test to determine if data are dependent, data are dependent if t test value is greater than t critical value, where:
ρ = correlation between data points
t critical = t[(n−2),(0.95)] = t score, the two-tailed t value of the Student's t Distribution for a specific degree of freedom (n−2) and a confidence level (0.95)
(iii) The Anderson-Darling normality test is used to establish whether the data are normally distributed. That is, a distribution is considered to be normally distributed when p > 0.05.
(2) Non-parametric equation for data not normally distributed and normally distributed but not statistically independent.
m = (n+1) * α
m = the rank of the ordered data point, when data are sorted smallest to largest. The data points are 720-hour averages for establishing NOX limits.
n = number of data points (e.g., 5,040 720-hourly averages for eight months of valid NOX lbs/MMBTU values)
α = 0.99, to reflect the 99th percentile
If m is a whole number, then the limit, UPL, shall be computed as:
UPL = Xm
Where:
Xm = value of the mth data point in terms of lbs SO2/hr or lbs NOX/MMBtu, when the data are sorted smallest to largest.
If m is not a whole number, the limit shall be computed by linear interpolation according to the following equation.
UPL = xm = xmi.md = xmi + 0.md(xm(i+1)−xmi)
Where:
mi = the integer portion of m, i.e., m truncated at zero decimal places, and
md = the decimal portion of m
[78 FR 8738, Feb. 6, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 21687, Apr. 12, 2016; 86 FR 12106, Mar. 2, 2021; 91 FR 50, Jan. 2, 2026; 91 FR 34581, June 8, 2026]
§ 52.1236 Visibility protection.
(a) The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met, because the plan does not include approvable procedures for protection of visibility in mandatory Class I Federal areas.
(b) Regulation for visibility monitoring and new source review. The provisions of § 52.28 are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable plan for the State of Minnesota.
(c) [Reserved]
(d) The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met because the regional haze plan submitted by the state on December 30, 2009, and on May 8, 2012, does not meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(e) with respect to NOX and SO2 emissions from United States Steel Corporation, Keetac of Keewatin, Minnesota; Hibbing taconite company of Hibbing, Minnesota; United States Steel Corporation, Minntac of Mountain Iron, Minnesota; United Taconite, LLC of Forbes, Minnesota; ArcelorMittal Minorca Mine, Inc. near Virginia, Minnesota; and Northshore Mining Company-Silver Bay of Silver Bay, Minnesota. The requirements for these facilities are satisfied by complying with the requirements of § 52.1235.
(e)(1) On and after the 30-boiler-operating-day period ending on September 30, 2015, the owners and operators of the facility at 13999 Industrial Boulevard in Becker, Sherburne County, Minnesota, shall not cause or permit the emission of SO2 from stack SV001 (serving Units 1 and 2) to exceed 0.050 lbs/MMBTU as a 30-day rolling average.
(2) On and after the 30-boiler-operating-day period ending on May 31, 2017, the owners and operators of the facility at 13999 Industrial Boulevard in Becker, Sherburne County, Minnesota, shall not cause or permit the emission of SO2 from Unit 3 to exceed 0.29 lbs/MMBTU as a 30-day rolling average.
(3) The owners and operators of the facility at 13999 Industrial Boulevard in Becker, Sherburne County, Minnesota, shall operate continuous SO2 emission monitoring systems in compliance with 40 CFR 75, and the data from this emission monitoring shall be used to determine compliance with the limits in this paragraph (e).
(4) For each boiler operating day, compliance with the 30-day average limitations in paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section shall be determined by summing total emissions in pounds for the period consisting of the day and the preceding 29 successive boiler operating days, summing total heat input in MMBTU for the same period, and computing the ratio of these sums in lbs/MMBTU. Boiler operating day is used to mean a 24-hour period between 12 midnight and the following midnight during which any fuel is combusted at any time in the steam-generating unit. It is not necessary for fuel to be combusted the entire 24-hour period. A boiler operating day with respect to the limitation in paragraph (e)(1) of this section shall be a day in which fuel is combusted in either Unit 1 or Unit 2. Bias adjustments provided for under 40 CFR 75 appendix A shall be applied. Substitute data provided for under 40 CFR 75 subpart D shall not be used.
[50 FR 28553, July 12, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 45137, Nov. 24, 1987; 78 FR 59839, Sept. 30, 2013; 81 FR 11670, Mar. 7, 2016; 82 FR 3129, Jan. 10, 2017]
§ 52.1237 Control strategy: Carbon monoxide.
(a) The base year carbon monoxide emission inventory requirement of section 187(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for the following areas: Duluth Metropolitan Area and Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area.
(b) Approval—The 1993 carbon monoxide periodic emission inventory requirement of section 187(a)(5) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990, has been satisfied for the following areas: the counties of the Twin cities seven county Metropolitan area (Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington), and Wright.
(c) Approval—On March 23, 1998, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency submitted a request to redesignate the Minneapolis/St. Paul CO nonattainment area (consisting of portions of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright) to attainment for CO. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted a maintenance plan as required by 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. Elements of the section 175A maintenance plan include a base year (1996 attainment year) emission inventory for CO, a demonstration of maintenance of the ozone NAAQS with projected emission inventories to the year 2009, a plan to verify continued attainment, a contingency plan, and an obligation to submit a subsequent maintenance plan revision in 8 years as required by the Clean Air Act. If the area records a violation of the CO NAAQS (which must be confirmed by the State), Minnesota will implement one or more appropriate contingency measure(s) which are contained in the contingency plan. The menu of contingency measures includes oxygenated fuel, transportation control measures, or a vehicle inspection and maintenance program. The redesignation request and maintenance plan meet the redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the Act as amended in 1990, respectively.
(d) Approval—On November 10, 2004, Minnesota submitted a revision to the Carbon Monoxide (CO) maintenance plan for the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. These plans revised 1996 and 2009 motor vehicle emission inventories and 2009 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEB) recalculated using the emissions factor model MOBILE6. The MVEB for transportation conformity purposes for the Minneapolis-St. Paul maintenance area is 1961 tons per winter day of CO.
(e) Approval—On June 16, 2010, Minnesota submitted a carbon monoxide (CO) limited maintenance plan for the Minneapolis-St. Paul area under section 175A of the CAA for the continued attainment of the one hour and eight hour CO NAAQS.
(f) Approval—On July 16, 2015, the State of Minnesota submitted a revision to their Particulate Matter State Implementation Plan. The submittal establishes transportation conformity criteria and procedures related to interagency consultation, and the enforceability of certain transportation related control and mitigation measures.
[59 FR 47807, Sept. 19, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 55172, Oct. 23, 1997; 64 FR 58354, Oct. 29, 1999; 69 FR 71380, Dec. 9, 2004; 75 FR 54778, Sept. 9, 2010; 80 FR 76865, Dec. 11, 2015]
§ 52.1238 Control strategy: Lead (Pb).
(a) Based upon EPA's review of the air quality data for the 3-year period 2012 to 2014, EPA determined that the Eagan, Minnesota lead nonattainment area attained the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). This clean data determination suspends the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the standard for as long as this area continues to meet the 2008 lead NAAQS.
(b) [Reserved]
[80 FR 51131, Aug. 24, 2015]
§ 52.1240 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of nitrogen oxides?
(a)(1) The owner and operator of each source located within the State of Minnesota and for which requirements are set forth under the Federal CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program in subparts AA through II of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such applicable requirements. The obligation to comply with these requirements in part 97 of this chapter will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to the Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP) as meeting the requirements of CAIR for PM2.5 relating to NOX under § 51.123 of this chapter, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional or unless such approval is under § 51.123(p) of this chapter.
(2) Notwithstanding any provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if, at the time of such approval of the State's SIP, the Administrator has already allocated CAIR NOX allowances to sources in the State for any years, the provisions of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation of CAIR NOX allowances for those years shall continue to apply, unless the Administrator approves a SIP provision that provides for the allocation of the remaining CAIR NOX allowances for those years.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, such paragraph is not applicable as it relates to sources in the State of Minnesota as of December 3, 2009, except that:
(1) The owner and operator of each source referenced in such paragraph in whose compliance account any allocation of CAIR NOX allowances was recorded under the Federal CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program in part 97 of this chapter shall hold in that compliance account, as of midnight of December 3, 2009 and with regard to each such recorded allocation, CAIR NOX allowances that are usable in such trading program, issued for the same year as the recorded allocation, and in the same amount as the recorded allocation. The owner and operator shall hold such allowances for the purpose of deduction by the Administrator under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
(2) After December 3, 2009, the Administrator will deduct from the compliance account of each source in the State of Minnesota any CAIR NOX allowances required to be held in that compliance account under paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The Administrator will not deduct, for purposes of implementing the stay, any other CAIR NOX allowances held in that compliance account and, starting no later than December 3, 2009, will not record any allocation of CAIR NOX allowances included in the State trading budget for Minnesota for any year.
(c)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Minnesota and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program in subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Minnesota's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.38(a) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Minnesota's SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Minnesota's SIP revision described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances under subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart AAAAA of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(d)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Minnesota and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 Trading Program in subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements with regard to emissions occurring in 2023 and each subsequent year. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State and areas of Indian country within the borders of the State subject to the State's SIP authority will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Minnesota's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) under § 52.38(b)(1) and (b)(2)(iii) for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in areas of Indian country within the borders of the State not subject to the State's SIP authority will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Minnesota's SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Minnesota's SIP revision described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances under subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State and areas of Indian country within the borders of the State subject to the State's SIP authority for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart GGGGG of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 3 allowances to such units for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the effectiveness of paragraph (d)(1) of this section is stayed with regard to emissions occurring in 2023 and thereafter.
[72 FR 62350, Nov. 2, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 56726, Oct. 3, 2009; 76 FR 48368, Aug. 8, 2011; 81 FR 74586, 74597, Oct. 26, 2016; 88 FR 36891, June 5, 2023; 88 FR 67107, Sept. 29, 2023]
§ 52.1241 Interstate pollutant transport provisions; What are the FIP requirements for decreases in emissions of sulfur dioxide?
(a) The owner and operator of each SO2 source located within the State of Minnesota and for which requirements are set forth under the Federal CAIR SO2 Trading Program in subparts AAA through III of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such applicable requirements. The obligation to comply with these requirements in part 97 of this chapter will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to the Minnesota State Implementation Plan as meeting the requirements of CAIR for PM2.5 relating to SO2 under § 51.124 of this chapter, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional or unless such approval is under § 51.124(r) of this chapter.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, such paragraph is not applicable as it relates to sources in the State of Minnesota as of December 3, 2009.
(c)(1) The owner and operator of each source and each unit located in the State of Minnesota and Indian country within the borders of the State and for which requirements are set forth under the CSAPR SO2 Group 2 Trading Program in subpart DDDDD of part 97 of this chapter must comply with such requirements. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units in the State will be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Minnesota's State Implementation Plan (SIP) as correcting the SIP's deficiency that is the basis for the CSAPR Federal Implementation Plan under § 52.39 for those sources and units, except to the extent the Administrator's approval is partial or conditional. The obligation to comply with such requirements with regard to sources and units located in Indian country within the borders of the State will not be eliminated by the promulgation of an approval by the Administrator of a revision to Minnesota's SIP.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, if, at the time of the approval of Minnesota's SIP revision described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Administrator has already started recording any allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 2 allowances under subpart DDDDD of part 97 of this chapter to units in the State for a control period in any year, the provisions of subpart DDDDD of part 97 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to complete the allocation and recordation of CSAPR SO2 Group 2 allowances to units in the State for each such control period shall continue to apply, unless provided otherwise by such approval of the State's SIP revision.
[72 FR 62350, Nov. 2, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 56726, Oct. 3, 2009; 76 FR 48368, Aug. 8, 2011; 81 FR 74586, 74597, Oct. 26, 2016]